Conference PaperPDF Available

RELATION OF POWER, SPEED AND AGILITY IN BASKETBALL PLAYERS BY POSITION

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The aim of this study was to determine differences in motor skills among top NBA players. In order to conduct the research, data was collected from the official NBA Draft Combine website, where statistical analysis of information was done in order to determine the differences between players depending on the players' positions. We analyzed the variables that characterize agility and strength, which are integral parts of the battery of tests applied to this draft. Based on "One Way ANOVA", it can be concluded that the arithmetic mean of the applied tests differs significantly in three motor variables at the level of p≤0.01 in relation to players playing in different positions (Lane Agility Time, Three Quarter Sprint and Max Vertical Leap). In all these variables, groups of players were formed and homogenized with similar average values in relation to body height that definitely determines the values of the performed motor skill tests, as shown by post-hoc analysis. A group of "lower-height" players (Shooting guard, Small forward and Point guard) showed on all three tests that their arithmetic means do not differ statistically, so their test results are very similar, which quite explains the tendency of modern basketball that on the positions 1-3 players can easily rotate.
Content may be subject to copyright.
FisCommunications2018
84
RELATIONOFPOWER,SPEEDANDAGILITYIN
BASKETBALLPLAYERSBYPOSITION
DušanStanković1andМарияЦанкова‐Калоянова2
1FacultyofSportandPhysicalEducation‐UniversityofNiš
2NationalSportsAcademy„VassilLevski“Sofia
DušanStankovićandМарияЦанкова‐Калоянова
UDC796.323:613.25
SUMMARY
Theaim of thisstudy was todetermine differences inmotor skills amongtop NBA players.In orderto
conduct the research, data was collected from the official NBA Draft Combine website, where statistical
analysisofinformationwasdoneinordertodeterminethedifferences betweenplayers dependingon the
players’positions.Weanalyzedthevariablesthatcharacterizeagilityandstrength,whichareintegralpartsof
thebatteryoftestsappliedtothisdraft.Basedon“OneWayANOVA“,itcanbeconcludedthatthearithmetic
mean of the applied tests differs significantly in three motor variables at the level of p≤0.01 in relation to
playersplayingindifferentpositions(LaneAgilityTime,ThreeQuarterSprintandMaxVerticalLeap). In all
thesevariables,groups of playerswere formedandhomogenized with similar averagevaluesin relation to
bodyheight that definitelydeterminesthe values oftheperformed motorskill tests, asshown by post‐hoc
analysis.Agroupof"lower‐height"players(Shootingguard,Smallforwardand Point guard)showedon all
threetests that their arithmeticmeansdonotdifferstatistically,sotheir test resultsareverysimilar,which
quiteexplainsthetendencyofmodernbasketballthatonthepositions1‐3playerscaneasilyrotate.
Ciljovogistrivanjajebiodaseutvrderazlikeumotorkimsposobnostima vrhunskihNBAigrača. Na
osnovupodatakasazvanicnogsajtaNBAdraftcombineuradjenajestatističkaobradapodatakasaciljemdase
utvrde razlike izmedju igrača u odnosunapozicijukojuigraju. Analizirane su varijable koje karakterišu
agilnostisnagu,akojesusastavnidelovibaterijetestovakojeseprimenjujunaovomdraftu.NaosnovuOne
Way Anove može se zaključiti da aritmetičke sredine primenjenih testova se značajno razlikuju u tri
motorickevarijablenanivoup≤0.01uodnosunaigracekojiigrajunarazličitimpozicijama(LaneAgilityTime,
Three Quarter Sprint and Max Vertical Leap). Kod svih ovih varijabligrupeigračasuseformiralei
homogenizovale sa sličnim prosečnim vrednostima u odnosu na telesnu visinu koja definitivno odredjuje
vrednosti realizovanih testova motoričkih sposobnosti, sto je pokazano post‐hoc analizom. Grupa „nižih“
igrača,Shootingguard, Small forward andPointguard,je u svatri testapokazaladase njihove aritmetičke
sredinestatističkiznačajnonerazlikujup≥0.01,takodasunjihovirezultatinatestuveomaslični,štodoneklei
objašnjavatendencijusavremenekošarkedanapoziciji1‐3mozedaselakorotirajuigrači.
