ArticlePDF Available

Air Leak Syndrome and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) Pneumonia – A Case Series – International Journal of Medical Sciences and Nursing Research

Authors:

Abstract

This is case series study describe about incidence of Air leak syndrome among patient with covid -19 pneumonia.
Quick Response Code:
Web Site
http://ijmsnr.com/
DOI
10.55349/ijmsnr.2022222528
Air Leak Syndrome and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19)
Pneumonia A Case Series
Eugene Alex Joshua1* , Karthikeyan Sellamuthu1, Rajesh Jeyaprakash1, Anand Khushvinder Singh2,
Kanagalakshmi Rameshkumar3, Chandrakala Sankarapandian4
1Associate Consultant, 2Senior Consultant, 3Junior Consultant, Department of critical care Medicine and Toxicology, Meenakshi
Mission Hospital and Research Center, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India. 4Assistant Professor, Medical Surgical Nursing Department,
Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
1Senior Resident, Department of Anesthesiology, Chettinad Hospital And Research Institute, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India. 2Assistant Professor,
Department of Anesthesiology, Chettinad Hospital And Research Institute, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India. 3Professor and HOD, Department of
Anesthesiology, Chettinad Hospital And Research Institute, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
Background: The COVID 19 pandemic caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus 2 has affected millions around the
globe. It presents with a multisystem involvement, predominantly affecting the respiratory system. Spontaneous Air leak syndrome which
includes subcutaneous emphysema, pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax has been reported as one of the complications of COVID-19
pneumonia.
Method: This is a series of 10 cases, which presented with one or more manifestations of air leak syndrome among patients with covid 19
positive admitted in intensive care unit of Meenakshi Mission Hospital and Research Center, Madurai, India.
Results: Out of the 365 cases analyzed, 10 cases developed either subcutaneous emphysema, pneumomediastinum or pneumothorax. The
incidence rate was 2.73% per 1000 population. None of the 10 patients was on invasive mechanical ventilation before developing air leak
syndrome. No one had undergone an invasive procedure like central venous cannulation, intubation or bronchoscopy prior to the onset of
air leak. Age group of the sample was 38 to 68 years. All the cases had elevated D-Dimer values.
Conclusion: present case series shows that air leak syndrome can develop in COVID-19 patients receiving oxygenation through Nin-Invasive
Ventilation (NIV) and High flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC).
Recommendation: Patients with covid 19 who develop subcutaneous emphysema and pneumomediastinum should be carefully monitored
for signs of pneumothorax which can be life threatening in a sick patient with borderline oxygenation.
Keywords: COVID-19 pneumonia, subcutaneous emphysema, pneumomediastinum, pneumothorax
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work
non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations
are licensed under the identical terms.
Corresponding Author: Dr. Eugene Alex Joshua,
Associate consultant, Department of Critical Care Medicine and
Toxicology, Meenakshi Mission Hospital and Research Center,
Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India. Email ID: eugenealexi@gmail.com
International Journal of Medical Sciences and Nursing Research 2022;2(2):25-28 Page No: 25
Abstract
Article Summary: Submitted: 08-April-2022 Revised: 10-May-2022 Accepted: 02-June-2022 Published: 30-June-2022
The diagnosis of alveolar air leak syndrome was made based on
clinical examination and radiological imaging.
Ethical Approval:
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of
Meenakshi Mission Hospital and Research Center, Madurai, Tamil
Nadu, India. Participation in the study was voluntary and informed
consent was obtained prior to participation in the study. Anonymity
was maintained.
