ArticlePDF Available

Intermittent Frontal Rhythmic Discharges as an Electroencephalogram Biomarker of Acute SARS-CoV-2 Infection-Associated Encephalopathy in Children

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Data on neurological sequelae of COVID-19 infection in children are sparse. Neurotropic and neuroinvasive potentials of the SARS-CoV-2 virus are a matter of ongoing scientific debate and not yet well understood. Most of the reported symptoms are nonspecific including headache, encephalopathy, weakness, and as a part of multisystem inflammatory response syndrome. Few observational studies have reported acute encephalopathy to be one of the neurological manifestations of COVID-19 infection, mostly in adults. A little is known about epileptogenesis or electroencephalogram (EEG) findings in this limited cohort of pediatric patients. We report a 17-year-old female with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM), who presented with two weeks history of intermittent headaches, followed by a one-day history of acute change in behavior in the form of prolonged staring, decreased speech, confusion, and alternating periods of agitation and sleepiness. No fever or respiratory symptoms. Her blood glucose was normal. Brain MRI was unremarkable. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) studies showed 1000 RBCs, no WBCs, normal glucose/protein, negative culture, and negative infectious PCR, and autoimmune panels. She was found to be positive for SARS-CoV-2 PCR with negative IgG. Her EEG showed remarkable background slowing and frequent frontal intermittent rhythmic discharges. She was managed with high-dose steroids with the full clinical recovery of all symptoms at discharge, as well as normalization of subsequent EEG studies. We hypothesize there may be some specific seizure characteristics or EEG patterns in patients with pediatric COVID-19 infection and concomitant acute encephalopathy. It is perhaps reasonable to obtain EEG studies in children who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 and report central neurological symptoms. Long-term follow-up of this cohort of patients will be helpful to understand the clinical significance and implications of such neurophysiological studies.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Review began 10/18/2021
Review ended 10/27/2021
Published 10/30/2021
© Copyright 2021
Khair. This is an open access article
distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0.,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution,
and reproduction in any medium, provided
the original author and source are credited.
Intermittent Frontal Rhythmic Discharges as an
Electroencephalogram Biomarker of Acute SARS-
CoV-2 Infection-Associated Encephalopathy in
Children
Abdulhafeez Khair
1. Neurology, Nemours Children's Health, Thomas Jefferson University, Wilmington, USA
Corresponding author: Abdulhafeez Khair, abdulhafeez.khair@nemours.org
Abstract
Data on neurological sequelae of COVID-19 infection in children are sparse. Neurotropic and neuroinvasive
potentials of the SARS-CoV-2 virus are a matter of ongoing scientific debate and not yet well
understood. Most of the reported symptoms are nonspecific including headache, encephalopathy, weakness,
and as a part of multisystem inflammatory response syndrome. Few observational studies have reported
acute encephalopathy to be one of the neurological manifestations of COVID-19 infection, mostly in adults.
A little is known about epileptogenesis or electroencephalogram (EEG) findings in this limited cohort of
pediatric patients. We report a 17-year-old female with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM), who presented with
two weeks history of intermittent headaches, followed by a one-day history of acute change in behavior in
the form of prolonged staring, decreased speech, confusion, and alternating periods of agitation and
sleepiness. No fever or respiratory symptoms. Her blood glucose was normal. Brain MRI was unremarkable.
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) studies showed 1000 RBCs, no WBCs, normal glucose/protein, negative culture,
and negative infectious PCR, and autoimmune panels. She was found to be positive for SARS-CoV-2 PCR
with negative IgG. Her EEG showed remarkable background slowing and frequent frontal intermittent
rhythmic discharges. She was managed with high-dose steroids with the full clinical recovery of all
symptoms at discharge, as well as normalization of subsequent EEG studies. We hypothesize there may be
some specific seizure characteristics or EEG patterns in patients with pediatric COVID-19 infection and
concomitant acute encephalopathy. It is perhaps reasonable to obtain EEG studies in children who test
positive for SARS-CoV-2 and report central neurological symptoms. Long-term follow-up of this cohort of
patients will be helpful to understand the clinical significance and implications of such neurophysiological
studies.
Categories: Neurology, Pediatrics
Keywords: biomarker, frontal intermittent rhythmic discharges, eeg, encephalopathy, pediatric covid-19
Introduction
Neurological symptoms associated are infrequently reported in the subset of pediatric patients with acute
COVID-19 infection [1]. Few studies highlighted the potential isolation of SARS-CoV-2 PCR from the
cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of some patients; however, the full understanding of potential neuro-
invasive characteristics of the virus is lacking [2]. Other non-invasive, neurotropic pathological mechanisms
appear to continue to a various range of neurological symptoms [3]. Neurological symptoms of COVID-19
infection have been reported in about nearly 35% of adult patients and less than 20% of pediatric
patients [4]. The incidence of neurological symptoms is higher in the cohort of pediatric multi-system
inflammatory syndrome temporally associated with COVID-19 infection (PIMS-TS) [5]. The majority of
reported symptoms are rather nonspecific. Nevertheless, acute encephalopathy with or without ongoing
encephalitis has been reported in a few children [6]. The presence of a specific electroencephalogram (EEG)
signature of acute COVID-19 encephalopathy is yet to be determined.
