ArticlePDF Available

Single port robotic splenectomy for pyruvate kinase deficiency in a five–year-old patient, a case report of a surgical first

Authors:

Abstract

Introduction Adoption of robotic surgery in pediatrics has been slow. Robotic surgery within spatially-constrained workspaces in children makes traditional platforms less translatable. Da Vinci's newest single port (SP) robotic platform provides narrow, and deep access, making pediatric robotic surgery more feasible. Case presentation A five-year old female presented with hepatosplenomegaly due to hemolytic anemia from pyruvate kinase deficiency (PKD). When she progressed to requiring monthly transfusions, a splenectomy was performed to avoid the complications associated with frequent blood transfusions. The robotic approach was used to remove the intact spleen because traditional minimally invasive surgery can result in post-operative splenosis. Discussion The patient successfully underwent single-port, robotic splenectomy - the first known splenectomy in a child using this approach. Furthermore, during the operation an accessory spleen was encountered in the omentum and was also successfully removed robotically. The patient tolerated the procedure well. Conclusion This case demonstrates that the SP robot can be used for splenectomy to eliminate the risk of splenosis and achieve a superior cosmetic result.
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports 84 (2021) 106122
Available online 19 June 2021
2210-2612/© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Case report
Single port robotic splenectomy for pyruvate kinase deciency in a
veyear-old patient, a case report of a surgical rst
Greg Klazura
*
, Thomas Sims, Marko Rojnica, Nathaniel Koo, Thom Lobe
University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, 840 S. Wood St. Ste 406, Chicago, IL 606112, United
States of America
ARTICLE INFO
Keywords:
Case report
Splenectomy
Robotic
Single port
Pediatric
da Vinci
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Adoption of robotic surgery in pediatrics has been slow. Robotic surgery within spatially-
constrained workspaces in children makes traditional platforms less translatable. Da Vinci's newest single port
(SP) robotic platform provides narrow, and deep access, making pediatric robotic surgery more feasible.
Case presentation: A ve-year old female presented with hepatosplenomegaly due to hemolytic anemia from
pyruvate kinase deciency (PKD). When she progressed to requiring monthly transfusions, a splenectomy was
performed to avoid the complications associated with frequent blood transfusions. The robotic approach was
used to remove the intact spleen because traditional minimally invasive surgery can result in post-operative
splenosis.
Discussion: The patient successfully underwent single-port, robotic splenectomy - the rst known splenectomy in
a child using this approach. Furthermore, during the operation an accessory spleen was encountered in the
omentum and was also successfully removed robotically. The patient tolerated the procedure well.
Conclusion: This case demonstrates that the SP robot can be used for splenectomy to eliminate the risk of sple-
nosis and achieve a superior cosmetic result.
1. Introduction [16]
Widespread adoption of robotic surgery in pediatrics has been slow
because minimal access surgery within spatially-constrained work-
spaces in children makes traditional platforms less translatable. Da
Vinci's single port (SP) robotic platform appears to make pediatric ro-
botic surgery more feasible.
SP surgery can be performed with a single incision. We used a
Pfannenstiel incision, well concealed in the lower abdominal crease, for
removal of the intact spleen, eliminating the concern for splenosis. This
approach also minimized the scarring and incisional pain associated
with multiple points of entry used during laparoscopic surgery.
The SP consists of a exible 3-D camera and three exible, inter-
changeable instruments, all of which pass through a 2.5 cm cannula. The
instruments have mid instrument exion and can be manipulated
immediately beyond the end of the cannula. Once deployed the tele-
scope and instruments are functional within a 7 cm diameter space. This
technology provides narrow, deep access [1] making it highly applicable
to pediatric surgery.
A full array of interchangeable instruments are available for tissue
manipulation, suturing, and cauterization. Notably, the SP allows the
telescope to move in a full 180arc without moving instruments relative
to the tissue eld, improving visualization in areas that previously were
difcult to access. Finally, the robot can rotate in a complete 360circle
without changing ports, allowing the surgeon to access the complete
abdomen.
Our patient suffered from Pyruvate kinase deciency (PKD), a rare
hemolytic anemia. Hepatosplenomegaly is due to extramedullary he-
matopoiesis and trapped cells leading to engorgement. Patients present
with anemia, jaundice, hepatosplenomegaly and possibly cholelithiasis.
The primary treatment is blood transfusion [2]. Splenectomy for
hypersplenism is reserved for patients who require chronic transfusions.
When splenectomy is required, the standard of care is laparoscopic
splenectomy [3]. However, splenosis is a risk with this approach. The
advent of the SP system made a robotic approach more feasible, safer
and provided an opportunity for the standard of care to be advanced.
* Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: greg.klazura@gmail.com (G. Klazura), tlsims@uic.edu (T. Sims), mrojnica@uic.edu (M. Rojnica), nkoo2@uic.edu (N. Koo), tlobe@uic.edu
(T. Lobe).
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijscr
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.106122
Received 26 May 2021; Received in revised form 14 June 2021; Accepted 16 June 2021
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports 84 (2021) 106122
2
2. Patient information and clinical ndings
This patient was a ve years-old Romani female who suffered from
hemolytic anemia due to PKD. Splenectomy was delayed because this
patient's mutation was associated with decreasing transfusion re-
quirements with age. Transfusion requirements, however, progressively
increased. The patient suffered from hepatosplenomegaly, transfusion
iron overload, erythrocyte alloimmunization, multiple admissions for
fever of unknown origin and chronic cholestatic jaundice. After
extended discussions the family agreed to splenectomy by Dr. Thom
Lobe.
On preoperative examination the patient was active with normal
affect. She had mild scleral icterus, the liver was noted 23 cm below the
costal margin and the spleen 11 cm below the costal margin. The skin
was jaundiced in the face, trunk and abdomen. Her blood-work 4 days
prior to operation revealed hemoglobin =8.1, total bilirubin =3.5 and
ferritin =3046 NG/ML (ref range 5116 NG/ML).
Preoperative marking for Pfannenstiel incision and palpable caudal extent of spleen. Skin ap raised in preparation for single port.
Clipping of splenic vessels. Ex-vivo spleen removed completely intact, measuring 16.9 cm.
G. Klazura et al.
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports 84 (2021) 106122
3
3. Timeline
Born 1/2016 at 38 WGA, shortly after diagnosed with PKD.
4/2016 Right upper extremity midline venous catheter placed for
frequent transfusions.
10/2017 MRI heart/liver demonstrated splenomegaly to 12 cm and
transfusion-associated iron overload.
3/2018 Patient prescribed iron chelator.
2/2019 MRI abdomen demonstrated splenomegaly (14.6 cm).
7/20198/2020 Admitted multiple times for fever and empiric
antibiotics.
1/2021 - Received pre-splenectomy pneumococcal & meningococcal
vaccines (Hib administered in 2016).
2/28/2021 SP robotic splenectomy, patient discharged four days
later taking acetaminophen for pain and prophylactic penicillin.
3/28/2021 Patient was tolerating diet, having regular bowel move-
ments, and not requiring pain medications.
4. Diagnostic assessment
Physical exam at birth revealed hepatosplenomegaly, laboratory
values showed hyperbilirubinemia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia.
Genetic testing revealed homozygous PKLR mutational deletion of
exon 11, an autosomal recessive inheritance seen in Romani families
causing PKD.
Postoperative pathology reported a 16.9 ×8.3 ×6.7 cm spleen
weighing 361 g consisting of benign splenic tissue with congestion
and extramedullary hematopoiesis and conrmed the presence of an
accessory spleen.
5. Intervention
The patient was admitted the night prior to the operation for RBC
transfusion and IV uid administration. Overnight IV uids were
administered to prevent sludging secondary to hypersplenism in the
setting of NPO.
Under general anesthesia, Foley catheter was placed and the patient
was prepped and draped and prophylactic cefazolin was administered.
A curvilinear incision was made in the lower abdominal crease and
the ap was raised cephalad to the level of the umbilicus. Midway be-
tween the incision and the umbilicus, underneath the ap, the single-
port was inserted in the midline, and the abdomen was insufated.
The port was used to dock the robot, and the short gastric vessels
were divided with cautery. A laparoscopic Kittner was placed as a
retractor through an accessory 5 mm cannula, inserted in the midline
just cephalad to the port. Attention was then turned posteriorly where
the spleen was retracted anterolaterally, exposing the hilum. Hilar tissue
was divided with cautery until the splenic vessels were encountered.
The splenic vein and artery were divided between clips, and the rest
of the hilum was divided to completely free the spleen. Prior to
undocking the robot, a small accessory spleen was seen in the omentum
and removed. The incision was opened in the midline from the umbilicus
to pubis to insert a hand and extract the intact spleen.
Once the spleen was removed, the abdomen was closed. Estimated
blood loss was 20 ml. A caudal regional block was performed for post-
operative analgesia. The length of the surgery was 2 h and 44 min. Work
has been reported in line with the SCARE 2020 criteria [6] and has been
registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04899557).
6. Follow-up and outcomes
One month follow up photograph of hidden incision in abdominal
crease.
