ArticlePDF Available

Betrayal trauma, dissociative experiences and dysfunctional family dynamics: Flashbacks, self-harming behaviors and suicide attempts in post-traumatic stress disorder and dissociative disorders

Authors:

Abstract

Abstract Betrayal trauma consists of negative life experiences in which the victims are close to the traumatizing people as well as institutions for which they rely upon protection, support, resources and survival. In most cases, it operates as a dynamic of dysfunctional families which are described as pathologically-structured patterns of thoughts, emotions and behaviors, which function as violence-oriented negative child-rearing styles and generate childhood traumas. Trauma-related psychopathologies frequently discussed with these notions tend to be correlated to a high risk of self-harming behaviors and suicide attempts. It is, thus, of great importance to comprehend, explain and approach suicide attempts in trauma-related psychopathologies such as post-traumatic stress disorder and dissociative disorders by taking the dysfunctional familial dynamics and succeeding betrayal trauma both in clinical and forensic settings. Thus, in this review, betrayal trauma, dissociative experiences and dysfunctional family dynamics were discussed in terms of the dissociogenic reactions directed to them as well as flashbacks, suicide attempts and self-harming behaviors. Keywords: Betrayal trauma, dissociation, dysfunctional families, flashbacks, self-harming behaviors, suicide attempts, childhood trauma, trauma-related psychopathologies, intergenerational transmission of trauma
1550
Available online at www.medicinescience.org
INVITED REVIEW
Medicine Science 2021;10(4):1550-6
Betrayal trauma, dissociative experiences and dysfunctional family dynamics: Flashbacks,
self-harming behaviors and suicide attempts in post-traumatic stress disorder and
dissociative disorders
Erdinc Ozturk1, Barishan Erdogan2
1Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Institute of Forensic Sciences and Legal Medicine, Department of Social Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
2Istanbul Arel University, Faculty of Letters, Department of Psychology, Istanbul, Turkey
Received 13 October 2021; Accepted 28 October 2021
Available online 25.11.2021 with doi: 10.5455/medscience.2021.10.342
Copyright@Author(s) - Available online at www.medicinescience.org
Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Betrayal trauma consists of negative life experiences in which the victims are close to the traumatizing people as well as institutions for which they rely upon protection,
support, resources and survival. In most cases, it operates as a dynamic of dysfunctional families which are described as pathologically-structured patterns of thoughts,
emotions and behaviors, which function as violence-oriented negative child-rearing styles and generate childhood traumas. Trauma-related psychopathologies frequently
discussed with these notions tend to be correlated to a high risk of self-harming behaviors and suicide attempts. It is, thus, of great importance to comprehend, explain
and approach suicide attempts in trauma-related psychopathologies such as post-traumatic stress disorder and dissociative disorders by taking the dysfunctional familial
dynamics and succeeding betrayal trauma both in clinical and forensic settings. Thus, in this review, betrayal trauma, dissociative experiences and dysfunctional family
dynamics were discussed in terms of the dissociogenic reactions directed to them as well as ashbacks, suicide attempts and self-harming behaviors.
Keywords: Betrayal trauma, dissociation, dysfunctional families, ashbacks, self-harming behaviors, suicide attempts, childhood trauma, trauma-related psychopathologies,
intergenerational transmission of trauma
Introduction
Betrayal trauma, rst introduced by Jennifer Freyd, is described
as a type of trauma consisting of negative life experiences in
which the victims are close to the traumatizing people as well as
institutions for which they rely upon protection, support, resources
and/or even survival [1,2]. It is emphasized that the violation of
the trust and/or psychological and physiological well-being of
the victims by such close perpetrators is a fundamental precedent
of dissociative experiences which are used for the purpose of
sustaining the original relationship with the caregiver. It is,
thus, proclaimed that an increased level of dissociative defense
mechanisms would be required in order to process the trauma
when individuals faced traumatization from those they are reliant
or dependent [3]. It is postulated that all human beings originally
possess an ability to recognize and dier such violations from
everyday life experiences and that when escape is not an option
in face of a traumatic experience (e.g. that by a primary caregiver)
the aforementioned ability may be withheld in order to survive
[4]. The breaking of the toxic relationship would otherwise mean
the lack of vital resources, primary support, care and protection.
Betrayal trauma can, in that manner, be told to describe the
conceptualization of the dissociative amnestic experiences which
function not only as the guarantors of survival but also the blockers
of traumatic experiences that would prevent one’s psychological
integrity. The best-documented type of betrayal trauma is most
probably child sexual abuse, while other types can be counted as
institutional and romantic betrayal. Due to the fact that it refers
to negative experiences perpetrated by those for whom one relies
upon, the most common perpetrators of betrayal trauma tends
to be one’s own family, or rather more precisely, one’s own
dysfunctional family.
The negative or positive child-rearing styles of the dominant family
structure in a certain time period determine both the prevalent
social structure and the direction of the transformation. Such a
*Corresponding Author: Erdinç Ozturk, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaa, Institute
of Forensic Sciences and Legal Medicine, Department of Social Sciences, Istanbul,
Turke E-mail: erdincerdinc@hotmail.com
Medicine Science
International
Medical Journal
1551
social structure and transformation towards either development
or regression can be told to be shaped in accordance with the
leading practices of child-rearing styles. Parents with the same
or related child-rearing styles tend to raise new generations as
similarly traumatized and pathologized as not only themselves
but also their own parents. This intergenerational transmission
of trauma is well documented especially by numerous studies on
the Holocaust. In her case history of a female patient who was
suering from parental traumas even though she was born after
the Nazi genocide of the Jews, Wilgowicz conceptualizes the
incarceration of children that have already been traumatized by
wars and other combats in their very own parents’ traumas as a
“vampiric” form of identication [5]. Prager also focused on the
fact that even generations that have not witnessed the traumatic
turning point themselves are most likely to be subjects of the
victimization due to this collective memory [6]. Öztürk, on the
other hand, promotes the suggestion by underlining the fact that
a traumatized individual has two life periods around the traumatic
turning point: one period before the traumatic experience and
the one afterwards. The traumatic turning point does not refer to
the rst trauma which the subject had experienced, remembers,
or realizes in time, but rather the most upsetting experience
that most likely to have happened in childhood. The traumatic
turning point refers to the most upsetting traumatic experience
which takes a major role in the development of trauma schemata.
After the traumatic turning point, the individual is most likely to
continue their life with a psychiatric diagnosis and as a case that
possesses a "trauma self" characterized by dissociative reactions
associated with this diagnosis. According to Öztürk, ashbacks
appear suddenly and rapidly after this traumatic turning point.
The frequency, severity and duration of traumatic experiences are
directly related to these ashbacks. After the traumatic turning
point, the negative life experiences of the individual in their
actual life will continue to be repeated in their inner world, almost
like a traumatic obsession. These repetitions, on the other hand,
constitute the main reason for self-harming behaviors and suicide
attempts, which are accompanied by feelings of shame and anger
in the traumatic case [7,8]. Parents with the same negative child-
rearing styles, thus, tend to raise a dysfunctional generation that
is characterized by the aforementioned negative feelings and
similar levels of traumatic and dissociative experiences [9]. It is
of high importance to refer to child-rearing styles in families -with
varying levels of functionality within a spectrum diering from
normality to psychopathology- as a medium of this transmission
in order to be able to operationally dene this intergenerational
traumatization. This review, thus, aims to evaluate the concepts of
betrayal trauma, dissociative experiences and dysfunctional family
dynamics as well as related ashbacks, self-harming behaviors and
suicide attempts in trauma-related psychiatric disorders, namely
post-traumatic stress disorder and dissociative disorders within a
psychotraumatological frame.
Family dynamics, which can be seen almost identical to the notion
of child-rearing styles, thus, gain vital signicance in evaluating
the characteristics of values, emotions, memories, behaviors and
experiences that are intergenerationally transmitted. In order to
comprehend these relationship dynamics varying from normal
to psychopathological within families, Öztürk underlines three
dierent family models: (i) “normal”, (ii) “psychopathological”
and (iii) “apparently normal” or in other terms, “dysfunctional”
families [9,10]. A “normal” family model refers to the involvement
of individuals without any psychiatric diagnoses; which is also
the only possible model to raise psychologically integrated
generations without psychopathologies. A “psychopathological”
model consists of members that are diagnosed with at least one
psychiatric disorder. An equally important model in-between is
called the “apparently normal” or “dysfunctional” family which
refers to children that are diagnosed with at least one psychiatric
disorder and parents with usually only subclinical diagnoses.
Dysfunctional family dynamics that are present in this last model
can be dened as pathologically-structured patterns of thoughts,
emotions and behaviors, which function as violence-oriented
negative child-rearing styles and generate childhood traumas.
These notions, i.e. childhood traumas as well as negative child-
rearing styles within dysfunctional families which not only
traumatize their own children but also fail to protect them from
external traumatic and/or negative life experiences, are among
the most signicant means of “intergenerational transmission of
trauma” and “intergenerational transmission of psychopathology”.
This intergenerational existence of traumatic experiences and
psychopathological processes bring dissociative disorders and
post-traumatic stress reactions into view [9].
Generating from chronical childhood traumas and dysfunctional
family dynamics, dissociative disorders are characterized by
suicide attempts, self-harming behaviors, dissociative amnesias,
bursts of anger and ambiguities in identity or identity confusions;
most commonly comorbid with post-traumatic stress disorder
(PTSD), somatoform disorders and borderline personality disorder
[11]. Research shows a wide range of the age of starting to self-
harming behaviors in dissociative disorders, varying from 5 to 14
with focus on the ages between 10 and 15 as the most common
period [9]. The etiology of deliberate self-harming behaviors is
likely to be multilayered, alluding to factors such as moments
of disappointment, physiological excitation, low tolerance, self-
punishment and problematic interpersonal relationships [12,13].
Apart from these, psychological traumas, precisely chronic
childhood traumas are likely to explain both self-harming
behaviors and suicide attempts. Dissociative experiences play a
mediating role in terms of the frequency, severity and duration
of self-harm behaviors and suicidality or suicide attempts related
to preceding childhood traumas [14,15]. Self-harming behaviors,
which are closely related to dissociation, are done in order to
control the negative eects of childhood traumas on emotion,
thought and behavior [16]. Under these circumstances, it is literally
of vital importance to scrutinize the eects of dysfunctional
family dynamics and betrayal trauma on deliberate self-harming
behaviors and suicide attempts especially in PTSD and dissociative
disorders, two of the most common psychiatric diagnoses related
to suicidal attempts.
Dysfunctional Families as a Dissociogenic Agent in Betrayal
Trauma
Bowlby, in his Attachment theory of which the most fundamental
tenet is that children in their early years need to form a relationship
with at least one primary caregiver for a healthy development both
socially and psychologically, was the rst author to emphasize the
fact that traumatizing experiences with one's primary caregiver
impacts a child's attachment security, stress, coping strategies, and
doi: 10.5455/medscience.2021.10.342 Med Science 2021;10(4):1550-6
1552
the sense of self [17]. He mentions three types of internal working
models, i.e. internal representations with which individuals
can recognize which inner content is dominant. Bowlby denes
“securely organized internal working models”, “insecurely
organized internal working models” and “disorganized internal
working models” among which the latter two refer to possible
early childhood traumas. The last one, however, alludes directly
to unprocessed or unmetabolized negative life experiences
of the caregiver themself, which then aect the subsequent
attachment style with their own children. Hesse and Main [18]
suggest that disorganized attachment occurs when the caregiver
is ambivalently both a source of the child's fright and solution,
referring to a double bind. Individuals with this disorganized form
of attachment happen to experience altered states of consciousness
as well as dissociation more frequently. Insecure and disorganized
attachments also happen to form one of the main characteristics of
apparently normal families, namely the dysfunctional families as
dened by Öztürk and Şar [9,10].
