ArticlePublisher preview available
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.
LETTER
Infectious complications after hyaluronic acid injectionsTwo
case reports
Dear Editor
As the number of cosmetic procedures performed increases, there is
also an increase in the number of side effects. Among them are infec-
tious complications, which can be divided into early and late. Most
often, they are of bacterial or viral origin.
We present two case reports with infectious complications after
hyaluronic acid injections.
First patient, a 54-year-old female presented to the Emergency
Department (ER) on October 16, 2021, with a fever of 38C, itchy,
erythematous lesions on the face, tender to the touch, with increased
warmth and consistency. Past medical history included atopic derma-
titis, bronchial asthma, urticaria, and Hashimoto's disease.
Five days before admission to the ER, on October 11, she was
administered hyaluronic acid in the area of the nasolabial folds by a
beautician. The initial symptoms appeared 4 h post-procedure. At the
admission to the ER, laboratory tests revealed a decreased level of
lymphocytes (0.68 [10
9
/l]), an increased level of neutrophils (7.63
[10
9
]), a rise in C Reactive Protein (CRP levels 53 mg/dl), and anti-
streptolysin O (ASO) was 420 IU/ml. Performed pharyngeal swab
revealed Streptococcus group C. Based on the clinical picture and
additional tests, the diagnosis of erysipelas of the face was made.
Therefore, she was prescribed Penicillin 1000 mg twice daily. On
November 10, 2021, all symptoms have resolved.
Two months post-injection, in mid-December 2021, the second
episode occurred. The patient reported similar symptoms to those dur-
ing the first admission. (Figure 1) Since that was her second episode of
erysipelas, the patient was instructed to take Penicillin 1000 mg twice
daily for the following 6 months. In February 2022, ASO decreased to
197.4 IU/ml and the patient remains asymptomatic.
The second patient is a 42-year old female, without diagnosed
chronic diseases and with no history of allergic reactions. She
reported three transient swelling of the infraorbital area along with
the upper and lower lips. (Figure 1) Over the last 4 years, these places
were injected with hyaluronic acid several timestear trough filler
(total volume =2.8 ml), lip augmentation (total volume =1.5 ml), as
well as nasolabial fold filler (total volume =1.0 ml).
Each episode occurred 36 months post HA injection starting in
August 2019, during infection of the throat and tonsils with accompa-
nying fever. Two to three days after the onset of the throat infection
symptoms, the patient would experience a feeling of distension
around the lips and infraorbital area. The physical examination
revealed no accompanying redness, increased warmth, or tenderness
on palpation. The swelling would resolve spontaneously after 3 days
each time, with only cool compresses applied to the infraorbital and
lip area.
Infectious complications such as cellulitis, abscess formation,
and other may occur when injecting dermal fillers due to a tempo-
rarily disrupted skin barrier. Erysipelas is an acute inflammation of
the skin that is prone to recur in the lower limbs, face, and other
areas. It is often caused by β-hemolytic streptococci group A (Strep-
tococcus pyogenes).
1
Erysipelas presents as an acute onset of local
inflammation and tender erythema with a sharp border to the unaf-
fected skin. Several studies discussed recurrent erysipelas,
24
none-
theless, to our knowledge our patient is the first case report of
recurrent erysipelas of the face as a complication after hyaluronic
acid injection.
Late-onset inflammatory reactions are uncommon complications
that may arise post injections with hyaluronic acid fillers. Their course
is rather unpredictable and can present weeks to months after treat-
ment. However, the exact mechanism is not fully understood and is
yet to be established. Nonetheless, the origin might be infectious,
immune-mediated, and related to filler properties, trauma, or injection
technique (filler volume, number of treatments). It may also be linked
to a flu-like illness or COVID-19 infections.
57
Delayed hypersensitivity reaction to HA post infection is rela-
tively scarce. Hypersensitivity type IV, initiated by T-lymphocytes
andmediatedbyCD4+cells, is proposed to be the underlying
cause of delayed swelling of hyaluronic acid fillers.
6
In our case
report, the most credible trigger seems to be a throat infection.