Joshua EA et al. Air Leak Syndrome and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) Pneumonia A Case Series
International Journal of Medical Sciences and Nursing Research 2022;2(2):25-28 Page No: 26
Table 1: Distribution of baseline characteristics of Covid-19 patients
Case No
Age
Sex
Comorbidities
D Dimer
(ng/mL)
CRP
(mg/L)
Ferritin
(ng/mL)
IL-6
(pg/mL)
LDH
(IU/L)
1
61
M
HTN
1667
1.52
1807.90
20.46
688
2
52
F
Nil
579
13.80
4521
62.09
1579
3
65
F
Nil
782
9.50
199
67.34
777
4
51
M
CLL, DM
755
1.09
316
252.62
912
5
37
F
DM, HTN, RA
957
11.50
306.60
-
559
6
60
M
HTN
223
12.4
429
20.50
730
7
68
M
HTN
546
1.41
910.30
27.93
510
8
65
M
Nil
937
10.70
1722.50
89.66
937
9
38
M
Nil
482
1.73
1083.50
69.73
765
10
58
M
DM
1054.99
28.9
535.63
64
438
Table 2: Distribution of Air leak syndrome, type and clinical outcome among cases
Case No
Age/
Sex
Oxygen Delivery
Device
Lung
Involvement
Day of
Illness
Type
Outcome
1
61/M
HFNC, IMV
45%
Day 10
Subcutaneous Emphysema
Succumbed
2
52/F
NIV/IMV
40%
Day 18
Subcutaneous Emphysema,
Unilateral Pneumothorax
Succumbed
3
65/F
HFNC, NIV, IMV
80%
Day 24
Subcutaneous Emphysema,
Bilateral Pneumothorax
Succumbed
4
51/M
90%
HFM, HFNC
Day 24
Subcutaneous Emphysema,
Pneumomediastinum
Discharged
5
37/F
30%
HFM, NIV
Day 15
Subcutaneous Emphysema
Discharged
6
60/M
35%
HFM, NIV, IMV
Day 21
Subcutaneous Emphysema
Succumbed
7
68%
50%
FM, HFM,
HFNC
Day 21
Subcutaneous Emphysema,
Pneumomediastinum
Discharged
8
65/M
80%
HFM, NIV, IMV
Day 27
Subcutaneous Emphysema,
Pneumomediastinum, Bilateral
Pneumothorax
Succumbed
9
38/M
60%
NIV
Day 20
Subcutaneous Emphysema,
Unilateral Pneumothorax
Succumbed
10
58/M
80%
HFM, HFNC
Day 11
Subcutaneous Emphysema,
Pneumomediastinum
Discharged
Results:
Out of the 365 cases we analyzed, 10 cases developed either
subcutaneous emphysema, pneumomediastinum or pneumothorax.
The incidence rate was 2.73% per 1000 population. All patients had
comparable baseline characteristics. None of the patients had any pre-
existing chronic respiratory conditions like chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease (COPD), Pulmonary Tuberculosis, Interstitial lung
disease, etc. We could not find any correlation between air leak
syndrome and any of the inflammatory markers.
Joshua EA et al. Air Leak Syndrome and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) Pneumonia A Case Series
All cases were diagnosed by clinical examination and radiological
imaging, chest Xray and HRCT whenever possible. None of the 10
patients were on invasive mechanical ventilation before developing
air leak syndrome. No one had undergone an invasive procedure like
central venous cannulation, intubation or bronchoscopy prior to the
onset of air leak. So iatrogenic cause was ruled out. All 10 cases had
developed air leak syndrome after 10 days of illness. The mean day
of illness when one or more manifestations of air leak syndrome was
diagnosed was 19.1. Of the 10 cases, 3 patients developed isolated
subcutaneous emphysema and 3 patients developed subcutaneous
emphysema and pneumomediastinum. The remaining 4 patients
developed pneumothorax 24 to 48 after subcutaneous emphysema
was diagnosed. These 4 patients required placement of intercostal
drainage tubes, intubation and mechanical ventilation. 6 of the 10
patients died during the course of illness. But the cause of death was
not directly related to the air leak syndrome. 2 patients were
discharged after a full recovery and 1 patient was discharged against
medical advice.
Discussion:
Many reviews on case reports and case series have brought to the fore
the association of air leak syndrome with COVID-19 pneumonia. [3
5] Almost identical cases were reported during Severe Acute
Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and Middle East Respiratory
Syndrome (MERS) epidemic. [6] part of these publications focus
attention on the occurrence of spontaneous air leak syndrome in
patients not receiving invasive mechanical ventilation. The
phenomenon is not clear that, whether the diffuse alveolar damage
caused by these viruses predisposes the alveoli to undergo rupture
leading to air leak. The most common risk factors for alveolar air
leak syndrome are positive pressure ventilation, blunt chest trauma,
esophageal perforation, connective tissue disorders, smoking, cocaine
abuse and pre-existing chronic obstructive and restrictive lung
disease. [7] No one of our patients had any of these predisposing
conditions.