Case Presentation
A 17-year-old female with a known history of type I diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypercholesterolemia
presented with an acute alteration of mental status. She was in her usual state of good health until her
mother reported that she started complaining of headaches for two weeks. These headaches were
intermittent and associated with a feeling of neck muscle tightness. She tried taking calcium and
magnesium supplements as well as using topical oils to ease the pain. Then on one day morning, the mother
found her staring and not speaking with minimal responsiveness to verbal and tactile stimulation. No
associated eye-rolling, facial twitching, tongue biting, body posturing, or extremity shaking movements
were noted. She appeared to be breathing comfortably but she continued to be confused for more than an
hour, which ultimately prompted the family to bring her to the emergency department. Otherwise, there
were no reported recent infections, fever, vomiting, weakness, or seizures. She was noted to be drinking
more water than usual but her blood glucose checks at home were within the usual normal range. The night
1
Open Access Case
Report DOI: 10.7759/cureus.19149
How to cite this article
Khair A (October 30, 2021) Intermittent Frontal Rhythmic Discharges as an Electroencephalogram Biomarker of Acute SARS-CoV-2 Infection-
Associated Encephalopathy in Children. Cureus 13(10): e19149. DOI 10.7759/cureus.19149
before the presentation she received an extra dose of Insulin as her home urine test showed some extra
ketones. Overall, her diabetes control was described as suboptimal. A month before this presentation her
HbA1C was 12.7. She had to be hospitalized five years prior due to acute diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA).
Upon evaluation in the emergency department, she was noted to be very confused and lethargic. Her vital
signs were appropriate, and she was breathing spontaneously with no respiratory support. She was slow to
respond to questions and unable to cooperate with simple task requests. Her remote memory was impaired.
Her Glasgow coma scale was estimated to be 12. No cranial nerve palsies, motor weakness, or sensory
impairment could be elicited. She was able to ambulate with her hands being held, but she had a slow,
hesitant, wide-based gait. Her blood glucose was initially 252 mg/dL and mild acidosis with serum Ph of
7.24 needing an insulin bolus. Her measures serum osmolality was 283 mmol/kg. No other electrolyte
imbalance was noted in her blood work. Extended drug screening was negative. Head CT without contrast
was obtained and was unremarkable. She received intravenous fluids, but she remained confused and
occasionally agitated. Testing for SARS-CoV-2 PCR was negative from nasal swab samples. The concern for
possible COVID-19 attributed multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C) was entertained but work up
including hematological and cardiac evaluations were not consistent with MIS-C.
With her DM history and given the remarkable change in sensorium, the neurology team was involved in the
evaluation of encephalopathy and possibly cerebral edema. Non-contrast brain magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI) including diffusion-weighted sequences, along with dedicated venography sequences (MRV) were all
unremarkable. Lumbar puncture was performed with a normal CSF profile including negative screening for
autoimmune encephalopathy antibody panel. EEG was performed to assess her egress of encephalopathy
and eliminate the possibility of clinical or electrographic seizures. An overnight EEG showed a poorly
formed posterior dominant rhythm of 8 Hz with superimposing low amplitude fast beta activity with
anterior voltage predominance. Rhythmic runs of intermittent, yet consistent, dominantly right frontal slow
theta and delta waves were noted throughout the record (Figures 1, 2).
FIGURE 1: EEG showing asymmetrical FIRDA with right-side dominance
FIRDA - Frontal Intermittent Rhythmic Delta Activity
2021 Khair et al. Cureus 13(10): e19149. DOI 10.7759/cureus.19149 2 of 5
FIGURE 2: EEG showing recurring frontal intermittent rhythmic delta
activity
There was no change in the EEG pattern in response to sensory or photic stimulation. Those discharges were
consistent with Frontal Intermittent Rhythmic Delta Activity, also known as FIRDA. No other distinct
epileptiform or ictal discharges were seen. It is worth noting that the Patient did not receive any sedative or
pain medications at the time of those evaluations.
The patient was admitted to the hospital for two weeks, out of which eight days were spent in the pediatric
intensive care unit for close monitoring of clinical progress and metabolic management. She developed a
low-grade fever maxed at 100.8 F but all infectious workup was negative. She received a trial of high-dose
methylprednisolone for five days for presumed immune-mediated encephalopathy with no tapering
course. During her second week of hospitalization, she had a transient increase in her need for respiratory
support needing high flow oxygen for two days. Chest x-ray at the time was interpreted as suggestive
of nonspecific viral pneumonitis. Her mental status and behavior continued to improve throughout her
hospitalization. Her neurological exam upon discharge was completely unremarkable. Post-discharge EEG
which was done about three weeks after her first EEG was normal as well. As the above evaluations were
thought to be non-diagnostic, the diagnosis of COVID-19 encephalopathy was concluded.
Discussion
Recognition and understanding of neurological symptoms of pediatric COVID-19 infection have improved
with advancing basic and clinical knowledge of SARS-CoV-2 infection characteristics. Children appear to
represent less than 10% of the total case cohort, and about one-third of them have reported headaches as
the most commonly observed neurological symptom [7]. A subset of children exhibit symptoms of acute
encephalopathy such as disrupted sleep cycle, altered behavior, fluctuating level of consciousness, seizures,
or upper motor neuron signs [8]. Full understanding of the pathophysiological process behind pediatric
COVID-19 attributed encephalopathy is lacking, but hematogenous dissemination, direct brain invasion,
secondary hypoxic brain injury, angiotensin-converting enzyme dysfunction, autoimmune-mediated
neurotoxicity, and inflammatory cascade pathways activation are presumed contributing mechanisms [9].
Interestingly, the majority of patients have elevated CSF protein indicating some degree of blood-brain
barrier disruption, but SARS-CoV-2 cannot usually be isolated from CSF [10]. The commonest brain
neuroimaging findings are acute and subacute infarcts, leptomeningeal enhancement, microbleeds, and
hyperintense signal abnormalities [11].
Although EEG is often used as a part of a neuro-diagnostic evaluation of patients with altered mental
functions including those with COVID-19 encephalopathy, only a few studies have reported any particular
pattern of EEG abnormalities. Reviews published earlier in the course of the current pandemic concluded
that EEG findings are nonspecific and no pattern could be found [12,13]. Nevertheless, EEG findings do
usually correlate with clinical severity of coma or mental status impairment and can thus offer valuable
prognostic guidance. In half of the adult patients who remained comatose after weaning of all sedatives, the
alpha coma pattern was a marker of a more grim prognosis or rather prolonged recovery [14]. Additionally,
EEG background reactivity, in particular, can help to prognosticate neurological outcomes in patients with
COVID-19-induced hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy [15].
Background slowing is the most dominant EEG signature in various reports. In a cohort of 23 adult patients
with COVID-19 encephalopathy, 17 had diffuse background slowing but none had any ictal discharges [10].
Pasiti et al. reported a group of 13 adult patients, all of them had mixed theta and delta 4-8 Hz slowing,
2021 Khair et al. Cureus 13(10): e19149. DOI 10.7759/cureus.19149 3 of 5
among them four had consistent bifrontal slowing [16]. In 10 adult patients with severe encephalopathy
reported by Canham, widespread delta slowing with mild anterior emphasis was recorded [17]. Flamand et
al. reported an 80 years old patient whose EEG showed distinct 1-1.5 seconds periods of triphasic discharges
consistent with toxic or metabolic encephalopathy [18]. Vellieux et al. reported two young adults with
symmetric yet monomorphic, diphasic, delta slow waves with dominant frontal projection [19]. FIRDA is
more commonly encountered in the neurocritical care setting and may indicate an associated vascular
territorial injury [20]. The systemic review by Antony et al. of 617 patients concluded that frontal EEG
patterns were noted in about one-third of patients and the authors suggested incorporating this pattern as a
biomarker of COVID-19 encephalopathy [21].
The epileptogenic potential of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is a subject of active research. Conclusive evidence that
COVID-19 infection directly generates cortical excitability is lacking. However, contributing etiologies to
seizure emergence in the pediatric population are thought to include high fever, hypoxic insult due to severe
respiratory compromise, and multi-organ dysfunction [22]. The overall prevalence of either generalized or
more rarely focal EEG epileptiform discharges is estimated to be around 20% in total patients with COVID-
19 encephalopathy [23]. Patients with pre-existing epilepsy and comorbid neurological conditions appear to
be at a higher risk of having ictal or interictal epileptiform discharges [24]. To our knowledge, detection of
isolated electrographic seizures without preceding or following clinical seizures is exceptionally rare [25,26].
However, a more recent review by Lin et al. reported that up to 4% of clinically ill patients may have
evidence of non-convulsive status epilepticus in EEG without associated clinical seizures, which highlights
both the importance and underutilization of EEG in critically sick COVID-19 patients [27]. Of note, despite
the presence of an overall 1% incidence of acute symptomatic seizures as a part of COVID-19 infection
symptomatology, the incidence of short and long-term epilepsy in those patients is not yet known [28].
Limitations and disruption of EEG resources availability to COVID-19 patients with neurological or critical
symptoms have been noted across different health systems [29,30]. Unfortunately, and following a long
history of disparity and inequality, children's access to EEG services has been more preferentially
jeopardized [31]. This has contributed significantly to the rarity of published EEG data in COVID-19 infected
children [32].
Conclusions
Pediatric COVID-19 encephalopathy is a rare, yet serious clinical phenotype variant of SARS-CoV-2
infection responsible for the current worldwide pandemic. EEG can elicit both non-diagnostic and
potentially specific characteristics. Whether focal, frontally dominant, periodic (as recorded in our reported
patient), and continuous background slowing represents a specific EEG signature biomarker for acute
COVID-19 is to be determined. It appears to be plausible to screen children with clinical encephalopathy and
those EEG findings for COVID-19.
Additional Information
Disclosures
Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Conflicts of interest: In
compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services
info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the
submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial
relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an
interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other
relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
References
1. Paterson RW, Brown RL, Benjamin L, et al.: The emerging spectrum of COVID-19 neurology: clinical,
radiological and laboratory findings. Brain. 2020, 143:3104-20. 10.1093/brain/awaa240
2. Baig AM, Sanders EC: Potential neuroinvasive pathways of SARS-CoV-2: Deciphering the spectrum of
neurological deficit seen in coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). J Med Virol. 2020, 92:1845-57.
10.1002/jmv.26105
3. Condie LO: Neurotropic mechanisms in COVID-19 and their potential influence on neuropsychological
outcomes in children. Child Neuropsychol. 2020, 26:577-96. 10.1080/09297049.2020.1763938
4. Chou SH, Beghi E, Helbok R, et al.: Global incidence of neurological manifestations among patients
hospitalized with COVID-19-a report for the GCS-neuroCOVID consortium and the ENERGY consortium.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021, 4:e2112131. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.12131
5. LaRovere KL, Riggs BJ, Poussaint TY, et al.: Neurologic involvement in children and adolescents
hospitalized in the United States for COVID-19 or multisystem inflammatory syndrome. JAMA Neurol.
2021, 78:536-47. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.0504
6. Vraka K, Ram D, West S, Chia WY, Kurup P, Subramanian G, Tan HJ: Two paediatric patients with
encephalopathy and concurrent COVID-19 infection: two sides of the same coin?. Case Rep Neurol Med.
2021, 2021:6658000. 10.1155/2021/6658000
7. Jorden MA, Rudman SL, Villarino E, et al.: Evidence for limited early spread of COVID-19 within the United
States, January-February 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020, 69:680-4. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6922e1
2021 Khair et al. Cureus 13(10): e19149. DOI 10.7759/cureus.19149 4 of 5
8. Abdel-Mannan O, Eyre M, Löbel U, et al.: Neurologic and radiographic findings associated with COVID-19
infection in children. JAMA Neurol. 2020, 77:1440-5. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2687
9. Wu Y, Xu X, Chen Z, et al.: Nervous system involvement after infection with COVID-19 and other
coronaviruses. Brain Behav Immun. 2020, 87:18-22. 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.03.031
10. Uginet M, Breville G, Assal F, et al.: COVID-19 encephalopathy: clinical and neurobiological features . J Med
Virol. 2021, 93:4374-81. 10.1002/jmv.26973
11. Gulko E, Oleksk ML, Gomes W, et al.: MRI brain findings in 126 patients with COVID-19: initial observations
from a descriptive literature review . AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020, 41:2199-203. 10.3174/ajnr.A6805
12. Roberto KT, Espiritu AI, Fernandez ML, Gutierrez JC: Electroencephalographic findings in COVID-19
patients: a systematic review . Seizure. 2020, 82:17-22. 10.1016/j.seizure.2020.09.007
13. Petrescu AM, Taussig D, Bouilleret V: Electroencephalogram (EEG) in COVID-19: a systematic retrospective
study. Neurophysiol Clin. 2020, 50:155-65. 10.1016/j.neucli.2020.06.001
14. Koutroumanidis M, Gratwicke J, Sharma S, Whelan A, Tan SV, Glover G: Alpha coma EEG pattern in patients
with severe COVID-19 related encephalopathy. Clin Neurophysiol. 2021, 132:218-25.
10.1016/j.clinph.2020.09.008
15. Pati S, Toth E, Chaitanya G: Quantitative EEG markers to prognosticate critically ill patients with COVID-
19: a retrospective cohort study . Clin Neurophysiol. 2020, 131:1824-6. 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.06.001
16. Pasini E, Bisulli F, Volpi L, et al.: EEG findings in COVID-19 related encephalopathy . Clin Neurophysiol.
2020, 131:2265-7. 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.07.003
17. Canham LJ, Staniaszek LE, Mortimer AM, Nouri LF, Kane NM: Electroencephalographic (EEG) features of
encephalopathy in the setting of Covid-19: a case series. Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2020, 5:199-205.
10.1016/j.cnp.2020.06.001
18. Flamand M, Perron A, Buron Y, Szurhaj W: Pay more attention to EEG in COVID-19 pandemic . Clin
Neurophysiol. 2020, 131:2062-4. 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.05.011
19. Vellieux G, Rouvel-Tallec A, Jaquet P, Grinea A, Sonneville R, d'Ortho MP: COVID-19 associated
encephalopathy: is there a specific EEG pattern?. Clin Neurophysiol. 2020, 131:1928-30.
10.1016/j.clinph.2020.06.005
20. Dericioglu N, Khasiyev F, Arsava EM, Topcuoglu MA: Frontal intermittent rhythmic delta activity (FIRDA) in
the neurological intensive care: prevalence, determinants, and clinical significance. Clin EEG Neurosci.
2018, 49:272-7. 10.1177/1550059416688108
21. Antony AR, Haneef Z: Systematic review of EEG findings in 617 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 . Seizure.
2020, 83:234-41. 10.1016/j.seizure.2020.10.014
22. Khair AM, Husain S, Kaur G, Falchek S: Convulsive status epilepticus in a child with controlled epilepsy and
concurrent COVID-19 infection: a case report and a quick review. Clin Med Insights Case Rep. 2020,
13:1179547620984126. 10.1177/1179547620984126
23. Kubota T, Gajera PK, Kuroda N: Meta-analysis of EEG findings in patients with COVID-19 . Epilepsy Behav.
2021, 115:107682. 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107682
24. Kubota T, Kuroda N: Exacerbation of neurological symptoms and COVID-19 severity in patients with
preexisting neurological disorders and COVID-19: a systematic review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021,
200:106349. 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106349
25. Pellinen J, Carroll E, Friedman D, et al.: Continuous EEG findings in patients with COVID-19 infection
admitted to a New York academic hospital system. Epilepsia. 2020, 61:2097-105. 10.1111/epi.16667
26. Pilato MS, Urban A, Alkawadri R, et al.: EEG findings in coronavirus disease [PREPRINT] . J Clin
Neurophysiol. 2020, 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000752
27. Lin L, Al-Faraj A, Ayub N, et al.: Electroencephalographic abnormalities are common in COVID-19 and are
associated with outcomes. Ann Neurol. 2021, 89:872-83. 10.1002/ana.26060
28. Hogan RE, Grinspan Z, Axeen E, Marquis B, Day BK: COVID-19 in patients with seizures and epilepsy:
Interpretation of relevant knowledge of presenting signs and symptoms. Epilepsy Curr. 2020, 20:312-5.
