Content uploaded by Minaam Farooq
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Minaam Farooq on Nov 28, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.
Introduction
Prevalence of nomophobia; and an analysis of its contributing
factors in the undergraduate students of Pakistan
•Nomophobia (no-mobile-phone phobia) is a
relatively new term that explains the increasing
psychological dependence of people, especially
young and adolescents, on mobile devices.
•The term was first used in 2008 by a UK-based
research organization, YouGov, licensed by UK
Post Office to evaluate the anxieties associated with
the use of mobile phones.
•It is yet to be added to the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders (DSM)
•It hasn’t been studied on Pakistani
demography.
Objectives
•To determine the prevalence of Nomophobia
among the undergraduate students of Pakistan
•To determine its correlation with gender
•To determine the contributory factors of
Nomophobia
Materials and Methods
•Study Design: Cross-sectional Study
(Observational)
•Study Setting: Online Nomophobia questionnaire
by Yildrim and Correia, developed using Google
Forms was circulated through social media sites
(WhatsApp, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram)
because of the prevalent pandemic and its
associated restrictions imposed by the Government.
•Study Population: Undergraduate Students
(Intermediate till University)
•Study Sampling: Snowball
•Duration: 5th April 2021 to 19th April 2021
•Data Analysis: IBM SPSS version 22 and MS
Excel 2007
Factor Description Items concerned
on NMP-Q
Average Score per
Question (1-7)
Factor I Not being able to
communicate Item
10,11,12,13,14,15 4.89
Factor II Losing connectedness Item 16,17,18,19,20 4.59
Factor III Not being able to
access information Item 1,2,3,4 4.97
Factor IV Giving up
convenience Item 5,6,7,8,9 4.10
•Geographical
•Demographical
•COVID-19
•Hopefully, the administration will utilize this to adopt
measures to set up awareness and prevention programs so
that the current magnitude of this phobia can be
minimized.
•Wider research should be done to investigate it further and
evaluate its clinical significance.
Category Scores No. of responses
Percentage of total
responses
Severe
Nomophobia (100-140) 186 40.88 %
Moderate
Nomophobia (60-99) 221 48.57%
Mild Nomophobia
(21-59) 48 10.55 %
1. Kuscu TD, Gumustas F, Rodopman Arman A et al. The relationship between nomophobia and
psychiatric symptoms in adolescents. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract(2021);56-61. doi:
10.1080/13651501.2020.1819334. Epub 2020 17th September. PMID: 32940094. [PubMed]
2. Bhattacharya S, Bashar MA, Srivastava A et al. NOMOPHOBIA: NO MObilePHonePhoBIA. J
Family Med Prim Care(2019);8(4):1297-1300. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_71_19. PMID: 31143710;
PMCID: PMC6510111. [PubMed]
3. C. Yildirim, A.Correia. Exploring the dimensions of nomophobia: Development and validation of a
self-reported questionnaire. Computers in human behavior(2015); Vol.49.doi:
10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.059. [ResearchGate]
Results
Conclusion
Limitations
86
88
90
92
94
96
Females Males
Mean Score
Gender
Minaam Farooq1, Musa Ali Rizvi1, Waaiz Ali Wajid1, Mohammad Ashraf2, Mukarram Farooq3, Kaleem Ullah Ranjha1
References
Rationale
1King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan
2The University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK
3Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan