ArticlePDF Available

Prevention of Genital Tract Malignancies: A Task for all.

Authors:
  • Rivers State University Port Harcourt Nigeria
  • Mother, Baby and Adolescent Care Global Foundation C/O Department of OBGYN Rivers State University/Teaching Hospital
  • Rivers State University Teaching Hospital

Abstract

As more is learned about the factors associated with malignant diseases of the female genital tract comprising of cancers of the vulva, vagina, cervix, endometrium, fallopian tubes and ovaries, there is hope of preventing certain types. This involves elimination or control of what are believed to be causal agents, a typical example being the human papilloma virus (HPV) which is the prime aetiological factor of cervical cancer. Screening modalities in the developed world constituted a great step in the prevention of cervical cancer by over 80%. The advent of cervical cancer vaccination revolutionized the prevention of cancer of the cervix. However, there is scarcity of cervical cancer vaccines in the developing countries of the world. Where these vaccines are available the cost is a challenge because majority of the masses cannot afford them. Vulvectomy for dysplasia of the vulva epithelium has its place but does not always prevent squamous cell carcinoma in that site. Hysterectomy for all women showing cervical epithelial dysplasia or suffering from post menopausal bleeding or discharge or whose family is completed could well reduce the number of cancer if it is cervical cancer or cancer of the corpus uteri. Such an approach, however, is likely to involve operative mordalities. Reason and safety impose strict limit on the place of prophylactic surgery in the prevention of cancer of the vulva, cervix, corpus uteri, fallopian tubes and ovaries. Early Diagnosis It is generally accepted that an early cancer is more amenable to cure than one which has been present for sometimes. 11 It is important to pay heed to the first suspicious symptoms or signs presented by the patient, for example, irregular uterine bleeding or discharge occurring after the age of forty years. 12 Although early diagnosis and treatment must offer the patient a better chance of survival, they do not always make much difference that might be expected.1,12 Stage 1 cases of cancer of the cervix can do badly while more advanced ones sometimes respond well to treatment. 13 This is because certain cancer cell growth divide the vascular channel at a very early stage, whereas others can come to terms with their cancer cells,14 even to the extent of inactivating the malignant cells liberated into the blood or lodged in the bone marrow. 15 The first type is rarely cured no matter how early the occurrence, whereas the second is nearly always cured no matter how long treatment is deferred. 14 The result of therapy according to the stage of cancer of the cervix clearly shows that the less the clinical extent of the disease the better the outlook.12-14 However, it is often assumed that the extent of a cancer represents its age.13
Greener Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 12-14, 2020
Greener Journal of Medical Sciences
Vol. 10(1), pp. 12-14, 2020
ISSN: 2276-7797
Copyright ©2020, the copyright of this article is retained by the author(s)
https://gjournals.org/GJMS
Prevention of Genital Tract Malignancies: A
Task for all
Kalio DGB1; Eli S2; Briggs NCT3; Iwo-Amah R1; Okagua KE1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecolology, Rivers State University Teaching Hospital.1
Mother and Baby Care Global Foundation.2
Rivers State Hospital Management Board.3
ARTICLE INFO.
