ArticlePDF Available

Lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach for coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus: Report of three cases and review of the literature

Authors:
  • Southern Medical University-Nanfang Hospital

Abstract and Figures

BACKGROUND Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus are rare injuries and are technically challenging to manage. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) has become the preferred treatment because it provides anatomical reduction, stable internal fixation, and early motion, but the optimal surgical approach remains controversial. CASE SUMMARY We report three cases of coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus treated successfully by ORIF via a novel surgical approach, in which lateral epicondyle osteotomy was performed based on the extended lateral approach. We named the novel surgical approach the lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach. All patients underwent surgical treatment and were discharged successfully. All patients had excellent functional results according to the Mayo elbow performance score. The average range of motion was 118° in flexion/extension and 172° in pronation/ supination. Only case 2 had a complication, which was implant prolapse. CONCLUSION We demonstrated that the lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach in ORIF is effective and safe for coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus. Keywords: Distal humerus fracture, Coronal shear fracture, Lateral epicondyle, Surgical approach, Osteotomy, Case report.
Content may be subject to copyright.
World Journal of
Clinical Cases
ISSN 2307-8960 (online)
World J Clin Cases 2021 June 16; 9(17): 4116-4459
Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
WJCC https://www.wjgnet.com IJune 16, 2021 Volume 9 Issue 17
World Journal of
Clinical Cases
W J C C
Contents Thrice Monthly Volume 9 Number 17 June 16, 2021
EDITORIAL
Is it time to put traditional cold therapy in rehabilitation of soft-tissue injuries out to pasture?
4116
Wang ZR, Ni GX
MINIREVIEWS
Health-related quality of life after gastric cancer treatment in Brazil: Narrative review and reflections
4123
Pinheiro RN, Mucci S, Zanatto RM, Picanço Junior OM, Oliveira AF, Lopes Filho GJ
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and COVID-19: An epidemic that begets pandemic
4133
Ahmed M, Ahmed MH
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Retrospective Study
Why MUC16 mutations lead to a better prognosis: A study based on The Cancer Genome Atlas gastric
cancer cohort
4143
Huang YJ, Cao ZF, Wang J, Yang J, Wei YJ, Tang YC, Cheng YX, Zhou J, Zhang ZX
Design and development of a new type of phimosis dilatation retractor for children
4159
Yue YW, Chen YW, Deng LP, Zhu HL, Feng JH
Primary needle-knife fistulotomy for preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
pancreatitis: Importance of the endoscopist’s expertise level
4166
Han SY, Baek DH, Kim DU, Park CJ, Park YJ, Lee MW, Song GA
Observational Study
Patients with functional bowel disorder have disaccharidase deficiency: A single-center study from Russia
4178
Dbar S, Akhmadullina O, Sabelnikova E, Belostotskiy N, Parfenov A, Bykova S, Bakharev S, Baulo E, Babanova A,
Indeykina L, Kuzmina T, Kosacheva T, Spasenov A, Makarova A
Self-perceived burden and influencing factors in patients with cervical cancer administered with
radiotherapy
4188
Luo T, Xie RZ, Huang YX, Gong XH, Qin HY, Wu YX
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
COVID-19 in gastroenterology and hepatology: Lessons learned and questions to be answered
4199
Liu S, Tang MM, Du J, Gong ZC, Sun SS
WJCC https://www.wjgnet.com II June 16, 2021 Volume 9 Issue 17
World Journal of Clinical Cases
Contents Thrice Monthly Volume 9 Number 17 June 16, 2021
META-ANALYSIS
Efficacy of topical vs intravenous tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss and promoting wound healing in
bone surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
4210
Xu JW, Qiang H, Li TL, Wang Y, Wei XX, Li F
CASE REPORT
Ex vivo liver resection followed by autotransplantation in radical resection of gastric cancer liver
metastases: A case report
4221
Wang H, Zhang CC, Ou YJ, Zhang LD
Bone marrow inhibition induced by azathioprine in a patient without mutation in the thiopurine S-
methyltransferase pathogenic site: A case report
4230
Zhou XS, Lu YY, Gao YF, Shao W, Yao J
Eosinophilic gastroenteritis with abdominal pain and ascites: A case report
4238
Tian XQ, Chen X, Chen SL
Tunica vaginalis testis metastasis as the first clinical manifestation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A case
report
4244
Zhang YR, Ma DK, Gao BS, An W, Guo KM
“AFGP” bundles for an extremely preterm infant who underwent difficult removal of a peripherally
inserted central catheter: A case report
4253
Chen Q, Hu YL, Su SY, Huang X, Li YX
Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging features of cavernous hemangioma in the manubrium: A case
report
4262
Lin TT, Hsu HH, Lee SC, Peng YJ, Ko KH
Diagnosis and treatment of pediatric anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive large B-cell lymphoma: A case
report
4268
Zhang M, Jin L, Duan YL, Yang J, Huang S, Jin M, Zhu GH, Gao C, Liu Y, Zhang N, Zhou CJ, Gao ZF, Zheng QL, Chen D,
Zhang YH
Stevens-Johnson syndrome and concurrent hand foot syndrome during treatment with capecitabine: A
case report
4279
Ahn HR, Lee SK, Youn HJ, Yun SK, Lee IJ
Rosai-Dorfman disease with lung involvement in a 10-year-old patient: A case report
4285
Wu GJ, Li BB, Zhu RL, Yang CJ, Chen WY
Acute myocardial infarction in twin pregnancy after assisted reproduction: A case report
4294
Dai NN, Zhou R, Zhuo YL, Sun L, Xiao MY, Wu SJ, Yu HX, Li QY
Complete recovery of herpes zoster radiculopathy based on electrodiagnostic study: A case report
4303
Kim HS, Jung JW, Jung YJ, Ro YS, Park SB, Lee KH
WJCC https://www.wjgnet.com III June 16, 2021 Volume 9 Issue 17
World Journal of Clinical Cases
Contents Thrice Monthly Volume 9 Number 17 June 16, 2021
Acute liver failure with thrombotic microangiopathy due to sodium valproate toxicity: A case report
4310
Mei X, Wu HC, Ruan M, Cai LR
Lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach for coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus: Report of three
cases and review of the literature
4318
Li J, Martin VT, Su ZW, Li DT, Zhai QY, Yu B
Pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma in a pregnant woman: A case report and review of the literature
4327
Gao LP, Kong GX, Wang X, Ma HM, Ding FF, Li TD
Primary primitive neuroectodermal tumor in the pericardium—a focus on imaging findings: A case report
4336
Xu SM, Bai J, Cai JH
Minimally invasive surgery for glycogen storage disease combined with inflammatory bowel disease: A
case report
4342
Wan J, Zhang ZC, Yang MQ, Sun XM, Yin L, Chen CQ
Coronary sinus endocarditis in a hemodialysis patient: A case report and review of literature
4348
Hwang HJ, Kang SW
Clostridium perfringens bloodstream infection secondary to acute pancreatitis: A case report
4357
Li M, Li N
Kidney re-transplantation after living donor graft nephrectomy due to de novo chromophobe renal cell
carcinoma: A case report
4365
Wang H, Song WL, Cai WJ, Feng G, Fu YX
Pelvic lipomatosis with cystitis glandularis managed with cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor: A case report
4373
Mo LC, Piao SZ, Zheng HH, Hong T, Feng Q, Ke M
Prone position combined with high-flow nasal oxygen could benefit spontaneously breathing, severe
COVID-19 patients: A case report
4381
Xu DW, Li GL, Zhang JH, He F
