Content uploaded by Batara Surya Batara Surya
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Batara Surya Batara Surya on May 25, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.
Land2021,10,556.https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060556www.mdpi.com/journal/land
Article
LandUseChange,UrbanAgglomeration,andUrbanSprawl:
ASustainableDevelopmentPerspectiveofMakassarCity,
Indonesia
BataraSurya
1,
*,AgusSalim
2
,HernitaHernita
3
,SeriSuriani
4
,FirmanMenne
5
andEmilSalimRasyidi
6
1
DepartmentofUrbanandRegionalPlanning,FacultyofEngineering,UniversityBosowa,MakassarCity
90231,Indonesia
2
DepartmentofRegionalPlanning,FacultyofEngineering,UniversityBosowa,MakassarCity90231,
Indonesia;agus.salim@universitasbosowa.ac.id
3
DepartmentofEconomic,STIMLasharanJaya,MakassarCity90231,Indonesia;
hernita@stimlasharanjaya.ac.id
4
DepartmentofFinancialManagement,FacultyofEconomicandBusiness,UniversityBosowa,Makassar
City90231,Indonesia;seri.suriani@universitasbosowa.ac.id
5
DepartmentofAccounting,FacultyofEconomicandBusiness,UniversityBosowa,MakassarCity90231,
Indonesia;firman@universitasbosowa.ac.id
6
DepartmentofUrbanPlanning,FacultyofEngineering,BosowaUniversity,MakassarCity90231,
Indonesia;emil.salim@universitasbosowa.ac.id
*Correspondence:batara.surya@universitasbosowa.ac.id
Abstract:Urbanizationtowardstheexpansionofthecityareacausesurbansprawlandchangesin
spaceuse.Furthermore,urbanagglomerationtowardsurbanspatialintegrationcausesadecrease
inenvironmentalquality.Thisstudyaimstoanalyze(1)land‐usechangeandurbansprawlwork
asdeterminantsofenvironmentalqualitydegradationinsuburbanareas.(2)Theeffectofurban
sprawl,urbanagglomeration,land‐usechange,urbanactivitysystems,andtransportationsystems
onenvironmentalqualitydegradationinsuburbanareas.Acombinationofquantitativeand
qualitativeapproachesisusedsequentiallyinthisstudy.Dataobtainedthroughobservation,
surveys,anddocumentation.TheresultsshowedthattheexpansionoftheMakassarCityareato
thesuburbshadanimpactonspatialdynamics,spatialsegregation,andenvironmental
degradation.Furthermore,urbansprawl,land‐usechange,urbanagglomeration,activitysystems,
andtransportationsystemshaveapositivecorrelationtoenvironmentalqualitydegradationwith
adeterminationcoefficientof85.9%.Thisstudyrecommendsthehandlingofurbansprawl,land‐
usechange,andurbanagglomerationtobeconsideredintheformulationofdevelopmentpolicies
towardsthesustainabilityofnaturalresourcesandtheenvironmentofMakassarCity,Indonesia.
Keywords:land‐usechange;urbansprawl;urbanagglomeration;sustainabledevelopment
1.Introduction
Urbanexpansionduetourbanizationcontributestourbangrowth,changesinspatial
structure,andspatialpatternsinsuburbanareasinthecaseoflargeandmetropolitan
cities.Urbanizationinthedynamicsofmetropolitancitieshasledtochangesintraditional
ruralcharacteristicstowardsurbancharacteristics[1].Thatis,urbanizationdoesnotonly
affectthecharacteristicsofsociety,economy,andculturebutalsoecologicaland
environmentalaspects[2].Thus,urbanizationiscloselyrelatedtoanincreasein
population,changesinland‐use,andurbanspatialpatternstowardsadecreasein
environmentalquality[3,4].Furthermore,urbanurbanizationtowardsurbanexpansion
ismarkedbythedevelopmentoflarge‐scalesettlements,industry,centersofeconomic
activity,andconnectivityofthetransportationnetworksystem[5].Increasedsocio‐
Citation:Surya,B.;Salim,A.;
Hernita,H.;Suriani,S.;Menne,F.;
Rasyidi,E.S.LandUseChange,
UrbanAgglomeration,andUrban
Sprawl:ASustainableDevelopment
PerspectiveofMakassarCity,
Indonesia.Land2021,10,556.
https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060556
AcademicEditors:Ileana
Pătru‐StupariuandChristineFürst
Received:22April2021
Accepted:24May2021
Published:25May2021
Publisher’sNote:MDPIstays
neutralwithregardtojurisdictional
claimsinpublishedmapsand
institutionalaffiliations.
Copyright:©2021bytheauthors.
LicenseeMDPI,Basel,Switzerland.
Thisarticleisanopenaccessarticle
distributedunderthetermsand
conditionsoftheCreativeCommons
Attribution(CCBY)license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses
/by/4.0/).
Land2021,10,5562of33
economicactivitiesinthesuburbshaveanimpactontrafficcongestion,pollution,urban
sprawl,conversionofproductiveagriculturalland,socio‐economicproblems,anda
decreaseintheenvironmentalqualityofsuburbanareas[6].Thus,urbanizationand
suburbanizationinsuburbanareascausechangesinspatialcharacteristicsfrompreviously
monocentrictopolycentric[7–9].
TheWorldBankstatesthaturbanizationinIndonesiahasreached55%[10].This
figure,whencomparedtoseveraldevelopingcountries,isclassifiedaslaggingbehind
whencomparedtoBrazilwhichhasreachedarateof86.3%.Inthe2017period,around
144millionIndonesianslivedincitiesoutofatotalpopulationof264millionpeople[11].
Furthermore,theurbancategoryinSoutheastAsiainrelationtopopulationdistribution
placesurbanareasinIndonesiainthesecond‐highestposition,or54.7%.Malaysiaranks
firstwith75.4%.Thailandoccupiesthethirdpositionwithanurbanpopulation
distributionof49.2%.ThePhilippinesandVietnamarerespectivelyinfourthandfifth
positionswith46.7%and35.2%[12].Thus,thenumberofurbanresidentscoupledwith
theexpansionofthecitytothesuburbshasanimpactontheburdenofinfrastructure
financing,increasingdemandforhousingfacilities,changesinland‐use,andadecrease
inenvironmentalquality[13,14].
TheurbanpopulationinIndonesiawhichincreaseseveryyearhasanimpacton
increasingthefinancingofurbaninfrastructureandmeetingtheneedsforresidential
facilities.Thisconditionismarkedbytheexistenceofnewareaswhicharepredominantly
developedinthesuburbanareas.Furthermore,thelandareaforeachpersonlivinginbig
andmetropolitancitiesinIndonesiaoccupiesanaverageof40meters.Thisfigureisthe
smallestsizeofallcountriesintheEastandSoutheastAsiaregion[13].Thus,urbanization
inthecaseofurbanareasinIndonesiahasanimpactonincreasingurbanactivity,urban
sprawl,anditseffectondecreasingthequalityofthesuburbanenvironment.Urban
sprawlisacomplexphenomenonthatrequirestreatmentandstudyofthefactorsthat
causethisconditiontooccur[15].Thus,aneffectivestrategyisneededtocontrolurban
growth,developingspatialpatterns,anddrivingforcesforurbanexpansion[16].
Furthermore,urbansprawlistheeffectoftheexpansionofthebigcityareaandtheurban
processthatappearsisthepolarizingeffectofthesocio‐economicactivitiesofthecity
centermovingtothesuburbanarea[17,18].
Urbanizationhasanimportantimpactontheenvironment,changesinland‐use
intensity,spatialstructure,andurbanspatialpatterns[19,20].Theurbansprawlthat
developsinsuburbanareasoccursduetoseveralfactors,namely(i)relativelylowland
prices,and(ii)lowpopulationdensity.Thesetwofactorscausetheurbanspatial
distributiontobeefficientandeffectiveinrelationtospaceutilizationanditseffecton
environmentalqualitydegradation[21,22].Furthermore,housingandsettlement
developmentactivitiesandincreasedtransportationinfrastructuredevelopmenthavean
impactonthecomplexityofspaceutilization[23]Thisconditionischaracterizedby
environmentalimbalance,morphology,andlossofurbannaturalvegetation[24,25].Thus,
theconstructionofnewsettlementsinsuburbanareasandtheirimpactonthe
environmentareveryimportantintheprocessofurbangrowth[26].
Cityexpansionduetoexcessiveurbanizationisaphenomenonthatisquite
prominentinthecaseofbigandmetropolitancitiesinIndonesia.Thatis,urbanization
hasanimpactonenvironmentalimbalance,congestion,pollution,andurbansprawl[27].
Theexpansionofurbanareashassignificantlyalteredthecharacteristicsofthesuburban
areaanddecreasedenvironmentalquality[28].Theexpansionofurbanareascoupled
withincreasedurbanactivity,andtheconstructionofnewsettlementsinsuburbanareas
haveanimpactontheconversionofproductiveagriculturalland,transportation
movementsystems,andadecreaseinenvironmentalquality[29].Furthermore,itisvery
importanttoplanwelltheprovisionofvariousurbaninfrastructureandservices
includingtheurbantransportsystem[26].Thus,comprehensive,andintegratedhandling
towardsthesustainabilityoftheurbansystemisneeded[30].
Land2021,10,5563of33
Anurbanagglomerationistheunificationofareasintoonephysical,economic,
social,andculturalentity.Urbanagglomeration(UA)isaspecializedgeospatial
organizationofaseriesofcitiesformedwhenthecitycrossesahighlydevelopedstage
[31].Anurbanagglomerationconsistsoflargeurbangroupsinthesenseofthe
developmentcenterzoneofacitythatisconnectedtothesurroundingcitieswhichalso
develop.Thatis,thespatialstructureofurbanagglomerationnotonlyreflectsthe
interactionsandrelationshipsbetweencitiesbutalsoshowsthestagesofurban
development[32,33].Thus,urbanagglomerationisbasicallyaimedatintegratingurban
resources,adjustingindustrialstructures,narrowingthegapbetweenurbanandrural
areas,improvingurbanfunctions,strengtheningurbancompetitiveness,andpromoting
sustainableregionaldevelopmentstrategies[34].Theurbanagglomerationpolicyis
formulatedasaresponsetovariousgrowthpolesaccordingtothedevelopingindustrial
agglomerationstages[35].Thatis,urbanresiliencehasbecomearequirementforthe
sustainabledevelopmentofmoderncitiesandurbanagglomerations[36].Furthermore,
thespatialdynamicsandthetendencyofurbanagglomerationsthatdevelopinsuburban
areastowardstheintegrationofurbansystemshaveanimpactonland‐usechanges,
movementofthetransportationsystem,andadecreaseinenvironmentalquality[37,38].
UrbansprawlinthesuburbsofMakassarCityinrelationtopopulationmobility
illustratesthatsupportfortheavailabilityoftransportationfacilitiesintermsof
transportationservicesisidentifiedasinadequateintermsofsafety,comfort,and
timelinessofgettingtothedestination.Furthermore,thechoiceofpeoplelivinginthe
suburbanareabasedontheoriginanddestinationofthemovementismoredominant
usingprivatetransportation.Thisconditionhasanimpactonincreasingtrafficvolume
andcongestiononthemainroadcorridorleadingtothecity.Thus,urbantransportation
policiesaremoredominantinthedirectionofincreasingthecapacityofroadbodiesand
theconstructionofringroadstoreducetrafficcongestion,buttheyarelesseffectivein
solvinglong‐termtransportationproblems[39].Anotherfactorthatalsocontributestothe
urbansprawlinthesuburbsofMakassarCityistheweakcontroloverspaceutilization
duetotheineffectiveimplementationofurbanspatialplanning.Thus,highpopulation
growth,urbansprawl,andcontrolofspaceutilizationinsuburbanareasarechallenges
thatrequiresolutionstoaddresstheintegrationofurbansystems,effectiveuseofspace,
andsustainabledevelopment[40,41].
TheaccelerationandexpansionofMakassarCitytothesuburbsduetourbanization
haveanimpactonchangesinland‐usetypologyofsuburbanareas,spatialstructure,and
spatialpatterns.Theexpansionofurbanareastosuburbanareascauseschangesinspatial
useandincreasesinsocio‐economicactivitiestowardsurbanspatialintegration.[42,43].
Furthermore,thedivisionofMakassarCityintosuburbanareasismarkedbyanincrease
inurbanactivities,including(1)housingandsettlementscoveringanareaof1889.74
hectare;(2)tradeandservicescoveringanareaof25.67hectare;(3)industrycoveringan
areaof401.9hectare,and(4)educationandhealthfacilitiescoveringanareaof24.36
hectare.Weakcontroloverspatialuseandmismatchbetweenthestipulatedspatialplans
andthenumberofpermitsissuedbythegovernmentforhousingandsettlement
developmenthaveresultedintheconversionofproductiveagriculturalland,land
reclamation,andenvironmentaldegradation.Inaddition,urbanactivitiesthattendto
increaseandthetendencyofthecommunitytousevacantlandforhousingneedsaswell
astheconstructionofnewsettlementscarriedoutbydevelopers,arefactorsthattrigger
urbansprawl.Spatialintegrationcoupledwithurbanagglomerationtowards
industrializationhasanimpactonthecomplexityofspatialuseinsuburbanareas.
Industrialagglomerationisaneconomicphenomenonandhasasignificanteffectonland‐
useefficiency[44].Furthermore,urbansprawlandurbanagglomerationinthesuburbsof
MakassarCitycontributetoenvironmentaldegradation,spatialsegregation,and
differentiationofcommunityactivities.Thus,theexpansionoftheurbanareatowardsthe
suburbanareacausesbuildingdensity,unevenpopulationdistribution,andadecreasein
environmentalquality[45,46].
Land2021,10,5564of33
ResearchresultsthatsupportthisstudyincluderesearchconductedbyMorollónand
Yserte[47],thisstudyfoundthaturbansprawlhasanimpactonenvironmentaldamage,
unsustainablemobility,regionalfiscalsolvency,qualityoflife,andthehealthoftheurban
population.InastudyconductedbyAlJarahetal.[48],theresultsofthisstudyfoundthat
rapidurbanizationhasanimpactondecreasingenvironmentalquality,urbanspatialpat‐
terns,andineffectiveimplementationofurbandevelopmentduetospaceallocationthat
isnotinaccordancewiththepredeterminedmasterplan.InresearchconductedbyFeng
etal.[49],itwasfoundthaturbansprawlandindustrialagglomerationhaveanimpact
onenvironmentalqualitydegradation,changesinindustrialstructure,andtechnological
innovation.Thethreeresultsofthesestudiesareatameetingpointbyemphasizingthat
theurbansprawlcontributestothedeclineinenvironmentalquality,regionalfiscalsol‐
vency,qualityoflife,populationhealth,andurbanspatialdynamics.Thus,urbanspawl
andurbanagglomerationcoupledwithchangesinland‐useandanincreaseinthetrans‐
portationmovementsysteminthesuburbsofMakassarCityareveryimportantandstra‐
tegicmatterstoberesolvedimmediatelythroughdevelopmentpoliciesfromthegovern‐
menttowardstheintegrationoftheurbansystem.Thus,thefocusofthisstudyisaimed
atansweringresearchquestions,namely:(1)Howdoland‐usechangesandurbansprawl
workasdeterminantsofenvironmentalqualitydegradationinsuburbanareas?(2)How
dourbansprawl,urbanagglomeration,land‐usechange,urbanactivitysystem,andtrans‐
portationsystemaffectthedegradationofenvironmentalqualityinsuburbanareas?
2.ConceptualFramework
Theincreaseindevelopmentactivitiesinthesuburbanareaisindicatedbythecon‐
versionofproductiveagriculturallandtoresidentialdevelopmentandsocio‐economic
activities.Knoxetal.[50]formulatesurbanizationasaprocessofspatialandeconomic
changecausedbyhumanfactorsandtheirimpactonnaturalresourceswhichresultsin
economic,social,andphysicalconditionsaswellasproblemsthatmustbefacedinthe
formulationofurbandevelopmentpolicies.Thefastertherateofeconomicgrowth,the
fasterthetrendofpopulationurbanizationanditsimpactontheprevalenceofpoverty
andurbaninequality[51].Thus,urbanizationasaprocessofformingcitiesandcommu‐
nitieswillhaveanimpactoninequalityandsocio‐economicdisparities.Increasedurban
activityandtransportationhaveadirectimpactonecosystemconditions[52].Urbanspa‐
tialdynamicscontributedirectlytochangesinland‐usepatterns,urbanecology,morphol‐
ogy,andthesustainabilityofurbandiversity[53].
2.1.UrbanSprawlandUrbanAgglomeration
Theexpansionoftheareaduetourbanizationhasanimpactontheconversionof
land‐usefunctionsandthesuburbanizationofthesuburbanareasinrelationtothedevel‐
opmentofnewareasforvariousurbanactivities.Furthermore,land‐useconversioncan‐
notbeseparatedfromthecitydevelopmentpolicysetbythegovernmentduetothede‐
mandsofdevelopmentneeds.Furthermore,urbanexpansiontowardssuburbanareas
contributestoeconomicgrowth,andpopulationgrowthaswellastheimpactonenviron‐
mentalqualitydegradation[54].Thatis,urbanexpansioniscloselyrelatedtotheprepa‐
rationofdevelopmentzonesandneweconomicactivitiesinsuburbanareas[55,56].
Thatis,thecharacteristicsofland‐usechangeduetourbanspatialexpansionarevery
differentforeachurbanareaandarehighlydependentonspatialphysicalconditionsand
landavailability[57].Theseeightfactorsleadtochangesinspatialstructureandspatial
patternsinthedirectionofchangesinpopulationmobilityandspatialuseinthesuburban
areaswhicharenotassessedonthebasis,ofagriculturallandproductivitybutareas‐
sessedbasedonthefunctionofdevelopingspace[58].Thus,spatialexpansiontowards
suburbanareascontributestochangesinspatialstructure,spatialpatterns,andurbanag‐
glomeration[29].Thedistributionflowofgoodsandservices,labormigration,andin‐
creasedeconomicproductivitycausesocialmobilityverticallyandhorizontally[59].
Land2021,10,5565of33
2.2.TransportationSystemConnectivity
Theconnectivityofthecorecitytransportationsystemtothehinterlandareaisatrig‐
geringfactorforurbansprawlandurbanagglomeration.Urbansprawlhasasignificantly
negativeimpactonenvironmentalefficiency,butwiththecontinualimprovementofindus‐
trialagglomeration,thenegativeeffectsofurbansprawlwillbepartiallyoffset[60].The
increaseintrafficvolumeonthemaincityroadshasanimpactoncongestionandthetrav‐
elingtimetothedestinationareabecomesinefficientandtravelcostsbecomequitehigh[61].
Theeconomiccostandenvironmentalimpactoftrafficjamsinlargemetropolitanareasare
enormous[62].Transportationsystemconnectivityduetospatialexpansioniscloselyre‐
latedtourbansprawlandurbanagglomerationthatdevelopsinsuburbanareas.Over‐ag‐
glomerationinaregion,mainlytriggeredbypoorplanningandmismanagementofre‐
sourceallocation,mayalsobecomeabarrierforsustainabledevelopment[63].
2.3.SustainableDevelopmentoftheSuburbs
Theexpansionofthecorecityareatothesuburbshasanimpactontheintegrationof
theurbansystemanditseffectsonthesocio‐economicconditionsofthecommunity.Asa
result,thepeoplewhooriginallyoccupiedthelandoftenlosetheirlandasthemainsource
oflivelihoodforthecommunity[64].Indevelopingcountries,inparticular,citieshave
experiencedrapidgrowthintransport‐relatedchallenges,includingpollution,conges‐
tion,accidents,publictransportdecline,environmentaldegradation,climatechange,en‐
ergydepletion,visualintrusion,andlackofaccessibilityfortheurbanpoor[65].Urban
sustainabilityhasbecomeasignificantchallengegloballyduetorapidlygrowingurbani‐
zationandindustrialization[66].Sustainabilityisoftenconceivedofasanattempttobal‐
ancecompetingeconomic,environmental,andsocialpriorities[67].Furthermore,byinte‐
gratingfunctions,variousecologicalandsocio‐economicservicescanbeprovidedsimulta‐
neouslyandsynergiescanbedevelopedthatenablegreateroverallperformanceandmore
sustainabledevelopment[68].TheconceptualframeworkofthisstudyispresentedinFig‐
ure1below.
Figure1.Conceptualframeworkofurbanspawlandland‐usechangeinMakassarCity.Source:Authorelaborator.
Land2021,10,5566of33
3.MaterialandMethod
3.1.ResearchDesign
Thisstudyisdirectedatunderstandingthaturbansprawl,land‐usechange,andur‐
banagglomerationandtheirimpactonenvironmentalqualitydegradationinsuburban
areas.Thisstudyusesacombinationofquantitative‐qualitativeapproachessequentially.
Thecasestudieswereselectedinthisstudywiththefollowingconsiderations:First,the
complexityofspatialuseandenvironmentaldegradationarequiteprominentproblems
inthedynamicsofsuburbandevelopment.Second,theurbansprawlcasehasanimpact
onthesustainabilityoftheurbansystemofMakassarCity.Third,thecontextofthecase
ofland‐usechangeontheoutskirtsofMakassarCityisquitecomplex.Thesethreethings
areverystrategicproblemsinthegrowthanddevelopmentofbigandmetropolitancities.
Thismeansthatthespatialexpansionofprimarycitiesinthemetropolitanurbansystem
contributestochangesinland‐use,urbansprawl,andurbanagglomerationtowardsur‐
banspatialintegrationandaffectsthesustainabilityofthecity.Inaccordancewiththe
chosenapproach,namelycasestudies,thistypeofresearchisacombinationofquantita‐
tive‐qualitativeapproaches[69].
3.2.StudyArea
MakassarCityisthecorecityintheMamminasataMetropolitanurbansystem.This
determinationisbasedonthefollowingconsiderations:(1)thegatewaytothedevelop‐
mentofEasternIndonesia,inrelationtothedistributionofgoodsandservices,aswellas
transportationservicenodes;(2)thedevelopmentofMakassarCityhasadirectimpacton
environmentalconditions,thetransportationsystemandthesocio‐economicconditions
ofthecommunity;(3)Urbanexpansioncontributestochangesinland‐use.Spatialdistri‐
butionplaysanimportantroleasaninstrumentforcontrollingtheuseofurbanspace[70].
ThecurrentpopulationofMakassarCityis1,526,677peoplewithanaveragegrowthof
2.9%peryear[71].Thisfigureishigherthanthenationalpopulationgrowthaverageof
1.4%.Urbansprawl,land‐usechange,andurbanagglomerationareformedduetothe
supportofthemainroadcorridorsandtheconnectivityoftheMetropolitanMaminasata
urbantransportationnetworksystem.Theroadcorridorsinclude(1)PerintisKe‐
merdekaanCorridorwitharoadlengthof11.93km;(2)HertasningCorridorwitharoad
lengthof3.76km,and(3)MetroTanjungBungaCorridorwitharoadlengthof4.7km.In
addition,urbansprawlisalsotriggeredbytheexistenceofcommercialactivitycenters
andlarge‐scaleresidentialareasthatarepredominantlydevelopinginthesuburbanarea.
ThegeographiclocationoftheMakassarCityareabasedonthedistrictandthepopulation
ofMakassarCityispresentedinTable1below.
Table1.TotalpopulationofMakassarCityandthelocationdistancetothecitycenter.
NumberDistrictVillageArea(Hectare)TotalPopulation
(Person)
DistancetoCityCen‐
ter(Kilometers)
1Makassar1326
,
53685,5152–5
2Mariso928,18960,4992–5
3Tamalate10241
,
359205,5412–5
4Panakukang10156
,
765149,6645–10
5Tallo1496
,
153140,3302–5
6Bontoala8173857,1972–5
7UjungTanah813,63129,0542–5
8SangkarrangIslands3968814,53110–20
9Mamajang925,08761,4522–5
10Rappocini9109
,
628170,1215–10
11UjungPandang728
,
45919,0542–5
12Wajo820,47231,4532–5
Land2021,10,5567of33
13Manggala62
,
291
,
46149,4872–5
14Biringkanaya73,678,17220,4565–10
15Tamalanrea63
,
857
,
08115,8435–10
Source:BPSMakassarCity[71].
Table1theareaofMakassarCitywhichconsistsof15districtsand127villages.Fur‐
thermore,thedevelopmentofMakassarCityshowsthatthedistributionofthepopulation
tendstobeunevenandispredominantlyconcentratedinthesuburbanareas,namely(i)
BiringkanayaDistrictwithasmanyas220,456people,(ii)149,664peopleinPanakkukang
District,and149,487people,andinManggalaDistrictasmanyas149,487,(iii)Rappocini
District170,121people,PanakkukangDistrict149,664people,andTalloDistrict140,330
people.Thedistrictareaiscategorizedasatransitionzoneandazoneforthesuburban
areaofMakassarCity.ThestudylocationsarepresentedinFigure2below.
Figure2.MakassarCityasastudylocation.
3.3.MethodofCollectingData
Inthisstudy,thedevelopmentofsuburbanareasisassociatedwithchangesinland‐
use,urbansprawl,andurbanagglomeration.Thedatainthisstudyusesanominalscale
toclassifyobjects,individuals,orgroupsforcategorizationneeds.Measurementsusinga
nominalscalearecarriedoutbygivingnumberstotheobjectunderstudy.Furthermore,
thedatainthisstudyaremeasuredusingindicators:(1)dataonland‐usechangeismeas‐
uredbyindicators,namelyspatialusepatterns,spatialfunctions,andtheareaofbuilt‐up
areas.(2)Urbansprawldataismeasuredbyindicators,namelypopulationdensityand
buildingdensity.(3)Dataonurbanactivitiesismeasuredusingindicators,namelythe
distancetothecenteroftheactivity,thetypeofactivity,andthecharacteristicsofthe
activity.(4)Thetransportationsystemismeasuredbyindicatorsofpopulationmobility,
roadnetwork,androadfunctions.(5)Thedecreaseinenvironmentalqualityismeasured
byindicators,namelythesourceofpollution,thetypeofactivity,andthecarryingcapac‐
ityoftheenvironment.Thus,thedatacollectionmethodsinthisstudywereobtained
throughobservation,surveys,anddocumentationdata.Thedevelopmentpatternofur‐
banactivitiesinsuburbanareasisassessedbasedonthegroupingofactivities,namely(i)
Land2021,10,5568of33
housingandsettlement,(ii)tradeandservices,(iii)industry,and(iv)educationalactivi‐
ties.ThesefouractivitiesareurbanprimaryfunctionsthatdevelopinthesuburbsofMa‐
kassarCityandareadeterminingfactorforurbanagglomerationtowardsthespatialin‐
tegrationoftheMamminasataMetropolitanurbanarea.Agglomerationisrelatedtothe
spatialconcentrationofpopulationactivityandeconomicactivity[72].Furthermore,ag‐
glomerationisaformofpositiveexternalityinproductionwhichisoneofthefactors
causingitsurbangrowth[73].Thestagesofdatacollectionanddataanalysisinthestudy
arepresentedinFigure3below.
Figure3.Flowchartofthemethodology.Source:Authorelaborator.
Datagroupinginthisstudywascarriedoutbycomparingtheresultsoffieldobser‐
vations,surveys,documentation,andmappingresultsfromsatelliteimagerymaps.Thus,
thedatainthisstudyweredividedintotwomaincategories,namelyprimaryandsec‐
ondarydata.Land‐usechangedataisreviewedbasedonthedynamicsofthedevelop‐
mentofMakassarCityfortheperiod2006–2020whichisadjustedtotheresultsofobser‐
vationsmadeinthefield.Landusedataisthencarriedoutbyoverlappingmapsand
processedthroughageographicinformationsystem(GIS).Furthermore,theurbansprawl
inthisstudywasassessedbasedonindicatorsofpopulationdensity,buildingdensity,
accessibility,roadnetwork,distancetothecitycenter,andmixedland‐use,namelyhous‐
ing,workplaces,andsocio‐economicfacilities[74,75].Eachstudiedvariableisthenas‐
signeditsaveragevalueandstandarddeviationtodeterminethesizeofthesprawland
itsimpact.Themeasurementofurbanagglomerationinthisstudyisgroupedintothree
Land2021,10,5569of33
categories,namely(i)agglomerationinthecitycenter,(ii)agglomerationinthetransition
zone,and(iii)agglomerationinthesuburbanzone.Urbanagglomerationhasanimpact
onincreasingthemovementofruralpopulationstowardsurbanareas[76,77].
Datacollectioninthisstudywascarriedoutthroughobservation,surveys,anddoc‐
umentation.Researchersplayaroleasthemaininstrumentincollectingdataorinfor‐
mationthroughobservationanddocumentation[78,79].Furthermore,themainsurvey
instrumentisaquestionnaireobtainedfromrespondents.Thus,thetwoinstrumentsin
thisstudyaretriangulating.Thismeansthatthedatainthisstudywereobtainedthrough
observation,questionnaires,anddocumentation.Datacollectionmethodsanddata
sourcesinthisstudyarepresentedinTable2below.
Table2.Summaryofresearchdataanddatacollectionmethods.
NumberResearchQuestionResearchVar‐
iableIndicatorDataSourceDataCollectionInstru‐
ments
1
Howdoland‐use
changesandurban
sprawlworkasdeter‐
minantsofenviron‐
mentalqualitydegra‐
dationinsuburban
areas.
Land‐Use
Change
Land‐usechangeismeas‐
uredbyindicators:spatial
function,built‐upland
area,andland‐usepat‐
terns.
Observation,sur‐
vey,anddocu‐
mentation.
Fieldnotes,basemapof
location,questionnaire,
andMapofMakassar
Cityland‐usedata
(2006–2020)
UrbanSprawl
Urbansprawlismeasured
byindicators:population
density,buildingdensity,
typology,built‐inlandarea
ratio,buildinggrouping,
andthedistanceofsettle‐
mentstothecitycenter.
Observation,sur‐
vey,anddocu‐
mentation.
Fieldnotes,question‐
naires,populationden‐
sitymap(2006–2020),
buildingdensitymap
(2006–2020),Makassar
citydevelopmentarea
map(2006–2020),new
areadevelopmentarea
mapofsuburbanareas
Environmen‐
talQualityDe‐
crease
Thedeclineinenviron‐
mentalqualityismeas‐
uredbythefollowingin‐
dicators:sourceofpollu‐
tion,levelofpollution,
andcarryingcapacityof
theenvironment.
Observation,and
survey.
Fieldnotes,question‐
naires,locationbase
maps,andcameras
2
Howdourban
sprawl,urbanag‐
glomeration,land‐use
change,urbanactivity
system,andtranspor‐
tationsystemaffect
theenvironmental
qualitydegradationi
n
suburbanareas.
UrbanSprawl
Urbansprawlismeasured
byindicators:population
density,buildingdensity,
typology,built‐inland
arearatio,buildinggroup‐
ing,andthedistanceof
settlementstothecitycen‐
ter.
Observation,sur‐
vey,anddocu‐
mentation.
Fieldnotes,question‐
naires,populationden‐
sitymap(2006–2020),
buildingdensitymap
(2006–2020),Makassar
citydevelopmentarea
map(2006–2020),new
areadevelopmentarea
mapofsuburbanareas.
UrbanAg‐
glomeration
Urbanagglomerationis
measuredbyindicators:
housingandsettlement
grouping,tradeandser‐
vicegrouping,industrial
grouping,educationalac‐
tivitygrouping,urban
Observationand
survey.
Fieldnotes,question‐
naires,basemapsofcity
activitylocations,devel‐
opmentmapsofsubur‐
banareas,andspatial
zoningmaps.
Land2021,10,55610of33
growth,andurbanspatial
zoning.
Land‐use
change
Land‐usechangeismeas‐
uredbyindicators:spatial
function,built‐upland
area,andland‐usepat‐
terns.
Observation,sur‐
vey,anddocu‐
mentation.
Fieldnotes,basemapof
location,questionnaire,
andMapofMakassar
Cityland‐usedata
(2006–2020).
ActivitySys‐
tem
Thecityactivitysystemis
measuredbyindicators:
spatialfunction,builtarea,
movementsystem,andfa‐
cilitiesandinfrastructure.
Observationand
survey.
Fieldnotes,basemaps
oflocation,question‐
naires,andcameras.
Environmen‐
talQualityDe‐
crease
Thedeclineinenviron‐
mentalqualityismeas‐
uredbythefollowingin‐
dicators:sourceofpollu‐
tion,levelofpollution,
andcarryingcapacityof
theenvironment.
Observation,and
survey.
Fieldnotes,question‐
naires,locationbase
maps,andcameras.
3.3.1.Observation
Theobservationsinthisstudywereusedtoobservethecharacteristicsoftheurban
sprawl,changesinland‐use,urbanagglomeration,andmobilityofthepopulationinthe
suburbsofMakassarCity.Theinstrumentsusedintheobservationwerebasemapsand
fieldnotes.Observationswereusedtotracethedata:(1)urbansprawlthatdevelopedin
thesuburbanarea;(2)changesinland‐usebasedondevelopmentactivitiescarriedoutby
thecommunityanddevelopersduringacertainperiodoftime;(3)thegroupingofurban
activities,namelyhousingandsettlements,tradeandservices,industry,offices,andedu‐
cation,(4)thesystemofsocio‐economicactivitiesthatdevelopinthesuburbanareas;(5)
mobilityofthepopulationfromthesuburbanareatothecenter,and(6)urbanactivities
thatdevelopandtheirimpactonthedeclineinthequalityofsuburbanareas.Further‐
more,observationsinthisstudyarealsousedindataretrieval,including(a)thepattern
ofhousingdevelopmentactivitiescarriedoutbythecommunityanddevelopers;(b)trans‐
portationfacilitiesusedbythecommunityinmobility,and(c)newdevelopmentareas
developedbythegovernment.Thedataobtainedthroughobservationisusedbyre‐
searcherstodescribechangesinland‐useanddevelopingurbanagglomerations.Theaim
istodescribetheurbansprawlandland‐usechangesthataredevelopingontheoutskirts
ofMakassarCity.
3.3.2.Questionnaire
Theuseofquestionnairesinthisstudyisusedfortwofunctions:(1)description,
whichdescribesthesocio‐economiccharacteristicsofcommunitieslocatedinruralareas;
and(2)measurement,namelytheassignmentofvaluestoeachvariableandindicator
used.Thequestionnaireinthisstudyusedastructuredandunstructuredlistofquestions
thathadbeenpreparedpreviously.Furthermore,thequestionnairewasusedintracing
thedata:(1)developmentpatternscarriedoutbythecommunityanddevelopers;(2)
changesinland‐useinsuburbanareas;(4)urbanactivitygrouping;(4)thesystemofurban
activitiesinrelationtothesocio‐economicactivitiesofthecommunity;(4)thetransporta‐
tionsystem(originanddestinationpatterns)basedonpopulationmobility,distanceto
thecitycenter,andthemeansoftransportationused,and(5)decreasingenvironmental
qualitybasedondevelopmentscarriedoutbythecommunityanddevelopers.Theresults
ofdatacollectionthroughquestionnairesarethenmeasuredusingintervalandratio
Land2021,10,55611of33
scales.Thequestionnairewasdistributedtodistrictsthatareincludedinthecategoryof
suburbsinMakassarCity.Thereasontheresearchersdeterminedthelocationwastocom‐
paresprawl,land‐usechange,urbanagglomeration,transportationsystem,population
mobility,andurbanactivitiesthataffectenvironmentaldegradation.
DatacollectionthroughquestionnaireswascarriedoutfromAugusttoOctober2020.
Furthermore,structuredinterviewsusingaquestionnaireconductedbyresearcherswere
carriedoutbyaskingquestionstorespondentsbasedonpredeterminedquestions.Filling
inthequestionnairewasnotsubmittedtotherespondentbutwasguidedbyresearchers
andenumerators.Theenumeratorswerechosenbasedonconsiderations,namely,those
whocancollectdata,areclosetoandunderstandthesocio‐culturalconditionsofthere‐
spondents.Beforecarryingouttheirdutiesinthefield,theenumeratorsweregivenin‐
structionsandexercisesinfillingoutthequestionnaireaswellastechniquesforconduct‐
inginterviewswithrespondents.Thecriteriaforactorswhofilloutthequestionnaire(re‐
spondents)are(i)localresidentslocatedinsuburbanareas,andimmigrantswhobuilda
shelterinsuburbanareas,(ii)peoplewhohavesocio‐economicactivitiesinsuburbanar‐
eas,(iii)developerswhocarryouthousingdevelopmentactivitiesinsuburbanareas,and
(iv)localgovernment.Furthermore,therespondentsinthisstudyweredeterminedusing
apurposivesamplingtechniquewhichtheresearcherdeterminedbasedoncertainchar‐
acteristics.WithdrawalofsamplesreferstoIsaacandMichael[80].Furthermore,thefor‐
mulationsusedindeterminingthesampleareasfollows.
s=λ2NPQ/d2(N‐1)+λ2PQ(1)
wheresisthenumberofsamples,Nisthenumber,ofpopulationλ2isChi‐Square,the
errorrateis1%,5%,and10%d=0.05P=Q=0.5.Thenumberofsamplesinthisstudy
wassetat400samples.Thenumberofsamples(respondents)inthisstudyispresentedin
Table3below.
Table3.Numberofrespondentsinthisstudy.
NumberDistrictTotalPopulation(Person)NumberofRespondents
1Makassar85,51510
2Mariso60,4996
3Tamalate205,54160
4Panakukang149,66445
5Tallo140,33046
6Bontoala57,1976
7UjungTanah29,0544
8SangkarrangIslands14,5312
9Mamajang61,4526
10Rappocini170,12160
11UjungPandang19,0543
12Wajo31,4534
13Manggala149,48745
14Biringkanaya220,45673
15Tamalanrea115,84330
Source:Author’selaboration.
3.3.3.Documentation
Thisstudyusesvariousdocumentsrelatingtothesituationandconditionsofthe
suburbsofMakassarCity.Thedocumentsreferredtoinclude(1)MakassarCitySpatial
PlanobtainedthroughtheMakassarCitySpatialPlanningService;(2)Populationdata
obtainedfromtheMakassarCityStatisticsOffice;(3)thesocio‐economicprofileofthe
Land2021,10,55612of33
communityisobtainedfromtheDistrictOffice,and(4)Plansfordevelopmentanddevel‐
opmentoftheoutskirtsofMakassarCityareobtainedthroughtheRegionalDevelopment
PlanningAgencyanddeveloperswhoarecarryingoutdevelopment.Thefourdocuments
areusedbyresearcherstosupportthedatafromobservationsandquestionnaires.
3.4.DataAnalysisMethod
Qualitativedataanalysiswascarriedoutduringdatacollectionandaftercompleting
datacollection.Theanalysisiscarriedoutinteractivelyandcontinuestocompletion.Thus,
qualitativedataanalysisinthisstudyisdividedintothreecategories,namelydatareduc‐
tion,datadisplay,andconclusion.Datareductioniscarriedoutwiththefollowingcon‐
siderations:(1)thedataobtainedinthefieldisquitealot,complexandcomplicated,so
thatdatareductionanddatagroupingmustbedoneimmediatelyforinterpretationneeds;
(2)selectingandsummarizingthemainthings,focusingontheimportantthings,themes
andpatterns,thenformulatingtheconclusions;(3)reduceddataareusedtoprovidea
clearpictureaccordingtothefocusofthestudy;(4)datareductionisdonebyproviding
codesoncertainaspectsaccordingtotheobjectivestobeachievedinthisstudy.
Thequantitativeanalysisinthisstudyisusedtoanswerresearchquestions,howare
theeffectsofurbansprawl,land‐usechange,urbanagglomeration,urbanactivitysys‐
tems,andthetransportationsystemonenvironmentaldegradationinthesuburbanarea.
Multipleregressionanalysisinthisstudyisusedtodeterminehowmuchinfluencethe
independentvariablehasonthedependentvariableandtopredictthevalueofthede‐
pendentvariablewhenalltheindependentvariableshaveknownvalues.Theurban
sprawlanalysisconsiderstheratioofhouseholdsinonevillagetototalhouseholdstoone
sub‐districtarea(A),theratioofthebuilt‐upareaofthedistricttothetotalbuilt‐uparea
(B).Furthermore,therelationshipbetweenthetworatiosinthesensethat,if(A)isreduced
(B)resultsinavalueof0thenitiscategorizedinnormalconditions,iftheresultispositive,
itindicatescompact,andifthevalueisnegative,itindicatesasprawl[81].
SprawlmeasurementforeachdistrictinMakassarCityusesseveralanalyticalap‐
proaches,including(1)populationdensityanalysis;(2)buildingdensityanalysis;(3)the
analysisofthedistancetothecitycenterusesanetworkanalysisapproach,theindicators
beingassessedaretheroadnetworkandthedistributionofbuildings;(4)development
analysis,inrelationtoroadnetworkcoverageanddistributionofnewbuildingsinthe
2020period,usingabufferingapproachwithadistanceof100m,asthebasisforassessing
thehighwaystripindex;(5)analysisoftheconstructionofirregularactivitypatterns,us‐
ingadistanceapproachofthelocationofnewhousingbuildingsthatarefragmentedand
locatedoutsidethecenteroftheoldresidentialbuildingtothecenterofactivity.Thedis‐
tancecalculationusestheroadnetworkanalysisapproachandtheresultsobtainedare
describedusingthedevelopmentindexapproachwithoutapattern;(6)sprawlcharacter‐
isticsareclassifiedintothreelevelsandusingscoringanalysis.Theresultswerethen
mappedforeachcategory,namelyhigh,medium,andlow;(7)urbansprawllevelanalysis
usesscoringanalysis,namely(i)score1showstheinfluenceofthevariableonthesprawl‐
inglevelwiththelowcategory,(ii)score2showsthevariableonthesprawlinglevelwith
themediumcategory,and(iii)score3showstheeffectofthevariableonthesprawlinthe
highcategory.Theresultsoftheassessmentthroughscoringarethenfollowedupfor
sprawlclassification.Theaimistodefinethreetypologycategoriesbasedontheclass
rangeresults.Theformulationsusedindeterminingtheurbansprawltypologycategory
areasfollows:
KP ∑P/LTKB ∑
IHS ∑JBUBJJ/∑JBU(2)
IHS TBU/∑JBURK NT NTR/∑K(3)
Explanationsrelatedtotheformulausedinclude(1)PopulationDensity(KP)iscal‐
culatedbasedontheratioofthetotalpopulation(people)totheareaofdistrictsanddis‐
tricts(hectares);(2)buildingdensity(KB)iscalculatedbasedontheratioofthenumber
Land2021,10,55613of33
ofbuildings(units)totheareaofbuiltland(hectares);(3)thehighwaylaneindex(IHS)is
calculatedbasedontheratioofthenumberofnewbuildingsinroadnetworksupport
(units)tothenumberofnewbuildings(units)fortheperiod2006,2010,2015and2020;(4)
thehighwaylaneindex(IHS)iscalculatedbasedontheratioofthetotalbuildingdistance
(meters)tothenumberofnewbuildings(units)fortheperiod2006,2010,2015and2020,
and(5)classdistance(RK)iscalculatedbasedonthehighestscoreminusthelowestscore
forthenumberofclasses(3).Theresultsoftheanalysisarethenexplaineddescriptively
qualitativelyandquantitatively.Totesttheeffectofurbansprawl(X1),land‐usechange
(X2),urbanagglomeration(X3),urbanactivitysystem(X4),transportationsystem(X5),en‐
vironmentalqualitydegradation(Y),basedonquestionnairedataobtainedinthefield.
Thedataisthenanalyzedusingmultipleregressionmethods.Theanalyticalformulations
usedareasfollows.