Article No.: 042520063
Type: Commentary
Accepted: 30/04/2020
Published: 09/05/2020
*Corresponding Author
Dr. Eli S, MB BS, FWACS, FIMC, CMC
E-mail: elisukarime@ gmail. com
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
As more is learned about the factors associated
with malignant diseases of the female genital tract
comprising of cancers of the vulva, vagina, cervix,
endometrium, fallopian tubes and ovaries, there is
hope of preventing certain types.1 This involves
elimination or control of what are believed to be causal
agents, a typical examples being the human papilloma
virus (HPV) which is the prime aetiological factor of
cervical cancer.2 Screening modalities in the
developed world constituted a great step in the
prevention of cervical cancer by over 80%.3 The
advent of cervical cancer vaccination revolutionized
the prevention of cancer of the cervix.4 However, there
is scarcity of cervical cancer vaccines in the
developing countries of the world.5 Where these
vaccines are available the cost is a challenge because
majority of the masses cannot afford them.6
Vulvectomy for dysplasia of the vulva epithelium
has its place but does not always prevent squamous
cell carcinoma in that site.7 Hysterectomy for all
women showing cervical epithelial dysplasia or
suffering from post menopausal bleeding or discharge
or whose family is completed could well reduce the
number of cancer if it is cervical cancer or cancer of
the corpus uteri.8 Such an approach, however, is likely
to involve operative mordalities.9
Reason and safety impose strict limit on the
place of prophylactic surgery in the prevention of
cancer of the vulva, cervix, corpus uteri, fallopian tubes
and ovaries.10
Early Diagnosis
It is generally accepted that an early cancer is
more amenable to cure than one which has been
present for sometimes.11 It is important to pay heed to
the first suspicious symptoms or signs presented by
the patient, for example, irregular uterine bleeding or
discharge occurring after the age of forty years.12
Although early diagnosis and treatment must offer the
patient a better chance of survival, they do not always
make much difference that might be expected.1,12
Stage 1 cases of cancer of the cervix can do badly
while more advanced ones sometimes respond well to
treatment.13 This is because certain cancer cell growth
divide the vascular channel at a very early stage,
whereas others can come to terms with their cancer
cells,14 even to the extent of inactivating the malignant
cells liberated into the blood or lodged in the bone
marrow. 15 The first type is rarely cured no matter how
early the occurrence, whereas the second is nearly
always cured no matter how long treatment is
deferred. 14
The result of therapy according to the stage of
cancer of the cervix clearly shows that the less the
clinical extent of the disease the better the outlook.12-14
However, it is often assumed that the extent of a
cancer represents its age.13 That this is not the case
as shown by some literatures that women who have
Kalio et al / Greener Journal of Medical Sciences 13
symptom for more than 6 months before being treated
often show better 5year survival rate than those with
symptoms for only 3 - 6months.12,13
This is because those women who delay taking
advice either die before treatment is instituted or they
have cancers which are only slowly progressive. 5-7
This also explains why the clinical stage of cancer of
the cervix is not necessarily proportional to the
duration of symptoms.14-15
Nevertheless, the earlier the patient reports, the
better the overall 5year survival rate.2,3 Even this
argument, however, may be deceptive. Hypothetically
a woman with a stage 1 carcinoma of the cervix is
treated in 1989 and dies in 1999, her survival for more
than 5years is then credited to early treatment. If the
same woman neglects her symptoms and fails to take
advice until 1994, the cancer has then progressed to
stage iv. She is then treated but only survives until
1995, and thus attributed to her late stage disease. 5-7
The above scenario is hypothetical. Evidence
have shown that microscopically diagnosed cancer of
the cervix at well women clinic who receive prompt
treatment have better prognosis.8,9
PROPAGANDA AND EDUCATION OF THE PUBLIC
Women are often slow to report symptoms of
genital tract malignancies in developed countries of the
world.1-4 The reasons for late presentations of genital
tract malignancies are social, cultural, religious and
economically. 7,8 For this reason, those who believe
that early treatment will have a dramatic effect in the
results often advocate for propaganda to ensure that
all women are aware of the early symptoms of genital
tract malignancies.5,6 Unfortunately some women are
resistant to education by the mass media and are
more likely to accept what they are told by friends than
by the doctors. Often it is the over anxious woman who
takes notice of misinformation and wrong advice,
which have no basis except fear. The women with
genuine symptoms often avoid presenting early. They
would rather remain in doubt because whatever they
may have heard, the refuse to accept that genital tract
cancer can be cured.9
Despite the acknowledged risks of smoking and
genital tract malignancies, 4 young women are
amongst the heaviest smokers in the developed
countries. 7,8 Genital tract malignancies have increased
in women in the past decades.10 To date, health
education does not appear to have been heeded,
although there have been sure reduction in those who
smoke during pregnancy.9 However, in the developed
countries patients with genital tract malignancies
present early compared with developing countries of
the world.4
