A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Protoplasma
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
1 3
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-021-01710-5
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Megasporogenesis, megagametogenesis, andembryogenesis
inMaxillaria crassifolia (Lindl.) Rchb.f. (Cymbidieae, Orchidaceae)
GalinaL.Kolomeitseva1 · AlexanderV.Babosha1 · AndreyS.Ryabchenko1
Received: 26 April 2021 / Accepted: 23 September 2021
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2021
Abstract
Maxillaria crassifolia (Lindl.) Rchb.f. belongs to the polyphyletic genus Maxillaria Ruiz & Pav., which currently is the
subject of several taxonomic research. There are conflicting descriptions of megasporogenesis, megagametogenesis, and
embryogenesis in orchids from the tribe Cymbidieae, in general, and in the genus Maxillaria, in particular. In the present
report, all stages of embryonic development of M. crassifolia were examined using confocal fluorescence microscopy. Some
features of the development of the ovule and embryo, which distinguish M. crassifolia from other species of the tribe Cym-
bidieae were identified. The T-shaped arrangement of megaspores is formed by dividing the micropylar megaspore of the
dyad. The megagametophyte develops according to the modified Polygonum-type with an unstable number of nuclei in the
embryo sacs. The nucleus of the central cell varies in composition and may include unfused micropylar and chalazal nuclei
and daughter nuclei formed during their division. The sequence of embryonal divisions is strictly structured. A special vari-
ant of embryogenesis, the Cymbidium-type Maxillaria-variant, has been described. Its characteristic features are the strictly
apical nature of embryonic divisions, the absence of basal cell (cb) division, the formation of one to three pairs of tubular
suspensor cells, and the localization of all suspensor cells within the inner integument.
Keywords Orchidaceae· Embryogenesis· Suspensor· Confocal microscopy
Introduction
The genus Maxillaria Ruiz & Pav. (Cymbidieae, Orchi-
daceae) is polyphyletic and is currently the subject of taxo-
nomic research. The taxonomic affiliation of M. crassifolia
(Lindl.) Rchb.f., as well as other species from the subtribe
Maxillariinae, has been repeatedly revised, and the species
itself has changed both generic and species names (Dressler
1981; Carnevali 1991; Senghas 2002; Christenson 2002;
Chase etal. 2003; Ojeda Alaion 2003; Ojeda Alaion etal.
2003; Cabral etal. 2006; Blanco etal. 2007; Whitten etal.
2007; Szlachetko etal. 2012; Moraes etal. 2016). In par-
ticular, in several modern studies, this species appears as
Heterotaxis sessilis (Sw.) Barros (de Barros 2002) and H.
gatunensis (Schltr.) Szlach. & Sitko (Szlachetko etal. 2012).
In this study, we have investigated the embryonic develop-
ment of Maxillaria crassifolia to determine important diag-
nostic characters that can help in defining this group along
with the molecular data.
Genus Maxillaria belongs to the tribe Cymbidieae, which
consists of 10 subtribes, including the subtribes Coeliopsidi-
nae, Cymbidiinae, Eulophiinae, Maxillariinae, Oncidiinae,
and Stanhopeinae (Chase etal. 2015). It was hypothesized
that embryogenesis in all Cymbidieae species is similar and
corresponds to embryogenesis of Cymbidium-type or V-type
with an irregular division of both basal (cb) and apical (ca)
cells, filamentous proembryo, and multicellular suspensor
with several tubular cells (Swamy 1949b; Clements 1999).
Ovule growth of 16 species of orchids from the tribe Cym-
bidieae is described in the literature (Treub 1879; Afzelius
1916, 1918; Swamy 1942, 1943, 1946; Veyret 1965; Abe
1967; Nagashima 1982; Vij and Sharma 1986; Zee and Ye
1995; Yeung etal. 1994, 1995, 1996; Huang etal. 1998;
Communicated by Handling Editor: Dorota Kwiatkowska.
* Andrey S. Ryabchenko
marchellos@yandex.ru
Galina L. Kolomeitseva
kmimail@mail.ru
Alexander V. Babosha
phimmunitet@yandex.ru
1 N.V. Tsitsin Main Botanical Garden ofRussian Academy
ofSciences, Botanicheskaya 4, 127276Moscow, Russia
/ Published online: 30 September 2021
Protoplasma (2022) 259:885–903
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.