Content uploaded by Javier Oltra-Cucarella
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Javier Oltra-Cucarella on Sep 22, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,9958.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18199958www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph
Article
Regression‐BasedNormativeDataforIndependentand
CognitivelyActiveSpanishOlderAdults:DigitSpan,Letters
andNumbers,TrailMakingTestandSymbolDigit
ModalitiesTest
ClaraIñesta
1
,JavierOltra‐Cucarella
1,2,
*,BeatrizBonete‐López
1,2
,EvaCalderón‐Rubio
1
andEstherSitges‐Maciá
1,2
1
SABIEX,UniversidadMiguelHernándezdeElche,Avda.delaUniversidad,03207Elche,Spain;
clara.inesta@goumh.umh.es(C.I.);bbonete@umh.es(B.B.‐L.);eva.calderon@goumh.umh.es(E.C.‐R.);
esther.sitges@umh.es(E.S.‐M.)
2
DepartmentofHealthPsychology,MiguelHernandezUniversityofElche,03202Elche,Spain
*Correspondence:joltra@umh.es
Abstract:Inthiswork,wedevelopednormativedatafortheneuropsychologicalassessmentofin‐
dependentandcognitivelyactiveSpanisholderadultsover55yearsofage.Method:Regression‐
basednormativedatawerecalculatedfromasampleof103non‐depressedindependentcommu‐
nity‐dwellingadultsaged55orolder(67%women).RawdataforDigitSpan(DS),LettersandNum‐
bers(LN),theTrailMakingTest(TMT),andtheSymbolDigitModalitiesTest(SDMT)werere‐
gressedonage,sex,andeducation.ThemodelpredictingTMT‐BscoresalsoincludedTMT‐A
scores.Z‐scoresforthediscrepancybetweenobservedandpredictedscoreswereusedtoidentify
lowscores.ThebaserateoflowscoresforSABIEXnormativedatawascomparedtothebaserate
oflowscoresusingpublishednormativedataobtainedfromthegeneralpopulation.Results:The
effectsofage,sex,andeducationvariedacrossneuropsychologicalmeasures.Althoughthepropor‐
tionoflowscoreswassimilarbetweennormativedatasets,therewasnoagreementintheidentifi‐
cationofcognitivelyimpairedindividuals.Conclusions:Normativedataobtainedfromthegeneral
populationmightnotbesensitivetoidentifylowscoresincognitivelyactiveolderadults,incor‐
rectlyclassifyingthemascognitivelynormalcomparedtotheless‐activepopulation.Weprovidea
friendlycalculatorforuseinneuropsychologicalassessmentincognitivelyactiveSpanishpeople
aged55orolder.
Keywords:cognitivelyactive;cognitiveimpairment;neuropsychologicalassessment;normative
data;olderadults
1.Introduction
Thepopulationaged65yearsorolderisexpectedtoriseworldwideinthecoming
decades.TheUnitedNations[1]predictedanincreasefrom9%in2020toaround16%in
2050.AsreportedbytheEurostatdatabase,20%ofpeopleinEuropeareaged65orolder
andthispercentageisestimatedtoincreaseto30%by2070.AccordingtotheSpanish
NationalStatisticsInstitute[2],Spainisoneofthecountrieswiththehighestrateofolder
peopleinEurope,with18.58%ofpeopleaged65yearsorolder.
Sinceageisthemainriskfactorfordementia[3,4],theincreaseintheproportionof
olderpeopleisassociatedwithanincreaseintheincidenceandprevalenceofcognitive
impairmentanddementia[5,6].Thenumberofpeoplelivingwithdementiaworldwide
iscurrentlyestimatedat50million,withdementiabeingtheleadingcauseofdisability
anddependenceduringaging[7].Arecentmeta‐analysisreporteda12.4%prevalenceof
dementiainEuropeand5–9%inSpaininpeopleolderthan65[8].Previousresearchhas
foundthatpeoplediagnosedwithMildCognitiveImpairment(MCI)areatahigherrisk
Citation:Iñesta,C.;Oltra‐Cucarella,
J
.;Bonete‐López,B.;Calderón‐Rubio,
E.;Sitges‐Maciá,E.Regression‐Based
NormativeDataforIndependent
andCognitivelyActiveSpanish
OlderAdults:DigitSpan,Letters
andNumbers,TrailMakingTest
andSymbolDigitModalitiesTest.
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,
18,9958.https://doi.org/
10.3390/ijerph18199958
AcademicEditor:PaulB.
Tchounwou
Received:29July2021
Accepted:18September2021
Published:22September2021
Publisher’sNote:MDPIstaysneu‐
tralwithregardtojurisdictional
claimsinpublishedmapsandinstitu‐
tionalaffiliations.
Copyright:©2021bytheauthor.
LicenseeMDPI,Basel,Switzerland.
Thisarticleisanopenaccessarticle
distributedunderthetermsand
conditionsoftheCreativeCommons
Attribution(CCBY)license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses
/by/4.0/).
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,99582of18
ofdevelopingdementia[9].Thus,intheabsenceofeffectivepharmacologicalandnon‐
pharmacologicaltreatmentsfordementia[10–12],earlydetectionofcognitiveimpairment
duringaginghasbecomeamajorresearchtopic.
Neuropsychologicalassessmentisessentialtoidentifypathologicalcognitive
changesduringaging[13,14].Standardizedtestsareadministeredinordertoassessthe
functioningofdifferentcognitivedomainssuchasattention,memory,language,
visuospatialabilities,andexecutivefunctions.Performanceisinterpretedbycomparing
individuals’scoreswithscoresfromareferencegroup[13].Asrawscoresincognitive
testsareaffectedbydemographicvariablessuchasage,sex,oreducationallevel[15–17],
normativedataareusedtotransformthemintorelativemeasurescorrectedfortheinflu‐
enceofthesevariables[16,18]andtoprovideaframeworkinwhichthesesscorescanbe
locatedandinterpreted.Thus,selectingappropriatenormativedatasetsisnecessaryfor
accuratelyinterpretingtheresultsoftheneuropsychologicalassessment,andforreducing
theprobabilityoffalsediagnosesofcognitiveimpairment[15,19].
Differentapproachestodevelopingnormativedatahavebeenreported.Thesimplest
procedureisbasedonthetests’scoredistributiontogeneratenormsfromthemeansand
standarddeviations.Thisstrategycanbeusedwiththeentiresampleorstratifyingthe
samplebyage[20,21],sex[22],andeducation[20,21,23].Meansandstandarddeviations
withineachsubgroupareusedtotransformrawscoresintoeasilyinterpretablemeasures
suchasZscores,T‐scores,scaledscores,orpercentileranks[22].Thismethodhassome
limitations:First,itisbasedonaseriesofarbitrarystrata[24],assumingwhichperson
variablesarepredictiveofthetestscore;second,theestimatedpopulationmeansandvar‐
iancescanbelessreliablewhendividingthesampleintosubgroupsthanusingthewhole
sample[25].Amoreadvancedproceduretodevelopnormativedataisusingmultiple
linearregressionmodelstoestimateanindividual’spredictedlevelofperformance,based
onsociodemographicvariablessuchasage,sex,andeducation.Thedifferencebetween
thepredictedandtheobservedscore(residualvalues)isthenstandardizedandinter‐
preted[26–28].AdifferentprocedureforclinicalclassificationistheReceiverOperating
Characteristiccurve(ROC)analysis,whichisusedtodeterminethecut‐offscorewiththe
optimalbalancebetweensensitivityandspecificity[29,30].TheareaundertheROCcurve
(AUC)offersanindexofthetest’soveralldiscriminationaccuracy,withvaluescloseto1
suggestingahighdiagnosticaccuracy.
1.1.ActiveAging
Althoughbrainchangesduringnormalagingentailchangesinsomecognitiveabili‐
ties[31],certainactivitiesareconsideredprotectivefactorsagainstcognitivedecline,such
ascontinuedlearningandengagementinsociallyandcognitivelystimulatingactivities
duringaging[32,33].Thisprotectivelinkismostlyattributedtoanincreasedcognitive
reserve,whichcompensatesforbrainchangesinnormalaginganddelaystheclinicalex‐
pressionofcognitiveimpairmentdespiteunderlyingbrainpathologycausedbyneuro‐
degenerativeprocesses[34,35].Supportingthesehypotheses,frequentparticipationin
cognitiveactivitieshasbeenassociatedwithslowerlate‐lifecognitivedecline[36]anda
reducedriskofdevelopingMCIanddementia[37].
Asaresponsetothechallengesofpopulationaging,theconceptandpoliciesof“Ac‐
tiveAging”emerged.TheActiveAgingFrameworkpromotestheoptimizationofoppor‐
tunitiesforhealth,participation,andsecuritywiththeaimofimprovingthequalityoflife
aspeopleage[38,39].Thisnotionemphasizestheimportanceofanactivelifestyleandthe
benefitsoflife‐longlearning[40,41].Fromthisperspective,universityprogramsforsen‐
iors(UPS)havebecomeanimportantresourceforincreasingopportunitiesforactiveag‐
ing,improvingseveralaspectssuchashealth,psychologicalwell‐being,cognitivefunc‐
tioning,autonomymaintenance,andsocialparticipation[41–43].Inrecentdecades,UPS
havespreadworldwide[40,44]andhavepromptedanincreaseinthenumberofolder
adultsthatundertakeuniversitycourses.InSpain,accordingtotheStateAssociationof
UniversityProgramsforOlderAdults(AEPUM),thenumberofadultsaged55orolder
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,99583of18
enrollingintheseprogramsincreasedfrom23,000duringthe2005–2006academicyearto
63,173in2018–2019(https://www.aepumayores.org/)(accessedon20June,2021).
Olderpeoplewhoparticipateinuniversitycoursesliveindependentlyintheireve‐
rydaylifeandseekcontinuedpersonaldevelopmentandsocialinteractionsthroughthese
educationalprograms[45].Ithasbeenreportedthatthemotivationstoattendthesepro‐
gramsaretofeelactive,toinvestinpersonaldevelopment,andtogainnewknowledge
andsocialcontacts[45,46].TheevidencealsosuggeststhatindividualswhoengageinUPS
arecognitivelymoreactivethansame‐agepeopleinthegeneralpopulation.Thetendency
toengageinthesecourseshasbeenrelatedtoalargernumberofindividualandcommu‐
nity‐basedactivepractices.Thus,cognitivelyactivepeoplereadmorefrequently,domore
physicalexercise,attendmoreculturalevents,andparticipatemoreinsocialactivities
[42,47].
Ithasbeenreportedthatcognitivelystimulatingactivitiesinmid‐life[48]andlate
life[49]contributetocognitivereserveindependentlyofeducation.Christensenetal.[50]
foundthatthelevelofactivityineverydaylifeinfluencedcognitiveperformanceandac‐
countedforagreaterproportionofvarianceinolderpeople’scognitivefunctioningthan
thelevelofeducation.Inlinewiththeseresults,inapost‐mortemstudy,Reedetal.[51]
foundthatcognitiveactivitiesduringadulthoodhaveahigherinfluencethanthelevelof
educationindeterminingcognitivereserve.Thus,activeagingisrelatedtoaseriesof
practicesineverydaylifethatdiffersfromsame‐ageadultsfromthegeneralpopulation,
contributingtoahighercognitivereservethatmaypreserveorenhancetheircognitive
function.
1.2.ActiveAgingandNeuropsychologicalAssessment
Thereisevidencesuggestingthatactiveolderadults’lifestyleswillaffectperfor‐
manceonneuropsychologicalassessmentirrespectiveofyearsofformaleducation.Active
olderpeoplearelikelytooutperformnon‐activeindividualsoncognitivetests[50,52].
Eventhoughnormativedataaredemographicallycorrectedbyeducation,theydonot
accountforthecharacteristicsofactiveaging,andtherefore,theymightbelesssensitive
foridentifyingcognitiveimpairmentamongcognitivelyactiveolderadultswithhigher
performancelevels.Totheauthors’knowledge,therearenonormativedataforSpanish
activeolderadults.Thisimpliesthatactiveolderadultsmightpresentadiagnosticchal‐
lengeinconditionssuchascognitiveimpairmentandAD,aspathologicalchangesmight
goundetectedintheneuropsychologicalassessment.Tofillthatgap,thisstudydeveloped
normativedataontheassessmentofattention,processingspeed,andworkingmemory
throughfourcognitivetestswidelyusedaspartoftheneuropsychologicalassessment.
TheDigitspanforward(DSF)andbackward(DSB)[53]aretwofrequentlyused
measuresofattentionandworkingmemory.TheSpanisheditionoftheWAIS‐IIIincludes
normativedataforSpanishindividuals.Therearealsonormativedataofthistestforsub‐
jectsover50inSpainwithintheNEURONORMAProject[54].Somestudieswithhealthy
controlsandMCIandADpatientshavereportedtheeffectivenessofbothsubteststo
identifysubtleimpairmentsandtodetectMCI[55],andtodifferentiatepeoplewithMCI
andAD[56].Lortieetal.[57]foundthatindividualswithMCIdeclinedinperformance
over6months,suggestingthatbothsubtestsareareliablemeasureformonitoringthe
diseaseprogression.Thebackwarddigitspansubtesthasalsobeenreportedtobeakey
variablediscriminatingbetweendementiasubtypessuchasADandDementiawithLewy
Bodies[58].
TheLettersandNumberssubtest[53]isusedasameasureofworkingmemory.Some
studiesprovidednormativedataforthistestinSpain[54]andLatinAmerica[59]with
adultsfromthegeneralpopulation.Kesseletal.[60]foundthatMCIandADpatients
performedworseonthissubtestcomparedwithhealthycontrols.Worseperformancein
ADcomparedwithMCIpatientswasalsorevealed,meaningitissuitabletodifferentiate
peoplewithMCIandAD.
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,99584of18
TheSymbolDigitModalitiesTest(SDMT)[61]isusedasameasureofinformation
processingspeed.Normsobtainedwithhealthyadultsfromthegeneralpopulationhave
beenpublishedinSpain[54]andinLatinAmerica[62].Smithalsoincludednormative
datainSpanishforanagerangeof18to85yearsfortwoschoolinggroups[61].Perfor‐
manceontheSDMTisasignificantpredictorofconversionfromcognitivelynormalto
MCI[63]andofprogressionfromMCItoAD[64].Itisalsooneofthemostcommonly
usedtestsintheassessmentofMultipleSclerosis[65],Huntington’sDisease[66],andPar‐
kinson’sdisease[67].
TheTrailMakingTest(TMT)[68]iswidelyusedasameasureofattentionandpro‐
cessingspeed[15].TMTnormativedatahavebeenreportedforadultsover50inSpain
withintheNEURONORMAProject[54]andforadultsaged18–95inLatinAmerica[69].
TheTMTisusedtoscreenforneurodegenerativediseasesinolderadults,suchasAlz‐
heimer’sDisease[70],Parkinson’sDisease[71],andHuntington’sdisease[72].Bothparts
AandBaresensitivetothedetectionofbothprogressivecognitiveimpairmentandde‐
mentia[19,73].
Becausethelikelihoodofdiagnosticerrorsamongactiveolderadultscouldpoten‐
tiallyincreasebyusingnormsobtainedfromthegeneralpopulation,normativedata
adaptedtothespecificcharacteristicsofthispopulationareneeded.Thus,theaimofthis
studyistoprovidenormativedataforthesefourcommonlyusedneuropsychological
testswithasampleofcognitivelyactiveSpanisholderadultswhoattenduniversity
courses.Sincethecognitivelyactivepopulationhashighercognitiveperformanceinde‐
pendentlyofageandyearsofeducation,thehypothesisisthattheywillobtainalower
rateoflowscoresusingnormativedatafromthegeneralpopulationthanwithnormative
dataobtainedfromthecognitivelyactiveolderpopulation.
2.MaterialsandMethods
2.1.Participants
Thisisacross‐sectionalobservationalstudywithcognitivelyhealthyindividualsliv‐
ingindependentlyinthecommunity.Voluntaryparticipantswererecruitedconsecutively
fromtheUniversityforSeniors(SABIEX)attheUniversidadMiguelHernándezdeElche
(Spain)fromOctober2019toJuly2021.SABIEXisacomprehensiveprogramforthepro‐
motionofactiveandhealthyagingandincludesanacademicuniversityprogramforpeo‐
pleaged55yearsorolder,coveringtopicssuchaseconomics,physiology,sociology,pol‐
itics,arts,amongothers,aswellasthepossibilityofparticipatingindifferentactivities
suchasseminars,voluntarywork,theaterworkshops,andradioprograms.
Inclusioncriteriaforparticipationwere(a)being55yearsoldorolder,(b)beingcog‐
nitivelynormal(CN)withoutsubjectivecognitivecomplaints,and(c)livinginde‐
pendentlyinthecommunity.ParticipantswereclassifiedasCNiftheyhada)Mini‐Mental
StateExamination[74]scoreshigherthan23,(b)ClinicalDementiaRatingscale[75]scores
equalto0,and(c)InstrumentalActivitiesofDailyLiving[76]scores7orhigher.Exclusion
criteriawerea)unwillingnesstoparticipateintheneuropsychologicalassessment,and(b)
thepresenceofvisionand/orhearingimpairmentsthatmighthaveimpededtheadmin‐
istrationofcognitivetests.Participantswerenotexcludedbasedonahistoryofmedical
conditions(e.g.,diabetes,highbloodpressure,cancer,psychiatricdisorders,metabolic
disease)inordertoassurethatthesampleisrepresentativeofthepopulationofpeople
over54yearsinSpain[77,78].AllparticipantswerebornandraisedinSpainandhad
Spanishastheirfirstlanguage.
2.2.Procedure
Participantswereinvitedtoparticipatevoluntarilyintheneuropsychologicalassess‐
mentandwereassessedindividuallybyaboard‐certifiedclinicalneuropsychologist(JO‐
C)andtrainedundergraduateandmaster’sorPhDdegreestudents.Theneuropsycho‐
logicalassessmentwasperformedinonesessionandtookapproximately90min.
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,99585of18
Participantssignedtheinformedconsentpriortoenrollmentandprovidedpersonaland
familyhealthhistory.Personaldatawerecodedanonymously.Thisprojectwasapproved
bytheUMHEthicsCommittee(DPS.ESM.01.19).
Asociodemographicquestionnairewascreatedforthisprojecttocollectdataongen‐
der,age,yearsofformaleducation,residencezone(rural,urban),civilstatus,household
context,andmedicalhistory.Theneuropsychologicaltestsincludedinthisworkwere
administeredaspartofalargerneuropsychologicalassessmentcoveringseveralcognitive
domains.Thetestswereadministeredinapre‐establishedordersothattherewasnoin‐
terferencebetweendifferenttasks(e.g.,interactionbetweenlanguageandverbalmemory
tasks).Thetestsincludedintheneuropsychologicalassessmenthavebeenpreviouslyde‐
scribed[79].Wecalculatednormativedatawithmorethan100participantsbecauseusing
linearregressionmodelswithasamplesizegreaterthan100andz≤−1.28givesanumber
oftruepositiveandtruenegativesaroundthe95%confidenceinterval[80].
2.3.Materials
Subjectivecognitivecomplaintsandgeneralcognitivefunctioningwereassessed
withtheCDRscaleandtheMMSE,respectively.Depressivesymptomswereassessed
withtheYessavageGeriatricDepressionScale[81](GDS).
AttentionandworkingmemorywereassessedwiththeDigitSpanForward(DSF)
andbackward(DSB),andLettersandNumbers(LN)subtestsfromtheWechslerAdult
IntelligenceScale—3rdedition[53],andtheTrailMakingTestPartB[68].Speedofpro‐
cessinginformationwasassessedwiththeTMTPartA(TMT‐A)andthewrittenversion
oftheSymbolDigitModalitiesTest[82].Thesetestswereadministeredintheorderpre‐
viouslydescribed.
2.3.1.DigitSpanForwardandBackward
IntheDSFtest,theexamineeisrequestedtorepeataseriesofnumbersindirector‐
der.IntheDSBtest,theexamineeisrequestedtorepeataseriesofnumbersinreverse
order.Inthisstudy,theoutcomevariableswerethelongestseriesrecalled,i.e.,themaxi‐
mumnumberofdigitscorrectlyrepeated(spanscore)withoutanyerrorinoneofthetwo
trials.FortheDSF,themaximumrawscoreis9,andforDSB,itis8.
2.3.2.LettersandNumbers
TheLNtestrequiresaseriesoflettersandnumbersofincreasinglengthtobere‐
peated.Theindividualisreadthecombinationofnumbersandlettersinrandomorder
andinstructedtorepeatbackthenumbersfirst,inascendingorder,followedbytheletters
inalphabeticorder.Thestudyvariablewasthelongestseriesrecalled,foramaximumof
8items.
2.3.3.TrailMakingTest
TheTMTconsistsoftwoparts(TMT‐AandTMT‐B).TMT‐Acontainscirclesnum‐
beredfrom1to25randomlyarrangedonasheetofpaper.Theparticipantisrequiredto
drawalineconnectingthecirclesinascendingorder.TMT‐Bcontainsnumbersfrom1to
13andlettersfromAtoL.Theparticipantisrequiredtoconnectthecirclesalternating
betweennumbersandlettersinascendingorder.Participantsareinstructedtocomplete
bothpartsasfastaspossiblewhilemaintainingaccuracy.Theerrorswerepointedout
immediatelybytheexaminerandcorrectedbytheparticipant.Theoutcomevariablewas
thetimetakentocompletethetasksinseconds.
2.3.4.SymbolDigitModalitiesTest
Inthistest,akeyboxwith2rowsispresentedatthetopofthepagewith9unique
symbolsassociatedwith9uniquesymbols.Onehundredandtwentysymbolsarethen
shown,eachwithablankspaceunderneath.Theparticipantisrequiredtoconsecutively
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,99586of18
fillineachblankwiththenumberthatmatcheseachsymbolasfastaspossible.After10
practiceitems,theparticipantcontinuesthetaskfor90s.Thissubtestwasadministered
accordingtothestandardproceduresdescribedinthetestmanual[82].Theoutcomevar‐
iablewasthenumberofcorrectresponses,andthemaximumscoreis110.
