ArticlePDF Available

Outcome of Carotid Endarterectomy in a Tertiary Center of Nepal: A Retrospective Study

Authors:
  • Manmohan cardiothoracic vascular and transplant centre nepal

Abstract and Figures

Introduction Carotid endarterectomy for carotid artery disease is one of the surgeries performed by vascular surgeons for carotid artery disease. The objective of this study is to describe the early and late outcome of the patient undergoing carotid endarterectomy and the association between the complication and comorbidities present previously in the patient. Methods All patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy at Manmohan Cardiothoracic Vascular and Transplant Centre between April 2010 to April 2020 were included. The follow-up data for upto a year from medical and clinical records, telephone interview regarding the immediate and late postoperative complications in patients with and without comorbidities were investigated and compared. ResultsThe total study population was 42 patients. Two patients (4.7%) developed stroke, one immediately in postoperative period and the other during follow up. There were two deaths (4.7%) postoperatively due to cardiac events and three (7.14%) recurrences of carotid stenosis among whom one (2.5%) developed late stroke. Twenty six patients (61.90%) were symptomatic prior to the procedure of which 20 patients (47.61%) had brain infarct. Overall one year survival was 95.2% post procedure and overall complication rate was 7.14%. The consequence in the form of death and stroke occurred more in the patients with comorbidities (3vs1) p=0.42. Conclusion The immediate and late postoperative complications following carotid endarterectomy were death (4.7%), stroke (4.7%), cranial nerve injury (9.5%). The most frequent cause of death was postoperative cardiac event. Though major complications occurred more frequently in patients having comorbidities, it was statistically insignificant.
Content may be subject to copyright.
31
ABSTRACT
Introduction
Carotid endarterectomy for carotid artery disease is one of the
surgeries performed by vascular surgeons for carotid artery disease.
The objective of this study is to describe the early and late outcome of
the patient undergoing carotid endarterectomy and the association
between the complication and comorbidities present previously in
the patient.
Methods
All patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy at Manmohan
Cardiothoracic Vascular and Transplant Centre between April 2010
to April 2020 were included. The follow-up data for upto a year from
medical and clinical records, telephone interview regarding the
immediate and late postoperative complications in patients with
and without comorbidities were investigated and compared.
Results
The total study population was 42 patients. Two patients (4.7%)
developed stroke, one immediately in postoperative period and the
other during follow up. There were two deaths (4.7%) postoperatively
due to cardiac events and three (7.14%) recurrences of carotid
stenosis among whom one (2.5%) developed late stroke. Twenty six
patients (61.90%) were symptomatic prior to the procedure of which
20 patients (47.61%) had brain infarct. Overall one year survival was
95.2% post procedure and overall complication rate was 7.14%. The
consequence in the form of death and stroke occurred more in the
patients with comorbidities (3vs1) p=0.42.
Conclusion
The immediate and late postoperative complications following
carotid endarterectomy were death (4.7%), stroke (4.7%), cranial
nerve injury (9.5%). The most frequent cause of death was
postoperative cardiac event. Though major complications occurred
more frequently in patients having comorbidities, it was statistically
insignicant.
Keywords
Carotid artery, cerebrovascular disease, endarterectomy
Original Article
JIOM Nepal. 2021 Apr;43(1):31-35.
Outcome of Carotid Endarterectomy in a Tertiary Center of Nepal:
A Retrospective Study
Prashiddha B Kadel, Uttam K Shrestha, Kajan R Shrestha, Dinesh Gurung
Author(s) aliation
Department of Cardiothoracic and
Vascular Surgery, Maharajgunj
Medical Campus, Manmohan
Cardiothoracic and Vascular
Transplant Center, Institute of
Medicine, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu,
Nepal
Corresponding author
Prashiddha B Kadel, MBBS, MS
prashiddhakadel@gmail.com
Journal of Institute of Medicine Nepal
Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal
Submitted
Dec 2, 2020
Accepted
Mar 18, 2021
© JIOM Nepal
32
INTRODUCTION
Carotid artery disease as a disease entity is
known since the start of civilization. In 1658,
Wepfer highlighted the association of right
sided hemiplegia with occlusion of left internal
artery with inference of carotid artery disease and
hemiplegia. In 1665, Willis described a case with
asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.1 During 20th
century, there was a concept that carotid artery
bifurcation stenosis could lead to stroke due to
clot embolism but the characteristics of stenosing
lesion and the type of plaque causing embolism
was described only after 50 years.2
The first surgery which decreased the incidence
of stroke and other complications related to the
atheroma was carotid endarterectomy and it was
performed in women presenting with amaurosis
fugax resulting in successful treatment.2,3
The European Carotid Surgery Trial proposed that
in symptomatic patients, carotid endarterectomy
provided improved stroke free interval in patients
having greater than 70 percent stenosis.4 Similarly,
the North American Symptomatic Carotid Trial also
proposed that either symptomatic or asymptomatic
patients with 70 percent or more stenosis, more
benefitted from surgery with proportion of stenosis
related to outcome of surgery.5 The Veterans
Administration Asymptomatic Trial entails that
symptomatic patients with history of frequent
transient ischemic attacks or small cerebral
infarction had favourable outcome after surgery as
compared to medical therapy.6 The Asymptomatic
Carotid Atherosclerosis Study showed that patients
with 60% or more stenosis were candidate for
carotid endarterectomy and had a lower risk of
stroke at 5 years as compared to medical therapy.7
The main advantage of surgery is the high rate of
freedom from stroke though there is associated
risk of surgical complications. However, with the
advent of refinement of surgical techniques and
intrra operative monitoring, the complication rate
has decreased significantly over the years.8
The objective of this study was to describe the
early and late outcomes of patients that underwent
carotid endarterectomy and study the association
between complications and comorbidities present
previously in the patient.
METHODS
This is a retrospective study conducted at
Manmohan Cardiothoracic Vascular and Transplant
Centre, Kathmandu, Nepal using medical
records and telephone interview of the patients
undergoing carotid endarterectomy in Manmohan
Cardiothoracic Vascular and Transplant Centre. A
total of 42 patients with carotid artery stenosis were
enrolled in this study. The patients were referred
by either physicians, cardiologist, neurologist and
vascular surgeons. Comorbidities like hypertension,
diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease (COPD), asthma were considered as
variables in the study. Both symptomatic and
asymtomatic patients with ≥70 percent carotid
artery stenosis on the basis of carotid Doppler
ultrasound, underwent carotid angiography for
proper delineation of anatomy of carotid vessels.
There was slight difference in extend of stenosis
observed between carotid Doppler ultrasound and
carotid angiography. With stenosis of ≥70 percent
found on coronary angiography, both symptomatic
and asymptomatic patients underwent carotid
endarterectomy after proper evaluation of cardiac
function and other baseline investigations. All
baseline investigations were sent preoperatively
and then surgery was planned and performed.
Any complications after surgery were noted.
Postoperatively, all patients were started on oral
antiplatelet therapy (dual antiplatelet therapy). All
patients were then followed up in the OPD or via
telephone. Patients with stroke or hemiparesis
were then followed up with CT scan or MRI head
and the size of infarct were noted and neurology
consultation was done. Any death or loss to follow
up were noted. All patients undergoing carotid
endarterectomy underwent CT angiography
postoperatively after 10-11 months if carotid artery
duplex showed greater than 50% stenosis of
operated carotid artery.
Carotid artery duplex scan was routinely carried
out 6 months after surgery. Stenosis of more than
50% after initial surgery was marked as recurrence
and interventions in the form of repeat carotid
endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting was
advised.
Fisher's Exact Test was applied at a significance
level of 5%. Survival rate was made according to
the actuarial method. The SPSS program version
25 was used for the construction of tables and
evaluation of data.
RESULTS
A total of 42 patients with carotid artery stenosis
underwent carotid endarterectomy and the
outcome was studied. In our study, there were 16
patients ≤ 60 years while 26 patients > 60 years with
mean age of 64.3±18.7 years. A total of 10 patients
(23.8%) were female and 32 patients(76.2%) were
male. In all, 57.1% had comorbidities of which 10
patients (23.8%) had diabetes mellitus, 8 patients
(19%) had both hypertension and diabetes,6
patients(14.3%) had only hypertension. Unilateral
stenosis was present in 85.7% whereas 14.3% had
bilateral disease at presentation. Sixteen patients
had concomitant disease in the form of coronary
artery disease or peripheral vascular disease of
www.jiomnepal.com.np
Kadel et al.
VOLUME 43 | NUMBER 1 | APRIL 2021
33
which 12 patients (28.57%) were diagnosed to
have significant carotid artery disease after routine
investigation of carotid artery using Doppler
ultrasound as a part of coronary artery bypass graft
preoperative investigation, whereas 4 patients
(9.5%) undergoing femoropopliteal or aortofemoral
bypass had their carotid artery disease diagnosed
while performing carotid doppler as a preoperative
investigation. All patients having peripheral vascular
disease underwent femoropopliteal or aortofemoral
bypass after treatment of carotid artery stenosis.
Twenty six patients (61.9%) were symptomatic
(previous stroke, transient ischemic attack or
amaurosis fugax (Table 1) whereas 16 patients
(38.1%) were asymptomatic in the form of no prior
history of previous stroke, transient ischemic attack
or amaurosis fugax. Carotid endarterectomy with
great saphenous vein patch closure was done in
22 cases (52%) which was on the discretion of the
surgeon .
Complications encountered during and after
carotid endarterectomy have been shown in table
2. Massive bleeding requiring cell salvage support
autotransfusion was seen in 2 cases (4.7%) and 1
patient had stroke in the immediate postoperative
period. There were 2 deaths (4.7%) in the post
operative period, the cause of death being cardiac
event, 4 patients (9.5%) had cranial nerve injury
(hypoglossal nerve being the most common) in the
immediate postoperative period which recovered
with time. Postoperative hypertensive crisis
occured in 4 cases (9.5%). Late stroke occurred in 1
patient during 1 year follow up. Three patients had
recurrence of the disease in the form of re-stenosis
of more than 50%, these patients were offered for
redo endarterectomy but they refused, 2 patients
underwent carotid artery stenting as an alternative
JIOM Nepal
Outcome of Carotid Endarterectomy
VOLUME 43 | NUMBER 1 | APRIL 2021
Table 3. Distribution of postoperative death and stroke by age, sex, stump pressure,
comorbidities and after the use of shunt in the patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy
Characteristics Death or stroke Total p-value
No Yes
Age
≤60 yrs
>60 yrs
Sex
Male
Female
Comorbidities (HTN/DM)
Yes
No
Symptoms
Ye s
No
Carotid stump pressure
>50mmhg
<50mmhg
Shunt
Yes
No
16 (38%)
22 (52.5%)
28 (66.6%)
10 (23.8%)
21 (50%)
17 (40.5%)
24 (57.2%)
14 (33.33%)
32 (76.2%)
6 (14.2)
2 (4.7%)
36 (85.7%)
0
4 (9.5%)
4 (9.5%)
0
3 (7%)
1 (2.4%)
2 (4.7%)
2 (4.7%)
2 (4.7%)
2 (4.7%)
2 (4.7%)
2 (4.7%)
16 (38%)
26 (62%)
32 (76.2%)
10 (23.8%)
24 (57.2%)
18 (42.8%)
26 (61.9%)
16 (38.1%)
34 (80.9)
8 (19.1%)
4 (9.5%)
38 (90.5%)
0.13
0.32
0.42
0.49
0.16
0.12
Table 1. Dierent symptoms of
carotid artery disease
Symptoms Number
Stroke within 6 months
Transient ischemic attack
Amaurosis fugax
20
4
2
Table 2. Dierent complications encountered
after carotid endarterectomy
Complications Number
Massive bleeding
Early stroke
Death in post-operative period
Cranial nerve injury
Hypertensive crisis
Late stroke
Recurrence
2
1
2
4
4
1
3
34
to surgery. Table 3 compares the distribution of
death or stroke as a consequence of surgery on the
basis of age, sex, stump pressure, comorbidities and
use or disuse of shunt in the patients undergoing
carotid endarterectomy. The difference in outcome
in terms of stroke or death were not statistically
significant between the groups based on age, sex,
stump pressure, comorbidities and use of shunt as
shown in table 3.
DISCUSSION
Carotid endarterectomy though considered a
relatively safe surgery is associated with early and
late complications.9 The cut-off of carotid artery
stenosis was kept at 70 percent and included
both symptomatic and asymptomatic population.
Different multicentric trials signify that patients
having 70% stenosis or more should be operated.
Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Studystates
that all patients withstanding surgery with stenosis
of greater than 60% should be operated5,10, in the
end it all depends on the discretion of surgeons
whether to operate or not at around 60% stenosis
with symptoms and should be judged on case to
case basis.
Carotid artery disease is a part of multisystem
disease with peripheral artery disease, coronary
artery disease. According to this study, peripheral
artery disease was found in 4 cases (9.5%) and
12 cases (28%) had coronary artery disease.
Similar to the study done by Yan Wu et al which
showed that carotid atherosclerosis was an
independent risk factor for coronary heart disease
[OR = 2.66, 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 2.05–
3.46, p <0 .001].11 Klop et al in their study showed
that carotid artery disease with ≥75% stenosis
were present in 62 patients(14.9%) with peripheral
artery disease signifying the fact that carotid artery
screening should always be considered in a patient
of peripheral artery disease.12
In this study, wide range of patients with age
ranging from 45 to 86 years age with mean age of
64.31±8.7 years underwent carotid endarterectomy
with no significant difference in complications
related to different age group. Here we compared
between patients of age ≤ 60 years and > 60 years
(n=16 vs 26) or (38% vs 62%), though patients of
age less than 60years had more bleeding (2vs1), the
major adverse complications were more common
in age group more than 60 years with death in 2
patients (4.5%),postoperative hypertensive crisis
in 4 patients (all occurring in patients with age
greater than 60yrs),cranial nerve injury in 4 patients
(age greater than 60yrs). However it was found to
be statistically insignificant (p=0.66). There were 2
cases of stroke with 1 in immediate postoperative
period and another late stroke in patients, both
occurred in the patients with age >60 years
(p=0.134) which is similar to the study done by
Jeong MJ et al which concluded that age is an
independent risk factor for major adverse events
following CEA within 4 years.13 Summarizing, major
complications occurred more frequently in the age
group ≥60 years.
After carotid Doppler study, all patients under went
CT angiogram (CTA) of the carotid vessels for
proper delineation of the extent of stenosis and
feasibility of the surgery. In a study done by Titi M
et al, comparison of Doppler ultrasound and CT
angiography in evaluation of carotid stenosis they
found that the decision of operative management
changed in 28/187 cases (16%) (95% CI 0.11-0.21)
on the basis of carotid angiography.14
In cases of bilateral carotid artery stenosis, some
surgeons take a gap of at least 15 days between
the sequential surgery. In this study, sequential
surgery of the bilateral carotid artery was not done
though 4 patients had bilateral disease. Primary
endarterectomy was performed on the artery
with more severe stenosis or that associated with
symptoms, the latter artery with less significant
stenosis was to be operated only after 2-3 weeks.
However these patients opted for carotid artery
stenting after primary endarterectomy.
Carotid artery shunt is commonly done in our
institute if the stump pressure is below 50mmHg
which has been found to decrease post operative
stroke. In our study, carotid shunt was used
in 4 patients (9.5%), among whom 2 patients
developed major complication (stroke or death). In
38 patients (90.47%) where shunt was not required
intraoperatively, 2 patients had stroke or death
concluding that 50% patient undergoing carotid
endarterectomy using shunt had major complication
whereas 5.2% patient with stump pressure greater
than 50 mm Hg where shunt was not required
had adverse complications in the form of death or
stroke.However, it was not found to be significant
statistically (p=0.12).In a study done by Kwaan et al
in evaluation of stump pressure as a guide during
carotid endarterectomy, the study concluded that
carotid shunt doesnot ensure cerebral perfusion
rather the wakefulness during surgery serves to
prevent stroke when surgery is performed under
local anesthesia.15
Patients with hypertension and diabetes as
comorbidities had more postoperative stroke and
death as compared to patients without comorbidities
(n=3 Vs n=1) p=0.42. Similarly, patients with
comorbidities had more postoperative hospital stay
(5.25 days VS 5.22 days). Summarizing, patient with
comorbidities had higher frequency of complication
as compared to patients without comorbidities
though statistically insignificant. In a research done
by Jeong et al, the outcomes between diabetics
and nondiabetics were compared, and discovered
Kadel et al.
www.jiomnepal.com.npVOLUME 43 | NUMBER 1 | APRIL 2021
35
that diabetics were at greater risk of late major
adverse event and identified diabetes as an
independent risk factor for occurrence of stroke.16
In the present study major complications occurred
more frequently in patients with comorbidities. The
overall complication rate in the study is 7% which
is slightly more than the criteria set by Guidelines
for carotid endarterectomy of the Special Writing
Group of the Stroke Council and American Heart
Association which has 6% of postoperative stroke
and death, if one has to demonstrate its superiority
as compared to medically treated symptomatic
carotid stenosis patient.5,7 The slight increase in
postoperative stroke and death might be due
to the involvement of both symptomatic and
asymptomatic patients with carotid artery stenosis.
In this study, the incision used was a longitudinal
which spares the greater auricular nerve in
comparison to the transverse incision. Following
surgery cranial nerve injury (unilateral hypoglossal
nerve, recurrent laryngeal nerve) was present in
4 patients (9.5%) and the most common cranial
nerve injury was hypoglossal nerve followed by
recurrent laryngeal nerve however the cranial nerve
deficit recovered over months and there was no
residual deficit which is similar to the study done by
Cunningham which showed that the most common
cranial nerve injury was hypoglossal (27) followed by,
recurrent laryngeal(17) and emphasized that the risk
of nerve injury persisting beyond hospital discharge
was around 4% after carotid endarterectomy (95%
CI 2.9–4.7) which decreased with increasing
experience.17
After completion of endarterectomy, patch closure
technique was used whenever surgeons felt the
caliber of artery small, 22 patients (52%) had
patch closure out of which 2 patients (9.09%)
had recurrence (p=0.53). While the study done by
Clagett demonstrated the routine saphenous vein
patch closure did not yield superior results and
was also found to have a greater incidence of early
recurrence( 12.9% vs 1.7% with p<0.05) and post
operative time however if anatomical risk factors
was present for recurrent disease saphenous vein
patch closure seemed to be appropriate.18
Focussing on the long term complication, one
patient had a stroke with debilitation with overall
survival in our study being 95.2% at one year.
CONCLUSION
The immediate and late postoperative complication
following carotid endarterectomy was death (4.7%),
stroke (4.7%), cranial nerve injury (9.5%). The most
frequent cause of death was postoperative cardiac
events.Though major complications occurred more
frequently in patients having comorbidities, it was
statistically insignificant.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None declared.
REFERENCES
1. Aguiar ET, Lederman A, Higutchi C et al. Early and late results of
carotid endarterectomy: retrospective study of 70 operations. Sao
Paulo Med J. 2001;119(6):206-11.
2. Salles LR, Puech-Leão P, Netto BM et al. Risk factors of stroke
in carotid endarterectomy. Revistado Hospital das Clinicas.
1997;52(6):291-4.
3. Eastcott HH, Pickering GW, Rob CG et al. Reconstruction of internal
carotid artery in a patient with intermittent attacks of hemiplegia.
The Lancet.1954;264(6846):994-6.
4. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. MRC
European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic
patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid
stenosis. lancet. 1991;337(8752):1235-43.
5. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial
Collaborators*. Benecial effect of carotid endarterectomy in
symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J
Med. 1991;325(7):445-53.
6. Hobson RW, Weiss DG, Fields WS et al. Veterans Affairs Cooperative
Study Group. Efcacy of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic
carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(4):221-7.
7. Moore WS, Young B, Baker WH et al. Howard VJ, ACAS Investigators.
Surgical results: a justication of the surgeon selection process for
the ACAS trial. J Vasc Surg. 1996;23(2):323-8.
8. Biller J, Feinberg WM, Castaldo JE et al. Guidelines for carotid
endarterectomy: a statement for healthcare professionals from
a Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, American Heart
Association. Stroke. 1998;29(2):554-62.
9. Müller MD, Lyrer P, Brown MM et al. Carotid artery stenting versus
endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis. Cochrane
Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020(2).
10. Jeong MJ, Kwon H, Jung CH et al. Comparison of outcomes after
carotid endarterectomy between type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic
patients with signicant carotid stenosis. Cardiovasc Diabetol.
2019;18(1):41
11. Wu Y, He J, Sun X et al. Carotid atherosclerosis and its relationship
to coronary heart disease and stroke risk in patients with type 2
diabetes mellitus. Medicine. 2017;96(39).
12. Klop RB, Eikelboom BC, Taks AC et al. Screening of the internal
carotid arteries in patients with peripheral vascular disease by
colour-ow duplex scanning. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1991;5(1):41-5.
13. Jeong MJ, Kwon SU, Kim MJ et al. Effects of patient age on
outcomes after carotid endarterectomy: A retrospective, single-
center study in Korea. Medicine. 2019;98(32).
14. Titi M, George C, Bhattacharya D et al. Comparison of carotid
Doppler ultrasound and computerised tomographic angiography in
the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. Surgeon. 2007;5(3):132-6.
15. Kwaan JH, Peterson GJ, Connolly JE et al. Stump pressure: an
unreliable guide for shunting during carotid endarterectomy. Arch
Surg.1980;115(9):1083-5.
16. Jeong MJ, Kwon H, Jung CH et al. Comparison of outcomes after
carotid endarterectomy between type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic
patients with signicant carotid stenosis. Cardiovasc Diabetol.
2019 Dec 1;18(1):41.
17. Cunningham EJ, Bond R, Mayberg MR et al. Risk of persistent
cranial nerve injury after carotid endarterectomy. J Neurosurg.
2004;101(3):445-8.
18. Clagett GP, Patterson CB, Fisher Jr DF et al. Vein patch versus primary
closure for carotid endarterectomy: a randomized prospective study
in a selected group of patients. J Vasc Surg. 1989;9(2):213-23.
Outcome of Carotid Endarterectomy
JIOM Nepal VOLUME 43 | NUMBER 1 | APRIL 2021
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) is the standard treatment for patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. Data from Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMIC) is sparse on CEA and its outcomes. We aimed to describe the profile of our patients, and factors associated with periprocedural cerebral ischemic events in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis who underwent CEA in our institute. Methods: Retrospective review of patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis(50-99%) who underwent CEA between January 2011 and December 2021 was done. Clinical and imaging parameters and their influence on periprocedural cerebral ischemic events were analysed. Results: Of the 319 patients (77% males) with a mean age of 64 years (SD ±8.6), 207 (65%) presented only after a stroke. Majority (85%) had high grade stenosis (70%) of the symptomatic carotid. The mean time to CEA was 50 days (SD ±36), however only 26 patients (8.2%) underwent surgery within 2 weeks. Minor strokes and TIA occurred in 2.2%, while major strokes and death occurred in 4.1% patients. None of the clinical or imaging parameters predicted the periprocedural cerebral ischemic events. The presence of co-existing significant (50%) tandem intracranial atherosclerosis (n=77, 24%) or contralateral occlusion (n=24, 7.5%) did not influence the periprocedural stroke risk. Conclusion: There is a delay in patients undergoing CEA for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Majority have high grade stenosis and present late only after a stroke reflecting a lack of awareness. CEA can be performed safely even in patients with significant intracranial tandem stenosis and contralateral carotid occlusion.
Article
Full-text available
In this single-center, retrospective study, we aimed to compare early and late outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) between younger and elderly patients and to investigate the impact of patient age on the overall incidence of cardiovascular events after CEA. A total of 613 patients with 675 CEAs between January 2007 and December 2014 were stratified by patient age into 2 groups: younger (≤60 years, n = 103 CEAs, 15.3%) and elderly (>60 years, n = 572 CEAs, 84.7%) groups. The study outcomes were defined as the occurrence of major adverse events (MAEs), including fatal or nonfatal stroke or myocardial infarction (MI), or any-cause mortality, and overall cardiovascular events (meaning the composite incidence of stroke or MI) during the perioperative period and within 4 years after CEA. Although there were no significant differences in the incidence of 30-day MAEs and any of the individual MAE manifestations between the 2 groups, the differences in the MAE incidence (P = .006) and any-cause mortality (P = .023) within 4 years after CEA were significantly greater in patients in the elderly group. For overall incidence of cardiovascular events, no significant difference was noted between the 2 groups (P = .096). On multivariate analysis, older age (>60 years) did not affect the incidence of perioperative MAEs and individual MAE manifestations; however, older age was significantly associated with an increased risk of 4-year MAEs (hazard ratio [HR], 3.68, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35–10.0; P = .011) and any-cause mortality (HR, 3.26, 95% CI, 1.02–10.5; P = .047). With regard to the 4-year overall incidence of cardiovascular events, older age was not an independent predictor of increased risk of these cardiovascular events. Our study indicates that the risks of perioperative MAEs and the 4-year overall incidence of cardiovascular events do not significantly differ between younger and elderly Korean patients undergoing CEA, although there was a higher risk of 4-year any-cause mortality in the elderly patients. Older age does not appear to be an independent risk factor for perioperative MAEs and overall cardiovascular events within 4 years after CEA.
Article
Full-text available
Background: We aimed to compare early and late outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) between Korean type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients and to investigate the impact of diabetes on the overall incidence of cardiovascular events after CEA. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 675 CEAs, which were performed on 613 patients with significant carotid stenosis between January 2007 and December 2014. The CEAs were divided into a type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) group (n = 265, 39.3%) and a non-DM group (n = 410, 60.7%). The study outcomes included the incidence of major adverse events (MAEs), defined as fatal or nonfatal stroke or myocardial infarction or all-cause mortality, during the perioperative period and within 4 years after CEA. Results: Patients in the DM and non-DM groups did not differ significantly in the incidence of MAEs or any of the individual MAE manifestations during the perioperative period. However, within 4 years after CEA, the difference in the MAE incidence was significantly greater in the DM group (P = 0.040). Analysis of the individual MAE manifestations indicated a significantly higher risk of stroke in the DM group (P = 0.006). Multivariate analysis indicated that diabetes was not associated with MAEs or individual MAE manifestations during the perioperative period, whereas within 4 years after CEA, diabetes was an independent risk factor for MAEs overall (hazard ratio [HR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-2.48; P = 0.026) and stroke (HR, 2.55; 95% CI 1.20-5.41; P = 0.015) in particular. Conclusions: Diabetic patients were not at greater risk of perioperative MAEs after CEA; however, the risk of late MAE occurrence was significantly greater in these patients. Within 4 years after CEA, DM was an independent risk factor for the occurrence of MAEs overall and stroke in particular.
Article
Full-text available
Carotid atherosclerosis (CA) and carotid plaque (CP) are highly correlated with cardiovascular disease. We aimed to determine the prevalence of CA and CP and their relationship with 10-year risks of stroke and coronary heart disease (CHD) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We studied 1584 T2DM patients aged 20 years and older. CA and CP were detected using ultrasonography. Ten-year stroke and CHD risk were determined using the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) risk engine. The prevalence of CA and CP increased gradually with age. Men had a higher prevalence of CA than women (CA: 58.18% vs 51.54%, P < .01). The 10-year CHD risk (27.9% vs 15.4%, P < .001) and stroke risk (15.2% vs 5.70%, P < .001) were higher in patients with CA than that of those without CA. Compared with patients without CA, the odds ratios (ORs) of CHD in CA and CP group were 4.47 and 10.78 for men, and 4.19 and 5.20 for women, respectively; in the case of stroke, the OR in CA and CP group were 8.83 and 12.07 for men, and 4.35 and 4.90 for women, respectively (P < .001 for all). Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis showed that CA was an independent risk factor for CHD [OR = 2.66, 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 2.05–3.46, P < .001] and stroke (OR = 3.11, 95% CI, 2.38–4.07, P < .001). CA and CP were prevalent in patients with T2DM and positively correlated with 10-year CHD and stroke risk. CA was an independent risk factor for 10-year CHD risk.
