ArticlePDF Available

Current Scenario of Building-Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPVs)

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The Building-incorporated photovoltaics (BIPVs) are photovoltaic (PV) materials that are used to supplant traditional/conventional building materials that are being used in construction of building covering, for instance, the roof tiles, front windows, or veneers. Further, they represent a strong, versatile and eco-friendly means for attaining the goal of ever increasing power demand for zero energy and zero emission buildings of the adjacent future. In this regard, BIPVs may offer an aesthetically pleasing, costeffective and real-world solution, to integrate photovoltaic solar cells (BIPVs) reaping solar radiationto produce electricity along with climate protection of the buildings. This research work précises thecurrent stage of the development in the Building-integrated Photovoltaic systems and the scope of future research in building integration of photovoltaics, incorporating the latest and innovational ideas and features of BIPVs which include BIPV tiles& modules, BIPV foils,and solar power cell glazing products.
Content may be subject to copyright.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53555/nneee.v3i10.167 Publication URL: http://nnpub.org/index.php/EEE/article/view/167
CURRENT SCENARIO OF BUILDING-INTEGRATED PHOTOVOLTAICS
(BIPVS)
Ashish kumar1* and Dr. J.P. Kesari2
*1M. Tech (RET-Renewable Energy Technology), Delhi Technological University (formerly DCE), Delhi
2Former AICTE Director & Associate Professor, Delhi Technological University (formerly DCE), Delhi
*Corresponding Author: -
Abstract: -
The building-incorporated photovoltaics (BIPVs) are photovoltaic (PV) materials that are used to supplant
traditional/conventional building materials that are being used in construction of building covering, for instance, the roof
tiles, front windows, or veneers. Further, they represent a strong, versatile and eco-friendly means for attaining the goal
of ever-increasing power demand for zero energy and zero emission buildings of the adjacent future. In this regard, BIPVs
may offer an aesthetically pleasing, cost- effective and real-world solution, to integrate photovoltaic solar cells (BIPVs)
reaping solar radiationto produce electricity along with climate protection of the buildings. This research work précises
thecurrent stage of the development in the Building-integrated Photovoltaic systems and the scope of future research in
building integration of photovoltaics, incorporating the latest and innovational ideas and features of BIPVs which include
BIPV tiles& modules, BIPV foils,and solar power cell glazing products.
Keywords: - Building-integrated photovoltaic;Eco-friendly; Zero energy; Zero emission; BIPVs; Solar cell; Recent
development.
Journal of Advance Research in Electrical and Electronics Engineering (ISSN: 2208-2395)
Vol. 3 No. 10 (2016)
1
1. INTRODUCTION
As it is one of the well-known facts that the world’s energy demand is increasing like a rapid fire, this exponential increase
in energy demand in the name of development and to raise the living standard of humanity, a stage has arrived where
focus should be on renewable & non-polluting energy, along with high energyefficiency and cost effectiveness. Buildings
should be designed onzero energy and zero emission concept. In order to make any building complied to the idea/concept
of zero energy and zero emission, it is required to cropits energydemands from itssurroundings itself, where solar energy
from the sun seems to be one of the major available options. BIPV systems are the energy systems where solar cells are
embedded within the climate coverings of buildings and these solar cells exploitsolar radiation to generate electricity at
justifiedrunning/maintenance cost, and represent a stronger and adaptablemeans for attainingthe goalsof clean, eco-
friendly and renewable energy w.r.t aesthetical, cost-effective and real- world technical solutions.
BIPV systems can offerdual savings i.e., they reduce materials as well as electricity expenses. Also, they lead to lesser
usage of fossil fuels and lower emission of ozone depleting gases (CFCs etc.), and alsoenhance architectural attractiveness
of the building. Further, the building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) systems mayreplace the traditionally used building
materialsand systems within the climate casing of buildings, for instance, the roofs, skylights and frontages. BIPV
frameworks should be considered as a utilitarian part of the building structure as they are structurally coordinated into the
building's configuration [3]. Hence, the BIPVs servesthe dual functionality of beinga building envelope material and also
work asa power generator [4].
