ArticlePDF Available

Land Use Change, Urban Agglomeration, and Urban Sprawl: A Sustainable Development Perspective of Makassar City, Indonesia

Authors:
  • Universitas Bosowa Makassar
  • Lasharan Jaya Management College, Makassar, Indonesia

Abstract and Figures

Urbanization towards the expansion of the city area causes urban sprawl and changes in space use. Furthermore, urban agglomeration towards urban spatial integration causes a decrease in environmental quality. This study aims to analyze (1) land-use change and urban sprawl work as determinants of environmental quality degradation in suburban areas. (2) The effect of urban sprawl, urban agglomeration, land-use change, urban activity systems, and transportation systems on environmental quality degradation in suburban areas. A combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches is used sequentially in this study. Data obtained through observation, surveys, and documentation. The results showed that the expansion of the Makassar City area to the suburbs had an impact on spatial dynamics, spatial segregation, and environmental degradation. Furthermore, urban sprawl, land-use change, urban agglomeration, activity systems, and transportation systems have a positive correlation to environmental quality degradation with a determination coefficient of 85.9%. This study recommends the handling of urban sprawl, land-use change, and urban agglomeration to be considered in the formulation of development policies towards the sustainability of natural resources and the environment of Makassar City, Indonesia.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Land2021,10,556.https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060556www.mdpi.com/journal/land
Article
LandUseChange,UrbanAgglomeration,andUrbanSprawl:
ASustainableDevelopmentPerspectiveofMakassarCity,
Indonesia
BataraSurya
1,
*,AgusSalim
2
,HernitaHernita
3
,SeriSuriani
4
,FirmanMenne
5
andEmilSalimRasyidi
6
1
DepartmentofUrbanandRegionalPlanning,FacultyofEngineering,UniversityBosowa,MakassarCity
90231,Indonesia
2
DepartmentofRegionalPlanning,FacultyofEngineering,UniversityBosowa,MakassarCity90231,
Indonesia;agus.salim@universitasbosowa.ac.id
3
DepartmentofEconomic,STIMLasharanJaya,MakassarCity90231,Indonesia;
hernita@stimlasharanjaya.ac.id
4
DepartmentofFinancialManagement,FacultyofEconomicandBusiness,UniversityBosowa,Makassar
City90231,Indonesia;seri.suriani@universitasbosowa.ac.id
5
DepartmentofAccounting,FacultyofEconomicandBusiness,UniversityBosowa,MakassarCity90231,
Indonesia;firman@universitasbosowa.ac.id
6
DepartmentofUrbanPlanning,FacultyofEngineering,BosowaUniversity,MakassarCity90231,
Indonesia;emil.salim@universitasbosowa.ac.id
*Correspondence:batara.surya@universitasbosowa.ac.id
Abstract:Urbanizationtowardstheexpansionofthecityareacausesurbansprawlandchangesin
spaceuse.Furthermore,urbanagglomerationtowardsurbanspatialintegrationcausesadecrease
inenvironmentalquality.Thisstudyaimstoanalyze(1)landusechangeandurbansprawlwork
asdeterminantsofenvironmentalqualitydegradationinsuburbanareas.(2)Theeffectofurban
sprawl,urbanagglomeration,landusechange,urbanactivitysystems,andtransportationsystems
onenvironmentalqualitydegradationinsuburbanareas.Acombinationofquantitativeand
qualitativeapproachesisusedsequentiallyinthisstudy.Dataobtainedthroughobservation,
surveys,anddocumentation.TheresultsshowedthattheexpansionoftheMakassarCityareato
thesuburbshadanimpactonspatialdynamics,spatialsegregation,andenvironmental
degradation.Furthermore,urbansprawl,landusechange,urbanagglomeration,activitysystems,
andtransportationsystemshaveapositivecorrelationtoenvironmentalqualitydegradationwith
adeterminationcoefficientof85.9%.Thisstudyrecommendsthehandlingofurbansprawl,land
usechange,andurbanagglomerationtobeconsideredintheformulationofdevelopmentpolicies
towardsthesustainabilityofnaturalresourcesandtheenvironmentofMakassarCity,Indonesia.
Keywords:landusechange;urbansprawl;urbanagglomeration;sustainabledevelopment
1.Introduction
Urbanexpansionduetourbanizationcontributestourbangrowth,changesinspatial
structure,andspatialpatternsinsuburbanareasinthecaseoflargeandmetropolitan
cities.Urbanizationinthedynamicsofmetropolitancitieshasledtochangesintraditional
ruralcharacteristicstowardsurbancharacteristics[1].Thatis,urbanizationdoesnotonly
affectthecharacteristicsofsociety,economy,andculturebutalsoecologicaland
environmentalaspects[2].Thus,urbanizationiscloselyrelatedtoanincreasein
population,changesinlanduse,andurbanspatialpatternstowardsadecreasein
environmentalquality[3,4].Furthermore,urbanurbanizationtowardsurbanexpansion
ismarkedbythedevelopmentoflargescalesettlements,industry,centersofeconomic
activity,andconnectivityofthetransportationnetworksystem[5].Increasedsocio
Citation:Surya,B.;Salim,A.;
Hernita,H.;Suriani,S.;Menne,F.;
Rasyidi,E.S.LandUseChange,
UrbanAgglomeration,andUrban
Sprawl:ASustainableDevelopment
PerspectiveofMakassarCity,
Indonesia.Land2021,10,556.
https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060556
AcademicEditors:Ileana
PătruStupariuandChristineFürst
Received:22April2021
Accepted:24May2021
Published:25May2021
Publisher’sNote:MDPIstays
neutralwithregardtojurisdictional
claimsinpublishedmapsand
institutionalaffiliations.
Copyright:©2021bytheauthors.
LicenseeMDPI,Basel,Switzerland.
Thisarticleisanopenaccessarticle
distributedunderthetermsand
conditionsoftheCreativeCommons
Attribution(CCBY)license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses
/by/4.0/).
Land2021,10,5562of33
economicactivitiesinthesuburbshaveanimpactontrafficcongestion,pollution,urban
sprawl,conversionofproductiveagriculturalland,socioeconomicproblems,anda
decreaseintheenvironmentalqualityofsuburbanareas[6].Thus,urbanizationand
suburbanizationinsuburbanareascausechangesinspatialcharacteristicsfrompreviously
monocentrictopolycentric[7–9].
TheWorldBankstatesthaturbanizationinIndonesiahasreached55%[10].This
figure,whencomparedtoseveraldevelopingcountries,isclassifiedaslaggingbehind
whencomparedtoBrazilwhichhasreachedarateof86.3%.Inthe2017period,around
144millionIndonesianslivedincitiesoutofatotalpopulationof264millionpeople[11].
Furthermore,theurbancategoryinSoutheastAsiainrelationtopopulationdistribution
placesurbanareasinIndonesiainthesecondhighestposition,or54.7%.Malaysiaranks
firstwith75.4%.Thailandoccupiesthethirdpositionwithanurbanpopulation
distributionof49.2%.ThePhilippinesandVietnamarerespectivelyinfourthandfifth
positionswith46.7%and35.2%[12].Thus,thenumberofurbanresidentscoupledwith
theexpansionofthecitytothesuburbshasanimpactontheburdenofinfrastructure
financing,increasingdemandforhousingfacilities,changesinlanduse,andadecrease
inenvironmentalquality[13,14].
TheurbanpopulationinIndonesiawhichincreaseseveryyearhasanimpacton
increasingthefinancingofurbaninfrastructureandmeetingtheneedsforresidential
facilities.Thisconditionismarkedbytheexistenceofnewareaswhicharepredominantly
developedinthesuburbanareas.Furthermore,thelandareaforeachpersonlivinginbig
andmetropolitancitiesinIndonesiaoccupiesanaverageof40meters.Thisfigureisthe
smallestsizeofallcountriesintheEastandSoutheastAsiaregion[13].Thus,urbanization
inthecaseofurbanareasinIndonesiahasanimpactonincreasingurbanactivity,urban
sprawl,anditseffectondecreasingthequalityofthesuburbanenvironment.Urban
sprawlisacomplexphenomenonthatrequirestreatmentandstudyofthefactorsthat
causethisconditiontooccur[15].Thus,aneffectivestrategyisneededtocontrolurban
growth,developingspatialpatterns,anddrivingforcesforurbanexpansion[16].
Furthermore,urbansprawlistheeffectoftheexpansionofthebigcityareaandtheurban
processthatappearsisthepolarizingeffectofthesocioeconomicactivitiesofthecity
centermovingtothesuburbanarea[17,18].
Urbanizationhasanimportantimpactontheenvironment,changesinlanduse
intensity,spatialstructure,andurbanspatialpatterns[19,20].Theurbansprawlthat
developsinsuburbanareasoccursduetoseveralfactors,namely(i)relativelylowland
prices,and(ii)lowpopulationdensity.Thesetwofactorscausetheurbanspatial
distributiontobeefficientandeffectiveinrelationtospaceutilizationanditseffecton
environmentalqualitydegradation[21,22].Furthermore,housingandsettlement
developmentactivitiesandincreasedtransportationinfrastructuredevelopmenthavean
impactonthecomplexityofspaceutilization[23]Thisconditionischaracterizedby
environmentalimbalance,morphology,andlossofurbannaturalvegetation[24,25].Thus,
theconstructionofnewsettlementsinsuburbanareasandtheirimpactonthe
environmentareveryimportantintheprocessofurbangrowth[26].
Cityexpansionduetoexcessiveurbanizationisaphenomenonthatisquite
prominentinthecaseofbigandmetropolitancitiesinIndonesia.Thatis,urbanization
hasanimpactonenvironmentalimbalance,congestion,pollution,andurbansprawl[27].
Theexpansionofurbanareashassignificantlyalteredthecharacteristicsofthesuburban
areaanddecreasedenvironmentalquality[28].Theexpansionofurbanareascoupled
withincreasedurbanactivity,andtheconstructionofnewsettlementsinsuburbanareas
haveanimpactontheconversionofproductiveagriculturalland,transportation
movementsystems,andadecreaseinenvironmentalquality[29].Furthermore,itisvery
importanttoplanwelltheprovisionofvariousurbaninfrastructureandservices
includingtheurbantransportsystem[26].Thus,comprehensive,andintegratedhandling
towardsthesustainabilityoftheurbansystemisneeded[30].
Land2021,10,5563of33
Anurbanagglomerationistheunificationofareasintoonephysical,economic,
social,andculturalentity.Urbanagglomeration(UA)isaspecializedgeospatial
organizationofaseriesofcitiesformedwhenthecitycrossesahighlydevelopedstage
[31].Anurbanagglomerationconsistsoflargeurbangroupsinthesenseofthe
developmentcenterzoneofacitythatisconnectedtothesurroundingcitieswhichalso
develop.Thatis,thespatialstructureofurbanagglomerationnotonlyreflectsthe
interactionsandrelationshipsbetweencitiesbutalsoshowsthestagesofurban
development[32,33].Thus,urbanagglomerationisbasicallyaimedatintegratingurban
resources,adjustingindustrialstructures,narrowingthegapbetweenurbanandrural
areas,improvingurbanfunctions,strengtheningurbancompetitiveness,andpromoting
sustainableregionaldevelopmentstrategies[34].Theurbanagglomerationpolicyis
formulatedasaresponsetovariousgrowthpolesaccordingtothedevelopingindustrial
agglomerationstages[35].Thatis,urbanresiliencehasbecomearequirementforthe
sustainabledevelopmentofmoderncitiesandurbanagglomerations[36].Furthermore,
thespatialdynamicsandthetendencyofurbanagglomerationsthatdevelopinsuburban
areastowardstheintegrationofurbansystemshaveanimpactonlandusechanges,
movementofthetransportationsystem,andadecreaseinenvironmentalquality[37,38].
UrbansprawlinthesuburbsofMakassarCityinrelationtopopulationmobility
illustratesthatsupportfortheavailabilityoftransportationfacilitiesintermsof
transportationservicesisidentifiedasinadequateintermsofsafety,comfort,and
timelinessofgettingtothedestination.Furthermore,thechoiceofpeoplelivinginthe
suburbanareabasedontheoriginanddestinationofthemovementismoredominant
usingprivatetransportation.Thisconditionhasanimpactonincreasingtrafficvolume
andcongestiononthemainroadcorridorleadingtothecity.Thus,urbantransportation
policiesaremoredominantinthedirectionofincreasingthecapacityofroadbodiesand
theconstructionofringroadstoreducetrafficcongestion,buttheyarelesseffectivein
solvinglongtermtransportationproblems[39].Anotherfactorthatalsocontributestothe
urbansprawlinthesuburbsofMakassarCityistheweakcontroloverspaceutilization
duetotheineffectiveimplementationofurbanspatialplanning.Thus,highpopulation
growth,urbansprawl,andcontrolofspaceutilizationinsuburbanareasarechallenges
thatrequiresolutionstoaddresstheintegrationofurbansystems,effectiveuseofspace,
andsustainabledevelopment[40,41].
TheaccelerationandexpansionofMakassarCitytothesuburbsduetourbanization
haveanimpactonchangesinlandusetypologyofsuburbanareas,spatialstructure,and
spatialpatterns.Theexpansionofurbanareastosuburbanareascauseschangesinspatial
useandincreasesinsocioeconomicactivitiestowardsurbanspatialintegration.[42,43].
Furthermore,thedivisionofMakassarCityintosuburbanareasismarkedbyanincrease
inurbanactivities,including(1)housingandsettlementscoveringanareaof1889.74
hectare;(2)tradeandservicescoveringanareaof25.67hectare;(3)industrycoveringan
areaof401.9hectare,and(4)educationandhealthfacilitiescoveringanareaof24.36
hectare.Weakcontroloverspatialuseandmismatchbetweenthestipulatedspatialplans
andthenumberofpermitsissuedbythegovernmentforhousingandsettlement
developmenthaveresultedintheconversionofproductiveagriculturalland,land
reclamation,andenvironmentaldegradation.Inaddition,urbanactivitiesthattendto
increaseandthetendencyofthecommunitytousevacantlandforhousingneedsaswell
astheconstructionofnewsettlementscarriedoutbydevelopers,arefactorsthattrigger
urbansprawl.Spatialintegrationcoupledwithurbanagglomerationtowards
industrializationhasanimpactonthecomplexityofspatialuseinsuburbanareas.
Industrialagglomerationisaneconomicphenomenonandhasasignificanteffectonland
useefficiency[44].Furthermore,urbansprawlandurbanagglomerationinthesuburbsof
MakassarCitycontributetoenvironmentaldegradation,spatialsegregation,and
differentiationofcommunityactivities.Thus,theexpansionoftheurbanareatowardsthe
suburbanareacausesbuildingdensity,unevenpopulationdistribution,andadecreasein
environmentalquality[45,46].
Land2021,10,5564of33
ResearchresultsthatsupportthisstudyincluderesearchconductedbyMorollónand
Yserte[47],thisstudyfoundthaturbansprawlhasanimpactonenvironmentaldamage,
unsustainablemobility,regionalfiscalsolvency,qualityoflife,andthehealthoftheurban
population.InastudyconductedbyAlJarahetal.[48],theresultsofthisstudyfoundthat
rapidurbanizationhasanimpactondecreasingenvironmentalquality,urbanspatialpat
terns,andineffectiveimplementationofurbandevelopmentduetospaceallocationthat
isnotinaccordancewiththepredeterminedmasterplan.InresearchconductedbyFeng
etal.[49],itwasfoundthaturbansprawlandindustrialagglomerationhaveanimpact
onenvironmentalqualitydegradation,changesinindustrialstructure,andtechnological
innovation.Thethreeresultsofthesestudiesareatameetingpointbyemphasizingthat
theurbansprawlcontributestothedeclineinenvironmentalquality,regionalfiscalsol
vency,qualityoflife,populationhealth,andurbanspatialdynamics.Thus,urbanspawl
andurbanagglomerationcoupledwithchangesinlanduseandanincreaseinthetrans
portationmovementsysteminthesuburbsofMakassarCityareveryimportantandstra
tegicmatterstoberesolvedimmediatelythroughdevelopmentpoliciesfromthegovern
menttowardstheintegrationoftheurbansystem.Thus,thefocusofthisstudyisaimed
atansweringresearchquestions,namely:(1)Howdolandusechangesandurbansprawl
workasdeterminantsofenvironmentalqualitydegradationinsuburbanareas?(2)How
dourbansprawl,urbanagglomeration,landusechange,urbanactivitysystem,andtrans
portationsystemaffectthedegradationofenvironmentalqualityinsuburbanareas?
2.ConceptualFramework
Theincreaseindevelopmentactivitiesinthesuburbanareaisindicatedbythecon
versionofproductiveagriculturallandtoresidentialdevelopmentandsocioeconomic
activities.Knoxetal.[50]formulatesurbanizationasaprocessofspatialandeconomic
changecausedbyhumanfactorsandtheirimpactonnaturalresourceswhichresultsin
economic,social,andphysicalconditionsaswellasproblemsthatmustbefacedinthe
formulationofurbandevelopmentpolicies.Thefastertherateofeconomicgrowth,the
fasterthetrendofpopulationurbanizationanditsimpactontheprevalenceofpoverty
andurbaninequality[51].Thus,urbanizationasaprocessofformingcitiesandcommu
nitieswillhaveanimpactoninequalityandsocioeconomicdisparities.Increasedurban
activityandtransportationhaveadirectimpactonecosystemconditions[52].Urbanspa
tialdynamicscontributedirectlytochangesinlandusepatterns,urbanecology,morphol
ogy,andthesustainabilityofurbandiversity[53].
