ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Exocytosis in Astrocytes

Authors:

Abstract

Until recently, astrocytes were thought to be a part of a simple “brain glue” providing only a supporting role for neurons. However, the discoveries of the last two decades have proven astrocytes to be dynamic partners participating in brain metabolism and actively influencing communication between neurons. The means of astrocyte-neuron communication are diverse, although regulated exocytosis has received the most attention but also caused the most debate. Similar to most of eukaryotic cells, astrocytes have a complex range of vesicular organelles which can undergo exocytosis as well as intricate molecular mechanisms that regulate this process. In this review, we focus on the components needed for regulated exocytosis to occur and summarise the knowledge about experimental evidence showing its presence in astrocytes.
biomolecules
Review
Exocytosis in Astrocytes
Aleksandra Mielnicka and Piotr Michaluk *


Citation: Mielnicka, A.; Michaluk, P.
Exocytosis in Astrocytes. Biomolecules
2021,11, 1367. https://doi.org/
10.3390/biom11091367
Academic Editor: Agnieszka Jurga
Received: 16 August 2021
Accepted: 14 September 2021
Published: 16 September 2021
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral
with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affil-
iations.
Copyright: © 2021 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
BRAINCITY, Laboratory of Neurobiology, The Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, PAS,
02-093 Warsaw, Poland; a.mielnicka@nencki.edu.pl
*Correspondence: p.michaluk@nencki.edu.pl; Tel.: +48-22-5892-382
Abstract:
Until recently, astrocytes were thought to be a part of a simple “brain glue” providing
only a supporting role for neurons. However, the discoveries of the last two decades have proven
astrocytes to be dynamic partners participating in brain metabolism and actively influencing com-
munication between neurons. The means of astrocyte-neuron communication are diverse, although
regulated exocytosis has received the most attention but also caused the most debate. Similar to
most of eukaryotic cells, astrocytes have a complex range of vesicular organelles which can undergo
exocytosis as well as intricate molecular mechanisms that regulate this process. In this review, we
focus on the components needed for regulated exocytosis to occur and summarise the knowledge
about experimental evidence showing its presence in astrocytes.
Keywords: SNARE; secretion; vesicles; transmitter; lysosome; gliotransmission
1. Introduction
Astrocytes, together with oligodendrocytes and microglia, form three main categories
of glial cells in the central nervous system. They are found throughout the brain and
occupy around half of the brain’s volume. Astrocytes have a bushy morphology with
few main processes, starting from a relatively small cell body and extending many fine
processes that invade extracellular space. It has been estimated that an astrocyte can
contact over 100,000 synapses in rats and almost two million in the human cortex [
1
].
Even though astrocytes tend to occupy distinct and non-overlapping domains, their fine
processes are in contact with one another via gap junctions. They create, therefore, a large
network of interconnected cells which can easily exchange ions and small molecules of up
to 1–1.2 kDa [2].
For a long time, neuroscientists considered glia as merely supportive cells in the brain
that control ion and water homeostasis, produce and remove neurotransmitters, induce
synaptogenesis, provide trophic factors for neurons and maintain the blood–brain barrier.
Their view as “passive” cells was reinforced by observations that astrocytes expressed
potassium and sodium channels and could exhibit evoked inward currents, but they did
not “fire” or propagate action potentials [
3
]. Therefore, it can be safely said that the entire
field was revolutionised by the discovery of glutamate-induced Ca
2+
waves in cultured
astrocytes. This raised the possibility that astrocytes may contribute to modulating neu-
ronal activity [
4
]. This observation was later confirmed many times in different
in vitro
and
in vivo
models [
5
9
]. Further demonstrations that intracellular Ca
2+
levels in astrocytes
can cause a release of glutamate and a subsequent Ca
2+
increase in neurons [
10
,
11
] led to
the concept of gliotransmission i.e., the release of transmitters from astrocytes and other
glial cells to neurons. This, in turn, helped to coin the term “tripartite synapse”, where
astrocyte processes form an integral part of a functional brain connection in addition to
pre- and post-synaptic compartments [
12
]. The classical understanding of this model as-
sumes that through spillover neurotransmitters and other factors released by neurons, bind
to high-affinity astrocytic G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), triggering inositol-1,4,5-
trisphosphate (IP
3
) production and Ca
2+
release from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) [
13
].
Biomolecules 2021,11, 1367. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11091367 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/biomolecules
Biomolecules 2021,11, 1367 2 of 19
Increases in astrocytic Ca
2+
levels lead to a release of gliotransmitters, including glutamate,
ATP, D-serine and
γ
-aminobutyric acid (GABA) [
14
]. The release of gliotransmitters has a
wide range of effects on neurons, such as stimulating N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NM-
DAR), synchronising neuronal spiking [
15
], as well as regulating synaptic vesicle release
probability, synaptic plasticity and even behaviour [
7
,
14
,
16
18
]. Despite this description
of different modes of transmitter release from astrocytes, regulated exocytosis became the
most studied but also criticised (for a review, see [7,19,20]).
Exocytosis is a process in which the cargo of a secretory vesicle is released across
the cell membrane. This universal process, which is common to all eukaryotic cells, can
be generally divided into two types: unregulated and regulated exocytosis. Unregulated
(constitutive) exocytosis typically involves the formation of membranous secretory vesicles
within the cell, in which the cargo is packaged and then continually released through the
cell membrane. In regulated exocytosis, the secretory vesicle with its cargo is stored until
a signal triggers the process of secretion [
21
23
]. The secretory vesicle has to go through
several stages before secretion actually occurs. The first stage, docking, is the tethering and
linking of the vesicle to the plasma membrane. Docking is followed by priming, during
which the attached vesicle’s membrane is brought in proximity to the release site at the
plasma membrane. Finally, a trigger (most commonly an influx of Ca
2+
) leads to fusion,
during which the vesicle and the plasma membrane combine with each other. After fusion,
the secretory vesicle can either be recycled by the closing of the fusion pore, a model termed
“kiss-and-run”, or it can collapse and fully integrate with the plasma membrane [
21
,
24
].
Regardless of the mechanism of exocytosis, all cells require vesicular organelles with a
cargo and the molecular machinery to conduct exocytosis.
Similar to all eukaryotic cells, astrocytes contain different types of vesicular organelle
which cargo can be released to the environment. Generally, secretory vesicles form a
complex network originating from the ER or the Golgi apparatus, as well as from endo-
somes. Astrocytes are not different, and they contain several secretory organelles, including
synaptic-like microvesicles (SLMV) [
25
28
], dense-core vesicles (DCV) [
29
32
], secretory
lysosomes (SL) [
33
35
] and extracellular vesicles, which can be further divided into ex-
osomes and ectosomes [
36
,
37
]. Out of these, the SLMVs, DCVs and SLs have been well
described in the literature as undergoing exocytosis in astrocytes (see Table 1). In this
review, we focus on these three types of vesicular organelle, and the molecular machinery
regulating exocytosis and providing its spatial organisation, as well as on the Ca
2+
sensors
which can trigger membrane fusion.
Table 1. Secretory vesicles undergoing exocytosis in astrocytes.
Secretory Organelle Diameter Cargo Associated Proteins
Protein Name Gene Name
Synaptic-Like
Microvesicles (SLMVs) 30–100 nm Glutamate
d-serine
VGluT1
VGlut2
VGlut3
VAMP2 (synaptobrevin 2)
VAMP3 (cellubrevin)
Rab3a
V-ATPase
Slc17a7
Slc17a6
Slc17a8
Vamp2
Vamp3
Rab3a
Atp6v0, Atp6v1 1
Dense-Core Vesicles
(DCV) 100–600 nm
ANP
ATP
BDNF
Secretogranin II
Secretogranin III
Chromogranin
NPY
VAMP2 (synaptobrevin 2)
VAMP3 (cellubrevin)
VNuT
Vamp2
Vamp3
Slc17a9
Biomolecules 2021,11, 1367 3 of 19
Table 1. Cont.
Secretory Organelle Diameter Cargo Associated Proteins
Protein Name Gene Name
Secretory Lysosome
(SL) 300–500 nm
ATP
Cathepsin B
Cathepsin D
Proteolytic enzymes
VAMP7 (TI-VAMP)
Rab7
CD63
LAMP1
Sialin
VNuT
Vamp7
Rab7a
Cd63
Lamp1
Slc17a5
Slc17a9
1
V-ATPase is a large complex consisting of 13 subunits coded by many more genes; however, all the gene names start with Atp6v0 or with
Atp6v1 for the VOand V1domains, respectively.
1.1. Synaptic-like Microvesicles (SLMVs)
Astroglial SLMVs are small (30–100 nm in dimeter) electron-lucent vesicles, similar to
neuronal synaptic vesicles. They were first identified in the brain tissue in the molecular
layer of the dentate gyrus using electron microscopy [
25
]. They are much less numerous
than synaptic vesicles in neurons; however, they form small groups of 2–15 in the astro-
cytic cytoplasm and were shown to be present in the vicinity of NMDARs at asymmetric
synapses [
25
,
38
,
39
]. Further studies have also found astrocytic SLMVs close to extrasy-
naptic NMDARs containing the GluN2B subunit [
26
]. Despite being grouped, SLMVs in
astrocytes are not concentrated by structurally organised active zones, as it is the case in
neurons [
26
]; however, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) seems to be in proximity to these
clusters [
25
,
38
]. This localisation is in line with the canonical tripartite synapse model,
where local increases in Ca
2+
concentration released from the ER can trigger a release of
gliotransmitters. It should be noted, however, that ER is usually not present in perisynaptic
processes [
40
]. Additionally, it was shown that SLMVs containing vesicle-associated mem-
brane protein 2 (VAMP2) are highly mobile in astrocytes, and that an increase in cytosolic
Ca
2+
causes vesicle docking [
29
]. Similarly, Ca
2+
-regulated mobility of vesicular glutamate
transporter 1 (VGluT1)-positive vesicles have been found also in other studies [41].
SLMVs contain mainly small signalling molecules: glutamate and D-serine [
37
]. Fill-
ing vesicles with a transmitter requires active transport fuelled by an electrochemical
gradient generated by the vesicular ATP-dependent H
+
pump (V-ATPase), a large complex
composed of two domains, V
O
(transmembrane, responsible for H+ translocation) and V
1
(responsible for ATP hydrolysis) [
23
]. Expression of V-ATPase has been shown in cultured
astrocytes by fractionation and immunoblotting [
27
,
42
], immunofluorescence [
43
] and func-
tionally, by usage of its blocker—bafilomycin [
44
46
]. The transport of a neurotransmitter is
mediated by vesicular transporters. There are three vesicular glutamate transporters (VGluT1-
3) and they all have been identified in cultured astrocytes [
25
,
27
,
29
,
33
35
,
45
,
47
49
]. Moreover,
expression of VGluT1 and -3 has been demonstrated in acute and fixed tissue by a number
of techniques, including confocal and electron microscopy, and RT-PCR [
25
,
39
,
46
,
50
,
51
].
Electron microscopy studies have shown that VGluT1-3 colocalises with SLMVs in the hip-
pocampus [
25
,
39
,
51
] and, importantly, in the case of VGluT1 and -3, immunogold labelling
was not present in knockout animals of those proteins [
39
,
51
]. Additionally, Bezzi and
co-workers [
25
], by means of immunogold staining, have shown coloclization of VGluT1
and -2 with VAMP3. Notably, other studies have not confirmed the expression of VGluTs
in astrocytes by means of RNA-seq [
52
,
53
], gene chip microarrays [
54
], or by confocal
microscopy [
55
]. It has to be noted, however, that high-throughput methods such as RNA
sequencing or gene chip microarrays might not be sensitive enough to detect low protein
expression, and that because reported exocytosis in astrocytes is slow and glutamate is also
a metabolite for astrocytes, they might not need high expression of VGluTs [56,57].
So far, no D-serine vesicular transporter has been identified in astrocytes in situ;
however, it was shown to be present in immunopurified astrocytic vesicles in one study [
27
].
The identified transporter was proposed to be the D-serine/chloride co-transporter, which
uses the H
+
gradient created by V-ATPase concentrated D-serine in the vesicles [
27
]. It is
Biomolecules 2021,11, 1367 4 of 19
still not clear whether D-serine is loaded together with glutamate to the same SLMVs. This
process of vesicular synergy is present in neurons where glutamate is co-released with
dopamine, serotonin or acetylcholine [
58
]. VGluTs and D-serine are located in astrocytic
VAMP2- and VAMP3-positive vesicles, which raises the possibility that these may be the
same vesicles [
25
,
45
,
49
,
59
,
60
]. Additionally, in immunopurified SLMVs, both transmitters
can be present within the same vesicle, and D-serine application modulates the uptake of
glutamate to immunopurified SLMVs and vice versa [
27
]. This suggests that these two
amino acids may be released from the same vesicles. Notably, D-serine had no effect on
glutamate uptake into immunopurified synaptic vesicles [
27
]. Contrary to this evidence,
in fixed tissue, it was shown that D-serine and glutamate are stored in distinct vesicles
within the same astrocyte [38]. Notably, it has also been recently shown that the source of
D-serine is mainly neuronal, as serine racemase (SR)—the enzyme which converts L-serine
into D-serine—is expressed almost entirely in the neurons [
61
,
62
]. This, however, does
not exclude the possibility of D-serine transport from neurons to astrocytes and secondary
astroglial release of D-serine [
63
]. Additionally, traumatic brain injury causes a population
of reactive astrocytes to express SR, so astroglial D-serine may be important in pathological
conditions [64].
1.2. Dense-Core Vesicles (DCV)
Dense-core vesicles (DCVs) have been well studied in a variety of tissues, where
they are responsible for the storage and secretion of biogenic amines, peptides and neu-
rotrophins, including catecholamines released from adrenal chromaffin cells or insulin
released from DCVs in pancreatic
β
cells [
21
]. In astrocytes, DCVs are larger than SLMVs,
being 100–600 nm [
30
32
] in diameter; however, it has been reported that atrial natri-
uretic peptide (ANP)-containing vesicles can be 50 nm in diameter [
65
]. As their name
suggests, DCVs have an electron-dense core, although it is not as dense as that in neuroen-
docrine cells [
36
,
65
]. DCVs are not very abundant in astrocytes, accounting for roughly
2% of the vesicles [
29
]. Despite their low numbers, they have been shown in culture to
contain an array of molecules such as secretogranin II [
30
,
31
,
66
,
67
] and III [
68
,
69
], chromo-
granins [
32
], ANP [
66
,
70
,
71
], neuropeptide Y (NPY) [
31
,
72
], brain-derived neurotrophic
factor (BDNF) [
73
,
74
] and ATP [
75
,
76
]. To our knowledge, only secretogranins consisting
of DCVs have been shown to be present in situ in human brain tissue [
32
]. Interestingly,
the same study showed the existence of inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate (IP
3
) receptors (IP
3
Rs)
in DCVs, suggesting that they can serve as IP
3
-sensitive intracellular Ca
2+
reservoirs. As
they are relatively small, they could be directed to many distinct processes of the astrocyte,
including perisynaptic processes [
32
], and provide an additional source of Ca
2+
for regu-
lated exocytosis. Similar to SMLVs, DCVs have also been found to be highly mobile, and
an increase in cytosolic Ca2+ levels seems to decrease this mobility [77,78].
Of all molecules present in DCVs, ATP has attracted the most attention, as it is a
potent transmitter influencing glial and neuronal signalling, as well as behaviour [
79
,
80
].
Its localisation in DCVs in cultured astrocytes was demonstrated on a few occasions [
74
76
]
but, to our knowledge, not in the tissue. ATP is transported into vesicles by the vesicular
nucleotide transporter (VNuT) [
81
], which is also present in microglia [
82
]. VNuT is present
in cultured astrocytes [
47
,
83
85
] as well as in freshly isolated astrocytes [
86
]. Even though
there seems to be a lack of evidence showing VNuT in the astrocytes in tissue, an astrocyte-
selective VNuT knockout was shown to be important for fluoxetine-induced antidepressive
behaviour [
87
]. This provides proof, albeit indirect, that ATP is transported into the vesicles
in astrocytes in vivo.
