ArticlePublisher preview available

Megasporogenesis, megagametogenesis, and embryogenesis in Maxillaria crassifolia (Lindl.) Rchb.f. (Cymbidieae, Orchidaceae)

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

Maxillaria crassifolia (Lindl.) Rchb.f. belongs to the polyphyletic genus Maxillaria Ruiz & Pav., which currently is the subject of several taxonomic research. There are conflicting descriptions of megasporogenesis, megagametogenesis, and embryogenesis in orchids from the tribe Cymbidieae, in general, and in the genus Maxillaria, in particular. In the present report, all stages of embryonic development of M. crassifolia were examined using confocal fluorescence microscopy. Some features of the development of the ovule and embryo, which distinguish M. crassifolia from other species of the tribe Cymbidieae were identified. The T-shaped arrangement of megaspores is formed by dividing the micropylar megaspore of the dyad. The megagametophyte develops according to the modified Polygonum-type with an unstable number of nuclei in the embryo sacs. The nucleus of the central cell varies in composition and may include unfused micropylar and chalazal nuclei and daughter nuclei formed during their division. The sequence of embryonal divisions is strictly structured. A special variant of embryogenesis, the Cymbidium-type Maxillaria-variant, has been described. Its characteristic features are the strictly apical nature of embryonic divisions, the absence of basal cell (cb) division, the formation of one to three pairs of tubular suspensor cells, and the localization of all suspensor cells within the inner integument.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
1 3
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-021-01710-5
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Megasporogenesis, megagametogenesis, andembryogenesis
inMaxillaria crassifolia (Lindl.) Rchb.f. (Cymbidieae, Orchidaceae)
GalinaL.Kolomeitseva1 · AlexanderV.Babosha1 · AndreyS.Ryabchenko1
Received: 26 April 2021 / Accepted: 23 September 2021
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2021
Abstract
Maxillaria crassifolia (Lindl.) Rchb.f. belongs to the polyphyletic genus Maxillaria Ruiz & Pav., which currently is the
subject of several taxonomic research. There are conflicting descriptions of megasporogenesis, megagametogenesis, and
embryogenesis in orchids from the tribe Cymbidieae, in general, and in the genus Maxillaria, in particular. In the present
report, all stages of embryonic development of M. crassifolia were examined using confocal fluorescence microscopy. Some
features of the development of the ovule and embryo, which distinguish M. crassifolia from other species of the tribe Cym-
bidieae were identified. The T-shaped arrangement of megaspores is formed by dividing the micropylar megaspore of the
dyad. The megagametophyte develops according to the modified Polygonum-type with an unstable number of nuclei in the
embryo sacs. The nucleus of the central cell varies in composition and may include unfused micropylar and chalazal nuclei
and daughter nuclei formed during their division. The sequence of embryonal divisions is strictly structured. A special vari-
ant of embryogenesis, the Cymbidium-type Maxillaria-variant, has been described. Its characteristic features are the strictly
apical nature of embryonic divisions, the absence of basal cell (cb) division, the formation of one to three pairs of tubular
suspensor cells, and the localization of all suspensor cells within the inner integument.
Keywords Orchidaceae· Embryogenesis· Suspensor· Confocal microscopy
Introduction
The genus Maxillaria Ruiz & Pav. (Cymbidieae, Orchi-
daceae) is polyphyletic and is currently the subject of taxo-
nomic research. The taxonomic affiliation of M. crassifolia
(Lindl.) Rchb.f., as well as other species from the subtribe
Maxillariinae, has been repeatedly revised, and the species
itself has changed both generic and species names (Dressler
1981; Carnevali 1991; Senghas 2002; Christenson 2002;
Chase etal. 2003; Ojeda Alaion 2003; Ojeda Alaion etal.
2003; Cabral etal. 2006; Blanco etal. 2007; Whitten etal.
2007; Szlachetko etal. 2012; Moraes etal. 2016). In par-
ticular, in several modern studies, this species appears as
Heterotaxis sessilis (Sw.) Barros (de Barros 2002) and H.
gatunensis (Schltr.) Szlach. & Sitko (Szlachetko etal. 2012).
In this study, we have investigated the embryonic develop-
ment of Maxillaria crassifolia to determine important diag-
nostic characters that can help in defining this group along
with the molecular data.
Genus Maxillaria belongs to the tribe Cymbidieae, which
consists of 10 subtribes, including the subtribes Coeliopsidi-
nae, Cymbidiinae, Eulophiinae, Maxillariinae, Oncidiinae,
and Stanhopeinae (Chase etal. 2015). It was hypothesized
that embryogenesis in all Cymbidieae species is similar and
corresponds to embryogenesis of Cymbidium-type or V-type
with an irregular division of both basal (cb) and apical (ca)
cells, filamentous proembryo, and multicellular suspensor
with several tubular cells (Swamy 1949b; Clements 1999).
