A preview of this full-text is provided by Wiley.
Content available from Dermatologic Therapy
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
LETTER
Dissecting cellulitis of the scalp: A review on clinical
characteristics and management options in a series of
14 patients
Dear Editor,
Dissecting cellulitis of the scalp (DCS) is a rare neutrophilic dermatosis
related to hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Its management is generally
difficult.
1,2
Our objective was to describe clinical presentation and ther-
apeutic options in patients with DCS. A retrospective observational
single-center study was performed. DCS disease severity was assessed
according to Lee's classification. Complete response (CR) was defined
as the complete recovery of hair loss or global absence of a bald area.
Partial response (PR) as the partial recovery with noticeable bald areas
and no response (NR) as no improvement or enlarging hairless areas.
Recurrence rate was defined as a relapse of inflammation or nodules
after a CR or the disappearance of improvement in those who achieved
a PR. Response and recurrence were evaluated 3 and 6 months, respec-
tively after the beginning of the treatment.
3
Fourteen patients, 100% (14/14) men with a median age of
39.6 ± 9.8 years, a median of body mass index of 28.5 kg/m
2
and a
high rate of smoking habit (64%) (9/14) were included. 86% (12/14)
had also HS in other areas, which was controlled with topical treat-
ment, in only 14% (2/14) of the patients DCS was an isolated finding.
Acne history was present in 64% (9/14) of the patients. About 79%
(11/14) of them showed II or III SDC stage and lesions predominated
on the vertex 100% (14/14) and occipital area 50% (7/14).
A linear regression model where DCS was the dependent vari-
able proved there was statistically significant association with
acne (p< 0.01), Hurley stage (p=0.02) and male sex (p=0.04)
(Table S1).
They all received a combined treatment for SDC, either sequen-
tially or in parallel. Initial management included topical or oral antibi-
otics, or intralesional steroid injection. In 86% (12/14) of them, the
treatment was scaled up to isotretinoin, dapsone, surgery, or TNF-
alpha antagonists. Treatment response rates, duration, recurrence
rates and adverse effects are summarized in Table 1and Table S2.
TABLE 1 Treatment outcome and adverse effects
Treatment Patients %
CR
(complete
response) %
PR (partial
response) %
NR (no
response) %
Mean duration of
the treatment ±
standard deviation
(DE) months
RR
(recurrence
rate) % Adverse effects
Topical
antibiotics
78.6% (11/14) 0% (0/11) 27.3% (3/11) 72.7% (8/11) 5.09 ± 1.56 100% (3/3) Pruritus or erythema
36.3% (4/11)
Systemic
antibiotics
a
71.4% (10/14) 10% (1/10) 90% (9/10) 0% (0/10) 2.5 ± 0.83 90% (9/10) Abdominal intolerance
40% (4/10)
Isotretinoin
b
28.6% (4/14) 25% (1/4) 50% (2/4) 25% (1/4) 3.5 ± 1.8 33.3% (1/3) Dry eyes, itching 75%
(3/ 4)
Surgical
treatment
21.4% (3/14) 100% (3/3) 0% (0/3) 0% (0/3) –0% (0/3) None reported
Dapsone
c
28.6% (4/14) 50% (2/4) 50% (2/4) 0% (0/4) 9.25 ± 5.06 0% (0/4) None reported
Anti-tumor
necrosis
factor
(TNF)
d
21.4% (3/14) 75% (2/3) 25% (1/3) 0% (0/3) 9.33 ± 3.77 0% (0/3) Infusion reaction, that
forced treatment
withdrawal 33% (1/3)
Intralesional
steroid
injection
7.1% (1/14) 0% (0/1) 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1) –0% (0/1) Discrete skin atrophy
Abbreviations: CR, complete response; NR, no response; PR, partial response; RR, recurrence rate.
a
Systemic antibiotics: 60% (6/10) doxycycline 200 mg/24 h 3 months, 40% (4/10) rifampicin and clindamycin 300 mg/12 h 3 months.
b
Isotretinoin 0.5 mg/kg/day.
c
Dapsone: 50% (2/4) 50 mg/day, 50% (2/5) 100 mg/day.
d
Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF): 66.6% (2/3) adalimumab 80 mg/2 weeks, infliximab 33.3% (1/3) 0.5 mg/kg/month.
Received: 28 March 2022 Revised: 30 May 2022 Accepted: 6 June 2022
DOI: 10.1111/dth.15626
Dermatologic Therapy. 2022;35:e15626. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/dth © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC. 1of2
https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.15626