The patient tolerated the procedure well and was seen in clinic one
month after surgery. She did not require additional analgesics but took
benadryl for a rash that developed around the incision. She had not
required blood transfusion since before surgery.
7. Discussion
Partial splenectomy, open splenectomy, and laparoscopic splenec-
tomy are all alternatives to robotic splenectomy. Although robotic sur-
gery can be more costly than traditional approaches, the increased
functionality gives the experienced robotic surgeon far more tools to
safely perform an operation. The robotic approach has the same relative
and absolute contraindications as any laparoscopic surgery: inability to
tolerate pneumoperitoneum, uncorrectable coagulopathy, abdominal
compartment syndrome, abdominal wall infection, and previous
extensive abdominal surgery [4].
When the splenic capsule is violated there is opportunity for tiny
fragments of splenic tissue to seed the abdomen and the risk of splenosis
after laparoscopic splenectomy is well documented. Splenosis can cause
abdominal pain, adhesions and the need for additional surgery [5].
Remaining splenic tissue can also defeat the benets of splenectomy for
patients suffering from hemolytic disease. Given this concern the family
followed our recommendation for a robotic approach.
8. Conclusion
In this case, the SP robotic splenectomy was safe and effective. The
curvilinear incision in the abdominal crease provided cosmetic
improvement over multiple abdominal trocar sites, and the patient re-
ported less pain than usual with a prompt return to full activity. The
cost, length of procedure and long-term complications must all be
considered, but this operation sets an exciting precedent for SP robotic
surgery and pushes the needle forward for what is possible in children's
robotic surgery.
G. Klazura et al.
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports 84 (2021) 106122
4
Provenance and peer review
Not commissioned, externally peer-reviewed.
Sources of funding
University of Illinois at Chicago Department of Surgery.
Ethical approval
Research studies involving patients require ethical approval. Please
state whether approval or exemption has been given, name the relevant
ethics committee and the state the reference number for their judge-
ment. Please give a statement regarding ethnical approval that will be
included in the publication of your article, if the study is exempt from
ethnical approval in your institution please state this.
Approval given by the University of Illinois at Chicago Institutional
Review Board. The research protocol number is 2014-0396.
Informed consent(s)
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publi-
cation of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the
written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this
journal on request.
a) Waiver of Informed Consent granted under [45 CFR 46.116(d)]
Assent(s):
a) Waiver of Child Assent granted [45 CFR 46.116(d)] for the
retrospective phase of
research.
Parental Permission(s):
b) Waiver of Parental Permission granted [45 CFR 46.116 (d)] for the
retrospective chart
review phase.
HIPAA Authorization(s):
a) Waiver of Authorization granted under [45 CFR 164.512(i)]
Author contribution
Greg Klazura, original draft, project administration.
Thomas Sims, review & editing.
Marko Rojnica, review & editing.
Nathaniel Koo, review & editing.
Thom Lobe, review and editing.
Registration of research studies
Clinicaltrials.gov.
NCT04899557.
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04899557.
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04899557?id=04899
557&draw=2&rank=1.
Guarantor
Greg Klazura, MD, Thom Lobe, MD.
Declaration of competing interest
No conicts of interest.
References
[1] Intuitive.com. www.intuitive.com/en-us/healthcare-professionals/surgeons.
[2] Karakousis, George, and Douglas Fraker. Greeneld's Surgery: Scientic Principles &
Practice, by Michael W. Mulholland et al., Wolters Kluwer, 2017, pp. 12761276.
[3] Josef Prchal, Pyruvate kinase deciency, in: Donald Mahoney, Jennifer Tirnauer
(Eds.), UpToDate, 29 May 2020. www.uptodate.com/contents/pyruvate-kinase-de
ciency?search=pyruvate+kinase+deciency.
[4] Guidelines for Diagnostic Laparoscopy - a SAGES Publication, SAGES, 5 Jan. 2021.
www.sages.org/publications/guidelines/guidelines-for-diagnostic-laparoscopy.
[5] Masahito Sato, et al., A case of splenosis after laparoscopic splenectomy, Pediatr.
Surg. Int. 23 (10) (2007) 10191021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-007-1989-4.
[6] R.A. Agha, T. Franchi, C. Sohrabi, G. Mathew, for the SCARE Group, The SCARE
2020 guideline: updating consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines, Int. J.
Surg. 84 (2020) 226230.