2.4.StatisticalAnalyses
2.4.1.CalculationofNormativeData
Theregression‐basednormativedatawerecalculatedusingage,sex,andeducation
aspredictorsandrawscoresasoutcomesforeachvariable.Thelinearregressionmodel
canbewrittenas
𝑌 𝛼𝛽
∗𝑋
𝛽
∗𝑋
⋯𝛽
∗𝑋
∈𝑁0,1,(1)
whereY’isthepredictedscore,𝛼istheintercept,𝑋isthescoreofvariablei,and𝛽is
thebetacoefficientassociatedwithvariablei.Theintercept(𝛼)indicatesthevalueofthe
responsevariablewhenallthepredictorsareequalto0,whereasthebetacoefficientsin‐
dicatethemeanchangeintheresponsevariablefora1‐unitincreaseinthepredictorwhile
holdingconstanttherestofthepredictors.Becauseageandeducationinoursampledid
nothavevaluesof0,wefirsttransformedboththeageandeducationvariablesforthe
intercepttobeinterpretable.Wetransformeddataonageandeducationforeachpartici‐
pant,takingthelowervalueinthedistributionasreference(seeTable1fordescriptive
statistics).Thus,iftheminimumageinthesampleis55,theageofaparticipantaged60
wasrecodedas5.ThesetransformedvariablesarereferredtoasAgeMinandEducationMin
throughoutthemanuscript.Sex,AgeMin,andEducationMinwereincludedaspredictorsin
thefirststepinaforwardmultiplelinearregressionmodel.Thesecondandthirdsteps
addedthequadraticAgeMinandEducationMinandthecubicAgeMinandEducationMin,re‐
spectively,soastoanalyzepossiblecurvilinearrelationships.Thisprocedurewasused
forpredictingeachofthe6variablesindependently.
Table1.DemographicstatisticsandperformanceonMMSE,IADL,andGDS.
VariableMSDRange
Age65.766.56755–87
Education11.443.4633–22
MMSE28.481.48125–30
IADL7.990.0997–8
GDS4.323.3550–14
M:mean,SD:standarddeviation.
Assomevariablesintheneuropsychologicalbatteryarenotindependentofeach
other,normativedatacalculatedindependentlymightbemisleadingifrelevantinfor‐
mationisnotincludedinthemodel.ThisisthecasefortheTMT‐B,whosescoresarenot
independentofscoresontheTMT‐A.Toillustratethedependencyofscores,iftwoindi‐
vidualsscore120sontheTMT‐B,thisscorecorrespondstoanaverageperformance(e.g.,
z‐score=0).IndividualAobtainsaz‐score=1.5ontheTMT‐A,whereasindividualB
obtainsaz‐score=0ontheTMT‐A.Reasonably,anaveragescoreontheTMT‐Bcannotbe
interpretedthesamewayforanindividualwithhigh‐levelperformanceontheTMT‐A
comparedtoanindividualwithaverageperformanceontheTMT‐A.AlthoughTMT‐B
scoresaresimilarforbothindividuals,TMT‐BscoresforindividualAarelikelyshowing
agreaterdeclinecomparedtoTMT‐BscoresforindividualB.Toimprovetheinterpreta‐
tionofscores,itisnecessarytoknowhowfrequentitwouldbetoshowsuchadeclinein
theTMT‐BaccordingtoscoresontheTMT‐A.Forthisreason,wecalculatednormative
datafortheTMT‐BwitharegressionmodelincludingthesamepredictorsplusTMT‐A
scores,whichwillbereferredtoasTMT‐BSABIEX,inordertodifferentiatethesenormative
datafromtheTMT‐BnormativedatacalculatedindependentlyoftheTMT‐A.SinceTMT‐
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,99587of18
Ascoresdidnothaveavalueof0,thisvariablewasfirsttransformedfortheinterceptto
beinterpretablebytakingthelowervalueinthedistributionasareference.Thetrans‐
formedvariablewillbereferredtoasTMT‐Aminthroughoutthemanuscript.
2.4.2.ComparingNormativeDataSets
Toanalyzewhethernormativedataforcognitivelyactiveolderindividualsprovide
differentdatacomparedtonormativedataobtainedinthegeneralpopulation,wecom‐
paredthenumberoflowscoresshownbyoursamplewhenusingeithertheSABIEXor
theNEURONORMAnormativedata.TheNEURONORMAnormativedataweredevel‐
opedwithindividualsrecruitedinthegeneralpopulation[83],andprovideage‐,sex‐,and
education‐correctedScaledScores(SS).UnlikeSABIEXnormativedata,whichprovide
residualz‐scores,NEURONORMAnormativedataprovideSStointerpretperformance,
whichlimitstheselectionofacut‐offpointtodefinelowscores.Toavoidusingdifferent
scales,lowscoreswereidentifiedasSSequaltoorlowerthan6usingNEURONORMA,
andasz‐scoresequaltoorlowerthan−1.28usingSABIEXnormativedata.Individuals
werelabelledasshowinglowscoreswhenshowingatleastonelowscoreasdefined
above.
Asthesameindividualswerecategorizedasshowinglowscoresbasedonboth
SABIEXandNEURONORMAnormativedata,theMcNemartest(correctedforcontinu‐
ity)forrelatedproportions[84]wasusedtoanalyzewhetherthenumberofindividuals
withoneormorelowscoresdifferedbetweennormativedatasets.Additionally,because
itisimportanttonotonlyknowwhethertheproportionsofindividualslabeledasim‐
paireddiffer,butalsowhetherthesameindividualsshowoneormorelowscoresusing
bothnormativedatasets,theFleiss’kappa[84]interratercorrelationcoefficientforcate‐
goricaldatawasusedtoanalyzethelevelofagreementbetweenSABIEXandNEU‐
RONORMAnormativedata.AccordingtoFleissetal.[84],agreementbeyondchancecan
beinterpretedaspoor,fairtogood,andexcellentforvaluesof0–0.40,0.41–0.75,and>0.75,
respectively.
3.Results
Fromapoolof105consecutiveparticipants,twowerenotincludedbecauseofMMSE
scores<24.Thesamplewascomposedof103participants(69women,67%).Participants’
agerangedfrom55to87andyearsofeducationfrom3to22(notincludingUniversityfor
Seniors).DescriptivestatisticsfordemographicvariablesandMMSE,IADL,andGSD
scoresareprovidedinTable1.Statisticallysignificantdifferenceswerefoundbetween
sexesinage(p=0.003,95%CI=1.43,6.67),withmen(M=68.47;SD=6.50)beingolder
thanwoman(M=64.42;SD=6.22),butnotinyearsofeducation(p=0.583,95%CI=−1.04,
1.85),MMSE(p=0.114,95%CI=−1.10,0.12),IADL(p=0.485,95%CI=−0.03,0.06),orGDS
(p=0.240,95%CI=−2.22,0.56).Mostparticipants(59.2%)weremarriedandwereliving
withanotherperson(72.8%).Atotalof63participants(61.2%)reportedahistoryofmed‐
icalillnesses(Table2)and41(39.8%)werecurrentlytakingmedication.Performanceon
neuropsychologicaltestsisshowninTable3.Therewerenostatisticallysignificantdiffer‐
encesbetweensexesintestsperformance.Nostatisticallysignificantdifferenceswere
foundintestsperformancebetweenparticipantswithorwithoutmedicalhistory(allp’s
>0.05),norbetweenparticipantswhowereorwerenottakingmedication(allp’s>0.05).
Table2.Number(and%)ofparticipantswithmedicalhistory(n=103).
n%
Anxiety1918.4
Depression87.8
Epilepsy21.9
Stroke43.9
CVD1211.7
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,99588of18
Hypo/hipertyroidism76.8
Cancer98.7
DM43.9
HBP1312.6
TBI32.9
COPD11.0
RA21.9
Others1411.7
CVD:Cardiovasculardisease,DM:Diabetesmellitus,HBP:Highbloodpressure,TBI:Traumatic
braininjury,COPD:Chronicobstructivepulmonarydisease,RA:Rheumatoidarthritis,Others:
Opticnervesheathmeningioma,hypercholesterolemia,osteopenia,Chronicvenousinsufficiency,
Dyslipidemia,dyspepsia,Cholecystectomy,Autoimmunehypoglycemia,COVID‐19,Asthma.
Table3.Rawscoresonneuropsychologicaltests.
Neuropsychological
MeasuresMSDRange
DSF(n=103)5.361.1533–9
DSB(n=103)3.940.8732–7
LN(n=102)4.501.1152–8
TMT‐A(n=103)47.7916.24924–140
TMT‐B(n=102)119.0857.80741–345
TMT‐BSABIEX(n=102)119.0857.80741–345
SDMT(n=102)37.199.57116–56
M:Mean,SD:Standarddeviation,DSF:DigitSpanForward,DSB:DigitSpanBackwards,LN:Let‐
tersandNumbers,TMT:TrailMakingTest,SDMT:SymbolDigitModalitiesTest.
3.1.CalculationofNormativeData
Theeffectsofage,sex,andeducationvariedacrossneuropsychologicalmeasures.
ThemultiplelinearregressionmodelsarepresentedinTable4.Regressionanalyses
showedthatagewassignificantlyassociatedwithLN,TMTAandTMT‐BSABIEX,and
SDMT.AgeMin2wassignificantlyrelatedtoTMT‐BandTMT‐BSABIEX.Educationhadsignif‐
icanteffectsonDSF,TMT‐A,TMT‐B,TMT‐BSABIEX,andSDMT.EducationMin2wasassoci‐
atedwithDSB,andsexhadnoeffectontheneuropsychologicaltestsincludedinthispa‐
per.Ofrelevancetothisstudywastheassociationfoundindependenttaskswithinthe
TMT.TheregressionanalysesfortheTMT‐BincludingscoresontheTMT‐A(TMT‐BSABIEX)
showedthatperformanceontheTMT‐Aissignificantlyassociatedwithperformanceon
theTMT‐B.
Table4.Multiplelinearregressionmodels.
ΒSE(β)95%CIpcoeffR2Adjusted
DSFIntercept4.7190.2944.14–5.30<0.001
EducationMin0.0760.0320.01–0.14 0.0210.043
DSBIntercept3.6950.1353.43–3.96<0.001
EducationMin20.0030.0010.00–0.00 0.0220.042
LNIntercept5.0140.2044.61–5.42<0.001
AgeMin−0.0480.16−0.08–−0.02 0.0040.071
TMT‐A Intercept48.6764.5539.66–57.70<0.001
AgeMin0.7410.2320.28–1.200.003
EducationMin−1.0510.440−1.92–−0.18 0.0190.111
TMT‐BIntercept155.35214.001127.57–183.13<0.001
EducationMin−6.0291.523−9.05–−3.00<0.001
AgeMin20.0950.0280.04–0.15 0.0010.177
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,99589of18
TMT‐BSABIEXIntercept122.83617.48788.13–157.54<0.001
TMT‐AMin2.0430.2841.48–2.60<0.001
EducationMin−4.3031.272−6.83–−1.78 0.001
AgeMin20.1910.0670.06–0.32 0.005
AgeMin−4.2111.930−8.04–0.380.0320.456
SDMTIntercept36.5082.43531.68–41.34<0.001
AgeMin−0.6550.124−0.90–−0.41 <0.001
EducationMin0.9130.2350.45–1.38<0.0010.273
DSF:DigitSpanForward,DSB:DigitSpanBackward,LN:LettersandNumbers,TMT:TrailMak‐
ingTest,SDMT:SymbolDigitModalitiesTest, β:Regressioncoefficient,SE(β):Standarderrorofβ,
SEM:Standarderrorofthemeasurement.
Forallmultiplelinearregressionmodels,multicollinearity(varianceinflationfactor
[VIF]≤10)wasevaluated.VIFvaluesinallmodelswerewellbelow10andcollinearity
tolerancevaluesdidnotexceedthevalueof1[85].
