ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

In this work, we developed normative data for the neuropsychological assessment of independent and cognitively active Spanish older adults over 55 years of age. Method: Regression-based normative data were calculated from a sample of 103 non-depressed independent community-dwelling adults aged 55 or older (67% women). Raw data for Digit Span (DS), Letters and Numbers (LN), the Trail Making Test (TMT), and the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) were regressed on age, sex, and education. The model predicting TMT-B scores also included TMT-A scores. Z-scores for the discrepancy between observed and predicted scores were used to identify low scores. The base rate of low scores for SABIEX normative data was compared to the base rate of low scores using published normative data obtained from the general population. Results: The effects of age, sex, and education varied across neuropsychological measures. Although the proportion of low scores was similar between normative datasets, there was no agreement in the identification of cognitively impaired individuals. Conclusions: Normative data obtained from the general population might not be sensitive to identify low scores in cognitively active older adults, incorrectly classifying them as cognitively normal compared to the less-active population. We provide a friendly calculator for use in neuropsychological assessment in cognitively active Spanish people aged 55 or older.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,9958.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18199958www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph
Article
RegressionBasedNormativeDataforIndependentand
CognitivelyActiveSpanishOlderAdults:DigitSpan,Letters
andNumbers,TrailMakingTestandSymbolDigit
ModalitiesTest
ClaraIñesta
1
,JavierOltraCucarella
1,2,
*,BeatrizBoneteLópez
1,2
,EvaCalderónRubio
1
andEstherSitgesMaciá
1,2
1
SABIEX,UniversidadMiguelHernándezdeElche,Avda.delaUniversidad,03207Elche,Spain;
clara.inesta@goumh.umh.es(C.I.);bbonete@umh.es(B.B.L.);eva.calderon@goumh.umh.es(E.C.R.);
esther.sitges@umh.es(E.S.M.)
2
DepartmentofHealthPsychology,MiguelHernandezUniversityofElche,03202Elche,Spain
*Correspondence:joltra@umh.es
Abstract:Inthiswork,wedevelopednormativedatafortheneuropsychologicalassessmentofin
dependentandcognitivelyactiveSpanisholderadultsover55yearsofage.Method:Regression
basednormativedatawerecalculatedfromasampleof103nondepressedindependentcommu
nitydwellingadultsaged55orolder(67%women).RawdataforDigitSpan(DS),LettersandNum
bers(LN),theTrailMakingTest(TMT),andtheSymbolDigitModalitiesTest(SDMT)werere
gressedonage,sex,andeducation.ThemodelpredictingTMTBscoresalsoincludedTMTA
scores.Zscoresforthediscrepancybetweenobservedandpredictedscoreswereusedtoidentify
lowscores.ThebaserateoflowscoresforSABIEXnormativedatawascomparedtothebaserate
oflowscoresusingpublishednormativedataobtainedfromthegeneralpopulation.Results:The
effectsofage,sex,andeducationvariedacrossneuropsychologicalmeasures.Althoughthepropor
tionoflowscoreswassimilarbetweennormativedatasets,therewasnoagreementintheidentifi
cationofcognitivelyimpairedindividuals.Conclusions:Normativedataobtainedfromthegeneral
populationmightnotbesensitivetoidentifylowscoresincognitivelyactiveolderadults,incor
rectlyclassifyingthemascognitivelynormalcomparedtothelessactivepopulation.Weprovidea
friendlycalculatorforuseinneuropsychologicalassessmentincognitivelyactiveSpanishpeople
aged55orolder.
Keywords:cognitivelyactive;cognitiveimpairment;neuropsychologicalassessment;normative
data;olderadults
1.Introduction
Thepopulationaged65yearsorolderisexpectedtoriseworldwideinthecoming
decades.TheUnitedNations[1]predictedanincreasefrom9%in2020toaround16%in
2050.AsreportedbytheEurostatdatabase,20%ofpeopleinEuropeareaged65orolder
andthispercentageisestimatedtoincreaseto30%by2070.AccordingtotheSpanish
NationalStatisticsInstitute[2],Spainisoneofthecountrieswiththehighestrateofolder
peopleinEurope,with18.58%ofpeopleaged65yearsorolder.
Sinceageisthemainriskfactorfordementia[3,4],theincreaseintheproportionof
olderpeopleisassociatedwithanincreaseintheincidenceandprevalenceofcognitive
impairmentanddementia[5,6].Thenumberofpeoplelivingwithdementiaworldwide
iscurrentlyestimatedat50million,withdementiabeingtheleadingcauseofdisability
anddependenceduringaging[7].Arecentmetaanalysisreporteda12.4%prevalenceof
dementiainEuropeand5–9%inSpaininpeopleolderthan65[8].Previousresearchhas
foundthatpeoplediagnosedwithMildCognitiveImpairment(MCI)areatahigherrisk
Citation:Iñesta,C.;OltraCucarella,
J
.;BoneteLópez,B.;CalderónRubio,
E.;SitgesMaciá,E.RegressionBased
NormativeDataforIndependent
andCognitivelyActiveSpanish
OlderAdults:DigitSpan,Letters
andNumbers,TrailMakingTest
andSymbolDigitModalitiesTest.
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,
18,9958.https://doi.org/
10.3390/ijerph18199958
AcademicEditor:PaulB.
Tchounwou
Received:29July2021
Accepted:18September2021
Published:22September2021
Publisher’sNote:MDPIstaysneu
tralwithregardtojurisdictional
claimsinpublishedmapsandinstitu
tionalaffiliations.
Copyright:©2021bytheauthor.
LicenseeMDPI,Basel,Switzerland.
Thisarticleisanopenaccessarticle
distributedunderthetermsand
conditionsoftheCreativeCommons
Attribution(CCBY)license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses
/by/4.0/).
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,99582of18
ofdevelopingdementia[9].Thus,intheabsenceofeffectivepharmacologicalandnon
pharmacologicaltreatmentsfordementia[10–12],earlydetectionofcognitiveimpairment
duringaginghasbecomeamajorresearchtopic.
Neuropsychologicalassessmentisessentialtoidentifypathologicalcognitive
changesduringaging[13,14].Standardizedtestsareadministeredinordertoassessthe
functioningofdifferentcognitivedomainssuchasattention,memory,language,
visuospatialabilities,andexecutivefunctions.Performanceisinterpretedbycomparing
individuals’scoreswithscoresfromareferencegroup[13].Asrawscoresincognitive
testsareaffectedbydemographicvariablessuchasage,sex,oreducationallevel[15–17],
normativedataareusedtotransformthemintorelativemeasurescorrectedfortheinflu
enceofthesevariables[16,18]andtoprovideaframeworkinwhichthesesscorescanbe
locatedandinterpreted.Thus,selectingappropriatenormativedatasetsisnecessaryfor
accuratelyinterpretingtheresultsoftheneuropsychologicalassessment,andforreducing
theprobabilityoffalsediagnosesofcognitiveimpairment[15,19].
Differentapproachestodevelopingnormativedatahavebeenreported.Thesimplest
procedureisbasedonthetests’scoredistributiontogeneratenormsfromthemeansand
standarddeviations.Thisstrategycanbeusedwiththeentiresampleorstratifyingthe
samplebyage[20,21],sex[22],andeducation[20,21,23].Meansandstandarddeviations
withineachsubgroupareusedtotransformrawscoresintoeasilyinterpretablemeasures
suchasZscores,Tscores,scaledscores,orpercentileranks[22].Thismethodhassome
limitations:First,itisbasedonaseriesofarbitrarystrata[24],assumingwhichperson
variablesarepredictiveofthetestscore;second,theestimatedpopulationmeansandvar
iancescanbelessreliablewhendividingthesampleintosubgroupsthanusingthewhole
sample[25].Amoreadvancedproceduretodevelopnormativedataisusingmultiple
linearregressionmodelstoestimateanindividual’spredictedlevelofperformance,based
onsociodemographicvariablessuchasage,sex,andeducation.Thedifferencebetween
thepredictedandtheobservedscore(residualvalues)isthenstandardizedandinter
preted[26–28].AdifferentprocedureforclinicalclassificationistheReceiverOperating
Characteristiccurve(ROC)analysis,whichisusedtodeterminethecutoffscorewiththe
optimalbalancebetweensensitivityandspecificity[29,30].TheareaundertheROCcurve
(AUC)offersanindexofthetest’soveralldiscriminationaccuracy,withvaluescloseto1
suggestingahighdiagnosticaccuracy.
1.1.ActiveAging
Althoughbrainchangesduringnormalagingentailchangesinsomecognitiveabili
ties[31],certainactivitiesareconsideredprotectivefactorsagainstcognitivedecline,such
ascontinuedlearningandengagementinsociallyandcognitivelystimulatingactivities
duringaging[32,33].Thisprotectivelinkismostlyattributedtoanincreasedcognitive
reserve,whichcompensatesforbrainchangesinnormalaginganddelaystheclinicalex
pressionofcognitiveimpairmentdespiteunderlyingbrainpathologycausedbyneuro
degenerativeprocesses[34,35].Supportingthesehypotheses,frequentparticipationin
cognitiveactivitieshasbeenassociatedwithslowerlatelifecognitivedecline[36]anda
reducedriskofdevelopingMCIanddementia[37].
Asaresponsetothechallengesofpopulationaging,theconceptandpoliciesof“Ac
tiveAging”emerged.TheActiveAgingFrameworkpromotestheoptimizationofoppor
tunitiesforhealth,participation,andsecuritywiththeaimofimprovingthequalityoflife
aspeopleage[38,39].Thisnotionemphasizestheimportanceofanactivelifestyleandthe
benefitsoflifelonglearning[40,41].Fromthisperspective,universityprogramsforsen
iors(UPS)havebecomeanimportantresourceforincreasingopportunitiesforactiveag
ing,improvingseveralaspectssuchashealth,psychologicalwellbeing,cognitivefunc
tioning,autonomymaintenance,andsocialparticipation[41–43].Inrecentdecades,UPS
havespreadworldwide[40,44]andhavepromptedanincreaseinthenumberofolder
adultsthatundertakeuniversitycourses.InSpain,accordingtotheStateAssociationof
UniversityProgramsforOlderAdults(AEPUM),thenumberofadultsaged55orolder
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,99583of18
enrollingintheseprogramsincreasedfrom23,000duringthe2005–2006academicyearto
63,173in2018–2019(https://www.aepumayores.org/)(accessedon20June,2021).
Olderpeoplewhoparticipateinuniversitycoursesliveindependentlyintheireve
rydaylifeandseekcontinuedpersonaldevelopmentandsocialinteractionsthroughthese
educationalprograms[45].Ithasbeenreportedthatthemotivationstoattendthesepro
gramsaretofeelactive,toinvestinpersonaldevelopment,andtogainnewknowledge
andsocialcontacts[45,46].TheevidencealsosuggeststhatindividualswhoengageinUPS
arecognitivelymoreactivethansameagepeopleinthegeneralpopulation.Thetendency
toengageinthesecourseshasbeenrelatedtoalargernumberofindividualandcommu
nitybasedactivepractices.Thus,cognitivelyactivepeoplereadmorefrequently,domore
physicalexercise,attendmoreculturalevents,andparticipatemoreinsocialactivities
[42,47].
Ithasbeenreportedthatcognitivelystimulatingactivitiesinmidlife[48]andlate
life[49]contributetocognitivereserveindependentlyofeducation.Christensenetal.[50]
foundthatthelevelofactivityineverydaylifeinfluencedcognitiveperformanceandac
countedforagreaterproportionofvarianceinolderpeople’scognitivefunctioningthan
thelevelofeducation.Inlinewiththeseresults,inapostmortemstudy,Reedetal.[51]
foundthatcognitiveactivitiesduringadulthoodhaveahigherinfluencethanthelevelof
educationindeterminingcognitivereserve.Thus,activeagingisrelatedtoaseriesof
practicesineverydaylifethatdiffersfromsameageadultsfromthegeneralpopulation,
contributingtoahighercognitivereservethatmaypreserveorenhancetheircognitive
function.
1.2.ActiveAgingandNeuropsychologicalAssessment
Thereisevidencesuggestingthatactiveolderadults’lifestyleswillaffectperfor
manceonneuropsychologicalassessmentirrespectiveofyearsofformaleducation.Active
olderpeoplearelikelytooutperformnonactiveindividualsoncognitivetests[50,52].
Eventhoughnormativedataaredemographicallycorrectedbyeducation,theydonot
accountforthecharacteristicsofactiveaging,andtherefore,theymightbelesssensitive
foridentifyingcognitiveimpairmentamongcognitivelyactiveolderadultswithhigher
performancelevels.Totheauthors’knowledge,therearenonormativedataforSpanish
activeolderadults.Thisimpliesthatactiveolderadultsmightpresentadiagnosticchal
lengeinconditionssuchascognitiveimpairmentandAD,aspathologicalchangesmight
goundetectedintheneuropsychologicalassessment.Tofillthatgap,thisstudydeveloped
normativedataontheassessmentofattention,processingspeed,andworkingmemory
throughfourcognitivetestswidelyusedaspartoftheneuropsychologicalassessment.
TheDigitspanforward(DSF)andbackward(DSB)[53]aretwofrequentlyused
measuresofattentionandworkingmemory.TheSpanisheditionoftheWAISIIIincludes
normativedataforSpanishindividuals.Therearealsonormativedataofthistestforsub
jectsover50inSpainwithintheNEURONORMAProject[54].Somestudieswithhealthy
controlsandMCIandADpatientshavereportedtheeffectivenessofbothsubteststo
identifysubtleimpairmentsandtodetectMCI[55],andtodifferentiatepeoplewithMCI
andAD[56].Lortieetal.[57]foundthatindividualswithMCIdeclinedinperformance
over6months,suggestingthatbothsubtestsareareliablemeasureformonitoringthe
diseaseprogression.Thebackwarddigitspansubtesthasalsobeenreportedtobeakey
variablediscriminatingbetweendementiasubtypessuchasADandDementiawithLewy
Bodies[58].
TheLettersandNumberssubtest[53]isusedasameasureofworkingmemory.Some
studiesprovidednormativedataforthistestinSpain[54]andLatinAmerica[59]with
adultsfromthegeneralpopulation.Kesseletal.[60]foundthatMCIandADpatients
performedworseonthissubtestcomparedwithhealthycontrols.Worseperformancein
ADcomparedwithMCIpatientswasalsorevealed,meaningitissuitabletodifferentiate
peoplewithMCIandAD.
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,99584of18
TheSymbolDigitModalitiesTest(SDMT)[61]isusedasameasureofinformation
processingspeed.Normsobtainedwithhealthyadultsfromthegeneralpopulationhave
beenpublishedinSpain[54]andinLatinAmerica[62].Smithalsoincludednormative
datainSpanishforanagerangeof18to85yearsfortwoschoolinggroups[61].Perfor
manceontheSDMTisasignificantpredictorofconversionfromcognitivelynormalto
MCI[63]andofprogressionfromMCItoAD[64].Itisalsooneofthemostcommonly
usedtestsintheassessmentofMultipleSclerosis[65],Huntington’sDisease[66],andPar
kinson’sdisease[67].
TheTrailMakingTest(TMT)[68]iswidelyusedasameasureofattentionandpro
cessingspeed[15].TMTnormativedatahavebeenreportedforadultsover50inSpain
withintheNEURONORMAProject[54]andforadultsaged18–95inLatinAmerica[69].
TheTMTisusedtoscreenforneurodegenerativediseasesinolderadults,suchasAlz
heimer’sDisease[70],Parkinson’sDisease[71],andHuntington’sdisease[72].Bothparts
AandBaresensitivetothedetectionofbothprogressivecognitiveimpairmentandde
mentia[19,73].
Becausethelikelihoodofdiagnosticerrorsamongactiveolderadultscouldpoten
tiallyincreasebyusingnormsobtainedfromthegeneralpopulation,normativedata
adaptedtothespecificcharacteristicsofthispopulationareneeded.Thus,theaimofthis
studyistoprovidenormativedataforthesefourcommonlyusedneuropsychological
testswithasampleofcognitivelyactiveSpanisholderadultswhoattenduniversity
courses.Sincethecognitivelyactivepopulationhashighercognitiveperformanceinde
pendentlyofageandyearsofeducation,thehypothesisisthattheywillobtainalower
rateoflowscoresusingnormativedatafromthegeneralpopulationthanwithnormative
dataobtainedfromthecognitivelyactiveolderpopulation.
2.MaterialsandMethods
2.1.Participants
Thisisacrosssectionalobservationalstudywithcognitivelyhealthyindividualsliv
ingindependentlyinthecommunity.Voluntaryparticipantswererecruitedconsecutively
fromtheUniversityforSeniors(SABIEX)attheUniversidadMiguelHernándezdeElche
(Spain)fromOctober2019toJuly2021.SABIEXisacomprehensiveprogramforthepro
motionofactiveandhealthyagingandincludesanacademicuniversityprogramforpeo
pleaged55yearsorolder,coveringtopicssuchaseconomics,physiology,sociology,pol
itics,arts,amongothers,aswellasthepossibilityofparticipatingindifferentactivities
suchasseminars,voluntarywork,theaterworkshops,andradioprograms.
Inclusioncriteriaforparticipationwere(a)being55yearsoldorolder,(b)beingcog
nitivelynormal(CN)withoutsubjectivecognitivecomplaints,and(c)livinginde
pendentlyinthecommunity.ParticipantswereclassifiedasCNiftheyhada)MiniMental
StateExamination[74]scoreshigherthan23,(b)ClinicalDementiaRatingscale[75]scores
equalto0,and(c)InstrumentalActivitiesofDailyLiving[76]scores7orhigher.Exclusion
criteriawerea)unwillingnesstoparticipateintheneuropsychologicalassessment,and(b)
thepresenceofvisionand/orhearingimpairmentsthatmighthaveimpededtheadmin
istrationofcognitivetests.Participantswerenotexcludedbasedonahistoryofmedical
conditions(e.g.,diabetes,highbloodpressure,cancer,psychiatricdisorders,metabolic
disease)inordertoassurethatthesampleisrepresentativeofthepopulationofpeople
over54yearsinSpain[77,78].AllparticipantswerebornandraisedinSpainandhad
Spanishastheirfirstlanguage.
2.2.Procedure
Participantswereinvitedtoparticipatevoluntarilyintheneuropsychologicalassess
mentandwereassessedindividuallybyaboardcertifiedclinicalneuropsychologist(JO
C)andtrainedundergraduateandmaster’sorPhDdegreestudents.Theneuropsycho
logicalassessmentwasperformedinonesessionandtookapproximately90min.
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,99585of18
Participantssignedtheinformedconsentpriortoenrollmentandprovidedpersonaland
familyhealthhistory.Personaldatawerecodedanonymously.Thisprojectwasapproved
bytheUMHEthicsCommittee(DPS.ESM.01.19).
Asociodemographicquestionnairewascreatedforthisprojecttocollectdataongen
der,age,yearsofformaleducation,residencezone(rural,urban),civilstatus,household
context,andmedicalhistory.Theneuropsychologicaltestsincludedinthisworkwere
administeredaspartofalargerneuropsychologicalassessmentcoveringseveralcognitive
domains.Thetestswereadministeredinapreestablishedordersothattherewasnoin
terferencebetweendifferenttasks(e.g.,interactionbetweenlanguageandverbalmemory
tasks).Thetestsincludedintheneuropsychologicalassessmenthavebeenpreviouslyde
scribed[79].Wecalculatednormativedatawithmorethan100participantsbecauseusing
linearregressionmodelswithasamplesizegreaterthan100andz≤−1.28givesanumber
oftruepositiveandtruenegativesaroundthe95%confidenceinterval[80].
2.3.Materials
Subjectivecognitivecomplaintsandgeneralcognitivefunctioningwereassessed
withtheCDRscaleandtheMMSE,respectively.Depressivesymptomswereassessed
withtheYessavageGeriatricDepressionScale[81](GDS).
AttentionandworkingmemorywereassessedwiththeDigitSpanForward(DSF)
andbackward(DSB),andLettersandNumbers(LN)subtestsfromtheWechslerAdult
IntelligenceScale—3rdedition[53],andtheTrailMakingTestPartB[68].Speedofpro
cessinginformationwasassessedwiththeTMTPartA(TMTA)andthewrittenversion
oftheSymbolDigitModalitiesTest[82].Thesetestswereadministeredintheorderpre
viouslydescribed.
2.3.1.DigitSpanForwardandBackward
IntheDSFtest,theexamineeisrequestedtorepeataseriesofnumbersindirector
der.IntheDSBtest,theexamineeisrequestedtorepeataseriesofnumbersinreverse
order.Inthisstudy,theoutcomevariableswerethelongestseriesrecalled,i.e.,themaxi
mumnumberofdigitscorrectlyrepeated(spanscore)withoutanyerrorinoneofthetwo
trials.FortheDSF,themaximumrawscoreis9,andforDSB,itis8.
2.3.2.LettersandNumbers
TheLNtestrequiresaseriesoflettersandnumbersofincreasinglengthtobere
peated.Theindividualisreadthecombinationofnumbersandlettersinrandomorder
andinstructedtorepeatbackthenumbersfirst,inascendingorder,followedbytheletters
inalphabeticorder.Thestudyvariablewasthelongestseriesrecalled,foramaximumof
8items.
2.3.3.TrailMakingTest
TheTMTconsistsoftwoparts(TMTAandTMTB).TMTAcontainscirclesnum
beredfrom1to25randomlyarrangedonasheetofpaper.Theparticipantisrequiredto
drawalineconnectingthecirclesinascendingorder.TMTBcontainsnumbersfrom1to
13andlettersfromAtoL.Theparticipantisrequiredtoconnectthecirclesalternating
betweennumbersandlettersinascendingorder.Participantsareinstructedtocomplete
bothpartsasfastaspossiblewhilemaintainingaccuracy.Theerrorswerepointedout
immediatelybytheexaminerandcorrectedbytheparticipant.Theoutcomevariablewas
thetimetakentocompletethetasksinseconds.
2.3.4.SymbolDigitModalitiesTest
Inthistest,akeyboxwith2rowsispresentedatthetopofthepagewith9unique
symbolsassociatedwith9uniquesymbols.Onehundredandtwentysymbolsarethen
shown,eachwithablankspaceunderneath.Theparticipantisrequiredtoconsecutively
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,99586of18
fillineachblankwiththenumberthatmatcheseachsymbolasfastaspossible.After10
practiceitems,theparticipantcontinuesthetaskfor90s.Thissubtestwasadministered
accordingtothestandardproceduresdescribedinthetestmanual[82].Theoutcomevar
iablewasthenumberofcorrectresponses,andthemaximumscoreis110.
2.4.StatisticalAnalyses
2.4.1.CalculationofNormativeData
Theregressionbasednormativedatawerecalculatedusingage,sex,andeducation
aspredictorsandrawscoresasoutcomesforeachvariable.Thelinearregressionmodel
canbewrittenas
𝑌 𝛼𝛽
∗𝑋
𝛽
∗𝑋
⋯𝛽
∗𝑋
∈𝑁0,1,(1)
whereY’isthepredictedscore,𝛼istheintercept,𝑋isthescoreofvariablei,and𝛽is
thebetacoefficientassociatedwithvariablei.Theintercept(𝛼)indicatesthevalueofthe
responsevariablewhenallthepredictorsareequalto0,whereasthebetacoefficientsin
dicatethemeanchangeintheresponsevariablefora1unitincreaseinthepredictorwhile
holdingconstanttherestofthepredictors.Becauseageandeducationinoursampledid
nothavevaluesof0,wefirsttransformedboththeageandeducationvariablesforthe
intercepttobeinterpretable.Wetransformeddataonageandeducationforeachpartici
pant,takingthelowervalueinthedistributionasreference(seeTable1fordescriptive
statistics).Thus,iftheminimumageinthesampleis55,theageofaparticipantaged60
wasrecodedas5.ThesetransformedvariablesarereferredtoasAgeMinandEducationMin
throughoutthemanuscript.Sex,AgeMin,andEducationMinwereincludedaspredictorsin
thefirststepinaforwardmultiplelinearregressionmodel.Thesecondandthirdsteps
addedthequadraticAgeMinandEducationMinandthecubicAgeMinandEducationMin,re
spectively,soastoanalyzepossiblecurvilinearrelationships.Thisprocedurewasused
forpredictingeachofthe6variablesindependently.
Table1.DemographicstatisticsandperformanceonMMSE,IADL,andGDS.
VariableMSDRange
Age65.766.56755–87
Education11.443.4633–22
MMSE28.481.48125–30
IADL7.990.0997–8
GDS4.323.3550–14
M:mean,SD:standarddeviation.
Assomevariablesintheneuropsychologicalbatteryarenotindependentofeach
other,normativedatacalculatedindependentlymightbemisleadingifrelevantinfor
mationisnotincludedinthemodel.ThisisthecasefortheTMTB,whosescoresarenot
independentofscoresontheTMTA.Toillustratethedependencyofscores,iftwoindi
vidualsscore120sontheTMTB,thisscorecorrespondstoanaverageperformance(e.g.,
zscore=0).IndividualAobtainsazscore=1.5ontheTMTA,whereasindividualB
obtainsazscore=0ontheTMTA.Reasonably,anaveragescoreontheTMTBcannotbe
interpretedthesamewayforanindividualwithhighlevelperformanceontheTMTA
comparedtoanindividualwithaverageperformanceontheTMTA.AlthoughTMTB
scoresaresimilarforbothindividuals,TMTBscoresforindividualAarelikelyshowing
agreaterdeclinecomparedtoTMTBscoresforindividualB.Toimprovetheinterpreta
tionofscores,itisnecessarytoknowhowfrequentitwouldbetoshowsuchadeclinein
theTMTBaccordingtoscoresontheTMTA.Forthisreason,wecalculatednormative
datafortheTMTBwitharegressionmodelincludingthesamepredictorsplusTMTA
scores,whichwillbereferredtoasTMTBSABIEX,inordertodifferentiatethesenormative
datafromtheTMTBnormativedatacalculatedindependentlyoftheTMTA.SinceTMT
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,99587of18
Ascoresdidnothaveavalueof0,thisvariablewasfirsttransformedfortheinterceptto
beinterpretablebytakingthelowervalueinthedistributionasareference.Thetrans
formedvariablewillbereferredtoasTMTAminthroughoutthemanuscript.
2.4.2.ComparingNormativeDataSets
Toanalyzewhethernormativedataforcognitivelyactiveolderindividualsprovide
differentdatacomparedtonormativedataobtainedinthegeneralpopulation,wecom
paredthenumberoflowscoresshownbyoursamplewhenusingeithertheSABIEXor
theNEURONORMAnormativedata.TheNEURONORMAnormativedataweredevel
opedwithindividualsrecruitedinthegeneralpopulation[83],andprovideage,sex,and
educationcorrectedScaledScores(SS).UnlikeSABIEXnormativedata,whichprovide
residualzscores,NEURONORMAnormativedataprovideSStointerpretperformance,
whichlimitstheselectionofacutoffpointtodefinelowscores.Toavoidusingdifferent
scales,lowscoreswereidentifiedasSSequaltoorlowerthan6usingNEURONORMA,
andaszscoresequaltoorlowerthan−1.28usingSABIEXnormativedata.Individuals
werelabelledasshowinglowscoreswhenshowingatleastonelowscoreasdefined
above.
Asthesameindividualswerecategorizedasshowinglowscoresbasedonboth
SABIEXandNEURONORMAnormativedata,theMcNemartest(correctedforcontinu
ity)forrelatedproportions[84]wasusedtoanalyzewhetherthenumberofindividuals
withoneormorelowscoresdifferedbetweennormativedatasets.Additionally,because
itisimportanttonotonlyknowwhethertheproportionsofindividualslabeledasim
paireddiffer,butalsowhetherthesameindividualsshowoneormorelowscoresusing
bothnormativedatasets,theFleiss’kappa[84]interratercorrelationcoefficientforcate
goricaldatawasusedtoanalyzethelevelofagreementbetweenSABIEXandNEU
RONORMAnormativedata.AccordingtoFleissetal.[84],agreementbeyondchancecan
beinterpretedaspoor,fairtogood,andexcellentforvaluesof0–0.40,0.41–0.75,and>0.75,
respectively.
3.Results
Fromapoolof105consecutiveparticipants,twowerenotincludedbecauseofMMSE
scores<24.Thesamplewascomposedof103participants(69women,67%).Participants’
agerangedfrom55to87andyearsofeducationfrom3to22(notincludingUniversityfor
Seniors).DescriptivestatisticsfordemographicvariablesandMMSE,IADL,andGSD
scoresareprovidedinTable1.Statisticallysignificantdifferenceswerefoundbetween
sexesinage(p=0.003,95%CI=1.43,6.67),withmen(M=68.47;SD=6.50)beingolder
thanwoman(M=64.42;SD=6.22),butnotinyearsofeducation(p=0.583,95%CI=−1.04,
1.85),MMSE(p=0.114,95%CI=−1.10,0.12),IADL(p=0.485,95%CI=−0.03,0.06),orGDS
(p=0.240,95%CI=−2.22,0.56).Mostparticipants(59.2%)weremarriedandwereliving
withanotherperson(72.8%).Atotalof63participants(61.2%)reportedahistoryofmed
icalillnesses(Table2)and41(39.8%)werecurrentlytakingmedication.Performanceon
neuropsychologicaltestsisshowninTable3.Therewerenostatisticallysignificantdiffer
encesbetweensexesintestsperformance.Nostatisticallysignificantdifferenceswere
foundintestsperformancebetweenparticipantswithorwithoutmedicalhistory(allp’s
>0.05),norbetweenparticipantswhowereorwerenottakingmedication(allp’s>0.05).
Table2.Number(and%)ofparticipantswithmedicalhistory(n=103).
n%
Anxiety1918.4
Depression87.8
Epilepsy21.9
Stroke43.9
CVD1211.7
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,99588of18
Hypo/hipertyroidism76.8
Cancer98.7
DM43.9
HBP1312.6
TBI32.9
COPD11.0
RA21.9
Others1411.7
CVD:Cardiovasculardisease,DM:Diabetesmellitus,HBP:Highbloodpressure,TBI:Traumatic
braininjury,COPD:Chronicobstructivepulmonarydisease,RA:Rheumatoidarthritis,Others:
Opticnervesheathmeningioma,hypercholesterolemia,osteopenia,Chronicvenousinsufficiency,
Dyslipidemia,dyspepsia,Cholecystectomy,Autoimmunehypoglycemia,COVID19,Asthma.