This research work essentiallyconcludes the current scenario of the developments of BIPVs, including the BIPV tiles,
foils,modules andsolar (PV) cell glazing products, but we have also focused on building- attached photovoltaic (BAPV)
systems because of their similarity with BIPVs. Building-applied photovoltaics (BAPV) are sometimes referred as
photovoltaics that arefitted into the buildingenvelope onlyafter construction workof the building is complete.For
auxiliaryoverview and embellishments including some possible research prospects andconduits for the future BIPVs,
reference [5] may be referred.
2. Building integration processof photovoltaic (PV) cells
First of all, the probable spaces within the building envelop have to be recognized for the integration of PV cells/modules.
The building integration of photovoltaic (PV) cells are basicallydoneon slanted roofs, level roofs, fronts andsolar shielding
systems. Building-integrated photovoltaic cells may be installed above the building envelope itself or onto the
existingconventional rooftop or wall coveringsystems. These systems replace the building’s outer envelope membrane,
therefore serving simultaneously as a climate screen as well as a power source by generating electricity. Hence, BIPVs
provide savings inmaterials and reduce labor as well, further reduce the electricity expenses. However, the Building-
integrated photovoltaics (BIPVs) function as theclimate shelter screens which requires to have satisfactory or strict
necessities of raintightness, toughness and durability.
Manyaspects have to be taken and evaluated w.r.t the integration of photovoltaic cells into theouter casing of building
envelope. One of the important aspect is to ensure proper air gap below the PV cells in order to provide sufficient air flow
which will reduce the temperature of the solar PV cells, because at high temperature theefficiency of the solar cells
decreases, specifically for mono crystallineand poly crystalline silicon (Si) cells. Other aspect that hasto be considered is
the leaning of the BIPVs, for both existing and new buildings, as PVcells essentially need to followthe inclination of
roof (or the wall) for its proper integration in the buildings.Also the geographical position, orientation towards the sun
and exposure area are yet another factors to beconsidered during integration process of the BIPV systems. Some BIPV
companies also offer a range of dummymodules to deliver more aesthetical and reliable appearance of the rooftops and
frontages.
Henceforth, it is concluded that BIPVs have to fulfil all the necessities, w.r.t different properties, of thebuilding’s envelope
membraneswhich they are substituting. Along the above explained factors, other building physical subjects like e.g.
moisture and heat transportation in the building’s envelope are also important and should be accounted for. Solar cell
(PV) glazingproducts also offer a good solution for using the fenestration w.r.t sunshine, solar-heat gain, solarshading,
and finally solar energy gain by transforming solarradiation into useful electrical energy.
3. BIPV’s architectural traits
BIPV systems serve not only to create architectural appeal,they also offer savings in building materials that would
otherwise be used and reduced electricity costs. Along with this, these systems will protect against the weather and will
be a source of clean, eco-friendly and renewable energy.In view of availability, numerous options forinnovative
architectural design are available with us provided by leading manufacturers of BIPVs, which are also aesthetically
soothing. BIPVs may also be utilized as screeningdevices and also give a solution for semi-transparent elements of
fenestration [10].
Further, silicon tilescan be used to construct a building-integrated photovoltaic roof which mayappear very much similar
to a standard/conventional tiled roof, whereas semi-transparent modules can also beused infrontages or on the glass
ceilings to craft different soothing visual effects.Some wants BIPV roofs to give clear visual impression and is preferred
by mostof the architects, whileother people want the BIPV roofs to appear very much similar toa traditional/conventional
roof.More info aboutbuilding integration ofphotovoltaicpower systems and building integration of BIPVs inparticular,
may be found in references [3] [7].
Journal of Advance Research in Electrical and Electronics Engineering (ISSN: 2208-2395)
Vol. 3 No. 10 (2016)
2
4. Test methods and BIPV quality standards
Assessment/quality inspection of BIPVs involve several mathematical deciding factors, e.g. solar cell efficiency
η= Pmax/(ΦA)
where Φ is the input solar radiation in W/m2;
A is the surface area of photovoltaic cell in m2;
Pmax is the power at maximum power point (MPPT) in Wor Watt-peak (Wp); Voc is the open circuit potential or voltage
in volt (V);
Isc is the short circuit electrical current in Amp (A);
Also, Fill factor(FF) = Pmax/(VocIsc) = (VI)max /(VocIsc),
The fill factor (FF), is a parameter which when combined with Voc and Isc, governs the amount of power obtainablefrom
a solar photovoltaic (PV) cell. Mathematically, it may be defined asthe ratio of the maximum powerobtainable from the
photovoltaic solar cell to the product of Voc and Isc. The significance of fill factor is that it measuresthe square-ness of the
solar cell in terms ofthe area of the largest possible rectangle which can accommodate into the I-V characteristic curve of
the photovoltaic cell. The graph representing the fill factor is given below.