In developing countries it is commonly observed
especially in the lower socio-economic patients, that
post-menopausal women are reluctant to report
symptoms of abnormal vaginal bleeding and offensive
vaginal discharge to their families because of
embarrassment, although they recognize that these
symptoms are abnormal. 9,10
ROUTINE MEDICAL EXAMINATION
One possible method of improving the outcome
of genital tract malignancy is to discover malignant
disease before it has become invasive or while it is
still microscopic and asymptomatic.3,4 This means the
routine screening of all apparently normal women who
are at risk of genital tract malignancy is
recommended.5 Arrangements for this, however,
usually concentrate on the detection of cervical cancer
to the exclusion of other genital tract malignancies
which may be equally, if not more, injurious to the
health of women. 6,7
In the developed world, cancer of the breast
kills more women compared to cancer of the cervix. 12
It can be argued that regular examination of breast is
as routine as test on the cervix. 12 Malignant conditions
of the ovary, although less common are mostly fatal
unless detected in their early asymptomatic stage.1,4
Again, diseases such as chronic hypertension,
diabetes mellitus, obesity and peptic ulcer disease
may potentially be far more dangerous to women than
is cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.13
Note the observation that cancer detection clinic
or clinics devoted only to clinical or routine cervical
cancer diagnosis are of limited valve.12 If the best
results are to be obtained cervical smears need to be
taken as seriously as a full pelvis and general
examination carried out by someone who is competent
to recognize pelvic and other disease by their clinical
expertise and to give expert medical advice.11-12
From the standpoint of detecting genital cancer
in its early and pre-invasive stage, cytology and
colposcopy have proven their worth. 1,2CA 125 has
been developed as a reasonably satisfactory tumor
marker for ovarian cancer which helps in the
screening, treatment and prognostic factor of cancer of
the ovary.14 However, it is neither cost-effective
method for widespread screening nor is it sufficiently
specific.1,14 Similarly, trans-vaginal ultrasound may be
useful as a screening tool for ovarian malignancy but
not suitable for large scale screening.14
CYTODIAGNOSIS
Cytodiagnosis depends on the fact that epithelial
cells are being shed continually from the epithelial
lining of the genital tract.15 They can therefore be
collected and examined to see if they show cytological
evidence of dysplasa.15 It should be however noted
that cytology is not in itself a method for cancer
diagnosis in general.14,15 It is a means of screening
apparently healthy and symptom-free women to
discover those who deserve further investigation to
see if they have malignant disease.15,16 Cancer can
only be diagnosed with reasonable certainly by
histological examination of malignant tissues.14-16
TECHNIQUES
Vaginal Cystoscopy
The secretory lining of the upper vagina
normally contains desquamated cells from the vaginal
14 Kalio et al / Greener Journal of Medical Sciences
wall.2,3 The vaginal aspect of the cervix, the
endocervix, the endometrium and sometimes the
fallopian tubes are made up of similar epitheliai
tissues.2-4 The examination of desquamated cells in
the vaginal pool, test suggested by George
Papanicolaou may be the earliest means of detecting
premalignant lesions of the genital tract in these cities
especially in the cervix and the endometrium.2,13
This method of collecting material has the
advantage that it can be done blindly by anyone even
the woman herself. Since the smear contains
endometrial as well as cervix cells, its examination
may give lead to cancer in either site.13-15 On the other
hand, the admixture of cells means that the Cytologist
may find it more difficult and time consuming to
interpret .14,15 Since it is the detection of cervical pre-
invasive cells, the cervical scrape method for obtaining
materials is preferable.2,13
CERVICAL SCRAPE
This method is the gold standard of
cytodiagnosis of premalignant lesions of the cervix.12,13
It involves scraping of the superficial cells from the
external and endocervix by means of a special wooden
spatula.16 Accurate application of the spatula to the
squamo-columnar epithelial junction throughout
circumferentially is essential. 14-16
The Ayre’s scrape technique is unreliable in
picking up edometrial cells but it is more efficient than
the Papanicolaou method in collecting cervical cells.17
Moreover, the resulting smear can be assessed more
easily and more quickly in the laboratory.15-17
The Ayre’s spatula occasionally yields
insufficient number of endocervical cells.14-16 The
extended tip spatula with a longer endocervical limb
has been found to have a higher rate of satisfactory
smears.16,17 The Ayre’s spatula can sometimes be
replaced by the cyto-brush to improve the yield of
endocervical cells.18
This is the technique to be employed for the
routine screening of apparently well women.14,15 It can
be applied during pregnancy and is not ruled out if the
woman is menstruating or bleeding .15,16
Indeed it is potentially dangerous to insert
instruments into the cavity of the endometrium if there
is a possibility of cancer of the endometrium with
pyometra. 18 Suction curettage is effective method of
obtaining endometrical tissue using a negative
pressure.18 Suction aspiration of the endometrium
carries an accuracy rate over 80% in the diagnosis of
endometrial cancer.16-18
REFERENCES
1. Chumworathayi B. Female Genital Cancer
Prevention. Medical Research Archives 2020; 8(1):
1924 2375.
2. de Sanjose S, Quint WG, Alemanye L et al. Human
Papillomavirus genotype attribution in invasise
cervical cancer.Lancet Oncol. 2010; 11: 1048
1056.
3. Drolet M, Benard E, Perez N, Brisso M. HPV
Vaccination Impact Study Group Population Level
Impact and herd effects following the introduction of
human papillomavirus vaccination programmes
updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lancet 2019; 394: 497 509.
4. Sankaranarayanan R, Nene BM, Shastri SS et al.
HPV Screening for Cervical Cancer in rural India. N.
Engl.J Med 2009; 360; 1385 1394.
5. Kate TS, Steinberg J , Caruana M et al. Impact of
scaled up Human Pappilomavirus Vaccination and
Cervical Cancer in 181 Countries 2020 99. A
Modelling Study.
Lancet Oncol. 2019; 20(2): 394 407.
6. Sundstrom K, Elfstrom KM. Advances in Cervical
Cancer Prevention. Efficacy, effectiveness,
elimination? PLoS Med 2020; 17(1):e1003035
Doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed. 1003035.
7. Eke AC, Alabi Isama LI, Akabuike JC.
Management options for vulva carcinoma in a low
resource setting. World J Surg Onc 2010; 94:8.
Https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-8-94 .
8. Amanti F, Mirza R, Korskaj M, Creutzberg CL.
Cancer of the corpus uteri. International Journal of
Gynaecology & Obstetrics 2018: 143: 25.
Https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12612 .
9. Hysterectomy-corrected rates of endometrial cancer
among women younger than 50 in the United States.
Cancer Causes Control 2018; 29: 427 433.
10. Schmeler KM, Lynch HT. Chen L, Munsell MP.
Prophylactic Surgery to Reduce the Risk of
Gynecologic Cancers with the Lynch Syndrome. N
Eng J Med 2006; 354: 261 268.
11. Okunwo AA, Smith-Okowu ST. Cervical cancer
screening among urban Women in Lagos, Nigeria.
Focus on barriers and motivations for screening. The
Nigerian Journal of General Practice 2020; 18(1):
10.
12. Oluwole EO, Mohammed AJ, Akinyinka MR, Salako
O. Cervical cancer awareness and screening uptake
among rural women in Lagos, Nigeria. Journal of
Community Medicine and Primary Health Care 2017;
29(1): 81 88.
13. Ronco G, Dillner J, Elfstrom KM, Tunesi S. Efficacy
of HPV- based Screening for Prevention of invasive
cervical cancer follow-up of four European
randomized contrl trials. Lancet 2014; 383: 524
532.
14. Avbyn M, Ronco G, Anila A, Meijer CJ, Poljak M,
Ogilvie G et al. Evidence regarding human
papillomavirus testing in secondary prevention of
cervical cancer. Vaccine 2012; 30: f88- f99.
15. Tsikouras P, Stefanos Z, Manav B, Tomara E.
Cervical cancer screening and staging. Journal of
the Baikan Union of Oncology 2016; 21(2): 320
325.
Cite this Article: Kalio DGB; Eli S; Briggs NCT; Iwo-
Amah R; Okagua KE (2020). Prevention of Genital Tract
Malignancies: A Task for all. Greener Journal of Medical
Sciences, 10(1): 12-14.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
With major advances in understanding the infectious etiology of cervical cancer, preventive medicine has obtained highly promising new tools. Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines, together with a growing arsenal of HPV-based screening tests, have the potential to radically change public health but require diligent, large-scale implementation to reach the final goal: the elimination of cervical cancer. We reflect here upon the state of cervical cancer prevention globally as there have been several recent developments that will inform this implementation process.
