PreprintPDF Available

Mental health of Adolescents in the Pandemic: Long-COVID19 or Long-Pandemic Syndrome?

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Backround Post-COVID19 complications such as pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome (PIMS) and Long-COVID19 move increasingly into focus, potentially causing more harm in this age group than the acute infection. To better understand the symptoms of long-COVID19 in adolescents and to distinguish infection-associated symptoms from pandemic-associated symptoms, we conducted a Long-COVID19 survey, comparing responses from seropositive and seronegative adolescents. To our knowledge, data of Long-COVID19 surveys with seronegative control groups have not been published yet. Methods Since May 2020 students grade 8-12 in fourteen secondary schools in Eastern Saxony were enrolled in the SchoolCovid19 study. Seroprevalence was assessed via serial SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing in all participants. Furthermore, during the March/April 2021 study visit all participants were asked to complete a 12 question Long-COVID19 survey regarding the occurrence and frequency of difficulties concentrating, memory loss, listlessness, headache, abdominal pain, myalgia/ arthralgia, fatigue, insomnia and mood (sadness, anger, happiness and tenseness). Findings 1560 students with a median age of 15 years participated in this study. 1365 (88%) were seronegative, 188 (12%) were seropositive. Each symptom was present in at least 35% of the students within the last seven days before the survey. However, there was no statistical difference comparing the reported symptoms between seropositive students and seronegative students. Whether the infection was known or unknown to the participant did not influence the prevalence of symptoms. Interpretation The lack of differences comparing the reported symptoms between seropositive and seronegative students suggests that Long-COVID19 might be less common than previously thought and emphasizing the impact of pandemic-associated symptoms regarding the well-being and mental health of young adolescents. Funding This study was supported by a grant by the Federal State of Saxony. M.K.W. was supported by the Else Kroener-Fresenius Center for Digital Health (EKFZ), TU Dresden, Germany.
Content may be subject to copyright.
1
Mental health of Adolescents in the Pandemic: Long-COVID19 or Long-Pandemic Syndrome?
Judith Blankenburg1, MD, Magdalena K. Wekenborg2, PhD, Jörg Reichert1, PhD, Carolin Kirsten1,
Elisabeth Kahre1, MD, Luise Haag1, MD, Leonie Schumm1, MD, Paula Czyborra1, MD, Reinhard
Berner1, MD, Jakob P. Armann1, MD
Affiliations:
1 Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technische
Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany;
2 Biological Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Zellescher Weg 19,
01069 Dresden, Germany
Corresponding Author: Jakob P. Armann, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital and Medical
Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden,
Germany; email: jakob.armann@uniklinikum-dresden.de; telephone: +49 351 458 18568
Clinical Trial Registration: SchoolCoviDD19: Prospektive Erfassung der SARS-CoV-2 Seropositivität bei
Schulkindern nach Ende der unterrichtsfreien Zeit aufgrund der Corona-Schutz-Verordnung (COVID-
19), DRKS00022455,
https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00022455
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 11, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.11.21257037doi: medRxiv preprint
NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used to guide clinical practice.
2
Abstract
Backround
Post-COVID19 complications such as pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome (PIMS) and Long-
COVID19 move increasingly into focus, potentially causing more harm in this age group than the
acute infection. To better understand the symptoms of long-COVID19 in adolescents and to
distinguish infection-associated symptoms from pandemic-associated symptoms, we conducted a
Long-COVID19 survey, comparing responses from seropositive and seronegative adolescents. To our
knowledge, data of Long-COVID19 surveys with seronegative control groups have not been published
yet.
Methods
Since May 2020 students grade 8-12 in fourteen secondary schools in Eastern Saxony were enrolled
in the SchoolCovid19 study. Seroprevalence was assessed via serial SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing in all
participants. Furthermore, during the March/April 2021 study visit all participants were asked to
complete a 12 question Long-COVID19 survey regarding the occurrence and frequency of difficulties
concentrating, memory loss, listlessness, headache, abdominal pain, myalgia/ arthralgia, fatigue,
insomnia and mood (sadness, anger, happiness and tenseness).
Findings
1560 students with a median age of 15 years participated in this study. 1365 (88%) were
seronegative, 188 (12%) were seropositive. Each symptom was present in at least 35% of the
students within the last seven days before the survey. However, there was no statistical difference
comparing the reported symptoms between seropositive students and seronegative students.
Whether the infection was known or unknown to the participant did not influence the prevalence of
symptoms.
Interpretation
The lack of differences comparing the reported symptoms between seropositive and seronegative
students suggests that Long-COVID19 might be less common than previously thought and
emphasizing the impact of pandemic-associated symptoms regarding the well-being and mental
health of young adolescents.
Funding
This study was supported by a grant by the Federal State of Saxony. M.K.W. was supported by the
Else Kröner-Fresenius Center for Digital Health (EKFZ), TU Dresden, Germany.
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 11, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.11.21257037doi: medRxiv preprint
3
Abbreviations:
COVID-19 Coronavirus disease 2019
ELISA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
IgG Immunoglobulin G
IQR Interquartile Range
PCR Polymerase Chain Reaction
SARS-CoV-2 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 11, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.11.21257037doi: medRxiv preprint
4
Introduction:
Since the identification of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) as the
cause of COVID-19 1 in December 2019 and the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Germany in
March 2020 nearly 490.000 cases in children and adolescents have been reported by the Robert-
Koch-Institute (RKI)2. In contrast to adults, children and adolescents usually have mild disease
courses with a low rate of hospitalization35. Therefore, post-COVID19 complications such as pediatric
inflammatory multisystem syndrome (PIMS) and Long-COVID19 - with persisting symptoms 4 12
weeks and more than 12 weeks after an acute SARS-CoV-2infection6 move into focus, potentially
causing more harm in this age group than the acute infection.
