Available via license: CC BY 4.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
Sun, Sand and Submachine Guns:
Tourism in a Militarized Xinjiang, China
Gregory Fayard
*
Abstract
In recent years, domestic tourism into the Xinjiang region of China has
grown rapidly. Government officials view tourism as a source of both eco-
nomic capital and social stability, presenting a normalcy that makes it
attractive for investment. There are two paradoxes to Xinjiang tourism.
According to most literature, a massive military presence should deter tour-
ists, but numbers have continued to grow in the militarized Xinjiang region.
Second, the cultural “otherness”of Xinjiang is a big draw to the region, yet
this culture is being suppressed by state policies to contain Islam. Using a
dataset of Han Chinese travel diaries, I look at how narrated tourist experi-
ences of Xinjiang justify policing, how ethnic boundaries are reinforced by
practices in both transportation and personal interaction, and how state pol-
icies influence Chinese travellers’views on the authenticity of their experi-
ence. While bodily assurances of security substantiate political legitimacy,
tourists resist the bureaucratic management of sites, allowing for critiques
focused almost exclusively on aesthetic taste.
Keywords: Xinjiang; China; Belt and Road Initiative; Uyghur nationality;
tourism
In recent years, the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of China has become
a police state. Movements across the region are controlled by a dense network of
military police, security cameras, facial scanners, police checkpoints and razor
wire.
1
Public expressions of Islamic faith by Uyghurs, Kazakhs and Hui peoples
have been harshly suppressed, and Muslims are now targets of numerous
so-called counter-terrorist interventions that seek to constrain their physical
mobility and change their thinking, culture and behaviour.
2
It is estimated that
up to 1.5 million Uyghurs and other Muslims have been incarcerated in the
Xinjiang region.
3
Interestingly, at the same time as the region has become intensely militarized, it
has also become a popular tourist destination. According to most literature on
* Department of Sociology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. Email: gmfayard@berkeley.edu.
1 Zenz 2018b.
2 Leibold 2020; Anderson and Byler 2019.
3 Zenz 2019.
1
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. doi:10.1017/S0305741021000515
Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741021000515
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 181.214.179.221, on 25 Jul 2021 at 20:08:22, subject to the
travel and security, a region’s affiliation with terrorism should deter mass tour-
ism.
4
Yet while Muslim mobility has been curtailed in the region, ethnic Han
tourists have begun to freely explore Xinjiang’s newly accessible landscapes
and publicly praise its exotic beauty. By looking at tourist practices, this paper
seeks to explain why, in spite of the increased military crackdowns and suppres-
sion of indigenous ways of life, the tourism industry in Xinjiang has boomed.
It demonstrates how tourism is used to build political legitimacy in the region,
and how domestic travellers negotiate the recent processes of both ethnic-based
securitization and commercial development of tourist sites.
Background on Xinjiang and Xinjiang Tourism
The story of the heightened militarization in Xinjiang combines both an increas-
ing aversion to and suppression of Islam by the state and new technologies of
social control. In response to a string of alleged terrorist attacks, riots and pro-
tests by ethnic Uyghurs, the central state has mobilized its security apparatus
to pacify the region and ensure complete allegiance. Islam, once considered by
state leaders to be a peaceful religion that was occasionally distorted by a minor-
ity of extremists, has in recent years become seditious in the eyes of officials.
Islamic piety now connotes ethnic separatism and religious extremism.
Concordant with this shift in sentiment, the government has instituted a series
of physical controls and indoctrination techniques that mark the Islamic element
as deviant as well as implementing various purification programmes designed to
build loyalty to the Party. Such measures include the removal of the Uyghur lan-
guage from schooling, shuttering mosques, encouraging the reporting of relatives’
religiosity to authorities and the mandatory training of shopkeepers in the arts of
resisting terrorist incursion.
Although the north-west frontier has long been used as an experimental
ground for new political techniques,
5
recent digital technologies have allowed
for unprecedented surveillance.
6
Ethnic policies carve up the landscape and
sort populations into those considered reliable, i.e. Han Chinese, who move easily
across its deserts and grasslands, and those considered unreliable (Uyghurs, Hui
and Kazakhs), who are constantly tracked and monitored for seditious move-
ments. A vast network of integrated data relays can theoretically pinpoint
one’s whereabouts and perceived threat level at any moment. Police regularly
request identification and facial scans, and some cities have placed sentry stations
at nearly every intersection. Uyghur-owned vehicles in certain areas must be fit-
ted with GPS tracking devices.
7
Passports are nearly impossible to procure for
Uyghurs and other minorities, and foreign contacts in general are grounds for
4 Enders and Sandler 1991; Drakos and Kutan 2003.
5 Millward 1998.
6 Leibold 2020; Mozur 2019.
7 Phillips 2017.
2The China Quarterly, pp. 1–23
of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741021000515
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 181.214.179.221, on 25 Jul 2021 at 20:08:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms
suspicion.
8
Uyghurs arriving from abroad are subject to special interrogation and
health checks that collect DNA, blood type and other biometrics, information
which can be used to monitor future activities. As Darren Byler put it, at present
the “the principal purpose of Uyghur life is to generate data.”
9
Officials have also initiated the mass detention of “unreliable elements”in spe-
cial training centres, where large numbers of Muslims, mainly men, are forced to
undergo cultural purification, which involves learning Mandarin, singing patri-
otic songs, praising Xi Jinping 习近平and having their previous loyalties eroded
by bodily and psychological techniques.
10
Security spending increased ten-fold
from 2007 to 2017, with a 93 per cent increase between 2016 and 2017.
11
Additionally, thousands of plainclothes Uyghur guards have been hired to patrol
streets.
12
At the same time, the Xinjiang tourism industry is expanding. From 2011 to
2018, total tourist visits increased by 266 per cent, from nearly 40 million to
150 million, although the year-on-year trend was broken by a dip in 2014, the
year of a major bombing in Urumqi, the capital of Xinjiang, and the introduction
of a “strike hard”(yanda 严打) campaign against violent extremism.
13
According
to People’s Daily, to make up for that decline in visitor numbers, the Xinjiang
Tourism Bureau launched a scheme in 2014 that offered a 500-yuan subsidy to
each visitor to the region.
14
Communist Party officials view the tourism boom as a sign of the Party’s stra-
tegic success in economic and social development. State media frequently extols
the tourism boom in Xinjiang as evidence of positive changes in social stability,
living conditions and ethnic solidarity.
15
Additionally, the symbolic normaliza-
tion embodied in the arrival of regular visitors supports the Party’s vision of
the region as a stable pillar and hub in its Belt and Road Initiative –a place
safe for investment. The Xinjiang government has sought to portray the region
as a place of “prosperity, civilized progress, unity, and stability,”using tourism
as an engine of growth for the new Silk Road.
16
There is no doubt much to attract a visitor to Xinjiang. Once part of the
Western Regions (xiyu 西域) conquered by the Qing Empire in the 18th century,
it has long stood apart in mainland eyes as a restive and remarkable place filled
with alien ways of life, majestic scenery and valuable natural resources.
17
Stimulated by improved infrastructure and positive portrayals in such media as
8 Finley 2019; Standish and Toleukhanova 2019.
9 Byler 2019.
10 Zenz 2018b; Vanderklippe 2018.
11 Zenz 2018a.
12 Zenz 2018b.
13 Cockerell 2019.
14 Wang, Zhida 2014.
15 Liu 2019;Xu2018.
16 “Xinjiang weiwuer zizhiqu lüyouye fazhan di shisan ge wunian guihua”(The 13th Five-Year Plan for
the development of the tourism industry in Xinjiang). Xinjiangtour, 13 February 2017, http://zw.
xinjiangtour.gov.cn/info/1061/53725.htm. Accessed 3 May 2019.
17 Perdue 2005.
Sun, Sand and Submachine Guns 3
of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741021000515
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 181.214.179.221, on 25 Jul 2021 at 20:08:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms
Chinese National Geographic, its landscapes and folkways are contemporary
objects of tourist desire. Visitors to Xinjiang form one part of the increasingly
important tourism industry in China where the expanding transportation and
sanitation infrastructure, rising incomes and the installation of standardized trav-
eller facilities allow multi-day access to most regions.
