ArticlePDF Available

THE GEOPOLITICAL IMPORTANCE OF AFGHANISTAN FOR INDIA IN THE 21 st CENTURY

Authors:
  • Hemvati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University
  • PROF. RAJENDRA SINGH (RAJJU BHAIYA) STATE UNIVERSITY, PRAYAGRAJ, U.P., INDIA

Abstract

This review paper explores and overview of the geopolitical importance of Afghanistan for India in the 21 st century's geostrategic and geo-economics environment. After the withdrawal of the USA from Afghanistan and recapture of city Kabul by Taliban has deteriorated the strategic and security calculus of south Asia. India is the Neighbouring country of Afghanistan and a true supporter of Afghan-led and Afghan-owned government. This study will also try to suggest the regional and global significance of Afghanistan for peace, security and development.
105 JOURNAL OF THE ASIATIC SOCIETY OF MUMBAI, ISSN: 0972-0766, Vol. XCV, No.28, 2022
THE GEOPOLITICAL IMPORTANCE OF AFGHANISTAN FOR INDIA IN THE 21st
CENTURY
Devaki Nandan Research Scholar, Department of Defence Strategic and Geopolitical Studies,
Hemvati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal Central University, Srinagar, Uttarakhand
Dr Bharti Chauhan Professor, Department of Defence Strategic and Geopolitical Studies, Hemvati
Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal Central University, Srinagar, Uttarakhand
Rahul Kumar Assistant Professor, Department of Defence and Strategic Studies P.R.S. University
Naini, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh
Abstract: This review paper explores and overview of the geopolitical importance of Afghanistan for
India in the 21st century’s geostrategic and geo-economics environment. After the withdrawal of the
USA from Afghanistan and recapture of city Kabul by Taliban has deteriorated the strategic and
security calculus of south Asia. India is the Neighbouring country of Afghanistan and a true supporter
of Afghan-led and Afghan-owned government. This study will also try to suggest the regional and
global significance of Afghanistan for peace, security and development.
Keywords: Afghanistan, India, Taliban, Geopolitics, Strategy, Security, Peace
Introduction: Geopolitics is a trinity of the relationship among history, geography and strategy (Sloan,
2017). Geopolitics seeks to analyse the interaction between the spatial setting and political process,
i.e., in broader perspective politics, especially international relations as influenced by geographical
factors. Therefore, geopolitical studies emphasise how geographical configuration such as location,
climate, natural resources, population and physical terrain determines states foreign policy (Grygiel,
2006). From its inception, as a gateway to India, Afghanistan has had great strategic importance. The
control of Afghanistan means having strategic control on their trade routes. Conceptually, Afghanistan
is a focal point of strategic interest and crossroad for the geopolitical and geoeconomics struggle for
power and dominance in the region. Further, it is surrounded by powerful neighbours. It plays a vital
role in efficiently connecting the regions and for this reason, remain a geopolitical necessity for any
great power (Adamec, 2003). Notably, Afghanistan is the crossroad of routes in Asia. Historically
Afghanistan has always been the epicentre of the great game (Bird & Marshall, 2011). Further, its
geopolitical location had attracted the regional and international actors to manifest rivalry in this
theatre. Earlier British India, later USSR and USA were the part of a great game. These all
superpowers had succumbed in a very deteriorated way in front of brave Afghans. It has the fearless
and tireless resistance of its brave people. Now is quite interesting to see what will happen because
now China is interested in becoming a new player in a never-ending great game in Afghanistan. It is
quite interesting that these Afghans have never liked to be conquered. “When everyone is dead the
Great Game is finished. Not before.” Rudyard Kipling (Edwards, 2003). After fighting the longest-
running war in Afghanistan the USA has decided that it will withdraw all remaining troops by the
twentieth anniversary of 9/11. The USA withdrawal would be embroiled the regional geopolitical
antagonism in Afghanistan (Remarks by President Biden on the Way Forward in Afghanistan, 2021).
The exit of the USA and entering China into Afghanistan will be beneficial to Pakistan. In this context,
it will be a herculean task for Indian policymakers to pursue a strategic interest in Afghanistan
including maintaining connectivity up to the Central Asian Republic.
The Geopolitics of Afghanistan: Its regional and global significances
Afghanistan a mountainous landlocked country is, historically, geographically, politically,
culturally and strategically a part of central Asia. Owning to religious, Political, geographical features
is also a part of South Asia and West Asia (I. Khan, 1998). Its borders are connected with China,
Pakistan, Iran, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan. Afghanistan has a small stretch of border
with India but due to illegal occupation of POK, it’s disputed. Geography and history have left
106 JOURNAL OF THE ASIATIC SOCIETY OF MUMBAI, ISSN: 0972-0766, Vol. XCV, No.28, 2022
Afghanistan a fractured landscape. The country’s forbidding landscape of desert and mountain has laid
down many imperial ambitions to rest. The total area of Afghanistan is 652,200 km2. The Northern
and Southern part of Afghanistan is split by the Hindukush Mountain. Other major mountains dominate
the central and eastern part of Afghanistan, covering about three-fourths of the country (Political Map
of Afghanistan - Nations Online Project, n.d.). The Pamir mountains to the northeast are the trijunction
between Tajikistan, Afghanistan and China. In the East, the passes in the Suleiman mountain range
like the famous Khaybar passes have provided access to the Indian subcontinent (Roy, 2015).
The history of Afghanistan has been subject to intervention by external powers (Nojumi, 2016).
Afghanistan is a trijunction between Central Asia, West Asia and South Asia. The geopolitical,
geostrategic and geo-economic salience of Central Asia, West Asia and South Asia is a bone of
contention and power projection among regional, extra-regional and external superpowers in
Afghanistan. The main purpose of all-powerful nations is to maintain control over trade routes, oil
and natural gases resources. It is also a fact that Afghanistan holds a significant deposit of rare earth
elements. According to the U.S Geological Survey, approximately 1 million metric tons of rare earth
elements resources are hidden in Afghanistan’s Helmand province (Simpson, 2011). These earth
metals are essential to building UAVs, turbines, electric vehicles and other ICT equipment (Schmid,
2019). Today due to energy security needs pipelines are important in the same way as the railways
building was important in the 19th century, it connects trading partners and influence the entire region
TAPI project is its glaring example. Further escalating traditional and non-traditional threats and
challenges posed by religious extremism, terrorism, narco-terrorism, nuclear material proliferation and
aggressive nationalism is also the basic cause to escalate rivalry among concerned countries (Joshi &
Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program, 2010). As it is well known that
Afghanistan is a landlocked country, it has limited connectivity access to regional and international
trade further any land lock country’s peace security and prosperity depends on those of its surrounding
neighbours. Since the Taliban regime change in 2001, the Afghan government had shown its
commitment to don’t interfere in the internal affairs of any nation and don’t allow any country to utilise
Afghanistan’s soils against its neighbours (A Peaceful Afghanistan Key to Regional Connectivity in
South and Central Asia, n.d.).
Kabul declaration on good-neighbour relations was signed on 22 December 2002 by the
Transnational administration of Afghanistan and the governments of China, Pakistan, Iran,
Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan. Now when after fighting the longest war in any external
land the USA and NATO have decided to withdraw, the role of these neighbouring countries including
India is inevitable to strengthen peace, security and prosperity in Afghanistan (Weitz, 2015).
China: In Afghanistan, above mentioned neighbouring nations have their interest. Afghanistan is
already of strategic and geo-economics interest for China owing to the withdrawal of the USA, Chinese
influence will grow in this region. China is curiously overserving pros and cons. Afghanistan has a
diplomatic priority to China as it wants to convince Afghanistan to join its own most ambitious and
flagship project BRI (Belt and Road Initiative), further China look to use Afghanistan as a corridor for
its ‘March West’ strategy (Hong, 2013). China is also worried about its internal security interest as it
wants to prevent moral and ideological support to its Uyghur secessionist groups from Afghanistan.
After the regime change in Kabul, the Taliban had assured China that it will not support separatists’
activities in its prone and vulnerable Xinjiang province.
Pakistan: Pakistan due to its security and economic interest is so keen to be a pivotal actor in the
Afghan Peace process. Pakistan priorities in Afghanistan are to prevent Indian influence in this region
generally Pakistan backed the Taliban regime in this condition because the Taliban is ideologically
reliable and military resilient against growing Indian influence in this region. To build up economic
and energy security connectivity up to Central Asia, in the vis-à-vis confrontation with India utilise
Afghanistan as a place of strategic depth, establish safe heaven to Pakistan trained extremist group as
it is obvious that notorious Pakistani intelligence agency has linkage with the Taliban and Al-Qaeda
(Singh, n.d.). Pakistan is regularly making effort to compel Afghanistan to leave its claim over
107 JOURNAL OF THE ASIATIC SOCIETY OF MUMBAI, ISSN: 0972-0766, Vol. XCV, No.28, 2022
Pashtuns. Pakistan wants to train extremists in Afghanistan and to penetrate them in the Indian state
of Jammu and Kashmir. Pakistan has an ambition that every country must know that it's essential to
Afghanistan reconciliation talk and oppose Afghanistan regional integration (Hanauer & Chalk, 2012).
Iran: Iran is a great actor in the Asian especially West Asian geopolitical rivalry. Iran is a unique
country in the Islamic fauna because it has an overwhelmingly more Shia population than Sunni
(Matin, 2013). As Iran shares a border with Afghanistan here the Taliban government is in the way to
uphold political and administrative power. So apart from their sectarian and ideological differences,
the Islamic Republic and the ‘’ Islamic Emirates, The Tehran-Taliban rivalry would be manifest
(Akbarzadeh & Ibrahimi, 2020). Iran wants to maintain harmonious relations with Afghanistan. The
USA had labelled Iran the biggest threat to stability in the region (Milani, 2006). Iran is so keen to
American exit from Afghanistan, Iran has joined hands with China and Russia to shape geostrategy
and geo-economy in this region.
Turkmenistan: Turkmenistan lies along the northwest frontier of Afghanistan. As a non-
traditional threat narco (illicit opium production) abuses in Turkmenistan is rapidly growing. As
Afghanistan is responsible to produce 90% of illicit opium so Turkmenistan government expect to
make effort to interdict drug shipment from this country (Bradford, 2019). Including it, Turkmenistan
is interested in the economic ties with Afghanistan. In this process, Turkmenistan continuously
supplies energy at a great discount to Afghanistan. Turkmenistan has the largest underdeveloped oil
and natural gas resources in the world. It supplies natural gas through the Trans-Afghan natural gas
pipeline to India through Afghanistan and Pakistan (Ahmadzai & McKinna, 2018).