2.1.UrbanSprawlandUrbanAgglomeration
Theexpansionoftheareaduetourbanizationhasanimpactontheconversionof
landusefunctionsandthesuburbanizationofthesuburbanareasinrelationtothedevel
opmentofnewareasforvariousurbanactivities.Furthermore,landuseconversioncan
notbeseparatedfromthecitydevelopmentpolicysetbythegovernmentduetothede
mandsofdevelopmentneeds.Furthermore,urbanexpansiontowardssuburbanareas
contributestoeconomicgrowth,andpopulationgrowthaswellastheimpactonenviron
mentalqualitydegradation[54].Thatis,urbanexpansioniscloselyrelatedtotheprepa
rationofdevelopmentzonesandneweconomicactivitiesinsuburbanareas[55,56].
Thatis,thecharacteristicsoflandusechangeduetourbanspatialexpansionarevery
differentforeachurbanareaandarehighlydependentonspatialphysicalconditionsand
landavailability[57].Theseeightfactorsleadtochangesinspatialstructureandspatial
patternsinthedirectionofchangesinpopulationmobilityandspatialuseinthesuburban
areaswhicharenotassessedonthebasis,ofagriculturallandproductivitybutareas
sessedbasedonthefunctionofdevelopingspace[58].Thus,spatialexpansiontowards
suburbanareascontributestochangesinspatialstructure,spatialpatterns,andurbanag
glomeration[29].Thedistributionflowofgoodsandservices,labormigration,andin
creasedeconomicproductivitycausesocialmobilityverticallyandhorizontally[59].
Land2021,10,5565of33
2.2.TransportationSystemConnectivity
Theconnectivityofthecorecitytransportationsystemtothehinterlandareaisatrig
geringfactorforurbansprawlandurbanagglomeration.Urbansprawlhasasignificantly
negativeimpactonenvironmentalefficiency,butwiththecontinualimprovementofindus
trialagglomeration,thenegativeeffectsofurbansprawlwillbepartiallyoffset[60].The
increaseintrafficvolumeonthemaincityroadshasanimpactoncongestionandthetrav
elingtimetothedestinationareabecomesinefficientandtravelcostsbecomequitehigh[61].
Theeconomiccostandenvironmentalimpactoftrafficjamsinlargemetropolitanareasare
enormous[62].Transportationsystemconnectivityduetospatialexpansioniscloselyre
latedtourbansprawlandurbanagglomerationthatdevelopsinsuburbanareas.Overag
glomerationinaregion,mainlytriggeredbypoorplanningandmismanagementofre
sourceallocation,mayalsobecomeabarrierforsustainabledevelopment[63].
2.3.SustainableDevelopmentoftheSuburbs
Theexpansionofthecorecityareatothesuburbshasanimpactontheintegrationof
theurbansystemanditseffectsonthesocioeconomicconditionsofthecommunity.Asa
result,thepeoplewhooriginallyoccupiedthelandoftenlosetheirlandasthemainsource
oflivelihoodforthecommunity[64].Indevelopingcountries,inparticular,citieshave
experiencedrapidgrowthintransportrelatedchallenges,includingpollution,conges
tion,accidents,publictransportdecline,environmentaldegradation,climatechange,en
ergydepletion,visualintrusion,andlackofaccessibilityfortheurbanpoor[65].Urban
sustainabilityhasbecomeasignificantchallengegloballyduetorapidlygrowingurbani
zationandindustrialization[66].Sustainabilityisoftenconceivedofasanattempttobal
ancecompetingeconomic,environmental,andsocialpriorities[67].Furthermore,byinte
gratingfunctions,variousecologicalandsocioeconomicservicescanbeprovidedsimulta
neouslyandsynergiescanbedevelopedthatenablegreateroverallperformanceandmore
sustainabledevelopment[68].TheconceptualframeworkofthisstudyispresentedinFig
ure1below.
Figure1.ConceptualframeworkofurbanspawlandlandusechangeinMakassarCity.Source:Authorelaborator.
Land2021,10,5566of33
3.MaterialandMethod
3.1.ResearchDesign
Thisstudyisdirectedatunderstandingthaturbansprawl,landusechange,andur
banagglomerationandtheirimpactonenvironmentalqualitydegradationinsuburban
areas.Thisstudyusesacombinationofquantitativequalitativeapproachessequentially.
Thecasestudieswereselectedinthisstudywiththefollowingconsiderations:First,the
complexityofspatialuseandenvironmentaldegradationarequiteprominentproblems
inthedynamicsofsuburbandevelopment.Second,theurbansprawlcasehasanimpact
onthesustainabilityoftheurbansystemofMakassarCity.Third,thecontextofthecase
oflandusechangeontheoutskirtsofMakassarCityisquitecomplex.Thesethreethings
areverystrategicproblemsinthegrowthanddevelopmentofbigandmetropolitancities.
Thismeansthatthespatialexpansionofprimarycitiesinthemetropolitanurbansystem
contributestochangesinlanduse,urbansprawl,andurbanagglomerationtowardsur
banspatialintegrationandaffectsthesustainabilityofthecity.Inaccordancewiththe
chosenapproach,namelycasestudies,thistypeofresearchisacombinationofquantita
tivequalitativeapproaches[69].
3.2.StudyArea
MakassarCityisthecorecityintheMamminasataMetropolitanurbansystem.This
determinationisbasedonthefollowingconsiderations:(1)thegatewaytothedevelop
mentofEasternIndonesia,inrelationtothedistributionofgoodsandservices,aswellas
transportationservicenodes;(2)thedevelopmentofMakassarCityhasadirectimpacton
environmentalconditions,thetransportationsystemandthesocioeconomicconditions
ofthecommunity;(3)Urbanexpansioncontributestochangesinlanduse.Spatialdistri
butionplaysanimportantroleasaninstrumentforcontrollingtheuseofurbanspace[70].
ThecurrentpopulationofMakassarCityis1,526,677peoplewithanaveragegrowthof
2.9%peryear[71].Thisfigureishigherthanthenationalpopulationgrowthaverageof
1.4%.Urbansprawl,landusechange,andurbanagglomerationareformedduetothe
supportofthemainroadcorridorsandtheconnectivityoftheMetropolitanMaminasata
urbantransportationnetworksystem.Theroadcorridorsinclude(1)PerintisKe
merdekaanCorridorwitharoadlengthof11.93km;(2)HertasningCorridorwitharoad
lengthof3.76km,and(3)MetroTanjungBungaCorridorwitharoadlengthof4.7km.In
addition,urbansprawlisalsotriggeredbytheexistenceofcommercialactivitycenters
andlargescaleresidentialareasthatarepredominantlydevelopinginthesuburbanarea.
ThegeographiclocationoftheMakassarCityareabasedonthedistrictandthepopulation
ofMakassarCityispresentedinTable1below.
Table1.TotalpopulationofMakassarCityandthelocationdistancetothecitycenter.
NumberDistrictVillageArea(Hectare)TotalPopulation
(Person)
DistancetoCityCen
ter(Kilometers)
1Makassar1326
,
53685,5152–5
2Mariso928,18960,4992–5
3Tamalate10241
,
359205,5412–5
4Panakukang10156
,
765149,6645–10
5Tallo1496
,
153140,3302–5
6Bontoala8173857,1972–5
7UjungTanah813,63129,0542–5
8SangkarrangIslands3968814,53110–20
9Mamajang925,08761,4522–5
10Rappocini9109
,
628170,1215–10
11UjungPandang728
,
45919,0542–5
12Wajo820,47231,4532–5
Land2021,10,5567of33
13Manggala62
,
291
,
46149,4872–5
14Biringkanaya73,678,17220,4565–10
15Tamalanrea63
,
857
,
08115,8435–10
Source:BPSMakassarCity[71].
Table1theareaofMakassarCitywhichconsistsof15districtsand127villages.Fur
thermore,thedevelopmentofMakassarCityshowsthatthedistributionofthepopulation
tendstobeunevenandispredominantlyconcentratedinthesuburbanareas,namely(i)
BiringkanayaDistrictwithasmanyas220,456people,(ii)149,664peopleinPanakkukang
District,and149,487people,andinManggalaDistrictasmanyas149,487,(iii)Rappocini
District170,121people,PanakkukangDistrict149,664people,andTalloDistrict140,330
people.Thedistrictareaiscategorizedasatransitionzoneandazoneforthesuburban
areaofMakassarCity.ThestudylocationsarepresentedinFigure2below.
Figure2.MakassarCityasastudylocation.
3.3.MethodofCollectingData
Inthisstudy,thedevelopmentofsuburbanareasisassociatedwithchangesinland
use,urbansprawl,andurbanagglomeration.Thedatainthisstudyusesanominalscale
toclassifyobjects,individuals,orgroupsforcategorizationneeds.Measurementsusinga
nominalscalearecarriedoutbygivingnumberstotheobjectunderstudy.Furthermore,
thedatainthisstudyaremeasuredusingindicators:(1)dataonlandusechangeismeas
uredbyindicators,namelyspatialusepatterns,spatialfunctions,andtheareaofbuiltup
areas.(2)Urbansprawldataismeasuredbyindicators,namelypopulationdensityand
buildingdensity.(3)Dataonurbanactivitiesismeasuredusingindicators,namelythe
distancetothecenteroftheactivity,thetypeofactivity,andthecharacteristicsofthe
activity.(4)Thetransportationsystemismeasuredbyindicatorsofpopulationmobility,
roadnetwork,androadfunctions.(5)Thedecreaseinenvironmentalqualityismeasured
byindicators,namelythesourceofpollution,thetypeofactivity,andthecarryingcapac
ityoftheenvironment.Thus,thedatacollectionmethodsinthisstudywereobtained
throughobservation,surveys,anddocumentationdata.Thedevelopmentpatternofur
banactivitiesinsuburbanareasisassessedbasedonthegroupingofactivities,namely(i)
Land2021,10,5568of33
housingandsettlement,(ii)tradeandservices,(iii)industry,and(iv)educationalactivi
ties.ThesefouractivitiesareurbanprimaryfunctionsthatdevelopinthesuburbsofMa
kassarCityandareadeterminingfactorforurbanagglomerationtowardsthespatialin
tegrationoftheMamminasataMetropolitanurbanarea.Agglomerationisrelatedtothe
spatialconcentrationofpopulationactivityandeconomicactivity[72].Furthermore,ag
glomerationisaformofpositiveexternalityinproductionwhichisoneofthefactors
causingitsurbangrowth[73].Thestagesofdatacollectionanddataanalysisinthestudy
arepresentedinFigure3below.
Figure3.Flowchartofthemethodology.Source:Authorelaborator.
Datagroupinginthisstudywascarriedoutbycomparingtheresultsoffieldobser
vations,surveys,documentation,andmappingresultsfromsatelliteimagerymaps.Thus,
thedatainthisstudyweredividedintotwomaincategories,namelyprimaryandsec
ondarydata.Landusechangedataisreviewedbasedonthedynamicsofthedevelop
mentofMakassarCityfortheperiod2006–2020whichisadjustedtotheresultsofobser
vationsmadeinthefield.Landusedataisthencarriedoutbyoverlappingmapsand
processedthroughageographicinformationsystem(GIS).Furthermore,theurbansprawl
inthisstudywasassessedbasedonindicatorsofpopulationdensity,buildingdensity,
accessibility,roadnetwork,distancetothecitycenter,andmixedlanduse,namelyhous
ing,workplaces,andsocioeconomicfacilities[74,75].Eachstudiedvariableisthenas
signeditsaveragevalueandstandarddeviationtodeterminethesizeofthesprawland
itsimpact.Themeasurementofurbanagglomerationinthisstudyisgroupedintothree
Land2021,10,5569of33
categories,namely(i)agglomerationinthecitycenter,(ii)agglomerationinthetransition
zone,and(iii)agglomerationinthesuburbanzone.Urbanagglomerationhasanimpact
onincreasingthemovementofruralpopulationstowardsurbanareas[76,77].
Datacollectioninthisstudywascarriedoutthroughobservation,surveys,anddoc
umentation.Researchersplayaroleasthemaininstrumentincollectingdataorinfor
mationthroughobservationanddocumentation[78,79].Furthermore,themainsurvey
instrumentisaquestionnaireobtainedfromrespondents.Thus,thetwoinstrumentsin
thisstudyaretriangulating.Thismeansthatthedatainthisstudywereobtainedthrough
observation,questionnaires,anddocumentation.Datacollectionmethodsanddata
sourcesinthisstudyarepresentedinTable2below.
Table2.Summaryofresearchdataanddatacollectionmethods.
NumberResearchQuestionResearchVar
iableIndicatorDataSourceDataCollectionInstru
ments
1
Howdolanduse
changesandurban
sprawlworkasdeter
minantsofenviron
mentalqualitydegra
dationinsuburban
areas.
LandUse
Change
Landusechangeismeas
uredbyindicators:spatial
function,builtupland
area,andlandusepat
terns.
Observation,sur
vey,anddocu
mentation.
Fieldnotes,basemapof
location,questionnaire,
andMapofMakassar
Citylandusedata
(2006–2020)
UrbanSprawl
Urbansprawlismeasured
byindicators:population
density,buildingdensity,
typology,builtinlandarea
ratio,buildinggrouping,
andthedistanceofsettle
mentstothecitycenter.
Observation,sur
vey,anddocu
mentation.
Fieldnotes,question
naires,populationden
sitymap(2006–2020),
buildingdensitymap
(2006–2020),Makassar
citydevelopmentarea
map(2006–2020),new
areadevelopmentarea
mapofsuburbanareas
Environmen
talQualityDe
crease
Thedeclineinenviron
mentalqualityismeas
uredbythefollowingin
dicators:sourceofpollu
tion,levelofpollution,
andcarryingcapacityof
theenvironment.
Observation,and
survey.
Fieldnotes,question
naires,locationbase
maps,andcameras
2
Howdourban
sprawl,urbanag
glomeration,landuse
change,urbanactivity
system,andtranspor
tationsystemaffect
theenvironmental
qualitydegradationi
n
suburbanareas.
UrbanSprawl
Urbansprawlismeasured
byindicators:population
density,buildingdensity,
typology,builtinland
arearatio,buildinggroup
ing,andthedistanceof
settlementstothecitycen
ter.
Observation,sur
vey,anddocu
mentation.
Fieldnotes,question
naires,populationden
sitymap(2006–2020),
buildingdensitymap
(2006–2020),Makassar
citydevelopmentarea
map(2006–2020),new
areadevelopmentarea
mapofsuburbanareas.
UrbanAg
glomeration
Urbanagglomerationis
measuredbyindicators:
housingandsettlement
grouping,tradeandser
vicegrouping,industrial
grouping,educationalac
tivitygrouping,urban
Observationand
survey.
Fieldnotes,question
naires,basemapsofcity
activitylocations,devel
opmentmapsofsubur
banareas,andspatial
zoningmaps.
Land2021,10,55610of33
growth,andurbanspatial
zoning.
Landuse
change
Landusechangeismeas
uredbyindicators:spatial
function,builtupland
area,andlandusepat
terns.
Observation,sur
vey,anddocu
mentation.
Fieldnotes,basemapof
location,questionnaire,
andMapofMakassar
Citylandusedata
(2006–2020).
ActivitySys
tem
Thecityactivitysystemis
measuredbyindicators:
spatialfunction,builtarea,
movementsystem,andfa
cilitiesandinfrastructure.
Observationand
survey.
Fieldnotes,basemaps
oflocation,question
naires,andcameras.
Environmen
talQualityDe
crease
Thedeclineinenviron
mentalqualityismeas
uredbythefollowingin
dicators:sourceofpollu
tion,levelofpollution,
andcarryingcapacityof
theenvironment.
Observation,and
survey.
Fieldnotes,question
naires,locationbase
maps,andcameras.
3.3.1.Observation
Theobservationsinthisstudywereusedtoobservethecharacteristicsoftheurban
sprawl,changesinlanduse,urbanagglomeration,andmobilityofthepopulationinthe
suburbsofMakassarCity.Theinstrumentsusedintheobservationwerebasemapsand
fieldnotes.Observationswereusedtotracethedata:(1)urbansprawlthatdevelopedin
thesuburbanarea;(2)changesinlandusebasedondevelopmentactivitiescarriedoutby
thecommunityanddevelopersduringacertainperiodoftime;(3)thegroupingofurban
activities,namelyhousingandsettlements,tradeandservices,industry,offices,andedu
cation,(4)thesystemofsocioeconomicactivitiesthatdevelopinthesuburbanareas;(5)
mobilityofthepopulationfromthesuburbanareatothecenter,and(6)urbanactivities
thatdevelopandtheirimpactonthedeclineinthequalityofsuburbanareas.Further
more,observationsinthisstudyarealsousedindataretrieval,including(a)thepattern
ofhousingdevelopmentactivitiescarriedoutbythecommunityanddevelopers;(b)trans
portationfacilitiesusedbythecommunityinmobility,and(c)newdevelopmentareas
developedbythegovernment.Thedataobtainedthroughobservationisusedbyre
searcherstodescribechangesinlanduseanddevelopingurbanagglomerations.Theaim
istodescribetheurbansprawlandlandusechangesthataredevelopingontheoutskirts
ofMakassarCity.