18
It should be noted that the vast majority (over 96 per cent) of tourists to
Xinjiang are mainland Chinese; foreign tourists are closely monitored and
often turned away at various points. Some foreign visitors find they may only
be allowed to explore and take pictures of the “positive things,”which hints at
the existence of less attractive images.
19
Literature Review and Research Questions
There are three interconnecting branches of tourism research that can shed some
light on the puzzling nature of Xinjiang travel. They are focused on securitiza-
tion, ethnic relations and authenticity.
Scholars have long noted that pacification of a territory is one of the prerequi-
sites for leisure travel, with perceived risk to life and limb one of the surest deter-
rents to tourists.
20
A reputation for being the site of terrorist activities has been
shown to negatively impact tourist arrivals.
21
Politicians and businesspeople
work hard to frame regions known for recent political turmoil as peaceful and
safe areas for travellers.
22
While some literature addresses “dark tourists”–
those drawn to places of trauma and danger
23
–these are usually a minority of
thrill-seekers. In Xinjiang, tourism is a mass phenomenon, with many of its des-
tinations pre-packaged in the same way as more ordinary tourism destinations.
Although tourism to Xinjiang is undoubtedly negatively correlated with recent
violence, the “forces of repression”–the police and its weaponry –do not
seem to have the same deterrent effect that we would expect according to the lit-
erature. This raises the key research question: what role do tourists play in the
pacification of spaces?
Another body of literature addresses ethnic relations in tourism, showing for
example how ethnic groups on the Kenyan coast mobilize cooperatively and
competitively against threats to tourism,
24
how minorities in China dramatize
culture to attain capital,
25
and how racial relations are sustained by backstage
and frontstage performances to foreigners in Cuba.
26
Typically, these works pre-
sume a durable host community with some strategic choice in the cultural
18 Airey and Chong 2010.
19 Martin 2019.
20 Richter 1980; Hall, Timothy and Duval 2004.
21 Enders and Sandler 1991; Drakos and Kutan 2003; Saha and Yap 2014.
22 Lepp and Harris 2008; Rivera 2008.
23 Lennon and Foley 2000.
24 Jamison 1999.
25 Oakes 1997.
26 Sanchez and Adams 2008.
4The China Quarterly, pp. 1–23
of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741021000515
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 181.214.179.221, on 25 Jul 2021 at 20:08:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms
deployment of its most marketable face. Yet the ethnic project that operates in
Xinjiang is much closer to cultural erasure in which open displays of Islamic cul-
ture lead to persecution. The ethnic tourism –that is tourism concentrating on
experiencing peoples with putatively unique cultural identities
27
–in Xinjiang
is qualitatively different than that typically studied by scholars. Many Uyghur
religious practices are now considered to be radical and antithetical to Chinese
norms. Islam has been metaphorically described as a “virus”and a “cancer”
by internal Party documents.
28
To officials, Uyghur culture is something that
must be cleansed, even as it beckons tourists with its distinctiveness. This raises
another key research question: how does tourism affect ethnic boundaries in a
militarized, apartheid context?
A third area of research directly addresses Chinese domestic tourism and asks
whether Chinese tourists meet Western standards for an exploratory tourism that
searches for authenticity. Pál Nyíri’s original work on “scenic spots,”defined as
those state-sanctioned spaces of visitation that abrogate the need for adventuring,
has triggered a debate over the essence of Chinese travel.
29
Do Chinese tourists
adhere to a “stop-photo-sleep”model of movement or something more akin to
aLonely Planet-style attempt to get beyond facades?
30
Answers to this question could be greatly supplemented by an investigation of
Xinjiang, where the spatial scale, mode of travel (the automobile) and ethnic com-
position shape tourist expectations in ways inconsistent with other major destina-
tions. In addition, security measures put in place to keep travellers safe permeate
into the demand side of a site. The technostructure of security, while giving Han
travellers a sense of ownership and belonging, might also deprive the local scene
of the sincere public expression of cultural content that makes for satisfied viewing.
Cultural tourism might thus be compromised by the repressive forces. Another
important research area then is to examine how tourists psychologically navigate
the militarized, contested terrains of Xinjiang in terms of desired authenticity.
While the study of Xinjiang tourism addresses these fundamental questions, it
also raises more. What role does tourism play in the formation of Han Chinese
political consciousness? How do Han tourists interpret and make sense of
encounters with the police regime of Xinjiang? A few journalists and foreign wri-
ters have written of their own movements within Xinjiang, but we know little
about the subjective experiences of Chinese themselves, particularly how they
assess the region’s securitization and system of mobility controls.
Data and Methods
This study draws on novel materials which have not previously been used to
investigate contemporary Xinjiang. Owing to the relative inaccessibility of
27 Wood 1984.
28 Thum 2018.
29 Nyíri 2006.
30 Chio 2014; Kolas 2008; Shepherd 2009.
Sun, Sand and Submachine Guns 5
of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741021000515
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 181.214.179.221, on 25 Jul 2021 at 20:08:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms
Xinjiang to outside researchers, scholarly knowledge of its situation has been dif-
ficult to generate and fraught with ethical concerns. Travelogues are one means
to produce new insights on the ongoing sociopolitical processes of this important
region.
Data for this paper are mainly drawn from four online sources. The first is a
sample of 45 travel diaries, written in Mandarin, by Han Chinese who visited
Xinjiang between 2010 and 2019. The majority (31 of 45) of these diaries
appeared between 2017 and 2019, a period when re-education camps were
being used to detain large numbers of Muslims. The diaries were written mainly
by educated urban Chinese and posted online to public blog pages, online travel
sites or automobile enthusiast sites. Most were created by mainland Chinese,
although I include two by Taiwanese travellers. The average text length of the
diaries is about 13,800 characters, and most contain hundreds of photographs.
Almost all (approximately 87 per cent) of the diarists travelled by automobile,
although four mainly travelled by train and two used buses.
In order to compare ethnic relations, I rely on a second dataset of travel diaries
by Han Chinese tourists travelling to Tibetan regions (22 diaries written between
2006 and 2018). I use these travelogues mainly to compare Han–Tibetan interac-
tions with ethnic interactions in Xinjiang.
According to a survey of outgoing tourists, those who write travel diaries tend
to be well-educated (having tertiary education) and middle-class. Their most sig-
nificant motivations for publishing travelogues are documenting and sharing
their trips and the subjective enjoyment of blogging.
31
Those who read and follow
content on travel sites state their primary reasons are to help them plan their own
travel itineraries, plot routes, ascertain the major sites and learn about food
recommendations.
32
In the current dataset, the majority of the diarists who trav-
elled to Xinjiang hail from China’s largest cities, including Beijing (12 trips),
Shanghai (4), Guangzhou (3), Urumqi (3), Nanjing (2), Shenzhen (2) and
Xi’an (2). Many are car owners and so are likely to be fairly affluent, given
that Ministry of Public Security statistics show that as of the beginning of
2019, only about 240 million Chinese owned vehicles, or about 25 per cent of
the population aged 25 or above.
The third data source comprises online reviews taken from travel booking sites
for major Xinjiang attractions. These reviews are used mainly to substantiate
public opinion on certain destinations. Finally, where relevant, I examine official
media, government reports, magazine articles and online automobile advertise-
ments relevant to Xinjiang travel.
I performed content analysis on these travel materials, using an iterative
approach that combines both deductive and inductive analysis. Deductively, in
keeping with the literature review above and major research questions, I focused
a priori on classifying themes that relate to security and safety, state-building
31 Wu and Pearce 2016.
32 Luo and Li 2019.
6The China Quarterly, pp. 1–23
of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741021000515
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 181.214.179.221, on 25 Jul 2021 at 20:08:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms
(such as infrastructure, law enforcement, territorial marking and historical inter-
pretations), ethnic relationships, cultural authenticity and feelings of exploration.
Inductively, I recorded emerging insights, revising my conceptual frames and
re-assessing my dataset based on these patterns. In particular, greater attention
was given to the affective elements as my theoretical constructs do not address
these. After adapting the categories to fit the data, I looked for thematic closure
where a preponderance of evidence suggested recurring, consistent reactions to
certain situations. Exceptions were noted, but these widely shared patterns
formed the basis of my analysis.