Uzbekistan: Uzbekistan’s vital interest in Afghanistan finally settling peace is generally twofold.
First, as Uzbek President Shavkat Mirziyoyev said in March 2018 “Secure Afghanistan means secure
Uzbekistan’’ (Weitz, 2018). Second, Uzbekistan has the ambition in playing a greater economic role
in Afghanistan. It is interested in the economic project to connect the country to major international
transportation corridors with access to seaports in South Asia and the Middle East (Baizakova &
Baizakova, 2014).
Tajikistan: Tajikistan has its security and economic interest in Afghanistan. Since Afghanistan
is responsible for more than 90 % of illicit opium production. These narco products supply all over the
world through these central Asian countries in which Tajikistan is prominent (Nawa, 2012). Except it,
the illegal drug trade enriches the non-state actors which are indulged in it such as the Taliban and
their allies the IMU (Islamic Movement of Afghanistan) and other criminal groups that continuously
threaten the sovereignty and stability of the country. In 2008 Tajikistan, Iran and Afghanistan agreed
to form the Economic Council of the Persian speaking Union and shown commitment to improving
transportation links -road and rail, further trade between these three countries (Joharifard, 2010).
Afghanistan has its own energy needs it has sought to import energy from Tajikistan. In brief, both
countries are mutual and equally important to fulfil needs.
Russia & America Rivalry in Afghanistan:
Afghanistan plays a crucial role in regional as well as international strategic and geo-economic
dynamics. In the above paragraphs linkages between regional actors have been discussed but here it is
essential to discuss the USA and Russian interest in Afghanistan because overtly or covertly both
countries have impacted the regional as well as extra-geopolitics of Afghanistan. For Russia,
Afghanistan is important in four domains such as security, economy, power projection and
connectivity.
Russia: Russian main security concern is due to the rise of Islamic fundamentalism in Central
Asia. Russia has the peril of spread of ‘warlordism’ into neighbouring Central Asian republic. They
could ‘Afghanise’ the entire region. As a non-traditional threat drug trafficking is also a crux to a
Russian security analyst. The Afghan quagmire and weak economy were the main causes of the
disintegration of the erstwhile USSR. Russia is making effort to boost its economy and reoccupy its
reputation in the international community. In this way, Russia is trying to develop a single economic
108 JOURNAL OF THE ASIATIC SOCIETY OF MUMBAI, ISSN: 0972-0766, Vol. XCV, No.28, 2022
zone in which Central Asia will play a crucial role. An existing Afghan threat will always be vulnerable
to the union’s economy. Further, Afghanistan is rich in mineral resources a report has revealed that it
has untapped mineral deposits that could exceed a trillion dollars. American geologists have
discovered huge mineral deposits in Afghanistan: the ‘Saudi Arabia’ of lithium. Apart from it, various
hidden Rare Earth Elements extraction will be beneficial to Russia to boost its economy (Sangar,
2016). In the process of power projection, Russia has joined hands with China and Iran. Now when
the USA and its NATO allies are approximately packing to withdraw. By upholding a clutch over
Central Asia and Afghanistan (Krastev & Holmes, 2019), Russia will be a crucial factor in the Middle
East geopolitical rivalry. Owing to their geographical location it is well known that peaceful and
prosperous Afghanistan will spill over peace and prosperity all over the region. Further, it could
connect South and Central Asia Including Russia.
America: The United States of America is the most influential and determinant country which has
affected the geopolitical setting of Afghanistan. Vividly, it is quite interesting that from 1979
Afghanistan had become the focal point of American geopolitical interest (Hilali, 2017). Treacherously
Americas had supported the Mujahidin with weaponry and logistics against the USSR’s intervention.
But in the 21st, 9\11 it was exposed that the incumbent Taliban government had linkage with the
notorious terror group Al-Qaeda (Taj, 2011), which were utterly responsible for an exterminated terror
attack in the mainland of the USA. The Bush administration and NATO declared the Global war
against terrorism in Afghanistan. Post 9\11 the principal objective of the U.S in Afghanistan has been
to prevent a terrorist attack on the USA and become a peril to its people and assets, or U.S allies
elsewhere (Mir, 2010). Further, ensure that Afghanistan’s territory is not used for sponsoring terrorism
worldwide. Other American interests in Afghanistan are to maintain regional BoP (Balance of Power).
Curb and Crackdown Chinese, Iranian and Russian influence in South Asia, Central Asia and oil-rich
West Asia. Including it as the USA always claim that as a responsible democracy, they are committed
to ensuring human rights, minorities rights and women’s rights, - as well as humanitarian issues,
particularly minimising the suffering and death due to war, illness, or starvation, and enabling inclusive
socio-economic development in Afghanistan.
India is also the neighbouring (due to Pakistan Occupied Kashmir it is disputed) and regional
country of Afghanistan. Like other neighbours, she also has had various interests in Afghanistan. India,
China and Pakistan are the prominent countries the South Asia and Afghanistan affairs (Snedden,
2016). The rivalry between India one hand and China-Pakistan on the other hand has affected the
geopolitical setting of this region. Due to this geopolitical, geo-economic, and geostrategic rivalry,
there is a lack of synergy to peace, prosperity, stability and humanitarian development in this region
(Z. Khan, 2016). This stratagem has directly and indirectly affected the entire region. India, Pakistan,
Afghanistan and China can’t flee from redundancy. India is committed to an ‘Afghan-led and Afghan
owned’ government. A peaceful and prosperous Afghanistan will bring peace and prosperity to the
entire region (Ali, n.d.).