Dysfunctional families are characterized by non-empathetic
violence-oriented child-rearing styles, inconsistent communication
styles, constant conicts, frequent child abuse and/or neglect,
and probable history of traumatic experiences of at least one
family member, resulting in dissociative defenses which is
accompanied by a “pathological conformism”, described as
the adoption of psychopathological actions. These families
manifest major impairments in the fulllment of basic family
functions and children that grown up in these families, with a
psychopathological eort to adopt and/or a conformist attitude,
perceive these dysfunctions in the family as a social norm [9].
There are certain common behavioral patterns that dysfunctional
family models develop as a result of negative life experiences
within an "internal social system" and that should be recognized in
the psychotherapy process. These particular common behavioral
patterns are instrumental in the emergence of dysfunctional family
patterns by enabling inconsistent communication dynamics.
Dysfunctional family dynamics are psychopathogenic dynamics
that are learned from parents but can be unconsciously acted upon
at certain rates. These psychopathogenic dynamics function as
a means of controlling individuals and traumatize them. Some
common characteristics of dysfunctional families are listed below
[9]:
•Distortions, dissociative defenses as well as denial are prominent
in dysfunctional families. Parents tend to reject the fact of abuse,
or even legalize it by believing its normality and/or ordinariness.
•These families consist of inconsistent individuals and there
are certain –mostly sub-threshold psychopathologies in family
members.
•Parental favoritism is common. Besides, parents lack the
necessary mutuality, or they may even manifest pseudomutuality.
Some members of the family are approached by over empathetic
attitudes while the others face the lack of empathy.
•Adjustment of personal spaces or interpersonal distances is often
problematic.
•Manipulation, envy, jealousy and rudeness are present in both
internal and external relationship dynamics of the family members.
•Bursts of anger, self-harming behaviors, inconsistent interpersonal
relationships and suicide attempts as well as addictive behaviors
are frequent.
•Family members frequently sabotage not only themselves but
also others.
•“Intergenerational transmission of trauma” and “intergenerational
transmission of psychopathology” is ubiquitous.
•Lack of privacy between the members is common.
•Children tend to experience processes of insecure attachment.
•A social isolation is mostly present.
•The members are controlled by traumatization, which continues
in an intergenerational dimension.
•Womanhood and childhood are internalized as negative notions.
•Negative and psychopathological child-rearing styles are adopted.
•A criminogenic structure is observed.
•Continuity of a dysfunctional generation is provided.
Traumatic experiences and the negative child-rearing styles
of dysfunctional families can cause adverse and permanent
psychological eects on the whole life of people from childhood
to old age. In a process characterized by normal and optimal
functional dynamics, the family is the most important and most
valuable agent of the society in which the strategies of knowledge,
kindness, merit, loyalty and overcoming the maladaptive eects
of negative life events are transmitted or taught to children
from parents. Intergenerational experiences and psychosocial
dynamics transmitted by parents can be both positive and negative.
Children's ability to eectively use their coping styles in the face of
negative life events in and outside the family, to provide empathic
reciprocity, to construct trust-oriented communication styles, and
to maintain the optimal stimulus level against excessive stimuli
or lack of stimulus are positive dynamics. Negative dynamics are
that violence-oriented negative child-rearing styles continue to
exist between generations without much change, the asymmetrical
internal system: polarization of the family structure, attachment to
the abuser, identication with the abuser, experiencing dissociative
chaos in close relationship patterns, and generally choosing children
as victims in the family with a dysfunctional orientation [9,19].
Intergenerational transmission of trauma and intergenerational
transmission of psychopathology, which are characterized by these
negative dynamics, make it possible to experience many psychiatric
diagnoses over generations, especially dissociative disorders and
post-traumatic stress disorder, which show the closest relationship
with chronic negative life events [7].
Although they were initially suggested to explain the etiology of
schizophrenia decades ago, such characteristics which are now
associated with apparently normal families still play a crucial
role in the comprehension of childhood traumas. Apart from
insecure and disorganized attachment among those characteristics,
pseudomutuality refers to the apparently happy members who in
fact restrain themselves excessively, which in turn generates a
doi: 10.5455/medscience.2021.10.342 Med Science 2021;10(4):1550-6
1553
mild psychological disturbance in at least one of the members due
to the lack of a eld of freedom in which individuals can be and
manifest themselves. Another typical characteristic, double-bind,
as mentioned before refers to multiple messages from parents
which are reciprocally conicting and visible in interpersonal
relationships and communication [20]. Parental favoritism refers
to an in-group schism or segregation and would most likely to end
in a split in the psyche of the ospring. All these characteristics
above can be told to be violating a child’s feeling of safety,
intimacy and trust, i.e. the betrayal trauma. Betrayal trauma, thus,
functions as a dysfunctional family dynamic in most cases.
As mentioned before, dysfunctional and pathological family models
serve the intergenerational transmission of psychopathology and
trauma in a society. Dysfunctional families are characterized
by the intergenerational transmission of contradictory and
psychopathogenic dynamics that they learn from their parents and
unwittingly apply to their own children. Dysfunctional families
use violence-oriented and unempathetic negative child-rearing
styles as a method of punishment for their own children, and in
fact, the traumatized or even victimized individual is stigmatized
as "sick" and easily controlled by both their own family and
those outside the family. In the formation of psychopathology,
dysfunctional family structure and dynamics come into play as
the most destructive internal systems. The basic reality here is
that both psychopathology disrupts the family structure and the
family is in an existentially dysfunctional structure. The traumatic
experiences of both the parents and children of individuals who
adopt the same child-rearing styles are close to each other and in
the same psychopathological pattern, and their revictimization
experiences on the intergenerational axis also happen to show
similarities in the same direction [9].
Negative life events that are repeated through the traumatizing and
negative child-rearing styles of parents, and psychopathologies
characterized by these negative life events show intergenerational
transmission on a dissociative basis. The traumatic experiences
of parents or caregivers are transmitted to their own children
through the negative child-rearing styles they adopt. While some
of the parents are active agents in dysfunctional communication
dynamics characterized by violence-focused, trust-insecurity
conicts, and negative child-rearing styles far from empathy,
some of the parents remain as recessive agents in the position of
an inactive spectator, thus ensuring the continuity of abuse and
neglect as well as ensuring the continuity of abuse and neglect
within the family. It hides traumatic experiences and even makes it
impossible for individuals outside the family to be noticed. Parents'
adoption of their traumatic experiences in their own history to their
own children through negative child-rearing styles may cause this
maladaptive process of intergenerational transmission of trauma to
be experienced by being preserved at certain or even major rates
for generations [19,21].
Basic Etiological Factors of Psychopathology: Dysfunctional
Family Dynamics and Betrayal Trauma
As a result of the increase in the number of studies conducted
within the scope of childhood traumas, these negative life
experiences and dysfunctional family dynamics have begun to
be evaluated in a common context. The ambivalent and insecure
relationship patterns that emerge between the parents, the
inconsistent and double or mixed messages given to the children,
and the poor communication skills constitute the basic elements of
dysfunctional families. Child abuse and neglect, among the most
visible forms of familial dysfunctionality, happen to be correlated
with numerous psychopathologies including alcohol and/or
substance abuse [22], as well as negative eects on the brain
and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) system; resulting
in psychiatric vulnerability in adulthood [23]. Dysfunctional
attitudes and behaviors that arise in the family and are directed to
children to a large extent can cause –mainly in guise of childhood
traumas- the development of many psychopathologies, especially
dissociative disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression
disorders and anxiety disorders [9,24,25].
Betrayal trauma is documented as a signicant contributor to
symptoms in many trauma-related psychiatric disorders including
PTSD, personality disorders, dissociative disorders as well as
schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders. Thus, when
it comes to trauma-related psychopathologies, the presence of
dysfunctional family dynamics should also be considered as the
betrayal trauma functions as one. A traumatized individual may
experience a very limited or an absolute nonexistent amount of
awareness of the traumatic event. Especially early, chronic and
cumulative childhood traumas can be manifested psychosomatic
and psychological symptoms such as somatization, ashbacks,
disorientation and psychological symptoms such as somatization,
ashbacks, disorientation and dissociation. As dissociative
defenses cease the awareness of the traumatic experiences, major
negative life events such as childhood sexual abuse may well
create the dissociative reactions. Dissociative identity disorder,
likewise, is signicantly related with chronic and overwhelming
traumas such as childhood sexual abuse and/or neglect and similar
interpersonal injuries. Another case that is commonly associated
with dysfunctional families is alcohol and/or substance abuse
disorder. Current research found that childhood neglect and abuse
increase the risk for substance abuse [15,22,26]. Some authors
suggest that due to the fact that betrayal trauma happen to generate
a loss of control, this loss incorporates into the guise of substance
abuse while others claim that it is a form of coping mechanism
with post-traumatic negative aect traits such as avoidance, self-
medication or tension reduction [27]. Even though the preeminent,
long-standing and prominent way of treatment of hallucinations
that are present in psychotic disorders has been pharmacotherapy;
current research postulates that the treatment of betrayal trauma may
also be benecial in reducing hallucinations when accompanied
with a history of sexual abuse in childhood [28]. When it comes
to personality disorders, the most studied trauma-related case in
literature happens to be the borderline personality disorder. It is
a well-documented fact that borderline personality disorder has
roots in early abuse, neglect, insecure attachment and other forms
of traumas which may occur as a result of the emotional, physical
and/or sexual abuse by caregivers [29]. Strikingly, self-harming
behaviors and suicide attempts in guises of suicidal ideation;
dissociative (deep) memory and dysfunctional family dynamics
happen to be what all these trauma-related psychopathologies have
in common [7,9]. In order to comprehend, explain and work on
suicidal tendencies or suicide attempts, it is of vital importance
to scrutinize early childhood traumas and related dysfunctional
family dynamics that can most likely to be manifested as betrayal
trauma.
doi: 10.5455/medscience.2021.10.342 Med Science 2021;10(4):1550-6
1554
Flashbacks, Self-Harming Behaviors and Suicide Attempts
with Regard to Dysfunctional Family Dynamics
Flashbacks can be dened as intense revisualizations of traumatic
experiences mostly reported by patients with PTSD [30]. Some
authors prefer to conceptualize them as completely distinct type of
memory [31,32] while some others tend to refer to a fragmented
and disorganized form of the autobiographical memory [33,34].