Results
Background imagination on Xinjiang
In tourism, the narrative arrives before the traveller. This is particularly true in
China, where numerous thousand-year-old sites thrive in collective memory –
in novels, textbooks, news programmes, movies and guidebooks. This also
applies to Xinjiang in part. For example, Journey to the West (Xiyouji 西游记),
the novel tracing the monk Xuanzang’s玄奘numerous travails to retrieve sutras
from India, is constantly referenced by travellers. Compared to other regions of
China, however, travel to Xinjiang is still embryonic and narratives are still being
developed. Furthermore, many sites have yet to be formally included as scenic
sites, so there are no entrance gates and fees.
Xinjiang offers tourists a huge space to explore. In the Taklamakan Desert, for
example, drivers can randomly park on the side of the road and trudge up
and down sand dunes. What gratifies many travellers about this kind of
undemarcated space is its lack of artificiality. One female visitor to Xiata
Canyon (Xiata xiagu 夏塔峡谷) draws analogies to entering a foreign national
park where the original ecology is retained.
33
The main means of travel in Xinjiang is by motor vehicle (either personal
vehicle, rental car or hired driver), so that one architect of the imaginative con-
sumption of spaces is automobile advertising. While advertisements do not auto-
matically express the belief systems of consumers, marketing materials do speak
to psychological impulses of empowerment and finding the self.
34
Of those who
drove their own vehicles and I could determine the type of vehicle, 64 per cent
travelled in sport utility vehicles.
While few if any marketing materials mention Xinjiang specifically, many fea-
ture the isolated landscapes found in frontier regions like Tibet and Xinjiang.
One Nissan Navara advertisement on xcar.com in September 2018 shows a
large SUV splashing off-road through water (something drivers attempt in
33 Tekes (Tekesi 特克斯), 2018. To anonymize sources, I use the key destination and year to indicate which
travel diary is referenced.
34 Frank 1997; Popp 2012.
Sun, Sand and Submachine Guns 7
of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741021000515
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 181.214.179.221, on 25 Jul 2021 at 20:08:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms
Xinjiang) with the tagline: “wherever you want to go, there’s no place you cannot
reach.”In another advertisement, for the BMW X5 in autohome.com in February
2019, a white SUV is parked in front of an unmarked glacier in the Kashgar
(Kashi 喀什) region), instructing viewers to “break a thousand boundaries, estab-
lish new boundaries”(po wanjing, li xinjing 破万境,立新境). Thus, there is a pre-
fabricated notion of automobility, particularly among SUV drivers, that one will
not follow prefabricated notions. While Xinjiang tourists are by no means
patternless in their movements, they interact with a consumer ethos that suggests
they travel off the beaten path.
Preparing for a Xinjiang trip
There are many online travel guides that advise on when to visit Xinjiang, where
to go and how to get around. A widely viewed introductory article on the website
Mafengwo describes Xinjiang as being China’s largest province (shengfen 省份),
bordered by six countries and marked by remoteness and mystery (shenmi
神秘).
35
Although Xinjiang is administered at a provincial level and many of
the diarists consider it to be a province, it is technically an autonomous region,
or zizhiqu 自治区. In general, Xinjiang vacations tend to cover large swaths of
latitude and longitude and advice tends to centre on dealing with the great
distances away from the normal, comfortable routines of mainland China.
Most guides recommend packing dried food because of the great distances
between places of re-supply. They suggest filling luggage with both warm and
cold weather clothes, as the temperature changes rapidly. However, the most
important item to bring is an official identification card, which is necessary not
only to cross security checkpoints but also to accomplish mundane tasks such
as re-fueling vehicles and entering restrooms. For example, at most petrol sta-
tions, all passengers except the driver must exit the vehicle and wait outside a
razor-wire fence. The driver must first show identification and offer the trunk
for inspection before taking the vehicle to the pumps.
There is a general consensus among the online guides that north Xinjiang
(north of the Tianshan Mountains 天山) has more natural beauty, while south
Xinjiang (south of the Tianshan Mountains) has more interesting culture. Most
guides start journeys in Urumqi, the capital and the only place where visitors
can hire vehicles. One post on Mafengwo 马蜂窝sums up the essential places
to visit: “If you don’t go to Xinjiang, you don’t know how big China is. If you
don’t go to Ili (Yili 伊犁), you don’t know how beautiful Xinjiang is. If you
don’t go to Kashgar, you haven’t arrived in Xinjiang.”
36
The last phrase echoes
the tourist slogan of Kashgar, which is displayed prominently throughout the
35 “Xinjiang gaikuang”(Xinjiang general overview). Mafengwo, 11 August 2017, https://m.mafengwo.cn/
gl/catalog/index?id=776&catalog_id=4050. Accessed 12 July 2019.
36 “Di yi ci qu Xinjiang, bi kan de xing qian shi da wenti quan jieda”(Ten essential question-and-answers
for first-time visitors to Xinjiang). Mafengwo, 2018, http://www.mafengwo.cn/gonglve/ziyouxing/
112050.html. Accessed 12 July 2019.
8The China Quarterly, pp. 1–23
of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741021000515
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 181.214.179.221, on 25 Jul 2021 at 20:08:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms
city. For Han visitors, Kashgar is a city whose cultural bloodline links it to
Aladdin and Afghanistan; some describe it as the least Chinese place in China.
Tourists capture folk images of Uyghur pottery, fabrics, musical instruments,
playful children and the wizened faces of old men. Yili features the alpine
Lake Sayram (Sailimu hu 赛里木湖) and panoramic views of grasslands, provid-
ing tourists with the opportunity to photograph Kazakh herders tending to
horses in green fields. Other well-travelled sites in Xinjiang include the Flaming
Mountains (Huoyanshan 火焰山), the film location for the 1986 television
serial Journey to the West, Bayanbulak grassland (Bayinbuluke 巴音布鲁克),
Lake Kanas (Kanasi 喀纳斯) and the Pakistan border at Khunjerab Pass
(Hongqilafu 红其拉甫).
As for routes, there are two roads commonly enjoyed for their unique scenery.
The first is the Duku 独库Highway, which connects Maytag (Dushanzi 独山子)
and Kucha (Kuche 库车). Offering superb high-altitude views while crossing the
Tianshan Mountains, tourists yield to herds of cattle and sheep, and park
off-road to scrape ice off mountainsides and dip their feet in clear streams. On
the way, many stop at the Qiaoerma 乔尔玛Martyr’s Monument.
Memorializing the 168 members of the People’s Liberation Army who sacrificed
their lives to construct this roadway in the 1980s, the route has been heavily
promoted by official and unofficial media as the “road of heroes”(yingxiong
zhi lu 英雄之路).
The other “must-do”route traverses the Gobi Desert along Route 315.
Nicknamed the “Tarim Desert Oil Road,”it is considered to be a close analogue
of segments of the ancient Silk Road. In this arid stretch, travellers typically get
out of their cars to frolic among the sand dunes, rolling around, jumping and
stomping in the sand. Alongside sand and water wells, the landscape is dominated
by oil wells and the slogans of the China National Petroleum Corporation, which
trumpet its extraordinary resilience in harsh conditions. One prominent sign
popular with tourists snapping photographs reads: “Triumphing over a sea of
death”(zhengzhan “siwang”zhi hai 征战“死亡”之海).
Militarization and tourism
Black uniforms, submachine guns, riot shields, facial scans and metal spikes fea-
ture in most tourist commentaries and are photographed frequently. Travellers
arriving at the airport or train station in Urumqi are immediately confronted
with People’s Armed Police (wujing 武警). But whereas dread might be an
assumed response, Chinese tourists instead feel reassured by the panoply of tech-
nologies and soldiers. Many travel diaries background their decision to enter
Xinjiang with a debate between themselves and their anxious friends and
relatives:
Many of my mainland (neidi 内地) friends will not dare go to Xinjiang, especially to the south,
mainly because of safety concerns. In fact, there are many ethnic groups in Xinjiang, and Han
are the majority. Various cities have a well instituted set of security personnel. Many Han
Sun, Sand and Submachine Guns 9
of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741021000515
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 181.214.179.221, on 25 Jul 2021 at 20:08:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms
Chinese have lived there for years. Terrorist attacks are quite rare, you are unlikely to be
involved in one.
37
This traveller situates himself in distinction from those who do not really know
the facts.