3.2.ComparingNormativeDataSets(NEURNORMA‐SABIEX)
UsingNEURONORMAnormativedataandtakingascaledscoreof6orlowerasthe
cutoffforalowscore,30participants(29.70%)hadatleastoneormorelowscoresamong
thefivemeasures.UsingSABIEXnormativedata,withTMT‐AandTMT‐Basindepend‐
entandaz‐score≤−1.28asthecutoffforlowscore,32participants(31.68%)hadatleast
onelowscoreamongthesemeasures(seesupplementarymaterial).Thedifferencewas
notstatisticallysignificant(McNemarχ2(n=101)=0.029,p=0.863).TheFleiss’sKappa
coefficientshowedpooragreementintheindividualslabeledasshowingoneormorelow
scoresusingNEURONORMAandSABIEXdata(k=0.209,p=0.036).
UsingtheSABIEXnormativedatasetwiththeTMT‐BconditionalontheTMT‐A
(TMT‐BSABIEX),30participants(29.70%)showedatleastonelowscore.TheMcNemarTest
showednostatisticallysignificantdifferenceswhencomparedtoNEURONORMA
(McNemarχ2(n=101)=0.031,p=0.859).Again,therewaspooragreementidentifying
lowscoresbetweennormativedatasets(k=0.241,p=0.015).
Thenumberoflowscoresshownbyfewerthan10%ofthesamplewastwoormore
withthethreenormativedatasets:NEURONORMA(7.8%;SS<6),SABIEX(8.7%;z≤
−1.28),andSABIEXtakingtheTMT‐BasconditionalontheTMT‐A(9.9%;z≤−1.28).
MMSEscoreswerecomparedbetweenindividualswithandwithoutlowscores
withineachnormativedataset.UsingSABIEXnormativedata,statisticallysignificantdif‐
ferenceswerefoundontheMMSEscores(p=0.010,95%CI=0.22,1.62)betweenindivid‐
ualsshowingoneormorelowscores(M=28.75;SD=1.40)andthoseshowingnolow
scores(M=27.83;SD=1.64).UsingNEURONORMAnormativedata,therewerenosta‐
tisticallysignificantdifferencesintheMMSEscores(p=0.798,95%CI=−0.62,0.80)be‐
tweenindividualswithoneormorelowscores(M=28.50;SD=1.34)andthosewithno
lowscores(M=28.59;SD=1.50).
3.3.ComparingTrailMakingTest(NEURONORMA‐SABIEX)
Separatedcontrastanalysiswasperformedtocomparetheproportionoflowscores
whenusingtheTMT‐BindependentoftheTMT‐A(TMT‐BNEURONORMA)andtheTMT‐B
conditionalontheTMT‐A(TMT‐BSABIEX)
UsingTMT‐BNEURONORMA,thepercentageoflowscoreswas12.75%,andwithTMT‐
BSABIEX,4.9%.ThecorrectedMcNemartestwasnotstatisticallysignificant(McNemarχ2(n
=102)=2.722,p=0.099),probablybecausenoneoftheindividualsshowedalowscore
withbothnormativedatasets.Interestingly,therewasnoagreementbetweenthetwonor‐
mativedatasets(k=−0.097,p=0.344)whenclassifyingindividualsasshowinglowscores.
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,995810of18
Afriendlycalculatorofz‐scoresforDSF,DSB,LN,SDMT,andTMTisavailablefor
cliniciansandresearchersathttps://drive.google.com/file/d/1p‐RDT6F85EsXPxALV‐
l6R8Sq‐E4qGEr0/view?usp=sharing.
4.Discussion
Thisworkaimedtoprovideregression‐basednormativedatafortheDigits,Letters,
andNumbers,TMT,andSDMTtestsforcognitivelyactiveSpanishadultsaged55or
older.Additionally,andcomparedwithothernormativestudies[69,86],ourstudyintro‐
ducedanovelapproachforthecalculationofnormativedatafortheTMT,thatis,consid‐
eringthedependencyofrelatedtasksbycalculatingnormativedatafortheTMT‐Bcon‐
trollingforscoresontheTMT‐A.
RegardingtheuseoftheSABIEXnormativedatacomparedtonormativedataob‐
tainedfromthegeneralpopulation,ourresultsshowedpooragreementinidentifyinglow
scores.Consideringthisdiscrepancyintheclassificationandthatnormativedatamustbe
adaptedtospecificcharacteristicsofindividualsforadequatescoreinterpretation[15,19],
ourdatasuggestthatusingnormativedataobtainedinthegeneralpopulationforthe
neuropsychologicalassessmentofactiveolderadultsmightbeassociatedwithanincrease
inthenumberofmisdiagnosesbyerroneouslyidentifyinglowscores.
Regardingtheresultsintestscomposedofrelatedmeasures,otherstudieshave
shownthatforanaccurateinterpretationofperformanceintheassessment,itisnecessary
toconsiderthecorrelationamongdifferentmeasures[87,88].Eventhoughamoderate
correlation(r=0.31–0.6)betweenTrailAandBhasbeenreported[15],normativedatafor
theTMTareusuallycalculatedtreatingbothpartsasindependents.Thisworkshowsthat
whenTMT‐BisanalyzedconsideringscoresintrailA(TMT‐BSABIEX),theresultsarediffer‐
entfromthoseobtainedwhentheyareconsideredindependent.Inourstudy,astrong
correlationbetweentrailAandB(r=0.62)wasfound,aswellasasignificantcontribution
ofTMT‐AscoresinthepredictionmodelforTMT‐B.Thisfindingsupportsthatinterpret‐
ingthemasindependentmightincreasethelikelihoodofdiagnosticerrorsintheidentifi‐
cationofcognitiveimpairment.Thisconclusionissupportedbythedataindicatingthat
alltheparticipantsclassifiedasshowingalowscoreontheTMT‐BusingtheNEU‐
RONORMAdatasetareclassifiedasshowingaveragescoresontheTMT‐Bconditional
onTMT‐Ascores(TMT‐BSABIEX).
Thedemographicvariablesincludedinthepredictionmodels(age,sex,andeduca‐
tion)haddifferenteffectsacrosstheneuropsychologicaltestsstudiedinthiswork.Asin
previousworks[27,89],ourstudyincludedquadraticageandeducationintheregression
models,whichallowedustoexplorepossiblenon‐linearassociationsbetweenthesevari‐
ablesandperformanceinthetests.Overall,olderageandlowereducationwereassociated
withworseperformance.Thesefindingsareinlinewithpreviousresearchshowingage‐
relateddecreaseinperformanceandpositiveseffectsofeducationoncognitivefunction
[17,90].ConsistentwiththeresultsreportedbySalthouse[91],thecubictermdidnotpro‐
videadditionalinformationoverthemodelincludingthequadraticterm,whichshowed
thatperformanceworsenedfortheoldestagesandincreasedforthehighestyearsofed‐
ucation.
4.1.DigitSpanForwardandBackwards
Arelationshipbetweenolderageandworseperformance,aswellasapositiveeffect
oflevelofeducation,hasbeenfrequentlyreported[54,92].Intermsofeducation,inline
withpreviousstudies,ourworkconfirmstheexistenceofasignificanteffectofeducation
onbothDSFandDSB[54,93].However,therelationshipbetweeneducationandDSB
showedacurvilinearpattern,andcomparedtootherstudies,theeffectsize[93]wassmall
forbothtests(r2=0.05).Contrarytothepreviousstudies[93,94],wedidnotfindany
effectsofageonthedigitspan.
Thefactthatourresultsdifferfrompreviousstudieswitholderadultsintermsof
ageandtheeffectsizeofeducationisofspecialrelevance.Severalworkshavereporteda
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,995811of18
decreaseinperformanceontheDSbeyond65yearsofageandhavealsofoundthatper‐
formanceontheDSisinfluencedbylevelofeducation[19,93,94].However,ithasbeen
reportedthatfrequentcognitiveactivityisassociatedwithareducedrateofcognitivede‐
clineinolderadults[95].Onepossibleinterpretationisthattheinfluenceofageoncogni‐
tivelyactiveadults’performancemightnotfollowthesamepatternthaninthegeneral
populationand,therefore,specificnormativedataforthesepopulationsareneeded.The
smalleffectsizeforeducationsuggeststhatcognitiveactivitiesduringadulthoodhavea
higherinfluencethanthelevelofeducationindeterminingcognitivereserve[51].
4.2.LettersandNumbers(LN)
Regardingtheeffectsofageonperformance,ourresultsshowanegativelinearrela‐
tionshipbetweenageandLNperformance,withalackofcontributionofquadraticage.
Thesefindingsdisagreewithapreviousstudythatreportedasignificantcurvilinearde‐
creasewithage[96]withasampleofyoungandolderadults.Differencesintheagerange
ofthesample,from55to87inourstudyand18to89inMyersonetal.[96],maybere‐
sponsibleforthevariability.However,consistentwithourresults,inthestudyofMyerson
etal.[96],apronouncedlineardeclinewithageisfoundinindividualsbeyond60com‐
paredtothe20‐to60‐year‐olds.
4.3.TrailMakingTest
Inlinewithpreviousstudies,ourresultsindicatethatbothpartsAandBareassoci‐
atedwithageandeducationallevelbutnotwithsex[54,97,98].Moreover,eveninprevi‐
ousworksreportingstatisticallysignificantassociationsbetweensexandTMT[86]orbe‐
tweensexandTMT‐B[99],theseassociationsweresmall,withsexaccountingforanegli‐
gibleproportionofthevarianceontheTMT(<1%).Somestudiesreportedalinearrela‐
tionshipbetweenageandcompletiontimeinbothparts[86,99].Inourstudy,TMT‐B
scoresareaffectedbythequadratictermofage,suggestingthatperformanceontheTMT‐
Bworsensmoremarkedlyintheoldestpopulation.Besides,ourresultssupportthatparts
AandBshouldnotbetreatedasindependentwheninterpretingperformancesoasto
decreasethelikelihoodoffalsepositivediagnoses.TheTMT‐BSABIEXnormativedatamight
provideclinicallyusefuldataasacomplementtoexistinggeneralpopulation‐based
normsforevaluatingSpanisholderadults.Futureworksshouldbeconductedonclinical
settingstoexaminewhethertheuseofbothnormativedatasetsaddsdifferentandvalua‐
bleinformationintheassessmentofattentionandprocessingspeed.
4.4.SymbolDigitModalitiesTest
Inlinewithpreviousworks,wefoundthatyoungerageandhighereducationwere
significantlyassociatedwithbetterperformanceontheSDMT[54,62,89,100,101].Contrary
toRyan[101]andKiely[100],butinlinewithPeña‐Casanova[54]andArango‐Lasprilla
[62],wedidnotfindasignificanteffectofsex.
Sinceolderpeoplehaveanincreasedriskofcognitiveimpairment[102],theavaila‐
bilityofappropriateandreliablenormativedataisessentialforearlyandaccurateidenti‐
ficationofpathologicalchangesincognition.Althoughseveralstudieshavereportedon
normativedataforolderadults,thesestudiesusedgeneralpopulation‐basedsamples.
Thefindingthatthereisnoagreementintheindividualslabeledasshowinglowscores
whenusingnormativedataobtainedfromthegeneralpopulationandSABIEX‐specific
normativedatahighlightstheneedforspecificnormativedataforhighlycognitivelyac‐
tivepeople.
Animportantaspectthatdistinguishesthesenormativedataisthatwedidnotex‐
cludeparticipantswithahistoryofmedicalconditionsthatcouldaffectneuropsycholog‐
icalfunctioning.Ithasbeensuggestedthatlessrigorousexclusioncriteriamightdecrease
thesensitivityofthenormativedatatoidentifytruecognitiveimpairment[103].However,
sinceboththeincidenceandprevalenceofchronicdiseases[104]andmultimorbidity[105]
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,995812of18
increasewithage,thepresenceofmedicalconditionsisfrequentintheolderpopulation.