The values of different parameters of BIPV as claimed by solar cell manufacturers are mainly obtained by the quality
tests done at standard testconditions (STC).
The binding quality standards for Building-Integrated Photovoltaic (BIPV) modules are the standards: EN-61646 ”Thin-
film BIPV (Building-integrated Photovoltaic) modules: designer qualifications and type of approval” [8],EN-61215-2005
Silicon (Si) crystalline terrestrial photovoltaic (PV) module: Designer qualifications and typeof approval” [9], EN-
61730-1 ”photovoltaic (PV)module’s safety qualifications Part 1” [10], EN-61730-2 ”Photovoltaic (PV)
modules:design &safety qualifications” [10] & UL-1703 ”UL-standards for safety of flat-plate Photovoltaic (PV)
modules& panels” [11]. The above mentionedstandards may be referred for further information.
5. Current scenario of BIPVs
5.1.
BIPV classification
A wide range of BIPV products are available in the market, which may be classified in several different ways depending
upon the criteria of characterization. This work of categorization is mainly dependent on the product specifications from
thecompanies and for what other materials, the products are customized to be combined with. Based on these
twoimportant factors, the building-integrated photovoltaic products or systems may beclassifiedas follows:
(i)
BIPV foil products
(ii)
BIPV tile products
(iii)
BIPV module products
(iv)
Solar cell (PV) glazing products
Other than above classifications of BIPV products, one more related category should be discussed i.e.the Building-
Attached Photovoltaic (BAPV)products, as BAPVs are very much similar to the to the BIPV systems and sometimes it
may be difficult to differentiate them:
(v)
BAPV products
The only major difference between the two BIPVs and BAPVs is that Building-attached photovoltaic (BAPV) products
Journal of Advance Research in Electrical and Electronics Engineering (ISSN: 2208-2395)
Vol. 3 No. 10 (2016)
3
are observed as attachments to the buildings itself, hence they are notdirectly linked to building structure’s functional
aspects [3]. That is, BAPVs are different from BIPVs, because the BAPVs are not integrated into the building’s envelope
as like BIPVs do, thus they do not replace thetraditional/conventional building parts. Specifically, BAPVs may be referred
as the attachments to the buildings, which is done after the construction work is finished.
Some of the BIPV products have extensive range of properties and features, thus it becomes more difficult to classifythem.
However, in some of the cases it might be somewhat difficult to even decide whether a PV product should beconsidered
as a BIPV product or BAPV product, all because ofdeficiency of information and uncertainty about how the productis
going to be mounted. For detailed appraisal of the BIPV products or systems, includingthe references and contact-info,
reference [5] may be referred.
5.2.
BIPV foil products
These have an added advantage of the flexibility and arelightweight products, which areadvantageousw.r.t easier& faster
installationand prevailing weight constraints for roofs. In these foil products the PV cells are usually made from thin-film
cells to uphold the flexibility feature in the foil along with their efficiency atelevated temperatures. Theyare of great use
for the non-ventilated rooftop solutions. Unfortunately, at present there are only a few manufacturers of BIPV foil
products available in the market whoofferreal-world weather tightsolutions. SomeBIPV foil products available to
consumer in the market are given below in Table 1. They specifically have a lowfill factor because of the lower efficiency
and the large solar cell resistances of thin-film cells. However, as an advantage it is always possible to alter the degree of
inclination of the BIPV foil product to provideflexibility in their use.
Table 1. Specification sheet for few BIPV foil products available in the global market [5].