G. Klazura et al.
... This procedure offers better visualization and more precise movement; moreover, the learning curve is less than that of a laparoscope, there has a study reported that one surgeon can be proficient in robotic surgical system when he has performed more than 41 surgeries [22], of course, comparing to multi-port robotic-assisted surgery, it needs more experience to master the skill of single-port robotic-assisted surgery, the surgeon in our center can skillfully perform the operation when he has completed 5 single-port robotic-assisted surgeries. Single-port robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery is gradually being applied in many medical centers due to its concealed incision [23,24], it also has some limitations, the robot arms have a restricted range of motion, the arms might be prone to collisions, skilled assistant is needed to adjust the direction of the arms at any time. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose Patent processus vaginalis (PPV) is usually observed in pediatric abdominal surgery; however, robotic single-port surgery in repairing processus vaginalis has not been reported in children. Herein, we present our clinical experiences in single-port robotic surgeries for PPV repair to evaluate both efficacy and safety. Methods Retrospective analysis of patients underwent single-port robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for genitourinary diseases from May 2020 and May 2023 in our center. Among these patients, 21 children had PPV repaired at the same time. The case characteristics and follow-up data were recorded. Results Twenty-one of the 53 children were found to have PPV during genitourinary surgery. The simultaneous treatment of the primary disease and PPV with a single-port robotic-assisted platform was both convenient and safe. There was no significant increase in total operation time, and no excessive intraoperative hemorrhage was observed in any of the operations. There were no complications observed on follow-up. Conclusion With a high incidence of PPV in children, a single-port robotic-assisted procedure is feasible and effective if simultaneously performed when addressing a primary abdominal disease.
... However, single-port robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (S-RALS) is rarely applied in pediatric surgery due to the small abdominal space and thin abdominal wall in children. Until today, only a few studies reported the applications of S-RALS in children, such as pyeloplasty (7), cholecystectomy (8), and splenectomy (9). There is no study on the application of S-RALS for resection of pediatric benign ovarian tumors. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Single-port robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (S-RALS) is rarely applied in pediatric surgery. There is still no study on the application of S-RALS for resection of pediatric benign ovarian tumors. The current study aimed to investigate the safety and feasibility of S-RALS for resection of pediatric benign ovarian tumors using the da Vinci Xi system. Methods The clinical data of three patients who underwent S-RALS for resection of benign ovarian tumors in the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University from May 2020 to September 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The mean age of these children was 7.9 years (5.8–9.3 years). One was a case of bilateral ovarian tumors, and the other two were cases of right ovarian tumors. Results All three patients successfully underwent the resection of ovarian tumors through S-RALS without conversion to laparotomy. The average operation time was 180 min (118–231 min). The average amount of blood loss was 20 ml (10–35 ml). No drainage tube was placed. All postoperative pathological types of ovarian tumors were mature cystic teratomas in the three cases. All patients started a liquid diet 2 h after surgery. The average length of postoperative hospital stay was 4.7 days (3–7 days). No tumor recurred, no surgical site hernia occurred, and the wound healed very well with a cosmetic scar in the lower umbilical crease during the postoperative follow-up for 6–18 months. Conclusion S-RALS has the advantages of less surgical trauma, quick postoperative recovery, and a cosmetic scar in the lower umbilical crease. It is safe, effective, and feasible for pediatric benign ovarian tumors.
... In the future, advances in surgical technologies will offer multiple new opportunities, which are currently under development, like hyperspectral imaging [49] and robotic single-port surgery [50]. Their potential applications and outcomes in emergency surgery need to be evaluated and updated once evidence is available. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Robotics represents the most technologically advanced approach in minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Its application in general surgery has increased progressively, with some early experience reported in emergency settings. The present position paper, supported by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), aims to provide a systematic review of the literature to develop consensus statements about the potential use of robotics in emergency general surgery. Methods This position paper was conducted according to the WSES methodology. A steering committee was constituted to draft the position paper according to the literature review. An international expert panel then critically revised the manuscript. Each statement was voted through a web survey to reach a consensus. Results Ten studies (3 case reports, 3 case series, and 4 retrospective comparative cohort studies) have been published regarding the applications of robotics for emergency general surgery procedures. Due to the paucity and overall low quality of evidence, 6 statements are proposed as expert opinions. In general, the experts claim for a strict patient selection while approaching emergent general surgery procedures with robotics, eventually considering it for hemodynamically stable patients only. An emergency setting should not be seen as an absolute contraindication for robotic surgery if an adequate training of the operating surgical team is available. In such conditions, robotic surgery can be considered safe, feasible, and associated with surgical outcomes related to an MIS approach. However, there are some concerns regarding the adoption of robotic surgery for emergency surgeries associated with the following: (i) the availability and accessibility of the robotic platform for emergency units and during night shifts, (ii) expected longer operative times, and (iii) increased costs. Further research is necessary to investigate the role of robotic surgery in emergency settings and to explore the possibility of performing telementoring and telesurgery, which are particularly valuable in emergency situations. Conclusions Many hospitals are currently equipped with a robotic surgical platform which needs to be implemented efficiently. The role of robotic surgery for emergency procedures remains under investigation. However, its use is expanding with a careful assessment of costs and timeliness of operations. The proposed statements should be seen as a preliminary guide for the surgical community stressing the need for reevaluation and update processes as evidence expands in the relevant literature.