1.3. Secretory Lysosomes (SL)
Secretory lysosomes have diameters ranging from 300 to 500 nm [
34
,
88
] and have
been identified multiple times in cultured astrocytes or in freshly isolated astrocytes,
where they store and release ATP in a Ca
2+
-dependent manner [
34
,
35
,
89
]. Moreover,
lysosomes can coexist with SLMVs in the same astrocyte, and they fuse with the plasma
Biomolecules 2021,11, 1367 5 of 19
membrane in a Ca
2+
-regulated manner, although small vesicles are exocytosed more
efficiently than lysosomes [
33
]. Secretory lysosomes contain ATP, cathepsin B and D and
other proteolytic enzymes [
34
,
37
,
90
,
91
]. Secretory lysosomes in cultured astrocytes can be
labelled by dextrans [
92
,
93
], various FM dyes and MANT-ATP—a fluorescent analogue
used in studies of ATP stores [
34
,
94
]—as well as quinacrine, which emits a green fluorescent
signal in the presence of intracellular ATP [
91
]. One study has found, however, that FM
dyes do not enter astrocytes on the endocytic pathway but rather via the store-operated
calcium channel and do not stain lysosomes [
95
]. In this study, the authors did not use
any lysosomal/endosome markers except for fluorescently labelled dextran. Astroglial
secretory lysosomes lack VGluTs, VAMP2 and VAMP3 [
33
,
34
]; however, they express
lysosomal-specific markers including cathepsin D, lysosomal-associated membrane protein
1 (LAMP1) [
34
,
59
], sialin, CD63/LAMP3 [
35
], monomeric ras-related protein Rab7 [
96
] and
VAMP7 [
35
]. Interestingly, VAMP7 is insensitive to cleavage by the tetanus neurotoxin
(TeNT) and contributes to TeNT-independent exocytotic release of ATP, hence its alternative
name (TI-VAMP) [
33
,
91
]. Downregulation of VAMP7 expression inhibits the fusion of ATP-
storing vesicles and decreases ATP-mediated calcium wave propagation [
91
], which is an
important form of long-range communication in the astrocytic network. Similar to DCV,
secretory lysosomes in the astrocytes express VNuT [
83
], which transports ATP from the
cytoplasm into the vesicles.
2. The Exocytosis Machinery in Astrocytes
Secretory vesicle docking, priming and fusion with a plasma membrane are generally
mediated by SNARE proteins (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein attach-
ment protein receptors) and SM proteins (Sec1/Munc18-like proteins) that undergo a cycle
of association and dissociation during the fusion reaction. The mechanism of regulated
SNARE complex assembly is conserved in many different cell types, including neuronal,
exocrine, haematopoetic and endocrine cells (Figure 1; for reviews, see [
21
,
23
,
97
99
]). The
SNARE complex consists of two target membrane proteins (t-SNARE), namely syntaxin
and SNAP-25 (or SNAP-23), and one vesicle-associated (v-SNARE) protein, VAMP2. Syn-
taxins are ~35 kDa proteins containing a carboxy-terminal transmembrane domain and
an amino terminus oriented toward the cytoplasm. The other t-SNARE, SNAP-25 or -23
(25 and 23 kDa respectively), is attached to the plasma membrane via four palmitoylated
cysteine residues. The v-SNARE VAMP2 is a 18 kDa protein with a vesicle lumen-oriented
carboxyl terminus and an amino terminus oriented toward the cytoplasm. During the
vesicle docking process, the SM protein Munc18-1 initially binds to the closed conformation
of syntaxin1. When the closed conformation of syntaxin1 “opens” during priming and
SNARE complexes starts forming, Munc18-1 remains attached to syntaxin1 in the assem-
bling SNARE complex but switches its binding mode to an interaction with the SNARE
complex. The SNARE complex is extremely stable, where one v-SNARE binds with two t-
SNARE proteins in a 1:1:1 ratio. The SNARE complex forms initially a “trans” configuration
(SNARE proteins are on opposite membranes) with amino- to carboxy-terminal zippering
of proteins, which brings the vesicle closer to the plasma membrane. Assembly of the
full trans-SNARE complex, together with the action of the SM protein, opens the fusion
pore. After fusion pore opening, the membrane of the vesicle and the plasma membrane
completely merge, and trans-SNARE complexes are converted into cis-SNARE complexes,
where the SNARE complexes are on a single membrane. Next, the cis-SNARE complex pro-
teins are bound by N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor (NSF) and soluble NSF-attachment
proteins (SNAPs, no relation to SNAP-25 and its homologs) to catalyse SNARE complex
dissociation into monomers. This allows for endocytosis of the v-SNARE and recycling of
the individual t-SNAREs back to their respective plasma membrane compartments.
Biomolecules 2021,11, 1367 6 of 19
Biomolecules 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 19
ment proteins (SNAPs, no relation to SNAP-25 and its homologs) to catalyse SNARE com-
plex dissociation into monomers. This allows for endocytosis of the v-SNARE and recy-
cling of the individual t-SNAREs back to their respective plasma membrane compart-
ments.
Figure 1. Schematic SNARE/SM cycle. SNARE and SM proteins undergo a cycle of assembly and disassembly. At the
beginning of docking, syntaxin1 is present in a “closed” conformation in which its Habc domain (purple) blocks its SNARE
motif (dark blue rectangle). In this position, Munc18-1 binds monomeric syntaxin1. For the SNARE complex to assemble,
syntaxin1 has to ‘‘open’’. During this conformational change, the SNARE complex assembly and Munc18-1 change their
binding to syntaxin1 by binding to assemble the trans-SNARE complexes via interacting with the syntaxin1 N-peptide.
Once the SNARE complexes have partly assembled, complexin binds to further tighten secretory vesicle priming. The
‘‘superprimed’’ SNARE/SM protein complexes are then ready for the Ca
2+
-trigger. Ca
2+
binds to synaptotagmin, which
causes an interaction between synaptotagmin and SNAREs and phospholipids of the plasma membrane. After fusion pore
opening, the vesicular membrane and plasma membrane merge, resulting in a change from trans- to cis-SNARE complexes.
The association of NSF/SNAP ATPases disassembles SNARE complexes to free SNAREs, and the vesicle is recycled, can
be refilled with neurotransmitters, and reused for another release (modified from [98]).
For over two decades, a large number of studies identified components of the SNARE
complex and SM proteins in the astrocytes; however, the issue of regulated exocytosis still
remains a matter of debate. Out of the v-SNAREs, the expression of VAMP2 and VAMP3
has been shown multiple times in vitro [29,45,100–102] and in vivo [43,46,52–54,103].
The functionality of VAMP2/VAMP3 has been confirmed by multiple studies, espe-
cially by the use of tetanus neurotoxin (TeNT) and botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT), which
cleave SNARE proteins. In particular, application of TeNT to cultured astrocytes attenu-
ated the exocytotic release of glutamate [25,45,104–106]. Moreover, the enzymatically ac-
tive light chain of TeNT was applied through a patch pipette to astrocytes in acute slices,
where it abolished the release of
D
-serine [16] or glutamate [26,107], which affected neigh-
bouring neurons. Importantly, Haydon’s laboratory has developed a transgenic mouse
Figure 1.
Schematic SNARE/SM cycle. SNARE and SM proteins undergo a cycle of assembly and disassembly. At the
beginning of docking, syntaxin1 is present in a “closed” conformation in which its Habc domain (purple) blocks its SNARE
motif (dark blue rectangle). In this position, Munc18-1 binds monomeric syntaxin1. For the SNARE complex to assemble,
syntaxin1 has to “open”. During this conformational change, the SNARE complex assembly and Munc18-1 change their
binding to syntaxin1 by binding to assemble the trans-SNARE complexes via interacting with the syntaxin1 N-peptide.
Once the SNARE complexes have partly assembled, complexin binds to further tighten secretory vesicle priming. The
“superprimed” SNARE/SM protein complexes are then ready for the Ca
2+
-trigger. Ca
2+
binds to synaptotagmin, which
causes an interaction between synaptotagmin and SNAREs and phospholipids of the plasma membrane. After fusion pore
opening, the vesicular membrane and plasma membrane merge, resulting in a change from trans- to cis-SNARE complexes.
The association of NSF/SNAP ATPases disassembles SNARE complexes to free SNAREs, and the vesicle is recycled, can be
refilled with neurotransmitters, and reused for another release (modified from [98]).
For over two decades, a large number of studies identified components of the SNARE
complex and SM proteins in the astrocytes; however, the issue of regulated exocytosis still
remains a matter of debate. Out of the v-SNAREs, the expression of VAMP2 and VAMP3
has been shown multiple times in vitro [29,45,100102] and in vivo [43,46,5254,103].
The functionality of VAMP2/VAMP3 has been confirmed by multiple studies, espe-
cially by the use of tetanus neurotoxin (TeNT) and botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT), which
cleave SNARE proteins. In particular, application of TeNT to cultured astrocytes atten-
uated the exocytotic release of glutamate [
25
,
45
,
104
106
]. Moreover, the enzymatically
active light chain of TeNT was applied through a patch pipette to astrocytes in acute slices,
where it abolished the release of D-serine [
16
] or glutamate [
26
,
107
], which affected neigh-
bouring neurons. Importantly, Haydon’s laboratory has developed a transgenic mouse
which overexpress a dominant negative SNARE (cytosolic tail of VAMP2, dnSNARE) in
astrocytes [
17
]. This method had been previously shown to decrease astrocytic gliotrans-
mission
in vitro
[
46
] and was later explained in detail as stabilizing the fusion pore in a
narrow, release-unproductive state, thus effectively decreasing exocytosis [
73
]. Experiments
Biomolecules 2021,11, 1367 7 of 19
with dnSNARE transgenic mice performed not only by Haydon’s group showed reduced
SNARE-dependent gliotransmission (mostly of adenosine and ATP), which influences the
behaviour, synaptic transmission and maturation of neurons [
17
,
86
,
108
113
]. Although
studies using dnSNARE mice were convincing and showed the transgenic expression
specifically in astrocytes, a study by Fujita and co-workers [
114
] found that dnSNARE
can be also expressed in the neurons of transgenic mice, thus questioning the previous
findings. This has led to a heated debate (see [
115
,
116
]). The discussion has pointed to
technical matters in studying gliotransmission, particularly the use of the GFAP promoter
as a glial-specific promoter. Importantly, another study using astrocyte-specific expression
of the BoNT serotype B light chain (BoNT/B) in a Cre/Lox system (named “iBot mice”)
showed decreased VAMP-dependent glutamate release from the astrocytes and impaired
glial volume regulation [
117
]. Later, the same model (iBot mice) was used in parallel with
dnSNARE mice to show that blockade of gliotransmitter release from astrocytes influences
adult-born neurons, reduces their glutamatergic synaptic input as well as dendritic spine
density, and leads to their lower functional integration and hence survival [
110
]. This
result validated the relevance of the dnSNARE mouse model, as well as the importance of
astrocytic exocytosis.
Other v-SNARE proteins have also been identified in astrocytes. In particular, VAMP7
was shown in astrocytes
in vitro
as a v-SNARE associated with lysosomes [
35
,
59
,
91
], as was
VAMP8 [
35
,
59
]. Additionally, VAMP4 and VAMP8 can be found to be actively expressed
in vivo
in the cortex, hippocampus and striatal astrocytes, based on RNA sequencing [
53
].
For t-SNARE proteins, astrocytes were shown to express syntaxin1; however, the
results of various studies have been mixed. Syntaxin1 has been demonstrated in cultured
astrocytes [
45
,
66
], albeit at a lower level than in isolated synaptosomal membranes [
118
].
Additionally, one group failed to find syntaxin1 in cultured astrocytes [
119
], while an-
other was able to identify it in astrocytes in situ [
120
]. Syntaxin4, however, seems to
have a much higher expression level in astrocytes than syntaxin1, and it was shown to
be expressed in culture [
66
], in situ [
121
] and ex vivo from freshly isolated astrocytes,
based on RNA sequencing [
53
]. With regard to the second t-SNARE, it seems that as-
trocytes express SNAP-23 rather than SNAP-25. The latter failed to be found even in
cultured
astrocytes [45,66,118,119,122,123]
. SNAP-23 was, however, identified in astro-
cytes
in vitro
[
27
,
29
,
43
,
45
,
46
,
48
,
66
,
122
,
123
] and in fixed tissue
in vivo
[
43
,
120
], although
one recent study has found its expression to be insignificant, based on RNA sequencing,
while showing SNAP-25 expression [
53
]. Therefore, the expression profile of SNARE
proteins in astrocytes seems to follow other non-neuronal cells, where the SNARE com-
plex consists mostly of SNAP-23, syntaxin 4 and VAMP2 (synaptobrevin 2) or VAMP3
(cellubrevin) [124126].
As mentioned above, the SNARE complex requires SM proteins for its formation, in
particular Munc-18 is a prominent and well-studied example. It was shown to be significant
for vesicle docking in chromaffin cells where Munc18-1 knockout reduces fraction of
docked vesicles from 30% to 5% [
21
,
127
]. Moreover, Munc18-1 binding to assembling
SNARE complexes is essential for synaptic vesicle fusion, and in every SNARE-dependent
fusion reaction studied, an SM protein participated and was essential for that fusion
reaction [
98
]. Munc18-1 and Munc18-3 have been found in cultured and freshly isolated
astrocytes [
46
,
66
,
128
], while RNA sequencing from freshly isolated astrocytes has shown
that they express Munc18-3 rather than Munc18-1, which is expressed in the neurons [
52
].
A similar result has recently been found in another study using RNA sequencing, where
Munc18-1 expression was found in astrocytes at a low level; however, Munc18-3 and
Munc18-4 were enriched in the astrocytes [53].
Other components of the exocytosis machinery in astrocytes have not been intensively
studied. Notable exceptions are the Rab proteins—small GTPases that are localised on
synaptic vesicles and are important for their docking. Cultured astrocytes were shown to
express Rab3 [
100
,
101
,
129
,
130
], which is usually associated with SMLVs or DCVs. A recent
study in cultured astrocytes has shown that disruption of Rab3 function by mutated Hunt-
Biomolecules 2021,11, 1367 8 of 19
ingtin blocks the docking of DCVs and ultimately decreases BDNF and ATP release [
74
].
Expression of Rab7, which is associated with late endosomes/lysosomes, was also reported
in astrocytes
in vitro
[
29
,
35
,
91
,
131
]. Additionally, Rab10 and Rab35 have also been shown
to be associated with lysosomes in cultured astrocytes [
131
]. Thanks to access to a database
(http://astrocyternaseq.org/ accessed on 1 January 2021) of sequenced astrocytic RNAs
from different brain structures [
53
], we were able to confirm the expression of Rab3a, Rab7
and Rab35 in freshly isolated astrocytes. All these proteins are expressed at a significantly
different level from the expression threshold set as fragments per kilobase per million
(FPKM) >10 (see [53]).
3. Spatial Organisation of Exocytosis
Ultrafast neurotransmitter release, which occurs in neurons in response to an action
potential, can only be achieved by bringing Ca
2+
channels to docked and primed synaptic
vesicles at the active zone. Most of the active zones in vertebrates are specialised disc-
like structures at the plasma membrane with a 0.2–0.5
µ
m diameter. Active zones are
surrounded by a perisynaptic zone containing transsynaptic cell adhesion molecules and
receptors regulating neurotransmitter release, which is the site of synaptic vesicle endocyto-
sis [
132
]. The core of the active zone is formed mainly by the members of six evolutionarily
conserved proteins: Rab3-interacting molecules (RIM), RIM-binding proteins (RIM-BP),
Munc13 (no relation to Munc18),
α
-liprin and ELKS protein, as well as piccolo/bassoon.