They were also found to be among the most common types of
dissociation [35]. While some studies tend to be skeptical about
the frequency of ashbacks as they tend to handle this notion
referring to comorbid substance abuse and related hallucinogenic
eects [36], others claim that many trauma survivors suer from
autobiographical memory disturbances (such as psychogenic
or dissociative amnesia) and intrusions (namely ashbacks and
nightmares) that would manifest powerful sensory characteristics
[37,38]. Another study focusing on forensic interviews with children
that have an abuse history suggests that such interviews were a
medium through which dissociative post-traumatic reactions were
activated and frequently manifested in sensory ashbacks [39].
Apart from their characteristics and neuropsychological roots,
ashbacks have been scrutinized in terms of their relationship
with suicide attempts and deliberate self-harming behaviors. In a
study conducted with suicidal women with borderline personality
disorder, it was found that suicide attempts were more likely to
be preceded by ashbacks or nightmares [40]. Some authors even
prefer the term “ash-forwards” to describe the imagery about a
future suicide attempt, risk-taking and/or self-harming behaviors
rather than visualization of a past traumatic event [41]. Mainly
focusing on war trauma that can have intergenerational eects,
literature draws a parallelism between post-traumatic stress
reactions, ashbacks as well as nightmares, self-harming behaviors
and related suicide attempts [42].
As mentioned before, dysfunctional and pathological family models
serve the intergenerational transmission of psychopathology and
trauma in a society. Dysfunctional families are characterized
by the intergenerational transmission of contradictory and
psychopathogenic dynamics that they learn from their parents and
unwittingly apply to their own children. Dissociative disorders,
which are frequently seen in adolescents and young adults, on the
other hand, are among the psychiatric diagnoses in which self-
harming behaviors and suicide attempts are seen most frequently.
Self-harming behaviors are one of the public health problems that
have signicant adverse psychological eects on all age groups
in the world and in our country. Self-harming behaviors, which
are characterized by decreasing the quality of life of individuals
and having negative eects on their physical and psychological
stability, are among the focus topics of clinical psychology and
psychiatry disciplines [7,9,43].
Self-harming behavior is dened as the whole of behaviors that
are mostly performed voluntarily, resulting in injury to at least one
part of the body, and directly disrupting the integrity of it [44].
Current research stresses the fact that 87% of dissociative disorder
cases manifest self-harming behaviors, while 78% of them report
suicide attempts and 1 to 2% of the cases result in death by suicide
[24]. Studies on self-harming behaviors emphasize that childhood
traumas are major etiological factors of negative behaviors in
psychiatric disorders associated with these traumatic experiences
[45,46]. Self-harming behaviors, which are closely related to
dissociation, are adopted to control the adverse psychological
eects of childhood traumas on emotion, thought and behavior
[16]. Connors described three basic functions of trauma-
related self-harming behaviors: (i) re-enacting real or symbolic
representations of the original trauma with self-harming behaviors,
(ii) trying to express feelings and emotional problems that are
dicult to share by self-harming, such as post-traumatic anger,
regret and shame (iii) restoring the physiological and emotional
balance, that is, homeostasis, by rearranging the self through self-
harming behaviors [47]. Various mental health experts in the eld
of dissociative disorders underline the fact that childhood traumas
are closely related to self-harming behaviors [7, 48-51]. Franzke,
Wabnitz, and Catani state that solely dissociation plays a mediating
role between childhood traumas and self-harming behaviors [45].
Brand, Loewenstein, and Lanius state that as a result of negative life
events experienced by individuals, especially childhood traumas
and that cannot be coped, self-harming behaviors occur on a wide
scale ranging from careless driving to physiological self-neglect
[52]. Brand et al. emphasize that 64-78% of dissociative identity
disorder cases harm themselves, 61-72% have suicidal ideation,
and 1-2% suicidal attempts result in death by suicide [53].
Conclusion
First introduced by Freyd, betrayal trauma is described as a type
of trauma consisting of negative experiences in which the victims
are close to the traumatizing people as well as institutions for
which they rely upon protection, support, vital resources and/or
even survival. Three distinct types were dened as: (i) child sexual
abuse which shows a direct correlation with dysfunctional family
dynamics, (ii) institutional betrayal trauma that can be observed in
academic, military, legal and healthcare organizations in guises of
mobbing, harassment, discrimination, sexual assault and brutality,
and (iii) romantic betrayal trauma which refers to a wide spectrum
of interpersonal relations varying from indelity to domestic
violence. In most cases, severe traumatic reactions are products
of prolonged childhood traumas in the early years of life, stressing
the fact that betrayal trauma happens to function as a dysfunctional
family dynamic. The dysfunctionality of the family in terms of
support, care, nutrition and protection of the child manifests itself
as a traumatized child most likely to suer from trauma-related
psychopathologies as an adult. Dissociation was found to be a
severe symptom of betrayal trauma; recent studies even underline
that hallucinations are linked to extreme cases of this type of
generalized trauma [28].
A grand majority of dissociative disorder cases states that they
tried to harm themselves because they could not cope with their
traumas in their rst interview, their desire to live decreased
almost to nothing and they were suicidal. In these cases, suicide
attempts ranges from moderate to severe death wish, and a case
without suicidal ideation is extremely rare to observe [7,24,54].
Öztürk refers to self-harming behaviors and suicide attempts as
“individuals’ last-ditch cry for help not only against themselves,
but also their abusers due to the fact that they were unable to
take traumas into consideration as a solid possibility and thus
they were left in the lurch [55]. The elimination of self-harming
behaviors and suicide attempts in cases of dissociative disorder is
successfully achieved by the application of trauma-centered and
doi: 10.5455/medscience.2021.10.342 Med Science 2021;10(4):1550-6
1555
structured psychotherapies including crisis intervention treatment
for this diagnosis group. It is a striking point that insecure
attachment, childhood separation, emotional neglect, sexual abuse,
and dissociation, all of which refer to betrayal trauma and related
dysfunctional family dynamics, were found to be signicant
predictors of deliberate self-harming behaviors [56]. Öztürk, also
suggests that traumatized individuals have a certain traumatic
turning point and thus two periods of their lives, namely the one
prior to the specic traumatic experience and the one afterwards.
The traumatic turning point refers to the most upsetting traumatic
experience which takes a major role in the development of trauma
schemata. From the traumatic turning point on, individuals are
most likely to continue their lives with a psychiatric diagnosis
and a "trauma self" characterized by dissociative reactions
associated with the diagnosis. According to Öztürk, ashbacks
appear suddenly and rapidly after this traumatic turning point and
the frequency, severity and duration of traumatic experiences are
directly related to them. After this aforementioned turning point,
the negative life experiences of individuals in their actual lives
will continue to be repeated in their inner worlds, resembling to
a so-called traumatic obsession. These repetitions can be told to
constitute the basic triggers behind self-harming behaviors and
suicide attempts accompanied by feelings of shame and anger in
the traumatic individual [7,8].
In this respect, in all trauma-related psychiatric diagnosis
groups, cases that continue psychotherapy should be supervised
in recurrent crisis periods, crisis intervention psychotherapy
approaches like Trauma Based Alliance Model Therapy developed
by Öztürk should be used, and these cases should be admitted to
a closed psychiatry service when necessary. Working eectively
in the psychotherapy process with chronic dissociative disorder
cases characterized by repetitive suicide attempts and self-
harming behaviors require fundamental knowledge -focused
on psychotraumatology and suicidology- specic to this eld,
cumulative professional experience and a novel perspective and
scientic approach. Working with self-harming behaviors and
suicide attempts of trauma cases is, in fact, a crisis intervention
psychotherapy [7,55].
Being able to terminate self-harming behaviors and suicide
attempts, which are the basic psychopathological and dissociative
characteristics of all trauma-related psychiatric diagnosis groups,
requires the development of short-term and trauma-centered
psychotherapy methods, which will be structured within the
framework of the paradigms of modern psychotraumatology. Since
childhood traumas constitute an important factor in the etiology of
self-harming behaviors and suicide attempts the prevention of them
should be undoubtedly prioritized [57-60]. To conclude, we found
the three quotes below from patients with dissociative disorder
encountered by Öztürk during their psychotherapeutic processes
very striking in terms of referring to their dysfunctional families,
betrayal trauma and ideation of annihilation (self-annihilation)
which would likely to be manifested as risk-taking, self-harming
or suicidal behaviors:
“I can no longer live in this situation. I wish I just disappeared, I
wish I became nothing, I wish I simply didn’t exist anymore.”
“They killed my emotions. Now I have so few emotions to give
that I want to become numb, and I want them to feel that I became
emotionless.”
“Not being able to feel even the numbness kills me inside every
day. When my traumatic memories invade every moment like an
obsession, I can only realize that I still exist by cutting my body.
The pain of injuring my own body drives my planned suicide
attempts away from me. The shame that my family inicted and
the anger I felt towards them distance me from all people and
from myself. The only thing that consoles me is my own wounds,
which are still bleeding, which I can endure as if I'm experiencing
someone else's pain. The never-healing wounds that both others
and the past inicted and that surround my mind at every moment...
I am now a dierent person watching the evil done to myself from
afar and watching every scene of my sacrice a thousand times in
my mind.”
Conict of interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Financial Disclosure
All authors declare no nancial support.
References
1. Goldsmith RE, Freyd JJ, DePrince AP. Betrayal trauma: Associations with
psychological and physical symptoms in young adults. J Interpers Violence.
2012;27:547-67.
2. Freyd JJ. Betrayal trauma: The logic of forgetting childhood abuse. 1996;
Harvard University Press.
3. Giesbrecht T, Merckelbach H. Betrayal trauma theory of dissociative
experiences: Stroop and directed forgetting ndings. Am J Psychol.
2009;337-48.
4. Cosmides L. The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped
how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition.
1989;31:187-276.
5. Wilgowicz P. Listening psychoanalytically to the Shoah half a century on.
Int J Psychoanal. 1999;80:429-38.
6. Prager J. Lost childhood, lost generations: The intergenerational
transmission of trauma. J Human Rights. 2003;2:173-81.
7. Öztürk E. Trauma and dissociation: basic book of psychotraumatology. 2nd
Ed. stanbul: Nobel Tip Kitabevi. 2020;33-85.
8. Öztürk E, Şar V. The trauma-self and its resistances in psychotherapy. J
Psychol Clin Psychiatry. 2016;6:00386.
9. Öztürk E. From dysfunctional family models to functional family model:
“natural and guiding parenting style”. In Öztürk E, Ed. Aile Psikopatolojisi.
1st Ed. Ankara: Turkiye Klinikleri; 2021. p.1-39.
10. Öztürk E, Şar V. The “apparently normal” family: A contemporary agent of
transgenerational trauma and dissociation. J Trauma Practice. 2006;4:287-
303.
11. Ross CA, Ferrell L, Schroeder E. Co-occurrence of dissociative identity
disorder and borderline personality disorder. J Trauma Dissociation.
2014;15:79-90.
12. Warm A, Murray C, Fox J. Why do people self-harm? Psychol Health Med.
2003;8:72-9.
13. Ford JD, Gómez JM. The relationship of psychological trauma and
dissociative and posttraumatic stress disorders to nonsuicidal self-injury
and suicidality: A review. J Trauma Dissociation. 2015;16:232-71.
14. Swannell S, Martin G, Page A, et al. Child maltreatment, subsequent non-
suicidal self-injury and the mediating roles of dissociation, alexithymia and
self-blame. Child Abuse Neglect. 2012;36:572-84.
15. Tamar-Gürol D, Şar V, Karadağ F, et al. Childhood emotional abuse,
dissociation, and suicidality among patients with drug dependency in
Turkey. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2008;62:540-7.
16. Polskaya NA, Melnikova MA. Dissociation, trauma and self-harm.
Counseling Psychol Psychotherapy. 2020;28:25-48.
doi: 10.5455/medscience.2021.10.342 Med Science 2021;10(4):1550-6
1556
17. Liotti G. A model of dissociation based on attachment theory and research.
J Trauma Dissociation. 2006:55-73.
18. Hesse E, Main M. Second-generation eects of unresolved trauma in
nonmaltreating parents: Dissociated, frightened, and threatening parental
behavior. Psychoanalytic Inquiry. 1999;19:481-540.
19. Öztürk E. Intergenerational transmission of trauma, the domino eect and
psychopathological traces of traumatic experiences. Paper presented at the
TURAZ Academy 3rd International Congress of Forensic Sciences, Legal
Medicine and Pathology. 2021. Baku: Azerbaijan.
20. Bateson G, Jackson DD, Haley J, Weakland J. Toward a theory of
schizophrenia. Behavioral science. 1956;1:251-64.
21. Öztürk E, Erdoğan B. Dissociogenic components of oppression and
obedience in regards to psychotraumatology and psychohistory. Med
Science. 2021;10:1059-68.
22. Erdoğan B, Ergelen M, Tamar Gürol D. Assessment of the self-regulation
system via projective tests in patients diagnosed with alcohol use and/or
substance abuse disorder. J Psychopathol Projective Tests. 2021;1:27-43.
23. McCrory E, De Brito SA, Viding E. The link between child abuse and
psychopathology: a review of neurobiological and genetic research. J Royal
Society Med. 2012;105:151-6.
24. Öztürk E, Derin G. Self-injury behaviors and suicidal tendencies in
dissociative disorders: a psychotherapeutic assessment from the trauma
perspective. Aydın J Humanity Society. 2021;7:9-31.
25. Akcan G, Öztürk E, Erdoğan B. The investigation of the mediating role of
coping trategies on the relationship between childhood traumas, depression
and alcohol use disorder in university students. J Subst Abuse Treat.
2021;123:108305.
26. Bolduc R, Bigras N, Daspe MÈ, et al. Childhood cumulative trauma
and depressive symptoms in adulthood: The role of mindfulness and
dissociation. Mindfulness, 2018;9:1594-603.
27. Delker BC, Freyd JJ. From betrayal to the bottle: Investigating possible
pathways from trauma to problematic substance use. J Traumatic Stress.
2014;27:576-84.
28. Gómez JM, Kaehler LA, Freyd JJ. Are hallucinations related to betrayal
trauma exposure? A three-study exploration. Psychological Trauma:
Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. 2014;6:675-82.
29. Baer JC, Martinez CD. Child maltreatment and insecure attachment: A
meta-analysis. J Reproductive Infant psychol. 2006;24:187-97.
30. Hellawell SJ, Brewin CR. A comparison of ashbacks and ordinary
autobiographical memories of trauma: Content and language. Behaviour
Res Therapy. 2004;42:1-12.
31. Brewin CR. Memory processes in post-traumatic stress disorder. Int Review
Psychiatry. 2001;13:159-63.
32. Brewin CR, Dalgleish T, Joseph, S. A dual representation theory of
posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychol Review. 1996;103:670.
33. Foa EB, Riggs DS, Dancu CV, Rothbaum BO. Reliability and validity of
a brief instrument for assessing post-traumatic stress disorder. J Traumatic
Stress. 1993;6:459-73.
34. Conway MA, Pleydell-Pearce CW, Whitecross SE. The neuroanatomy
of autobiographical memory: A slow cortical potential study of
autobiographical memory retrieval. J Memory Language. 2001;45:493-524.
35. Paulik G, Newman-Taylor K, Steel C, Arntz A. Managing dissociation in
imagery rescripting for voice hearers with trauma: lessons from a case
series. Cognitive Behavioral Practice. 2020.
36. Frankel FH. The concept of ashbacks in historical perspective. International
Journal of Clinical and experimental hypnosis. 1994;42:321-36.
37. van der Kolk BA. Trauma and memory. Guilford Press. 1996.
38. van der Kolk BA, Fisler R. Dissociation and the fragmentary nature of
traumatic memories: Overview and exploratory study. J Traumatic Stress.
1995;8,505-25.
39. Tsur N, Katz C. And then Cinderella was lying in my bed: Dissociation
displays in forensic interviews with children following intrafamilial child
sexual abuse. J Interpersonal Violence. 2021.
40. Harned MS, Rizvi SL, Linehan MM. Impact of co-occurring posttraumatic
stress disorder on suicidal women with borderline personality disorder. Am
J Psychiatry. 2010;167:1210-7.
41. Holmes EA, Crane C, Fennell MJ, Williams JMG. Imagery about suicide
in depression—“Flash-forwards”?. J Behavior Therapy Experimental
Psychiatry. 2007;38:423-34.
42. Jones E, Vermaas RH, McCartney H, et al. Flashbacks and post-traumatic
stress disorder: the genesis of a 20th-century diagnosis. British J Psychiatry.
2003;182:158-63.
43. Demir P, Çakın-Memik, N. Self-injury behavior and childhood maltreatment
experiences: a review. Üsküdar University Journal of Social Sciences.
2020;:129-55.
44. Favazza AR. The coming of age of self-mutilation. J Nervous Mental
Disease. 1998;186:259-68.
45. Franzke I, Wabnitz P, Catani C. Dissociation as a mediator of the relationship
between childhood trauma and nonsuicidal self-injury in females: A path
analytic approach. J T Dissociation. 2015;16:286-302.
46. van der Hart O. Trauma-related dissociation: An analysis of two conicting
models. Eur J Trauma Dissociation. 2021;5:100210.
47. Connors R. Self-injury in trauma survivors: Functions and meanings.
American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 1996;66:197-206.
48. Derin G, Öztürk E. Psychological trauma in dissociative disorders and
borderline personality disorder. Bartin University J Faculty Letters.
2018;3:29-42.
49. Erdoğan B. Comparison of aggressive and risk-taking behaviors among
university students with dark triad personality traits and those with self-
harm behaviors. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. 2018. Istanbul: Istanbul
University, Institute of Forensic Medicine.
50. Brand BL, Schielke HJ, Putnam KT, et al. Lanius RA. An online educational
program for individuals with dissociative disorders and their clinicians:
1-year and 2-year follow-up. J Traumatic Stress. 2019;32:156-66.
51. Putnam FW. Child development and dissociation, Child Adolescent
Psychiatric Clin North Am. 1996;5284–300.
52. Brand BL, Loewenstein, RJ, Lanius RA. Dissociative identity disorder.
Treatments Psychiatric Disorders. 2014;439-58.
53. Brand BL, McNary SW, Myrick AC, et al. A longitudinal naturalistic study
of patients with dissociative disorders treated by community clinicians.
Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. 2013;5,301.
54. Derin G, Öztürk E. Psychohistorical dynamics in the transmission of
psychological trauma. In Öztürk E, Eds. Psikotarih. 1st Ed. Ankara: Turkiye
Klinikleri; 2020. p.22-32.
55. Öztürk E. Trauma based alliance model therapy. Med Science. 2021;10:631-
50.
56. Gratz KL, Conrad SD, Roemer L. Risk factors for deliberate self-harm
among college students. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2002;72:128-40.
57. Öztürk E, Derin G, Okudan, M. Investigation of the relationship between
childhood trauma, defense mechanisms and self-injury behaviours in
university students. Turkiye Klinikleri J Foren Sci Leg Med. 2020;17:10-
24.
58. Öztürk E. Psychohistory, trauma and dissociation: the anamnesis of the
childhood traumas, wars and dissociation. In: Öztürk E, ed, Psikotarih.
Ankara: Turkiye Klinikleri. p. 2020;1-21.
59. Öztürk E. Trauma self and getting himself/herself in psychotherapy. VIII.
Annual Spring Conference of the Psychiatric Association of Turkey, 14-18
April 2004. Antalya, Turkey, p. 55-7.
60. Ermağan Çağlar E, Öztürk E, Derin G, Tuğba TK. Investigation of the
relationship among childhood traumas and self-harming behaviours,
depression, psychoform and somatoform dissociation in female university
students. Turkish Psychol Counseling Guidance J. 2021;11:383-402.
doi: 10.5455/medscience.2021.10.342 Med Science 2021;10(4):1550-6
... It is the family model in which the most intense domestic traumas, especially physical and emotional traumas, are experienced so intensely that it can even be called "family terrorism". These parents traumatize their own children, even each other, in order to temporarily control the psychopathogenic effects of their traumatic experiences in the present [1,2,39,40]. Other family members cannot resist the abuse of the dominant extratensive parent. ...
... Incestuous fathers go unnoticed by their social circles as they seem to support the maintenance of either traditional values or postmodern norms. Incestuous fathers often isolate their wives and daughters by restricting both their freedom of movement and social relationships, and they continue to abuse them [2,39,48]. When children in this family model become adults, they are usually diagnosed with dissociative disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and borderline personality disorder. ...
Article
Full-text available
Intergenerational psychosocial transformation functions in two opposite directions, “intergenerational development” and “intergenerational fossilization”, and the main factor in this dynamic process is family dynamics and child-rearing styles. In psychosocial terms, every family can teach their children compassion, loyalty, honesty and strategies to effectively cope with traumatic experiences, on the other hand, they can traumatize and dissociate their children with their violence-oriented and unempathetic negative child-rearing styles, which they use as a punishment tool. Family psychopathologies show a negative relationship with "intergenerational development" and a positive relationship with "intergenerational transmission of trauma" and "intergenerational transfer of psychopathology", that is, the "intergenerational fossilization". In a wide space from normality to psychopathology, family dynamics and communication patterns are discussed in three categories: "normal family model", "dysfunctional family model" and "pathological family model". From past to present, traumatic experiences and negative child-rearing styles have been used in all nations of the world to both put oppression on and control individuals and societies. Because individuals and societies, by dissociating the people and masses they traumatized and psycho- pathologized, are able to control and manage more easily. In this context, intergenerational traumatic and psychopathological experiences are transmitted to the next generation at similar rates by people living in the same age in a revictimization cycle. The natural and guiding parenting style, developed by Ozturk, is structured both as a functional family model focused on psychosocial development and as a long-term prevention strategy against childhood traumas and closely related dissociative disorders and post-traumatic stress disorder. In this study, the "dysfunctional generation" defined by Ozturk and dysfunctional family models, dysfunctional family dynamics and dysfunctional communication patterns are discussed in detail. Keywords: Dysfunctional family, dysfunctional family models, dysfunctional family dynamics, dysfunctional communication patterns, dysfunctional generation, child- hood traumas, intergenerational transmission of trauma, intergenerational transfer of psychopathology, dissociation, dissoanalysis, digital family, digital abuse, natural and guiding parenting style
... In traumatised societies, psychosocial memory evolves into wounded psychosocial memory. "Wounded psychosocial memory" is burdened with elements that submissive on both traumatised subjects and dissociated masses, and the major agents of these submissive elements are persistent oppression, chronic childhood traumas, dysfunctional family dynamics and negative child-rearing styles with discontinuous empathy [1,2,16]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Modern psychotraumatology: trauma and dissociation studies" is carried out on the axis of dissociative disorders and post-traumatic stress disorder diagnoses, being both short and long-term psychological consequences of chronic childhood traumas. Post-traumatic stress disorder and dissociative disorders are major co-morbid mental disorders and, in addition, post-traumatic stress disorder comprises only a subset of the psychiatric symptoms of dissociative disorders. The main purpose of the "Dissoanalysis Theory" developed by Ozturk based on the principles of modern psychotraumatology is to create a development-oriented, psychologically normal and functional society consisting of common sense, compassionate, fair, capable and empathetic individuals. Dissoanalysis is accomplished through the treatment of individual and social traumas over the shortest possible term, the development of psychosocial theories focused on strategies to prevent childhood traumas and wars, and the neutralisation of dissociogenic components underlying intergenerational transmission of trauma and intergenerational transfer of psychopathology with a holistic orientation. The theory of dissoanalysis played an active role in the emergence of "dissoanalytic psychohistory" in the psychosocial dimension. Defined as the dissoanalysis of the traumatic history of humanity and the construction of a new social reality, dissoanalytic psychohistory both analyses and integrates the dissociogenous components of societies with absolute reality. The main goal of modern psychotraumatology, dissoanalysis and dissoanalytic psychohistory is to enable an innovative, creative, compassionate, empathetic, justice and peace-oriented society of psychologically integrated individuals to prevail in the intergenerational space.