While multiple studies and registers have provided reliable data on epidemiology, clinical
presentation, disease course and treatment options on PIMS79 to date no comparable data exists for
Long-COVID19 in children and adolescents. A cross-sectional study from Italy10 in 123 children
diagnosed with a SARS-CoV-2 infection found that more than 50% of participants had at least one
persisting symptom 120 days after their infection, with Insomnia, pain, fatigue, and concentration
difficulties being the most commonly reported ones. An April 2021 Office for National Statistics (ONS)
report from the UK11 similarly provided data that symptoms in children persisted at least 12 weeks
after their SARS-CoV-2 infection.
These numbers are concerning and require attention; however, currently they merely show a
temporal connection and not a causal relationship. In order to better understand the epidemiology
and clinical manifestations of Long-COVID19 in children and adolescents and differentiate infection-
associated symptoms from pandemic-associated symptoms, we conducted a Long-COVID19 survey in
more than 1500 students participating in the SchoolCoviDD19 study in March and April 2021.
Methods:
Study Design
Since May 2020 students grade 8-12 in fourteen secondary schools in Eastern Saxony are enrolled in
the SchoolCoviDD19study. Two of these 14 schools are vocational schools. Seroprevalence is
assessed via serial SARS-CoV-2 antibody assessment in all participants. During the March/April 2021
study visit all participants were asked to complete a Long-COVID19 survey. Vaccinated Students (n=7)
were excluded from the analysis.
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 11, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.11.21257037doi: medRxiv preprint
5
Survey Details
The Survey included besides sociodemographic variables (i.e., age, sex) twelve questions on the
occurrence and frequency of relevant neurocognitive, pain and mood symptoms, namely difficulties
concentrating, memory loss, listlessness, headache, abdominal pain, myalgia/arthralgia, fatigue,
insomnia and mood (sadness, anger, happiness and tenseness) within the last seven days before the
survey.
The questions were taken from the Symptom Checklist-90-R (SCL-90-R)12, the Somatic Symptom Scale
(SSS-8)13 and a questionnaire about stress and stress management in children and adolescents (SS KJ
3-8 R)14. All questionnaires are validated in adolescents.
Answers were coded on a categorical scale never, once, multiple times for insomnia and all
mood questions; not at all, a little bit, quite, severe and very severe for the remaining
questions.
In addition, a self-generated item was used to assess the overall level of mental distress on a scale
from 0 (“not at all”) to 10 (“total”).
Laboratory Analysis
We assessed anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in all samples using a commercially available
chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) technology for the quantitative determination of anti-S1
and anti-S2 specific IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 (Diasorin LIAISON® SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG Assay).
Antibody levels > 15·0 AU/ml were considered positive and levels between 12·0 and 15·0 AU/ml were
considered equivocal.
All samples with a positive or equivocal LIAISON® test result, as well as all samples from participants
with a reported personal or household history of a SARS-CoV-2 infection, were re-tested with two
additional serological tests. These were a chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA)
intended for the qualitative detection of IgG antibodies to the nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV-2
(Abbott Diagnostics® ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgG ) (an index (S/C) of < 1·4 was considered negative
whereas one >/= 1·4 was considered positive) and an ELISA detecting IgG against the S1 domain of
the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (Euroimmun® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 ELISA) (a ratio < 0·8 was considered
negative, 0·81·1 equivocal, > 1·1 positive).
Participants whose positive or equivocal LIAISON® test result could be confirmed by a positive test
result in at least one additional serological test were considered seropositive. Participants with a
negative LIAISON® test result, but positive results in both additional serological tests were also
considered positive.
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 11, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.11.21257037doi: medRxiv preprint
6
Statistical Analysis
Results for continuous variables are presented as medians with interquartile ranges (IQR) and
categorical variables as numbers with percentages, unless stated otherwise.
Fisher’s exact test was used to determine categorical variables for the statistical analysis. Thereby,
the answers to the items assessing neurocognitive, pain and mood symptoms, were dummy-coded,
enabling a comparison of the answer category “none” (coded 0) against the answer categories “a
little bit”/ “quite”/ “severe”/ “very severe” and “once”/ “multiple times” (coded 1), respectively.
Furthermore, data distributions of the neurocognitive, pain and mood symptoms were tested for
normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test. Data with distributions significantly different (p<
0·05) from normal were either transformed to ranks to allow parametric statistics or analyzed using
non-parametric statistics.
In order to examine associations between sociodemographic variables (i.e., age, sex) and the
neurocognitive and pain symptoms, bivariate correlation analyses were conducted.
In a second step, partial correlation analyses were conducted between serostatus and the
neurocognitive and pain symptoms, adjusting for age and sex.
Analyses were performed using IBM SPSS 27.0 or Microsoft Excel 2010. All statistical tests were
conducted with α < 0.05.
Approval
The SchoolCoviDD19 study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Technische Universität (TU)
Dresden (BO-EK-156042020) and has been assigned clinical trial number DRKS00022455.
Role of the funding source
The funder of the study had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data
interpretation, or writing of the report and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.
Results:
1560 students with a median age of 15 years participated at the study visit in March/April 2021 and
had their serostatus analyzed. Seven already vaccinated students were excluded from the analysis,
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 11, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.11.21257037doi: medRxiv preprint
7
1365 (88%) were seronegative and 188 (12%) were seropositive. Median age, sex and household size
did not differ significantly between seropositive and seronegative participants (table 1).
Long-COVID19 survey was answered by at least 1504 (96·8%) of the participants. Each symptom,
regardless of the expression, was present in at least 35% of the students within the last seven days
before the survey, most commonly happiness (98·7%) followed by tenseness (86·4%), listlessness
(80·7%) and difficulties concentrating (79·3%). Myalgia/arthralgia (35·6%) and fatigue (37·8%) were
reported least commonly. (see table 2 for full results).
Fisher’s exact test did not reveal any significant differences between seropositive and seronegative
students regarding the prevalence of any of the neurocognitive and pain symptoms reported (figure
1).
To avoid underestimation of seropositive individuals due to our relatively strict definitions of
seropositivity, we also analyzed the data if only the LIAISON® test result was taken into consideration
for the decision on seropositivity. This resulted in 204 (13%) LIAISON®-seropositive and 1342 (86%) -
seronegative students. There was no statistical difference (Fisher’s exact test) in the occurrence of
any neurocognitive, pain or mood symptoms between these LIAISON®-seropositive and
seronegative students either (see Supplementals - figure 1).
Spearman correlation analyses revealed that age was positive correlate with nearly all
neurocognitive and pain symptoms, except for insomnia, sad mood and angry mood (table 3). In
addition, females reported a consistently higher prevalence of neurocognitive and pain symptoms
compared to men, except for Myalgia Arthralgia where there was no significant association with sex.
Partial correlation analyses, which were performed to test for age and sex independent effects of the
analysed serostatus on rank-transformed neurocognitive and pain symptoms revealed differences
only with respect to sadness; with being seronegative was associated with an increased prevalence
of sadness (table 4).
104 out 188 seropositive students (55%) had previously been tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and/ or
reported a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 positive household member and were therefore considered as
known SARS-CoV2 infections. Compared to those with an unknown infection (84/188 (45%)) Fisher’s
exact test did not reveal any significant differences regarding the prevalence of any of the
neurocognitive and pain symptoms reported either (table 5).
The median score of self-reported mental distress was 4 and did not differ between seropositive and
seronegative participants.
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 11, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.11.21257037doi: medRxiv preprint
8
Discussion:
The data presented in our study clearly shows a high rate of neurocognitive, pain and mood
symptoms in the surveyed group of adolescents, with every item being present in at least one third
of the students within the last seven days before responding to the survey. This is consistent with
previous studies and surveys on the prevalence of Long-COVID19 symptoms10 or psychosomatic
symptoms during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic15 in this age group. Furthermore the prevalence is
considerably higher compared to pre-pandemic data.15
Our study can know provide a control group to SARS-CoV-2 infected adolescents by comparing the
responses of seropositive individuals to those of their seronegative peers which has not been
published so far.
The differentiation between infection-associated and pandemic-associated symptoms is important
because the approach to mediate these symptoms will be different. While strict lock-down measures
including school closures will prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmissions in this age group and thereby
prevent long-term infection related illnesses, these measures will also further restrict social contact,
self-determination, education and development of the affected children and adolescents and
thereby amplify pandemic- or lockdown-associated symptoms.
The equal prevalence of neurocognitive, pain and mood symptoms in seronegative and seropositive
adolescents in our study does not negate the existence of Long-COVID19 symptoms in general or in
the pediatric population. However, it does suggest that they occur less frequently than previously
assumed at least in children and adolescents with only mild to asymptomatic courses of disease
as were investigated by this study.
Furthermore, it confirms the negative effects of lockdown measures on mental health and well-being
of children and adolescents16. These effects affecting this whole age group need to be balanced
with the risk of Long-COVID19 in infected individuals. This balancing act will be a difficult task for
public health officials and political officials. Nevertheless, it will be a necessary one when aiming to
improve mental health in adolescents.
While self-reported symptoms cannot be equated with the diagnosis of an illness, a prevalence of at
least 35% for each symptom is a concerning screening result that requires further investigation. In
addition, validated, reliable tests are needed to evaluate symptom severity in affected individuals.
The fact that self-reported overall mental distress did not differ significantly between seropositive
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 11, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.11.21257037doi: medRxiv preprint
9
and seronegative individuals does not suggest though that infection-associated symptoms are
necessarily more severe than pandemic associated symptoms. The interpretation of the negative
correlation of sadness and positive serostatus in the partial correlation analyses is difficult and
should be but not the overstated given the fact that the group (none vs. any) comparison did not
yield significant results and the fact, that this was an exploratory study design. Nevertheless, this
finding warrants further investigation.
As a positive takeaway the fact that happiness is by far the most common response in our survey is
reassuring und clearly points to the resilience of this age group.
There are several limitations to our study. The sample size of around 180 infected individuals is not
large enough to detect rare symptoms and a screening questionnaire cannot reliably compare the
severity of symptoms in affected individuals. Furthermore, our questionnaire concentrated on
neurocognitive, general pain and mood symptoms. Symptoms like a persistent sore throat, persistent
cough or chest tightness and an altered sense of smell/ taste were not included.
However, our survey covers a variety of symptoms reported in the context of Long-COVID19 and
having a control group of age-matched peers who never had a SARS-CoV-2 infection adds valuable
information to the Long-COVID19 discussion that is urgently needed.
Conclusion:
In our cohort of adolescents more than one third reported the presence of at least one
neurocognitive, pain or mood symptom with tenseness, listlessness and difficulties concentrating
being reported most commonly. However, there was no statistical difference comparing the reported
symptoms between seropositive students - with mild to asymptomatic courses of SARS-CoV-2
infections - and seronegative students. Leading to the conclusion that symptoms of Long-COVID19
might be less common than previously assumed and emphasizing on the impact of pandemic-
associated symptoms regarding the well-being and mental health of young adolescents.
Research in context
Evidence before this study
We searched PubMed for articles published between January 1, 2020, and May 1, 2021, using the
search terms ("Long-Covid19") AND ("adolescent") AND (“children”). We identified 1 relevant cross
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 11, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.11.21257037doi: medRxiv preprint
10
sectional study and 1 case series. Persisting symptoms up to 120 days after the SARS-CoV-2 infection
were reported in at least 50% of children and adolescents.
Added value of this study
By adding a control group this study documents that there is no significant difference in the
prevalence of neurocognitive, pain and mood symptoms in seropositive compared to seronegative
adolescents. This suggests that pandemic- and lockdown-associated factors affect the mental health
of adolescents more than infection-associated factors.
Implications of all the available evidence
These findings add relevant new data that will help to inform scientists, public health authorities and
policy makers in regard to future policy measures in an ongoing pandemic.
Acknowledgements:
We thank the Federal State of Saxony for supporting this study by a financial grant.
We thank J. Schneider for her support and excellent organization of the study visit March/ April 2021.
We thank J. Herrmann and K. Jackisch for their great support in collecting all samples.
Declaration of interests: Reinhard Berner and Jakob P. Armann report grants from the Federal State
of Saxony during the conduct of the study. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Contributors:
J.A and R.B. designed the study and wrote the protocol. J.A., J.B., M.W., J.R. and R.B. designed the
Long-COVID19 Survey. J.A., J.B., C.K., L.H., E.K., L.S., P.C. collected samples. J.A., J.B. and M.W.
analyzed and verified the data. J.A. , J.B. and M.W. wrote the manuscript. M.W., R.B., C.K., L.H., E.K.,
L.S., P.C. reviewed the manuscript.
All corresponding authors had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for
the decision to submit for publication.
Data Sharing:
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 11, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.11.21257037doi: medRxiv preprint
11
Deidentified individual participant data will be made available, in addition to study protocols, the
statistical analysis plan, and the informed consent form. The data will be made available upon
publication to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal for use in achieving the
goals of the approved proposal. Proposals should be submitted to corresponding author
(jakob.armann@uniklinikum-dresden.de).
References
1 Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, et al. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China,
2019. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: 72733. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017.
2 RKI - Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 - COVID-19-Fälle nach Altersgruppe und Meldewoche (Tabelle wird
jeden Dienstag aktualisiert).
https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Daten/Altersverteilung.html
(accessed May 03, 2021).
3 Mehta NS, Mytton OT, Mullins EWS, et al. SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19): What Do We Know About
Children? A Systematic Review. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 71: 246979.
https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa556.
4 Armann JP, Diffloth N, Simon A, et al. Hospital Admission in Children and Adolescents With
COVID-19. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2020; 117: 37374. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2020.0373.
5 DGPI: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Pädiatrische Infektiologie. COVID-19 Survey-Update: 2021,
Kalenderwoche 17. https://dgpi.de/covid-19-survey-update/ (accessed May 03, 2021).
6 Overview | COVID-19 rapid guideline: managing the long-term effects of COVID-19 | Guidance |
NICE. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng188 (accessed May 06, 2021).
7 DGPI: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Pädiatrische Infektiologie. PIMS Survey Update: 2021,
Kalenderwoche 17. https://dgpi.de/pims-survey-update/ (accessed May 03, 2021).
8 Harwood R, Allin B, Jones CE, et al. A national consensus management pathway for paediatric
inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with COVID-19 (PIMS-TS): results of a
national Delphi process. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health 2021; 5: 13341.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30304-7.
9 Feldstein LR, Tenforde MW, Friedman KG, et al. Characteristics and Outcomes of US Children and
Adolescents With Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) Compared With
Severe Acute COVID-19. JAMA 2021; 325: 107487. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.2091.
10 Buonsenso D, Munblit D, Rose C de, et al. Preliminary evidence on long COVID in children. Acta
Paediatr 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.15870.
11 Ayoubkhani D. Office for National Statistics 01.04.2021.
12 Franke G. Die Symptom-Checkliste von Derogatis (SCL-90-R) - Deutsche Version - Manual, 2002.
13 Gierk B, Kohlmann S, Kroenke K, et al. The somatic symptom scale-8 (SSS-8): a brief measure of
somatic symptom burden. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174: 399407.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12179.
14 Lohaus A, Eschenbeck H, Kohlmann C-W, Klein-Heßling J. Fragebogen zur Erhebung von Stress
und Stressbewältigung im Kindes- und Jugendalter (SSKJ 3-8). Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2006., 2006.
15 Ravens-Sieberer U, Kaman A, Otto C, et al. Mental Health and Quality of Life in Children and
Adolescents During the COVID-19 Pandemic-Results of the Copsy Study. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2020;
117: 82829. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2020.0828.
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 11, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.11.21257037doi: medRxiv preprint
12
16 Figueiredo CS de, Sandre PC, Portugal LCL, et al. COVID-19 pandemic impact on children and
adolescents' mental health: Biological, environmental, and social factors. Prog
Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2021; 106: 110171.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.110171.
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 11, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.11.21257037doi: medRxiv preprint
Table 1) Demographic data and serostatus of the participating students at study visit in March/ April
2021; IQR Interquartile range
Seronegative Students
Seropositive Students
Age (median/IQR), (range)
15 (14-16), (10 - 38)
15 (14-17), (10 - 35)
Female (n/%)
762 (56)
104 (55)
Houshold size (median/IQR)
4 (3-5)
4 (4-5)
Table 2) All answers of seronegative (-) and seropositive (+) participants to the Long-COVID19-survey
Not at all
A little bit
Very severe
Serostatus
Item
-
+
-
+
-
+
-
+
-
+
Difficulty
concentrating
278
(20·9)
34
(19·1)
710
(53·5)
98
(55·1)
230
(17·3)
23
(12·9)
88
(6·6)
19
(10·7)
21
(1·6)
4
(2·2)
Memory loss
709
(53·4)
87
(48·9)
478
(36·0)
60
(33·7)
104
(7·8)
18
(10·1)
28
(2·1)
12
(6·7)
9
(0·7)
1
(0·6)
Listlessness
251
(18·9)
39
(21·9)
500
(37·7)
64
(36·0)
329
(24·8)
36
(20·2)
178
(13·4)
30
(16·9)
68
(5·1)
9
(5·1)
Headache
598
(45·1)
69
(38·8)
387
(29·2)
51
(28·7)
233
(17·6)
38
(21·3)
83
(6·3)
19
(10·7)
25
(1·9)
1
(0·6)
Abdominal
pain
794
(59·8)
96
(53·9)
317
(23,9)
43
(24·2)
152
(11·5)
26
(14·6)
52
(3·9)
7
(3·9)
12
(0·9)
6
(3·4)
Myalgia/
Arthralgia
851
(64·1)
116
(65·2)
312
(23,5)
37
(20·8)
124
(9·3)
18
(10·1)
34
(2·6)
6
(3·4)
7
(0·5)
1
(0·6)
Fatigue
831
(62·6)
107
(60·1)
334
(25,2)
44
(24·7)
121
(9·1)
19
(10·7)
32
(2·4)
8
(4·5)
9
(0·7)
0
(0)
Never
Once
Serostatus
Item
-
+
-
+
-
+
Insomnia
450
(34·0)
66
(37·1)
418
(31,6)
53
(29·8)
456
(34·4)
59
(33·1)
Mood - Sad
447
(33·7)
75
(42·1)
428
(32,2)
51
(28·7)
453
(34·1)
52
(29·2)
Mood - Angry
422
(31·8)
59
(33·1)
506
(38,1)
73
(41·0)
399
(30·1)
46
(25·8)
Mood - Happy
15
(1·1)
4
(2·2)
88
(6,6)
8
(4·5)
1225
(92·2)
166
(93·3)
Mood - tense
181
(13·6)
23
(12·9)
498
(37,5)
72
(40·4)
648
(48·8)
83
(46·6)
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 11, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.11.21257037doi: medRxiv preprint
Table 3) Spearman-Rho bivariate correlations between age, sex, and the reported neurocognitive, pain and mood symptoms (n = 1553, * significant at level 0·05,
** significant at level 0·01 (one-tailed test))
Variable
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(1) Age
(2) sex
05
(3) Distress
·23**
·25**
(4) Concentration
·08**
·14**
·35**
(5) Memory
·10**
·07**
·24**
·47**
(6) Listlessness
·17**
·08**
·36**
·52**
·32**
(7) Headache
·10**
·27**
·30**
·30**
·23**
·27**
(8) Abdominal Pain
·05*
·21**
·26**
·21**
·20**
·23**
·28**
(9) Myalgia Arthralgia
07*
·05
·15**
·24**
·21**
·20**
·21**
·26**
(10) Fatigue
·11**
·10**
·26**
·32**
·25**
·29**
·28**
·27**
·35**
(11) Insomina
·04
·20**
·30**
·28**
·23**
·22**
·29**
·18**
·18**
·24**
(12) Sad
·04
·38**
·48**
·35**
·27**
·33**
·30**
·28**
·18**
·27**
·37**
(13) Angry
04
·12**
·24**
·23**
·20**
·22**
·17**
·18**
·14**
·16**
·23**
·33**
(14) Happy
05*
·06*
11*
-·17**
-·12**
-·17**
06*
05*
-·07**
-·11**
-·12**
-·11**
06*
(15) Tense
·14**
·16**
·33**
·29**
·23**
·30**
·20**
·20**
·14**
·23**
·25**
·36**
·28**
-.07**
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 11, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.11.21257037doi: medRxiv preprint
Table 4) Partial correlations between serostatus and neurocognitive, pain and mood symptoms (rank-transformed), controlling for age and sex (n = 1553, *
significant at level 0·05, ** significant at level 0·01 (one-tailed test))
Variable
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(1) Serostatus
(2) Mental Distress
01
(3) Concentration
·02
·33**
(4) Memory
·05
·22**
·47**
(5) Listlessness
01
·34**
·51**
·31**
(6) Headache
·05
·24**
·27**
·21**
·24**
(7) Abdominal Pain
·05
·22**
·18**
·18**
·22**
·23**
(8) Myalgia Arthralgia
<-·01
·16**
·23**
·21**
·20**
·20**
·26**
(9) Fatigue
·02
·23**
·31**
·24**
·27**
·25**
·25**
·35**
(10) Insomina
02
·26**
·26**
·22**
·20**
·25**
·14**
·18**
·23**
(11) Sad
06*
·44**
·32**
·25**
·32**
·22**
·22**
·17**
·25**
·32**
(12) Angry
02
·22**
·22**
·20**
·21**
·15**
·18**
·13**
·15**
·22**
·31**
(13) Happy
·01
-·12**
-·17**
-·12**
-·17**
-·07**
07*
-·08**
-·11**
-·13**
-·14**
07*
(14) Tense
02
·28**
·27**
·22**
·28**
·16**
·17**
·15**
·21**
·22**
·31**
·27**
-·07**
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 11, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.11.21257037doi: medRxiv preprint
Table 5) Answers of seropositive participants to the Long-COVID19-survey known vs. previously
unknown infection (Fisher’s exact test: n = 1553, * significant at level 0·05)
None
Any
p
known
infection
unknown
infection
known
infection
unknown
infection
Difficulty
concentrating
22 (22·5)
12 (15·0)
76 (77·6)
68 (85·0)
NS
Memory loss
47 (48·0)
40 (50·0)
51 (52·0)
40 (50·0)
NS
Listlessness
21 (21·4)
18 (22·5)
77 (78·6)
62 (77·5)
NS
Headache
40 (40·8)
29 (36·3)
58 (59·2)
51 (63·8)
NS
Abdominal pain
55 (56·1)
41 (51·2)
43 (43·9)
39 (48·8)
NS
Myalgia/Arthralgia
64 (65·3)
52 (65·0)
34 (34·7)
28 (35·0)
NS
Fatigue
61 (62·2)
46 (57·5)
37 (37·8)
34 (42·5)
NS
Never
At least once
p
known
infection
unknown
infection
known
infection
unknown
infection
Insomnia
35 (35·7)
31 (38·8)
63 (64·3)
49 (61·3%)
NS
Mood - Sad
41 (41·8)
34 (42·5)
57 (58·2)
46 (57·58)
NS
Mood - Angry
30 (30·6)
29 (36·3)
68 (69·4)
51 (63·8)
NS
Mood Happy
1 (1·0)
3 (3·8)
97 (99·0)
77 (96·3)
NS
Mood - Tense
11 (1·22)
12 (15·0)
87 (88·8)
68 (85·0)
NS
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 11, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.11.21257037doi: medRxiv preprint
Figure 1) Prevalence of neurocognitive, pain and mood symptoms in seronegative and seropositive
study participants (Fisher’s exact test: n = 1553, * significant at level 0·05)
0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0
Mood - Tense
Mood - Happy
Modd- Angry
Mood - Sad
Insomnia
Fatigue
Myalgia/ Arthralgia
Abdominal Pain
Headache
Litslessness
Memory loss
Difficulty concentrating
Seropositive (%) Seronegative (%)
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 11, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.11.21257037doi: medRxiv preprint
Supplementals - Figure 1) Prevalence of neurocognitive, pain and mood symptoms in LIAISON®-
negativ and positive study participants (Fisher’s exact test: n = 1553, * significant at level 0·05)
0,00 10,00 20,00 30,00 40,00 50,00 60,00 70,00 80,00 90,00 100,00
Mood - Tense
Mood - Happy
Modd- Angry
Mood - Sad
Insomnia
Fatigue
Myalgia/ Arthralgia
Abdominal Pain
Headache
Litslessness
Memory loss
Difficulty concentrating
LIAISON®-positive (%) LIAISON®-negativ (%)
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 11, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.11.21257037doi: medRxiv preprint
... As symptoms associated with post-COVID-19 condition appear to decline over time, controlled studies based on routine medical data may help to identify long-term health conditions following SARS-CoV-2 infection, provided access to healthcare is equally available to individuals with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection. Few such studies have been conducted to this point and almost none of these studies has included both adults and children [5,6,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. ...
... We observed relevant post-COVID-19 healthcare utilization and new-onset morbidity patterns documented by physicians in children and adolescents following SARS-CoV-2 infection in a large sample of patients with confirmed COVID-19 compared with a matched control group. Our results contrast with findings from several earlier epidemiological studies among children and adolescents, which did not observe significant group differences between children and adolescents with COVID-19 and controls [17,[30][31][32][33]. These differences may possibly be due to high dropout rates and/or high risk of selection bias [30], self-reported outcome assessment [30,31], insufficiently long follow-up time to assess post-COVID-19 outcomes [30,32], and low sample size resulting in low statistical power [17,32,33]. ...
... Our results contrast with findings from several earlier epidemiological studies among children and adolescents, which did not observe significant group differences between children and adolescents with COVID-19 and controls [17,[30][31][32][33]. These differences may possibly be due to high dropout rates and/or high risk of selection bias [30], self-reported outcome assessment [30,31], insufficiently long follow-up time to assess post-COVID-19 outcomes [30,32], and low sample size resulting in low statistical power [17,32,33]. Using national SARS-CoV-2 testing data collected in early January 2021 in the UK, Zavala and colleagues reported a slightly higher frequency of any persisting symptoms in association with a positive PCR test result among children aged 2 to 16 years after 1 month of follow-up [34]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Long-term health sequelae of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) are a major public health concern. However, evidence on post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (post-COVID-19) is still limited, particularly for children and adolescents. Utilizing comprehensive healthcare data on approximately 46% of the German population, we investigated post-COVID-19-associated morbidity in children/adolescents and adults. Methods and findings We used routine data from German statutory health insurance organizations covering the period between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2020. The base population included all individuals insured for at least 1 day in 2020. Based on documented diagnoses, we identified individuals with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed COVID-19 through June 30, 2020. A control cohort was assigned using 1:5 exact matching on age and sex, and propensity score matching on preexisting medical conditions. The date of COVID-19 diagnosis was used as index date for both cohorts, which were followed for incident morbidity outcomes documented in the second quarter after index date or later.Overall, 96 prespecified outcomes were aggregated into 13 diagnosis/symptom complexes and 3 domains (physical health, mental health, and physical/mental overlap domain). We used Poisson regression to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). The study population included 11,950 children/adolescents (48.1% female, 67.2% aged between 0 and 11 years) and 145,184 adults (60.2% female, 51.1% aged between 18 and 49 years). The mean follow-up time was 236 days (standard deviation (SD) = 44 days, range = 121 to 339 days) in children/adolescents and 254 days (SD = 36 days, range = 93 to 340 days) in adults. COVID-19 and control cohort were well balanced regarding covariates. The specific outcomes with the highest IRR and an incidence rate (IR) of at least 1/100 person-years in the COVID-19 cohort in children and adolescents were malaise/fatigue/exhaustion (IRR: 2.28, 95% CI: 1.71 to 3.06, p < 0.01, IR COVID-19: 12.58, IR Control: 5.51), cough (IRR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.48 to 2.04, p < 0.01, IR COVID-19: 36.56, IR Control: 21.06), and throat/chest pain (IRR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.39 to 2.12, p < 0.01, IR COVID-19: 20.01, IR Control: 11.66). In adults, these included disturbances of smell and taste (IRR: 6.69, 95% CI: 5.88 to 7.60, p < 0.01, IR COVID-19: 12.42, IR Control: 1.86), fever (IRR: 3.33, 95% CI: 3.01 to 3.68, p < 0.01, IR COVID-19: 11.53, IR Control: 3.46), and dyspnea (IRR: 2.88, 95% CI: 2.74 to 3.02, p < 0.01, IR COVID-19: 43.91, IR Control: 15.27). For all health outcomes combined, IRs per 1,000 person-years in the COVID-19 cohort were significantly higher than those in the control cohort in both children/adolescents (IRR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.25 to 1.35, p < 0.01, IR COVID-19: 436.91, IR Control: 335.98) and adults (IRR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.31 to 1.34, p < 0.01, IR COVID-19: 615.82, IR Control: 464.15). The relative magnitude of increased documented morbidity was similar for the physical, mental, and physical/mental overlap domain. In the COVID-19 cohort, IRs were significantly higher in all 13 diagnosis/symptom complexes in adults and in 10 diagnosis/symptom complexes in children/adolescents. IRR estimates were similar for age groups 0 to 11 and 12 to 17. IRs in children/adolescents were consistently lower than those in adults. Limitations of our study include potentially unmeasured confounding and detection bias. Conclusions In this retrospective matched cohort study, we observed significant new onset morbidity in children, adolescents, and adults across 13 prespecified diagnosis/symptom complexes, following COVID-19 infection. These findings expand the existing available evidence on post-COVID-19 conditions in younger age groups and confirm previous findings in adults. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05074953 .
... At 12 months, 10% of children and 34% of adults had residual symptoms (5). Table 1 shows the methodology of 13 pediatric studies that compared new-onset symptoms in children with SARS-CoV-2 infection to a control group (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). Table 2 shows the results of this comparison. ...
... Table 2 shows the results of this comparison. All but three studies (12,15,17) report increased symptoms in cases versus controls in at least one age group. However, one study that reported such a difference reported higher quality-of-life scores related to emotional and social functioning in 12-to 14-year-old cases than in controls (6). ...
... Проте, у віковій категорії від 0 до 18 років за наявними опублікованими спостереженнями залежно від величини когорти, методології та визначення поняття 10-25% дітей мають стійкі симптоми після перенесеної інфекції [1,2]. Тривала після гострого процесу симптоматика відома як: постгострі наслідки COVID-19, віддалений, хронічний або тривалий COVID-синдром, синдром після COVID-19 [3][4][5]. Ці про-яви після перенесеного COVID-19 є новими, повторюваними або постійними проблемами здоров'я, які виникли через 4 і більше тижнів після початку коронавірусної інфекції, cпричинені SARS-CoV-2 [6]. На цей час створена мультидисциплінарна консенсусна інструкція щодо оцінювання та лікування постгострих наслідків інфекції SARS-CoV-2 у дітей та підлітків [7]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose - to analyze the prevalence of symptoms of long COVID-19 in the pediatric population and the methods of their diagnosis. Electronic search of scientific research using known databases from PubMed, SCOPUS, ResearchGate, Wiley Online Library and Google Scholar from 2019 to February 2023. The keywords for this review: long COVID, post COVID, COVID-19, pediatrics, children, adolescents, post-acute sequelae of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection (PASC). Exclusion criteria were: duplicated, dedicated exclusively to adults, analyzed only acute COVID-19. In the analysis were included research from the post-Covid period in children and adolescents, which contained the results of the assessment of their state of health and displayed certain clinical manifestations that remained after the end of the acute infection within 4-12 weeks. Optimistic forecasts regarding the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the child population at the beginning of the pandemic quite quickly passed into the stage of uncertainty in forecasts of the course of the post-Covid period and the consequences of the transferred disease. Most children infected with COVID-19 recover, but some of them have persistent symptoms after an infection. The true prevalence of “long-term COVID” is under investigation study. Reports on the range of its manifestations are very diverse and differ in conclusions about the intensity of their impact on the quality of children’s life. Hence, there is an obvious need for long-term clinical observations with a mandatory comparison with the data of control groups appropriate age. Because this category of convalescents will need of a multidisciplinary approach in monitoring them, and therefore they will bear a significant burden on the health care system. No conflict of interests was declared by the authors.
... COVID-19 in children is often asymptomatic or mild, with low levels of hospitalization (less than 2%) and low mortality (less than 0.03%) [1]. Although the neurological signs are not leading in the clinical picture of COVID-19, there are reports of possible nervous system involvement in more than 30% of patients, the leading role in those affl icted involving cognitive, sensory, emotional, and other disorders [2][3][4]. ...
Article
It has now been established that neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders persist for prolonged periods in a significant proportion of adult patients who have had COVID-19, though there is much less information about the manifestations of post-COVID syndrome (PCS) in children and adolescents. This review presents data on the features of the course of PCS in young patients, and considers the options for treating these patients. The results of studies on the use of Cortexin for correcting cognitive and emotional disorders are analyzed.
... ; Lange and Pickett-Depaolis 2020; Preston 2020); poverty(Broadbent et al. 2020;Gibson and Olivia 2020); runaway inflation and enormous public deficits(Allen 2022;Camera and Gioffré 2021); childhood malnutrition and related mortality(Headey et al. 2020); developmental delays in infants and young children(Chanchlani, Buchanan, and Gill 2020;Deoni et al. 2021); significant decline in the quality of education(Buonsenso et al. 2020;Christakis, Cleve, and Zimmerman 2020;Engzell, Frey, and Verhagen 2021;Moore et al. 2021); decline in mental health and increase in alcoholism, drug use and suicide rates(Blankenburg et al. 2021;Gulland 2020;McIntyre and Lee 2020;Pellicano et al. 2022;Pietrabissa and Simpson 2020;Rahman et al. 2021;Viner et al. 2021); domestic violence(Hsu and Henke 2021;Sidpra et al. 2021); isolation-induced and/or mask-induced impairments of cognitive function(Ingram, Hand, and Maciejewski 2021;Kisielinski et al. 2021;Ong et al. 2020); agoraphobia and hypochondria stemming from being encouraged to rethink fellow humans as vectors of disease(Bzdok and Dunbar 2020;Dodsworth 2021;Furedi 2020;Saint and Moscovitch 2021;Shapiro and Bouder 2021); decline in physical activity and increase in obesity; rise in preventable deaths because of fears of hospitals and delayed treatments(Greco et al. 2020;Jenkins, Sikora, and Dolan 2021;Maringe et al. 2020); the resurgence of neglected diseases such as tuberculosis, HIV, and malaria(Bell and Hansen 2021;Pai 2020); increased vulnerability to other health risks because of excessive hygiene(Finlay et al. 2021); pollution(Amuah et al. 2022;Phelps Bondaroff and Cooke 2020); as well as new forms of social conflict and divisiveness(Graso, Chen, and Reynolds 2021;Huang et al. 2022;Monaghan 2020;O'Connor et al. 2021;Prasad 2020;Ye 2021). The totality of available evidence reveals a public health 'double whammy' whereby the benefits of non-pharmaceutical interventions were overestimated, and their costs underestimated. ...
