Content uploaded by Dildora Bazarova
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Dildora Bazarova on Jun 12, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.
LEGAL TECH: LAW AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Dildora Bazarova,
PhD in law, professor of Tashkent state university of law
E-mail: dildora@me.com
This year, in the Year of Science, Education and the Digital Economy and
within the framework of the Digital Uzbekistan 2030 program, the development of
human capital in the field of information technology, training and retraining of
personnel, digitalization of public services and the information ecosystem. this is
one of the key questions.
It is known that information technologies are widely implemented in the field
of law, as well as in all spheres of society, and legal technologies for legal services
and other similar functions are being developed in order to create a more favorable
environment in this area for individuals and legal entities. legal entities and
lawyers.
Scientific and innovative research in the field of state and law with the
development of information legal technologies and systems (Legal Tech) were
identified as one of the priority areas for the further development of legal education
and science.
Based on the foregoing, in our article we will consider the issues of modern
jurisprudence and the introduction of information technology into it using the
example of "Legal tech".
Legal tech (English legal technology) is a set of software and other electronic
resources designed specifically to optimize and simplify the legal process,
providing technological solutions for legal professionals to further improve the
quality of legal services.
The analysis of sources in this area uses legal technologies “legal search
engines”, “software”, “electronic platforms”, “electronic legal expertise”, “legal
web pages”, “legal social networks” and “online legal advice systems. ". and smart
contracts.
In terms of industry history, the introduction of the legal technology
community around the world began in the United States in 1977 with the example
of LexisNexis. In addition, since the 2000s, development trends have been
observed in this area associated with the development of online legal advice and
automated document creation systems.
The United States also has online law firms, including LawDingo,
UpCounsel, and Priori Legal. One of the systems for automating certain legal
functions and one of the services of e-government is the e-justice system, which in
Russia is performed by the “My Arbiter” system (source: cyclowiki.org).
In addition, one of the most advanced technologies in the industry, Smart
Contracts, is now part of the contractual realm. The advantage of this type of
contracts is that they have a simplified registration system and a system for
reminding the parties of their rights and obligations during the period specified in
the contract.
Several legal technology tools have been introduced in our country, which can
be summarized as follows.
The national database of legislation - information and legal portals lex.uz and
norma.uz - is one of the first and most optimal types of national legal technologies,
designed for quick and convenient search for information in the legal field,
including the necessary legal documents.
These include projects launched by the judiciary for the remote provision of
legal information to citizens, as well as to increase the legal knowledge of the
population, in particular, "Bot for legal advice", "Notary consultation", "Public
services", "Legal services". Informational ”channels were launched in social
networks.
A legal information portal Advice.uz was developed, along with legal
information, an online consulting service was launched to provide legal advice.
In 2013, the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan and the United
Nations Development Program (UNDP) created the National Electronic Judicial
Information System "E-COURT" in order to introduce electronic exchange of
documents, develop and implement information resources and information systems
in the region, and provide interactive services in judicial system., this system is an
information system that allows individuals and legal entities to electronically apply
to civil courts with applications and claims.
In addition, as an example of the introduction of legal technologies into rule-
making activities in our country, a unified electronic system for the development
and approval of draft normative acts has been developed, which today ensures the
implementation of all stages of the preparation of draft normative acts. regulations.
In conclusion, it should be noted that the introduction of modern information
technologies in jurisprudence, as well as in other areas, in turn, serves to create
more favorable conditions for lawyers working in this area, as well as individuals
and legal entities receiving legal services.
References:
1. Базарова, Д. Б. (2016). Место и роль процессуальных гарантий в уголовном процессе.
In Государство и право. Актуальные научные проблемы. Рассмотрение, решение, практика (pp.
50-53).
2. Bazarova, D. (2019). The use of the institution of consignation of testimony as a
proceduralguarantee to protect the rights and legitimate interests of participants in criminal
procedure. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 7(5), 742-751.
3. Bazarova, D. (2021). Challenges of enhancement of the procedural guarantees of the rights and
interests of participants in criminal proceedings. Ilkogretim Online, 20(3).
4. Базарова, Д. Б. (2017). ПРАВО НА ЗАЩИТУ КАК ПРОЦЕССУАЛЬНАЯ ГАРАНТИЯ В
УГОЛОВНОМ ПРОЦЕССЕ США. Правовые исследования, (3), 17-22.