3.3.2.Questionnaire
Theuseofquestionnairesinthisstudyisusedfortwofunctions:(1)description,
whichdescribesthesocioeconomiccharacteristicsofcommunitieslocatedinruralareas;
and(2)measurement,namelytheassignmentofvaluestoeachvariableandindicator
used.Thequestionnaireinthisstudyusedastructuredandunstructuredlistofquestions
thathadbeenpreparedpreviously.Furthermore,thequestionnairewasusedintracing
thedata:(1)developmentpatternscarriedoutbythecommunityanddevelopers;(2)
changesinlanduseinsuburbanareas;(4)urbanactivitygrouping;(4)thesystemofurban
activitiesinrelationtothesocioeconomicactivitiesofthecommunity;(4)thetransporta
tionsystem(originanddestinationpatterns)basedonpopulationmobility,distanceto
thecitycenter,andthemeansoftransportationused,and(5)decreasingenvironmental
qualitybasedondevelopmentscarriedoutbythecommunityanddevelopers.Theresults
ofdatacollectionthroughquestionnairesarethenmeasuredusingintervalandratio
Land2021,10,55611of33
scales.Thequestionnairewasdistributedtodistrictsthatareincludedinthecategoryof
suburbsinMakassarCity.Thereasontheresearchersdeterminedthelocationwastocom
paresprawl,landusechange,urbanagglomeration,transportationsystem,population
mobility,andurbanactivitiesthataffectenvironmentaldegradation.
DatacollectionthroughquestionnaireswascarriedoutfromAugusttoOctober2020.
Furthermore,structuredinterviewsusingaquestionnaireconductedbyresearcherswere
carriedoutbyaskingquestionstorespondentsbasedonpredeterminedquestions.Filling
inthequestionnairewasnotsubmittedtotherespondentbutwasguidedbyresearchers
andenumerators.Theenumeratorswerechosenbasedonconsiderations,namely,those
whocancollectdata,areclosetoandunderstandthesocioculturalconditionsofthere
spondents.Beforecarryingouttheirdutiesinthefield,theenumeratorsweregivenin
structionsandexercisesinfillingoutthequestionnaireaswellastechniquesforconduct
inginterviewswithrespondents.Thecriteriaforactorswhofilloutthequestionnaire(re
spondents)are(i)localresidentslocatedinsuburbanareas,andimmigrantswhobuilda
shelterinsuburbanareas,(ii)peoplewhohavesocioeconomicactivitiesinsuburbanar
eas,(iii)developerswhocarryouthousingdevelopmentactivitiesinsuburbanareas,and
(iv)localgovernment.Furthermore,therespondentsinthisstudyweredeterminedusing
apurposivesamplingtechniquewhichtheresearcherdeterminedbasedoncertainchar
acteristics.WithdrawalofsamplesreferstoIsaacandMichael[80].Furthermore,thefor
mulationsusedindeterminingthesampleareasfollows.
s=λ2NPQ/d2(N1)+λ2PQ(1)
wheresisthenumberofsamples,Nisthenumber,ofpopulationλ2isChiSquare,the
errorrateis1%,5%,and10%d=0.05P=Q=0.5.Thenumberofsamplesinthisstudy
wassetat400samples.Thenumberofsamples(respondents)inthisstudyispresentedin
Table3below.
Table3.Numberofrespondentsinthisstudy.
NumberDistrictTotalPopulation(Person)NumberofRespondents
1Makassar85,51510
2Mariso60,4996
3Tamalate205,54160
4Panakukang149,66445
5Tallo140,33046
6Bontoala57,1976
7UjungTanah29,0544
8SangkarrangIslands14,5312
9Mamajang61,4526
10Rappocini170,12160
11UjungPandang19,0543
12Wajo31,4534
13Manggala149,48745
14Biringkanaya220,45673
15Tamalanrea115,84330
Source:Author’selaboration.
3.3.3.Documentation
Thisstudyusesvariousdocumentsrelatingtothesituationandconditionsofthe
suburbsofMakassarCity.Thedocumentsreferredtoinclude(1)MakassarCitySpatial
PlanobtainedthroughtheMakassarCitySpatialPlanningService;(2)Populationdata
obtainedfromtheMakassarCityStatisticsOffice;(3)thesocioeconomicprofileofthe
Land2021,10,55612of33
communityisobtainedfromtheDistrictOffice,and(4)Plansfordevelopmentanddevel
opmentoftheoutskirtsofMakassarCityareobtainedthroughtheRegionalDevelopment
PlanningAgencyanddeveloperswhoarecarryingoutdevelopment.Thefourdocuments
areusedbyresearcherstosupportthedatafromobservationsandquestionnaires.
3.4.DataAnalysisMethod
Qualitativedataanalysiswascarriedoutduringdatacollectionandaftercompleting
datacollection.Theanalysisiscarriedoutinteractivelyandcontinuestocompletion.Thus,
qualitativedataanalysisinthisstudyisdividedintothreecategories,namelydatareduc
tion,datadisplay,andconclusion.Datareductioniscarriedoutwiththefollowingcon
siderations:(1)thedataobtainedinthefieldisquitealot,complexandcomplicated,so
thatdatareductionanddatagroupingmustbedoneimmediatelyforinterpretationneeds;
(2)selectingandsummarizingthemainthings,focusingontheimportantthings,themes
andpatterns,thenformulatingtheconclusions;(3)reduceddataareusedtoprovidea
clearpictureaccordingtothefocusofthestudy;(4)datareductionisdonebyproviding
codesoncertainaspectsaccordingtotheobjectivestobeachievedinthisstudy.
Thequantitativeanalysisinthisstudyisusedtoanswerresearchquestions,howare
theeffectsofurbansprawl,landusechange,urbanagglomeration,urbanactivitysys
tems,andthetransportationsystemonenvironmentaldegradationinthesuburbanarea.
Multipleregressionanalysisinthisstudyisusedtodeterminehowmuchinfluencethe
independentvariablehasonthedependentvariableandtopredictthevalueofthede
pendentvariablewhenalltheindependentvariableshaveknownvalues.Theurban
sprawlanalysisconsiderstheratioofhouseholdsinonevillagetototalhouseholdstoone
subdistrictarea(A),theratioofthebuiltupareaofthedistricttothetotalbuiltuparea
(B).Furthermore,therelationshipbetweenthetworatiosinthesensethat,if(A)isreduced
(B)resultsinavalueof0thenitiscategorizedinnormalconditions,iftheresultispositive,
itindicatescompact,andifthevalueisnegative,itindicatesasprawl[81].
SprawlmeasurementforeachdistrictinMakassarCityusesseveralanalyticalap
proaches,including(1)populationdensityanalysis;(2)buildingdensityanalysis;(3)the
analysisofthedistancetothecitycenterusesanetworkanalysisapproach,theindicators
beingassessedaretheroadnetworkandthedistributionofbuildings;(4)development
analysis,inrelationtoroadnetworkcoverageanddistributionofnewbuildingsinthe
2020period,usingabufferingapproachwithadistanceof100m,asthebasisforassessing
thehighwaystripindex;(5)analysisoftheconstructionofirregularactivitypatterns,us
ingadistanceapproachofthelocationofnewhousingbuildingsthatarefragmentedand
locatedoutsidethecenteroftheoldresidentialbuildingtothecenterofactivity.Thedis
tancecalculationusestheroadnetworkanalysisapproachandtheresultsobtainedare
describedusingthedevelopmentindexapproachwithoutapattern;(6)sprawlcharacter
isticsareclassifiedintothreelevelsandusingscoringanalysis.Theresultswerethen
mappedforeachcategory,namelyhigh,medium,andlow;(7)urbansprawllevelanalysis
usesscoringanalysis,namely(i)score1showstheinfluenceofthevariableonthesprawl
inglevelwiththelowcategory,(ii)score2showsthevariableonthesprawlinglevelwith
themediumcategory,and(iii)score3showstheeffectofthevariableonthesprawlinthe
highcategory.Theresultsoftheassessmentthroughscoringarethenfollowedupfor
sprawlclassification.Theaimistodefinethreetypologycategoriesbasedontheclass
rangeresults.Theformulationsusedindeterminingtheurbansprawltypologycategory
areasfollows:
KP P/LTKB ∑
 IHS JBUBJJ/JBU(2)
IHS TBU/JBURK NT NTR/K(3)
Explanationsrelatedtotheformulausedinclude(1)PopulationDensity(KP)iscal
culatedbasedontheratioofthetotalpopulation(people)totheareaofdistrictsanddis
tricts(hectares);(2)buildingdensity(KB)iscalculatedbasedontheratioofthenumber
Land2021,10,55613of33
ofbuildings(units)totheareaofbuiltland(hectares);(3)thehighwaylaneindex(IHS)is
calculatedbasedontheratioofthenumberofnewbuildingsinroadnetworksupport
(units)tothenumberofnewbuildings(units)fortheperiod2006,2010,2015and2020;(4)
thehighwaylaneindex(IHS)iscalculatedbasedontheratioofthetotalbuildingdistance
(meters)tothenumberofnewbuildings(units)fortheperiod2006,2010,2015and2020,
and(5)classdistance(RK)iscalculatedbasedonthehighestscoreminusthelowestscore
forthenumberofclasses(3).Theresultsoftheanalysisarethenexplaineddescriptively
qualitativelyandquantitatively.Totesttheeffectofurbansprawl(X1),landusechange
(X2),urbanagglomeration(X3),urbanactivitysystem(X4),transportationsystem(X5),en
vironmentalqualitydegradation(Y),basedonquestionnairedataobtainedinthefield.
Thedataisthenanalyzedusingmultipleregressionmethods.Theanalyticalformulations
usedareasfollows.
Y=b0+bX1+bX2+bX3+bnXn+ε (4)
r nXy∑Xy
nXX nyy(5)
y.12
R2y.12(6)
R2y.12 1 – JKG/n1 s2y(7)
whereYisthedependentvariable,b0istheregressionconstant,b1,b2theregressioncoef
ficient/influenceX1,X2,X3aretheindependentvariables,ε=0.Thecorrelationcoefficient
(r)isameasureofthelinearrelationshipoftheXandYvariables.Thervaluerangesfrom
(+1)to(1).Thevalueofrthatis(+)isindicatedbythevalueofbthatis(+),andthevalue
ofrthatis()isindicatedbythevalueofbthatis().Ifthevalueofrapproaches+1orr
approaches−1,thenXandYhaveahighlinearcorrelation.Ifr=+1orr=−1,thenXand
Yhaveaperfectlinearcorrelation.Ifr=0,thenXandYdonothavealinearrelationship.
R2y.12isthecoefficientofdeterminationformultiplelinearregression,JKGisthesumof
squaresoferrors,ands2yisthesumofsquaresofy(corrected).
4.Result
4.1.DeterminantofUrbanSprawlandLandUseChange
TheexpansionoftheMakassarCityareatothesuburbshasanimpactonchangingthe
characteristicsoftransportationtowardsincreasingpopulationmobility.Thechangein
transportationcharacteristicsisduetotheincreasingneedfortransportationservicesforthe
communityinrelationtotheexistenceofdevelopingcentersofsocioeconomicactivities.
Furthermore,theeconomicactivitypatternofurbancenterresidentsandsuburbanresi
dentstogetherformatravelprofilethatisinfluencedbyexternalandinternalfactors.Exter
nalfactorsrelatetothemovementoftransportationfromthecitycenterandthemovement
oftransportationtotheurbanareaoftheMamminasataMetropolitanArea.Meanwhile,in
ternalfactorsareinfluencedbytheexistenceofnewhousingcomplexesandthemobilityof
thepopulationtowardsthecenterofsocioeconomicactivitiesandthemovementtowards
thecitycenter.Thetransportationsystemandpopulationmobilityinsuburbanareasare
closelyrelatedtothedynamicsofthedevelopmentofMakassarCity.Thespatialdevelop
mentofMakassarCityislinearandconcentricispresentedinFigure4below.
Land2021,10,55614of33
Figure4.ThedevelopmentofMakassarCityislinearandconcentric.
Figure4showsalinearandconcentricspatialdevelopmentpatterninthesuburbsof
MakassarCity.Thisconditionspecificallyoccursinthecenterofthesuburbsasaresult,
oftheaccumulationofsocioeconomicactivities,andthecenterpointismarkedbythe
existenceofashoppingcenter,followedbythedevelopmentofvariousothersocioeco
nomicactivities,andsupportedbytheexistenceofnewsettlementsthatarecohesive.
FieldfactsfoundtoillustratethateffortstocontrolthespatialphysicalformofMakassar
Cityinthetransitionzoneandthesuburbanzonearemucheasier,withtheconsideration
thatoutsidethebuiltupareaitisstillemptyland,sothatregulationsthatleadtothe
accelerationofthecityʹsspatialphysicaldevelopmentcanbeimplementedwithminimal
resistance.FieldfindingsshowthatnewdevelopmentareasinMakassarCityhavethe
potentialtoexperiencefloods,landerosioninriverbasins,andcoastalabrasion.Thetrig
geringfactorsarelandreclamation,landuseforriveruseareas,anddamagetomangrove
foresthabitat.Landuseplanningisanactiontoeliminatedisasterriskandimproveenvi
ronmentalqualityforthebetter[82].ThechangeinspatialuseofMakassarCityispre
sentedinTable4below.
Land2021,10,55615of33
Table4.SpaceutilizationofMakassarCityfortheperiod2006–2020.
NumberTypeofActivitySpaceUtilization(Hectares)
Year2006–2010Percentage(%)Year2015–2020Percentage(%)
1Commercial7.340.04266,14315.14
2Education27.730.16182,8951.04
3Settlement786,18144.7310,589.3137.97
4Health5.210.03112,1490.64
5Offices5.770.03139,1550.79
6Sportsfacilities53.390.30621,6973.54
7Socialfacilities18.770.114,349,69324.75
8Ricefieldsandmixedgardens640,96336.47528,9453.01
Source:Authorelaborator,map(c)2019Google.
Table4showsthechangeintheuseofspaceinMakassarCitytowardsurbandiffer
entiationduetotheincreasingscaleofthemodernindustrialsocietyandthedevelopment
ofnewgrowthpoles.Threethingsthatunderliethisprocessoccur,amongothers:(1)the
distributionoftherangeandintensityoftherelationshipbetweenactivitiestowardsthe
changingcharacterofmodernsociety;(2)differentiationofspatialfunctionsandcommu
nityactivitypatterns,and(3)themorecomplexspatialorganization.Fieldfactsfound
showthatspatialphysicalchangesinMakassarCityhaveapositivecontributiontosocio
economicchangesatthemicrolevelofsociety.Furthermore,ifitisbasedontheprocess
offormingspatialandsocialdiversityinrelationtothedevelopingsocioeconomicchar
acteristics,threesymptomsarefound,namely:(1)changesintheintensityofeconomic
activitytowardsthecreationofaneweconomicorder,whichrequirescertaintypesof
expertiseandskillstoaccessworkofaformalnature.Thisconditionillustratesthatedu
cationalbackgroundasanindexofsocialdifferentiationisanimportantfactor;(2)differ
entiationofnewfunctionswhichtendstocontinueduetoincreasedreachandservices
andtheirimpactonsocialandeconomicchoicesforthecommunity.Thisconditionallows
foranumber,ofalternativeactivitypatternsforthecommunity;(3)socialordermovesto
wardschangesinpopulationmobilityandpopulationcompositiontowardssocietaldiffer
entiation.Thedifferencesandassimilationofthecommunity,bothmigrantsandindigenous
people,aremovingtowardssocialandculturaltransformationasonesocialgroup[83].
Fieldfactsfoundtoillustratethattheintensityoflandusechangeisinfluencedby
severalfactors,including(1)easeoflicensingissuedbythegovernmentanditsimpacton
landbuyingandselling.Thisconditionismarkedbyachangeinthestatusofcommunity
landownershiptodeveloperownership.Furthermore,changesinlandownershipstatus
arefollowedbytheconstructionoflargescalehousingandsettlementsequippedwith
supportingfacilitiesandinfrastructure,whicharepredominantlyinhabitedbyimmi
grants;(2)landreclamation,thisconditionischaracterizedbydevelopmentcarriedout
bythedeveloperandtheintensityoflandcoverchangesinwatercatchmentareas,river
benefitareasandcoastalareas;(3)increasingurbanactivitydevelopmentactivitiesand
newhousingdevelopmentshaveanimpactondecreasingtheenvironmentalqualityof
thesuburbanareas.ThedegradationoftheenvironmentalqualityinthesuburbsofMa
kassarispresentedinFigure5below.
Land2021,10,55616of33
Figure5.DecreasingenvironmentalqualityinMakassarCity.Source:Primarydata.
Figure5showsthedeclineintheenvironmentalqualityofMakassarCitybasedon
developingurbanactivities.Threeinterpretationsthatcanbeproposedforthesecondi
tions,namely:(1)housingandsettlementdevelopment,landreclamation,andlanduse
changecontributedpositivelytoenvironmentaldegradationwitheachvalueof9.61%;(2)
buildingconstructionwithavalueof9.41%,householdwasteandtransportationsystems
withavalueof9.31%againstenvironmentaldegradation;(3)shoppingcentersanddo
mesticwastecontributedpositivelytoenvironmentaldegradationwithavalueof8.82%;
and(4)educationalactivitieswithavalueof8.33%,andhealthactivitieswithavalueof
7.84%againstadecreaseinenvironmentalquality.Urbanexpansionresultsinsocioeco
nomictransformationswithrelevantimplicationsforlandinsuburbanareas,leadingto
environmentalconcernsaboutlanddegradationandincreaseddesertificationriskineco
logicallyfragiledistricts[84].Thisconditionischaracterizedbythegroupingofpeople
basedoneconomiccapacity,segregation,andgentrificationinsuburbanareas.Thecom
parisonofurbansprawlinMakassarCityispresentedinFigure6below.
Figure6.ComparisonoftheurbansprawlofMakassarCity:(A)2006,(B)2009,(C)2016,and(D)
2020.