10.1177/1535759720948549
29. Zafar SF, Khozein RJ, LaRoche SM, Westover MB, Gilmore EJ: Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on
continuous EEG utilization [PREPRINT]. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2020, 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000802
30. Krysl D, Beniczky S, Franceschetti S, Arzimanoglou A: The COVID-19 outbreak and approaches to
performing EEG in Europe. Epileptic Disord. 2020, 22:548-54. 10.1684/epd.2020.1208
31. Wirrell EC, Grinspan ZM, Knupp KG, et al.: Care delivery for children with epilepsy during the COVID-19
pandemic: an international survey of clinicians. J Child Neurol. 2020, 35:924-33. 10.1177/0883073820940189
32. Asadi-Pooya AA, Simani L, Shahisavandi M, Barzegar Z: COVID-19, de novo seizures, and epilepsy: a
systematic review. Neurol Sci. 2021, 42:415-31. 10.1007/s10072-020-04932-2
2021 Khair et al. Cureus 13(10): e19149. DOI 10.7759/cureus.19149 5 of 5
... The frequency of seizures in children with COVID-19 varies between 0.7% and 52.9%. [6,[9][10][11][12]15,23,26,[53][54][55] Reports show that seizures are observed more frequently in patients with underlying neurological disease and/or hospitalised for severe illness. [6,[9][10][11][12]15,23,26,[53][54][55] Unlike the literature, in our study, the number of boys (n:13, 37.1%) was slightly smaller than the number of girls (n:22, 62.9%) in Group 1. ...
... [6,[9][10][11][12]15,23,26,[53][54][55] Reports show that seizures are observed more frequently in patients with underlying neurological disease and/or hospitalised for severe illness. [6,[9][10][11][12]15,23,26,[53][54][55] Unlike the literature, in our study, the number of boys (n:13, 37.1%) was slightly smaller than the number of girls (n:22, 62.9%) in Group 1. Most studies have reported that there is no gender difference in terms of neurological findings among children. ...
... Notably, neurological findings are more common in obese patients in the literature. [6,[9][10][11][12]15,23,26,[53][54][55] Laboratory results showed statistically significant differences in blood leucocyte (P = .02), lymphocyte (P = .01), ...
Article
Full-text available
There is insufficient evidence on SARS-CoV-2 induced neurological effects. Studies on CNS involvement during COVID-19 in children are limited. This study aims to identify and manage the neurological signs and symptoms in COVID-19-infected pediatric patients during follow up and plan future follow-ups. Children diagnosed COVID-19 and hospitalized in the pediatric pandemic services, between March 18, 2020, and June 18, 2021, were included in the study. Children with underlying neurological disease were excluded from the study. Patient data retrieved from hospital files and medical records. Children divided into 2 groups, 1 and 2, based on the presence or absence of neurological findings. A total of 243 children received follow-ups in the pandemic wards, 35 (14.4%) of these patients had neurological findings. Major neurological manifestations were headache (n:17, 7%), seizure (n:4, 1.6%), and anosmia/hyposmia (n:17, 7%). The number of boys (n:13, 37.1%) was smaller than the number of girls (n:22, 62.9%) in Group 1. Group 1 showed higher blood leukocyte, lymphocyte, thrombocyte, AST, LDH, d-dimer values. Anosmia/hyposmia occurred more often in girls, anosmia and headache occurred more often over 9 years of age. Pulmonary and hematologic involvement was more common in children with anosmia and headache. Our study is one of the few studies on neurological involvement in COVID-19 in children. To the best of our knowledge, there is limited data on these subjects in the literature.
... EEG recordings showed diffuse slowing in 2 of these patients, while 1 had mild slow activity in the anterior part of the brain [10]. Another study reported a child with COVID-19 infection whose initial symptom was a headache, and her EEG showed remarkable background slowing and frequent frontal intermittent rhythmic discharges [11]. The current studies on the EEG performance of pediatric patients with COVID-19 are mainly case studies, and no studies have been conducted to analyze it systematically. ...