Manufacturer
Product
Name
efficiency
η
(%)
Voc
(Volt
)
Pmax
(Watt)
Fill
factor
(FF)
Area
(mm2)
Pmax/
Area
(W/m2)
Alwitra GmbH
& Corporation
EvalonV
Solar- 408
138.6
408.0/
module
0.58
1550 x
6000
42.90
EvalonV
Solar-
136
46.2
136.0/
module
0.58
1050 x
3360
38.50
5.3.
BIPV tile products
Basically, BIPV tile products are the roofing tiles which may shield the entire rooftop or a part of the rooftop and act as
the replacement for conventional/traditional tiles used on the rooftops.In view of their structure, they are side-by-side
arranged PV modules with samephysical look and properties like of standard roof tiles and act as asubstitute to
thetraditional roof tiles, thus enables the easy retro-fitting of roofs. The tile shape and cell type differs with the
manufacturer.Fewof the tile productslook like curved ceramic tiles but they have a drawback of lesser effective area
because of its curvy surface, but on the other side they are more aesthetic and hence preferred for looks and decorative
finishing. Some examples of BIPVtile products available to the customer in the market are given below in Table 2.
Table 2. Specification sheet of few BIPV tile products available in the global market [5].
Manufacturer
Product
Name
efficienc
y η
(%)
Voc
(Volt)
Isc
(Amp)
Pmax
(Watt)
Fill
factor
(FF)
Area
(mm2)
Pmax/
Area
(W/m2)
SRS Energy
Solé
Powertile
6.30
4.6
15.75/
module
0.54
868 x
457.2
39.70
Solardachstei
n
STEPdesig
n
23.75
2.40
1.36/ cell
0.76
100 x 100
8 units
136
Solar Century
C-21e Tile
20/cell
12.0
5.55
52/
module
0.78
1221 x
420
101.50
Lumeta
Solar Flat
Tile
7.41
5.20
28/
module
0.73
432 x 905
71.60
The BIPV tile products from top manufacturers Solardachstein, Solar Century and Lumeta provide the highest FF (fill
factors) which indicates their high efficiency. In fact, Solar Century offers an efficiency of 20 percent/ cell fortheir C-21e
Tile and is more area effective. Further, the available design concept of the of the manufacturers like SoléPowertile and
the STEPdesign is very much similar to the standard roof tiles, hence, theymay replace several standard roof tiles. But, in
these the PV module has an integrated panel of monocrystalline or polycrystallinecells. i.e., portions of the modules are
not externally covered with PV cells, hence the areaefficiency is low. The C-21e Tile from Solar Century has more active
area than the any other products since monocrystalline Si (Silicon) cells shield the complete module area, and has
compatibility witha diverse range of tiles and slates. SoléPowertile from SRS-Energy hasskeleton very much similar to
standard rooftop tiles.
Journal of Advance Research in Electrical and Electronics Engineering (ISSN: 2208-2395)
Vol. 3 No. 10 (2016)
4
5.4.
BIPV module products
The BIPV modules are the solar products that look very much similar to traditional/conventional photovoltaic modules.
But in case of BIPV modules, we have an advantage of having dual functionality
i.e. together with electricity generation, they also provide theweather tight solutions. There are two types of BIPV
moduleproducts, one which may replace several different types of roofing materialsi.e. they are not manufacturer specific
while second includes those which may fit only with a specific roof solution made by itsown manufacturer. Further,
the mounting systems of the BIPV modules makes their installation easier and hassle free.There are variety
ofproducts in the market out of which some are promoted as BIPV productsirrespective of the fact that they do not function
as weather skins, while other Building-Integrated Photovoltaic (BIPV) products do not provide any information about
how they have to be mounted which leads to obscurity whether they are BIPVs or BAPVs.Some of the BIPV module
products availablein the market are given below in Table 3.
Table 3: Specification sheet of few BIPV module products available in the global market [5].
Manufacturer
Product
Name
efficiency
η
(%)
Voc
(Volt)
Isc
(Amp)
Pmax
(Watt)
Fill
factor
(FF)
Area
(mm2)
Pmax/ Area
(W/m2)
Abakus
Solar- AG
Peak-on
P235-60
14.60
37.21
8.48
235
0.74
1630 x
1000
144.20
Creaton-AG
Creaton-
Solesia
13.86
8.46
90/mod
ule
0.77
1778 x 355
142.60
Suntech
MSZ-
190JD
45.20
5.62
190/mo
dule
0.75
1641 x
834.50
139
Solar Century
C-21e
slate
20/cell
12.0
5.55
52
0.78
1174 x 318
139.31
5.5.