According to the theories proposed in the Macklin Effect [8] as
described in 1939 by Charles C. Macklin. During his experimental
studies on cats, Macklin noticed that artificially over distending the
lungs causes alveolar wall rupture and leakage of air. This air then
dissects along the sheaths surrounding the pulmonic blood vessels
and reaches the hilum from where it dissects in to the tissue planes of
mediastinum and the neck. In patients with ARDS, alveolar over
distension has been well described in patients undergoing invasive
mechanical ventilation with conventional large tidal volume due to
ventilator induced lung injury (VILI). No patients were on invasive
mechanical ventilation at the time of developing air leak syndrome.
This gives credence to the concept of Patient Self Inflicted Lung
Injury (P-SILI). [9] The large swings in transpulmonary pressure
during non-invasive ventilation, large tidal volumes generated due to
the relatively high lung compliance, coughing on a tight-fitting NIV
mask and mucus plugging can all cause increased intra alveolar
pressure and alveolar rupture. [10 11]
Pulmonary vascular thrombosis causing parenchymal and pleural
International Journal of Medical Sciences and Nursing Research 2022;2(2):25-28 Page No: 27
infarction has been proposed as a reason for air leak syndrome. All
our cases had elevated D-Dimer values. One patient had a CT
pulmonary angiogram due to clinical suspicion which ruled out any
major or minor pulmonary thromboembolism. While other cases did
not undergo a computed tomography by cause of risks involved in
transport. There was no echocardiographic evidence of pulmonary
thromboembolism or peripheral deep venous thrombosis. This shows
there is a complex interplay of various factors causing alveolar
rupture and air leak.
Conclusion:
This case series shows that air leak syndrome can develop in COVID-
19 patients receiving oxygenation through NIV and HFNC. This
should be ruled out whenever there is any sudden clinical
deterioration. Patients who develop subcutaneous emphysema and
pneumomediastinum should be carefully monitored for signs of
pneumothorax which can be life threatening in a sick patient with
borderline oxygenation.
Source of funding: This research did not receive any specific
grant from funding agencies. No incentives was given to the study
participants.
Conflict of Interest: The Authors reports no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgment: The Authors would like to thank all the
patients who has participated in this study for their cooperation and
support.
Authors’ Contributions: EAJ, KS, RJ, AKS, KR conceived
the study concept, design, analysed and interpreted the data, draft
manuscript, Reviewed and revised the full manuscript.
Here, EAJ- Eugene Alex Joshua, KS Karthikeyan sellamuthu, RJ
Rajesh Jeyaprakash; AKS Anand Khushvinder Singh, KR
Kanagalakshmi Rameshkumar, CK Chandrakala Sankarapandian.
References
1. Yuki K, Fujiogi M, Koutsogiannaki S. COVID-19
pathophysiology: A review. Clin Immunol. 2020;215:108427.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2020.108427
2. Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y, et al.
Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019
novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive
study. Lancet 2020;395(10223):507513. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7
3. López Vega, J.M., Parra Gordo, M.L., Diez Tascón, A. et
al. Pneumomediastinum and spontaneous pneumothorax
as an extrapulmonary complication of COVID-19
disease. Emerg Radiol 27, 727730 (2020). DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-020-01806-0
Publish your research articles with
International Journal of Medical Sciences and Nursing Research
Website: http://ijmsnr.com/ eISSN: 2583-0996
Joshua EA et al. Air Leak Syndrome and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) Pneumonia A Case Series
International Journal of Medical Sciences and Nursing Research 2022;2(2):25-28 Page No: 28
4. Martinelli AW, Ingle T, Newman J, et al. COVID-19 and
pneumothorax: A multicentre retrospective case series. Eur Respir
J. Published online 2020. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.02697-2020
5. Joshi S, Bhatia A, Tayal N, Chaturvedi S, Ali SJ. Alveolar air leak
syndrome a potential complication of COVID-19-ARDS - Single
center retrospective analysis. J Assoc Physicians India. Published
online 2021.
6. Das KM, Lee EY, Jawder SE Al, et al. Acute Middle East
Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus: Temporal Lung Changes
Observed on the Chest Radiographs of 55 Patients. Am J
Roentgenol. 2015;205(3):W267-S274. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.15.14445
7. Paramasivam E, Bodenham A. Air leaks, pneumothorax, and chest
drains. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2008;8(6):204-209.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkn038
8. Macklin CC. Transport of Air Along Sheaths Of Pulmonic Blood
Vessels From Alveoli To Mediastinum: Clinical Implications.
