PreprintPDF Available

Ultrasound-guided glenohumeral joint injections for shoulder pain in ALS: A Case Series

Authors:
Preprints and early-stage research may not have been peer reviewed yet.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Shoulder pain is a common secondary impairment for people living with ALS (PALS). Decreased range of motion (ROM) from weakness can lead to shoulder pathology, which can result in debilitating pain. Shoulder pain may limit PALS from participating in activities of daily living and may have a negative impact on quality of life. This case series explores the efficacy of glenohumeral joint injections for management of shoulder pain due to adhesive capsulitis in PALS. METHODS: PALS with shoulder pain were referred to sports medicine certified physiatrists for diagnostic evaluation and management. They completed the Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale and a questionnaire asking about their pain levels and how it impacts sleep, function, and quality of life at baseline pre-injection, one-week post-injection, one-month and three-months post-injection. RESULTS: We present 5 cases of PALS who were diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis and underwent glenohumeral joint injections. Though only one PALS reported complete symptom resolution, all had at least partial symptomatic improvement during the observation period. No complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: PALS require a comprehensive plan to manage shoulder pain. Glenohumeral joint injections are safe and effective for adhesive capsulitis in PALS, but alone may not completely resolve shoulder pain. Additional therapies to improve ROM and reduce pain should be considered.
Page 1/14
Ultrasound-guided glenohumeral joint injections for
shoulder pain in ALS: A Case Series
Katherine M. Burke ( Katherine.Burke@mgh.harvard.edu )
Sean M. Healey & AMG Center for ALS at Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School
Amy S. Ellrodt
Sean M. Healey & AMG Center for ALS at Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School
Benjamin C. Joslin
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
Pia P. Sanpitak
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
Claire MacAdam
Sean M. Healey & AMG Center for ALS at Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School
Prabhav Deo
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Kevin Ozment
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Cristina Shea
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Stephen A. Johnson
Sean M. Healey & AMG Center for ALS at Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School
Doreen Ho
Sean M. Healey & AMG Center for ALS at Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School
Samuel K. Chu
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Colin K. Franz
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Ashwin N. Babu
Massachusetts General Hospital, Sports Medicine
Sabrina Paganoni
Sean M. Healey & AMG Center for ALS at Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School
Research Article
Page 2/14
Keywords: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Motor Neuron Disease, Shoulder Pain, Frozen Shoulder,
Adhesive Capsulitis
Posted Date: September 15th, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1990390/v1
License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. 
Read Full License
Page 3/14
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Shoulder pain is a common secondary impairment for people living with ALS (PALS).
Decreased range of motion (ROM) from weakness can lead to shoulder pathology, which can result in
debilitating pain. Shoulder pain may limit PALS from participating in activities of daily living and may
have a negative impact on quality of life. This case series explores the ecacy of glenohumeral joint
injections for management of shoulder pain due to adhesive capsulitis in PALS.
METHODS: PALS with shoulder pain were referred to sports medicine certied physiatrists for diagnostic
evaluation and management. They completed the Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale and a
questionnaire asking about their pain levels and how it impacts sleep, function, and quality of life at
baseline pre-injection, one-week post-injection, one-month and three-months post-injection.
RESULTS: We present 5 cases of PALS who were diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis and underwent
glenohumeral joint injections. Though only one PALS reported complete symptom resolution, all had at
least partial symptomatic improvement during the observation period. No complications were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: PALS require a comprehensive plan to manage shoulder pain. Glenohumeral joint
injections are safe and effective for adhesive capsulitis in PALS, but alone may not completely resolve
shoulder pain. Additional therapies to improve ROM and reduce pain should be considered.
Introduction
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative disease.1 Management of ALS is largely
focused on symptom management as current FDA-approved treatments to slow disease progression
have modest ecacy.1
ALS symptoms include muscle weakness and atrophy, reduced range of motion, spasticity, and cramping
leading to progressive disability. Pain is a common secondary complication of ALS from musculoskeletal
dysfunction due to limited mobility, loss of range of motion, and diculty with positioning in bed, chairs,
or wheelchairs.2 Progressive, often non-uniform, weakness likely also contributes by disrupting agonist-
antagonist muscle pair equilibrium leading to increased stress on the joint and surrounding structures.
Pain negatively affects quality of life for both PALS and their caregivers.2,3,4,5,6,7 The most commonly
reported loci of pain in PALS are the lower back, neck, legs, and shoulders.2,8 Shoulder pain is reported by
roughly 20% of the total ALS population.8 Many PALS develop shoulder pain due to weakness of the peri-
scapular muscles with subsequent loss of range of motion, subluxation, and development of shoulder
pathology, including adhesive capsulitis or ‘frozen shoulder’.