Keywords:strength,agility,basketball,playerpositions
INTRODUCTION
Agility is an important component of many
sportsbuthasnotbeenextensivelyresearched
(Young& Farrow, 2006).Somestudies notedthat
the improvement in speed, power, and balance
shouldresultinanimprovementofagility(Sekulic,
Spasic, Mirkov, Cavar, & Sattler, 2013). One more
studyshowedthatthephysiologicalprofileofelite
players in the Belgian first division differs by
player position. More specifically, guards were
characterized by high endurance, speed, and
agility,whereascentersandpowerforwardshad
higher muscle strength than the other positions.
(Boone& Bourgois,2013).In oneresearch where
the strength on bench press 1RM was examined,
power forwards and centers were stronger than
the rest of the players' positions (Ben Abdelkrim,
Chaouachi, Chamari, Chtara, & Castagna, 2010).
Some researchers have been investigating
basketball footwear requirements depending on
playingposition(Brauner,Zwinzscher,&Sterzing,
2012). Furthermore, many researches have been
looking into physical fitness (Köklü, Alemdaroǧlu,
Koçak,Erol,&Findikoǧlu, 2011) (Scanlan,Tucker,
& Dalbo, 2014). In another research where male
basketball players were doing agility tests, 20m
shuttleruntests,asignificantdifferencewasfound
onthespeedandagilitytestsbetweenplaymakers
and centers. (Tsitskaris, Theoharopoulos, &
Garefis,2003).Thepointguard“(PG),alsoknown
as“numberone(1)”,istypicallyateam'sbestball
InternationalScientificConference
85
handler and passer. Therefore, they often lead
their team in assists and steals. They are often
quick and can hit shots either outside the three‐
point line or "in the paint", largely depending on
the player's skill level. Point guards are looked
upon as the "floor general" or the "coach on the
floor".Theyshouldstudythe game andgame film
to be able to recognize the weaknesses of the
defense, and the strengths of their own offense.
Theyareresponsiblefordirectingplays,making
the position equivalent to that of quarterback in
Americanfootball,aplaymakerinAssociation
football, center in ice hockey, or setter in
volleyball. Good point guards increase team
efficiency and generally have a high number of
assists.They are often referred to as dribblers or
playmakers.IntheNBA,pointguardsareusually
theleasttallplayersontheteamandareusually6
feet5inches(1.96m)tallorshorter.Theshooting
guard“(SG)”isalsoknownas“numbertwo(2)”or
the “off guard”. Along with a small forward, a
shooting guard is often referred to as a wing
becauseofitsuseincommonpositioningtactics.
Asthenamesuggests,mostshootingguardsare
goodshootersfromthethree‐pointrange.Besides
beingableto shoottheball, shootingguardstend
tohavegoodballhandlingskillsandtheabilityto
drive the ball to the basket, often creating their
own shots off the dribble. A versatile shooting
guardwillhavegoodpassingskills,allowingthem
to assume point guard responsibilities known as
comboguards.IntheNBA,shootingguardsusually
rangebetween6feet4inches(1.93m)and6feet7
inches(2.01m)in height. Thesmall forward(SF),
also known as “number three (3)”, is the most
versatile of the five main basketball positions.
Versatilityiskeyforsmallforwardsbecauseofthe
nature of their role, which resembles that of a
shooting guard more often than that of a power
forward. This is why the small forward and the
shootingguardpositionsareofteninterchangeable
and referred to as wings. Small forwards have a
variety of assets, such as quickness and strength
inside. One common thread among all kinds of
smallforwardsistheabilityto"gettotheline"and
draw fouls by aggressively attempting (post up)
plays, lay‐ups, or slam dunks. As such, accurate
foulshootingisacommonskillforsmallforwards,
many of whom record a large portion of their
points from the foul line. Besides being able to
drivetothe basket, theyarealsogood long‐range
shooters.Somesmallforwardshavegoodpassing
skills, allowing them to assume point guard
responsibilities known as point forwards. Small
forwards should be able to do a little bit of
everything on the court, typically playing roles
suchasswingmenanddefensivespecialists.Inthe
NBA,smallforwardsusuallyrangefrom6feet6
inches(1.98m)and6feet9inches(2.06m)in
height. The power forward“(PF),alsoknownas
“numberfour(4)”,oftenplaysarolesimilartothat
ofthe center,down inthe "post" or "low blocks".