Land2021,10,55617of33
Figure6showstheurbansprawlinthedynamicsofthedevelopmentofMakassar
City.Interpretationsthatcanbeproposedregardingurbansprawlinclude(1)totheeast,
markedbychangesinlandusetowardslanduseforhousingandsettlements,industry,
andshoppingcenters;(2)tothenorth,markedbyconversionofproductiveagricultural
landcoveringanareaof5880.68hectares;(3)tothesouth,itismarkedbycoastalreclama
tionforthedevelopmentofeconomicactivitiescoveringanareaof159.24hectares.The
developingurbansprawlhasanimpactonchangesinlandcover,typology,andmorphol
ogy,increasedpopulationmobility,populationdensity,andtrafficcongestiononthe
maincityroadcorridors.ChangesinthespatialpatternofMakassarCityduetothesprawl
anditsassociatedimpactsaremarkedbytheunevendistributionoffacilitiesandthedis
tributionofsettlementsintheurbanarea.Thisconditionhasanimpactontheaccumula
tionofvariousactivitiesincertainareas,scarcityofinfrastructure,anddisparityofsocio
economicservicesinthesuburbanareas.Thefactsonthegroundthatwerefoundshow
thattheexistenceofnewsettlementsbuiltbydevelopershasapositivecontributiontothe
differentiationofjobsandpeople’slifestyles.
ThefactorsthattriggersprawlinthesuburbsofMakassarCityincludes(1)lower
landpricesandhighlandpurchasetransactions,whichdevelopersusetobuildlargescale
settlementsandcommercialareas;(2)Supportforinfrastructuredevelopmentdeveloped
bythegovernment,namelyroadinfrastructure,airportsandotherinfrastructure;(3)in
creasingcommunityincome,markedbytheabilityofthecommunitytopaylandtaxand
mobilityforwork,business,andsocialactivities;(4)consistencyintheimplementationof
theMakassarCityplanningplan,inrelationtocontrollingspatialuse;(5)thetaxrateis
quitelowwhencomparedtothetaxrateatthecitycenter;(6)highpopulationgrowthdue
tourbanizationandmigration;(7)residentialoptionsforhighincomegroupstobuilda
shelterinsuburbanareas.Thesesevenfactorsmakeapositivecontributiontothesubur
banizationofthesuburbanareastowardsincreasingpopulationdensity.Increasedindus
trialactivityinlinewithhousingdevelopmentnotonlyhasanimpactonincreasingpop
ulationbutalsocontributestothedeteriorationoftheenvironmentalqualityofsuburban
areas[14].
Theeverincreasingpopulationinthesuburbanareaispositivelyassociatedwitha
reductioninagriculturallandandanincreaseinbuildingdensity.Thisconditionillus
tratesthattheexpansionofthespatiallayoutofMakassarCitytotheoutskirtsofthecity
hasanimpactonchangingthelivelihoodsoflocalcommunitiesfrombeingagrarianto
industrialcities.Furthermore,theorientationoflocalcommunityactivitiesisdominant
duetochangesinenvironmentalconditions,namelylaborers,masons,andconstruction
workers,includingurbaninformalactivities(mobiletradersandfoodstalls)andasmall
proportionofthemstillworkinagriculturalactivitiesbutarenotdominant.Metropoliza
tionisthecauseoftheeconomictransformation,spatialuse,andsocialcultureofsociety
[85].
ThepopulationdensityofMakassarCity(seeFigureA1).Theresultsofthepopula
tiondensityanalysisshowthat:(1)ThehighdensitycategoryislocatedintheTalloDis
trict,BontoalaDistrict,MakassarDistrict,Mariso,andMamajangDistrictwithpopulation
densityfiguresof24,070–33,935people/hectare;(2)Thecategoryofmediumdensityis
locatedinWajoDistrictandRappociniDistrictwithanumberof15,806–18,431peo
ple/hectare;(3)ThelowdensitycategoryislocatedintheUjungPandangDistrict,Ta
malateDistrict,PanakkukangDistrict,TamalanreaDistrict,ManggalaDistrict,Biringka
nayaDistrict,andSangkarrangIslandswithafigureof3638–11,047people/hectare.Inter
pretationsthatcanbeproposedarerelatedtothepopulationdensityofMakassarCity,
namely:(a)districtareaswithhighdensitycategoriesshowafairly,lowurbansprawl;(b)
districtswithalowpopulationdensitycategoryshowahighlevelofurbansprawl.These
resultsconfirmthaturbansprawltendstodevelopindistrictswithlowdensityinrelation
totheavailablelandarea.Thus,landareaandlowlandvaluearefactorsthattriggerthe
communityanddevelopersfornewhousingfacilitiesanddeveloptowardslargescale
settlementsinthesuburbanareas.Theroleofgovernmentisveryimportanttomaintain
Land2021,10,55618of33
environmentalbalanceandensuretherightsoffuturegenerationstothenaturalenviron
ment[86].
Theresultsofthefieldconfirmationshowthattheroleofthegovernmentalsocon
tributestothesprawlinthesuburbanareas.Thisconditionismarkedbythenumberof
buildingpermitsissuedandlocationpermitsgrantedtodevelopers.Thus,theurban
sprawltrendinthesuburbsofMakassarCityisinfluencedbythreemainfactors,namely
(i)theuseofvacantlandfortheconstructionofhousingfacilitiesbythecommunity,(ii)
theconstructionofnewhousingbydevelopers,and(iii)governmentpoliciesingranting
locationpermits.andbuildingpermits.Fieldfactsfoundindicatethatthedevelopment
mechanismsandproceduresinthesuburbsofMakassarCityhavenotyetreferredtothe
predeterminedspatialplan.Thedevelopmentoflargescalesettlementsaffectsthetypology
andmorphologyofthesuburbanareatowardstheformationofthebuiltenvironment[87].
ThedensityofbuildingsinMakassarCity(seeFigureA2).Interpretationsthatcanbe
proposedfortheseresults:(1)in2005thebuildingdensitylevelwas30.47%,thenin2019,
thebuildingdensitywas60.24%.Thisfigureshowsthatfor15yearsthebuildingdensity
inMakassarCityhasincreasedby29.77%.(2)Buildingdensityisdifferentiatedbasedon
fourmainclassifications,namely(i)buildingdensityatthecitycenterof91.22%,(ii)the
easternareaofMakassarCitycoveringfivesubdistrictswithabuildingdensityof63%,
(iii)theareatheNorthcoversfourdistrictswithabuildingdensityof76.91%,(iv)the
Southincludesthreedistrictswithabuildingdensityof80.3%.Inaddition,therelatively
lowbuildingdensityindicatesirregulardevelopment.Fieldfactsthathavebeenfound
illustratethatthemassiveincreaseinbuildingdensityislocated,intheEastandSouth
regions.Furthermore,thedistrictsdetectedwithafairly,lowlevelofbuildingdensityare
located,intheTamalanreaDistrict,TamalateDistrict,ManggalaDistrict,andBiringka
nayaDistrict.Thefourdistrictsarecategorizedasexperiencingirregulardevelopmentsin
thedynamicsofthedevelopmentofMakassarCityfortheperiod2006–2020.Thespatial
expansionofMakassarCitytothesuburbsareahasapositivecorrelationwithchangesin
thelivesoflocalcommunities.Thisconditionismarked,socialrelationsbetweencommu
nitiesarestartingtodeclineandonlytakeplaceinsmallgroups.Fieldfactsthatwere
foundindicatetheexistenceoflocalcommunitysettlementsthattendtobeclusteredin
certainlocationsandcomeinto,contactwithnewhousinglocationsinhabitedbymigrant
residents.Thus,urbansprawlhasapositivecontributiontochangesintypologyandmor
phologyofthesuburbanarea[88].
Furthermore,basedonthefactorofconsideration,thedistancetotheCentralBusi
nessDistrict(CBD)locationisdeterminedbasedontheaccumulationofspatialfunctions
bothintheoldcityareaandonnewdevelopmentsinMakassarCity.TheseCBDsinclude
(i)CBDoftheoldcity,(ii)CBDofPanakkukangMas,(iii)CBDDaya,and(iv)CBDofthe
MetroTanjungBungaarea.Indicationsfordistrictareasthatexperiencesprawlthrough
bufferingaresetwitharadiusofreachasfaras5–10km.Fieldfactsthatarefoundillus
trate:(1)83.20%ofthesubdistrictsinMakassarCityarewithinaradiusoffivekilometers
and(2)16.80%oftheareasareinaradiusoftenkilometers.Thus,thefartheradistrictis
totheCBDlocation,thehigherthesprawlrateandthecloserthedistrictistotheCBD
location,therelativelylowurbansprawlrateandhighlydependentondevelopingresi
dentialclusters.Thelevelofincomeofthecommunityinfluencesthedecisiontochoose
thelocationofresidenceandtheshapeofthecityiscloselyrelatedtothepopulationdis
tribution[89].
ThetypologyandcomparisonofthedistancebetweenthedistrictstotheCBDloca
tion(seeFigureA3).Threethingscanbeexplainedinrelationtothis,amongothers:(1)
25.42%ofdistrictswhicharefivekilometersfromtheoldcitycenter;(2)39.89%ofdistricts
thathaveadistance,offivekilometerstotheCBDlocationofPanakkukangMas;(3)
37.09%ofdistrictareasthathaveadistance,offivekilometerstoCBDDaya,and(iv)
18.58%ofdistrictsthathaveadistanceoffivekilometerstotheCBDoftheMetroTanjung
Bungaarea.InthecontextofurbansprawlinMakassarCity,slumsettlementsarefound
Land2021,10,55619of33
adjacenttotheCBDlocation.Thelocationoftheseslumsettlementsismarkedbytheex
istenceoftheurbanpoor,characterizedbyspatialsegregationandadeclineinenviron
mentalquality.Slumsettlementsthatdeveloparecloselyrelatedtopoorhealthcondi
tions,sourcesofpollution,sourcesofdiseasespread,anddeviantbehaviorthataffectpeo
ple’slives[90].
TheexpansionoftheMakassarCityareashowsthat29.77%ofthedistrictexperiences
urbansprawlwithtypologicaldiversity.Typologyofurbansprawlisdividedintothree
maincategories,namely:(1)Typology1coverseightsubdistrictsor15.32%ofthetotal
areaofMakassarCity;(2)Typology2coverstwodistrictareasor13.01%ofthetotalarea
ofMakassarCity,and(3)Typology3coversfourdistrictsor71.65%ofthetotalareaof
MakassarCity.Theseresultsconfirmthatduringtheperiodof15yearsurbansprawlin
creasedsignificantlyandthisincreaseoccurredbetweentheperiod2010–2020.Thefield
factsfoundshowthaturbansprawliscategorizedashighinrelationtoseveralthings,
namely(i)theaccelerationofdevelopmentinMakassarCitytowardssuburbanareasare
followedbydevelopmentpoliciesthatprovideeasylicensingfordeveloperstobuildnew
housing,(ii)conversionofproductiveagriculturallandduetoweakcontroloverspatial
use,(iii)massivelanduseconversioninthesuburbanarea,and(iv)landvaluewhichis
quitelowandtheproductivityofagriculturallandtendstodecline,causinghighland
transactionsbetweenlocalpeopleandhousingdevelopers.Governmentpoliciesrelated
tolandusewillrequireecologicalandenvironmentalconservationactionstowardssus
tainableeconomicandsocialdevelopment[91].Furthermore,theprocessofexpanding
theurbanareatowardstheoutskirtsofMakassarCityisdividedintothreecategories,
namely:(1)Theconcentricdistributionischaracterizedbyequaldistributionofactivity
throughouttheexistingurbanareasandthistypeiscategorizedastheslowspread.(2)
Thelongitudinalspreadischaracterizedbytheurbanstretchthatdevelopsalongtheex
istingroadnetwork.Thismeansthatthetransportationnetworkplaysanimportantrole
intheprocess.(3)Thespreadofhoppingischaracterizedbyaseparatebuildingpattern
fromthemaincityandCBD.
TwocategoriesofurbansprawlthathavedevelopedinthesuburbsofMakassarCity
are:(1)in2006thetrendofurbansprawlwasstilllimitedtotheborderareabetweenthe
corezoneandthetransitionzone;(2)In2010–2020,thespatialexpansionofMakassarCity
tendstoexpandtowardstheMamminasataMetropolitanurbanareawhichisdeveloping
rapidlybothlinearlyfollowingthemainroadcorridorsanddevelopingconcentrically(p
value0.01andzzero2.44).Thisconditiondevelopsapartfromtheresultofafairly,low
landvalue,anothersupportingfactoristheintegrationoftheMamminasaMetropolitan
urbansystem.Furthermore,differentconditionsintheperiod2006–2010tendedtode
velopconcentricallywithapvalueof0.01andazzeroof2.51.Thisconditionisinfluenced
bythepreferenceforlivinginthesuburbs.Asummaryoftheurbansprawltypologyof
MakassarCityisinTable5below.
Table5.ComparisonofurbansprawltypologyinMakassarCityin2006,2010,and2020.
ParameterQuantificationTypology
PopulationDensityYear2006Year2010Year2020
High24.000–34.000111,2
Moderate13.000–24.0001,21,22
Low0–13.0001,2,31,2,31,2,3
Buildingdensity
High79–100111
Moderate59–7922
Low0–591,2,32,33
Distancetocitycenter(CBD)
Far7001–12.0002,333
Moderate3.000–7.0001,21,2,31,2,3
Land2021,10,55620of33
Near0–3.000111
Developmentwithinroadnetworkcoverage
Affordable0.9–1.001,21,21
QuiteAffordable0.8–0.91,2,31,2,31,2
Unreachable0.7–0.8333
Thepatternofdevelopmentisirregular
High1.200–1.90033
Moderate600–1.20031,31,2
Low200–6001,21,21
Source:Analysisresults.
Table5showsthedifferencesintheurbansprawltypologyofMakassarCity.Inter
pretationsthatcanbesubmittedregardingtheseresults,namely:(1)in2006thesprawl
tendencyofMakassarCitywasdominantindevelopingtransitionalareasandnewdevel
opmentareas,namelyinTamalanreaandManggalaDistricts;(2)the2010periodtheten
dencyofsprawltoshowdominantlytowardsthetransitionareaandsuburbanMakassar
City;and(3)In2020thedominanturbansprawlmovedtothesuburbs,namelyinthe
areasofPanakkukangDistricts,BiringkanayaDistricts,andTamalateDistricts.
4.2.UrbanAgglomerationandTransportationSystems
ThepositionofMakassarCityasacorecityintheMamminatasaMetropolitanurban
system.Threefactorsdetermineurbanunification,amongothers:(1)easeofproduction
processesandtradeflowsthatcauseabuiltinsystemenvironment;(2)MakassarCity
providesvarioussocioeconomicfacilitiesaswellasavarietyofgoodsandservicesso
thatitbecomesanattractivefactorforthemobilityofthesurroundingurbanpopulation,
and(3)theavailabilityofpublicfacilitiesinMakassarCity,whichismoredominantwhen
comparedtothesurroundingcities,causesthedemandforgoodsandservicesinitsterri
torialareastobequitehigh.Furthermore,therelationshipbetweenpopulationdensity
distributionandpublicservicefacilitieshasadirectrelationshipwiththelayoutofpublic
facilities[92].AgglomerationinthedevelopmentdynamicsofMakassarCityischaracter
izedbythegroupingofseveraldominantsocioeconomicactivitiesthatdevelopinthe
suburbswhicharelocateddirectlyadjacenttotheMamminasataMetropolitanurbanarea.
Fieldfactsfoundshowthatalongthedevelopingroadcorridorsaremarkedbythe
presenceofshoppingcenters,serviceservices,offices,industry,healthfacilities,andnew
settlementsdevelopedbythedeveloper.TheexistenceoftheMakassarCityroadcorridor
hasanimpactonurbanagglomerationtowardstheunificationoftheMamminasataMet
ropolitanurbanarea.Thus,duringthe2006–2020period,theaccelerationofdevelopment
andeconomicgrowthofMakassarCityexperiencedasignificantincreaseandhadanim
pactonlabormobilityinitshinterlandareas.Theimpactofspatialexpansiononenviron
mentaldegradationwillrequirealongprocessinrelationtothesocialandeconomiccon
ditionsofthecommunity[93].Thecomparisonofurbanagglomerationsbasedonthespa
tialzoningofMakassarCityispresentedinTable6below.
Land2021,10,55621of33
Table6.ComparisonofurbanagglomerationsbasedonspatialzonesinMakassarCity.
UrbanAgglomeration
CityCenterArea(CBD)TransitionZoneFringeZone
LandArea
(ha)
%ofCBD
Area
LandArea
(ha)
%ofTransi
tionZone
Area
LandArea
(ha)
%toAreaofSubur
banZone
Settlement510.3465.294252.4530.751889.748.90
Offices5.770.740.040.000.000.00
Education5.630.72152.901.1124.360.11
Trading101.9213.04180.531.3125.670.12
Industry0.000.00219.801.59401.901.89
HotelsandTouristFacilities32.444.15117.400.8521.260.10
Source:Authorelaborator,Map©2021Google.
Table6showsthecomparisonofurbanagglomerationsbasedonthespatialzoning
ofMakassarCity.Threeinterpretationscanbeputforwardregardingthisprocess.First,
theagglomerationthatdevelopedintheoldcitycenter(CBD)wascharacterizedbythe
groupingofshoppingcenters,bankingservices,offices,andtouristfacilities.Thisurban
activityistheembryoofthegrowthofMakassarCitywhichcausestheflowoftranspor
tationtothecitycentertobequitehigh.Second,theagglomerationthatdevelopsinthe
transitionzoneismarkedbytheconversionofresidentialbuildingstocommercialactivi
ties.Thiszoneischaracterizedbyagroupingofresidentialapartmentbuildings,multi
functionalshoppingcenters,offices,warehouses,andhealthservicecenters.Third,the
suburbanzoneisanewdevelopmentarea.Thiszoneischaracterizedbytheconversion
ofproductiveagriculturallandswhicharepredominantlydevelopedintolargescaleres
identialareas.Settlementdevelopmentutilizesalargeareaoflandwhichisconnectedto
thecity’smainroadnetworksystem.Furthermore,thesuburbanzoneischaracterizedby
thegroupingofresidentialareas,commercialactivities,andofficesalongthemainroad
corridorsandintegratedwiththeMamminasataMetropolitanurbansystem.Thedevel
opmentofbigcitiesshowsasignificanttrendofsuburbanizationandisveryimportantto
considerintheformulationofurbanspatialplanning[94].Theinfluenceofurbansprawl,
landusechange,urbanagglomeration,urbanactivitysystem,andtransportationsystem
onenvironmentalqualitydegradationinthesuburbsofMakassarCityispresentedin
Table7below.
Table7.Summaryoftestresultsforthesignificanceofmultipleregressioncoefficients.
CorrelationCoefficientErrortCounttTable
β Sbi
UrbanSprawltoenvironmentaldegradation(ryx1)0.1910.0672.8721.84
Urbanagglomerationtoenvironmentaldegradation(ryx2)0.1380.0532.8541.84
Landusechangetoenvironmentalqualitydegradation(ryx3)0.4060.0974.1841.84
Cityactivitysystemtoenvironmentalqualitydegradation(ryx4)0.2010.0692.6891.84
Transportationsystemtoenvironmentaldegradation(ryx5)0.1320.0652.6521.84
SourcevariantSumofsquares
(JK)FreeDegrees(db)
Averageofthe
sumofthesquares
(RJK)
FcountFtable
α=0.05
Regression
Residue
32,504
1458
7
12
6.547
0.07686,1446.76
Total33,96219‐
RR2db1db2FcountFtable
0.9270.85971286,1446.76
Source:Analysisresults.
Land2021,10,55622of33
TheresultsofTable7thatcanbeexplainedinclude(1)urbansprawlhasapositive
correlationwithenvironmentaldegradation;(2)urbanagglomerationhasapositivecor
relationwithenvironmentaldegradation;(3)landusechangehasapositivecorrelationto
environmentalqualitydegradation;(4)thesystemofactivitieshasapositivecorrelation
toenvironmentalqualitydegradation,and(5)thetransportationsystemhasapositive
correlationtoenvironmentalqualitydegradation.Thus,itcanbeconcludedthaturban
sprawl,urbanagglomeration,changesinlanduse,urbanactivitysystems,andtranspor
tationsystemshaveasignificanteffectonenvironmentalqualitydegradationwithacoef
ficientofdeterminationoftheeffectof85.9%.Thus,itisnecessarytoevaluateenviron
mentalconditionsbytaking,intoaccountthesocioeconomicconditionsofthecommu
nityinsuburbanareas[95].
5.Discussion
5.1.UrbanSprawlandUrbanAgglomerationHandlingSolutions
Urbansprawl,changesinlanduse,andurbanagglomerationinthesuburbsofMa
kassarCityhavecontributedpositivelytoenvironmentaldegradation.Furthermore,the
conversionoflandusefunctionsandtheconversionofproductiveagriculturallandsdue
toindustrialdevelopment,housing,trade,services,andeducation.Furthermore,theex
pansionofMakassarCitytowardstheoutskirtshasanimpactonincreasingpopulation
mobility,trafficvolume,andspatialsegregation.Thus,thesolutionsneededtohandle
urbansprawlinclude(1)consistencyinspatialplanningimplementationthroughtight
eningthegrantingoflocationpermitsanddistributionpatternsofurbanactivities;(2)
applicationofincentivesanddisincentivesfollowedbylawenforcementagainstviola
tionsofspatialplanning;(3)arrangementofperipheralareasthroughpopulationdensity
distribution,intensificationofeconomicandsocialactivities,towardssustainabledevel
opmentofsuburbanareas.Thesustainabilityofthehandlingisaimedatcreatingalivable
urbanfuture[96].Theimplementationofdevelopmentpoliciesanddevelopmentofsub
urbanareasiscarriedoutconsistentlythroughthefollowingefforts:(1)realizingsocial
justiceforallgroupsofsociety,especiallylowincomepeople;(2)conservinglanduse
througheffortstotightenpermitsforspatialusetosupportthesustainabilityofecosystem
functions;(3)synergizingpopulationdensitytowardsmeetingtheneedsofsocioeco
nomicactivities,intensifyingpublictransportation,andincreasingcommunitywelfareto
wardssustainabledevelopmentofsuburbanareasbyinvolvingtheroleofcommunity
participation.Sustainabledevelopmentandurbandevelopmentstrategiescanbe
achievedthroughthecooperationofallstakeholders[97].
Thesuccessfulhandlingofurbansprawlandurbanagglomerationinthesuburbsof
MakassarCitywillrequirevariousactions,including:(1)developingapublictransporta
tionsystemthatisaccessible,comfortable,safe,andeconomical;(2)developingnewset
tlementnodesbyapplyingamixedlandusepatternthatisintegratedwiththeurbanac
tivitysystem;(3)integratingzoningforspatialusewhichisorientedtowardsenviron
mentalsustainability,and(4)distributionofurbanactivitiestoreduceservicedisparities
andanticipationofgentrificationandsegregationofsuburbanareas.Inorder,tosupport
theeffectivenessandefficiencyofspatialuseinsuburbanareas,thecompactcityconcept
aspartofthespatialplanforMakassarCityisveryimportanttoimplementtoanticipate
landusechangesthatarealignedwiththeapplicationofincentivesanddisincentives.The
applicationofthispolicyiscarriedoutbysimulatingappropriateprogramstominimize
thenegativeimpactscaused.Theroleofstrategicplanningisveryimportantaspartof
urbangovernancewhichrequirestheinvolvementofthecommunityandtheprivatesec
tortowardssustainabledevelopment[98].
5.2.SustainabilityoftheSuburbsofMakassarCity
ThesustainabilityoftheurbansystemofMakassarCityinrelationtothehandlingof
urbansprawl,landusechange,andfutureurbanagglomeration,isorientedtowardsfive
Land2021,10,55623of33
basicprinciples,namelyenvironmental,economic,social,andstrengtheninggovernment
capacityindecisionmaking.Severalthingsneedtobeconsideredintheformulationof
developmentpoliciesforthesuburbsofMakassarCity,amongothers:(1)buildingpublic
awarenessofeffortstosavetheenvironment;(2)buildingequalityinaccessingurbanspa
tialfunctionsbasedoneconomicjusticeprinciplestoreducedisparitiesinservicesbe
tweenurbanareas;(3)ecologicalsustainabilityisorientedtothearrangementofthesub
urbanareasbasedonnaturaldisastermitigationwhichissynchronizedwithglobalcli
matechange.
Sustainabledevelopmentinthecontextofthesuburbanareaisorientedtowardsfour
mainthingsaspartofeffortstocontrolspatialuse,amongothers:(1)equitabledistribu
tionandsocialjustice,inthiscasereducinginequalityinexcessiveuseofnaturalresources
througheffortstoequalizelanddistributionandfulfillment.urbanservicestandards;(2)
Respectfordiversity,inthiscaseinadditiontopreservingbiodiversity,itisalsonecessary
toanticipatetheemergenceofdiscriminationagainsturbanspaceaccesstowardscommu
nalharmonyandculturaldiversitytopreventsegregationinthesocioeconomicdynam
icsofsociety;(3)integrative,inthiscase,theimplementationofthedevelopmentofthe
suburbanareasguidedbythereciprocalrelationshipbetweenhumansandtheenviron
ment;and(4)longtermperspective,inthiscase,spatialplanningwhichisorientedto
wardsoptimizingthemanagementandutilizationofnaturalresourcesthatcanbeused
inthelongtermandabletoaccommodatetheinterestsofthegeneralpublic.Spatialplan
ningobjectivesbecomethebasisfordecisionmakingrelatedtogovernment,privatesec
tor,andactionscommunitytaken[99].Spatialplanningusingacrosssectoralapproach
aimstobalancespatialaspectsandlandrequirementstowardsenvironmental,social,and
economicsustainability[100].Theresultsoftheanalysisthathavebeencarriedoutillus
tratethatthedevelopmentorientationofthesuburbsofMakassarCityinrelationtourban
sprawlandurbanagglomerationwillrequiredevelopmentpolicysupportfromthegov
ernmentwhichisorientedtowardsthreemainpillarsinthesustainabilityofurbandevel
opment,namelyenvironmental,economic,andsocialaspartofthedirectionofdevelop
menttobeachieved,namelyequitabledevelopmentandimprovementofcommunity
welfarewhilemaintainingthebalanceoftheurbanenvironment.Thesustainabilityof
MakassarCitydevelopmentispresentedinFigure7below.
Land2021,10,55624of33
Figure7.SustainabledevelopmentofthesuburbsofMakassarCity.Source:Author’selaboration.
6.Conclusions
TheexpansionoftheMakassarCityareatothesuburbshasanimpactonlanduse
changesandthecharacteristicsofthetransportationsystemduetoincreasedsocioeco
nomicactivities.Urbansprawlinthespatialdynamicsofsuburbanareashasdifferent
characteristicsandishighlydependentonpopulationdensity,buildingdensity,spaceca
pacity,andenvironmentalcarryingcapacity.Theintensityoflandusechangeinsubur
banareasisinfluencedbyseveralfactors,namelyeaseoflicensing,changesinlandown
ershipstatus,andsuburbanization.Theimpactoflandusechangecontributestotheland
useofwatercatchmentareas,riveruseareas,andcoastalbenefitareasduetolandrecla
mationforhousingandsettlementdevelopmentneedsaswellasurbaninfrastructure.
Increaseddevelopmentactivitiesinsuburbanareashaveapositivecontributiontoriver
waterqualitypollution,airpollution,anddamagetonaturalvegetationtowardsenviron
mentaldegradation.Developmentactivitiesthatcontinuetoincrease,bothcarriedoutby
thecommunityanddevelopers,areaccompaniedbytheconstructionofaroadnetwork
system,inadditiontoencouragingincreasedpopulationmobilityandincreasedsocio
economicactivitiestowardstheintegrationoftheurbansystem,whichispositivelyasso
ciatedwithurbansprawlinsuburbanareas.Factorsthattriggersprawlinsuburbanareas,
namelylowlandprices,infrastructuredevelopmentdevelopedbythegovernment,in
creasedcommunityincome,inconsistenciesintheimplementationofspatialplans,low
taxrates,populationgrowth,andpreferenceforcommunitysettlements.Urbansprawl
tendstodevelopindistrictareaswithlowdensityinrelationtotheavailablelandarea.
Land2021,10,55625of33
Thus,theexpansionofurbanareastosuburbanareasispositivelyassociatedwithsocio
economicdisparitiesandslumsettlementstowardsspatialsegregationandadecreasein
environmentalquality.
UrbanagglomerationinthedynamicsofdevelopmentofMakassarCityhasanim
pactoneconomicgrowthandispositivelyassociatedwithchangesinlanduse,spatial
structure,spatialpatterns,typology,andmorphologyofsuburbanareastowardsenviron
mentaldegradation.Urbanagglomerationcoupledwithurbanspatialintegrationhasan
impactonagriculturallandconversion,changesinpeople’slifestyles,urbanization,mi
gration,suburbanization,andsocioeconomicdisparitiestowardsindustrializationof
suburbanareas.TheaccelerationofthedevelopmentofMakassarCityhasanimpacton
energymobilityandtheflowoftransportationtothecitycenterisquitehigh.Urbanag
glomerationbasedongrowingspatialzoninghasanimpactonthegroupingofhousing
andsettlements,commercialactivities,industry,educationalfacilities,andofficesthat
dominatetheareaonthemaincityroadcorridorstowardstheintegrationoftheurban
system.Thus,urbansprawl,urbanagglomeration,changesinlanduse,urbanactivity
systems,andtransportationsystemshaveasignificanteffectonthedeteriorationofthe
environmentalqualityofsuburbanareas.Todealwithurbansprawlandurbanagglom
erationthatdevelopsinsuburbanareas,itwillrequirethesupportofdevelopmentpoli
ciesfromthegovernmentwhichisimplementedconsistentlythroughthefollowingef
forts:(1)realizingsocialjusticeforalllevelsofsociety,(2)conservationoflandandwa
tershedresourcesthrougheffortstotightenspaceutilizationpermitstosupportthe
preservationofecosystemfunctions;(3)synergizingpopulationdensityandbuildingden
sitysupportedbythefulfillmentofsocioeconomicactivities;(4)preparationofadequate
publictransportationfacilities,and(5)increasingthewelfareofthecommunitytowards
sustainabledevelopmentbasedoncommunityparticipation.
ThesustainabilityoftheurbansystemofMakassarCityasasolutiontodealingwith
urbansprawl,landusechange,andurbanagglomerationinthefuture,isorientedtosev
eralbasicprinciples,namelyenvironmental,economic,social,andstrengtheninggovern
mentcapacityindecisionmaking.Severalthingsthatneedtobeconsideredintheformu
lationofdevelopmentpoliciesforthesuburbsofMakassarCity,amongothers:(1)build
ingpublicawarenessofeffortstosavetheenvironment;(2)buildingequalityinaccessing
urbanspatialfunctionsbasedontheprinciplesofeconomicjusticeandreducingdispari
tiesinservicesbetweenurbanareas;(3)ecologicalsustainabilityisorientedtothearrange
mentofthesuburbanareasbasedonnaturaldisastermitigationwhichissynchronized
withglobalclimatechange.Furthermore,theactionsneededindevelopingsuburbanar
eastowardssustainableurbandevelopmentinclude(a)landstewardshipwhichempha
sizestheimportanceofbuildingecologicalethicstomanageandpreserveecosystems;(b)
determiningthethresholdforspatialusebasedonthemanagementofthebuiltenviron
mentandanticipatingenvironmentalqualitydegradationthroughmonitoringandman
agementofwaste,airpollution,anddepletionofresourcesinasustainablemanner;(c)
interdependenceincludesnotonlyecologicalrelationshipsbetweenspeciesandnature
butalsoeconomicandculturalrelationshipsatthelocalandregionallevels;(d)economic
restructuringbymeansofexpandingemploymentopportunitiesforthecommunityin
synergywitheffortstopreservetheenvironment;(e)socialjusticeinmeetingpeopleʹs
needsfordecentwork,educationandhealthservices;(f)intergenerationalneedsthatem
phasizetheneedforthelongtermtoimprovepeopleʹswelfare.
SustainabledevelopmentinthesuburbsofMakassarCityinthefutureisoriented
towardsfourmainthingsaspartofeffortstocontrolspatialuse,including:(1)equitable
socialandeconomicfacilitiesbasedonsocialjusticetoreduceinequalityinexcessiveuse
ofnaturalresourcesandequitablelanddistributionfollowedbyfulfillmenturbanservice
standards;(2)respectfordiversity,inthiscaseinadditiontopreservingbiodiversity,itis
alsonecessarytoanticipatetheemergenceofdiscriminationagainsturbanspaceaccess
towardscommunityharmonyandculturaldiversitytopreventsegregationinthesocio
Land2021,10,55626of33
economicdynamicsofsociety;(3)integrative,inthiscasetheimplementationofthede
velopmentofthesuburbanareasguidedbythereciprocalrelationshipbetweenhumans
andtheenvironment,and(4)longtermperspective,inthiscaseistoimplementspatial
planningthatisorientedtowardsoptimizingthemanagementandutilizationofnatural
resourceseffectivelyandefficientlyforthelongtermandabletoaccommodatetheinter
estsofthegeneralpublic.
AuthorContributions:B.S.,conceptualization;B.S.,H.H.,andA.S.,compilingtheresearch;S.S.
F.M.,andE.S.R.,establishingthestudy;B.S.,H.H.;S.S.,andF.M.,processingdata;A.S.,F.M.,and
E.S.R.,contributingtomaterials/methods/analysistools;B.S.,S.S.,andH.H.,analyzingdata;F.M.
andE.S.R.,contributingtodatachecking;B.S.,H.H.,S.S.;S.S.,F.M.,andE.S.R.,writingandrevising
concepts.Allauthorshavereadandagreedtothepublishedversionofthemanuscript.
Funding:ThisresearchisfundedbytheGovernmentthroughtheMinistryofEducationandCul
tureoftheRepublicofIndonesiaintheformofresearchanddevelopmentgrantassistanceforuni
versities.
InstitutionalReviewBoardStatement:ThisresearchwasconductedwiththeapprovaloftheInsti
tuteforResearchandCommunityService(LPPMBosowaMakassarUniversity)withContract
Number12/LPPM/VIII/2020dated12August2020.Furthermore,fundingforthisresearchisfunded
throughtheBosowaMakassarUniversityInstitutethroughresearchanddevelopmentandhasbeen
approvedbytheChairpersonoftheBosowaUniversityLPPM.
InformedConsentStatement:TheresultsofthisstudyhavereceivedapprovalfromtheInstitute
forResearchandCommunityServiceatBosowaUniversityMakassarasoutlinedintheapprovalof
theChairpersonofLPPMNumber72/LPPM/IX/2020.
DataAvailabilityStatement:WefullysupportopenscientificexchangethroughMDPIinsharing
andarchivingresearchdatafromthisstudy.Wefullycomplywiththeprovisionsthathavebeen
setbyreferringtotheestablishedjournalguidelines.