Therefore,includingonlyhealthyolderadultsinanormativestudycouldbiastheresults
asthesamplewouldbeunrealisticandnotrepresentativeofthepopulationthatwillbe
assessedwiththesenormativedata.Moreover,usinganextremelyhealthysamplemight
increasetheriskofoverdiagnosingcognitiveimpairmentinclinicalsettings.Asinother
normativestudiesforolderadults[26,83],weensuredthenormalcognitivefunctioning
ofparticipantsincludedinoursamplethroughthescoresintheMMSE,CDR,andinde‐
pendenceintheADLs.
Regardingtheclinicalapplicabilityofthesenorms,theneuropsychologicaltestsde‐
scribedinthispapermightbeusefulintheprocessofdiagnosingcognitiveimpairment
anddementia.Sinceactiveolderadultsmayhaveabettercognitivefunctioningcompared
tosame‐agepeoplefromthegeneralpopulation[50,95],impairedperformancecouldbe
moredifficulttoidentifythroughtestsstandardizedonthegeneralpopulation.Thenor‐
mativedatareportedinthepresentworkmightbeespeciallyhelpfulforcliniciansand
researcherstoaccuratelyinterpretscoresofolderadultswhocontinuetoleadaveryactive
lifeduringaging,identifyinglower‐than‐averageperformancemoreaccuratelyand,thus,
reducingtheriskofdiagnosticerrorsiflowscoresaretobeusedtodiagnosecognitive
impairment.SinceindividualswithMCIareatgreaterriskofAD[9,106],theSABIEXnor‐
mativedatamighthelptoidentifyMCIwithgreatercertaintyinhighlycognitivelyactive
Spanishindividuals.Oneofthestrengthsofthisworkisthatweprovidenormativedata
forfiveneuropsychologicalmeasures,whichallowsthecomparisonofanindividual‘s
performanceacrossthedifferentnormedtests.
4.5.Limitations
Thesenormativedatashouldbeinterpretedwithlimitations.First,thesampleused
tocalculatethemwastakenfromuniversitycoursesforseniors.Thisrestrictsthegeneral‐
izabilitytothepopulationwiththischaracteristic.InSpain,duringthe2019–2020aca‐
demicyear,thenumberofadultsthatparticipatedinthesecoursesamountsto35.199
(https://www.aepum.es/)(accessedon20June,2021),whichrepresents0,22%ofthepop‐
ulationaged55orolder(https://www.ine.es)(accessedon13February,20221).However,
differentstudieshavereportedthatotheractivepracticesduringaging,suchasvolun‐
teering,contributetothemaintenanceofcognitivereserveandpositivelyimpactolder
adults’cognitivefunction[107,108];therefore,itisrecommendedtoanalyzewhetherthese
normativedataarealsoappropriatetoproperlyinterprettheperformanceofolderadults
engagedincognitivelystimulatingactivitiesotherthanuniversitycourses.
Anotherpotentiallimitationofthepresentstudyisthat,duetothecompositionof
thesample,thesenormativedatawillbeusefulonlyforpeoplebetween55and87years
oldandwith3to22yearsofeducation.Additionally,takingintoaccountthewell‐docu‐
mentedeffectsofcultureonthediscrepancyinperformanceinthedifferentcognitivedo‐
mains[109,110],anotherlimitationofthesenormativedataisthattheyareonlyapplicable
totheSpanishpopulation.TheirusewithotherSpanish‐speakingpopulations,withdif‐
ferentculturalbackgrounds,islimited.Somestudieshavefounddifferencesinperfor‐
manceinthetestsincludedinthisworkamongindividualsfromdifferentSpanish‐speak‐
ingcountries[62,69],andusingthesenormativedatamightresultindiagnosticerrors.
Afurtherlimitationofthisstudyisthatthenormativedataareobtainedwithcogni‐
tivelyactiveadults,buttheyhavenotbeenappliedinclinicalpopulations.Itisstillun‐
knowniftheyareadequatetoidentifycognitiveimpairment.Futurestudiesshouldbe
conductedwithclinicalpopulationstohelptoclarifytheclinicalusefulnessofthesenor‐
mativedata.Therefore,wesuggestusingthesenormativedataasasupplementofexisting
general‐population‐basednormsuntiltheirclinicalutilityisanalyzed.Anotherlimitation
isthefactthatz‐scoresequaltoorlowerthan−1.28wereusedtointerpretperformance
anddefinelowscores,whilstthemostcommonlyusedcut‐offpointtointerpretcognitive
impairmentisatleast1.5standarddeviationsbelowthemean.
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,995813of18
Lastly,sinceagingisassociatedwithchangesinthebrainstructureandinthefunc‐
tionalconnectivityrelatedtocognitiveprocesses[111,112],alimitationofthepresent
studyisthelackofneuroimageprofilestoanalyzecorrelatesbetweenbrainstructure,
functionalconnectivity,andparticipants’variabilityincognitivefunctioning(e.g.,
whetherthenumberoflowscoresisassociatedwithdifferentstructuralbrainalterations
ortheconnectivitybetweendifferentbrainareas).Byanalyzingourresultstogetherwith
magneticresonanceimages(MRI),amorecompleteunderstandingoftheeffectsofaging
onnetworkfunction,brainstructure,andcognitivefunctionwouldbeobtained.Future
worksarewarrantedtoidentifytheassociationofacognitivelyactivelifestyleandcogni‐
tivefunction,brainstructure,andbrainconnectivity.
5.Conclusions
Inconclusion,thepresentworkprovidesnormativedataforacognitivelyactive
Spanishpopulationthatmayhelptoidentifycognitiveimpairmentduringaging,improve
diagnosticprecision,andreducediagnosticerrors.Ourfindingshighlighttheimportance
ofusingappropriatenormativedata,relevanttothepopulationbeingassessed.Despite
theavailabilityofSpanishnormativedatafortheolderpopulation,ourresultssuggest
thattheaccuracyintheinterpretationofactiveolderadults’performancemightbemax‐
imizedusingpopulation‐specificnormativedata.
SupplementaryMaterials:Thefollowingareavailableonlineatwww.mdpi.com/arti‐
cle/10.3390/ijerph18199958/s1,TableS1:Comparingnumberoflowscoresbetweennormativedata
sets(NEURONORMA‐SABIEX),TableS2:Comparingnumberoflowscoresbetweennormative
datasets(NEURONORMA‐SABIEX)withTMT‐BconditionalonTMT‐A,TableS3.Comparing
numberoflowscoresonTMT‐Bindependent(TMT‐BNEURONORMA)andTMT‐Bconditionalon
TMT‐A(TMT‐BSABIEX)
AuthorContributions:Conceptualization,J.O.‐C,E.S.‐M.,andB.B.‐L.;methodology,J.O.‐C,C.I.,
andE.C.‐R.;formalanalysis,C.I.andJ.O.‐C.;investigation,C.I.,J.O.‐C.,B.B.‐L.,E.C.‐R.,andE.S.‐M.;
datacuration,C.I.andJ.O.‐C;writing—originaldraftpreparation,C.I.andJ.O.‐C;writing—review
andediting,C.I.,J.O.‐C.,B.B.‐L.,E.C.‐R.,andE.S.‐M.;supervision,J.O.‐C.,E.S.‐M.,andB.B.‐L.All
authorshavereadandagreedtothepublishedversionofthemanuscript.
Funding:Thisresearchreceivednoexternalfunding.
InstitutionalReviewBoardStatement:Thestudywasconductedaccordingtotheguidelinesofthe
DeclarationofHelsinkiandapprovedbytheEthicsCommitteeoftheMiguelHernandezUniversity
(protocolcodeDPS.ESM.01.19).
InformedConsentStatement:Informedconsentwasobtainedfromallsubjectsinvolvedinthe
study.
DataAvailabilityStatement:Dataareavailableatrequestfromthecorrespondingauthor.
Acknowledgments:None.
ConflictsofInterest:Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictofinterest.
References
1. UnitedNations.WorldPopulationAgeing2020Highlights:LivingArrangementsofOlderPersons;UnitedNationPublication:New
York,NY,USA,2020.
2. InstitutoNacionaldeEstadísticaProporcióndePersonasMayoresdeCiertaEdadPorComunidadAutónoma.Availableonline:
https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Datos.htm?t=1451#!tabs‐tabla(accessedon13February,2021).
3. Hou,X.‐H.;Feng,L.;Zhang,C.;Cao,X.‐P.;Tan,L.;Yu,J.‐T.ModelsforPredictingRiskofDementia:ASystematicReview.J.
Neurol.Neurosurg.Psychiatry2019,90,373–379,doi:10.1136/jnnp‐2018‐318212.
4. Power,M.C.;Mormino,E.;Soldan,A.;James,B.D.;Yu,L.;Armstrong,N.M.;Bangen,K.J.;Delano‐Wood,L.;Lamar,M.;Lim,
Y.Y.;etal.CombinedNeuropathologicalPathwaysAccountforAge‐RelatedRiskofDementia:MultiplePathologiesandAge‐
RelatedDementiaRisk.Ann.Neurol.2018,84,10–22,doi:10.1002/ana.25246.
5. Nichols,E.;Szoeke,C.E.I.;Vollset,S.E.;Abbasi,N.;Abd‐Allah,F.;Abdela,J.;Aichour,M.T.E.;Akinyemi,R.O.;Alahdab,F.;
Asgedom,S.W.;etal.Global,Regional,andNationalBurdenofAlzheimer’sDiseaseandOtherDementias,1990–2016:A
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,995814of18
SystematicAnalysisfortheGlobalBurdenofDiseaseStudy2016.LancetNeurol.2019,18,88–106,doi:10.1016/S1474‐
4422(18)30403‐4.
6. Petersen,R.C.;Lopez,O.;Armstrong,M.J.;Getchius,T.S.D.;Ganguli,M.;Gloss,D.;Gronseth,G.S.;Marson,D.;Pringsheim,T.;
Day,G.S.;etal.PracticeGuidelineUpdateSummary:MildCognitiveImpairment:ReportoftheGuidelineDevelopment,
Dissemination,andImplementationSubcommitteeoftheAmericanAcademyofNeurology.Neurology2018,90,126–135,
doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000004826.
7. AlzheimerʹsAssociation.Alzheimer’sAssociation2020Alzheimer’sDiseaseFactsandFigures.Alzheimer’sDement.2020,16,
391–460,doi:10.1002/alz.12068.
8. Bacigalupo,I.;Mayer,F.;Lacorte,E.;DiPucchio,A.;Marzolini,F.;Canevelli,M.;DiFiandra,T.;Vanacore,N.ASystematic
ReviewandMeta‐AnalysisonthePrevalenceofDementiainEurope:EstimatesfromtheHighest‐QualityStudiesAdoptingthe
DSMIVDiagnosticCriteria.J.AlzheimersDis.2018,66,1471–1481,doi:10.3233/JAD‐180416.
9. Oltra‐Cucarella,J.;Ferrer‐Cascales,R.;Alegret,M.;Gasparini,R.;Díaz‐Ortiz,L.M.;Ríos,R.;Martínez‐Nogueras,Á.L.;Onandia,
I.;Pérez‐Vicente,J.A.;Cabello‐Rodríguez,L.;etal.RiskofProgressiontoAlzheimer’sDiseaseforDifferentNeuropsychological
MildCognitiveImpairmentSubtypes:AHierarchicalMeta‐AnalysisofLongitudinalStudies.Psychol.Aging2018,33,1007–1021,
doi:10.1037/pag0000294.
10. Bahar‐Fuchs,A.;Clare,L.;Woods,B.CognitiveTrainingandCognitiveRehabilitationforMildtoModerateAlzheimer’sDisease
andVascularDementia.CochraneDatabaseSyst.Rev.2013,doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003260.pub2.
11. Buckley,J.S.;Salpeter,S.R.ARisk‐BenefitAssessmentofDementiaMedications:SystematicReviewoftheEvidence.Drugs
Aging2015,32,453–467,doi:10.1007/s40266‐015‐0266‐9.
12. Oltra‐Cucarella,J.;Ferrer‐Cascales,R.;Clare,L.;Morris,S.B.;Espert,R.;Tirapu,J.;Sánchez‐SanSegundo,M.DifferentialEffects
ofCognition‐FocusedInterventionsforPeoplewithAlzheimer’sDisease:AMeta‐Analysis.Neuropsychology2018,32,664–679,
doi:10.1037/neu0000449.
13. Lu,P.H.;Lee,G.J.TheRoleofNeuropsychologyintheAssessmentoftheCognitivelyImpairedElderly.Neurol.Clin.2017,35,
191–206,doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2017.01.002.
14. Watt,S.;Crowe,S.F.ExaminingtheBeneficialEffectofNeuropsychologicalAssessmentonAdultPatientOutcomes:A
SystematicReview.Clin.Neuropsychol.2018,32,368–390,doi:10.1080/13854046.2017.1414885.
15. Strauss,E.;Sherman,E.;Spreen,O.ACompendiumofNeuropsychologicalTests:Administration,Norms,andComentary,3rded.;
OxfordUniversitiyPress:Oxford,UK,2006;ISBN978‐0‐19‐515957‐8.
16. VanderElst,W.TheNeuropsychometricsofAging:NormativeStudiesintheMaastrichtAgingStudy;NeuropsychPublishers:
Amsterdam,TheNetherlands,2006;ISBN978‐90‐75579‐29‐1.
17. vanHooren,S.A.H.;Valentijn,A.M.;Bosma,H.;Ponds,R.W.H.M.;vanBoxtel,M.P.J.;Jolles,J.CognitiveFunctioninginHealthy
OlderAdultsAged64–81:ACohortStudyintotheEffectsofAge,Sex,andEducation.AgingNeuropsychol.Cogn.2007,14,40–
54,doi:10.1080/138255890969483.
18. VanderElst,W.;Molenberghs,G.;VanBoxtel,M.P.J.;Jolles,J.EstablishingNormativeDataforRepeatedCognitiveAssessment:
AComparisonofDifferentStatisticalMethods.Behav.Res.Methods2013,45,1073–1086,doi:10.3758/s13428‐012‐0305‐y.
19. Lezak,M.D.;Howieson,D.;Bigler,E.D.;Tranel,D.NeuropsychologicalAssessment,5thed.;OxfordUniversityPress:Oxford,
UK/ NewYork,NY,USA,2012;ISBN978‐0‐19‐539552‐5.
20. O’Bryant,S.E.;Edwards,M.;Johnson,L.;Hall,J.;Gamboa,A.;O’jile,J.TexasMexicanAmericanAdultNormativeStudies:
NormativeDataforCommonlyUsedClinicalNeuropsychologicalMeasuresforEnglish‐ andSpanish‐Speakers.Dev.
Neuropsychol.2018,43,1–26,doi:10.1080/87565641.2017.1401628.
21. Torres,V.L.;Vila‐Castelar,C.;Bocanegra,Y.;Baena,A.;Guzmán‐Vélez,E.;Aguirre‐Acevedo,D.C.;Tirado,V.;Munoz,C.;
Henao,E.;Moreno,S.;etal.NormativeDataStratifiedbyAgeandEducationforaSpanishNeuropsychologicalTestBattery:
ResultsfromtheColombianAlzheimer’sPreventionInitiativeRegistry.Appl.Neuropsychol.Adult2021,28,230–244,
doi:10.1080/23279095.2019.1627357.
22. Mokri,H.;Ávila‐Funes,J.A.;Meillon,C.;GutiérrezRobledo,L.M.;Amieva,H.NormativeDatafortheMini‐MentalState
Examination,theFreeandCuedSelectiveRemindingTestandtheIsaacsSetTestforanOlderAdultMexicanPopulation:The
CoyoacánCohortStudy.Clin.Neuropsychol.2013,27,1004–1018,doi:10.1080/13854046.2013.809793.
23. Vila‐Castelar,C.;Papp,K.V.;Amariglio,R.E.;Torres,V.L.;Baena,A.;Gomez,D.;Rendon,J.;Samaroo,A.;Lopera,F.;Rentz,
D.M.;etal.ValidationoftheLatinAmericanSpanishVersionoftheFace‐NameAssociativeMemoryExaminaColombian
Sample.Clin.Neuropsychol.2020,34,1–12,doi:10.1080/13854046.2019.1690050.
24. Oosterhuis,H.E.M.;vanderArk,L.A.;Sijtsma,K.SampleSizeRequirementsforTraditionalandRegression‐BasedNorms.
Assessment2016,23,191–202,doi:10.1177/1073191115580638.
25. VanBreukelen,G.J.P.;Vlaeyen,J.W.S.NormingClinicalQuestionnaireswithMultipleRegression:ThePainCognitionList.
Psychol.Assess.2005,17,336–344,doi:10.1037/1040‐3590.17.3.336.
26. Guàrdia‐Olmos,J.;Peró‐Cebollero,M.;Rivera,D.;Arango‐Lasprilla,J.C.MethodologyfortheDevelopmentofNormativeData
forTenSpanish‐LanguageNeuropsychologicalTestsinElevenLatinAmericanCountries.NeuroRehabilitation2015,37,493–499,
doi:10.3233/NRE‐151277.
27. Rivera,D.;Arango‐Lasprilla,J.C.MethodologyfortheDevelopmentofNormativeDataforSpanish‐SpeakingPediatric
Populations.NeuroRehabilitation2017,41,581–592,doi:10.3233/NRE‐172275.
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,995815of18
28. VanderElst,W.;vanBoxtel,M.P.J.;vanBreukelen,G.J.P.;Jolles,J.TheLetterDigitSubstitutionTest:NormativeDatafor1,858
HealthyParticipantsAged24–81fromtheMaastrichtAgingStudy(MAAS):InfluenceofAge,Education,andSex.J.Clin.Exp.
Neuropsychol.2006,28,998–1009,doi:10.1080/13803390591004428.
29. Biundo,R.;Weis,L.;Pilleri,M.;Facchini,S.;Formento‐Dojot,P.;Vallelunga,A.;Antonini,A.DiagnosticandScreeningPower
ofNeuropsychologicalTestinginDetectingMildCognitiveImpairmentinParkinson’sDisease.J.NeuralTransm.2013,120,627–
633,doi:10.1007/s00702‐013‐1004‐2.
30. Matias‐Guiu,J.A.;Cortés‐Martínez,A.;Valles‐Salgado,M.;Rognoni,T.;Fernández‐Matarrubia,M.;Moreno‐Ramos,T.;Matías‐
Guiu,J.Addenbrooke’sCognitiveExaminationIII:DiagnosticUtilityforMildCognitiveImpairmentandDementiaand
CorrelationwithStandardizedNeuropsychologicalTests.Int.Psychogeriatr.2017,29,105–113,doi:10.1017/S1041610216001496.
31. Correia,R.;Barroso,J.;Nieto,A.Age‐RelatedCognitiveChanges:TheImportanceofModulatingFactors.J.Geriatr.Med.
Gerontol.2018,4,1–10,doi:10.23937/2469‐5858/1510048.
32. Small,B.J.;Dixon,R.A.;McArdle,J.J.;Grimm,K.J.DoChangesinLifestyleEngagementModerateCognitiveDeclineinNormal
Aging?EvidencefromtheVictoriaLongitudinalStudy.Neuropsychology2012,26,144–155,doi:10.1037/a0026579.
33. Vemuri,P.;Lesnick,T.G.;Przybelski,S.A.;Machulda,M.;Knopman,D.S.;Mielke,M.M.;Roberts,R.O.;Geda,Y.E.;Rocca,W.A.;
Petersen,R.C.;etal.AssociationofLifetimeIntellectualEnrichmentWithCognitiveDeclineintheOlderPopulation.JAMA
Neurol.2014,71,1017,doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.963.
34. Stern,Y.CognitiveReserve.Neuropsychologia2009,47,2015–2028,doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.03.004.
35. Stern,Y.CognitiveReserveinAgeingandAlzheimer’sDisease.LancetNeurol.2012,11,1006–1012,doi:10.1016/S1474‐
4422(12)70191‐6.
36. Wilson,R.S.;Boyle,P.A.;Yu,L.;Barnes,L.L.;Schneider,J.A.;Bennett,D.A.Life‐SpanCognitiveActivity,Neuropathologic
Burden,andCognitiveAging.Neurology2013,81,314–321,doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31829c5e8a.
37. Yates,L.A.;Ziser,S.;Spector,A.;Orrell,M.CognitiveLeisureActivitiesandFutureRiskofCognitiveImpairmentandDementia:
SystematicReviewandMeta‐Analysis.Int.Psychogeriatr.2016,28,1791–1806,doi:10.1017/S1041610216001137.
38. Naah,F.L.;Njong,A.M.;Kimengsi,J.N.DeterminantsofActiveandHealthyAgeinginSub‐SaharanAfrica:Evidencefrom
Cameroon.Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2020,17,3038,doi:10.3390/ijerph17093038.
39. WHO.ActiveAgeing:APolicyFramework;WHO:Madrid,Spain,2002.
40. Formosa,M.ActiveAgeingThroughLifelongLearning:TheUniversityoftheThirdAge.InTheUniversityoftheThirdAgeand
ActiveAgeing;Formosa,M.,Ed.;SpringerInternationalPublishing:Cham,Germany,2019;Volume23,pp.3–18,ISBN978‐3‐
030‐21514‐9.
41. Narushima,M.;Liu,J.;Diestelkamp,N.LifelongLearninginActiveAgeingDiscourse:ItsConservingEffectonWellbeing,
HealthandVulnerability.AgeingSoc.2018,38,651–675,doi:10.1017/S0144686X16001136.
42. Fernández‐Ballesteros,R.;Molina,M.Á.;Schettini,R.;delRey,Á.L.PromotingActiveAgingThroughUniversityProgramsfor
OlderAdults:AnEvaluationStudy.GeroPsych2012,25,145–154,doi:10.1024/1662‐9647/a000064.
43. Zadworna,M.HealthyAgingandtheUniversityoftheThirdAge—HealthBehaviorandSubjectiveHealthOutcomesinOlder
Adults.Arch.Gerontol.Geriatr.2020,90,104126,doi:10.1016/j.archger.2020.104126.
44. Formosa,M.FourDecadesofUniversitiesoftheThirdAge:Past,Present,Future.AgeingSoc.2014,34,42–66,
doi:10.1017/S0144686X12000797.
45. MontoroRodríguez,J.;PinazoHernandis,S.;TortosaChuliá,M.Á.Motivacionesyexpectativasdelosestudiantesmayoresde
55añosenlosprogramasuniversitarios.Rev.Esp.GeriatríaGerontol.2007,42,158–166,doi:10.1016/S0211‐139X(07)73542‐4.
46. Cachioni,M.;NascimentoOrdonez,T.;daSilva,T.B.L.;TavaresBatistoni,S.S.;SanchesYassuda,M.;CaldeiraMelo,R.;Accioly
RodriguesdaCostaDomingue,M.;Lopes,A.MotivationalFactorsandPredictorsforAttendingaContinuingEducation
ProgramforOlderAdults.Educ.Gerontol.2014,40,584–596,doi:10.1080/03601277.2013.802188.