Furthermore, Homsy et al. presented two patients with an immune-
mediated delayed hypersensitivity after sore throat
8
;however,
unlike our patient, medical intervention was required to relieve
symptoms.
To conclude, complications after hyaluronic acid injections can
occur at any time after the procedure, however, the biggest risk of
infection arises during the procedure. Practitioners are responsible to
screen patients for potential risk factors by collecting a thorough medi-
cal history and performing a physical examination. Hypersensitivity
reaction is a potential risk for each patient undergoing hyaluronic acid
dermal filler injection since systemic infections are inevitable. No clini-
cal studies investigated this problem yet, hence management is often
challenging.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Conceptualization: Wioletta Bara
nska-Rybak and Zuzanna
´
Swierczewska. Patients' data: Natallia Romanowska and Wioletta
Received: 28 April 2022 Revised: 13 June 2022 Accepted: 31 July 2022
DOI: 10.1111/dth.15752
Dermatologic Therapy. 2022;35:e15752. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/dth © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC. 1of3
https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.15752
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Delayed reactions after facial hyaluronic acid injection are relatively rare complications. Their cause may be infectious or immune-mediated in origin, and their outbreak can be triggered, for example, by an influenza-like illness. Objective: To describe potential adverse event of influenza like illness following dermal filler injection. Methods: We report fourteen unusual cases of delayed hypersensitivity reaction to several brands of hyaluronic acid dermal filler following influenza like illness. Results: Increasing evidence implicates influenza infection in the pathogenesis of late onset filler reaction. Conclusion: Although there is a low risk of late onset adverse reaction with hyaluronic acid fillers, injecting physicians must be aware of the possible filler reaction following the influenza infection.
Article
Full-text available
BACKGROUND: Erysipelas is a common infectious skin disease. A typical feature of erysipelas, especially on the lower limbs, is the tendency to reoccur and the study aimed to define the comorbidities associated with it. AIM: We aimed to investigate systemic and local comorbidities in patients diagnosed with erysipelas on the lower limbs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospectively-prospective, population-based cohort study which included all patients diagnosed with erysipelas on the lower limbs, during two years. Patients were divided into two groups: patients with first episode and patients with recurrent erysipelas. These two groups were compared, with particular emphasis on systemic and local comorbidities. RESULTS: The study included 313 patients, of which 187 with the first episode of erysipelas and 126 with a recurrent. Regarding the analyzed systemic risk factors, the recurrent erysipelas was significantly associated with obesity (p < 0.0001), insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (p = 0.0015), history of malignant disease (p = 0.02) and tonsillectomy (p = 0.000001). For a p-value < 0.0001, significantly more frequent finding of peripheral arterial occlusive disease, chronic oedema/lymphoedema, fungal infections of the affected leg and chronic ulcer was confirmed in recurrent erysipelas. Neuropathy had 23% of the recurrent cases and 8.6% in patients without recurrence, and the difference was found to be significant for p = 0.0003. The only dissection of the lymph nodes was found more frequently in recurrent erysipelas (p = 0.017), but no associations with other analysed local surgery on the affected leg. Patients with recurrent erysipelas had ipsilateral coexisting dermatitis p = 0.00003 significantly more frequent. Minor trauma often preceded the first episode of erysipelas p = 0.005. CONCLUSION: Identification and treatment of modifiable risk factors are expected to reduce the risk of a subsequent episode of erysipelas on the lower limbs
Article
Full-text available
The aetiology of erysipelas remains poorly defined though beta-haemolytic streptococci are considered as the main causative pathogens. We describe a case of a 70-year-old woman with recurrent erysipelas in her left arm due to infection with streptococci of the mitis group. Her past medical history includes lymphoedema of the left arm secondary to lymph node dissection due to breast cancer surgery. On seven different occasions during a decade, she has presented a clinical picture of erysipelas and in three of them with Streptococcus mitis group bacteraemia. The results indicate that two cases were caused by Streptococcus mitis and one case was caused by Streptococcus oralis . This is, to our knowledge, the first reported cases of S. mitis and of S. oralis as the causative agents of erysipelas.
Article
Full-text available
We report two rare cases of inflammatory reactions with multiple subcutaneous facial painful collections after Hyaluronic acid injections, expose their management and discuss aetiologic hypothesis. Due to unfavourable evolution despite antibiotic treatment, surgical drainage was performed. Immune-mediated delayed hypersensitivity reactions were the most probable cause.
Article
The incidence of hypersensitivity reactions to hyaluronic acid dermal fillers is between 0.3 and 4.25%, mediated by T‐lymphocytes. Flu‐like illness can trigger immunogenic reactions at the site of filler placement. Cases of SARS‐CoV‐2 are significant, and pose a possible risk of inducing hypersensitivity. This case report is of a delayed type hypersensitivity after hyaluronic acid dermal filler treatment of the nose and subsequent infection with SARS‐CoV‐2. Risk factors for the development of such symptoms were identified as the presence of hyaluronic acid combined with flu‐like illness and repeated treatment of one area. The case resolved without intervention. Clinicians should be mindful of the risk posed by the interaction of hyaluronic acid dermal filler with SARS‐CoV‐2 in light of the pandemic.
Article
Dermal fillers have been an effective therapy for people pursuing non‐invasive facial rejuvenation.¹ Hyaluronic acid (HA) soft tissue fillers specifically; have become a popular device for enhancement of facial features over the last few years.² We are presenting a case of a 32 years old lady treated at The Esthetic Clinics, Mumbai in February 2020 for facial rejuvenation. She was rejuvenated using dermal fillers at multiple sites on her face. The patient is a regular patient with us and had facial rejuvenation with dermal fillers regularly since the past 6 years and has never reported any reactions or adverse effects related to dermal fillers in the past. (Figure 1‐A & B)
Article
Recurrence is a common complication of erysipelas (cellulitis). Todescribe the characteristics of patients with recurrent erysipelas and thereby, identify potential risk factors and evaluate prophylaxis efficacy. Data were retrospectively recorded from the files of 47 patients admitted to hospital between 1995 and 2003 for erysipelas recurrence. Studied variables included: general condition, regional and local factors, e.g. broken cutaneous barrier. Patient characteristics were used to construct tree-based models according to the classification and regression tree methodology. Our patients suffered a mean of 4.1 recurrences. Cutaneous barrier disruption was observed in 81%, mainly intertrigo (60%). Antibiotic prophylaxis was taken by 68% of the patients for 30.6 months. After 1 and 2 years, 84 and 72% of the patients, respectively, were recurrence-free. Our results showed that erysipelas recurrence has the same risk factors as single episodes and underlines the potential benefit of oral or parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent recurrences.
Article
Erysipelas is a distinctive type of superficial cellulitis of the skin with prominent lymphatic involvement, generally caused by group A streptococci. A substantial proportion of patients experience recurrences of erysipelas, and this may be a reason to install prophylactic antibiotic treatment. Despite such prophylaxis, further recurrences are occasionally encountered. To investigate recurrences of erysipelas during prophylactic antibiotic treatment and to delineate the reasons for such failure. Retrospective chart review of 117 adult patients with episodes of erysipelas known in our institution between 1990 and 2004. Recurrent episodes of erysipelas, despite prophylactic treatment, were found in eight patients. Our analysis indicated noncompliance, incorrect selection and insufficient dosing of antibiotics, and causative pathogens other than streptococci as demonstrable causes of the recurrence of erysipelas. In three patients, a reason for failure could not be identified. In a minority of cases, erysipelas recurs despite antibiotic prophylaxis. Based on these cases, we first recommend that all efforts are made to (re)confirm the diagnosis of erysipelas and search for the causative microorganism. Based on this information, the right antibiotic with adequate dosing and timing can be selected. The issue of compliance with the prophylactic treatment should be addressed and finally, the clinician should be aware that prophylaxis does not prevent erysipelas in all cases.
Comorbidities as risk factors for acute and recurrent erysipelas. Open Access Maced
  • V Brishkoska-Boshkovski
  • I Kondova-Topuzovska
  • K Damevska
  • A Petrov
Brishkoska-Boshkovski V, Kondova-Topuzovska I, Damevska K, Petrov A. Comorbidities as risk factors for acute and recurrent erysipelas. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7:937-942. doi:10.3889/oamjms.2019.214