A preview of this full-text is provided by Wiley.
Content available from Advanced Optical Materials
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
2201598 (1 of 9) © 2022 Wiley-VCH GmbH
www.advopticalmat.de
Achieving Small Temperature Coecients in Carbon-Based
Perovskite Solar Cells by Enhancing Electron Extraction
Xian Zhang, Yan Guan, Yangyang Zhang, Wenjin Yu, Cuncun Wu,* Jiaheng Han,
Yafei Zhang, Cong Chen, Shijian Zheng,* and Lixin Xiao*
DOI: 10.1002/adom.202201598
1. Introduction
The photovoltaic parameters of solar cells
are generally dependent on the operating
temperature of the device.[1–6] The tem-
perature coecient (TC) describes the
changes of a photovoltaic parameter (X)
with temperature (T). Assuming linear
temperature behavior of over a limited
temperature range, TC(X) is given by:
XXT
X
T
TC
1d
d
0
()
()
= (1)
where T0 is 25 °C. The TC is crucial for
the true energy yield calculations of
photovoltaic devices, and the standard
specifications of commercial photovoltaic
modules usually need to include the TCs
of the device. For the conventional inor-
ganic solar cells, such as silicon, CdTe,
and CuInGaSe, the power conversion e-
ciency (PCE) decreases with increasing
temperature, showing negative PCE TCs of
about −0.44%/°C, −0.28%/°C, −0.32%/°C,
respectively.[7,8] These large PCE TCs are
mainly due to the widened bandgap (Eg)
of the active layer with the increase in temperature. It is worth
noting that although the increase of Eg can slightly reduce the
short-circuit current density (Jsc), the thermal-induced nonradi-
ative recombination at high temperature increases significantly.
This leads to a large loss of open-circuit voltage (Voc) and fill
factor (FF) of the device.
For the emerging perovskite solar cells (PSCs), the certi-
fied PCE has reached 25.7%,[9–13] which is comparable to the
eciency of monocrystalline silicon-based solar cells. The sta-
bility of PSCs has been much improved by architecture design
of devices, interface/grain boundary defects passivation, and
inhibition of ion migration.[14,15] Recent results show that its
stability can satisfy the standards of international tests.[16] PSCs
also hold great potential in some specific scenarios, such as
near space and exoplanet exploration.[17–20] Therefore, lowering
the TCs value of PSCs is not only conducive to improving the
real energy yield of perovskite photovoltaic devices but also con-
ducive to their application in special scenarios.
Previous studies have found that the TCs of perovskite
devices are closely related to the device architecture and the
composition of the active layer.[7,8,21–23] A champion TC(PCE) of
Hole transport layer (HTL)-free carbon electrode-based perovskite solar
cells (C-PSCs) have drawn great attention due to their excellent stability
and simple fabrication process. However, the photovoltaic parameters
of C-PSCs usually exhibit large negative temperature coecients (TCs).
Herein, the TCs of C-PSCs can be suppressed by enhancing electron extrac-
tion. An ecient electron transport layer (ETL), [6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid
methyl ester (PCBM)-coated nanoneedle-like brookite TiO2 (ND-B-TiO2)
is used as ETL to prepare HTL-free pure FAPbI3-based C-PSCs. Compared
with bare ND-B-TiO2, PCBM@ND-B-TiO2 shows higher electron mobility,
and better band alignment with formamidinium lead triiodide (FAPbI3)
perovskite, as well as improved contact with perovskite, which leads to
enhanced electron extraction and transportation. Consequently, the power
conversion eciency (PCE) of HTL-free carbon-based FAPbI3 PSC can reach
up to 14.55%, which is one of the highest eciencies for FAPbI3-based
planar C-PSCs so far. More importantly, the optimized device is less sensi-
tive to the operating temperature due to the boosted carrier extraction and
passivated interface defects, showing a small TC(PCE) of only ≈−0.11%/°C
between 25 °C and 85 °C. The work demonstrates that enhancing electron
extraction is an eective way to achieve high-performance C-PSCs and high-
temperature solar cells.
X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, C. Wu, J. Han, Y. Zhang, C. Chen, S. Zheng
Department of New Energy Materials and Devices
State Key Laboratory of Reliability and Intelligence of Electrical Equipment
School of Materials Science and Engineering
Hebei University of Technology
Tianjin 300130, P. R. China
E-mail: cuncunwu@163.com; sjzheng@hebut.edu.cn
Y. Guan
Department of Chemistry
College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering
Peking University
Beijing 100871, P. R. China
W. Yu, L. Xiao
State Key Laboratory for Macroscopic Physics and Department of Physics
Peking University
Beijing 100871, P. R. China
E-mail: lxxiao@pku.edu.cn
The ORCID identification number(s) for the author(s) of this article
can be found under https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202201598.
ReseaRch aRticle
Adv. Optical Mater. 2022, 10, 2201598