Y=b0+bX1+bX2+bX3+bnXn+ε (4)
r n∑Xy∑X∑y
n∑X∑X n∑y∑y(5)
y.12
R2y.12(6)
R2y.12 1 – JKG/n1 s2y(7)
whereYisthedependentvariable,b0istheregressionconstant,b1,b2theregressioncoef‐
ficient/influenceX1,X2,X3aretheindependentvariables,ε=0.Thecorrelationcoefficient
(r)isameasureofthelinearrelationshipoftheXandYvariables.Ther‐valuerangesfrom
(+1)to(−1).Thevalueofrthatis(+)isindicatedbythevalueofbthatis(+),andthevalue
ofrthatis(−)isindicatedbythevalueofbthatis(−).Ifthevalueofrapproaches+1orr
approaches−1,thenXandYhaveahighlinearcorrelation.Ifr=+1orr=−1,thenXand
Yhaveaperfectlinearcorrelation.Ifr=0,thenXandYdonothavealinearrelationship.
R2y.12isthecoefficientofdeterminationformultiplelinearregression,JKGisthesumof
squaresoferrors,ands2yisthesumofsquaresofy(corrected).
4.Result
4.1.DeterminantofUrbanSprawlandLandUseChange
TheexpansionoftheMakassarCityareatothesuburbshasanimpactonchangingthe
characteristicsoftransportationtowardsincreasingpopulationmobility.Thechangein
transportationcharacteristicsisduetotheincreasingneedfortransportationservicesforthe
communityinrelationtotheexistenceofdevelopingcentersofsocio‐economicactivities.
Furthermore,theeconomicactivitypatternofurbancenterresidentsandsuburbanresi‐
dentstogetherformatravelprofilethatisinfluencedbyexternalandinternalfactors.Exter‐
nalfactorsrelatetothemovementoftransportationfromthecitycenterandthemovement
oftransportationtotheurbanareaoftheMamminasataMetropolitanArea.Meanwhile,in‐
ternalfactorsareinfluencedbytheexistenceofnewhousingcomplexesandthemobilityof
thepopulationtowardsthecenterofsocio‐economicactivitiesandthemovementtowards
thecitycenter.Thetransportationsystemandpopulationmobilityinsuburbanareasare
closelyrelatedtothedynamicsofthedevelopmentofMakassarCity.Thespatialdevelop‐
mentofMakassarCityislinearandconcentricispresentedinFigure4below.
Land2021,10,55614of33
Figure4.ThedevelopmentofMakassarCityislinearandconcentric.
Figure4showsalinearandconcentricspatialdevelopmentpatterninthesuburbsof
MakassarCity.Thisconditionspecificallyoccursinthecenterofthesuburbsasaresult,
oftheaccumulationofsocio‐economicactivities,andthecenterpointismarkedbythe
existenceofashoppingcenter,followedbythedevelopmentofvariousothersocio‐eco‐
nomicactivities,andsupportedbytheexistenceofnewsettlementsthatarecohesive.
FieldfactsfoundtoillustratethateffortstocontrolthespatialphysicalformofMakassar
Cityinthetransitionzoneandthesuburbanzonearemucheasier,withtheconsideration
thatoutsidethebuilt‐upareaitisstillemptyland,sothatregulationsthatleadtothe
accelerationofthecityʹsspatialphysicaldevelopmentcanbeimplementedwithminimal
resistance.FieldfindingsshowthatnewdevelopmentareasinMakassarCityhavethe
potentialtoexperiencefloods,landerosioninriverbasins,andcoastalabrasion.Thetrig‐
geringfactorsarelandreclamation,land‐useforriveruseareas,anddamagetomangrove
foresthabitat.Landuseplanningisanactiontoeliminatedisasterriskandimproveenvi‐
ronmentalqualityforthebetter[82].ThechangeinspatialuseofMakassarCityispre‐
sentedinTable4below.
Land2021,10,55615of33
Table4.SpaceutilizationofMakassarCityfortheperiod2006–2020.
NumberTypeofActivitySpaceUtilization(Hectares)
Year2006–2010Percentage(%)Year2015–2020Percentage(%)
1Commercial7.340.04266,14315.14
2Education27.730.16182,8951.04
3Settlement786,18144.7310,589.3137.97
4Health5.210.03112,1490.64
5Offices5.770.03139,1550.79
6Sportsfacilities53.390.30621,6973.54
7Socialfacilities18.770.114,349,69324.75
8Ricefieldsandmixedgardens640,96336.47528,9453.01
Source:Authorelaborator,map(c)2019Google.
Table4showsthechangeintheuseofspaceinMakassarCitytowardsurbandiffer‐
entiationduetotheincreasingscaleofthemodernindustrialsocietyandthedevelopment
ofnewgrowthpoles.Threethingsthatunderliethisprocessoccur,amongothers:(1)the
distributionoftherangeandintensityoftherelationshipbetweenactivitiestowardsthe
changingcharacterofmodernsociety;(2)differentiationofspatialfunctionsandcommu‐
nityactivitypatterns,and(3)themorecomplexspatialorganization.Fieldfactsfound
showthatspatialphysicalchangesinMakassarCityhaveapositivecontributiontosocio‐
economicchangesatthemicro‐levelofsociety.Furthermore,ifitisbasedontheprocess
offormingspatialandsocialdiversityinrelationtothedevelopingsocio‐economicchar‐
acteristics,threesymptomsarefound,namely:(1)changesintheintensityofeconomic
activitytowardsthecreationofaneweconomicorder,whichrequirescertaintypesof
expertiseandskillstoaccessworkofaformalnature.Thisconditionillustratesthatedu‐
cationalbackgroundasanindexofsocialdifferentiationisanimportantfactor;(2)differ‐
entiationofnewfunctionswhichtendstocontinueduetoincreasedreachandservices
andtheirimpactonsocialandeconomicchoicesforthecommunity.Thisconditionallows
foranumber,ofalternativeactivitypatternsforthecommunity;(3)socialordermovesto‐
wardschangesinpopulationmobilityandpopulationcompositiontowardssocietaldiffer‐
entiation.Thedifferencesandassimilationofthecommunity,bothmigrantsandindigenous
people,aremovingtowardssocialandculturaltransformationasonesocialgroup[83].
Fieldfactsfoundtoillustratethattheintensityofland‐usechangeisinfluencedby
severalfactors,including(1)easeoflicensingissuedbythegovernmentanditsimpacton
landbuyingandselling.Thisconditionismarkedbyachangeinthestatusofcommunity
landownershiptodeveloperownership.Furthermore,changesinlandownershipstatus
arefollowedbytheconstructionoflarge‐scalehousingandsettlementsequippedwith
supportingfacilitiesandinfrastructure,whicharepredominantlyinhabitedbyimmi‐
grants;(2)landreclamation,thisconditionischaracterizedbydevelopmentcarriedout
bythedeveloperandtheintensityoflandcoverchangesinwatercatchmentareas,river
benefitareasandcoastalareas;(3)increasingurbanactivitydevelopmentactivitiesand
newhousingdevelopmentshaveanimpactondecreasingtheenvironmentalqualityof
thesuburbanareas.ThedegradationoftheenvironmentalqualityinthesuburbsofMa‐
kassarispresentedinFigure5below.
Land2021,10,55616of33
Figure5.DecreasingenvironmentalqualityinMakassarCity.Source:Primarydata.
Figure5showsthedeclineintheenvironmentalqualityofMakassarCitybasedon
developingurbanactivities.Threeinterpretationsthatcanbeproposedforthesecondi‐
tions,namely:(1)housingandsettlementdevelopment,landreclamation,andland‐use
changecontributedpositivelytoenvironmentaldegradationwitheachvalueof9.61%;(2)
buildingconstructionwithavalueof9.41%,householdwasteandtransportationsystems
withavalueof9.31%againstenvironmentaldegradation;(3)shoppingcentersanddo‐
mesticwastecontributedpositivelytoenvironmentaldegradationwithavalueof8.82%;
and(4)educationalactivitieswithavalueof8.33%,andhealthactivitieswithavalueof
7.84%againstadecreaseinenvironmentalquality.Urbanexpansionresultsinsocio‐eco‐
nomictransformationswithrelevantimplicationsforlandinsuburbanareas,leadingto
environmentalconcernsaboutlanddegradationandincreaseddesertificationriskineco‐
logicallyfragiledistricts[84].Thisconditionischaracterizedbythegroupingofpeople
basedoneconomiccapacity,segregation,andgentrificationinsuburbanareas.Thecom‐
parisonofurbansprawlinMakassarCityispresentedinFigure6below.
Figure6.ComparisonoftheurbansprawlofMakassarCity:(A)2006,(B)2009,(C)2016,and(D)
2020.
Land2021,10,55617of33
Figure6showstheurbansprawlinthedynamicsofthedevelopmentofMakassar
City.Interpretationsthatcanbeproposedregardingurbansprawlinclude(1)totheeast,
markedbychangesinland‐usetowardsland‐useforhousingandsettlements,industry,
andshoppingcenters;(2)tothenorth,markedbyconversionofproductiveagricultural
landcoveringanareaof5880.68hectares;(3)tothesouth,itismarkedbycoastalreclama‐
tionforthedevelopmentofeconomicactivitiescoveringanareaof159.24hectares.The
developingurbansprawlhasanimpactonchangesinlandcover,typology,andmorphol‐
ogy,increasedpopulationmobility,populationdensity,andtrafficcongestiononthe
maincityroadcorridors.ChangesinthespatialpatternofMakassarCityduetothesprawl
anditsassociatedimpactsaremarkedbytheunevendistributionoffacilitiesandthedis‐
tributionofsettlementsintheurbanarea.Thisconditionhasanimpactontheaccumula‐
tionofvariousactivitiesincertainareas,scarcityofinfrastructure,anddisparityofsocio‐
economicservicesinthesuburbanareas.Thefactsonthegroundthatwerefoundshow
thattheexistenceofnewsettlementsbuiltbydevelopershasapositivecontributiontothe
differentiationofjobsandpeople’slifestyles.
ThefactorsthattriggersprawlinthesuburbsofMakassarCityincludes(1)lower
landpricesandhighlandpurchasetransactions,whichdevelopersusetobuildlarge‐scale
settlementsandcommercialareas;(2)Supportforinfrastructuredevelopmentdeveloped
bythegovernment,namelyroadinfrastructure,airportsandotherinfrastructure;(3)in‐
creasingcommunityincome,markedbytheabilityofthecommunitytopaylandtaxand
mobilityforwork,business,andsocialactivities;(4)consistencyintheimplementationof
theMakassarCityplanningplan,inrelationtocontrollingspatialuse;(5)thetaxrateis
quitelowwhencomparedtothetaxrateatthecitycenter;(6)highpopulationgrowthdue
tourbanizationandmigration;(7)residentialoptionsforhigh‐incomegroupstobuilda
shelterinsuburbanareas.Thesesevenfactorsmakeapositivecontributiontothesubur‐
banizationofthesuburbanareastowardsincreasingpopulationdensity.Increasedindus‐
trialactivityinlinewithhousingdevelopmentnotonlyhasanimpactonincreasingpop‐
ulationbutalsocontributestothedeteriorationoftheenvironmentalqualityofsuburban
areas[14].
Theever‐increasingpopulationinthesuburbanareaispositivelyassociatedwitha
reductioninagriculturallandandanincreaseinbuildingdensity.Thisconditionillus‐
tratesthattheexpansionofthespatiallayoutofMakassarCitytotheoutskirtsofthecity
hasanimpactonchangingthelivelihoodsoflocalcommunitiesfrombeingagrarianto
industrialcities.Furthermore,theorientationoflocalcommunityactivitiesisdominant
duetochangesinenvironmentalconditions,namelylaborers,masons,andconstruction
workers,includingurbaninformalactivities(mobiletradersandfoodstalls)andasmall
proportionofthemstillworkinagriculturalactivitiesbutarenotdominant.Metropoliza‐
tionisthecauseoftheeconomictransformation,spatialuse,andsocialcultureofsociety
[85].
ThepopulationdensityofMakassarCity(seeFigureA1).Theresultsofthepopula‐
tiondensityanalysisshowthat:(1)Thehigh‐densitycategoryislocatedintheTalloDis‐
trict,BontoalaDistrict,MakassarDistrict,Mariso,andMamajangDistrictwithpopulation
densityfiguresof24,070–33,935people/hectare;(2)Thecategoryofmediumdensityis
locatedinWajoDistrictandRappociniDistrictwithanumberof15,806–18,431peo‐
ple/hectare;(3)Thelow‐densitycategoryislocatedintheUjungPandangDistrict,Ta‐
malateDistrict,PanakkukangDistrict,TamalanreaDistrict,ManggalaDistrict,Biringka‐
nayaDistrict,andSangkarrangIslandswithafigureof3638–11,047people/hectare.Inter‐
pretationsthatcanbeproposedarerelatedtothepopulationdensityofMakassarCity,
namely:(a)districtareaswithhigh‐densitycategoriesshowafairly,lowurbansprawl;(b)
districtswithalowpopulationdensitycategoryshowahighlevelofurbansprawl.These
resultsconfirmthaturbansprawltendstodevelopindistrictswithlowdensityinrelation
totheavailablelandarea.Thus,landareaandlowlandvaluearefactorsthattriggerthe
communityanddevelopersfornewhousingfacilitiesanddeveloptowardslarge‐scale
settlementsinthesuburbanareas.Theroleofgovernmentisveryimportanttomaintain
Land2021,10,55618of33
environmentalbalanceandensuretherightsoffuturegenerationstothenaturalenviron‐
ment[86].
Theresultsofthefieldconfirmationshowthattheroleofthegovernmentalsocon‐
tributestothesprawlinthesuburbanareas.Thisconditionismarkedbythenumberof
buildingpermitsissuedandlocationpermitsgrantedtodevelopers.Thus,theurban
sprawltrendinthesuburbsofMakassarCityisinfluencedbythreemainfactors,namely
(i)theuseofvacantlandfortheconstructionofhousingfacilitiesbythecommunity,(ii)
theconstructionofnewhousingbydevelopers,and(iii)governmentpoliciesingranting
locationpermits.andbuildingpermits.Fieldfactsfoundindicatethatthedevelopment
mechanismsandproceduresinthesuburbsofMakassarCityhavenotyetreferredtothe
predeterminedspatialplan.Thedevelopmentoflarge‐scalesettlementsaffectsthetypology
andmorphologyofthesuburbanareatowardstheformationofthebuiltenvironment[87].
ThedensityofbuildingsinMakassarCity(seeFigureA2).Interpretationsthatcanbe
proposedfortheseresults:(1)in2005thebuildingdensitylevelwas30.47%,thenin2019,
thebuildingdensitywas60.24%.Thisfigureshowsthatfor15yearsthebuildingdensity
inMakassarCityhasincreasedby29.77%.(2)Buildingdensityisdifferentiatedbasedon
fourmainclassifications,namely(i)buildingdensityatthecitycenterof91.22%,(ii)the
easternareaofMakassarCitycoveringfivesub‐districtswithabuildingdensityof63%,
(iii)theareatheNorthcoversfourdistrictswithabuildingdensityof76.91%,(iv)the
Southincludesthreedistrictswithabuildingdensityof80.3%.Inaddition,therelatively
lowbuildingdensityindicatesirregulardevelopment.Fieldfactsthathavebeenfound
illustratethatthemassiveincreaseinbuildingdensityislocated,intheEastandSouth
regions.Furthermore,thedistrictsdetectedwithafairly,lowlevelofbuildingdensityare
located,intheTamalanreaDistrict,TamalateDistrict,ManggalaDistrict,andBiringka‐
nayaDistrict.Thefourdistrictsarecategorizedasexperiencingirregulardevelopmentsin
thedynamicsofthedevelopmentofMakassarCityfortheperiod2006–2020.Thespatial
expansionofMakassarCitytothesuburbsareahasapositivecorrelationwithchangesin
thelivesoflocalcommunities.Thisconditionismarked,socialrelationsbetweencommu‐
nitiesarestartingtodeclineandonlytakeplaceinsmallgroups.Fieldfactsthatwere
foundindicatetheexistenceoflocalcommunitysettlementsthattendtobeclusteredin
certainlocationsandcomeinto,contactwithnewhousinglocationsinhabitedbymigrant
residents.Thus,urbansprawlhasapositivecontributiontochangesintypologyandmor‐
phologyofthesuburbanarea[88].
Furthermore,basedonthefactorofconsideration,thedistancetotheCentralBusi‐
nessDistrict(CBD)locationisdeterminedbasedontheaccumulationofspatialfunctions
bothintheoldcityareaandonnewdevelopmentsinMakassarCity.TheseCBDsinclude
(i)CBDoftheoldcity,(ii)CBDofPanakkukangMas,(iii)CBDDaya,and(iv)CBDofthe
MetroTanjungBungaarea.Indicationsfordistrictareasthatexperiencesprawlthrough
bufferingaresetwitharadiusofreachasfaras5–10km.Fieldfactsthatarefoundillus‐
trate:(1)83.20%ofthesub‐districtsinMakassarCityarewithinaradiusoffivekilometers
and(2)16.80%oftheareasareinaradiusoftenkilometers.Thus,thefartheradistrictis
totheCBDlocation,thehigherthesprawlrateandthecloserthedistrictistotheCBD
location,therelativelylowurbansprawlrateandhighlydependentondevelopingresi‐
dentialclusters.Thelevelofincomeofthecommunityinfluencesthedecisiontochoose
thelocationofresidenceandtheshapeofthecityiscloselyrelatedtothepopulationdis‐
tribution[89].
ThetypologyandcomparisonofthedistancebetweenthedistrictstotheCBDloca‐
tion(seeFigureA3).Threethingscanbeexplainedinrelationtothis,amongothers:(1)
25.42%ofdistrictswhicharefivekilometersfromtheoldcitycenter;(2)39.89%ofdistricts
thathaveadistance,offivekilometerstotheCBDlocationofPanakkukangMas;(3)
37.09%ofdistrictareasthathaveadistance,offivekilometerstoCBDDaya,and(iv)
18.58%ofdistrictsthathaveadistanceoffivekilometerstotheCBDoftheMetroTanjung
Bungaarea.InthecontextofurbansprawlinMakassarCity,slumsettlementsarefound
Land2021,10,55619of33
adjacenttotheCBDlocation.Thelocationoftheseslumsettlementsismarkedbytheex‐
istenceoftheurbanpoor,characterizedbyspatialsegregationandadeclineinenviron‐
mentalquality.Slumsettlementsthatdeveloparecloselyrelatedtopoorhealthcondi‐
tions,sourcesofpollution,sourcesofdiseasespread,anddeviantbehaviorthataffectpeo‐
ple’slives[90].
TheexpansionoftheMakassarCityareashowsthat29.77%ofthedistrictexperiences
urbansprawlwithtypologicaldiversity.Typologyofurbansprawlisdividedintothree
maincategories,namely:(1)Typology1coverseightsub‐districtsor15.32%ofthetotal
areaofMakassarCity;(2)Typology2coverstwodistrictareasor13.01%ofthetotalarea
ofMakassarCity,and(3)Typology3coversfourdistrictsor71.65%ofthetotalareaof
MakassarCity.Theseresultsconfirmthatduringtheperiodof15yearsurbansprawlin‐
creasedsignificantlyandthisincreaseoccurredbetweentheperiod2010–2020.Thefield
factsfoundshowthaturbansprawliscategorizedashighinrelationtoseveralthings,
namely(i)theaccelerationofdevelopmentinMakassarCitytowardssuburbanareasare
followedbydevelopmentpoliciesthatprovideeasylicensingfordeveloperstobuildnew
housing,(ii)conversionofproductiveagriculturallandduetoweakcontroloverspatial
use,(iii)massiveland‐useconversioninthesuburbanarea,and(iv)landvaluewhichis
quitelowandtheproductivityofagriculturallandtendstodecline,causinghighland
transactionsbetweenlocalpeopleandhousingdevelopers.Governmentpoliciesrelated
toland‐usewillrequireecologicalandenvironmentalconservationactionstowardssus‐
tainableeconomicandsocialdevelopment[91].Furthermore,theprocessofexpanding
theurbanareatowardstheoutskirtsofMakassarCityisdividedintothreecategories,
namely:(1)Theconcentricdistributionischaracterizedbyequaldistributionofactivity
throughouttheexistingurbanareasandthistypeiscategorizedastheslowspread.(2)
Thelongitudinalspreadischaracterizedbytheurbanstretchthatdevelopsalongtheex‐
istingroadnetwork.Thismeansthatthetransportationnetworkplaysanimportantrole
intheprocess.(3)Thespreadofhoppingischaracterizedbyaseparatebuildingpattern
fromthemaincityandCBD.
TwocategoriesofurbansprawlthathavedevelopedinthesuburbsofMakassarCity
are:(1)in2006thetrendofurbansprawlwasstilllimitedtotheborderareabetweenthe
corezoneandthetransitionzone;(2)In2010–2020,thespatialexpansionofMakassarCity
tendstoexpandtowardstheMamminasataMetropolitanurbanareawhichisdeveloping
rapidlybothlinearlyfollowingthemainroadcorridorsanddevelopingconcentrically(p‐
value0.01andz‐zero2.44).Thisconditiondevelopsapartfromtheresultofafairly,low
landvalue,anothersupportingfactoristheintegrationoftheMamminasaMetropolitan
urbansystem.Furthermore,differentconditionsintheperiod2006–2010tendedtode‐
velopconcentricallywithap‐valueof0.01andaz‐zeroof2.51.Thisconditionisinfluenced
bythepreferenceforlivinginthesuburbs.Asummaryoftheurbansprawltypologyof
MakassarCityisinTable5below.
Table5.ComparisonofurbansprawltypologyinMakassarCityin2006,2010,and2020.
ParameterQuantificationTypology
PopulationDensityYear2006Year2010Year2020
High24.000–34.000111,2
Moderate13.000–24.0001,21,22
Low0–13.0001,2,31,2,31,2,3
Buildingdensity
High79–100111
Moderate59–79‐22
Low0–591,2,32,33
Distancetocitycenter(CBD)
Far7001–12.0002,333
Moderate3.000–7.0001,21,2,31,2,3
Land2021,10,55620of33
Near0–3.000111
Developmentwithinroadnetworkcoverage
Affordable0.9–1.001,21,21
QuiteAffordable0.8–0.91,2,31,2,31,2
Unreachable0.7–0.8333
Thepatternofdevelopmentisirregular
High1.200–1.900‐33
Moderate600–1.20031,31,2
Low200–6001,21,21
Source:Analysisresults.
Table5showsthedifferencesintheurbansprawltypologyofMakassarCity.Inter‐
pretationsthatcanbesubmittedregardingtheseresults,namely:(1)in2006thesprawl
tendencyofMakassarCitywasdominantindevelopingtransitionalareasandnewdevel‐
opmentareas,namelyinTamalanreaandManggalaDistricts;(2)the2010periodtheten‐
dencyofsprawltoshowdominantlytowardsthetransitionareaandsub‐urbanMakassar
City;and(3)In2020thedominanturbansprawlmovedtothesuburbs,namelyinthe
areasofPanakkukangDistricts,BiringkanayaDistricts,andTamalateDistricts.
4.2.UrbanAgglomerationandTransportationSystems
ThepositionofMakassarCityasacorecityintheMamminatasaMetropolitanurban
system.Threefactorsdetermineurbanunification,amongothers:(1)easeofproduction
processesandtradeflowsthatcauseabuilt‐insystemenvironment;(2)MakassarCity
providesvarioussocio‐economicfacilitiesaswellasavarietyofgoodsandservicesso
thatitbecomesanattractivefactorforthemobilityofthesurroundingurbanpopulation,
and(3)theavailabilityofpublicfacilitiesinMakassarCity,whichismoredominantwhen
comparedtothesurroundingcities,causesthedemandforgoodsandservicesinitsterri‐
torialareastobequitehigh.Furthermore,therelationshipbetweenpopulationdensity
distributionandpublicservicefacilitieshasadirectrelationshipwiththelayoutofpublic
facilities[92].AgglomerationinthedevelopmentdynamicsofMakassarCityischaracter‐
izedbythegroupingofseveraldominantsocio‐economicactivitiesthatdevelopinthe
suburbswhicharelocateddirectlyadjacenttotheMamminasataMetropolitanurbanarea.
Fieldfactsfoundshowthatalongthedevelopingroadcorridorsaremarkedbythe
presenceofshoppingcenters,serviceservices,offices,industry,healthfacilities,andnew
settlementsdevelopedbythedeveloper.TheexistenceoftheMakassarCityroadcorridor
hasanimpactonurbanagglomerationtowardstheunificationoftheMamminasataMet‐
ropolitanurbanarea.Thus,duringthe2006–2020period,theaccelerationofdevelopment
andeconomicgrowthofMakassarCityexperiencedasignificantincreaseandhadanim‐
pactonlabormobilityinitshinterlandareas.Theimpactofspatialexpansiononenviron‐
mentaldegradationwillrequirealongprocessinrelationtothesocialandeconomiccon‐
ditionsofthecommunity[93].Thecomparisonofurbanagglomerationsbasedonthespa‐
tialzoningofMakassarCityispresentedinTable6below.
Land2021,10,55621of33
Table6.ComparisonofurbanagglomerationsbasedonspatialzonesinMakassarCity.
UrbanAgglomeration
CityCenterArea(CBD)TransitionZoneFringeZone
LandArea
(ha)
%ofCBD
Area
LandArea
(ha)
%ofTransi‐
tionZone
Area
LandArea
(ha)
%toAreaofSubur‐
banZone
Settlement510.3465.294252.4530.751889.748.90
Offices5.770.740.040.000.000.00
Education5.630.72152.901.1124.360.11
Trading101.9213.04180.531.3125.670.12
Industry0.000.00219.801.59401.901.89
HotelsandTouristFacilities32.444.15117.400.8521.260.10
Source:Authorelaborator,Map©2021Google.
Table6showsthecomparisonofurbanagglomerationsbasedonthespatialzoning
ofMakassarCity.Threeinterpretationscanbeputforwardregardingthisprocess.First,
theagglomerationthatdevelopedintheoldcitycenter(CBD)wascharacterizedbythe
groupingofshoppingcenters,bankingservices,offices,andtouristfacilities.Thisurban
activityistheembryoofthegrowthofMakassarCitywhichcausestheflowoftranspor‐
tationtothecitycentertobequitehigh.Second,theagglomerationthatdevelopsinthe
transitionzoneismarkedbytheconversionofresidentialbuildingstocommercialactivi‐
ties.Thiszoneischaracterizedbyagroupingofresidentialapartmentbuildings,multi‐
functionalshoppingcenters,offices,warehouses,andhealthservicecenters.Third,the
suburbanzoneisanewdevelopmentarea.Thiszoneischaracterizedbytheconversion
ofproductiveagriculturallandswhicharepredominantlydevelopedintolarge‐scaleres‐
identialareas.Settlementdevelopmentutilizesalargeareaoflandwhichisconnectedto
thecity’smainroadnetworksystem.Furthermore,thesuburbanzoneischaracterizedby
thegroupingofresidentialareas,commercialactivities,andofficesalongthemainroad
corridorsandintegratedwiththeMamminasataMetropolitanurbansystem.Thedevel‐
opmentofbigcitiesshowsasignificanttrendofsuburbanizationandisveryimportantto
considerintheformulationofurbanspatialplanning[94].Theinfluenceofurbansprawl,
land‐usechange,urbanagglomeration,urbanactivitysystem,andtransportationsystem
onenvironmentalqualitydegradationinthesuburbsofMakassarCityispresentedin
Table7below.
Table7.Summaryoftestresultsforthesignificanceofmultipleregressioncoefficients.
CorrelationCoefficientErrort‐Countt‐Table
β Sbi
UrbanSprawltoenvironmentaldegradation(ryx1)0.1910.0672.8721.84
Urbanagglomerationtoenvironmentaldegradation(ryx2)0.1380.0532.8541.84
Land‐usechangetoenvironmentalqualitydegradation(ryx3)0.4060.0974.1841.84
Cityactivitysystemtoenvironmentalqualitydegradation(ryx4)0.2010.0692.6891.84
Transportationsystemtoenvironmentaldegradation(ryx5)0.1320.0652.6521.84
SourcevariantSumofsquares
(JK)FreeDegrees(db)
Averageofthe
sumofthesquares
(RJK)
F‐countF‐table
α=0.05
Regression
Residue
32,504
1458
7
12
6.547
0.07686,1446.76
Total33,96219‐‐‐
RR2db1db2F‐countF‐table
0.9270.85971286,1446.76
Source:Analysisresults.
Land2021,10,55622of33
TheresultsofTable7thatcanbeexplainedinclude(1)urbansprawlhasapositive
correlationwithenvironmentaldegradation;(2)urbanagglomerationhasapositivecor‐
relationwithenvironmentaldegradation;(3)land‐usechangehasapositivecorrelationto
environmentalqualitydegradation;(4)thesystemofactivitieshasapositivecorrelation
toenvironmentalqualitydegradation,and(5)thetransportationsystemhasapositive
correlationtoenvironmentalqualitydegradation.Thus,itcanbeconcludedthaturban
sprawl,urbanagglomeration,changesinland‐use,urbanactivitysystems,andtranspor‐
tationsystemshaveasignificanteffectonenvironmentalqualitydegradationwithacoef‐
ficientofdeterminationoftheeffectof85.9%.Thus,itisnecessarytoevaluateenviron‐
mentalconditionsbytaking,intoaccountthesocio‐economicconditionsofthecommu‐
nityinsuburbanareas[95].
5.Discussion
5.1.UrbanSprawlandUrbanAgglomerationHandlingSolutions
Urbansprawl,changesinland‐use,andurbanagglomerationinthesuburbsofMa‐
kassarCityhavecontributedpositivelytoenvironmentaldegradation.Furthermore,the
conversionofland‐usefunctionsandtheconversionofproductiveagriculturallandsdue
toindustrialdevelopment,housing,trade,services,andeducation.Furthermore,theex‐
pansionofMakassarCitytowardstheoutskirtshasanimpactonincreasingpopulation
mobility,trafficvolume,andspatialsegregation.Thus,thesolutionsneededtohandle
urbansprawlinclude(1)consistencyinspatialplanningimplementationthroughtight‐
eningthegrantingoflocationpermitsanddistributionpatternsofurbanactivities;(2)
applicationofincentivesanddisincentivesfollowedbylawenforcementagainstviola‐
tionsofspatialplanning;(3)arrangementofperipheralareasthroughpopulationdensity
distribution,intensificationofeconomicandsocialactivities,towardssustainabledevel‐
opmentofsuburbanareas.Thesustainabilityofthehandlingisaimedatcreatingalivable
urbanfuture[96].Theimplementationofdevelopmentpoliciesanddevelopmentofsub‐
urbanareasiscarriedoutconsistentlythroughthefollowingefforts:(1)realizingsocial
justiceforallgroupsofsociety,especiallylow‐incomepeople;(2)conservingland‐use
througheffortstotightenpermitsforspatialusetosupportthesustainabilityofecosystem
functions;(3)synergizingpopulationdensitytowardsmeetingtheneedsofsocio‐eco‐
nomicactivities,intensifyingpublictransportation,andincreasingcommunitywelfareto‐
wardssustainabledevelopmentofsuburbanareasbyinvolvingtheroleofcommunity
participation.Sustainabledevelopmentandurbandevelopmentstrategiescanbe
achievedthroughthecooperationofallstakeholders[97].
Thesuccessfulhandlingofurbansprawlandurbanagglomerationinthesuburbsof
MakassarCitywillrequirevariousactions,including:(1)developingapublictransporta‐
tionsystemthatisaccessible,comfortable,safe,andeconomical;(2)developingnewset‐
tlementnodesbyapplyingamixedland‐usepatternthatisintegratedwiththeurbanac‐
tivitysystem;(3)integratingzoningforspatialusewhichisorientedtowardsenviron‐
mentalsustainability,and(4)distributionofurbanactivitiestoreduceservicedisparities
andanticipationofgentrificationandsegregationofsuburbanareas.Inorder,tosupport
theeffectivenessandefficiencyofspatialuseinsuburbanareas,thecompactcityconcept
aspartofthespatialplanforMakassarCityisveryimportanttoimplementtoanticipate
land‐usechangesthatarealignedwiththeapplicationofincentivesanddisincentives.The
applicationofthispolicyiscarriedoutbysimulatingappropriateprogramstominimize
thenegativeimpactscaused.Theroleofstrategicplanningisveryimportantaspartof
urbangovernancewhichrequirestheinvolvementofthecommunityandtheprivatesec‐
tortowardssustainabledevelopment[98].
5.2.SustainabilityoftheSuburbsofMakassarCity
ThesustainabilityoftheurbansystemofMakassarCityinrelationtothehandlingof
urbansprawl,land‐usechange,andfutureurbanagglomeration,isorientedtowardsfive
Land2021,10,55623of33
basicprinciples,namelyenvironmental,economic,social,andstrengtheninggovernment
capacityindecisionmaking.Severalthingsneedtobeconsideredintheformulationof
developmentpoliciesforthesuburbsofMakassarCity,amongothers:(1)buildingpublic
awarenessofeffortstosavetheenvironment;(2)buildingequalityinaccessingurbanspa‐
tialfunctionsbasedoneconomicjusticeprinciplestoreducedisparitiesinservicesbe‐
tweenurbanareas;(3)ecologicalsustainabilityisorientedtothearrangementofthesub‐
urbanareasbasedonnaturaldisastermitigationwhichissynchronizedwithglobalcli‐
matechange.
Sustainabledevelopmentinthecontextofthesuburbanareaisorientedtowardsfour
mainthingsaspartofeffortstocontrolspatialuse,amongothers:(1)equitabledistribu‐
tionandsocialjustice,inthiscasereducinginequalityinexcessiveuseofnaturalresources
througheffortstoequalizelanddistributionandfulfillment.urbanservicestandards;(2)
Respectfordiversity,inthiscaseinadditiontopreservingbiodiversity,itisalsonecessary
toanticipatetheemergenceofdiscriminationagainsturbanspaceaccesstowardscommu‐
nalharmonyandculturaldiversitytopreventsegregationinthesocio‐economicdynam‐
icsofsociety;(3)integrative,inthiscase,theimplementationofthedevelopmentofthe
suburbanareasguidedbythereciprocalrelationshipbetweenhumansandtheenviron‐
ment;and(4)long‐termperspective,inthiscase,spatialplanningwhichisorientedto‐
wardsoptimizingthemanagementandutilizationofnaturalresourcesthatcanbeused
inthelongtermandabletoaccommodatetheinterestsofthegeneralpublic.Spatialplan‐
ningobjectivesbecomethebasisfordecision‐makingrelatedtogovernment,privatesec‐
tor,andactionscommunitytaken[99].Spatialplanningusingacross‐sectoralapproach
aimstobalancespatialaspectsandlandrequirementstowardsenvironmental,social,and
economicsustainability[100].Theresultsoftheanalysisthathavebeencarriedoutillus‐
tratethatthedevelopmentorientationofthesuburbsofMakassarCityinrelationtourban
sprawlandurbanagglomerationwillrequiredevelopmentpolicysupportfromthegov‐
ernmentwhichisorientedtowardsthreemainpillarsinthesustainabilityofurbandevel‐
opment,namelyenvironmental,economic,andsocialaspartofthedirectionofdevelop‐
menttobeachieved,namelyequitabledevelopmentandimprovementofcommunity
welfarewhilemaintainingthebalanceoftheurbanenvironment.Thesustainabilityof
MakassarCitydevelopmentispresentedinFigure7below.
Land2021,10,55624of33
Figure7.SustainabledevelopmentofthesuburbsofMakassarCity.Source:Author’selaboration.
6.Conclusions
TheexpansionoftheMakassarCityareatothesuburbshasanimpactonland‐use
changesandthecharacteristicsofthetransportationsystemduetoincreasedsocio‐eco‐
nomicactivities.Urbansprawlinthespatialdynamicsofsuburbanareashasdifferent
characteristicsandishighlydependentonpopulationdensity,buildingdensity,spaceca‐
pacity,andenvironmentalcarryingcapacity.Theintensityofland‐usechangeinsubur‐
banareasisinfluencedbyseveralfactors,namelyeaseoflicensing,changesinlandown‐
ershipstatus,andsuburbanization.Theimpactofland‐usechangecontributestotheland‐
useofwatercatchmentareas,riveruseareas,andcoastalbenefitareasduetolandrecla‐
mationforhousingandsettlementdevelopmentneedsaswellasurbaninfrastructure.
Increaseddevelopmentactivitiesinsuburbanareashaveapositivecontributiontoriver
waterqualitypollution,airpollution,anddamagetonaturalvegetationtowardsenviron‐
mentaldegradation.Developmentactivitiesthatcontinuetoincrease,bothcarriedoutby
thecommunityanddevelopers,areaccompaniedbytheconstructionofaroadnetwork
system,inadditiontoencouragingincreasedpopulationmobilityandincreasedsocio‐
economicactivitiestowardstheintegrationoftheurbansystem,whichispositivelyasso‐
ciatedwithurbansprawlinsuburbanareas.Factorsthattriggersprawlinsuburbanareas,
namelylowlandprices,infrastructuredevelopmentdevelopedbythegovernment,in‐
creasedcommunityincome,inconsistenciesintheimplementationofspatialplans,low
taxrates,populationgrowth,andpreferenceforcommunitysettlements.Urbansprawl
tendstodevelopindistrictareaswithlowdensityinrelationtotheavailablelandarea.
Land2021,10,55625of33
Thus,theexpansionofurbanareastosuburbanareasispositivelyassociatedwithsocio‐
economicdisparitiesandslumsettlementstowardsspatialsegregationandadecreasein
environmentalquality.
UrbanagglomerationinthedynamicsofdevelopmentofMakassarCityhasanim‐
pactoneconomicgrowthandispositivelyassociatedwithchangesinland‐use,spatial
structure,spatialpatterns,typology,andmorphologyofsuburbanareastowardsenviron‐
mentaldegradation.Urbanagglomerationcoupledwithurbanspatialintegrationhasan
impactonagriculturallandconversion,changesinpeople’slifestyles,urbanization,mi‐
gration,suburbanization,andsocio‐economicdisparitiestowardsindustrializationof
suburbanareas.TheaccelerationofthedevelopmentofMakassarCityhasanimpacton
energymobilityandtheflowoftransportationtothecitycenterisquitehigh.Urbanag‐
glomerationbasedongrowingspatialzoninghasanimpactonthegroupingofhousing
andsettlements,commercialactivities,industry,educationalfacilities,andofficesthat
dominatetheareaonthemaincityroadcorridorstowardstheintegrationoftheurban
system.Thus,urbansprawl,urbanagglomeration,changesinland‐use,urbanactivity
systems,andtransportationsystemshaveasignificanteffectonthedeteriorationofthe
environmentalqualityofsuburbanareas.Todealwithurbansprawlandurbanagglom‐
erationthatdevelopsinsuburbanareas,itwillrequirethesupportofdevelopmentpoli‐
ciesfromthegovernmentwhichisimplementedconsistentlythroughthefollowingef‐
forts:(1)realizingsocialjusticeforalllevelsofsociety,(2)conservationoflandandwa‐
tershedresourcesthrougheffortstotightenspaceutilizationpermitstosupportthe
preservationofecosystemfunctions;(3)synergizingpopulationdensityandbuildingden‐
sitysupportedbythefulfillmentofsocio‐economicactivities;(4)preparationofadequate
publictransportationfacilities,and(5)increasingthewelfareofthecommunitytowards
sustainabledevelopmentbasedoncommunityparticipation.
ThesustainabilityoftheurbansystemofMakassarCityasasolutiontodealingwith
urbansprawl,land‐usechange,andurbanagglomerationinthefuture,isorientedtosev‐
eralbasicprinciples,namelyenvironmental,economic,social,andstrengtheninggovern‐
mentcapacityindecisionmaking.Severalthingsthatneedtobeconsideredintheformu‐
lationofdevelopmentpoliciesforthesuburbsofMakassarCity,amongothers:(1)build‐
ingpublicawarenessofeffortstosavetheenvironment;(2)buildingequalityinaccessing
urbanspatialfunctionsbasedontheprinciplesofeconomicjusticeandreducingdispari‐
tiesinservicesbetweenurbanareas;(3)ecologicalsustainabilityisorientedtothearrange‐
mentofthesuburbanareasbasedonnaturaldisastermitigationwhichissynchronized
withglobalclimatechange.Furthermore,theactionsneededindevelopingsuburbanar‐
eastowardssustainableurbandevelopmentinclude(a)landstewardshipwhichempha‐
sizestheimportanceofbuildingecologicalethicstomanageandpreserveecosystems;(b)
determiningthethresholdforspatialusebasedonthemanagementofthebuiltenviron‐
mentandanticipatingenvironmentalqualitydegradationthroughmonitoringandman‐
agementofwaste,airpollution,anddepletionofresourcesinasustainablemanner;(c)
interdependenceincludesnotonlyecologicalrelationshipsbetweenspeciesandnature
butalsoeconomicandculturalrelationshipsatthelocalandregionallevels;(d)economic
restructuringbymeansofexpandingemploymentopportunitiesforthecommunityin
synergywitheffortstopreservetheenvironment;(e)socialjusticeinmeetingpeopleʹs
needsfordecentwork,educationandhealthservices;(f)intergenerationalneedsthatem‐
phasizetheneedforthelongtermtoimprovepeopleʹswelfare.
SustainabledevelopmentinthesuburbsofMakassarCityinthefutureisoriented
towardsfourmainthingsaspartofeffortstocontrolspatialuse,including:(1)equitable
socialandeconomicfacilitiesbasedonsocialjusticetoreduceinequalityinexcessiveuse
ofnaturalresourcesandequitablelanddistributionfollowedbyfulfillmenturbanservice
standards;(2)respectfordiversity,inthiscaseinadditiontopreservingbiodiversity,itis
alsonecessarytoanticipatetheemergenceofdiscriminationagainsturbanspaceaccess
towardscommunityharmonyandculturaldiversitytopreventsegregationinthesocio‐
Land2021,10,55626of33
economicdynamicsofsociety;(3)integrative,inthiscasetheimplementationofthede‐
velopmentofthesuburbanareasguidedbythereciprocalrelationshipbetweenhumans
andtheenvironment,and(4)long‐termperspective,inthiscaseistoimplementspatial
planningthatisorientedtowardsoptimizingthemanagementandutilizationofnatural
resourceseffectivelyandefficientlyforthelongtermandabletoaccommodatetheinter‐
estsofthegeneralpublic.
AuthorContributions:B.S.,conceptualization;B.S.,H.H.,andA.S.,compilingtheresearch;S.S.
F.M.,andE.S.R.,establishingthestudy;B.S.,H.H.;S.S.,andF.M.,processingdata;A.S.,F.M.,and
E.S.R.,contributingtomaterials/methods/analysistools;B.S.,S.S.,andH.H.,analyzingdata;F.M.
andE.S.R.,contributingtodatachecking;B.S.,H.H.,S.S.;S.S.,F.M.,andE.S.R.,writingandrevising
concepts.Allauthorshavereadandagreedtothepublishedversionofthemanuscript.
Funding:ThisresearchisfundedbytheGovernmentthroughtheMinistryofEducationandCul‐
tureoftheRepublicofIndonesiaintheformofresearchanddevelopmentgrantassistanceforuni‐
versities.
InstitutionalReviewBoardStatement:ThisresearchwasconductedwiththeapprovaloftheInsti‐
tuteforResearchandCommunityService(LPPMBosowaMakassarUniversity)withContract
Number12/LPPM/VIII/2020dated12August2020.Furthermore,fundingforthisresearchisfunded
throughtheBosowaMakassarUniversityInstitutethroughresearchanddevelopmentandhasbeen
approvedbytheChairpersonoftheBosowaUniversityLPPM.
InformedConsentStatement:TheresultsofthisstudyhavereceivedapprovalfromtheInstitute
forResearchandCommunityServiceatBosowaUniversityMakassarasoutlinedintheapprovalof
theChairpersonofLPPMNumber72/LPPM/IX/2020.
DataAvailabilityStatement:WefullysupportopenscientificexchangethroughMDPIinsharing
andarchivingresearchdatafromthisstudy.Wefullycomplywiththeprovisionsthathavebeen
setbyreferringtotheestablishedjournalguidelines.
Acknowledgments:Wearegratefulfortheparticipationofstakeholdersincontributingideasand
ideastotheimplementationofthisstudy.ThankyoutotheMinistryofEducationandCultureof
theRepublicofIndonesiafortheirsupportandgrantaidforappliedresearchgrantsinsupporting
theresearchofthisstudy.
ConflictsofInterest:Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictofinterest.
Land2021,10,55627of33
AppendixA
FigureA1.PopulationdensityofMakassarCitybydistrict:(A)in2006,(B)in2010,(C)in2015,and(D)in2020.
Land2021,10,55628of33
FigureA2.ComparisonofbuildingdensityinMakassarCity:(A)2006,(B)2009,(C)2016,and(D)2020.
Land2021,10,55629of33
FigureA3.DifferencesindistancebetweendistrictstoCBDlocationsandsprawltypologyofMakassarCity.(A)Year
2010,(B)Year2015,(C)Year2020,and(D)DistancetoCBD.
Land2021,10,55630of33
References
1. Legates,R.;Hudalah,D.Peri‐urbanplanningfordevelopingEastAsia:LearningfromChengdu,Chinaand
Yogyakarta/Kartamantul,Indonesia.J.UrbanAff.2014,36(Supp.1),334–353,doi:10.1111/juaf.12106.
2. Wu,K.;Zhang,H.Landusedynamics,built‐uplandexpansionpatterns,anddrivingforcesanalysisofthefast‐growing
Hangzhoumetropolitanarea,easternChina(1978–2008).Appl.Geogr.2012,34,137–145,doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.11.006.
3. Jiang,Y.;Hou,L.;Shi,T.;Ning,Y.SpatialZoningStrategyofUrbanizationBasedonUrbanClimateCo‐Movement:ACase
StudyinShanghaiMainlandArea.Sustainability2018,10,2706,doi:10.3390/su10082706.
4. Surya,B.;Ahmad,D.N.A.;Sakti,H.H.;Sahban,H.LandUseChange,SpatialInteraction,andSustainableDevelopmentinthe
MetropolitanUrbanAreas,SouthSulawesiProvince,Indonesia.Land2020,9,95,doi:10.3390/land9030095.
5. Surya,B.;Ahmad,D.N.A.;Bahrun,R.S.;Saleh,H.Urbanfarmingasaslumsettlementsolution(studyonslumsettlementsin
TanjungMerdekaVillage,MakassarCity).IOPConf.SeriesEarthEnviron.Sci.2020,562,012006,doi:10.1088/1755‐
1315/562/1/012006.
6. Švajlenka,J.;Kozlovská,M.HousesBasedonWoodasanEcologicalandSustainableHousingAlternative‐CaseStudy.Sustain‐
ability2018,10,1502,doi:10.3390/su10051502.
7. Zhang,Y.;Song,R.;vanNes,R.;He,S.;Yin,W.IdentifyingUrbanStructureBasedonTransit‐OrientedDevelopment.Sustain‐
ability2019,11,7241,doi:10.3390/su11247241.
8. Anas,A.;Arnott,R.J.;Small,K.A.Urbanspatialstructure.J.Econ.Lit.1998,36,1426–1464.
9. Garcia‐López,M.À.;Muñiz,I.Urbanspatialstructure,agglomerationeconomies,andeconomicgrowthinBarcelona:Anintra‐
metropolitanperspective.Pap.Reg.Sci.2013,92,515–534,doi:10.1016/j.jue.2012.05.003.
10. Kloosterman,R.C.;Musterd,S.ThepolycentricUrbanregion:TowardsaresearchAgenda.UrbanStud.2001,38,623–633,
doi:10.1080/00420980120035259.
11. WorkBank.LajuUrbanisasidiIndonesia.2019.Availableonline:
https://www.google.com/search?q=Urbanisasi+di+Indonesia+(Work+Bank%2C+2019)&oq=Urbanisasi+di+Indonesia+(Work+B
ank%2C+2019)&aqs=chrome..69i57.18168j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF‐8(accessedon3March2020).
12. AsianDevelopmentBank.AnnualReport.2019.Availableonline:https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/institutional‐
document/650011/adb‐annual‐report‐2019.pdf(accessedon3December2020).
13. WordBank.KajianKebijakanPembangunan2014.Indonesia:MenghindariPerangkap.Availableonline:
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/132131468051887925/pdf/889290REVISED00y0review020140bahasa.pdf(accessed
on3March2020).
14. Handayani,W.;Chigbu,U.E.;Rudiarto,I.;Putri,I.H.S.UrbanizationandIncreasingFloodRiskintheNorthernCoastofCentral
Java—Indonesia:AnAssessmenttowardsBetterLandUsePolicyandFloodManagement.Land2020,9,343,
doi:10.3390/land9100343.
15. Egidi,G.;Cividino,S.;Vinci,S.;Sateriano,A.;Salvia,R.TowardsLocalFormsofSprawl:ABriefReflectiononMediterranean
Urbanization.Sustainability2020,12,582,doi:10.3390/su12020582.
16. Huang,D.;Tan,X.;Liu,T.;Chu,E.;Kong,F.EffectsofHierarchicalCityCentersontheIntensityandDirectionofUrbanLand
Expansion:ACaseStudyofBeijing.Land2020,9,312,doi:10.3390/land9090312.
17. KungLai,S.Effectsoflanduseplansonurbandevelopment:Apropertyrightsapproach.J.UrbanManag.2020,9,1–5,
doi:10.1016/j.jum.2019.12.002.
18. Kurda,K.P.;Vavrouchová,H.LandCoverChangeandLandscapeTransformations(2000–2018)intheRuralMunicipalitiesof
theUpperSilesia‐Zagł˛ebieMetropolis.Sustainability2020,12,9911,doi:10.3390/su12239911.
19. Surya,B.;Menne,F.;Sabhan,H.;Suriani,S.;Abubakar,H.;Idris,M.EconomicGrowth,IncreasingProductivityofSMEs,and
OpenInnovation.J.OpenInnov.Technol.Mark.Complex2021,7(1),20,doi:10.3390/joitmc7010020.
20. Ashik,F.R.;Mim,S.A.;Neema,M.N.Towardsverticalspatialequityofurbanfacilities:Anintegrationofspatialandaspatial
accessibility.J.UrbanManag.2020,9,77–92,doi:10.1016/j.jum.2019.11.004.
21. Assaf,C.;Adams,C.;Ferreira,F.F.;França,H.Landuseandcovermodelingasatoolforanalyzingnatureconservationpolicies
–AcasestudyofJuréia‐Itatins.LandUsePolicy2020100,104895,doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104895.
22. Carruthers,J.I.;Ulfarrson,G.F.UrbanSprawlandtheCostofPublicServices.Environ.Plan.BUrbanAnal.CitySci.2003,30,
503–522,doi:10.1068/b12847.
23. Zerhouny,M.;Fadil,A.;Hakdaoui,M.UndergroundSpaceUtilizationintheUrbanLand‐UsePlanningofCasablanca(Mo‐
rocco).Land2018,7,143,doi:10.3390/land7040143.
24. Wojewodzic,T.;Janus,J.;Dacko,M.;Pijanowski,J.;Taszakowski,J.Measuringtheeffectivenessoflandconsolidation:Aneco‐
nomicapproachbasedonselectedcasestudiesfromPoland.LandUsePolicy2021,100,104888,
doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104888.
25. Cheng,J.AnalysisofcommerciallandleasingofthedistrictgovernmentsofBeijinginChina.LandUsePolicy2021,100,104881,
doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104881.
26. Hlaváˇcek,P.;Kopáˇcek,M.;Horáˇcková,L.ImpactofSuburbanisationonSustainableDevelopmentofSettlementsinSuburban
Spaces:SmartandNewSolutions.Sustainability2019,11,7182,doi:10.3390/su11247182.
Land2021,10,xFORPEERREVIEW31of33
27. Surya,B.;Hadijah,H.;Suriani,S.;Baharuddin,B.;Fitriyah,A.T.;Menne,F.;Rasyidi,E.S.SpatialTransformationofaNewCity
in2006–2020:PerspectivesontheSpatialDynamics,EnvironmentalQualityDegradation,andSocio—EconomicSustainability
ofLocalCommunitiesinMakassarCity,Indonesia.Land2020,9,324,doi:10.3390/land9090324.
28. Zhang,Q.;Zhang,H.;Zhao,D.;Cheng,B.;Yu,C.;Yang,Y.DoesUrbanSprawlInhibitUrbanEco‐Efficiency?EmpiricalStudies
ofSuper‐EfficiencyandThresholdRegressionModels.Sustainability2019,11,5598,doi:10.3390/su11205598.
29. Alipbeki,O.;Alipbekova,C.;Sterenharz,A.;Toleubekova,Z.;Makenova,S.;Aliyev,M.;Mineyev,N.AnalysisofLand‐Use
ChangeinShortandyDistrictinTermsofSustainableDevelopment.Land2020,9,147,doi:10.3390/land9050147.
30. Vaidyanathan,V.;King,R.A.;deJong,M.UnderstandingurbantransportationinIndiaaspolycentricsystem.PolicySoc.2013,
32,175–185,doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.05.005.
31. Surya,B.;Hamsina,H.;Ridwan,R.;Baharuddin,B.;Menne,F.;Fitriyah,A.T.;Rasyidi,E.S.TheComplexityofSpaceUtilization
andEnvironmentalPollutionControlintheMainCorridorofMakassarCity,SouthSulawesi,Indonesia.Sustainability2020,12,
9244,doi:10.3390/su12219244.
32. Surya,B.TheDynamicsofSpatialStructureandSpatialPatternChangesattheFringeAreaofMakassarCity.Indones.J.Geogr.
2015,47,11–19:doi:10.22146/ijg.6926.
33. Tian,Y.MutualisticPatternofIntra‐UrbanAgglomeration,andImpactAnalysis:ACaseStudyof11UrbanAgglomerationsof
MainlandChina.ISPRSInt.J.Geo‐Inf.2020,9,565,doi:10.3390/ijgi9100565.
34. Surya,B.ChangePhenomenaofSpatialPhysicalintheDynamicsofDevelopmentinUrbanFringeArea.Indones.J.Geogr.2016,
48,118–134,doi:10.22146/ijg.17631.
35. Zhao,Y.;Zhang,G.;Zhao,H.SpatialNetworkStructuresofUrbanAgglomerationBasedontheImprovedGravityModel:A
CaseStudyinChina’sTwoUrbanAgglomerations.Complexity2021,6651444,doi:10.1155/2021/6651444.
36. Han,H.;Li,H.CouplingCoordinationEvaluationbetweenPopulationandLandUrbanizationinHa‐ChangUrbanAgglomer‐
ation.Sustainability2020,12,357,doi:10.3390/su12010357.
37. Shen,N.;Zhao,Y.;Wang,Q.DiversifiedAgglomeration,SpecializedAgglomeration,andEmissionReductionEffect—ANon‐
linearTestBasedonChineseCityData.Sustainability2018,10,2002,doi:10.3390/su10062002.
38. Ma,F.;Wang,Z.;Sun,Q.;Yuen,K.F.;Zhang,Y.;Xue,H.;Zhao,S.Spatial–TemporalEvolutionofUrbanResilienceandIts
InfluencingFactors:EvidencefromtheGuanzhongPlainUrbanAgglomeration.Sustainability2020,12,2593,
doi:10.3390/su12072593.
39. Surya,B.;Saleh,H.;Suriani,S.;Sakti,H.H.;Hadijah,H.;Idris,M.EnvironmentalPollutionControlandSustainabilityManage‐
mentofSlumSettlementsinMakassarCity,SouthSulawesi,Indonesia.Land2020,9,279,doi:10.3390/land9090279.
40. Yao,Z.;Ye,K.;Xiao,L.;Wang,X.RadiationEffectofUrbanAgglomeration’sTransportationNetwork:EvidencefromChengdu–
ChongqingUrbanAgglomeration,China.Land2021,10,520,doi:10.3390/land10050520.
41. Nugmanova,A.;Arndt,W.H.;Hossain,M.A.;Kim,J.R.EffectivenessofRingRoadsinReducingTrafficCongestioninCitiesfor
LongRun:BigAlmatyRingRoadCaseStudy.Sustainability2019,11,4973,doi:10.3390/su11184973.
42. Surya,B.;Syafri,S.;Sahban,H.;Sakti,H.H.NaturalResourceConservationBasedonCommunityEconomicEmpowerment:
PerspectivesonWatershedManagementandSlumSettlementsinMakassarCity,SouthSulawesi,Indonesia.Land2020,9,104,
doi:10.3390/land9040104.
43. Forsyth,A.;Peiser,R.Lessonsfromplannedresettlementandnewtownexperiencesforavoidingclimatesprawl.Landsc.Urban
Plan.2021,205,103957,doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103957.
44. Han,W.;Zhang,Y.;Cai,J.;Ma,E.DoesUrbanIndustrialAgglomerationLeadtotheImprovementofLandUseEfficiencyin
China?AnEmpiricalStudyfromaSpatialPerspective.Sustainability2019,11,986,doi:10.3390/su11040986.
45. Ahrens,A.;Lyons,S.ChangesinLandCoverandUrbanSprawlinIrelandFromaComparativePerspectiveOver1990–2012.
Land2019,8,16,doi:10.3390/land8010016.
46. Guyot,M.;Araldi,A.;Fusco,G.;Thomas,I.TheurbanformofBrusselsfromthestreetperspective:Theroleofvegetationinthe
definitionoftheurbanfabric.Landsc.UrbanPlan.2021,205,103947,doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103947.
47. Morollón,F.R.;Yserte,R.G.RecentLiteratureaboutUrbanSprawl:ARenewedRelevanceofthePhenomenonfromthePer‐
spectiveofEnvironmentalSustainability.Sustainability2020,12,6551,doi:10.3390/su12166551.
48. AlJarah,S.H.;Zhou,B.;Abdullah,R.J.;Lu,Y.;Yu,W.UrbanizationandUrbanSprawlIssuesinCityStructure:ACaseofthe
SulaymaniahIraqiKurdistanRegion.Sustainability2019,11,485,doi:10.3390/su11020485.
49. Feng,D.;Li,J.;Li,X.;Zhang,Z.TheEffectsofUrbanSprawlandIndustrialAgglomerationonEnvironmentalEfficiency:Evi‐
dencefromtheBeijing–Tianjin–HebeiUrbanAgglomeration.Sustainability2019,11,3042,doi:10.3390/su11113042.
50. Knox,P.;McCarthy,L.M.Urbanization:AnIntroductiontoUrbanGeography,3rded.;PearsonEduc.Ltd.:Harlow,UK,2014;
pp.1–142.Availableonline:https://files.pearsoned.de/inf/ext/9781292047935(accessedon23November2020).
51. TheASEANSecretariat.AseanSustainableUrbanisationStrategy.AssociationofSoutheastAsianNations(ASEAN)2018.
Availableonline:https://asean.org/storage/2018/11/ASEAN‐Sustainable‐Urbanisation‐Strategy‐ASUS.pdf.(accessedon5May
2020).
52. Izakoviˇcová,Z.;Mederly,P.;Petroviˇc,F.Long‐TermLandUseChangesDrivenbyUrbanisationandTheirEnvironmental
Effects(ExampleofTrnavaCity,Slovakia).Sustainability2017,9,1553,doi:10.3390/su9091553.
53. Rousta,I.;Sarif,M.O.;Gupta,R.D.;Olafsson,H.;Ranagalage,M.;Murayama,Y.;Zhang,H.;Mushore,T.D.Spatiotemporal
AnalysisofLandUse/LandCoverandItsEffectsonSurfaceUrbanHeatIslandUsingLandsatData:ACaseStudyofMetropol‐
itanCityTehran(1988–2018).Sustainability2018,10,4433,doi:10.3390/su10124433.
Land2021,10,xFORPEERREVIEW32of33
54. Zhang,Y.;Xie,H.InteractiveRelationshipamongUrbanExpansion,EconomicDevelopment,andPopulationGrowthsincethe
ReformandOpeningupinChina:AnAnalysisBasedonaVectorErrorCorrectionModel.Land2019,8,153,
doi:10.3390/land8100153.
55. Surya,B.SpatialArticulation,andCoexistenceofModeofProductionintheDynamicsofDevelopmentatTheUrbanFringeof
MakassarCity.J.Eng.Appl.Sci.2015,10,214–222,doi:10.36478/jeasci.2015.214.222.
56. Barton,J.R.;Ramírez,M.I.TheRoleofPlanningPoliciesinPromotingUrbanSprawlinIntermediateCities:Evidencefrom
Chile.Sustainability2019,11,7165,doi:10.3390/su11247165.
57. Gao,J.;Wei,Y.D.;Chen,W.;Yenneti,K.UrbanLandExpansionandStructuralChangeintheYangtzeRiverDelta,China.
Sustainability2015,7,10281–10307,doi:10.3390/su70810281.
58. Surya,B.InequilityofSpaceReproductionControlandUrbanSlumAreaManagementSustainability(CaseStudy:SlumArea
ofBuloaUrbanVillageinMakassarCity).J.Eng.Appl.Sci.2018,13,6033–6042,doi:10.36478/jeasci.2018.6033.6042.
59. Surya,B.;Saleh,H.;Remmang,H.EconomicGentrificationandSocio‐CulturalTransformationMetropolitanSuburbanofMam‐
minasata.J.Eng.Appl.Sci.2018,13,6072–6084,doi:10.3923/jeasci.2018.6072.6084.
60. Jiang,S.;Ferreira,J.;Gonzalez,M.C.Discoveringurbanspatial‐temporalstructurefromhumanactivitypatterns.InProceedings
oftheACMSIGKDDInternationalWorkshoponUrbanComputing,Beijing,China,12August2012;pp.95–102,
doi:10.1145/2346496.2346512.
61. Hernita,H.;Surya,B.;Perwira,I.;Abubakar,H.;Idris,M.EconomicBusinessSustainabilityandStrengtheningHumanResource
CapacityBasedonIncreasingtheProductivityofSmallandMediumEnterprises(SMEs)inMakassarCity,Indonesia.
Sustainability2021,13(6),3177,doi:10.3390/su13063177
62. Surya,B.OptimizationofFunctionandRoleofTraditionalMarketsinUrbanDevelopmentSystemofKetapangCity:acase
study:RangeSentapMarket,DeltaPawanSubdistrict,Ketapangcity’.WorldAppl.Sci.J.2015,33,1457–1471,
doi:10.5829/idosi.wasj.2015.33.09.156111.
63. Surya,B.;Saleh,H.Transformationofmetropolitansuburbanarea(astudyonnewtowndevelopmentinMoncongloe‐Patta‐
lassangMetropolitanMaminasata).IOPConf.Ser.EarthEnviron.Sci.2018,202,012027,doi:10.1088/1755‐1315/202/1/012027.
64. Pratomo,R.A.;Samsura,D.A.A.;vanderKrabben,E.TransformationofLocalPeople’sPropertyRightsInducedbyNewTown
Development(CaseStudiesinPeri‐UrbanAreasinIndonesia).Land2020,9,236,doi:10.3390/land9070236.
65. Wang,Z.;Zhao,J.;Lin,S.;Liu,Y.IdentificationofIndustrialLandParcels,andItsImplicationsforEnvironmentalRiskMan‐
agementintheBeijing–Tianjin–HebeiUrbanAgglomeration.Sustainability2020,12,174,doi:10.3390/su12010174.
66. Surya,B.SocialChange,SpatialArticulationintheDynamicsofBoomtownConstructionandDevelopment(CaseSatudyof
MetroTanjungBungaBoomtown,Makassar).Mod.Appl.Sci.2014,8,238–245,doi:10.5539/mas.v8n4p238.
67. Mangi,M.Y.;Yue,Z.;Kalwar,S.;Lashari,Z.A.ComparativeAnalysisofUrbanDevelopmentTrendsofBeijingandKarachi
MetropolitanAreas.Sustainability2020,12,451,doi:10.3390/su12020451.
68. Boyer,R.H.W.;Peterson,N.D.;Arora,P.;Caldwell,K.FiveApproachestoSocialSustainabilityandanIntegratedWayForward.
Sustainability2016,8,878,doi:10.3390/su8090878.
69. Denzin,N.K.;danLincoln,Y.S.(eds.).HandbookofQualitativeResearch.TerjemahanDariyatnodkk.Jogjakarta:PustakaPela‐
jar.2009.ISBN:978‐602‐84.Availableonline:https://openlibrary.telkomuniversity.ac.id/pustaka/9769/handbook‐of‐qualitative‐
research.html(accessedon20April2020).
70. Huang,D.;Liu,Z.;Zhao,X.MonocentricorPolycentric?TheUrbanSpatialStructureofEmploymentinBeijing.Sustainability
2015,7,11632–11656,doi:10.3390/su70911632.
71. BPSMakassarCity.KotaMakassarDalamAngka.2019.Availableonline:https://makassarkota.bps.go.id/publica‐
tion/2019/08/16/4ca03301b8e2b8414e33f6a3/kota‐makassar‐dalam‐angka‐2019.html(accessedon13February2020).
72. Malmberg,A.;Maskell,P.TowardsandExplanationofIndustryAgglomerationandRegionalSpezialitation.EuropeanPlanning
Studies,1997,5,25–41,doi:10.1080/09654319708720382.
73. Bhatta,B.;Saraswati,S.;Bandyopadhyay,D.“UrbanSprawlMeasurementFromRemoteSensingData”.AppliedGeography,
2010,30,731–740,doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.02.002.
74. Viljoen,C.;Lowies,B.;Lushington,K.;McGreal,S.Femaleperspectivesonhousingqualityandhouseholdcharacteristics,per‐
ceptionsandchallenges:EvidencefromAustralia.HabitatInt.2020,105,102276,doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102276.
75. Schneider,C.;Achilles,B.;Merbitz,H.UrbanityandUrbanization:AnInterdisciplinaryReviewCombiningCulturalandPhys‐
icalApproaches.Land2014,3,105–130,doi:doi:10.3390/land3010105.
76. Monteiro,F.F.;Gonçalves,W.A.;Andrade,L.M.B.;Villavicencio,L.M.M.;Silva,C.M.S.AssessmentofUrbanHeatIslandsin
BrazilbasedonMODISremotesensingdata.UrbanClim.2021,35,100726,doi:10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100726.
77. Surya,B.;Saleh,H.;Hamsina,H.;Idris,M.;Ahmad,D.N.A.RuralAgribusiness‐basedAgropolitanAreaDevelopmentand
EnvironmentalManagementSustainability:RegionalEconomicGrowthPerspectives.Int.J.EnergyEcon.Policy2021,1,142–157,
doi:10.32479/ijeep.10184.
78. Creswell,J.W.ResearchDesignPendekatanMetodeKualitatif,Kuantitatif,danCampuran;PustakaPelajar:Jakarta,Indonesia,2016.
ISBN:9786022295846.
79. Sugiyono.MetodePenelitianKuantitatif,KualitatifdanR&D.Bandung:PTAlfabet.2016.ISBN:978‐602‐289‐533‐6.Available
online:http://cvalfabeta.com/product/metode‐penelitian‐kuantitatif‐kualitatif‐dan‐rd‐mpkk/(accessedon5May2020).
80. Isaac,S.;Michael,W.B.HandbookinResearchandEvaluation;EDITSPublishers:SanDiego,CA,USA,1981;Volume234,
doi:10.1002/1520‐6807(198207)19:3<413::AID‐PITS2310190328>3.0.CO;2‐X.
Land2021,10,xFORPEERREVIEW33of33
81. Zandi,R.;Zanganeh,M.;Akbari,E.Zoningandspatialanalysisofpovertyinurbanareas(CaseStudy:SabzevarCity‐Iran).J.
UrbanManag.2019,8,342–354,doi:10.1016/j.jum.2019.09.002.
82. Das,M.;Das,A.DynamicsofUrbanizationanditsimpactonUrbanEcosystemServices(UESs):Astudyofamediumsizetown
ofWestBengal,EasternIndia.J.UrbanManag.2019,8,420–434,doi:10.1016/j.jum.2019.03.002.
83. Surya,B.;Muhibuddin,A.;Suriani,S.;Rasyidi,E.S.;Baharuddin,B.;Fitriyah,A.T.;Abubakar,H.EconomicEvaluation,Useof
RenewableEnergy,andSustainableUrbanDevelopmentMamminasataMetropolitan,Indonesia.Sustainability2021,13,1165,
doi:10.3390/su13031165.
84. Syafri,S.;Surya,B.;Ridwan,R.;Bahri,S.;Rasyidi,E.S.;Sudarman,S.WaterQualityPollutionControlandWatershedManage‐
mentBasedonCommunityParticipationinMarosCity,SouthSulawesi,Indonesia.Sustainability2020,12,10260,
doi:10.3390/su122410260.
85. Brueckner,J.K.;Thisse,J.F.;Zenou,Y.WhyiscentralParisrichanddowntownDetroitpoor?Eur.Econ.Rev.1999,43,91–107,
doi:10.1016/S0014‐292100019‐1.
86. Hwang,U.;Woo,M.AnalysisofInter‐RelationshipsbetweenUrbanDeclineandUrbanSprawlinCity‐RegionsofSouthKorea.
Sustainability2020,12,1656,doi:10.3390/su12041656.
87. Surya,B.;Syafri,S.;Hadijah,H.;Baharuddin,B.;Fitriyah,A.T.;Sakti,H.H.ManagementofSlum‐BasedUrbanFarmingand
EconomicEmpowermentoftheCommunityofMakassarCity,SouthSulawesi,Indonesia.Sustainability2020,12,7324,
doi:10.3390/su12187324.
88. Surya,B.;Suriani,S.;Menne,F.;Abubakar,H.;Idris,M.;Rasyidi,E.S.;Remmang,H.CommunityEmpowermentandUtilization
ofRenewableEnergy:EntrepreneurialPerspectiveforCommunityResilienceBasedonSustainableManagementofSlumSet‐
tlementsinMakassarCity,Indonesia.Sustainability2021,13,3178,doi:10.3390/su13063178.
89. Yuan,F.;Wei,Y.D.;Wu,J.W.AmenityeffectsofurbanfacilitiesonhousingpricesinChina:Accessibility,scarcity,andurban
spaces.Cities2020,96,102433,doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.102433.
90. Wang,Y.;Liu,K.EvolutionofUrbanSocio‐SpatialStructureinModernTimesinXi’an,China.Sustainability2017,9,1935,
doi:10.3390/su9111935.
91. Krier,R.UrbandSpace;JohnWiley&Sons:Hoboken,NJ,USA,1979.
92. Saleh,H.;Surya,B.;Hamsina,H.ImplementationofSustainableDevelopmentGoalstoMakassarZeroWasteandEnergy
Source.Int.J.EnergyEcon.Policy,2020,10,530‐538,doi:10.32479/ijeep.9453.
93. Baker,S.SustainableDevelopment;Routledge:London,UK,2006;p.245.
94. Bounoua,L.;Fathi,N.;ElBerkaoui,M.;ElGhazouani,L.;Messouli,M.AssessmentofSustainabilityDevelopmentinUrban
AreasofMorocco.UrbanSci.2020,4,18,doi:10.3390/urbansci4020018.
95. Dushkova,D.;Haase,D.NotSimplyGreen:Nature‐BasedSolutionsasaConceptandPracticalApproachforSustainability
StudiesandPlanningAgendasinCities.Land2020,9,19,doi:10.3390/land9010019.
96. Surya,B.SpatialInteractionPatternandtheProcessofCityActivityFormationSystem(Casestudy,TernateCity,Tidore
ArchipelagoCityandSofifiCityofNorthMaluku,Indonesia).Res.J.Appl.Sci.2015,10,880–892,
doi:10.36478/rjasci.2015.880.892.
97. Teferi,Z.A.;Newman,P.SlumRegenerationandSustainability:ApplyingtheExtendedMetabolismModelandtheSDGs.
Sustainability2017,9,2273,doi:10.3390/su9122273.
98. Ageev,I.A.;Ageeva,V.V.Urbanlifestyleasanelementofconsumptionidealandeconomicwellbeing:meaning‐changingtrans‐
formationfromSovietperiodtomodernity.ProcediaSoc.Behav.Sci.2015,166,24–29,doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.477.
99. Saleh,H.;Surya,B.;Ahmad,D.N.A.;Manda,D.TheRoleofNaturalandHumanResourcesonEconomicGrowthandRegional
Development:WithDiscussionofOpenInnovationDynamics.J.OpenInnov.Technol.Mark.Complex.2020,6,103,
doi:10.3390/joitmc6040103.
100. Lankao,P.R.;Gnatz,D.M.;Wilhelmi,O.;Hayden,M.UrbanSustainabilityandResilience:FromTheorytoPractice.Sustainability
2016,8,1224,doi:10.3390/su8121224.