RIM, RIM-BP and Munc13, are multidomain proteins, whereas
α
-liprin and ELKS exhibit
a simpler structure. Active zone proteins form a single large protein complex that docks
and primes synaptic vesicles, recruits Ca
2+
channels to the docked and primed vesicles,
tethers the vesicles and Ca
2+
channels to synaptic cell adhesion molecules, and mediates
synaptic plasticity. Astrocytes do not have an active zone that could be observed under an
electron microscope; however, the fact that there have been observations of small groups of
SMLVs in astrocytes (see above) [
25
,
38
,
39
] suggest the possibility of its existence. To our
best knowledge, components of the active zone have not been intensively studied, except
for Munc13, which is a priming factor catalysing the conformational switch of syntaxin1
from closed to open, promoting SNARE complex assembly. Mungenast [
133
] found the
expression of Munc13-1 in cultured astrocytes by RT-PCR, immunostaining and Western
blotting, and showed that siRNA downregulation of Munc13-1 inhibits astrocytic ATP
release, induced by diacylglycerol (DAG). In another study based on RNA sequencing
from freshly isolated astrocytes, Munc13-2 and -3 were enriched in the astrocytes, while
Munc13-1 was expressed mainly by neurons [
52
,
134
]. Similar results can be found in RNA
sequencing data from freshly isolated astrocytes; however, only Munc13-3 has shown a
significant level of expression in these cells in the striatum [
53
]. Results showing the ex-
pression and function of Munc13 in regulated exocytosis in the astrocytes are very limited,
and the involvement of other active zone components in vesicular release could provide
more insights into explaining the process. It can be theorised, however, that the spatial
organisation of exocytosis in astrocytes might be completely different from that present
at a presynaptic site in neurons. For example, a recent report by Buscemi and co-workers
showed that mGlu5 interacts with Homer1b/c in astrocytes and that this interaction is
crucial for the their glutamate release [
135
]. The interaction between Homer and mGluR5
in astrocytes has been previously suggested but not shown directly [
136
]. Homer1 is,
however, a neuronal postsynaptic marker (for a review, see [
137
]) and its role in astrocytes
is quite novel. Nevertheless, in line with these observations, neurons may also have “non-
canonical” exocytosis machinery, which has been reported, for example, in dendrites [
138
].
Interestingly, the composition of the SNARE complex, which was proposed to regulate
exocytosis from neuronal dendrites, is very similar to that proposed in astrocytes and
consists of SNAP-23, syntaxin 4 and VAMP2 or VAMP3 [138].
Biomolecules 2021,11, 1367 9 of 19
4. The Ca2+ Sensor for Regulated Exocytosis in Astrocytes
Under physiological circumstances, primed vesicles are stimulated to exocytosis by
Ca
2+
; therefore, to trigger the final stage of the fusion reaction, a Ca
2+
sensor is required
at the site of exocytosis. Since the discovery of synaptotagmin1 (Syt1) [
139
], it has been
proposed to be the Ca
2+
sensor for regulated exocytosis. Syts are evolutionarily conserved
proteins containing a short amino-terminal sequence directed toward the vesicle lumen,
followed by a transmembrane region, a central linker sequence of variable length, and
two carboxy-terminal C2 domains that bind Ca
2+
. [
98
,
140
]. C2 domains were initially
defined in protein-kinase C isozymes and were later shown to constitute autonomously
folding Ca2+/phospholipid-binding domains. In addition, C2 domains constitute protein
interaction domains and, in the case of Syt1, bind to syntaxin-1 and to SNARE complexes.
There are 16 Syts expressed in the brain and eight of them bind Ca
2+
: Syt1, Syt2, Syt3,
Syt5, Syt6, Syt7, Syt9 and Syt10 [
140
]. Out of those, Syt1, Syt2 and Syt9 are responsible
for triggering fast fusion of the synaptic vesicles; however, astrocytes do not seem to
express any of them [
52
,
53
,
123
,
141
,
142
]. Strikingly, for many other forms of regulated,
Ca
2+
-triggered exocytosis, Syt1, Syt2 and Syt9 are involved in chromaffin cells, neuropep-
tide secretion in neurons or mast cell degranulation. However, Syt7 has also been shown
to be involved in triggering exocytosis in chromaffin cells [
143
], pancreatic insulin- and
glucagon-secreting cells [
144
,
145
], or exocytosis of lysosomes in fibroblasts [
146
]. In neu-
rons, Syt7 was also shown to be important for Ca
2+
-triggered asynchronous release [
147
].
For astrocytes, however, results showing Syt7 expression are quite ambiguous. Studies
in cultured astrocytes did not detect Syt7 [
142
,
148
] or even showed that overexpression
of Syt7 inhibited lysosomal exocytosis [
148
]. However, Mittelsteadt and colleagues [
141
]
showed, using single cell RT-PCR, that patch-clamped hippocampal astrocytes in the CA1
stratum radiatum express Syt7 (in seven out of nine cells). However, cultured astrocytes
express Syt4 and Syt11 [
29
,
65
,
123
,
142
,
148
150
]. Syt4 expression was also found in freshly
isolated astrocytes by RT-PCR [
142
]; similarly, Syt11 was found by RNA sequencing [
52
,
53
]
and RT-PCR [
141
]. Zhang and co-workers also confirmed the expression of Syt4 in situ
by confocal and electron microscopy. Even though Syt4 and Syt11 do not bind Ca
2+
[
151
],
Zhang and co-workers have shown that it regulates astrocytic Ca
2+
-dependent glutamate
release in cultured astrocytes [
142
]. Similarly, Syt11 was shown to regulate Ca
2+
-dependent
lysosome exocytosis in injured astrocytes [
148
]. It should be mentioned that there is a
whole set of studies showing that astrocytes do not release neurotransmitters in response
to Ca
2+
elevation, arguing against the existence of Ca
2+
-dependent exocytosis in astrocytes
(for in depth reviews, see [
7
,
19
,
20
,
115
,
152
]). Clearly, the involvement of synaptotagmins
in regulated exocytosis in astrocytes needs further studies and clarification, especially in
more intact preparations like brain slices or in vivo.
Synaptotagmins, however, do not act alone in triggering fusion but require complexin
as a cofactor [
140
]. Complexin was discovered by virtue of its tight binding to SNARE
complexes. It functions as a priming factor for SNARE complexes, as well as an activator
of these complexes, preparing them for subsequent synaptotagmin action, and also as a
clamp of spontaneous release, preventing unregulated fusion [
98
]. Complexin’s expression
in astrocytes has been studied mainly
in vitro
, where cultured astrocytes have been shown
to express complexin 2, while complexin 1 was expressed in the neurons [
46
,
153
,
154
].
Recently, complexin 2 expression was confirmed by RNA sequencing data [
53
], while
complexin 1 was also expressed at a significant level, albeit much lower than the general
tissue level, and only in cortical astrocytes.
It should also be noted that Ca
2+
is not the only signal that can trigger vesicle secretion,
as many cells show GTP-dependent DCV secretion. Non-hydrolysable GTP was shown to
trigger secretion in a Ca
2+
-independent manner in chromaffin cells [
155
], mast cells [
156
]
and pancreatic
β
cells [
157
]. Even though GTP-dependent exocytosis differs from Ca
2+
-
dependent exocytosis in terms of the signal sensor for triggering, the final fusion steps are
still dependent on the SNARE proteins [
21
]. The major sensors for GTP in GTP-dependent
exocytosis are considered to be Ral proteins (RalA and RalB) and GTPases [
158
]. Ral
Biomolecules 2021,11, 1367 10 of 19
proteins interact with the exocyst protein complex, which is an octameric protein complex
containing, among other proteins, Sec5, which is bound by Ral in a GTP-dependent
manner [
21
,
159
]. It is believed that the exocyst complex tethers secretory vesicles to
the plasma membrane, where fusion occurs in a SNARE-dependent manner [
159
]. For
example, live-cell imaging of Sec8 (another member of the exocyst complex) showed that it
is transported to a cellular membrane where it remains for seconds until fusion occurs [
160
],
which is in line with the slow kinetics of astrocytic release after stimulus [
161
]. Additionally,
members of the exocyst complex can interact with Rab proteins or v-SNARE [
162
], directly
with plasma membrane via phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P2) [
163
], and
with a Sec1/Munc18 (SM) protein family member, Sec1 [
164
]. Interestingly, when we
searched for expression of RalA, RalB and Sec5 (encoded in mice by Ral1a, Ral1b and Exoc2,
respectively) in a database of sequenced astrocytic RNAs (http://astrocyternaseq.org/
accessed on 1 January 2021), we found that all these proteins are expressed at a significantly
different level from the expression threshold set as fragments per kilobase per million
(FPKM) >10 [
53
]. However, to our knowledge, so far, there are no experimental data
exploring the exocyst complex in astrocytes, as it has mostly been studied in yeast. Given
the lack of Ca
2+
-binding synaptotagmins in astrocytes and their slow exocytosis [
37
,
161
],
GTP-dependent exocytosis could be an interesting alternative hypothesis.
5. Exocytosis in Pathological Conditions
In nearly all brain pathologies, such as traumatic brain injury, stroke, ischemia, infec-
tious disease, neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative disease, epilepsy, brain tumours,
schizophrenia, migraine or depression, there is clearly a presence of “reactive astroglio-
sis” [
165
,
166
]. This term is a result of a consensus statement [
167
] recently proposed to
describe the process in which, in response to pathology, astrocytes engage in molecularly
defined programs involving changes in transcriptional regulation, biochemical, morpho-
logical, metabolic and physiological remodelling, which result in a loss of or increase in
homeostatic functions and/or the gain of completely new function(s).
Accumulating evidence suggests that in pathological conditions, microglia are acti-
vated first and, through the release of ATP and inflammatory mediators (mainly interleukin-
1
α
(IL-1
α
), tumour necrosis factor (TNF) and complement component 1, subcomponent q
(C1q)), subsequently trigger astrocytic activation [
168
,
169
]. Activated astrocytes, in turn,
increase their production and secretion of chemotactic cytokine stromal cell-derived factor-
1
α
(SDF-1
α
) [
170
,
171
], the proinflammatory cytokine TNF and the inflammatory mediator
prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) [
105
,
172
], IL-1
α
, IL-6, interferon-
γ
(IFN-
γ
) [
173
] and many oth-
ers [
174
]. As mentioned above, some groups have argued that astrocytes are capable of
Ca
2+
-regulated exocytosis only after activation by microglia (see, for example, [
115
,
175
]).
In support of this view, a previous report by Pascual and co-workers [
176
] showed that
activation of the microglia by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induced a rapid (within minutes)
and transient (several minutes long) increase in the frequency of excitatory synaptic cur-
rents in acute hippocampal slices. The proposed mechanism involved the activation of
metabotropic P2Y1 receptors (P2Y1Rs) on astrocytes by the release of ATP from the mi-
croglia, thus triggering glutamate release from astrocytes and finally modulating synaptic
mGluRs. Similarly, it was shown that astrocytes from TNF-deficient or TNF type 1 receptor
(TNFR1)-deficient mice displayed altered P2Y1R-dependent Ca
2+
signalling and decreased
glutamate release [
44
,
177
]. Interestingly, a recent study [
178
] has shown that the presence
of microglia downregulates the expression of VAMP2 in astrocytes, which slows down the
vesicular release by astrocytes. This favours the longer release of transmitters in opposition
to a rapid release and exhaustion of the vesicular pool in the absence of microglial factors.
Additionally, the authors showed that the gliotransmission triggered by the P2Y1 agonist
is impaired in slices from transgenic mice devoid of microglia [178].
SDF-1
α
, TNF or PGE2 by themselves are also sufficient to induce glutamate release
from astrocytes, albeit still in a Ca
2+
-dependent manner. They act through activation of their
respective receptors—CXCR4 and-, TNFR (both G
i/o
–associated GPCRs)—or prostaglandin
Biomolecules 2021,11, 1367 11 of 19
E (EP) receptors (G
i
/G
s
–associated GPCRs) [
104
,
105
,
175
,
179
181
]. The Ca
2+
-dependence
of the exocytosis of glutamate after activation of these receptors is based on an observation
that the response is blocked by intracellular Ca
2+
chelators or inhibitors of exocytosis [
105
].
In physiological conditions, astrocytes maintain constant levels of blood and brain
PCO
2
/pH and they respond to physiological decreases in pH with vigorous elevations
in intracellular Ca
2+
and regulate the exocytosis of ATP [
182
]. However, in pathological
conditions of hypoxia, they can react to a decrease in PO2 by Ca
2+
signalling, accompa-
nied by increases in mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and ATP
exocytosis [
183
,
184
]. In the context of hypoxia, a recent study by Byts and co-workers [
185
]
has shown that transmembrane prolyl 4-hydroxylase (P4H-TM), which is located in the
ER and has a Ca
2+
-sensing EF-domain, controls ATP-induced Ca
2+
signalling and glio-
transmission. This effect is mediated by hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF1), which is a
heterodimeric transcription factor. In normoxia, prolyl 4-hydroxylase (P4H) hydroxy-
lates two prolyl residues located on HIF’s
α
subunit. This hydroxylation leads to von
Hippel–Lindau (VHL)-targeted degradation of HIFa, which suppresses the transcription
of hypoxia-responsive genes. However, in hypoxia, P4H is inactive, which leads to stabil-
isation, accumulation and activation of HIF and induction of hypoxia-responsive genes.
One study [
185
] showed that P4H-TM knockout animals had a changed expression of
several genes related to Ca
2+
signalling and vesicular transport/docking pathways, thus
influencing receptor-operated calcium entry (ROCE) and store-operated calcium entry
(SOCE), as well as calcium re-uptake by mitochondria. Moreover, in an
in vitro
model
of cerebral ischemia, oxygen–glucose deprivation (OGD), there was a biphasic increase
in Ca
2+
signalling in astrocytes as well as neurons and a subsequent accumulation of
pro-inflammatory factors, such as IL-1b and TNF
α
, leading to hyperexcitation of the neu-
rons and their death after reoxygenation [
186
]. Interestingly, pretreatment of cell cultures
with the selective
α
2-adrenergic receptor agonists guanfacine and UK-14,304 showed a
neuroprotective effect through Ca2+-regulated exocytosis of ATP [186].
Reactive astrocytes have been also shown to release complement system proteins [
187
].
The complement system represents one of the most basic immune cascades. The comple-
ment proteins C3a, C1q and C5 are present in the brain, where they regulate neurogenesis,
neuronal survival and synaptic elimination [
188
,
189
]. It has been shown that NF-
κ
B sig-
nalling promotes the secretion of C3a. In Alzheimer’s disease, exposure to amyloid
β
strongly activates astroglial NF-
κ
B, which increases the astroglial C3a release that, in turn,
contributes to neurodegeneration [187].
Finally, the activation of astrocytes is often associated with their morphological and
biochemical remodelling. The reactivity is manifested by an increased expression of
intermediate filaments (most notably GFAP and vimentin). It has been suggested that such
an upregulation of intermediate filaments allows faster and therefore more efficient delivery
of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) Class II molecules to the cell surface. Exposure
of astrocytes to INF-γinduced MHC Class II expression in late endosomes/lysosomes [92,96].
6. Conclusions
Astrocytes are receiving increasing attention as their complex role in the central
nervous system becomes more prominent and accepted. In this review, we presented
only a fraction of the studies which not only show that astrocytes have various types of
secretory vesicles but also that they express a complex molecular machinery associated
with those vesicles which is sufficient for their regulated exocytosis. For other excellent
in-depth reviews, please see [
36
,
134
,
161
]. Even though some of the components of this
release machinery, such as SNARE or synaptotagmins, have been intensively studied for
over two decades, others have remained mostly undescribed. These include potential
scaffolding proteins or components of the active zone, which can direct exocytosis to
the most crucial places for astrocyte–neuron communication, but also alternative to Ca
2+
mechanisms of triggering exocytosis. Moreover, much attention needs to be given to
designing new experiments to bring them to the more physiology-relevant environment
Biomolecules 2021,11, 1367 12 of 19
of neural tissue. New techniques of astrocyte culturing also give hope for creating new
study models which will resemble astrocytes in the brain. Regardless of the discussion on
Ca
2+
sources for triggering exocytosis and gaps in our knowledge about the elements of
the exocytotic molecular machinery, astrocytes have proven to be an important component
of neuronal networks.
Author Contributions:
Conceptualisation, P.M.; investigation, P.M. and A.M.; writing—original draft
preparation, P.M., A.M.; writing—review and editing, P.M.; funding acquisition, P.M. All authors
have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding:
This research was funded by National Science Centre, Poland, grant number 2017/26/D/
NZ3/01017.
Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement: Not applicable.
Acknowledgments:
We would like to thank Katarzyna Kuter and Agnieszka Jurga for giving us the
opportunity to participate in the Special Issue: “Astroglia in Physiology, Pathology and Therapy”,
and Leszek Kaczmarek for all the support.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1.
Oberheim, N.A.; Takano, T.; Han, X.; He, W.; Lin, J.H.C.; Wang, F.; Xu, Q.; Wyatt, J.D.; Pilcher, W.; Ojemann, J.; et al. Uniquely
Hominid Features of Adult Human Astrocytes. J. Neurosci. 2009,29, 3276–3287. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2.
Giaume, C.; Naus, C.C. Connexins, gap junctions, and glia. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Membr. Transp. Signal.
2013
,2, 133–142.
[CrossRef]
3.
Edallérac, G.; Echever, O.; Erouach, N. How do astrocytes shape synaptic transmission? Insights from electrophysiology. Front.
Cell. Neurosci. 2013,7, 159. [CrossRef]
4.
Cornell-Bell, A.H.; Finkbeiner, S.M.; Cooper, M.S.; Smith, S.J. Glutamate induces calcium waves in cultured astrocytes: Long-range
glial signaling. Science 1990,247, 470–473. [CrossRef]
5.
Agulhon, C.; Petravicz, J.; McMullen, A.B.; Sweger, E.J.; Minton, S.K.; Taves, S.; Casper, K.B.; Fiacco, T.A.; McCarthy, K.D. What Is
the Role of Astrocyte Calcium in Neurophysiology? Neuron 2008,59, 932–946. [CrossRef]
6.
Araque, A.; Carmignoto, G.; Haydon, P.G.; Oliet, S.H.; Robitaille, R.; Volterra, A. Gliotransmitters Travel in Time and Space.
Neuron 2014,81, 728–739. [CrossRef]
7. Bazargani, N.; Attwell, D. Astrocyte calcium signaling: The third wave. Nat. Neurosci. 2016,19, 182–189. [CrossRef]
8.
Bekar, L.K.; He, W.; Nedergaard, M. Locus Coeruleus
α
-Adrenergic–Mediated Activation of Cortical Astrocytes In Vivo. Cereb.
Cortex 2008,18, 2789–2795. [CrossRef]
9.
Hirase, H.; Qian, L.; Barthó, P.; Buzsaki, G. Calcium Dynamics of Cortical Astrocytic Networks In Vivo. PLoS Biol.
2004
,2, e96.
[CrossRef]
10.
Nedergaard, M. Direct signaling from astrocytes to neurons in cultures of mammalian brain cells. Science
1994
,263, 1768–1771.
[CrossRef]
11.
Parpura, V.; Basarsky, T.A.; Liu, F.; Jeftinija, K.; Jeftinija, S.; Haydon, P.G. Glutamate-mediated astrocyte–neuron signalling. Nat.
Cell Biol. 1994,369, 744–747. [CrossRef]
12.
Perea, G.; Navarrete, M.; Araque, A. Tripartite synapses: Astrocytes process and control synaptic information. Trends Neurosci.
2009,32, 421–431. [CrossRef]
13.
Volterra, A.; Liaudet, N.; Savtchouk, I. Astrocyte Ca
2+
signalling: An unexpected complexity. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.
2014
,15, 327–335.
[CrossRef]
14.
Hamilton-Whitaker, N.; Attwell, D. Do astrocytes really exocytose neurotransmitters? Nat. Rev. Neurosci.
2010
,11, 227–238.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
15.
Angulo, M.C.; Kozlov, A.S.; Charpak, S.; Audinat, E. Glutamate Released from Glial Cells Synchronizes Neuronal Activity in the
Hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 2004,24, 6920–6927. [CrossRef]
16.
Henneberger, C.; Papouin, T.; Oliet, S.H.R.; Rusakov, D.A. Long-term potentiation depends on release of d-serine from astrocytes.
Nature 2010,463, 232–236. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17.
Pascual, O.; Casper, K.B.; Kubera, C.; Zhang, J.; Revilla-Sanchez, R.; Sul, J.-Y.; Takano, H.; Moss, S.J.; McCarthy, K.; Haydon, P.G.
Astrocytic Purinergic Signaling Coordinates Synaptic Networks. Science 2005,310, 113–116. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
18.
Serrano, A.; Haddjeri, N.; Lacaille, J.-C.; Robitaille, R. GABAergic Network Activation of Glial Cells Underlies Hippocampal
Heterosynaptic Depression. J. Neurosci. 2006,26, 5370–5382. [CrossRef]
Biomolecules 2021,11, 1367 13 of 19
19.
Fiacco, T.A.; McCarthy, K.D. Multiple Lines of Evidence Indicate That Gliotransmission Does Not Occur under Physiological
Conditions. J. Neurosci. 2018,38, 3–13. [CrossRef]
20. Savtchouk, I.; Volterra, A. Gliotransmission: Beyond Black-and-White. J. Neurosci. 2018,38, 14–25. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
21. Sugita, S. Mechanisms of exocytosis. Acta Physiol. 2007,192, 185–193. [CrossRef]
22. Thorn, P.; Zorec, R.; Rettig, J.; Keating, D.J. Exocytosis in non-neuronal cells. J. Neurochem. 2016,137, 849–859. [CrossRef]
23. Südhof, T.C.; Rizo, J. Synaptic Vesicle Exocytosis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011,3, a005637. [CrossRef]
24.
Chanaday, N.L.; Cousin, M.A.; Milosevic, I.; Watanabe, S.; Morgan, J.R. The Synaptic Vesicle Cycle Revisited: New Insights into
the Modes and Mechanisms. J. Neurosci. 2019,39, 8209–8216. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25.
Bezzi, P.; Gundersen, V.; Galbete, J.L.; Seifert, G.; Steinhäuser, C.; Pilati, E.; Volterra, A. Astrocytes contain avesicular compartment
that is competent for regulated exocytosis of glutamate. Nat. Neurosci. 2004,7, 613–620. [CrossRef]
26.
Jourdain, P.; Bergersen, L.H.; Bhaukaurally, K.; Bezzi, P.; Santello, M.; Domercq, M.; Matute, C.; Tonello, F.; Gundersen, V.; Volterra,
A. Glutamate exocytosis from astrocytes controls synaptic strength. Nat. Neurosci. 2007,10, 331–339. [CrossRef]
27.
Martineau, M.; Shi, T.; Puyal, J.; Knolhoff, A.; Dulong, J.; Gasnier, B.; Klingauf, J.; Sweedler, J.V.; Jahn, R.; Mothet, J.-P. Storage
and uptake of d-serine into astrocytic synaptic-like vesicles specify gliotransmission. J. Neurosci.
2013
,33, 3413–3423. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
28.
Bergersen, L.; Gundersen, V. Morphological evidence for vesicular glutamate release from astrocytes. Neuroscience
2009
,158,
260–265. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
29.
Crippa, D.; Schenk, U.; Francolini, M.; Rosa, P.; Verderio, C.; Zonta, M.; Pozzan, T.; Matteoli, M.; Carmignoto, G. Synaptobrevin2-
expressing vesicles in rat astrocytes: Insights into molecular characterization, dynamics and exocytosis. J. Physiol.
2006
,570,
567–582. [CrossRef]
30.
Calegari, F.; Coco, S.; Taverna, E.; Bassetti, M.; Verderio, C.; Corradi, N.; Matteoli, M.; Rosa, P. A Regulated Secretory Pathway in
Cultured Hippocampal Astrocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 1999,274, 22539–22547. [CrossRef]
31.
Prada, I.; Marchaland, J.; Podini, P.; Magrassi, L.; D’Alessandro, R.; Bezzi, P.; Meldolesi, J. REST/NRSF governs the expression of
dense-core vesicle gliosecretion in astrocytes. J. Cell Biol. 2011,193, 537–549. [CrossRef]
32.
Hur, Y.S.; Kim, K.D.; Paek, S.H.; Yoo, S.H. Evidence for the Existence of Secretory Granule (Dense-Core Vesicle)-Based Inositol
1,4,5-Trisphosphate-Dependent Ca2+ Signaling System in Astrocytes. PLoS ONE 2010,5, e11973. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
33.
Liu, T.; Sun, L.; Xiong, Y.; Shang, S.; Guo, N.; Teng, S.; Wang, Y.; Liu, B.; Wang, C.; Wang, L.; et al. Calcium Triggers Exocytosis
from Two Types of Organelles in a Single Astrocyte. J. Neurosci. 2011,31, 10593–10601. [CrossRef]
34.
Zhang, Z.; Chen, G.; Zhou, W.; Song, A.; Xu, T.; Luo, Q.; Wang, W.; Gu, X.-S.; Duan, S. Regulated ATP release from astrocytes
through lysosome exocytosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007,9, 945–953. [CrossRef]
35.
Li, D.; Ropert, N.; Koulakoff, A.; Giaume, C.; Oheim, M. Lysosomes Are the Major Vesicular Compartment Undergoing
Ca2+-Regulated Exocytosis from Cortical Astrocytes. J. Neurosci. 2008,28, 7648–7658. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
36.
Vardjan, N.; Parpura, V.; Verkhratsky, A.; Zorec, R. Gliocrine System: Astroglia as Secretory Cells of the CNS. In Advances in
Experimental Medicine and Biology; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Berlin, Germany, 2019; Volume 1175, pp. 93–115.
37.
Verkhratsky, A.; Matteoli, M.; Parpura, V.; Mothet, J.; Zorec, R. Astrocytes as secretory cells of the central nervous system:
Idiosyncrasies of vesicular secretion. EMBO J. 2016,35, 239–257. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
38.
Bergersen, L.; Morland, C.; Ormel, L.; Rinholm, J.; Larsson, M.; Wold, J.; Røe, Å.T.; Stranna, A.; Santello, M.; Bouvier, D.; et al.
Immunogold Detection of L-glutamate and D-serine in Small Synaptic-Like Microvesicles in Adult Hippocampal Astrocytes.
Cereb. Cortex 2012,22, 1690–1697. [CrossRef]
39.
Ormel, L.; Stensrud, M.J.; Bergersen, L.H.; Gundersen, V. VGLUT1 is localized in astrocytic processes in several brain regions.
Glia 2012,60, 229–238. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
40.
Patrushev, I.; Gavrilov, N.; Turlapov, V.; Semyanov, A. Subcellular location of astrocytic calcium stores favors extrasynaptic
neuron–astrocyte communication. Cell Calcium 2013,54, 343–349. [CrossRef]
41.
Stenovec, M.; Kreft, M.; Grilc, S.; Potokar, M.; Kreft, M.E.; Pangršiˇc, T.; Zorec, R. Ca
2+
-dependent mobility of vesicles capturing
anti-VGLUT1 antibodies. Exp. Cell Res. 2007,313, 3809–3818. [CrossRef]
42.
Hiasa, M.; Miyaji, T.; Haruna, Y.; Takeuchi, T.; Harada, Y.; Moriyama, S.; Yamamoto, A.; Omote, H.; Moriyama, Y. Identification of
a mammalian vesicular polyamine transporter. Sci. Rep. 2015,4, 6836. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
43.
Wilhelm, A.; Volknandt, W.; Langer, D.; Nolte, C.; Kettenmann, H.; Zimmermann, H. Localization of SNARE proteins and
secretory organelle proteins in astrocytes in vitro and in situ. Neurosci. Res. 2004,48, 249–257. [CrossRef]
44.
Domercq, M.; Brambilla, L.; Pilati, E.; Marchaland, J.; Volterra, A.; Bezzi, P. P2Y1 Receptor-evoked Glutamate Exocytosis from
Astrocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 2006,281, 30684–30696. [CrossRef]
45.
Montana, V.; Ni, Y.; Sunjara, V.; Hua, X.; Parpura, V. Vesicular Glutamate Transporter-Dependent Glutamate Release from
Astrocytes. J. Neurosci. 2004,24, 2633–2642. [CrossRef]
46.
Zhang, Q.; Pangršiˇc, T.; Kreft, M.; Kržan, M.; Li, N.; Sul, J.-Y.; Halassa, M.; Van Bockstaele, E.; Zorec, R.; Haydon, P.G. Fusion-
related Release of Glutamate from Astrocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 2004,279, 12724–12733. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
47.
Kasymov, V.; Larina, O.; Castaldo, C.; Marina, N.; Patrushev, M.; Kasparov, S.; Gourine, A.V. Differential Sensitivity of Brainstem
versus Cortical Astrocytes to Changes in pH Reveals Functional Regional Specialization of Astroglia. J. Neurosci.
2013
,33, 435–441.
[CrossRef]
Biomolecules 2021,11, 1367 14 of 19
48.
Höltje, M.; Hofmann, F.; Lux, R.; Veh, R.W.; Just, I.; Ahnert-Hilger, G. Glutamate Uptake and Release by Astrocytes Are Enhanced
by Clostridium botulinum C3 Protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2008,283, 9289–9299. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
49.
Bowser, D.; Khakh, B.S. Two forms of single-vesicle astrocyte exocytosis imaged with total internal reflection fluorescence
microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007,104, 4212–4217. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
50.
Fremeau, R.T.; Burman, J.; Qureshi, T.; Tran, C.H.; Proctor, J.; Johnson, J.; Zhang, H.; Sulzer, D.; Copenhagen, D.R.; Storm-Mathisen,
J.; et al. The identification of vesicular glutamate transporter 3 suggests novel modes of signaling by glutamate. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA 2002,99, 14488–14493. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
51.
Ormel, L.; Stensrud, M.J.; Chaudhry, F.A.; Gundersen, V. A distinct set of synaptic-like microvesicles in atroglial cells contain
VGLUT3. Glia 2012,60, 1289–1300. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
52.
Zhang, Y.; Chen, K.; Sloan, S.A.; Bennett, M.L.; Scholze, A.R.; O’Keeffe, S.; Phatnani, H.P.; Guarnieri, P.; Caneda, C.; Ruderisch, N.;
et al. An RNA-Sequencing Transcriptome and Splicing Database of Glia, Neurons, and Vascular Cells of the Cerebral Cortex. J.
Neurosci. 2014,34, 11929–11947. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
53.
Chai, H.; Diaz-Castro, B.; Shigetomi, E.; Monte, E.; Octeau, J.C.; Yu, X.; Cohn, W.; Rajendran, P.S.; Vondriska, T.M.; Whitelegge,
J.P.; et al. Neural Circuit-Specialized Astrocytes: Transcriptomic, Proteomic, Morphological, and Functional Evidence. Neuron
2017,95, 531–549.e9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
54.
Cahoy, J.D.; Emery, B.; Kaushal, A.; Foo, L.C.; Zamanian, J.; Christopherson, K.S.; Xing, Y.; Lubischer, J.; Krieg, P.A.; Krupenko,
S.A.; et al. A Transcriptome Database for Astrocytes, Neurons, and Oligodendrocytes: A New Resource for Understanding Brain
Development and Function. J. Neurosci. 2008,28, 264–278. [CrossRef]
55.
Li, D.; Hérault, K.; Silm, K.; Evrard, A.; Wojcik, S.; Oheim, M.; Herzog, E.; Ropert, N. Lack of Evidence for Vesicular Glutamate
Transporter Expression in Mouse Astrocytes. J. Neurosci. 2013,33, 4434–4455. [CrossRef]
56.
Guˇcek, A.; Vardjan, N.; Zorec, R. Exocytosis in Astrocytes: Transmitter Release and Membrane Signal Regulation. Neurochem. Res.
2012,37, 2351–2363. [CrossRef]
57.
Vardjan, N.; Kreft, M.; Zorec, R. Regulated Exocytosis in Astrocytes is as Slow as the Metabolic Availability of Gliotransmitters:
Focus on Glutamate and ATP. Adv. Neurobiol. 2014,11, 81–101.