Geo-strategic and geo-economic Significance of Afghanistan for India
India and Afghanistan have civilizational, geographical, social, cultural, religious, humanitarian
and emotional links (Pate, 2018). The incumbent prime minister Narendra Modi said, “India -
Afghanistan ties are ancient as history”. Afghanistan’s geographical location is known as both the
‘Heart of Asia’ and ‘The graveyard of empires’ (Thubron, 2012). Both these features manifest that its
geography must be read very wisely to detangle Geo-strategic and Geo-economic challenges. Until
the arrival of Islam, Arab traders, religious preachers and armies, Culturally and politically it was also
part of the great Indian subcontinent. The great Mauryan empire’s territory was extended up to
Hindukush Mountain. Afghanistan was the cradle of Buddhism and Hinduism culture. The statue of
Bamiyan Buddha is the epitome of this peaceful religion in Afghanistan. Buddhism was expanded up
to Central Asia and China via Afghanistan. In the medieval period the great Mughal empire whose
founder Babur was the native of Afghanistan. From the medieval period geopolitically, Afghanistan
109 JOURNAL OF THE ASIATIC SOCIETY OF MUMBAI, ISSN: 0972-0766, Vol. XCV, No.28, 2022
has had a prominent role in the security, survival, prosperity and harmony of India. Many ambitious
sects and clans and emperors (Mahmud Ghaznavi, Muhammad Ghori, Babur, Nader Shah, and Ahmad
Shah Durrani) had emanated from Afghanistan to create mayhem, spread religion, extend territory and
loot this prosperous nation. During colonial rule in India, after the Crimean war and commence of the
Great Game (a political and diplomatic confrontation) to maintain the Balance of Power the British
Indian government tried to make Afghanistan a buffer state. British authority was aware of the reality
that India was vulnerable to the Russian empire attack from Afghanistan (Wang, 2017).
During the Cold War, Pakistan joined hands with Western security alliances SEATO and CENTO
under the stewardship of the U.S. The geopolitical rivalry between the USA and USSR, directly and
indirectly, affected the security of the entire South Asian continent. After the Saur Revolution in
Afghanistan communist party took control and power over the country. To support this government
the USSR launched a covert Operation Storm-333 that took place on 27 December 1979. The USSR
installed Babrak Karmal as Amin’s successor. In this Soviet-Afghan war, the USA with the help of
Pakistan supported an insurgents’ group (the Mujahideen). The USA, USSR geopolitical rivalry’s
litmus test which took place in India’s neighbourhood directly and indirectly affected her strategic and
security parameters (Hilali, 2017). Afghanistan’s geopolitical litmus test was proved beneficial to
Pakistan which has an aspiration to fight thousands of years of war with India. Under the golden
opportunity of the Soviet-Afghan war Pakistan developed trustworthy relations with the USA, China
provided technical support and the USA provide approval to enrich its nuclear material further to
become a nuclear state. After the victory of the Mujahidin over the infidel, Soviets Pakistan becomes
a prominent actor in the Islamic community. OIC always shows solidarity over Kashmir against India.
Pakistan seeks ‘Strategic Depth’ in Afghanistan against India. The Taliban regime with the support of
Pakistan is on its way to holding power in Afghanistan. If the Taliban came into power in Afghanistan,
it could be devastating security challenges to India’s policymakers to subdue Pakistan influence over
Afghanistan (Weinbaum, 1997).
India -Afghanistan ties are strengthened by empathy, security and mutual development needs. India
wants a strong government in Afghanistan. Because it will prevent Pakistan to utilise Afghanistan as
a ‘Strategic Depth’ and haven for the terror group (Siddique, 2011). India is the victim of state-
sponsored terrorism of Pakistan, which wants to bleed India by thousands of cuts. India has ambitions
to Afghan-led and Afghan-owned government. By strengthening Afghanistan, India advances its own
security needs and objective (Kaura, 2017a). Erstwhile Indian prime minister Lt. Atal Bihari Vajpayee
once said “We can forget our history but not geography’’ i.e., we can change our friends, not our
neighbours. Therefore, we should live peacefully adjust to them. India, Pakistan and Afghanistan have
historical, cultural linkages. Disharmony and conflict in any one country would affect all nations. In
the geoeconomics dimension, it is quite a crystal clear that stable and prosperous Afghanistan means
more economic opportunities to the entire region including India(Racine, 2002). From a connectivity
perspective, Afghanistan is always considered as India’s gateway to Central Asia (Kaura, 2017b).