... The median length in the hospital was seven days (IQR = 5 to 11 days). One hundred and twenty-two patients recovered at the time of discharge, and three patients (2.40%) were discharged with neurological sequelae, one with a language barrier, one with dystonia, (5,11) and the remaining one with both language barrier and dystonia. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) infection has many neurological manifestations, and its effects on the nervous system are increasingly recognized. There has been no systematic analysis of electroencephalography (EEG) characteristics in children exhibiting neurological symptoms of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The primary aim of this study was to describe the EEG characteristics caused by COVID-19 infection in children who were showing neurological symptoms and to assess the relationship between COVID-19-related EEG changes and clinical features in these children. Method: This study included 125 pediatric patients infected with SARS-CoV2 and showing neurological symptoms, and their continuous EEG was recorded. In addition, the demographic and clinical characteristics of these patients were analyzed and the correlation between the two was investigated. Results: Abnormal EEG findings were detected in 31.20% (N = 39) of the patients. Abnormal discharges (43.59%) were the most common EEG abnormalities, followed by background abnormalities (41.03%). The proportion of patients diagnosed with febrile seizure was higher in the normal EEG group than in the abnormal EEG group (P = 0.002), while the opposite was true for epilepsy and encephalitis/encephalopathy (P = 0.016 and P = 0.003, respectively). The independent associated factors of abnormal EEG were age and total length of stay (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively). Non-specific EEG abnormalities were found in COVID-19-related encephalitis/encephalopathy. Conclusion: Our study corroborated that a small group of pediatric patients infected by COVID-19 and showing neurological symptoms may exhibit abnormal EEG. This study could help improve the understanding of clinical and EEG characteristics in children with COVID-19 and inform triage policies in other hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article
Full-text available
Importance The COVID-19 pandemic continues to affect millions of people globally, with increasing reports of neurological manifestations but limited data on their incidence and associations with outcome. Objective To determine the neurological phenotypes, incidence, and outcomes among adults hospitalized with COVID-19. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study included patients with clinically diagnosed or laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 at 28 centers, representing 13 countries and 4 continents. The study was performed by the Global Consortium Study of Neurologic Dysfunction in COVID-19 (GCS-NeuroCOVID) from March 1 to September 30, 2020, and the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) Neuro-COVID Registry (ENERGY) from March to October 2020. Three cohorts were included: (1) the GCS-NeuroCOVID all COVID-19 cohort (n = 3055), which included consecutive hospitalized patients with COVID-19 with and without neurological manifestations; (2) the GCS-NeuroCOVID COVID-19 neurological cohort (n = 475), which comprised consecutive patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who had confirmed neurological manifestations; and (3) the ENERGY cohort (n = 214), which included patients with COVID-19 who received formal neurological consultation. Exposures Clinically diagnosed or laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. Main Outcomes and Measures Neurological phenotypes were classified as self-reported symptoms or neurological signs and/or syndromes assessed by clinical evaluation. Composite incidence was reported for groups with at least 1 neurological manifestation. The main outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. Results Of the 3055 patients in the all COVID-19 cohort, 1742 (57%) were men, and the mean age was 59.9 years (95% CI, 59.3-60.6 years). Of the 475 patients in the COVID-19 neurological cohort, 262 (55%) were men, and the mean age was 62.6 years (95% CI, 61.1-64.1 years). Of the 214 patients in the ENERGY cohort, 133 (62%) were men, and the mean age was 67 years (95% CI, 52-78 years). A total of 3083 of 3743 patients (82%) across cohorts had any neurological manifestation (self-reported neurological symptoms and/or clinically captured neurological sign and/or syndrome). The most common self-reported symptoms included headache (1385 of 3732 patients [37%]) and anosmia or ageusia (977 of 3700 patients [26%]). The most prevalent neurological signs and/or syndromes were acute encephalopathy (1845 of 3740 patients [49%]), coma (649 of 3737 patients [17%]), and stroke (222 of 3737 patients [6%]), while meningitis and/or encephalitis were rare (19 of 3741 patients [0.5%]). Presence of clinically captured neurologic signs and/or syndromes was associated with increased risk of in-hospital death (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.99; 95% CI, 4.33-8.28) after adjusting for study site, age, sex, race, and ethnicity. Presence of preexisting neurological disorders (aOR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.80-2.75) was associated with increased risk of developing neurological signs and/or syndromes with COVID-19. Conclusions and Relevance In this multicohort study, neurological manifestations were prevalent among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and were associated with higher in-hospital mortality. Preexisting neurological disorders were associated with increased risk of developing neurological signs and/or syndromes in COVID-19.
Article
Full-text available
Background The severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) has been associated with neurological complications, including acute encephalopathy. In order to better understand the neuropathogenesis of this acute encephalopathy, we describe a series of patients with COVID‐19 encephalopathy, highlighting its phenomenology and its neurobiological features. Methods On May 10 2020, 707 patients infected by SARS‐CoV‐2 were hospitalized at the Geneva University Hospitals; 31 (4.4%) consecutive patients with an acute encephalopathy (64.6 ± 12.1 years; 6.5% female) were included in this series, after exclusion of comorbid neurological conditions, such as stroke or meningitis. Severity of the COVID‐19 encephalopathy was divided into severe and mild based on the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS): severe cases (n=14, 45.2%) were defined on a RASS < ‐3 at worst presentation. Results Severe form of this so‐called COVID‐19 encephalopathy presented more often headache. Severity of the pneumonia was not associated with severity of the COVID‐19 encephalopathy: 28/31 (90%) patients did develop an acute respiratory distress syndrome, without any difference between groups (p = 0.665). MRI abnormalities were found in 92.0% (23/25 patients) with an intracranial vessel gadolinium enhancement in 85.0% (17/20 patients), while an increase CSF/serum quotient of albumin suggestive of blood‐brain barrier disruption was reported in 85.7% (6/7 patients). RT‐PCR for SARS‐CoV‐2 were negative for all patients in the CSF. Conclusions Although different pathophysiological mechanisms may contribute to this acute encephalopathy, our findings suggest the hypothesis of a disturbed brain homeostasis and vascular dysfunction consistent with a SARS‐CoV‐2 induced endotheliitis. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Article
Full-text available
There is increasing evidence that SARS-CoV-2 has neurotropic potential. We report on two paediatric patients who presented with encephalopathy during COVID-19 illness. Both patients had ADEM-like changes in their neuroimaging, negative SARS-CoV-2 RNA PCR in CSF, and paucity of PIMS-TS laboratory findings. However, the first patient was positive for serum MOG antibodies with normal CSF analysis, and the second had negative MOG antibodies but showed significant CSF lymphocytic pleocytosis. We concluded that the first case was a typical case of demyelination, which could have been triggered by different cofactors. In the second case, however, we postulated that the encephalopathic process was triggered by SARS-CoV-2, as no other cause was identified. With these two contrasting cases, we provide evidence that SARS-CoV-2-associated encephalitis can show ADEM-like changes, which can present during the postinfectious phase of COVID-19 illness. As ADEM is a relatively common type of postinfectious encephalitis in children, the distinguishing line between the two conditions of encephalitis and ADEM can be relatively fine. The development of more reliable diagnostic tools (e.g., anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in CSF) might play an assisting role in the differentiation of these encephalopathic processes.