58.
El Mestikawy, S.; Mackenzie, Å.; Fortin, G.M.; Descarries, L.; Trudeau, L.-E. From glutamate co-release to vesicular synergy:
Vesicular glutamate transporters. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2011,12, 204–216. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
59.
Martineau, M.; Galli, T.; Baux, G.; Mothet, J.-P. Confocal imaging and tracking of the exocytotic routes for d-serine-mediated
gliotransmission. Glia 2008,56, 1271–1284. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
60.
Mothet, J.-P.; Pollegioni, L.; Ouanounou, G.; Martineau, M.; Fossier, P.; Baux, G. Glutamate receptor activation triggers a calcium-
dependent and SNARE protein-dependent release of the gliotransmitter d-serine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
2005
,102, 5606–5611.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
61.
Wolosker, H.; Balu, D.T.; Coyle, J.T. The Rise and Fall of the d -Serine-Mediated Gliotransmission Hypothesis. Trends Neurosci.
2016,39, 712–721. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
62.
Papouin, T.; Henneberger, C.; Rusakov, D.A.; Oliet, S.H. Astroglial versus Neuronal d-Serine: Fact Checking. Trends Neurosci.
2017,40, 517–520. [CrossRef]
63.
Neame, S.; Safory, H.; Radzishevsky, I.; Touitou, A.; Marchesani, F.; Marchetti, M.; Kellner, S.; Berlin, S.; Foltyn, V.N.; Engelender,
S.; et al. The NMDA receptor activation by d-serine and glycine is controlled by an astrocytic Phgdh-dependent serine shuttle.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019,116, 20736–20742. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
64.
Perez, E.J.; Tapanes, S.A.; Loris, Z.B.; Balu, D.; Sick, T.J.; Coyle, J.T.; Liebl, D.J. Enhanced astrocytic d-serine underlies synaptic
damage after traumatic brain injury. J. Clin. Investig. 2017,127, 3114–3125. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
65.
Potokar, M.; Stenovec, M.; Kreft, M.; Kreft, M.E.; Zorec, R. Stimulation inhibits the mobility of recycling peptidergic vesicles in
astrocytes. Glia 2007,56, 135–144. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
66.
Paco, S.; Margelí, M.A.; Olkkonen, V.M.; Imai, A.; Blasi, J.; Aguado, F.; Fischer-Colbrie, R. Regulation of exocytotic protein
expression and Ca2+-dependent peptide secretion in astrocytes. J. Neurochem. 2009,110, 143–156. [CrossRef]
67.
Fischer-Colbrie, R.; Kirchmair, R.; Schobert, A.; Olenik, C.; Meyer, D.K.; Winkler, H. Secretogranin II Is Synthesized and Secreted
in Astrocyte Cultures. J. Neurochem. 1993,60, 2312–2314. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
68.
Paco, S.; Pozas, E.; Aguado, F. Secretogranin III Is an Astrocyte Granin That Is Overexpressed in Reactive Glia. Cereb. Cortex
2009
,
20, 1386–1397. [CrossRef]
69.
Zhan, X.; Wen, G.; Jiang, E.; Li, F.; Wu, X.; Pang, H. Secretogranin III upregulation is involved in parkinsonian toxin-mediated
astroglia activation. J. Toxicol. Sci. 2020,45, 271–280. [CrossRef]
70.
Kreft, M.; Stenovec, M.; Rupnik, M.S.; Grilc, S.; Kržan, M.; Potokar, M.; Pangršiˇc, T.; Haydon, P.G.; Zorec, R. Properties of
Ca2+-dependent exocytosis in cultured astrocytes. Glia 2004,46, 437–445. [CrossRef]
71.
Chatterjee, S.; Sikdar, S.K. Corticosterone treatment results in enhanced release of peptidergic vesicles in astrocytes via cytoskeletal
rearrangements. Glia 2013,61, 2050–2062. [CrossRef]
72.
Ramamoorthy, P.; Whim, M.D. Trafficking and Fusion of Neuropeptide Y-Containing Dense-Core Granules in Astrocytes. J.
Neurosci. 2008,28, 13815–13827. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
73.
Guˇcek, A.; Jorgaˇcevski, J.; Singh, P.; Geisler, C.; Lisjak, M.; Vardjan, N.; Kreft, M.; Egner, A.; Zorec, R. Dominant negative SNARE
peptides stabilize the fusion pore in a narrow, release-unproductive state. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.
2016
,73, 3719–3731. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
Biomolecules 2021,11, 1367 15 of 19
74.
Hong, Y.; Zhao, T.; Li, X.-J.; Li, S. Mutant Huntingtin Impairs BDNF Release from Astrocytes by Disrupting Conversion of
Rab3a-GTP into Rab3a-GDP. J. Neurosci. 2016,36, 8790–8801. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
75.
Coco, S.; Calegari, F.; Pravettoni, E.; Pozzi, D.; Taverna, E.; Rosa, P.; Matteoli, M.; Verderio, C. Storage and Release of ATP from
Astrocytes in Culture. J. Biol. Chem. 2003,278, 1354–1362. [CrossRef]
76.
Pangršiˇc, T.; Potokar, M.; Stenovec, M.; Kreft, M.; Fabbretti, E.; Nistri, A.; Pryazhnikov, E.; Khiroug, L.; Giniatullin, R.; Zorec, R.
Exocytotic Release of ATP from Cultured Astrocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 2007,282, 28749–28758. [CrossRef]
77.
Potokar, M.; Kreft, M.; Pangršiˇc, T.; Zorec, R. Vesicle mobility studied in cultured astrocytes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
2005
,
329, 678–683. [CrossRef]
78.
Potokar, M.; Vardjan, N.; Stenovec, M.; Gabrijel, M.; Trkov, S.; Jorgaˇcevski, J.; Kreft, M.; Zorec, R. Astrocytic Vesicle Mobility in
Health and Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013,14, 11238–11258. [CrossRef]
79.
Bowser, D.; Khakh, B.S. Vesicular ATP Is the Predominant Cause of Intercellular Calcium Waves in Astrocytes. J. Gen. Physiol.
2007,129, 485–491. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
80.
Hines, D.J.; Haydon, P.G. Astrocytic adenosine: From synapses to psychiatric disorders. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.
2014
,369,
20130594. [CrossRef]
81.
Sawada, K.; Echigo, N.; Juge, N.; Miyaji, T.; Otsuka, M.; Omote, H.; Yamamoto, A.; Moriyama, Y. Identification of a vesicular
nucleotide transporter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008,105, 5683–5686. [CrossRef]
82.
Imura, Y.; Morizawa, Y.; Komatsu, R.; Shibata, K.; Shinozaki, Y.; Kasai, H.; Moriishi, K.; Moriyama, Y.; Koizumi, S. Microglia
release ATP by exocytosis. Glia 2013,61, 1320–1330. [CrossRef]
83.
Oya, M.; Kitaguchi, T.; Yanagihara, Y.; Numano, R.; Kakeyama, M.; Ikematsu, K.; Tsuboi, T. Vesicular nucleotide transporter is
involved in ATP storage of secretory lysosomes in astrocytes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013,438, 145–151. [CrossRef]
84.
Angelova, P.R.; Iversen, K.Z.; Teschemacher, A.G.; Kasparov, S.; Gourine, A.V.; Abramov, A.Y. Signal transduction in astrocytes:
Localization and release of inorganic polyphosphate. Glia 2018,66, 2126–2136. [CrossRef]
85.
Beckel, J.M.; Gómez, N.M.; Lu, W.; Campagno, K.; Nabet, B.; AlBalawi, F.; Lim, J.C.; Boesze-Battaglia, K.; Mitchell, C.H.
Stimulation of TLR3 triggers release of lysosomal ATP in astrocytes and epithelial cells that requires TRPML1 channels. Sci. Rep.
2018,8, 1–14. [CrossRef]
86.
Lalo, U.; Palygin, O.; Rasooli-Nejad, S.; Andrew, J.; Haydon, P.G.; Pankratov, Y. Exocytosis of ATP From Astrocytes Modulates
Phasic and Tonic Inhibition in the Neocortex. PLoS Biol. 2014,12, e1001747. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
87.
Kinoshita, M.; Hirayama, Y.; Fujishita, K.; Shibata, K.; Shinozaki, Y.; Shigetomi, E.; Takeda, A.; Le, H.P.N.; Hayashi, H.; Hiasa, M.;
et al. Anti-Depressant Fluoxetine Reveals its Therapeutic Effect Via Astrocytes. EBioMedicine 2018,32, 72–83. [CrossRef]
88.
Chen, X.; Wang, L.; Zhou, Y.; Zheng, L.-H.; Zhou, Z. “Kiss-and-Run” Glutamate Secretion in Cultured and Freshly Isolated Rat
Hippocampal Astrocytes. J. Neurosci. 2005,25, 9236–9243. [CrossRef]
89.
Jaiswal, J.K.; Fix, M.; Takano, T.; Nedergaard, M.; Simon, S.M. Resolving vesicle fusion from lysis to monitor calcium-triggered
lysosomal exocytosis in astrocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007,104, 14151–14156. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
90.
Li, L.; Lundkvist, A.; Andersson, D.; Wilhelmsson, U.; Nagai, N.; Pardo, A.; Nodin, C.; Ståhlberg, A.; Aprico, K.; Larsson, K.; et al.
Protective Role of Reactive Astrocytes in Brain Ischemia. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2007,28, 468–481. [CrossRef]
91.
Verderio, C.; Cagnoli, C.; Bergami, M.; Francolini, M.; Schenk, U.; Colombo, A.; Riganti, L.; Frassoni, C.; Zuccaro, E.; Danglot, L.;
et al. TI-VAMP/VAMP7 is the SNARE of secretory lysosomes contributing to ATP secretion from astrocytes. Biol. Cell
2012
,104,
213–228. [CrossRef]
92.
Vardjan, N.; Gabrijel, M.; Potokar, M.; Švajger, U.; Kreft, M.; Jeras, M.; de Pablo, Y.; Faiz, M.; Pekny, M.; Zorec, R. IFN-
γ
-induced
increase in the mobility of MHC class II compartments in astrocytes depends on intermediate filaments. J. Neuroinflam.
2012
,9,
144. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
93.
Jaiswal, J.; Andrews, N.; Simon, S.M. Membrane proximal lysosomes are the major vesicles responsible for calcium-dependent
exocytosis in nonsecretory cells. J. Cell Biol. 2002,159, 625–635. [CrossRef]
94.
Soerensen, C.; Novak, I. Visualization of ATP Release in Pancreatic Acini in Response to Cholinergic Stimulus. J. Biol. Chem.
2001
,
276, 32925–32932. [CrossRef]
95.
Li, D.; Herault, K.; Oheim, M.; Ropert, N. FM dyes enter via a store-operated calcium channel and modify calcium signaling of
cultured astrocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009,106, 21960–21965. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
96.
Boži´c, M.; Verkhratsky, A.; Zorec, R.; Stenovec, M. Exocytosis of large-diameter lysosomes mediates interferon
γ
-induced
relocation of MHC class II molecules toward the surface of astrocytes. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.
2019
,77, 3245–3264. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
97.
Söllner, T.; Bennett, M.K.; Whiteheart, S.; Scheller, R.H.; Rothman, J.E. A protein assembly-disassembly pathway
in vitro
that may
correspond to sequential steps of synaptic vesicle docking, activation, and fusion. Cell 1993,75, 409–418. [CrossRef]
98.
Südhof, T.C. Neurotransmitter release: The last millisecond in the life of a synaptic vesicle. Neuron
2013
,80, 675–690. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
99.
Aslamy, A.; Thurmond, D.C. Exocytosis proteins as novel targets for diabetes prevention and/or remediation? Am. J. Physiol.
Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2017,312, R739–R752. [CrossRef]
100.
Anlauf, E.; Derouiche, A. Astrocytic exocytosis vesicles and glutamate: A high-resolution immunofluorescence study. Glia
2004
,
49, 96–106. [CrossRef]
101.
Maienschein, V.; Marxen, M.; Volknandt, W.; Zimmermann, H. A plethora of presynaptic proteins associated with ATP-storing
organelles in cultured astrocytes. Glia 1999,26, 233–244. [CrossRef]
Biomolecules 2021,11, 1367 16 of 19
102.
Singh, P.; Jorgaˇcevski, J.; Kreft, M.; Grubiši´c, V.; Stout, R.; Potokar, M.; Parpura, V.; Zorec, R. Single-vesicle architecture of
synaptobrevin2 in astrocytes. Nat. Commun. 2014,5, 1–12. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
103.
Kim, J.-H.; Kim, J.-H.; Cho, Y.-E.; Baek, M.-C.; Jung, J.-Y.; Lee, M.-G.; Jang, I.-S.; Lee, H.-W.; Suk, K. Chronic Sleep Deprivation-
Induced Proteome Changes in Astrocytes of the Rat Hypothalamus. J. Proteome Res. 2014,13, 4047–4061. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
104.
Bezzi, P.; Carmignoto, P.; Pasti, L.; Vesce, S.; Rossi, D.M.; Rizzini, B.L.; Pozzan, T.; Volterra, A. Prostaglandins stimulate
calcium-dependent glutamate release in astrocytes. Nat. Cell Biol. 1998,391, 281–285. [CrossRef]
105.
Bezzi, P.; Domercq, M.; Brambilla, L.; Galli, R.; Schols, D.; De Clercq, E.; Vescovi, A.; Bagetta, G.; Kollias, G.; Meldolesi, J.; et al.
CXCR4-activated astrocyte glutamate release via TNF
α
: Amplification by microglia triggers neurotoxicity. Nat. Neurosci.
2001
,4,
702–710. [CrossRef]
106.
Hua, X.; Malarkey, E.B.; Sunjara, V.; Rosenwald, S.E.; Li, W.-H.; Parpura, V. Ca
2+
-dependent glutamate release involves two
classes of endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ stores in astrocytes. J. Neurosci. Res. 2004,76, 86–97. [CrossRef]
107.
Perea, G.; Araque, A. Astrocytes Potentiate Transmitter Release at Single Hippocampal Synapses. Science
2007
,317, 1083–1086.
[CrossRef]
108. Halassa, M.M.; Florian, C.; Fellin, T.; Munoz, J.R.; Lee, S.-Y.; Abel, T.; Haydon, P.G.; Frank, M.G. Astrocytic Modulation of Sleep
Homeostasis and Cognitive Consequences of Sleep Loss. Neuron 2009,61, 213–219. [CrossRef]
109. Hines, D.; Haydon, P.G. Inhibition of a SNARE-sensitive pathway in astrocytes attenuates damage following stroke. J. Neurosci.
2013,33, 4234–4240. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
110.
Sultan, S.; Li, L.; Moss, J.; Petrelli, F.; Cassé, F.; Gebara, E.; Lopatar, J.; Pfrieger, F.; Bezzi, P.; Bischofberger, J.; et al. Synaptic
Integration of Adult-Born Hippocampal Neurons Is Locally Controlled by Astrocytes. Neuron
2015
,88, 957–972. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
111.
Sardinha, V.M.; Guerra-Gomes, S.; Caetano, I.; Tavares, G.; Martins, M.; Reis, J.S.; Correia, J.S.; Teixeira-Castro, A.; Pinto, L.;
Sousa, N.; et al. Astrocytic signaling supports hippocampal-prefrontal theta synchronization and cognitive function. Glia
2017
,
65, 1944–1960. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
112.
Nadjar, A.; Blutstein, T.; Aubert, A.; Laye, S.; Haydon, P.G. Astrocyte-derived adenosine modulates increased sleep pressure
during inflammatory response. Glia 2013,61, 724–731. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
113.
Turner, J.R.; Ecke, L.E.; Briand, L.A.; Haydon, P.G.; Blendy, J.A.; Haydon, P. Cocaine-related behaviors in mice with deficient
gliotransmission. Psychopharmacology 2013,226, 167–176. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
114.