Chapter
Robotic splenectomy with da Vinci Xi is a novel approach to the treatment of splenic benign and malignant disorders and arterial aneurisms. Robot’s advantages consist in endowristed instruments with a stable 3d view and a 4 × zoom that allow a more meticulous hilar dissection especially in most complex cases (magistral pattern, intrasplenic pancreatic tail, high spleen volume, fragile parenchyma) and in cases of vascular reconstruction. Da Vinci Xi allows also the use of high energy device like Synchoseal or Harmonic ACE and this in useful in hemisplenectomy. In operative room the patient cart is docked from the patient’s right side, with the boom rotated to target the left upper quadrant and after inducing pneumoperitoneum assistant port is placed above the umbilicus near midline. The 4 robotic ports are placed as described in Fig. 33.3. In anterior approach after sectioning the gastrocolic and phrenicocolic ligament splenic hilum is identified and isolated. Splenic vein is sectioned at first and then splenic artery. Splenectomy is completed sectioning the peritoneal lateral and posterior ligaments. Then specimen is extracted in Endobag with a Pfannestiel incision. Usually the indications for the treatment of SAA include symptomatic aneurysms and asymptomatic aneurysms >2 cm. The aneurysm is resected with robotic scissors and the splenic artery reconstructed by a double running suture using PTFE 5-0 sutures.
Article
Pediatric robotic surgery offers children a minimally invasive approach with numerous advantages over open or thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery. However, despite its widespread adoption for adult patients, the utilization of robotic surgery within pediatrics has been relatively slower to progress. This paper provides an overview of pediatric robotic surgery and discusses benefits, limitations, and strategies for successful implementation of robotics within pediatric surgical practice.
Chapter
In 2000, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of the first robotic platform in surgical procedures, starting a new era in the minimally invasive surgery world. The da Vinci Surgical System platform (Intuitive Surgical, Inc.; Sunnyvale, CA) has been widely adopted by most surgical fields all around the world. With the three-dimensional (3D) image and articulated instrument arms, this platform overcame many of the limitations of laparoscopic surgery. Single-site robotic surgery was then developed to show potential advantages in terms of the recovery period, postoperative pain, and cosmesis compared to other techniques. Despite these potential advantages, inherent technical challenges such as external clashing between robotic arms and inadequate triangulation limited the use of this approach. This all has led to the development of the purpose-built single-port (SP) robotic platform, the da Vinci Single-Port (SP) (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA), FDA approved for use in urology patients in 2018 and otolaryngology in 2019. Since its introduction, a wide range of successful urological and other procedures were performed with encouraging outcomes. This chapter introduces the SP platform and focuses on its implications in urological procedures among other specialties.KeywordsRobotic surgerySingle portTechnologyOutcomesUrology
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: The SCARE Guidelines were first published in 2016 and were last updated in 2018. They provide a structure for reporting surgical case reports and are used and endorsed by authors, journal editors and reviewers, in order to increase robustness and transparency in reporting surgical cases. They must be kept up to date in order to drive forwards reporting quality. As such, we have updated these guidelines via a DELPHI consensus exercise. Methods: The updated guidelines were produced via a DELPHI consensus exercise. Members were invited from the previous DELPHI group, as well as editorial board member and peer reviewers of the International Journal of Surgery Case Reports. The expert group completed an online survey to indicate their agreement with proposed changes to the checklist items. Results: 54 surgical experts agreed to participate and 53 (98%) completed the survey. The responses and suggested modifications were incorporated to the 2018 guideline. There was a high degree of agreement amongst the SCARE Group, with all SCARE Items receiving over 70% scores 7-9. Conclusion: A DELPHI consensus exercise was completed, and an updated and improved SCARE Checklist is now presented.
Article
Splenosis is the heterotopic autotransplantation of splenic tissue usually following traumatic rupture of the spleen or surgical manipulation of splenic tissue. Although it is generally asymptomatic, it may present with abdominal pain or mass. Furthermore, there may be recurrence of the hematological disorders for which the patient underwent splenectomy. We report a rare case of splenosis in a 9-year-old girl after laparoscopic splenectomy for hereditary spherocytosis, which required laparotomy due to bowel obstruction.