5. БАЗАРОВА, Д. (2019). ПРИМЕНЕНИЕ ИНСТИТУТА ДЕПОНИРОВАНИЯ ПОКАЗАНИЙ В
КАЧЕСТВЕ ПРОЦЕССУАЛЬНОЙ ГАРАНТИИ ЗАЩИТЫ ПРАВ И ЗАКОННЫХ ИНТЕРЕСОВ
УЧАСТНИКОВ УГОЛОВНОГО ПРОЦЕССА. Право и жизнь, (1), 157-167.
6. Базарова, Д. (2020). РОЛЬ ПРОКУРОРА В ОБЕСПЕЧЕНИИ ГАРАНТИЙ ПРАВ И СВОБОД
УЧАСТНИКОВ УГОЛОВНОГО СУДОПРОИЗВОДСТВА. Review of law sciences, (3).
7. Bazarova, D. (2020). Principles of criminal procedure in the system of guaranteeing the rights of
participants in criminal court proceedings. The American Journal of Social Science and Education
Innovations, 2(02), VI-XV.
8. Bazarova, D. (2020). About the System of Procedural Guarantees to Ensure the Rights of
Participants in Criminal Proceedings. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(2).
9. Bazarova, D. B. (2016). Procedural safeguards in investigating and adjudicating criminal cases
by summary procedure. Theoretical & Applied Science, (12), 34-37.
10. Базарова, Д. Б. (2016). Принцип уважения чести и достоинства личности как важнейшая
процессуальная гарантия в уголовном судопроизводстве. Российский следователь, (20), 53-56.
11. Базарова, Дилдора Бахадировна. "Принцип уважения чести и достоинства личности как
важнейшая процессуальная гарантия в уголовном судопроизводстве." Российский следователь 20
(2016): 53-56.
12. Bazarova, Dildora Baxadirovna. "Procedural safeguards in investigating and adjudicating
criminal cases by summary procedure." Theoretical & Applied Science 12 (2016): 34-37.
13. Bazarova, Dildora. "About the System of Procedural Guarantees to Ensure the Rights of
Participants in Criminal Proceedings." International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation 24.2 (2020).
14. Bazarova, Dildora. "Principles of criminal procedure in the system of guaranteeing the rights of
participants in criminal court proceedings." The American Journal of Social Science and Education
Innovations 2.02 (2020): VI-XV.
15. Bazarova, Dildora, and Kanat Utarov. "Comparative Legal Analysis Of Issues Of Enforcement
Of Rights Of Individuals In The Criminal Proceeding Of The Republic Of Uzbekistan And Republic Of
Kazakhstan." The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology 3.02 (2021): 105-110.
16. Базарова, Дилдора. "РОЛЬ ПРОКУРОРА В ОБЕСПЕЧЕНИИ ГАРАНТИЙ ПРАВ И СВОБОД
УЧАСТНИКОВ УГОЛОВНОГО СУДОПРОИЗВОДСТВА." Review of law sciences 3 (2020).
17. БАЗАРОВА, Дилдора. "ПРИМЕНЕНИЕ ИНСТИТУТА ДЕПОНИРОВАНИЯ ПОКАЗАНИЙ В
КАЧЕСТВЕ ПРОЦЕССУАЛЬНОЙ ГАРАНТИИ ЗАЩИТЫ ПРАВ И ЗАКОННЫХ ИНТЕРЕСОВ
УЧАСТНИКОВ УГОЛОВНОГО ПРОЦЕССА." Право и жизнь 1 (2019): 157-167.
18. Базарова, Дилдора Бахадировна. "ПРАВО НА ЗАЩИТУ КАК ПРОЦЕССУАЛЬНАЯ
ГАРАНТИЯ В УГОЛОВНОМ ПРОЦЕССЕ США." Правовые исследования 3 (2017): 17-22.
19. Bazarova, Dildora. "Challenges of enhancement of the procedural guarantees of the rights and
interests of participants in criminal proceedings." Ilkogretim Online 20.3 (2021).
20. Bazarova, Dildora. "The use of the institution of consignation of testimony as a
proceduralguarantee to protect the rights and legitimate interests of participants in criminal
procedure." European Journal of Business and Social Sciences 7.5 (2019): 742-751.
21. Базарова, Д. Б. "Место и роль процессуальных гарантий в уголовном
процессе." Государство и право. Актуальные научные проблемы. Рассмотрение, решение,
практика. 2016.