Page 4/14
Adhesive capsulitis is a complex disorder that involves pain and restricted range of motion (ROM) of the
shoulder9 and can lead to considerable disability. The capsule surrounding the glenohumeral (GH) joint
stiffens and becomes inamed, which results in decreased ROM at the shoulder. There are overlapping
stages of adhesive capsulitis. In the earlier stages, patients present with severely restricted ROM and
signicant pain, often in the absence of injury. In the later stages, restrictions in ROM remain, but with
improvements in pain. As ROM and pain improve, there may be continued evidence of a tight joint space,
but no evidence of synovitis.10 Adhesive capsulitis is largely a clinical diagnosis, with any imaging done
to exclude other potential diagnoses.9
For individuals without ALS, the management of adhesive capsulitis involves exercises and supervised
physical therapy focused on gentle ROM and periscapular stabilization.First-line medications typically
prescribed to treat pain in ALS are non-steroidal anti-inammatory agents (NSAIDs) and non-opioid
analgesics.4,12 Early corticosteroid injection to the GH joint should be considered for moderate to severe
symptoms,13,14as there is evidence suggesting improved outcomes with earlier steroid injection.15This
in-clinic procedureis fast and safe. It is routinely performed in the seated position, which is preferable for
PALS who may be in a power wheelchair and/or have limited tolerance of the supine position. Adverse
effects such as bleeding or infection are rare when performed with proper clean technique. In cases where
conservative measures are ineffective, surgical interventions such as arthroscopic release and
manipulation under anesthesia are considered, especially in the early stages when the pain can be
debilitating.16,17
To the best of our knowledge, there is no evidence from controlled trials that would substantiate a
standard best practice for addressing shoulder pain in people with ALS. Thus, management of shoulder
pain has long been based on individual clinician’s experience and preferences with very little empirically
derived evidence to support the implementation of one therapeutic method over another. When a PALS is
presenting with progressive shoulder pain, accompanying restrictions in ROM, and no history of trauma,
referral to physiatry can help assess the pain generator (e.g., adhesive capsulitis versus other shoulder
pathology) and help guide intervention. There is growing evidence to support the use of GH steroid
injections for adhesive capsulitis for those without ALS13,14,15,16,17 but to our knowledge, no evidence for
its use in individuals with ALS.
The purpose of this study was to assess the ecacy of ultrasound-guided GH joint injections for treating
shoulder pain due to adhesive capsulitis in PALS. We present a case series of 5 patients referred for
physiatric evaluation and consideration of GH joint injections as part of their clinical care. Participants
completed surveys pre- and post-injections regarding their pain levels and impact on function. 
Page 5/14
Methods
Participants were recruited from the Sean M. Healey & AMG Center for ALS at Massachusetts General
Hospital and the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine ALS Clinic. Eligible participants
were informed of the study and study staff consented interested participants. Both the Mass General
Brigham Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the Northwestern IRB approved this study.
Participants were asked to participate in this study if they had ALS and a clinical suspicion of adhesive
capsulitis (pain with restricted ROM, without history of trauma). Participants were seen by physiatrists
certied in Sports Medicine by the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation for diagnostic
conrmation and consideration of GH steroid injections. The physiatrists completed a history, physical
and ultrasound examinations to assess likelihood of adhesive capsulitis versus other common shoulder
pathologies (such as rotator cuff or biceps tendinopathy, periscapular myofascial pain, etc.). Once
clinical diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis was established, ultrasound-guided GH joint injection was
performed. For Cases 1-3, a solution of 4mL of 1% Lidocaine and 1mL (40mg) of Kenalog was injected
into the affected joints. For Cases 4 and 5, a solution of 2 mL of 1% Lidocaine, 2 mL 0.25% Bupivacaine,
and 1mL (40mg) of Kenalog was injected into the involved joints.  Differences were due to preference of
the physiatrist performing the intervention.  Study duration was from May 2019 through August 2021.
Enrollment was limited by the COVID-19 pandemic, as sites had temporary holds on observational
studies, and patient care shifted to telemedicine visits.
Participants were asked to complete the revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) and a
questionnaire that assessed pain, sleep, function, and quality of life (Supplementary Materials) at
baseline prior to undergoing the GH joint injections. They were then asked to complete the same
questionnaires at one week post injection and one month post injection. There was an optional phone
call at 3 months to complete the same questionnaires.
Electronic medical record review was available for all participants, from which information regarding their
ALS diagnosis, disease duration and current functional status was gathered.
Results
Of 9 participants enrolled in the study, 3 initially agreed but ultimately declined the referral for GH joint
injections and were provided with ROM and stretching exercises by clinic physical therapists.  Follow-up
of these individuals was not pursued as part of this study. Another participant was seen by physiatry:
diagnostic evaluation pointed to myofascial pain with muscle spasms as the most likely pain generator.
Page 6/14
For this reason, the participant underwent bilateral trapezius, infraspinatus, levator scapulae trigger point
injections rather than GH joint injections. This participant did have resolution of his shoulder pain 18
days post injection, but this was not sustained 2 months post-injection. We report on the remaining 5
participants who were diagnosed by sports medicine certied physiatrists with adhesive capsulitis and
did undergo ultrasound guided GH joint steroid injections. None of the participants experienced
procedure-related complications. Average pain scores and impact on sleep and quality of life for each
participant are shown in Table 1. Complete data for each participant are shown in Supplementary Tables
1-5.
Case 1.