Primary intratracheal schwannoma misdiagnosed as severe asthma in an adolescent: A case report
4388
Huang HR, Li PQ, Wan YX
Prenatal diagnosis of cor triatriatum sinister associated with early pericardial effusion: A case report
4395
Cánovas E, Cazorla E, Alonzo MC, Jara R, Álvarez L, Beric D
Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis complicated with tuberculosis: A case report
4400
Bai H, Meng ZR, Ying BW, Chen XR
Surgical treatment of four segment lumbar spondylolysis: A case report
4408
Li DM, Peng BG
WJCC https://www.wjgnet.com IX June 16, 2021 Volume 9 Issue 17
World Journal of Clinical Cases
Contents Thrice Monthly Volume 9 Number 17 June 16, 2021
Efficacy of artificial liver support system in severe immune-associated hepatitis caused by camrelizumab:
A case report and review of the literature
4415
Tan YW, Chen L, Zhou XB
Anti-Yo antibody-positive paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration in a patient with possible
cholangiocarcinoma: A case report and review of the literature
4423
Lou Y, Xu SH, Zhang SR, Shu QF, Liu XL
Intraneural ganglion cyst of the lumbosacral plexus mimicking L5 radiculopathy: A case report
4433
Lee JG, Peo H, Cho JH, Kim DH
Effectiveness of patient education focusing on circadian pain rhythms: A case report and review of
literature
4441
Tanaka Y, Sato G, Imai R, Osumi M, Shigetoh H, Fujii R, Morioka S
Schwannoma mimicking pancreatic carcinoma: A case report
4453
Kimura K, Adachi E, Toyohara A, Omori S, Ezaki K, Ihara R, Higashi T, Ohgaki K, Ito S, Maehara SI, Nakamura T,
Fushimi F, Maehara Y
WJCC https://www.wjgnet.com XJune 16, 2021 Volume 9 Issue 17
World Journal of Clinical Cases
Contents Thrice Monthly Volume 9 Number 17 June 16, 2021
ABOUT COVER
Editorial Board Member of World Journal of Clinical Cases, Pietro Scicchitano, MD, Professor, Research Scientist,
Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, School of Medicine, University of Bari, Bari 70124, Italy.
piero.sc@hotmail.it
AIMS AND SCOPE
The primary aim of World Journal of Clinical Cases (WJCC, World J Clin Cases) is to provide scholars and readers from
various fields of clinical medicine with a platform to publish high-quality clinical research articles and
communicate their research findings online.
  WJCC mainly publishes articles reporting research results and findings obtained in the field of clinical medicine
and covering a wide range of topics, including case control studies, retrospective cohort studies, retrospective
studies, clinical trials studies, observational studies, prospective studies, randomized controlled trials, randomized
clinical trials, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and case reports.
INDEXING/ABSTRACTING
The WJCC is now indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (also known as SciSearch®), Journal Citation
Reports/Science Edition, Scopus, PubMed, and PubMed Central. The 2020 Edition of Journal Citation Reports®
cites the 2019 impact factor (IF) for WJCC as 1.013; IF without journal self cites: 0.991; Ranking: 120 among 165
journals in medicine, general and internal; and Quartile category: Q3. The WJCC's CiteScore for 2019 is 0.3 and
Scopus CiteScore rank 2019: General Medicine is 394/529.
RESPONSIBLE EDITORS FOR THIS ISSUE
Production Editor: Jia-Hui Li; Production Department Director: Yu-Jie Ma; Editorial Office Director: Jin-Lei Wang.
NAME OF JOURNAL INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS
World Journal of Clinical Cases https://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/204
ISSN GUIDELINES FOR ETHICS DOCUMENTS
ISSN 2307-8960 (online) https://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/GerInfo/287
LAUNCH DATE GUIDELINES FOR NON-NATIVE SPEAKERS OF ENGLISH
April 16, 2013 https://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/240
FREQUENCY PUBLICATION ETHICS
Thrice Monthly https://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/GerInfo/288
EDITORS-IN-CHIEF PUBLICATION MISCONDUCT
Dennis A Bloomfield, Sandro Vento, Bao-Gan Peng https://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/208
EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS ARTICLE PROCESSING CHARGE
https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/editorialboard.htm https://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/242
PUBLICATION DATE STEPS FOR SUBMITTING MANUSCRIPTS
June 16, 2021 https://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/GerInfo/239
COPYRIGHT ONLINE SUBMISSION
© 2021 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc https://www.f6publishing.com
© 2021 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
E-mail: bpgoffice@wjgnet.com https://www.wjgnet.com
WJCC https://www.wjgnet.com 4318 June 16, 2021 Volume 9 Issue 17
World Journal of
Clinical Cases
W J C C
Submit a Manuscript: https://www.f6publishing.com World J Clin Cases 2021 June 16; 9(17): 4318-4326
DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i17.4318 ISSN 2307-8960 (online)
CASE REPORT
Lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach for coronal shear fractures
of the distal humerus: Report of three cases and review of the
literature
Jie Li, Vidmi Taolam Martin, Zhi-Wen Su, Dong-Tai Li, Qi-Yi Zhai, Bo Yu
ORCID number: Jie Li 0000-0001-
6545-1070; Vidmi Taolam Martin
0000-0003-0179-3906; Zhi-Wen Su
0000-0002-9822-9326; Dong-Tai Li
0000-0002-6947-324X; Qi-Yi Zhai
0000-0002-5899-8403; Bo Yu 0000-
0001-9765-1341.
Author contributions: Yu B was
responsible for the patients’
surgical treatment; Martin VT, Su
ZW, Li DT, and Zhai QY were part
of the surgical team; Li J drafted
the manuscript; all authors read
and approved the final manuscript;
all authors helped collect the data
and write and revise the
manuscript.
Informed consent statement: All
patients gave their informed
consent.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All
authors declare that they have no
conflicts of interest to disclose.
CARE Checklist (2016) statement:
The authors have read the CARE
Checklist (2016), and the
manuscript was prepared and
revised according to the
CAREChecklist-2016.
Open-Access: This article is an
open-access article that was
selected by an in-house editor and
fully peer-reviewed by external
Jie Li, Vidmi Taolam Martin, Zhi-Wen Su, Dong-Tai Li, Qi-Yi Zhai, Bo Yu, Department of
Orthopedics, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510282,
Guangdong Province, China
Corresponding author: Bo Yu, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopedics,
Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, No. 253 Industrial Avenue Middle Street,
Haizhu District, Guangzhou 510282, Guangdong Province, China. gzyubo@163.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus are rare injuries and are technically
challenging to manage. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) has become
the preferred treatment because it provides anatomical reduction, stable internal
fixation, and early motion, but the optimal surgical approach remains contro-
versial.
CASE SUMMARY
We report three cases of coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus treated
successfully by ORIF via a novel surgical approach, in which lateral epicondyle
osteotomy was performed based on the extended lateral approach. We named the
novel surgical approach the lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach. All patients
underwent surgical treatment and were discharged successfully. All patients had
excellent functional results according to the Mayo elbow performance score. The
average range of motion was 118° in flexion/extension and 172° in pronation/
supination. Only case 2 had a complication, which was implant prolapse.
CONCLUSION
We demonstrated that the lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach in ORIF is
effective and safe for coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus.
Key Words: Distal humerus fracture; Coronal shear fracture; Lateral epicondyle; Surgical
approach; Osteotomy; Case report
©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Li J et al. Coronal shear fracture of distal humerus
WJCC https://www.wjgnet.com 4319 June 16, 2021 Volume 9 Issue 17
reviewers. It is distributed in
accordance with the Creative
Commons Attribution
NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0)
license, which permits others to
distribute, remix, adapt, build
upon this work non-commercially,
and license their derivative works
on different terms, provided the
original work is properly cited and
the use is non-commercial. See: htt
p://creativecommons.org/License
s/by-nc/4.0/
Manuscript source: Unsolicited
manuscript
Specialty type: Orthopedics
Country/Territory of origin: China
Peer-review report’s scientific
quality classification
Grade A (Excellent): A, A
Grade B (Very good): 0
Grade C (Good): 0
Grade D (Fair): 0
Grade E (Poor): 0
Received: January 13, 2021
Peer-review started: January 13,
2021
First decision: February 11, 2021
Revised: February 24, 2021
Accepted: April 2, 2021
Article in press: April 2, 2021
Published online: June 16, 2021
P-Reviewer: de Sousa Arantes
Ferreira G
S-Editor: Liu M
L-Editor: Wang TQ
P-Editor: Wang LL
Core Tip: Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus are rare and technically
challenging to manage. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) has become the
preferred treatment, but the optimal surgical approach remains controversial. We report
three cases of coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus treated successfully by
ORIF via the lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach, in which lateral epicondyle
osteotomy was performed based on the extended lateral approach. Our management
experience in the three cases demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of this novel
approach.
Citation: Li J, Martin VT, Su ZW, Li DT, Zhai QY, Yu B. Lateral epicondyle osteotomy
approach for coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus: Report of three cases and review of
the literature. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(17): 4318-4326
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i17/4318.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i17.4318
INTRODUCTION
Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus are rare, accounting for 6% of distal
humerus fractures and 1% of elbow fractures[1]. These fractures are technically
challenging to manage due to their small size, associated osteochondral fragments,
and propensity to displace, and they lead to limited elbow motion. Open reduction
and internal fixation (ORIF)[2-10] has become the preferred treatment because it
provides anatomical reduction, stable internal fixation, and early motion, but the
optimal surgical approach remains controversial. Currently, the common surgical
approaches include the anterolateral approach[2,3], posterior olecranon osteotomy
approach[4-7], and extended lateral approach[7-10].
We report three cases of coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus treated
successfully by ORIF via a novel surgical approach, in which lateral epicondyle
osteotomy was performed based on the extended lateral approach. We named the
novel surgical approach the lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach. We discuss the
advantages and disadvantages of various surgical approaches with regard to our
management experience.
CASE PRESENTATION
Chief complaints
Case 1: Right elbow and right upper arm pain accompanied by limited range of
motion (ROM).
Case 2: Left elbow pain accompanied by limited ROM.
Case 3: Right elbow pain accompanied by limited ROM.
History of present illness
Case 1: A 57-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with right elbow and right
upper arm pain accompanied by limited ROM for 12 d after he accidentally fell from a
ladder and landed on his right hand.
Case 2: A 64-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with left elbow pain
accompanied by limited ROM for 7 d after he accidentally fell onto his outstretched
left hand when walking down stairs.
Case 3: A 31-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with right elbow pain
accompanied by limited ROM for 3 d after he fell accidentally and landed on his right
elbow.
History of past illness
Case 1 underwent ORIF of the left calcaneus fracture 4 years earlier. Cases 2 and 3 had
no history of other diseases.
Li J et al. Coronal shear fracture of distal humerus
WJCC https://www.wjgnet.com 4320 June 16, 2021 Volume 9 Issue 17
Personal and family history
No family history to note.
Physical examination
Case 1: The physical examination revealed pain in the right elbow and right upper arm
accompanied by limited ROM but no open wounds.
Case 2: The physical examination revealed pain in the left elbow accompanied by
limited ROM but no open wounds.
Case 3: The physical examination revealed swelling and pain in the right elbow
accompanied by limited ROM but no open wounds.
Laboratory examinations
No obvious abnormalities were observed in the preoperative examinations.
Imaging examinations
Case 1: Radiographs revealed a right humerus shaft fracture and right capitellar
fracture (Figure 1A and B). A computed tomography scan revealed a right humerus
shaft fracture and right capitellar and trochlea fractures (Figure 1C and D).
Case 2: Radiographs revealed left capitellar and trochlea fractures (Figure 2A and B).
A computed tomography scan revealed left capitellar and trochlea fractures
accompanied by a left olecranon avulsion fracture (Figure 2C and D).
Case 3: Both radiographs and a computed tomography scan revealed right distal
humerus fractures, including lateral epicondyle, capitellum, and trochlea fractures
(Figure 3A-D).
FINAL DIAGNOSIS
Case 1
The final diagnosis was coronal shear fractures of the right distal humerus (type 3A
according to Dubberley et al[7]) and a right humerus shaft fracture.
Case 2
The final diagnosis was coronal shear fractures of the left distal humerus (type 3B
according to Dubberley et al[7]) accompanied by a left olecranon avulsion fracture.
Case 3
The final diagnosis was coronal shear fractures of the right distal humerus (type 2B
according to Dubberley et al[7]) accompanied by a lateral epicondyle fracture.
TREATMENT
Case 1
The examination performed after anesthesia showed that the affected elbow joint was
not unstable in varus or valgus. The extended lateral approach was used in ORIF, and
then, lateral epicondyle osteotomy was performed. The lateral epicondyle was
mobilized distally along with the origins of the common wrist and digit extensor
muscles and the lateral collateral ligament to provide ideal visualization of the distal
humerus articular surface, thereby allowing the fracture fragments to be anatomically
reduced under direct vision and the screws to be placed in the anterior-posterior
direction. During surgery, fragmentation of the articular surface was noted, and both
the capitellum and lateral trochlea were involved as separate fracture fragments. The
fracture fragments were reduced and temporarily fixed with K-wires. First, six screws
were placed as follows with countersinking: Five screws were placed in the anterior-
posterior direction, and the remaining screw was placed in the distal-proximal
direction. Then, a K-wire was inserted for bone stabilization. Finally, two lag screws
were used to stabilize the osteotomy region. The right humerus shaft fracture was also
treated by ORIF. Passive activities were encouraged starting on the second day after
surgery.
Li J et al. Coronal shear fracture of distal humerus
WJCC https://www.wjgnet.com 4321 June 16, 2021 Volume 9 Issue 17
Figure 1 Imaging examinations performed before and 12 mo after surgery. A-D: Preoperative radiographs and computed tomography scan showed a
type Dubberley 3A fracture and a right humerus shaft fracture; E and F: Radiographs taken 12 mo after surgery showed union without osteonecrosis.
