ArticlePDF Available

A contribution to the syntaxonomic diversity of the Tazovsky Peninsula, Arctic Russia

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Syntaxonomic diversity of the vegetation in the southern tundra subzone of the Tazovsky Peninsula is represented by six associations, three subassociations and three variants. Four associations (Dicrano maji–Salicetum lanatae Khitun ass. nov. hoc loco, Sphagno girgensohnii–Betuletum nanae Khitun ass. nov. hoc loco, Empetro subholarctici– Eriophoretum vaginati Khitun ass. nov. hoc loco, Eriophoro leiocarpi–Caricetum rotundatae Khitun ass. nov. hoc loco), the three subassociations (Hierochloo alpinae– Hylocomietum splendentis empetretosum subholarctici Khitun subass. nov. hoc loco, Eriophoro leiocarpi–Caricetum rotundatae typicum Khitun subass. nov. hoc loco, Eriophoro leiocarpi–Caricetum rotundatae caricetosum chordorrhizae Khitun subass. nov. hoc loco) and the three variants are described for the first time. A high degree of similarity was found between vegetation of the Tazovsky Peninsula and vegetation of the southern part of the Gydansky Peninsula (the typical tundra subzone). They have four of six associations in common, whereas with the northern part of the typical tundra there is only one association in common.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Botanica Pacica. A journal of plant science and conservaon. 2021. 10(1): 37–51
DOI: 10.17581/bp.2021.10106
37
©Botanical Garden-Instute FEB RAS. 2021
ABSTRACT
Syntaxonomic diversity of the vegetation in the southern tundra subzone of the
Tazovsky Peninsula is represented by six associations, three subassociations and
three variants. Four associations (Dicrano maji–Salicetum lanatae Khitun ass. nov. hoc
loco, Sphagno girgensohnii–Betuletum nanae Khitun ass. nov. hoc loco, Empetro subhol-
arctici–Eriophoretum vaginati Khitun ass. nov. hoc loco, Eriophoro leiocarpi–Caricetum
rotundatae Khitun ass. nov. hoc loco), the three subassociations (Hierochloo alpinae–
Hylocomietum splendentis empetretosum subholarctici Khitun subass. nov. hoc loco, Eri-
ophoro leiocarpi–Caricetum rotundatae typicum Khitun subass. nov. hoc loco, Eriophoro
leiocarpi–Caricetum rotundatae caricetosum chordorrhizae Khitun subass. nov. hoc loco)
and the three variants are described for the rst time. A high degree of similarity
was found between vegetation of the Tazovsky Peninsula and vegetation of the
southern part of the Gydansky Peninsula (the typical tundra subzone). They have
four of six associations in common, whereas with the northern part of the typical
tundra there is only one association in common.
Keywords: the Arctic, the Tazovsky Peninsula, tundra, mires, vegetation classica-
tion, syntaxonomy
РЕЗЮМЕ
Телятников М.Ю., Хитун О.В., Чернядьева О.В., Кузьмина Е.Ю., Ер
мо хи на К.А. К синтаксономическому разнообразию Тазовского полу
ост рова, российская Арктика. Cинтаксономическое разнообразие юж
ных тундр северовосточной части Тазовского полуострова представлено
6 ассоциациями, 3 субассоциациями и 3 вариантами, из которых 4 ассоциа-
ции (Dicrano maji–Salicetum lanatae Khitun ass. nov. hoc loco, Sphagno girgensohnii–
Betuletum nanae Khitun ass. nov. hoc loco, Empetro subholarctici–Eriophoretum vaginati
Khitun ass. nov. hoc loco, Eriophoro leiocarpi–Caricetum rotundatae Khitun ass. nov.
hoc loco), 3 субассоциации (Hierochloo alpinae–Hylocomietum splendentis empetretosum
subholarctici Khitun subass. nov. hoc loco, Eriophoro leiocarpi–Caricetum rotundatae
typicum Khitun subass. nov. hoc loco, Eriophoro leiocarpi–Caricetum rotundatae
caricetosum chordorrhizae Khitun subass. nov. hoc loco) и 3 варианта описаны
впервые. Выявлено высокое сходство растительности района исследований
с растительностью южой части типичных тундр Гыданского полуострова (4
из 6 описанных ассоциаций общие) и низкое сходство с растительностью
северной части типичных тундр того же полуострова (общей является всего
1 ассоциация).
Ключевые слова: Арктика, Тазовский полуостров, тундры, болота, классификация
растительности, синтаксономия
Michael Yu. Telyatnikov 1*
e-mail: arct-alp@mail.ru
Olga V. Khitun 2
e-mail: khitun-olga@yandex.ru
Irina V. Czernyadjeva 2
e-mail: irinamosses@yandex.ru
Ekaterina Yu. Kuzmina 2
e-mail: ekuzmina@yandex.ru
Ksenia A. Ermokhina 3
e-mail: diankina@gmail.com
1 Central Siberian Botanical Garden SB
RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia
2 Komarov Botanical Institute RAS,
St. Petersburg, Russia
3 A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and
Evolution RAS, Moscow, Russia
* corresponding author
Manuscript received: 07.12.2020
Review completed: 04.03.2021
Accepted for publication: 20.03.2021
Published online: 24.03.2021
Michael Yu. Telyatnikov1*, Olga V. Khitun2, Irina V. Czernyadjeva2,
Ekaterina Yu. Kuzmina2 & Ksenia A. Ermokhina3
A contribution to the syntaxonomic
diversity of the Tazovsky Peninsula,
Arctic Russia
There have been a limited number of vegetation studies
on the Tazovsky Peninsula. The rst such surveys date back
to Go vorukhin’s (1933) inventory of reindeer summer pas
tures and Nikolaeva’s (1941) description of shrub vege ta
tion, both based on dominant approach methodology. An
im portant contribution to the study of the regional vege ta-
tion was the creation of the map “Vegetation of the West
Si berian Plain” (Il'ina1976) followed by the legend issued as
a se pa rate book (Il'ina et al. 1985). However, this book and
the map provide only general information, also based on
do mi nant approach. Since 1986, a few studies of zonal dif-
fe ren tiation of the plant cover, focused primarily on ora,
were carried out on the Tazovsky and Gydansky Peninsulas
(e.g., Rebristaya et al. 1989, Khitun 1989, 1998, 2005). The
latest research in the area was mainly devoted to the anth-
ro po genic transformation of vegetation, which follows the
local gas-oil industry development (e.g., Valeyeva & Mos-
kov chenko 2008, Moskovchenko et al. 2016, 2017).
Our study is the rst application of the oristicsocio lo
gical (BraunBlanquet) approach to the classication of ve
ge tation of the Tazovsky Peninsula. It is also our contri bu-
tion to the Arctic Vegetation Archive international project
(Walker et al. 2018; https://avarus.space).
The aim of our study is to classify southern tundra sub-
zone vegetation and identify syntaxonomic diversity in the
north west of the Tazovsky Peninsula.
Study area
Geology and topography. The Tazovsky Peninsula, as
well as the Gydansky Peninsula, lies in the north of the West
Si be rian Plain. The terrain is formed by the 200 to 250 m
thick layer of negrained Quaternary sedimentary de po
38 Botanica Pacica. A journal of plant science and conservaon. 2021. 10(1):37–51
Telyatnikov et al.
sits. The geomorphology reects the Pleistocene Ho lo
cene marine transgressions and regressions. Overall, ve
geo mor phological levels (terraces) are distinguished in the
West Siberian Arctic. At the study site, the 3rd marine ter race
with an elevation 30 to 45 m above sea level (a.s.l.) is present
(Ogo rodnov et al. 1971). The topography is represented by
at gently rolling watershed hills dissected by water tracks
and meandering streams. Lakes and wetlands are numerous
both in riverine valleys and on poorly drained areas of lower
water shed hills. The region lies entirely within the zone of
con tinuous permafrost and therefore the area shows many
cryo genic features, such as nonsorted circles and earth
hum mocks, ice-wedge polygons, high-centered poly gonal
tun dra-mire complexes, thermokarst lakes and drai ned
ther mokarst basins, locally called “khasyrei”. Deep ra vines
form at the edges of the terrace starting from the ice wedge
thaw. Sandy and loamy deposits predominate in the study
area. On the watersheds formed by sandy deposits, areas
of ero ded sand lacking vegetation (sometimes rather exten-
ded) appear due to deation. A consequence of water log
ging of soils is accumulation of the thick peat horizons,
which is the most general characteristic of subarctic tundra
in West Siberia (Khitun 2005).
Climate. The area belongs to the arctic belt in the Re-
gion of the Atlantic inuence (Antonov et al. 1986). Cyc
lo nic circulation causes large diurnal amplitudes of air
tem pe ra ture, high frequency of strong winds and cloudy
sky, as well as re la tively intense precipitation (Simonov
1977). Accor ding to: https://weatherarchive.ru/Pogoda/
Yamburg (28.06.2020) mean annual air temperature in
Yam burg (the clo sest station to the study site, see Fig. 1) for
the pe riod from 2014 to 2019 is 5.9°C. The mean July tem
pe ra ture is +13.1˚C; mean January temperature is 22.9°C.
Pre ci pi ta tion in this region is 330–380 mm, of which 75 %
falls du ring sum mer and autumn (Ogo rodnov et al. 1971).
Zonal position and general overview of vegetation.
The study area is located within the southern tundra sub-
zone (Gorodkov 1935, Chernov & Matveyeva 1997), which
is also called the southern hypoarctic tundra subzone (Yur-
tsev 1994) and it coincides with subzone E, or the low
shrub sub zone on the Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map
(CAVM Team 2003). In the system of geobotanical division
of the Arctic by Aleksandrova (1980), the subarctic tundra
is divided into three belts (in contrast to the mentioned
above schemes with only two subdivisions) and the study
area be longs to the southern belt of the subarctic tundra
sub zone, at its border with the middle belt. We compare
our associations with those distinguished previously on the
Gy dan sky Peninsula (Telyatnikov et al. 2019) in the typical
tundra subzone (Gorodkov 1935, Chernov & Matveyeva
1997). The latter is also called the northern hypoarctic tund-
ra (Yurtsev 1994) and it coincides with subzone D, or the
erect dwarf shrub subzone (CAVM Team 2003). According
to the system of Aleksandrova (1980) that study was carried
out in the northern belt of the subarctic tundra subzone.
Hereafter we use the abbreviations: STS, southern tundra
subzone; TTS, typical tundra subzone.
The characteristic feature of vegetation in the STS is
the pre do mi nance of low deciduous shrubs, primarily Betu-
la nana and to a lesser extent Salix glauca and S. lanata, in
zo nal communities on watershed hills. Erect dwarf shrubs
Vac cinium uliginosum subsp. microphyllum, V. vitis-idaea subsp.
minus, Ledum palustre subsp. decumbens are present and abun-
dant in the majority of communities except those that are
per manently waterlogged. Tall (up to 2.5 m) willow thi-
ckets (Salix lanata, S. glauca, S. phylicifolia) with herbaceous
un der story occupy the relatively steep slopes of hollows
and lake basins and riparian habitats. Lower (1–1.5 m) wil
low thickets with developed herb–moss understory usual ly
grow at the bottom of wider hollows. Alder (Alnus fruti co sa)
in the studied locality was found rarely, as solitary shrubs
on slopes. Oligotrophic hypoarctic and boreal spe cies
dominate in all types of vegetation in this subzone. Pro per
arctic species grow either in snowbeds (Ranunculus niva lis,
Salix polaris, S. arctica) or on the edges of exposed, wind-
blown hilltops (Armeria maritima, Hierochloë alpina, Salix num-
mu la ria, Pachypleurum alpinum).
Various variants of low- and dwarf-shrub dominated
tund ra with a well-developed lichen-moss ground layer
are wide spread on watershed hills with a better drainage.
Figure 1 Study sites (circled numbers): 1 – upper reaches of the
Verkh nyaya Yareiyakha River; 2 – Lake Parisento surroundings; 3
basin of the Tanama River middle reaches. Our eldwork revealed
that the boundaries of the TTS should be essentialy shifted north-
wards compare to their position in Yurtsev (1994): dashed lines
borders as in Yurtsev (1994); dotted lines borders according
to Khitun (2005), Telyatnikov et al. (2019) and Telyatnikov et al.
(in print)
39
Botanica Pacica. A journal of plant science and conservaon. 2021. 10(1):37–51
Syntaxonomic diversity of the Tazovsky Peninsula, the Arctic
Dwarf birch-Sphagnum spp. communities with very dense
shrub layers populate the slope edges of low watershed
hills and lake terraces. Betula nana + Ledum palustre s. l. +
Erio pho rum vaginatum communities with thick moss mats
cover large atcentered polygons (30 to 40 cm high) in
the tund ra–mire complexes, which are common on the lo
wer water sheds with a poorer drainage. Sedge (Carex rotun-
da ta, Eriophorum angustifolium) – moss mires occur in the
troughs between the polygons. Sedge-moss mires domi-
na ted by Carex rotundata and C. chordorrhiza, cover the
bot toms of drained thermokarst basins, whereas Carex
con co lor dominated communities with or without a moss
layer occupy more saturated habitats, along water tracks
and streams. Psammophytic communities with abundant
grasses, herbs and dwarf shrubs grow on various eroded
steep sandy slopes.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Sampling and data analysis
The study site is located approximately 35 km to the
north of Yamburg settlement, in the upper reaches of the
Verkh nyaya Yareiyakha River at 68°13'N 75°12'E (Fig. 1,
site 1). Olga Khitun conducted vegetation sampling between
27 July and 8 August 2017. Plots locations were subjectively
cho sen in areas of homogenous vegetation in visually dif fe-
rent communities along several transects established in the
area. Plot sizes varied from 25 to 100 m2. In total, 65 re le vés
were sampled, 37 of which are used in this paper. Bet ween
8 July and 7 August 2017, Olga Khitun carried out si mi lar
investigations at two sites in the southern part of the TTS
on the Gydansky Peninsula: in the surroundings of the Pa-
ri sen to Lake, 70°06'N 75°36'E (Fig. 1, site 2) and in the
basin of the Tanama River middle reaches, 69°56'N 78°50'E
(Fig. 1, site 3). At those sites, 215 relevés were sampled, 75
of them are used in another publication (Telyatnikov et al.
in press). However, initially all relevés were analysed to ge-
ther in MegaTab (see below), and 19 relevés from the Gy-
dan sky Peninsula are considered here because they belong
to synataxa common for both subzones.
We use the modied BraunBlanquet coverabundance
scale (Mirkin & Naumova 1998) to score the cover of each
spe cies: 1 < 1 %; 2 = 1–5 %; 3 = 6–10 %; 4 = 11–25 %; 5 =
26–50 %; 6 = 51–75 %; 7 = 76–100 %. At each relevé, we
re cor ded the complete species composition (including mos-
ses and lichens) and cover-abundance scores for each spe-
cies. The percentage cover of major plant growth forms was
vi sually estimated. Canopy height, thickness of moss layer
and depth of soil organic horizons were measured with a
ruler. Soil texture was estimated according to Bogolubov et
al. (2001) after digging small soil pits. Coordinates and alti-
tude of plots were taken with Garmin eTrex 10.
We classied the vegetation according to the Braun
Blan quet sorted-table method (Westhoff & van der Maarel
1978). The relevés were entered in the TURBOVEG data-
base (Hennekens & Schaminée 2001), thereafter a sorted
table was derived in the MegaTab program (Hennekens
1996) and a dichotomous hierarchy of groups of relevés
was con structed using the TWINSPAN program (Hill 1979)
and transformed by M.Yu. Telyatnikov into a hierarchy of
syn taxa. At this stage, we identied diagnostic (character),
dif fe rential and constant species; we discarded transitional,
between syntaxa, relevés.
Nomenclature
The nomenclature of the described syntaxa is in accor-
dance with the International Code of Phytosociological
No menclature (Theurillat et al. 2021). Diagnostic species
of the class Loiseleurio procumbentis–Vaccinietea Eggler ex
Schu bert 1960, are given in accordance with “Vegetation
of Europe…″ (Mucina et al. 2016) and the paper of
Erma kov (2012). Diagnostic species of the class Oxycocco-
Sphagnetea Br.Bl. et Tx. ex Westhoff et al. 1946 are cited
after Lavri nen ko & Lavrinenko (2015) and also ″Vegetation
of Europe…″ (Mucina et al. 2016) and of the class
Scheuchzerio–Cari cetea nigrae (Nordh. 1936) Tx. 1937 after
Lavrinenko et al. (2016).
The nomenclature of the species followed Sekretareva
(2004) for vascular plants, Ignatov et al. (2006) for mosses, ,
Potemkin & Sofronova (2009) for liverworts and Esslinger
(2016) for lichens.
The synoptic table presents syntaxa with their constancy
class in each community: + = present in 1 to 10 % of re
cords; I = 11–20 %; II = 21–40 %; III = 41–60 %; IV =
61–80 %; V = 81–100 %.
In the description of nomenclatural type relevés (holo-
types), to avoid the repetition of headings and long names of
localities throughout this paper we write in the following order:
1) relevé number in the table and, in parentheses, in the da-
ta base, for example, 3(276);
2) table No (T1 for Table 1 or T2 for Table 2);
3) region is YamalNenets Autonomous Area (YaNAA);
4) locality is indicated by number as in Figure 1 (1, Verkh
nyayaYareiyakha; 2, Parisento; 3, Tanama);
5) coordinates (latitude, N and longitude, E);
6) elevation, m above sea level (a.s.l.);
7) plot surface area (m2, most commonly it was 100 m2).
This is followed by the information about habitat (topo-
gra phy, soil, cover of growth forms); date of observation
(ddmmyyyy); author; and, nally, list of species in the typus
relevé with cover abundance scores.
RESULTS
Dwarf shrub tundra in relatively dry
wind-exposed habitats
We placed tundra communities of relatively dry habitats
in the class Loiseleurio procumbentis–Vaccinietea Eggler ex
Schu bert 1960, order Deschampsio exuosae–Vaccinietalia myr
ti lli Dahl 1957 and alliance Loiseleurio–Arctostaphylion Kalli o la
ex Nordhagen 1943.
The Loiseleurio procumbentis–Vaccinietea includes dwarf
shrub ve ge tation on dry acidic ha bitats with thin snow cover
in al pine and arctic regions of the northern hemisphere.
Diag nostic species of the class are: Alectoria ochroleuca, Aula-
com nium turgidum, Betula na na, Cladonia bellidifolia, C. stel la ris,
Di phasiastrum alpinum, Flavo cet ra ria cucullata, F. nivalis, Hie ro chloё
alpina, Huperzia arc ti ca, Lycopodium annotinum subsp. pun gens,
L. clavatum subsp. monostachyon, Ochrolechia fri gi da, Pedi cu la ris
40 Botanica Pacica. A journal of plant science and conservaon. 2021. 10(1):37–51
Telyatnikov et al.
lapponica, Stereo cau lon paschale, Sphaerophorus glo bo sus, Vac cinium
vitis-idaea subsp. minus, V. uliginosum subsp. microphyllum.
The Deschampsio exuosae–Vaccinietalia myrtilli includes
dwarf shrub or low shrub dominated tund ra vegetation of
the Arctic and mountain tundra of the nor thern Eurasia
and the islands and archipelagos of the Arctic Ocean. Diag
nos tic species of the order are: Betula nana, Carex arctisibirica.
The Loiseleurio–Arctostaphylion includes mountain and
low land tundra of northern Eurasia, Svalbard, Island and
Green land. Diagnostic species of the alliance are Alectoria
ochroleuca and Flavocetraria nivalis. Within this alliance, we
place two variants and one subassociation of the association
described earlier.
Hierochloo alpinae–Hylocomietum splendentis (Table 1,
rel. 1–14; Table 3)
Diagnostic species: Hierochloё alpina, Polytrichum hyper bo-
reum, Alectoria ochroleuca;
Differential species: Festuca ovina, Luzula confusa, Salix
num mularia, Bryocaulon divergens, Flavocetraria nivalis, Bryoria
nitidula, Racomitrium lanuginosum.
Distribution and ecology. This association is described
from the nor thern part of the TTS on the Gydansky Pe nin-
sula (Telyat ni kov et al. 2019). These communities occupy dry,
often slightly convex, marginal parts of the hilltops and ad ja-
cent upper parts of slopes with shallow snow accu mu lation.
Structure and composition. Such communities in Russian
li terature are commonly called “spotted” tundra because
they have comp lex horizontal structure including small
pat ches of bare ground surrounded by vegetated rims and
small troughs. Communities have a sparse upper layer (up to
20 cm high) of grass straw and closed ground layer for med
by prost rate dwarf shrubs and cryptogams. The cover va lues
vary bet ween 25 and 55 % of dwarf shrubs, 20 to 60 % of
li chens and 30 to 70 % of mosses (Telyatnikov et al. 2019).
Hierochloo alpinae–Hylocomietum splendentis empet re-
to sum subholarctici subass. nov. hoc loco (Table 1, rel.
1–14; Table. 3, Fig. 2A)
Differential species: Empetrum subholarcticum, Arctous alpi-
na, Calamagrostis neglecta.
Holotypus: 3 (276); T1; YaNAA; 1; 68°12′25.8″N 75°13′25.5″E;
47; 100.
Relevé. Well-drained marginal part of the hilltop with ex-
pres sed po ly gonal cracks; dry nonsorted circles and small
earth hum mocks are almost completely overgrown with
vegetation. In cli nation 2°. Aspect 202°. Soil: the dark
brown peaty hu mus organic horizon is 1–2 cm thick and
the mineral ho rizon is light yellowish-brown with a sandy
tex ture. The cover of lichens is 70 %, of mosses 30 %,
shrubs 15 %, dwarfshrubs 10 %, herbs 15 %. 04.08.2017.
O.V. Khitun.
List of species: Alectoria ochroleuca 5, Polytrichum hyperboreum
4, Bryo caulon divergens 4, Betula nana 4, Cladonia stygia 3, Ca la-
ma g ros tis neglecta 3, Carex arctisibirica 3, Dicranum elongatum 3,
Po lytrichum juniperinum 3, Alectoria nigricans 2, Bryoria nitidula 2,
Cladonia gracilis s. l. 2, Cetraria islandica 2, Flavocetraria cucullata
2, Hierochloё alpina 2, Ochrolechia frigida 2, Pogonatum dentatum
2, Salix glauca 2, Vaccinium uliginosum subsp. microphyllum 2,
Arctous alpina 1, Aulacomnium turgidum 1, Bistorta elliptica 1,
B. vivipara 1, Cladonia arbuscula 1, C. chlorophaea 1, C. cornuta
1, C. pleurota 1, Cetraria laevigata 1, C. aculeata 1, Eriophorum
vaginatum 1, Empetrum subholarcticum 2, Festuca ovina 2,
Flavocetraria nivalis 1, Gymnomitrion coralloides 1, Sphenolobus
minutus 1, Ledum palustre subsp. decumbens 2, Luzula confusa 1,
Pedicularis labradorica 1, Pertusaria panyrga 1, Pleurozium schreberi
1, Poa alpigena 1, Pohlia sp. 1, Salix nummularia 1, S. pulchra 1,
Vaccinium vitis-idaea subsp. minus 1.
Distribution and ecology. The communities of the
subass. empetretosum subholarctici occur in the STS on the Ta-
zov sky Peninsula and in the sou thern part of the TTS on
the Gy dansky peninsula. They occupy well-drained parts of
wa ter sheds such as the edges of hilltops, the upper parts
of hill slopes and river ter races; at altitudes varying bet-
ween 24 and 57 m a.s.l. Com pared to the association, in
sub association the cover of shrubs and lichens is higher,
and the cover of herbs, dwarf shrubs and mosses is lower.
The subassociation splits into two variants.
Variant typicum (Table 1, rel. 1–6; Table 3; Fig. 2A)
Differential species are the same as for the subassociation.
Distribution and ecology. These communities occur in
the STS on the Ta zov sky Peninsula on well-drained parts
of watersheds and upper parts of their slopes with an in-
cli nation of 1 to 15° and within an altitude range of 43 to
57 m. The micro to po gra phy is polygonal with at polygons
15 to 20 m in dia me ter divided by cracks of ap pro xi mately
0.5 m in width. The or ga nic horizons range in thick ness
from 2 to 3 cm and con sist of dark brown mucky peat; the
un derlying mineral ground is yellow sand or sandy loam.
Structure and composition. These communities have two
ver ti cal strata. Low shrubs, pre do mi nant ly dwarf birch, (15
to 25 %, rarely 5 %) and herbs, pre do mi nant ly Calamagrostis
neg lec ta and Carex arctisibi ri ca, (10 to 25 %) form a sparse
even ly dis tri buted overstory, usual ly 10 to 15 cm height.
The dwarf shrub–cryptogam un der story is closed, with li
chens cover of 70 to 90 % that serves as a back ground for
mos ses (up to 35 %) and se pa rate patches (5 to 10 %) of
prost rately growing in this con di tions dwarf shrubs such as
Le dum palustre subsp. de cum bens, Vaccinium uliginosum subsp.
mic rophyllum, V. vitis-idaea subsp. mi nus. Alectoria ochroleuca
and Cladonia stygia are the most abun dant among the lichens,
and Polytrichum hyperboreum and Dic ra num elongatum are pre do-
mi nant among the mosses.
Variant Aconogonon ochreatum (Table 1, rel. 7–14; Tabl. 3;
Fig. 2B)
Differential species: Tanacetum bi pin na tum, Aconogonon och-
rea tum, Ca rex quasivaginata, Campanula ro tun di folia.
Distribution and ecology. These phyto coe no ses occur in
the southern part of the TTS on the Gydansky Pe ninsula
and in the STS on the Tazovsky Peninsula. They occupy
windswept mar gi nal parts of watershed hills and the up per
Figure 2 Photographs of the described plant communities on the Tazovsky Peninsula. A – Hierochloo alpinae–Hylocomietum splendentis subass.
em pet retosum subholarctici var. typicum on welldrained part of the watershed hill; B – Hierochloo alpinae–Hylocomietum splendentis subass. empetretosum
subholarctici var. Aconogonon ochreatum on the gentle convex slope of the watershed hill; C – Dicrano maji–Salicetum lanatae on the bottom of the
hol low at the watershed hillslope; D – Sphagno girgensohnii–Betuletum nanae on the lake terrace; E – Empetro subholarctici–Eriophoretum vaginati on
the polygons in tundra–mire complex on the at low watershed; F – Eriophoro leiocarpi–Caricetum rotundatae subass. typicum in the wet trough bet-
ween polygons of tundra–mire complex; G – Eriophoro leiocarpi–Caricetum rotundatae subass. caricetosum chordorrhizae on the bottom of the drai-
ned lakebed; H – Carici stantis–Warnstoretum exannulatae var. War nstora sarmentosa on the bottom of the wet hollow in the watershed hill slope
41
Botanica Pacica. A journal of plant science and conservaon. 2021. 10(1):37–51
Syntaxonomic diversity of the Tazovsky Peninsula, the Arctic
42 Botanica Pacica. A journal of plant science and conservaon. 2021. 10(1):37–51
Telyatnikov et al.
Table 1. Associations Hierochloo alpinae–Hylocomietum splendentis (var. typicumA, and var. Aconogonon ochreatum – B), Dicrano maji–
Salicetum lanatae (C), Sphagno girgensohnii–Betuletum nanae (D) and Empetro subholarctici–Eriophoretum vaginati (E)
SYNTAXON CODE A B C D E A B C D E
Locality
T
T
T
T
T
T
G1
G2
G2
G2
T
Т
T
T
G2
G2
G2
T
T
T
T
Т
Т
Т
Т
Т
Т
Т
Т
Т
Т
Cover total, %:
90
95
90
90
100
95
60
95
95
80
60
95
60
95
95
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
95
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Cover shrubs, %
25
20
15
25
20
5
5
10
1
5
5
25
1
10
50
50
60
20
50
70
80
80
5
5
5
5
5
5
15
Cover dwarf shrubs, %
5
10
10
10
5
10
20
35
5
20
10
20
35
10
5
10
15
10
10
5
10
10
30
20
25
30
20
25
20
15
25
Cover lichens, %
70
70
70
70
80
90
20
40
50
40
30
70
20
80
1
1
2
50
5
40
20
20
30
90
90
50
90
80
50
80
20
Cover mosses,%
35
15
35
10
35
5
10
35
30
30
5
5
15
5
90
65
40
45
90
90
100
100
90
70
40
40
65
70
90
40
70
Cover herbs, %
25
15
15
15
20
10
15
20
20
25
10
20
15
10
70
50
50
30
20
20
25
35
40
15
15
65
30
30
35
60
70
Height shrubs (cm)
5
15
10
60
10
5
5
3
15
5
2
25
50
10
60
120
100
70
160
40
35
80
10
15
15
15
15
8
15
15
20
Aspect (°)
360
135
202
202
270
157
-
112
292
90
202
202
338
315
135
315
45
292
292
180
225
360
135
-
338
225
22
-
90
90
-
Inclination of slope (°)
1
1
2
15
2
5
0
2
5
28
25
8
35
3
5
5
20
1
1
5
1
3
1
0
1
2
1
0
1
1
0
Altitude ( m a.s.l.)
53
57
47
44
47
43
38
24
25
30
39
37
39
34
26
34
9
36
35
49
55
51
49
47
50
49
47
43
48
51
52
Total number of species
30
27
44
32
42
27
26
52
40
52
30
26
51
29
36
38
63
41
35
26
30
23
28
23
24
26
22
28
19
25
35
Number of vascular plants species
9
10
19
17
15
12
20
29
26
28
18
15
26
16
18
23
46
28
23
13
11
12
7
8
11
8
9
10
7
7
9
Number of lichen species
13
13
17
11
17
11
2
14
9
17
9
8
18
11
5
4
5
5
4
4
11
5
15
10
9
13
7
9
7
15
18
Number of moss species
8
4
8
4
10
4
4
9
5
7
3
3
7
2
13
11
12
8
8
9
8
6
6
5
4
5
6
9
5
3
8
Relevé nr: in the database
233
235
276
277
290
294
39
110
123
134
278
279
283
286
153
186
216
281
282
246
257
258
234
241
244
245
248
242
251
254
255
In the table
1
2
3*
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18*
19
20
21*
22
23
24
25
26
27*
28
29
30
31
Number of relevés 6 8 6 39
Diagnostic species of Hierochloo alpinae–Hylocomietum splendentis
Hierochloё alpina (L-V) 3221· 131 · 1 2 2 2 1 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · V 2 V 2 · · ·
Polytrichum hyperboreum 434331 · 3131 2 · · · · 1 · · · · · ········· V4IV 3I 1 · ·
Alectoria ochroleuca (LA, LV) 5 5 5 1 6 5 · · · · 2 · · 5 ········235 · 43343 V 5 II 4· · V 4
Differential species of Hierochloo alpinae–Hylocomietum splendentis
Festuca ovina 1 · 2 2 · 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 · · · 1 1 · 1 · · · · · · · · · · IV 2 V 2 II 1 II 1 ·
Luzula confusa · 1 1 1 1 1 · 1 1 1 1 1 · 1 · · 1 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · V 1 IV1 I 1 · ·
Salix nummularia · · 1 1 · 2 32 · 31 · 32·················III1 IV3···
Bryocaulon divergens 1 1 4·46 · · · 1 · · 1 6 · · · · · · · · 1 1 1 · · · · 1 1 V 4II 4· · III 1
Flavocetraria nivalis (LA, LV, RcDe) 1 · 1 1 1 2 · · · 3 3 ··1···········13· · 1 · V 1 II 3· · II 2
Bryoria nitidula · 1 3·11·······1················1IV2 I1 · · I1
Racomitrium lanuginosum (Sh) · · · · 3132 · · · · 1 · ················· II2 II2 · · ·
Differential species in subass. empetretosum subholarctici and var. typicum
Empetrum subholarcticum 22221213222242 · · · · 1 1111111111·1 V 2 V 3I 1 V 1 V 1
Arctous alpina 2 · 2 2 · 334·323 3 2 · · · · 1 ············IV2 V3I 1 · ·
Calamagrostis neglecta 4 3 3 · 2 · · · 2 · 1 31 1 · · 1 2 3222 · 1 · · 1 · · · · IV 3IV 2 III2 V 1 II 1
Differential species in var. Aconogonon ochreatum
Tanacetum bipinnatum · · · · · · 2 1 2 1 2 1 · 2 · 1 1 1 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · V 2 III 1 · ·
Aconogonon ochreatum · · · · · 1 1 2 2 · 2 2 2 1 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · I 1 V 2 · · ·
Carex quasivaginata · · · · · · · 1 2 1 1 · 1 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · IV 1 · · ·
Campanula rotundifolia · · · · · · 1 1 · 1 1 · 1 1 · · 1 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · IV 1 I 1 · ·
Differential species in Dicrano maji–Salicetum lanatae
Carex stans ········1·····53·31 · · 1 · · · · · · · · · · I 1 IV 4II 1 ·
Dicranum majus ··············3 3 132············ · · V3· ·
Polemonium acutiorum · · · · · · · · 1 · · · · · 1 1 1 1 2 · · · · · · · · · · · · · I 1 V 1 · ·
Aulacomnium palustre (O-S) ··············13· 2 1 1 · · · · · · · · · · · · · IV 2 II 1 ·
Differential species in Sphagno girgensohnii–Betuletum nanae
Sphagnum girgensohnii ··············3· · 1 · 5 5 6 · · · · · · · · · · · II 2 V 6 ·
Polytrichum commune ·················41333········3· · II 4V3I3
Differential species in.Empetro subholarctici-Eriophoretum vaginati
Cladonia stellaris (L-V) 14·41 · · · · · · 6 1 · · · · · · 1 · · 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 5 · IV 4II 4· II 1 V 3
Sphagnum lenense ······················5 · · · 3154 4 · · · · IV 4
Diagnostic combination of species in alliance Rubo chamaemori–Dicranion elongati (Rc-De)
Cetraria islandica 1124· · 32431431 · 1 · · · 444 ·331 1 1 1 · 1 IV 2 V 3I 1 V 4IV 2
Cladonia stygia 35355·····45·······51·356555564V4II 4· IV 4V 5
Dicranum elongatum 33323····1··1·········331313 3 · 5 V 3II 1 ·· V 3
Ledum palustre subsp. decumbens ·3222· 2222· 22· · · 11· 111544444444 IV 2 IV 2 II 1 V 1 V 4
Diagnostic species in class Salicetea herbaceae (Sh)
Salix polaris ········21····13331············ · II2 V3· ·
Carex lachenalii ········1·····132 1 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · I 1 IV2 · ·
Conostomum tetragonum ·······2······················· · I2 · · ·
Pohlia drummondii ················1·············· · · I1 · ·
Ranunculus nivalis ··············111·············· · · III1 · ·
Ranunculus pygmaeus ················1·············· · · I1 · ·
Sibbaldia procumbens ·················1············· · · I1 · ·
Diagnostic species in order Deschampsio exuosae–Vaccinietalia myrtilli (D-V)
Carex arctisibirica ·33331 2 · 2 1 1 1 1 · · · 1 · · 3· · · · · · 2 2 · · · V 3IV 2 I 1 II 3II 2
Diagnostic species in class Loiseleurio procumbentis–Vaccinietea (L-V)
Betula nana (D-V, O-S, Rc-De) 44444223222423·12326772223·3·3 4 V4V3IV 2 V 7 IV 3
Vaccinium uliginosum subsp. microphyllum (O-S, Rc-De) ·1231 · 2 31 · 2 331 · · 1 1 31111222132 · 1 IV 2 V 3III 2 V 1 V 2
Flavocetraria cucullata 3 3 214431 · 333341·····3·4333· 5 3 3 3 V3V3I 1 II 3V3
Vaccinium vitis-idaea subsp. minus (Rc-De) 1 1 1 1 2 · 2 2 1 2 · 1 2 · · · 1 · 1 1 3322121211·3V 1 IV 2 II 1 V 3V 2
Aulacomnium turgidum 1 · 1 · 3· · 1 · · · 1 1 · 1 · 1 · 1 1 3 3 · · · 1 · · · · 1 III 2 II 1 III 1 V 3II 1
Huperzia arctica (O-S) ········1···11················· · II1 · · ·
Lycopodium annotinum subsp. pungens ············1····11············ · I1 II1 · ·
Ochrolechia frigida ··2····2·2····················1 I2 II2 · · I1
Sphaerophorus globosus ·········3··1·················· · II2 · · ·
Cladonia bellidiora ········1······················ · I1 · · ·
Diphasiastrum alpinum ·················1············· · · I1 · ·
Lycopodium clavatum subsp. monostachyon ········1······················ · I1 · · ·
Pedicularis lapponica ···················1··········· · · · II1 ·
Stereocaulon paschale ········3······················ · I3···
43
Botanica Pacica. A journal of plant science and conservaon. 2021. 10(1):37–51
Syntaxonomic diversity of the Tazovsky Peninsula, the Arctic
Table 1 Continued.
SYNTAXON CODE A B C D E A B C D E
Diagnostic species in class Oxycocco–Sphagnetea (O-S)
Andromeda polifolia subsp. pumila (Rc-De) ········1···············211·· · I1 · · III1
Eriophorum vaginatum ··1···············1·32363435 6 II 1 · · II 1 V 4
Polytrichum strictum (Rc-De) ···················4······3· · · · · · · II 4I3
Rubus chamaemorus (Rc-De) ··············4····334533243444 · · I 4V3V4
Sphagnum balticum ······················545 · 5 · 3· · · · IV 5
Sphagnum capillifolium ················ ······3· · · · · · · · · · · I 3
Sphagnum compactum ···························4· · · · · · · I 4
Sphagnum fuscum ·······················45 · · · · · · · · · · II 4
Sphagnum russowii ··············3················ · · I3· ·
Other species
Alectoria nigricans · · 2 · 1 · · · · · 1 · · 3· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 1 · II 1 II 2 · · I 1
Antennaria villifera · · · · · · · 1 · · 1 · 1 1 · · 1 1 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · III 1 II 1 · ·
Arctocetraria andrejevii ···········4·····52············ · I4II 4· ·
Armeria scabra ······1111····················· · III1 · · ·
Bistorta elliptica · · 1 · · · · 1 · · · · 1 1 · · · 1 1 · · · · · · · · · · · · I 1 II 1 II 1 · ·
Bistorta vivipara · · 1 · · · · 1 1 1 · 1 · · 1 32 1 1 · · · · · · · · · · · · I 1 III 1 V 2 · ·
Bryum sp. ····1··········11·············· I1 · II1 · ·
Calamagrostis holmii ·······2·1·····1··············· · II2 I1 · ·
Cetraria aculeata ··11···1····1·················· II1 II1 · · ·
Cetraria laevigata · · 1 1 1 · · · · 1 1 31 1 · · · · · · 1 · 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 III 1 IV 2 · II 1 V 3
Cetrariella delisei ·······4 4 · · · 1 · 1 · 1 5 3············ · II4IV 3· ·
Cladonia amaurocraea 1 1 · · · 1 · · · 1 · · 1 · · · · · · · 1 · 3331535 1 1 III 1 II 1 · II 1 V 3
Cladonia arbuscula 4 4 131 1 · · 1 1 4114·······111·····11 V3IV 3· II 1 III 1
Cladonia cenotea ····1···············1·1······11 I1 · · II1 II1
Cladonia chlorophaea 1 · 1 · 1 · · 2 · · · · 1 1 1 1 1 · · · · · 1 · · 1 · · · · 1 III 1 II 1 III 1 · II 1
Cladonia cocciferal 1 · · · · · · 2 2 1 · · 1 · · · 1 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · I 1 III 2 I 1 · ·
Cladonia cornuta ··1···············331 · · 1 · · · · 1 II 1 · · IV 3II 1
Cladonia cyanipes ····················1····1···3· · · · II 1 II 3
Cladonia gracilis s.l. 1 1 2 · · · · 1 · · · 1 1 · 1 1 · 313· · · · · · · 1 · · 1 III 1 II 1 IV2 II 3II 1
Cladonia pleurota · · 1113· · · · · · · · · · · · · · 1 · 1 · · 1 · · · · 1 IV 2 · · II 1 II 1
Cladonia subfurcata ·1······3··············111·1·1· I1 I3· · III 1
Cladonia sulphurina ······················1······11 · · · · II1
Cladonia uncialis ·1··1···21····················· II1 II2 · · ·
Dicranum laevidens ···············3····3·3···3 4 ·3· · · I 3II 3III3
Equisetum arvense subsp. boreale · · · 2 · 1 1 1 · 32 2 1 · 3432 1 1 · · · · · · · · · · · II 2 IV 2 V 3II 1 ·
Eriophorum angustifolium · · · · 1 · · · · · · · · · 1 1 1 · · 1 · · · · · · · 1 · · · I 1 · III 1 II 1 I 1
Festuca rubra subsp. arctica ·······111······1·············· · II1 I1 · ·
Gymnomitrion coralloides · · 1 · · · 1 · · · 1 · 2 3················· I1 II2 · · ·
Hylocomium splendens ·······4······13132253········1 · I4V 2 V 4I 1
Orthocaulis binsteadii · 1 · · 1 1 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 1 · 1 · · 1 · · · III 1 · · · II 1
Pachypleurum alpinum ·······111······1·············· · II1 I1 · ·
Peltigera scabrosa ··············131 · 1 3· · · · · · · · · · · IV 2 IV 2 ·
Pertusaria dactylina ····1·····1··············1····· I1 I1 · · I1
Petasites frigidus ··············131·············· · · III2 · ·
Pleurozium schreberi · · 1 · · · · · · 1 · · · · · · 1 · 1 4·1·····3· · 1 I 1 I 1 II 1 IV 3II 2
Poa alpigena · · 1 1 · · · 1 1 1 · · · · 1 · 1 1 · 1 · · · · · · · · · · · II 1 II 1 III1 II 1 ·
Poa arctica ···············2····1······1··· · · I2 II1 I1
Pogonatum dentatum 1 · 2 1 · · 1 2 · 1 1 · 1 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · III 1 IV 1 · · ·
Pohlia nutans 1·······1·····1················ I1 I1 II1 · ·
Polytrichum juniperinum · · 3·3·······1··1····1···13· · · · · II 3I 1 I 1 II 1 II 2
Polytrichum piliferum · · · · · 1 2 · 3···31················· I1 III3···
Ptilidium ciliare · · · 1 · · · 1 · 3· · · · · 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 · · · · · 1 · · 1 I 1 II 2 IV1 V 1 II 1
Pyrola minor ················111············ · · III1 · ·
Ranunculus propinquus ··············121·············· · · III2 · ·
Salix glauca 1 1 2 · 1 1 · 1 · 1 1 · · · · 43132 2 · · · · · · · · · · V 1 II 1 IV3IV 2 ·
Salix lanata ·········1····55635 · · 1 · · · · · · · · 1 · I 1 V 5 II 1 I 1
Salix pulchra 1 · 1 · 1 · · · · 2 · · · · · · 1 · · · · · · · · · · · · · 1 III 1 I 2 I 1 · I 1
Sanionia uncinata · · · · · · · · · 1 · 1 1 · 5 5 5 363· · · · · 1 · 1 · · · · II 1 V 5 II 3II 1
Sphenolobus minutus 1 1 1 · 1 · · · · · · 1 1 · · · · · 1 · 1 1 · · 1 1 1 · · IV 1 II· 1 I 1 II 1 III1
Stellaria peduncularis · · · · · · · · · 1 · · 1 · 1 1 1 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · II 1 III 1 · ·
Stereocaulon alpinum ·······212······1·············· · II2 I1 · ·
Thamnolia vermicularis 1 1 · 1 · 1 · 2 · 1 · · 1 1 · · · · · · · · · ·······3IV 1 III 1 · · I 3
Toeldia coccinea ···1·····11··········· · · · · · · · I 1 II 1 I 1 · ·
Trisetum spicatum · · · 1 · · · 1 · 1 · · 1 · · · · 1 · · · · · · · · · · · · · I 1 II 1 I 1 · ·
Veratrum lobelianum ···············2222············ · · IV2 · ·
Viola epipsiloides ················221············ · · III2 · ·
Note. Single occurrence: Alopecurus alpinus 17(1); Arctagrostis latifolia 5(1); Artemisia borealis 7(1); A. tilesii 16(1), 17(1); Astragalus alpinus subsp.
arc ticus 17(1); Calamagrostis lapponica 4(1), 22(1); C. neglecta subsp. groenlandica 4(2), 6(1); Carex aquatilis 22(3); C. rariora 18(1), 30(1); C. rotundata
5(1), 29(1); Cerastium jenisejense 17(1); Corallorrhiza trida 17(1); Dryas octopetala subsp. subincisa 7(2), 8(2); Dupontia scheri 15(1); Eremogone polaris
13(1); Erio phorum russeolum subsp. leiocar pum 25(1); E. russeolum subsp. russeolum 15(2); E. scheuchzeri 16(1); Hedysarum hedysaroides subsp. arcticum
17(1); Juncus biglumis 9(1); J. tridus 13(1); Lagotis minor 8(1), 17(1); Luzula multiora subsp. frigida 18(1), 19(1); L. wahlenbergii 15(1); Lychnis sibirica
subsp. samojedorum 7(1); Myosotis asiatica 17(1); M. palustris 19(1); Oxyria digyna 10 (1), 17(1); Parnassia palustris subsp. neogaea 17(1); Pedicularis
com pac ta 17(1); P. hirsuta 8(1); P. interioroides 16(1), 17(1); P. labradorica 3(1), 18(1); Pinguicula vulgaris 25(1); Polemonium boreale 7(1), 14(1); Pyrola
ro tun di folia 9(1); Rumex acetosa subsp. pseudoxyria 13(1); R. graminifolius 7(1); Salix arctica 16(1); S. lapponum 19(1); S. myrtilloides 5(1); S. phylicifolia
19(2), 22(1); S. reptans 17(1), 26(1); Saxifraga cernua 17(1); S. hieracifolia 16(1); S. nelsoniana 17(1); Solidago lapponica 13(1), 18(1); Trisetum sibiricum
subsp. litorale 17(1); Trollius asiaticus 17(1); Valeriana capitata 8(1). Lichens: Arthrorhaphis alpina 10(1); Asahinea chrysantha 10(1); Cetraria nigricans
6(1),13(1); Cladonia deformis 23(1); C. macrophylla 30 (1); C. verticillata-vulcani 6(1), 13(1); Dactylina arctica 5(1), 10(1); Icmadophila ericetorum 23(1);
Lobaria linita 8(1); Peltigera aphthosa 22(1), 31(1); P. leucophlebia 8(1), 17(1); P. malacea 13(1), 22(1); P. rufescens 8(1); Pertusaria panyrga 3(1);
Protopannaria pezizoides 8(1); Stereocaulon sp. 18(4). Mosses: Brachythecium sp. 15(1); B. turgidum 16(1), 17(1); Bryum pseudotriquetrum 16(1),
17(1); Calliergon cordifolium 18(1); Straminergon stramineum 15(3); Ceratodon pur pureus 1(1); Climacium dendroides 8(1); Dicranum acutifolium 10(3);
D. spadiceum 8(3), 9(1); Distichium capillaceum 1(1); Kiaeria glacialis 9(4); Oncophorus wahlenbergii 5(1), 15(1); Paludella squarrosa 15(3); Plagiomnium
cuspidatum 16(1), 17(1); Pohlia sp. 3(1), 10(1); Polytrichastrum alpinum 30(1); Polytrichum jensenii 28(3), 29(1); P. longisetum 5(1).
Author: O.V. Khitun. Localities: YamalNenets Autonomous Area. T – the Tazovsky Peninsula, upper reaches of the Verkhnyaya Yarei ya
kha (Fig. 1, site 1): 168°13′10.2″ 75°12′47.7″, 31.07.2017; 2 – 68°13′12.5″ 75°12′52.3″, 31.07.2017; 368°12′25.8″ 75°13′25.5″, 04.08.2017;
4 – 68°12′25.3″ 75°13′25.1″, 04.08.2017; 5 – 68°12′32.7″ 75°13′39.7″, 06.08.2017; 668°12′06.8″ 75°13′49.2″ 06.08.2017; 11 – 68°12′24.9″
75°13′24.5″ 04.08.2017; 12 – 68°12′24.8″ 75°13′24.2″, 04.08.2017; 13 68°12′23.0″ 75°13′23.2″, 04.08.2017; 14 – 68°12′05.0″ 75°13′08.8″,
04.08.2017; 18 – 68°12′23.3″ 75°13′23.5″, 04.08.2017; 19 – 68°12′23.1″ 75°13′22.6″, 04.08.2017; 20 – 68°13′30.3″ 75°13′25.0″, 02.08.2017; 21
– 68°14′17.2″ 75°14′48.8″, 03.08.2017; 22 – 68°14′18.4″ 75°14′45.4″, 03.08.2017; 23 – 68°13′11.0″ 75°12′49.5″, 31.07.2017; 24 – 68°13′20.6″
75°13′07.3″, 02.08.2017; 25 – 68°13′27.8″ 75°13′20.3″, 02.08.2017; 2668°13′29.6″ 75°13′23.6″, 02.08.2017; 27 – 68°13′15.5″ 75°13′21.1″,
02.08.2017; 28 – 68°13′22.6″ 75°13′10.5″, 02.08.2017; 2968°13′14.5″ 75°13′48.1″, 02.08.2017; 30 68°13′13.2″ 75°14′31.0″, 02.08.2017;
31 68°14′03.4″ 75°14′25.1″, 03.08.2017; G1 – the Gydansky Peninsula, basin of the Tanama River middle reaches (Fig.1, site 3): 7
69°56′45.9″ 78°50′44.4″, 14.07.2017; G2 – the Gydansky Peninsula, Lake Parisento surroundings (Fig.1, site 2): 8 – 70°05′26.0″ 75°34′54.6″,
21.07.2017; 9 – 70°06′02.7″, 75°36′39.0″, 22.07.2017; 10 70°05′45.4″, 75°38′08.7″, 23.07.2017; 1570°05′21.6″, 75°38′44.6″, 24.07.2017;
16 – 70°04′60.0″, 75°41′56.2″, 25.07.2017; 17 – 70°02′17.1″, 75°43′37.6″, 27.07.2017. * – nomenclatural type.
44 Botanica Pacica. A journal of plant science and conservaon. 2021. 10(1):37–51
Telyatnikov et al.
parts of their steep slopes with
va rious aspects, at ele va tions
bet w een 24 and 39 m a.s.l. The
soil organic horizon is poorly
de veloped, peaty, 1–3 cm thick;
the underlying mineral ground
is sand.
Structure and composition.
The sparse (10 to 25 %) upper
la yer of shrubs (Betula nana,
usual ly 1–10 %) and herbs is
usual ly up to 10 cm height. Ca rex
arc ti sibirica, Hie ro chloё alpina, Fes-
tuca ovina, Aco no go non ochre a tum,
Tanacetum bi pin na tum and Equi-
setum arvense subsp. bo reale are
the most abundant herbs. The
dwarf shrub-cryp to gam ground
layer is wellde ve loped, 1–3 cm
thick, do mi na ted by lichens (20–
80 %) and mos ses (5–35 %),
with pat ches of prostrate dwarf
shrubs such as Arctous alpina,
Em pet rum sub ho larc ticum, Salix
num mu laria (up to 35 %). Flavo-
cet ra ria cucu l lata, Thamnolia ver mi-
cu la ris, Cet ra ria is lan di ca, Cla do nia
ar bus cula pre vail among li chens.
Po ly tri chum hy per bo reum, P. pili fe-
rum and Ra comitrium lanuginosum
are abundant among mosses.
Low shrub
communities in mesic
habitats
Dicrano maji–Salicetum lana-
tae ass. nova hoc loco (Table
1, rel. 15–19; Table 3; Fig. 2C)
Low willow thickets with horse-
tail and moss under sto rey we
do not refer yet to any higher
syn ta xo no mical unit. By their
com po si tion and structure, they
are tran si tio nal bet ween three
classes: snowbed vegetation
Sa li ce tea her ba ceae Br.Bl. 1948,
dwarf shrub tundra Loiseleurio
pro cum ben tis–Vaccinietea Eggler
ex Schu bert 1960 and sedge
mires Scheuch ze rio–Caricetea nigrae
(Nordh. 1936) Tx. 1937.
Table 2. Associations Eriophoro leiocarpi–Caricetum rotundatae (subass. typicumF, subass.
caricetosum chordorrhizaeG) and Carici stantis–Warnstoretum exannulatae (H)
SYNTAXON CODE F G H F G H
Locality
G1
G1
G2
G2
G2
T
T
T
T
T
G1
G2
T
T
T
T
T
G1
G2
G2
G2
T
Cover total, %:
90
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
90
100
90
100
100
100
100
100
100
95
90
90
100
100
Cover shrubs, %
1
5
1
10
5
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
Cover dwarf shrubs, %
10
5
5
1
1
5
1
1
Lichens, %
1
5
Mosses, %
70
40
90
90
90
100
90
100
70
100
35
95
100
90
100
100
80
50
55
70
40
100
Herbs, %
40
45
50
80
80
85
85
50
65
90
50
90
80
65
80
80
100
50
55
80
50
15
Height shrubs (cm)
10
10
10
20
35
30
20
15
15
25
15
10
Aspect (°)
135
338
90
180
135
180
360
90
Inclination of slope (°)
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
2
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
Altitude (m a.s.l.)
17
24
30
20
34
52
44
48
45
38
17
30
51
51
54
53
54
21
25
26
21
44
Total number of species
11
14
13
21
16
22
5
10
8
18
17
18
12
7
9
13
8
14
12
10
8
4
Number of vascular plant species
7
7
5
10
6
7
3
7
6
9
8
8
8
5
5
7
6
8
6
2
4
1
Number of lichens species
4
10
Number of moss species
4
7
8
7
10
5
2
3
2
9
9
10
4
2
4
6
2
6
6
8
4
3
Relevé nr.: in the database
49
87
191
204
207
239
249
253
243
289
8
189
261
262
263
267
268
2
135
143
175
250
Relevé nr.: in the table
1
2
3
4*
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13*
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Number of relevés 98 5
Differential species in Eriophoro leiocarpi-Caricetum rotundatae and subass. typicum
Carex rotundata (Cr) 45555574655663335 · · · · · V 6 V 5 ·
Eriophorum russeolum subsp. leiocarpum 32235535343· 2 2 · · 5 · 32 · · V 4IV 4II 3
Polytrichum jensenii (Cr) 3333131 2 · 3232 · 1 3·3· · · · V 3IV 3I4
Luzula wahlenbergii · · 1 1 1 · 1 1 · · · 1 1 · · · 2 · · · · · III 1 II 2 ·
Differential species in subass. caricetosum chordorrhizae
Carex chordorrhiza (S-C) 3····3· · · · 3215614 4 · · · · II 3V 5 I 4
Carex rariora (Cr, Sp) · 2 3·3· · · · 1 2 423363·3· · · II 3V4I3
Sphagnum aongstroemii ···5·····3·35 5 5 · · · · · · · I 5 IV 5 ·
Differential species in ass. Carici stantis–Warnstoretum exannulatae
Warnstora exannulata (De) ·3 3 ·4····31 · · · 6 · · 4 4 54 3 II 4II 5 V 4
Straminergon stramineum (De, S-C) ··111··········3··313·II 1 I 3IV 3
Differential species in var. Warnstora sarmentosa
Warnstora sarmentosa (De) ···········3·····3 3 3 3 3 · I 3V3
Differential combination of species in suballiance Caricenion rariorae (Cr)
Eriophorum russeolum subsp. russeolum (Sb) · 1 · · · 3···4· · · · 1 1 · 1 3· · · II 3II 3II 2
CDiagnostic species in alliance Sphagnion baltici (Sb)
Sphagnum balticum (Cr) 3355457754 3 ·3· · · · · · · · · V 6 II 4·
Diagnostic species in alliance Drepanocladion exannulati (De) and class Scheuchzerio–Caricetea nigrae (S-C)
Aulacomnium palustre · · 2 · 2 · · · · 2 2 2 · · · · · · · 1 · · II 2 II 2 I 1
Carex stans 33313· · · · · · 1 · 1 1 · · 5 5 7 3· III 3II 1 IV 6
Comarum palustre (De) ················31 · · · · · I 4I 1
Eriophorum angustifolium 1 · · 4·3···3· · · · · · · 2 · · 5 · II 4I4II 5
Paludella squarrosa ··················35 · · · · II 5
Sphagnum fallax ···········5········ ·· · I6 ·
S. lindbergii (Cr, Sb, Sp) ·········3············ · I 4·
S. majus ··············3· · · · · · · · I 4·
S. obtusum · · 3······5·····46 · · · · 7 I 3II 5 I 7
S. russowii ···········1········ ·· · I1 ·
S. squarrosum ··········1····64· · · · · · II 5 ·
S. warnstori ···············3· · · · · · · I 4·
Other species
Andromeda polifolia subsp. pumila 3······1·13· 1 · · 1 · · · · · · II 3III 2 ·
Aulacomnium turgidum · · · 1 1 · · · · · 2 · · · · 1 · · · · · · II 1 II 2 ·
Betula nana 1 · · 313·311111· · 3· · · · · · IV 2 IV 2 ·
Calliergon cordifolium ·········1·········11· · I 1 II1
Dicranum laevidens · · · 2 2 2 · · · · · 1 · · · · · · · · · · II 2 I 1 ·
Drepanocladus aduncus ·3· · 3·················II3· ·
Eriophorum vaginatum · 1 · 2 · · · · · · · 1 · · · · · 1 · · · 4II 2 I 1 II 3
Flavocetraria cucullata ···1·2 ················II2 · ·
Scorpidium revolvens 12········3······3· · · · II 2 I 3I3
Pedicularis interioroides · 1 · · · · · · · · 1 1 · · · · · · · · · · I 1 II 1 ·
Salix myrtilloides · · · · · 1 · · 1 1 · · 1 · · 1 · 1 · · · · II 1 II 1 I 1
Sanionia uncinata · · · 1 4 3 ·············1··II3· I 1
Sphagnum compactum ·3 3 ·4···5·············III4· ·
S. lenense ·3 4 · · 5 · 4· · · 1 · · · · · · · · · · III 5 I 1 ·
Note. Single occurrence: Caltha arctica 19(1), 21(1); Dupontia scheri 19(1), 21(1); Empetrum sub ho l arc ti cum 9(1); Ledum palustre subsp. decumbens
4(1), 10(1); Pedicularis lapponica 11(1); Rubus chamaemorus 4(2), 8(2); Salix pulchra 18(1); Vaccinium uliginosum subsp. microphyllum 8(1), 9(1); V. vitis-
idaea subsp. mi nus 4(3); lichens: Cetraria islandica 6(1); C. laevigata 6(1); Cladonia cenotea 6(1); C. chlorophaea 6(1); C. cor nuta 6(1); C. cyanipes 6(1); C.
deformis 6(1); C. gracilis s.l. 6(1); C. stygia 6(1); C. subfurcata 4(1); Peltigera scab ro sa 4(1); Thamnolia vermicularis 4(1); mosses: Dicranum elongatum 12(4); D.
groenlandicum 12(1); D. majus 20(3); Pohlia drummondii 18(01); Polytrichum juniperinum 11(1); Rhizomnium andrewsianum 18(1); R. pseudopunctatum 19(2);
Sphagnum girgensohnii 10(4); S. perfoliatum 13(5), 14(6); S. steerei 1(5), 11(3); S. tundrae.
Author: Khitun O.V. Locality: YamalNenets Autonomous Area. T – the Tazovsky Peninsula, up per reaches of Verkhnyaya Yareiyakha
River (Fig. 1, site 1): 6 – 68°13′16.9″ 75°13′00.5″, 02.08.2017; 7 – 68°13′15.2″ 75°13′25.6″, 02.08.2017; 8 – 68°13′14.0″ 75°14′06.7″, 02.08.2017; 9
68°13′25.7″ 75°13′16.3″ 02.08.2017; 10 – 68°12′27.2″ 75°14′16.4″, 06.08.2017; 13 – 68°14′13.7″ 75°14′36.4″, 03.08.2017; 14 68°14′11.0″ 75°14′30.2″,
03.08.2017; 15 – 68°14′01.4″ 75°14′25.5″, 03.08.2017; 16 – 68°13′53.3″ 75°14′59.7″, 03.08.2017; 1768°13′52.7″ 75°14′50.0″, 03.08.2017; 2268°13′15.2″
75°13′35.5″, 02.08.2017; G1 the Gydansky Peninsula, basin of the Tanama River middle reaches (Fig.1, site 3): 1 69°56′56.0″ 78°49′22.2″,
15.07.2017; 269°57′36.9″ 78°45′55.8″, 18.07.2017; 11 – 69°58′07.8″ 78°47′58.7″, 11.07.2017; 18 – 69°58′17.3″ 78°48′05.9″, 10.07.2017; G2 – the Gydansky
Peninsula, Lake Parisento surroundings (Fig.1, site 3): 3 –70°05′03.8″ 75°41′22.0″, 25.07.2017; 4 – 70°05′11.8″ 75°40′16.8″, 26.07.2017; 5 –70°05′13.6″
75°39′55.2″, 26.07.2017; 12 –70°05′02.7″ 75°41′32.4″, 25.07.2017; 19 70°05′45.1″ 75°38′09.6″, 23.07.2017; 20 – 70°05′39.4″ 75°38′38.8″, 23.07.2017; 21
–70°04′52.1″ 75°43′03.3″, 25.07.2017. * – nomenclatural type.
45
Botanica Pacica. A journal of plant science and conservaon. 2021. 10(1):37–51
Syntaxonomic diversity of the Tazovsky Peninsula, the Arctic
Differential group of species of this association are: Carex
stans, Dicranum majus, Polemonium acutiorum, Aulacomnium palustre.
Holotypus: 18 (281); T1; YaNAA; 1; 68°12′23.3″N 75°13′23.5″E;
36; 100.
Relevé. The relevé was taken at the bottom of a hollow
bet ween two outreaches of watershed hill with a smooth
sur face, with an inclination of 1 ° and an aspect of 292 °.
The cover of mosses is 45 %, herbs 30 %, shrubs 20 %,
dwarf shrubs 10 % and lichens 50 %. Soil organic horizon
is dark brown mucky peat 15–20 cm thick, underlained by
dark yellow sandy loam. 04.08.2017. O.V. Khitun.
List of species: Arctocetraria andrejevii 5, Cetrariella delisei 5, Po-
ly tri chum commune 4, Stereocaulon sp. 4, Betula nana 3, Cladonia
gracilis s. l. 3, Carex stans 3, Dicranum majus 3, Hylocomium splen-
dens 3, Peltigera scabrosa 3, Salix lanata 3, S. polaris 3, Sanionia
un ci na ta 3, Calamagrostis neglecta 2, Equisetum arvense subsp. bo-
rea le 2, Viola epipsiloides 2, Antennaria villifera 1, Aulacomnium
pa lust re 2, Bistorta elliptica 1, B. vivipara 1, Calliergon cordifolium
1, Carex lachenalii 1, C. rariora 1, Diphasiastrum alpinum 1,
Fes tu ca ovina 1, Ledum palustre subsp. decumbens 1, Luzula mul-
ti o ra subsp. frigida 1, Lycopodium annotinum subsp. pungens 1,
Pe di cularic labradorica 1, Poa alpigena 1, Polemonium acutiorum 1,
Ptilidium ciliare 1, Pyrola minor 1, Salix glauca 1, Sibbaldia pro cum-
bens 1, Solidago lapponica 1, Sphagnum girgensohnii 1, Tanacetum
bi pinnatum 1, Trisetum spicatum 1, Vaccinium uliginosum subsp.
microphyllum 1, Veratrum lobelianum 2.
Distribution and ecology. These phytocoenoses occur in
the southern part of the TTS on the Gydansky Peninsula
and in the STS on the Tazovsky Peninsula within an ele va tion
range from 9 to 36 m a.s.l. They grow on slopes of wa ter shed
hills (in cli na tion of 1 to 20°) and on at bottoms of hol lows
with slight ly hummocky nanotopography. Soil or ga nic ho ri-
zon is mucky peat underlained by sand or sandy loam.
Structure and composition. The stands have three ver ti-
cal strata. The overstory is 60 to 180 cm high, formed by
hy poarctic-montane willow species (Salix gla uca, S. lanata)
and Betula nana and its cover varies from 20 to 90 %. The
eld layer is 15 to 20 cm high, formed by herbs and varies
in cover from sparse to closed (10–70 %). Herbs are dis tri
buted unevenly under the willow canopy, con cen tra ting in
open parts. Equisetum arvense dominates, Poa alpigena, Po le-
mo nium acutiorum, Viola epipsiloides and Carex stans are com-
mon but not abundant. Dwarf shrub–moss ground layer
is closed. Moss cover reaches 90 %; Sanionia uncinata, Hy lo-
co mium splendens and Dicranum majus dominate. Lichens and
dwarf shrubs (Salix polaris and Vaccinium uligino sum subsp.
microphyllum) are not abundant (5–15 %).
Peat-moss vegetation in moist habitats
Tussock tundra dominated by Eriophorum vaginatum is
assigned to the class Oxycocco-Sphagnetea Br.-Bl. et Tx. ex
West hoff et al. 1946, order Sphagnetalia medii Kästner et
Flöss ner 1933 and alliance Rubo chamaemori–Dicranion elongati
O. Lav rinenko et I. Lavrinenko 2015.
The Oxycocco-Sphagnetea comprises dwarf shrub, sedge
and peat-moss vegetation of the Holarctic ombrotrophic
bogs, fens and wet heaths. Diagnostic species include And-
ro meda polifolia subsp. pumila, Aulacomnium palustre, Betula na na,
Huperzia arctica, Eriophorum vaginatum, Polytrichum stric tum, Rubus
chamaemorus, Sphagnum balticum, S. capillifolium, S. com pac tum,
S. fus cum, S. russowii. Vaccinium uliginosum subsp. microphyllum.
The Sphagnetalia medii is represented by Sphagnum-do mi-
nated bog communities occurring in suboceanic and con ti-
nen tal regions, and in the mountains in the northern hemi-
sphere. Diagnostic species are the same as for the class.
The Rubo chamaemori–Dicranion elongati includes dwarf
shrub, cloudberry, moss, lichen communities on oligo tro-
phic sub arc tic peatlands, including palsa bogs and high-cen-
te red poly gons. Differential combination of species in cludes
And ro me da polifolia subsp. pumila, Betula nana, Rubus cha mae mo-
rus, Le dum palustre subsp. decumbens, Vaccinium vitis-idaea subsp.
mi nus, V. uli gi nosum subsp. microphyllum, Dicranum elon ga tum,
Poly tri chum strictum, Flavocetraria nivalis, Cetraria is lan dica, Cla-
do nia arbuscula and C. rangiferina. Cladonia stygia was for a long
time considered as a form of C. rangiferina, but now they are
trated as different species (Ahti & Hyvönen 1985) and in
the studied locality we found predominantely Cladonia stygia.
We distinguished two associations.
Sphagno girgensohnii–Betuletum nanae ass. nova hoc
loco (Table 1, rel. 20–22; Table 3; Fig. 2D)
Differential species: Empetrum subholarcticum, Calamagrostis
neglecta, Sphagnum girgensohnii, Polytrichum commune.
Holotypus: 21 (257); T1; YaNAA; 1; 68°14′17.2″N
75°14′48.8″E; 55; 100.
Relevé. The relevé is located on the lake’s terrace with
slightly hummocky surface, with an inclination 1° and an
aspect 225°. Soil organic horizon is dark brown mucky peat,
10 cm thick, underlain by sandy loam. The cover of mosses
is 100%, of shrubs 80 %, dwarf shrubs 10 %, herbs 25 %,
lichens 20 %. 03.08.2017. O.V. Khitun.
List of species: Betula nana 7, Hylocomium splendens 5, Sphag-
num girgensohnii 5, Cetraria islandica 4, Aulacomnium turgidum 3,
Dic ranum laevidens 3, Polytrichum commune 3, Rubus chamaemorus
3, Vaccinium vitis-idaea subsp. minus 3, Cladonia cornuta 2, Fla-
vo cet raria cucullata 2, Salix glauca 2, Sphenolobus minutus 1, Cet-
raria laevigata 1, Cladonia cenotea 1, C. cyanipes 1, C. pleurota 1,
C. stygia 1, Calamagrostis neglecta 1, Cladonia amaurocraea 1, Em-
petrum subholarcticum 1, Eriophorum vaginatum 1, Festuca ovi na 1,
Ledum palustre subsp. decumbens 1, Peltigera malacea 1, P. scab-
rosa 1, Poa arctica 1, Polytrichum juniperinum 1, Ptilidium cili are 1,
Vaccinium uliginosum subsp. microphyllum 1.
Distribution and ecology. These communities occur in
the STS on the Ta zovsky Peninsula at the sites with re la ti ve ly
deep snow cover: at or gently sloping parts of lakes’ ter
races or on the edges of steep lee slopes with so li uc tion fea
tures in the upper parts of ravines. The soil organic ho ri zon
is 10–15 cm thick and consists of dark brown mucky peat;
the mi ne ral horizons are dark yel low with sandy loam texture.
Structure and composition. The ca nopy of Betula nana is
al most closed, 70–80 %, and is 35–80 cm high. The her bal
layer is 10 cm high, sparse, with pre do minance of Rubus cha-
mae morus and Calamagrostis neglecta. In the ground layer moss
co ver reaches 100 %, cover of lichens is 20 to 40 % and of
dwarf shrubs is 5–10 %. Sphag num girgensohnii dominates in
the moss carpet, while Hylocomium splendens is less abundant.
Cet raria islandica and Cladonia cornuta are the most abundant
li chens and Vaccinium vitis-idaea subsp. minus is the most abun-
dant dwarf shrub.
Empetro subholarctici–Eriophoretum vagi na ti ass. nova
hoc loco (Table 1, rel. 23–31; Table 3; Fig. 2E)
Differential species: Alectoria ochroleuca, Em pet rum subholarc-
ti cum, Cladonia stellaris, Sphagnum lenense.
Holotypus: 27 (248); T1; YaNAA; 1; 68°13′15.5″N
75°13′21.1″E; 47; 100.
Relevé. The stand occurs on the gentle slope of the water-
shed with an inclination 1° and an aspect 22°. The surface is
46 Botanica Pacica. A journal of plant science and conservaon. 2021. 10(1):37–51
Telyatnikov et al.
slightly hummocky and tussocky. Soil organic
horizon is pea ty, 17 cm thick, underlained
by loam. The cover of li chens and mosses
is 90 % and 65 % respectively, the cover of
herbs and shrubs is 30 and 20 %. 02.08.2017.
O.V. Khitun.
List of species: Cladonia amaurocraea 5, C. stygia
5, Sphagnum bal ticum 5, Ledum palustre subsp. de-
cum bens 4, Rubus cha mae mo rus 4, Alectoria och ro-
leuca 3, Dicranum laevidens 3, Eriophorum va gi na-
tum 3, Flavocetraria nivalis 3, Polytrichum strictum
3, Sphagnum le nense 3, Carex arctisibirica 2, And-
ro me da polifolia subsp. pumila 1, Calamagrostis
neg lec ta 1, Cetraria islandica 1, C. laevigata 1, Cla-
do nia stellaris 1, Dicranum elongatum 1, Empetrum
sub ho larc ticum 1, Vaccinium uliginosum subsp. mic-
ro phyllum 1, Vaccinium vitis-idaea subsp. minus 1.
Distribution and ecology. These phyto coe-
no ses occur on high centered polygons in the
polygonal tundramire complexes on the at
tops of watersheds (43 to 52 m a.s.l.) on the
Tazovsky Pe ninsula. Polygons are 5 to 25 m in
diameter, 20 to 40 cm high and have a hum
mo cky surface. Soil organic horison is peaty,
20 to 30 cm thick, underlain by sandy loam.
Structure and composition. These com mu-
ni ties have two ver tical strata. The overstory
with cover of 15 to 70 % is 10 to 15 cm high;
it is for med by even ly distributed graminoids
and herbs, Ru bus chamaemorus and Eriophorum
va gi natum being most com mon, sometimes
with low shrubs (5 to 15 %). The dwarf
shrub, li chen, moss ground layer is well-de-
ve lo ped and closed. Mosses are the most
abun dant bet ween hum mocks and lichens on
the hum mocks. Dwarf shrubs (15–30 %) are
even ly dis tri buted, Ledum palustre subsp.de cum-
bens is the most abundant, Vaccinium uliginosum
subsp. mic ro phyl lum, V. vitis-idaea subsp. minus,
Em pet rum subholarcticum are com mon but less
abun dant. Sphagnum balticum and Dicranum
elon ga tum dominate among mosses, Alectoria
och roleuca, Cetra ria islandica, C. laevigata, Cladonia
amaurocraea, C. stygia and Fla vocetraria cucullata
are the most abundant among lichens.
Sedge-moss vegetation in wet
habitats
Sedge-moss mires and bogs we assign to
the class Scheuch zerio–Caricetea nigrae (Nordh.
1936) Tx. 1937, order Scheuch zerietalia palustris
Nordh. 1936, two alliances Sphagnion bal tici
Kus tova 1987 ex Lapshina 2010, Drepanocladion
exa n nu lati Krajina 1933 and one suballiance
Ca ricenion rariorae Lav rinenko, Matveyeva et
Lavrinenko 2016.
The class Scheuchzerio–Caricetea nigrae com-
prises oligo-mesotrophic and meso tro phic
bogs and intermediate mires rich in mos ses
and sedges. Diagnostic species of the class
present in the study area are Ca rex chor do rrhiza,
C. stans, Comarum palustre, Erio phorum angus ti fo-
lium, Paludella squarrosa, Sphagnum fallax, S. lind-
bergii, S. majus, S. obtusum, S. russowii, S. squar-
rosum, S. warn stori and Straminergon stramineum.
Table 3 Synoptic table of associations in the southern tundra subzone
on the Tazovsky Peninsula (Syntaxa codes – see Tables 1 and 2; among
“others” species with constancy < II are not included).
SYNTAXON CODE A B C D E F G H
Number of relevés 6 8 6 3 9 9 8 5
Diagnostic species in ass. Hierochloo alpinae–Hylocomietum splendentis
Hierochloё alpina (LV) V 2 V 2 · · · · · ·
Polytrichum hyperboreum V4IV 3I 1 · ····
Alectoria ochroleuca (LV) V 5 II 4· · V 1 · · ·
Differential species in ass. Hierochloo alpinae–Hylocomietum splendentis
Festuca ovina IV 2 V 2 II 1 II 1 · · · ·
Luzula confusa (Sh) V 1 IV 1 I 1 · · · · ·
Salix nummularia III 2 IV 3······
Bryocaulon divergens V4 II 4 · · III 1 · · ·
Flavocetraria nivalis (LV) V 1 II 3 · · II 2 · · ·
Bryoria nitidula IV 2 I 1 · · I 1 · · ·
Racomitrium lanuginosum (Sh) II 2 II 2 ······
Differential species in subass. empetretosum subholarctici and var. typicum
Empetrum subholarcticum V 2 V 3I 1 V 1 V 1 I 1 · ·
Arctous alpina IV 2 V 3I 1 ·····
Calamagrostis neglecta (S-C) IV 3IV 2 III 2 V 1 II 1 · · ·
Differential species in var. Aconogonon ochreatum
Tanacetum bipinnatum · V 2 III 1 · · · · ·
Aconogonon ochreatum I 1 V 2 · · · · · ·
Carex quasivaginata (S-C) · IV 1 · · · · · ·
Campanula rotundifolia ·IV 1 I1·····
Differential species in ass. Dicrano maji–Salicetum lanatae
Carex stans (S-C) · I 1 IV 4II 1 · III 3II 1 IV 5
Dicranum majus · · V 3· · · · I 3
Polemonium acutiorum · I 1 V 1 · · · · ·
Aulacomnium palustre ((O-S, S-C) · · IV 2 II 1 · II 2 II 2 I 1
Differential species in ass. Sphagno girgensohnii-Betuletum nanae
Sphagnum girgensohnii · · II 2 V 6 · · I 5 ·
Polytrichum commune · · II 4V4I3···
Differential species in ass..Empetro subholarctici-Eriophoretum vaginati
Cladonia stellaris (LV) IV 4II 4· II 1 V 3· · ·
Sphagnum lenense · · · · IV 4III 4I 1 ·
Dif-sp. in ass. Eriophoro medii-Caricetum rotundatae and subass. typicum
Carex rotundata I 1 · · · I 1 V 6 V 5 ·
Eriophorum medium · · · · I 1 V 4IV 4II 3
Polytrichum jensenii · · · · II 3V3IV 3I4
Luzula wahlenbergii · · I 1 · · III 1 II 1 ·
Differential species in subass. caricetosum chordorrhizae
Carex chordorrhiza (S-C) · · · · · II 3V 5 I 4
Carex rariora · · I 1 · I 1 II 3V4I3
Sphagnum aongstroemii · · · · · I 5 IV 5 ·
Differential species in ass. Carici stantis–Warnstoretum exannulatae
Warnstora exannulata · · · · · II 4II 5 V 4
Straminergon stramineum (S-C) · · I 3· · II 1 I 3III 3
Differential species in var. Warnstora sarmentosa
Warnstora sarmentosa ······I3V3
Diagnostic species in class Salicetea herbaceae (Sh)
Salix polaris · II 2 V 3·····
Carex lachenalii · I 1 IV 2 · · · · ·
Ranunculus nivalis · · III 1 · · · · ·
Diagnostic species in class Loiseleurio procumbentis–Vaccinietea (LV)
Aulacomnium turgidum III 2 II 1 III 1 V 3II 1 II 1 II 2 ·
Betula nana (LV, O-S) V4V3IV 2 V 7 IV 3IV 2IV 2 ·
Flavocetraria cucullata V3V3I 1 II 3V3II 2 · ·
Vaccinium uliginosum subsp. microphyllum IV 2 V 3III 2 V 1 V 2 II 1 · ·
Vaccinium vitis-idaea subsp. minus V 1 IV 2 II 1 V 3IV 2 I 3· ·
Diagnostic species in class Oxycocco-Sphagnetea (O-S)
Andromeda polifolia subsp. pumila · I 1 · · III 1 II 3III 2 ·
Eriophorum vaginatum II 1 · · II 1 V 4II 2 I 1 II 3
Rubus chamaemorus · · I 4V3V4II 2 · ·
Sphagnum balticum · · · · IV 5 V 6 II 3·
S. compactum · · · · I 5 III 4· ·
Diagnostic species in class Scheuchzerio–Caricetea nigrae (S-C)
Eriophorum angustifolium I 1 · III 1 II 1 I 1 II 3I4II 4
Other species:
Antennaria villifera · II 1 II 1 · · · · ·
Armeria scabra · III 1 · · · · · ·
Bistorta vivipara I 1 III 1 V 2 · · · · ·
Carex arctisibirica V3IV 2 I 1 II 3II 2 · · ·
Cetraria islandica IV 2 V 3I 1 V 4 IV 2 I 1 · ·
C. laevigata III 1 IV 1 · II 1 V 3I 1 · ·
Cetrariella delisei · II 4 IV 3·····
Cladonia amaurocraea III 1 II 1 · II 1 V 3···
C. arbuscula V3IV 3· II 1 III 1 · · ·
C. chlorophaea III 1 II 1 III 1 · II 1 I 1 · ·
C. coccifera I 1 III 2 I 1 · · · · ·
Cladonia cornuta II 1 · · IV 3II 1 I 1 · ·
C. gracilis s.l. III 1 II 1 IV 2 II 3II 1 I 1 · ·
C. pleurota IV 2 · · II 1 II 1 · · ·
C. stygia V4II 4· IV 4 V 5 I 1 · ·
C. subfurcata I 1 I 3· · III 1 I 1 · ·
Dicranum elongatum V3II 1 ·· IV 3· I 5 ·
D. laevidens · · I 3II 3III 3II 3I 1 ·
Equisetum arvense sunsp. boreale II 2 IV 2 V 3II 1 · · · ·
Hylocomium splendens · I 4V2 V4I 1 · · ·
Ledum palustre subsp. decumbens IV 2 IV 2 II 1 V 1 V 4I 1 I 1 ·
47
Botanica Pacica. A journal of plant science and conservaon. 2021. 10(1):37–51
Syntaxonomic diversity of the Tazovsky Peninsula, the Arctic
The Scheuch zerietalia palustris comprises wet ombrotrophic
and minerotrophic communities in depressions in bogs,
swamps and mires occurring on peaty soil with high water
table. Diagnostic species: Carex rariora and Sphagnum lindbergii.
The Sphagnion baltici comprises vegetation of wet de pres-
sions in bogs and intermediate mires dominated by oligo-
tro phic Sphagnum-mosses in continental parts of the boreal
zone in the Holarctic. Diagnostic species are: Sphagnum bal-
ticum, S. lindbergii and Eriophorum russeolum (Lavrinenko et
al. 2016). The alliance is represented by suballiance Cari-
ce nion rariorae, comprising vegetation of swamps and de-
pres sions in polygonal bogs and palsas dominated by oli-
go tro phic Sphagnum-mosses in the tundra zone of the East
Euro pean and probably West Siberian sectors of the Arctic.
Differential combination of species includes Carex rari ora,
C. rotundata, Eriophorum russeolum, Sphagnum balticum, S. lind-
ber gii and Polytrichum jensenii (Lavrinenko et al. 2016).
We describe one new association and two subassociations
in this suballiance.
Eriophoro leiocarpi–Caricetum rotundatae (Table 2, rel.
1–17; Table 3)
Differential species: Carex rotundata, Eriophorum russeolum
subsp. leiocarpum, Polytrichum jensenii, Luzula wahlenbergii.
Holotypus: 4 (204); T2; YaNAA; 2; 70°05′11.8″ 75°40′16.8″
E; 20; 100.
Relevé. The community occurs in the wa ter track channel
on the gentle slope. The cover of mosses is 90 %. The cover
of graminoids is 80 %, shrubs and dwarf shrubs 5 % each.
Soils are peaty, moist, with 15–20 cm thick organic horizon
underlained by sandy loam. 26.07.2017. O.V. Khitun.
List of species: Carex rotundata 5, Sphagnum aong stroemii 5,
S. bal ti cum 5, Eriophorum an gus ti folium 4, Betula nana 3, Dic-
ra num laevidens 2, Erio phorum russeolum subsp. leiocarpum 3,
E. vaginatum 3, Po ly tri chum jen senii 3, Vaccinium vitis-idaea
subsp. minus 3, Aula com nium turgidum 1, Carex stans 1, Cladonia
sub furcata 1, Fla vo cet raria cucullata 1, Ledum pa lust re subsp.
decumbens 1, Luzula wahlenbergii 1, Peltigera scabrosa 1, Rubus
chamaemorus 1, Sa nio nia uncinata 1, Straminergon stramineum 1,
Tham nolia vermicularis 1.
Distribution and ecology. These communities occur in
the sou thern part of the TTS on the Gydansky Peninsula
and in the STS on the Tazovsky Peninsula. They occupy
lake depressions, drai ned lakebeds, wet hol lows between
watershed hills, wet troughs on the watershed hills. The
soils are waterlogged, with peat horizons 20
to 30 cm thick un der lained by sandy loam or
clay loam.
Structure and composition. The stands are
rather homogenous, for med by hygrophitic
gra minoids and predominantly Sphag num mos-
ses. The layer of graminoids in these com mu-
nities is up to 80 cm high, with the cover of 40
to 85 %. Carex ro tun data, Erio pho rum russeolum
subsp. leiocarpum and Lu zu la wahlenbergii are the
most abundant. Hyg ro phytic mosses (Sphagnum
balticum and Poly tri chum jensenii predominate)
form a thick carpet with 40 to 100 % cover.
Rarely small patches of dwarf shrubs are
present on the moss pads (Andromeda polifolia
subsp. pumila, Ledum palustre subsp. decumbens).
Eriophoro leiocarpi–Caricetum rotundatae
typicum subass. nov. hoc loco (Table 2, rel. 1–9; Table 3;
Fig. 2F)
Differential species are the same as for the association.
Distribution and ecology. These phytocoenoses occur in
the southern part of the TTS on the Gydansky Peninsula
and in the STS on the Tazovsky Peninsula within the
altitude range of 17 to 52 m a.s.l. on the drained lakebeds,
on low poorly drained watersheds, in troughs of polygonal
tundra-mire complexes.
Eriophoro leiocarpi–Caricetum rotundatae caricetosum
chordorrhizae subass. nov. hoc loco (Tabl. 2, rel. 10–17;
Tabl. 3; Fig. 2G)
Differential species: Carex chordorrhiza, C. rotundata, C. rari-
o ra and Sphagnum aongstroemii.
Holotypus: 13 (261); T2; YaNAA; 1; 68°14′13.7″N
75°14′36.4″E; 51; 100.
Relevé. The stand grows on drained lakebed with a rather
even surface. The cover of mosses is 100 %, graminoids
80 %, shrubs and dwarf shrubs 1 % each. Soils are peaty
and wet, with organic horizon 20–25 cm thick, underlained
by sandy loam. 03.08.2017. O.V. Khitun.
List of species: Carex rotundata 6, Sphagnum aongstroemii 5,
Sphagnum perfoliatum 5, Sphagnum balticum 3, Carex rariora 2,
Eriophorum russeolum subsp. leiocarpum 2, Polytrichum jensenii
2, Andromeda polifolia subsp. pumila 1, Betula nana 1, Carex
chordorrhiza 1, Luzula wahlenbergii 1, Salix myrtilloides 1.
Distribution and ecology. These communities occur in
the sou thern part of the TTS on the Gydansky Peninsula
and in the STS on the Tazovsky Peninsula. They occupy
drai ned lakebeds, sel dom occur in troughs of polygonal
comp lexes on the lo wer watersheds. They were recorded
within the altitude range of 17 to 54 m a.s.l.
Structure and composition. Two vertical strata are clear ly
distinguished in this community: an upper layer of hyg ro-
phi tic sedges (Ca rex rotundata, C. chordorrhiza, C rariira) 20
to 30 cm high with cover 50 to 100 %, and a closed ground
la yer (100 %) for med by hygrophitic mosses Polytrichum jen-
senii and Sphagnum aongstroemii.
The alliance Drepanocladion exannulati comprises non-cal-
cy phytic fens dominated by mosses (Warnstora exannulata
and W. sarmentosa) and with a sparse sedge cover (Eriophorum
poly stachion, E. scheuchzeri, Carex cinerea, C. lachenalii, C. rari o
ra, C. rostrata). Communities of this alliance occur in bo real
and arctic regions as well as in alpine areas in Cent ral and
Sou thern Europe. Diagnostic species include Comarum pa-
Table 3. Continued.
SYNTAXON CODE A B C D E F G H
Orthocaulis binsteadii III 1 · · · II 1 · · ·
Peltigera scabrosa · · IV 2 IV 2 · I 1 · ·
Petasites frigidus · · III 2 · · · · ·
Pleurozium schreberi I 1 I 1 II 1 IV 3II 2 · · ·
Poa alpigena II 1 II 1 III 1 II 1 · · · ·
Pogonatum dentatum III 1 IV 1 · · · · · ·
Polytrichum piliferum I 1 III 3······
Ptilidium ciliare I 1 II 2 IV 1 V 1 II 1 · · ·
Pyrola minor · · III 1 · · · · ·
Ranunculus propinquus · · III 2 · · · · ·
Salix glauca V 1 II 1 IV 3IV 2 · · · ·
S. lanata · I 1 V 5 II 1 I 1 · · ·
S. pulchra III 1 I 1 I 1 · I 1 · · I 1
Sanionia uncinata · II 1 V 5 II 3II 1 II 3· I 1
Stellaria peduncularis · II 1 III 1 · · · · ·
Thamnolia vermicularis IV 1 III 1 · · I 3I 1 · ·
Veratrum lobelianum · · IV 2 · · · · ·
Viola epipsiloides · · III 2 · · · · ·
48 Botanica Pacica. A journal of plant science and conservaon. 2021. 10(1):37–51
Telyatnikov et al.
lustre, Straminergon stramineum, Warnstora exannulata, W. sar-
men tosa. In the study area this alliance is represented by the
va riant of the association Carici stantis–Warnstoretum exannu
la tae Lavrinenko, Matveyeva et Lavrinenko 2016, described
earlier in the East European Arctic (Lavrinenko et al. 2016).
Carici stantis–Warnstoretum exannulatae Lavrinenko,
Matveyeva et Lavrinenko 2016
Differential combination of species includes Carex stans,
Warnstora exannulata and Straminergon stramineum.
Total vegetation cover is 80–100%. Sedges and solitary wil
lows form the canopy up to 30 cm high, with the cover
from 35 to 95 %. The ground moss layer varies from 1 % to
almost closed. These stands occupy paludied depressions
on watersheds, low marine terraces and oodplains. The
soils are peaty, underlained by gleyed mineral horizons. As
so ciation is present in the TTS and STS of the East Euro-
pean Arctic (Lavrinenko et al. 2016). We describe a variant
of this association below.
Carici stantis–Warnstoretum exannulatae var. Warn-
stor a sarmentosa (Tabl. 2, rel 1822; Tabl. 3; Fig. 2H).
Differential species: Warnstora sarmentosa.
Distribution and ecology. These communities occur in
the sou thern part of the TTS on the Gydansky Peninsula
and in the STS on the Tazovsky Pe nin sula. They were re-
cor ded within an altitude range of 21 to 44 m a.s.l. in water
log ged habitats at the bottoms of hol lows between hills,
on drained lakebeds or in thermocarst thaw troughs on
water sheds. The soils with approximately 15 cm thick peat
horizon, water-soaked, on sandy deposits.
Structure and composition. The stands have two vertical
layers: Carex stans dominates in the upper one, which height
is 30–35 cm and cover up to 80 %; Warnstora exannulata,
W. sarmentosa and Straminergon stra mi neum are predominant
in the ground layer which cover varies from 40 to 100 %.
Overview of the syntaxonomical
diversity of the Tazovsky Peninsula and
the prodromus of vegetation
For the rst time, for the STS on the Tazovsky Penin
su la, the syntaxonomic diversity is described, including 6
as so cia tions, 3 subassociations and 3 variants. Among them
4 as so ciations, 3 subassociations and 3 variants are nov.
hoc. loco. The subass. Hierochloo alpinae–Hylocomietum splen-
den tis em pet retosum subholarctici with 2 variants the typicum and
the Aco no gonon ochreatum are wide-spread and occupy the
most drai ned parts of the watershed hills and their edges.
The as so ciation Dicrano maji–Salicetum lanatae is common
in the stu dy area but occupy relatively small areas on the
slopes of watersheds and hollows between them. The as-
so ciation Sphag no girgensohnii–Betuletum nanae was relatively
ra ri ly found, main ly on the gently sloping lake terraces. The
tussock tund ra Empetro subholarctici–Eriopho re tum vaginati and
the sedge-Sphag num mires Eriophoro leiocarpi–Caricetum ro-
tun datae are the parts of polygonal tundra-mire complexes
on the at water sheds. The sedgemoss fens (subass. Carici
stantis–Warn stor etum exannulatae warnstoretosum sarmentosae)
in lake dep res sions and hollows betwen hills are rather
com mon in the area.
A hyerarchy of the syntaxonomical system of vegetation
of the Tazovsky Peninsula is represented in the following
prodromus:
Class
Order
Alliance
Suballiance
Association
Subassociation
Variant
Loiseleurio procumbentis–Vaccinietea Eggler ex
Schubert 1960
Deschampsio exuosae–Vaccinietalia myrtilli Dahl 1957
Loiseleurio–Arctostaphylion Kalliola ex
Nordhagen1943
Hierochloo alpinae–Hylocomietum splendentis
Telyatnikov et al. 2019
empetretosum subholarctici Khitun subass.
nov. hoc loco
typicum Khitun var. nov. hoc loco
Aconogonon ochreatum Khitun var. nov.
hoc loco
? Unknown class
? Unknown order
? Unknown alliance
Dicrano maji–Salicetum lanatae Khitun ass.
nov. hoc loco
Oxycocco-Sphagnetea Br.Bl. et Tx. ex Westhoff et al. 1946
Sphagnetalia medii Kästner et Flössner 1933
Rubo chamaemori–Dicranion elongati
O. Lavrinenko et I. Lavrinenko 2015
Sphagno girgensohnii–Betuletum nanae Khitun
ass. nov. hoc loco
Empetro subholarctici–Eriophoretum vaginati
Khitun ass. nov. hoc loco
Scheuchzerio–Caricetea nigrae (Nordh. 1936) Tx. 1937
Scheuchzerietalia palustris Nordh. 1936
Sphagnion baltici Kustova 1987 ex Lapshina 2010
Caricenion rariorae Lavrinenko, Matveyeva et
Lavrinenko 2016
Eriophoro leiocarpi–Caricetum rotundatae
Khitun ass. nov. hoc loco
typicum Khitun subass. nov. hoc loco
caricetosum chordorrhizae Khitun subass.
nov. hoc loco
Drepanocladion exannulati Krajina 1933
Carici stantis–Warnstoretum exannulatae
Lavrinenko, Matveyeva et Lavrinenko 2016
Warnstora sarmentosa Khitun var. nov.
hoc loco
DISCUSSION
In the STS on the Tazovsky Peninsula we found the
same tendencies as in the southern part of the TTS on the
Gydansky Peninsula. (Telyatnikov et al., in press). As ex pec
ted, spotted dwarf shrub-moss tundras with notable par-
ti cipation of forbs (subass. Luzulo tundricolae–Hylocomietum
splendentis empetretosum subholarctici), which are characteristic
for the zonal habitats in the northern part of the TTS on
the Gy dan sky Peninsula, are absent on Tazovsky. On the
Ta zovsky Peninsula, dwarf birch dominated communities
with an abundance of erect dwarf shrubs, sedge (Carex
arc ti sibirica) and well-developed lichen-moss ground layer
with rare frost boil spots occupy zonal habitats on loamy
grounds (Khitun 1989). However, in the studied locality
san dy grounds were absolutely predominant, therefore we
col lec ted not enought relevés corresponding strictly to this
zonal type to describe it here. Instead, psammophitic va-
riants of such communities were present. We assigned them
to the earlier described association Hierochloo alpinae–Hylo co-
49
Botanica Pacica. A journal of plant science and conservaon. 2021. 10(1):37–51
Syntaxonomic diversity of the Tazovsky Peninsula, the Arctic
mie tum splendentis. These phytocoenoses grow on the better
drai ned parts of watershed hills with shallow peaty horizon.
On the poorly drained parts of watershed hills on sandy
loams or loams, where peaty horizon is rather thick, tussock
tundras occur (ass. Empetro subholarctici–Eriophoretum vagi na-
ti). In the southern part of the TTS in the central part of
the Gydansky Peninsula tussock tundra is widespread and
we con sidered it as a zonal community (Telyatnikov et al., in
press). This idea goes back to Gorodkov (1935). Matveyeva
& Zanokha (1986) in their surveys of vegetation in the sou-
thern tundra of the Taimyr Peninsula also referred com mu-
ni ties with abundant Eriophorum vaginatum to the zonal type.
Though tussock tundra is physiognomically very similar
and have similar species composition in various regions,
some regional or local variation is present (Walker et al.
1994). For example, Cassiope tetragona, common in this type
of tundra in Taimyr, was not found in similar habitats in the
West Siberian Arctic. We found some difference in do mi
nant species of Sphagnum mosses. In the central part of the
Gydansky Peninsula, Sphagnum balticum and S. aongstroemii
were dominant in tussock tundra, the latter is also the main
do mi nant in tussock tundra in the STS of Taimyr (Matveeva
& Za nokha 1986). On the Tazovsky Peninsula, Sphagnum
bal ticum and S. lenense dominate in the tussock tundra. In the
stu dy area we found Sphagnum aongstroemii only on the for-
mer lakebeds of drained lakes in the wet sedge-moss mires.
Tussock tundra usually develops on loam and clay
grounds and is characterized by a poorer drainage. However,
in the studied localities sand deposits were widespread, so
san dy loams and sands were underlaying relatively thick or-
ga nic peaty horizons. It is likely that these peat horizons
pro vide the conditions suitable for such communities. The
pre sence of thick peaty horizons is very characteristic of
sub arctic tundra in the West Siberian Arctic (Rebristaya
2013, Khitun 2005). Peaty acidic soils are favourable for ma
ny oligotrophic hypoarctic species, but are an obstacle to the
spread of arctic species southwards (in contrast to Tai myr,
where arctic species are present even in the southern tund-
ra). The absence of arctic species is the main reason that the
species richness of zonal communities in the West Si be rian
Arctic is lower, when compared to Taimyr; and the tus sock
tundras are the poorest of the zonal communities in the re-
gion (by species composition). Only in the subzone of the
arctic tundra, where organic horizons are minimal and mi-
ne ral horizons are close to the surface, we recorded the in-
crease of forb species and zonal communities become one
of the richest by number of species (Khitun 1998, 2005).
In the studied locality, as well as in the localities in the
sou thern part of the TTS on the Gydansky Peninsula,
we did not nd Dryas-dominated communities Dryado
octopetalae–Hylocomietum alaskani (Andreev 1932) Lavrinenko
et Lavrinenko 2018, which was unexpected, taking into ac-
count the widespread sandy grounds. It is probable that
the thick peat horizons and poor drainage, overall, was the
rea son for their absence. In previously studied sites on the
Tazov sky Peninsula Dryas-dominated stands were also rare
(Khitun 1989).
Vegetation in the southern part of the TTS on the Gy-
dan sky and in the STS on the Tazovsky Peninsulas is phy to-
coe nologically linked with the territories located westwards.
Association Carici stantis–Warnstoretum exannulatae is com-
mon with the EastEuropean Arctic but there are no com
mon as sociations with regions located to the east. In the
nor thern part of the TTS on the Gydansky Peninsula, we
dis co vered the opposite trend, nding connections only
with regions located eastward, i.e. Taimyr, East Siberia
(Telyatnikov et al. 2019).
We found a high degree of similarity between
vegetation of Tazovsky and southern part of the TTS of
the Gydansky Pe ninsula. Four of six associations which
we described are common for these territories (Hierochloo
alpinae–Hylocomietum splendentis, Dicrano maji–Salicetum lana tae,
Eriophoro leiocarpi–Caricetum rotundatae, Carici stantis–Warn-
stor etum exannulatae) and only two (Sphagno girgensohnii–Betu-
le tum nanae and Empetro subholarctici-Eriophoretum vaginati)
are specic for the STS on the Tazovsky Peninsula. At the
same time, comparison of the northern part of the TTS
and STS, revealed low similarity with only one association in
common (Hierochloo alpinae–Hylocomietum splendentis).
CONCLUSION
Summarizing the results of our phytosociological re-
search in the Gydansky and Tazovsky Peninsulas, we con-
clude that the results correspond with the statements of
Alexan drova (1980), who wrote that the vegetation of the
nor thern part of the TTS differed notably from the ve ge-
tation of the southern parts of the TTS and of STS. The
two latter are rather similar by species composition and
structure. According to Alexandrova (1980), zonal com mu
nities in the northern belt of the subarctic tundra (coin-
ciding with northern part of TTS) have the features tran-
si tional to the arctic tundra subzone, but the presence of
low shrubs (dwarf birch and willows) is characteristic for
sub arctic tundra. Our data conrm this conclusion.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors are grateful to Transregional Expeditional
Cen ter “Arctica”, Scientic Center of Arctic Studies and
De part ment of Science and Innovations of the Yamal-
Ne nets Autonomous Area for the eld work lo gis tics. We
are very thankful to Dr. Il’ya Zhdanov for iden ti ca tion
of lichens in the eld, to our cartographer Yakov Gu
nin for various help during the eld work and to Ber
nard Steward for improving the English language text.
The work was carried out with funding of the State Task
of the Central Siberian Botanical Garden Siberian Branch
RAS (№ ААААА211210111000076), and with the sup
port of the RFBR (project no 1804 01010 A). Work of
the reseachers of the Komarov Botanical In sti tute RAS was
carried out within the framework of the in sti tute topics
ААААА191190306900025 and 1210216001846, and
support of RFBR project no 180560093.
LITERATURE CITED
Ahti, T. & S. Hyvönen 1985. Cladyna stygia, a common, over-
looked species of reindeer lichen. Annals Botanici Fennici
22:223–229.
Aleksandrova, V.D. 1980. The Arctic and Antarctic: their division into
geobotanical areas. Cambrige Univ. Press, Cambrige, 247 pp.
50 Botanica Pacica. A journal of plant science and conservaon. 2021. 10(1):37–51
Telyatnikov et al.
Antonov, V.M. et al. (eds) 1986. Atlas of the USSR. Moscow,
260 pp. (in Russian). [Атлас СССР / под ред. В.М. Анто
но ва и др. 1986. М., 260 с.].
Bogolyubov, A.S., M.V. Kravchenko & S.V. Baslerov 2001. The
simplest method of describing the soil. Moscow, 16 pp. (in Rus-
sian). [Боголюбов А.С., Кравченко М.В., Баслеров С.В.
2001. Простейшая методика описания почв. М., 16 с.].
CAVM Team. 2003. Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map. Con-
ser vation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF) Map No. 1.
An chorage, AK, US: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Chernov, Yu.I. & Matveyeva N.V. 1997. Arctic ecosystems in
Russia. In: Ecosystems of the World 3, Polar and Alpine Tund ra
(F.E. Wielgolaski, ed.), pp. 361–507, Elseiver, Amsterdam.
Ermakov, N.B. 2012. Prodromus of higher vegetation units of
Russia. In: Modern state of the basic concepts of Ve ge ta tion Science
(B.M. Mirkin & L.G. Naumova), pp. 377–483, Gilem, Ufa
(in Rus sian). [Ермаков Н.Б. 2012. Продромус высших
еди ниц рас тительности России // Миркин Б.М., Нау
мо ва Л.Г. Современное состояние основных кон цеп
ций науки о растительности. Уфа: Гилем. С. 377–483].
Esslinger, T.L. 2016. A cumulative checklist for the li chen
for ming, lichenicolous and allied fungi of the Con ti-
nen tal United States and Canada, Version 21. Opuscula
Philolichenum 15:136–390.
Gorodkov, B.N. 1935. Vegetation of the USSR tundra zone.
Mos cow, Leningrad, 142 рр. (in Russian). [Гордков Б.Н.
1935. Ра стительность тундровой зоны СССР. Москва;
Ленинград, 142 с.].
Govorukhin, V.S. 1933. Essay on the vegetation of summer
reindeer pastures in the tundra of the Ob-Taz Peninsula.
Zem levedenie 35(1):68–92 (in Russian). [Говорухин В.С.
1933. Очерк растительности летних пастбищ север
но го оленя в тундрах ОбскоТазовского полуострова
// Землеведение. Т. 35, вып. 1. С.68–92].
Hennekens, S.M. & J.H.J. Schaminée 2001. TURBOVEG, a
comprehensive database management system for vegeta-
tion data. Journal of Vegetation Science 12:589–591.
Hennekens, S.M. 1996. MEGATAB a visual editor for phyto so-
cio logical tables. Uift, 11 pp.
Hill, M.O. 1979. DECORANA and TWINSPAN, for or di na-
tion and classication of multivariate species data: a new edi tion,
together with supporting programs, in FORTRAN 77. Hun ting-
don, 58 pp.
Ignatov, M.S., O.M. Afonina, E.A. Ignatova, A.A. Abolinya,
T.V. Akatova, E.Z. Baisheva, L.V. Bardunov et al. 2006.
Checklist of mosses of East Europe and North Asia.
Arctoa 15:1–130 (in Russian with English summary). [Иг
на тов М.С., Афонина О.М., Игнатова E.A., Aболи
ня A.A., Акатова T.В., Баишева Э.З., Бардунов Л.В. и
др. 2006. Список мхов Восточной Европы и Северной
Азии // Arctoa. T. 15. С. 1–130].
Il'ina, I.S. (ed.) 1976. Vegetation of the West Siberian Plain.
A map. M 1: 500 000. GUGK, Moscow (in Russian). [Рас
тительность ЗападноСибирской равнины. Карта М 1:
500 000. 1976 / под ред. И.С. Ильиной. М.: ГУГК.]
Il’ina, I.S., E.I. Lapshina, N.N. Lavrenko, L.I. Melzer, E.A. Ro
ma no va, B.A. Bo goyavlensky & V.D. Makhno 1985. The
vegetation cover of the West Siberian Plain. Nauka, No vo si
birsk, 251 pp. (in Russian). [Ильина И.С., Лап ши на Е.И.,
Лав ренко Н.Н., Мельцер Л.И., Романова Е.А., Бо го
явленский Б.А., Махно В.Д. 1985. Расти тель ный по
кров ЗападноСибирской равнины. Но во си бирск:
Нау ка. 251 c.].
Khitun, O.V. 1989. Floristic characteristics of habitas in
two local oras of the Tazovsky peninsula (the Wes tern
Siberia). Botanicheskii Zhurnal 74(10):1466–1476 (in Rus
sian with English summary). [Хитун О.В. 1989. Фло рис
ти ческая характеристика экотопов двух локальных
флор на Тазовском полуострове (Западная Сибирь)
// Ботанический журнал. Т. 74, № 10. С. 1466–1476].
Khitun, O.V. 1998. Comparative analysis of local and par tial
oras in two subzones of the West Siberian Arc tic (Gy
dan sky and Tazovsky peninsulas). In: The stu dy of bio lo gical
diversity by methods of comparative oristics (B.A.Yurtsev, ed.), pp.
173–201, St. Petersburg [in Russian]. (Хитун О.В. Срав
нительный анализ локальных и парциальных флор
в двух подзонах Западносибирской Арк ти ки (пова
Гыданский и Тазовский) // Изучение био ло ги ческого
разнообразия методами сравнительной фло ристики /
под ред. Б.А. Юрцева. СПб., 1998. С. 173–201).
Khitun, O.V. 2005. Zonal and ecotopological differentiation of the
o ra of the central part of the West Siberian Arctic (Gydansky
and Ta zov sky Peninsulas). Abstract dis. cand. biol. sciences.
Saint Petersburg, 28 pp. (in Russian). [Хитун О.В. 2005.
Зо наль ная и экотопологическая дифференциация
фло ры центральной части Западносибирской Арк
ти ки (Гыданский и Тазовский полуострова): Авторе
фе рат диссертации кандидата биологических наук.
Санкт Петербург. 28 с.].
Lavrinenko, O.V & I.A. Lavrinenko 2015. Communities
of the class Oxycocco-Sphagnetea Br.Bl. et R. Tx. 1943 in
the East European tundras. Rastitel'nost' Rossii 26:55–84
(in Russian with English summary). [Лавриненко О.В.,
Лавриненко И.А. 2015. Сообщества класса Oxycocco–
Sphag netea Br.Bl. et R. Tx. 1943 в в восточноевропейских
тундрах // Растительность России. № 26. С. 55–84].
Lavrinenko, O.V., N.V. Matveyeva & I.A. Lavrinenko 2016.
Сom munities of the class Scheuchzerio–Caricetea nigrae
(Nordh. 1936) Tx. 1937 in the East European tund ras.
Rastitel'nost' Rossii 28:55–88 (in Russian with Eng lish sum
ma ry). [Лавриненко О.В., Матве е ва Н.В., Лав ри нен
ко И.А. 2016. Сообщества класса Sche uch zerio–Cari ce tea
nigrae (Nordh. 1936) Tx. 1937 в вос точ но ев ро пей ских
тунд рах // Растительность России. № 28. С. 55–88].
Matveyeva, N.V. & L.L. Zanokha 1986. Vegetation of the
sou thern tundra in the western Taimyr. In: Southern tund ras
of Tai myr (Yu.I. Chernov & N.V. Matveeva, eds), pp. 5–67,
Nauka, Leningrad (in Russian). [Матвеева Н.В, За но ха
Л.Л. 1986. Растительность южных тундр на за пад ном
Тай мыре // Южные тундры Таймыра / отв. ред. Ю.И.
Чернов и Н.В. Матвеева. Ленинград: Наука. С. 5–67].
Mirkin, B.M. & L.G. Naumova 1998. Vegetation science (his to
ry and current state of the basic concepts), Gilem, Ufa, 410 pp.
(in Russian). [Миркин Б.М., Наумова Л.Г. 1998. Наука
о рас ти тель ности (история и современное состояние
ос нов ных концепций). Уфа: Гилем. 410 с.].
Moskovchenko, D.V., S.P. Arefyev, V.A. Glazunov & A.A. Ti
ge ev 2017. Changes in vegetation and geocryological
con di tions of the Tazovsky peninsula (eastern part) for
the pe riod of 1988–2016. Kriosfera Zemli 21(6):3–13 (in
Russian with English summary) [Московченко Д.В.,
Аре фьев С.П., Глазунов В.А., Тигеев А.А. 2017. Из
ме не ние состояния растительности и геокриологи
чес ких условий Тазовского полуострова (восточная
часть) за период 1988–2016 гг. // Криосфера Земли,
T. 21, № 6. C. 3–13].
Moskovchenko, D.V., V.A. Glazunov & A.A. Tigeev 2016.
Stu dy of vegetation cover changes on the eastern part of
the Ta zov sky peninsula. Ekologicheskii Monitoring i Bio raz-
no ob razie (11)1:91–96 (in Russian). [Московченко Д.В.,
Гла зу нов В.А., Тигеев А.А. 2016. Исследование ди на
ми ки растительного покрова восточной час ти Та зов
51
Botanica Pacica. A journal of plant science and conservaon. 2021. 10(1):37–51
Syntaxonomic diversity of the Tazovsky Peninsula, the Arctic
ско го полуострова // Экологический мониторинг и
биоразнообразие. Т. 11, № 1. С. 91–96].
Mucina, L., H. Bültmann, K. Dierßen, J.P. Theurillat,
T. Raus, A. Čarni, K. Šumberová, et al. 2016. Vegetation
of Europe: hierarchical oristic classication system of
vas cu lar plant, bryophyte, lichen, and algal communities.
Applied Vegetation Science 19(1): 3–264.
Nikolaeva, M.G. 1941. Shrub vegetation type of the Bol shoi
and Malyi Yamal. Botanicheskii Zhurnal 26(1):52–86 (in Rus
sian with German resume). Николаева М.Г. 1941. Кус
тар никовый тип растительности Большого и Ма ло го
Ямала // Ботанический журнал. Т. 26, № 1. С. 52–86).
Ogorodnov, E.A. et al. (eds) 1971. Atlas of the Tyumen Region.
Tyu men. Issue 1. 198 pp. (in Russian). [Атлас Тюменской
об ласти. 1971 / отв. ред. Е.А. Огороднов и др. Тю
мень. Вып. 1. 198 с.].
Potemkin, A.D. & E.V. Sofronova 2009 Liverworts and horn-
worts of Russia, vol. 1. Saint Petersburg, Yakutsk. 368 pp.
[По тёмкин А. Д., Софронова Е. В. 2009. Печеночники
и антоцеротовые России. СПб; Якутск. Т. 1. 368 с.].
Rebristaya O.V. 2013. Flora of the Yamal peninsula. Modern state
and history of the formation. LETI, Saint Petersburg, 312 pp.
(in Rus sian with English summary). [Ребристая О.В. 2013.
Фло ра полуострова Ямал. Современное состояние и ис
то рия формирования. СанктПетербург: ЛЭТИ, 312 с.].
Rebristaya, O.V., V.A. Tvorogov & O.V. Khitun 1989. Flora
of the Tazovsky peninsula (the north of the Western Si-
be ria). Botanicheskii Zhurnal 74(1):22–35. (in Russian with
Eng lish summary). [Ребристая О.В., Творогов В.А.,
Хи тун О.В. 1989. Флора Тазовского полуострова
(се вер Западной Сибири) // Ботанический журнал.
Т. 74, № 1. С. 22–35].
Sekretareva, N.A. 2004. Vascular plants of Russian Arctic and
adjacent territories. KMK Press, Moscow, 131 pp. (in Rus
sian). [Сек ре та ре ва Н.А. 2004. Сосудистые растения
Рос сийской Арктики и сопредельных территорий.
М.: Издво КМК 131 с.].
Simonov, I.M. 1977. Climate. In: The Yamal-Gydan Region
(R.K. Sisko, ed.), pp. 27–50, Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad
(in Rus sian). [Симонов И.М. 1977. Климат // Ямало
Гы дан ская область / под ред. Р.К. Сиско. Ленинград:
Гид рометеоиздат. С. 27–50].
Telyatnikov, M.Yu., E.I. Troeva, K.A. Ermokhina & S.A. Pri
styazh nyuk 2019. Vegetation of the two regions of the
northern part of the Gydan Peninsula (the sub zone of
typical tundras). Turczaninowia 22(4):128–144 (in Rus
sian with English summary). (Телятников М.Ю., Тро
е ва Е.И., Ермохина К.А., Пристяжнюк С.А. 2019.
Рас ти тель ность двух районов северной части Гы
дан ско го полуострова (подзона типичных тундр) //
Turczaninowia. Т. 22, вып. 4. С. 128–144).
Theurillat, J.P., W. Willner, F. FernándezGonzález, H. Bült
mann, A. Čarni, D. Gigante, L. Mucina & H. Weber. 2021.
International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature.
4th edition. Applied Vegetation Science 24: e12491.
Valeyeva, E.I. & D.V. Moskovchenko 2008. Zonal fea-
tures of the vegetation cover of the Taz Peninsula and
its technogenic transformation. Vestnik Ekologii, Leso-
ve deniya i Landshaftovedeniya 9:174–191 (in Russian with
Eng lish summary). (Валеева Э.И., Московченко Д.В.
2008. Зональные особенности растительного по кро
ва Тазовского полуострова и его техногенная транс
формация // Вестник экологии, лесоведения и ланд
шаф товедения. Т. 9. С. 174–191).
Walker, M.D., D.A. Walker & N.A. Auerbach 1994. Plant
com munities of a tussock tundra landscape in the Brooks
Range Foothills, Alaska. Journal of Vegetation Science 5–6:
843–866.
Walker, D.A., F.J.A. Daniëls, N.V. Matveyeva, J. Šibík, M.D. Wal
ker, A.L. Breen, L.A. Druckenmiller, M. Raynolds al.
2018. Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Classi cation.
Phytocoenologia 48(2):181–201.
Westhoff, V. & E. van der Maarel 1973. The BraunBlan
quet approach. In: Handbook of vegetation science. Part 5
(R. Tüxen, ed.), pp. 617–726, Junk, Amsterdam.
Yurtsev, B.A. 1994. Floristic division of the Arctic. Journal
of Vegetation Science 5–6:765–774.
... However, the small number of sites studied did not allow the determination of a final conclusion. We carried out field geobotanical research (mainly in 2017), then standardized and analyzed field material to characterize the present-day vegetation cover of the West Siberian Arctic (Telyatnikov et al., 2019a(Telyatnikov et al., , 2019b(Telyatnikov et al., , 2021a(Telyatnikov et al., , 2021b; AVA, https://avarus.space) and to clarify the location of the High-Low Arctic boundary. ...
... The height of shrubs decreases in the middle and northern parts of the Low Arctic, but their species diversity remains almost the same. A specific feature of the West Siberian Arctic is widespread Labrador tea-dominated tundra along with dwarf birch tundra on watersheds and areas of tussock tundra with Eriophorum vaginatum on watersheds with poorer drainage (Gorodkov, 1935;Khitun, 1998;Telyatnikov et al., 2021a). The presence of tall shrubs is also a diagnostic feature of the Low Arctic. ...
Article
Full-text available
Geobotanical subdivision of landcover is a baseline for many studies. The High–Low Arctic boundary is considered to be of fundamental natural importance. The wide application of different delimitation schemes in various ecological studies and climatic scenarios raises the following questions: (i) What are the common criteria to define the High and Low Arctic? (ii) Could human impact significantly change the distribution of the delimitation criteria? (iii) Is the widely accepted temperature criterion still relevant given ongoing climate change? and (iv) Could we locate the High–Low Arctic boundary by mapping these criteria derived from modern open remote sensing and climatic data? Researchers rely on common criteria for geobotanical delimitation of the Arctic. Unified circumpolar criteria are based on the structure of vegetation cover and climate, while regional specifics are reflected in the floral composition. However, the published delimitation schemes vary greatly. The disagreement in the location of geobotanical boundaries across the studies manifests in poorly comparable results. While maintaining the common principles of geobotanical subdivision, we derived the boundary between the High and Low Arctic using the most up‐to‐date field data and modern techniques: species distribution modeling, radar, thermal and optical satellite imagery processing, and climatic data analysis. The position of the High–Low Arctic boundary in Western Siberia was clarified and mapped. The new boundary is located 50–100 km further north compared to all the previously presented ones. Long‐term anthropogenic press contributes to a change in the vegetation structure but does not noticeably affect key species ranges. A previously specified climatic criterion for the High–Low Arctic boundary accepted in scientific literature has not coincided with the boundary in Western Siberia for over 70 years. The High–Low Arctic boundary is distinctly reflected in biodiversity distribution. The presented approach is appropriate for accurate mapping of the High–Low Arctic boundary in the circumpolar extent.
Article
The vegetation of frozen peat mounds and polygons of palsa bogs as well as tundra-mire complexes, according to the Braun-Blanquet classification, is assigned to Oxycocco-Sphagnetea class Br.-Bl. et Tx. ex Westhoff et al. 1946 (Koroleva, 2006; Lavrinenko and Lavrinenko, 2015; Telyatnikov et al., 2021; Jiroušek et al., 2021) and considered within two alliances – Oxycocco microcarpi–Empetrion hermaphroditi Nordhagen ex Du Rietz 1954 and Rubo chamaemori–Dicranion elongati Lavrinenko et Lavrinenko 2015. However, the data on the phytocoenotic diversity of these mire types are very scarce. Our research was conducted between 2004 and 2019 in the northern part of the Khanty-Mansi and the southern part of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous Areas of the Tyumen Region at 20 study sites (Fig. 1) located between 63° and 75° N in the northern taiga, forest tundra and southern tundra of West Siberia. Additionally, we used relevés obtained in 2021 at 3 study sites at the northern boundary of the larch woodland sub-zone and in the southern tundra of the Taimyr Peninsula in the middle reaches of the Dudypta River (70.5°–71.5°N and 90.5°–95.0°E). Seven associations, 9 subassociations and 9 variants (Tables 1–6) have been identified in the class Oxycocco-Sphagnetea on the base of 376 vegetation relevés of palsa bogs and tundra-mire complexes. Furthermore, 567 previously published relevés of ecologically similar syntaxa from the adjacent regions (Koroleva, 2006; Lavrinenko and Lavrinenko, 2015; Telyatnikov et al., 2021; Lavrinenko et al, 2022) were used for statistical processing and comparative analysis. A comparison of all identified and previously described syntaxa in similar habitats of the Russian Subarctic were made (Table 7). Statistical processing and t-SNE ordination (t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding method) (van der Maaten, Hinton, 2008) of the entire data set was performed to confirm the classification results (Fig. 11). Cluster analysis (Fig. 12) showed a significant difference between the 4 groups of syntaxa at a high hierarchical level. Two clusters, I and IV (Fig. 12) are assigned to the earlier described alliances Rubo chamaemori–Dicranion elongati and Oxycocco microcarpi–Empetrion hermaphroditi. The alliance Rubo chamaemori–Dicranion elongati comprises shrub-moss (Dicranum elongatum, Polytrichum strictum)-lichen communities on dry frozen peat mounds of oligotrophic palsa bogs and polygonal mires in the forest tundra and tundra zone of European Russia. It includes 4 associations (Fig. 11, 12) Tephroserido–Politrichetum stricti, Rubo chamaemori–Dicranetum elongati, Pleurozio schreberi–Caricetum globularis, Rubo chamaemori–Caricetum rariflorae, previously described on the east coast of the Kola Peninsula and in the East European tundra (Koroleva, 2006; Lavrinenko, Lavrinenko, 2015; Lavrinenko et al., 2022). The alliance Oxycocco–Empetrion hermaphroditi includes open and forested dwarf shrub-Sphagnum communities of relatively dry hummocks and ridges dominated by Sphagnum fuscum on ombrotrophic raised bogs in the boreal and forest-tundra zones of Eurasia. The alliance is represented by a single ass. Ledo palustris–Sphagnetum fusci occurred on frozen bogs in the north of Western Siberia. We consider this association in the narrow sense (sensu Du Rietz, 1921), including only non-forested dwarf shrub-Sphagnum (S. fuscum) communities of subarctic subcontinental regions of Europe and Western Siberia. Two new alliances, along with the previously described ones are proposed (Fig. 12, clusters II and III) – Rubo chamaemori–Cladonion stygiae all. nov.and Sphagnion lenenses all. nov. (Table 8). They combine dwarf shrub-lichen communities of palsa bogs of the northern forest taiga zone in Western Siberia and oligotrophic dwarf shrub-cotton grass-lichen-Sphagnum communities with S. lenense and S. balticum in raised bogs of Asian part of the Subarctic, respectively. The alliance Sphagnion lenenses is represented by the recently described ass. Ledo decumbentis–Eriophoretum vaginati (Lavrinenko et al., 2022). Based on additional data from the southern tundra zone of Western Siberia and the Taimyr Peninsula, two new subassociations are described within the association L. d.–E. v. sphagnetosum lenenses and cladonietosum amaurocraeae. The alliance Rubo chamaemori–Cladonion stygiae includes 3 associations, replacing each other from south to north: ass. Ledo palustris–Cladonietum stygiae ass. nov. with 2 subass. L. p.–C. s. typicum, and sphagnetosum fusci, differing by the ratio of mosses and lichens in the ground cover (northern taiga) → ass. Cladonio stygiae–Caricetum globularis with 2 subass. C. s.–E. v. typicum and salicetosum pulchrae (forest tundra) → ass. Sphagno lenenses–Cladonietum stygiae (southern tundra). We also assigned conventionally the Ledum palustre–Polytrichum communities (ass. Ledo palustris–Polytrichetum stricti) to the same alliance. They represent the long-term successional stage in the post-fire restoration of the dwarf shrub (Ledum palustre)-lichen vegetation of frozen peat palsas. Despite a relatively small number and wide ecological amplitude of the majority of dominant and constant species in raised bog communities of Oxycocco-Sphagnetea, the species constancy and abundance (phytocoenotic activity) in communities of various alliances differ clearly, which makes it possible to identify the differential species combinations (Table 8). Two alliances described here and previously known all. Rubo chamaemori–Dicranion elongati are assigned to the new order Rubo chamaemori–Cladonietalia arbusculae ord. nov. Differential species combination of the alliance Rubo chamaemori–Dicranion elongati (having a central position in the order), is common to all communities of the class Oxycocco-Sphagnetea in the Subarctic. These species are proposed as diagnostic species of the new order: Betula nana, Cladonia arbuscula, C. amaurocraea, C. rangiferina, C. stygia, Dicranum elongatum, Empetrum nigrum s. l., Flavocetraria cucullata, Polytrichum strictum, Rubus chamaemorus, Vaccinium vitis-idaea subsp. minus. The order Sphagnetalia medii Kästner et Flössner 1933 is represented in the north of Western Siberia by only one alliance — Oxycocco microcarpi–Empetrion hermaphroditi, common mainly in the boreal forest zone. The new structure of the class Oxycocco-Sphagnetea shows the major zonal and sectoral-geographical categories of mire vegetation in Northern Eurasia. The involvement of the entire volume of relevés data set and the expansion of the survey to the boreal zone and eastern regions of Russia will allow the hierarchical structure and differences of higher units in the class Oxycocco-Sphagnetea to be more clearly demonstrated.
Article
Full-text available
Motivation The goal of the Russian Arctic Vegetation Archive (AVA‐RU) is to unite and harmonize data of plot‐based plant species and their abundance, vegetation structure and environmental variables from the Russian Arctic. This database can be used to assess the status of the Russian Arctic vegetation and as a baseline to document biodiversity changes in the future. The archive can be used for scientific studies as well as to inform nature protection and restoration efforts. Main types of variables contained The archive contains 2873 open‐access geobotanical plots. The data include the full species. Most plots include information on the horizontal (cover per species and morphological group) and vertical (average height per morphological group) structure of vegetation, site and soil descriptions and data quality estimations. In addition to the open‐access data, the AVA‐RU website contains 1912 restricted‐access plots. Spatial location and grain The plots of 1–100 m ² size were sampled in Arctic Russia and Scandinavia. Plots in Russia covered areas from the West to the East, including the European Russian Arctic (Kola Peninsula, Nenets Autonomous district), Western Siberia (Northern Urals, Yamal, Taza and Gydan peninsulas), Central Siberia (Taymyr peninsula, Bolshevik island), Eastern Siberia (Indigirka basin) and the Far East (Wrangel island). About 72% of the samples are georeferenced. Time period and grain The data were collected once at each location between 1927 and 2022. Major taxa and level of measurement Plots include observations of >1770 vascular plant and cryptogam species and subspecies. Software format CSV files (1 file with species list and abundance, 1 file with environmental variables and vegetation structure) are stored at the AVA‐RU website ( https://avarus.space/ ), and are continuously updated with new datasets. The open‐access data are available on Dryad and all the datasets have a backup on the server of the University of Zurich. The data processing R script is available on Dryad.
