A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Brain Structure and Function
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
1 3
Brain Structure and Function (2022) 227:3145–3160
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-022-02558-y
REVIEW
Motor awareness: amodel based onneurological syndromes
ValentinaPacella1,2 · ValentinaMoro3
Received: 6 December 2021 / Accepted: 24 August 2022 / Published online: 6 September 2022
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022
Abstract
Motor awareness is a complex, multifaceted construct involving the awareness of both (i) one’s motor state while executing
a movement or remaining still and (ii) one’s motor abilities. The analysis of neurological syndromes associated with motor
disorders suggests the existence of various different components which are, however, integrated into a model of motor aware-
ness. These components are: (i) motor intention, namely, a conscious desire to perform an action; (ii) motor monitoring
and error recognition, that is, the capacity to check the execution of the action and identify motor errors; and (iii) a general
awareness of one’s own motor abilities and deficits, that is, the capacity to recognize the general state of one’s motor abilities
about the performance of specific actions and the potential consequences of motor impairment. Neuroanatomical correlates
involving the parietal and insular cortices, the medial and lateral frontal regions, and subcortical structures (basal ganglia
and limbic system) support this multi-component model. Specific damage (or disconnections) to these structures results
in a number of different disorders in motor awareness, such as anosognosia for hemiplegia and apraxia, and a number of
symptoms which are specific to motor intention disorders (e.g., the Anarchic Hand Syndrome and Tourette’s Syndrome) or
motor monitoring (e.g., Parkinson’s and Huntington’s diseases). All of these clinical conditions are discussed in the light of
a motor awareness model.
Keywords Motor awareness networks· Model for motor awareness· Motor execution· Motor intention· Motor
monitoring· Sense of agency· Anosognosia
Introduction
When considering motor awareness, one can imagine two
partially different situations: (i) the presence and execution
of an actual movement, of whose an individual is or is not
aware, and (ii) a more general acknowledgement of one’s
own motor abilities (i.e., “I can move that part of my body”;
“I can do that action”—e.g., using a spoon, walking) and
limitations (i.e., “I cannot run a marathon”).
Experiencing the awareness of a movement (or acknowl-
edging an inability to perform it) is the result of various
different, integrated, cognitive components that are related
to the person’s motor state. These might concern an inten-
tion to move or stay still, a sense of being the agent of an
action, an ability to predict sensorimotor feedback, and the
monitoring of the execution of a movement. The ability to
experience one’s own body has been recently introduced
as a necessary component for motor awareness. Specifi-
cally, interoceptive signal processing has been ascribed to
the individual’s voluntary sense of movement, with the will
to move emerging from the perceived body signals (Ganos
etal. 2015a). Indeed, the multisensory integration of infor-
mation coming from the body contributes to motor aware-
ness as it allows the individual to maintain a sense of bodily
self (Craig 2009) and the representation of their own body
in terms of proprioception and limb position in space (Sirigu
etal. 1991; Coslett etal. 2008; Romano etal. 2013) during
the execution of a movement. Moreover, the feeling of being
in control of one’s own actions defines the sense of agency,
which also contributes to the aware motor performance and
* Valentina Pacella
valentina.pacella.90@gmail.com
* Valentina Moro
valentina.moro@univr.it
1 Groupe d’Imagerie Neurofonctionnelle, Institut des Maladies
Neurodégénératives-UMR 5293, CNRS, CEA University
ofBordeaux, 33076Bordeaux, CS, France
2 Brain Connectivity andBehaviour Laboratory, Sorbonne
Universities, Paris, France
3 NPSY.Lab-VR, Department ofHuman Sciences, University
ofVerona, Lungadige Porta Vittoria 17, 37129Verona, Italy
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.