Case 2
The examination after anesthesia showed that the elbow joint was not unstable in
varus or valgus. As in the first case, the extended lateral approach was used in ORIF,
and then, lateral epicondyle osteotomy was performed. During surgery, we noted that
the fracture involved the capitellum, medial trochlea, and posterior aspect of the
lateral condyle. The fracture fragments of the capitellum and trochlea were sequen-
tially reduced and temporarily fixed with K-wires; then, final fixation was performed
by placing screws in the anterior–posterior direction and in the distal–proximal
direction. All screws were inserted with the screw head buried beneath the articular
surface. Three K-wires were retained. Finally, the posterolateral plate of the distal
humerus was used to fix the osteotomy region and the fracture of posterior aspect of
the lateral condyle at the same time. Regarding the olecranon avulsion fracture, after
elevating the lateral aspect of the triceps from the distal humerus and the proximal
olecranon, we removed the free fracture fragments and repaired the triceps tendon
with two absorbable rivets. Passive activities were encouraged starting on the second
day after surgery.
Case 3
The examination after anesthesia showed that the elbow joint was unstable in varus
but not unstable in valgus. The extended lateral approach was used in ORIF, and a
lateral epicondyle fracture was noted. The origins of the lateral collateral ligament and
the common extensor muscles were attached to the fracture piece, as in the lateral
epicondyle osteotomies performed in the two cases above. During surgery, a large
fracture fragment consisting of the capitellum and the medial trochlea was seen, and it
was reduced and temporarily fixed with K-wires. Then, screws were placed in the
anterior–posterior direction and in the lateral–medial direction for fixation. Finally, the
fracture piece of the lateral epicondyle was reduced and fixed with a posterolateral
plate of the distal humerus. Passive activities were encouraged starting on the second
day after surgery.
Li J et al. Coronal shear fracture of distal humerus
WJCC https://www.wjgnet.com 4322 June 16, 2021 Volume 9 Issue 17
Figure 2 Imaging examinations performed before and 5.5 mo after surgery. A-D: Preoperative radiographs and computed tomography scan showed a
type Dubberley 3B fracture accompanied by a left olecranon avulsion fracture; E and F: Radiographs taken 5.5 mo after surgery showed union without osteonecrosis.
OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP
Case 1
At 12 mo after surgery, radiographs showed union without osteonecrosis (Figure 1E
and F). At the 33-mo follow-up, the postoperative elbow ROM values were as follows,
without pain or instability: Extension 33°, flexion 147°, pronation 86°, and supination
90°. The Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) was 95 points (excellent), and the
disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score was 10 points.
Case 2
At 5.5 mo after surgery, radiographs showed union without osteonecrosis (Figure 2E
and F). At 6 mo after surgery, the patient underwent hardware removal because of
prominent implants, and during the second surgery, two K-wires and one loose screw
were removed. At the 12.5-mo follow-up, the postoperative elbow ROM values were
as follows, without pain or instability: Extension 21°, flexion 133°, pronation 78°, and
supination 90°. The MEPS was 100 points (excellent), and the DASH score was 1.7
points.
Case 3
At 16 mo after surgery, radiographs showed union without osteonecrosis (Figure 3E
and F). At the 20-mo final follow-up, the postoperative elbow ROM values were as
follows, without pain or instability: Extension 0°, flexion 128°, pronation 82°, and
supination 90° (Figure 4). The MEPS was 100 points (excellent), and the DASH score
was 0 points.
DISCUSSION
Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus are rare injuries, accounting for 6% of
distal humeral fractures and 1% of elbow fractures[1]. With the development of digital
imaging and computed tomographic scans, the complex nature of these fractures is
now better understood[4,8]. These fractures are technically challenging to manage due
to their small size, associated osteochondral fragments, and propensity to displace,
and they can result in limited elbow motion. Compared to surgical treatments,
Li J et al. Coronal shear fracture of distal humerus
WJCC https://www.wjgnet.com 4323 June 16, 2021 Volume 9 Issue 17
Figure 3 Imaging examinations performed before and 16 mo after surgery. A-D: Preoperative radiographs and computed tomography scan showed a
type Dubberley 2B fracture accompanied by a lateral epicondyle fracture; E and F: Radiographs taken 16 mo after surgery showed union without osteonecrosis.
Figure 4 Elbow range of motion 20 mo after surgery.
nonsurgical treatments are often associated with worse results and more complic-
ations, such as elbow stiffness, traumatic arthritis, chronic pain, and joint
instability[11-13]. The surgical treatments available include ORIF[2-10], arthroscopic
surgery[14,15], fragment resection[16,17], and elbow joint replacement[18,19].
Currently, ORIF has become the preferred treatment because it provides anatomical
Li J et al. Coronal shear fracture of distal humerus
WJCC https://www.wjgnet.com 4324 June 16, 2021 Volume 9 Issue 17
reduction, stable internal fixation, and early motion. However, the limited surgical
window and associated osteochondral fragments make it difficult to obtain stable
internal fixation to allow early motion. Therefore, it is essential to choose a suitable
surgical approach that provides direct visualization of fracture fragments and
facilitates anatomical reduction of the fracture fragments to achieve good outcomes.
The common surgical approaches include the anterolateral approach, posterior
olecranon osteotomy approach, and extended lateral approach. Some surgeons choose
the anterolateral approach[2,3], which starts from the space between the biceps brachii
and brachioradialis. The anterolateral approach provides access to trochlear fragments
and facilitates anatomical reduction in the fragment without the need for lateral
collateral ligament complex (LCLC) release or olecranon osteotomy, but it is difficult
to stabilize the fractures with posterior comminution via this approach alone.
Therefore, ORIF through the anterolateral approach is suitable for Dubberley type A
fractures. However, the surgical dissection of this approach is relatively cumbersome,
given the risk of neurovascular injury to the structures of the fossa cubitalis.
The posterior olecranon osteotomy approach[4-7] has been used frequently in ORIF
for coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus, because it can provide the widest
exposure of the articular surfaces of the distal humerus[20,21]. This approach is
especially suitable for capitellar and trochlea fractures combined with posterior
comminution of the lateral or medial condyle. The disadvantages of the posterior
olecranon osteotomy approach include the need for additional internal fixation of the
osteotomy and the risk of complications related to osteotomy, such as olecranon pain,
nonunion, delayed healing, malunion, and implant prolapse[7,22,23].
We prefer the extended lateral approach[7-10]. A skin incision that is centered on
the lateral epicondyle and extended from the lateral column of the distal humerus to
approximately 2 cm distal to the radial head is made. The common origin of the wrist
and digit extensor muscles along with the anterior capsule is elevated anteriorly as a
full-thickness sleeve. A continuous full-thickness anterior soft-tissue flap is created by
connecting the distal Kocher space to the proximal exposed region. However, due to
obstruction from the LCLC, this approach does not provide adequate visualization of
the trochlear fragments or facilitate anatomical reduction of the fragments. In cases in
which the fracture involves the trochlea, the LCLC may need to be released to provide
adequate visualization of the trochlear fragments[7,10,24]. However, this additional
procedure increases the risk of posterolateral rotatory instability due to laxity of the
lateral collateral ligament[25]. Mighell et al[26] thought that release of LCLC would
affect the blood supply of the capitellum, thus affecting fracture healing. Therefore, we
performed lateral epicondyle osteotomy based on the extended lateral approach to
provide ideal visualization of the medial trochlea fragments and permit direct
reduction and screw placement in the anterior–posterior direction. Concerning screw
fixation, the ideal direction of implantation is still controversial. Sano et al[6] showed
that screws placed in the posterior–anterior direction fail to fix thin fragments because
the threads do not completely pass through them. Additionally, given the cancellous
screw’s solid core and higher ratio of the outer-to-inner diameter, anterior-to-posterior
screw insertion without countersinking may be more biomechanically robust than
headless screws as well as countersunk anterior-to-posterior screws and posterior-to-
anterior screws, although no direct comparisons have been made[27,28]. Matache
et al[29] conducted an anatomical study and indicated that there is a nonarticulating
zone for screw placement along the anterior aspect of the lateral trochlear ridge
throughout the normal elbow ROM. The use of a partially threaded cancellous screw
inserted anterior-to-posterior into this region without countersinking could theoret-
ically improve the stability of some fractures that extend into the anterolateral aspect
of the trochlea. Therefore, the lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach may be superior
to the olecranon osteotomy approach regarding the direction of screw implantation.
In lateral epicondyle osteotomy, two hollow lag screws or the posterolateral plate of
the distal humerus can be used for fixation. Regarding Dubberley type B fractures, the
posterolateral plate of the distal humerus can simultaneously fix the osteotomy region
and the fractured posterior aspect of the lateral condyle. The plate ensures firm
internal fixation for early postoperative functional exercises and maximizes the motion
of elbow joint function[8,30-32].
In conclusion, we report three cases of coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus
treated by ORIF via the lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach and discuss the
advantages and disadvantages of various surgical approaches. According to our
management experience, the lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach is reliable and
potentially useful for coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus. However, due to
the limited number of cases and the short follow-up time in this study, additional
high-quality clinical research needs to be conducted to verify the practicality of this
Li J et al. Coronal shear fracture of distal humerus
WJCC https://www.wjgnet.com 4325 June 16, 2021 Volume 9 Issue 17
surgical approach.
CONCLUSION
The three patients had excellent functional results according to the MEPS. The average
ROM was 118° in flexion/extension and 172° in pronation/supination. Only case 2
had one complication, which was implant prolapse. Our experience regarding the
management of these three cases initially proved the effectiveness and safety of the
lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach.
REFERENCES
Morrey BF, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Morrey ME. Morrey’s the Elbow and Its Disorders. 5th ed.
Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, 2018
1
Imatani J, Morito Y, Hashizume H, Inoue H. Internal fixation for coronal shear fracture of the distal
end of the humerus by the anterolateral approach. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001; 10: 554-556 [PMID:
11743535 DOI: 10.1067/mse.2001.118005]
2
Malki AA, Salloom FM, Wong-Chung J, Ekri AI. Cannulated screw fixation of fractured capitellum:
surgical technique through a limited approach. Injury 2000; 31: 204-206 [PMID: 10704588 DOI:
10.1016/s0020-1383(99)00254-5]
3
Guitton TG, Doornberg JN, Raaymakers EL, Ring D, Kloen P. Fractures of the capitellum and
trochlea. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91: 390-397 [PMID: 19181983 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01660]
4
Ashwood N, Verma M, Hamlet M, Garlapati A, Fogg Q. Transarticular shear fractures of the distal
humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010; 19: 46-52 [PMID: 19884023 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.07.061]
5
Sano S, Rokkaku T, Saito S, Tokunaga S, Abe Y, Moriya H. Herbert screw fixation of capitellar
fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005; 14: 307-311 [PMID: 15889031 DOI:
10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.005]
6
Dubberley JH, Faber KJ, Macdermid JC, Patterson SD, King GJ. Outcome after open reduction and
internal fixation of capitellar and trochlear fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 46-54 [PMID:
16391249 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02954]
7
Ring D, Jupiter JB, Gulotta L. Articular fractures of the distal part of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg
Am 2003; 85: 232-238 [PMID: 12571299 DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200302000-00008]
8
Ring D. Open reduction and internal fixation of an apparent capitellar fracture using an extended
lateral exposure. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34: 739-744 [PMID: 19345881 DOI:
10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.01.026]
9
Sen MK, Sama N, Helfet DL. Open reduction and internal fixation of coronal fractures of the
capitellum. J Hand Surg Am 2007; 32: 1462-1465 [PMID: 17996785 DOI:
10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.08.015]
10
Alvarez E, Patel MR, Nimberg G, Pearlman HS. Fracture of the capitulum humeri. J Bone Joint Surg
Am 1975; 57: 1093-1096 [PMID: 1201993]
11
Stricker SJ, Thomson JD, Kelly RA. Coronal-plane transcondylar fracture of the humerus in a child.
Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; (294): 308-311 [PMID: 8358934]
12
Ochner RS, Bloom H, Palumbo RC, Coyle MP. Closed reduction of coronal fractures of the
capitellum. J Trauma 1996; 40: 199-203 [PMID: 8637066 DOI:
10.1097/00005373-199602000-00005]
13
Kuriyama K, Kawanishi Y, Yamamoto K. Arthroscopic-assisted reduction and percutaneous fixation
for coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus: report of two cases. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35:
1506-1509 [PMID: 20728284 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.05.021]
14
Mitani M, Nabeshima Y, Ozaki A, Mori H, Issei N, Fujii H, Fujioka H, Doita M. Arthroscopic
reduction and percutaneous cannulated screw fixation of a capitellar fracture of the humerus: a case
report. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009; 18: e6-e9 [PMID: 19036612 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.07.007]
15
Grantham SA, Norris TR, Bush DC. Isolated fracture of the humeral capitellum. Clin Orthop Relat
Res 1981; (161): 262-269 [PMID: 7307389]
16
Fowles JV, Kassab MT. Fracture of the capitulum humeri. Treatment by excision. J Bone Joint Surg
Am 1974; 56: 794-798 [PMID: 4835823]
17
Frankle MA, Herscovici D Jr, DiPasquale TG, Vasey MB, Sanders RW. A comparison of open
reduction and internal fixation and primary total elbow arthroplasty in the treatment of intraarticular
distal humerus fractures in women older than age 65. J Orthop Trauma 2003; 17: 473-480 [PMID:
12902784 DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200308000-00001]
18
McKee MD, Veillette CJ, Hall JA, Schemitsch EH, Wild LM, McCormack R, Perey B, Goetz T,
Zomar M, Moon K, Mandel S, Petit S, Guy P, Leung I. A multicenter, prospective, randomized,
controlled trial of open reduction--internal fixation vs total elbow arthroplasty for displaced intra-
articular distal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009; 18: 3-12 [PMID:
18823799 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.06.005]
19
Wu ZZ, Wang JD, Ji XX, Ma ZJ, Wu JH, Wang QG. Surgical exposures of the distal humeral 20
Li J et al. Coronal shear fracture of distal humerus
WJCC https://www.wjgnet.com 4326 June 16, 2021 Volume 9 Issue 17
fractures: An anatomical study of the anterior, posterior, medial and lateral approaches. Chin J
Traumatol 2018; 21: 356-359 [PMID: 30598337 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2018.07.006]
Wilkinson JM, Stanley D. Posterior surgical approaches to the elbow: a comparative anatomic study.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001; 10: 380-382 [PMID: 11517370 DOI: 10.1067/mse.2001.116517]
21
Deluise A, Voloshin J. Current management of distal humerus fractures. Curr Opin Orthop 2006; 17:
340-347 [DOI: 10.1097/01.bco.0000233730.49010.c5]
22
Allende CA, Allende BT, Allende BL, Bitar I, Gonzalez G. Intercondylar distal humerus fractures--
surgical treatment and results. Chir Main 2004; 23: 85-95 [PMID: 15195581 DOI:
10.1016/j.main.2004.02.005]
23
McKee MD, Jupiter JB, Bamberger HB. Coronal shear fractures of the distal end of the humerus. J
Bone Joint Surg Am 1996; 78: 49-54 [PMID: 8550679 DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199601000-00007]
24
O’Driscoll SW. Acute, Recurrent, and Chronic Elbow Instabilities. In: Norris TR. Orthopaedic
Knowledge Update: Shoulder and Elbow 2. Rosemont, IL: The American Academy of Orthopaedic
Surgeons, 2002: 313-323
25
Mighell M, Virani NA, Shannon R, Echols EL Jr, Badman BL, Keating CJ. Large coronal shear
fractures of the capitellum and trochlea treated with headless compression screws. J Shoulder Elbow
Surg 2010; 19: 38-45 [PMID: 19664940 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.05.012]
26
Elkowitz SJ, Polatsch DB, Egol KA, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ. Capitellum fractures: a biomechanical