The conventional wisdom about Xinjiang being an unwelcoming place is
refuted by personal touring experience. Almost no diarists downplay the security
apparatus as invisible or unremarkable; they see themselves as empirical valida-
tors who go into the field to relay on-the-ground truths back home and test com-
mon viewpoints:
I looked at travel logs and guides before and they said that Kashgar does not seem like a place
in China, and the people there do not look Chinese. If we go to Kashgar, we would be treated
like foreigners, and South Xinjiang is chaotic (luan 乱) and dangerous (weixian 危险), etc.
Although this makes some sense, if you don’t experience it personally, you can be mistaken.
Actually, there is probably some danger, but many people live here. Will I really encounter
riots at any time and place?
38
A more patriotic testimonial also emphasizes the reassuring ubiquity of security
institutions:
At Kargalik (Yecheng 叶城), the security check was especially strict. All the town entrances
have armed police (wujing) and traffic police stops. Not only do you present your official
identification, they inspect your luggage, and you have to open your hood; they inspect the
interior of the vehicle and all your belongings. To enter lodgings, stores and restaurants, you
have to go through a metal detector, get a simple frisk and open your bags …People urged
me to go past Yecheng straight to Kashgar, saying it wasn’t safe. There was a recent revolt
here. But I believe in the Party! I believe in the government! To exaggerate a little, every
three steps is a guardpost (gang 岗), every five steps a sentry (shao 哨). People’s armed
police vehicles, traffic police vehicles and armoured cars are everywhere, really tight
security …It gives those trying to go about their everyday business a sense of security
(anquangan 安全感).
39
Another writer not only normalizes the policing but admires its comparative
excellence in broader perspective:
Friends who want to go to Xinjiang worry about the safety issues. To this, let me say in all ser-
iousness that Xinjiang has the best public security in all of China. It is said the amount of police
in Xinjiang is greater than the total police force in the United States. I had heard before I left
that it was chaotic, but after going it’s no big deal …I have been to many crime-filled cities, like
Manila, Naples and Brussels, and so-called dirty cities like New York and Paris. Xinjiang is far
above them. The streets are filled with police, with 24-hour patrols. The supermarkets, hotels,
markets, buses, gas stations and ticketing halls all require ID and a security scan …In any bad
situation, you can find the police, who not only have a good attitude but are also handsome!
40
These narratives counter the commonly perceived risk of travelling in Xinjiang.
They assert that the dangers are overstated; the people are not out to get you;
there are large populations (especially of Han Chinese); the security levels ensure
safe movement; and it is safer than many other areas of the world.
Securitization provides both a prior rationale for visiting and a post-hoc justi-
fication of their visit. It provides Chinese visitors with a dose of patriotic pride to
37 Tashkurgan (Tashikuergan 塔什库尔干), 2017.
38 Khunjerab, 2017.
39 Kashgar, 2017.
40 Tekes, 2018.
10 The China Quarterly, pp. 1–23
of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741021000515
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 181.214.179.221, on 25 Jul 2021 at 20:08:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms
see the region so safe and a sense of personal pride for relaying the message back
home to others.
Tourism as an ethnic classification project
When travelling in Xinjiang, especially in south Xinjiang, tourists transition into
spaces where Han Chinese are in the minority. Here, value is given to manage-
able degrees of difference, where tourist practices form public representations
of membership and draw group boundaries. In general, tourists interacting
with Uyghurs feel occasional unease, a tension which is less obvious in their inter-
actions with Tajiks or Tibetans. I examine three modes of practice to show how
tourism reflects ethnocultural distinction: mobility configurations, personal
exchanges and intra-ethnic sharing.
Inequality in movement and space is integral to the political regime in
Xinjiang. The activities of Han tourists make plain these disparities. One way
is through their fear of sharing vehicles. For example, after landing at Kashgar
airport, one visitor describes a feeling of “apprehensiveness”(fachu 发怵) after
being overwhelmed by a large number of bearded men offering taxi rides.
41
Although some Han tourists occasionally pick up Tibetan hitchhikers,
42
no diar-
ists mention allowing Muslims in their vehicles, the main cited reason being the
language barrier. One married couple state that they had a pre-existing policy to
refuse hitchhikers but were nonetheless charmed by a Han soldier, whose com-
bination of “gentle refinement, along with being Han, and having no barriers
to communication”led them to shed their principles and offer him a ride.
43
Pragmatic reasons are also given for the lack of cross-ethnic contact when trav-
elling. As one rider explains, when sharing cars, police will conduct a more strin-
gent inspection if Uyghurs are in the backseat.
44
Although mobility restrictions such as having to present identification on the
street, facial scans, security checkpoints, etc. are clearly aimed at Uyghurs,
almost none of the mainland Chinese travel diaries makes overt reference to rela-
tive travel privilege. Compare this to one of the travellers from Taiwan, who
acknowledges that Xinjiang is safe to travel through yet is struck by its
disparities:
In fact, travelling in Xinjiang all this time you’ll discover that the police and security personnel
treat Han and Uyghurs very differently. Uyghurs will have to produce more documents and
undergo deeper inspections. Whereas us Han, they will sometimes just quickly wave us
through.
45
It is probably no coincidence that the only mainland Chinese travelogue to men-
tion separate standards was written by a gregarious family of three who met a
41 Yan’an 延安–Kashgar, 2017.
42 Lhasa-Namucuo 纳木错, 2014; Lhasa, 2016.
43 Tashkurgan, 2017.
44 Khotan (Hetian 和田), 2018.
45 Hami 哈密, 2018.
Sun, Sand and Submachine Guns 11
of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741021000515
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 181.214.179.221, on 25 Jul 2021 at 20:08:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms
pair of Uyghur students on the train to Urumqi. The students spoke fluent
Mandarin and studied in the family’s hometown.
46
They even invited the Han
family to their home to eat with them. A road trip by car inevitably will provide
a more solitary experience and segregation than a journey by train, but it is the
combination of personal openness, language parity and contact sites that likely
explains such opportunities for fellowship.
Other opportunities for meaningful exchange are also constrained on vacations
in Xinjiang. For instance, although there is a widespread custom for road travel-
lers to deliver school supplies and clothing to needy schools in Tibetan regions,
47
I found no evidence of such a practice in Xinjiang. This may not be entirely down
to the tourists, who are unable to pass on anything hand-to-hand in Xinjiang.
Many diaries point out how schoolyards in Xinjiang are tightly barricaded
against public access. In contrast, road-trippers in Tibetan mountainous areas
often cooperate directly with school administrators, driving along dirt roads to
visit isolated elementary schools and handing out gifts personally, an informal
charitable act not feasible in a context of militarization.
Reading the diary texts, it appears that none of the travellers added Uyghurs to
their personal contacts in social networking applications. Compared with their
interactions with Tibetans, they are less likely to use the inclusive term tongbao
同胞(compatriots) to describe Uyghurs. Of the 22 Tibet travelogues, seven (32
per cent) use the term directly for Tibetans; of the 45 Xinjiang diaries, just
three (7 per cent) do so for Uyghurs.
While some travellers to Tibet use phrasebooks and speak a few commonly used
phrases, no tourists in Xinjiang attempt to tackle the language barriers. In areas of
southern Xinjiang, many exchanges consist of just smiles, gestures, pointing and so
forth. At times, such exchanges can feel one-sided as tourists, despite their unease,
attempt to capture images of ethnic daily life through photography. Tourists in
Tibet express sensitivity about wantonly snapping shots of pilgrims and monks,
yet tourists in southern Xinjiang are even more circumspect, with multiple tourists
envisioning scenarios of having to flee for their lives in old town Kashgar while
taking pictures.
48
Hinting at this concern, one man travelling with his wife and
young daughter dispenses advice on how to win over the children in Kashgar:
If you want to engage with these children, it is simple. If you see a group of kids playing, you
can sit down beside them and slowly work your way closer; this way they won’t feel uneasy. You
could put on a smile, take a photo for them, or hand them some snacks, to build good feelings.
Children are all quite curious, especially about visitors, so it is easy to get close to them.
49
A few travellers in old town Kashgar used black-and-white photography to cap-
ture images of local residents, adding a greater sense of social distance and other-
ness to even the mundane tourist practice of taking photographs.