Solar cell (PV) glazing products
Building-Integrated photovoltaic products when used as solar cell (PV) glazing products offer abundant variety of choices
for building windows, tiled or glassed frontages and roofing, Different transparencies and colors can providedifferent
aestheticalresults. Someof the solar cell (PV) glazing product available to the customer in the market are given below in
Table 4. The solar cell (PV) glazing modules serves dual functions i.e. they transmit daylight and also serve as water and
sun protection inside the building. The optimum gapbetween the solar cells is normally 3 - 50 mm in solar cell (PV)
glazing products which depends on desired transparency and the amount ofelectricity to be produced. The available gap
between the solar cells transmits diffused sunlight in the daytime. Therefore, both natural lighting and shading are
provided along with electricity production.
The solar cell (PV) glazing product’s manufacturers generally provide customized products aboutthe shape, cell material,
color and different transparency level, i.e. the available gap between the cells.
Generally, the transparency of the solar cells (PVs)falls in the range of 16 % to 41 % for different Vidursolar models,
while it has value of 25 % for the Abakus Solar-AG Peak in his P210-60 item model. The distinctive models from Sapa
Building System utilizes either formless, polycrystalline or monocrystalline cells with various cell detachments.
Table 4. Specification sheetoffew solar cell (PV) glazing products available in the global market [5].
Manufacturer
Product Name
efficiency η
(%)
Voc
(Volt
)
Isc
(Amp)
Pmax
(Watt)
Fill
facto r
(FF)
Area
(mm2)
Pmax/ Area
(W/m2)
Vidursolar
FV-VS16
C36-P120
21.60
7.63
1600 x
720
Glaswerke
Arnold GmbH
&Corporation
Voltarlux-
ASI-TMono
4-fach
93
1.97
100/
module
0.55
2358 x
1027
41.3
Schott Solar
ASI-THRU-
4IO
6.0
111
2.21
189
0.77
1123 x
2620
64.72
Sapa-
integrated
Building
System
Amorphous
Silicon(Si) thin
film
5.0/cell
32/ cell
576 x
976
/cell
50
Poly-
crystalline
16.0/cell
1.46-
3.85
/cell
156 x
156
/cell
120
Mono-
crystalline
Highlyeffici
ent
22.0/cell
2.91-
3.11
/cell
125 x
125
/cell
155
Journal of Advance Research in Electrical and Electronics Engineering (ISSN: 2208-2395)
Vol. 3 No. 10 (2016)
5
5.6.
BAPV products
The Building Attached Photovoltaics (BAPVs) are the products that add on rather than integrated in the rooftop or
frontage like BIPV products. They are extra attachments to the building and installed after the construction of building is
completed. TheBAPV solar products are not the main focus of this research work, but because of their similarities with
BIPV products, it would be more interesting to look briefly at some of them. The Uni-Solar laminate (BAPV) available
in the market have good flexibility, thus makes it easier to join with other building materials. Some other examples of
BAPVproducts available to the customer in the market are given below in Table 5.
Table 5. Specification sheet of few of the BAPV products available in the global market [5].