Table3.Rawscoresonneuropsychologicaltests.
Neuropsychological
MeasuresMSDRange
DSF(n=103)5.361.1533–9
DSB(n=103)3.940.8732–7
LN(n=102)4.501.1152–8
TMTA(n=103)47.7916.24924–140
TMTB(n=102)119.0857.80741–345
TMTBSABIEX(n=102)119.0857.80741–345
SDMT(n=102)37.199.57116–56
M:Mean,SD:Standarddeviation,DSF:DigitSpanForward,DSB:DigitSpanBackwards,LN:Let
tersandNumbers,TMT:TrailMakingTest,SDMT:SymbolDigitModalitiesTest.
3.1.CalculationofNormativeData
Theeffectsofage,sex,andeducationvariedacrossneuropsychologicalmeasures.
ThemultiplelinearregressionmodelsarepresentedinTable4.Regressionanalyses
showedthatagewassignificantlyassociatedwithLN,TMTAandTMTBSABIEX,and
SDMT.AgeMin2wassignificantlyrelatedtoTMTBandTMTBSABIEX.Educationhadsignif
icanteffectsonDSF,TMTA,TMTB,TMTBSABIEX,andSDMT.EducationMin2wasassoci
atedwithDSB,andsexhadnoeffectontheneuropsychologicaltestsincludedinthispa
per.Ofrelevancetothisstudywastheassociationfoundindependenttaskswithinthe
TMT.TheregressionanalysesfortheTMTBincludingscoresontheTMTA(TMTBSABIEX)
showedthatperformanceontheTMTAissignificantlyassociatedwithperformanceon
theTMTB.
Table4.Multiplelinearregressionmodels.
ΒSE(β)95%CIpcoeffR2Adjusted
DSFIntercept4.7190.2944.14–5.30<0.001
EducationMin0.0760.0320.01–0.14 0.0210.043
DSBIntercept3.6950.1353.43–3.96<0.001
EducationMin20.0030.0010.00–0.00 0.0220.042
LNIntercept5.0140.2044.61–5.42<0.001
AgeMin−0.0480.16−0.08–0.02 0.0040.071
TMTA Intercept48.6764.5539.66–57.70<0.001
AgeMin0.7410.2320.28–1.200.003
EducationMin−1.0510.440−1.92–0.18 0.0190.111
TMTBIntercept155.35214.001127.57–183.13<0.001
EducationMin−6.0291.523−9.05–3.00<0.001
AgeMin20.0950.0280.04–0.15 0.0010.177
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,99589of18
TMTBSABIEXIntercept122.83617.48788.13–157.54<0.001
TMTAMin2.0430.2841.48–2.60<0.001
EducationMin−4.3031.272−6.83–1.78 0.001
AgeMin20.1910.0670.06–0.32 0.005
AgeMin−4.2111.930−8.04–0.380.0320.456
SDMTIntercept36.5082.43531.68–41.34<0.001
AgeMin−0.6550.124−0.90–0.41 <0.001
EducationMin0.9130.2350.45–1.38<0.0010.273
DSF:DigitSpanForward,DSB:DigitSpanBackward,LN:LettersandNumbers,TMT:TrailMak
ingTest,SDMT:SymbolDigitModalitiesTest, β:Regressioncoefficient,SE(β):Standarderrorofβ,
SEM:Standarderrorofthemeasurement.
Forallmultiplelinearregressionmodels,multicollinearity(varianceinflationfactor
[VIF]≤10)wasevaluated.VIFvaluesinallmodelswerewellbelow10andcollinearity
tolerancevaluesdidnotexceedthevalueof1[85].
3.2.ComparingNormativeDataSets(NEURNORMASABIEX)
UsingNEURONORMAnormativedataandtakingascaledscoreof6orlowerasthe
cutoffforalowscore,30participants(29.70%)hadatleastoneormorelowscoresamong
thefivemeasures.UsingSABIEXnormativedata,withTMTAandTMTBasindepend
entandazscore≤−1.28asthecutoffforlowscore,32participants(31.68%)hadatleast
onelowscoreamongthesemeasures(seesupplementarymaterial).Thedifferencewas
notstatisticallysignificant(McNemarχ2(n=101)=0.029,p=0.863).TheFleiss’sKappa
coefficientshowedpooragreementintheindividualslabeledasshowingoneormorelow
scoresusingNEURONORMAandSABIEXdata(k=0.209,p=0.036).
UsingtheSABIEXnormativedatasetwiththeTMTBconditionalontheTMTA
(TMTBSABIEX),30participants(29.70%)showedatleastonelowscore.TheMcNemarTest
showednostatisticallysignificantdifferenceswhencomparedtoNEURONORMA
(McNemarχ2(n=101)=0.031,p=0.859).Again,therewaspooragreementidentifying
lowscoresbetweennormativedatasets(k=0.241,p=0.015).
Thenumberoflowscoresshownbyfewerthan10%ofthesamplewastwoormore
withthethreenormativedatasets:NEURONORMA(7.8%;SS<6),SABIEX(8.7%;z≤
1.28),andSABIEXtakingtheTMTBasconditionalontheTMTA(9.9%;z≤−1.28).
MMSEscoreswerecomparedbetweenindividualswithandwithoutlowscores
withineachnormativedataset.UsingSABIEXnormativedata,statisticallysignificantdif
ferenceswerefoundontheMMSEscores(p=0.010,95%CI=0.22,1.62)betweenindivid
ualsshowingoneormorelowscores(M=28.75;SD=1.40)andthoseshowingnolow
scores(M=27.83;SD=1.64).UsingNEURONORMAnormativedata,therewerenosta
tisticallysignificantdifferencesintheMMSEscores(p=0.798,95%CI=−0.62,0.80)be
tweenindividualswithoneormorelowscores(M=28.50;SD=1.34)andthosewithno
lowscores(M=28.59;SD=1.50).
3.3.ComparingTrailMakingTest(NEURONORMASABIEX)
Separatedcontrastanalysiswasperformedtocomparetheproportionoflowscores
whenusingtheTMTBindependentoftheTMTA(TMTBNEURONORMA)andtheTMTB
conditionalontheTMTA(TMTBSABIEX)
UsingTMTBNEURONORMA,thepercentageoflowscoreswas12.75%,andwithTMT
BSABIEX,4.9%.ThecorrectedMcNemartestwasnotstatisticallysignificant(McNemarχ2(n
=102)=2.722,p=0.099),probablybecausenoneoftheindividualsshowedalowscore
withbothnormativedatasets.Interestingly,therewasnoagreementbetweenthetwonor
mativedatasets(k=−0.097,p=0.344)whenclassifyingindividualsasshowinglowscores.
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,995810of18
AfriendlycalculatorofzscoresforDSF,DSB,LN,SDMT,andTMTisavailablefor
cliniciansandresearchersathttps://drive.google.com/file/d/1pRDT6F85EsXPxALV
l6R8SqE4qGEr0/view?usp=sharing.
4.Discussion
ThisworkaimedtoprovideregressionbasednormativedatafortheDigits,Letters,
andNumbers,TMT,andSDMTtestsforcognitivelyactiveSpanishadultsaged55or
older.Additionally,andcomparedwithothernormativestudies[69,86],ourstudyintro
ducedanovelapproachforthecalculationofnormativedatafortheTMT,thatis,consid
eringthedependencyofrelatedtasksbycalculatingnormativedatafortheTMTBcon
trollingforscoresontheTMTA.
RegardingtheuseoftheSABIEXnormativedatacomparedtonormativedataob
tainedfromthegeneralpopulation,ourresultsshowedpooragreementinidentifyinglow
scores.Consideringthisdiscrepancyintheclassificationandthatnormativedatamustbe
adaptedtospecificcharacteristicsofindividualsforadequatescoreinterpretation[15,19],
ourdatasuggestthatusingnormativedataobtainedinthegeneralpopulationforthe
neuropsychologicalassessmentofactiveolderadultsmightbeassociatedwithanincrease
inthenumberofmisdiagnosesbyerroneouslyidentifyinglowscores.
Regardingtheresultsintestscomposedofrelatedmeasures,otherstudieshave
shownthatforanaccurateinterpretationofperformanceintheassessment,itisnecessary
toconsiderthecorrelationamongdifferentmeasures[87,88].Eventhoughamoderate
correlation(r=0.31–0.6)betweenTrailAandBhasbeenreported[15],normativedatafor
theTMTareusuallycalculatedtreatingbothpartsasindependents.Thisworkshowsthat
whenTMTBisanalyzedconsideringscoresintrailA(TMTBSABIEX),theresultsarediffer
entfromthoseobtainedwhentheyareconsideredindependent.Inourstudy,astrong
correlationbetweentrailAandB(r=0.62)wasfound,aswellasasignificantcontribution
ofTMTAscoresinthepredictionmodelforTMTB.Thisfindingsupportsthatinterpret
ingthemasindependentmightincreasethelikelihoodofdiagnosticerrorsintheidentifi
cationofcognitiveimpairment.Thisconclusionissupportedbythedataindicatingthat
alltheparticipantsclassifiedasshowingalowscoreontheTMTBusingtheNEU
RONORMAdatasetareclassifiedasshowingaveragescoresontheTMTBconditional
onTMTAscores(TMTBSABIEX).
Thedemographicvariablesincludedinthepredictionmodels(age,sex,andeduca
tion)haddifferenteffectsacrosstheneuropsychologicaltestsstudiedinthiswork.Asin
previousworks[27,89],ourstudyincludedquadraticageandeducationintheregression
models,whichallowedustoexplorepossiblenonlinearassociationsbetweenthesevari
ablesandperformanceinthetests.Overall,olderageandlowereducationwereassociated
withworseperformance.Thesefindingsareinlinewithpreviousresearchshowingage
relateddecreaseinperformanceandpositiveseffectsofeducationoncognitivefunction
[17,90].ConsistentwiththeresultsreportedbySalthouse[91],thecubictermdidnotpro
videadditionalinformationoverthemodelincludingthequadraticterm,whichshowed
thatperformanceworsenedfortheoldestagesandincreasedforthehighestyearsofed
ucation.
4.1.DigitSpanForwardandBackwards
Arelationshipbetweenolderageandworseperformance,aswellasapositiveeffect
oflevelofeducation,hasbeenfrequentlyreported[54,92].Intermsofeducation,inline
withpreviousstudies,ourworkconfirmstheexistenceofasignificanteffectofeducation
onbothDSFandDSB[54,93].However,therelationshipbetweeneducationandDSB
showedacurvilinearpattern,andcomparedtootherstudies,theeffectsize[93]wassmall
forbothtests(r2=0.05).Contrarytothepreviousstudies[93,94],wedidnotfindany
effectsofageonthedigitspan.
Thefactthatourresultsdifferfrompreviousstudieswitholderadultsintermsof
ageandtheeffectsizeofeducationisofspecialrelevance.Severalworkshavereporteda
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,995811of18
decreaseinperformanceontheDSbeyond65yearsofageandhavealsofoundthatper
formanceontheDSisinfluencedbylevelofeducation[19,93,94].However,ithasbeen
reportedthatfrequentcognitiveactivityisassociatedwithareducedrateofcognitivede
clineinolderadults[95].Onepossibleinterpretationisthattheinfluenceofageoncogni
tivelyactiveadults’performancemightnotfollowthesamepatternthaninthegeneral
populationand,therefore,specificnormativedataforthesepopulationsareneeded.The
smalleffectsizeforeducationsuggeststhatcognitiveactivitiesduringadulthoodhavea
higherinfluencethanthelevelofeducationindeterminingcognitivereserve[51].
4.2.LettersandNumbers(LN)
Regardingtheeffectsofageonperformance,ourresultsshowanegativelinearrela
tionshipbetweenageandLNperformance,withalackofcontributionofquadraticage.
Thesefindingsdisagreewithapreviousstudythatreportedasignificantcurvilinearde
creasewithage[96]withasampleofyoungandolderadults.Differencesintheagerange
ofthesample,from55to87inourstudyand18to89inMyersonetal.[96],maybere
sponsibleforthevariability.However,consistentwithourresults,inthestudyofMyerson
etal.[96],apronouncedlineardeclinewithageisfoundinindividualsbeyond60com
paredtothe20‐to60yearolds.
4.3.TrailMakingTest
Inlinewithpreviousstudies,ourresultsindicatethatbothpartsAandBareassoci
atedwithageandeducationallevelbutnotwithsex[54,97,98].Moreover,eveninprevi
ousworksreportingstatisticallysignificantassociationsbetweensexandTMT[86]orbe
tweensexandTMTB[99],theseassociationsweresmall,withsexaccountingforanegli
gibleproportionofthevarianceontheTMT(<1%).Somestudiesreportedalinearrela
tionshipbetweenageandcompletiontimeinbothparts[86,99].Inourstudy,TMTB
scoresareaffectedbythequadratictermofage,suggestingthatperformanceontheTMT
Bworsensmoremarkedlyintheoldestpopulation.Besides,ourresultssupportthatparts
AandBshouldnotbetreatedasindependentwheninterpretingperformancesoasto
decreasethelikelihoodoffalsepositivediagnoses.TheTMTBSABIEXnormativedatamight
provideclinicallyusefuldataasacomplementtoexistinggeneralpopulationbased
normsforevaluatingSpanisholderadults.Futureworksshouldbeconductedonclinical
settingstoexaminewhethertheuseofbothnormativedatasetsaddsdifferentandvalua
bleinformationintheassessmentofattentionandprocessingspeed.
4.4.SymbolDigitModalitiesTest
Inlinewithpreviousworks,wefoundthatyoungerageandhighereducationwere
significantlyassociatedwithbetterperformanceontheSDMT[54,62,89,100,101].Contrary
toRyan[101]andKiely[100],butinlinewithPeñaCasanova[54]andArangoLasprilla
[62],wedidnotfindasignificanteffectofsex.
Sinceolderpeoplehaveanincreasedriskofcognitiveimpairment[102],theavaila
bilityofappropriateandreliablenormativedataisessentialforearlyandaccurateidenti
ficationofpathologicalchangesincognition.Althoughseveralstudieshavereportedon
normativedataforolderadults,thesestudiesusedgeneralpopulationbasedsamples.
Thefindingthatthereisnoagreementintheindividualslabeledasshowinglowscores
whenusingnormativedataobtainedfromthegeneralpopulationandSABIEXspecific
normativedatahighlightstheneedforspecificnormativedataforhighlycognitivelyac
tivepeople.
Animportantaspectthatdistinguishesthesenormativedataisthatwedidnotex
cludeparticipantswithahistoryofmedicalconditionsthatcouldaffectneuropsycholog
icalfunctioning.Ithasbeensuggestedthatlessrigorousexclusioncriteriamightdecrease
thesensitivityofthenormativedatatoidentifytruecognitiveimpairment[103].However,
sinceboththeincidenceandprevalenceofchronicdiseases[104]andmultimorbidity[105]
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,995812of18
increasewithage,thepresenceofmedicalconditionsisfrequentintheolderpopulation.