... In one previous study, Narang and Contreras (2005) reported that affective family environment moderated the relationship between abuse history and dissociation in a sample of mothers (N = 76). Our findings support the idea that somatoform dissociation is not only associated with trauma exposure, but also family dynamics and relationships (Fung et al., 2023;Ozturk & Erdogan, 2021). Even if a person was exposed to adversities before 18 years old, they are less likely to develop somatoform dissociative symptoms if there is a supportive family environment. ...
Article
Full-text available
The impacts of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) have been well documented. One possible consequence of ACEs is dissociation, which is a major feature of post-traumatic psychopathology and is also associated with considerable impairment and health care costs. Although ACEs are known to be associated with both psychoform and somatoform dissociation, much less is known about the mechanisms behind this relationship. Little is known about whether social and interpersonal factors such as family environments would moderate the relationship between ACEs and somatoform dissociation. This paper discusses the importance of family environments in trauma recovery. We then report the findings of a preliminary study in which we examined whether the association between ACEs and somatoform dissociation would be moderated by family well-being in a convenience sample of Hong Kong adults (N = 359). The number of ACEs was positively associated with somatoform dissociative symptoms, but this association was moderated by the level of family well-being. The number of ACEs was associated with somatoform dissociation only when the family well-being scores were low. These moderating effects were medium. The findings point to the potential importance of using family education and intervention programs to prevent and treat trauma-related dissociative symptoms, but further investigation is needed. Keywords: Childhood adversities; Trauma; Somatoform dissociation; Mental health; Family interventions
... Travma sonrası stres bozukluğu, majör depresyon, madde kullanım bozukluğu, panik bozukluk bunlardan başlıcalarıdır. 6 Klinik psikoloji ve psikiyatrinin araştırma alanına giren patolojik dissosiyasyonun yanında sosyoloji ve ağırlıklı olarak psikotarihin araştırma konusu olan toplumsal dissosiyasyon; itaat ve isyan ambivalansı, savaş ve terörizm ile karakterizedir. Öztürk'e göre toplumsal dissosiyasyonun oluşumundaki itici güç "dissosiyatif narsistik" dominant liderlerdir. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
ÖZET İnsan toplulukları arasında tarih boyunca gerçekleşen çatışmalar ve savaşlar psikotarihin temel araş-tırma konularındandır. Savaşların arkasındaki psikososyal dinamikler bireysel ve toplumsal travmaların yeri ve önemi, dominant liderlerin rolü, dissosiyatif savunmaların işleyişi psikotarihin ele aldığı temel bi-leşenlerdir. Bu çalışmada savaşların temelindeki dissosiyojen dinamikler, yıkım ve travmaların dissosiya-tif sonuçları tarihsel kişi ve olaylar üzerinden ele alınacaktır. Çocuk yetiştirme stillerinin ve siyasi rejimlerin yapısının savaşın oluşumuna nasıl imkan verdiği ve Aydınlanma sonrası değişimlerin savaşlara nasıl etki edeceği psikotravmatolojik ve psikotarihsel perspektiften ele alınacaktır. Öztürk tarafından geliştirilen dis-soanaliz kuramının travma ve dissosiyasyon temelli teorik ve klinik örüntüsü çerçevesinde modern psikot-ravmatoloji ve psikotarih paradigmalarının yapılandırılması olanaklı kılınmaktadır. Dissoanalizin temel amacı hümanist, empatik, barışçıl ve sağduyulu bireylerin oluşturduğu gelişim odaklı fonksiyonel bir top-lum oluşturmaktır. Bir modern psikotravmatoloji kuramı olarak dissoanalizin psikotarihsel işlevi ise, ruh-sal açıdan entegre bireylerden oluşan bir toplumun kuşaklararası süreçte etkin olmasını sağlamaktır. Böylece kronik çocukluk çağı travmaları konusunda şiddet odaklı olumsuz çocuk yetiştirme stilleri ve baskıcı sis-temler psikotoplumsal açıdan analiz edilerek kısa ve uzun dönemli "fonksiyonel psikoterapi yaklaşımları, etkin travma müdahale programları ve savaşları önleme stratejileri geliştirilecektir. Anah tar Ke li me ler: Savaş; psikotravmatoloji; dissosiyasyon; psikotarih; dissoanaliz ABS TRACT Conflicts and wars between societies throughout history are the main research topics of psychohistory. Psychosocial dynamics behind wars, the place and importance of individual and social traumas, the role of dominant leaders, the functioning of dissociative mechanisms are the main components that psychohistory deals with. In this chapter, the dissociative dynamics underlying the wars, the dissociative consequences of destruction and traumas will be discussed through historical people and events. It will be discussed how parenting styles and the structure of political regimes allow the formation of war and how post-enlightenment changes will affect wars. Within the framework of the trauma and dissociation-based theoretical and clinical pattern of the dissoanalysis theory developed by Öztürk, it is possible to construct modern psychotraumatology and psychohistory paradigms. The main purpose of dissoanalysis is to create a development-oriented functional society composed of humanistic, empa-thetic, peaceful and prudent individuals. As a modern psychotraumatology theory, the psychohistorical function of dissoanalysis is to ensure that a society of psychologically integrated individuals is active in the intergenerational process. Thus, by analyzing the violence-focused negative child-rearing styles and oppressive systems in terms of psychosocial aspects of chronic childhood traumas, short and long-term functional psychotherapy approaches, effective trauma intervention programs and war prevention strategies will be developed.
... According to Ozturk, the "traumatic self" is the main factor in the subject's high suggestibility against oppressors, abusers and dictators. Today, individuals and societies are controlled and managed by their trauma, even by their traumatic self or unhealthy parts [1,6,[9][10][11][12]. According to dissoanalytic psychohistory, every dominant leader or dictator is a "psychopolitical defector" or "dissociative defector"; for the sake of potency and power, they can defend all kinds of political views without judgment, and they can influence and even control the masses with different political views. ...
Article
Full-text available
In today's age of global dissociation, it has become necessary to deal with the social and clinical aspects of dissociation, which is a "psychosocial denial experience" in terms of ideational, emotional, relational, behavioral and sensory aspects. In dysfunctional nations experiencing psychosocial denial, democracy unfortunately functions as the majority's freedom to make wrong decisions. The freedom of the majority to make wrong decisions creates “dissociative and misanthropic masses” and causes “universal violence circulation” and despotism to prevail. Dissoanalysis and “Ozturk’s Pervasive and Reversible Dissociative Fusion Theory” define the universal circulation of violence as a reversible “dissociative violence oscillation” associated with trauma, which spreads from individual to society and from society to individual. The submissive mode associated with the experience of connecting to their oppressors and dictators is contagious; it spreads from traumatized and dysfunctional individuals to dissociated and dysfunctional societies, creating fused interpersonal relationships and both conformist and sadomasochistic masses. The dissoanalytic school defines the phenomenon of dissociation, which is most closely related to chronic, complex and cumulative traumatic experiences, which can transform from the individual to the social dimension and from the social dimension to the individual dimension in the face of oppression, and even be experienced simultaneously in the individual and social dimensions, both in relational and psychosociopolitical contexts. Dissoanalytic psychohistory, which continues its development rapidly in parallel with the principles of dissoanalysis and modern psychotraumatology, has far outstripped the stable and dogmatic schools of psychiatry, psychology, and history with its integrative solution-oriented approaches and effective psychosocial prevention strategies towards the phenomenon of trauma-related dissociation and individual and mass obedience cycles against oppression. In this original article, Ozturk defined the phenomenon of “objectification trap”, “controlled human syndrome” and “shared dissociative identity disorder” as the triple pillar of fused bilateral relations dominated by reversible dominative and submissive modes from the perspective of dissoanalysis theory and dissoanalytic psychohistory. Keywords: Shared dissociative identity disorder, controlled human syndrome, objectification trap phenomenın, defector alter personality, dissoanalytic psychohistory, dissoanalysis
... Mutlak gerçekliği idrak edebilen bütün bireyler, çoğu baskıcı sistemin ya da katı siyasi rejimin kendilerini herkesleştirip anonim yapan ve "özneliklerini" yok eden faşist yapısına ya boyun eğerek reviktimize olmaya devam edecekler ya da despotizmin hüküm sürdüğü var olan düzeni değiştirebilmek için, içinde yaşadıkları topluma ve sisteme adeta kendilerini hedef göstererek mücadele edecekler ancak eyleme geçirdikleri özgürlükçü "dissosiyatif devrimler" ile büyük zaferler kazanacaklardır! [1][2][3]15,[37][38][39][40][41][42] Öztürk, baskıcı sistemler ve dominant liderler ya da diktatörler tarafından travmatize hatta dissosiye edilerek sanları adına artık bireyden topluma pervasif yayılım gösteren bir kitlesel ya da global dissosiyasyon çağının başladığını önemle vurgular. Dissoanalitik psikotarihe göre, travmatize edilerek kontrol edilen hatta yönetilen bireyler ve toplumlar kendilerinin sağlıklı yanlarını yeniden aktive ederek başlatacakları "dissosiyatif kurtuluşlar" (dissociative emancipations) ve özellikle "dissosiyatif devrimler" (dissociative revolutions) aracılığı ile istismardan, baskıdan ve esaretten ya da gönüllü kölelikten kurtulabilirler. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