Article
Full-text available
Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy in high‐income countries. Although the overall prognosis is relatively good, high‐grade endometrial cancers have a tendency to recur. Recurrence needs to be prevented since the prognosis for recurrent endometrial cancer is dismal. Treatment tailored to tumor biology is the optimal strategy to balance treatment efficacy against toxicity. Standard treatment consists of hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo‐oophorectomy. Lymphadenectomy (with ongoing studies of sentinel node biopsy) enables identification of lymph node positive patients who need adjuvant treatment, including radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Adjuvant radiotherapy is used for Stage I–II patients with high‐risk factors and Stage III lymph node negative patients. In advanced disease, a combination of surgery to no residual disease and chemotherapy results in the best outcome. Surgery for recurrent disease is only advocated in patients with a good performance status with a relatively long disease‐free interval. The latest state‐of‐the‐art treatment for endometrial cancer is described, incorporating the most recent new data that influence its clinical management.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Cervical cancer is the most common cause of female genital cancer and female cancer deaths in developing countries such as Nigeria. The most recent government estimates put the number of new cases at 25,000 per year. According to the latest global estimates, 493,000 new cases occur each year and 274,000 women die of the disease annually. This study therefore determined the awareness, knowledge and use of cervical cancer screening services among rural women in Lagos State, Nigeria. Method: A cross sectional, descriptive study design was adopted and a total of 400 women were studied. Data was collected using a structured, interviewer-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire elicited information about socio-demographic characteristics, awareness, knowledge and use of cervical screening services. Univariate and bivariate analyses were done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16. Significance level at 5%. Results: Age range of study participants was 25-65 years and a mean age of 38.9 +/- 9.51 years. Most of the repondents (85.0%) were not aware of cervical cancer. However, amongst those who were aware of cervical cancer, 66.7% got the information from the media. Only a few (13.3%) of the respondents have ever been screened and none of the screening was in the last 3 years. Majority (86.7%) of the respondents expressed willingness to undergo cervical cancer screening. Conclusion: There was low awareness of cervical cancer and screening uptake among the respondents and the overall knowledge was equally poor. However, the respondents showed a strong willingness for screening. There is need for community education and awareness among the rural women at large as this would engender a more positive attitude and increased use of screening services.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: Despite the widespread screening programs, cervical cancer remains the third most common cancer in developing countries. Based on the implementation of cervical screening programs with the referred adoption of improved screening methods in cervical cytology with the knowledge of the important role of the human papilloma virus (HPV) it's incidence is decreased in the developed world. Even if cervical HPV infection is incredibly common, cervical cancer is relatively rare. Depending on the rarity of invasive disease and the improvement of detection of pre-cancerous lesions due to the participation in screening programs, the goal of screening is to detect the cervical lesions early in order to be treated before cancer is developed. In populations with many preventive screening programs, a decrease in cervical cancer mortality of 50-75% is mentioned over the past 50 years. The preventive examination of vagina and cervix smear, Pap test, and the HPV DNA test are remarkable diagnostic tools according to the American Cancer Association guidelines, in the investigation of asymptomatic women and in the follow up of women after the treatment of pre-invasive cervical cancer. The treatment of cervical cancer is based on the FIGO 2009 cervical cancer staging.
