ArticlePDF Available

Native North American Frog Mythic Motif Clusters and Transformation Formula (rCF) for North American Frog Mythemes and Frog-like Petroglyphs, NW Pacific Coast (2022)

Authors:
  • Jim's Lab for Research on the Origins of Art Religion and Symbols

Abstract

This began as a Supplementary Table to Harrod (2022), Portable Art Sculptures from the Anzick Clovis Cache, Wilsall, Montana. I did it to provide a Siberian/East Asian and North American comparative mythology context to identify Anzick Clovis cache (13,000 years ago) portable art, and support proposed taxon depicted. I decided best to upload this separately from my Anzick article, to stand independently, pertaining to the Frog motif in global comparative mythology .
James B. Harrod 07 January 2022
1
Native North American Frog Mythic Motif Clusters and
Transformation Formula (rCF) for North American Frog Mythemes
Harrod (2022), Portable Art Sculptures from the Anzick Clovis Cache, Wilsall, Montana
(Supplementary Tables 7A, 7B and 7C)
Supplementary Table 7A. North American Frog Mythic Motif Clusters
Mytheme
Tribe [Language family]
mtDNA
(1) Frog
Woman, deity,
mediator
between
humans and
mother earth;
‘queen of the
waters’;
positive
medicine
power, healer;
squatting,
birthing,
singing,
dancing
posture;
balances the
soul’s dual life-
forces; patron
of creative arts
and crafts
Nisga’a, Gitksan [Interior Tsimshian < Penutian or isolate?]: Frog is
communicator between mother earth and humans. Frog is the only child
of mother earth (stoningtongallery.com). 76%A, 17%X, 5%C, 2%B, no D
(Hughes, et al., 2017); incl. A2ag, A2ah (Cui, et al., 2013). Lucy Islands, BC
(Tsimshian territory) (#939) ~6,260-5,890 cal BP D4h3a7 (Cui, et al., 2013).
A
D4h3a7
~6 ka
Haida [Na Dené]: Haida say that the Tsimshian and Tlingit Copper or
Volcano Woman or Weeping Frog Woman, the same as their own
Dzelarhons, and they claim (citing Swanton, 1905-1909:92), she came
from the mainland to their island and became the patroness of the arts
and crafts (Barbeau, 1953:24). n=29 (97%A, 3%D) (Lorenz & Smith, 1996);
~29% A2ah (Cui, et al., 2013).
A
Klamath [< Plateau Penutian] have very strong belief in the Frog as a
medicine-woman, closely associated with pond-lily seeds (wo'kas) (Spier,
1930, cited Wassén, 1934). Yakama [Sahaptian < Plateau Penutian] n=42
modern, 66%B, 17%D, 7%C, 5%A, 5%X; n=8 (200 BP), 50%B, 25%D, 25%C, no A,
no X (Malhi, et al., 2004).
B + D
Northern Paiute [Western Numic]: The song and dance by Whippoorwill,
caused Frog, who had offered himself to be the Moon, to rise into the air
and become the beautiful full Moon, accompanied by his seven wives, the
sisters of Wolf and Coyote, who became stars, and his son who became
Venus (J. W. Powell in Fowler & Fowler, 1971:221,229). Northern
Paiute/Shoshone: n=94 48%D, 43%B, 10%C, no A (Malhi, et al., 2003). Spirit Cave
NV, mummy (~10.9 cal ka) n=2 D1 (Moreno-Mayar, et al., 2018). Pyramid Lake,
NV, w of Winnemucca Lake, Wizard’s Beach Man (~9.2 cal ka) = C1; (~5.5-1.5 cal
ka); n=18 56%D, 33%B, 11%A, no C, no X (Chatters, et al., 2014, Kaestle & Smith,
2001); [A=A2a]
Stillwater Marsh NV (~3.5 cal ka) n=21 57%D, 38%B, 5%A, no C, no x; most similar
to current Penutians (Kaestle & Smith, 2001).
D + B
D1
~10.9
ka
Chumash [isolate, may be oldest CA language family]: Frog Woman was
"queen of the waters" in Chumash myths (Anderson, 1996/2020:15).
60-53%A, 38-33%D, 20-14%C, 20-0%B, no X (Malhi, et al., 2004; Johnson &
Lorenz, 2006; Lorenz & Smith, 1996); 16%D4h3a (Kemp, et al., 2007).
A + D
16%
D4h3a
James B. Harrod 07 January 2022
2
Sioux [Sisseton/Wahpeton (Santee, Eastern Dakota)]: Hnaska - The Frog
Spirit of Holy Medicine (wikipedia). 56%A, 20%B, 18%C, 4%D, 2%X (Shook &
Smith, 2008).
A
Anishinaabe (Ojibwa) [Central Algonquian] Manabozho cycle: a frog-like
old lady has rattle used in doctoring (Radin & Reagan, 1928, cited
Wassén, 1934). [Radin texts collected at Sarnia, SW ON, which I guess
would be a Mississaugas and/or Odawa Anishinaabe homeland area]
Wisconsin (31%A+30%X+30%C+7%B+3%D); Great Western Park, SW ON, ~800
cal BP, n=6, 4=67%C, 2=33%A, no B, no D, no X (Shook & Smith, 2008) [JBH.
Apply Lick mthap: A 6 matches for A2a, A2a2 or A2f1; C matches for C1, C1b or
C1f, C1c?]
A + C, X
Maya [Mayan]: Rhinella marina (formerly Bufo), Cane toad, the world’s
largest toad, which produces a powerful hallucinogen, depicted on
Protoclassic Izapa stelae altars. In Early Classic reliefs, lords are seated in
the mouths of toads. In Classic Maya art Toad and Jaguar iconography
overlap (Miller & Taub, 1993). Xcaret, Q.R. (fossil Mayan) n=25 84%A, 4%B,
8%C, no D (González-Oliver, et al., 2001).
A
Aztec [Uto-Aztecan]: hieroglyph ollin (‘movement’, i.e., ‘burning water’)
(Séjourné, 1960:97-111). Tlatelolco (fossil Aztec) 65%A, 17%D 13%B, 4%C, no
X (Kemp, et al., 2005).
A
James B. Harrod 07 January 2022
3
(2) Weeping
Volcano
Woman (Frog)
deity, may take
revenge on
persons who
neglect or
abuse deity,
animals,
partners or who
cause conflicts
between kin,
clans, tribes
A
D4h3a7
~6 ka
James B. Harrod 07 January 2022
4
Haida [Na Dené]: Haida say that the Tsimshian and Tlingit Copper or Volcano
Woman or Weeping Frog Woman, the same as their own Dzelarhons, and they
claim (citing Swanton, 1905-1909:92), she came from the mainland to their island
and became the patroness of the arts and crafts (Barbeau, 1953:24). Dzelarhons,
Frog Princess, Volcano Woman, who arrived from the sea with six canoe-loads of
people, i.e., an entire tribe; her husband, the Bear god, Kaiti (A Dictionary of World
Mythology, Oxford Reference, accessed 24 October 2021); Dzelarhons, ‘Volcano
Woman’, who rules the earth’s creatures and punishes anyone who abuses them
(wiki) n=29 (97%A, 3%D) (Lorenz & Smith, 1996); ~29% A2ah (Cui, et al., 2013).
(variant1 of Tsimshian variant1) ‘Salmon-Eater’s niece, Dzelarhons, fell in love with
a Haida man and had her uncle arrange a marriage. Following a splendid wedding,
she was neglected by her Grizzly-Bear bridegroom, who demanded she spend the
first night holing a lighted torch above his head, and her garments were burned.
Though warned about Gitrhawn’s vengeance, he continued to demand this, until
her people came to her rescue. They burned a Haida village but did not find her,
only a stone statue holding a burning staff topped by a copper Frog, between
whose legs a stream flowed. Thereafter Dzelarhons became a powerful divinity who
judged people’s actions toward animals’ (Monaghan, 2014:318).
(variant2) Five young men from Skidegate went fishing for trout. The prince’s
Cormorant hat kept falling in the water, so he angrily beat the water with his hat.
Later while roasting some trout, a Frog jumped on the trout. The prince, still
sulking, caught the frog and threw it into the fire; this repeated 4x. Then a woman’s
voice descended from far up in the hills, an ill omen, so they paddled away.
Dzelarhons appeared on the shore with a cane surmounted by the Frog, continually
crying ‘O my child! O my child! What has happened to my child?’ As those paddling
away paid no heed to her, she invoked their death, and the whole village was set
ablaze, destroying it. One young woman in her puberty seclusion hut, her mother,
and one other woman survived, and mourned until Eagle-Man took the younger
and the other under its wings, to the Nass where a new tribe arose, and built a
totem pole with Eagle at the top and persons under its wings (Barbeau, 1953:17-
19). Dzelarhons held a cane the lower part of which had the carving of a Frog on it;
the upper part, a carving of a cormorant (some say duck, sgîl); her hat, the design of
a Frog on it (Swanton, 1905-1909:94-95).
A
James B. Harrod 07 January 2022
5
(variant3), develops dirge or funeral song aspect of the Dzelarhons, which dirges
are Buddhistic and closely follow a Chinese pattern) A young Raven prince and his
friends went to spear salmon up a nearby stream. While making camp, a huge
Frog came up to them, and over protests of the others, the prince took it and
threw it into the fire, where it was destroyed. During the night they heard the
voice of a woman wailing ‘O my child! O my child! Give me back my child, my only
child! What have you done to my child?’ They paid no heed, returned to their
village on the coast, and she followed them wailing. No one in the village paid
heed, except one woman and her only daughter, who dug a cave behind their
house. A volcanic eruption destroyed the village; only the mother and daughter
escaped, to a village only partly destroyed. That night the woman’s voice crying
out said ‘all the haughty, thoughtless ones have perished; your uncles sleep,
appeased’. Next day, paddling up the stream, they saw a huge Frog in the water,
half human and wearing a lanenraet (layer hat), and later were rescued by the
family of a Haida chief, mourning over the grave of their only daughter, who
adopted the daughter, finding happiness (Barbeau, 1953:17-22; 9-83).
Chumash [isolate, may be oldest CA language family]: #13 Coyote and his Sons.
‘Frog was married to Coyote. She became exasperated with Coyote’s selfishness
and ordered the springs to stop flowing and the streams to become dry. Lazy
Coyote sent each of their sixteen sons farther and farther in search of water, but
they found none. Coyote became desperate and went himself. When his futile
search took him to the top of a deep canyon in the mountains, Frog released the
pent up waters in a sudden flood which swept foolish Coyote all the way to the
ocean. Ashamed, Coyote turned himself into a sheepshead fish and his sixteen
sons were transformed as well, proving that Frog was indeed “queen of the
waters” (Anderson, 1996/2020:15, citing Blackburn, 1975:204-207).
#24 Coyote’s Search. ‘One day Coyote was very hungry when he came upon a fire
which Frog had built near the road. Frog was slowly roasting a salmon, and its tail
was sticking out of the ashes. Coyote, showing no self-discipline, just walked over
to the fire and began talking to himself about the wonderful smelling salmon.
Soon Hawk flew overhead and circled three times. Coyote interpreted this as an
omen, permission to eat Frog’s dinner. So, he ate all the salmon, except the
bones, which he quickly buried back in the coals to hide his theft, and then lazy
Coyote fell asleep under a nearby tree. Frog discovered the theft, and exclaimed
“I won’t urinate now, and all the springs will dry up. Coyote will be thirsty, and
thus I’ll pay him back!” Later Coyote demanded some water, but Frog didn’t
answer. In revenge, Coyote burnt down Frog’s house, but Frog, who had dug a big
hole, emerged unharmed. He was forced to urinate and all the streams and rivers
flowed once again. Coyote took a drink, and came back to talk to Frog. Frog said
he did not blame Coyote, but Hawk, and advised “Don’t cheat or deceive any poor
soul” (Anderson, 1996/2020:14-16, citing Blackburn, 1975:166-172). 60-53%A, 38-
33%D, 20-14%C, 20-0%B, no X (Malhi, et al., 2004; Johnson & Lorenz, 2006; Lorenz &
Smith, 1996); 16%D4h3a (Kemp, et al., 2007).
A + D
16%
D4h3a
James B. Harrod 07 January 2022
6
(3) Frog
ancestor of
tribe, moiety,
clan, lineage,
benefactor;
crest of lineage
identity;
empowerment
for generosity,
potlatch, food-
sharing, gift-
giving;
Cormorant
(Frog) Hat
[the Gift-giving
virtue
(Nietzsche); the
greatest virtue
megalopsychia
(Aristotle)]
A
D4h3a7
~6 ka
James B. Harrod 07 January 2022
7
C + D +
A
B
A
A + C,X
James B. Harrod 07 January 2022
8
(4) Female Frog
creation space
deity; air, spirit;
spaciousness
for breathing,
inhale and
exhale, life and
death
A
James B. Harrod 07 January 2022
9
(5) Sun/Moon, 1
Eye Open/1 Eye
Closed,
(squinting or
missing)
(asymmetrical
balance of dual
radiances, dual
positive/negative
creative forces,
co-originating
life-energies)
(eclipse)
Nlaka’pamux (a.k.a. Thompson River) [No. Interior < Interior Salish]:
Moon was as bright as Sun, but his sister Frog or Hare jumped on his
face (Teit, 1900:337-342, cited Crellin, thesis, 1994).
Shuswap [No. Interior Salish] 33%C, 27-32%D, 16-33%A, 3-5%B, 11-3%X
(Hughes, et al., 2017).
C + D,A
Southern Okanagan [Colville-Okanagan < So. Interior Salishan]: In the
beginning it was dark. People decided to have a Sun and Moon. Crane
was chosen to be Sun, but result too long a day; next was Coyote, but
gossiped about what he saw. Woodpecker caused great heat. Frog-
Woman caused a rain to force Coyote’s sons into her tipi. Frog clung to
face of elder son; people decide he shall be Moon, with Frog on his
face; the younger, Sun (Cline, et al., 1938:250).
Northern Plateau Salish (Wenatchee, San Poil, S. Colville-Okanagan) 55%B,
27%A, 9%C, 9%D, no X (Mahli, et al., 2004). Kennewick, ~8.7-8.4 ka, root-X2a,
close to Colville, Cree, Anishinaabe (Rasmussen, et al., 2015).
B + A
X2a
~8.5 ka
Spokane [< Montana Salish < So. Interior Salishan]: Earth-Creator
Amotken and Thunder made two brothers to help create light; they
went to lodge of Lady Bullfrog, who became so enamored of one she
leapt onto this face and stuck there. In pulling loose she tore out one of
his eyes; he ascended to be Sun. The other brother joined him, but
before he did so, she jumped onto his face, too. He became the Moon.
Today, if one looks carefully at the Moon, one can see Bullfrog clinging
to his face (Ruby & Brown, 1970:6-7).
Kennewick, ~8.7-8.4 cal ka, root-X2a, close to Colville, Cree, Anishinaabe
(Rasmussen, et al., 2015). Northern Plateau Salish (Wenatchee, San Poil, S.
Colville-Okanagan) 55%B, 27%A, 9%C, 9%D, no X (Mahli, et al., 2004)
B + A
X2a
~8.5 ka
Salish (a.k.a. Bitterroot, Flathead) [< Montana Salish < So. Interior
Salishan]: Amotken sent his son, Spokani; Frog jumped on his face. He
became Sun by day, in robe of shining light, and by night the Moon,
showing his disfigured face (Clark, 1966).
B + A?
Cherokee, Creeks and other tribes believed an eclipse of sun or moon
caused by a giant Frog trying to swallow it, and make noise to frighten
it off (Mooney, 1900, cited Wassén, 1934).
45%C, 35%B, 13%A, 2%D (Yates & Yates, 2014, Malhi, et al., 2001).
C + B
(6) Frog Widow,
respect for
grieving process,
mortuary taboos,
versus
disrespect,
abuse, violation
of taboos
Nez-Perce [Nez-Perce < Sahaptian < Plateau Penutian]: A Frog widow
badly treated in revenge drains the river for mankind by laying down on
its source, until Coyote by guile secures it again (Spinden, 1917, cited
Wassén, 1934).
Yakama [Sahaptian < Plateau Penutian] n=42 modern, 66%B, 17%D, 7%C,
5%A, 5%X; n=8 (200 BP), 50%B, 25%D, 25%C, no A, no X (Malhi, et al., 2004).
B + D
James B. Harrod 07 January 2022
10
(7) Frog is
Earth-Diver
A2a
OYK
Cave
~10.3
ka
D4h3a
B
A
A?
D4
James B. Harrod 07 January 2022
11
(8) Frog/Toad
navel-string
amulet pouch
D + B
D1
~10.9
ka
A
James B. Harrod 07 January 2022
12
A + C
X
James B. Harrod 07 January 2022
13
A + C
James B. Harrod 07 January 2022
14
(9) Frog
positive,
source of
water,
releases rain,
fertility
(abundance
of eggs)
(source of
sustenance)
‘lunar’
quality
Chumash [isolate, may be oldest CA language family]: #1 The Three Worlds.
‘There is this world in which we live, but there is also one above us and one
below us. Here we live in the center of the worldthe biggest island. There
are two giant serpents that hold our world up from below. When they are
tired they move, and that causes earthquakes. The World above is
sustained by the great Eagle, who by stretching his wings causes the phases
of the moon. And the water in the springs and streams of this earth is the
urine of the many frogs who live in it’ (Blackburn, 1975:91); fresh water
under care of frogs, since it is their urine (Miller, 1983b, citing Blackburn
1975:91).
mtDNA: 60-53%A, 38-33%D, 20-14%C, 20-0%B, no X (Malhi, et al., 2004; Johnson &
Lorenz, 2006; Lorenz & Smith, 1996); 16%D4h3a (Kemp, et al., 2007).
A
16%
D4h3a
Klamath [< Plateau Penutian]: associate the frog and rain (Spier, 1928, cited
Wassén, 1934).
Yakama [Sahaptian < Plateau Penutian] n=42 modern, 66%B, 17%D, 7%C, 5%A,
5%X; n=8 (200 BP), 50%B, 25%D, 25%C, no A, no X (Malhi, et al., 2004).
B + D
Maidu [Wintuan-Maidu < Inland 'Core' Penutian]: Hunt frogs to procure rain
(Spier, 1928, cited Wassén, 1934).
Wintuan n=3, 100%B (Johnson & Lorenz, 2006).
B
Northern Paiute [< Western Numic]: Frog tunnels to bring primal waters of
sea to emerge as springs and other water flows (J. W. Powell in Fowler &
Fowler, 1971:246, 242).
Northern Paiute/Shoshone: n=94 48%D, 43%B, 10%C, no A (Malhi, et al., 2003).
Spirit Cave NV, mummy (~10.9 cal ka) n=2 D1 (Moreno-Mayar, et al., 2018).
Pyramid Lake, NV, w of Winnemucca Lake, Wizard’s Beach Man (~9.2 cal ka) = C1;
(~5.5-1.5 cal ka); n=18 56%D, 33%B, 11%A, no C, no X (Chatters, et al., 2014,
Kaestle & Smith, 2001); [A=A2a]
Stillwater Marsh NV (~3.5 cal ka) n=21 57%D, 38%B, 5%A, no C, no x; most similar
to current Penutians (Kaestle & Smith, 2001).
D + B
D1
~10.9
ka
Northern Shoshoni [Central Numic] Killing a frog and placing it on its back
will cause rain (Spier, 1928, cited Wassén, 1934).
Northern Paiute/Shoshone: n=94 48%D, 43%B, 10%C, no A no A (Malhi, et al.,
2003).
D + B
Southern Ute [Colorado R dialect chain < Southern Numic]: Frog associated
with fog and thunder (Spier, 1928, cited Wassén, 1934).
#6 The Transformation of Animals. ‘Sünā’wavi asked Cottontail what he
wanted to be, and he said a Buffalo. He asked Frog, who said a frog and stay
in the water. [same for the birds, with different colors and marks on their
bodies due to the way they painted themselves]. A few people were left
and went to hunt buffalo, but they ran too fast, some into rocks and holes,
and none could be caught. They asked that Buffalo should be slow, so we
want the big Frogs to turn into Buffalo. So Sünā’wavi did this. A Ute scout
reported that buffalo were round a spring, drinking water. The people went
there. The buffalo ran away, but since they were so slow they could be
killed. Now people thought it was as it should be’ (#6, told by Buckskin
Charlie in Lowie, 1924:14).
James B. Harrod 07 January 2022
15
Luiseño [CA language area < No. Uto-Aztecan] Frog associated with flood
(Spier, 1928, cited Wassén, 1934).
53%C, 27%D, 20%B, no A, X (Johnson & Lorenz, 2003, in Eshleman, et al., 2004)
C + D
Hopi [No. Uto-Aztecan] use a fetish rude stone Frog, over which is stretched
a string extended along a line of meal on the floor, a pathway of blessings,
for rain (Fewkes, 1903, cited Wassén, 1934).
Pima [So. Uto-Aztecan] Frogs sit on rain mountains in the east and sing near
storm clouds. Notched rattle 'rainstick' are rubbed to bring rain (Spier,
1928, cited Wassén, 1934).
82%C1, 14%B2 (Johnson & Lorenz, 2003, in Eshleman, et al., 2004); Akimal
O’odham (Pima) 54%B, 40%C, 5%A, 2%X, no D (Lorenz & Smith, 1996)
C + B
Havasupai [Yuman] associate the rasping sound with the frog and rain
(Spier, 1928, cited Wassén, 1934).
Delta, River, Pai 57-67%B, 26-44%C1, 0-7%A, no D (Malhi et al., 2003).
B + C
(10) Frog
holds back
source of
waters,
devours or
otherwise
contains it
Kalapuya [isolate, Penutian?]: The frog people had all the water and people
had to trade with them to get some. Coyote tricked them, went
underwater, dug a hole in the dam so it collapsed and the water made
creeks, rivers and waterfalls, and all the creatures could get a drink, get
water for cooking, or just swim around in it (Lopez, 1977:162).
Wintuan n=3, 100%B (Johnson & Lorenz, 2006).
B?
Wendat/Wyandot (Huron) [No. Iroquoian]: First Woman gave birth to
Twins. ‘Flinty’, the bad twin broke through her body, killing her; out of her
body sprang vegetables, pumpkin-vine, maize, bean, esculents; and Good
Man. They created animals. Flint created fierce monstrous animals:
serpents, panthers, wolves, bears, of enormous size and huge mosquitoes
‘as large as turkeys’ and an immense Toad that drank up all the waters of
the earth. Good brother created innocent and useful animals, including
partridge. He followed partridge to find Toad, slew him and released the
waters (Hale, 1888, in Long, 1963).
Mohawk 58%A, 24%C, 17%B, 2%D, no X (Mahli, et al., 2001 citing Merriwether &
Ferrell, 1996).
A
Abenaki, Penobscot [Eastern Algonquian]: Gluskap kills the monster Frog
holding back the waters (wikipedia).
Mi’kmaq [Eastern Algonquian] 50%X+33%A+17%C, no B, no D (Malhi, et al., 2001)
X + A
James B. Harrod 07 January 2022
16
(11) Frog
negative; cause
of mortality;
harms with
envy, spite,
mockery,
poison, self-
poisoning with
own venom,
witchcraft; or is
killed, causing
humans to be
mortal
A2a
OYK
Cave
~10.3
ka
D4h3a
B + D
C + B
B
B + C
(12) Frog
positive source
of fire for
cooking, light,
warmth; saves
fire during flood
by swallowing it
‘solar’ quality
B
B
James B. Harrod 07 January 2022
17
Supplementary Table 7B. Transformation Formula (rCF) for North American Frog Mythemes
active (- 0)
Passive (0 -)
reflexive (0 +)
doubly reflexive inverse (+0 +0)
Fx(a) : Fy(b)
à
Fx(b) : Fa-1(y)
discharge (fire) =
devour (water) =
discharge (water) =
1/fire > earth (devour) =
(11) Frog cause of
mortality, harms with
envy, spite, mockery,
poison, self-poisoning
with own venom,
witchcraft; or is killed,
causing humans to be
mortal
(10) Frog holds
back source of
waters,
devours or otherwise
contains it
(9) Frog positive source
of water, releases rain,
fertility (abundance of
eggs); source of
sustenance;
‘lunar’ quality
(2) Weeping Volcano
Woman (Frog) deity, molten
lava engulfs persons who
neglect or abuse deity,
animals, partners or who
cause conflict between kin,
clans, tribes
(lava =‘flowing-fire’)
à
Fy(a) : Fb-1(x)
devour (fire) =
1/water > space (discharge)
(12) Frog source of fire,
saves fire during flood by
swallowing it; positive
source of fire for cooking,
light, warmth;
‘solar’ quality
(4) Female Frog creation
space deity, her separation
yields gap; for sky, air, earth
axis mundi, biosphere;
spaciousness for breathing,
inhale & exhale, life & death
(Aztec Tlaltecuhtli)
Derivative, variant inverses
Fa-1(x) 1/fire > earth (discharge) =
(7) Frog, Earth-diver, in self-sacrifice retrieves earth from
depths of primordial or flood waters; Celestial Woman
descends to carefully place around Turtle’s shell to form
land for vegetation and all live to live and grow; or Coyote
takes it to make the earth
Fb-1(y) 1/water > space (devour) =
(8) Frog/Toad Navel-cord amulet pouch with diamond,
rhomboid or hexagonal-shape; supports one’s own breath,
own voice, own soul, own life; sustains long life; gives shape
to life-movement, unfolding, a straight path, enspirited and
inspired; one must protect the cord, never burn it
Fx-1(a) 1/discharge > balance (fire) =
(5) Sun/Moon, 1 Eye Open/1 Eye Closed (squinting,
missing), asymmetrical balance of dual radiances, dual
positive/negative creative forces, co-originating life-
energies; noise wards off eclipse devouring sun or moon
Fx-1(b) 1/discharge > balance (water) =
(1) Frog Woman deity, mediator between humans and
mother earth; ‘queen of the waters’; positive medicine
power, healer; squatting, birthing, singing, dancing posture;
balances dual life-forces of the soul; patron of creative arts
and crafts; marital respect (‘fiery-flowing’ = Aztec ollin)
Fy-1(a) 1/devour > share (fire)
(3) Frog ancestor tribe, moiety, clan, lineage, benefactor;
crest of lineage identity; empowerment for generosity,
potlatch, food-sharing, gift-giving; Cormorant (Frog) Hat;
[the Gift-giving Virtue (Nietzsche); megalopsychia (Aristotle)]
Fy-1(b) 1/devour > share (water) =
(6) Frog Widow, if disrespect for grieving process, mortuary
taboos, blocks flow of waters; if respected they flow again
James B. Harrod 07 January 2022
18
Basic concepts
x and y = ‘to discharge’ complementary opposite ‘to devour’
x = Discharge; to discharge, e-gest, excrete, ex-tend
(negation of x = to stop a discharge)
(zero void of x = to deny a discharge)
y = Devour; to devour, swallow, in-gest, in-tend, keep in stomach or belly
(negation of y = [not in rCF])
(zero void of y = to purge, vomit up)
a and b = ‘fire, to light’ complementary opposite ‘water, to flow’
a = ‘Fire; to light, to be radiant; to kindle fire, light, warmth; to burn up, consume own fuel’
(negation of a = [not in rCF])
(zero void of a = to be an angry hot-head)
b = ‘Water; to flow, stream, move in waves, give drink, quench thirst’
(negation of b = to not flow, to thirst)
(zero void of b = [not in rCF])
Inverses
x-1 and y-1 = inverses with respect to ‘to discharge’ and ‘to devour’
x-1 = inverse of discharge = Balance; to balance complementary energies of creative
potential and complementary forces during creative process
(perversion = intentionally imbalance, destroy balance; thwart creativity,
creation)
y-1 = inverse of devour = Benefactor; to be a benefactor, share, give generously
(perversion = everything is mine; I can take whatever I desire; greed for more,
more)
a-1 and b-1 = inverses with respect to ‘fire, to light’ and ‘water, to flow’
a-1 = inverse of fire = Earth; to retrieve earth from primordial waters, make earth
(perversion = destroy the earth; deny destruction; make life, lives of all beings,
unsustainable)
b-1 = inverse of water = Space, air, to make space and medium, biosphere, shape one’s
life movement unfolding, vertical individual and co-originating uprightness, spirit
(perversion = pollute the air, make breathing impossible; collapse, crush
breathing spaces)
James B. Harrod 07 January 2022
19
Supplementary Table 7C. Frog-like Petroglyphs, NW Pacific Coast (after Hill & Hill, 1974)
Site
Tribal
Territory
Frog/Birthing (Squatting posture)
Motif
Hill & Hill
mtDNA
Douglas
Channel,
Hawkesbury
Island, BC
FjTh1
Gitk’a’ata
Tsimshian
(Maritime
Penutian)
‘many birds, some frog-like figures’.
Frog-like squatting posture figure,
arms bent, hands raised up, eyes,
mouth, no circle outline of head.
Frog-like squatting posture figure,
arms bent, hands raised up, 2nd Face
in body thorax-belly.
Frog-like squatting posture figure
(partial, no R leg?), arms bent, hands
raised up, eyes, mouth, no circle
outline of head; bent arms overlap
two breasts?
Frog-like squatting posture figure,
arms bent, hands raised up, with 3
circles with dots in thorax-belly
[compare Buddhist trikaya]
p. 184.
p. 185, lower L.
p. 186, upper L.
p. 186R
p. 187L
Tsimshian
76%A,17%X,
5%C, 2%B, no D
(Hughes, et al.,
2017); incl. A2ag,
A2ah (Cui, et al.,
2013).
Lucy Islands,
Prince Rupert
Harbor, #939
5710±40 BP,
6260-5890 cal BP
D4h3a (Cui, et
al., 2013);
~6,075±185 cal
BP D4h3a7
(Lindo, et al.,
2017).
Ancient DNAs
are genomic
ancestors of
Tsimshian (Lindo,
et al., 2016).
Compare OYK,
AK (Tlingit
territory) ~10.5-
10.25 cal ka,
D4h3a (Chatters,
et al., 2014)
Metlakatla, BC
near Prince
Rupert
GcTo8
(collective winter
village of the
Tsimshian ‘9
Tribes’, lower
Skeena River)
Frog-like squatting posture figure,
arms bent, hands raised up,
feathers/rays headdress
p.202, upper C
Myers Passage
(N side
Swindle Island)
FdTd5
Heiltsuk
(aka Bella Bella)
(Xai’xais < No.
Wakashan)
(also Kitasoo So.
Tsimshian)
Two frog-like squatting figures, arms
bent, hands raised up; one figure
with vulva?
p. 181, lower R,
lower L
Elcho (Alice)
Harbour
FcSu2
Nuxalk
(aka Bella Coola)
(< Salishan)
(in Heiltsuk
territory?)
Frog-like squatting posture, arms
bent, hands raised up, 2nd Face in
body thorax-belly; other Mask Faces
around the figure
p. 174
Port Neville
Narrows
EdSl1
Tlowitsis
Kwakwakaʼwakw
(aka Kwakiutl)
(No. Wakashan)
Frog-like squatting posture figure,
arms bent, hands raised up, 2
horns?,
p. 151
Ford Creek,
Hornby Island
Vancouver Isl.
DjSd6
K’omoks
(Coast Salish)
(also Pentlatch <
Coast Salish)
Frog-like squatting posture, arms
bent, hands raised up; dark line
emerging from pelvic floor
(birthing?, phallus?)
p. 137
James B. Harrod 07 January 2022
20
Holden Lake,
Gabriola
Island,
Nanaimo area,
Vancouver Isl.
DgRw40
Snuneymuxw,
Halkomelem
(Island
Halkomelem <
Coast Salish)
Frog-like squatting posture, vulva
(birthing), face looking up at circular?
Mask Face, smiling, 2 symmetrical
eyes, 2 nostrils, L arm/hand raised, R
horizontal
petroglyph style occurs in Marpole phase art,
~2400-1500 BP (Holm, 1990:199, 314; Adams,
2003a: 32-40; 2003b); or to ~1200 BP’ (Lepofsky,
et al., 2005)
p. 98L
Clo-oose Hill
site
Vancouver Isl.
DdSf2
Ditidaht band
(Nuu-chah-
nulth)
(Ditidaht < S.
Wakashan)
Frog-like squatting posture, vulva
(birthing), arms bent, hands raised
up; associated with 4 Killer Whales
[central dorsal fin, flat tail, not whale
but killer whale?]
p. 78
Nootka Island,
Vancouver Isl.
5 sites?
(Meade, 1971)
[JBH. Meade says
“at Nootka” and
Map #27 arrow
points to Nootka
Island, so I infer the
petroglyphs occur
on Nootka Island?]
Nuu-chah-
nulth
Frog-like squatting posture, ‘male
figure’ [with penis, scrotum] [JBH. or
more likely ‘vulva’?], arms bent,
hands raised up.
Female figure, pecked on granite; R
arm bent downward, left arm bent
upward [JBH. ‘heart’ and/or ‘breast’,
‘vulva’].
p. 39
p. 40
“The characteristic posture of Northwest Coast figures is a frontally oriented pose, with the knees bent and
the arms bent upwards. Those who had the opportunity to watch West Coast Indian dancing will recognize
this as a dance position. The association of rattles with some of the figures further suggests both the dance
and also the connection with shamanism. The figures from the southern coast tend to be less rigid and
more realistic than the stylized ‘frog’ figures from the northern part of the coast” (Hill & Hill, 1974: 267).
James B. Harrod 07 January 2022
21
Some Frog Dance Posture Petroglyphs
(after Hill & Hill, 1974: 267)
James B. Harrod 07 January 2022
22
(after Hill & Hill, 1974: 268)
James B. Harrod 07 January 2022
23
References
Achilli, A., Perego, U. A., Lancioni, H., Olivieri, A., Gandini, F., Kashani, B. H., ... & Torroni,
A. (2013). Reconciling migration models to the Americas with the variation of North American
native mitogenomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(35), 14308-14313.
Adams, A. S. (2003a). Visions cast on stone: a stylistic analysis of the petroglyphs of Gabriola
Island, BC. Master of Arts thesis. Department of Anthropology and Sociology. University of
British Columbia.
Adams, A. S. (2003b) Visions cast on stone: The petroglyphs of Gabriola Island. The Midden
35(4): 4-9.
Anderson, J. D. (2008). The Four Hills of Life: Northern Arapaho Knowledge and Life Movement.
Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press.
Anderson, J. M. (1996/2020). When Frog Stole the Waters: Frog Symbolism. Kootenai, ID:
American Designs.
Bancroft, H. H. (1883). The native races of the Pacific States of North America, I-V. San
Francisco: A. L. Bancroft.
Barbeau, M. (1953). Haida myths illustrated in argillite carvings, No. 32. Ottawa: Department of
Resources and Development, National Parks Branch, National Museum of Canada.
Barrett, S. A. (1919). Myths of the southern Sierra Miwok, Vol. 16, No. 1-8. Berkeley: University
of California Press.
Berezkin, Y. E. (2007). “Earth-diver” and “emergence from under the earth”: Cosmogonic tales
as evidence in favor of the heterogenic origins of the American Indians. Archaeology, Ethnology
and Anthropology of Eurasia, 32(1), 110-123.
Berezkin, Y. E. (2012). Folklore parallels between Siberia and South Asia and the mythology of
the Eurasian steppes. Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia, 40(4), 144-155.
Blackburn, T. C. (1975). December's child: a book of Chumash oral narratives, collected by J. P.
Harrington. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Boas, F. (1916). Tsimshian Mythology. 31st Annual Report, Bureau of American Ethnology to the
Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. 1909-1910. Washington: US Government Printing
Office
Caduto, M. J., & Bruchac, J. (1997). Keepers of the animals: Native American stories and wildlife
activities for children. Golden, Colorado: Fulcrum Publishing.
James B. Harrod 07 January 2022
24
Chatters, J. C., Kennett, D. J., Asmerom, Y., Kemp, B. M., Polyak, V., Blank, A. N., ... & Stafford, T.
W. (2014). Late Pleistocene human skeleton and mtDNA link Paleoamericans and modern
Native Americans. Science, 344(6185), 750-754. DOI: 10.1126/science.1252619
Clark, E. E. (1966). Indian legends from the Northern Rockies. The Civilization of the American
Indian Series, Vol. 82. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Cline, W. , Commons, R. S., Mandelbaum, M., Post, R. H., & Walters, L. V. W. 1938. (Ed.) Leslie
Spier, The Sunkaietk or Southern Okanagan of Washington. Contributions from the Laboratory
of Anthropology, No. 6. Menasha, Wisconsin: George Banta.
Cooper, J. C. (1992). Symbolic and Mythological Animals. New York: Harper Collins.
Crellin, D. F. (1994). Is there a dog in the house: the cultural significance of prehistoric
domesticated dogs in the mid Fraser River region of British Columbia. M. A. thesis, Dept. of
Archaeology, Simon Fraser University, British Columbia.
Cui, Y., Lindo, J., Hughes, C. E., Johnson, J. W., Hernandez, A. G., Kemp, B. M., ... & Malhi, R. S.
(2013). Ancient DNA analysis of mid-holocene individuals from the Northwest Coast of North
America reveals different evolutionary paths for mitogenomes. PloS ONE, 8(7), e66948.
Curtis, E. S. (1908). The North American Indian: being a series of volumes picturing and
describing the Indians of the United States, and Alaska. Volume 2, the Pima. The Papago. The
Qahatika. The Mohave. The Yuma. The Maricopa. The Walapai. The Havasupai. The Apache-
Mohave, or Yavapai. London: Cambridge University Press.
Duggan, A. T., Whitten, M., Wiebe, V., Crawford, M., Butthof, A., Spitsyn, V., ... & Pakendorf, B.
(2013). Investigating the prehistory of Tungusic peoples of Siberia and the Amur-Ussuri region
with complete mtDNA genome sequences and Y-chromosomal markers. PloS One, 8(12),
e83570.
Erdoes, R., & Ortiz, A. (1998). American Indian Trickster Tales. New York: Penguin.
Eshleman, J. A., Malhi, R. S., Johnson, J. R., Kaestle, F. A., Lorenz, J., & Smith, D. G. (2004).
Mitochondrial DNA and prehistoric settlements: Native migrations on the western edge of
North America. Human Biology, 55-75.
Fagundes, N. J., Kanitz, R., & Bonatto, S. L. (2008). A reevaluation of the Native American
mtDNA genome diversity and its bearing on the models of early colonization of Beringia. PLoS
One, 3(9), e3157.
Fewkes, W. J. (1903). Hopi Katchinas drawn by native artists. 21st Annual Report of the Bureau
of Ethnology (pp. 3-126). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
James B. Harrod 07 January 2022
25
Fowler, D. D., & Fowler, C. S. (1971). Anthropology of the Numa: John Wesley Powell's
manuscripts on the Numic peoples of western North America, 1868-1880. Smithsonian
Contributions to Anthropology, No. 14. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.
Gifford, E. W. (1916). Miwok moieties. University of California Publications in American
Archaeology and Ethnography, vol. 12(4): 139-194. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Goddard du Bois, C. (1901). The Mythology of the Diequeños. The Journal of American Folk-Lore,
14: 181-185.
González-Oliver, A., Márquez-Morfín, L., Jiménez, J. C., & Torre-Blanco, A. (2001). Founding
amerindian mitochondrial DNA lineages in ancient Maya from Xcaret, Quintana Roo. American
Journal of Physical Anthropology, 116(3), 230-235.
Hale, H. (1888). Huron Folk-Lore. I. Cosmogonic Myths. The Good and Evil Minds. The Journal of
American Folk-Lore, 1(3), 177-183.
Halpin, M. M., & Seguin, M. (1990). Tsimshian Peoples: Southern Tsimshian, Coast Tsimshian,
Nishga, and Gitksan. In Handbook of North American Indians, 7, 267-284. Washington: US
Government Printing Office.
Hilger, M. I. (1946). Notes on Cheyenne child life. American Anthropologist, 48(1): 60-69.
Hilger, M. I. (1952). Arapaho child life and its cultural background. Bureau of American
Ethnology Bulletin 148. Smithsonian Institution. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Hill, B. & Hill, R. (1974). Indian petroglyphs of the Pacific Northwest. Seattle, WA: University of
Washington Press.
Holm, M. A. (1990). Prehistoric Northwest Coast art: a stylistic analysis of the archaeological
record. Master of Arts thesis. Department of Anthropology and Sociology, University of British
Columbia.
Hughes, C. E., Rogers, M. P., Owings, A. C., Petzelt, B., Mitchell, J., Harry, H., ... & Malhi, R. S.
(2017). Genetic structure of First Nation communities in the Pacific Northwest. Human Biology,
88(4), 251-263.
Johnson, J. R., Kemp, B. M., Monroe, C., & Lorenz, J. G. (2012). A land of diversity: genetic
insights into ancestral origins. In Jones, T. L. & Perry, J. E. (Eds.), Contemporary Issues in
California Archaeology (pp. 49-72). Left Coast Press, New York.
Johnson, J. R., & Lorenz, J. G. (2003). Genetics, linguistics, and culture change in Southern
California prehistory. In Abstracts of the 68th Annual Meetings of the Society for American
Archaeology, 136.
James B. Harrod 07 January 2022
26
Johnson, J. R., & Lorenz, J. G. (2006). Genetics, linguistics, and prehistoric migrations: An
analysis of California Indian mitochondrial DNA lineages. Journal of California and Great Basin
Anthropology, 33-64.
Kaestle, F. A., & Smith, D. G. (2001). Ancient mitochondrial DNA evidence for prehistoric
population movement: The Numic expansion. American Journal of Physical Anthropology: The
Official Publication of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, 115(1), 1-12.
Kemp, B. M., Malhi, R. S., McDonough, J., Bolnick, D. A., Eshleman, J. A., Rickards, O., ... &
Smith, D. G. (2007). Genetic analysis of early Holocene skeletal remains from Alaska and its
implications for the settlement of the Americas. American Journal of Physical Anthropology: The
Official Publication of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, 132(4), 605-621.
Kemp, B. M., Reséndez, A., Román Berrelleza, J. A., Malhi, R. S., & Smith, D. G. (2005). An
analysis of ancient Aztec mtDNA from Tlatelolco: Pre-Columbian relations and the spread of
Uto-Aztecan. Biomolecular archaeology: Genetic approaches to the past, 32, 22-42.
Kroeber, A. L. (1908). Ethnology of the Gros Ventre. Anthropological Papers of the American
Museum of Natural History, Vol. 1, Part IV. New York: American Museum of Natural History.
Kroeber, A. L. (1902,1904,1907/1983). The Arapaho. Bulletin of the American Museum of
Natural History, XVIII. Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press.
Kroeber, A. L. (1925). Handbook of the Indians of California. Smithsonian Institution Bureau of
American Ethnology Bulletin 78. Washington: Government Printing Office.
Lepofsky, D., Lertzman, K., Hallett, D., & Mathewes, R. (2005). Climate change and culture
change on the southern coast of British Columbia 2400-1200 cal. BP: An hypothesis. American
Antiquity, 70(2), 267-293.
Lindo, J., Achilli, A., Perego, U. A., Archer, D., Valdiosera, C., Petzelt, B., ... & Malhi, R. S. (2017).
Ancient individuals from the North American Northwest Coast reveal 10,000 years of regional
genetic continuity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(16), 4093-4098.
Lindo, J., Huerta-Sánchez, E., Nakagome, S., Rasmussen, M., Petzelt, B., Mitchell, J., ... & Malhi,
R. S. (2016). A time transect of exomes from a Native American population before and after
European contact. Nature communications, 7(1), 1-11.
Long, C. H. (1963). Alpha: The myths of creation. Patterns of myth. New York: George Braziller.
Lopez, B. (1977). Giving Birth To Thunder, Sleeping With His Daughter: Coyote Builds North
America. Kansas City, MO: Andrews & McMeel.
Lorenz, J. G., & Smith, D. G. (1996). Distribution of four founding mtDNA haplogroups among
Native North Americans. American Journal of Physical Anthropology: The Official Publication of
the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, 101(3), 307-323.
James B. Harrod 07 January 2022
27
Lowie, R. H. (1924). Shoshonean Tales. The Journal of American Folklore, 37, 143/144: 1-242.
https://doi.org/10.2307/535228
Malhi, R. S., Breece, K. E., Shook, B. A. S., Kaestle, F. A., Chatters, J. C., Hackenberger, S., &
Smith, D. G. (2004). Patterns of mtDNA diversity in northwestern North America. Human
Biology, 76(1): 33-54.
Malhi, R. S., Mortensen, H. M., Eshleman, J. A., Kemp, B. M., Lorenz, J. G., Kaestle, F. A., ... &
Smith, D. G. (2003). Native American mtDNA prehistory in the American Southwest. American
Journal of Physical Anthropology: The Official Publication of the American Association of
Physical Anthropologists, 120(2), 108-124.
Malhi, R. S., Schultz, B. A., & Smith, D. G. (2001). Distribution of mitochondrial DNA lineages
among Native American tribes of Northeastern North America. Human Biology, 17(1): 17-55.
Mao, X., Zhang, H., Qiao, S., Liu, Y., Chang, F., Xie, P., ... & Fu, Q. (2021). The deep population
history of northern East Asia from the Late Pleistocene to the Holocene. Cell, 184(12), 3256-
3266.E13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.040
Meade, E. F. (1971). Indian Rock Carvings of the Pacific Northwest. Sidney, BC: Gray's
Publishing.
Merriwether, D. A., Reed, D. M., & Ferrell, R. E. (1997). Ancient and contemporary
mitochondrial DNA variation in the Maya. In S. L. Whittington, L. E. Wright, J. P. Gerry, K.
Jacobi, D. M. Reed, & M. E. Danforth, Bones of the Maya: studies of ancient skeletons (pp. 208-
217). University of Alabama Press.
Miller, J. (1983b). Numic Religion: An Overview of Power in the Great Basin of Native North
America. Anthropos, 337-354.
Miller, M. E., & Taube, K. A. (1993). The gods and symbols of ancient Mexico and the Maya: an
illustrated dictionary of Mesoamerican religion. Thames & Hudson.
Monaghan, P. (2014). Encyclopedia of goddesses and heroines. Novato, California: New World
Library.
Mooney, J. (1900). Myths of the Cherokee. 19th Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology, part
1. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Moreno-Mayar, J. V., Vinner, L., de Barros Damgaard, P., De La Fuente, C., Chan, J., Spence, J. P.,
... & Willerslev, E. (2018). Early human dispersals within the Americas. Science, 362(6419).
Radin, P. & Reagan, A. B. (1928). Ojibwa myths and tales. Journal of American Folk-Lore,
41(159): 61-146.
James B. Harrod 07 January 2022
28
Rasmussen, M., Sikora, M., Albrechtsen, A., Korneliussen, T. S., Moreno-Mayar, J. V., Poznik, G.
D., ... & Willerslev, E. (2015). The ancestry and affiliations of Kennewick Man. Nature,
523(7561), 455-458.
Ruby, R. & Brown, J. (1970). The Spokane Indians: Children of the sun. Norman: University of
Oklahoma Press.
Schmidt, P. W. (1929). Der Ursprung der Gottesidee, II: 2, Die Religionen der Urvölker Amerikas.
Münster: Aschendorffsche.
Schurr, T. G., Dulik, M. C., Owings, A. C., Zhadanov, S. I., Gaieski, J. B., Vilar, M. G., ... &
Genographic Consortium. (2012). Clan, language, and migration history has shaped genetic
diversity in Haida and Tlingit populations from Southeast Alaska. American Journal of Physical
Anthropology, 148(3), 422-435.
Séjourné, L. (1960). Burning water. Thought and religion in ancient Mexico. New York: Grove
Press.
Shook, B. A. S., & Smith, D. G. (2008). Using ancient mtDNA to reconstruct the population
history of northeastern North America. American Journal of Physical Anthropology: The Official
Publication of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, 137(1), 14-29.
Siska, V., Jones, E. R., Jeon, S., Bhak, Y., Kim, H. M., Cho, Y. S., ... & Manica, A. (2017). Genome-
wide data from two early Neolithic East Asian individuals dating to 7700 years ago. Science
Advances, 3(2), Article e1601877. 10.1126/sciadv.1601877
Smelcer J.E. (1992). The Raven and the Totem. Anchorage: Salmon Run Book.
Smith, D. G., Malhi, R. S., Eshleman, J., Lorenz, J. G., & Kaestle, F. A. (1999). Distribution of
mtDNA haplogroup X among native North Americans. American Journal of Physical
Anthropology: The Official Publication of the American Association of Physical
Anthropologists, 110(3), 271-284.
Spier, L. (1928). Havasupai Ethnography. Anthropological papers of the American Museum of
Natural History, vol. XXIX, part III. New York: American Museum of Natural History.
Spier, L. (1930). Klamath Ethnography. University of California Publications in American
Archaeology and Ethnography, vol. XXX. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Spinden, H. J. (1917). Nez Percé Tales. Folk-Tales of Salishan and Sahaptin tribes. Memoirs of
the American Folk-Lore Society, vol. XI: 180-201. New York: American Folk-Lore Society.
Sukernik, R. I., Volodko, N. V., Mazunin, I. O., Eltsov, N. P., Dryomov, S. V., & Starikovskaya, E. B.
(2012). Mitochondrial genome diversity in the Tubalar, Even, and Ulchi: contribution to
prehistory of native Siberians and their affinities to Native Americans. American Journal of
Physical Anthropology, 148(1), 123-138.
James B. Harrod 07 January 2022
29
Swanton, J. R. (1905-1909). Contributions to the ethnology of the Haida. Memoirs of the
American Museum of Natural History, Volume VIII, Part I: The Haida of Queen Charlotte Islands.
[Reprint from Vol. V, Part I, The Jesup North Pacific Expedition, (ed.) Franz Boas.] New York: G.
E. Stechert.
Swanton J. R. (1908). Social Conditions, Beliefs, and Linguistic Relationships of the Tlingit
Indians. Twenty-Sixth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of
Smithsonian Institution: 391-485. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Teit, J. A. (1900). The Thompson Indians of British Columbia. The Jesup North Pacific Expedition,
edited Franz Boas. Memoir of the American Museum of Natural History (Vol. 1, Part IV. Merritt,
British Columbia: Nicola Valley Museum Archives Association.
Van Ysslestyne, J. (2018). Spirits from the Edge of the World: Classical Shamanism in Ulchi
Society. Seattle, WA: Pathfinder Counseling.
Wallace, E., & Hoebel, E. A. (1952). The Comanches: Lords of the South Plains. Norman:
University of Oklahoma Press.
Wassén, H. (1934). The frog in Indian mythology and imaginative world. Anthropos, 5(6), 613-
658.
Yates, D. N., & Yates, T. A. (2014). Cherokee DNA Studies: Real People Who Proved the
Geneticists Wrong (Vol. 1). Panthers Lodge Publishers.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Complex processes in the settling of the Americas The expansion into the Americas by the ancestors of present day Native Americans has been difficult to tease apart from analyses of present day populations. To understand how humans diverged and spread across North and South America, Moreno-Mayar et al. sequenced 15 ancient human genomes from Alaska to Patagonia. Analysis of the oldest genomes suggests that there was an early split within Beringian populations, giving rise to the Northern and Southern lineages. Because population history cannot be explained by simple models or patterns of dispersal, it seems that people moved out of Beringia and across the continents in a complex manner. Science , this issue p. eaav2621
Article
Full-text available
Significance The peopling of the Americas has been examined on the continental level with the aid of SNP arrays, next generation sequencing, and advancements in ancient DNA, all of which have helped elucidate evolutionary histories. Regional paleogenomic studies, however, have received less attention and may reveal a more nuanced demographic history. We present genome-wide sequences of individuals from the northern Northwest Coast covering a timespan of ∼10,000 years and show that continental patterns of demography do not necessarily apply on the regional level. Compared with existing paleogenomic data, we show that geographically linked population samples from the Northwest Coast exhibit an early ancestral lineage and find that population structure existed among Native North American groups as early as the late Pleistocene.
Article
Full-text available
A major factor for the population decline of Native Americans after European contact has been attributed to infectious disease susceptibility. To investigate whether a pre-existing genetic component contributed to this phenomenon, here we analyse 50 exomes of a continuous population from the Northwest Coast of North America, dating from before and after European contact. We model the population collapse after European contact, inferring a 57% reduction in effective population size. We also identify signatures of positive selection on immune-related genes in the ancient but not the modern group, with the strongest signal deriving from the human leucocyte antigen (HLA) gene HLA-DQA1. The modern individuals show a marked frequency decrease in the same alleles, likely due to the environmental change associated with European colonization, whereby negative selection may have acted on the same gene after contact. The evident shift in selection pressures correlates to the regional European-borne epidemics of the 1800s.