Therefore,includingonlyhealthyolderadultsinanormativestudycouldbiastheresults
asthesamplewouldbeunrealisticandnotrepresentativeofthepopulationthatwillbe
assessedwiththesenormativedata.Moreover,usinganextremelyhealthysamplemight
increasetheriskofoverdiagnosingcognitiveimpairmentinclinicalsettings.Asinother
normativestudiesforolderadults[26,83],weensuredthenormalcognitivefunctioning
ofparticipantsincludedinoursamplethroughthescoresintheMMSE,CDR,andinde
pendenceintheADLs.
Regardingtheclinicalapplicabilityofthesenorms,theneuropsychologicaltestsde
scribedinthispapermightbeusefulintheprocessofdiagnosingcognitiveimpairment
anddementia.Sinceactiveolderadultsmayhaveabettercognitivefunctioningcompared
tosameagepeoplefromthegeneralpopulation[50,95],impairedperformancecouldbe
moredifficulttoidentifythroughtestsstandardizedonthegeneralpopulation.Thenor
mativedatareportedinthepresentworkmightbeespeciallyhelpfulforcliniciansand
researcherstoaccuratelyinterpretscoresofolderadultswhocontinuetoleadaveryactive
lifeduringaging,identifyinglowerthanaverageperformancemoreaccuratelyand,thus,
reducingtheriskofdiagnosticerrorsiflowscoresaretobeusedtodiagnosecognitive
impairment.SinceindividualswithMCIareatgreaterriskofAD[9,106],theSABIEXnor
mativedatamighthelptoidentifyMCIwithgreatercertaintyinhighlycognitivelyactive
Spanishindividuals.Oneofthestrengthsofthisworkisthatweprovidenormativedata
forfiveneuropsychologicalmeasures,whichallowsthecomparisonofanindividual‘s
performanceacrossthedifferentnormedtests.
4.5.Limitations
Thesenormativedatashouldbeinterpretedwithlimitations.First,thesampleused
tocalculatethemwastakenfromuniversitycoursesforseniors.Thisrestrictsthegeneral
izabilitytothepopulationwiththischaracteristic.InSpain,duringthe2019–2020aca
demicyear,thenumberofadultsthatparticipatedinthesecoursesamountsto35.199
(https://www.aepum.es/)(accessedon20June,2021),whichrepresents0,22%ofthepop
ulationaged55orolder(https://www.ine.es)(accessedon13February,20221).However,
differentstudieshavereportedthatotheractivepracticesduringaging,suchasvolun
teering,contributetothemaintenanceofcognitivereserveandpositivelyimpactolder
adults’cognitivefunction[107,108];therefore,itisrecommendedtoanalyzewhetherthese
normativedataarealsoappropriatetoproperlyinterprettheperformanceofolderadults
engagedincognitivelystimulatingactivitiesotherthanuniversitycourses.
Anotherpotentiallimitationofthepresentstudyisthat,duetothecompositionof
thesample,thesenormativedatawillbeusefulonlyforpeoplebetween55and87years
oldandwith3to22yearsofeducation.Additionally,takingintoaccountthewelldocu
mentedeffectsofcultureonthediscrepancyinperformanceinthedifferentcognitivedo
mains[109,110],anotherlimitationofthesenormativedataisthattheyareonlyapplicable
totheSpanishpopulation.TheirusewithotherSpanishspeakingpopulations,withdif
ferentculturalbackgrounds,islimited.Somestudieshavefounddifferencesinperfor
manceinthetestsincludedinthisworkamongindividualsfromdifferentSpanishspeak
ingcountries[62,69],andusingthesenormativedatamightresultindiagnosticerrors.
Afurtherlimitationofthisstudyisthatthenormativedataareobtainedwithcogni
tivelyactiveadults,buttheyhavenotbeenappliedinclinicalpopulations.Itisstillun
knowniftheyareadequatetoidentifycognitiveimpairment.Futurestudiesshouldbe
conductedwithclinicalpopulationstohelptoclarifytheclinicalusefulnessofthesenor
mativedata.Therefore,wesuggestusingthesenormativedataasasupplementofexisting
generalpopulationbasednormsuntiltheirclinicalutilityisanalyzed.Anotherlimitation
isthefactthatzscoresequaltoorlowerthan−1.28wereusedtointerpretperformance
anddefinelowscores,whilstthemostcommonlyusedcutoffpointtointerpretcognitive
impairmentisatleast1.5standarddeviationsbelowthemean.
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,995813of18
Lastly,sinceagingisassociatedwithchangesinthebrainstructureandinthefunc
tionalconnectivityrelatedtocognitiveprocesses[111,112],alimitationofthepresent
studyisthelackofneuroimageprofilestoanalyzecorrelatesbetweenbrainstructure,
functionalconnectivity,andparticipants’variabilityincognitivefunctioning(e.g.,
whetherthenumberoflowscoresisassociatedwithdifferentstructuralbrainalterations
ortheconnectivitybetweendifferentbrainareas).Byanalyzingourresultstogetherwith
magneticresonanceimages(MRI),amorecompleteunderstandingoftheeffectsofaging
onnetworkfunction,brainstructure,andcognitivefunctionwouldbeobtained.Future
worksarewarrantedtoidentifytheassociationofacognitivelyactivelifestyleandcogni
tivefunction,brainstructure,andbrainconnectivity.
5.Conclusions
Inconclusion,thepresentworkprovidesnormativedataforacognitivelyactive
Spanishpopulationthatmayhelptoidentifycognitiveimpairmentduringaging,improve
diagnosticprecision,andreducediagnosticerrors.Ourfindingshighlighttheimportance
ofusingappropriatenormativedata,relevanttothepopulationbeingassessed.Despite
theavailabilityofSpanishnormativedatafortheolderpopulation,ourresultssuggest
thattheaccuracyintheinterpretationofactiveolderadults’performancemightbemax
imizedusingpopulationspecificnormativedata.
SupplementaryMaterials:Thefollowingareavailableonlineatwww.mdpi.com/arti
cle/10.3390/ijerph18199958/s1,TableS1:Comparingnumberoflowscoresbetweennormativedata
sets(NEURONORMASABIEX),TableS2:Comparingnumberoflowscoresbetweennormative
datasets(NEURONORMASABIEX)withTMTBconditionalonTMTA,TableS3.Comparing
numberoflowscoresonTMTBindependent(TMTBNEURONORMA)andTMTBconditionalon
TMTA(TMTBSABIEX)
AuthorContributions:Conceptualization,J.O.C,E.S.M.,andB.B.L.;methodology,J.O.C,C.I.,
andE.C.R.;formalanalysis,C.I.andJ.O.C.;investigation,C.I.,J.O.C.,B.B.L.,E.C.R.,andE.S.M.;
datacuration,C.I.andJ.O.C;writing—originaldraftpreparation,C.I.andJ.O.C;writing—review
andediting,C.I.,J.O.C.,B.B.L.,E.C.R.,andE.S.M.;supervision,J.O.C.,E.S.M.,andB.B.L.All
authorshavereadandagreedtothepublishedversionofthemanuscript.
Funding:Thisresearchreceivednoexternalfunding.
InstitutionalReviewBoardStatement:Thestudywasconductedaccordingtotheguidelinesofthe
DeclarationofHelsinkiandapprovedbytheEthicsCommitteeoftheMiguelHernandezUniversity
(protocolcodeDPS.ESM.01.19).
InformedConsentStatement:Informedconsentwasobtainedfromallsubjectsinvolvedinthe
study.
DataAvailabilityStatement:Dataareavailableatrequestfromthecorrespondingauthor.
Acknowledgments:None.
ConflictsofInterest:Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictofinterest.
References
1. UnitedNations.WorldPopulationAgeing2020Highlights:LivingArrangementsofOlderPersons;UnitedNationPublication:New
York,NY,USA,2020.
2. InstitutoNacionaldeEstadísticaProporcióndePersonasMayoresdeCiertaEdadPorComunidadAutónoma.Availableonline:
https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Datos.htm?t=1451#!tabstabla(accessedon13February,2021).
3. Hou,X.H.;Feng,L.;Zhang,C.;Cao,X.P.;Tan,L.;Yu,J.T.ModelsforPredictingRiskofDementia:ASystematicReview.J.
Neurol.Neurosurg.Psychiatry2019,90,373–379,doi:10.1136/jnnp2018318212.
4. Power,M.C.;Mormino,E.;Soldan,A.;James,B.D.;Yu,L.;Armstrong,N.M.;Bangen,K.J.;DelanoWood,L.;Lamar,M.;Lim,
Y.Y.;etal.CombinedNeuropathologicalPathwaysAccountforAgeRelatedRiskofDementia:MultiplePathologiesandAge
RelatedDementiaRisk.Ann.Neurol.2018,84,10–22,doi:10.1002/ana.25246.
5. Nichols,E.;Szoeke,C.E.I.;Vollset,S.E.;Abbasi,N.;AbdAllah,F.;Abdela,J.;Aichour,M.T.E.;Akinyemi,R.O.;Alahdab,F.;
Asgedom,S.W.;etal.Global,Regional,andNationalBurdenofAlzheimer’sDiseaseandOtherDementias,1990–2016:A
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,995814of18
SystematicAnalysisfortheGlobalBurdenofDiseaseStudy2016.LancetNeurol.2019,18,88–106,doi:10.1016/S1474
4422(18)304034.
6. Petersen,R.C.;Lopez,O.;Armstrong,M.J.;Getchius,T.S.D.;Ganguli,M.;Gloss,D.;Gronseth,G.S.;Marson,D.;Pringsheim,T.;
Day,G.S.;etal.PracticeGuidelineUpdateSummary:MildCognitiveImpairment:ReportoftheGuidelineDevelopment,
Dissemination,andImplementationSubcommitteeoftheAmericanAcademyofNeurology.Neurology2018,90,126–135,
doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000004826.
7. AlzheimerʹsAssociation.Alzheimer’sAssociation2020Alzheimer’sDiseaseFactsandFigures.Alzheimer’sDement.2020,16,
391–460,doi:10.1002/alz.12068.
8. Bacigalupo,I.;Mayer,F.;Lacorte,E.;DiPucchio,A.;Marzolini,F.;Canevelli,M.;DiFiandra,T.;Vanacore,N.ASystematic
ReviewandMetaAnalysisonthePrevalenceofDementiainEurope:EstimatesfromtheHighestQualityStudiesAdoptingthe
DSMIVDiagnosticCriteria.J.AlzheimersDis.2018,66,1471–1481,doi:10.3233/JAD180416.
9. OltraCucarella,J.;FerrerCascales,R.;Alegret,M.;Gasparini,R.;DíazOrtiz,L.M.;Ríos,R.;MartínezNogueras,Á.L.;Onandia,
I.;PérezVicente,J.A.;CabelloRodríguez,L.;etal.RiskofProgressiontoAlzheimer’sDiseaseforDifferentNeuropsychological
MildCognitiveImpairmentSubtypes:AHierarchicalMetaAnalysisofLongitudinalStudies.Psychol.Aging2018,33,1007–1021,
doi:10.1037/pag0000294.
10. BaharFuchs,A.;Clare,L.;Woods,B.CognitiveTrainingandCognitiveRehabilitationforMildtoModerateAlzheimer’sDisease
andVascularDementia.CochraneDatabaseSyst.Rev.2013,doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003260.pub2.
11. Buckley,J.S.;Salpeter,S.R.ARiskBenefitAssessmentofDementiaMedications:SystematicReviewoftheEvidence.Drugs
Aging2015,32,453–467,doi:10.1007/s4026601502669.
12. OltraCucarella,J.;FerrerCascales,R.;Clare,L.;Morris,S.B.;Espert,R.;Tirapu,J.;SánchezSanSegundo,M.DifferentialEffects
ofCognitionFocusedInterventionsforPeoplewithAlzheimer’sDisease:AMetaAnalysis.Neuropsychology2018,32,664–679,
doi:10.1037/neu0000449.
13. Lu,P.H.;Lee,G.J.TheRoleofNeuropsychologyintheAssessmentoftheCognitivelyImpairedElderly.Neurol.Clin.2017,35,
191–206,doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2017.01.002.
14. Watt,S.;Crowe,S.F.ExaminingtheBeneficialEffectofNeuropsychologicalAssessmentonAdultPatientOutcomes:A
SystematicReview.Clin.Neuropsychol.2018,32,368–390,doi:10.1080/13854046.2017.1414885.
15. Strauss,E.;Sherman,E.;Spreen,O.ACompendiumofNeuropsychologicalTests:Administration,Norms,andComentary,3rded.;
OxfordUniversitiyPress:Oxford,UK,2006;ISBN9780195159578.
16. VanderElst,W.TheNeuropsychometricsofAging:NormativeStudiesintheMaastrichtAgingStudy;NeuropsychPublishers:
Amsterdam,TheNetherlands,2006;ISBN9789075579291.
17. vanHooren,S.A.H.;Valentijn,A.M.;Bosma,H.;Ponds,R.W.H.M.;vanBoxtel,M.P.J.;Jolles,J.CognitiveFunctioninginHealthy
OlderAdultsAged64–81:ACohortStudyintotheEffectsofAge,Sex,andEducation.AgingNeuropsychol.Cogn.2007,14,40–
54,doi:10.1080/138255890969483.
18. VanderElst,W.;Molenberghs,G.;VanBoxtel,M.P.J.;Jolles,J.EstablishingNormativeDataforRepeatedCognitiveAssessment:
AComparisonofDifferentStatisticalMethods.Behav.Res.Methods2013,45,1073–1086,doi:10.3758/s134280120305y.
19. Lezak,M.D.;Howieson,D.;Bigler,E.D.;Tranel,D.NeuropsychologicalAssessment,5thed.;OxfordUniversityPress:Oxford,
UK/NewYork,NY,USA,2012;ISBN9780195395525.
20. O’Bryant,S.E.;Edwards,M.;Johnson,L.;Hall,J.;Gamboa,A.;O’jile,J.TexasMexicanAmericanAdultNormativeStudies:
NormativeDataforCommonlyUsedClinicalNeuropsychologicalMeasuresforEnglish‐ andSpanishSpeakers.Dev.
Neuropsychol.2018,43,1–26,doi:10.1080/87565641.2017.1401628.
21. Torres,V.L.;VilaCastelar,C.;Bocanegra,Y.;Baena,A.;GuzmánVélez,E.;AguirreAcevedo,D.C.;Tirado,V.;Munoz,C.;
Henao,E.;Moreno,S.;etal.NormativeDataStratifiedbyAgeandEducationforaSpanishNeuropsychologicalTestBattery:
ResultsfromtheColombianAlzheimer’sPreventionInitiativeRegistry.Appl.Neuropsychol.Adult2021,28,230–244,
doi:10.1080/23279095.2019.1627357.
22. Mokri,H.;ÁvilaFunes,J.A.;Meillon,C.;GutiérrezRobledo,L.M.;Amieva,H.NormativeDatafortheMiniMentalState
Examination,theFreeandCuedSelectiveRemindingTestandtheIsaacsSetTestforanOlderAdultMexicanPopulation:The
CoyoacánCohortStudy.Clin.Neuropsychol.2013,27,1004–1018,doi:10.1080/13854046.2013.809793.