50
46 Kashgar-Altay (Aletai 阿勒泰), 2017.
47 Labrang Monastery 拉卜楞寺, 2015; Kashgar–Lhasa, 2017.
48 Aqsu (Akesu 阿克苏), 2015; Khunjerab, 2017.
49 Tashkurgan, 2017.
50 Kucha, 2017; Khunjerab, 2018.
12 The China Quarterly, pp. 1–23
of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741021000515
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 181.214.179.221, on 25 Jul 2021 at 20:08:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms
Tajiks elicit a more favourable response from Han tourists. One of the less
populous ethnic minorities in China, Tajiks are heavily engaged in tourism. On
the Pamir Plateau, tourists will often stay in yurts with a Tajik family or attend
a Tajik wedding. The travelogues almost all describe Tajiks similarly –as
pastoral, as surviving in demanding environments, as the only “white”ethnic
minority in China and as being friendly towards the Chinese state. Travel sites
note that Tajiks practise secularized Islam. Unlike Uyghurs, they are occasionally
added to personal contacts. Thus, while contact sites and deep connections with
Uyghurs seem limited, Tajik–Han relations appear to be brought closer through
tourist practices.
It appears that travel in Xinjiang is also a reinforcer of intra-ethnic solidarity. One
Taiwanese backpacker says openly what likely goes unstated by mainland Chinese:
We found a sedan driven by a [Xinjiang] Han to drive us …They told us that seeking a car like
we were was really dangerous. If a Uyghur picked us up, it would not be safe. Then, they pro-
ceeded to complain about how the Uyghurs made their everyday lives so inconvenient, why they
had all the strict safety inspections.
51
Here, local Han Chinese share their grievances about the “other”to perceived
members of their own group.
Concurrently, tourists greatly cherish the sacrifices that (Han) soldiers made to
open up and develop the region along the Duku Highway, near national borders
at the Khunjerab Pass and Korgas (Huoerguosi 霍尔果斯) and in the oil indus-
try. These infrastructural developments serve as symbolic achievements marking
national strength. For example, signage in the First Oil Well scenic area and the
Tamir Basin alludes to the tireless martyrdom of those working to develop
Xinjiang. One tourist driving a sedan through southern Xinjiang exults in his dili-
gent compatriots: “Building a road like this in an uninhabitable area is a magnifi-
cent feat; I’m amazed by the hardship endured by them, the engineering will and
the strength (qiangda 强大) of the country.”
52
Meanwhile, some tourists (although only a few go this far) insinuate them-
selves into national projects with subtle ways of identification. A father poetically
alludes to the great Han explorer of the 2nd century BC: “In ancient times it was
Zhang Qian 张骞travelling to the west, now it is [father’s name] travelling to
Xinjiang.”
53
Near Bayanbulak Grassland, without a cell phone signal, another
group connect their experience to that of their socialist predecessors:
[In the Gobi] on both sides, there are barren hills, with few plants growing, alongside broken,
closed trains and half-cut mountain caves. We felt like those youth in the 1950s and 1960s sent
down to Xinjiang to offer aid, a really unique feeling.
54
Road-trip travellers incorporate tropes of bodily struggle and what Nelson
Graburn calls “pioneer endurance.”
55
This is enhanced by the sense of
51 Hami, 2018.
52 Kucha, 2017.
53 Kashgar–Altay, 2017.
54 Yining 伊宁–Lake Kanas, 2017.
55 Graburn 1977.
Sun, Sand and Submachine Guns 13
of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741021000515
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 181.214.179.221, on 25 Jul 2021 at 20:08:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms
“extremity”that their travel in Xinjiang evokes: they experience extreme climates,
at the extreme limits of Chinese territory, among extremely intrepid compatriots
who have built roads and oil wells against extreme resistance.
Authenticity and commercialization
How do the massive spatial and socio-political changes in Xinjiang affect tour-
ists’evaluation of their experience? As I have shown, the huge infrastructure pro-
jects and webs of surveillance have permitted increased consumption of
landscapes and local culture by allowing feelings of safe mobility for Han
Chinese tourists. Furthermore, the achievements and surveillance form part of
the region’s distinctiveness and make great social media content. Yet, connected
to developmental policies are tourist concerns with authenticity. There are two
side effects of state policy that tourists regard as antithetical to their desires: devi-
talized atmosphere and over-commercialization.
Han tourists are to some extent aware that minority populations are being
moved around and that foot traffic is unusually low. They allude to Kazakh
nomads leaving Chinese territory, the relocation of Uyghur residents and
deserted markets. Some reviewers of Kashgar Old Town are underwhelmed by
the lack of atmosphere caused by empty stalls and the absence of people.
In general, Han tourists in Xinjiang are not looking for a true backstage experi-
ence of ethnic life; they are content with what the frontstage can provide. They do
not seek spiritual fulfilment from pure contact with opposing cultures, as so many
theories of Western travel assume.
56
If their middle-school textbook or the
Xinjiang Museum says that an ethnic group wears X costume and eats Y food,
they expect to witness or bodily engage with X and Y. They are not like writer
Edith Wharton touring Italy, fervently trying to detach her experience from
Turner paintings.
57
Rather, Han tourists in Xinjiang hope to attach themselves
to the popular image. For example, when visiting the Flaming Mountains,
they will generally take a picture next to the most symbolic image, the
Monkey King statue. A site does not necessarily lose charm by having other tour-
ists there; a certain number of visitors simply validates its common value. When
touring cultural sites, they, like so many travellers, presume that what they see
going on is an immobile social form that is always as they see it.
58
There is no
need for unmasking when no masking is presumed.
Even so, all else being equal, they prefer to experience different lifestyles with
some depth and sincerity, for instance by staying in a Kazakh yurt to “under-
stand the details (diyun 底蕴) of full-on grassland culture,”
59
or circling a mosque
to “genuinely experience (zhenzheng tiyan 真正体验) the lifeways of the local
56 Cohen and Cohen 2012.
57 Decker 2009.
58 Pratt 2007; Salazar 2012.
59 Altay, 2017.
14 The China Quarterly, pp. 1–23
of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741021000515
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 181.214.179.221, on 25 Jul 2021 at 20:08:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms
ethnic minorities.”
60
The adverb “genuinely”here implies there are lesser versions
of experience. Similarly, Kashgar promotes itself as the only place where you are
“genuinely”considered to be in Xinjiang.
Although a night of pre-arranged camping or circling a mosque might not
qualify as true travel in Western middle-class eyes (as in the travel philosophy
of Lonely Planet guides), it is enough to substantiate and validate many a journey
for Han Chinese visitors. Moreover, elements of surprise –unplanned happen-
stances –loom large in these diaries. Having a vehicle stuck in the mud and
then pushed out by several locals was a thrill for one couple in Wensu 温宿
Canyon.
61
Another group took a wrong turn and ended up at a nuclear test
research facility, where they excitedly paid homage to famous physicists.
62
Many authors have explored how Chinese tourists differ from ideal typical
Western ones in their different conceptions of authenticity,
63
but few have ana-
lysed how Chinese tourists adamantly despise “commercialization”(shangyehua
商业化). For Chinese tourists, commercialization signifies the use of prefigured,
procrustean styles of site management that detract from the native, unmediated
and unfettered enjoyment of a place. It is not so much the idea of charging
entrance fees that irks tourists, given that most attractions in China already
require payments for access; rather, tourists resist the intensification of activities
that centre on the pursuit of profit and that cover up local ecologies and cul-
tures.
64
In this, they can be said to follow the classical Marxian division between
use value and exchange value. Where exchange values take over (as some believe
has happened in Xinjiang tourism), the use values –the human needs that are
supposedly fulfilled –become qualitatively diminished. In the case of tourism,
this means that the ontological experience of the native, genuine destination is
replaced by something that can only be mediated by money.
Characteristics of an over-commercialized site include fixed pathways, the
inability to drive a car inside, high ticket prices, raised walkways for photo oppor-
tunities, charges for photographs and barricades around lakes. In Karamay
(Kelamayi 克拉玛依), two male travellers in the scenic area of Black Oil
Mountain (the supposed site of the first post-liberation oil well) are outraged
at having to pay 40 yuan to see a hill and a black pool: “what was flowing
here was not oil, but money.”
65
Tourists disdain plastic, factitious, mercenary
replicas of indigenous cultural items. At an exhibit in Turpan (Tulufan 吐鲁
番), one tourist group describes the replica Uyghur living spaces as somewhat
fake, so they just took some pictures to prove they were there and left.