Manufacturer
Product
Name
efficiency
η
(%)
Voc
(Volt)
Isc
(Amp)
Pmax
(Watt)
Fill
factor
(FF)
Area
(mm2)
Pmax/
Area
(W/m2)
Hauptsitz
SunPower
220 Solar
Panel
17.70
48.60
5.75
1559 x
798
Uni-Solar
PVL-68
23.10
5.10
68/module
0.58
2849 x
394
60.60
PVL-144
46.20
5.30
144/module
0.59
5486 x
394
66.60
Isofoton
ISF-240
14.50
37.10
8.45
240
0.77
1667 x
994
144.80
6. Economical aspects of BIPVs
As per the report of consulting firm Nano-Markets,New York [12], the global market for BIPVs is estimated to grow
from $1.8·109 in 2009, to $8.7·109 in 2016 . Further, Nano-Markets state that CopperIndium Gallium Selenide solar
power cells will account for 17 % of the BIPV market in 2016and polysilicon-based BIPVs will drop from 75 % of the
market to 33 % by 2016 in terms of volume [12]. As PV panels requires a large installation area, the associated financial
challenge may be best countered byspace-saving technologies like BIPVs [13]. BIPV systems are cheaper than other
traditional/conventional PV systems that need separate and dedicated mounting systems. Further, Integration of
photovoltaicproducts into building parts such as rooftops, windows, sunshades and glassed frontages gives the opportunity
of cost saving by substitutingcommon building materials with BIPVs at peripheral costs [6]. When BIPVs usedas a
covering material are compared to steel, glass orother more traditional/conventional covering materials, they seem to be
much economical because of their low running and maintenance cost,but installing BIPV products adds a marginal extra
cost of 2-5 % ofthe complete construction costs of a commercial building which later on gets balanced by the lower
running and maintenance cost [14]. Also, this marginal installation andoperation cost of the BIPV products/systems might
be minimized by selling the surplus electricity to a regional power distribution company and may become a profit
business.[15].
Meanwhile, the price of a PV system is on decline with the improvement of technology advancement and increasing cut-
throat competition in the global market,which has resulted into a lesser price per kW installed PV system [16], which is
avital part of the development for makinginstallation and building integration of PV modulesmore profitable without
government subsidies. To work out the energy payback time, the embodied energy of the system should be calculable
[15]. For detailed knowledge of theenergy- payback time reference [17] may be referred.Research and development work
in the area of photovoltaic (PV) cells &modules and improvement/advancements in their technologies may have an even
strongerimpact on the coming future of BIPVs.
7. Conclusions
Today, theexisting building-integrated photovoltaic products in the market,offer an extensive range of integration of
photovoltaic (PV) products or systems into buildings and their roofing& frontages. The research anddevelopment workis
continued in both PV and BIPV materials and advancement in technologies will definitelyproducebetter BIPVsolutions
along with good cost economics in the adjacent future. The increased efficiency of solar cell, reduction in productioncosts
and improved building integration will bang the coming future of solar BIPVs & BAPVs. Further, there is a need of new
and innovative solutions in the field of BIPVs whichmay cut costs and increase efficiency of BIPV products.
Acknowledgement
This exploration/research work has been finished under the guidance and support of Dr. J.P. Kesari, Former AICTE
Director, Associate Professor, Delhi Technological University (formerly Delhi College Engineering).
References
[1] Dr. J.P Kesari. Empowering India with Green Energy Technology, paper presented in 53rd National Convention of
Indian Institution of Industrial Engineering and National conference on India as a Technology Hub, (Dec. 16-17),
2011.
[2] Kesari J.P. Solar Thermal Power Generation in India: An overview of recent policies under National Solar Mission,
Proceedings of the National Conference on Management of Technologies for Advancing Rural India, SDCOE at
Journal of Advance Research in Electrical and Electronics Engineering (ISSN: 2208-2395)
Vol. 3 No. 10 (2016)
6
Muzaffarnagarfeb.( 5-6), 2011.
[3] Y. Huang,Z. Wu,C. Peng, Building-integrated photovoltaics(BIPVs) in architectural design in China, Energy and
Buildings43 (2011) 35923598.
[4] S. Strong, Building-Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPVs), Whole Building Design Guide,
<http://www.wbdg.org/resources/bipv.php>, June 9, 2010.
[5] B.P. Jelle, H.D. Røkenesand C. Breivik, BIPVs: A state-of-the-art review and futureresearch opportunities, Solar
Energy Materials and Solar Cells, doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2011.12.016, in press, 2012.
[6] T.K. Mallick, P.C. Eames, B. Norton,S.J. McCormack,M.J. Huang,Y.G. Yohanis and J.D. Mondol,Enhancing
theperformance of BIPVs, Solar Energy 85 (2011) 16291664.
[7] A.G. Hestnes, Building-integration of solar energy systems, Solar Energy 67 (2000) 181187.
[8] European Committee for Electro-TechnicalStandardization, Thin-film Terrestrial Photovoltaic (PV) Modules
DesignQualification and Type Approval, EN 61646, European Standard, 2008.