evaluation of three fixation methods. J Orthop Trauma 2002; 16: 503-506 [PMID: 12172281 DOI:
10.1097/00005131-200208000-00009]
27
Burkhart KJ, Nowak TE, Appelmann P, Sternstein W, Rommens PM, Mueller LP. Screw fixation of
radial head fractures: compression screw vs lag screw--a biomechanical comparison. Injury 2010; 41:
1015-1019 [PMID: 20347084 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.03.001]
28
Matache BA, Culliton K, Chang Y, Cron GO, Pollock JW. Lateral Trochlear Ridge: A Non-
Articulating Zone for Anterior-to-Posterior Screw Placement in Fractures Involving the Capitellum
and Trochlea. JBJS 2019; 101: e75 [PMID: 31393432 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.18.01270]
29
Mighell MA, Harkins D, Klein D, Schneider S, Frankle M. Technique for internal fixation of
capitellum and lateral trochlea fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2006; 20: 699-704 [PMID: 17106381 DOI:
10.1097/01.bot.0000246411.33047.80]
30
Ruchelsman DE, Tejwani NC, Kwon YW, Egol KA. Open reduction and internal fixation of
capitellar fractures with headless screws. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90: 1321-1329 [PMID:
18519327 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00940]
31
Goodman HJ, Choueka J. Complex coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus. Bull Hosp Jt Dis
2005; 62: 85-89 [PMID: 16022218]
32
Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Telephone: +1-925-3991568
E-mail: bpgoffice@wjgnet.com
Help Desk: https://www.f6publishing.com/helpdesk
https://www.wjgnet.com
© 2021 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
... The surgical approach for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus depends on multiple factors including fracture pattern, extent of articular involvement, rehabilitation protocols, associated soft tissue injury, and surgeon preference. 14 Common approaches include the extensile lateral approach, 17 anterolateral approach, 5 and posterior olecranon osteotomy approach, 2 and several studies have recently reported a medial approach, 19 lateral epicondyle osteotomy, 10 and disruption of lateral collateral ligament complex (LCLC) 1,16 to treat complex coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus. ...
... To achieve good outcomes, it is essential to choose a suitable surgical approach that provides direct visualization of fracture fragments and facilitates anatomical reduction of the fracture fragments. 10 Olecranon osteotomy provides the most visualization of the distal humerus articular surface providing just over 50% exposure. Wu et al reported the anterior approach to the distal humerus that provides access to 46% of the articular surface. ...
... 12 Li et al proposed the lateral epicondyle osteotomy to prevent these disadvantages in ORIF for complex coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus. 10 We also believe that osteosynthesis of the osteotomized site is more reliable than soft tissue repair such as reattachment of the LCLC. In this patient, a distal humeral osteotomy combined with the posterior olecranon osteotomy was performed to acquire an adequate visualization of anterior articular surfaces, because we determined that more soft tissue stripping was required to expose the greatly proximally displaced anterior articular fragments via the lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach alone. ...
Article
Full-text available
A 60-year-old woman sustained a coronal shear fracture of the distal humerus. Open reduction and internal fixation were performed using distal humeral osteotomy combined with posterior olecranon osteotomy to obtain visualization of the anterior articular surfaces. Radiographs revealed union without osteonecrosis in the capitellum and trochlea at final visit. Distal humeral osteotomy combined with posterior olecranon osteotomy is recommended as a surgical option for coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus with posterior wall comminution when there is a need for two incisions, similar to the combined anterior and posterior approach.
... Exposure of the distal humeral articular surface for internal xation is challenging for the surgeons owing to its unique anatomy. Several approaches for this lesion including the anterolateral approach [4], extended lateral approach [5], posterior olecranon osteotomy approach [2,[6][7][8], and lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach [9] have been reported. ...
... In our experience the intact or not intact lateral epicondyle is a crucial factor in the operative treatment for coronal fracture of distal humerus. If the epicondyle is intact, osteotomy could be performed and re ected anteriorly to expose the anterior compartment, which could be named as epicondyle osteotomy approach [9]. In addition, the fractured epicondyle could be re ected directly which could be named as natural epicondyle osteotomy approach. ...
... So the selection of an appropriate surgical approach is necessary. The most commonly reported approach is lateral approach or its extensile variations [9,[18][19][20]. In these reports the common extensors or even the LUCL were stripped off the lateral epicondyle as full thickness sleeve and retracted anterior to expose the fractures. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Background: To investigate the feasibility of using a lateral combined approach with preservation of the extensors and lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) for exposing the coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus, and to analyze the results of open reduction and internal fixation of these injuries. Methods: 45 patients suffered to coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus with the lateral epicondyle intact were treated with open reduction and internal fixation(ORIF) from January 2013 to August 2020. The fractures were exposed by the lateral combined approach in which the tendons involving the common extensor, the extensor carpi ulnaris and the LUCL was preserved, and the two observing windows formed anterior to and posterior to these tendons and LUCL were used to achieve the fracture reduction. Buried screws with or without plate placed on posterior lateral condyle were used to fix the fragments. The functional outcome of these patients was reviewed and assessed with physical and radiographic examination, range of motion (ROM) measurements, and self-evaluation (Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score). Results: 40 patients followed for over one year were included in the final analysis and the mean follow-up duration was 42.10±29.79 months (range, 12-107months). The patients’ mean age was 41.8years (range, 12-74 years). According to Dubberley classification, there were 15 type I, 17 type II and 8 type III fractures. At the final follow-up the average flexion-extension arch was 130.75°(range, 65-150). And the mean pronation and supination was 73.00°(range, 45-80) and 70.63°(range, 40-80), respectively. The mean MEPI score was 87.56(range, 61-97) points, and the results were excellent in 21 patients, good in 13, and fair in 4 and poor in 2. The mean DASH score was 10.59 (range, 0-41.67) points. Neither functional score nor range of movement was associated with age, sex, fracture type, injury type, surgical timing. Conclusions: Reduction and stable fixation with internal fixation for coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus could be achieved by the lateral combined approach. Early functional mobilization could be allowed and then result in satisfactory restoration of elbow function.
... 1,5,7 Some surgeons have mentioned that if the lateral collateral ligament complex is released in the extended lateral approach, the exposure of the articular surface of the distal humerus will be greatly increased, 7,14,22 which is also consistent with our clinical experience. 11 However, releasing the lateral collateral ligament complex and then repairing it may lead to posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow. 6 It may also affect the blood supply of the capitellum, which is not conducive to fracture healing. ...