66
Bazaars are only as good as the people in them, and places, such as Urumqi
60 Kashgar–Kazakhstan, 2016.
61 Tashkurgan, 2017.
62 Kucha–Kashgar, 2017.
63 Nyíri 2006; Shepherd 2009; Li, Sharpley and Gammon 2019.
64 Sun et al. 2019.
65 Karamay, 2016.
66 Lake Kanas, 2017.
Sun, Sand and Submachine Guns 15
of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741021000515
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 181.214.179.221, on 25 Jul 2021 at 20:08:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms
Market, receive negative reviews for being lifeless (lengqing 冷清) and lacking in
popularity with locals. Conversely, the bazaar in Kucha is applauded for not
being “overly opened for commercialization”and as a site where you can “see
the folk customs in their original form.”
67
Particularly with young tourists, scenery delights in inverse relation to the
degree of management. A young female travelling in a group of five effuses
about Lake Sayram’s touristic immaturity:
Sayram gave me a feeling of “Wow!”I never expected a lake in the interior to be this clean, clear
and free of impurities …This is not some manmade, opened-up place, and it has no manage-
ment and protection. Rocks and abandoned fishing nets sit randomly (suiyi 随意) on the lake
shore. There is no jumble of things piled together, there is just the awe of seeing this lake that
looks like an ocean. I don’t want to stop looking.
68
Because development spoils the organic scenery, some are thrilled at getting there
before the aesthetic decline:
Even though the road now connects to the entrance of the Maytag Valley, right now it has not
been commercialized. Other than a footbridge, there is no protection (weihu 维护). So, if you
want to come, you should seize the day, because I feel in the future there will be many people.
After commercialization, its sense of beauty will be impacted.
69
Thus, although visiting a scenic site can provide an opportunity to tick something
off a list, tourists still value the freedom to explore an organic place unsullied by
money-making. Xinjiang tourism often fails to satisfy these preferences.
Tourism and political legitimacy
A final question is the extent to which tourists acquiesce in or endorse the pack-
age of policies governing Xinjiang. Construed broadly, tourism provides political
legitimacy by naturalizing people’s right to a certain geographic space through
perception and bodily contact. Many diaries explicitly state that a visit to
Xinjiang helps one to understand how “big”China is. Border gates are now
almost guaranteed stops on trips to the region and help to confirm state geo-
graphical sovereignty. For example, the Kazakhstan border at Korgas displays
a carved monument with a large map of China in relief, the islands claimed by
China in the South China Sea sandwiched into the bottom-right corner. Tour
groups gather together in front of the map, waving Chinese flags and singing
the national anthem.
70
As such, tourism in Xinjiang anoints the land into an
enduring, integral whole known as China, the tourist body incorporating itself
into this whole through personal perception and ritual.
Yet, there is certainly much cognitive dissonance with regard to the specific
securitization policies in the region. With bodily security, there are countervailing
forces of anxiety owing to the number of Uyghurs and assuagement given the
67 Kashgar, 2018.
68 Yining, 2017.
69 Maytag, 2018.
70 Korgas, 2017.
16 The China Quarterly, pp. 1–23
of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741021000515
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 181.214.179.221, on 25 Jul 2021 at 20:08:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms
number of soldiers. Although almost all travel diarists state explicitly that
Xinjiang is safe, many construct phantom situations of dread, similar to the
photography encounters outlined above. A young male travelling in a tour
group through the alleyways of Kashgar has contradictory thoughts about his
experience:
I thought that if a group of locals came charging in to extort me, there would literally be nothing
I could do about it. But that clearly did not happen. In my mind the whole time I did not think
anything dangerous would happen to me. Kashgar is such a charming city in the western
region.
71
This contrasts with the accounts of travellers in Tibet, who approve of the pres-
ence of security forces but rarely hint at any fear of violence or retribution.
Freedom seems a fair trade to one diarist entering a night market in Xinjiang,
who enjoys the advantages of confinement: “It felt like being in a cage. But
from a visitor’s perspective, it felt much safer.”
72
In general, tourists present bold-
face taglines that state that Xinjiang is safe, but the fine print reveals their fear,
unease and frustration.
Some tourists reveal an understated ambivalence about the securitization: the
traveller who misses the bustling bazaars of yesteryear, the van driver annoyed
at having to wait in long lines for petrol or the nature lovers who have their tripods
seized at the train station. A few make oblique references to the absence of a crit-
ical mass of charming locals: “It’s been said that because of security controls (zhian
治安), street markets (minjian jishi 民间集市) have been suppressed.”
73
The writer
then immediately explains that Xinjiang is indeed safe, no matter what others say.
Another notes that the Kazakhs have been fleeing China, which he hopes is simply
a seasonal, pasture-related phenomenon.
74
Thus, it is clear that tourists are cogni-
zant of some drop in public cultural life in Xinjiang, but few acknowledge or will
admit to the prejudicial treatment of Uyghurs in transportation and policing, nor
to any type of forced relocation policies that depopulates the once alluring folk dis-
tricts. Unfortunately for Uyghurs, Xinjiang is probably too replete in natural won-
ders (Sayram Lake, Duku Highway) and patriotic punctuations (border crossings,
oil wells) to make preservation of authentic, spontaneous Islamic cultural life a sine
qua non of its tourist industry.
Conclusion
Tourism has largely been overlooked in the story of state repression in Xinjiang
since the late 2010s. Tourists visit Xinjiang for many reasons including its open
landscapes, exotic cultures and ability to stoke feelings of adventure. Recent
improvements in its infrastructure have also aided tourism and are indeed attrac-
tions in and of themselves.
71 Khunjerab, 2017.
72 Korgas, 2017.
73 Kucha, 2017.
74 Khunjerab, 2017.
Sun, Sand and Submachine Guns 17
of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741021000515
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 181.214.179.221, on 25 Jul 2021 at 20:08:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms
Tourism to Xinjiang cannot be separated from politics. The regional govern-
ment looks to tourism as a source of both economic and symbolic capital, as a
way to improve the investment climate, particularly as a cornerstone hub of
the Belt and Road Initiative. For officials, increasing tallies of visitors prove
the wisdom of stability maintenance policies, and for visitors, the stability main-
tenance policies prove the wisdom of their decision to journey there. Based on the
travel diaries analysed here, I contend that tourists perform “rituals of reassur-
ance”by correcting their social network’s misapprehensions about its dangerous
situation.
75
At the western extremities, they learn “how big China is,”venture off
the beaten track, brave harsh terrain in SUVs, and implicate their own bodies in
the grand project of controlling the contested spaces of the west by honouring sol-
diers and great explorers. The language of contact with Xinjiang’s visual tableau
orients visitors to the numerous sacrifices of the region’s constructors, similar to
how oil workers and long-term residents of Xinjiang are indoctrinated into the
idioms of Han sacrifice.
76
Here, tourists serve as information filters, personally resolving discrepancies
and discordant elements through narrative. Xinjiang is certainly not an informa-
tional black hole. Whereas Uyghurs and Kazakhs find their positionings relent-
lessly monitored, and their cell phone photographs occasionally deleted by
authorities, Han tourists are encouraged to circulate imagery, with the govern-
ment even partnering with the live-streaming application Douyin to relay visitor
impressions.
77
As such, social media is used not to expose corruption or Party
failures but to lend credence to Party propaganda –in this case to affirm a secure,
well-ordered Xinjiang.
Certainly, online travel diarists are under pressure to self-censor their content
and remove any language that might appear critical of the Party’s narrative of
Xinjiang’s security and prosperity. While it is difficult to gauge the extent of
the suppression of content, it must be said that diarists often furtively take pic-
tures of military equipment, checkpoints and soldiers, all of which they acknow-
ledge should not be done openly. They do not abide by principles of censorship in
that regard. Furthermore, given that many writers offer effusive praise of the
police and military, they are likely either sincere in their impressions or strategic-
ally signalling support for the government, or a combination of both. At least
with the impressions of securitization, many tourists sidestep issues of repressive
censorship to report on and openly express admiration for the situation in
Xinjiang. However, it is more difficult to assess the sincerity of the opinions on
issues of ethnic relations. Future research on travel writing in China will be
needed to determine how self-censorship operates and shapes what impressions
are shareable.