India’s Afghan Policy for Peace & Tranquilities
India’s Afghan policy is crystal clear to establish her friendly government in Afghanistan and
provide it humanitarian and state-building capability. Through all these steps India wants to protect
her long-term aspirations in Afghanistan (Goodson, 2003). During the Soviet-led intervention, India
was the only South Asian country to the recognized pro-Soviet Democratic Republic of Afghanistan
in 1980. Initially, India’s policymakers make moral efforts to get some political solution to the Soviets
withdrawal from the war-affected country. With generosity, India offered to work with Pakistan in this
situation. But Pakistan’s Zia-ul-Haq firmly refused to oblige. After the USSR with an exit from
Afghanistan in 1989, India pursued the policy to assist Najibullah’s government with humanitarian aid
(India’s Afghan Policy, n.d.). It’s also notable that India provided military assistance to the Northern
Alliance whose rival group were the Taliban, backed by Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (Yadav
& Barwa, 2011). Finally, the Taliban regime took control of Afghanistan. Pakistan and other Arab
110 JOURNAL OF THE ASIATIC SOCIETY OF MUMBAI, ISSN: 0972-0766, Vol. XCV, No.28, 2022
countries such as Saudi Arabia and the UAE recognised the Taliban government. Gaining authority
over Afghanistan always manifested anti-India gestures in its territory. In 1999, the hijacked Indian
Airlines Flight 814 landed at Kandahar in Afghanistan and the Taliban government were suspected to
have nexus with Jaish-e-Mohammed and Laskar-e-Taiba with its complete support. In the same
antagonistic posture, the Taliban government destroyed the Bamiyan Buddha monuments. All these
events deteriorated India and the Taliban relations (Dixit, 2003).
After the 9/11 attack on WTC and Pentagon, the USA declared a Global war Against Terrorism
and launched “Operation Enduring Freedom’’ in Afghanistan against the Taliban regime in November
2001. This event provided an opportunity for India to establish relations with Afghanistan and pursue
its strategic interest, which had affected in a deteriorated way during the Taliban regime. Mr Jastvant
Singh, then Indian external affairs minister, during his visit to the USA in 2001 urged the international
community should support the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan. Mr Singh also added that “India has
never recognised the Taliban regime as a legitimate regime. We have continued to recognize the
government of Afghanistan represented by President Rabbani. They have formed the Northern alliance
…it should be the effort of the international community now to strengthen the legitimate government
of Afghanistan” (Ashraf, 2007). India as a most favourable country enhanced amicable relations with
the Afghanistan government. In 2005, India was a strong supporter and proposed Afghanistan’s
membership in the SAARC. Both the countries followed the will to share strategic and intelligence
cooperation against the Islamic militia (Ghale, 2015). During recent two decades, the Indian
government has committed approximately US$3 billion towards humanitarian assistance, basic
infrastructure development and rebuilding governance capacity to enhance human development in
Afghanistan. India has assisted Afghanistan through various humanitarian initiative, a million tonnes
of wheat, rejuvenating and rebuilding hospitals, and providing major health projects.
On 10 September 2021 New Delhi hosted the Third Regional Security Dialogue on Afghanistan at the
level of National Security Advisers (NSAs). This Delhi Declaration reaffirmed a conclusion and
manifest commitment that ‘’Afghanistan would never become a haven for global terrorism’’.
Conclusion: In the 21st-century geopolitics has been changed into geoeconomics. Any country’s
peace, prosperity and growth as a rising tide depend upon the economy because the economic
challenges develop various social, ethnic, political, physical and mental changes. Including it, it is
also the hard reality that the Taliban’s return to the city of Kabul could be a haven for terrorism and
these terror groups as domino effects will spread all over the world from the Af-Pak area. India has
vital economic, strategic, cultural interests and seeks to maintain energy needs and connectivity from
the Middle -East and Central Asian Republic countries. Therefore, New Delhi wants friendly relations
with the Afghan Government because by enhancing amicable relations with the Afghan Government
India can fulfil its vital interest and needs in an optimum way.
References:
A Peaceful Afghanistan Key to Regional Connectivity in South and Central Asia. (n.d.). Retrieved 8
June 2021, from https://thediplomat.com/2018/01/a-peaceful-afghanistan-key-to-regional-
connectivity-in-south-and-central-asia/
Adamec, L. W. (2003). Historical dictionary of Afghanistan (3rd ed). Scarecrow Press.
Ahmadzai, S., & McKinna, A. (2018). Afghanistan electrical energy and trans-boundary water
systems analyses: Challenges and opportunities. Energy Reports, 4, 435469.
Akbarzadeh, S., & Ibrahimi, N. (2020). The Taliban: A new proxy for Iran in Afghanistan? Third
World Quarterly, 41(5), 764782.
Ali, A. (n.d.). Conflict Resolution and State-Building in Afghanistan: Examining the Constructive
Approach of India, Paki-stan and China. South Asian, 87.
Ashraf, F. (2007). INDIA-AFGHANISTAN RELATIONS: POST-9/11. Strategic Studies, 27(2), 90
102.
111 JOURNAL OF THE ASIATIC SOCIETY OF MUMBAI, ISSN: 0972-0766, Vol. XCV, No.28, 2022
Baizakova, K., & Baizakova, Z. (2014). Connect Central Asia: Role of Afghanistan. Public
Administration and Reginal Studies, 2, 94104.
Bird, T., & Marshall, A. (2011). CHAPTER ONE. THE GREAT ENIGMA: Afghanistan in
historical context. In Afghanistan (pp. 946). Yale University Press.
Bradford, J. T. (2019). Poppies, Politics, and Power: Afghanistan and the Global History of Drugs
and Diplomacy. Cornell University Press.
Dixit, J. N. (2003). India-Pakistan in war and peace. Routledge.
Edwards, M. (2003). The New Great Game and the new great gamers: Disciples of Kipling and
Mackinder. Central Asian Survey, 22(1), 83102.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0263493032000108644
Ghale, P. (2015). Asymmetric power balance and its implications for regionalism in South Asia.
NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY CA.
Goodson, L. (2003). Afghanistan’s long Road to Reconstruction. Journal of Democracy, 14(1), 82
99.
Grygiel, J. J. (2006). Great powers and geopolitical change. JHU Press.
Hanauer, L., & Chalk, P. (2012). India’s and Pakistan’s strategies in Afghanistan: Implications for
the United States and the region. RAND.
Hilali, A. Z. (2017). US-Pakistan relationship: Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Taylor & Francis.
Hong, Z. (2013). CHINA’S AFGHAN POLICY: THE FORMING OF THE" March WEST"
STRATEGY? The Journal of East Asian Affairs, 129.
India’s Afghan policy. (n.d.). Retrieved 21 June 2021, from https://www.mea.gov.in/articles-in-
indian-media.htm?dtl/14368/Indias+Afghan+policy
Joharifard, A. (2010). Iran, Afghanistan, and Tajikistan alliance: Assessing the potential of a
Persian-speaking association.
Joshi, N. & Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program. (2010). Reconnecting
India and Central Asia: Emerging security and economic dimensions. The Central Asia-
Caucasus Institute, Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies; The Silk Road
Studies Program.
Kaura, V. (2017a). India-Afghanistan Relations in the Modi-Ghani Era. Indian Journal of Asian
Affairs, 30(1/2), 2946.
Kaura, V. (2017b). India’s Aims in Central Asia and India-Afghanistan-Iran Triangular Relationship.
The Journal of Central Asian Studies, 24(1), 2341.
Khan, I. (1998). Afghanistan: A geopolitical study. Central Asian Survey, 17(3), 489502.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02634939808401049
Khan, Z. (2016). Strategic Conundrum of USChina and IndiaPakistan: A Perspective. Margalla
Papers, 20(1).
Krastev, I., & Holmes, S. (2019). The light that failed: A reckoning. Penguin UK.
Matin, K. (2013). Recasting Iranian modernity: International relations and social change.
Routledge.
Milani, M. M. (2006). Iran’s policy towards Afghanistan. The Middle East Journal, 60(2), 235279.
Mir, A. (2010). Talibanisation of Pakistan from 9/11 to 26/11 and beyond. Pentagon Press.
Nawa, F. (2012). 13. Women and the Drug Trade in Afghanistan. In Under the Drones (pp. 236
256). Harvard University Press.
Nojumi, N. (2016). The rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan: Mass mobilization, civil war, and the
future of the region. Springer.
Pate, T. (2018). Soft power, strategic narratives, and state identity: Re-assessing India-Afghanistan
relations post-2011. India Review, 17(3), 320351.
Political Map of AfghanistanNations Online Project. (n.d.). Retrieved 6 June 2021, from
https://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/map/afghanistan_map.htm?
112 JOURNAL OF THE ASIATIC SOCIETY OF MUMBAI, ISSN: 0972-0766, Vol. XCV, No.28, 2022
Racine, J.-L. (2002). Pakistan and the ‘India Syndrome’: Between Kashmir and the Nuclear
Predicament. Pakistan: Nationalism without a Nation, 195227.
Remarks by President Biden on the Way Forward in Afghanistan. (2021, April 14). The White
House. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/04/14/remarks-
by-president-biden-on-the-way-forward-in-afghanistan/
Roy, K. (2015). War and Society in Afghanistan: From the Mughals to the Americans, 15002013.
Oxford University Press.
Sangar, K. (2016). Afghanistan’s significance for Russia in the 21st century: Interests, perceptions
and perspectives. Politics in Central Europe, 12(1), 5982.
Schmid, M. (2019). Rare earths in the trade dispute between the US and China: A déjà vu.
Intereconomics, 54(6), 378384.
Siddique, Q. (2011). Pakistan’s future policy towards Afghanistan: A look at strategic depth, militant
movements and the role of India and the US. DIIS Report.
Simpson, S. (2011). Afghanistan’s buried riches. Scientific American, 305(4), 5865.
Singh, R. (n.d.). Lashkar-i-Taiba: An al Qaeda associate in Pakistan? Al Qaeda after Bin Laden.
Sloan, G. (2017). Geopolitics, geography and strategic history (Vol. 4). Taylor & Francis.
Snedden, C. (2016). Shifting Geo politics in the Greater South Asia Region. JSTOR.
Taj, F. (2011). Taliban and anti-Taliban. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Thubron, C. (2012). The lost heart of Asia. Random House.
Wang, J. (2017). India’s Policy toward Afghanistan: Implications to the Regional Security
Governance. Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies, 11(4), 112120.
https://doi.org/10.1080/25765949.2017.12023321
Weinbaum, M. G. (1997). THE AFGHAN FACTOR IN PAKISTAN’S INDIA POLICY. Himalayan
and Central Asian Studies, 1(2), 3.
Weitz, R. (2018). Uzbekistan’s New Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity under New Leadership.
Uzbekistan’s New Face, 41.
Yadav, V., & Barwa, C. (2011). Relational control: India’s grand strategy in Afghanistan and
Pakistan. India Review, 10(2), 93125.