Participant was a 41-year-old female with limb onset sporadic ALS who used a wheelchair for mobility
and was dependent on caregivers for activities of daily living (ADLs). ALS symptom onset was over three
years prior with left hand weakness. She presented with atraumatic bilateral shoulder pain, right greater
than left, with passive range of motion restrictions. She was taking NSAIDs as needed and undergoing
physical therapy with shoulder range of motion and stretching exercises. Physiatry evaluation conrmed
the diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis and she underwent right GH joint injection with ultrasound guidance.
Post injection, she demonstrated improvements in shoulder pain, which were sustained at the 3-month
visit, as well as sustained improvements in sleep, function, and quality of life. (Supplementary Table 1)
Case 2.
Participant was a 42-year-old male with limb onset sporadic ALS who was ambulatory with single point
cane and had modied independence with ADLs. ALS onset was over two years prior with lower
extremity weakness. He presented with atraumatic right shoulder pain that started a few months prior,
with limited ROM. He was not taking any medications and was not participating in physical therapy. He
had been prescribed shoulder range of motion and stretching exercises at multidisciplinary clinic, but was
unable to perform due to pain. Physiatry evaluation conrmed the diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis and
he underwent right GH joint injection with ultrasound guidance. Post injection, he demonstrated
improvements in shoulder pain, which were sustained at the 1-month visit, as well as improvements in
sleep, function and quality of life (Supplementary Table 2). He initiated a stretching program for bilateral
shoulders post-injection.
Case 3.
Participant was a 57-year-old male with limb onset sporadic ALS. ALS symptom onset was over three
years prior with lower extremity weakness. He was ambulatory without an assistive device and required
Page 7/14
assistance with ADLs due to bilateral upper extremity weakness. He presented with bilateral atraumatic
shoulder pain, left greater than right. He had been prescribed shoulder range of motion and stretching
exercises at multidisciplinary clinic, but was unable to perform due to pain. He was not taking any pain
medications. Physiatry evaluation conrmed the diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis and he underwent
bilateral GH joint injections with ultrasound guidance. Overall pain was improved in bilateral shoulders
post-injection, and this was sustained at the 3-month visit. At one month, pain was not impacting sleep,
function, and quality of life, but this was not sustained at three-months (Supplementary Table 3). He was
stretching at the 1-month mark, but this was not sustained at 3-months.
Case 4.
Participant was a 49-year-old male with limb onset sporadic ALS. He was power wheelchair dependent
for community mobility and used either a cane or power wheelchair for household mobility. He had
modied independence with ADLs. He presented with 6 months of progressively worsening atraumatic
bilateral anterolateral shoulder pain and stiffness, left greater than right. He had passive and active ROM
restrictions bilaterally. He had been taking ibuprofen as needed for several years. He had been prescribed
shoulder range of motion and stretching exercises at multidisciplinary clinic, but was not able to comply
due to pain. He underwent bilateral GH joint injections with ultrasound guidance. He exhibited
improvements in impact of shoulder pain that lasted only about 1 month, but improvements on his
quality of life and function were largely sustained at the 3-month follow-up (Supplementary Table 4).
Case 5.
Participant is a 58-year-old female with limb onset sporadic ALS. She was ambulatory and required
assistance with ADLs due to upper extremity weakness. She presented with atraumatic left shoulder pain
and stiffness for 2 months. She managed her pain with nightly dose of ibuprofen and had not yet started
physical therapy prior to initial referral for injection. She had limited active and passive shoulder ROM.
She underwent left GH joint injections with ultrasound guidance. In early and late follow up, the patient
reported resolution of shoulder pain and it was no longer impacting sleep. This allowed her to engage in
shoulder home exercise program provided by ALS interdisciplinary clinic occupational therapist with
assistance from her family.  Resolution of pain and impact on sleep, function, and quality of life were
sustained at the 3-month visit (Supplementary Table 5).
Table 1. Pain and Impact on Sleep, Function, and Quality of Life
Page 8/14
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5
Average Pain 0-10 (R/L)
pre-injection (days from
baseline) 7/7 (-19) 7/0 (-22) 3/4 (-3) 6/5 (-18) 1/7 (0)
1st follow-up (days from
baseline) 4/7 (7) 2/0 (7) 0/0 (7) 1/2 (10) 0/0
(11)
2nd follow-up (days from
baseline) 5/7 (28) 2/0 (21) 2/3 (25) 4/4 (31) 0/0
(28)
3rd follow-up (days from
baseline) 0/0 (74) not
collected 0/0 (87) 6/6 (87) 0/0
(87)
Max Pain 0-10 (R/L)
pre-injection 9/9 9/0 4/5 8/8 1/8
1st follow-up 8/7 4/0 5/5 4/4 0/0
2nd follow-up 8/8 5/0 2/3 8/8 0/0
3rd follow-up 5/5 not
collected 10/10 8/6 0/0
My shoulder pain keeps me from getting enough sleep at night.
pre-injection Often Sometimes Rarely Always Always
1st follow-up Never Rarely Rarely Never Never
2nd follow-up Never Sometimes Never Never Never
3rd follow-up Never not
collected Never Never Never
My shoulder pain limits my ability to complete daily hygiene.
pre-injection Always Often Always Always Never
1st follow-up Often Rarely Always Never Never
2nd follow-up Sometimes Sometimes Never Never Never
3rd follow-up Rarely not
collected Always Never Never
My shoulder pain limits my ability to get dressed each day.
pre-injection Always Often Always Always Always
1st follow-up Often Sometimes Always Rarely Never
2nd follow-up Sometimes Sometimes Never Rarely Never
3rd follow-up Always not Always Sometimes Never
Page 9/14
collected
My shoulder pain limits me from leaving the house for other activities.
pre-injection Always Rarely Often Sometimes Never
1st follow-up Never Rarely Always Rarely Never
2nd follow-up Never Sometimes Never Rarely Never
3rd follow-up Never not
collected Rarely Rarely Never
My shoulder pain has a negative impact on my quality of life.
pre-injection Always Often Always Always Never
1st follow-up Often Sometimes Sometimes Never Never
2nd follow-up Often Sometimes Never Never Never
3rd follow-up Always not
collected Always Never Never
Discussion
In this case series, we present empiric evidence for benet from GH joint steroid injections for PALS who
present with shoulder pain in the setting of adhesive capsulitis. All study participants presented here
reported improvement in their pain levels and positive impact on sleep, function, or quality of life. One of
the participants (Case 5) reported complete resolution of her shoulder pain. There were no adverse events
reported by the participants in this study. These results demonstrate the safety of, and suggest a role for,
ultrasound-guided GH joint steroid injections for PALS with adhesive capsulitis, though additional
measures may be needed for further pain management.
The development of shoulder pain from adhesive capsulitis in PALS is likely a secondary effect of their
disease resulting from multiple factors such as decreased shoulder muscle strength, muscle atrophy, and
reduced activity levels. The progressive lack of motion may contribute to inammation and tightening of
the joint capsule. Similar pathology has been reported in both stroke and Parkinsons disease where there
is motor dysfunction involving the shoulder.18,19 Motion is critical to maintain and restore ROM.13,16 For
PALS with shoulder pain, stretching and range of motion exercises are recommended, and strategies to
increase compliance can be helpful.20 Shoulder approximation sleeves can also be used to help support
the shoulder and manage pain, as well as modalities such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
(TENS) devices. However, while these tools and strategies have shown promise, these interventions are
not always enough to completely relieve pain or improve function.20Unfortunately, there may be limited
ability to complete the recommended exercises due to disease progression or pain. Often the shoulder will
become quite painful and will limit ability to participate in ADLs, including daily hygiene, and may impact
Page 10/14
sleep quality and overall quality of life. When pain has become a limiting factor, the provider is
challenged to make appropriate recommendations for adequate pain control and to optimize the persons
ability to participate in ADLs. This study highlights the need for multifaceted approach, which may
include GH joint injections, as well as education on the cause of shoulder pain and importance of a long-
term stretching program to maintain a functional ROM to minimize risk for re-freezing or ongoing pain. 
Referral to musculoskeletal specialists for consideration for steroid injections should be considered for
PALS with shoulder pain.  The procedure offers the advantages of being a fast, safe, in-oce procedure
that requires no ionizing radiation or sedation. Evidence in non-ALS populations shows improved pain
relief with steroid injections compared to manual therapy and exercise without injection.21 Shoulder
injections have also been shown to be benecial for hemiplegic shoulder pain in patients status post
stroke.22With pain relief from the injections, the person may be able to tolerate ROM and stretching
exercises, which will restore motion and in turn may further improve pain, and help restore function and
quality of life. Appropriate pain relief with localized steroid injections also offers a strategy to reduce
reliance on pain medications with systemic medications with potential GI, renal and neurologic side
effects.
It is important to minimize delays in referrals to musculoskeletal specialistsgiven the emerging evidence
of improved outcomes with earlier steroid injections in people without ALS, as well as improved ecacy
compared to manual therapy with exercise.14,21 While early diagnosis and intervention is ideal, our cohort
suggests that GH joint injection for adhesive capsulitis likely benets PALS across the progression of
ALS. If employed in early ALS, GH injection may allow a person to maintain ROM, functional
independence, and participation in active physical therapy programs. In later-stage ALS, GH injection may
offer improved passive ROM and caregiver ability to assist with ADLs, such as dressing and bathing.
Throughout all ALS stages, the pain-reducing effect of GH injection may have benets on activity, sleep
and mood.
Our study is limited by the small number of participants and case series design. The ongoing COVID-19
pandemic also limited participation, such that we were not able to collect range of motion measurements
as the participants completed their post injection visits over the telephone, and many did not present to
clinic again during the study period due to COVID-19 restrictions. Further research is also needed to
compare outcomes between those who choose not to have the injections to those who do choose this
intervention. Finally, as more evidence emerges regarding specic injection techniques and steroid dose
for people without ALS, it will be important to explore these same questions in the ALS population. 
Page 11/14
This case series supports the safety and ecacy of GH joint injections for adhesive capsulitis in PALS.
Larger studies to determine prevalence of adhesive capsulitis versus other pathologies and to optimize
comprehensive management plans aimed at complete shoulder pain resolution are needed.
Conclusions
PALS require a comprehensive plan to manage shoulder pain. Referrals to musculoskeletal specialists are
helpful to determine the underlying cause of pain. Glenohumeral joint injections are safe and effective for
adhesive capsulitis in PALS, but alone may not completely resolve shoulder pain. Additional therapies to
improve ROM and reduce pain should be considered.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate:Both the Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Board
(IRB) and the Northwestern IRB approved this study. Eligible participants were informed of the study and
study staff consented interested participants.