Ovule growth of 16 species of orchids from the tribe Cym-
bidieae is described in the literature (Treub 1879; Afzelius
1916, 1918; Swamy 1942, 1943, 1946; Veyret 1965; Abe
1967; Nagashima 1982; Vij and Sharma 1986; Zee and Ye
1995; Yeung etal. 1994, 1995, 1996; Huang etal. 1998;
Communicated by Handling Editor: Dorota Kwiatkowska.
* Andrey S. Ryabchenko
marchellos@yandex.ru
Galina L. Kolomeitseva
kmimail@mail.ru
Alexander V. Babosha
phimmunitet@yandex.ru
1 N.V. Tsitsin Main Botanical Garden ofRussian Academy
ofSciences, Botanicheskaya 4, 127276Moscow, Russia
/ Published online: 30 September 2021
Protoplasma (2022) 259:885–903
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... Certain genes, such as CKI1 (histidine kinase), can be expressed during female gametophyte development, restricting the fusion of the polar nuclei and interacting with the antipodals activity (Li and Yang 2020). The occurrence of the Polygonum-type embryo sac was unstable in the sexually reproducing Maxillaria orchid, where micropylar and chalazal nuclei remain unfused (Kolomeitseva et al. 2022). However, studies show that in Tulipa sp. with the tetrasporic Fritillaria-type embryo sac and a pentaploid endosperm, the fusion of micropylar (one maternal) and sperm (one paternal) nuclei results in the formation of a diploid endosperm (Mizuochi et al. 2009). ...
Article
Full-text available
Apart from apomictic types, the Polygonum-type eight-nuclear embryo sac is considered to be dominant in grasses. A triploid endosperm is formed as a result of double fertilisation. This study showed, for the first time, the dominance of diploid nuclei in the syncytial stage of the central cell of embryo sac in oat species and amphiploids. The dominance of diploid nuclei, which were the basis for the formation of polyploid nuclei, was weaker in amphiploids due to aneuploid events. The genomic in situ hybridisation method applied in the study did not distinguish the maternal and paternal haploid nuclei of embryo sac. However, this method demonstrated the lack of a set of genomes of one haploid nucleus. Embryological analyses of the initial stages of oat endosperm development revealed a fertilised egg cell, and two polar nuclei differing in size. It can be assumed that the formation of diploid oat endosperm occurred after the fusion of one polar nucleus and the nucleus of a male gamete, while the second polar nucleus gave rise to 1n nuclei. The levels of ploidy of syncytial nuclei were not influenced by both aneuploid events and correlated with pollen developmental anomalies. The differences in the analysed cytogenetic events distinguished amphiploids and their parental species in the ordination space.
Article
Full-text available
The orchid reproductive strategy, including the formation of numerous tiny seeds, is achieved by the elimination of some stages in the early plant embryogenesis. In this study, we documented in detail the formation of the maternal tissues (the nucellus and integuments), the structures of female gametophyte (megaspores, chalazal nuclei, synergids, polar nuclei), and embryonic structures in Dendrobium nobile. The ovary is unilocular, and the ovule primordia are formed in the placenta before the pollination. The ovule is medionucellate: the two-cell postament and two rows of nucellar cells persist until the death of the inner integument. A monosporic eight-nucleated embryo sac is developed. After the fertilization, the most common central cell nucleus consisted of two joined but not fused polar nuclei. The embryogenesis of D. nobile is similar to the Caryophyllad-type, and it is characterized by the formation of all embryo cells from the apical cell (ca) of a two-celled proembryo. The only exception is that there is no formation of the radicle and/or cotyledons. The basal cell (cb) does not divide during the embryogenesis, gradually transforming into the uninuclear suspensor. Then the suspensor goes through three main stages: it starts with an unbranched cell within the embryo sac, followed by a branched stage growing into the integuments, and it ends with the cell death. The stage-specific development of the female gametophyte and embryo of D. nobile is discussed.
Article
Full-text available
The karyotype is shaped by different chromosome rearrangements during species evolution. However, determining which rearrangements are responsible for karyotype changes is a challenging task and the combination of a robust phylogeny with refined karyotype characterization, GS measurements and bioinformatic modelling is necessary. Here, this approach was applied in Heterotaxis to determine what chromosome rearrangements were responsible for the dysploidy variation. We used two datasets (nrDNA and cpDNA, both under MP and BI) to infer the phylogenetic relationships among Heterotaxis species and the closely related genera Nitidobulbon and Ornithidium. Such phylogenies were used as framework to infer how karyotype evolution occurred using statistical methods. The nrDNA recovered Ornithidium, Nitidobulbon and Heterotaxis as monophyletic under both MP and BI; while cpDNA could not completely separate the three genera under both methods. Based on the GS, we recovered two groups within Heterotaxis: (1) "small GS", corresponding to the Sessilis grade, composed of plants with smaller genomes and smaller morphological structure, and (2) "large GS", corresponding to the Discolor clade, composed of plants with large genomes and robust morphological structures. The robust karyotype modeling, using both nrDNA phylogenies, allowed us to infer that the ancestral Heterotaxis karyotype presented 2n = 40, probably with a proximal 45S rDNA on a metacentric chromosome pair. The chromosome number variation was caused by ascending dysploidy (chromosome fission involving the proximal 45S rDNA site resulting in two acrocentric chromosome pairs holding a terminal 45S rDNA), with subsequent descending dysploidy (fusion) in two species, H. maleolens and H. sessilis. However, besides dysploidy, our analysis detected another important chromosome rearrangement in the Orchidaceae: chromosome inversion, that promoted 5S rDNA site duplication and relocation.
