فلسفة "المواطنة العالمية" وإشكالياتها في إطار تطور المركز الدولي للفرد
Abstract and Figures
تفرض التطورات الجوهرية في اطار فروع القانون الدولي المعاصر، والاتساع الكبير في مجال التعامل مع القضايا ذات الاهتمام العالمي المشترك، قيام اشخاص القانون الدولي والفاعلين من غير الدول بالعمل معا من اجل تحقيق مقاصد التنظيم الدولي في حفظ الامن والسلم الدوليين وتطوير المجالات الخاصة بخدمة الحياة الإنسانية في اطار ينسجم مع التغير في الأدوار الجوهرية التي كانت تناط لكل من الدول والمنظمات الدولية الحكومية، واهمية الاعتراف بان هناك نمو حقيقي لفكرة المواطنة العالمية وان هناك من الالتزامات القانونية الدولية ما يصعب تحقيقها الا من خلال التعامل مع هذه الفكرة ونتائجها واثارها والتي تعبر عن تطور كبير في المركز القانوني الدولي للفرد وقدرته على ان يكون جزء من الاطراف المكلفين بنفاذ قواعد القانون الدولي بطرق معينة وبحدود تتناسب مع المكانة التي يتمتع بها في الواقع الدولي القائم، في ذات الوقت هناك الكثير من المشكلات المتعلقة بمصطلح المواطنة العالمية ومضمونه وعناصره وتطوره التاريخي ومدى رسوخه في التنظيم الدولي وحدود نجاحه في التعبير عن حالة من التضامن العالمي تجاه القضايا العالمية ذات الاهتمام الأبرز من قبل المنظمات الدولية العالمية كالأمم المتحدة ووكالاتها المتخصصة والمنظمات الإقليمية كالاتحاد الأوربي، وثمة إشكاليات أخرى ترتبط بمفاهيم السيادة الوطنية والجنسية والهوية الثقافية الوطنية والخضوع للقانون الداخلي، وعدد اخر من التحديات التي لاتزال تطرح من قبل الفقه الدولي في مجال التعامل مع هذا الموضوع للوصول الى انضاج تجربة واضحة فيما يخص الإقرار بوجوده وطبيعته واثاره القانونية.
Figures - uploaded by Wisam Nimat Al Saadi
Author content
All figure content in this area was uploaded by Wisam Nimat Al Saadi
Content may be subject to copyright.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
The UN Charter contains a group of provisions about human rights which are ambiguous as to the obligations they impose on the UN itself and its Member states, especially as other provisions prevent the Organization from intervening in the domestic affairs of any state. This article examines three provisions which require the UN to promote respect for human rights for all, and then three further provisions which empower certain organs of the UN to take measures for the same purpose. This examination yields a clear view of the obligations which the Organization and its Members have in the field of human rights.
Traditional concepts of citizenship and sovereignty have come under pressure from the combined challenge of globalization and the subnational revolt. Against this background this article sets out an argument for new visions of the state in which subnational and transnational citizenship are strengthened and in which one central purpose of the state is mediating different loyalties at the subnational, national and international levels. The analysis explores various connections between Bull's reflections on a possible post-Westphalian order in Europe, discourse ethics and the idea of cosmopolitan democracy. The article concludes with some observations about the nature of citizenship in the post-Westphalian state.
Global citizenship is a concept that has been both propounded and critiqued on a number of grounds in recent scholarship, but little attention has been paid to what it might mean in an age of empire. Beginning with an analysis of American empire, the author argues that there has been an important shift in the meaning of imperial rule from what was initially a "realpolitik" version of empire in the immediate aftermath of 9/11 to what has become a more "liberal" form of imperial power since late 2003. Whereas the former sought national security in a seemingly anarchical and hostile world, the latter has sought to spread a particular kind of globalized citizenship to the world, particularly in the Middle East. The author argues that the ideological grounding for such an imperial "civilizing mission" needs to be challenged through an alternative theorization of global citizenship. Thus, the second half of the article suggests a new theory of global citizenship rooted in two basic principles: Social rights (in order to address the least well off) and shared fate (in order to draw the links between the north/south and east/west). Taken together, they provide a starting point for an alternative theory of global citizenship that speaks not simply against empire but to it.
- K A Appiah
Appiah, K. A. (2006). Global citizenship. Fordham L. Rev., 75, 2375.
Globalization and change: The transformation of global capitalism
- B Berberoglu
Berberoglu, B. (Ed.). (2005). Globalization and change: The
transformation of global capitalism. New York: Lexington Books. Brecher.
Globalized Citizenship: Sovereignty, Security and Soul, 50 Vill
- Berta Esperanza Hernández-Truyol
Berta Esperanza Hernández-Truyol,(2005), Globalized Citizenship:
Sovereignty, Security and Soul, 50 Vill. L. Rev. 1009 (2005), available at http:
//scholarship. law. ufl. edu/facultypub/516, p 1009.
The Recognition of the Individual: A Human Rights Perspective for International Commerce, in MORAL IMPERIALISM, supra note 69, at 151 (discussing how norm of indifference facilitates human rights abuses
- Claire M Dickerson
Claire M. Dickerson, The Recognition of the Individual: A Human
Rights Perspective for International Commerce, in MORAL IMPERIALISM,
supra note 69, at 151 (discussing how norm of indifference facilitates human
rights abuses.
Multidimensional citizenship: Education policy for the twenty-first century. Tokyo: Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- J Cogan
Cogan, J. (1997). Multidimensional citizenship: Education policy for
the twenty-first century. Tokyo: Sasakawa Peace Foundation.
11. D. Held and A. McGrew, eds,(2003) The Global Transformations
Reader: An Introduction to the Globalization Debate, 2nd edn, Cambridge:
Polity, 2003.
12. e Jirgen Habermas, Citizenship and National Identity, in THE
CONDITION OF CITIZENSHIP 20, 22 (Bart van Steenbergen ed., 1994).
Nation-building: Sovereignty and citizenship
- R Grotenhuis
Grotenhuis, R. (2016). Nation-building: Sovereignty and citizenship.
In Nation-Building as Necessary Effort in Fragile States (pp. 59-72).