Article
Abstract Background: More than 10 years have elapsed since human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination was implemented. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of the population-level impact of vaccinating girls and women against human papillomavirus on HPV infections, anogenital wart diagnoses, and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+ (CIN2+) to summarise the most recent evidence about the effectiveness of HPV vaccines in real-world settings and to quantify the impact of multiple age-cohort vaccination. Methods: In this updated systematic review and meta-analysis, we used the same search strategy as in our previous paper. We searched MEDLINE and Embase for studies published between Feb 1, 2014, and Oct 11, 2018. Studies were eligible if they compared the frequency (prevalence or incidence) of at least one HPV-related endpoint (genital HPV infections, anogenital wart diagnoses, or histologically confirmed CIN2+) between pre-vaccination and post-vaccination periods among the general population and if they used the same population sources and recruitment methods before and after vaccination. Our primary assessment was the relative risk (RR) comparing the frequency (prevalence or incidence) of HPV-related endpoints between the pre-vaccination and post-vaccination periods. We stratified all analyses by sex, age, and years since introduction of HPV vaccination. We used random-effects models to estimate pooled relative risks. Findings: We identified 1702 potentially eligible articles for this systematic review and meta-analysis, and included 65 articles in 14 high-income countries: 23 for HPV infection, 29 for anogenital warts, and 13 for CIN2+. After 5-8 years of vaccination, the prevalence of HPV 16 and 18 decreased significantly by 83% (RR 0·17, 95% CI 0·11-0·25) among girls aged 13-19 years, and decreased significantly by 66% (RR 0·34, 95% CI 0·23-0·49) among women aged 20-24 years. The prevalence of HPV 31, 33, and 45 decreased significantly by 54% (RR 0·46, 95% CI 0·33-0·66) among girls aged 13-19 years. Anogenital wart diagnoses decreased significantly by 67% (RR 0·33, 95% CI 0·24-0·46) among girls aged 15-19 years, decreased significantly by 54% (RR 0·46, 95% CI 0.36-0.60) among women aged 20-24 years, and decreased significantly by 31% (RR 0·69, 95% CI 0·53-0·89) among women aged 25-29 years. Among boys aged 15-19 years anogenital wart diagnoses decreased significantly by 48% (RR 0·52, 95% CI 0·37-0·75) and among men aged 20-24 years they decreased significantly by 32% (RR 0·68, 95% CI 0·47-0·98). After 5-9 years of vaccination, CIN2+ decreased significantly by 51% (RR 0·49, 95% CI 0·42-0·58) among screened girls aged 15-19 years and decreased significantly by 31% (RR 0·69, 95% CI 0·57-0·84) among women aged 20-24 years. Interpretation: This updated systematic review and meta-analysis includes data from 60 million individuals and up to 8 years of post-vaccination follow-up. Our results show compelling evidence of the substantial impact of HPV vaccination programmes on HPV infections and CIN2+ among girls and women, and on anogenital warts diagnoses among girls, women, boys, and men. Additionally, programmes with multi-cohort vaccination and high vaccination coverage had a greater direct impact and herd effects
Article
Background: Cervical screening and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination have been implemented in most high-income countries; however, coverage is low in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). In 2018, the Director-General of WHO announced a call to action for the elimination of cervical cancer as a public health problem. WHO has called for global action to scale-up vaccination, screening, and treatment of precancer, early detection and prompt treatment of early invasive cancers, and palliative care. An elimination threshold in terms of cervical cancer incidence has not yet been defined, but an absolute rate of cervical cancer incidence could be chosen for such a threshold. In this study, we aimed to quantify the potential cumulative effect of scaled up global vaccination and screening coverage on the number of cervical cancer cases averted over the 50 years from 2020 to 2069, and to predict outcomes beyond 2070 to identify the earliest years by which cervical cancer rates could drop below two absolute levels that could be considered as possible elimination thresholds-the rare cancer threshold (six new cases per 100 000 women per year, which has been observed in only a few countries), and a lower threshold of four new cases per 100 000 women per year. Methods: In this statistical trends analysis and modelling study, we did a statistical analysis of existing trends in cervical cancer worldwide using high-quality cancer registry data included in the Cancer Incidence in Five Continents series published by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. We then used a comprehensive and extensively validated simulation platform, Policy1-Cervix, to do a dynamic multicohort modelled analysis of the impact of potential scale-up scenarios for cervical cancer prevention, in order to predict the future incidence rates and burden of cervical cancer. Data are presented globally, by Human Development Index (HDI) category, and at the individual country level. Findings: In the absence of further intervention, there would be 44·4 million cervical cancer cases diagnosed globally over the period 2020-69, with almost two-thirds of cases occurring in low-HDI or medium-HDI countries. Rapid vaccination scale-up to 80-100% coverage globally by 2020 with a broad-spectrum HPV vaccine could avert 6·7-7·7 million