Travmatik yaşantılarla ilişkili kuşatıcı dissosiyatif reaksiyonlar karşısında öznel ve nesnel bileşenleri ile kişiye özgü bir deneyim olan bilincin tekilliği hipotezi, deneysel açıdan doğrulanabilen bir fenomen değildir. Kimlik kavramının travmatik yaşantılarla eşlenik "çoklu bilinç sistemi" ve "çoklu bellek fenomeni"ne dair bireysel ve toplumsal her ögeyle en yakın etkileşimsel dinamiğe sahip bir eksende yapılandırılan "dissoanaliz kuramı", bir travma terapisti ve bir psikotarihçi olan Öztürk'ün modern psikotravmatoloji çalışmalarından bilimsel köken almıştır. "Travma ve dissosiyasyon çalışmaları" yani "modern psikotravmatoloji" paradigmaları ve modaliteleri temel alınarak; empatik, sağduyulu, adaletli, barışçıl ve liyakatli bireylerden oluşan bir fonksiyonel toplum yaratmak amacıyla Öztürk tarafından geliştirilen "Dissoanaliz Kuramı", psikotoplumsal açıdan "dissoanalitik psikotarih"in ortaya çıkmasını olanaklı kılmıştır. İnsanlığın travmatik tarihinin dissoanalizi ve bir yeni toplumsal gerçekliğin inşaası demek olan dissoanalitik psikotarih; toplumların dissosiyatif bileşenlerini mutlak realite eşliğinde hem analiz hem de entegre etmektedir. Dissoanalitik psikotarih, çocukluk çağı travmalarını ve savaşları önleme adına psikoloji, psikiyatri, antropoloji ve sosyoloji bilimlerinden çok daha etkin ve uygulanabilir stratejiler sunmaktadır. Bu nedenle dissoanalitik psikotarihin bütün ilişkili olduğu öteki disiplinleri yakın zamanda hem domine ede-rek hem de kendi kapsamına alarak ilerleyişine devam edeceği düşünülmektedir. Dissoanalitik psikotarih perspektifinden savaşlar, kalbi kırılan ve yalnızlığa terk edilen çocukların geçmişten günümüze sızan binyıllık feryatlarıdır ya da intikamlarıdır hatta gülümsemeleri çalınmış çocukların binyıllık travmatik yaşantılarının ruhsal izleridir! Savaşlar, dünde kalmış zaman-dan bugüne yansıyan kronik çocukluk çağı travma öyküleri bulunan dissosiye yetişkinlerin psikotoplumsal sabotajlarıdır. Bir "dissosiyatif bumerang" gibi uzaklaştırılamayan hatta kuşaklararası bir geçiş gösteren bireysel ve toplumsal travmatik yaşantıların "sessiz çığlıkları", "saklı gözyaşları", "amnezik yansıları", "dominatik etkileri" ve "psikopatolojik izleri", günümüzde vandalizm, terör ve savaşlara hatta soykırımlara transforme olarak bizleri karşılamaktadır. Travmatize edilerek kontrol kurulan hatta yönetilen bireyler ve toplumlar kendilerinin sağlıklı yanlarını yeniden aktive ederek başlatacakları "dissosiyatif devrimler" aracılığı ile savaşlardan, baskıdan ve esaretten ya da gönüllü kölelikten kurtulabilirler. Dissosiyatif devrimler, baskı kurularak ve travmatize edilerek kontrol edilen hatta yönetilen bireylerin ve toplumların dominant liderleriyle olan psikotoksikojen bağlarını kesmeleri ve özgürleşmeleri adına yaptıkları eylemlerin bütünüdür ki bu eylemlerle birlikte ancak ve ancak "psikotoplumsal bilinç alyansı" ve "kuşaklararası gelişim" imkanlı kılınır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Dissoanalitik psikotarih; dissoanaliz; savaş travması; soykırım; baskı; çocuk istismarı ABSTRACT The hypothesis of the singularity of consciousness, which is an individual experience with its subjective and objective components, in the face of encompassing dissociative reactions associated with traumatic experiences, is not an experimentally verifiable phenomenon. The "theory of dissoanalysis", structured on an axis that has the closest interactional dynamic with each individual and social element of the "multiple consciousness system" and "multiple memory phenomenon" conjugated with traumatic experiences, has its scientific roots in modern psychotraumatology studies conducted by Ozturk, a trauma therapist and a psychohistorian. Based on trauma and dissociation studies, i.e. modern psychotraumatology paradigms and modalities, the "Dissoanalysis Theory", structured by Ozturk with the aim of creating a functional society consisting of empathetic, prudent, just, peaceful, and capable individuals, made it possible for the emergence of "dissoanalytic psychohistory" from a psychosocial perspective. Dissoanalytic psychohistory, which is the dissoanalysis of the traumatic history of humanity and the construction of a new societal reality, both analyzes and integrates the dissociative components of societies with absolute reality. Dissoanalytic psychohistory offers much more effective and applicable strategies than psychology, psychiatry, anthropology, and sociology to prevent childhood traumas and wars. Therefore, it is thought that dissoanalytic psychohistory will continue to progress by both dominating and comprising all other related disciplines soon. From the perspective of dissoanalytic psychohistory, wars are the millennial cries of children whose hearts are broken and left to loneliness, or their revenge, or even the psychological traces of the millennial traumatic experiences of children whose smiles have been stolen! Wars are psychosocial sabotage of dissociated adults with chronic childhood trauma histories reflected from the past to the present. The "silent screams", "hidden tears", "amnesic reflections", "dominant effects" and "psychopathological traces" of individual and social traumatic experiences that cannot be removed like a "dissociative boomerang" and even show an intergenerational transmission meet us today, transforming into vandalism, terrorism, wars and even genocides. Individuals and societies that are controlled and even ruled by traumatizing can be freed from wars, oppression and captivity or voluntary slavery through "dissociative revolutions" that they will initiate by reactivating their healthy parts. Dissociative revolutions are the whole of the actions taken by individuals and societies that are controlled or even managed by oppression and traumatization in order to break their psychotoxicogen bonds with their dominant leaders and to liberate them and with these actions, only "psychosocial consciousness alliance" and "intergenerational development" are made possible. Keywords: Dissoanalytic psychohistory; dissoanalysis; war psychology; genocide; oppression; child abuse
... Hem içinde yetiştiği şiddet kültürünü yetişkinlik dönemine taşıyan hem de istismarcı liderlerin peşinde şiddet eylemleri gerçekleştiren tüm bireyler savaş ve terör olaylarının döngüsel biçimde varlanışını devam ettirmesine katkı sağlarlar. 59,61,62 Tarihsel süreçte bireysel ve toplumsal şiddet olaylarının döngüsel olarak devam etmesinin arkasında yatan psikolojik dinamiklerin anlaşılmasında çok önemli yeri olan psikotarih bilimine göre bir toplumda benimsenen yanlış çocuk yetiştirme stilleri, ortak kültür ve değerler ile kollektif bilinçdışı ögeler toplumsal olayların oluşumunda ana etkenlerdir. Benzer çocuk yetiştirme stilleri ile adeta ortak travmaları olan bireylerden oluşan bir toplumda insanların hissettikleri stres, baskı ve tehdit onları kendilerine benzeyen kişiler ile yakınlaşmaya itmektedir. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
Şiddetin uç bir formu olan savaşlar ve terör olayları insanlık tarihi boyunca toplumları derinden etkilemiş ve milyonlarca kişinin hayatının son bulmasına, yaralanmasına ve ruhsal travma yaşamasına neden olmuştur. Savaşlar insanlar için yaşamsal tehdit içermesinin yanı sıra sosyoekonomik şartların kötüleşmesi, zorunlu göç, günlük ihtiyaçların karşılanamaması ve kentlerin ve doğanın tahrip olması gibi zorlayıcı deneyimleri de beraberinde getirmektedir. Savaş veya terör saldırılarına maruz kalan çocuklarda en sık rastlanan psikopatolojiler travma sonrası stres bozukluğu, dissosiyatif bozukluklar, depresyon bozuklukları, anksiyete bozuklukları, psikosomatik bozukluklar ve uyku bozukluklarıdır. Düzensiz siyasi rejimin/iktidarın ve ekonomik istikrarsızlığın olduğu bölgelerdeki savaş ve terör olaylarında yetişkinler tarafından teşvik edilerek şiddet suçları işleyen ve asker olarak kullanılan fail durumundaki çocuklar olduğu bilinmektedir. Esasen kendileri de mağdur olan bu çocuklar tıpkı savaşa ve teröre maruz kalan diğer çocuklar gibi ağır travmatik deneyimlere bağlı birçok psikiyatrik hastalık yaşadıkları gibi içinde bulundukları örgütler tarafından da şiddetin pek çok türün maruz kalmakta ve cinsel istismara uğramaktadırlar. Savaş travmaları sadece belirli bir zaman diliminde insanları olumsuz etkilemekle kalmayarak kuşaklararası travma geçişi ve kuşaklararası psikopatoloji aktarımı ile uzun yıllar sonra bile çocuk ruh sağlığını etkileyebilmektedir. Şiddet ve korku kültürünün olduğu bir zeminde üst kuşağın travmalarının negatif yansımaları ile karşı karşıya kalan bir çocuk ise içselleştirdiği bu yaşam biçimini yetişkinlik dönemine taşıyarak çocukluk çağı travmalarına dayalı öfkesini şiddet olayları, savaş ve terör şeklinde dışa yansıtabilmektedir. Bu kısır döngü aracılığıyla şiddete dayalı travmalar uzun yıllardır dünyanın gündeminden düşmemektedir. Yani savaş sürecinde çocuk olmak hem travmatize olmak hem de bu travmayı gelecek kuşaklara taşımak demektir. Savaş ve terör saldırıları sonrası ebeveynlere ve çocuklara yönelik sosyal yardımlar ile travma odaklı psikoterapilerden oluşan güçlendirici müdahaleler mağdurların ruhsal açıdan tam bir iyilik haline kavuşmalarına katkı sağlayacaktır. Ancak şiddete dayalı tüm olayların kökten çözülmesi için çocukluk çağı travmalarının önlenmesi temel gerekliliktir. Bu çalışmada savaş ve terör olaylarının çocuk ruh sağlığı üzerindeki negatif etkileri geniş kapsamlı bir şekilde psikotravmatolojik ve dissoanalitik perspektifen ele alınmıştır. Wars and terrorist incidents, which are an extreme form of violence, have deeply affected societies throughout human history and have caused millions of deaths, injuries and mental trauma. Wars not only threaten people's lives, but also bring with them compelling experiences such as worsening socio-economic conditions, forced migration, inability to meet daily needs, and destruction of cities and nature. The most common psychopathologies in children exposed to war or terrorist attacks are post-traumatic stress disorder, dissociative disorders, depression disorders, anxiety disorders, psychosomatic disorders and sleep disorders. It is known that there are children as perpetrators who commit violent crimes by being encouraged by adults and are used as soldiers in war and terrorist incidents in regions where there is an irregular political regime/power and economic instability. In fact, these children, who are victims themselves, are exposed to many types of violence and sexual abuse by the organizations they are involved in, as they experience many psychiatric illnesses due to severe traumatic experiences, just like other children who are exposed to war and terrorism. War traumas not only negatively affect people in a certain period of time, but also can affect children's mental health even after many years, with Intergenerational transmission of trauma and intergenerational transfer of psychopathology. A child who grows up with the negative reflections of the traumas of the upper generation on an axis with a culture of violence and fear can carry this internalized lifestyle into adulthood and reflect his anger based on childhood traumas in the form of violence, war and terror. For this reason, traumas based on violence have been on the agenda of the world for many years. In other words, being a child during the war means both being traumatized and carrying this trauma to future generations. Strengthening interventions consisting of social assistance for parents and children and trauma-focused psychotherapies after war and terrorist attacks will contribute to the mental well-being of the victims. However, the prevention of childhood traumas is the basic requirement for resolving all traumas based on violence. In this study, the negative effects of war and terror events on children's mental health are comprehensively discussed from a psychotraumatological and dissoanalytic perspective.
... Betrayal trauma refers to "negative life experiences in which the victims are close to the traumatizing people and institutions they rely upon" (Ozturk & Erdogan, 2021, p. 1550 to-80s, many doctors told parents to go home, have sex, mix the sperm (fertile and nonfertile sperm), and never disclose DC status to their children. Much of the research focused on perpetuating these narratives, and the main focus was often the well-being of the parents, also known as "recipient parents." ...
Thesis
The capability of US mental health clinicians to confidently use scientific, rigorous information to authenticate their counseling practice is critical to successful mental health provision. In this age of genetics, the provision of substandard, ill-informed mental health professional services through non-evidence-based science has negative clinical implications for patients, families, and the behavioral health field. With exponentially increasing access to genetic testing, the high prevalence of discovering an unknown genetic parentage is a new phenomenon. This study aims to assess in-service and accredited training within NAMI mental health professional disciplines which serve US donor-conceived (DC). DC adults are one specific type of misattributed parentage (MP) population. Misattributed parentage situations include: unknown/undisclosed extramarital affair/tryst, adoption (hidden, orphan, foster care, late discovery adoptees), assisted conception (DC, sperm donation, egg donation, embryo donation, surrogacy, dna clinic mix-up etc.), rape or assault, or another event. The study’s findings included the lack of DC/MP curricula, clinical advocacy benefits, and clinicians’ need to understand genetics. Also, the study found future participatory research must include DC-related stakeholders (DC, donors, social/biological nuclear family, fertility industry, DNA testing companies, etc.). Clinicians called for cross-discipline communities of practice, the need for federal DC reporting, and research on modalities to treat specific DC-trauma/identity issues (eg. excessive numbers of siblings, specific legal/ethical issues, wide denial of known relationships, etc.). Most notably, clinicians agreed on the need to educate themselves via revamped association in-service and accredited academic training using donor-conceived-client-centered approaches and industry-standard behavioral health practices to improve donor-conceived peoples' health and mental well-being.
... Romantik yakın ilişkilerde bir duygusal istismar biçimi olan sadakatsizlik ve fail tarafından inkara dayanan manipülasyon ile birlikte ortaya çıkabilen ihanet travması, bahsi geçen psikiyatrik bozukluklar açısından önemli bir risk oluşturabilmekte ve mağdurda öz değerin sarsılması, kendinden şüphe etme, gerçeklik algısının bozulması gibi sonuçlara sebep olabilmektedir. 37,38 DuYGuSAL İSTİSmArA vE mANİPÜLASYoNA mAruZ KALmANIN DİSSoSİYATİF ETKİLErİ Çocukluk çağı travmaları sonrasında bireyde bu durumla baş edebilmek için ortaya çıkan dissosiyatif reaksiyonlar uyuma hizmet eden bir düzeyde olduğunda subklinik bir süreç olarak yaşantılanmaktadır, yetişkinlik döneminde kişi bir yakın ilişki içerisindeyken duygusal istismara ve manipülasyona maruz kaldığında bu yaşantılar baş edemeyeceği bir nitelikte olursa, dissosiyatif bozukluklar ortaya çıkabilmektedir. 39 Birçok psikiyatrik belirtiyle birlikte görülebilen dissosiyasyonun travmatik deneyimlerin etkisiyle parçalanmış olan bilinç, bellek, kimlik ve çevreyi algılama işlevlerinin yeniden bütünleştirilme çabası olduğu göz önünde bulundurulduğunda, yakın ilişkisinde duygusal istismara ve manipülasyona maruz kalan birey, bilinçli ya da bilinçli olmayan bir şekilde ilişkiyi sürdürebilmek için zaman zaman dissosiyatif yaşantılar içerisinde olabilir. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
Although the close relationships can include any kind of parent, friend, romantic relationship that a person has established attachment relationships with throughout the life, this study will be discussed in terms of romantic close relationships. Close relationships can be an element that supports the psychological, physical health, growth and development processes of a person's life; on the other hand, manipulation and emotional abuse can occur due to different conditions. In connection with these experiences and past traumatic events, dissociation and various psychiatric symptoms may occur. In this study, the concepts of manipulation, emotional abuse and dissociation in close relationships will be discussed from the perspective of psychotraumatology which is a science field that considers the effects of acute and chronic traumatic experiences.
... Travmatik dönüm noktası, travma şemalarının gelişmesinde rolü olan en üzücü travmatik deneyimi tanımlar. 7 Yaşamı derinden değiştiren deneyimlerin geçici olmaktan ziyade kalıcı ve köklü değişikliklerle sonuçlanabileceği fikri TSSB'nin tanımlanmasında önemli bir rol oynamıştır. 6 Bu bağlamda travma üzerine çalışmalar yapan araştırmacılar, travmatik ruhsal yaraların yalnızca kişiyi ilgilendiren bir olgu olarak görülmesindense, nesiller boyu etkileri süren bir olgu olarak değerlendirilmesi gerektiğinden yana olmuşlardır. 1 Kültürel ve bireysel travmanın etkilerinin nesiller arası ebeveynden çocuğa ve hatta sonraki nesillere aktarılıp aktarılmayacağı veya ne şekilde aktarı-lacağı sorusu, sadece akademik platformda değil, popüler alanda da ilgi çekmiş ve tartışmalara yol açmıştır. ...
Chapter
ÖZET Travma, maruz kalan kişilerin ruhsal bütünlüğünü tehdit eden bir durumdur. Travmatik olay kar- şısında kişilerin savunma mekanizmalarının yetersiz kaldığı durumlarda, travma sonrası stres bozuk- luğu ve dissosiyatif bozukluklar başta olmak üzere birçok psikopatoloji ortaya çıkabilmektedir. Özellikle çocukluk çağında yaşanmış travmaların etkisi, dissosiyasyon riskini arttırabilmektedir. Dissosiyasyon ise, bir kişinin çoğunlukla travmatik bir olaya tepki olarak, altta yatan tıbbi bir bozukluğa bağlı olmadan dü- şünce, duygu, algı veya hatıralara yönelik bilinçte bir farklılaşma durumudur. Dissosiyasyon her ne kadar çocukluk çağında travmanın üstesinden gelmek için kullanılan bir çeşit savunma mekanizması ise de, zaman içinde patolojik bir görünüme dönüşebilir. Travmanın yarattığı bilişsel, duygusal ve fiziksel et- kiler üzerine yapılan araştırmalar, travmatik hafızanın kuşaklararası aktarımı olduğunu kanıtlamakta ve son yıllarda bu çalışmalara epigenetik araştırmalar da eşlik etmektedir. Epigenetik, DNA dizisindeki de- ğişikliklerden bağımsız şekilde gen ifadesini etkileyen genom modifikasyonları olarak tanımlanmakta- dır. Bu derlemede travma, travma sonrası stres ve dissosiyasyon kavramları tanımlanmış; travmanın kuşaklararası aktarımını kanıta dayalı şekilde ortaya koyan epigenetik araştırmalar ve travmatik hafızanın epigenetik hafıza ile birleştiği noktalar ele alınmıştır. Disiplinlerarası çalışmalardan elde edilen bulgu- lar, bu konunun davranışsal, bilişsel ve epigenetik araştırmalarla çok boyutlu incelenmesi gerektiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Travma; dissosiyasyon; hafıza; epigenetik; kuşaklararası aktarım
Article
Full-text available
The aim of this study is to determine the predictive role of childhood traumas on self-harming behaviours, depression, psychoform, and somatoform dissociation in female university students. This study was conducted with 314 female university students. It was evaluated that the differentiation of psychoform dissociation as an independent variable, varied based on negative or positive taxonomy in terms of dependent variables as well as the predictive effect of childhood traumas. It was found that childhood trauma predicted psychoform dissociation experienced in adulthood, and emotional abuse predicted amnestic dissociation, absorption and psychoform dissociation. The findings of the study differed from other studies, especially with clinical samples, and childhood traumas were positively correlated with psychoform dissociation and negatively associated with somatoform dissociation. The findings also emphasise the importance of certain correlations between childhood trauma and self-harming behaviours in a non-clinical sample group, such as female university students, as well as clinical samples.
Article
Full-text available
AbstractToday, oppression is addressed by various disciplines on the basis of modern psychotraumatology and psychohistory paradigms. From a psychotraumatological perspec-tive, oppression, as negative occurrences that force obedience that individuals and societies have to encounter at certain rates, is characterized by dissociative experiences and post-traumatic stress reactions. According to psychohistory, on the other hand, oppression may maintain its control and obedience-oriented domination on both in-dividuals and societies on the basis of violence-focused as well as unempathetic negative child-rearing styles and intergenerational transmission of traumas. Oppression, which is also a socially negative life experience, may force individuals to obey by both traumatizing and dissociating them. In postmodern societies, oppression can be defined as providing absolute control and dominance over individuals and societies by creating fear of chaos over individuals and societies with excessive or variable use of digital communication networks by dominant/authoritarian leaders. Especially since digital network platforms make cyber anonymity “exceedingly” possible, the masses who use these platforms excessively and uncontrollably can both easily overcome the interpersonal boundaries that they would not normally violate, and also lose their ability to grasp the reality or truth in the face of highly contradictory stimuli they are exposed to. Individuals who are unable to realize, grasp and comprehend reality may begin to dissociate themselves in the face of oppression over time. As a strategy of control, obedience and manipulation, oppression continues to exist with its dominance over individuals who show conformity to strict rules on a pathological basis in order to ensure the legitimacy of the system, which does not have the ability to stretch. Being able to effectively fight against oppression, which is a social traumatic experience, can be achieved by neutralizing violence-oriented and unempathetic negative child-rearing styles, as psychotraumatology -especially psychohistory- emphasizes, and by adopting empathetic child-rearing styles with a positive nature that are "away from oppression and control". The aim of this study is to evaluate the dissociogenic components of oppression and obedience in terms of psychotraumatology and psychohistory.Keywords: Oppression, obedience, psychotraumatology, psychohistory, dissociation, reversible society, trauma denial, intergenerational transmission of trauma, intergen-erational transmission of psychopathology, overstimulation, stimulus deprivation (PDF) Dissociogenic components of oppression and obedience in regards to psychotraumatology and psychohistory. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354193964_Dissociogenic_components_of_oppression_and_obedience_in_regards_to_psychotraumatology_and_psychohistory [accessed Aug 29 2021].
Article
Full-text available
Özet Erken yaşta başlayan kronik çocukluk çağı travmaları ve disfonksiyonel aile dinamiklerinin etkisiyle gelişen dissosiyatif bozukluklar; intihar girişimleri, kendine zarar verme davranışları, bilinç kesintileri, amneziler, konsantrasyon güçlükleri, öfke patlamaları ve kimlikte belirsizlik hisleriyle karakterize olan temel psikiyatrik tanı gruplarından biridir. Dissosiyatif bozukluk vakalarının psikoterapilerinin etkin bir şekilde yürütülebilmesi için öncelikle kendine zarar verme davranışlarının ve intihar girişimlerinin stabilizasyon aşamasında sonlandırılması gereklidir. Stabilizasyon aşamasından sonra travma çalışması ve entegrasyon süreci daha kısa sürede tamamlanabilmektedir. Bu tanı grubu, travma sonrası stres bozukluğu, somatoform bozukluklar ve sınırda kişilik bozukluğu başta olmak üzere birçok ruhsal bozukluk ile birlikte eştanı almaktadır. Alanyazındaki araştırmalarda dissosiyatif bozukluk vakalarında kendine zarar verme başlangıç yaş aralığı 5-14 olarak bildirilmiş olup, bu davranışların sık görüldüğü yaş aralığı ise 10-15 olarak belirtilmiştir. Bu araştırmalarda intihar girişimi ortalaması ise 10 olarak belirtilmiştir. Ayrıca bazı çalışmalarda dissosiyatif bozukluk vakalarının yaklaşık olarak %87’sinin kendine zarar verme davranışı gösterdiği, %78’sinin intihar girişiminde bulunduğu ve %1-2’sinin ise intihar girişimlerinin tamamlanmış intiharla sonuçlandığı vurgulanmaktadır. Dissosiyatif kimlik bozukluğu vakaları ile yapılan güncel çalışmalar, bu vakaların %92’sinin geçmiş ya da güncel intihar düşüncesine sahip olduğunu, %60-80’inin intihar girişiminde bulunduğunu ve %87’sinin ise intihar dışında kendine zarar verme davranışı gösterdiğini ortaya çıkarmıştır. Dissosiyatif bozukluklar, bu alanda uzmanlaşmış klinik psikologlar ve psikiyatristler tarafından travma merkezli psikoterapiler uygulanarak tedavi edilebilmekte ve klinik açıdan bu başarılı tedaviler ile kendine zarar verme davranışları ve intihar eğilimleri de ortadan kalkabilmektedir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Dissosiyasyon; dissosiyatif bozukluklar; psikoterapi; travma; psikotravmatoloji; kendine zarar verme davranışları; çocukluk çağı travmaları; intihar eğilimi; intihar girişimi Abstract Dissociative disorders that develop with the effect of chronic childhood traumas and dysfunctional family dynamics that begin at an early age; it is one of the main psychiatric diagnosis groups characterized by suicidal attempts, self-injurious behavior, unconsciousness, amnesia, concentration difficulties, outbursts of anger and feelings of uncertainty in identity. In order to effectively conduct the psychotherapies of cases of dissociative disorders, self-harm behaviors and suicide attempts require to be terminated during the stabilization phase as a priority. After this phase, it is possible to complete the trauma work and the integration process in a shorter period of time. This diagnostic group is comorbid with many mental disorders including post-traumatic stress disorder, somatoform disorders and borderline personality disorder. In the studies in the literature, the age range of onset of self-injury in cases of dissociative disorder has been reported as 5-14, and the age range in which these behaviors are common has been reported as 10-15. In these studies, the mean suicide attempt was reported as 10. In addition, in some studies, it was emphasized that approximately 87% of dissociative disorder cases show self-injury behavior, 78% have attempted suicide, and 1-2% suicide attempts result in completed suicide. Current studies with dissociative identity disorder cases revealed that 92% of these cases had past or current suicidal thoughts, 60-80% attempted suicide and 87% showed self-injury behavior other than suicide. Dissociative disorders can be treated by applying trauma-centered psychotherapy by clinical psychologists and psychiatrists specialized in this field, and self-injury behaviors and suicidal tendencies can be eliminated with these clinically successful treatments. Keywords: Dissociation; dissociative disorders; psychotherapy; trauma; psychotraumatology; self-injury behaviors; childhood traumas; suicide tendency; suicide attempt
Article
Full-text available
“Trauma Based Alliance Model Therapy” (TBAMT) was developed by Öztürk for the psychotherapy of dissociative identity disorder. Alliance with alter personalities is an important issue in TBAMT model. TBAMT, which is specific to dissociative identity disorder, was structured based on professional experiences of Öztürk, who has been working intensively and only with this psychiatric diagnosis group for long years in order to shorten the duration of the treatment period. Thus, it can also be considered as short-term psychotherapy of dissociative identity disorder. TBAMT is also recognized as the “alter personality alliance model”. TBAMT is generally a trauma centered, strategic, both crisis intervention and an integrated psychotherapy method focused on the processing of trauma following the alliance of the host and alter personalities in dissociative identity disorder. TBAMT is based on eight main phases linked to each other; “multifocal therapeutic alliance”, “short-term and efficient trauma practice”, “integrative intervention and control for crises”, “missions and strategic functions of host and alter personalities”, “solution-oriented approaches towards insecure attach-ment and psychopathogenic family dynamics”, “correction of different time perceptions and cognitive distortions of host and alter personalities”, “integration; fusions made via the host” and “post-integrative psychotherapy providing autonomy”. Every basic phase has three-week periods and the treatment of dissociative identity disorder is completed nearly in six months. Keywords: Trauma based alliance model therapy; psychotherapy of dissociative identity disorder; crisis intervention psychotherapy; short-term psychotherapy; trauma based psychotherapy; dissociative disorders; post-traumatic stress disorder; psychotraumatology; therapeutic reciprocity
Article
Full-text available
The author has been involved in the development of two conflicting theoretical models of trauma-related dissociation which has given rise to conceptual confusion—the more so because both models originally included the term ‘levels of dissociation.’ In one model, stemming from a so-called broad conceptualization, these ‘levels’ refer to a range of trauma-related phenomena which may or may not be dissociative in nature. The other model, developed within the so-called narrow understanding of dissociation, distinguishes ‘levels’ in terms of complexity of dissociation of the personality. This paper describes and discusses the origins of the two models, their contents, their use of the terms ‘levels’ and ‘dissociation,’ and their differences and similarities. Arguments are given why, in both models, the term ‘levels’ (of dissociation) was ill-chosen, as well as why the author prefers the second model stemming from the narrow understanding of trauma-related dissociation.
Article
Full-text available
Trauma, voice hearing, and dissociation tend to be closely linked. Cognitive models of voice hearing largely agree that traumatic events may predispose people to voice hearing via dissociative processes. While treating trauma in voice hearers may help to reduce voice distress and frequency, dissociation may be a barrier to this therapeutic work. This case series reports on the dissociative experiences of a subsample of voice hearing clients who reported dissociation during Imagery Rescripting (ImRs) for trauma (N = 6, 50% of original sample) in the case series study reported on previously (Paulik et al., 2019). The aims in the current paper were to explore the impact of dissociation on outcomes, the type of dissociative experiences encountered, where in the ImRs protocol they occurred, and the use of therapeutic techniques to address them. We found that clients who dissociated during therapy showed reductions in their trauma intrusions and voice-related distress and frequency. However, when compared to nondissociators, these benefits took more sessions to achieve. The most common types of dissociation were flashbacks, losing control over the image, emotional detachment, and trance/absorbed state. These were most likely to occur at points during the therapy where negative affect was heightened. Grounding and soothing techniques, as well as strategies to reduce the level of negative affect, were reported effective by participants in preventing or interrupting dissociation. We recommend that dissociation should not be a barrier to implementing imagery rescripting with this group.
Chapter
Full-text available
Psychohistory has attracted the attention of the whole world in recent years with its effective and practical solutions to prevent childhood traumas and wars. Psychohistory provides a significant contribution to many sciences from clinical psychology to psychiatry, forensic sciences and sociology. Decreases in the transfer of psychological trauma are observed with the increase in the value given to the child. This situation may also support the solution of international security and terror problems, which are among the important determinants of social dynamics. One of the most basic fields of study in psychohistory, a multidisciplinary science, is the history of childhood. Psychohistory also examines the development of intergenerational transmisson of traumas and child rearing styles. Childrearing styles throughout history show a relatively slow and irregular progress in the direction of empathy. With the positive development of child rearing styles to support the child, the psychological traumas, which were transferred from the parents (caregivers) to the child, decreased. Feeling emotional support and empathy by the parents during childhood promotes awareness that can maintain their emotional integrity and protect themselves against traumas from the outside. In this article, the relationship between psychohistorical child rearing styles and tranmission of psychological trauma will be discussed in the light of relevant literature. Keywords: Psychohistory; child rearing; childhood traumas; transmission of psychological trauma
Article
Full-text available
The presented analytical preview considers the main approaches to the relationship between dissociation, trauma and self-harm. This relationship is functionally complex and depends on many variables. In regards to trauma dissociation and self-harm are (1) defense mechanisms, activating to traumatic cues; (2) destructive pathological self-regulatory modes. Meantime functional links between dissociation and self-harm reveal two tendencies: anti-dissociation (regaining control) and dissociation-inducing (rejecting one’s feelings). Dissociation is widely considered a mediator between trauma and self-harm. At the same time psychological mechanisms, such as emotion regulation and body rejection, exert significant influence on pathological post-traumatic development. We discuss the psychopathological aspects of the links between trauma, dissociation and self-harm in borderline personality and eating disorders. We also take note of the gender- and age-related peculiarities of these issues.
Article
Child sexual abuse (CSA) has been implicated in dissociative peritraumatic and post-traumatic symptoms and disorders. Although explicitly relevant to the legal process following alleged CSA, very little is known about dissociative manifestations in the context of forensic interviews with children following abuse. The current study was designed to uncoverperi- and post-traumatic dissociation of abused children as revealed in forensic interviews. The study examines the display of dissociation in 42 forensic interviews with children (29 girls, aged 4-14) following intra familial child sexual abuse (IFCSA). Thematic analysis was used to identify key expressions of dissociation in all of the forensic interviews. The analyses identified depersonalization and derealization in the children’s description of the abuse. This was manifested both in an inability to feel things that happened during the incidents or imagination and fantasies that were reported as part of the abusive incidents. The children’s interviews also revealed the potential manifestations of dissociative amnesia, which was evident in the children’s attempts to communicate their retrieval difficulties to the forensic interviewers. Finally, it was identified that the forensic interviews were a platform in which dissociative post-traumatic reactions were activated and often displayed in sensory flashbacks. The current findings uncover the importance of acknowledging trauma and dissociation in the context of forensic interviews with abused children and the urgent need to implement unique responses to trauma within practical guidelines.
Article
The aim of this study is to investigate the mediating effect of coping strategies on the relationship among childhood traumas, depression, and alcohol use disorder in university students. The participants of this study consisted of 735 (209 males and 526 females) university students. Participants completed measures of depressive symptoms, childhood traumas, problematic alcohol consumption, and coping strategies as well as a sociodemographic information form. According to results, coping strategies fully mediated the relationship between childhood traumas and alcohol use disorder, and partially mediated the relationship between childhood traumas and depression.