The power forward is often the team's most
versatile scorer, being able to score close to the
basketwhilealsobeingable to shoot mid‐range
jump shots from 12 to 18 feet away from the
basket. Some power forwards, known as “stretch
fours”,havesinceextendedtheirshootingrangeto
three‐pointers. On defense, they are required to
havethestrengthtoguard bigger players closeto
the basket and to have the athleticism to guard
quick players away from the basket. Most power
forwards tends to be more versatile than centers
sincetheycanbepartofplaysandarenotalways
inthelowblock.IntheNBA,powerforwards
usuallyrangefrom 6 feet8inches(2.03 m) and6
feet11inches(2.11m)inheight.Thecenter“(C)”,
alsoknownas“numberfive(5),nicknamedthe
"pivot",usuallyplaysnearthebaseline,closetothe
basket(referredtoasthe"lowpost").Theyare
usuallythetallestplayeronthefloor.Thecenter
usually scores "down low, in the paint" (near the
basket, in the key), but some can be good
perimeter shooters. They are typically skilled at
gathering rebounds, contesting shots and setting
screens on plays. The center position has been
traditionally considered [by whom?] one of the
mostimportantpositions,ifnotthemost
important.Therangeofplayersusedinthe
position has transitioned from relatively slower
but much taller 'back to the basket' players to
playerswhowouldnormallybeclassifiedaspower
forwardsbutcandominatethepositionwiththeir
defensiveskills,ormismatch ability toshootfrom
thehighpost.Thishasbeenduetothescarcityof
players possessing the combination of great skill,
idealheight,anddurability.Thishasbeenmatched
by the development of more fast‐paced and
athletic basketball play which calls for less
traditional center play and a more up‐and‐down
thecourtstyle.IntheNBA,centersareusually6
feet10inches(2.08m)ortaller.
METHODS
Subjects
The NBA Draft Combine is a multi‐day
showcase that takes place every May before the
annual June NBA draft. At the combine, college
basketball players receive measurements,
participate in interviews, undergo shooting drills,
takemedicaltests,gothroughfiveonfivedrills
and perform various athletic tests in front of
National Basketball Association (NBA) coaches,
general managers, and scouts. Athletes attend by
invitation only. An athlete's performance during
the combine can affect perception, draft status,
FisCommunications2018
86
salary, and ultimately the player's career. In this
study,theresultsfromthepastfiveyearswere
takenwith a totalofN =250players divided into
the following subgroups: Point guard N=58,
ShootingguardN=59, Small forwardN=43,Power
forwardN=60andCenterN=30.
Procedure
Inthisresearch, weusedthevariablesthatare
usedinthetestingofplayerswhowereatthe
draft. Data extracted from the following website:
https://stats.nba.com/draft/combinestrength
agility/,basedontheresultsfromthelast5years.
The athletic tests include an athletes
measurementsofastandingverticaljump(inches),
maximum vertical jump (inches), shuttle run
(seconds), three‐quarter‐court sprint time
(seconds) and lane agility time (seconds). The
verticaljump‐isatestofanathlete’sexplosiveleg
power. There are two versions of this test
performed, the standard (no step) vertical jump
andarunning Max Vert. ¾CourtSprint‐ Time to
sprint over the distance of three‐quarters of the
court is measured in seconds. Maximum running
speedisimportantinbasketball,thoughthe
acceleration or time over the first few steps is
probably more important. See the details of the
3/4sprinttestprocedure.LaneAgilityDrill‐Agility
is very important in basketball and is measured
using the lane agility test at the NBA camp. The
LaneAgilitytestmeasureshowfastaplayermoves
laterallyaroundthekey.
Statisticalanalysis
Statisticalanalysiswascarriedoutonrawdata
using one‐way repeatedmeasuresofANOVA
followedbyTukey’sposthoctest(p<0.01wasset
asthelevelofstatisticalsignificance).
RESULTS
Table1OneWayANOVAanddescriptive
MEAN(*p≤0.01)
N
LANEAGILITY
TIME*
SHUTTLE
RUN
THREEQUARTERS
PRINT*
STANDINGVERTICAL
LEAP
MAXVERTICAL
LEAP*
Pointguard 58 11.05 3.02 3.24 30.63 37.08
Shooting
guard 59 11.08 3.06 3.28 30.04 36.30
Small
forward 43 11.32 3.09 3.28 30.51 36.38
Power
forward 60 11.55 3.13 3.36 29.47 34.73
Center 30 11.86 3.10 3.41 28.43 32.43
Table2PostHocTukeyHSDtestforLaneAgilityTest
POSITION Subset foralpha=0.05
123
Pointguard 11,0517
Shootingguard 11,0822
Smallforward 11,3209 11,3209
Powerforward 11,5500
Center 11,8640
Sig. ,075 ,182 1,000
Table3PostHocTukeyHSDtestforTreeQuarterSprinttest
POSITION Subsetforalpha=0.05
1 2
Pointguard 3,2393
Smallforward 3,2763
Shootingguard 3,2825
Powerforward 3,3617
Center 3,4083
Sig. ,321 ,246
InternationalScientificConference
87
Table4PostHocTukeyHSDtestforMaxVerticalLeaptest
POSITION Subsetforalpha=0.05
123
Center 32,433
Powerforward 34,725
Shootingguard 36,297 36,297
Smallforward 36,384 36,384
Pointguard 37,078
Sig. 1,000 ,134 ,804
DISCUSSION
TableNo.1showstheresultsofthedescriptive
statisticsandOneWayANOVA.Wenoticethatin
three variables there are statistically significant
differences between subgroups,
LANEAGILITYTIME, THREEQUARTERSPRINT
andMAXVERTICALLEAPonalevelgreaterthan
0.01.Theseresultsaremostlyverysimilartothe
results of previous researches (Tsitskaris,
Theoharopoulos, & Garefis, 2003, Köklü,
Alemdaroǧlu,Koçak,Erol,&Findikoǧlu,2011).
Given that these studies were conducted on a
sampleofathleteswhodidnotpossessthesame
amount of quality as Draft NBA players, we can
concludethattheperformanceandlevelofthe
playersdonotplayacrucialroleinthedifferences
inthemotorskillsofthebasketballplayers
comparedtothepositiontheyplay.Variable
LaneAgilityTime shows that the minimum
average time was 11.05 seconds for the point
guard subgroup, for which we can say that they
werethefastestonthistest.Theslowestwere
centers with a time of 11.86 seconds. In the next
test,shuttlerun,pointguardsalsohadthebest
average time which was 3:02 seconds, while the
subgroup “power forwards” had the time of 3.13
seconds, where we see that power forwards are
slowerthan thesubgroup “centers” which isvery
interesting considering that the players at these
positionsare usuallyof lessheight and physically
moreprepared.Turningtechniqueand
coordination is also a large factor in this test. At
Three Quarter Sprint variable point guards also
had the best average time of 3.24 seconds, small
forwardsandshootingguardsbothhadthetimeof
3.28,whilecentersweretheslowestwiththetime
of3.41seconds.Whatisunusualisthatonthenext
test, the point guards had the best results even
though speed was not included, At the standing
vertical leap the average height of the jump was
30.63 inches; however, the centers had the worst
results,withtheaveragejumpbeing28.43inches.
Onthelasttest,MaxVerticalLeap,pointguards
once more had the best results with an average
jump height of 37.08 inches, whereas the centers
weretheworstwitha32.43averagejumpheight.
According to post‐hoc analysis, shown in the
followingtables,wecanseethatsubgroups,whose
arithmetic means statistically did not differ
significantly,haveseparatedfromthelowesttothe
highestplayers.Table2showsthatlaneagility
timetesthasthreesubsetplayers,intableno.3for
THREE QUARTER SPRINT two subsets, for MAX
VERTICALLEAP test intable no. 4also 3 subsets.
Thegeneralconclusionisthatthehighestplayers
oftheSubgroup“Centerhadtheweakestresults
inthemaxverticalleapandlaneagilitytimetest
and they were separated as a specialsubset with
veryspecificresultsofmotorskills.
CONCLUSION
Based on the conducted research, using data
collectedfromtheofficialwebsite,itcanbe
concluded that the differences in motor skills in
treated basketball players compared to the
positiontheyplayexistandthattheyaremainly
conditioned by anthropometric characteristics.