Article
Background Exposure of the articular surface is the key to successful open reduction and internal fixation treatment for coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus. The olecranon osteotomy approach has previously been described as one of the most effective exposure approaches23,24. Nevertheless, this approach cannot expose the anterior trochlea, and it is impossible to reduce and fix the capitellum under direct vision. The purpose of this study was to compare the exposure of the articular surface of the distal humerus between the lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach (group L) and the olecranon osteotomy approach (group O). Methods Each approach was performed on 8 freshly frozen upper limbs of adult cadavers. After each approach was completed, a 0.5 mm Kirschner wire is inserted along the edge to mark the visible part of the articular surface. Then the soft tissue of each elbow is removed and a surface scanning system is used to create a digital three-dimensional model. The visible part of the articular surface obtained by each surgical approach was mapped and quantified using markers created by Kirschner wires. Results The lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach and the olecranon osteotomy approach exposed 0.8±0.0 and 0.6±0.0 of the distal humeral articular surface (P <0.001), 1.0±0.0 and 0.3±0.1 of the capitellum (P <0.001), 0.6±0.0 and 0.7±0.0 of the trochlea (P <0.001), 0.7±0.0 and 0.5±0.1 of the anterior trochlea (P <0.001), and 0.5±0.0 and 1.0±0.0 of the posterior trochlea, respectively (P <0.001). Conclusion Compared with the olecranon osteotomy approach, the lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach could more fully expose the total articular surface of the distal humerus, capitellum and anterior trochlea, but the olecranon osteotomy approach could more fully expose the trochlea and posterior trochlea.
... Additionally, by raising the LUCL origin off the bone, the joint can be hinged open to allow for better exposure of the medial trochlea, while preserving the olecranon and medial soft tissues. In certain cases, the lateral epicondyle is fractured and the joint can be exposed by simple mobilization of the fragment, with the LUCL remaining attached to the bone [49]. Whenever the LUCL or the lateral epicondyle is detached, it needs a careful reinsertion, with either suture anchors or bone tunnel fixation, in order to avoid posterolateral rotatory instability. ...
Article
Full-text available
Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus are rare, frequently comminuted, and are without consensus for treatment. The aim of this paper is to review the current concepts on the diagnosis, classification, treatment options, surgical approaches, and complications of capitellar and trochlear fractures. Computed Tomography (CT) scans, along with the Dubberley classification, are extremely helpful in the decision-making process. Most of the fractures necessitate open reduction and internal fixation, although elbow arthroplasty is an option for comminuted fractures in the elderly low-demand patient. Stiffness is the most common complication after fixation, although reoperation is infrequent.
Article
Purpose: To investigate the outcome of capitellum and trochlea fractures through a systematic review of the contemporary literature. The effect on the outcome, of the posterolateral column comminution and the surgical approach used for fixation, was also evaluated. Methods: PUBMED, SCOPUS and MENDELEY databases were searched for capitellum and trochlea fractures and a systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. The minimum one year clinical outcome and the flexion extension arc of these fractures, as well as the risk of developing degenerative arthritis were evaluated. The studies included to the meta - analysis were assessed based on the Newcastle Ottawa score. A fixed effect model was performed to compare the outcome and range of motion among Dubberley type A and type B fractures as well as between the extended lateral approach and the posterior transolecranon approach which were performed for Dubberley type B fractures. Furthermore the relative risk of degenerative arthritis (DA) among type A and type B fractures was also estimated. Chi square test was used to test heterogenity among studies. Results: Ten nonrandomized case series were eligible to our inclusion criteria, including 76 patients in total. The fixed overall Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and the Range of Motion (ROM) of the Dubberley type A fractures was 86 (95% C.I.: 85,1-86,9) and 124 0 (95% C.I.: 122 0-124 0) respectively. The fixed overall MEPS and ROM of the Dubberley type B fractures was 84 (95%C.I.: 79,9-88,1) and 122 0 (95% C.I.: 120 0-123 0) respectively. Significant heterogenity was found though between studies regarding MEPS of type B fractures. The fixed overall MEPS and ROM for fractures treated with an extended lateral approach was 89,4 (95% C.I.: 85,36-93,44) and 123 0 (120 0-126 0) respectively. The fixed overall MEPS and ROM for fractures treated with a posterior transolecranon approach was 68,75 (95% C.I.: 67,89-69,6) and 122 0 (114 0-130 0) respectively. The degenerative arthritis relative risk (RR) of type B compared to type A fractures was 3,91 (95% C.I.: 0,84-18,13). Conclusion: There is no statistically significant difference among type A and type B fractures, in terms of outcome and ROM. The posterior transolecranon approach leads to a lower MEPS as opposed to the extended lateral approach. High quality studies comparing directly the outcome of type A and type B fractures are required, in order for safe conclusions to be extracted.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose Exposure of the articular surface is the key to the successful treatment of intra-articular fractures of distal humerus. Anterior, posterior olecranon osteotomy as well as medial and lateral approaches are the four main approaches to the elbow. The aim of this study was to compare the exposure of distal articular surfaces of these surgical approaches. Methods Twelve cadavers were used in this study. Each approach was performed on six elbows according to previously published procedures. After completion of each approach, the exposed articular surfaces were marked by inserting 0.5 mm K-wires along the margins. The elbow was then disarticulated and the exposed articular surfaces were painted. The distal humeral articular surfaces were then closely wrapped using a piece of fibre-glass screen net with meshes. The exposed articular surfaces and the total articular surfaces were calculated by counting the number of meshes, respectively. Results The average percentages of the exposed articular surfaces for the anterior, posterior olecranon osteotomy, medial and lateral approaches were 45.7% ± 2.0%, 53.9% ± 7.1%, 20.6% ± 4.9% and 28.5% ± 6.3%, respectively. Conclusion The anterior and posterior approaches provide greater exposures of distal humeral articular surface than the medial and lateral ones in the treatment of distal humeral fractures.
Article
Background: Coronal shear fractures of the distal aspect of the humerus that involve the capitellum and the trochlea are rare; nevertheless, they are difficult to treat because of the complex fracture patterns and osteochondral nature of the fragments, limiting optimal screw placement. The use of anterior-to-posterior screw fixation by a lag technique (without countersinking) could potentially improve the strength of the construct. Our primary research question was to anatomically determine if there is a non-articulating zone for screw placement along the anterior aspect of the lateral trochlear ridge (aLTR) throughout normal elbow range of motion. Methods: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric elbows were used. The region of interest was defined with 3 polymeric pins inserted in the inferior, middle, and superior-most aspects of the aLTR of each elbow, with use of an extensor digitorum communis (EDC) split approach. The elbows were then mounted on a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-compatible compression frame and subjected to high-resolution 7-T MRI at 90°, 120°, and 145° of flexion (positions of potential impingement), and at neutral and maximal pronation and maximal supination for each position of flexion. Portions of the aLTR that had free adjacent space were identified using the sagittal and coronal scans. This non-articulating region was identified as the "non-articulating zone" (NAZ). Results: The NAZ was found to encompass the proximal 38.2% (range, 30.2% to 48.9%) of the aLTR, measuring, on average, 5.2 mm in width. It was consistently located either directly adjacent to the apex of the ridge or just medial to it. The distal 61.8% of the aLTR articulated with either the ulna or the radial head in some of the elbows. Conclusions: Our results suggest that there is a portion of the aLTR that, despite being covered with articular cartilage, is non-articulating throughout normal elbow range of motion. Clinical relevance: In situations in which headless anterior-to-posterior and posterior-to-anterior screw insertion results in inadequate fixation of capitellar-trochlear fractures, anterior-to-posterior lag screw instrumentation along the non-articulating portion of the aLTR may provide a location for additional fixation in some patients. However, because of variation between patients, each case must be individualized.