Arch Intern Med. 1939;64(5):913-926. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1939.00190050019003
9. Carteaux G, Parfait M, Combet M, Haudebourg A-F, Tuffet S,
Mekontso Dessap A. Patient-Self Inflicted Lung Injury: A
Practical Review. J Clin Med. Published online 2021. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122738
10. Yoshida T, Grieco DL, Brochard L, Fujino Y. Patient self-inflicted
lung injury and positive end-expiratory pressure for safe
spontaneous breathing. Curr Opin Crit Care. Published online
2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000691
11. Neetz B, Flohr T, Herth FJF, Müller MM. Patient self-inflicted
lung injury (P-SILI): From pathophysiology to clinical evaluation
with differentiated management. Medizinische Klin - Intensivmed
und Notfallmedizin. Published online 2021. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-021-00823-2
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Patients with severe lung injury usually have a high respiratory drive, resulting in intense inspiratory effort that may even worsen lung damage by several mechanisms gathered under the name “patient-self inflicted lung injury” (P-SILI). Even though no clinical study has yet demonstrated that a ventilatory strategy to limit the risk of P-SILI can improve the outcome, the concept of P-SILI relies on sound physiological reasoning, an accumulation of clinical observations and some consistent experimental data. In this review, we detail the main pathophysiological mechanisms by which the patient’s respiratory effort could become deleterious: excessive transpulmonary pressure resulting in over-distension; inhomogeneous distribution of transpulmonary pressure variations across the lung leading to cyclic opening/closing of nondependent regions and pendelluft phenomenon; increase in the transvascular pressure favoring the aggravation of pulmonary edema. We also describe potentially harmful patient-ventilator interactions. Finally, we discuss in a practical way how to detect in the clinical setting situations at risk for P-SILI and to what extent this recognition can help personalize the treatment strategy.
Article
Full-text available
The establishment of assisted spontaneous breathing is a phase of ventilation therapy that is generally considered to be beneficial and not dangerous. However, recent findings regarding potential damage from vigorous spontaneous breathing effort should be noticed in patients with acute injured lungs. This syndrome is called patient self-inflicted lung injury. Physicians, nurses and respiratory therapists should be aware of this issue. Parameters that can be determined using esophageal pressure measurement or simple maneuvers on the respirator are helpful when deciding to implement and to monitor assisted spontaneous breathing, even in the acute phases of lung damage. In addition to monitoring, there are therapeutic options for dealing with high respiratory drive or increased breathing effort.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: Pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum have both been noted to complicate cases of COVID-19 requiring hospital admission. We report the largest case series yet described of patients with both these pathologies that includes non-ventilated patients. Methods: Cases were collected retrospectively from UK hospitals with inclusion criteria limited to a diagnosis of COVID-19 and the presence of either pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum. Patients included in the study presented between March and June 2020. Details obtained from the medical record included demographics, radiology, laboratory investigations, clinical management and survival. Results: Seventy-one patients from 16 centres were included in the study, of whom 60 patients had pneumothoraces (six also with pneumomediastinum), whilst 11 patients had pneumomediastinum alone. Two of these patients had two distinct episodes of pneumothorax, occurring bilaterally in sequential fashion, bringing the total number of pneumothoraces included to 62. Clinical scenarios included patients who had presented to hospital with pneumothorax, patients who had developed pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum during their inpatient admission with COVID-19 and patients who developed their complication whilst intubated and ventilated, either with or without concurrent extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Survival at 28 days was not significantly different following pneumothorax (63.1%±6.5%) or isolated pneumomediastinum (53.0%±18.7%; p=0.854). The incidence of pneumothorax was higher in males. The 28-day survival was not different between the sexes (males 62.5%±7.7% versus females 68.4%±10.7%; p=0.619). Patients above the age of 70 had a significantly lower 28-day survival than younger individuals (≥70 years 41.7%±13.5% survival versus <70 years 70.9%±6.8% survival; p=0.018 log-rank). Conclusion: These cases suggest that pneumothorax is a complication of COVID-19. Pneumothorax does not seem to be an independent marker of poor prognosis and we encourage active treatment to be continued where clinically possible.