Fujita, T.; Chen, M.J.; Li, B.; Smith, N.; Peng, W.; Sun, W.; Toner, M.J.; Kress, B.T.; Wang, L.; Benraiss, A.; et al. Neuronal transgene
expression in dominant-negative SNARE mice. J. Neurosci. 2014,34, 16594–16604. [CrossRef]
115.
Sloan, S.A.; Barres, B.A. Looks Can Be Deceiving: Reconsidering the Evidence for Gliotransmission. Neuron
2014
,84, 1112–1115.
[CrossRef]
116. Petrelli, F.; Bezzi, P. Novel insights into gliotransmitters. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2016,26, 138–145. [CrossRef]
117.
´
Sl˛ezak, M.; Grosche, A.; Niemiec, A.; Tanimoto, N.; Pannicke, T.; Münch, T.; Crocker, B.; Isope, P.; Härtig, W.; Beck, S.C.; et al.
Relevance of Exocytotic Glutamate Release from Retinal Glia. Neuron 2012,74, 504–516. [CrossRef]
118.
Parpura, V.; Fang, Y.; Basarsky, T.; Jahn, R.; Haydon, P.G. Expression of synaptobrevin II, cellubrevin and syntaxin but not
SNAP-25 in cultured astrocytes. FEBS Lett. 1995,377, 489–492. [CrossRef]
119.
Jeftinija, S.D.; Jeftinija, K.V.; Stefanovi´c, G. Cultured astrocytes express proteins involved in vesicular glutamate release. Brain Res.
1997,750, 41–47. [CrossRef]
120.
Schubert, V.; Bouvier, D.; Volterra, A. SNARE protein expression in synaptic terminals and astrocytes in the adult hippocampus:
A comparative analysis. Glia 2011,59, 1472–1488. [CrossRef]
121.
Tao-Cheng, J.-H.; Pham, A.; Yang, Y.; Winters, C.; Gallant, P.; Reese, T. Syntaxin 4 is concentrated on plasma membrane of
astrocytes. Neuroscience 2015,286, 264–271. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
122.
Hepp, R.; Perraut, M.; Chasserot-Golaz, S.; Galli, T.; Aunis, D.; Langley, K.; Grant, N.J. Cultured glial cells express the SNAP-25
analogue SNAP-23. Glia 1999,27, 181–187. [CrossRef]
123.
Malarkey, E.B.; Parpura, V. Temporal characteristics of vesicular fusion in astrocytes: Examination of synaptobrevin 2-laden
vesicles at single vesicle resolution. J. Physiol. 2011,589, 4271–4300. [CrossRef]
124.
Smithers, N.P.; Hodgkinson, C.P.; Cuttle, M.; Sale, G.J. Insulin-triggered repositioning of munc18c on syntaxin-4 in GLUT4
signalling. Biochem. J. 2008,410, 255–260. [CrossRef]
125.
Predescu, S.; Predescu, D.N.; Shimizu, K.; Klein, I.K.; Malik, A.B. Cholesterol-dependent Syntaxin-4 and SNAP-23 Clustering
Regulates Caveolar Fusion with the Endothelial Plasma Membrane. J. Biol. Chem. 2005,280, 37130–37138. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
126.
Brandie, F.M.; Aran, V.; Verma, A.; McNew, J.A.; Bryant, N.J.; Gould, G. Negative Regulation of Syntaxin4/SNAP-23/VAMP2-
Mediated Membrane Fusion by Munc18c In Vitro. PLoS ONE 2008,3, e4074. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
127.
Voets, T.; Toonen, R.F.; Brian, E.C.; de Wit, H.; Moser, T.; Rettig, J.; Südhof, T.C.; Neher, E.; Verhage, M. Munc18-1 Promotes Large
Dense-Core Vesicle Docking. Neuron 2001,31, 581–592. [CrossRef]
128.
Oh, E.; Kalwat, M.; Kim, M.-J.; Verhage, M.; Thurmond, D.C. Munc18-1 Regulates First-phase Insulin Release by Promoting
Granule Docking to Multiple Syntaxin Isoforms. J. Biol. Chem. 2012,287, 25821–25833. [CrossRef]
129.
Motoike, T.; Sano, K.; Nakamura, H.; Takai, Y. Expression of smg p25A/rab 3A guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor (GDI) in
neurons and glial cells from rat brain. Neurosci. Lett. 1993,156, 87–90. [CrossRef]
Biomolecules 2021,11, 1367 17 of 19
130.
Madison, D.; Krüger, W.; Kim, T.; Pfeiffer, S. Differential expression of rab3 isoforms in oligodendrocytes and astrocytes. J.
Neurosci. Res. 1996,45, 258–268. [CrossRef]
131.
Bonet-Ponce, L.; Beilina, A.; Williamson, C.D.; Lindberg, E.; Kluss, J.H.; Saez-Atienzar, S.; Landeck, N.; Kumaran, R.; Mamais, A.;
Bleck, C.K.E.; et al. LRRK2 mediates tubulation and vesicle sorting from lysosomes. Sci. Adv. 2020,6, eabb2454. [CrossRef]
132. Südhof, T.C. The Presynaptic Active Zone. Neuron 2012,75, 11–25. [CrossRef]
133. Mungenast, A.E. Diacylglycerol Signaling Underlies Astrocytic ATP Release. Neural Plast. 2011,2011. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
134.
Bohmbach, K.; Schwarz, M.K.; Schoch, S.; Henneberger, C. The structural and functional evidence for vesicular release from
astrocytes in situ. Brain Res. Bull. 2018,136, 65–75. [CrossRef]
135.
Buscemi, L.; Ginet, V.; Lopatar, J.; Montana, V.; Pucci, L.; Spagnuolo, P.; Zehnder, T.; Grubiši´c, V.; Truttman, A.; Sala, C.;
et al. Homer1 Scaffold Proteins Govern Ca2+ Dynamics in Normal and Reactive Astrocytes. Cereb. Cortex
2017
,27, 2365–2384.
[CrossRef]
136.
Paquet, M.; Ribeiro, F.M.; Guadagno, J.; Esseltine, J.L.; Ferguson, S.S.; Cregan, S.P. Role of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5
signaling and homer in oxygen glucose deprivation-mediated astrocyte apoptosis. Mol. Brain 2013,6, 9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
137. Foa, L.; Gasperini, R. Developmental roles for Homer: More than just a pretty scaffold. J. Neurochem. 2009,108. [CrossRef]
138. Kennedy, M.J.; Ehlers, M.D. Mechanisms and Function of Dendritic Exocytosis. Neuron 2011,69, 856–875. [CrossRef]
139.
Perin, M.S.; Fried, V.A.; Mignery, G.A.; Jahn, R.; Südhof, T.C. Phospholipid binding by a synaptic vesicle protein homologous to
the regulatory region of protein kinase C. Nat. Cell Biol. 1990,345, 260–263. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
140. Südhof, T.C. Calcium Control of Neurotransmitter Release. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011,4, a011353. [CrossRef]
141.
Mittelsteadt, T.; Seifert, G.; Alvárez-Barón, E.; Steinhäuser, C.; Becker, A.J.; Schoch, S. Differential mRNA expression patterns of
the synaptotagmin gene family in the rodent brain. J. Comp. Neurol. 2009,512, 514–528. [CrossRef]
142.
Zhang, Q.; Fukuda, M.; Van Bockstaele, E.; Pascual, O.; Haydon, P.G. Synaptotagmin IV regulates glial glutamate release. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004,101, 9441–9446. [CrossRef]
143.
Schonn, J.-S.; Maximov, A.; Lao, Y.; Sudhof, T.C.; Sorensen, J.B. Synaptotagmin-1 and -7 are functionally overlapping Ca
2+
sensors
for exocytosis in adrenal chromaffin cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008,105, 3998–4003. [CrossRef]
144.
Gustavsson, N.; Lao, Y.; Maximov, A.; Chuang, J.-C.; Kostromina, E.; Repa, J.; Li, C.; Radda, G.K.; Südhof, T.C.; Han, W. Impaired
insulin secretion and glucose intolerance in synaptotagmin-7 null mutant mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
2008
,105, 3992–3997.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
145.
Gustavsson, N.; Wei, S.-H.; Hoang, D.N.; Lao, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Radda, G.K.; Rorsman, P.; Südhof, T.C.; Han, W. Synaptotagmin-7 is
a principal Ca2+sensor for Ca2+-induced glucagon exocytosis in pancreas. J. Physiol. 2009,587, 1169–1178. [CrossRef]
146.
Martinez, I.; Chakrabarti, S.; Hellevik, T.; Morehead, J.; Fowler, K.; Andrews, N.W. Synaptotagmin VII Regulates Ca
2+
-Dependent
Exocytosis of Lysosomes in Fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 2000,148, 1141–1150. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
147.
Luo, F.; Bacaj, T.; Südhof, T.C. Synaptotagmin-7 Is Essential for Ca
2+
-Triggered Delayed Asynchronous Release But Not for
Ca2+-Dependent Vesicle Priming in Retinal Ribbon Synapses. J. Neurosci. 2015,35, 11024–11033. [CrossRef]
148.
Sreetama, S.C.; Takano, T.; Nedergaard, M.; Simon, S.; Jaiswal, J.K. Injured astrocytes are repaired by Synaptotagmin XI-regulated
lysosome exocytosis. Cell Death Differ. 2015,23, 596–607. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
149.
Oh, S.-J.; Han, K.-S.; Park, H.; Woo, D.H.; Kim, H.Y.; Traynelis, S.F.; Lee, C.J. Protease activated receptor 1-induced glutamate
release in cultured astrocytes is mediated by Bestrophin-1 channel but not by vesicular exocytosis. Mol. Brain
2012
,5, 38.
[CrossRef]
150.
Stenovec, M.; Lasiˇc, E.; Boži´c, M.; Bobnar, S.T.; Stout, R.F.; Grubiši´c, V.; Parpura, V.; Zorec, R. Ketamine Inhibits ATP-Evoked
Exocytotic Release of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor from Vesicles in Cultured Rat Astrocytes. Mol. Neurobiol.
2016
,53,
6882–6896. [CrossRef]
151.
Dai, H.; Shin, O.-H.; Machius, M.; Tomchick, D.; Südhof, T.C.; Rizo, J. Structural basis for the evolutionary inactivation of Ca
2+
binding to synaptotagmin 4. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2004,11, 844–849. [CrossRef]
152. Rusakov, D. Disentangling calcium-driven astrocyte physiology. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2015,16, 226–233. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
153.
Hazell, A.S.; Wang, N. Identification of complexin II in astrocytes: A possible regulator of glutamate release in these cells. Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011,404, 228–232. [CrossRef]
154.
Wang, Z.; Wei, X.; Liu, K.; Zhang, X.; Yang, F.; Zhang, H.; He, Y.; Zhu, T.; Li, F.; Shi, W.; et al. NOX2 deficiency ameliorates cerebral
injury through reduction of complexin II-mediated glutamate excitotoxicity in experimental stroke. Free. Radic. Biol. Med.
2013
,
65, 942–951. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
155.
Burgoyne, R.D.; Handel, S.E. Activation of exocytosis by GTP analogues in adrenal chromaffin cells revealed by patch-clamp
capacitance measurement. FEBS Lett. 1994,344, 139–142. [CrossRef]
156.
Fernandez, J.M.; Neher, E.; Gomperts, B.D. Capacitance measurements reveal stepwise fusion events in degranulating mast cells.
Nat. Cell Biol. 1984,312, 453–455. [CrossRef]
157.
Regazzi, R.; Li, G.; Ullrich, S.; Jaggi, C.; Wollheim, C.B. Different requirements for protein kinase C activation and Ca
2+
-
independent insulin secretion in response to guanine nucleotides. J. Biol. Chem. 1989,264, 9939–9944. [CrossRef]
158.
Li, G.; Han, L.; Chou, T.-C.; Fujita, Y.; Arunachalam, L.; Xu, A.; Wong, A.; Chiew, S.-K.; Wan, Q.; Wang, L.; et al. RalA and RalB
Function as the Critical GTP Sensors for GTP-Dependent Exocytosis. J. Neurosci. 2007,27, 190–202. [CrossRef]
159. Wu, B.; Guo, W. The Exocyst at a Glance. J. Cell Sci. 2015,128, 2957–2964. [CrossRef]
Biomolecules 2021,11, 1367 18 of 19
160.
Rivera-Molina, F.; Toomre, D. Live-cell imaging of exocyst links its spatiotemporal dynamics to various stages of vesicle fusion. J.
Cell Biol. 2013,201, 673–680. [CrossRef]
161.
Zorec, R.; Verkhratsky, A.; Rodríguez, J.; Parpura, V. Astrocytic vesicles and gliotransmitters: Slowness of vesicular release and
synaptobrevin2-laden vesicle nanoarchitecture. Neuroscience 2016,323, 67–75. [CrossRef]
162.
Lepore, D.; Martínez-Núñez, L.; Munson, M. Exposing the Elusive Exocyst Structure. Trends Biochem. Sci.
2018
,43, 714–725.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
163.
Liu, J.; Zuo, X.; Yue, P.; Guo, W. Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-Bisphosphate Mediates the Targeting of the Exocyst to the Plasma
Membrane for Exocytosis in Mammalian Cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 2007,18, 4483–4492. [CrossRef]
164.
Morgera, F.; Sallah, M.R.; Dubuke, M.L.; Gandhi, P.; Brewer, D.N.; Carr, C.M.; Munson, M. Regulation of exocytosis by the exocyst
subunit Sec6 and the SM protein Sec1. Mol. Biol. Cell 2012,23, 337–346. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
165.
Moulson, A.J.; Squair, J.W.; Franklin, R.J.M.; Tetzlaff, W.; Assinck, P. Diversity of Reactive Astrogliosis in CNS Pathology:
Heterogeneity or Plasticity? Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2021. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
166.
Nosi, D.; Lana, D.; Giovannini, M.; Delfino, G.; Zecchi-Orlandini, S. Neuroinflammation: Integrated Nervous Tissue Response
through Intercellular Interactions at the “Whole System” Scale. Cells 2021,10, 1195. [CrossRef]
167.
Escartin, C.; Galea, E.; Lakatos, A.; O’Callaghan, J.P.; Petzold, G.C.; Serrano-Pozo, A.; Steinhäuser, C.; Volterra, A.; Carmignoto, G.;
Agarwal, A.; et al. Reactive astrocyte nomenclature, definitions, and future directions. Nat. Neurosci.
2021
,24, 312–325. [CrossRef]
168.
Liddelow, S.A.; Guttenplan, K.A.; Clarke, L.E.; Bennett, F.C.; Bohlen, C.J.; Schirmer, L.; Bennett, M.L.; Münch, A.E.; Chung, W.S.;
Petersong, T.C.; et al. Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia. Nature
2017
,541, 481–487. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
169.
Liddelow, S.A.; Barres, B.A. Reactive Astrocytes: Production, Function, and Therapeutic Potential. Immunity
2017
,46, 957–967.
[CrossRef]
170.
Peng, H.; Erdmann, N.; Whitney, N.; Dou, H.; Gorantla, S.; Gendelman, H.E.; Ghorpade, A.; Zheng, J. HIV-1-infected and/or
immune activated macrophages regulate astrocyte SDF-1 production through IL-1β.Glia 2006,54, 619–629. [CrossRef]
171.
Zheng, J.C.; Huang, Y.; Tang, K.; Cui, M.; Niemann, D.; Lopez, A.; Morgello, S.; Chen, S. HIV-1-infected and/or immune-activated
macrophages regulate astrocyte CXCL8 production through IL-1
β
and TNF-
α
: Involvement of mitogen-activated protein kinases
and protein kinase R. J. Neuroimmunol. 2008,200, 100–110. [CrossRef]
172.
Álvarez, S.; Blanco, A.; Fresno, M.; Muñoz-Fernández, M. Ángeles Nuclear factor-
κ
B activation regulates cyclooxygenase-2
induction in human astrocytes in response to CXCL12: Role in neuronal toxicity. J. Neurochem. 2010,113, 772–783. [CrossRef]
173.