23. VilaCastelar,C.;Papp,K.V.;Amariglio,R.E.;Torres,V.L.;Baena,A.;Gomez,D.;Rendon,J.;Samaroo,A.;Lopera,F.;Rentz,
D.M.;etal.ValidationoftheLatinAmericanSpanishVersionoftheFaceNameAssociativeMemoryExaminaColombian
Sample.Clin.Neuropsychol.2020,34,1–12,doi:10.1080/13854046.2019.1690050.
24. Oosterhuis,H.E.M.;vanderArk,L.A.;Sijtsma,K.SampleSizeRequirementsforTraditionalandRegressionBasedNorms.
Assessment2016,23,191–202,doi:10.1177/1073191115580638.
25. VanBreukelen,G.J.P.;Vlaeyen,J.W.S.NormingClinicalQuestionnaireswithMultipleRegression:ThePainCognitionList.
Psychol.Assess.2005,17,336–344,doi:10.1037/10403590.17.3.336.
26. GuàrdiaOlmos,J.;PeróCebollero,M.;Rivera,D.;ArangoLasprilla,J.C.MethodologyfortheDevelopmentofNormativeData
forTenSpanishLanguageNeuropsychologicalTestsinElevenLatinAmericanCountries.NeuroRehabilitation2015,37,493–499,
doi:10.3233/NRE151277.
27. Rivera,D.;ArangoLasprilla,J.C.MethodologyfortheDevelopmentofNormativeDataforSpanishSpeakingPediatric
Populations.NeuroRehabilitation2017,41,581–592,doi:10.3233/NRE172275.
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,995815of18
28. VanderElst,W.;vanBoxtel,M.P.J.;vanBreukelen,G.J.P.;Jolles,J.TheLetterDigitSubstitutionTest:NormativeDatafor1,858
HealthyParticipantsAged24–81fromtheMaastrichtAgingStudy(MAAS):InfluenceofAge,Education,andSex.J.Clin.Exp.
Neuropsychol.2006,28,998–1009,doi:10.1080/13803390591004428.
29. Biundo,R.;Weis,L.;Pilleri,M.;Facchini,S.;FormentoDojot,P.;Vallelunga,A.;Antonini,A.DiagnosticandScreeningPower
ofNeuropsychologicalTestinginDetectingMildCognitiveImpairmentinParkinson’sDisease.J.NeuralTransm.2013,120,627–
633,doi:10.1007/s0070201310042.
30. MatiasGuiu,J.A.;CortésMartínez,A.;VallesSalgado,M.;Rognoni,T.;FernándezMatarrubia,M.;MorenoRamos,T.;Matías
Guiu,J.Addenbrooke’sCognitiveExaminationIII:DiagnosticUtilityforMildCognitiveImpairmentandDementiaand
CorrelationwithStandardizedNeuropsychologicalTests.Int.Psychogeriatr.2017,29,105–113,doi:10.1017/S1041610216001496.
31. Correia,R.;Barroso,J.;Nieto,A.AgeRelatedCognitiveChanges:TheImportanceofModulatingFactors.J.Geriatr.Med.
Gerontol.2018,4,1–10,doi:10.23937/24695858/1510048.
32. Small,B.J.;Dixon,R.A.;McArdle,J.J.;Grimm,K.J.DoChangesinLifestyleEngagementModerateCognitiveDeclineinNormal
Aging?EvidencefromtheVictoriaLongitudinalStudy.Neuropsychology2012,26,144–155,doi:10.1037/a0026579.
33. Vemuri,P.;Lesnick,T.G.;Przybelski,S.A.;Machulda,M.;Knopman,D.S.;Mielke,M.M.;Roberts,R.O.;Geda,Y.E.;Rocca,W.A.;
Petersen,R.C.;etal.AssociationofLifetimeIntellectualEnrichmentWithCognitiveDeclineintheOlderPopulation.JAMA
Neurol.2014,71,1017,doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.963.
34. Stern,Y.CognitiveReserve.Neuropsychologia2009,47,2015–2028,doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.03.004.
35. Stern,Y.CognitiveReserveinAgeingandAlzheimer’sDisease.LancetNeurol.2012,11,1006–1012,doi:10.1016/S1474
4422(12)701916.
36. Wilson,R.S.;Boyle,P.A.;Yu,L.;Barnes,L.L.;Schneider,J.A.;Bennett,D.A.LifeSpanCognitiveActivity,Neuropathologic
Burden,andCognitiveAging.Neurology2013,81,314–321,doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31829c5e8a.
37. Yates,L.A.;Ziser,S.;Spector,A.;Orrell,M.CognitiveLeisureActivitiesandFutureRiskofCognitiveImpairmentandDementia:
SystematicReviewandMetaAnalysis.Int.Psychogeriatr.2016,28,1791–1806,doi:10.1017/S1041610216001137.
38. Naah,F.L.;Njong,A.M.;Kimengsi,J.N.DeterminantsofActiveandHealthyAgeinginSubSaharanAfrica:Evidencefrom
Cameroon.Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2020,17,3038,doi:10.3390/ijerph17093038.
39. WHO.ActiveAgeing:APolicyFramework;WHO:Madrid,Spain,2002.
40. Formosa,M.ActiveAgeingThroughLifelongLearning:TheUniversityoftheThirdAge.InTheUniversityoftheThirdAgeand
ActiveAgeing;Formosa,M.,Ed.;SpringerInternationalPublishing:Cham,Germany,2019;Volume23,pp.3–18,ISBN9783
030215149.
41. Narushima,M.;Liu,J.;Diestelkamp,N.LifelongLearninginActiveAgeingDiscourse:ItsConservingEffectonWellbeing,
HealthandVulnerability.AgeingSoc.2018,38,651–675,doi:10.1017/S0144686X16001136.
42. FernándezBallesteros,R.;Molina,M.Á.;Schettini,R.;delRey,Á.L.PromotingActiveAgingThroughUniversityProgramsfor
OlderAdults:AnEvaluationStudy.GeroPsych2012,25,145–154,doi:10.1024/16629647/a000064.
43. Zadworna,M.HealthyAgingandtheUniversityoftheThirdAge—HealthBehaviorandSubjectiveHealthOutcomesinOlder
Adults.Arch.Gerontol.Geriatr.2020,90,104126,doi:10.1016/j.archger.2020.104126.
44. Formosa,M.FourDecadesofUniversitiesoftheThirdAge:Past,Present,Future.AgeingSoc.2014,34,42–66,
doi:10.1017/S0144686X12000797.
45. MontoroRodríguez,J.;PinazoHernandis,S.;TortosaChuliá,M.Á.Motivacionesyexpectativasdelosestudiantesmayoresde
55añosenlosprogramasuniversitarios.Rev.Esp.GeriatríaGerontol.2007,42,158–166,doi:10.1016/S0211139X(07)735424.
46. Cachioni,M.;NascimentoOrdonez,T.;daSilva,T.B.L.;TavaresBatistoni,S.S.;SanchesYassuda,M.;CaldeiraMelo,R.;Accioly
RodriguesdaCostaDomingue,M.;Lopes,A.MotivationalFactorsandPredictorsforAttendingaContinuingEducation
ProgramforOlderAdults.Educ.Gerontol.2014,40,584–596,doi:10.1080/03601277.2013.802188.
47. Villar,F.;Celdrán,M.LearninginLaterLife:ParticipationinFormal,NonFormalandInformalActivitiesinaNationally
RepresentativeSpanishSample.Eur.J.Ageing2013,10,135–144,doi:10.1007/s1043301202571.
48. Chan,D.;Shafto,M.;Kievit,R.;Matthews,F.;Spink,M.;Valenzuela,M.;Henson,R.N.LifestyleActivitiesinMidLifeContribute
toCognitiveReserveinLateLife,IndependentofEducation,Occupation,andLateLifeActivities.Neurobiol.Aging2018,70,
180–183,doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.06.012.
49. Hall,C.B.;Lipton,R.B.;Sliwinski,M.;Katz,M.J.;Derby,C.A.;Verghese,J.CognitiveActivitiesDelayOnsetofMemoryDecline
inPersonsWhoDevelopDementia.Neurology2009,73,356–361,doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b04ae3.
50. Christensen,H.;Korten,A.;Jorm,A.F.;Henderson,A.S.;Scott,R.;Mackinnon,A.J.ActivityLevelsandCognitiveFunctioning
inanElderlyCommunitySample.AgeAgeing1996,25,72–80,doi:10.1093/ageing/25.1.72.
51. Reed,B.R.;Dowling,M.;TomaszewskiFarias,S.;Sonnen,J.;Strauss,M.;Schneider,J.A.;Bennett,D.A.;Mungas,D.Cognitive
ActivitiesDuringAdulthoodAreMoreImportantthanEducationinBuildingReserve.J.Int.Neuropsychol.Soc.2011,17,615–
624,doi:10.1017/S1355617711000014.
52. Zhang,J.;Zou,L.;Jiao,C.;Zhang,M.;Wang,L.;Song,W.;Yu,Q.;Grabovac,I.;Zhang,Y.;Willeit,P.;etal.CognitiveBenefits
ofActivityEngagementamong12,093AdultsAgedover65Years.BrainSci.2020,10,967,doi:10.3390/brainsci10120967.
53. Wechsler,D.TheWechslerAdultIntelligenceScale,3rdEd;TEAEdiciones:Madrid,Spain,1999.
54. PeñaCasanova,J.;QuiñonesUbeda,S.;QuintanaAparicio,M.;Aguilar,M.;Badenes,D.;Molinuevo,J.L.;Torner,L.;Robles,
A.;Barquero,M.S.;Villanueva,C.;etal.SpanishMulticenterNormativeStudies(NEURONORMAProject):NormsforVerbal
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,995816of18
Span,VisuospatialSpan,LetterandNumberSequencing,TrailMakingTest,andSymbolDigitModalitiesTest.Arch.Clin.
Neuropsychol.2009,24,321–341,doi:10.1093/arclin/acp038.
55. Kessels,R.P.C.;Overbeek,A.;Bouman,Z.AssessmentofVerbalandVisuospatialWorkingMemoryinMildCognitive
ImpairmentandAlzheimer’sDementia.Dement.Neuropsychol.2015,9,301–305,doi:10.1590/198057642015dn93000014.
56. Ruchinskas,R.WechslerAdultIntelligenceScale4thEditionDigitSpanPerformanceinSubjectiveCognitiveComplaints,
AmnesticMildCognitiveImpairment,andProbableDementiaoftheAlzheimerType.Clin.Neuropsychol.2019,33,1436–1444,
doi:10.1080/13854046.2019.1585574.
57. Lortie,J.J.;Remington,R.;Hoffmann,H.;Shea,T.B.LackofCorrelationofWAISDigitSpanwithClox1andtheDementia
RatingScaleinMCI.Int.J.AlzheimersDis.2012,2012,1–4,doi:10.1155/2012/829743.
58. Kawai,Y.;Miura,R.;Tsujimoto,M.;Sakurai,T.;Yamaoka,A.;Takeda,A.;Arahata,Y.;Washimi,Y.;Kachi,T.;Toba,K.
NeuropsychologicalDifferentiationbetweenAlzheimer’sDiseaseandDementiawithLewyBodiesinaMemoryClinic:
DifferentiationbetweenADandDLB.Psychogeriatrics2013,13,157–163,doi:10.1111/psyg.12019.
59. Gooding,A.;Seider,T.;Marquine,M.;Suárez,P.;Umlauf,A.;RiveraMindt,M.;Heaton,R.K.;ArtiolaIFortuni,L.;Cherner,M.
DemographicallyAdjustedNormsforthePacedAuditorySerialAdditionTestandLetterNumberSequencingTestinSpanish
SpeakingAdults:ResultsfromtheNeuropsychologicalNormsfortheU.S.MexicoBorderRegioninSpanish(NPNUMBRS)
Project.Clin.Neuropsychol.2020,doi:10.1080/13854046.2019.1711199.
60. Kessels,R.P.C.;Molleman,P.W.;Oosterman,J.M.AssessmentofWorkingMemoryDeficitsinPatientswithMildCognitive
ImpairmentandAlzheimer’sDementiaUsingWechsler’sWorkingMemoryIndex.AgingClin.Exp.Res.2011,23,487–490,
doi:10.1007/BF03325245.
61. Smith,A.SDMT:TestdeSímbolosyDígitos:Manual;TEAEdiciones:Madrid,Spain,2002;ISBN9788471747235.
62. ArangoLasprilla,J.C.;Rivera,D.;Rodríguez,G.;Garza,M.T.;GalarzadelAngel,J.;Rodríguez,W.;VelázquezCardoso,J.;
Aguayo,A.;Schebela,S.;Weil,C.;etal.SymbolDigitModalitiesTest:NormativeDatafortheLatinAmericanSpanishSpeaking
AdultPopulation.NeuroRehabilitation2015,37,625–638,doi:10.3233/NRE151282.
63. Cherbuin,N.;Sachdev,P.;Anstey,K.J.NeuropsychologicalPredictorsofTransitionFromHealthyCognitiveAgingtoMild
CognitiveImpairment:ThePATHThroughLifeStudy.Am.J.Geriatr.Psychiatry2010,18,723–733,
doi:10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181cdecf1.
64. Fleisher,A.S.;Sowell,B.B.;Taylor,C.;Gamst,A.C.;Petersen,R.C.;Thal,L.J.;ClinicalPredictorsofProgressiontoAlzheimer
DiseaseinAmnesticMildCognitiveImpairment.Neurology2007,68,1588–1595,doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000258542.58725.4c.
65. Benedict,R.H.;DeLuca,J.;Phillips,G.;LaRocca,N.;Hudson,L.D.;Rudick,R.MultipleSclerosisOutcomeAssessments
ConsortiumValidityoftheSymbolDigitModalitiesTestasaCognitionPerformanceOutcomeMeasureforMultipleSclerosis.
Mult.Scler.J.2017,23,721–733,doi:10.1177/1352458517690821.
66. Maroof,D.A.;Gross,A.L.;Brandt,J.ModelingLongitudinalChangeinMotorandCognitiveProcessingSpeedin
PresymptomaticHuntington’sDisease.J.Clin.Exp.Neuropsychol.2011,33,901–909,doi:10.1080/13803395.2011.574606.
67. Wilson,H.;Pagano,G.;Yousaf,T.;Polychronis,S.;DeMicco,R.;Giordano,B.;Niccolini,F.;Politis,M.PredictCognitiveDecline
withClinicalMarkersinParkinson’sDisease(PRECODE1).J.NeuralTransm.2020,127,51–59,doi:10.1007/s00702019021256.
68. Reitan,R.M.ValidityoftheTrailMakingTestasanIndicatorofOrganicBrainDamage.Percept.Mot.Skills1958,8,271–276,
doi:10.2466/pms.1958.8.3.271.
69. ArangoLasprilla,J.C.;Rivera,D.;Aguayo,A.;Rodríguez,W.;Garza,M.T.;Saracho,C.P.;RodríguezAgudelo,Y.;Aliaga,A.;
Weiler,G.;Luna,M.;etal.TrailMakingTest:NormativeDatafortheLatinAmericanSpanishSpeakingAdultPopulation.
NeuroRehabilitation2015,37,639–661,doi:10.3233/NRE151284.
70. Ashendorf,L.;Jefferson,A.;Oconnor,M.;Chaisson,C.;Green,R.;Stern,R.TrailMakingTestErrorsinNormalAging,Mild
CognitiveImpairment,andDementia.Arch.Clin.Neuropsychol.2008,S0887617707002247,doi:10.1016/j.acn.2007.11.005.
71. Bezdicek,O.;Stepankova,H.;Axelrod,B.N.;Nikolai,T.;Sulc,Z.;Jech,R.;Růžička,E.;Kopecek,M.ClinimetricValidityofthe
TrailMakingTestCzechVersioninParkinson’sDiseaseandNormativeDataforOlderAdults.Clin.Neuropsychol.2017,31,42–
60,doi:10.1080/13854046.2017.1324045.
72. O’Rourke,J.J.F.;Beglinger,L.J.;Smith,M.M.;Mills,J.;Moser,D.J.;Rowe,K.C.;Langbehn,D.R.;Duff,K.;Stout,J.C.;Harrington,
D.L.;etal.TheTrailMakingTestinProdromalHuntingtonDisease:ContributionsofDiseaseProgressiontoTestPerformance.
J.Clin.Exp.Neuropsychol.2011,33,567–579,doi:10.1080/13803395.2010.541228.
73. Ramlall,S.;Chipps,J.;Bhigjee,A.I.;Pillay,B.J.SensitivityandSpecificityofNeuropsychologicalTestsforDementiaandMild
CognitiveImpairmentinaSampleofResidentialElderlyinSouthAfrica.S.Afr.J.Psychiatry2014,20,7,
doi:10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v20i4.558.
74. Folstein,M.F.;Folstein,S.E.;McHugh,P.R.“MiniMentalState”.APracticalMethodforGradingtheCognitiveStateofPatients
fortheClinician.J.Psychiatr.Res.1975,12,189–198,doi:10.1016/00223956(75)900266.
75. Hughes,C.P.;Berg,L.;Danziger,W.;Coben,L.A.;Martin,R.L.ANewClinicalScalefortheStagingofDementia.Br.J.Psychiatry
1982,140,566–572,doi:10.1192/bjp.140.6.566.
76. Lawton,M.;Brody,E.AssessmentofOlderPeople:SelfMaintainingandInstrumentalActivitiesofDailyLiving.Gerontologist
1969,9,179–186.
77. Bielak,A.;Mansueti,L.;Strauss,E.;Dixon,R.PerformanceontheHaylingandBrixtonTestsinOlderAdults:Normsand
Correlates.Arch.Clin.Neuropsychol.2006,21,141–149,doi:10.1016/j.acn.2005.08.006.
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,995817of18
78. Whittle,C.;Corrada,M.M.;Dick,M.;Ziegler,R.;KahleWrobleski,K.;PaganiniHill,A.;Kawas,C.NeuropsychologicalDatain
NondementedOldestOld:The90+Study.J.Clin.Exp.Neuropsychol.2007,29,290–299,doi:10.1080/13803390600678038.
79. BoneteLópez,B.;OltraCucarella,J.;Marín,M.;Antón,C.;Balao,N.;López,E.;SitgesMaciá,E.ValidationandNormsfora
RecognitionTaskfortheSpanishVersionoftheFreeandCuedSelectiveRemindingTest.Arch.Clin.Neuropsychol.2020,36,
954–964,doi:10.1093/arclin/acaa117.
80. deAndradeMoral,R.;DiazOrueta,U.;OltraCucarella,J.LogisticVersusLinearRegressionBasedReliableChangeIndex:
ImplicationsforClinicalStudieswithDiverseSampleSizes.PsyArXiv2021,https://osf.io/gq7az.Availableonline:(accessedon
7September,2021).
81. Yesavage,J.A.;Brink,T.L.;Rose,T.L.;Lum,O.;Huang,V.;Adey,M.;Leirer,V.O.DevelopmentandValidationofaGeriatric
DepressionScreeningScale:APreliminaryReport.J.Psychiatr.Res.1982,17,37–49,doi:10.1016/00223956(82)900334.
82. Smith,A.SymbolDigitModalitiesTest;WesternPsychologicalServices:Torrance,CA,USA,1973.
83. PeñaCasanova,J.;Blesa,R.;Aguilar,M.;GramuntFombuena,N.;GómezAnsón,B.;Oliva,R.;Molinuevo,J.L.;Robles,A.;
Barquero,M.S.;Antúnez,C.;etal.SpanishMulticenterNormativeStudies(NEURONORMAProject):MethodsandSample
Characteristics.Arch.Clin.Neuropsychol.2009,24,307–319,doi:10.1093/arclin/acp027.
84. Fleiss,J.L.;Levin,B.;Paik,M.C.StatisticalMethodsforRatesandProportions.InWileySeriesinProbabilityandStatistics,3rded.;
Hoboken,N.J,Ed.;JohnWiley&Sons:Hoboken,NJ,USA,2003;ISBN9780471526292.
85. O’brien,R.M.ACautionRegardingRulesofThumbforVarianceInflationFactors.Qual.Quant.2007,41,673–690,
doi:10.1007/s1113500690186.
86. LlinàsReglà,J.;VilaltaFranch,J.;LópezPousa,S.;CalvóPerxas,L.;TorrentsRodas,D.;GarreOlmo,J.TheTrailMakingTest:
AssociationWithOtherNeuropsychologicalMeasuresandNormativeValuesforAdultsAged55YearsandOlderFroma
SpanishSpeakingPopulationBasedSample.Assessment2017,24,183–196,doi:10.1177/1073191115602552.
87. Crawford,J.R.;Garthwaite,P.H.;Gault,C.B.EstimatingthePercentageofthePopulationwithAbnormallyLowScores(or
AbnormallyLargeScoreDifferences)onStandardizedNeuropsychologicalTestBatteries:AGenericMethodwithApplications.
Neuropsychology2007,21,419–430,doi:10.1037/08944105.21.4.419.
88. OltraCucarella,J.;SánchezSanSegundo,M.;RubioAparicio,M.;ArangoLasprilla,J.C.;FerrerCascales,R.TheAssociation
BetweentheNumberofNeuropsychologicalMeasuresandtheBaseRateofLowScores.Assessment2021,28,955–963,
doi:10.1177/1073191119864646.
89. Fellows,R.P.;SchmitterEdgecombe,M.SymbolDigitModalitiesTest:RegressionBasedNormativeDataandClinicalUtility.
Arch.Clin.Neuropsychol.2020,35,105–115,doi:10.1093/arclin/acz020.
90. Meng,X.;D’Arcy,C.EducationandDementiaintheContextoftheCognitiveReserveHypothesis:ASystematicReviewwith
MetaAnalysesandQualitativeAnalyses.PLoSONE2012,7,e38268,doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038268.
91. Salthouse,T.A.DecomposingAgeCorrelationsonNeuropsychologicalandCognitiveVariables.J.Int.Neuropsychol.Soc.JINS
2009,15,650–661,doi:10.1017/S1355617709990385.
92. Monaco,M.;Costa,A.;Caltagirone,C.;Carlesimo,G.A.ForwardandBackwardSpanforVerbalandVisuoSpatialData:
StandardizationandNormativeDatafromanItalianAdultPopulation.Neurol.Sci.2013,34,749–754,doi:10.1007/s10072012
1130x.
93. Choi,H.J.;Lee,D.Y.;Seo,E.H.;Jo,M.K.;Sohn,B.K.;Choe,Y.M.;Byun,M.S.;Kim,J.W.;Kim,S.G.;Yoon,J.C.;etal.ANormative
StudyoftheDigitSpaninanEducationallyDiverseElderlyPopulation.PsychiatryInvestig.2014,11,39,
doi:10.4306/pi.2014.11.1.39.
94. Grégoire,J.;VanDerLinden,M.EffectofAgeonForwardandBackwardDigitSpans.AgingNeuropsychol.Cogn.1997,4,140–
149,doi:10.1080/13825589708256642.
95. Hertzog,C.;Kramer,A.F.;Wilson,R.S.;Lindenberger,U.EnrichmentEffectsonAdultCognitiveDevelopment:Canthe
FunctionalCapacityofOlderAdultsBePreservedandEnhanced?Psychol.Sci.PublicInterest2008,9,1–65,doi:10.1111/j.1539
6053.2009.01034.x.
96. Myerson,J.;Emery,L.;White,D.A.;Hale,S.EffectsofAge,Domain,andProcessingDemandsonMemorySpan:Evidencefor
DifferentialDecline.AgingNeuropsychol.Cogn.2003,10,20–27,doi:10.1076/anec.10.1.20.13454.
97. Suarez,P.A.;DíazSantos,M.;Marquine,M.J.;Kamalyan,L.;Mindt,M.R.;Umlauf,A.;Heaton,R.K.;Grant,I.;Cherner,M.
DemographicallyAdjustedNormsfortheTrailMakingTestinNativeSpanishSpeakers:ResultsfromtheNeuropsychological
NormsfortheUSMexicoBorderRegioninSpanish(NPNUMBRS)Project.Clin.Neuropsychol.2020,35,308–323,
doi:10.1080/13854046.2020.1800099.
98. Wei,M.;Shi,J.;Li,T.;Ni,J.;Zhang,X.;Li,Y.;Kang,S.;Ma,F.;Xie,H.;Qin,B.;etal.DiagnosticAccuracyoftheChineseVersion
oftheTrailMakingTestforScreeningCognitiveImpairment.J.Am.Geriatr.Soc.2018,66,92–99,doi:10.1111/jgs.15135.
99. Rasmusson,X.D.;Zonderman,A.B.;Kawas,C.;Resnick,S.M.EffectsofAgeandDementiaontheTrailMakingTest.Clin.
Neuropsychol.1998,12,169–178,doi:10.1076/clin.12.2.169.2005.
100. Kiely,K.M.;Butterworth,P.;Watson,N.;Wooden,M.TheSymbolDigitModalitiesTest:NormativeDatafromaLarge
NationallyRepresentativeSampleofAustralians.Arch.Clin.Neuropsychol.2014,29,767–775,doi:10.1093/arclin/acu055.
101. Ryan,J.;Woods,R.L.;Britt,C.J.;Murray,A.M.;Shah,R.C.;Reid,C.M.;Wolfe,R.;Nelson,M.R.;Orchard,S.G.;Lockery,J.E.;et
al.NormativeDatafortheSymbolDigitModalitiesTestinOlderWhiteAustraliansandAmericans,AfricanAmericans,and
Hispanic/Latinos.J.AlzheimersDis.Rep.2020,4,313–323,doi:10.3233/ADR200194.
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,995818of18
102. Deary,I.J.;Corley,J.;Gow,A.J.;Harris,S.E.;Houlihan,L.M.;Marioni,R.E.;Penke,L.;Rafnsson,S.B.;Starr,J.M.AgeAssociated
CognitiveDecline.Br.Med.Bull.2009,92,135–152,doi:10.1093/bmb/ldp033.
103. Harrington,K.D.;Lim,Y.Y.;Ames,D.;Hassenstab,J.;RaineySmith,S.;Robertson,J.;Salvado,O.;Masters,C.L.;Maruff,P.
UsingRobustNormativeDatatoInvestigatetheNeuropsychologyofCognitiveAging.Arch.Clin.Neuropsychol.2017,32,142–
154,doi:10.1093/arclin/acw106.
104. Melis,R.;Marengoni,A.;Angleman,S.;Fratiglioni,L.IncidenceandPredictorsofMultimorbidityintheElderly:APopulation
BasedLongitudinalStudy.PLoSONE2014,9,e103120,doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103120.
105. Garin,N.;Olaya,B.;Perales,J.;Moneta,M.V.;Miret,M.;AyusoMateos,J.L.;Haro,J.M.MultimorbidityPatternsinaNational
RepresentativeSampleoftheSpanishAdultPopulation.PLoSONE2014,9,e84794,doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084794.
106. OltraCucarella,J.;SánchezSanSegundo,M.;Lipnicki,D.M.;Crawford,J.D.;Lipton,R.B.;Katz,M.J.;Zammit,A.R.;Scarmeas,
N.;Dardiotis,E.;Kosmidis,M.H.;etal.VisualMemoryTestsEnhancetheIdentificationofAmnesticMCICasesatGreaterRisk
ofAlzheimer’sDisease.Int.Psychogeriatr.2019,31,997–1006,doi:10.1017/S104161021800145X.
107. Guiney,H.;Machado,L.VolunteeringintheCommunity:PotentialBenefitsforCognitiveAging.J.Gerontol.Ser.B2018,73,
399–408,doi:10.1093/geronb/gbx134.
108. Proulx,C.M.;Curl,A.L.;Ermer,A.E.LongitudinalAssociationsBetweenFormalVolunteeringandCognitiveFunctioning.J.
Gerontol.Ser.B2018,73,522–531,doi:10.1093/geronb/gbx110.
109. Daugherty,J.C.;Puente,A.E.;Fasfous,A.F.;HidalgoRuzzante,N.;PérezGarcia,M.DiagnosticMistakesofCulturallyDiverse
IndividualsWhenUsingNorthAmericanNeuropsychologicalTests.Appl.Neuropsychol.Adult2017,24,16–22,
doi:10.1080/23279095.2015.1036992.
110. Werry,A.E.;Daniel,M.;Bergström,B.GroupDifferencesinNormalNeuropsychologicalTestPerformanceforOlderNon
HispanicWhiteandBlack/AfricanAmericanAdults.Neuropsychology2019,33,1089–1100,doi:10.1037/neu0000579.
111. Petersen,R.C.;Aisen,P.S.;Beckett,L.A.;Donohue,M.C.;Gamst,A.C.;Harvey,D.J.;Jack,C.R.;Jagust,W.J.;Shaw,L.M.;Toga,
A.W.;etal.Alzheimer’sDiseaseNeuroimagingInitiative(ADNI):ClinicalCharacterization.Neurology2010,74,201–209,
doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181cb3e25.
112. Varangis,E.;Habeck,C.G.;Razlighi,Q.R.;Stern,Y.TheEffectofAgingonRestingStateConnectivityofPredefinedNetworks
intheBrain.Front.AgingNeurosci.2019,11,234,doi:10.3389/fnagi.2019.00234.
... Özdeniz [11] and Karakaş's [12] studies examined total forward and backward DST scores. However, in both international [5,[13][14][15][16][17] and national literature, [18,19] as well as in clinical neuropsychology practice in Türkiye, the longest (maximum) DSF and DSB scores are commonly used in DST scoring, and these scores are reported in neuropsychological evaluation reports. Despite its widespread use, there is no normative study conducted on the Turkish population for this scoring method in the literature. ...
... [8,[13][14][15][20][21][22] A previous study that included both young and old individuals in the sample demonstrated larger age effects; [15] however, in studies examining only older individuals, as in the present study, smaller age effects were found, [21] or no age effect was observed. [16,17,28,29] Baddeley [30] suggested that success in a span test such as the DST did not initially require a high degree of manipulation and was instead determined more by memory capacity. However, as the task becomes more complex, in other words, as the number of digits repeated increases, the workload on working memory increases, making it more difficult to complete the task successfully. ...
... These findings are consistent with previous studies in the literature. [13][14][15][16][17][20][21][22]28,29] The positive effect of education on cognitive functions is explained by the cognitive reserve theory, [32] which suggests that higher education makes cognitive functions more resilient against advanced age and pathologies. A previous study also demonstrated that higher education improved executive functions. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objectives: This study aimed to determine normative values stratified by age, education, and sex for the digit span test (DST), a commonly used tool for assessing attention, short-term memory, and working memory in Türkiye, in the Turkish population aged 50 and above. Patients and methods: A total of 340 healthy individuals (139 males, 201 females; mean age 64.4±8.5; range, 50 to 83 years) were included in the study, stratified by age (three levels: 50-59 years, 60-69 years, 70-83 years), education (three levels: 0-5 years, 6-11 years, 12 years and above), and sex (female, male) variables. The participants’ longest digit span forward (DSF), digit span backward (DSB) scores and total DST scores were included in the analyses. The relative contributions of age, education, and sex variables to DST scores were examined using multiple linear regression analysis, while their main effects and interaction effects were investigated using a 3×3×2 ANOVA design. Test-retest reliability of the DST was determined by tests administered in 12-month intervals. Results: Demographic variables accounted for 25 to 38% of the variance in the longest DSF and DSB scores and total DST scores. Significant main effects of age, education, and sex were observed on the longest DSF scores and total DST scores, while only age and education had main effects on the longest DSB scores. The DST demonstrated strong test-retest reliability. Conclusion: This study established normative values for the DST subscores for individuals aged 50-69 and 70-83 years with low, moderate, and high levels of education. Notably, years of education emerged as the strongest predictor of DST performance. Overall, advanced age, lower educational attainment, and female gender were associated with reduced DST performance.
... The score recorded in both parts of the test is the time (in seconds) needed to complete each task. Some authors warn about the separate use of the scores of parts A and B of the instrument due to interdependence between the scores iñesta et al., 2021). To overcome this concern, some authors have suggested use of a difference score between TMT-A and TMT-B (B-A) as a better index of executive function (Sánchez-Cubillo et al., 2009). ...
... even considering only the TMT, due to the differences related to the sample, the methodology or the age ranges, it is extremely difficult to make a between-study analysis of the norms reported. Thus, some studies did not report TMT norms considering age and/or education (Del Ser Quijano et al., 2004;iñesta et al., 2021;Periáñez et al., 2007). older adults included in the study 0 76 +3 +2 +1 0 +2 +2 +1 0 77 +3 +2 +1 0 +2 +2 +1 0 78 +3 +2 +1 0 +3 +2 +1 0 79 +3 +2 +1 0 +3 +2 +1 0 80 +3 +2 +2 +1 +3 +2 +1 0 81 +4 +3 +2 +1 +3 +2 +1 0 82 +4 +3 +2 +1 +3 +2 +1 0 83 +4 +3 +2 +1 +3 +2 +1 0 84 +4 +3 +2 +1 +3 +2 +1 +1 85 +4 +3 +2 +1 +3 +2 +2 +1 86 +4 +3 +2 +1 +3 +3 +2 +1 87 +4 +3 +2 +1 +3 +3 +2 +1 88 +4 +4 +3 +2 +4 +3 +2 +1 89 +5 +4 +3 +2 +4 +3 +2 +1 90 +5 +4 +3 +2 +4 +3 +2 +1 91 +5 +4 +3 +2 +4 +3 +2 +1 92 +5 +4 +3 +2 +4 +3 +2 +1 93 +5 +4 +3 +2 +4 +3 +2 +1 94 +5 +4 +3 +2 +4 +3 +2 +2 95 +5 +4 +3 +3 +4 +3 +3 +2 96 +6 +5 +4 +3 +4 +3 +3 +2 97 +6 +5 +4 +3 +4 +4 +3 +2 98 +6 +5 +4 +3 +5 +4 +3 +2 ...
... samples were in some studies small Periáñez et al., 2007), some of them including very old participants (Del Ser Quijano et al., 2004), and recruited locally (Del Ser Quijano et al., 2004;iñesta et al., 2021;Llinàs-Reglà et al., 2017). The comparison of our normative scores with those reported by Peña-Casanova et al. (2009) was also extremely difficult because adjustments for age and education were performed separately, unlike the procedure we used. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective: This paper reports normative data for different attentional tests obtained from a sample of middle-aged and older native Spanish adults and considering effects of age, educational level and sex. Method: 2,597 cognitively intact participants, aged from 50 to 98 years old, participated voluntarily in the SCAND consortium studies. The statistical procedure included conversion of percentile ranges into scaled scores. The effects of age, education and sex were taken into account. Linear regressions were used to calculate adjusted scaled scores. Results: Scaled scores and percentiles corresponding to the TMT, Digit Symbol and Letter Cancellation Task are shown. Additional tables show the values to be added to or subtracted from the scaled scores, for age and education in the case of the TMT and Letter Cancellation Task measures, and for education in the case of the Digit Symbol subtest. Conclusions: The current norms provide clinically useful data for evaluating Spanish people aged 50 to 98 years old and contribute to improving detection of initial symptoms of cognitive impairment.
... Previous papers have reported the importance of using appropriate normative data, relevant to the population being assessed [12,13]. Normative data obtained in the general population might be less sensitive for identifying cognitive impairment among cognitively active older adults with higher performance levels independent of years of education. ...
... Previous works comparing the base rates of low scores using normative data obtained from the general population and normative data obtained with a sample of cognitively active older adults showed a lack of agreement in the identification of low scores using both normative datasets. Therefore, the accuracy in the performance's interpretation might be maximized using population-specific normative data [12,13]. ...
... As cognitively older adults have higher cognitive reserve than community-dwelling individuals, specific normative data are essential to identify cognitive impairment. Our group developed in previous works normative data for the assessment of attention, processing speed, working memory [13], verbal and visual memory, and visuospatial perception [12] with a sample of cognitively active Spanish older adults who attend university courses. To complete a battery of neuropsychological tests covering all cognitive domains, the present study developed normative data on the assessment of semantic memory, executive functions, and language with a larger sample of cognitively active Spanish older adults who attend university courses. ...
Article
Full-text available
An increased cognitive reserve is associated with changes in the pattern of cognitive decline during aging. Thus, normative data adapted to the characteristics of the target population are needed to reduce the possibility of false diagnoses. The aim of this work was to develop normative data for the Phonemic Verbal Fluency test, the Semantic Verbal Fluency test and the Boston Naming Test (BNT). Method: Regression-based normative data were calculated from a sample of 118 non-depressed, cognitively active, independent community-dwelling adults aged 55 or older (64.4% women) from SABIEX (University for Seniors at the Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche). Raw scores were regressed on age, sex, and education. Results: The effects of age and education varied across neuropsychological measures. No effect of sex was found in any of the tests assessed. Statistically significant differences were found in the proportion of low scores using SABIEX or population-based normative datasets. The level of agreement identifying individuals labeled as showing one or more low scores was only fair-to-good. Conclusions: Normative data obtained from the general population might not be sensitive to identify low scores in cognitively active older adults, increasing the risk of misdiagnoses. A friendly calculator is available for neuropsychological assessment.
... The TMT has a high reliability and validity as a sensitive indicator of cognitive impairment associated with an acquired brain injury (Jang et al., 2016;Iñesta et al., 2021). Although it is widely used as an index of neuropsychological functioning (Langeard et al., 2021, Simfukwe et al., 2022, it has also been used to evaluate rehabilitation programs as well as a predictor of falls within disabled elderly people at home (S anchez-Cubillo et al., 2009;Hirota et al., 2010;Davis et al., 2018). ...
... The test measures the processes of focusing, tracking, and execution within the process of attention and self-monitoring (Reitan & Wolfson, 2013;Langeard et al., 2021). Traditionally, the test is used to measure psychomotor speed, attention, sequencing ability, mental flexibility, visual scanning, motor speed, visual attention, and simple motor and spatial skills (Hirota et al., 2010;Kim et al., 2014;Iñesta et al., 2021). ...
Article
The Test Making Test (TMT) was originally created as a distributed attention test. Part B (TMT-B) has been proposed as representative of executive functions as effective problem solving and working memory. This study aimed to explore the validity of the TMT-B as an indicator of working memory in adults. A cross-sectional study was conducted by using linear correlation coefficients between the TMT-B and neuropsychological and electrophysiological tests of working memory. Fifty-six individuals participated, all of which had normal cognitive functioning and were aged between 19 and 55 years old. Results show a significant correlation among the TMT-B scores with all subtests, the overall score of the Corsi Block-Tapping Test, the Working Memory Index of the WAIS-IV (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale) (p ≤ .05) and the auditory Event Related Potentials (p < .01) with the N200 and P300 latencies and amplitudes. These findings are preliminary evidence of the validity of the TMT-B for the evaluation of working memory in adults. Additional studies are required to assess the differential validity of the TMT-B in the evaluation of working memory, through comparative correlational analyzes with the results of various neuropsychological tests that assess other cognitive functions.
... Because of this, norms' accuracy and representativeness of the population are important (Innocenti et al., 2021). Selecting appropriate ND will affect neuropsychological assessment result interpretation accuracy, reducing the probability of false diagnoses of cognitive impairment (Inesta et al., 2021). ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective To quantify the evolution, impact, and importance of normative data (ND) calculation by identifying trends in the research literature and what approaches need improvement. Methods A PRISMA-guideline systematic review was performed on literature from 2000 to 2022 in PubMed, Pub-Psych, and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria included scientific articles about ND in neuropsychological tests with clear data analysis, published in any country, and written in English or Spanish. Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies were included. Bibliometric analysis was used to examine the growth, productivity, journal dispersion, and impact of the topic. VOSViewer compared keyword co-occurrence networks between 1952–1999 and 2000–2022. Results Four hundred twelve articles met inclusion and exclusion criteria. The most studied predictors were age, education, and sex. There were a greater number of studies/projects focusing on adults than children. The Verbal Fluency Test (12.7%) was the most studied test, and the most frequently used variable selection strategy was linear regression (49.5%). Regression-based approaches were widely used, whereas the traditional approach was still used. ND were presented mostly in percentiles (44.2%). Bibliometrics showed exponential growth in publications. Three journals (2.41%) were in the Core Zone. VOSViewer results showed small nodes, long distances, and four ND-related topics from 1952 to 1999, and there were larger nodes with short connections from 2000 to 2022, indicating topic spread. Conclusions Future studies should be conducted on children’s ND, and alternative statistical methods should be used over the widely used regression approaches to address limitations and support growth of the field.
... and internationally through Latin America and Spain(Benito-Sanchez et al., 2020a, b; Benito-Sanchez et al., 2020a, b;Calderon-Rubio et al., 2021;Inesta et al., 2021;Rivera et al., 2019Rivera et al., , 2021. ...
Article
Full-text available
Much attention in the field of clinical neuropsychology has focused on adapting to the modern healthcare environment by advancing telehealth and promoting technological innovation in assessment. Perhaps as important (but less discussed) are advances in the development and interpretation of normative neuropsychological test data. These techniques can yield improvement in diagnostic decision-making and treatment planning with little additional cost. Brooks and colleagues (Can Psychol 50: 196–209, 2009) eloquently summarized best practices in normative data creation and interpretation, providing a practical overview of norm development, measurement error, the base rates of low scores, and methods for assessing change. Since the publication of this seminal work, there have been several important advances in research on development and interpretation of normative neuropsychological test data, which may be less familiar to the practicing clinician. Specifically, we provide a review of the literature on regression-based normed scores, item response theory, multivariate base rates, summary/factor scores, cognitive intraindividual variability, and measuring change over time. For each topic, we include (1) an overview of the method, (2) a rapid review of the recent literature, (3) a relevant case example, and (4) a discussion of limitations and controversies. Our goal was to provide a primer for use of normative neuropsychological test data in neuropsychological practice.
... TMT-A simple is a simple random number sequence from 1 to 8. TMT-A complex is a random assortment of numbers between 1 and 25. TMT-B simple is a random combination of alphabet letters from A to D and numbers from 1 to 4. TMT-B complex is a random combination of alphabet letters from A to L and numbers from 1 to 12 [67]. The participants were instructed to look at the ascending numbers in TMT-A and the ascending combination of numbers and alphabet letters in TMT-B. ...
Article
Full-text available
The growing number of people with cognitive impairment will significantly increase healthcare demand. Screening tools are crucial for detecting cognitive impairment due to a shortage of mental health experts aiming to improve the quality of life for those living with this condition. Eye tracking is a powerful tool that can provide deeper insights into human behavior and inner cognitive processes. The proposed Eye-Tracking-Based Trail-Making Test, ETMT, is a screening tool for monitoring a person's cognitive function. The proposed system utilizes a fuzzy-inference system as an integral part of its framework to calculate comprehensive scores assessing visual search speed and focused attention. By employing an adaptive neuro-fuzzy-inference system, the tool provides an overall cognitive-impairment score, allowing psychologists to assess and quantify the extent of cognitive decline or impairment in their patients. The ETMT model offers a comprehensive understanding of cognitive abilities and identifies potential deficits in various domains. The results indicate that the ETMT model is a potential tool for evaluating cognitive impairment and can capture significant changes in eye movement behavior associated with cognitive impairment. It provides a convenient and affordable diagnosis, prioritizing healthcare resources for severe conditions while enhancing feedback to practitioners.
... TMT-A simple is a simple random number sequence from 1 to 8. TMT-A complex is a random assortment of numbers between 1 and 25. TMT-B simple is a random combination of alphabet letters from A to D and numbers from 1 to 4. TMT-B complex is a random combination of alphabet letters from A to L and numbers from 1 to 12 [67]. The participants were instructed to look at the ascending numbers in TMT-A and the ascending combination of numbers and alphabet letters in TMT-B. ...
Article
Full-text available
The growing number of people with cognitive impairment will significantly increase healthcare demand. Screening tools are crucial for detecting cognitive impairment due to a shortage of mental health experts aiming to improve the quality of life for those living with this condition. Eye tracking is a powerful tool that can provide deeper insights into human behavior and inner cognitive processes. The proposed Eye-Tracking-Based Trail-Making Test, ETMT, is a screening tool for monitoring a person’s cognitive function. The proposed system utilizes a fuzzy-inference system as an integral part of its framework to calculate comprehensive scores assessing visual search speed and focused attention. By employing an adaptive neuro-fuzzy-inference system, the tool provides an overall cognitive-impairment score, allowing psychologists to assess and quantify the extent of cognitive decline or impairment in their patients. The ETMT model offers a comprehensive understanding of cognitive abilities and identifies potential deficits in various domains. The results indicate that the ETMT model is a potential tool for evaluating cognitive impairment and can capture significant changes in eye movement behavior associated with cognitive impairment. It provides a convenient and affordable diagnosis, prioritizing healthcare resources for severe conditions while enhancing feedback to practitioners.
... Consta de dos subpruebas, en la primera parte (A) intervienen procesos de rastreo visual (unión numérica ascendente), en la segunda parte (B) intervienen, además, procesos de atención alternante (unión ascendente alternando números y letras). Se trata de una prueba ampliamente baremada en población española (Iñesta et al., 2021;Pena-Casanova et al., 2009;Tamayo et al., 2012) mLa medición del tiempo empleado por el sujeto en la realización de la prueba la convierten en una medida sensible de VPI (MacPherson et al., 2017). (Stroop, 1992): Test neuropsicológico orientado a la evaluación de las funciones ejecutivas, como la velocidad de denominación, la inhibición de respuesta, la flexibilidad cognitiva y el control atencional (Williams et al., 1996). ...