... The Doha Agreement includes provisions for preventing the Taliban from providing sanctuary to terrorist groups that could threaten China. The USA would benefit from staying in Afghanistan and directly connecting with the Taliban by establishing routine diplomatic engagement, implementing a development assistance program, and imposing tailored sanctions (Nandan et al., 2022). This approach would help protect US interests in the region, including preventing Afghanistan from becoming a base for transnational terrorist groups, securing the departure of at-risk Afghans associated with the US occupation, and reducing anti-Western sentiment (Joshua, 2022). ...
Article
Full-text available
This research aimed to understand the US’s strategic interests, political goals, and geopolitical considerations in Afghanistan post-US military occupation, highlighting its strategic value for the US, given its connection to Central Asia, South Asia, China, and Russia, and its importance to US. This study used qualitative research to conduct a content analysis of the US’s strategic interests and geopolitical considerations in Afghanistan post-withdrawal, using the theories of realism offensive and defensive to determine the value of Afghanistan for the US in the region, thereby revealing US’s clear strategic interests. Afghanistan helped as a US strategic base, reducing China, India and Russia’s influence in the region, promoting its weapons industry, energy resource, indirect engagement and diplomatic initiatives, counter-terrorism, and non-proliferation and regional stability. The US also established a military presence and stable government in Afghanistan, focusing on US interests. Afghanistan has become a battleground for great powers like US, India, China, and Russia, who has used its strategic location for their own interests. The US has worked for its interests in Afghanistan for 20 years, and its policy changes and goals remain safe after withdrawal. However, their interests remain constant. The Afghan government and future generations must recognize Afghanistan’s significance for US strategic interests and geopolitical considerations. US’s priorities and policies change in the region, and when regional and great powers pose challenges, US’s presence in Afghanistan becomes possible.
... In the last 20 years, the Indian government has committed over US$3 billion to provide humanitarian assistance, create basic infrastructure, and rebuild governance capacity in Afghanistan, with the aim of fostering human development. India has supported Afghanistan through various humanitarian endeavors, including the provision of one million metric tons of wheat, the revitalization and reconstruction of hospitals, and the implementation of substantial health programs (Nandan & Kumar, 2022). ...
Article
Full-text available
The research has focused on clarifying the political collaboration between Afghanistan and India and its influence on regional dynamics. It has also examined the economic relations between the two countries and the consequences for both. Additionally, the study has analyzed the development projects and initiatives undertaken by Afghanistan and India in the past 20 years and their resulting outcomes. The information for this article was collected from multiple reports utilizing a blend of quantitative and qualitative methods, as well as from printed and electronic media sources. India and Afghanistan have engaged in extensive collaboration across multiple domains since 2001, with the aim of fostering a cohesive, autonomous, diverse, tranquil, and influential Afghanistan. India deliberately refrains from engaging in military actions and employing hard power tactics, instead prioritizing collaboration and fostering friendly relationships. In addition, India has made substantial investments in major infrastructure projects, including the Salma Dam, the Zaranj-Delaram Highway, educational institutions, medical facilities such as the Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health, and others. India has consistently demonstrated its reliability as an ally to the people of Afghanistan over the past two decades. The Afghan populace expresses considerable contentment with the efficacy and probity of the Indian administration.
Chapter
Afghanistan is surrounded by four security systems including the Middle East, South Asia, Eurasia, and Asia-Pacific. It has enacted an ineffective role within these systems over the last four decades. However, the country has been a pivotal area regarding competition between influential players of these systems. As a result of various conflicts, we have witnessed an arms race taking place in this country. The main question of this article concerns the sources of the longstanding conflict in Afghanistan and its different aspects. The main argument of the present contribution is that the situation of Afghanistan as an insulator country has led to the rise of tensions and competition among the various security systems and, consequently, overwhelmed Afghanistan, with the key actors intervening and meddling in the Afghanistan internal political and security affairs. The findings show that the transition from an insulator state to one of a connector can help to manage the crisis in this country and prevent the current status quo from ever changing.
Book
Full-text available
This hitherto under-theorized international dimension is, the book argues, manifest in combined patterns of development, which incorporate both foreign and native forms. it is the tension-prone and unstable nature of these hybrid developmental patterns that mark Iranian modernity, and fuelled the socio-political dynamics of the 1979 revolution and the rise of political Islam.
Article
Full-text available
Since President Barack Obama set the end of 2014 as the deadline to complete the planned troop withdrawal from Afghanistan, numerous commentators have sought to assess Russia’s Afghan policy since September 11, 2001 and anticipate Moscow’s strategy in ‘post-2014’ Afghanistan. This paper maintains that an assessment/evaluation of Afghanistan’s significance for Russia in the current system of international relations is needed to understand Moscow’s current and future Afghan strategy. Hence, the aim of this study is to identify and analyse the major factors, which lead to a conceptualization of Russia’s interests in Afghanistan. When assessing Russia’s interests in Afghanistan, one must take into account a plethora of significant issues, including Putin’s ‘great-power’ rhetoric; geopolitical, geostrategic, and geo-economic rivalries in the wider region; security threats such as the illegal narcotics emanating from Afghanistan and global terrorism and Islamic fundamentalism; the rivalry and competition for energy resources; and control over pipeline routes and energy corridors. The analysis of these substantiating factors demonstrate why in the 21
Article
The trade dispute between the US and China has reached a point where export restrictions on rare earths have become a possible means for sanction. This contribution provides a succinct analysis of the current dependency of the US on rare earths from China and draws parallels to the events during the rare earth crisis of 2010 and 2011, which was caused by geopolitical tensions between Japan and China. Respective risks associated with restrictions on the trade of rare earths are considered. Findings suggest that Europe could be affected as well and should be better prepared to mitigate supply disruptions in rare earth trade. Potential mitigation strategies and consequences of the current developments for Europe are also discussed.
Article
As a major player in South Asia, India’s priority in Afghanistan is to support the Afghan government established after 2001. However, the political and security challenges after the announcement of US military withdrawal from Afghanistan have significantly impacted India. Afghanistan is facing a dual challenge on both security and political levels. On the security level, although the counter-insurgency measures taken by both international forces led by the US and Afghan forces have lasted for more than a decade, Taliban and other Islamic extremist groups continue to exert their strong political and security influence all across Afghanistan. At the political level, the new unity government, formed by Dr. President Ashraf Ghani and Dr. Abdullah, Chief Executive Officer, after the two terms of the presidency of Hamid Karzai, shows possible divisions and uncertainty. To address the new challenges, on the one hand, India tries to continue its “soft measures” to safeguard its interests in Afghanistan, while on the other hand, India strengthens the cooperation with international organizations and other regional states to create positive conditions for Afghan stability and reconstruction. However, given the political uncertainty and worsening security surroundings in Afghanistan, India still faces several challenges.
Article
In 2011, India and Afghanistan signed the Strategic Partnership Agreement that delimited cooperation in economic, social, political, and cultural areas. It depicted the rise of Indian soft power influence. However, the extent to which India garners strategic influence in Afghanistan through soft power remains contentious. This article contends that India’s soft power effectiveness in Afghanistan post-2011 can be fully grasped only via the construction and reception of India’s regional power identity negotiated at the sites of: “civilization,” “democracy,” and “economic-military” enabling India to provide a regional leadership that can forward both India and Afghanistan’s mutual interests. Examining soft power via the constructivist-discursive framework of collective identity strategic narrative, this article compares India-Afghanistan relations in periods 2011–14 and 2014–17. The former formalized strategic partnership agreement and the latter marked continuation of the agreement albeit through domestic political transitions in both countries. This article demonstrates that the Indian soft power influence in Afghanistan between 2014 and 2017 has increased markedly.
Article
In an era of high technology and instant communication, the role of geography in the formation of strategy and politics in international relations can be undervalued. But the mountains of Afghanistan and the scorching sand storms of Iraq have provided stark reminders that geographical rea'lities continue to have a profound impact on the success of military campaigns. Here, political scientist Jakub J. Grygiel brings to light the importance of incorporating geography into grand strategy. He argues that states can increase and maintain their position of power by pursuing a geostrategy that focuses on control of resources and lines of communication. Grygiel examines case studies of Venice, the Ottoman Empire, and China in the global fifteenth century-all great powers that faced a dramatic change in geopolitics when new routes and continents were discovered. The location of resources, the layout of trade networks, and the stability of state boundaries played a large role in the success or failure of these three powers. Grygiel asserts that, though many other aspects of foreign policy have changed throughout history, strategic response to geographical features remains one of the most salient factors in establishing and maintaining power in the international arena. © 2006 by The Johns Hopkins University Press. All Rights Reserved.
Article
This book describes the turbulent political history of Afghanistan from the communist upheaval of the 1970s through to the aftermath of the events of 11 September 2001. It reviews the importance of the region to external powers and explains why warfare and instability have been endemic. The author analyses in detail the birth of the Taliban and the bloody rise to power of fanatic Islamists, including Osama bin Laden, in the power vacuum following the withdrawal of US aid. Looking forward, Nojumi explores the ongoing quest for a third political movement in Afghanistan - an alternative to radical communists or fanatical Islamists and suggests the support that will be neccessary from the international community in order for such a movement to survive.
Article
Sweltering in the noonday sun outside Herat’s grand Friday Mosque last May 20, I was excited to see democracy (of a sort) in action in western Afghanistan. Local dignitaries and members of the Loya Jirga (Grand Council) Commission addressed a crowd of more than six-hundred Afghans who had turned out to cast ballots in Phase I of their newly liberated country’s two-stage voting process. In this first phase, they would choose members of the Loya Jirga, whose meeting a few weeks later would select Hamid Karzai as president of an 18-month Transitional Administration. As one of a handful of international monitors present for the Loya Jirga balloting, I too gave a short speech, telling the soon-to-be-voters that the whole world was watching Afghanistan, and that any of them who had a complaint could come to me, as a representative of the international community. I have since been struck by the irony of my well-meaning remarks, which I delivered with great sincerity at various Phase I polling places in western Afghanistan. In truth, it would have been fairer for the Afghans to have told me, as a representative of the international community, that it was Afghanistan’s 27 million people who would be watching us—watching and wondering if the world would stay involved this time and help their country to rebuild itself. My Afghan hosts were too polite to say any such thing, of course, but in fact Afghanistan desperately needs the substantial and committed involvement of the international community, especially the United States, if it is to have any hope of breaking out of the national deathtrap that more than two decades of ceaseless warfare have created. Larry Goodson, professor of Middle East Studies at the U.S. Army War College, is the author of Afghanistan’s Endless War: State Failure, Regional Politics, and the Rise of the Taliban (2000). In the spring and summer of 2002, he was a consultant to the Afghan Loya Jirga that chose Hamid Karzai as first president of the new republic of Afghanistan.