Article
Full-text available
The current unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic has been another step toward learning about the unique interaction between viral infections and human nervous system. Very few scientific papers explored neuroinvasive and neurotropic potentials of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in children. We report a child with convulsive status epilepticus and confirmed COVID-19 infection. Brief review of current available literature was discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Aims The coronavirus SARS‐CoV‐2 disease (COVID‐19) pandemic affects availability and performance of neurophysiological diagnostic methods, including EEG. Our objective was to outline the current situation regarding EEG‐based investigations across Europe. Methods A web‐based survey was distributed to centres within the European Reference Network on rare and complex epilepsies (ERN EpiCARE). Responses were collected between April 9 and May 15, 2020. Results were analysed with Microsoft Excel, Python Pandas and SciPy. Results Representants from 47 EpiCARE centres from 22 countries completed the survey. At the time of completing the survey, inpatient video‐EEGs had been stopped or restricted in most centres (61.7% vs. 36.2% for adults, and 38.3% vs. 53.2% for children). Invasive investigations and epilepsy surgery were similarly affected. Acute EEGs continued to be performed, while indications for outpatient EEGs were limited and COVID‐19 triage put in place. The strictness of measures varied according to extent of the outbreak in a given country. Conclusions The results indicate a profound impact of COVID‐19 on neurophysiological diagnostics, especially inpatient video‐EEGs, invasive investigations, and epilepsy surgery. The COVID‐19 pandemic may hamper care for patients in need of EEG‐based investigations, particularly patients with seizure disorders. ERN EpiCARE will work on recommendations on how to rapidly adapt to such situations in order to alleviate consequences for our patients.
Article
Objective To determine the prevalence and risk factors for electrographic seizures and other EEG patterns in patients with COVID‐19 undergoing clinically indicated continuous electroencephalogram monitoring (cEEG), and to assess whether EEG findings are associated with outcomes. Methods We identified 197 patients with COVID‐19 referred for cEEG at 9 participating centers. Medical records and EEG reports were reviewed retrospectively to determine the incidence of and clinical risk factors for seizures and other epileptiform patterns. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis assessed the relationship between EEG patterns and clinical outcomes. Results Electrographic seizures were detected in 19 (9.6%) patients, including nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) in 11 (5.6%). Epileptiform abnormalities (either ictal or interictal) were present in 96 (48.7%). Preceding clinical seizures during hospitalization were associated with both electrographic seizures (36.4% in those with versus 8.1% in those without prior clinical seizures, Odds Ratio (OR) 6.51, p = 0.01) and NCSE (27.3% vs 4.3%, OR 8.34, p = 0.01). A preexisting intracranial lesion on neuroimaging was associated with NCSE (14.3% vs 3.7%; OR 4.33, p = 0.02). In multivariate analysis of outcomes, electrographic seizures were an independent predictor of in‐hospital mortality (Hazard Ratio (HR) 4.07 [1.44‐11.51], p < 0.01). In competing risks analysis, hospital length‐of‐stay increased in the presence of NCSE (30 day proportion discharged with vs without NCSE: 0.21 [0.03‐0.33] vs 0.43 [0.36‐0.49]) Interpretation This multi‐center retrospective cohort study demonstrates that seizures and other epileptiform abnormalities are common in patients with COVID‐19 undergoing clinically‐indicated cEEG, and are associated with adverse clinical outcomes. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Article
Importance: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affects the nervous system in adult patients. The spectrum of neurologic involvement in children and adolescents is unclear. Objective: To understand the range and severity of neurologic involvement among children and adolescents associated with COVID-19. Setting, design, and participants: Case series of patients (age <21 years) hospitalized between March 15, 2020, and December 15, 2020, with positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 test result (reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and/or antibody) at 61 US hospitals in the Overcoming COVID-19 public health registry, including 616 (36%) meeting criteria for multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. Patients with neurologic involvement had acute neurologic signs, symptoms, or diseases on presentation or during hospitalization. Life-threatening involvement was adjudicated by experts based on clinical and/or neuroradiologic features. Exposures: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Main outcomes and measures: Type and severity of neurologic involvement, laboratory and imaging data, and outcomes (death or survival with new neurologic deficits) at hospital discharge. Results: Of 1695 patients (909 [54%] male; median [interquartile range] age, 9.1 [2.4-15.3] years), 365 (22%) from 52 sites had documented neurologic involvement. Patients with neurologic involvement were more likely to have underlying neurologic disorders (81 of 365 [22%]) compared with those without (113 of 1330 [8%]), but a similar number were previously healthy (195 [53%] vs 723 [54%]) and met criteria for multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (126 [35%] vs 490 [37%]). Among those with neurologic involvement, 322 (88%) had transient symptoms and survived, and 43 (12%) developed life-threatening conditions clinically adjudicated to be associated with COVID-19, including severe encephalopathy (n = 15; 5 with splenial lesions), stroke (n = 12), central nervous system infection/demyelination (n = 8), Guillain-Barré syndrome/variants (n = 4), and acute fulminant cerebral edema (n = 4). Compared with those without life-threatening conditions (n = 322), those with life-threatening neurologic conditions had higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (median, 12.2 vs 4.4) and higher reported frequency of D-dimer greater than 3 μg/mL fibrinogen equivalent units (21 [49%] vs 72 [22%]). Of 43 patients who developed COVID-19-related life-threatening neurologic involvement, 17 survivors (40%) had new neurologic deficits at hospital discharge, and 11 patients (26%) died. Conclusions and relevance: In this study, many children and adolescents hospitalized for COVID-19 or multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children had neurologic involvement, mostly transient symptoms. A range of life-threatening and fatal neurologic conditions associated with COVID-19 infrequently occurred. Effects on long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes are unknown.