Consent for publication: Not Applicable
Availability of data and materials:All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this
manuscript and its supplementary information les.
Competing Interests:
Doreen Ho – reports the following disclosures: compensation for consulting from Alexion
pharmaceuticals
Sabrina Paganoni – reports the following disclosures: Research grants from Amylyx Therapeutics,
Revalesio Corporation, Alector Therapeutics, UCB, Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Clene Nanomedicine,
Prilenia Therapeutics, Seelos Therapeutics. Research grants from the ALS Association, the American
Academy of Neurology, the CDC, ALS Finding a Cure, the Salah Foundation, the Spastic Paraplegia
Foundation, the Muscular Dystrophy Association, I AM ALS, Tambourine, Target ALS, Columbia University,
the Cullen Education and Research Fund. Site PI: Alector Therapeutics, Cytokinetics, Inc., Anelixis
Therapeutics. Institutional consulting agreements with Amylyx Therapeutics, Frequency Therapeutics,
Sola Biosciences. Personal consulting agreements with Cytokinetics, Inc., Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals,
Orthogonal Neurosciences. Honoraria from Medscape
All other authors report no disclosures.
Funding: No targeted funding.
Authors Contributions:
Page 12/14
Katherine M. Burke – concept and design; data collection; data analysis; drafting of manuscript; critical
review of manuscript
Amy S. Ellrodt – concept and design; data collection; data analysis, critical review of manuscript
Benjamin C. Joslin – concept and design; data collection; data analysis, drafting of manuscript, critical
review of manuscript
Pia P. Sanpitak - data collection; data analysis, critical review of manuscript
Claire MacAdam - data analysis and critical review of manuscript
Prabhav Deo - data collection; data analysis, critical review of manuscript
Kevin Ozment - data collection; data analysis, critical review of manuscript
Cristina Shea - data analysis and critical review of manuscript
Stephen A. Johnson - data analysis and critical review of manuscript
Doreen Ho – data analysis and critical review of manuscript
Samuel K. Chu - data collection; data analysis; critical review of manuscript
Colin K. Franz - concept and design; data collection; data analysis; drafting of manuscript; critical review
of manuscript
Ashwin N. Babu- concept and design; data collection; data analysis; critical review of manuscript
Sabrina Paganoni - concept and design; data collection; data analysis; critical review of manuscript
Acknowledgements
This research would not be possible without the contributions from our patients taking the time to
complete the surveys and provide feedback on the impact of the shoulder injections.
Abbreviations
ADLs – activities of daily living
ALS – amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
ALSFRS-R – amyotrophic lateral sclerosis functional rating scale - revised
GH – glenohumeral
IRB – Institutional Review Board
Page 13/14
NSAIDS – non-steroidal anti-inammatory agents
PALS – people living with ALS
ROM – range of motion
TENS – transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
References
1. Majmudar S, Wu J, Paganoni S. Rehabilitation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: why it matters.
Muscle Nerve
2014; 50:4-13.
2. Paganoni P, Karam C, Joyce N, et al. Comprehensive rehabilitative care across the spectrum of
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
NeuroRehabilitation
. 2015; 37:53-68.
3. Chio A, Mora G, Lauria G. Pain in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Lancet Neurol
2017; 16:144-157.
4. Chio A, Canosa A, Gallo S, et al. Pain in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a population-based controlled
study.
Eur J Neurol
2012;19: 551-55.
5. Raheja D, Stephens HE, Lehman E, et al. Patient-reported problematic symptoms in an ALS treatment
trial.
Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener
2015; 17: 21-29.
. Wallace VC, Ellis CM, Burman R, et al. The evaluation of pain in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a
controlled observational study.
Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener
2014; 15: 520-527.
7. Pizzimenti A, Aragona M, Onesti E, Inghilleri M. Depression, pain and quality of life in patients with
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A cross-sectional study.
Functional Neurology
. 2013; 28(2): 115-119.
. Ho DT, Ruthazer R, Russell JA.Shoulder pain in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
J Clin Neuromuscul
Dis.
2011;13(1):53-5.
9. Fields BKK, Skalski MR, Patel DB, et al. Adhesive capsulitis: review of imaging ndings,
pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and treatment options.
Skeletal Radiol
. 2019 Aug;48(8):1171-
1184.
10. Kraal T, Lubbers J, van den Bekerom MPJ, et al. The puzzling pathophysiology of frozen shoulders
a scoping review.
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
. 2020; Nov;7(91).
11. Nagy MT, MacFarlane RJ, Khan Y, Waseem M. The frozen shoulder: myths and realities.
The Open
Orthopaedics Journal
. 2013;7:352-355.
12. Brettschneider, Johannes, Jerome Kurent, and Albert Ludolph. "Drug therapy for pain in amyotrophic
lateral sclerosis or motor neuron disease."
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
2013 (6).
13. Challoumas D, Biddle M, McLean M, Millar NL. Comparison of treatments for frozen shoulder: a
systematic review and meta-analysis.
JAMA Netw Open.
2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2029581.
14. Shang X, Zhang Z, Pan X, et al. Intra-articular versus subacromial corticosteroid injection for the
treatment of adhesive capsulitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
Biomed Res Int
. 2019; Oct
15;1274790.
Page 14/14
15. Sun Y, Liu S, Chen S, Chen J. The effect of corticosteroid injection into rotator interval for early frozen
shoulder: a randomized controlled trial.
Am J Sports Med
. 2018; March;46(3):663-670.
1. Chan HBY, Pua PY, How CH. Physical therapy in the management of frozen shoulder.
Singapore Med
J
. 2017; 58(12):685-689.
17. Koh KH. Corticosteroid Injection for adhesive capsulitis in primary care: a systematic review of
randomized clinical trials.
Singapore Med J.
2016;57(12):646-657.
1. Zhu Y, Su B, Li N, Master, and Jin H. et al. Pain management of hemiplegic shoulder pain post stroke
in patients from Nanjing, China.
Neural Regen Re.s
2013 Sep 5;8(25):2389-2398.
19. Sarasua SM, Floyd S, Bridges WC, Pill SG. The epidemiology and etiology of adhesive capsulitis in
the U.S. Medicare population.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord
. 2021; 22: 828.
20. Burke K, de Marchi F, Ellrodt AS, et al. Exploring the use of educational materials for increasing
participation in a stretching program; a quality improvement project in people with motor neuron
disease.
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med.
2021; 57(1):78-84.
21. Page MJ, Green S, Kramer S, et al. Manual therapy and exercise for adhesive capsulitis (frozen
shoulder).
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
. 2014 Aug 26;(8):CD011275.
22. Lakse E, Gunduz B, Erhan B, Celik EC. The effect of local injections in hemiplegic shoulder pain: a
prospective, randomized, controlled study.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil
. 2009 Oct; 88(10):805-811.
Supplementary Files
This is a list of supplementary les associated with this preprint. Click to download.
SupplementaryMaterial2022.08.11.docx
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Background Adhesive capsulitis (AC) of the shoulder, also known as frozen shoulder, causes substantial pain and disability. In cases of secondary AC, the inflammation and fibrosis of the synovial joint can be triggered by trauma or surgery to the joint followed by extended immobility. However, for primary AC the inciting trigger is unknown. The burden of the disorder among the elderly is also unknown leading to this age group being left out of therapeutic research studies, potentially receiving delayed diagnoses, and unknown financial costs to the Medicare system. The purpose of this analysis was to describe the epidemiology of AC in individuals over the age of 65, an age group little studied for this disorder. The second purpose was to investigate whether specific medications, co-morbidities, infections, and traumas are risk factors or triggers for primary AC in this population. Methods We used Medicare claims data from 2010–2012 to investigate the prevalence of AC and assess comorbid risk factors and seasonality. Selected medications, distal trauma, and classes of infections as potential inflammatory triggers for primary AC were investigated using a case–control study design with patients with rotator cuff tears as the comparison group. Medications were identified from National Drug codes and translated to World Health Organization ATC codes for analysis. Health conditions were identified using ICD9-CM codes. Results We found a one-year prevalence rate of AC of approximately 0.35% among adults aged 65 years and older which translates to approximately 142,000 older adults in the United States having frozen shoulder syndrome. Diabetes and Parkinson’s disease were significantly associated with the diagnosis of AC in the elderly. Cases were somewhat more common from August through December, although a clear seasonal trend was not observed. Medications, traumas, and infections were similar for cases and controls. Conclusions This investigation identified the burden of AC in the US elderly population and applied case–control methodology to identify triggers for its onset in this population. Efforts to reduce chronic health conditions such as diabetes may reduce seemingly unrelated conditions such as AC. The inciting trigger for this idiopathic condition remains elusive.
Article
Full-text available
Importance There are a myriad of available treatment options for patients with frozen shoulder, which can be overwhelming to the treating health care professional. Objective To assess and compare the effectiveness of available treatment options for frozen shoulder to guide musculoskeletal practitioners and inform guidelines. Data Sources Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, and CINHAL were searched in February 2020. Study Selection Studies with a randomized design of any type that compared treatment modalities for frozen shoulder with other modalities, placebo, or no treatment were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis Data were independently extracted by 2 individuals. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Random-effects models were used. Main Outcomes and Measures Pain and function were the primary outcomes, and external rotation range of movement (ER ROM) was the secondary outcome. Results of pairwise meta-analyses were presented as mean differences (MDs) for pain and ER ROM and standardized mean differences (SMDs) for function. Length of follow-up was divided into short-term (≤12 weeks), mid-term (>12 weeks to ≤12 months), and long-term (>12 months) follow-up. Results From a total of 65 eligible studies with 4097 participants that were included in the systematic review, 34 studies with 2402 participants were included in pairwise meta-analyses and 39 studies with 2736 participants in network meta-analyses. Despite several statistically significant results in pairwise meta-analyses, only the administration of intra-articular (IA) corticosteroid was associated with statistical and clinical superiority compared with other interventions in the short-term for pain (vs no treatment or placebo: MD, −1.0 visual analog scale [VAS] point; 95% CI, −1.5 to −0.5 VAS points; P < .001; vs physiotherapy: MD, −1.1 VAS points; 95% CI, −1.7 to −0.5 VAS points; P < .001) and function (vs no treatment or placebo: SMD, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.9; P < .001; vs physiotherapy: SMD 0.5; 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.7; P < .001). Subgroup analyses and the network meta-analysis demonstrated that the addition of a home exercise program with simple exercises and stretches and physiotherapy (electrotherapy and/or mobilizations) to IA corticosteroid may be associated with added benefits in the mid-term (eg, pain for IA coritocosteriod with home exercise vs no treatment or placebo: MD, −1.4 VAS points; 95% CI, −1.8 to −1.1 VAS points; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this study suggest that the early use of IA corticosteroid in patients with frozen shoulder of less than 1-year duration is associated with better outcomes. This treatment should be accompanied by a home exercise program to maximize the chance of recovery.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose The pathophysiology of frozen shoulders is a complex and multifactorial process. The purpose of this review is to scope the currently available knowledge of the pathophysiology of frozen shoulders. Methods A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Embase and the Cochrane library. Original articles published between 1994 and October 2020 with a substantial focus on the pathophysiology of frozen shoulders were included. Results Out of 827 records, 48 original articles were included for the qualitative synthesis of this review. Glenohumeral capsular biopsies were reported in 30 studies. Fifteen studies investigated were classified as association studies. Three studies investigated the pathophysiology in an animal studies. A state of low grade inflammation, as is associated with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and thyroid disorders, predisposes for the development of frozen shoulder. An early immune response with elevated levels of alarmins and binding to the receptor of advance glycation end products is present at the start of the cascade. Inflammatory cytokines, of which transforming growth factor-β1 has a prominent role, together with mechanical stress stimulates Fibroblast proliferation and differentiation into myofibroblasts. This leads to an imbalance of extracellular matrix turnover resulting in a stiff and thickened glenohumeral capsule with abundance of type III collagen. Conclusion This scoping review outlines the complexity of the pathophysiology of frozen shoulder. A comprehensive overview with background information on pathophysiologic mechanisms is given. Leads are provided to progress with research for clinically important prognostic markers and in search for future interventions. Level of evidence Level V.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Adhesive capsulitis is one of the most well-known causes of pain and stiffness of the shoulder. Corticosteroid injections have been used for many years. However, it is still controversial where corticosteroid should be injected, whether subacromial or intra-articular. Objective: The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the effects of intra-articular (IA) and subacromial (SA) corticosteroid injections for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis. Materials and methods: Four foreign databases and two Chinese databases were searched for RCTs and quasi-RCTs involving the comparison of IA and SA corticosteroid injection for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis. The Cochrane risk of bias tool and PEDro score were used to evaluate the quality of the studies. The primary clinical outcomes including VAS, Constant score, ASES score, and ROM were collected. The secondary outcome of corticosteroid-related adverse reactions was also compared between the two groups. The results were evaluated and compared at five time points. Subgroup analyses were performed to further explore the differences between groups. Results: Eight RCTs and one quasi-RCT, involving 512 participants, were identified and included in this meta-analysis. All studies were of low risk of bias and medium-high quality with the PEDro score ≥5 points. The pooled effect showed that there was no significant difference in the primary outcomes between IA injection and SA injection, with an exception of VAS at 2-3 weeks (P=0.02) and ROM of internal rotation at 8-12 weeks (P=0.02). According to the results of subgroup analyses, the differences of VAS and ROM of internal rotation did not last beyond the 2-3-week time period. Additionally, SA injection had the advantage of avoiding adverse reactions from the corticosteroid, especially in avoiding a large fluctuation of serum blood glucose levels. Conclusions: When corticosteroid injection is used to treat adhesive capsulitis, both injection sites can be selected. However, due to the scarcity of related studies, more rigorous trials are needed to confirm the current findings.
Article
Full-text available
Adhesive capsulitis is a common cause of shoulder pain and limited movement. The objectives of this review are to assess the efficacy and safety of corticosteroid injections for adhesive capsulitis and to evaluate the optimum dose and anatomical site of injections. PubMed and CENTRAL databases were searched for randomised trials and a total of ten trials were included. Results revealed that corticosteroid injection is superior to placebo and physiotherapy in the short-term (up to 12 weeks). There was no difference in outcomes between corticosteroid injection and oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs at 24 weeks. Dosages of intra-articular triamcinolone at 20 mg and 40 mg showed identical outcomes, while subacromial and glenohumeral corticosteroid injections had similar efficacy. The use of corticosteroid injection is also generally safe, with infrequent and minor side effects. Physicians may consider corticosteroid injection to treat adhesive capsulitis, especially in the early stages where pain is the predominant presentation.