Acknowledgments:Wearegratefulfortheparticipationofstakeholdersincontributingideasand
ideastotheimplementationofthisstudy.ThankyoutotheMinistryofEducationandCultureof
theRepublicofIndonesiafortheirsupportandgrantaidforappliedresearchgrantsinsupporting
theresearchofthisstudy.
ConflictsofInterest:Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictofinterest.
Land2021,10,55627of33
AppendixA
FigureA1.PopulationdensityofMakassarCitybydistrict:(A)in2006,(B)in2010,(C)in2015,and(D)in2020.
Land2021,10,55628of33
FigureA2.ComparisonofbuildingdensityinMakassarCity:(A)2006,(B)2009,(C)2016,and(D)2020.
Land2021,10,55629of33
FigureA3.DifferencesindistancebetweendistrictstoCBDlocationsandsprawltypologyofMakassarCity.(A)Year
2010,(B)Year2015,(C)Year2020,and(D)DistancetoCBD.
Land2021,10,55630of33
References
1. Legates,R.;Hudalah,D.PeriurbanplanningfordevelopingEastAsia:LearningfromChengdu,Chinaand
Yogyakarta/Kartamantul,Indonesia.J.UrbanAff.2014,36(Supp.1),334–353,doi:10.1111/juaf.12106.
2. Wu,K.;Zhang,H.Landusedynamics,builtuplandexpansionpatterns,anddrivingforcesanalysisofthefastgrowing
Hangzhoumetropolitanarea,easternChina(1978–2008).Appl.Geogr.2012,34,137–145,doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.11.006.
3. Jiang,Y.;Hou,L.;Shi,T.;Ning,Y.SpatialZoningStrategyofUrbanizationBasedonUrbanClimateCoMovement:ACase
StudyinShanghaiMainlandArea.Sustainability2018,10,2706,doi:10.3390/su10082706.
4. Surya,B.;Ahmad,D.N.A.;Sakti,H.H.;Sahban,H.LandUseChange,SpatialInteraction,andSustainableDevelopmentinthe
MetropolitanUrbanAreas,SouthSulawesiProvince,Indonesia.Land2020,9,95,doi:10.3390/land9030095.
5. Surya,B.;Ahmad,D.N.A.;Bahrun,R.S.;Saleh,H.Urbanfarmingasaslumsettlementsolution(studyonslumsettlementsin
TanjungMerdekaVillage,MakassarCity).IOPConf.SeriesEarthEnviron.Sci.2020,562,012006,doi:10.1088/1755
1315/562/1/012006.
6. Švajlenka,J.;Kozlovská,M.HousesBasedonWoodasanEcologicalandSustainableHousingAlternativeCaseStudy.Sustain
ability2018,10,1502,doi:10.3390/su10051502.
7. Zhang,Y.;Song,R.;vanNes,R.;He,S.;Yin,W.IdentifyingUrbanStructureBasedonTransitOrientedDevelopment.Sustain
ability2019,11,7241,doi:10.3390/su11247241.
8. Anas,A.;Arnott,R.J.;Small,K.A.Urbanspatialstructure.J.Econ.Lit.1998,36,1426–1464.
9. GarciaLópez,M.À.;Muñiz,I.Urbanspatialstructure,agglomerationeconomies,andeconomicgrowthinBarcelona:Anintra
metropolitanperspective.Pap.Reg.Sci.2013,92,515–534,doi:10.1016/j.jue.2012.05.003.
10. Kloosterman,R.C.;Musterd,S.ThepolycentricUrbanregion:TowardsaresearchAgenda.UrbanStud.2001,38,623–633,
doi:10.1080/00420980120035259.
11. WorkBank.LajuUrbanisasidiIndonesia.2019.Availableonline:
https://www.google.com/search?q=Urbanisasi+di+Indonesia+(Work+Bank%2C+2019)&oq=Urbanisasi+di+Indonesia+(Work+B
ank%2C+2019)&aqs=chrome..69i57.18168j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF8(accessedon3March2020).
12. AsianDevelopmentBank.AnnualReport.2019.Availableonline:https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/institutional
document/650011/adbannualreport2019.pdf(accessedon3December2020).
13. WordBank.KajianKebijakanPembangunan2014.Indonesia:MenghindariPerangkap.Availableonline:
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/132131468051887925/pdf/889290REVISED00y0review020140bahasa.pdf(accessed
on3March2020).
14. Handayani,W.;Chigbu,U.E.;Rudiarto,I.;Putri,I.H.S.UrbanizationandIncreasingFloodRiskintheNorthernCoastofCentral
Java—Indonesia:AnAssessmenttowardsBetterLandUsePolicyandFloodManagement.Land2020,9,343,
doi:10.3390/land9100343.
15. Egidi,G.;Cividino,S.;Vinci,S.;Sateriano,A.;Salvia,R.TowardsLocalFormsofSprawl:ABriefReflectiononMediterranean
Urbanization.Sustainability2020,12,582,doi:10.3390/su12020582.
16. Huang,D.;Tan,X.;Liu,T.;Chu,E.;Kong,F.EffectsofHierarchicalCityCentersontheIntensityandDirectionofUrbanLand
Expansion:ACaseStudyofBeijing.Land2020,9,312,doi:10.3390/land9090312.
17. KungLai,S.Effectsoflanduseplansonurbandevelopment:Apropertyrightsapproach.J.UrbanManag.2020,9,1–5,
doi:10.1016/j.jum.2019.12.002.
18. Kurda,K.P.;Vavrouchová,H.LandCoverChangeandLandscapeTransformations(2000–2018)intheRuralMunicipalitiesof
theUpperSilesiaZagł˛ebieMetropolis.Sustainability2020,12,9911,doi:10.3390/su12239911.
19. Surya,B.;Menne,F.;Sabhan,H.;Suriani,S.;Abubakar,H.;Idris,M.EconomicGrowth,IncreasingProductivityofSMEs,and
OpenInnovation.J.OpenInnov.Technol.Mark.Complex2021,7(1),20,doi:10.3390/joitmc7010020.
20. Ashik,F.R.;Mim,S.A.;Neema,M.N.Towardsverticalspatialequityofurbanfacilities:Anintegrationofspatialandaspatial
accessibility.J.UrbanManag.2020,9,77–92,doi:10.1016/j.jum.2019.11.004.
21. Assaf,C.;Adams,C.;Ferreira,F.F.;França,H.Landuseandcovermodelingasatoolforanalyzingnatureconservationpolicies
AcasestudyofJuréiaItatins.LandUsePolicy2020100,104895,doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104895.
22. Carruthers,J.I.;Ulfarrson,G.F.UrbanSprawlandtheCostofPublicServices.Environ.Plan.BUrbanAnal.CitySci.2003,30,
503–522,doi:10.1068/b12847.
23. Zerhouny,M.;Fadil,A.;Hakdaoui,M.UndergroundSpaceUtilizationintheUrbanLandUsePlanningofCasablanca(Mo
rocco).Land2018,7,143,doi:10.3390/land7040143.
24. Wojewodzic,T.;Janus,J.;Dacko,M.;Pijanowski,J.;Taszakowski,J.Measuringtheeffectivenessoflandconsolidation:Aneco
nomicapproachbasedonselectedcasestudiesfromPoland.LandUsePolicy2021,100,104888,
doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104888.
25. Cheng,J.AnalysisofcommerciallandleasingofthedistrictgovernmentsofBeijinginChina.LandUsePolicy2021,100,104881,
doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104881.
26. Hlaváˇcek,P.;Kopáˇcek,M.;Horáˇcková,L.ImpactofSuburbanisationonSustainableDevelopmentofSettlementsinSuburban
Spaces:SmartandNewSolutions.Sustainability2019,11,7182,doi:10.3390/su11247182.
Land2021,10,xFORPEERREVIEW31of33
27. Surya,B.;Hadijah,H.;Suriani,S.;Baharuddin,B.;Fitriyah,A.T.;Menne,F.;Rasyidi,E.S.SpatialTransformationofaNewCity
in2006–2020:PerspectivesontheSpatialDynamics,EnvironmentalQualityDegradation,andSocio—EconomicSustainability
ofLocalCommunitiesinMakassarCity,Indonesia.Land2020,9,324,doi:10.3390/land9090324.
28. Zhang,Q.;Zhang,H.;Zhao,D.;Cheng,B.;Yu,C.;Yang,Y.DoesUrbanSprawlInhibitUrbanEcoEfficiency?EmpiricalStudies
ofSuperEfficiencyandThresholdRegressionModels.Sustainability2019,11,5598,doi:10.3390/su11205598.
29. Alipbeki,O.;Alipbekova,C.;Sterenharz,A.;Toleubekova,Z.;Makenova,S.;Aliyev,M.;Mineyev,N.AnalysisofLandUse
ChangeinShortandyDistrictinTermsofSustainableDevelopment.Land2020,9,147,doi:10.3390/land9050147.
30. Vaidyanathan,V.;King,R.A.;deJong,M.UnderstandingurbantransportationinIndiaaspolycentricsystem.PolicySoc.2013,
32,175–185,doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.05.005.
31. Surya,B.;Hamsina,H.;Ridwan,R.;Baharuddin,B.;Menne,F.;Fitriyah,A.T.;Rasyidi,E.S.TheComplexityofSpaceUtilization
andEnvironmentalPollutionControlintheMainCorridorofMakassarCity,SouthSulawesi,Indonesia.Sustainability2020,12,
9244,doi:10.3390/su12219244.
32. Surya,B.TheDynamicsofSpatialStructureandSpatialPatternChangesattheFringeAreaofMakassarCity.Indones.J.Geogr.
2015,47,11–19:doi:10.22146/ijg.6926.
33. Tian,Y.MutualisticPatternofIntraUrbanAgglomeration,andImpactAnalysis:ACaseStudyof11UrbanAgglomerationsof
MainlandChina.ISPRSInt.J.GeoInf.2020,9,565,doi:10.3390/ijgi9100565.
34. Surya,B.ChangePhenomenaofSpatialPhysicalintheDynamicsofDevelopmentinUrbanFringeArea.Indones.J.Geogr.2016,
48,118–134,doi:10.22146/ijg.17631.
35. Zhao,Y.;Zhang,G.;Zhao,H.SpatialNetworkStructuresofUrbanAgglomerationBasedontheImprovedGravityModel:A
CaseStudyinChina’sTwoUrbanAgglomerations.Complexity2021,6651444,doi:10.1155/2021/6651444.
36. Han,H.;Li,H.CouplingCoordinationEvaluationbetweenPopulationandLandUrbanizationinHaChangUrbanAgglomer
ation.Sustainability2020,12,357,doi:10.3390/su12010357.
37. Shen,N.;Zhao,Y.;Wang,Q.DiversifiedAgglomeration,SpecializedAgglomeration,andEmissionReductionEffect—ANon
linearTestBasedonChineseCityData.Sustainability2018,10,2002,doi:10.3390/su10062002.
38. Ma,F.;Wang,Z.;Sun,Q.;Yuen,K.F.;Zhang,Y.;Xue,H.;Zhao,S.Spatial–TemporalEvolutionofUrbanResilienceandIts
InfluencingFactors:EvidencefromtheGuanzhongPlainUrbanAgglomeration.Sustainability2020,12,2593,
doi:10.3390/su12072593.
39. Surya,B.;Saleh,H.;Suriani,S.;Sakti,H.H.;Hadijah,H.;Idris,M.EnvironmentalPollutionControlandSustainabilityManage
mentofSlumSettlementsinMakassarCity,SouthSulawesi,Indonesia.Land2020,9,279,doi:10.3390/land9090279.
40. Yao,Z.;Ye,K.;Xiao,L.;Wang,X.RadiationEffectofUrbanAgglomeration’sTransportationNetwork:EvidencefromChengdu–
ChongqingUrbanAgglomeration,China.Land2021,10,520,doi:10.3390/land10050520.
41. Nugmanova,A.;Arndt,W.H.;Hossain,M.A.;Kim,J.R.EffectivenessofRingRoadsinReducingTrafficCongestioninCitiesfor
LongRun:BigAlmatyRingRoadCaseStudy.Sustainability2019,11,4973,doi:10.3390/su11184973.
42. Surya,B.;Syafri,S.;Sahban,H.;Sakti,H.H.NaturalResourceConservationBasedonCommunityEconomicEmpowerment:
PerspectivesonWatershedManagementandSlumSettlementsinMakassarCity,SouthSulawesi,Indonesia.Land2020,9,104,
doi:10.3390/land9040104.
43. Forsyth,A.;Peiser,R.Lessonsfromplannedresettlementandnewtownexperiencesforavoidingclimatesprawl.Landsc.Urban
Plan.2021,205,103957,doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103957.
44. Han,W.;Zhang,Y.;Cai,J.;Ma,E.DoesUrbanIndustrialAgglomerationLeadtotheImprovementofLandUseEfficiencyin
China?AnEmpiricalStudyfromaSpatialPerspective.Sustainability2019,11,986,doi:10.3390/su11040986.
45. Ahrens,A.;Lyons,S.ChangesinLandCoverandUrbanSprawlinIrelandFromaComparativePerspectiveOver1990–2012.
Land2019,8,16,doi:10.3390/land8010016.
46. Guyot,M.;Araldi,A.;Fusco,G.;Thomas,I.TheurbanformofBrusselsfromthestreetperspective:Theroleofvegetationinthe
definitionoftheurbanfabric.Landsc.UrbanPlan.2021,205,103947,doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103947.
47. Morollón,F.R.;Yserte,R.G.RecentLiteratureaboutUrbanSprawl:ARenewedRelevanceofthePhenomenonfromthePer
spectiveofEnvironmentalSustainability.Sustainability2020,12,6551,doi:10.3390/su12166551.
48. AlJarah,S.H.;Zhou,B.;Abdullah,R.J.;Lu,Y.;Yu,W.UrbanizationandUrbanSprawlIssuesinCityStructure:ACaseofthe
SulaymaniahIraqiKurdistanRegion.Sustainability2019,11,485,doi:10.3390/su11020485.
49. Feng,D.;Li,J.;Li,X.;Zhang,Z.TheEffectsofUrbanSprawlandIndustrialAgglomerationonEnvironmentalEfficiency:Evi
dencefromtheBeijing–Tianjin–HebeiUrbanAgglomeration.Sustainability2019,11,3042,doi:10.3390/su11113042.
50. Knox,P.;McCarthy,L.M.Urbanization:AnIntroductiontoUrbanGeography,3rded.;PearsonEduc.Ltd.:Harlow,UK,2014;
pp.1–142.Availableonline:https://files.pearsoned.de/inf/ext/9781292047935(accessedon23November2020).
51. TheASEANSecretariat.AseanSustainableUrbanisationStrategy.AssociationofSoutheastAsianNations(ASEAN)2018.
Availableonline:https://asean.org/storage/2018/11/ASEANSustainableUrbanisationStrategyASUS.pdf.(accessedon5May
2020).
52. Izakoviˇcová,Z.;Mederly,P.;Petroviˇc,F.LongTermLandUseChangesDrivenbyUrbanisationandTheirEnvironmental
Effects(ExampleofTrnavaCity,Slovakia).Sustainability2017,9,1553,doi:10.3390/su9091553.
53. Rousta,I.;Sarif,M.O.;Gupta,R.D.;Olafsson,H.;Ranagalage,M.;Murayama,Y.;Zhang,H.;Mushore,T.D.Spatiotemporal
AnalysisofLandUse/LandCoverandItsEffectsonSurfaceUrbanHeatIslandUsingLandsatData:ACaseStudyofMetropol
itanCityTehran(1988–2018).Sustainability2018,10,4433,doi:10.3390/su10124433.
Land2021,10,xFORPEERREVIEW32of33
54. Zhang,Y.;Xie,H.InteractiveRelationshipamongUrbanExpansion,EconomicDevelopment,andPopulationGrowthsincethe
ReformandOpeningupinChina:AnAnalysisBasedonaVectorErrorCorrectionModel.Land2019,8,153,
doi:10.3390/land8100153.
55. Surya,B.SpatialArticulation,andCoexistenceofModeofProductionintheDynamicsofDevelopmentatTheUrbanFringeof
MakassarCity.J.Eng.Appl.Sci.2015,10,214–222,doi:10.36478/jeasci.2015.214.222.
56. Barton,J.R.;Ramírez,M.I.TheRoleofPlanningPoliciesinPromotingUrbanSprawlinIntermediateCities:Evidencefrom
Chile.Sustainability2019,11,7165,doi:10.3390/su11247165.
57. Gao,J.;Wei,Y.D.;Chen,W.;Yenneti,K.UrbanLandExpansionandStructuralChangeintheYangtzeRiverDelta,China.
Sustainability2015,7,10281–10307,doi:10.3390/su70810281.
58. Surya,B.InequilityofSpaceReproductionControlandUrbanSlumAreaManagementSustainability(CaseStudy:SlumArea
ofBuloaUrbanVillageinMakassarCity).J.Eng.Appl.Sci.2018,13,6033–6042,doi:10.36478/jeasci.2018.6033.6042.
59. Surya,B.;Saleh,H.;Remmang,H.EconomicGentrificationandSocioCulturalTransformationMetropolitanSuburbanofMam
minasata.J.Eng.Appl.Sci.2018,13,6072–6084,doi:10.3923/jeasci.2018.6072.6084.
60. Jiang,S.;Ferreira,J.;Gonzalez,M.C.Discoveringurbanspatialtemporalstructurefromhumanactivitypatterns.InProceedings
oftheACMSIGKDDInternationalWorkshoponUrbanComputing,Beijing,China,12August2012;pp.95–102,
doi:10.1145/2346496.2346512.
61. Hernita,H.;Surya,B.;Perwira,I.;Abubakar,H.;Idris,M.EconomicBusinessSustainabilityandStrengtheningHumanResource
CapacityBasedonIncreasingtheProductivityofSmallandMediumEnterprises(SMEs)inMakassarCity,Indonesia.
Sustainability2021,13(6),3177,doi:10.3390/su13063177
62. Surya,B.OptimizationofFunctionandRoleofTraditionalMarketsinUrbanDevelopmentSystemofKetapangCity:acase
study:RangeSentapMarket,DeltaPawanSubdistrict,Ketapangcity’.WorldAppl.Sci.J.2015,33,1457–1471,
doi:10.5829/idosi.wasj.2015.33.09.156111.
63. Surya,B.;Saleh,H.Transformationofmetropolitansuburbanarea(astudyonnewtowndevelopmentinMoncongloePatta
lassangMetropolitanMaminasata).IOPConf.Ser.EarthEnviron.Sci.2018,202,012027,doi:10.1088/17551315/202/1/012027.
64. Pratomo,R.A.;Samsura,D.A.A.;vanderKrabben,E.TransformationofLocalPeople’sPropertyRightsInducedbyNewTown
Development(CaseStudiesinPeriUrbanAreasinIndonesia).Land2020,9,236,doi:10.3390/land9070236.
65. Wang,Z.;Zhao,J.;Lin,S.;Liu,Y.IdentificationofIndustrialLandParcels,andItsImplicationsforEnvironmentalRiskMan
agementintheBeijing–Tianjin–HebeiUrbanAgglomeration.Sustainability2020,12,174,doi:10.3390/su12010174.
66. Surya,B.SocialChange,SpatialArticulationintheDynamicsofBoomtownConstructionandDevelopment(CaseSatudyof
MetroTanjungBungaBoomtown,Makassar).Mod.Appl.Sci.2014,8,238–245,doi:10.5539/mas.v8n4p238.
67. Mangi,M.Y.;Yue,Z.;Kalwar,S.;Lashari,Z.A.ComparativeAnalysisofUrbanDevelopmentTrendsofBeijingandKarachi
MetropolitanAreas.Sustainability2020,12,451,doi:10.3390/su12020451.
68. Boyer,R.H.W.;Peterson,N.D.;Arora,P.;Caldwell,K.FiveApproachestoSocialSustainabilityandanIntegratedWayForward.
Sustainability2016,8,878,doi:10.3390/su8090878.
69. Denzin,N.K.;danLincoln,Y.S.(eds.).HandbookofQualitativeResearch.TerjemahanDariyatnodkk.Jogjakarta:PustakaPela
jar.2009.ISBN:97860284.Availableonline:https://openlibrary.telkomuniversity.ac.id/pustaka/9769/handbookofqualitative
research.html(accessedon20April2020).
70. Huang,D.;Liu,Z.;Zhao,X.MonocentricorPolycentric?TheUrbanSpatialStructureofEmploymentinBeijing.Sustainability
2015,7,11632–11656,doi:10.3390/su70911632.
71. BPSMakassarCity.KotaMakassarDalamAngka.2019.Availableonline:https://makassarkota.bps.go.id/publica
tion/2019/08/16/4ca03301b8e2b8414e33f6a3/kotamakassardalamangka2019.html(accessedon13February2020).
72. Malmberg,A.;Maskell,P.TowardsandExplanationofIndustryAgglomerationandRegionalSpezialitation.EuropeanPlanning
Studies,1997,5,25–41,doi:10.1080/09654319708720382.
73. Bhatta,B.;Saraswati,S.;Bandyopadhyay,D.“UrbanSprawlMeasurementFromRemoteSensingData”.AppliedGeography,
2010,30,731–740,doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.02.002.
74. Viljoen,C.;Lowies,B.;Lushington,K.;McGreal,S.Femaleperspectivesonhousingqualityandhouseholdcharacteristics,per
ceptionsandchallenges:EvidencefromAustralia.HabitatInt.2020,105,102276,doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102276.
75. Schneider,C.;Achilles,B.;Merbitz,H.UrbanityandUrbanization:AnInterdisciplinaryReviewCombiningCulturalandPhys
icalApproaches.Land2014,3,105–130,doi:doi:10.3390/land3010105.
76. Monteiro,F.F.;Gonçalves,W.A.;Andrade,L.M.B.;Villavicencio,L.M.M.;Silva,C.M.S.AssessmentofUrbanHeatIslandsin
BrazilbasedonMODISremotesensingdata.UrbanClim.2021,35,100726,doi:10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100726.
77. Surya,B.;Saleh,H.;Hamsina,H.;Idris,M.;Ahmad,D.N.A.RuralAgribusinessbasedAgropolitanAreaDevelopmentand
EnvironmentalManagementSustainability:RegionalEconomicGrowthPerspectives.Int.J.EnergyEcon.Policy2021,1,142–157,
doi:10.32479/ijeep.10184.
78. Creswell,J.W.ResearchDesignPendekatanMetodeKualitatif,Kuantitatif,danCampuran;PustakaPelajar:Jakarta,Indonesia,2016.
ISBN:9786022295846.
79. Sugiyono.MetodePenelitianKuantitatif,KualitatifdanR&D.Bandung:PTAlfabet.2016.ISBN:9786022895336.Available
online:http://cvalfabeta.com/product/metodepenelitiankuantitatifkualitatifdanrdmpkk/(accessedon5May2020).
80. Isaac,S.;Michael,W.B.HandbookinResearchandEvaluation;EDITSPublishers:SanDiego,CA,USA,1981;Volume234,
doi:10.1002/15206807(198207)19:3<413::AIDPITS2310190328>3.0.CO;2X.
Land2021,10,xFORPEERREVIEW33of33
81. Zandi,R.;Zanganeh,M.;Akbari,E.Zoningandspatialanalysisofpovertyinurbanareas(CaseStudy:SabzevarCityIran).J.
UrbanManag.2019,8,342–354,doi:10.1016/j.jum.2019.09.002.
82. Das,M.;Das,A.DynamicsofUrbanizationanditsimpactonUrbanEcosystemServices(UESs):Astudyofamediumsizetown
ofWestBengal,EasternIndia.J.UrbanManag.2019,8,420–434,doi:10.1016/j.jum.2019.03.002.
83. Surya,B.;Muhibuddin,A.;Suriani,S.;Rasyidi,E.S.;Baharuddin,B.;Fitriyah,A.T.;Abubakar,H.EconomicEvaluation,Useof
RenewableEnergy,andSustainableUrbanDevelopmentMamminasataMetropolitan,Indonesia.Sustainability2021,13,1165,
doi:10.3390/su13031165.
84. Syafri,S.;Surya,B.;Ridwan,R.;Bahri,S.;Rasyidi,E.S.;Sudarman,S.WaterQualityPollutionControlandWatershedManage
mentBasedonCommunityParticipationinMarosCity,SouthSulawesi,Indonesia.Sustainability2020,12,10260,
doi:10.3390/su122410260.
85. Brueckner,J.K.;Thisse,J.F.;Zenou,Y.WhyiscentralParisrichanddowntownDetroitpoor?Eur.Econ.Rev.1999,43,91–107,
doi:10.1016/S00142921000191.
86. Hwang,U.;Woo,M.AnalysisofInterRelationshipsbetweenUrbanDeclineandUrbanSprawlinCityRegionsofSouthKorea.
Sustainability2020,12,1656,doi:10.3390/su12041656.
87. Surya,B.;Syafri,S.;Hadijah,H.;Baharuddin,B.;Fitriyah,A.T.;Sakti,H.H.ManagementofSlumBasedUrbanFarmingand
EconomicEmpowermentoftheCommunityofMakassarCity,SouthSulawesi,Indonesia.Sustainability2020,12,7324,
doi:10.3390/su12187324.
88. Surya,B.;Suriani,S.;Menne,F.;Abubakar,H.;Idris,M.;Rasyidi,E.S.;Remmang,H.CommunityEmpowermentandUtilization
ofRenewableEnergy:EntrepreneurialPerspectiveforCommunityResilienceBasedonSustainableManagementofSlumSet
tlementsinMakassarCity,Indonesia.Sustainability2021,13,3178,doi:10.3390/su13063178.
89. Yuan,F.;Wei,Y.D.;Wu,J.W.AmenityeffectsofurbanfacilitiesonhousingpricesinChina:Accessibility,scarcity,andurban
spaces.Cities2020,96,102433,doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.102433.
90. Wang,Y.;Liu,K.EvolutionofUrbanSocioSpatialStructureinModernTimesinXi’an,China.Sustainability2017,9,1935,
doi:10.3390/su9111935.
91. Krier,R.UrbandSpace;JohnWiley&Sons:Hoboken,NJ,USA,1979.
92. Saleh,H.;Surya,B.;Hamsina,H.ImplementationofSustainableDevelopmentGoalstoMakassarZeroWasteandEnergy
Source.Int.J.EnergyEcon.Policy,2020,10,530538,doi:10.32479/ijeep.9453.
93. Baker,S.SustainableDevelopment;Routledge:London,UK,2006;p.245.
94. Bounoua,L.;Fathi,N.;ElBerkaoui,M.;ElGhazouani,L.;Messouli,M.AssessmentofSustainabilityDevelopmentinUrban
AreasofMorocco.UrbanSci.2020,4,18,doi:10.3390/urbansci4020018.
95. Dushkova,D.;Haase,D.NotSimplyGreen:NatureBasedSolutionsasaConceptandPracticalApproachforSustainability
StudiesandPlanningAgendasinCities.Land2020,9,19,doi:10.3390/land9010019.
96. Surya,B.SpatialInteractionPatternandtheProcessofCityActivityFormationSystem(Casestudy,TernateCity,Tidore
ArchipelagoCityandSofifiCityofNorthMaluku,Indonesia).Res.J.Appl.Sci.2015,10,880–892,
doi:10.36478/rjasci.2015.880.892.
97. Teferi,Z.A.;Newman,P.SlumRegenerationandSustainability:ApplyingtheExtendedMetabolismModelandtheSDGs.
Sustainability2017,9,2273,doi:10.3390/su9122273.
98. Ageev,I.A.;Ageeva,V.V.Urbanlifestyleasanelementofconsumptionidealandeconomicwellbeing:meaningchangingtrans
formationfromSovietperiodtomodernity.ProcediaSoc.Behav.Sci.2015,166,24–29,doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.477.
99. Saleh,H.;Surya,B.;Ahmad,D.N.A.;Manda,D.TheRoleofNaturalandHumanResourcesonEconomicGrowthandRegional
Development:WithDiscussionofOpenInnovationDynamics.J.OpenInnov.Technol.Mark.Complex.2020,6,103,
doi:10.3390/joitmc6040103.
100. Lankao,P.R.;Gnatz,D.M.;Wilhelmi,O.;Hayden,M.UrbanSustainabilityandResilience:FromTheorytoPractice.Sustainability
2016,8,1224,doi:10.3390/su8121224.
... Most studies concerning new town development in peri-urban Jakarta have paid particular attention to the political economy which discussed more about the process of capital accumulation (see Firman, 2000Firman, , 2004Hudalah & Firman, 2012;Kenichiro, 2011Kenichiro, , 2015Winarso et al., 2015). Several studies have attempted to capture rural to urban spatial transformation process, but most of them were carried out at large spatial scale, such as from city to megacity level (see Pribadi & Pauleit, 2015;Surya et al., 2021). Therefore, we aim to explore the trajectory of new-build gentrification at microscale through a case study of rural-urban land conversion in the southwest of Jakarta. ...
... Many studies conducted urban land use changes using generated remote sensing formulas (Hadi et al., 2016;Hu et al., 2015;Nugroho et al., 2018;Surya et al., 2021). However, in this study, we conduct manual land use change analysis to investigate the detail spatial transformations in the study area. ...
Article
Located in the southwest of Jakarta, Pagedangan has been known as one of the hotspots for large-scale residential complexes or ‘new town’ in the Jakarta Metropolitan Area, Indonesia. By using a diachronic approach, we aim to examine spatial transformations of rural Pagedangan at micro-scale from 1901 to 2022 which shows the trajectory of new-build gentrification in the study area. This study thoroughly examines how land conversion transforms the rural Pagedangan into gentrifying urban landscape using historical maps and multitemporal imageries. During the last decade, Pagedangan has experienced massive agricultural land conversion which increased land price in the area. It has become gentrified seen by the rise of new town’s urban economy. Meanwhile, preexisting irregular settlements, or kampungs, have remained as an assemblage of enclaves in a new town, a realm that completely differs from their previous rural environment. Despite displacement has not yet been the main issue in Pagedangan, kampungs are still possibly at risk of disappearance. This study delivers a comprehensive empirical study on physical gentrification process to provide insights into urban studies discourse, especially in urban Asia. This study proposes kampung as an important spatial entity which government should consider in Indonesian land use planning and urban policy making.
... Furthermore, the increase in development activities not only impacts the emergence of new activities but also contributes to the urban macroclimate (Liu, Z. et al., 2019;Aguilar et al., 2022;Sahana et al., 2023). Urbanisation is positively associated with the expansion of urban areas into peripheral areas and impacts land use change and transport system complexity towards environmental degradation (Dadashpoor et al., 2019;Othman & Ali, 2020;Surya et al., 2021). Furthermore, changes in the temperature profile of urban areas are characterised by increases in rainfall intensity, relative humidity, and solar radiation patterns (Morris et al., 2017;Pyrgou et al., 2019;Li et al., 2022). ...
... The trend of spatial utilisation patterns in the Hertasning-Tun Abdul Razak periphery area is in line with the intensity of large-scale residential development and infrastructure development support has an impact on the connectivity of the Mamminasata Metropolitan urban transport system. Furthermore, the development orientation of the Hertasning-Tun Abdul Razak periphery will require spatial utilisation control and land use regulation in areas that must be protected towards the management and arrangement of urban transport systems (Kii et al., 2019;Surya et al., 2021). Environmental degradation of peripheral areas is characterised by a decline in air quality and its effects on public health. ...
Article
Full-text available
The development of peripheral areas as centres of socioeconomic activity has an impact on land use change and the complexity of the transport system. The ongoing spatial transformation contributes to anthropogenic enhancement towards urban macroclimate change. Increased anthropogenic activity is characterised by changes in typology, land use and traffic performance along the corridor. This study examines the relationship between traffic and land use performance variables and climatic conditions using a quantitative approach. The data that has been processed is then analysed using SEM PLS. The results of the analysis show that land use variables affect climate conditions with a T-Statistic value of 2.752 > 1.96 or a P value of 0.040 < 0.05. These results suggest that land use in the Hertasning-Tun Abdul Razak road corridor is positively associated with increased urban temperatures. This study recommends the handling of urban fringe areas towards controlling spatial utilisation along major road corridors, in anticipation of increasing urban macroclimate change.
... Research has also shown that changes in land values can contribute to air pollution [3]. Additionally, studies have highlighted the role of land use changes and transportation infrastructure in influencing urban air quality [4,5]. These findings underscore the urgent need to address the issue of increased vehicle emissions, which pose significant risks to the environment and public health. ...
Article
Full-text available
Air pollution is one of the most challenging issues for urban environment and environmental management. The goal of this study was to determine the impact of Tehran metropolitan's performance and accessibility on urban transportation and air pollution as sprawl grows. Tehran, with a population of 15.98 million people, has many environmental issues, including air pollution. Secondary data were collected from the Tehran Air Quality Control Company as well as Landsat satellite imagery (OLI). The raw data of intra-city and suburban traffic counts for spatial analysis of movements, combined with the raw data of measuring stations, were then used as a sample in the ArcGIS software environment for three selected days in 2013, 2014, and 2016. Following geometric and radiometric correction, programming methods and a multivariate regression algorithm were applied to the images, yielding results in the form of additional stations. According to the results obtained (about 3.29 m) root-mean-square error (RMSE), the Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) model was used in air pollution maps for better assessment. The findings suggest that Tehran is not the only source of air pollution and that TMA performance and accessibility play a significant role in the amount of air pollution. Furthermore, there is a strong correlation (more than 75%) between air pollution maps and transportation flow maps on specific days (February 23, 2013, February 26, 2015, and December 28, 2016). Finally, the analysis of this situation in three circles showed that the highest volume of traffic was done in the city of Tehran (CBD), suburban area (Suburban), and suburban area (Exurban), respectively, and the pattern of distribution and spatial accumulation of pollution has also been a function of this situation.
... K-means reveals inherent patterns and structures within the data, enabling researchers to identify meaningful relationships among socio-economic and environmental factors across Indonesia's provinces, allowing policymakers to tailor strategies and allocate resources effectively according to each region's unique needs and challenges. Additionally, uncovering underlying trends through clustering can inform targeted approaches for promoting sustainable development, mitigating environmental issues, and driving inclusive economic growth across Indonesia's diverse regions [19,29]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Indonesia's archipelago presents a distinctive opportunity for targeted sustainable development due to its complex interplay of economic advancement and environmental challenges. To better understand this dynamic and identify potential areas for focused intervention, this study applied K-means clustering to 2022 data on the Air Quality Index (AQI), electricity consumption, and Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP). The analysis aimed to delineate the provinces into three distinct clusters, providing a clearer picture of the varying levels of economic development and environmental impact across the nation's diverse islands. Each cluster reflects specific environmental and economic dynamics, suggesting tailored policy interventions. The results show that for provinces in Cluster 1, which exhibit moderate environmental quality and lower economic activity, the introduction of sustainable agricultural enhancements, eco-tourism, and renewable energy initiatives is recommended. Cluster 2, marked by higher economic outputs and moderate environmental conditions, would benefit from the implementation of smart urban planning, stricter environmental controls, and the adoption of clean technologies. Finally, Cluster 3, which includes highly urbanized areas with robust economic growth, requires expanded green infrastructure, improved sustainable urban practices, and enhanced public transportation systems. These recommendations aim to foster balanced economic growth while preserving environmental integrity across Indonesia's diverse landscapes.