Chapter
Full-text available
With the advent of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Saiki et al. 1988) it is now possible to extract DNA from ancient human bone, tissue, teeth, and hair and to amplify the number of copies of DNA to levels which enable molecular genetic analyses. Prior to the invention of PCR, it was not possible to retrieve enough high molecular weight DNA from ancient remains to perform DNA sequencing or restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analyses. In addition, the advent of PCR has enabled researchers to amplify and analyze DNA from small amounts of blood or plasma from living individuals. In the past ten years these techniques have been applied to the study of the peopling of the New World through the analysis of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) variation in ancient and contemporary Native Americans. Wallace et al. (1985) showed that all Native Americans are closely related, and showed evidence for a bottleneck in Amerindian genetic variation compared with modern Asian variation. Schurr et al. (1990) demonstrated that all Native American mtDNA variation can be traced back to just four founding lineages, and that all contemporary Amerindians are descendants of one of these four lineages (termed A, B, C, and D). Merriwether et al. (1994,1995) and Stone and Stoneking (1994) proved that variants of the four founding lineages were also present in ancient populations. It is first necessary to present some background about basic genetics, mtDNA, and the methods of data collection, before discussing the data and results. DNA consists of four different components (referred to as nucleotides or bases): adenosine (A), guanine (G), cytosine (C), and thymine (T). There are two primary locations for human genetic material in human cells. Nuclear DNA resides inside the nucleus of cells in the form of chromosomes (22 pairs of autosomes and a pair of sex chromosomes). An individual receives a complete set of 22 autosomes and one sex chromosome from each parcent, for a total of 46 chromosomes. The maternally and paternally derived chromosomes exchange portions of their DNA during meio-sis. This is called recombination, and leads to each chromosome in the nucleus of the progeny becoming a chimera of maternal and paternal genes. Mitochondrial DNA exists outside the nucleus in an organelle called the mitochondrion. Mitochondrial DNA is a circular molecule, some 16,569 nucleotides (nts) in length (Anderson et al. 1981). Mitochondrial DNA encodes genes which are involved in energy production for the cells, oxidative phosphorylation, and cellular respiration. There are 37 genes in the mtDNA molecule: 13 protein-coding genes, 2 ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs), and 22 transfer RNAs (tRNAs). The protein-encoding genes create subunits of Cytochrome oxidase, NADH dehydrogenase, ATPase, and Cytochrome B. The mtDNA has its own unique tRNAs, and some mtDNA tRNAs code for different amino acids than do the nuclear tRNAs. For example, in mtDNA both AGG and AGA code for protein chain termination, but in nuclear DNA they encode the amino acid arginine. There are approximately 1500 copies of mtDNA in every cell, as there arc an average of 2.6 copies of mtDNA per mitochondrion, and an average of 750 mitochondria per cell. This means that there are many more copies of mtDNA than of nuclear DNA in each cell (an important consideration when trying to recover DNA from ancient or suboptimal sources). Mitochondrial DNA is maternally inherited in mammals, meaning that only females pass on their mtDNA to the next generation. Mitochondrial DNA does not undergo recombination, so it is transmitted intact from mother to daughter, generation after generation. The only changes that occur in mtDNA are due to point mutations, insertions, and deletions (with insertions and deletions being rare). Mitochondrial DNA has a mutation rate that is six to ten times higher than that of nuclear DNA, making it an excellent molecule to study when addressing questions involving relatively recently separated individuals, populations, or species. Lastly, the mtDNA from more than 100 individuals has been completely sequenced, making it simple to design primers necessary for the PCR technique, and making it relatively simple to assign the precise location to restriction site cuts. The data described here were collected by cutting the PCR-amplified mtDNA with restriction enzymes. A restriction enzyme recognizes a specific sequence of four or more bases (nucleotides) and cleaves the DNA strand whenever it detects this "recognition sequence." Restriction enzymes are produced by bacteria as a defense mechanism against invading DNAs from viruses, plasmids, or other bacteria that try to integrate their DNA into the host bacterium's DNA. The name of the restriction enzyme is derived from the host bacterium. For example, Alu I was the first restriction endo-nuclease derived from the bacterium Arthro-bacter luteus. The convention for naming restriction endonucleases is to use the first letter from the genus name and the first two letters from the species name (hence, Alu I). If multiple restriction enzymes are derived from a single species, they are numbered with Roman numerals (I, II, III, etc.) in the order in which they were discovered. Alu I, as an example, recognizes the sequence AGCT and cuts the DNA between the G and the C. Alu I would cleave the illustrated (Fig. 16.1) 35-base-pair (bp) sequence into fragments, one 14 bases long and one 21 bases long. When one loads DNA on an agarose gel and runs current across the gel, the negatively charged DNA molecules move toward the positive electrode. The gel matrix separates the fragments by size. Because the smaller fragments can more easily pass through the matrix, they move farther through the gel than do the larger fragments in the same time period. It is then easy to tell a 35-bp uncut piece of DNA in one lane from 21-bp and 14-bp DNA fragments in another lane. There are hundreds of restriction enzymes, each recognizing a different specific sequence. It is possible to construct "haplotypes" for different individuals by cutting their DNAs with many different restriction enzymes and compiling a pattern of cuts and lack-of-cuts for each enzyme for each individual. This is how Schurr et al. (1990) discovered that all Native Americans can be traced back to one of four founding haplotypes generated by using 14 restriction enzymes on mtDNA from a large number of individuals. These four founding lineage haplotypes can be defined by three RFLPs and a 9-bp deletion in the mtDNA. We have collected RFLP data defining the four founding lineage haplogroups in nearly 2000 individuals from 27 contemporary and 3 ancient New World populations (Merriwether 1993; Merriwether et al. 1994, 1995). In addition, more than 30 populations have been reported in the literature (Ginther et al. 1993; Horai et al. 1993; Shields et al. 1992, 1993; Torroni et al. 1992; Torroni, Chen et al. 1994; The Hae III 663 site gain and the 9-bp deletion (defining lineages A and B) are, for all practical purposes, Asian-specific, and only populations of Asian descent (such as Amerindians and Pacific Islanders) tend to possess these mutations. The Hinc II 13259 and Alu I 5176 site losses (defining lineages C and D) are Asian-specific when they are accompanied by Dde I and Alu I site gains at np 10394 and np 10397 respectively. Thus, one can be fairly certain of dealing with Native American (or at least Asian) mtDNAs if they possess these patterns. Torroni et al. (1992) demonstrated this in a phylo-genetic tree showing the clustering of the four founding lineages into the "haplogroups" A, B, C,and D. Copyright
Book
Tells the stories of more than sixty participants in a mitochondrial haplotype project, Phase III, from 2014 to 2021. Includes historical Cherokee photographs, genealogies, graphs, charts, references, data, bibliography and index.
Article
Northern East Asia was inhabited by modern humans as early as 40 thousand years ago (ka), as demonstrated by the Tianyuan individual. Using genome-wide data obtained from 25 individuals dated to 33.6–3.4 ka from the Amur region, we show that Tianyuan-related ancestry was widespread in northern East Asia before the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). At the close of the LGM stadial, the earliest northern East Asian appeared in the Amur region, and this population is basal to ancient northern East Asians. Human populations in the Amur region have maintained genetic continuity from 14 ka, and these early inhabitants represent the closest East Asian source known for Ancient Paleo-Siberians. We also observed that EDAR V370A was likely to have been elevated to high frequency after the LGM, suggesting the possible timing for its selection. This study provides a deep look into the population dynamics of northern East Asia.
Article
This study presents genetic data for nine Native American populations from northern North America. Analyses of genetic variation focus on the Pacific Northwest (PNW). Using mitochondrial, Y chromosomal, and autosomal DNA variants, we aimed to more closely address the relationships of geography and language with present genetic diversity among the regional PNW Native American populations. Patterns of genetic diversity exhibited by the three genetic systems were consistent with our hypotheses: genetic variation was more strongly explained by geographic proximity than by linguistic structure. Our findings were corroborated through a variety on analytic approaches, with the unrooted trees for the three genetic systems consistently separating inland from coastal PNW populations. Furthermore, analyses of molecular variance support the trends exhibited by the unrooted trees, with geographic partitioning of PNW populations (FCT = 19.43%, p = 0.010 ± 0.009) accounting for over twice as much of the observed genetic variation as linguistic partitioning of the same populations (FCT = 9.15%, p = 0.193 ± 0.013). These findings demonstrate a consensus with previous PNW population studies examining the relationships of genome-wide variation, mitochondrial haplogroup frequencies, and skeletal morphology with geography and language.
Article
Kennewick Man, referred to as the Ancient One by Native Americans, is a male human skeleton discovered in Washington state (USA) in 1996 and initially radiocarbon dated to 8,340-9,200 calibrated years before present (BP). His population affinities have been the subject of scientific debate and legal controversy. Based on an initial study of cranial morphology it was asserted that Kennewick Man was neither Native American nor closely related to the claimant Plateau tribes of the Pacific Northwest, who claimed ancestral relationship and requested repatriation under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). The morphological analysis was important to judicial decisions that Kennewick Man was not Native American and that therefore NAGPRA did not apply. Instead of repatriation, additional studies of the remains were permitted. Subsequent craniometric analysis affirmed Kennewick Man to be more closely related to circumpacific groups such as the Ainu and Polynesians than he is to modern Native Americans. In order to resolve Kennewick Man's ancestry and affiliations, we have sequenced his genome to ∼1× coverage and compared it to worldwide genomic data including for the Ainu and Polynesians. We find that Kennewick Man is closer to modern Native Americans than to any other population worldwide. Among the Native American groups for whom genome-wide data are available for comparison, several seem to be descended from a population closely related to that of Kennewick Man, including the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation (Colville), one of the five tribes claiming Kennewick Man. We revisit the cranial analyses and find that, as opposed to genome-wide comparisons, it is not possible on that basis to affiliate Kennewick Man to specific contemporary groups. We therefore conclude based on genetic comparisons that Kennewick Man shows continuity with Native North Americans over at least the last eight millennia.