Article
Full-text available
div class="page" title="Page 1"> Heterotaxis Lindl. comprises about 11 primarily epiphytic species ranging from the southeastern U.S.A. (Florida) and the Greater Antilles to Brazil, with most of the species occurring in Central and South America. This complex is characterized by a sympodial growth habit, with short rhizomes, lateral- ly compressed oblong pseudobulbs (unifoliate), and subtended by various leaf-bearing sheaths </div
Chapter
Sexual reproduction is essential for the long-term survival of plant species. The process of meiosis allows for random assortment of parental genes which enable the offspring to adapt better to environmental changes (Pennell, 1988). In order to understand reproductive processes in plants, information concerning ovule development is indispensable. The structure and functions of the seeds cannot be properly understood without studying the ovule in all its aspects (Bouman, 1984). In most orchid species studied to date the ovules are quite rudimentary prior to pollination. Upon successful pollination, a massive number of ovules is produced in each ovary. This provides a unique opportunity to study events of ovule and embryo sac development in angiosperms (Sagawa and Israel, 1964).
Article
It is argued that a broad and expanded circumscription of Maxillaria is to be preferred over a narrower one that necessitates the recognition of many segregate genera. These more narrowly circumscribed genera are often difficult to diagnose, increasing the risk of misidentifications, especially when material is only identified to genus level. The genera of the Maxillaria alliance as recognised in Genera orchidacearum are treated as sections of an expanded genus Maxillaria. Cryptocentrum, Cyrtidiorchis, Mormolyca, Pityphyllum, and Trigonidium are here included in Maxillaria. Criteria for generic delimitation are discussed, the necessary combinations are made, and a key to the sections as well as a provisional checklist of the 634 species of Maxillaria arranged according to section are provided. Maxillaria prolifera is shown to be the correct name for M. pendens. Maxillaria humilis is a new combination for M. gracilis.
Article
This paper was designed to study the seed germination and embryogenesis in Cymbidium goeringii and Paphiopedilum insigne var. sanderae. The results may be summarized as follows.1. The column of Cymbidium became thick and green after pollination, and side wall of the column curved inside. This column withered about 100 days after polination.2. The ovary of Cymbidium rapidly increased in size and reached the definite size after 60 to 100 days after pollination. The ovary of Paphiopedilum scarcely increased in lenghth from flowering through maturation, while slowly increased in width after pollination.3. The embryo and seeds of Cymbidium rapidly increased and reached the definite size 80 days and 110 to 120 days after fertilization. Those of Paphiopedilum increased in size after fertilization and reached the difinite size, although the increase was interrupted for a time.4. Ovule formation occurred 43 to 45 days after pollination in Cymbidium, and 58 to 60 days after in Paphiopedilum.The double fertilization occurred 48 to 50 days after pollination in Cymbidium, and 68 to 70 days after in Paphiopedilum.The mature embryo sac was observed to have 8 nuclei in both Cymbidium and Paphiopedilum.For the maturation of embryo, 115 to 120 days and 195 to 200 days after pollination were required, respectively, in Cymbidium and Paphiopedilum.5. Proembryos of Cymbidium and Paphiopedilum at the tetrad stage were classified to the C1 and C2 type, respectively, according to Veyret′s classification. Similarly, embryos at and after the quadrant stage seemed to belong to the H (Angraecum distichum type) and F (Coelogyne parishii type) types in Cymbidium and Paphiopedidilum, respectively.The mature embryo was observed to be derived from the apical cells of proembryo in both Cymbium and Paphiopedilum.6. Three to five endosperm nuclei were observed in the embryo sac after fertilization in both Cymbidium and Paphiopedilum.7. Seeds of Cymbidium had an ability to germinate after the time between the octant and intermediary stages (80 days after pollination), and those of Paphiopedilum after the octant stage (160 days after pollination).The highest percentage of seed germination was obtained when the seeds were harvested near the mature embryo stage. As the germination medium, the Hyponex medium was better than the Murashige and Skoog medium.