Article
Purpose: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has significantly impacted healthcare delivery and utilization. The aim of this article was to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on in-hospital continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) utilization and identify areas for process improvement. Methods: A 38-question web-based survey was distributed to site principal investigators of the Critical Care EEG Monitoring Research Consortium, and institutional contacts for the Neurodiagnostic Credentialing and Accreditation Board. The survey addressed the following aspects of cEEG utilization: (1) general center characteristics, (2) cEEG utilization and review, (3) staffing and workflow, and (4) health impact on EEG technologists. Results: The survey was open from June 12, 2020 to June 30, 2020 and distributed to 174 centers with 79 responses (45.4%). Forty centers were located in COVID-19 hotspots. Fifty-seven centers (72.1%) reported cEEG volume reduction. Centers in the Northeast were most likely to report cEEG volume reduction (odds ratio [OR] 7.19 [1.53-33.83]; P = 0.012). Additionally, centers reporting decrease in outside hospital transfers reported cEEG volume reduction; OR 21.67 [4.57-102.81]; P ≤ 0.0001. Twenty-six centers (32.91%) reported reduction in EEG technologist coverage. Eighteen centers had personal protective equipment shortages for EEG technologists. Technologists at these centers were more likely to quarantine for suspected or confirmed COVID-19; OR 3.14 [1.01-9.63]; P = 0.058. Conclusions: There has been a widespread reduction in cEEG volume during the pandemic. Given the anticipated duration of the pandemic and the importance of cEEG in managing hospitalized patients, methods to optimize use need to be prioritized to provide optimal care. Because the survey provides a cross-sectional assessment, follow-up studies can determine the long-term impact of the pandemic on cEEG utilization.
Article
Objective To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize and quantitatively evaluate the electroencephalogram (EEG) findings in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods The MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.Gov databases were comprehensively assessed and searched for observational studies with EEG findings in patients with COVID-19. Pooled proportions of EEG findings with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were assessed using a random effects model. The quality of assessment for each study, heterogeneity between the studies, and publication bias were also evaluated. Results In total, 12 studies with 308 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Abnormal background activity and generalized slowing in the pooled proportions were common findings among the patients with COVID-19 (96.1% [95% CI: 89.4-99.9]; I²= 60%; p < 0.01 and 92.3% [95% CI: 81.2-99.3]; I² = 74%; p < 0.01, respectively). The proportion of patients with epileptiform discharges (EDs) was 20.3% ([95% CI: 9.85-32.9]; I² = 78%; p < 0.01). The proportion of EDs varied between patients with a history of epilepsy or seizures (59.5% [95% CI: 33.9-83.2]; I² = 0%; p = 0.49) and patients without them (22.4% [95% CI: 10.4-36.4]; I² = 46%; p = 0.07). The findings of seizures and status epilepticus on EEG were observed in 2.05% ([95% CI: 0.02-6.04]; I² = 39%; p = 0.08) and 0.80% ([95% CI: 0.00.-3.69]; I² = 28%; p = 0.17) of the patients, respectively. Conclusion The proportion of abnormal background activity in patients with COVID-19 was high (96.1%). The percentage of EDs was present in 20.3% of the cases and varied between people who had a history of epilepsy/seizure and those who did not. However, the proportion of seizures and status epilepticus on EEG was low (2.05% and 0. 80%, respectively).
Article
Objective We discuss the evidence on the occurrence of de novo seizures in patients with COVID-19, the consequences of this catastrophic disease in people with epilepsy (PWE), and the electroencephalographic (EEG) findings in patients with COVID-19.Methods This systematic review was prepared according to the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase from inception to August 15, 2020 were systematically searched. These key words were used: “COVID” AND “seizure” OR “epilepsy” OR “EEG” OR “status epilepticus” OR “electroencephalography”.ResultsWe could identify 62 related manuscripts. Many studies were case reports or case series of patients with COVID-19 and seizures. PWE showed more psychological distress than healthy controls. Many cases with new-onset focal seizures, serial seizures, and status epilepticus have been reported in the literature. EEG studies have been significantly ignored and underused globally.Conclusion Many PWE perceived significant disruption in the quality of care to them, and some people reported increase in their seizure frequency since the onset of the pandemic. Telemedicine is a helpful technology that may improve access to the needed care for PWE in these difficult times. De novo seizures may occur in people with COVID-19 and they may happen in a variety of forms. In addition to prolonged EEG monitoring, performing a through metabolic investigation, electrocardiogram, brain imaging, and a careful review of all medications are necessary steps. The susceptibility of PWE to contracting COVID-19 should be investigated further.