Article
Full-text available
The new disease outbreak that causes atypical pneumonia named COVID-19, which started in China’s Wuhan province, has quickly spread to a pandemic. Although the imaging test of choice for the initial study is plain chest radiograph, CT has proven useful in characterizing better the complications associated with this new infection. We describe the evolution of 3 patients presenting pneumomediastinum and spontaneous pneumothorax as a very rare complication of COVID-19 and their particular interest as a probable prognostic factor.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose of review: The potential risks of spontaneous effort and their prevention during mechanical ventilation is an important concept for clinicians and patients. The effort-dependent lung injury has been termed 'patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI)' in 2017. As one of the potential strategies to render spontaneous effort less injurious in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the role of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is now discussed. Recent findings: Experimental and clinical data indicate that vigorous spontaneous effort may worsen lung injury, whereas, at the same time, the intensity of spontaneous effort seems difficult to control when lung injury is severe. Experimental studies found that higher PEEP strategy can be effective to reduce lung injury from spontaneous effort while maintaining some muscle activity. The recent clinical trial to reevaluate systemic early neuromuscular blockade in moderate-severe ARDS (i.e., reevaluation of systemic early neuromuscular blockade (ROSE) trial) support that a higher PEEP strategy can facilitate 'safe' spontaneous breathing under the light sedation targets (i.e., no increase in barotrauma nor 90 days mortality versus early muscle paralysis). Summary: To prevent P-SILI in ARDS, it seems feasible to facilitate 'safe' spontaneous breathing in patients using a higher PEEP strategy in severe ARDS.
Article
Full-text available
The objective of our study was to describe lung changes on serial chest radiographs from patients infected with the acute Middle East respiratory syndrome corona-virus (MERS-CoV) and to compare the chest radiographic findings and final outcomes with those of health care workers (HCWs) infected with the same virus. Chest radiographic scores and comorbidities were also examined as indicators of a fatal outcome to determine their potential prognostic value. Chest radiographs of 33 patients and 22 HCWs infected with MERS-CoV were examined for radiologic features indicative of disease and for evidence of radiographic deterioration and progression. Chest radiographic scores were estimated after dividing each lung into three zones. The scores (1 [mild] to 4 [severe]) for all six zones per chest radiographic examination were summed to provide a cumulative chest radio-graphic score (range, 0-24). Serial radiographs were also examined to assess for radiographic deterioration and progression from type 1 (mild) to type 4 (severe) disease. Multivariate logistic regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis, and the Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare data of deceased patients with those of individuals who recovered to identify prognostic radiographic features. Ground-glass opacity was the most common abnormality (66%) followed by consolidation (18%). Overall mortality was 35% (19/55). Mortality was higher in the patient group (55%, 18/33) than in the HCW group (5%, 1/22). The mean chest radiographic score for deceased patients was significantly higher than that for those who recovered (13 ± 2.6 [SD] vs 5.8 ± 5.6, respectively; p = 0.001); in addition, higher rates of pneumothorax (deceased patients vs patients who recovered, 47% vs 0%; p = 0.001), pleural effusion (63% vs 14%; p = 0.001), and type 4 radiographic progression (63% vs 6%; p = 0.001) were seen in the deceased patients compared with those who recovered. Univariate and logistic regression analyses identified the chest radiographic score as an independent predictor of mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.38; 95% CI, 1.07-1.77; p = 0.01). The number of comorbidities in the patient group (n = 33) was significantly higher than that in the HCW group (n = 22) (mean number of comorbidities, 1.90 ± 1.27 vs 0.17 ± 0.65, respectively; p = 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a median survival time of 15 days (95% CI, 4-26 days). Ground-glass opacity in a peripheral location was the most common abnormality noted on chest radiographs. A higher chest radiographic score coupled with a high number of medical comorbidities was associated with a poor prognosis and higher mortality in those infected with MERS-CoV. Younger HCWs with few or no comorbidities had a higher survival rate.