Three Quarter Sprint test shows two groups of
basketball players with similarresults, table 3. In
the other two tests, the Agility and Power test,
three groups of athletes were clearly
differentiated, where the centers were isolated
from other players. The obtained results point to
the tendency of the modern basketball that the
differencesinmotorskillsarebecominglesserand
tolookforplayerswhocanequallybegoodatany
position.
REFERENCES
BenAbdelkrim,N.,Chaouachi,A.,Chamari,K.,Chtara,
M., & Castagna, C. (2010). Positional role and
competitive‐level differences in elite‐level men’s
basketballplayers. JournalofStrengthandConditioning
Research, 24(5), 1346–1355.
https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cf7510
Boone, J., & Bourgois, J. (2013). Morphological and
physiological profile of elite basketball players in
Belgium. InternationalJournalofSportsPhysiologyand
Performance.https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.8.6.630
Brauner, T., Zwinzscher, M., & Sterzing, T. (2012).
Basketball footwear requirements are dependent on
playing position. FootwearScience.
https://doi.org/10.1080/19424280.2012.674980
Köklü,Y.,Alemdaroǧlu,U.,Koçak,F.Ü.,Erol,A.E.,&
Findikoǧlu, G. (2011). Comparison of chosen physical
fitnesscharacteristicsof turkish professionalbasketball
players by division and playing position. Journalof
FisCommunications2018
88
HumanKinetics. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10078‐011‐
0077‐y
Scanlan, A. T., Tucker, P. S., & Dalbo, V. J. (2014). A
comparison of linear speed, closed‐skill agility, and
open‐skill agility qualities between backcourt and
frontcourt adult semiprofessional male basketball
players. JournalofStrengthandConditioningResearch,
28(5), 1319–1327.
https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000276
Sekulic,D.,Spasic,M.,Mirkov,D.,Cavar,M.,&Sattler,
T. (2013). Gender‐specific influences of balance, speed,
and power on agility performance. JournalofStrength
andConditioningResearch.
https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31825c2cb0
Tsitskaris,G..B.,Theoharopoulos,A..,&Garefis, A..
(2003). Speed, speed dribble and agility of male
basketballplayersplayingin different positions.Journal
ofHumanMovementStudies.
https://doi.org/refwid:7513
Young,W., & Farrow,D.(2006). A reviewof agility:
practical applications for strength and conditioning.
StrengthandConditioningJournal, 28(5), 24–29.
https://doi.org/10.1519/1533‐
4295(2006)28[24:AROAPA]2.0.CO;2

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate and compare speed, speed dribble and agility of male basketball players playing in different positions. The research sample consisted of 101 male basketball players from divisions A2, B and C of the Greek National League. The athletes were divided into three groups according to the playing position they played in, playmakers (n=28), forwards (shooting guards and small forwards, n=42) and centres (power forwards and centres, n=31). The athletes performed the 20m speed test with and without dribble, and the 20m shuttle run test for agility. "Photocell HL 2-34 Athletic" (photocell system of TAG HEUER ELECTRONIC TIMING) was used to record times. The variables of the study were related to the performance of the players in the specific tests and the reduction of their maximal speed during dribbling or agility. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was the statistical method used for the comparison of players from different positions. The significance level was set at p<0.05. The results showed that playmakers had the best performance in all tests and the least loss of speed while dribbling or changing directions followed by the forwards and the centres. It is worth noting that the loss of speed while dribbling of centres was comparable with that of playmakers and forwards. Significant differences (p<0.05) were found in the speed and agility tests between playmakers and centres.
Article
PURPOSE: The present study aimed to gain insight into the physiological profile of elite basketball players in Belgium in relation to their position on the field. METHODS: The group consisted of 144 players, divided into 5 groups according to position (point guards [PG], shooting guards [SG], small forwards [SF], power forwards [PF] and centers [C]). The anthropometrics were measured and the subjects underwent fitness tests (incremental running test, 10m-sprint,5x10m,Squat and Counter Movement Jump, isokinetic test) to obtain insight into endurance, speed, agility and power. The parameters of these tests were compared among the different positions by means of one-way variance analysis (MANOVA). Tukey post hoc-tests where performed in case of a significant MANOVA. RESULTS: It was observed that C were taller, heavier and had a higher body fat percentage compared to PG and SG. For the anaerobic sprint test C were slower compared to the other positions. For the 5x10m the PG and SG were faster than SF and PF. For the jump test C displayed a significantly lower absolute performance compared to the other positions. PG and SG had a higher VO2peak and speed at the anaerobic threshold compared to PF and C. The isokinetic strength test showed that the quadriceps muscle group of C could exert a higher torque during the knee extension compared to the other positions. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that the physiological profile of elite players in the Belgian first division differs among the position on the field. More specific, guards were characterized by a high endurance, speed and agility, whereas centers and power forwards showed a higher muscular strength compared to the other positions.
Article
The quick change of direction (i.e., agility) is important athletic ability in numerous sports. Because of the diverse and therefore hardly predictable manifestations of agility in sports, studies noted that the improvement in speed, power and balance should result in an improvement of agility.However, there is evident lack of data regarding the influence of potential predictors on different agility manifestations. The aim of the present study was to determine the gender-specific influence of speed, power and balance on different agility tests. A total of 32 college-age male athletes and 31 college-age female athletes (age 20.02 ± 1.89 years) participated in this study. The subjects were mostly involved in team sports (soccer, team handball, basketball and volleyball; 80% of males, and 75% of females), martial arts, gymnastics and dance. Anthropometric variables consisted of body height, body weight, and the body mass index. Five agility tests were used: a t-test (T-TEST), zig-zag test, 20-yard shuttle test, agility test with a 180-degree turn, and forward-backward running agility test (FWDBWD). Other tests included one jumping ability power test (squat jump, SQJ), two balance tests to determine the overall stability index and an overall limit of stability score (both measured by Biodex Balance System), and two running speed tests using a straight sprint for 10 m and 20 m (S10 and S20, respectively). A reliability analysis showed that all of the agility tests were reliable. Multiple regression and correlation analysis found speed and power (among females), and balance (among males), as most significant predictors of agility. The highest Pearson's correlation in both genders is found between the results of the FWDBWD and S10M tests (0.77 and 0.81 for males and females, respectively; P<0.05). Power, measured using the SQJ, is a significantly (P<0.05)related to FWDBWD and T-TEST results but only for females (-0.44; -0.41). The balance measures were significantly related to the agility performance for men but not for women. In addition to demonstrating a known relationship between speed and agility in both genders, and a small but statistically significant relationship between power and agility in females, these results indicate that balance should be considered as a potential predictor of agility in trained adult males.
Article
The purpose of the present study was to compare the physical attributes of elite men's basketball players according to age and specific individual positional roles. Forty-five players from 3 national basketball teams (Under-18 years, Under-20 years, and Senior) were measured for anthropometry (height, body mass, percentage body fat), explosive power (5 jumps and vertical jump), speed (5-m, 10-m, and 30-m sprint), agility (T-test), strength (bench press and squat 1 repetition maximum [1RM]), and intermittent high-intensity endurance performance (Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test [Yo-Yo IR1]). Data on match frequency, training routines, and playing experience were also collected. Under-18 players were significantly (p < 0.05) shorter and lighter than both Senior and Under-20 players but showed higher (p < 0.05) percentage body fat. Under-20 and Senior players were faster and had better explosive-power and agility (p < 0.05) performances than Under-18 players. Bench press and squat 1RMs were higher in Senior players (p < 0.05) compared with the other groups. There were significant difference in the Yo-Yo IR1 performance among groups (Senior > Under-20 > Under-18, p < 0.05). Centers and power forwards were the tallest and the heaviest (p < 0.05). The Yo-Yo IR1 performance was higher (p < 0.01) in point guards than in centers. Point guards showed also better agility and 5- and 10-m performances. Power forwards and centers were stronger than the rest of players' positions in the bench press 1RM (p < 0.01). These results showed the existence of age and positional role differences in fitness performance in men's basketball. Differences were particularly evident in intermittent high-intensity endurance and agility performance. Sprint training possibly should be individualized when dealing with positional roles in elite men's basketball. Strength and conditioning coaches should use Yo-Yo IR1 to assess specific endurance in players of different age and positional role.
A review of agility: practical applications for strength and conditioning
  • W Young
  • D Farrow
Young, W., & Farrow, D. (2006). A review of agility: practical applications for strength and conditioning. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 28(5), 24-29. https://doi.org/10.1519/1533-4295(2006)28[24:AROAPA]2.0.CO;2