75 Gorsuch 2003.
76 Cliff 2016.
77 Liu 2019.
18 The China Quarterly, pp. 1–23
of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741021000515
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 181.214.179.221, on 25 Jul 2021 at 20:08:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms
Part of the repertoire of wonders, the state technostructure of control gains cre-
dence as another crowning national achievement. While a few travellers use their
freedom of mediation to document specific surprising policing practices, these
never counter the travellers’overarching presumption that securitization is
improving the region. In fact, travellers evince an absolute trust in police and
legal institutions in Xinjiang far and above what they would likely demonstrate
in their home province. Hence, while most research on mobility and security con-
centrates on how negative images deter tourists, the data presented here show
that tourists themselves actively perform impression management and reframe
stigmatized destinations.
While any backstage ethnic performance is welcomed, there is little direct
attempt to engage deeper with the militarization. Perhaps owing to self-
censorship, few mention the relative absence of adult males on the streets, and
only one mainland Chinese notes the prejudicial segregation at security check-
points. However, it is an overstatement to contend they are completely oblivious.
One way to comment on the forced removal of conviviality is to call a place dull
or lacking in popularity. Many of the travellers point out that people are being
moved out and that the replacement –a type of renovated tourist zone –is gen-
erally unappealing to them.
Even though tourists proclaim the region to be safe, they still carry affective
reactions of fear and anxiety when among Uyghurs, especially in comparison
to their reactions to Tibetans. For sure, tourists treat Tibetans as timeless curios-
ities caught up in feudal religion and as unsophisticated but seemingly happy, in
the way puppies might be considered happy. Yet, the Han tourists in Tibet often
gift school supplies to local students, offer rides to Tibetan farmers, commend the
spiritualized culture, admire the pilgrims, practise occasional Tibetan phrases and
consider the Tibetans to be compatriots. In contrast, the data in this paper dem-
onstrate that tourists in Xinjiang, especially when in the south, consider the local
people to not look Chinese, not be safe to ride with and prone to sudden bursts of
violence. These patterns of mobility and affective responses struggle to draw an
inclusionary circle around Uyghurs based on anything other than their residence
in Chinese-designated territory.
The developments in Xinjiang that do appal Han tourists involve the corrup-
tion of native charm and ecologies with fake, money-grubbing displays and the
commercialized form of tourism beholden to “scenic area”models. To travellers,
a line is crossed when a site that should be enjoyable-as-is becomes over-signified
and over-commodified. While much tourism is still characterized by the
visit-photograph-leave model, there is growing disenchantment, especially
among road trippers, with the avariciousness of organized tourism. For
Xinjiang’s tourists, this frustration and resentment lies not so much with those
who profit –tourism companies, locals and officials –as with how commercial-
ization changes the encounter with the ecology and culture. Too much profiteer-
ing spoils the distinctive character of artifacts and events, or what Ning Wang
Sun, Sand and Submachine Guns 19
of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741021000515
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 181.214.179.221, on 25 Jul 2021 at 20:08:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms
calls “object-related authenticity.”
78
This analysis provides a corrective to the lit-
erature that regards Chinese tourists as unmoved by authenticity concerns and as
mindless stampers of sites.
79
They reprove the moats built around natural scen-
ery, the transportation monopolies, the high entrance fees, the myriad demarca-
tions and the forced beautifications. Ironically, the visitors here employ
Marxian-style critiques of commodities long abandoned by the Communist
Party. Thus, the space for political commentary is based on aesthetic taste,
inscribed in the act of consumption. In Xinjiang, the state monopoly on force
is welcome; the monopoly on beauty is not.
Tourists are liberal in what they consider to be genuine, but they do still expect
a modicum of realism. Mainland tourists are remarkably unattuned to the
inequalities in mobility and life chances: they are more concerned about being
barricaded out (by entrance gates) than by the local peoples being barricaded
in (by ethnic surveillance and mass incarceration). Their encounters with
Muslims other than Tajiks are either fleeting or obstructed by transportation
apartheid and a culture of fear. At present, meaningful relationships remain
unattainable through tourism. Han tourists do not present personal gifts to
Uyghurs and the everyday lives of Xinjiang residents are inaccessible to them.
In sum, Han tourists to Xinjiang believe that commercialization is unwarranted,
but soldiers are not. With respect to the future of Xinjiang, ethnic policy aimed at
Uyghurs, Hui and Kazakhs will likely only impact the sensibilities of Han Chinese
tourists where it intersects with their antagonism towards tawdry profiteering.
Acknowledgements
I thank Tom Gold, Laura Enriquez, Nelson Graburn, Susan Xue and the
reviewers for helpful comments at various stages of the project. Portions of this
article benefited from feedback given by the Tourism Working Group and the
Haas Junior Scholars Working Group at the University of California, Berkeley.
Conflicts of interest
None.
Biographical note
Gregory FAYARD is a PhD candidate in the department of sociology at the
University of California, Berkeley. His current research looks at the importance
of transportation and travel in China’s modernization project, specifically how
domestic and foreign travel are instrumental in forging a common belief system
in the middle class and substantiating Chinese economic aid and investment.
78 Wang, Ning 1999.
79 Nyíri 2006.
20 The China Quarterly, pp. 1–23
of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741021000515
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 181.214.179.221, on 25 Jul 2021 at 20:08:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms
摘摘要要:近年来，进入中国新疆维吾尔自治区的国内旅游者呈现上升的趋
势。政府官员将旅游业视为经济资本的一个来源和社会稳定的助力。对他
们来说旅游业可能使得该地区显得次序井然，使其对未来的投资具有吸引
力。当前新疆旅游行业形势有两个矛盾之处。根据大多数文献，大规模的
军事存在应当会使游客踌躇不前，但实际上到访军事化的新疆的人数仍在
不断增加。另外，新疆的一大吸引力是该地区的文化“异性”，但这种文化
被国家针对伊斯兰的政策所压制。通过研究汉族游客在新疆旅行的网络游
记，笔者分析新疆的游客体验如何肯定维持治安的合理性，交通工具和人
际交往如何增强民族界限感，以及政府政策如何影响中国旅行者对新疆认
识的真实度。尽管确保旅行者的人身安全能够佐证政策的政治合法性，游
客还是反对景点景色官僚化的管理。因此大多数游客以审美品味为评价政
策的标准。
关关键键词词:新疆;中国;一带一路;维吾尔族;旅游
References
Airey, David, and King Chong. 2010. “National policy-makers for tourism in China.”Annals of
Tourism Research 37(2), 295–314.
Anderson, Amy, and Darren Byler. 2019. “Eating Hanness.”China Perspectives 3(September), 17–26.
Byler, Darren. 2019. “Ghost world.”Logic Magazine, 3 April, https://logicmag.io/07-ghost-world.
Accessed 28 April 2019.
Chio, Jenny. 2014. A Landscape of Travel: The Work of Tourism in Rural Ethnic China. Seattle, WA:
University of Washington Press.
Cliff, Tom. 2016. Oil and Water: Being Han in Xinjiang. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Cockerell, Isobel. 2019. “Inside China’s surveillance crackdown on Uyghurs.”Wired, 9 May, https://
www.wired.com/story/inside-chinas-massive-surveillance-operation. Accessed 15 June 2020.
Cohen, Erik, and Scott A. Cohen. 2012. “Current sociological theories and issues in tourism.”Annals
of Tourism Research 39(4), 2177–2202.
Decker, William Merrill. 2009. “Americans in Europe: Henry James to the present.”In Alfred
Bendixen and Judith Hamera (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to American Travel Writing.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 127–144.
Drakos, Konstantinos, and Ali M. Kutan. 2003. “Regional effects of terrorism on tourism in three
Mediterranean countries.”Journal of Conflict Resolution 47(5), 621–641.
Enders, Walter, and Todd Sandler. 1991. “Causality between transnational terrorism and tourism: the
case of Spain.”Terrorism 14(1), 49–58.
Finley, Joanne Smith. 2019. “Securitization, insecurity and conflict in contemporary Xinjiang: has
PRC counter-terrorism evolved into state terror?”Central Asian Survey 38(1), 1–26.