Article
Background: Alveolar air leak comprising of pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and subcutaneous emphysema in the ongoing COVID 19 pneumonia have been increasingly reported in literature. These air leaks were also recognized in the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) and H1N1 viral pandemics. Here we review the incidence and outcomes of alveolar air leaks over 400 patients admitted to our tertiary care institution for moderate-severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods: We performed a retrospective audit of moderate to severe COVID-19 cases admitted to our hospital. Patients who were recognized as either a spontaneous pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, pneumopericardium and subcutaneous emphysema were identified. Their clinical features and characteristics were thoroughly documented and clinical outcomes were gathered. Each case has been presented as a brief synopsis. Results: During the audit period, we reviewed over 670 patients, out of these 419 patients required intensive care for moderate to severe disease. 10 patients developed Pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, pneumopericardium and/ or subcutaneous emphysema - referred to as Alveolar Air leak syndrome; The incidence of alveolar air leak was found to be 2.39%. 6 patients did not survive the resultant complication. Conclusion: Spontaneous alveolar air leaks are a rare but definite complication of COVID-19 viral pneumonia and may occur in the absence of mechanical ventilation. ICU Clinicians must be alert about the diagnosis and treatment of this complication.
Article
In December 2019, a novel coronavirus, now named as SARS-CoV-2, caused a series of acute atypical respiratory diseases in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. The disease caused by this virus was termed COVID-19. The virus is transmittable between humans and has caused pandemic worldwide. The number of death tolls continues to rise and a large number of countries have been forced to do social distancing and lockdown. Lack of targeted therapy continues to be a problem. Epidemiological studies showed that elder patients were more susceptible to severe diseases, while children tend to have milder symptoms. Here we reviewed the current knowledge about this disease and considered the potential explanation of the different symptomatology between children and adults.
Article
Background: In December, 2019, a pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) emerged in Wuhan, China. We aimed to further clarify the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 2019-nCoV pneumonia. Methods: In this retrospective, single-centre study, we included all confirmed cases of 2019-nCoV in Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital from Jan 1 to Jan 20, 2020. Cases were confirmed by real-time RT-PCR and were analysed for epidemiological, demographic, clinical, and radiological features and laboratory data. Outcomes were followed up until Jan 25, 2020. Findings: Of the 99 patients with 2019-nCoV pneumonia, 49 (49%) had a history of exposure to the Huanan seafood market. The average age of the patients was 55·5 years (SD 13·1), including 67 men and 32 women. 2019-nCoV was detected in all patients by real-time RT-PCR. 50 (51%) patients had chronic diseases. Patients had clinical manifestations of fever (82 [83%] patients), cough (81 [82%] patients), shortness of breath (31 [31%] patients), muscle ache (11 [11%] patients), confusion (nine [9%] patients), headache (eight [8%] patients), sore throat (five [5%] patients), rhinorrhoea (four [4%] patients), chest pain (two [2%] patients), diarrhoea (two [2%] patients), and nausea and vomiting (one [1%] patient). According to imaging examination, 74 (75%) patients showed bilateral pneumonia, 14 (14%) patients showed multiple mottling and ground-glass opacity, and one (1%) patient had pneumothorax. 17 (17%) patients developed acute respiratory distress syndrome and, among them, 11 (11%) patients worsened in a short period of time and died of multiple organ failure. Interpretation: The 2019-nCoV infection was of clustering onset, is more likely to affect older males with comorbidities, and can result in severe and even fatal respiratory diseases such as acute respiratory distress syndrome. In general, characteristics of patients who died were in line with the MuLBSTA score, an early warning model for predicting mortality in viral pneumonia. Further investigation is needed to explore the applicability of the MuLBSTA score in predicting the risk of mortality in 2019-nCoV infection. Funding: National Key R&D Program of China.
Article
An 85-year-old lady presented with a left middle cerebral artery territory infarct. Several days into her admission she became hypoxic and haemodynamically unstable. A CT pulmonary angiogram showed bilateral pulmonary emboli, right-sided parenchymal cavitation due to infarction and an associated large pneumothorax. She was treated successfully with an intercostal drain and anticoagulation. This case describes the rare phenomenon of secondary spontaneous pneumothorax due to pulmonary infarction from pulmonary embolism. The factors associated with the development of infarcts from pulmonary thromboemboli are poorly understood although a number of predisposing conditions and pathological features have been suggested. Pulmonary infarction occurs in around 10% of cases of pulmonary emboli but the complication of secondary spontaneous pneumothorax would appear to be much less common. One should consider pulmonary embolism as the cause of pneumothorax where there is significant clinical suspicion.