47. Villar,F.;Celdrán,M.LearninginLaterLife:ParticipationinFormal,Non‐FormalandInformalActivitiesinaNationally
RepresentativeSpanishSample.Eur.J.Ageing2013,10,135–144,doi:10.1007/s10433‐012‐0257‐1.
48. Chan,D.;Shafto,M.;Kievit,R.;Matthews,F.;Spink,M.;Valenzuela,M.;Henson,R.N.LifestyleActivitiesinMid‐LifeContribute
toCognitiveReserveinLate‐Life,IndependentofEducation,Occupation,andLate‐LifeActivities.Neurobiol.Aging2018,70,
180–183,doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.06.012.
49. Hall,C.B.;Lipton,R.B.;Sliwinski,M.;Katz,M.J.;Derby,C.A.;Verghese,J.CognitiveActivitiesDelayOnsetofMemoryDecline
inPersonsWhoDevelopDementia.Neurology2009,73,356–361,doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b04ae3.
50. Christensen,H.;Korten,A.;Jorm,A.F.;Henderson,A.S.;Scott,R.;Mackinnon,A.J.ActivityLevelsandCognitiveFunctioning
inanElderlyCommunitySample.AgeAgeing1996,25,72–80,doi:10.1093/ageing/25.1.72.
51. Reed,B.R.;Dowling,M.;TomaszewskiFarias,S.;Sonnen,J.;Strauss,M.;Schneider,J.A.;Bennett,D.A.;Mungas,D.Cognitive
ActivitiesDuringAdulthoodAreMoreImportantthanEducationinBuildingReserve.J.Int.Neuropsychol.Soc.2011,17,615–
624,doi:10.1017/S1355617711000014.
52. Zhang,J.;Zou,L.;Jiao,C.;Zhang,M.;Wang,L.;Song,W.;Yu,Q.;Grabovac,I.;Zhang,Y.;Willeit,P.;etal.CognitiveBenefits
ofActivityEngagementamong12,093AdultsAgedover65Years.BrainSci.2020,10,967,doi:10.3390/brainsci10120967.
53. Wechsler,D.TheWechslerAdultIntelligenceScale,3rdEd;TEAEdiciones:Madrid,Spain,1999.
54. Peña‐Casanova,J.;Quiñones‐Ubeda,S.;Quintana‐Aparicio,M.;Aguilar,M.;Badenes,D.;Molinuevo,J.L.;Torner,L.;Robles,
A.;Barquero,M.S.;Villanueva,C.;etal.SpanishMulticenterNormativeStudies(NEURONORMAProject):NormsforVerbal
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,995816of18
Span,VisuospatialSpan,LetterandNumberSequencing,TrailMakingTest,andSymbolDigitModalitiesTest.Arch.Clin.
Neuropsychol.2009,24,321–341,doi:10.1093/arclin/acp038.
55. Kessels,R.P.C.;Overbeek,A.;Bouman,Z.AssessmentofVerbalandVisuospatialWorkingMemoryinMildCognitive
ImpairmentandAlzheimer’sDementia.Dement.Neuropsychol.2015,9,301–305,doi:10.1590/1980‐57642015dn93000014.
56. Ruchinskas,R.WechslerAdultIntelligenceScale‐4thEditionDigitSpanPerformanceinSubjectiveCognitiveComplaints,
AmnesticMildCognitiveImpairment,andProbableDementiaoftheAlzheimerType.Clin.Neuropsychol.2019,33,1436–1444,
doi:10.1080/13854046.2019.1585574.
57. Lortie,J.J.;Remington,R.;Hoffmann,H.;Shea,T.B.LackofCorrelationofWAISDigitSpanwithClox1andtheDementia
RatingScaleinMCI.Int.J.AlzheimersDis.2012,2012,1–4,doi:10.1155/2012/829743.
58. Kawai,Y.;Miura,R.;Tsujimoto,M.;Sakurai,T.;Yamaoka,A.;Takeda,A.;Arahata,Y.;Washimi,Y.;Kachi,T.;Toba,K.
NeuropsychologicalDifferentiationbetweenAlzheimer’sDiseaseandDementiawithLewyBodiesinaMemoryClinic:
DifferentiationbetweenADandDLB.Psychogeriatrics2013,13,157–163,doi:10.1111/psyg.12019.
59. Gooding,A.;Seider,T.;Marquine,M.;Suárez,P.;Umlauf,A.;RiveraMindt,M.;Heaton,R.K.;ArtiolaIFortuni,L.;Cherner,M.
Demographically‐AdjustedNormsforthePacedAuditorySerialAdditionTestandLetterNumberSequencingTestinSpanish‐
SpeakingAdults:ResultsfromtheNeuropsychologicalNormsfortheU.S.‐MexicoBorderRegioninSpanish(NP‐NUMBRS)
Project.Clin.Neuropsychol.2020,doi:10.1080/13854046.2019.1711199.
60. Kessels,R.P.C.;Molleman,P.W.;Oosterman,J.M.AssessmentofWorking‐MemoryDeficitsinPatientswithMildCognitive
ImpairmentandAlzheimer’sDementiaUsingWechsler’sWorkingMemoryIndex.AgingClin.Exp.Res.2011,23,487–490,
doi:10.1007/BF03325245.
61. Smith,A.SDMT:TestdeSímbolosyDígitos :Manual;TEAEdiciones:Madrid,Spain,2002;ISBN978‐84‐7174‐723‐5.
62. Arango‐Lasprilla,J.C.;Rivera,D.;Rodríguez,G.;Garza,M.T.;Galarza‐del‐Angel,J.;Rodríguez,W.;Velázquez‐Cardoso,J.;
Aguayo,A.;Schebela,S.;Weil,C.;etal.SymbolDigitModalitiesTest:NormativeDatafortheLatinAmericanSpanishSpeaking
AdultPopulation.NeuroRehabilitation2015,37,625–638,doi:10.3233/NRE‐151282.
63. Cherbuin,N.;Sachdev,P.;Anstey,K.J.NeuropsychologicalPredictorsofTransitionFromHealthyCognitiveAgingtoMild
CognitiveImpairment:ThePATHThroughLifeStudy.Am.J.Geriatr.Psychiatry2010,18,723–733,
doi:10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181cdecf1.
64. Fleisher,A.S.;Sowell,B.B.;Taylor,C.;Gamst,A.C.;Petersen,R.C.;Thal,L.J.;ClinicalPredictorsofProgressiontoAlzheimer
DiseaseinAmnesticMildCognitiveImpairment.Neurology2007,68,1588–1595,doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000258542.58725.4c.
65. Benedict,R.H.;DeLuca,J.;Phillips,G.;LaRocca,N.;Hudson,L.D.;Rudick,R.MultipleSclerosisOutcomeAssessments
ConsortiumValidityoftheSymbolDigitModalitiesTestasaCognitionPerformanceOutcomeMeasureforMultipleSclerosis.
Mult.Scler.J.2017,23,721–733,doi:10.1177/1352458517690821.
66. Maroof,D.A.;Gross,A.L.;Brandt,J.ModelingLongitudinalChangeinMotorandCognitiveProcessingSpeedin
PresymptomaticHuntington’sDisease.J.Clin.Exp.Neuropsychol.2011,33,901–909,doi:10.1080/13803395.2011.574606.
67. Wilson,H.;Pagano,G.;Yousaf,T.;Polychronis,S.;DeMicco,R.;Giordano,B.;Niccolini,F.;Politis,M.PredictCognitiveDecline
withClinicalMarkersinParkinson’sDisease(PRECODE‐1).J.NeuralTransm.2020,127,51–59,doi:10.1007/s00702‐019‐02125‐6.
68. Reitan,R.M.ValidityoftheTrailMakingTestasanIndicatorofOrganicBrainDamage.Percept.Mot.Skills1958,8,271–276,
doi:10.2466/pms.1958.8.3.271.
69. Arango‐Lasprilla,J.C.;Rivera,D.;Aguayo,A.;Rodríguez,W.;Garza,M.T.;Saracho,C.P.;Rodríguez‐Agudelo,Y.;Aliaga,A.;
Weiler,G.;Luna,M.;etal.TrailMakingTest:NormativeDatafortheLatinAmericanSpanishSpeakingAdultPopulation.
NeuroRehabilitation2015,37,639–661,doi:10.3233/NRE‐151284.
70. Ashendorf,L.;Jefferson,A.;Oconnor,M.;Chaisson,C.;Green,R.;Stern,R.TrailMakingTestErrorsinNormalAging,Mild
CognitiveImpairment,andDementia.Arch.Clin.Neuropsychol.2008,S0887617707002247,doi:10.1016/j.acn.2007.11.005.
71. Bezdicek,O.;Stepankova,H.;Axelrod,B.N.;Nikolai,T.;Sulc,Z.;Jech,R.;Růžička,E.;Kopecek,M.ClinimetricValidityofthe
TrailMakingTestCzechVersioninParkinson’sDiseaseandNormativeDataforOlderAdults.Clin.Neuropsychol.2017,31,42–
60,doi:10.1080/13854046.2017.1324045.
72. O’Rourke,J.J.F.;Beglinger,L.J.;Smith,M.M.;Mills,J.;Moser,D.J.;Rowe,K.C.;Langbehn,D.R.;Duff,K.;Stout,J.C.;Harrington,
D.L.;etal.TheTrailMakingTestinProdromalHuntingtonDisease:ContributionsofDiseaseProgressiontoTestPerformance.
J.Clin.Exp.Neuropsychol.2011,33,567–579,doi:10.1080/13803395.2010.541228.
73. Ramlall,S.;Chipps,J.;Bhigjee,A.I.;Pillay,B.J.SensitivityandSpecificityofNeuropsychologicalTestsforDementiaandMild
CognitiveImpairmentinaSampleofResidentialElderlyinSouthAfrica.S.Afr.J.Psychiatry2014,20,7,
doi:10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v20i4.558.
74. Folstein,M.F.;Folstein,S.E.;McHugh,P.R.“Mini‐MentalState”.APracticalMethodforGradingtheCognitiveStateofPatients
fortheClinician.J.Psychiatr.Res.1975,12,189–198,doi:10.1016/0022‐3956(75)90026‐6.
75. Hughes,C.P.;Berg,L.;Danziger,W.;Coben,L.A.;Martin,R.L.ANewClinicalScalefortheStagingofDementia.Br.J.Psychiatry
1982,140,566–572,doi:10.1192/bjp.140.6.566.
76. Lawton,M.;Brody,E.AssessmentofOlderPeople:Self‐MaintainingandInstrumentalActivitiesofDailyLiving.Gerontologist
1969,9,179–186.
77. Bielak,A.;Mansueti,L.;Strauss,E.;Dixon,R.PerformanceontheHaylingandBrixtonTestsinOlderAdults:Normsand
Correlates.Arch.Clin.Neuropsychol.2006,21,141–149,doi:10.1016/j.acn.2005.08.006.
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,995817of18
78. Whittle,C.;Corrada,M.M.;Dick,M.;Ziegler,R.;Kahle‐Wrobleski,K.;Paganini‐Hill,A.;Kawas,C.NeuropsychologicalDatain
NondementedOldestOld:The90+Study.J.Clin.Exp.Neuropsychol.2007,29,290–299,doi:10.1080/13803390600678038.