Article
Background: Decreased range of motion is a common secondary complication of motor neuron disease (MND) that can contribute to functional decline and decreased participation in daily activities. Aim: The purpose of this study was to develop and assess the effectiveness of educational brochures and videos aimed at improving knowledge regarding the importance of a regular stretching program. Design: This was a quality improvement (QI) project. Setting: Participants were seen in outpatient multidisciplinary neuromuscular clinic. Population: Individuals with motor neuron disease were invited to participate in this QI study. Methods: Individuals were asked to complete surveys asking questions regarding current stretching program, pain levels, and knowledge of benefits of stretching before and after receiving the stretching brochures or videos. Results: A total of 53 participants completed the pre-intervention survey, 28 in the brochure group and 25 in the video group. Of those, 86% and 88% completed the post-intervention survey in the brochure and video groups, respectively. The video group increased stretching frequency significantly more than the brochure group (2.04 and 0.62 days/week respectively, p = 0.004). Significantly more participants in the video group reported usage of stretches from the educational materials on a regular basis (54% for brochure group and 86% for video group, p=0.024). Conclusions: Educational brochures and videos are two different strategies to improve knowledge of benefits of stretching for individuals with MND. Both groups increased frequency of stretching. Videos may be better able to improve frequency of stretching when compared to brochures. Clinical rehabilitation impact: The brochures and videos developed for this study can be used by clinicians treating individuals with MND. By improving knowledge regarding the benefits of stretching, individuals with MND may choose to prioritize stretching as a part of their routine. This in turn may help to prevent or address potential joint or muscle length issues or assist patients to incorporate preventative measures into their treatment plans.
Article
Adhesive capsulitis, commonly referred to as “frozen shoulder,” is a debilitating condition characterized by progressive pain and limited range of motion about the glenohumeral joint. It is a condition that typically affects middle-aged women, with some evidence for an association with endocrinological, rheumatological, and autoimmune disease states. Management tends to be conservative, as most cases resolve spontaneously, although a subset of patients progress to permanent disability. Conventional arthrographic findings include decreased capsular distension and volume of the axillary recess when compared with the normal glenohumeral joint, in spite of the fact that fluoroscopic visualization alone is rarely carried out today in favor of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRI and MR arthrography (MRA) have, in recent years, allowed for the visualization of several characteristic signs seen with this condition, including thickening of the coracohumeral ligament, axillary pouch and rotator interval joint capsule, in addition to the obliteration of the subcoracoid fat triangle. Additional findings include T2 signal hyperintensity and post-contrast enhancement of the joint capsule. Similar changes are observable on ultrasound. However, the use of ultrasound is most clearly established for image-guided injection therapy. More aggressive therapies, including arthroscopic release and open capsulotomy, may be indicated for refractory disease, with arthroscopic procedures favored because of their less invasive nature and relatively high success rate.
Article
Background: Corticosteroid injection is a common treatment for frozen shoulder, but controversy still exists regarding the injection site with the best outcome. Hypothesis: To treat the frozen shoulder in the freezing stage with corticosteroid injection, a single injection into the rotator interval (RI) could yield better effects in terms of improvement in pain, passive range of motion (ROM), and function than would an injection into the intra-articular (IA) or subacromial (SA) space. Study design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Patients with primary frozen shoulder in the freezing stage were randomized into 3 groups: RI injection, IA injection, or SA injection with corticosteroid. Clinical outcomes were documented at baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after intervention, including visual analog scale (VAS) for pain; passive ROM measurements, including external rotation, internal rotation, forward flexion, and abduction; and evaluation with the Disability of Arm, Hand, and Shoulder (DASH) score and Constant score. Results: There were no significant differences in the basic properties of the 3 groups (27 in RI group, 24 in IA group, and 26 in SA group) before injection. Improvements in pain VAS, passive ROM, Constant score, and DASH score were faster and significant in the RI group from 4 weeks after injection, followed by those in the IA group. Passive ROM decreased and DASH score did not change significantly in the SA group, although pain VAS and Constant score improved significantly. Conclusion: To treat frozen shoulder in the freezing stage with corticosteroid injection, a single injection into the RI yielded better effects in terms of improvement in pain, passive ROM, and function than did injections into the IA or SA space.
Article
Frozen shoulder, also known as adhesive capsulitis, is a common presentation in the primary care setting and can be significantly painful and disabling. The condition progresses in three stages: freezing (painful), frozen (adhesive) and thawing, and is often self-limiting. Common conservative treatments include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, oral glucocorticoids, intra-articular glucocorticoid injections and/or physical therapy. However, many physicians may find themselves limited to prescribing medications for treatment. This article elaborates on physical therapy exercises targeted at adhesive capsulitis, which can be used in combination with common analgesics.
Article
Pain is a largely neglected symptom in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) although it is reported by most of these patients. It occurs at all stages of the disease and can be an onset symptom preceding motor dysfunction. Pain is correlated with a deterioration in patients' quality of life and increased prevalence of depression. In the later stages of ALS, pain can be severe enough to require increased use of sedative and analgesic drugs, and is among the events that predict clinical deterioration and death. The site of pain depends on the pain type or underlying mechanism (eg, painful cramps, nociceptive pain, or neuropathic pain). Given the multifactorial nature of pain in patients with ALS, different treatments have been suggested, ranging from non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, drugs for neuropathic pain, opioids, and cannabinoids, to physical therapy strategies and preventive assistive devices. Further understanding of the pathophysiology is crucial to drive assessment in clinical trials of therapeutic strategies targeted at specific mechanisms and studies of individualised therapies.