Frank, Thomas. 1997. The Conquest of Cool: Business Culture, Counterculture, and the Rise of Hip
Consumerism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Gorsuch, Anne E. 2003. “‘There’s no place like home’: Soviet tourism in late Stalinism.”Slavic
Review 62(4), 760–785.
Graburn, Nelson. 1977. “Tourism: the sacred journey.”In Valene Smith (ed.), Hosts and Guests: The
Anthropology of Tourism. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 17–31.
Hall, C. Michael, Dallen J. Timothy and David Timothy Duval. 2004. “Security and tourism: towards
a new understanding?”Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing 15(2–3), 1–18.
Jamison, David. 1999. “Tourism and ethnicity: the brotherhood of coconuts.”Annals of Tourism
Research 26(4), 944–967.
Sun, Sand and Submachine Guns 21
of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741021000515
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 181.214.179.221, on 25 Jul 2021 at 20:08:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms
Kolas, Ashild. 2008. Tourism and Tibetan Culture in Transition: A Place Called Shangrila. London:
Routledge.
Leibold, James. 2020. “Surveillance in China’s Xinjiang region: ethnic sorting, coercion, and induce-
ment.”Journal of Contemporary China 29(121), 46–60.
Lennon, J. John, and Malcolm Foley. 2000. Dark Tourism. London: Continuum.
Lepp, Andrew, and John Harris. 2008. “Tourism and national identity in Uganda.”International
Journal of Tourism Research 10(6), 525–536.
Li, Mohan, Richard Sharpley and Sean Gammon. 2019. “Towards an understanding of Chinese tour-
ist photography: evidence from the UK.”Current Issues in Tourism 22(5), 505–521.
Liu, Xin. 2019. “Tourism in Xinjiang booms thanks to social stability.”Global Times, 21 January,
http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1136527.shtml. Accessed 25 October 2020.
Luo, Tianyi, and Bei Li. 2019. “Neirong fenxiangxing lüyou app yonghu chixu shiyong yanjiu –yi
Mafengwo wei li”(Content analysis of travel sharing apps and research into consumer persistence
in usage: the case of Mafengwo). E-Business Journal 3, 5–6.
Martin, Peter. 2019. “Inside Xinjiang: a 10-day tour of China’s most repressed state.”Bloomberg,24
January, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2019-01-24/inside-the-vast-police-state-at-the-
heart-of-china-s-belt-and-road. Accessed 18 May 2019.
Millward, James A. 1998. Beyond the Pass: Economy, Ethnicity, and Empire in Qing Central Asia,
1759–1864. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Mozur, Paul. 2019. “One month, 500,000 face scans: how China is using A.I. to profile a minority.”
New York Times, 14 April, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/14/technology/china-surveillance-
artificial-intelligence-racial-profiling.html. Accessed 28 March 2020.
Nyíri, Pál. 2006. Scenic Spots: Chinese Tourism, the State, and Cultural Authority. Seattle, WA:
University of Washington Press.
Oakes, Tim. 1997. “Ethnic tourism in rural Guizhou: sense of place and the commerce of authenti-
city.”In Robert Everett Wood and Michel Picard (eds.), Tourism, Ethnicity, and the State in
Asian and Pacific Societies. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i, 35–70.
Perdue, Peter C. 2005. China Marches West: The Qing Conquest of Central Eurasia. Cambridge, MA:
Belknap.
Phillips, Tom. 2017. “China orders hundreds of thousands of private cars to have GPS trackers
installed for monitoring.”The Guardian, 21 February, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/
feb/21/china-orders-gps-tracking-of-every-car-in-troubled-region. Accessed 25 October 2020.
Popp, Richard K. 2012. The Holiday Makers: Magazines, Advertising, and Mass Tourism in Postwar
America. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.
Pratt, Mary Louise. 2007. Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation. New York: Routledge.
Richter, Linda. 1980. “The political uses of tourism: a Philippine case study.”The Journal of Developing
Areas 14(2), 237–257.
Rivera, Lauren A. 2008. “Managing ‘spoiled’national identity: war, tourism, and memory in Croatia.”
American Sociological Review 73(4), 613–634.
Saha, Shrabani, and Ghialy Yap. 2014. “The moderation effects of political instability and terrorism
on tourism development: a cross-country panel analysis.”Journal of Travel Research 53(4), 509–521.
Salazar, Noel B. 2012. “Tourism imaginaries: a conceptual approach.”Annals of Tourism Research
39(2), 863–882.
Sanchez, Peter M., and Kathleen M. Adams. 2008. “The janus-faced character of tourism in Cuba.”
Annals of Tourism Research 35(1), 27–46.
Shepherd, Robert. 2009. “Cultural preservation, tourism and ‘donkey travel’on China’s frontier.”In
Tim Winter, Peggy Teo and T.C. Chang (eds.), Asia on Tour: Exploring the Rise of Asian Tourism.
London: Routledge, 253–263.
Standish, Reid, and Aigerim Toleukhanova. 2019. “Kazakhs won’t be silenced on China’s internment
camps.”Foreign Policy (blog), 4 March, https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/03/04/961387-concentrationcamps-
china-xinjiang-internment-kazakh-muslim. Accessed 18 June 2020.
22 The China Quarterly, pp. 1–23
of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741021000515
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 181.214.179.221, on 25 Jul 2021 at 20:08:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms
Sun, Xiaolong, Bishu Lin, Yonghong Chen, Shuyin Tseng and Jie Gao. 2019. “Can commercializa-
tion reduce tourists’experience quality? Evidence from Xijiang Miao village in Guizhou, China.”
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research 43(1), 120–140.
Thum, Rian. 2018. “China’s mass internment camps have no clear end in sight.”Foreign Policy
(blog), 22 August, https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/08/22/chinas-mass-internment-camps-have-no-
clear-end-in-sight. Accessed 7 September 2018.
Vanderklippe, Nathan. 2018. “‘It is about Xi as the leader of the world’:formerdetaineesrecountabuse
in Chinese re-education centres.”The Globe and Mail, 3 July, https://www.theglobeandmail.com/
world/article-former-detainees-recount-abuse-in-chinese-re-education-centres. Accessed 18 July 2018.
Wang, Ning. 1999. “Rethinking authenticity in tourism experience.”Annals of Tourism Research
26(2), 349–370.
Wang, Zhida. 2014. “Xinjiang lüyouju juzhang: jiangli mei wei dao Xinjiang de youke 500 yuan”
(Director of Xinjiang Tourism Bureau: every visitor to Xinjiang gets 500 yuan). People’s Daily,28
May, http://hn.people.com.cn/BIG5/n/2014/0528/c338398-21300484.html. Accessed 25 October 2020.
Wood, Robert E. 1984. “Ethnic tourism, the state, and cultural change in Southeast Asia.”Annals of
Tourism Research 11(3), 353–374.
Wu, Mao-Ying, and Philip L. Pearce. 2016. “Tourism blogging motivations: why do Chinese tourists
create little ‘Lonely Planets’?”Journal of Travel Research 55(4), 537–549.
Xu, Chang. 2018. “Shehui anquan wending zhutui Xinjiang lüyou da fazhan”(Social safety and sta-
bility boosts Xinjiang tourism development). Guangming Daily, 14 March, http://epaper.gmw.cn/
gmrb/html/2018-03/14/nw.D110000gmrb_20180314_3-11.htm. Accessed 22 March 2020.
Zenz, Adrian. 2018a. “China’s domestic security spending: an analysis of available data.”The Jamestown
Foundation, March, https://jamestown.org/program/chinas-domestic-security-spending-analysis-
available-data. Accessed 5 August 2019.
Zenz, Adrian. 2018b. “‘Thoroughly reforming them towards a healthy heart attitude’: China’s political
re-education campaign in Xinjiang.”Central Asian Survey 38(1), 1–27.
Zenz, Adrian. 2019. “Brainwashing, police guards and coercive internment: evidence from Chinese
government documents about the nature and extent of Xinjiang’s‘vocational training internment
camps’.”Journal of Political Risk 7(7), https://www.jpolrisk.com/brainwashing-police-guards-and-
coercive-internment-evidence-from-chinese-government-documents-about-the-nature-and-extent-of-
xinjiangs-vocational-training-internment-camps. Accessed 11 July 2019.
Sun, Sand and Submachine Guns 23
of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741021000515
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 181.214.179.221, on 25 Jul 2021 at 20:08:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms
