ArticlePDF Available

SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine-associated fixed drug eruption

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

A 26-year-old, healthy, female on no regular medication, developed a mildly pruritic, erythematous, annular patch with faint, central clearing on her left shoulder. The patient had received the first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in the same arm 15 days prior to the development of the lesion. The injection site was 7cm distal to the evolving patch. Over the span of 2 days, the patch developed a shallow, central erosion surrounded by a halo of erythema (Figure 1b) and subsequently started to resolve spontaneously. The patient had also experienced facial flushing 15 minutes after the vaccine was administered.
Content may be subject to copyright.
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine-
associated xed drug eruption
Dear Editor,
A 26-year-old, healthy, female nurse on no regular medica-
tion developed a mildly pruritic, erythematous, annular patch
with faint, central clearing on her left shoulder (Fig. 1a). The
patient had received the first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech
(Pfizer Inc., New York City, NY, USA) SARS-CoV-2 mRNA
vaccine in the same arm 15 days prior to the development of
the lesion. The injection site was 7 cm distal to the evolving
patch. Over the span of 2 days, the patch developed a
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Figure 1 FDE after the administration of the 1st (a, b) and 2nd (c, d) dose of Pzer-BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine.
©2021 European Academy of Dermatology and VenereologyJEADV 2021
JEADV
shallow, central erosion surrounded by a halo of erythema
(Fig. 1b) and subsequently started to resolve spontaneously.
The patient had also experienced facial flushing 15 minutes
after the vaccine was administered.
An identical erythematous patch re-emerged 14 days after the
patient was administered the second Pfizer-BioNTech SARS-
CoV-2 mRNA vaccine dose. This time, the patch was accompa-
nied by prominent vesiculation within its duskier centre (Fig. 1c).
(a)
(b)
Figure 2 (a) Photomicrograph showing skin with epidermal acanthosis and focal epidermal atrophy with overlying crust. A patchy
inammatory inltrate is present in the upper dermis, extending into the mid dermis in a periadnexial distribution. (H&E 940) (b) A liche-
noid inammatory pattern is seen, with lymphocytic inltration of the epidermis associated with pigment incontinence and Civatte body
formation (H&E 9200).
©2021 European Academy of Dermatology and VenereologyJEADV 2021
2Letter to the Editor
The vesicles eventually ruptured and scabbed, giving the lesion a
targetoid appearance (Fig. 1d). Of note, the patient had self-medi-
cated with a stat dose of hydroxyzine an hour prior to receiving
the second vaccine to abate facial flushing. She had otherwise not
taken any prescribed or over-the-counter medications.
Self-medication with topical 1% hydrocortisone and terbina-
fine applied twice daily for a couple of days on the second erup-
tion proved ineffective. The patient was referred for a
dermatological opinion. A diagnosis of fixed drug eruption (FDE)
was suspected, and a diagnostic punch biopsy was carried out.
Histology showed skin covered by a variably acanthotic and
atrophic epidermis with overlying crust (Fig. 2a). A patchy lym-
phohistiocytic infiltrate was present in the upper dermis, focally
extending into the mid dermis around skin adnexal structures.
Eosinophils were inconspicuous. Lymphocytic infiltration of the
basal layer of the epidermis was noted. This was associated with
basal cell vacuolar damage, Civatte body formation and pigment
incontinence (Fig. 2b). Incipient clefting at the dermalepider-
mal junction was also appreciated. The overall findings were
those of lichenoid interface dermatitis, consistent with a fixed
drug eruption.jd
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of
SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine-associated FDE. FDEs represent a
cutaneous adverse drug reaction (ADR) clinically characterized
by the appearance of recurrent, quasi-identical, cutaneous erup-
tions in the same anatomical location upon exposure and re-ex-
posure to the offending drug. The delay between drug
administration and FDE ranges from 0 to 40 days, manifesting
most commonly as a single lesion with a propensity for the
upper limbs.
1
Intraepidermal interferon c-secreting, CD8
+
T
cells are the key cellular mediators of this type IV hypersensitiv-
ity reaction.
2
FDEs have been associated with other vaccines
including the influenza,
3
human papilloma virus
4
and yellow
fever vaccine.
5
Of the 13 794 904 COVID-19 vaccine doses administered in
the United States between December 2020 and January 2021,
6354 adverse events were reported of which, 92.4% were non-
serious.
6
Injection site reactions account for up to 84% of ADRs
associated with the Pfizer-BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vac-
cine,
7
with erythema and oedema being the commonest reac-
tions.
8
Other described cutaneous ADRs to the Pfizer-BioNTech
SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine include lichen planus,
9
a morbilli-
form rash,
10
radiation recall
11
and urticaria.
12
Dermatologists and clinicians alike, who have now have
become experts at identifying cutaneous manifestations of
COVID-19, need to be aware of possible cutaneous ADR related
to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Notwithstanding, the authors
strongly recommend the administration (and uptake) of the
vaccine according to internationally established guidelines and
national vaccination strategies.
Conicts of interest
Dr Mintoff, Dr Pisani, Dr Betts and Dr Scerri have no conflicts
of interest to declare. The patients in this manuscript have given
written informed consent to publication of their case details.
Funding source
The authors declare no funding sources.
D. Mintoff,
1,
* D. Pisani,
2
A. Betts,
2
L. Scerri
1
1
Department of Dermatology, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta,
2
Department of Pathology, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta
*Correspondence: D. Mintoff. E-mail: dillon.mintoff@gov.mt
References
1 Jhaj R, Chaudhary D, Asati D, Sadasivam B. Fixed-drug eruptions: what
can we learn from a case series? Indian J Dermatol 2018; 63: 332337.
2 Shiohara T, Mizukawa Y. Fixed drug eruption: a disease mediated by self-
inflicted responses of intraepidermal T cells. Eur J Dermatol 2007; 17:
201208.
3 Byrd RC, Mournighan KJ, Baca-Atlas M, Helton MR, Sun NZ, Siegel MB.
Generalized bullous fixed-drug eruption secondary to the influenza vac-
cine. JAAD Case Rep 2018; 4: 953955.
4 Pyl J, Aerts O, Siozopoulou V et al. Bullous fixed drug eruption following
Human Papilloma Virus vaccination. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2020;
34: e697e698.
5 Sako EY, Rubin A, Young LC. Localized bullous fixed drug eruption fol-
lowing yellow fever vaccine. J Am Acad Dermatol 2014; 70: e113e114.
6 Gee J, Marquez P, Su J et al. First month of COVID-19 vaccine safety
monitoring - United States, December 14, 2020-January 13, 2021.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021; 70: 283288.
7 FDA. FDA Briefing Document, Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 2020. URL https://www.FDA.gov/
media/144245/download (last accessed: 16 March 2021).
8 Meo SA, Bukhari IA, Akram J, Meo AS, Klonoff DC. COVID-19 vaccines:
comparison of biological, pharmacological characteristics and adverse
effects of Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna Vaccines. Eur Rev Med Pharma-
col Sci 2021; 25: 16631669.
9 Hiltun I, Sarriugarte J, Mart
ınez-de-Espronceda I et al. Lichen planus
arising after COVID-19 vaccination. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.17221
10 Jedlowski PM, Jedlowski MF. Morbilliform rash after administration of
Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. Dermatol Online J 2021; 27:
13.
11 Soyfer V, Gutfeld O, Shamai S, Schlocker A, Merimsky O. COVID-19
vaccine induced radiation recall phenomenon. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol
Phys 2021. (in press). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.02.048
12 Corbeddu M, Diociaiuti A, Vinci M et al. Transient cutaneous manifesta-
tions after administration of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine: an
Italian single-centre case series. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.17268
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.17390
©2021 European Academy of Dermatology and VenereologyJEADV 2021
Letter to the Editor 3
... There are numerous vaccine platforms (i.e., mRNA, DNA, nonreplicating viral vectors, etc.) for administrating this global pandemic disease around the world [3]. The FDA approved two vaccines to prevent COVID-19 infection in December 2020. ...
... The FDA approved two vaccines to prevent COVID-19 infection in December 2020. There are four major vaccine mechanisms for the COVID-19 vaccines production, including protein-based vaccines, mRNA-based vaccines, DNA-based vaccines, and inactivated virus that motivates the immune response [2][3][4]. ...
... Numerous neurological complications are associated with COVID-19 infection [2,3]. Neurologists have concerns about potential neurological side effects, profits, and timing of COVID-19 vaccines. ...
Article
The COVID-19 mainly causes respiratory disorders with high infection and severe morbidity and mortality. Neurologists have concerns about potential neurological side effects, profits, and timing of COVID-19 vaccines. This study aimed to review systematically research for the COVID-19 vaccine and neurological complications. Data was searched in Scopus, ISI web of knowledge, Medline, PubMed, Wiley, Embase, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and Clinical Trials, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Two reviewer authors individually searched and assessed the titles and abstracts of all articles. The third reviewer resolved disagreement between them. Data were documented regarding study location, study design, type of complications, number of patients, various types of COVID-19 vaccine, and type of neurological complications. Six studies in COVID-19 vaccine and neurological complications include two studies about neurological manifestations after the mRNA vaccines, four records about side effects of vector-based vaccine were included in the study. The main neurological complication associated mRNA vaccines were body aches, paresthesia, and difficulty walking, erythema migrans lesion, fatigue, myalgia, and pain in the left lateral deltoid region. The major neurological complication related to vector-based vaccines were urinary retention difficulty, feeding and ambulating, arm soreness, mild fatigue, chills, left-sided facial droop, headaches, a generalized epileptic seizure, hemianopia, and mild aphasia, acute somnolence and right-hand hemiparesis, acute transverse myelitis, deep vein thrombosis in her left leg, a vigilance disorder and a twitching, a severe immobilizing opsoclonus myoclonus syndrome, and encephalitis. A large spectrum of severe neurological unfavorable has been reported. These complications could occur as a result of molecular stimulation and later neuronal damage. Generally, the advantages of COVID‐19 vaccination are dominant on the risks of a neurological complication at both individual and population levels. Future investigations will be required to find any relationship between neurological complications and COVID‐19 vaccines principally as new strains of the virus and new vaccines are technologically advanced against them.
... cutaneous adverse events due to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (7). The most common reaction was urticaria followed by other rashes, i.e., morbilliform, pityriasis-form, bullous drug eruption, fixed drug eruption, etc. (8)(9)(10). ...
... A skin rash appears at the same anatomical location each time the culprit drug, more frequently antibiotics, analgesics, antiphlogistic drugs and hypnotics [82], is ingested/administered. Interestingly, a few cases of FDE following SARS-CoV2 vaccines (both mRNA and inactive) have recently been reported [83][84][85]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Urticaria is an inflammatory skin disorder that may occur in isolation or associated with angioedema and/or anaphylaxis. Clinically, it is characterized by the presence of smooth, erythematous or blanching, itchy swelling, called wheals or hives, which greatly vary in size and shape and last less than 24 h before fading to leave normal skin. Urticaria is the consequence of mast-cell degranulation that can be caused by immunological or non-immunological mechanisms. From a clinical point of view, many skin conditions can mimic urticaria and their recognition is mandatory for a correct management and therapeutic approach. We have reviewed all of the main relevant studies which addressed differential diagnosis of urticarial, published until December 2022. The National Library of Medicine PubMed database was used for the electronic research. The present review offers a clinical narrative overview, based on the available literature, of the principal skin disorders that can be misdiagnosed as urticaria (mainly autoinflammatory or autoimmune disorders, drug-induced reactions, and hyperproliferative diseases). The aim of this review is to provide clinicians a useful tool for correctly suspecting and identifying all of these conditions.
... Rice et al reported that localized cutaneous erythema and swelling was commonly observed in the COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials. 2 Recent case reports have documented the findings of lichen planus, morbilliform rashes, injection site patches, and radiation recall after COVID-19 vaccine administration. [3][4][5][6][7] Here we present a morbilliform drug eruption akin to the sequelae of the COVID-19 Pfizer-BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: Cutaneous manifestations such as morbilliform rashes, lichen planus, and local injection site patches have been recently published in case reports to occur within days of receiving the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine. The most common drug eruptions have been noted to be delayed hypersensitivity reactions. Objective: To spotlight a vaccine drug eruption case in a patient with a long history of the autoimmune condition, psoriasis vulgaris. Case Presentation: A 51-year-old Caucasian female presented with pruritic and erythematous rashes covering her back, abdomen, pelvis, and both upper extremities emerging one week after receiving the Pfizer BioNTech mRNA vaccine. The rashes worsened, rapidly spreading toward the lower extremities within five days after her second dose. The patient was diagnosed with psoriasiform spongiotic dermatitis compatible with a drug eruption and began loratadine and clobetasol cream treatment and phototherapy. Conclusion: With limited published data available on skin reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine, our case report is among one of the first presentations to describe a morbilliform rash induced by a Pfizer BioNTech mRNA drug-eruption. Although this is a rare case, we may expect more reported drug eruptions to be documented as mass vaccinations continue to be dispensed across the globe. Physicians must be prepared to accurately diagnose and treat dermatologic conditions on patients with and without pre-existing illnesses.
... It is a type of delayed hypersensitivity reaction mediated by CD8+ T cells with an average latency period of 0-40 days. 8 Three case reports of bullous fixed drug eruptions have been reported so far-two cases with the mRNA vaccine (Moderna) and one with the viral vector vaccine (Oxford-AstraZeneca, ChAdOx1). 9 In our case, the patient had no history of prior self-medication and the lesions developed a day after the second dose of vaccination. ...
... [1][2][3] To date, only five cases of FDE following COVID-19 vaccination have been reported, 3 following mRNA and 2 after adenoviral vector-based vaccines (Table 1). [4][5][6][7][8] Here, we report a patient with generalized non-bullous FDE following vaccination with the mRNA-based Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. ...
Article
Full-text available
Fixed drug eruption is a cutaneous drug reaction which recurs at the same site when the individual is exposed to the causative drug, characterized by single or multiple round sharply demarcated erythematous‐to‐violaceous patches. Here, we report a patient with generalized non‐bullous fixed drug eruption following mRNA‐based Pfizer‐BioNTech COVID‐19 vaccine. Fixed drug eruption following COVID‐19 vaccination has been reported on rare occasions which includes bullous and non‐bullous lesions. The presented case adds to this list a “multiple non‐bullous” presentation of FDE following mRNA COVID‐19 vaccine.
... Fifteen days following the first dose of Pfizer-BioNTech SARS-CoV-2mRNA vaccine, a young woman developed an erythematous patch to her left shoulder. Re-emergences of the same lesion occurred 14 days after the second dose with biopsy findings being consistent with a diagnosis of FDE [35]. To the best of our knowledge two further cases exist, occurring after the administration of the mRNA-1273 (Moderna) and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) vaccines [36,37]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Fixe Arzneimittelexantheme (FAE) sind häufige unerwünschte Arzneimittelreaktionen der Haut, die nach Verabreichung auslösender Medikamente auftreten. Ziel dieser Übersicht ist es, eine aktualisierte Auflistung der Medikamente vorzulegen, die ein FAE verursachen. Dabei liegt der Schwerpunkt auf neu in Erscheinung getretene Auslöser, die seit Beginn des Jahrhunderts dokumentiert wurden. Die veröffentlichten Auslöser von FAE sind sehr vielfältig. Zu den am häufigsten mit FAE in Verbindung gebrachten Medikamenten gehören Analgetika (nichtsteroidale Antirheumatika [NSAR] und Paracetamol) und Antibiotika. Der am besten beschriebene Einzelwirkstoff ist wohl Cotrimoxazol. Seit Beginn des Jahrhunderts wurden mehr als 200 Medikamente in Fallberichten zum FAE genannt. Bedeutende neuartige Wirkstoffe sind unter anderem Cyclooxygenase-2-spezifische Inhibitoren, Fluconazol und Phosphodiesterase-5-Hemmer. Weitere mit FAE in Verbindung gebrachte Medikamente sind Impfstoffe, zum Beispiel verschiedene Impfstoffe gegen SARS-CoV-2. Medikamente, die für ein FAE verantwortlich gemacht werden, unterscheiden sich nach geografischer Region und der Verschreibungsmuster zu bestimmten Zeitpunkten. Neuere Medikamente kommen weiterhin auf den Markt und spielen eine wachsende Rolle für FAE. Bewusstsein hinsichtlich seltenerer Auslöser und neu in Erscheinung tretender Wirkstoffe kann dabei helfen, Auslöser zu erkennen. Dies ermöglicht die unverzügliche Absetzung des verursachenden Wirkstoffs und kann damit ein Rezidiv verhindern.
... Fifteen days following the first dose of Pfizer-BioNTech SARS-CoV-2mRNA vaccine, a young woman developed an erythematous patch to her left shoulder. Re-emergences of the same lesion occurred 14 days after the second dose with biopsy findings being consistent with a diagnosis of FDE [35]. To the best of our knowledge two further cases exist, occurring after the administration of the mRNA-1273 (Moderna) and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) vaccines [36,37]. ...
Article
Full-text available
A fixed drug eruption (FDE) is a common cutaneous adverse drug reaction which occurs following administration of an offending drug. The aim of this review is to provide an update on the list of drugs causing FDE, with a focus on emerging drug culprits reported since the start of the century. Across published literature, triggers for FDE are widely varied. The most frequently implicated drugs include analgesics (nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs] and paracetamol) and antibiotics. Co‐trimoxazole is perhaps the most well described single agent. Since the start of the century there have been over 200 drugs named in case reports on FDE. Newer, novel agents of note include cyclooxygenase‐2 specific inhibitors, fluconazole, and phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors. Other implicated drugs include vaccines, such as various SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccines. Drugs incriminated in FDE vary based on the geographical region studied and prescribing patterns at a given time. Newer drugs continue to enter the market and are playing an increasing role in the field of FDE. Awareness of rarer culprits and emerging novel agents can help identify a trigger, allowing for prompt withdrawal of the causative agent, preventing recurrence.
... To date, only five cases of FDE following COVID-19 vaccination have been reported, 3 following mRNA and 2 after adenoviral vector-based vaccines ( Table 1 ) [4][5][6][7][8]. Here, we report a patient with generalized non-bullous fixed drug eruption following vaccination with the mRNA-based Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. ...
Preprint
Fixed drug eruption is a cutaneous drug reaction which recurs at the same site when the individual is exposed to the causative drug, characterized by single or multiple round sharply demarcated erythematous-to-violaceous patches. Here, we report a patient with generalized non-bullous fixed drug eruption following mRNA-based Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.
Article
Full-text available
Numerous skin manifestations associated with COVID‐19 infection have been reported so far1‐3. They include vesicular or maculo‐papular skin rashes, livedoid/necrotic lesions, urticaria, chilblains‐like lesions and drug induced eruptions1
Article
Full-text available
Objective: The "Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)" disease has caused a worldwide challenging and threatening pandemic (COVID-19), with huge health and economic losses. The US Food and Drug Administration, (FDA) has granted emergency use authorization for treatment with the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines. Many people have a history of a significant allergic reaction to a specific food, medicine, or vaccine; hence, people all over the world have great concerns about these two authorized vaccines. This article compares the pharmacology, indications, contraindications, and adverse effects of the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines. Materials and methods: The required documents and information were collected from the relevant databases, including Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics), PubMed, EMBASE, World Health Organization (WHO), Food and Drug Authorities (FDA) USA, Local Ministries, Health Institutes, and Google Scholar. The key terms used were: Coronavirus, SARS-COV-2, COVID-19 pandemic, vaccines, Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, Moderna vaccine, pharmacology, benefits, allergic responses, indications, contraindications, and adverse effects. The descriptive information was recorded, and we eventually included 12 documents including research articles, clinical trials, and websites to record the required information. Results: Based on the currently available literature, both vaccines are beneficial to provide immunity against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Pfizer/BioNTech Vaccine has been recommended to people 16 years of age and older, with a dose of 30 μg (0.3 m) at a cost of $19.50. It provides immunogenicity for at least 119 days after the first vaccination and is 95% effective in preventing the SARS-COV-2 infection. However, Moderna Vaccine has been recommended to people 18 years of age and older, with a dose of 50 μg (0.5 mL) at a cost of $32-37. It provides immunogenicity for at least 119 days after the first vaccination and is 94.5% effective in preventing the SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, some associated allergic symptoms have been reported for both vaccines. The COVID-19 vaccines can cause mild adverse effects after the first or second doses, including pain, redness or swelling at the site of vaccine shot, fever, fatigue, headache, muscle pain, nausea, vomiting, itching, chills, and joint pain, and can also rarely cause anaphylactic shock. The occurrence of adverse effects is reported to be lower in the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine compared to the Moderna vaccine; however, the Moderna vaccine compared to the Pfizer vaccine is easier to transport and store because it is less temperature sensitive. Conclusions: The FDA has granted emergency use authorization for the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines. These vaccines can protect recipients from a SARS-CoV- 2 infection by formation of antibodies and provide immunity against a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Both vaccines can cause various adverse effects, but these reactions are reported to be less frequent in the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine compared to the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine; however, the Moderna vaccine compared to the Pfizer vaccine is easier to transport and store because it is less temperature sensitive.
Article
Full-text available
Two coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines are currently authorized for use in the United States. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine on December 11, 2020, and for the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine on December 18, 2020; each is administered as a 2-dose series. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices issued interim recommendations for Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines on December 12, 2020 (1), and December 19, 2020 (2), respectively; initial doses were recommended for health care personnel and long-term care facility (LTCF) residents (3). Safety monitoring for these vaccines has been the most intense and comprehensive in U.S. history, using the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a spontaneous reporting system, and v-safe,* an active surveillance system, during the initial implementation phases of the COVID-19 national vaccination program (4). CDC conducted descriptive analyses of safety data from the first month of vaccination (December 14, 2020-January 13, 2021). During this period, 13,794,904 vaccine doses were administered, and VAERS received and processed† 6,994 reports of adverse events after vaccination, including 6,354 (90.8%) that were classified as nonserious and 640 (9.2%) as serious.§ The symptoms most frequently reported to VAERS were headache (22.4%), fatigue (16.5%), and dizziness (16.5%). A total of 113 deaths were reported to VAERS, including 78 (65%) among LTCF residents; available information from death certificates, autopsy reports, medical records, and clinical descriptions from VAERS reports and health care providers did not suggest any causal relationship between COVID-19 vaccination and death. Rare cases of anaphylaxis after receipt of both vaccines were reported (4.5 reported cases per million doses administered). Among persons who received Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, reactions reported to the v-safe system were more frequent after receipt of the second dose than after the first. The initial postauthorization safety profiles of the two COVID-19 vaccines in current use did not indicate evidence of unexpected serious adverse events. These data provide reassurance and helpful information regarding what health care providers and vaccine recipients might expect after vaccination.
Article
Full-text available
A 30-year-old male healthcare worker with no past medical history presented for vaccination with the SARS-CoV2, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. The day after vaccination the patient experienced mild subjective fevers, headache, and injection site soreness in the deltoid region without overlying skin changes. Forty-eight hours after administration of the vaccine, the patient developed a mildly pruritic erythematous macular morbilliform eruption on the lower back . Over the course of the following 24 hours, the patient’s rash resolved without intervention.
Article
A 56‐year‐old woman, with personal history of lichen planus 7 years prior that had been successfully treated with topical therapy, was referred to our dermatology outpatient unit from a primary care center. She complained of pruritic lesions that had appeared 48 hours after the second dose of the COVID‐19 vaccine (Comirnaty, Pfizer‐BioNTech). The lesions had developed in the ankles and subsequently extended to the flexural wrist and forearms, periumbilical area, mammary and axillary folds.
Article
Radiation Recall Phenomenon (RRP) is an uncommon, late occurring, acute inflammatory skin reaction that emerges in localized areas coincident with previously irradiated radiotherapy (RT) treatment fields. RRP has been known to be triggered by a number of chemotherapy agents. To the best of our knowledge, this report is the first description of RRP following administration of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for COVID-19, or any other currently available vaccine against COVID-19. Acute skin reactions were observed in two radiotherapy patients with differing timelines of RT and vaccinations. In both cases however, the RRP presented within days of the patient receiving the second dose of vaccine. For each RT course the treatment planning dosimetry of the radiation fields was compared to the area of the observable RRP. RRP developed within the borders of treatment fields where prescription dose constraints were prioritized over skin sparing. Our observation is currently limited to two patients. The actual incidence of RRP in conjunction with Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine or any other vaccine against Covid-19, is unknown. For cancer patients being treated with radiation with significant dose to skin, consideration should be given to the probability of RRP side-effects from vaccinations against COVID-19.
Article
An otherwise healthy 13‐year‐old girl developed a bullous skin reaction on the upper arm 2 hours following the intramuscular administration of Cervarix® (GSK, Rixensart, Belgium), a bivalent vaccine targeting Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) types 16 and 18. She had received a first and uncomplicated dose of the vaccine eight months earlier. Clinical examination showed a localized, painful, erythematous area of 7 by 5 centimetres on the right upper arm, accompanied by clear skin epidermolysis with bulla formation and a positive Nikolsky sign, not extending beyond the borders of the erythematous area (Figure 1).
Article
Background A fixed-drug eruption (FDE) is a unique cutaneous adverse drug effect in the form of recurrent lesions at the same site after re-exposure to the offending agent. Aim The aim of the study was to identify changes in trends in fixed drug eruptions with regard to causative drug or patient risk factors. Methods Cases of FDEs encountered between March 2014 to May 2017 during routine pharmacovigilance activities were analyzed. Results FDEs made up 8.4% of total adverse drug reactions and 11.1% of cutaneous reactions. Majority of the patients were adults between 18 and 45 years old. The average lag period between drug intake and appearance of FDE was 2.04 days. Commonly affected sites were extremities, lips, head and neck, and genitalia. Number of FDE lesions varied from 1 to > 6, with nearly half the patients (46%) presenting with a single lesion. Antimicrobials (80.6%) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (20.8%) were most frequent drugs implicated. Route of administration was oral for all causative drugs. History of an FDE was positive in 26 (50.2%) of the cases. Majority of the patients (21 out of 25 or 84%) whose lesions appeared within minutes to hours of suspected drug intake had a history of FDE. Furthermore, 66.7% of patients with multiple lesions had a history of FDE while only 34.8% of patients with a single lesion had such a history. Conclusion FDEs are common cutaneous reactions with antimicrobials and anti-inflammatory agents, with increased likelihood of extensive and multiple lesions in patients with a history of FDE.