cases in this period, but more than half of these cases will be averted after 2060. Implementation of HPV-based screening twice per lifetime at age 35 years and 45 years in all LMICs with 70% coverage globally will bring forward the effects of prevention and avert a total of 12·5-13·4 million cases in the next 50 years. Rapid scale-up of combined high-coverage screening and vaccination from 2020 onwards would result in average annual cervical cancer incidence declining to less than six new cases per 100 000 individuals by 2045-49 for very-high-HDI countries, 2055-59 for high-HDI countries, 2065-69 for medium-HDI countries, and 2085-89 for low-HDI countries, and to less than four cases per 100 000 by 2055-59 for very-high-HDI countries, 2065-69 for high-HDI countries, 2070-79 for medium-HDI countries, and 2090-2100 or beyond for low-HDI countries. However, rates of less than four new cases per 100 000 would not be achieved in all individual low-HDI countries by the end of the century. If delivery of vaccination and screening is more gradually scaled up over the period 2020-50 (eg, 20-45% vaccination coverage and 25-70% once-per-lifetime screening coverage by 2030, increasing to 40-90% vaccination coverage and 90% once-per-lifetime screening coverage by 2050, when considered as average coverage rates across HDI categories), end of the century incidence rates will be reduced by a lesser amount. In this scenario, average cervical cancer incidence rates will decline to 0·8 cases per 100 000 for very-high-HDI countries, 1·3 per 100 000 for high-HDI countries, 4·4 per 100 000 for medium-HDI countries, and 14 per 100 000 for low-HDI countries, by the end of the century. Interpretation: More than 44 million women will be diagnosed with cervical cancer in the next 50 years if primary and secondary prevention programmes are not implemented in LMICs. If high coverage vaccination can be implemented quickly, a substantial effect on the burden of disease will be seen after three to four decades, but nearer-term impact will require delivery of cervical screening to older cohorts who will not benefit from HPV vaccination. Widespread coverage of both HPV vaccination and cervical screening from 2020 onwards has the potential to avert up to 12·5-13·4 million cervical cancer cases by 2069, and could achieve average cervical cancer incidence of around four per 100 000 women per year or less, for all country HDI categories, by the end of the century. A draft global strategy to accelerate cervical cancer elimination, with goals and targets for the period 2020-30, will be considered at the World Health Assembly in 2020. The findings presented here have helped inform initial discussions of elimination targets, and ongoing comparative modelling with other groups is supporting the development of the final goals and targets for cervical cancer elimination. Funding: National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Australia, part-funded via the NHMRC Centre of Excellence for Cervical Cancer Control (C4; APP1135172).
Article
In four randomised trials, human papillomavirus (HPV)-based screening for cervical cancer was compared with cytology-based cervical screening, and precursors of cancer were the endpoint in every trial. However, direct estimates are missing of the relative efficacy of HPV-based versus cytology-based screening for prevention of invasive cancer in women who undergo regular screening, of modifiers (eg, age) of this relative efficacy, and of the duration of protection. We did a follow-up study of the four randomised trials to investigate these outcomes. METHODS 176 464 women aged 20-64 years were randomly assigned to HPV-based (experimental arm) or cytology-based (control arm) screening in Sweden (Swedescreen), the Netherlands (POBASCAM), England (ARTISTIC), and Italy (NTCC). We followed up these women for a median of 6·5 years (1 214 415 person-years) and identified 107 invasive cervical carcinomas by linkage with screening, pathology, and cancer registries, by masked review of histological specimens, or from reports. Cumulative and study-adjusted rate ratios (experimental vs control) were calculated for incidence of invasive cervical carcinoma. FINDINGS The rate ratio for invasive cervical carcinoma among all women from recruitment to end of follow-up was 0·60 (95% CI 0·40-0·89), with no heterogeneity between studies (p=0·52). Detection of invasive cervical carcinoma was similar between screening methods during the first 2·5 years of follow-up (0·79, 0·46-1·36) but was significantly lower in the experimental arm thereafter (0·45, 0·25-0·81). In women with a negative screening test at entry, the rate ratio was 0·30 (0·15-0·60). The cumulative incidence of invasive cervical carcinoma in women with negative entry tests was 4·6 per 10(5) (1·1-12·1) and 8·7 per 10(5) (3·3-18·6) at 3·5 and 5·5 years, respectively, in the experimental arm, and 15·4 per 10(5) (7·9-27·0) and 36·0 per 10(5) (23·2-53·5), respectively, in the control arm. Rate ratios did not differ by cancer stage, but were lower for adenocarcinoma (0·31, 0·14-0·69) than for squamous-cell carcinoma (0·78, 0·49-1·25). The rate ratio was lowest in women aged 30-34 years (0·36, 0·14-0·94). INTERPRETATION HPV-based screening provides 60-70% greater protection against invasive cervical carcinomas compared with cytology. Data of large-scale randomised trials support initiation of HPV-based screening from age 30 years and extension of screening intervals to at least 5 years. FUNDING European Union, Belgian Foundation Against Cancer, KCE-Centre d'Expertise, IARC, The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, the Italian Ministry of Health.
Article
More than ever, clinicians need regularly updated reviews given the continuously increasing amount of new information regarding innovative cervical cancer prevention methods. A summary is given from recent meta-analyses and systematic reviews on 3 possible clinical applications of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing: triage of women with equivocal or low-grade cytologic abnormalities; prediction of the therapeutic outcome after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) lesions, and last not but not least, primary screening for cervical cancer and pre-cancer. Consistent evidence is available indicating that HPV-triage with the Hybrid Capture(®) 2 assay (Qiagen Gaithersburg, Inc., MD, USA [previously Digene Corp.] (HC2) is more accurate (higher sensitivity, similar specificity) than repeat cytology to triage women with equivocal Pap smear results. Several other tests show at least similar accuracy but mRNA testing with the APTIMA(®) (Gen-Probe Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) test is similarly sensitive but more specific compared to HC2. In triage of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), HC2 is more sensitive but its specificity is substantially lower compared to repeat cytology. The APTIMA(®) test is more specific than HC2 without showing a loss in sensitivity. Identification of DNA of HPV types 16 and/or 18, or RNA from the five most carcinogenic HPV types allow selecting women at highest risk for CIN3+ but the sensitivity and negative predictive value of these markers are lower than full-range high-risk HPV (hrHPV) testing. After conservative treatment of cervical pre-cancer, HPV testing picks up more quickly, with higher sensitivity and not lower specificity, residual or recurrent high-grade CIN than follow-up cytology. Primary screening for hrHPV generally detects more CIN2, CIN3 or cancer compared to cytology at cut-off atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) or LSIL, but is less specific. Combined HPV and cytology screening provides a further small gain in sensitivity at the expense of a considerable loss in specificity if positive by either test is referred to colposcopy, in comparison with HPV testing only. Randomised trials and follow-up of cohort studies consistently demonstrate a significantly lower cumulative incidence of CIN3+ and even of cancer, in women aged 30years or older, who were at enrollment hrHPV DNA negative compared to those who were cytologically negative. The difference in cumulative risk of CIN3+ or cancer for double negative (cytology & HPV) versus only HPV-negative women is small. HC2, GP5+/6+ PCR (polymerase chain reaction), cobas(®) 4800 PCR (Roche Molecular Systems Inc., Alameda, CA, USA) and Real Time PCR (Abbott Molecular, Des Plaines, IL, USA) can be considered as clinically validated for use in primary screening. The loss in specificity associated with primary HPV-based screening can be compensated by appropriate algorithms involving reflex cytology and/or HPV genotyping for HPV16 or 18. There exists a substantial evidence base to support that HPV testing is advantageous both in triage of women with equivocal abnormal cytology, in surveillance after treatment of CIN lesions and in primary screening of women aged 30years or older. However, the possible advantages offered by HPV-based screening require a well organised program with good compliance with screening and triage policies. This article forms part of a special supplement entitled "Comprehensive Control of HPV Infections and Related Diseases" Vaccine Volume 30, Supplement 5, 2012.