Lau, L.T.; Yu, A.C.-H. Astrocytes Produce and Release Interleukin-1, Interleukin-6, Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha and Interferon-
Gamma Following Traumatic and Metabolic Injury. J. Neurotrauma 2001,18, 351–359. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
174.
Verhoog, Q.P.; Holtman, L.; Aronica, E.; Van Vliet, E.A. Astrocytes as Guardians of Neuronal Excitability: Mechanisms Underlying
Epileptogenesis. Front. Neurol. 2020,11, 11. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
175.
Agulhon, C.; Sun, M.-Y.; Murphy, T.; Myers, T.; Lauderdale, K.; Fiacco, T.A. Calcium Signaling and Gliotransmission in Normal
vs. Reactive Astrocytes. Front. Pharmacol. 2012,3, 139. [CrossRef]
176.
Pascual, O.; Ben Achour, S.; Rostaing, P.; Triller, A.; Bessis, A. Microglia activation triggers astrocyte-mediated modulation of
excitatory neurotransmission. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012,109, E197–E205. [CrossRef]
177.
Santello, M.; Bezzi, P.; Volterra, A. TNF
α
Controls Glutamatergic Gliotransmission in the Hippocampal Dentate Gyrus. Neuron
2011,69, 988–1001. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
178.
Takata-Tsuji, F.; Chounlamountri, N.; Do, L.; Philippot, C.; Ducassou, J.N.; Couté, Y.; Ben Achour, S.; Honnorat, J.; Place, C.;
Pascual, O. Microglia modulate gliotransmission through the regulation of VAMP2 proteins in astrocytes. Glia
2021
,69, 61–72.
[CrossRef]
179.
Calì, C.; Marchaland, J.; Regazzi, R.; Bezzi, P. SDF 1-alpha (CXCL12) triggers glutamate exocytosis from astrocytes on a millisecond
time scale: Imaging analysis at the single-vesicle level with TIRF microscopy. J. Neuroimmunol. 2008,198, 82–91. [CrossRef]
180.
Canedo, T.; Portugal, C.C.; Socodato, R.; Almeida, T.O.; Terceiro, A.F.; Bravo, J.; Silva, A.I.; Magalhães, J.D.; Guerra-Gomes,
S.; Oliveira, J.F.; et al. Astrocyte-derived TNF and glutamate critically modulate microglia activation by methamphetamine.
Neuropsychopharmacology 2021. [CrossRef]
181.
Habbas, S.; Santello, M.; Becker, D.; Stubbe, H.; Zappia, G.; Liaudet, N.; Klaus, F.; Kollias, G.; Fontana, A.; Pryce, C.R.; et al.
Neuroinflammatory TNFαImpairs Memory via Astrocyte Signaling. Cell 2015,163, 1730–1741. [CrossRef]
182.
Gourine, A.V.; Kasymov, V.; Marina, N.; Tang, F.; Figueiredo, M.F.; Lane, S.; Teschemacher, A.G.; Spyer, K.M.; Deisseroth,
K.; Kasparov, S. Astrocytes Control Breathing Through pH-Dependent Release of ATP. Science
2010
,329, 571–575. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
183.
Angelova, P.R.; Kasymov, V.; Christie, I.; Sheikhbahaei, S.; Turovsky, E.; Marina, N.; Korsak, A.; Zwicker, J.D.; Teschemacher, A.G.;
Ackland, G.L.; et al. Functional Oxygen Sensitivity of Astrocytes. J. Neurosci. 2015,35, 10460–10473. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
184.
Marina, N.; Turovsky, E.; Christie, I.N.; Hosford, P.; Hadjihambi, A.; Korsak, A.; Ang, R.; Mastitskaya, S.; Sheikhbahaei, S.;
Theparambil, S.M.; et al. Brain metabolic sensing and metabolic signaling at the level of an astrocyte. Glia
2018
,66, 1185–1199.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
185.
Byts, N.; Sharma, S.; Laurila, J.; Paudel, P.; Miinalainen, I.; Ronkainen, V.-P.; Hinttala, R.; Törnquist, K.; Koivunen, P.; Myllyharju,
J. Transmembrane Prolyl 4-Hydroxylase is a Novel Regulator of Calcium Signaling in Astrocytes. Eneuro
2021
,8, 1–23. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
Biomolecules 2021,11, 1367 19 of 19
186.
Gaidin, S.G.; Turovskaya, M.V.; Mal’Tseva, V.N.; Zinchenko, V.P.; Blinova, E.; Turovsky, E.A. A Complex Neuroprotective Effect of
Alpha-2-Adrenergic Receptor Agonists in a Model of Cerebral Ischemia–Reoxygenation In Vitro. Biochem. (Moscow) Suppl. Ser. A
Membr. Cell Biol. 2019,13, 319–333. [CrossRef]
187.
Lian, H.; Yang, L.; Cole, A.; Sun, L.; Chiang, A.C.-A.; Fowler, S.W.; Shim, D.J.; Rodriguez-Rivera, J.; Taglialatela, G.; Jankowsky,
J.L.; et al. NF
κ
B-Activated Astroglial Release of Complement C3 Compromises Neuronal Morphology and Function Associated
with Alzheimer’s Disease. Neuron 2015,85, 101–115. [CrossRef]
188.
Stephan, A.H.; Barres, B.A.; Stevens, B. The Complement System: An Unexpected Role in Synaptic Pruning During Development
and Disease. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2012,35, 369–389. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
189.
Stevens, B.; Allen, N.J.; Vazquez, L.E.; Howell, G.R.; Christopherson, K.S.; Nouri, N.; Micheva, K.; Mehalow, A.; Huberman, A.D.;
Stafford, B.; et al. The Classical Complement Cascade Mediates CNS Synapse Elimination. Cell
2007
,131, 1164–1178. [CrossRef]
... Nevertheless, we still use genetic models to study astrocytic impact on synaptic activity, somehow upstreaming SLMVs exocytosis (Petrelli et al., 2020(Petrelli et al., , 2023. Indeed, calcium signaling has been largely used as a proxy to study the dynamics of SLMVs release in culture Cali et al., 2014;Marchaland et al., 2008;Vardjan et al., 2019;Stenovec et al., 2020;Mielnicka and Michaluk, 2021), leading to in vivo studies with the assumption that neuroglia functional interactions might be due to astrocytic SLMVs exocytosis (Kirchhoff, 2010;Wiedemann, 2010;Bindocci et al., 2017;de Ceglia et al., 2023). Aforementioned reasons led to a progressive abandonment of this quest, leaving the problem almost as a religious question, where believers don't need further proofs, and conversely no evidence will be enough for those who don't believe in it. ...
... Simulations support the presence of ER and SLMVs in PAPs (Manninen et al., 2018(Manninen et al., , 2023Linne et al., 2022). At present, the body of evidence of astrocytic Ca 2+ stores in vivo cannot be ignored, and might help reconsider the presence of SLMVs, being Ca 2+ their upstream triggering molecule (Calì et al., 2009;Bohmbach et al., 2018;Vardjan et al., 2019;Mielnicka and Michaluk, 2021). Moreover, in the dataset from (Calì et al., 2016), it is also possible to identify vesicular structures resembling SLMVs in size and shape ( Figure 1D, red arrowheads). ...
... HT and IHT quantify brain synapses with dendritic spines only; these spines are absent in most inhibitory neurons. Additionally, the IHT pre-/postsynaptic protein quantification established on chemical synapses does not include (a) synaptic proteins in electric synapses that have an essential function in local inhibitory circuits of the adult brain [11,32,183], or (b) the presynaptic proteins in astrocytes and microglia that seem to regulate the exocytosis, for example, of glutamate-containing vesicles [11,184,185]. The introduction of 3D stimulated emission depletion microscopy and super-resolution shadow imaging has improved the visualisation and quantification of dendritic spine structure and density in 3D [186][187][188]. ...
... High-resolution electron microscopy (EM) and immunohistochemistry (IHT) analysis of brain samples detected decreased spine density, dendritic spine morphological changes and an overall decreased hippocampal density of chemical synapses as an early sign of AD-related neuronal brain damage, preceding the neuronal loss comprehensively reviewed by Serrano et al. [11]. Neither electrical synapses with specific adhesion, scaffolding, and regulatory synaptic molecules [306,307] nor exocytosis regulating presynaptic proteins in astrocytes and microglia [11,184,185] have been morphologically quantified with IHT to the same degree as brain chemical synapses. EM and IHT techniques localised AD pathology's early, presymptomatic changes to hippocampal chemical synapses. ...
Article
Full-text available
Early cognitive decline in patients with Alzheimer’s (AD) is associated with quantifiable structural and functional connectivity changes in the brain. AD dysregulation of Aβ and tau metabolism progressively disrupt normal synaptic function, leading to loss of synapses, decreased hippocampal synaptic density and early hippocampal atrophy. Advances in brain imaging techniques in living patients have enabled the transition from clinical signs and symptoms-based AD diagnosis to biomarkers-based diagnosis, with functional brain imaging techniques, quantitative EEG, and body fluids sampling. The hippocampus has a central role in semantic and episodic memory processing. This cognitive function is critically dependent on normal intrahippocampal connections and normal hippocampal functional connectivity with many cortical regions, including the perirhinal and the entorhinal cortex, parahippocampal cortex, association regions in the temporal and parietal lobes, and prefrontal cortex. Therefore, decreased hippocampal synaptic density is reflected in the altered functional connectivity of intrinsic brain networks (aka large-scale networks), including the parietal memory, default mode, and salience networks. This narrative review discusses recent critical issues related to detecting AD-associated early cognitive decline with brain synaptic structural and functional markers in high-risk or neuropsychologically diagnosed patients with subjective cognitive impairment or mild cognitive impairment.
... For example, it has been shown that astrocytes possess some of the proteins involved in exocytosis, including the soluble N-ethyl maleimide-sensitive fusion protein attachment protein receptor (SNARE) complex (Zhang et al., 2004), to control vesicle fusion. SNARE proteins, such as VAMP2 or VAMP3, Syntaxin 1, SNAP23, and synaptotagmin isoforms have been detected in astrocytes (Bohmbach et al., 2018;Mielnicka and Michaluk, 2021). Interestingly, the mechanisms involved in glutamate-mediated exocytosis have been highly debated in the last years Chai et al., 2017). ...
Article
Full-text available
Glia are as numerous in the brain as neurons and widely known to serve supportive roles such as structural scaffolding, extracellular ionic and neurotransmitter homeostasis, and metabolic support. However, over the past two decades, several lines of evidence indicate that astrocytes, which are a type of glia, play active roles in neural information processing. Astrocytes, although not electrically active, can exhibit a form of excitability by dynamic changes in intracellular calcium levels. They sense synaptic activity and release neuroactive substances, named gliotransmitters, that modulate neuronal activity and synaptic transmission in several brain areas, thus impacting animal behavior. This “dialogue” between astrocytes and neurons is embodied in the concept of the tripartite synapse that includes astrocytes as integral elements of synaptic function. Here, we review the recent work and discuss how astrocytes via calcium-mediated excitability modulate synaptic information processing at various spatial and time scales.
... They contain several secretory vesicles including synaptic-like microvesicles (SLMV) and densecore vesicles (DCV), which enclose glutamate and D-serine, and ATP and BDNF, respectively. Similar to other nonneuronal cells, the SNARE complex in astrocytes consists mainly of Snap23, syntaxin 4, and synaptobrevin-2/VAMP2 and cellubrevin/VAMP3 (reviewed in Mielnicka & Michaluk, 2021). A recent study shows that astrocytic VAMP3-dependent secretion of neuropeptide Y reduces synaptic signaling while VAMP2-dependent glutamate release from astrocytes enhances the signaling (Schwarz et al., 2017). ...
Article
Full-text available
Neural communication in the adult nervous system is mediated primarily through chemical synapses, where action potentials elicit Ca2+ signals, which trigger vesicular fusion and neurotransmitter release in the presynaptic compartment. At early stages of development, the brain is shaped by communication via trophic factors and other extracellular signalling, and by contact‐mediated cell‐cell interactions including chemical synapses. The patterns of early neuronal impulses and spontaneous and regulated neurotransmitter release guide the precise topography of axonal projections and contribute to determining cell survival. The study of the role of specific proteins of the synaptic vesicle release machinery in the establishment, plasticity and maintenance of neuronal connections during development has only recently become possible, with the advent of mouse models where various members of the N‐ethylmaleimide‐sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) complex have been genetically manipulated. We provide an overview of these models, focusing on the role of regulated vesicular release and/or cellular excitability in synaptic assembly, development and maintenance of cortical circuits, cell survival, circuit level excitation‐inhibition balance, myelination and refinement and plasticity of key axonal projections from the cerebral cortex. These models are important for understanding various developmental and psychiatric conditions, and neurodegenerative diseases. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
Article
Full-text available
Astrocyte heterogeneity is an increasingly prominent research topic, and studies in the brain have demonstrated substantial variation in astrocyte form and function, both between and within regions. In contrast, retinal astrocytes are not well understood and remain incompletely characterized. Along with optic nerve astrocytes, they are responsible for supporting retinal ganglion cell axons and an improved understanding of their role is required. We have used a combination of microdissection and Ribotag immunoprecipitation to isolate ribosome‐associated mRNA from retinal astrocytes and investigate their transcriptome, which we also compared to astrocyte populations in the optic nerve. Astrocytes from these regions are transcriptionally distinct, and we identified retina‐specific astrocyte genes and pathways. Moreover, although they share much of the “classical” gene expression patterns of astrocytes, we uncovered unexpected variation, including in genes related to core astrocyte functions. We additionally identified the transcription factor Pax8 as a highly specific marker of retinal astrocytes and demonstrated that these astrocytes populate not only the retinal surface, but also the prelaminar region at the optic nerve head. These findings are likely to contribute to a revised understanding of the role of astrocytes in the retina.
Article
Objective: Perisynaptic astrocytic processes have been suggested as sites for the regulated release of neuroactive substances. However, very little is known about the molecular properties of regulated exocytosis in these processes. Soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive-factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) proteins mediate synaptic vesicle exocytosis from neuronal cells and might be candidates for regulated exocytosis also from astrocytic processes. The expression of SNARE proteins in astrocytes, however, is not clarified. Thus, we aimed to investigate the localization and relative concentrations of neuronal SNARE proteins syntaxin-1, synaptosomal nerve-associated protein 25 (SNAP-25), vesicle-associated membrane protein 2 (VAMP-2) (synaptobrevin-2) and calcium sensor synaptotagmin 1 in perisynaptic astrocytic processes compared to nerve terminals and dendrites. Methods: We used quantitative immunogold electron microscopy of the rat hippocampus to investigate the localization and concentration of neuronal SNARE proteins. Results: As expected, analysis of the immunogold data revealed a lower labeling density of SNARE proteins in the perisynaptic astrocytic processes than in presynaptic terminals. The same was also true when compared to dendrites. Contrary to VAMP-2, labeling intensities for syntaxin-1, SNAP-25 and synaptotagmin 1 were not distinguishable from background labeling in the processes. The relative concentration of VAMP-2 stands out, as the mean perisynaptic astrocytic process concentration of the protein was only 68 % lower than in presynaptic terminals and still 32 % higher than in dendrites. VAMP-2 was associated with small vesicles in the processes. Some gold particles were located over the astrocytic plasma membrane. Conclusion: VAMP-2 is expressed in perisynaptic astrocytic processes, with a concentration higher than in the dendrites. Our results are compatible with the role of VAMP-2 in exocytosis from perisynaptic astrocytic processes.
Article
Full-text available
Cell‐cell interactions in the central nervous system are based on the release of molecules mediating signal exchange and providing structural and trophic support through vesicular exocytosis and the formation of extracellular vesicles. The specific mechanisms employed by each cell type in the brain are incompletely understood. Here, we explored the means of communication used by Müller cells, a type of radial glial cells in the retina, which forms part of the central nervous system. Using immunohistochemical, electron microscopic, and molecular analyses, we provide evidence for the release of distinct extracellular vesicles from endfeet and microvilli of retinal Müller cells in adult mice in vivo. We identify VAMP5 as a Müller cell‐specific SNARE component that is part of extracellular vesicles and responsive to ischemia, and we reveal differences between the secretomes of immunoaffinity‐purified Müller cells and neurons in vitro. Our findings suggest extracellular vesicle‐based communication as an important mediator of cellular interactions in the retina.
Article
Full-text available
The role of the purinergic signal has been extensively investigated in many tissues and related organs, including the central and peripheral nervous systems as well as the gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, and immune systems. Less attention has been paid to the influence of purines in the oral cavity, which is the first part of the digestive apparatus and also acts as the body’s first antimicrobial barrier. In this review, evidence is provided of the presence and possible physiological role of the purinergic system in the different structures forming the oral cavity including teeth, tongue, hard palate, and soft palate with their annexes such as taste buds, salivary glands, and nervous fibers innervating the oral structures. We also report findings on the involvement of the purinergic signal in pathological conditions affecting the oral apparatus such as Sjögren’s syndrome or following irradiation for the treatment of head and neck cancer, and the use of experimental drugs interfering with the purine system to improve bone healing after damage. Further investigations are required to translate the results obtained so far into the clinical setting in order to pave the way for a wider application of purine-based treatments in oral diseases.
Article
Full-text available
GABAergic network activity has been established to be involved in numerous physiological processes and pathological conditions. Extensive studies have corroborated that GABAergic network activity regulates excitatory synaptic networks by activating presynaptic GABAB receptors (GABABRs). It is well documented that astrocytes express GABABRs and respond to GABAergic network activity. However, little is known about whether astrocytic GABABRs regulate excitatory synaptic transmission mediated by GABAergic network activity. To address this issue, we combined whole‐cell recordings, optogenetics, calcium imaging, and pharmacological approaches to specifically activate hippocampal somatostatin‐expressing interneurons (SOM‐INs), a type of interneuron that targets pyramidal cell dendrites, while monitoring excitatory synaptic transmission in CA1 pyramidal cells. We found that optogenetic stimulation of SOM‐INs increases astrocyte Ca²⁺ signaling via the activation of astrocytic GABABRs and GAT‐3. SOM‐INs depress excitatory neurotransmission by activating presynaptic GABABRs and astrocytic GABABRs, the latter inducing the release of ATP/adenosine. In turn, adenosine inhibits excitatory synaptic transmission by activating presynaptic adenosine A1 receptors (A1Rs). Overall, our results reveal a novel mechanism that SOM‐INs activation‐induced synaptic depression is partially mediated by the activation of astrocytic GABABRs. image
Preprint
Full-text available
Cell-cell interactions in the central nervous system (CNS) are based on the release of molecules mediating signal exchange and providing structural and trophic support through vesicular exocytosis and the formation of extracellular vesicles (EVs). The specific mechanisms employed by each cell type in the brain are incompletely understood. Here, we explored the means of communication used by Müller cells, a type of glial cells in the retina, which forms part of the CNS. Using immunohistochemical, electron microscopic, and molecular analyses, we provide evidence for the release of distinct EVs from highly specialized domains of Müller cells in retinae from adult mice in vivo . We identify VAMP5 as a Müller cell-specific SNARE component that is part of EVs and responsive to ischemia, and we reveal differences between the secretomes of affinity-purified Müller cells and neurons in vitro . Our findings suggest EV-based communication as an important mediator of cellular interactions in the retina.
Article
Full-text available
Astrocytes are essential for the development and homeostatic maintenance of the central nervous system (CNS). They are also critical players in the CNS injury response during which they undergo a process referred to as “reactive astrogliosis.” Diversity in astrocyte morphology and gene expression, as revealed by transcriptional analysis, is well-recognized and has been reported in several CNS pathologies, including ischemic stroke, CNS demyelination, and traumatic injury. This diversity appears unique to the specific pathology, with significant variance across temporal, topographical, age, and sex-specific variables. Despite this, there is limited functional data corroborating this diversity. Furthermore, as reactive astrocytes display significant environmental-dependent plasticity and fate-mapping data on astrocyte subsets in the adult CNS is limited, it remains unclear whether this diversity represents heterogeneity or plasticity. As astrocytes are important for neuronal survival and CNS function post-injury, establishing to what extent this diversity reflects distinct established heterogeneous astrocyte subpopulations vs. environmentally dependent plasticity within established astrocyte subsets will be critical for guiding therapeutic development. To that end, we review the current state of knowledge on astrocyte diversity in the context of three representative CNS pathologies: ischemic stroke, demyelination, and traumatic injury, with the goal of identifying key limitations in our current knowledge and suggesting future areas of research needed to address them. We suggest that the majority of identified astrocyte diversity in CNS pathologies to date represents plasticity in response to dynamically changing post-injury environments as opposed to heterogeneity, an important consideration for the understanding of disease pathogenesis and the development of therapeutic interventions.
Article
Full-text available
Different cell populations in the nervous tissue establish numerous, heterotypic interactions and perform specific, frequently intersecting activities devoted to the maintenance of homeostasis. Microglia and astrocytes, respectively the immune and the “housekeeper” cells of nervous tissue, play a key role in neurodegenerative diseases. Alterations of tissue homeostasis trigger neuroinflammation, a collective dynamic response of glial cells. Reactive astrocytes and microglia express various functional phenotypes, ranging from anti-inflammatory to pro-inflammatory. Chronic neuroinflammation is characterized by a gradual shift of astroglial and microglial phenotypes from anti-inflammatory to pro-inflammatory, switching their activities from cytoprotective to cytotoxic. In this scenario, the different cell populations reciprocally modulate their phenotypes through intense, reverberating signaling. Current evidence suggests that heterotypic interactions are links in an intricate network of mutual influences and interdependencies connecting all cell types in the nervous system. In this view, activation, modulation, as well as outcomes of neuroinflammation, should be ascribed to the nervous tissue as a whole. While the need remains of identifying further links in this network, a step back to rethink our view of neuroinflammation in the light of the “whole system” scale, could help us to understand some of its most controversial and puzzling features.
Article
Full-text available
Reactive astrocytes are astrocytes undergoing morphological, molecular, and functional remodeling in response to injury, disease, or infection of the CNS. Although this remodeling was first described over a century ago, uncertainties and controversies remain regarding the contribution of reactive astrocytes to CNS diseases, repair, and aging. It is also unclear whether fixed categories of reactive astrocytes exist and, if so, how to identify them. We point out the shortcomings of binary divisions of reactive astrocytes into good-vs-bad, neurotoxic-vs-neuroprotective or A1-vs-A2. We advocate, instead, that research on reactive astrocytes include assessment of multiple molecular and functional parameters-preferably in vivo-plus multivariate statistics and determination of impact on pathological hallmarks in relevant models. These guidelines may spur the discovery of astrocyte-based biomarkers as well as astrocyte-targeting therapies that abrogate detrimental actions of reactive astrocytes, potentiate their neuro- and glioprotective actions, and restore or augment their homeostatic, modulatory, and defensive functions.
Article
Full-text available
Electrically permeabilized RINm5F cells were used to assess the factors required for activation of protein kinase C (PKC) and insulin secretion. PKC was activated either by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) or by the generation of endogenous diacylglycerol in response to the nonhydrolyzable guanine nucleotide analog guanosine 5′-O-(thiotriphosphate) (GTPγS). As shown previously, both PMA and GTPγS elicit Ca²⁺-independent insulin secretion. This effect was mimicked by guanyl-5′-yl imidodiphosphate (Gpp(NH)p) but not by guanosine 5′-O-(3-fluorotriphosphate) and guanosine 5′-O-(3-phenyltriphosphate) possessing only one negative charge in the γ-phosphate group. The action of PMA was mediated by PKC, since the agent caused both phosphorylation of specific protein substrates and association of the enzyme with cellular membranes. This translocation was independent of the Ca²⁺ concentration employed. In contrast, GTPγS only promoted association of PKC with membranes at 10⁻⁶ and 10⁻⁵ M Ca²⁺ and failed to alter significantly protein phosphorylation in the absence of Ca²⁺. Neither Gpp(NH)p, which stimulates insulin release, nor the other two GTP analogs, increased the proportion of PKC associated with membranes. To verify that the Ca²⁺-dependent effect of GTPγS on PKC is due to activation of phospholipase C, we measured the generation of diacylglycerol. GTPγS indeed stimulated diacylglycerol production in the leaky cells by about 50% at Ca²⁺ concentrations between 10⁻⁷ and 10⁻⁵ M, an effect which was almost abolished in the absence of Ca²⁺. Thus, at 10⁻⁷ M Ca²⁺, the concentration found in resting intact cells, the generated diacylglycerol was not sufficient to cause PKC insertion into the membrane, demonstrating that both elevated Ca²⁺ and diacylglycerol are necessary for translocation to occur. It is concluded that while PKC activation by PMA elicits Ca²⁺-independent insulin secretion, the kinase seems not to mediate the stimulatory action of GTP analogs in the absence of Ca²⁺.
Article
Full-text available
Astrocytes are key homeostatic regulators in the central nervous system and play important roles in physiology. After brain damage caused by e.g., status epilepticus, traumatic brain injury, or stroke, astrocytes may adopt a reactive phenotype. This process of reactive astrogliosis is important to restore brain homeostasis. However, persistent reactive astrogliosis can be detrimental for the brain and contributes to the development of epilepsy. In this review, we will focus on physiological functions of astrocytes in the normal brain as well as pathophysiological functions in the epileptogenic brain, with a focus on acquired epilepsy. We will discuss the role of astrocyte-related processes in epileptogenesis, including reactive astrogliosis, disturbances in energy supply and metabolism, gliotransmission, and extracellular ion concentrations, as well as blood-brain barrier dysfunction and dysregulation of blood flow. Since dysfunction of astrocytes can contribute to epilepsy, we will also discuss their role as potential targets for new therapeutic strategies.
Article
Full-text available
Prolyl 4-hydroxylases (P4Hs) have vital roles in regulating collagen synthesis and hypoxia response. A transmembrane P4H (P4H-TM) is a recently identified member of the family. Biallelic loss of function P4H-TM mutations cause a severe autosomal recessive intellectual disability syndrome in humans, but functions of P4H-TM are essentially unknown at cellular level. Our microarray data on P4h-tm-/- mouse cortexes where P4H-TM is abundantly expressed indicated expression changes in genes involved in calcium signaling and expression of several calcium sequestering ATPases was upregulated in P4h-tm-/- primary mouse astrocytes. Cytosolic and intraorganellar calcium imaging of P4h-tm-/- cells revealed that receptor-operated calcium entry (ROCE) and store-operated calcium entry (SOCE) and calcium re-uptake by mitochondria were compromised. HIF1, but not HIF2, was found to be a key mediator of the P4H-TM effect on calcium signaling. Furthermore, total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) imaging showed that calcium agonist-induced gliotransmission was attenuated in P4h-tm-/- astrocytes. This phenotype was accompanied by redistribution of mitochondria from distal processes to central parts of the cell body and decreased intracellular ATP content. Our data show that P4H-TM is a novel regulator of calcium dynamics and gliotransmission.
Article
Full-text available
Genetic variation around the LRRK2 gene affects risk of both familial and sporadic Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, the biological functions of LRRK2 remain incompletely understood. Here, we report that LRRK2 is recruited to lysosomes after exposure of cells to the lysosome membrane–rupturing agent LLOME. Using an unbiased proteomic screen, we identified the motor adaptor protein JIP4 as an LRRK2 partner at the lysosomal membrane. LRRK2 can recruit JIP4 to lysosomes in a kinase-dependent manner via the phosphorylation of RAB35 and RAB10. Using super-resolution live-cell imaging microscopy and FIB-SEM, we demonstrate that JIP4 promotes the formation of LAMP1-negative tubules that release membranous content from lysosomes. Thus, we describe a new process orchestrated by LRRK2, which we name LYTL (LYsosomal Tubulation/sorting driven by LRRK2), by which lysosomal tubulation is used to release vesicles from lysosomes. Given the central role of the lysosome in PD, LYTL is likely to be disease relevant.
Article
Methamphetamine (Meth) is a powerful illicit psychostimulant, widely used for recreational purposes. Besides disrupting the monoaminergic system and promoting oxidative brain damage, Meth also causes neuroinflammation, contributing to synaptic dysfunction and behavioral deficits. Aberrant activation of microglia, the largest myeloid cell population in the brain, is a common feature in neurological disorders triggered by neuroinflammation. In this study, we investigated the mechanisms underlying the aberrant activation of microglia elicited by Meth in the adult mouse brain. We found that binge Meth exposure caused microgliosis and disrupted risk assessment behavior (a feature that usually occurs in individuals who abuse Meth), both of which required astrocyte-to-microglia crosstalk. Mechanistically, Meth triggered a detrimental increase of glutamate exocytosis from astrocytes (in a process dependent on TNF production and calcium mobilization), promoting microglial expansion and reactivity. Ablating TNF production, or suppressing astrocytic calcium mobilization, prevented Meth-elicited microglia reactivity and re-established risk assessment behavior as tested by elevated plus maze (EPM). Overall, our data indicate that glial crosstalk is critical to relay alterations caused by acute Meth exposure.
Article
Vesicular release is one of the release mechanisms of various signaling molecules. In neurons, the molecular machinery involved in vesicular release has been designed through evolution to trigger fast and synchronous release of neurotransmitters. Similar machinery with a slower kinetic and a slightly different molecular assembly allows astrocytes to release various transmitters such as adenosine triphosphate (ATP), glutamate, and D‐serine. Astrocytes are important modulators of neurotransmission through gliotransmitter release. We recently demonstrated that microglia, another type of glia, release ATP to modulate synaptic transmission using astrocytes as intermediate. We now report that microglia regulate astrocytic gliotransmission through the regulation of SNARE proteins in astrocytes. Indeed, we found that gliotransmission triggered by P2Y1 agonist is impaired in slices from transgenic mice devoid of microglia. Using total internal reflection fluorescence imaging, we found that the vesicular release of gliotransmitter by astrocytes was different in cultures lacking microglia compared to vesicular release in astrocytes cocultured with microglia. Quantification of the kinetic of vesicular release indicates that the overall release appears to be faster in pure astrocyte cultures with more vesicles close to the membrane when compared to astrocytes cocultured with microglia. Finally, biochemical investigation of SNARE protein expression indicates an upregulation of VAMP2 in absence of microglia. Altogether, these results indicate that microglia seems to be involved in the regulation of an astrocytic phenotype compatible with proper gliotransmission. The mechanisms described in this study could be of importance for central nervous system diseases where microglia are activated. Absence of microglia decreases the expression of VAMP2 in astrocyte. Soluble factor(s) from microglia slow(s) down glutamate vesicular release in astrocyte and gliotransmission.
Article
Environmental neurotoxins such as paraquat (PQ), manganese, and 1-1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) are associated with a higher risk of Parkinson’s disease (PD). These parkinsonian toxins exert certain common toxicological effects on astroglia; however, their role in the regulatory functions of astroglial secretory proteins remains unclear. In a previous study, we observed that secretogranin II (SCG2) and secretogranin III (SCG3), which are important components of the regulated secretory pathway, were elevated in PQ-activated U118 astroglia. In the current study, we used the parkinsonian toxins dopamine (DA), active metabolite of MPTP (MPP⁺), MnCl2, and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) as inducers, and studied the potential regulation of SCG2 and SCG3. Our results showed that all the parkinsonian toxins except LPS affected astroglial viability but did not cause apoptosis. Exposure to DA, MPP⁺, and MnCl2 upregulated glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), a marker for astrocyte activation, and stimulated the levels of several astrocytic-derived factors. Further, DA, MPP⁺, and MnCl2 exposure impeded astroglial cell cycle progression. Moreover, the expression of SCG3 was elevated, while its exosecretion was inhibited in astroglia activated by parkinsonian toxins. The level of SCG2 remained unchanged. In combination with our previous findings, the results of this study indicate that SCG3 may act as a cofactor in astrocyte activation stimulated by various toxins, and the regulation of SCG3 could be involved in the toxicological mechanism by which parkinsonian toxins affect astroglia.