Article
Purpose of review: The purpose of this article is to review the management of distal humerus fractures as well as to discuss several of the controversies which exist when treating this dreadful injury. Recent findings: The most current outcome studies of periarticular distal humerus fractures have shown improvements in patient function and satisfaction compared with a decade ago. Recent literature has questioned the utility of orthogonal plating and has offered the recommendation of 'parallel' plating. Further, although open reduction internal fixation of distal humerus fractures in the elderly has had success, total elbow replacement seems to have more predictable results at short-term follow-up in this patient population. Summary: As with all periarticular fractures, the most important key in achieving a good outcome is an immediate postoperative range of motion. This is obtained by anatomic restoration of the joint surface, secure fixation and adequate joint-shaft alignment and immediate maintenance of a functional arc of motion.
Article
The outcome of operatively treated capitellar fractures has not been reported frequently. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes following open reduction and internal fixation of capitellar fractures that were treated with a uniform surgical approach in order to further define the impact on the outcome of fracture type and concomitant lateral column osseous and/or ligamentous injuries. A retrospective evaluation of the upper extremity database at our institution identified sixteen skeletally mature patients (mean age, 40 +/- 17 years) with a closed capitellar fracture. In all cases, an extensile lateral exposure and articular fixation with buried cannulated variable-pitch headless compression screws was performed at a mean of ten days after the injury. Clinical, radiographic, and elbow-specific outcomes, including the Mayo Elbow Performance Index, were evaluated at a mean of 27 +/- 19 months postoperatively. Six Type-I, two Type-III, and eight Type-IV fractures were identified with use of the Bryan and Morrey classification system. Four of five ipsilateral radial head fractures occurred in association with a Type-IV fracture. The lateral collateral ligament was intact in fifteen of the sixteen elbows. Metaphyseal comminution was observed in association with five fractures (including four Type-IV fractures and one Type-III fracture). Supplemental mini-fragment screws were used for four of eight Type-IV fractures and one of two Type-III fractures. All fractures healed, and no elbow had instability or weakness. Overall, the mean ulnohumeral motion was 123 degrees (range, 70 degrees to 150 degrees). Fourteen of the sixteen patients achieved a functional arc of elbow motion, and all patients had full forearm rotation. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Index score was 92 +/- 10 points, with nine excellent results, six good results, and one fair result. Patients with a Type-IV fracture had a greater magnitude of flexion contracture (p = 0.04), reduced terminal flexion (p = 0.02), and a reduced net ulnohumeral arc (p = 0.01). An ipsilateral radial head fracture did not appear to affect ulnohumeral motion or the functional outcome. Despite the presence of greater flexion contractures at the time of follow-up in elbows with Type-IV fractures or fractures with an ipsilateral radial head fracture, good to excellent outcomes with functional ulnohumeral motion can be achieved following internal fixation of these complex fractures. Type-IV injuries may be more common than previously thought; such fractures often are associated with metaphyseal comminution or a radial head fracture and may require supplemental fixation.
Article
Two patients with fractures of the capitellum and trochlea were treated with arthroscopic-assisted reduction and percutaneous fixation. This option may only be appropriate for straightforward fractures with no posterior comminution that can be reduced and visualized adequately.
Article
Secondary loss of reduction and pseudarthrosis due to unstable fixation methods remain challenging problems of surgical stabilisation of radial head fractures. The purpose of our study was to determine whether the 3.0mm Headless Compression Screw (HCS) provides superior stability to the standard 2.0 mm cortical screw (COS). Eight pairs of fresh frozen human cadaveric proximal radii were used for this paired comparison. A standardised Mason II-Fracture was created with a fragment size of 1/3 of the radial head's articular surface that was then stabilised either with two 3.0 mm HCS (Synthes) or two 2.0 mm COS (Synthes) according to a randomisation protocol. The specimens were then loaded axially and transversely with 100 N each for 4 cycles. Cyclic loading with 1000 cycles as well as failure load tests were performed. The Wilcoxon test was used to assess statistically significant differences between the two groups. No statistical differences could be detected between the two fixation methods. Under axial loads the COS showed a displacement of 0.32 mm vs. 0.49 mm for the HCS. Under transverse loads the displacement was 0.25 mm for the COS vs. 0.58 mm for the HCS group. After 1000 cycles of axial loading there were still no significant differences. The failure load for the COS group was 291 N and 282 N for the HCS group. No significant differences concerning the stability achieved by 3.0 mm HCS and the 2.0 mm COS could be detected in the experimental setup presented.
Article
Capitellar fractures result from shearing and wedging forces transmitted to the elbow that create complex injury patterns that are difficult to stabilize. The fracture often extends into the trochlea and is associated with posterior comminution of the humerus and soft tissue injury. Diverse fixation techniques are required to restore the anatomy perfectly to ensure elbow function is regained. This study presents the results of treatment of 26 patients followed up prospectively and treated within a week of injury. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were done annually by an independent reviewer, and the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) was calculated. Results were excellent in 9 patients, good in 9, and fair in 8 when assessed at an average of 46 months (range, 19-94 months) postoperatively using the MEPI, which averaged 81.3 (range 65-100). The poorer results occurred in patients with severe injuries associated with posterior comminution of the humerus and who required more extensive reconstructive procedures. All pain scores improved significantly and activities of daily living were restored in all groups, All returned to employment within 6 months, but 6 (3 type 2 and 3 type 3) had altered their roles from manual to administrative work. This series reflects the challenges in reconstructing precisely this cartilage-covered sphere, especially when there are multiple fragments. Modern techniques of fracture stabilization that concentrate on restoring a circular structure may require a different approach and engineering solutions. Level 4; Case series, treatment study.
Article
The purpose of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the clinical outcomes of 18 patients with large coronal shear fractures of the capitellum and lateral trochlea that underwent open reduction and internal fixation with headless compression screws. Eighteen patients were identified (16 women, 2 men) with an average age of 45 years and an average follow-up of 26 months. Fractures were classified according to the Dubberley classification as 11 type-1A injuries and 7 type-2A injuries. All patients, with the exception of 1, had good to excellent functional results by the Broberg-Morrey scale (mean score, 93.3). Average arc of motion was 128 degrees in flexion/extension and 176 degrees in pronation/supination. Radiographically, 3 patients had subsequent development of avascular necrosis and 5 developed arthrosis. No significant negative correlation was noted between the development of avascular necrosis and clinical outcome. Minor complications occurred in 2 patients, but there were no re-operations. Headless compression screw fixation allows for stable fixation in patients with large coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus without posterior comminution. 4.
Article
Apparent fractures of the capitellum are often more complex involving the trochlea and the posterior aspect of the lateral column. Many of these fractures can be addressed through an extended lateral exposure, but fixation techniques specific to small, nearly entirely articular fragments will be necessary. When the fracture fragments do not fit, there is usually posterior impaction of the lateral column and sometimes the posterior trochlea. (J Hand Surg 2009: 34A.-739-744. (c) 2009 Published by Elsevier Inc. on. behalf of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand.)