Article
Full-text available
Growing evidence indicates that cognitive slowness in fibromyalgia patients constitutes one of the main concerns. This slowing, together with the physical and affective symptomatology that characterises them, significantly affects their quality of life. The main objective of the present study was to design and apply a cognitive training program to test its effects on the improvement of speed processing information (SPI) in fibromyalgia, and how this improvement influences other clinical symptoms in patients with fibromyalgia. 22 patients took part of this rehabilitation program. It consisted of 8 sessions including several types of tasks: cancellation, visual search, association and verbal fluency tasks. Before starting the training program, an individualized neuropsychological assessment of the SPI was performed through standardized tests. Additionally, different self-reported clinical questionnaires were applied to assess physical (pain and fatigue) and affective (anxiety, depression, catastrophic thoughts and impact of the disease on instrumental activities) symptomatology. This evaluation was administered again once the program was completed, as well as five months later, as a follow-up. ANOVAs showed a significant improvement in all neuropsychological assessment tests. In addition, both the depressive states and the impact of the disease on the instrumental activities were improved. These effects remained stable after five months. The application of this neuropsychological rehabilitation program has shown to be effective for improving SPI processes in patients with fibromyalgia. Moreover, this improvement of IPV had a direct impact on depressive symptomatology and instrumental activities of daily living, suggesting a strong relationship between cognitive and affective symptoms in the course of the disease.
Preprint
Norming of psychological tests and scales is decisive for the interpretation of test scores. However, conventional norming methods based on subgroups result either in biases or require very large samples to gather precise norms. Continuous norming methods, namely inferential, semi-parametric, and parametric norming, propose to solve those issues. This paper provides a systematic review of international research on continuous norming and summarizes and describes currently applied continuous norming practices. The review includes 121 publications with overall 189 studies. Most of these studies used inferential norming to compute continuous norms for a specific test and emerged in recent years. Summarizing the literature, we identified open questions such as when to prefer which continuous norming method over another. To address these open questions, we conducted a real data example. We used the Need for Cognition-KIDS scale, a personality questionnaire for elementary school children. Comparing the precision of conventional, semi-parametric, and parametric norms revealed a clear hierarchy in favor of parametric norms. Moreover, bias comparison of conventional and parametric norms showed less bias in parametric norms. Estimating the discrepancies between continuous and conventional norm scores revealed tremendous differences for some individuals.
Article
Full-text available
The linear regression-based reliable change index (RCI) is widely used to identify memory impairments through longitudinal assessment. However, the minimum sample size required for estimates to be reliable has never been specified. Using data from 920 participants from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative data as true parameters, we run 12,000 simulations for samples of size 10–1,000 and analyzed the percentage of times the estimates are significant, their coverage rate, and the accuracy of the models including both the true-positive rate and the true-negative rate. We compared the linear RCI with a logistic RCI for discrete, bounded scores. We found that the logistic RCI is more accurate than the linear RCI overall, with the linear RCI approximating the logistic RCI for samples of size 200 or greater. We provide an R package to compute the logistic RCI, which can be downloaded from the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/LogisticRCI/, and the code to reproduce all results in this article at https://github.com/rafamoral/LogisticRCIpaper/.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: The present study includes two aims: (1) to understand patterns of activity engagement among older Chinese adults; (2) to further investigate associations between activity engagement and cognitive abilities in this population. Methods: Latent class analysis was applied to answer the aforementioned research questions across different age ranges while controlling for confounding variables (age, health, socioeconomic status (SES), and living alone). Specifically, five latent classes (non-active, working-active, comprehensive-active, physical-active, and less-active) were identified. Furthermore, associations between the classes of activity engagement and cognition were examined separately in three age groups: less than 80 years (young-old group), 80-99.5 years (old-old group) and more than 100 years (oldest-old group) of age. Results: Compared with Non-active older individuals, the other classes with a higher probability of engagement in various activities generally showed higher cognitive abilities (including general cognition, orientation, calculation, recall, and language), but not all patterns of active engagement in daily life were positively associated with better cognitive status across different age ranges. In particular, differences in the individuals' cognitive abilities across the four active latent classes were especially obvious in the old-old group as follows: the Comprehensive-active class had higher general cognitive and recall abilities than the other three active classes and higher calculation and language abilities than the Working-active class. In addition, significant sex differences were observed in activity patterns, cognition, and their associations in the young-old and old-old groups. Culture-specific programs should be customized to subgroups of different ages and genders by providing different training or activity modules based on their related dimensions of cognitive decline.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Processing speed, which can be assessed using the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), is central to many brain functions. Processing speed declines with advanced age but substantial impairments are indicative of brain injury or disease. Objective: The purpose of this study was to provide SDMT normative data for older community-dwelling individuals in the U.S. and Australia. Methods: The ASPREE trial recruited 19,114 relatively healthy older men and women in Australia and the U.S. from the general community. All participants were without a diagnosis of dementia and with a Modified Mini-Mental State examination score of 78 or more at enrolment. The SDMT was administered at baseline as part of a neuropsychological test battery. Results: The median age of participants was 74 years (range 65-99), and 56% were women. The median years of education was 12. Ethno-racial differences in SDMT performance were observed and normative data were thus presented separately for 16,289 white Australians, 1,082 white Americans, 891 African-Americans, and 316 Hispanic/Latinos. There were consistent positive associations found between SDMT and education level, and negative associations between SDMT and age. Mean scores for women were consistently higher than men with the exception of Hispanic/Latinos aged ≥70 years. Conclusion: This study provides comprehensive SDMT normative data for whites (Australian and U.S.), Hispanic/Latinos, and African-Americans, according to gender, age, and education level. These norms can be used clinically as reference standards to screen for cognitive impairments in older individuals.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction By participating in the University of the Third Age (U3A), retirees are offered the opportunity for activation and development in the later years of life. However, little is known how certain aspects of healthy aging, such as health-related behavior and subjective health outcomes, differ between U3A students and other older adults not taking part in any form of education. To address this, the aim of the present study was to compare selected aspects of healthy aging in a group of U3A members with older adults not taking part in any form of lifelong learning. The study also establishes relationships between the tested variables and predictors of health behavior. Materials and methods 277 older adults (130 U3A members and 147 non-members) aged 60 to 92 (M = 68.84, SD = 5.32) completed measures of health behavior, self-rated physical health, self-rated sense of own health responsibility and satisfaction with life. Results The U3A attendees presented significantly higher scores for general health behavior and some of its components, and declared higher self-rated health than their peers not affiliated to any educational organization. Self-rated health, responsibility for health and satisfaction with life were positively correlated with general health behavior and most of their categories. but the correlation coefficients differed between both groups. A hierarchical regression model demonstrated the predictive roles of attendance in U3A, sociodemographic and subjective factors in health behavior undertaking. Conclusions The study results may help to identify older adults who should be targeted in interventions aimed at supporting healthy aging.
Article
Full-text available
This paper examines the determinants and policy implications of active and healthy ageing in Sub-Saharan Africa, taking the case of Bamenda, in Cameroon. Specifically, the study sought to identify and explore the determinants of active and healthy ageing using a mixed-methods approach involving qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis. Focus group discussions were conducted complemented by a survey (random and snowball sampling) using a structured questionnaire. Narratives and thematic analysis were used to analyze the data generated from the focus group discussion and Tobit regression was employed to analyze the multiple determinants of active ageing by dimensions and on a global scale in Cameroon. Results identified three key dimensions of active and healthy ageing: employment/livelihood options (EL), community support and health (CH) and housing and living in Bamenda (HL). The regression results reveal gender bias in active ageing, a non-effect of education and health on active ageing, and a positive effect of income on active and healthy ageing. This study contributes, among others, to the competence–environmental press theory on active ageing with regards to unbundling context specific determinants of active and healthy ageing. It equally derives policy considerations with regards to gender mainstreaming and the identification of age friendly income earning options to enhance the active and healthy ageing process.
Article
Objective: the aim of the present work was to develop and validate a recognition task to be used with the Spanish version of the 16-items Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT). Method: ninety-six (67.7% women) cognitively healthy, functionally independent community-dwelling participants aged 55 years or older underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. A recognition task for the FCSRT was developed that included the original 16 items, 16 semantically related items and 8 unrelated foils. Indices of discriminability (d’) and response bias (C), as well as 95% confidence intervals for chance level responding were calculated. Results: on average, our sample was 65.71 years old (standard deviation – SD = 6.68, range: 55-87), had 11.39 years of formal education (SD = 3.37, range: 3-19), and a Mini-Mental State Examination score = 28.42 (SD = 1.49, range: 25-30). Recognition scores did not differ statistically between sexes, nor did they correlate with demographics. Participants scored at ceiling levels (mean number of Hits = 15.52, SD = 0.906, mean number of False Alarms = 0.27, SD = 0.589). All the participants scored above chance levels. Conclusions: normative data from a novel recognition task for the Spanish version of the FCSRT are provided for use in clinical and research settings. Including a recognition task in the assessment of memory functioning might help uncover the pattern of memory impairments in older adults, and can help improve the memory profile of people with amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment. Future research is warranted to validate and expand the recognition task.
Article
Objective: Despite the wide use of the Trail Making Test (TMT), there is a lack of normative data for Spanish speakers living in the USA. Here we describe the development of regional norms for the TMT for native Spanish speakers residing in the Southwest Mexico-Border Region of the USA. Method: Participants were 252 healthy native Spanish speakers, 58% women, from ages 19 to 60, and ranging in education from 0 to 20 years, recruited in San Diego, CA and Tucson, AZ. All completed the TMT in Spanish along with a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery as part of their participation in the Neuropsychological Norms for the US-Mexico Border Region in Spanish (NP-NUMBRS) project. Univariable and interactive effects of demographics on test performance were examined. T-scores were calculated using fractional polynomial equations to account for linear and any non-linear effects of age, education, and sex. Results: Older age and lower education were associated with worse scores on both TMT A and B. No sex differences were found. The newly derived T-scores showed no association with demographic variables and displayed the expected 16% rates of impairment using a -1 SD cut point based on a normal distribution. By comparison, published norms for English-speaking non-Hispanic Whites applied to the current data yielded significantly higher impairment for both TMT A and B with more comparable rates using non-Hispanic African Americans norms. Conclusions: Population-specific, demographically adjusted regional norms improve the utility and diagnostic accuracy of the TMT for use with native Spanish speakers in the US-Mexico Border region.
Article
This article describes the public health impact of Alzheimer's disease (AD), including incidence and prevalence, mortality and morbidity, use and costs of care, and the overall impact on caregivers and society. The Special Report discusses the future challenges of meeting care demands for the growing number of people living with Alzheimer's dementia in the United States with a particular emphasis on primary care. By mid‐century, the number of Americans age 65 and older with Alzheimer's dementia may grow to 13.8 million. This represents a steep increase from the estimated 5.8 million Americans age 65 and older who have Alzheimer's dementia today. Official death certificates recorded 122,019 deaths from AD in 2018, the latest year for which data are available, making Alzheimer's the sixth leading cause of death in the United States and the fifth leading cause of death among Americans age 65 and older. Between 2000 and 2018, deaths resulting from stroke, HIV and heart disease decreased, whereas reported deaths from Alzheimer's increased 146.2%. In 2019, more than 16 million family members and other unpaid caregivers provided an estimated 18.6 billion hours of care to people with Alzheimer's or other dementias. This care is valued at nearly $244 billion, but its costs extend to family caregivers’ increased risk for emotional distress and negative mental and physical health outcomes. Average per‐person Medicare payments for services to beneficiaries age 65 and older with AD or other dementias are more than three times as great as payments for beneficiaries without these conditions, and Medicaid payments are more than 23 times as great. Total payments in 2020 for health care, long‐term care and hospice services for people age 65 and older with dementia are estimated to be $305 billion. As the population of Americans living with Alzheimer's dementia increases, the burden of caring for that population also increases. These challenges are exacerbated by a shortage of dementia care specialists, which places an increasing burden on primary care physicians (PCPs) to provide care for people living with dementia. Many PCPs feel underprepared and inadequately trained to handle dementia care responsibilities effectively. This report includes recommendations for maximizing quality care in the face of the shortage of specialists and training challenges in primary care.
Article
Objective: The Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Letter Number Sequencing subtest (LNS) are two commonly used measures of working memory. Demographic variables (age, education, ethnicity, etc.) can impact performance on these measures, underscoring the need for demographically adjusted norms. We aimed to develop normative data for the PASAT and LNS for Spanish-speaking adults living in the U.S.-Mexico border region as part of a larger normative effort. Method: Participants were native Spanish-speakers from the Neuropsychological Norms for the U.S. Mexico Border Region in Spanish (NP-NUMBRS) project. Two hundred and forty-nine participants completed the PASAT and 202 participants completed LNS. Ages ranged from 19 to 60 and education from 0 to 20 years. Results: Older age was associated with lower scores on LNS (p < .01) but not PASAT. Lower education was associated with lower scores on both tests (ps < .001). Women obtained lower raw scores than men on PASAT (ps < .003), and there were no significant main effects of gender on LNS raw scores. Raw-to-scaled score conversions were calculated, and fractional polynomial equations were developed to calculate demographically-adjusted T-scores accounting for age, education, and gender. Published norms for English-speaking non-Hispanic Whites substantially overestimated rates of impairment (defined as T-score < 40) on both the PASAT and LNS. Conclusions: The use of the population-specific normative data may improve detection of working memory dysfunction in U.S. Spanish-speaking adults and contribute to improved diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning in this population. Whether the norms generalize to U.S. Spanish-speakers from other countries remains to be determined.
Article
Objective: The Face-Name Associative Memory Exam (FNAME) has been used to detect subtle cognitive changes in clinically normal older adults at increased risk for Alzheimer’s disease. FNAME assesses learning and delayed recall for face-name pairs. The aim of this study is to introduce a Latin American Spanish version of the FNAME (LAS-FNAME), examine its psychometric properties, and provide preliminary normative data in a sample of clinically normal, Spanish-speaking individuals from Antioquia, Colombia. Method: 59 clinically-normal individuals (71% females) were recruited by the Grupo de Neurociencias in Antioquia (Colombia). Age ranged from 27 to 82 years (M = 50.31, SD = 15.32) and years of education ranged from 2 to 17 years (M = 9.02, SD = 4.11). All participants completed the LAS-FNAME and a brief neuropsychological evaluation. We examined associations between age, education, and sex and performance on the LAS-FNAME. Internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity were also assessed. Test-restest reliability was computed for a subset of participants (n = 32). Results: LAS-FNAME exhibited moderate convergent validity with other memory measures (Free and Cued Selective Reminding Scale, rs=.465, p<.01; Wechsler Memory Scale III - Logical Memory Delayed Recall, rs=.479, p<.01). The subscales of the LAS-FNAME exhibited adequate internal consistency (α=.825). Test-retest reliability analyses demonstrated consistency of scores over time. Normative data was stratified by age (<50, 50–65, >65) and low and high educational attainment (≤8 and >8 years of education, respectively). Conclusions: The LAS-FNAME is a valid and reliable measure to assess memory in clinically normal, Spanish-speaking individuals from Colombia for clinical and research purposes.