Article
Full-text available
The efficacy of carotid endarterectomy in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis has not been confirmed in randomized clinical trials, despite the widespread use of operative intervention in such patients. We conducted a multicenter clinical trial at 11 Veterans Affairs medical centers to determine the effect of carotid endarterectomy on the combined incidence of transient ischemic attack, transient monocular blindness, and stroke. We studied 444 men with asymptomatic carotid stenosis shown arteriographically to reduce the diameter of the arterial lumen by 50 percent or more. The patients were randomly assigned to optimal medical treatment including antiplatelet medication (aspirin) plus carotid endarterectomy (the surgical group; 211 patients) or optimal medical treatment alone (the medical group; 233 patients). All the patients at each center were followed independently by a vascular surgeon and a neurologist for a mean of 47.9 months. The combined incidence of ipsilateral neurologic events was 8.0 percent in the surgical group and 20.6 percent in the medical group (P < 0.001), giving a relative risk (for the surgical group vs. the medical group) of 0.38 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.22 to 0.67). The incidence of ipsilateral stroke alone was 4.7 percent in the surgical group and 9.4 percent in the medical group. An analysis of stroke and death combined within the first 30 postoperative days showed no significant differences. Nor were there significant differences between groups in an analysis of all strokes and deaths (surgical, 41.2 percent; medical, 44.2 percent; relative risk, 0.92; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.69 to 1.22). Overall mortality, including postoperative deaths, was primarily due to coronary atherosclerosis. Carotid endarterectomy reduced the overall incidence of ipsilateral neurologic events in a selected group of male patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis. We did not find a significant influence of carotid endarterectomy on the combined incidence of stroke and death, but because of the size of our sample, a modest effect could not be excluded.
Article
Atherosclerotic stenosis of the internal carotid artery is an important cause of stroke. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for the treatment of carotid stenosis. This review updates a previous version last published in 2012 including all randomized clinical trials comparing CAS to CEA for treatment of carotid stenosis
Article
Purpose: The selection of surgeons to participate in a prospective randomized trial comparing the efficacy of a surgical method with medical management is critically important because it will have a direct impact on the outcome of the study and the future use of the operation. We report the success of the method used for selecting surgeons who participated in the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS) by examining the surgical morbidity and mortality rates and the outcome of the study.Methods: A Surgical Management Committee established criteria for auditing surgeons who wished to participate in the study. The parameters included a minimum performance of at least 12 carotid endarterectomies (CEA) per year and an audit of each surgeon's last 50 consecutive CEAs with required documentation of a combined neurologic morbidity and mortality rate of
Article
The prevalence of internal carotid arterial disease was assessed in 416 consecutive patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Colour-flow duplex scanning was performed to determine the extent of the disease. Major internal carotid artery disease (MICAD), meaning 75% stenosis and/or occlusion, was found in 14.9% (62) of the patients; 12.5% (52) had unilateral disease and 2.4% (10) had bilateral disease. In 7.7% (32) there was a stenosis of 75-99%. An occlusion was seen in 7.2% (30). No correlation was found between the severity of the internal carotid artery disease and the severity of the peripheral arterial disease. The 16.0% (60) prevalence in MICAD in patients with obstructive disease was significantly higher than the 4.7% (2) in aneurysm patients (p less than 0.05). The results show that there was no correlation between MICAD and the risk factors: hypertension, gender, age, diabetes mellitus, hypercholestolaemia, smoking and ischaemic heart disease. The high prevalence of MICAD in patients with PAD suggests that it would be useful to start a screening programme to determine if high grade stenosis should be operated upon.
Article
During a 4-year period, 136 patients undergoing 152 carotid endarterectomies consented to be randomized to primary or saphenous vein patch closure of the arteriotomy. At operation, before randomization, careful assessment of arterial dimensions and anatomy was made. Patients who had an internal carotid artery (ICA) diameter less than 5 mm, arteriotomy extending more than 3 cm beyond the origin of the ICA, or tortuous or kinked ICAs were not randomized; they received obligatory vein patch closure (necessary in 20% cases). All patients were followed up every 3 months for 1 year and every 6 months thereafter with duplex scanning, ocular pneumoplethysmography, and neurologic assessment. The incidence of atherosclerotic risk factors was equal in the groups and all except one of the patients were male. Perioperative morbidity was not significantly different among those having primary closure (n = 60), saphenous vein patch closure (n = 62), and obligatory vein patch closure (n = 30). Operative time among patients having primary closure (122 +/- 4 minutes) was significantly less (p less than 0.001) than among those having saphenous vein patch closure (150 +/- 3 minutes). Three perioperative strokes were evenly distributed among the groups (2% for all procedures); no deaths and no acute postoperative occlusions occurred. Recurrent disease occurred in 12.9% of patients having saphenous vein patch closure compared with its occurrence in 1.7% of those having primary closure (p less than 0.05). However, most recurrences were moderate stenoses (25% to 50% diameter reduction), all were smooth-surfaced, and none required a second operation. All except one of the recurrences among those patients with saphenous vein patch closure were in the bulb and the origin of the ICA; two had evidence of regression. This finding suggested that thrombus layering in the dilated part of the saphenous vein patch reconstruction was the cause. This study demonstrates that in men with carotid arteries of predetermined minimal dimensions undergoing carotid endarterectomy routine saphenous vein patch closure does not produce superior results, is associated with a higher incidence of early recurrence, and increases operative time. In selected patients with anatomic risk factors for recurrent disease or acute postoperative occlusion, saphenous vein patch closure is appropriate.
Article
A correlative analysis was made between the neurological status of the awake patient and the internal carotid artery stump pressure in 125 consecutive patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. There was no mortality in this series. Twenty-four patients lost consciousness immediately after carotid cross-clamping, even though stump pressures were above 50 mm Hg in more than one third of the cases. The majority (80.8%) of the patients tolerated cross-clamping (stump pressures were between 20 and 90 mm Hg). This study demonstrated the variability of cerebral tolerance relative to absolute stump pressure guidelines, such as 25 or 50 mm Hg; reliance on these values to determine the need for intraoperative shunting could lead to stroke at operation. Our experience also showed that assessment of the awake but tranquil patient continues to be the safest and most reliable guide to selective shunting during carotid endarterectomy.
Article
ince the 1950s carotid endarterectomy has been performed in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, based on suggestive but inconclusive evidence for its effectiveness. Only during the last 5 years have randomized studies clarified the indications for surgery. In preparing this report, panel members used the same rules of evidence used in the previous report1,2 (Table). Management of Risk Factors Few studies have analyzed control of risk factors in a random- ized, prospective manner following carotid endarterectomy. However, a wealth of data are available regarding the general relationship between risk factor control and stroke risk. These data provide some guidance for the care of endarterectomy patients. Hypertension Hypertension is the most powerful, prevalent, and treatable risk factor for stroke.3 Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure are independently related to stroke incidence. Isolated systolic hypertension, which is common in the elderly, also consider- ably increases risk of stroke. Reduction of elevated blood pressure significantly lowers risk of stroke. Meta-analyses of randomized trials found that an average reduction in diastolic blood pressure of 6 mm Hg produces a 42% reduction in stroke incidence.3,4 Treatment of isolated systolic hypertension in people older than 60 years also reduces stroke incidence by 36% without an excessive number of side effects such as depression or dementia.5 Long-term care of patients after endarterectomy should include careful control of hypertension (Grade A recommendation for treatment of hypertension in general; Grade C recommendation for postendarterectomy care). Perioperative treatment of hypertension after carotid endar- terectomy represents a special situation. Poor control of blood pressure after endarterectomy increases risk of cerebral hyper- perfusion syndrome. 6- 9 This complication is characterized by unilateral headache, seizures, and occasionally altered mental status or focal neurological signs. Neuroimaging may show intracerebral hemorrhages10 -12 or white matter edema.13 Trans- cranial Doppler ultrasound shows elevated middle cerebral artery blood velocity ipsilateral to the endarterectomy and occasionally in the contralateral middle cerebral artery as well.12,14,15 The syndrome is thought to arise from impairment of autoregulation. At greatest risk are patients with severe preoperative internal carotid stenosis and chronic hyperten- sion. The risk is increased when a contralateral severe stenosis is present. Blood pressure should be carefully monitored after carotid endarterectomy, and elevated blood pressure should be aggres- sively treated, particularly in those with early symptoms of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (Grade C recommenda- tion). In patients thought to be at risk for hyperperfusion syndrome, blood pressure should be monitored for several days after surgery and for at least 7 days in patients with headaches or new neurological symptoms. Such monitoring may be performed on an outpatient basis as appropriate (Grade C recommendation).13 Transcranial Doppler ultrasound shows promise in early identification of the syndrome and possibly for monitoring therapy but has not been rigorously studied.