[9] European Committee for Electro-TechnicalStandardization, Crystalline Silicon Terrestrial Photovoltaic (PV) Modules
DesignQualification and Type Approval, EN 61215, European Standard, 2005.
[10] European Committee for Electro-TechnicalStandardization, Photovoltaic (PV) Module Safety Qualification Part
1& Part 2: Requirements for Construction, EN 61730-1&EN 61730-2, European Standard, 2007.
[11] Underwriters Laboratories Inc., UL Standard for Safety Flat-Plate Photovoltaic Modules and Panels, UL 1703, 2002.
[12] Dow,R. Coons: Solar shingles could generate $5 billion by 2015, Chemical Week 171 (2009) 9.
[13] S.N. Mandal,D. Paul, S.R. Bhadra and D. Mukherjee Chaudhuri, Optimisation of significant insolation
distributionparameters A new approach towards BIPV system design, Renewable Energy 35 (2010) 21822191.
[14] P. Eiffert, Guidelines for the economic evaluation of building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) power systems,
NREL/TP-550-31977,2003.
[15] IEA-PVPS, Grid-connected power systems: Summary of IEA/PVPS Task V activities from 1993 to 1998, T5-03,
1999.
[16] M. Elnimeiriand H. Sozer, Critical factors in reducing the cost of building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) systems,
Architectural Science Review-50 (2007) 115121.
[17] G.P. Hammond, C.I. Jones, A.B. Winnett andH.A. Harajli, Whole systems appraisal of a UK building-
integratedphotovoltaic (BIPV) system: Energy, environmental, and economic evaluations, Energy Policy- 40 (2012)
219230.
Journal of Advance Research in Electrical and Electronics Engineering (ISSN: 2208-2395)
Vol. 3 No. 10 (2016)
7
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Technical Report
Full-text available
This report summarises the important findings from the first stage of activities of IEA PVPS Task V - Grid Interconnection of Building Integrated and Other Dispersed Photovoltaic Power Systems. From 1993 to 1998, review of existing techniques and rules, theoretical and experimental investigation for the important issues for grid interconnection of photovoltaic power generation were conducted and recommendation for further work was issued. Keywords: Photovoltaic power generation, Grid interconnection, Utility distribution system, Guidelines and regulations for grid interconnection of PV systems, PV inverters, Harmonics, AC modules, Grounding, Ground-fault detection, Overvoltage protection, EMC, Islanding, External disconnect, Re-closing, Isolation transformer, DC injection, Distribution system fault
Chapter
This chapter presents best practice for the design and operation of building-integrated PV systems and performance issues arising from the building application, multifunctionality and shading. Requirements on BIPV installations as part of a future energy system are discussed with respect of regulations and standardization. Recommendations are made on approaches to monitor and validate meteorological and electrical data to ensure BIPV system output. Finally, an outlook is given on new approaches to define and design BIPV systems.
Article
Dow Chemical's Dow Solar Solutions business will introduce a line of copper indium gallium diselenide (CIGS)-based solar shingles by mid-2010. The 'Powerhouse' shingles have the potential to yield revenues of $5 billion in 2015 and $10 billion-$11 billion by 2020. The shingles' design enables them to be installed simultaneously with conventional roofing shingles and without special skills, significantly lowering the installation costs of building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV). The shingles use conventional polymer materials and automated polymer processing techniques, enabling mass production of the modules. The global market for BIPV is expected to grow from $1.8 billion in 2009, to $8.7 billion in 2016. Dow received a $20-million grant in 2007 to develop the shingles under the U.S. Department of Energy's Solar America Initiative Pathways Program.
Article
This report identifies the economic parameters of building-integrated PV (BIPV) systems. The guidelines are structured in three major parts: the investment analysis (methods and ownership issues), benefits, and costs. Measurement and verification are also discussed briefly.