... Subsidized single-family housing development perpetuates urban sprawl by promoting low-density growth and increasing land and infrastructure costs (Roberts et al., 2020). While the majority of research on urban sprawl in Indonesia has focused on Java island, particularly in and around large metropolitan areas (Firman, 2017;Firman & Fahmi, 2017;Mardiansjah et al., 2021;Pratama et al., 2021) studies outside Java island are still limited (Ahyuni & Nur, 2020) and mostly consist of single case studies (Christiawan, 2019;Surya et al., 2021) or macro-level analyses (Olivia et al., 2018;Civelli et al., 2020). ...
Article
Full-text available
This study presents a multidimensional urban sprawl assessment in 15 Indonesian island cities using 17 indicators across densities, composition, and configuration dimensions. The analysis utilizes data from the Global Human Settlement Layer (GHSL). Larger-sized islands serving as provincial capitals or regional activity centers , governed by multidistrict jurisdictions, tend to be more sprawl. Island-level planning and governance are crucial for managing sprawl effectively. The study highlights the coexistence of multiple sprawl typologies within single-island cities and emphasizes the limitations of simplistic binary/linear sprawl assessments. The findings offer insights applicable beyond island contexts, bridging regional and urban units in multilevel settings.
... In the era of the "Orde Baru" (New Order), the population of Makassar City continued to increase sharply due to increasing urbanization, driving the expansion of the city towards the mainland east and south of Makassar City. This confirms several previous studies that urbanization has a significant effect on spatial changes and urban growth (Ashik, Mim et al., 2020;Brettell, 2000;Msuya, Moshi et al., 2021;Surya, Salim et al., 2021;Yılmaz and Terzi, 2020). ...
Article
Full-text available
A city experiences a process of development and change, both physical and non-physical. Makassar grew through a long historical process and as a colonial trading base in eastern Indonesia in the past. At present, Makassar is growing as a metropolitan city with various complex urban problems, resulting in the emergence of threats to historical values. This study aims to identify the development characteristics of Makassar City from pre-colonial to modern times. The study was conducted through a literature study, observation, and interview. The study results show that the historical development of Makassar City has undergone a long transformation since the 17th century, which consists of three essential phases: the kingdom era (traditional city/kingdom city); the colonialism era (colonial city/fort city); and the development of Makassar towards a modern city after Indonesia's independence. After the collapse of the Gowa Kingdom, Makassar City grew from a colonial city formed around Fort Rotterdam, which grew from the Vlaardingen and Melayu villages in the northern part of Fort Rotterdam and Kampung Baru in the southern part of the fort. Unfortunately, the development of Makassar to become a world city has blurred the image of Makassar as a historical city, where historical sites are neglected and even displaced by the hegemony of urban development and trade areas. Therefore, a sustainable urban development strategy is needed by integrating the preservation of cultural heritage with the management of trade areas based on local wisdom. The findings of this study can provide information about the characteristics of the development of Makassar City from era to era and describe the impact of urban development on historical values and changes in urban spatial planning patterns, as well as provide input for city planners and a consideration for local governments in developing Makassar City that accommodates historical values and sustainability in the future.
... Natural resource balance includes land, forest, water and mineral resources. Land resources referred to in this case are land use and its distribution of ownership status (tenure) and spatial planning, the value of land use functions and the value of depletion due to changes in land functions in an area (Grebner et al., 2021;Saleh et al., 2020;Surya et al., 2021). ...
Article
Full-text available
The balance between the availability of land and the need for control, use and utilization of land based on regional functions is important as a reference for sustainable development directions and maintaining environmental sustainability. Imbalance in land use affects the direction of development and environmental sustainability. For this reason, it is necessary to conduct an analysis to determine the balance between land availability and land needs within a certain period of time through the preparation of a land use balance based on regional function directions. This research aims to analyze the balance between land availability and land use as well as the suitability of land use for the direction of regional functions. The method in this research uses a multi-temporal approach by utilizing remote sensing technology and geographic information systems. The overlay process was carried out to see the land change of Baubau city and see the level of conformity of existing land use with the direction of regional functions. The results show that the 2016 land use balance has the highest assets in forest land use of 21097.66 Ha and the 2020 land use balance has the highest liabilities in forest land use of 20959.56 Ha. The trend of land change in 2016-2020 is the change of forest, open land, mixed gardens, settlements and shrubs/shrubs. The level of conformity of existing land use with the direction of the function of the area is very high with a percentage level of suitability of 90.83% and a level of incompatibility of 9.17%.
Article
Arid areas with low precipitation and sparse vegetation typically yield compact urban pattern, and drought directly impacts urban site selection, growth processes, and future scenarios. Spatial simulation and projection based on cellular automata (CA) models is important to achieve sustainable urban development in arid areas. We developed a new CA model using bat algorithm (BA) named bat algorithm-probability-of-occurrence-cellular automata (BA-POO-CA) model by considering drought constraint to accurately delineate urban growth patterns and project future scenarios of Urumqi City and its surrounding areas, located in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China. We calibrated the BA-POO-CA model for the drought-prone study area with 2000 and 2010 data and validated the model with 2010 and 2020 data, and finally projected its urban scenarios in 2030. The results showed that BA-POO-CA model yielded overall accuracy of 97.70% and figure-of-merits (FOMs) of 35.50% in 2010, and 97.70% and 26.70% in 2020, respectively. The inclusion of drought intensity factor improved the performance of BA-POO-CA model in terms of FOMs, with increases of 5.50% in 2010 and 7.90% in 2020 than the model excluding drought intensity factor. This suggested that the urban growth of Urumqi City was affected by drought, and therefore taking drought intensity factor into account would contribute to simulation accuracy. The BA-POO-CA model including drought intensity factor was used to project two possible scenarios (i.e., business-as-usual (BAU) scenario and ecological scenario) in 2030. In the BAU scenario, the urban growth dominated mainly in urban fringe areas, especially in the northern part of Toutunhe District, Xinshi District, and Midong District. Using exceptional and extreme drought areas as a spatial constraint, the urban growth was mainly concentrated in the “main urban areas-Changji-Hutubi” corridor urban pattern in the ecological scenario. The results of this research can help to adjust urban planning and development policies. Our model is readily applicable to simulating urban growth and future scenarios in global arid areas such as Northwest China and Africa.
Article
Full-text available
This novel study explores the driving forces and dynamics of rapid urbanization, highlighting the main causes and effects of urban explosion, environmental disruption, and city pattern transformation. This study was carried out that how urbanization and urban sprawl have influenced the structure of the city of Sulaymaniah in Kurdistan region of Iraq. This is because over the years many urban areas have experienced dramatic growth and population explosion that has resulted in the exhaustion of social amenities in the concerned communities. For this purpose, a qualitative method is used based on in-depth face-to-face interviews with local authority, including planners, architects, and experts of master planning, as well as professors in the academic institutions. This study also utilizes extensive document analysis to present the evolution of urban growth. The findings reveal that the autonomy, political conflict, non-implementation of master plans, and economic prosperity are the driving forces which are accelerating this urbanization process. It is proposed that the practical policies and strategic urban development plans are urgent requirement to control the unplanned urban growth and stimulate the desired sustainable future urban development.
Article
Full-text available
Recent years have seen the global proliferation and integration of transportation systems in urban agglomeration (UA), suggesting that transportation networks have become more prominent in the sustainable development of UA. Core cities play a radiating and driving role in affecting their adjacent cities to formulate transportation networks. Such a phenomenon is called the radiation effect of transportation networks and can be imaged using a field strength model as proposed in the study. The field strength model was verified using the Chengdu–Chongqing urban agglomeration (CCUA) as a case. Case data concerning transportation routes and traffic volume were collected for the past 20 years. The data analyses results indicate a relatively stable pattern of transportation networks in the UA. UA cities’ radiation effects follow the same compactness trend. The core cities’ radiation spheres go beyond their territories, and they can envelop the surrounding cities, highlighting the core cities’ dominance in the entire transportation network. Moreover, two development stages of UA transportation—focus and spillover—are also identified. This study contributes to the literature by providing an innovative quantitative method to detect the interaction between a city’s transportation system and peripheral cities or regions. The radiation effect of cities’ transportation systems should be considered in the UA transportation development plan, so as to meet the needs of spatial structure planning and coordinated development of the UA.
Article
Full-text available
The acceleration of metropolitan city development toward economic growth has an impact on over-urbanization, energy scarcity, slum settlements, and environmental degradation. Slum settlements that are predominantly inhabited by the urban poor will require an increase in the productivity of economic enterprises through the empowerment process. This study aims to analyze (1) community empowerment functions as determinants of the use of renewable energy in handling slum settlement and (2) the effects of community empowerment, utilization of renewable energy , strengthening of institutional capacity, and productivity of economic enterprises on improving the quality of the slum settlement environment. The study approach used is a combination of qualitative-quantitative research. Data was obtained through observation, in-depth interviews, surveys , and documentation. The results of the study show that community empowerment, coupled with the use of renewable energy, strengthening institutional capacity, and community participation , contributes positively to increasing the productivity of economic enterprises and improving environmental quality toward sustainable management of slum settlements. The effect of economic empowerment, strengthening institutional capacity, and the use of renewable energy to improve environmental quality with a coefficient of determination of 78.5%. This study recommends socioeconomic empowerment based on the use of renewable energy in the implementation of the Ma-kasssar City toward environmental, economic sustainability and the creation of social cohesion.
Article
Full-text available
The dynamics of urban development coupled with economic growth have contributed positively to the development of small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Optimizing the utilization and strengthening of the capacity of SMEs' human resources will encourage increased productivity of economic enterprises and the sustainability of small and medium enterprises (SMEs). This study aims to analyze (1) strengthening the capacity of human resources (HR) of small and medium enterprises to work as a determinant of increasing the productivity of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and labor absorption; (2) the effect of strengthening the capacity of human resources (HR), business productivity, technology utilization, and business diversification on the sustainability of small and medium enterprises (SMEs); and (3) optimizing the role of government in supporting business development, increasing productivity, business stability and sustainability of small and medium enterprises (SMEs). This study uses a sequential explanatory design approach. Data were obtained through observation, in-depth interviews, surveys, and documentation. Qualitative analysis in this study was carried out through a process of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing, while the quantitative analysis in this study uses quantitative descriptive analysis, correlation, and multiple regression. The results showed that strengthening the capacity of human resources, coupled with the use of technology, and followed by diversification of business, had a positive contribution to increasing the productivity of small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Furthermore , strengthening human resource capacity, business productivity, technology utilization, and business diversification simultaneously have a positive and significant correlation to the sustainability of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) with a determination coefficient of 72.3%. This study recommends that government policy support through strengthening human resource capacity , increasing business productivity, technology utilization, and business diversification have an impact on the sustainability of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Makassar City, Indonesia.
Article
Full-text available
Research on urban agglomerations from the perspective of network spatial structure is important to promote their sustainable development. Based on online and traditional data, this paper first improves three aspects of the traditional spatial gravity model - city quality, the gravitation coefficient, and city distance - considering urban center functional intensity and population mobility tendencies. The resulting improved directional gravity model is applied to analyze the structure of the city network for two urban agglomerations in China, the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration (BTHUA) and the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration (YRDUA). The results of the study are as follows: (1) the existing urban connections have obvious hierarchies and imbalances, with the YRDUA urban hierarchical connections being of larger scale. (2) Cities are closely connected, but city networks are unbalanced, though the YRDUA has more balanced urban development. (3) Each node city has a clear radiation range limit, and spatial distance remains an important constraint on urban connections. The backbone network of the BTHUA has a triangular shape and trends toward a "sparse north and dense south,"while the YRDUA is characterized by multiple axes and an overall distribution that trends toward a "dense north and sparse south."(4) Cities with poor comprehensive strength are more likely to be captured, forming an attract and be attracted relationship. (5) The BTHUA and the YRDUA each form three communities.
Article
Full-text available
The acceleration of the development of the Metropolitan Mamminasata area has an impact on the socio-economic dynamics of the community and the use of excess energy resources. The purpose of this study was to analyze (1) economic growth and energy security work as determinants of urban development for Metropolitan Mamminasata, (2) the effect of economic growth, energy consumption, availability of transportation infrastructure, and renewable energy on the quality of the environment and the sustainability of the Metropolitan Mamminasata system, and (3) renewable energy management strategies and sustainable urban development for Metropolitan Mamminasata. An explanatory sequential approach was used. Data were obtained through observation, surveys, and documentation. The results showed that renewable energy which has the potential to used, in the Mamminasata Metropolitan urban area to support economic growth and increase urban productivity, namely water energy, wind energy, and biomass energy. Furthermore, it takes the effectiveness and efficiency of energy users toward improving environmental quality. Economic growth, energy consumption savings, the availability of transportation infrastructure, and renewable energy have a significant effect on environmental quality, with a determination coefficient of 82.3%, and the sustainability of the Metropolitan Mamminasata system, with a determination coefficient of 75.7%. Use of renewable energy in the management of urban development will require support from government policies, as well as community and business participation. This study recommends a renewable energy management strategy as an important part of supporting the sustainability of urban development in Metropolitan Mamminasata, Indonesia.
Article
Full-text available
The empowerment of small and medium economic enterprises will drive economic growth. The purpose of this study is to analyze (1) how economic growth works as a determinant of increasing the productivity of small and medium enterprises; (2) the influence of government policies, business capital support, and the strengthening of human resource capacity on the development of small and medium enterprises (SMEs); and (3) strategies to increase business productivity and the sustainability of SMEs. We used a sequential explanatory design, which is a combination of quantitative and qualitative research, and data were obtained through observation, in-depth interviews, surveys, and documentation. The results of the study indicate that economic growth coupled with technological innovation will boost the productivity of economic enterprises and increase people’s welfare. Government policies, business capital support, and human resource capacity strengthening simultaneously have a positive effect on the development of SMEs, with a determination coefficient of 97.6%. Based on the results of this study, an economic growth strategy based on technological innovation is recommended for government decision making as an effort to increase the productivity of community economic enterprises in Makassar City, Indonesia.
Article
Full-text available
Increases in the number of urban residents have significant impacts on spatial pressure, affecting the utilization of river basins. The purpose of this study is to analyze (1) the increase in population and changes in spatial use as determinants of the complexity of the watershed ecosystem; (2) the effect of housing development, urban activity systems, and land use changes on the degradation of the environmental quality of the watershed; and (3) the direct and indirect effects of changes in spatial use, land reclamation, and community behavior on water pollution and the sustainability of watershed management in Maros City. The research method used is a sequential explanatory design combining quantitative and qualitative research methods. Data were obtained through observation, in-depth interviews, surveys, and documentation. The study findings show that land use change, complexity of spatial use, and community behavior have a negative impact on the environmental quality of the watershed. Housing development, urban activity systems, and changes in land use had a significant effect on environmental quality degradation, with a coefficient of determination of 73.9%. Furthermore, the influence of spatial use, land reclamation, and community behavior on water pollution in the watershed was 72.82%. This study may serve to assist the decision-making of and policy formation by the Maros Regency Government in the framework of controlling the use of watersheds, working towards their social, economic, and environmental sustainability.
Article
Full-text available
Dynamic changes in the landscape have been observed in recent years. They are particularly visible in areas with a high degree of anthropopressure. An example of such areas is metropolitan regions and their immediate rural surroundings. The purpose of this article is to identify changes in land cover in the rural municipalities within metropolises and detect the processes of landscape transformation in rural areas, which are extremely sensitive to anthropopressure. The dynamics of land cover changes in the years 2000-2018 were determined using a change index (ChI), and their directions were determined using the indicator of changes in types of land cover. Corine Land Cover for level 2 groups (1.1-4.2) was used as research material, and the Upper Silesia-Zagłębie Metropolis was selected as the model area. The greatest changes in the landscape were observed in built-up areas, industrial areas, meadows and mining areas. This is due to the disappearance of the mining industry that was traditional for this region and the ongoing suburbanization process, as well as the re-industrialization of modern industry and the abandonment of arable land in rural areas.
Article
Climate change will cause substantial numbers of people to relocate, whether in a planned or more ad hoc manner. In receiving communities this could lead to substantial problems supplying physical infrastructure, preserving affordability, conserving wild and productive lands, maintaining social connections, and providing community services in new areas. Moving to comprehensively planned new settlements could be a solution to climate sprawl (fragmented and dispersed development) and climate gentrification (increased demand in existing areas). This may involve moving an entire settlement as a whole to a comprehensively planned neighborhood or town. We call this “whole community” retreat as it keeps social ties intact. An alternative involves creating a comprehensively planned new town or new neighborhood for people from a variety of locations. We refer to this as “new community” retreat as it provides a new environment, but social ties need to be developed. The paper examines lessons from two sets of experiences with large scale resettlement or community-building. One group of examples involves whole community resettlements after disasters or related to economic development and a second set of precedents come from the broader history of new towns. Challenges from both resettlement experience and new town history include land and infrastructure availability and cost, planning and development coordination, financing, and attracting a large enough proportion of people to keep social ties intact. A more comprehensive approach has benefits, but is easier to pull off at a neighborhood rather than a larger scale and for shorter rather than longer moves.