79. BoneteLópez,B.;Oltra‐Cucarella,J.;Marín,M.;Antón,C.;Balao,N.;López,E.;SitgesMaciá,E.ValidationandNormsfora
RecognitionTaskfortheSpanishVersionoftheFreeandCuedSelectiveRemindingTest.Arch.Clin.Neuropsychol.2020,36,
954–964,doi:10.1093/arclin/acaa117.
80. deAndradeMoral,R.;Diaz‐Orueta,U.;Oltra‐Cucarella,J.LogisticVersusLinearRegression‐BasedReliableChangeIndex:
ImplicationsforClinicalStudieswithDiverseSampleSizes.PsyArXiv2021,https://osf.io/gq7az.Availableonline:(accessedon
7September,2021).
81. Yesavage,J.A.;Brink,T.L.;Rose,T.L.;Lum,O.;Huang,V.;Adey,M.;Leirer,V.O.DevelopmentandValidationofaGeriatric
DepressionScreeningScale:APreliminaryReport.J.Psychiatr.Res.1982,17,37–49,doi:10.1016/0022‐3956(82)90033‐4.
82. Smith,A.SymbolDigitModalitiesTest;WesternPsychologicalServices:Torrance,CA,USA,1973.
83. Peña‐Casanova,J.;Blesa,R.;Aguilar,M.;Gramunt‐Fombuena,N.;Gómez‐Ansón,B.;Oliva,R.;Molinuevo,J.L.;Robles,A.;
Barquero,M.S.;Antúnez,C.;etal.SpanishMulticenterNormativeStudies(NEURONORMAProject):MethodsandSample
Characteristics.Arch.Clin.Neuropsychol.2009,24,307–319,doi:10.1093/arclin/acp027.
84. Fleiss,J.L.;Levin,B.;Paik,M.C.StatisticalMethodsforRatesandProportions.InWileySeriesinProbabilityandStatistics,3rded.;
Hoboken,N.J,Ed.;JohnWiley&Sons:Hoboken,NJ,USA,2003;ISBN978‐0‐471‐52629‐2.
85. O’brien,R.M.ACautionRegardingRulesofThumbforVarianceInflationFactors.Qual.Quant.2007,41,673–690,
doi:10.1007/s11135‐006‐9018‐6.
86. Llinàs‐Reglà,J.;Vilalta‐Franch,J.;López‐Pousa,S.;Calvó‐Perxas,L.;TorrentsRodas,D.;Garre‐Olmo,J.TheTrailMakingTest:
AssociationWithOtherNeuropsychologicalMeasuresandNormativeValuesforAdultsAged55YearsandOlderFroma
Spanish‐SpeakingPopulation‐BasedSample.Assessment2017,24,183–196,doi:10.1177/1073191115602552.
87. Crawford,J.R.;Garthwaite,P.H.;Gault,C.B.EstimatingthePercentageofthePopulationwithAbnormallyLowScores(or
AbnormallyLargeScoreDifferences)onStandardizedNeuropsychologicalTestBatteries:AGenericMethodwithApplications.
Neuropsychology2007,21,419–430,doi:10.1037/0894‐4105.21.4.419.
88. Oltra‐Cucarella,J.;Sánchez‐SanSegundo,M.;Rubio‐Aparicio,M.;Arango‐Lasprilla,J.C.;Ferrer‐Cascales,R.TheAssociation
BetweentheNumberofNeuropsychologicalMeasuresandtheBaseRateofLowScores.Assessment2021,28,955–963,
doi:10.1177/1073191119864646.
89. Fellows,R.P.;Schmitter‐Edgecombe,M.SymbolDigitModalitiesTest:Regression‐BasedNormativeDataandClinicalUtility.
Arch.Clin.Neuropsychol.2020,35,105–115,doi:10.1093/arclin/acz020.
90. Meng,X.;D’Arcy,C.EducationandDementiaintheContextoftheCognitiveReserveHypothesis:ASystematicReviewwith
Meta‐AnalysesandQualitativeAnalyses.PLoSONE2012,7,e38268,doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038268.
91. Salthouse,T.A.DecomposingAgeCorrelationsonNeuropsychologicalandCognitiveVariables.J.Int.Neuropsychol.Soc.JINS
2009,15,650–661,doi:10.1017/S1355617709990385.
92. Monaco,M.;Costa,A.;Caltagirone,C.;Carlesimo,G.A.ForwardandBackwardSpanforVerbalandVisuo‐SpatialData:
StandardizationandNormativeDatafromanItalianAdultPopulation.Neurol.Sci.2013,34,749–754,doi:10.1007/s10072‐012‐
1130‐x.
93. Choi,H.J.;Lee,D.Y.;Seo,E.H.;Jo,M.K.;Sohn,B.K.;Choe,Y.M.;Byun,M.S.;Kim,J.W.;Kim,S.G.;Yoon,J.C.;etal.ANormative
StudyoftheDigitSpaninanEducationallyDiverseElderlyPopulation.PsychiatryInvestig.2014,11,39,
doi:10.4306/pi.2014.11.1.39.
94. Grégoire,J.;VanDerLinden,M.EffectofAgeonForwardandBackwardDigitSpans.AgingNeuropsychol.Cogn.1997,4,140–
149,doi:10.1080/13825589708256642.
95. Hertzog,C.;Kramer,A.F.;Wilson,R.S.;Lindenberger,U.EnrichmentEffectsonAdultCognitiveDevelopment:Canthe
FunctionalCapacityofOlderAdultsBePreservedandEnhanced?Psychol.Sci.PublicInterest2008,9,1–65,doi:10.1111/j.1539‐
6053.2009.01034.x.
96. Myerson,J.;Emery,L.;White,D.A.;Hale,S.EffectsofAge,Domain,andProcessingDemandsonMemorySpan:Evidencefor
DifferentialDecline.AgingNeuropsychol.Cogn.2003,10,20–27,doi:10.1076/anec.10.1.20.13454.
97. Suarez,P.A.;Díaz‐Santos,M.;Marquine,M.J.;Kamalyan,L.;Mindt,M.R.;Umlauf,A.;Heaton,R.K.;Grant,I.;Cherner,M.
DemographicallyAdjustedNormsfortheTrailMakingTestinNativeSpanishSpeakers:ResultsfromtheNeuropsychological
NormsfortheUS‐MexicoBorderRegioninSpanish(NP‐NUMBRS)Project.Clin.Neuropsychol.2020,35,308–323,
doi:10.1080/13854046.2020.1800099.
98. Wei,M.;Shi,J.;Li,T.;Ni,J.;Zhang,X.;Li,Y.;Kang,S.;Ma,F.;Xie,H.;Qin,B.;etal.DiagnosticAccuracyoftheChineseVersion
oftheTrail‐MakingTestforScreeningCognitiveImpairment.J.Am.Geriatr.Soc.2018,66,92–99,doi:10.1111/jgs.15135.
99. Rasmusson,X.D.;Zonderman,A.B.;Kawas,C.;Resnick,S.M.EffectsofAgeandDementiaontheTrailMakingTest.Clin.
Neuropsychol.1998,12,169–178,doi:10.1076/clin.12.2.169.2005.
100. Kiely,K.M.;Butterworth,P.;Watson,N.;Wooden,M.TheSymbolDigitModalitiesTest:NormativeDatafromaLarge
NationallyRepresentativeSampleofAustralians.Arch.Clin.Neuropsychol.2014,29,767–775,doi:10.1093/arclin/acu055.
101. Ryan,J.;Woods,R.L.;Britt,C.J.;Murray,A.M.;Shah,R.C.;Reid,C.M.;Wolfe,R.;Nelson,M.R.;Orchard,S.G.;Lockery,J.E.;et
al.NormativeDatafortheSymbolDigitModalitiesTestinOlderWhiteAustraliansandAmericans,African‐Americans,and
Hispanic/Latinos.J.AlzheimersDis.Rep.2020,4,313–323,doi:10.3233/ADR‐200194.
Int.J.Environ.Res.PublicHealth2021,18,995818of18
102. Deary,I.J.;Corley,J.;Gow,A.J.;Harris,S.E.;Houlihan,L.M.;Marioni,R.E.;Penke,L.;Rafnsson,S.B.;Starr,J.M.Age‐Associated
CognitiveDecline.Br.Med.Bull.2009,92,135–152,doi:10.1093/bmb/ldp033.
103. Harrington,K.D.;Lim,Y.Y.;Ames,D.;Hassenstab,J.;Rainey‐Smith,S.;Robertson,J.;Salvado,O.;Masters,C.L.;Maruff,P.
UsingRobustNormativeDatatoInvestigatetheNeuropsychologyofCognitiveAging.Arch.Clin.Neuropsychol.2017,32,142–
154,doi:10.1093/arclin/acw106.
104. Melis,R.;Marengoni,A.;Angleman,S.;Fratiglioni,L.IncidenceandPredictorsofMultimorbidityintheElderly:APopulation‐
BasedLongitudinalStudy.PLoSONE2014,9,e103120,doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103120.
105. Garin,N.;Olaya,B.;Perales,J.;Moneta,M.V.;Miret,M.;Ayuso‐Mateos,J.L.;Haro,J.M.MultimorbidityPatternsinaNational
RepresentativeSampleoftheSpanishAdultPopulation.PLoSONE2014,9,e84794,doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084794.
106. Oltra‐Cucarella,J.;Sánchez‐SanSegundo,M.;Lipnicki,D.M.;Crawford,J.D.;Lipton,R.B.;Katz,M.J.;Zammit,A.R.;Scarmeas,
N.;Dardiotis,E.;Kosmidis,M.H.;etal.VisualMemoryTestsEnhancetheIdentificationofAmnesticMCICasesatGreaterRisk
ofAlzheimer’sDisease.Int.Psychogeriatr.2019,31,997–1006,doi:10.1017/S104161021800145X.
107. Guiney,H.;Machado,L.VolunteeringintheCommunity:PotentialBenefitsforCognitiveAging.J.Gerontol.Ser.B2018,73,
399–408,doi:10.1093/geronb/gbx134.
108. Proulx,C.M.;Curl,A.L.;Ermer,A.E.LongitudinalAssociationsBetweenFormalVolunteeringandCognitiveFunctioning.J.
Gerontol.Ser.B2018,73,522–531,doi:10.1093/geronb/gbx110.
109. Daugherty,J.C.;Puente,A.E.;Fasfous,A.F.;Hidalgo‐Ruzzante,N.;Pérez‐Garcia,M.DiagnosticMistakesofCulturallyDiverse
IndividualsWhenUsingNorthAmericanNeuropsychologicalTests.Appl.Neuropsychol.Adult2017,24,16–22,
doi:10.1080/23279095.2015.1036992.
110. Werry,A.E.;Daniel,M.;Bergström,B.GroupDifferencesinNormalNeuropsychologicalTestPerformanceforOlderNon‐
HispanicWhiteandBlack/AfricanAmericanAdults.Neuropsychology2019,33,1089–1100,doi:10.1037/neu0000579.
111. Petersen,R.C.;Aisen,P.S.;Beckett,L.A.;Donohue,M.C.;Gamst,A.C.;Harvey,D.J.;Jack,C.R.;Jagust,W.J.;Shaw,L.M.;Toga,
A.W.;etal.Alzheimer’sDiseaseNeuroimagingInitiative(ADNI):ClinicalCharacterization.Neurology2010,74,201–209,
doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181cb3e25.
112. Varangis,E.;Habeck,C.G.;Razlighi,Q.R.;Stern,Y.TheEffectofAgingonRestingStateConnectivityofPredefinedNetworks
intheBrain.Front.AgingNeurosci.2019,11,234,doi:10.3389/fnagi.2019.00234.