Article
Energy analysis, environmental life-cycle assessment (LCA) and economic appraisals have been utilised to study the performance of a domestic building integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) system on a ‘whole systems’ basis. Energy analysis determined that the system paid back its embodied energy in just 4.5 years. LCA revealed that the embodied impacts were offset by the electricity generated to provide a net environmental benefit in most categories. Only carcinogens, ecotoxicity and minerals had a small net lifetime burden. A financial analysis was undertaken from the householder's perspective, alongside cost-benefit analysis from a societal perspective. The results of both indicated that the systems are unlikely to pay back their investment over the 25 year lifetime. However, the UK is in an important period (2010/11) of policy transition with a move away from the ‘technology subsidies’ of the Low Carbon Buildings Programme (LCBP) and towards a ‘market development policy’ of feed-in tariffs. Representing the next stage on an innovation S-curve this is expected to facilitate rapid PV uptake, as experienced in countries such as Germany, Denmark, and Spain. The results of the present study clearly demonstrate the importance of the new government support scheme to the future uptake of BIPV.
Article
Even though photovoltaic (PV) technology is new and expensive for curtain walls and other aspects of the building industry, regardless of costly market development and technology advancement, the cost of building integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) systems can be reduced and their application can be spread further into the building industry as this paper will show. The paper uses life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA) to identify BIPV system cost components and makes the connection between the findings of LCCA and the building design process. It identifies specific quantifiable variables and measures that are compared with a non-PV integrated building and different PV system applications by using LCCA methods to confirm cost related issues.
Article
Building-Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV) are one of the best ways to harness solar power, which is the most abundant, inexhaustible and clean of all the available energy resources. This paper discusses issues concerning BIPV in architectural design in China, including how to choose between BIPV and building-attached photovoltaics (BAPV), whether it is necessary for photovoltaic components to last as long as buildings and how to design BIPV structures. The paper shows that we should consider the function, cost, technology and aesthetics of BIPV, rather than solely the high integrations. According to developments in technology and markets, photovoltaic structures and design should be focused on the maintenance and replacement of photovoltaic cell modules, rather than simply prolonging their lives. To solve problems associated with the existing photovoltaic structures in China, we design a building photovoltaic structure that allows convenient maintenance and replacement of photovoltaic components.Highlights► BIPV are one of the best ways to harness solar power. ► We should choose the appearance of BIPV according to actual needs. ► It is not necessary for photovoltaic components to last as long as buildings. ► The ease of maintaining and replacing photovoltaic components should be emphasized. ► Our novel BIPV structural comes from the principle of dry batteries, self-locking and the integration of electrical circuits and steel support systems.
Article
System efficiency and payback time are yet to attain a commercially viable level for solar photovoltaic energy projects. Despite huge development in prediction of solar radiation data, there is a gap in extraction of pertinent information from such data. Hence the available data cannot be effectively utilized for engineering application. This is acting as a barrier for the emerging technology. For making accurate engineering and financial calculations regarding any solar energy project, it is crucial to identify and optimize the most significant statistic(s) representing insolation availability by the Photovoltaic setup at the installation site. Quality Function Deployment (QFD) technique has been applied for identifying the statistic(s), which are of high significance from a project designer's point of view. A MATLAB™ program has been used to build the annual frequency distribution of hourly insolation over any module plane at a given location. Descriptive statistical analysis of such distributions is done through MINITABTM. For Building Integrated Photo Voltaic (BIPV) installation, similar statistical analysis has been carried out for the composite frequency distribution, which is formed by weighted summation of insolation distributions for different module planes used in the installation. Vital most influential statistic(s) of the composite distribution have been optimized through Artificial Neural Network computation. This approach is expected to open up a new horizon in BIPV system design.
Article
The way solar systems are used in buildings is different from what it used to be. Buildings are no longer designed to use just passive solar energy systems, such as windows and sunspaces, or active solar systems, such as solar water collectors. In fact, the words passive and active no longer make sense, as the newer buildings combine several of these technologies. They may be both energy efficient, solar heated and cooled, and PV powered, i.e. they are simply “solar buildings”. The paper discusses the various approaches in building integration of solar systems, and presents a number of successful examples. It also presents some of the work being done on improving the design processes to account for the need for a holistic approach to solar building design.
Empowering India with Green Energy Technology, paper presented in 53rd National Convention of Indian Institution of Industrial Engineering and National conference on India as a Technology Hub
  • J Dr
  • Kesari
Dr. J.P Kesari. Empowering India with Green Energy Technology, paper presented in 53rd National Convention of Indian Institution of Industrial Engineering and National conference on India as a Technology Hub, (Dec. 16-17), 2011.