Article
The classification of West Siberian mire vegetation is more or less well developed in the southern part of the forest zone (Lapshina, 2010) while in the northern part of the West Siberian Plain it has received much less study. There are only a small number of publications containing descriptions of mire types and plant communities (Pyavchenko, 1955; Boch et al., 1971; Kirpotin et al., 1995; Smagin, 2003; Neshatayev et al., 2002). This paper presents the classification results for the low-sedge vegetation of waterlogged hollows and Sphagnum lawns, within flat palsa-bogs, ombrotrophic raised bogs and transitional mire complexes, which is assigned to two alliances — Stygio–Caricion limosae Nordhagen 1943 and Scheuchzerion palustris Nordhagen ex Tx. 1937 of the class Scheuchzerio–Caricetea nigrae Tx. 1937. The classification is based on 422 relevés performed in 2004–2019 at 22 plots located between 63° and 75° N in the northern taiga, forest tundra, and southern tundra subzones of West Siberia (Fig. 1). In the most recent summary “Vegetation of Europe…” (Mucina et. al., 2016), the alliance Stygio–Caricion limosae is assigned to the order Sphagno watnstorfii–Tomentypnetalia Lapshina 2010, however this does not seem conclusive. Communities of this order are closely associated with rich fens, often spring fens fed by ground water, which does not correspond to the real conditions in which communities of this alliance are developed. Ecologically, in the current structure of the class Scheuchzetio–Caricetea nigrae (Peterka et al, 2017), the alliance Stygio–Caricion limosae has taken the true place of the alliance Rhynchosporion albae Koch 1926 (ICPN, Art. 36), which was initially unambiguously associated with the order Caricetalia nigrae Koch 1926 based on the original relevés and diagnostic species (Rhynchspora alba, Agrostis canina, sphagnum mosses of sec. Subsecunda). Therefore, we also consider the alliance Stygio–Caricion limosae belonging to the order Caricetalia nigrae, where it fits better judging by its ecological and floristic features. The differential species combination of the alliance Stygio–Caricion limosae in the northern part of West Siberia includes Carex limosa, Drosera obovata, Juncus stygius, Gymnocolea inflata, Sphagnum perfoliatum, S. platyphyllum, S. subsecundum, Utricularia minor, U. ochroleuca, Warnstorfia exannulata, and W. fluitans. Within this alliance, two new associations with subassociations have been described: Utricularo ochroleucae–Caricetum limosae and Sphagno perfoliati–Caricetum rotundatae, of which the first one occurs in the northern taiga mires, while the second one in the forest tundra and southern tundra subzones. The order Scheuchzerietalia palustris Nordhagen ex Tx. 1937 comprises ombrotrophic vegetation of Sphagnum lawns and bog hollows (Mucina et al., 2016) and currently includes the only alliance Scheuchzerion palustris. Its typical boreal suballiance Scheuchzerienion palustris suball. nov. (nomenclature type — lectotypus hoc. loco: ass. Scheuchzerietum palustris Tüxen, 1937: 61) is represented by two associations: Eriophoro vaginati–Sphagnetum baltici and Carici limosae–Sphagnetum jenseni. Their distribution to the north is limited by the mire complexes of the northern taiga. Further north similar habitats are occupied mainly by communities of the predominantly subarctic suballiance Caricion rariflorae. Within this suballiance, two associations — Carici rotundatae–Sphagnetum baltici and Carici rotundatae–Sphagnetum lindbergii — are widely distributed over the entire gradient from the northern taiga to the southern tundra. The ass. Carici rariflorae–Sphagnetum baltici occurs only occasionally and is bound to the forest tundra and southern tundra. Statistical processing of the entire data set was performed to confirm the classification results and make a number of syntaxonomic decisions. The results of t-SNE ordination (t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding method) (van der Maaten, Hinton, 2008) confirmed the validity and expediency of separating oligotrophic and mesooligotrophic low-sedge communities of hollows and fens not only at the alliance level, but also at the order level. Despite certain physiognomic and floristic similarities, the location points of the two alliances in multidimensional space are well differentiated and do not overlap with each other (Fig. 10). Calculation of the floristic similarity degree of relevés with regard to species abundance and visualization of the statistical processing results have clearly demonstrated that the entire relevé array of oligotrophic sphagnum lawns in the alliance Scheuchzerion palustris can be divided by the dominant sphagnum moss species into separate clusters, within which dominant grass layer clusters could also be distinguished. Given that, in the future, the formal statistical processing of large sets of geobotanical data will become an increasingly important tool to underpin syntaxonomic decisions, this fact cannot be ignored. In this connection, we propose to review the current practice of identifying associations of mire vegetation by the dominant species of vascular plants and sub-associations by the dominant moss species. The latters are of primary importance in the poor-species plant communities of waterlogged hollows and fens, because they are more sensitive to ecological conditions of habitats, which ultimately determine the entire floristic composition and community structure.
Article
Full-text available
Relevés of communities (94 in total) with shrub willows — Salix glauca, S. lanata, S. phylicifolia, and tree-like willows — S. viminalis, S. dasyclados were made in the Bolshezemelskaya tundra (11 sites, Fig. 1). Six new associations and one community type are described in 2 alliances — Polemonio acutiflorum–Salicion glaucae Lavrinenko et Lavrinenko 2021 and Galio borealis–Salicion viminalis all. nov. (Tables 1–4). The alliance Polemonio acutiflorum–Salicion glaucae unites herb and herb-moss willow scrubs (predominantly with Salix glauca, S. lanata) in lakeside depressions, runoff troughs, the slopes of hills on watersheds, slopes of bedrock terraces, above-floodplain terraces and occasionally flooded floodplains in river valleys. The range of this alliance is the plain tundra in the East European and Siberian sectors of the Arctic. Associations Polemonio acutiflorum–Salicetum lanatae Zanokha ex Lavrinenko et Lavrinenko 2021, Triseto sibirici–Salicetum glaucae Lavrinenko et Lavrinenko 2021 and Climacio dendroidis–Salicetum lanatae Lavrinenko et Lavrinenko 2021 were earlier described on Taymyr Peninsula, Kolguev and Vaygach Islands (Lavrinenko, Lavrinenko, 2021). New associations Chamaepericlymeno suecici–Salicetum glaucae, Geo rivalis–Salicetum glaucae, Hylocomio splendentis–Salicetum glaucae are described in the Bolshezemelskaya tundra (Table 1). Some communities of the associations Dicrano majoris–Salicetum lanatae Khitun in Telyatnikov et al. 2021 and Calliergono cordifolii–Salicetum lanatae Khitun in Telyatnikov et al. 2021, described on the Tazovskiy and Gydanskiy Peninsulas (Telyatnikov et al., 2021a and b) can be attributed to this alliance. However, the decisions for both these associations need to be revision (see Table 5). The characteristic species of the alliance Polemonio acutiflorum–Salicion glaucae were confirmed and clarifed. The phi-coefficient values for them are in the range 84.7–42.3 (Table 6). A new order of the same name is proposed for the willow scrubs of this alliance. Order Polemonio acutiflorum–Salicetalia glaucae ord. nov. Herb and herb-moss willow scrubs with Salix glauca and S. lanata in the plain tundra in the East European and Siberian sectors of the Arctic. Nomenclature type (holotypus): alliance Polemonio acutiflorum–Salicion glaucae Lavrinenko et Lavrinenko 2021 (Lavrinenko, Lavrinenko, 2021: 99). Differentiating species combination: Salix glauca, S. lanata; Bistorta vivipara, Petasites frigidus, Poa arctica, Polemonium acutiflorum, Ranunculus propinquus, Rubus chamaemorus, Valeriana capitata; Hylocomium splendens. Constant taxa: Achillea millefolium, Cardamine pratensis subsp. angustifolia, Chrysosplenium alternifolium subsp. sibiricum, Equisetum arvense s. l., Poa pratensis s. l., Rubus arcticus, Veratrum lobelianum, Viola biflora; Bryum pseudotriquetrum, Rhizomnium pseudopunctatum, Sanionia uncinata. Habitats. Intrazonal biotopes on watersheds (lakeside depressions, runoff troughs, hillsides), slopes of high river terraces, above-floodplain terraces and rarely flooded parts of floodplains in river and stream valleys. Willow scrubs from tree-like (Salix dasyclados, S. viminalis) and shrub (Salix lanata, S. phylicifolia) species, occupying the near-channel part of the floodplains of large and small rivers, channels and oxbows and experiencing regular flooding, are described in the southern tundra, northern forest-tundra and in the Pechora River delta. For such willow scrubs we have described a new alliance Galio borealis–Salicion viminalis in order Salicetalia purpureae Moor 1958 and class Salicetea purpureae Moor 1958. Alliance Galio borealis–Salicion viminalis all. nov. Tall grass-herb willow scrubs (Salix dasyclados, S. lanata, S. phylicifolia, S. viminalis) in riparian habitats in the southern tundra, forest-tundra and northern taiga in the European North of Russia. Nomenclature type (holotypus): ass. Senecioni nemorensis–Saliсetum viminalis ass. nov. (Table 2, rel. 19–25; Table 4, syntaxon 19). Characteristic species: Salix viminalis and Veronica longifolia (the same species of class Salicetea purpureae and order Salicetalia purpureae), Aconitum septentrionale, Adoxa moschatellina, Calamagrostis purpurea s. l., Filipendula ulmaria, Galium boreale, Lamium album, Myosotis palustris, Ranunculus repens and Vicia cracca (phi-coefficient varies from 77.7 to 47.6) (Table 6). Apparently, Salix dasyclados, with which one syntaxon has been described, can also be attributed to these. Constant species: Equisetum arvense s. l. (often dominant or codominant), Poa pratensis s. l., Veratrum lobelianum, Viola biflora. Habitats. Near the riverbed and central parts of the floodplain of large and small rivers, alluvial soils under conditions of regular flooding. Those willow scrubs are classified as 3 new associations and one community type: Vicio sepium–Salicetum lanatae, Senecioni nemorensis–Saliсetum viminalis, Bromopsio inermis–Salicetum viminalis, Calamagrostis purpurea–Salix dasyclados (Table 2). Floristically close communities are described in the floodplain of the Pechora River in the northern taiga (Shushpannikova, 1996), so we expanded the Galio borealis–Salicion viminalis range to this subzone. Further south the alliance Salicion triandrae T. Müller et Görs 1958 from the same order and class is widespread. Communities of Salicion triandrae occupy riparian habitats in the middle and southern taiga subzones (Taran, 1999; Vasilevich, 2009) and in the nemoral zone of Europe (Neuhäuslová et al., 2013; Mucina et al., 2016). The results of DCA-ordination confirm the correctness of the alliances Polemonio acutiflorum–Salicion glaucae and Galio borealis–Salicion viminalis establishment (Fig. 14). Ass. Carici stantis–Salicetum phylicifoliae ass. nov. (Table 3) unites willow scrubs (Salix glauca, S. lanata и S. phylicifolia) swamp-herb (Comarum palustre, Epilobium palustre, Equisetum fluviatile, Eriophorum angustifolium, Menyanthes trifoliata)–sedge (Carex aquatilis subsp. stans). If focusing on the composition of the lower layers, the place of association will undoubtedly be in the class Scheuchzerio palustris–Caricetea nigrae Tx. 1937, since most of the listed species are characteristic for it or for the order Caricetalia nigrae Koch 1926. However, the presence of rather tall and highly closed shrub layer, which determines the structure and physiognomy of communities, calls into question their attribution to mire. For the time being, we leave such communities outside the higher units. Differences in the floristic composition of the syntaxa in the East European tundras, in the mountainous Fennoscandia (Salicion phylicifoliae Dierssen 1992) and Chukotka (Aulacomnio turgidi–Salicion glaucae Sinelnikova 2001 (2009) and Saussureo oxyodontae–Salicion Sekretareva 2001 all. prov.) are significant (Table 4), which is clearly demonstrated be the results of cluster analysis (Fig. 15). Syntaxa of another northern alliance — Geranio albiflorum–Salicion Sekretareva 2011, described in Polar Ural, are joined in one cluster with the willow scrubs of the alliance Galio borealis–Salicion viminalis (Fig. 15). We have not assigned to any class the new order Polemonio acutiflorum–Salicetalia glaucae ord. nov., as opposed to Salicetalia glauco-lanatae Bœuf et al. ex Mucina et Daniёls in Mucina et al. 2016 (subarctic and boreal herbrich willow scrubs and birch krummholz of the Holarctic), placed in the class Betulo carpaticae–Alnetea viridis Rejmánek ex Bœuf, Theurillat, Willner, Mucina et Simler in Bœuf et al. 2014 (subalpine and subarctic herb-rich alder and willow scrubs and krummholz of the Alps, the Carpathians, the Balkans, the Caucasus, Northern Europe and Greenland). We believe that for the willow scrubs of the tundra zone a revision of all the accumulated data and description of a new class are required.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction. A revision of syntaxa was carried out within the framework of the classification of the Brown-Blanquet school identified in the Russian Arctic. A geodatabase (GDB) and GIS, which include several interconnected main modules (see: Matveyeva et al., 2019a, b), with information on species composition, structure, ecology, and geography of syntaxa of all levels, integrated in these databases, became the basis of the presented checklist. This is the first result of compiling information on the vegetation classification, performed with the prospect to produce Prodromus of syntaxa, identified in this territory, with detailed information (character/differential/diagnostic species, ecology, zonal position, geography, bibliography), available in the GDB. It will be in time included in the Prodromus and later will become the basis for a volume in multivolume series on the vegetation of the Russian Federation (see: Plugatar et al., 2020). Territory. The checklist contains information on syntaxa established in the Russian Arctic within the boundaries of the Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map (hereafter CAVM) (CAVM Team, et al., 2003; Walker et al., 2005; Raynolds et al., 2019), as well as on the Barents Sea coast of the Kola Peninsula, which is referred to the tundra zone in accordance with the zonation of the Russian Arctic flat territory (see: Matveyeva, 1998). The list includes syntaxa found north of the treeline — in the tundra zone (subzones of the southern, typical, and arctic tundra) and polar deserts.1 Hence, it follows that there are no syntaxa from the forest-tundra as well as those above the treeline in the mountains adjacent to the tundra zone (Putorana and Anabarskoe plateaus). The syntaxa from the territory of the «Russian Arctic» (Barentsburg, Pyramida) on the West Spitsbergen Island (Spitsbergen archipelago) are also not taken into account (their positioning is logical in Spitzbergern syntaxonomy). History. The study of the Russian Arctic plant cover began in the second third of the XIXth century in the north-east of the European Russia (Schrenk, 1855) and in Siberia on the Taymyr Peninsula (Middendorf, 1860–1867). After a significant break, it continued in the USSR in the pre-war time and intensified after the end of the Great Patriotic War. The most intense (both in the size of the studied areas and the numbers and duration of the field works) was the period from the mid-1960s to the early 1990s. Researchers working both in other zones and in the Arctic processed the obtained data in accordance with the approaches of the dominant classification, and the relevés were either not published or presented in a small (4–5) number for association. Despite the obvious limitations of this approach, there were published (both in the form of text with listing of few dominants and with relevé tables) both general (Gorodkov, 1935) and regional (Andreev, 1932; Bogdanovskaya-Giyenef, 1938; Smirnova, 1938; Dedov, 2006 [1940]; Aleksandrova, 1956, 1983; Gorodkov, 1956, 1958 a, b; Katenin, 1972) classifications, and checklists — a draft classification of vegetation of the whole Arctic (Aleksandrova, 1979) and classification of Taymyr vegetation (Matveyeva, 1985). In the late 1980s, Russian phytosociologists turned to the Brown-Blanquet floristic (= floristic-sociological (Theurillat et al., 2021), or ecological-floristic (Mirkin, Naumova, 2014)), classification system as the most conceptually substantiated, with generally accepted rules for describing communities in the field and the technique of relevé tabular processing, and also with clear rules for the formation of syntaxon names. In this system, the obligatory publication of the original data and the requirements for its validity when describing the basic syntaxon are strictly postulated, which provides an objective comparison and classification of any plant community types, in whatever system these data are not submitted. Just as it is impossible to imagine the development of taxonomy without the existence of herbarium collections, so it should be an axiom for phytosociologists that since the relevé is the only documentary reflection of a natural phenomenon named «plant community» (Matveyeva, 2008), it should be available for analysis to all syntaxonomists. Since the second decade of the XXth century, the followers of the Braun-Blanquet system have published thousands of relevés from different regions of the globe, which made it possible to produce a unified classification of vegetation from the Arctic to the tropics and its constant replenishment. Currently, the process of creating electronic databases (archives) of relevés, including the Arctic Vegetation Archive, which accumulates information on circumpolar vegetation is accumulated, is actively underway (Walker et al., 2018). The starting point when Russian tundra experts began to work consistently, following the principles of this classification, is the first International Meeting on the Classification and Mapping of Arctic Vegetation, which took place in 1992 in Boulder, CO (USA). For the publication of its data, a special issue of the Journal of Vegetation Science (1994, Vol. 5, N 6) named «Circumpolar arctic vegetation» (where 4 papers by Russian syntaxonomists were published) was provided. After 1992, when the intensity of field works decreased sharply, the number of publications with complete characteristics of the communities of the Russian Arctic increased rapidly.The proposed checklist of syntaxa is the result of this almost 30-year acti­vity. The checklist structure. The arrangement of syntaxa of class rank is mainly the same as in the EuroVegChecklist — hereafter EVC (Mucina et al., 2016): zonal and intrazonal communities of the polar desert zone (one class); zonal (one class) and landscape-forming intrazonal (five classes) communities of the tundra zone; intrazonal communities (13 classes), united into groups according to the gradients of moisture, snow depth and soil mechanical composition. A syntaxon is represented as follows: — higher units of the rank Class/Order/Allian­ce (Suballiance): number (for Class), abbreviated rank in English (Cl., Ord., All. (Suball.)), in square brackets — code (if any) from EVC (Mucina et al., 2016); full name, author(s) and year; below is a brief description in two languages: English — in general as in the cited paper with some corrections due to the specificity in syntaxon geography and ecology in the Asian part; Russian — partly in accordance with the English version and/or to Prodromus of higher vegetation units of Russia (Ermakov, 2012), sometimes with minor corrections or clarifications. For new orders and alliances within the zonal tundra class differential taxon combinations are listed; — syntaxa of the rank Association, Community Type, Community, established on the territory of the Russian Arctic: abbreviated rank in English (Ass., Com. Type, Com.), name, author(s) and year (besides association, the cited papers are included in the Refe­rences). If syntaxon was previously described by European/American authors outside the Russian Fede­ration, the link to the publication, where it was found in the Russian Arctic, is placed in brackets. The ­arrangement of associations is alphabetical; — syntaxa of units of a lower (within association) rank (subassociation and vicariant, variant, subvariant, facies): abbreviated rank in English (subass. and vicar., var., subvar., fac.), name, in brackets author, year (besides subassociation, the cited papers are included in the References). The arrangement of the syntaxa is as follows: typicum(-cal, -ca), inops, then alphabetically. For subass. typicum authors are not listed (Theurillat et al., 2021), but if it was described by another author and/or in another paper, then the link to it is given in brackets and the paper is included in the References. All names of syntaxa are given in the author’s edition (as it was published), including the endings of a typical syntaxon within an association (subassociation, vicariant, variant, facia) — typicum, typical, typica. In different papers, there are two English spellings of Russian surnames: Aleksandrova/Alexandrova, Andreev/Andreyev, Bogdanovskaya-Giyenef/Bogdanovskaya-Gienef, Pristyazhnyuk/Prystyazhnyuk, Savich/Savič. A uniform (the first one) spelling of the surname is used here. If there was something that caused a disagreement with the author’s decision (including the assignment of an association to a syntaxon of a higher rank), there is a superscript number before the syntaxon name, or before the author’s surname (when it is in brackets), referring to critical comments. Critical comments. 1 – The name is invalid or needs change because: 1a – no reference to the nomenclature type; 1b – published ineffectively (names published as ‘manuscript’ or ‘unpublished’); 1c – not accompanied by a sufficient diagnosis, no tables with original relevés; 1d – suggested by the author as preliminary; 1e – not obvious from what species syntaxon epithet is formed and it cannot be extracted from the diagnosis and/or tables); 1f – syntaxon with the same name was described earlier (including the case of inversion); 1g – the form of the syntaxon name does not correspond to Art. 10 of «International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature» — hereafter ICPN (Theurillat et al., 2021); 1h – the given nomenclature type belongs to a different syntaxon, validation does not correspond to ICPN; 1i – the relevé chosen as an association or subassociation nomenclature type does not contain the name-giving taxon of this syntaxon; 1j – there is a subspecies in the original diagnosis and in the tables, while in the syntaxon name the species name is used; 1k – the nomenclature type is given for 2 variants of the vicariant, among which there is no tyicum one; 1l – published or validated in 2002 or later with no indication of novelty (like, Ass. nov.). 2 – the author(s) did not place the syntaxon among the higher units. 3 – the author(s) placed the syntaxon in other higher units than suggested in this list. 4 – the syntaxon was renamed due to a change in its rank; in this checklist it is also given under a new name. 5 – the syntaxon is described by the author(s) in the Community rank but is assigned within the known association as a unit of it internal division. 6 – the author(s) assigned the syntaxon to this class with a question. 7 – the author(s) unreasonably (noted in literature) placed the communities in given syntaxon that needs revision. 8 – in the EVC there is only one author, while in the original source there are two. 9 – it is written that the title proposed by the first author was valid, but according to Principle II of the ICPN it is not. 10 – the author(s) of the syntaxon is(are) incorrect: the syntaxonomic units originally described in the framework of the ecological-physiognomic classification are invalid in accordance with Principle II (Art. 3d ICPN), and have been validated by subsequent authors. 11 – the author(s) assigned the syntaxon to this class/order, but did not refer to an alliance or placed in the alliance other than that proposed in this checklist. 12 – the author(s) attributed the syntaxon to this alliance, but as part of a different class/order, or not attributed to the class/order. 13 – the author(s) changed the rank of the syntaxon in comparison with the original description. 14 – the spelling of the syntaxon name does not correspond to the rules of the ICPN; the correct name [recte[ is given in square brackets. 15 – in the EVC the alliance is placed in another order. 16 – the author(s) of the syntaxon are incorrect, the first author (in brackets) did not give such a name, or incorrect year. 17 – the author(s) of the syntaxon incorrectly cited, priority belongs to other author(s) who published the name earlier and/or effectively. 18 – in the EVC the alliance is placed in synonyms for another alliance, which name was changed but not yet approved (nom. mut. propos). THE CHECKLIST — see the main text. Brief analysis of the composition. The checklist is based upon analysis of more than 70 papers, professionally reviewed and published, which contain more than 6,000 geobotanical relevés, that make available information on the composition and structure of 734 syntaxa ranging from association/community type/community to facies. At the mid-2021, the checklist includes 241 associations (152 subassociations and 25 vicariants, 190 variants and 61 subvariants, 13 facies), 35 types of communities and 17 communities from 62 alliances (6 suballiances), 33 orders and 20 classes. Most of the higher rank units — Class/Order/Alliance — are taken from the classification of vegetation in Europe (Mucina et al., 2016) Class. Of the 20 classes, 19 are in EVC (Mucina et al., 2016), to which we have assigned 207 associations, although we do not consider this decision final. A new class for zonal tundra vegetation Carici arctisibiricae–Hylocomietea alaskani class. prov.2 so far is left in the provisional status. Conventionally is used the class Betulo carpaticae–Alnetea viridis which contains willow scrubs in the valleys and on the interfluves. Order. Of the 33 orders 29 are in EVC. Among the known ones there is formally described Salicetalia glauco-lanatae so far located in Betulo carpaticae–Alnetea viridis. Three orders (Arctophiletalia fulvae; Chamerio–Betuletalia nanae; Schulzio crini­tae–Aquilegietalia glandulosae) were described by Russian authors. Three new orders (Salici polaris–Hylocomietalia alaskani ord. nov. prov., Caricetalia arctisibiricae-lugentis ord. nov. prov., Eriophoretalia vaginati ord. nov. prov.) are suggested here in the provisional status, for establishing within the tund­ra zonal class Carici arctisibiricae–Hylocomietea alaskani class. prov. Nameless order is proposed for communities dominated by mesophytic arctic and/or arcto­alpine herbs often with dwarf shrubs (Salix arctica/polaris/reticulata, Dryas octopetala/punctata) and few mosses on the southern slopes of hills and high river banks in the tundra zone of Eurasia; conventionally it is placed in the Mulgedio–Aconitetea. According to both species composition and habitat the order Arabidetalia caeruleae is moved from Thlaspietea rotundifolii (as in EVC) into Salicetea herbaceae. Alliance. Of the 62 alliances 36 are in EVC, 5 of which (Arctophilion fulvae; Caricion stantis, Chamerio angustifolii–Matricarion hookeri; Dryado octopetalae–Caricion arctisibiricae, Polemonio acutiflorum–Veratrion lobeliani) are described by Russian authors. Alliance Oxytropidion nigrescentis, validated in 1998 (Matveyeva 1998, p. 81), is given as valid. The following 8 alliances are valid: Aulacomnio palustris–Caricion rariflorae, Polemonio acutiflorum–Salicion glaucae and Rubo chamaemori–Dicranion elongati on the European North, Carici concoloris–Aulacomnion turgidi, Oxytropido sordidae–Tanacetion bipinnati in Siberia, Androsaco arctisibiricae–Aconogonion laxmannii, Aulacomnio turgidi–Salicion glaucae, Salici pulchrae–Caricion lugentis on Chukotka. Another 7 alliances have invalid names (suggested as preliminary, no nomenclature type was chosen, etc.). For 6 of these validation is necessary and quite simple. An exeption is the alliance Luzulo–Festucion rubrae (Ektova, Ermokhina, 2012), with all invalid associations (no both relevés and diagnoses); after the later are validated they logically could be placed in Loiseleurio-Arctostaphylion. Within the tundra zonal class the alliance Salici polaris–Hylocomion alaskani all. nov. is formally described and the alliances Cassiopo tetragonae–Eriophorion vaginati all. nov. prov. and Poo arcticae–Calamagrostion holmii all. nov. prov. are proposed provisionally. It is recommended to establish 6 alliances (in the checklist with no name) in classes Drabo corymbosae–Papaveretea dahliani (3), Betulo carpaticae–Alnetea viridis (1), Thlaspietea rotundifolii (1) and Mulgedio-Aconitetea (1). Syntaxonomic decisions, other than those derived from the EVC, are made on the positions of 4 alliances within the higher-rank units: Caricion stantis was moved from Sphagno warnstorfii–Tomentypnetalia to Caricetalia fuscae; Dryado octopetalae–Caricion arctisibiricae — from Carici rupestris–Kobresietea bellardii to Carici arctisibiricae–Hylocomietea alaskani class. prov. (see: Lavrinenko, Lavrinenko, 2018a); Potentillo–Polygonion vivipari is recognized (Koroleva et al., 2019) as different from Kobresio-Dryadion, synonym with which it is given in the EVC; the Honckenyo–Leymion arenarii is used compare to the EVC where it is the synonym of Agropyro–Honckenyion peploidis nom. mut. propos. Compared to the author’s decision, the alliance Carici concoloris–Aulacomnion turgidi from Loiseleurio procumbentis–Vaccinietea is moved to Carici arctisibiricae–Hylocomietea alaskani class. prov. Suballiance. Of the 6 suballiances 4 (Androsaco arctisibiricae–Aconogonenion laxmannii; Astragalo pseudadsurgentis–Calamagrostienion purpurascentis; Caricenion rariflorae; Oxytropido vassilczenkoi–Dryadenion punctatae) are valid, and two (Anemono parviflorae–Salicenion and Pediculari lapponicae–Salicenion) require validation. The suballiance Caricenion rariflorae placed in the checklist in Scheuchzerion palustris was originally established within the Sphagnion baltici, which in the EVC is synonymous with the first name. Association. Of 241 associations only 34 are known outside the Russian Arctic, and the remaining 207 are new. The known ones are mainly on coastal bio­topes — marshes (15) and dunes (3) — and extremely wet habitats (9). There are 4 associations described earlier in Europe within the large landscape-forming classes (Dryadetum octopetalae, Empetro–Betuletum nanae, Loiseleurio-Diapensietum, Phyllodoco–Vaccinietum myrtilli) which distribution ranges are extended to the European North of Russia, and 3 within small intrazonal classes (Geranietum sylvatici, Potentillo crantzii–Polygonetum vivipari, and Rumici–Salicetum lapponi) found on Kola Peninsula. Only 2 associations, described by European (Dryado–Cassiopetum tetragonae) and American syntaxonomists (Sphagno–Eriophoretum vaginati), occur in the Asian part of the Russian Arctic (with new subunits within both). The most association-rich are 8 main classes. The two zonal classes include Drabo corymbosae–Papaveretea dahliani (20 associations) in the polar desert zone and Carici arctisibiricae–Hylocomietea alaskani class. prov. (34 associations) in the tundra zone — 54 in total. 129 associations are identified in the 6 main classes of intrazonal vegetation: Be­tulo carpaticae–Alnetea viridis (29 associations) Loiseleurio procumbentis–Vaccinietea 1960 (22 associations), Carici rupestris–Kobresietea (21 associations), Salicetea herbaceae (16), Scheuchzerio palustris–Caricetea fuscae (25 associations); Juncetea maritimi (16 associations) — 187 in total. The vegetation of other 12 classes is described locally geographically and selectively syntaxonomically. 37 associations were not assigned to any of the known classes. This, in particular, was the case with the vegetation of the polar desert zone (Matveyeva, 2006) before Drabo corymbosae–Papaveretea dahliani class was described in 2016. But it also happened when deciding to assign an association to some well-known class, authors stressed that they did this forcibly in the absence of an adequate unit. For example, before the proposal, albeit provisionally, of the class Carici arctisibiricae–Hylocomietea alaskanii class. prov., even zonal communities from the Arctic tundra subzone were placed in the Loiseleurio procumbentis–Vaccinietea class accentuating that they do not contain a single characteristic species of this class (Kholod, 2007). Community type is distinguished when author does not establish new association due to the small number (less than 10) relevés in one location, leaving this for the future There are 35 such units, most of which (9) are in the Drabo corymbosae–Papaveretea dahliani in the polar desert zone. It is worth noting two points: 1) almost never Community types reach the association status; 2) not all authors are stopped by a small number of relevés, when naming syntaxa, and many associations are based upon on less than not 10, but even 5 relevés. As a result, units of different status often contain equally little information about their composition. Community. This rank exists when there is only one relevé, due to both the type rarity and the lack of time. There are 17 such units, with 7 in the polar desert zone. Two main subordinate levels are used within the association: the first — subassociation and vicariant (not protected by the ICPN), the second — variant. Both reflect small but obvious differences in composition, abundance, constancy of species from the type of association (typicum), conditioned edaphically, locally-climatically, chorologically (Ellenberg, 1956; Braun-Blanquet, 1964) or indicate different stages of succession (Westhoff, van der Maarel, 1978). Differences in the listed characteristics from the type group (typicum) due to ecology are an undoubted reason for identifying several subassociations even in a landscape. To reflect similar differences due to the object location in several areas on latitudinal (in different tundra subzones) or longitudinal (in different sectors of the same zone/subzone) gradients in similar habitats (on the same landscape elements, with the same soil type), subassociation (a unit protected by the ICPN) is used as well. However, the desire to distinguish the reasons that caused such differences is also understandable. Hence, understandable is the interest to the concept of geographic vicariant, perceived by some Russian syntaxonomists working in the Arctic, which is reflected in the checklist (since the unit is not protected by ICPN, after the name in brackets there is a link to References). Leading European phytosociologists E. van der Maarel and W. Westhoff, who in 1993 reviewed an article by N. Matveyeva on the vegetation of Taymyr (Matveyeva, 1994), recalling the concept of geographical races (Becking, 1957), or vicariants (Barkman, 1958), recommended to use the status of a geographic vicariant to reflect changes in the composition of communities of one association related with a geographic location, leaving ecologically determined differences for subassociations.The need for such a division is reflected in the famous paper of F. Daniëls (1982) on Greenland, where the author distinguishes ecologically (habitat-differential) and geographically (area-differential) determined syntaxa, although uses only the name of subassociations. It is a great pity that the concept of a geographical vicariant, which was formed in the minds of the classics of phytosociology almost 60 years ago, did not find formal support: this unit was not included nor in the 3rd edition of the ICPN (Weber et al., 2000), neither in the 4th (Theurillat et al., 2021). The question of whether such a unit should be covered by the ICPN regulations «... can be resolved with the accumulation of experience in its application» (Weber et al., 2000, p. 6); the results of such experience are reflected in this checklist. Subassociation. There are 152 subassociations within 71 associations: most of all in the Carici arctisibiricae–Hylocomietea alaskani (24), slightly less in Loiseleurio procumbentis–Vaccinietea (21) and Betulo carpaticae–Alnetea viridis (23), more than 11 in Carici rupestris–Kobresietea bellardii (16), Scheuchzerio palustris–Caricetea fuscae (17), Juncetea maritimi (12) and Thlaspietea rotundifolii (12). Usually there are 2–3 subassociations in one association. Vicariant. There are 25 vicarians in the 14 associations. 19 of these are latitudinal in associations of zonal, mire, snowbed (Matveyeva, 1994, 1998, 2006) and herb meadow (Zanokha, 1993, 1995a, b) communities within 3 tundra subzones and syntaxa, replacing them in the polar deserts on Severnaya Zemlya (Zanokha, 2001; Matveyeva, 2006. The appeal to the concept of vicariant on Taymyr, where in the only place on the Earth on the mainland at about 900 km a full latitudinal gradient from the tree line to the polar deserts is expressed (Matveyeva, 1998), is quite understandable and logical. The other 6 vicariants are longitudinal: 1 in the European North of Russia (Matveyeva, Lavrinenko, 2011) and 5 on Wrangel Isl. (Kholod, 2007). Variant. There are 190 variants within 66 associations. There are no clearly formulated rules regarding their fundamental difference from subassociations. It is also not obvious whether the level of variant is the next after subassociation in association subdivision, or these are units of the same rank: in 31 associations, variants are allocated within subassociations or vicariants, in 34 — directly in the association. There is no clear logic behind why even one and the same author follows the first way in some cases, and the second in others. Subvariant. This unit was used for the division of variants of technogenically disturbed vegetation (Sumina, 2012, 2018), where 54 subvariants (2–5 in each) were identified in 20 variants of 6 associations, as well as of the baydzharakh vegetation in the arctic tundra subzone in Siberia (7 subvariants). Facies. The unit without differentiaal taxa, recognized by the predominance (with a high abundance) of a species of the «normal» floristic complex of the association, due to particular or sometimes ­extreme abiotic factors, or under anthropogenic impact (Westhoff, van der Maarel, 1978). There are 14 facies in 2 associations of 2 classes on Wrangel Isl. (Kholod, 2007) and in 3 syntaxa of 3 classes in the Bolshezemelskaya tundra (Neshataev, Lavrinenko, 2020). Conclusion. One of the purposes of publishing this checklist is to draw the attention of northern phytosociologists to assessing the validity of syntaxa and the legality of their position in the Braun-Blanquet system. Our task was to bring together all available information, which is done in this article. Even a simple list of syntaxa makes it possible to assess the completeness of the geographical and syntaxonomic knowledge of vegetation. Geographically, sytaxonomic information is available for 12 of the 13 Russian floristic provinces (according to CAVM), in which about 130 districts have been investigated. The most studied provinces (from west to east) are Kanino-Pechora, Yamalo-Gydan, Taymyr, East Chukotka, Wrangel Island (the number of published relevés in each more than 600. There are no published data for the Kharaulakh province. It is not possible to say for sure to what extent the number of associations reflects the presence and distribution communities of 20 classes in different regions of the Russian Arctic. The completeness of the vegetation study depended on the tasks and on the possibility of their implementation. High attention to zonal vegetation is natural, since it is used for subdivision of the territory, for zonal division, and for maps of various scales. Both snowless (Carici rupestris–Kobresietea bellardii) and snowbed (Salicetea herbaceae) communities, as specific for the Arctic, are also always in the sphere of interests. Polygonal mires and bog-hollow vegetation (Scheuchzerio palustris–Caricetea) certainly require much more research, due to their vast areas in the eastern regions of the Siberian Arctic, where these types are not described. For the relatively well-studied shrub communities in the Asian part (conditionally assigned to the Betulo carpaticae–Alnetea viridis), validation of many syntaxa are required; the gap in the description of this object in the northern European regions has just begun to be filled. For 12 associations of grass-forbs communities on the well heated slopes conditionally positioned in the Mulgedio-Aconitetea, new orders and allian­ces, and, potentially, the class are necessary to be established. Unreasonably little data are available for raised bogs (Oxycocco-Sphagnetea), if even these are ­rather common of the southern regions of the tundra zone. Very scattered geographically and sparse syntaxonomic data are on the vegetation of naturally eroded mobile substrates (sand screes, gravel debris, landslides). In the Arctic, as in other regions of the globe, communities are placed in this class not by their species composition, but by habitat (unstable substrate), and the fact of the sparse cover. Only recently the zonal vegetation of polar deserts on horizontal surfaces with quite stable loamy substrates has been classified as a distinct class (Daniëls et al., 2016). In the list of habitat types with associated described Brown-Blanquet syntaxa from Arctic regions of Europe, Greenland, western North America, and Alaska, there are 5 classes (Walker et al., 2018) which are absent in our checklist: Juncetea trifidi Hadač in Klika et Hadač 1994, Saxifrago cernuae–Cochlearietea groenlandica Micuna et Daniëls in Mucina et al. 2016, Vaccinio-Piceetea Br.-Bl. in Br.-Bl. et al. 1939, Asplenietea trichomanis (Br.-Bl. in Meier et Br.-Bl. 1934) Oberd. 1977, Salicetea purpureae Moor 1958. Communities of these classes either exist in the Russian Arctic, but were not described (e. g. forest «islets» in tundra landscapes — Vaccinio-Piceetea, and the vegetation of rocks and rubble talus — Asplenietea trichomanis), or they exist, but are positioned in the other classes. An open question remains with Junce­tea trifidi on acidic substrates. Final conclusions on these classes will become possible after the thorough analysis of syntaxa throughout the entire circumpolar space. Even a very brief analysis of the available data revealed numerous cases of invalid names of syntaxa (no indication of the nomenclature type) or inconsistency names with ICPN rules (correct [recte] names are given for 43 ones); leaving the association outside of higher-level units or assigning one basic unit to ­several higher ones, etc. There are more such cases than we have noted now, especially taking into ­account the new edition of the ICPN (for example, the obligatory Latin or English terminology for denoting ranks and new units (ICPN 4th, Art. 3d, 3i, 3o, 5), mutation ­cases (Lat. mutatum, ICPN. 4th, Art. 45), inversions (Lat. inversum, ICPN. 4th, Art. 42) of names and autonym (Lat. autonym, ICPN 4th, Art. 13b, 4d). Now it becomes possible for each author to take measures to eliminate errors of various kinds to validate their syntaxa. Consolidated participation in joint publication is also possible. This is a necessary step for the next action — preparing the Prodromus of the vegetation syntaxa of the Russian Arctic with the expanded characteristics for all levels.
Article
Full-text available
Version 21 of the checklist of lichen-forming, lichenicolous and allied fungi occurring in North America north of Mexico is presented. It includesa a total of 5,421 species in 733 genera, with an additional 41 subspecies, 45 varieties, and 3 forms. The total species number includes 588 lichenicolous fungi, 96 saprophytic fungi related to lichens or to lichenicolous fungi, and another 53 species of varying and/or uncertain biological status.
Article
Full-text available
Aims: Syntaxonomic classification is widely used for vegetation survey in Europe. The long history of its use has produced many concepts and names of vegetation units that need to be revised and integrated into a single classification system. Here we (1) present a new, global hierarchical syntaxonomic systems of alliances, orders, classes of the Braun-Blanquet syntaxonomy for vascular plant, bryophyte, lichen and algal communities; (2) characterize all accepted syntaxonomic concepts in ecological and geographical terms, (3) link all available synonyms to these concepts, and (4) provide a list of diagnostic species for all classes of European vegetation. Location: Europe, Greenland, Arctic archipelagos, Canary Islands, Madeira, Azores and Cyprus. Methods: We reviewed about 10 000 bibliographic sources to compile the syntaxonomic systems of classes, orders and alliances, and species lists characterizing all classes. All known syntaxonomic concepts were critically evaluated by experts and their names revised according to the International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature. Results: The newly compiled EuroVegChecklist is a syntaxonomic conspectus consists of systems of classes, orders, and alliances for the communities dominated by vascular plants (EVC1), bryophytes and lichens (EVC2), and algae (EVC3). EVC1 comprises 110 classes, 300 orders and 1088 alliances (with 4067 synonyms for all ranks); EVC2 27 classes, 53 orders and 137 alliances (with 410 synonyms for all ranks); EVC3 13 classes, 24 orders and 53 alliances (with 188 synonyms for all ranks). 13 289 diagnostic taxa were assigned to classes of EVC1, 2099 to classes of EVC2 and 346 to classes of EVC3. Information on each accepted syntaxonomic concept was made accessible through the software tool EuroVegBrowser. An expert system for an automatic identification of class membership based on the proportion of character species was also developed. Conclusions: The Conspectus is the first comprehensive and critical account of syntaxa synthesizing more than 100 years of classification effort of European phytosociologists. It aims at stabilizing the nomenclature of the syntaxa and of classification concepts for practical uses such as calibration of habitat classification used by the European Union, standardization of terminology for environmental assessment studies, management and conservation of nature areas, landscape planning and education.
Article
. The computer software package TURBOVEG (for Microsoft® Windows®) was developed in The Netherlands for the processing of phytosociological data. This package comprises an easy-to-use data base management system. The data bank to be managed can be divided into several data bases which may consist of up to 100 000 relevés each. The program provides methods for input, import, selection, and export of relevés. In 1994, TURBOVEG was accepted as the standard computer package for the European Vegetation Survey. Currently it has been installed in more than 25 countries throughout Europe and overseas.
Article
The progress in the floristic study of the circumpolar Arctic since the 1940s is summarized and a new floristic division of this region is presented. The treeless areas of the North Atlantic and North Pacific with an oceanic climate, absence of permafrost and a very high proportion of boreal taxa are excluded from the Arctic proper. It is argued that the Arctic deserves the status of a floristic region. The tundra zone and some oceanic areas are divided into subzones according to their flora and vegetation. Two groups of subzones are recognized: the Arctic group (including the Arctic tundras proper and the High Arctic) and the Hypoarctic group. The Arctic phytochorion is floristically divided into sectors: 6 provinces and 20 subprovinces reflecting the regional features of each sector in connection with flora history, physiography and continentality-oceanity of the climate. Each sector is described and differentiated by a set of differential and co-differential species. The peculiarities of the Arctic flora are manifest in different ways in the various sectors, and endemism is not the universal criterion for subdivision.
Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map. Conser vation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF) Map No. 1. An chorage
  • Cavm Team
CAVM Team. 2003. Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map. Conser vation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF) Map No. 1. An chorage, AK, US: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Prodromus of higher vegetation units of Russia
  • Yu I Chernov
  • N V Matveyeva
  • Amsterdam Elseiver
  • N B Ermakov
Chernov, Yu.I. & Matveyeva N.V. 1997. Arctic ecosystems in Russia. In: Ecosystems of the World 3, Polar and Alpine Tund ra (F.E. Wielgolaski, ed.), pp. 361-507, Elseiver, Amsterdam. Ermakov, N.B. 2012. Prodromus of higher vegetation units of Russia. In: Modern state of the basic concepts of Ve ge ta tion Science (B.M. Mirkin & L.G. Naumova), pp. 377-483, Gilem, Ufa (in Rus sian). [Ермаков Н.Б. 2012. Продромус высших еди ниц рас тительности России // Миркин Б.М., Нау мо ва Л.Г. Современное состояние основных кон цеп ций науки о растительности. Уфа: Гилем. С. 377-483].
Vegetation of the USSR tundra zone. Mos cow, Leningrad, 142 рр. (in Russian). [Гордков Б.Н. 1935. Ра стительность тундровой зоны СССР
  • B N Gorodkov
Gorodkov, B.N. 1935. Vegetation of the USSR tundra zone. Mos cow, Leningrad, 142 рр. (in Russian). [Гордков Б.Н. 1935. Ра стительность тундровой зоны СССР. Москва;
Essay on the vegetation of summer reindeer pastures in the tundra of the Ob-Taz Peninsula
  • V S Govorukhin
Govorukhin, V.S. 1933. Essay on the vegetation of summer reindeer pastures in the tundra of the Ob-Taz Peninsula. Zem levedenie 35(1):68-92 (in Russian). [Говорухин В.С. 1933. Очерк растительности летних пастбищ север но го оленя в тундрах ОбскоТазовского полуострова // Землеведение. Т. 35, вып. 1. С.68-92].