Article
Full-text available
In this paper, we critically analyze the response to the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting not only the breadth of knowledge geographers have already contributed to this assessment, but also the surprisingly limited critique within geography, social sciences and the broadly defined “Academic Left” of the authoritarian dimension of the public health policies of 2020 onwards. We conclude with a number of research questions for the aftermath of the pandemic, with the hope that they will help spur the growth of a new wave of anti-authoritarian Leftist geographical thinking that reaffirms the centrality of human rights and civil liberties to making the world a better place. Key words: COVID-19; authoritarianism; public health; Academic Left; pandemic response. HOW TO CITE: Simandan, D., Rinner, C., Capurri, V., (2024). The academic left, human geography, and the rise of authoritarianism during the COVID-19 pandemic. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, vol. 106, issue 2, pp. 175-195, https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2023.2168560
... Moreover, the control group was heterogeneous, and details about the previous infections were not available in some subjects, apart from SARS-CoV-2 being excluded. In contrast to two recently reported larger healthy control cohorts, none of our controls complained of reduced physical activity, fatigue, and headache as possible post-pandemic symptoms (2,49). Furthermore, the detection thresholds of the control group were within the normal range in contrast to the SARS-CoV-2 group. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Long-term neurological complaints after SARS-CoV-2 infection occur in 4–66% of children and adolescents. Controlled studies on the integrity of the peripheral nerve system are scarce. Therefore, we examined the somatosensory function in children and adolescents after SARS-CoV-2 infection in a case-control study compared with age-matched individuals. Materials and Methods Eighty-one subjects after SARS-CoV-2 infection ( n = 44 female, 11.4 ± 3.5 years, n = 75 SARS-CoV-2 seropositive, n = 6 PCR positive during infection and SARS-CoV-2 seronegative at the time point of study inclusion, n = 47 asymptomatic infection) were compared to 38 controls without SARS-CoV-2 infection (26 female, 10.3 ± 3.4 years, n = 15 with other infection within last 6 months). After standardised interviews and neurological examinations, large fibre (tactile and vibration detection thresholds) and small fibre (cold and warm detection thresholds, paradoxical heat sensation) functions were assessed on both feet following a validated protocol. After z-transformation of all values, all participants were compared to published reference values regarding the number of abnormal results. Additionally, the mean for all sensory parameters values of both study groups were compared to an ideal healthy population (with z -value 0 ± 1), as well as with each other, as previously described. Statistical analyses: t -test, Chi-squared test, and binominal test. Findings None of the controls, but 27 of the 81 patients (33%, p < 0.001) reported persistent complaints 2.7 ± 1.9 (0.8–8.5) months after SARS-CoV-2 infection, most often reduced exercise capacity (16%), fatigue (13%), pain (9%), or paraesthesia (6%). Reflex deficits or paresis were missing, but somatosensory profiles showed significantly increased detection thresholds for thermal (especially warm) and vibration stimuli compared to controls. Approximately 36% of the patients after SARS-CoV-2, but none of the controls revealed an abnormal sensory loss in at least one parameter ( p < 0.01). Sensory loss was characterised in 26% by large and 12% by small fibre dysfunction, the latter appearing more frequently in children with prior symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Myalgia/paraesthesia was indicative of somatosensory dysfunction. In all eight re-examined children, the nerve function recovered after 2–4 months. Interpretation This study provides evidence that in a subgroup of children and adolescents previously infected with SARS-CoV-2, regardless of their complaints, the function of large or small nerve fibres is presumably reversibly impaired.
Article
Full-text available
Background Research on the long-term impact on COVID-19 in children and young people (CYP) has been published at pace. We aimed to update and refine an earlier systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the current evidence for Post-COVID-19 Condition in CYP. Methods Studies from the previous systematic review were combined with studies from a systematic search from July 2021 to November 2022 (registration PROSPERO CRD42021233153). Eligible studies included CYP aged ≤19 years with confirmed or probable SARS-CoV-2 infection and symptoms persisting at least 12 weeks. Findings 55 studies (n = 1,139,299 participants) were included. Over two-hundred symptoms were associated with Post COVID-19 Condition. Gastrointestinal problems, headaches, cough and fever were among the most prevalent symptoms with rates of 50.2%, 35.6%, 34.7% and 25.8% respectively. Twenty-one symptoms from 11 studies were suitable for meta-analysis. There were significantly higher pooled estimates of proportions of symptoms for altered / loss of smell or taste, dyspnoea, fatigue, and myalgia in CYP with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Heterogeneity was high suggesting substantial variation amongst the included studies. Conclusions Many CYP continue to experience symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Efforts to aid early identification and intervention of those most in need is warranted and the consequences of COVID-19 for CYP call for long-term follow-up.
Article
Full-text available
Emerging data suggests that endotheliopathy changes can be associated with post covid condition (PCC) in adults. Research on the matter in children is lacking. We analyzed an extended coagulation profile including biomarkers of endothelial damage in children with PCC and compared it with a control group of children that fully recovered post- SARS-CoV-2 infection. A case-control study enrolling children below 18 years of age with previous microbiologically confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in a pediatric post-covid unit in Italy ≥ 8 weeks after the initial infection. Samples were taken at 8 and 12 weeks after the SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis and analyzed for coagulation profiling (fibrinogen, prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, activated partial thromboplastin time, d-dimers, factor VIII coagulant activity, plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF) antigen and VWF ristocetin cofactor (RC)). We compared coagulation profiles in samples from children identified with PCC (at least one, or three or more symptoms, which could not be explained by an alternative diagnosis, at the 8- and 12-week follow-up assessment using the pediatric Long Covid International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium (ISARIC) survey. Seventy-five children were enrolled, 49.3% were females, the median age was 10.2 (IQR 4.9) years. Forty-six (61%) of the children had at least one persisting symptom at the eight weeks post-onset, (PCC8); 39/75 (52%) had persistent symptoms for more than 12 weeks (PCC12) and 15/75(32%) had at least three persisting symptoms (PCC ≥ 3) at 12 weeks. Children with PCC presented more frequently with abnormal D-Dimer levels above the reference range compared to children that had fully recovered at the 8–12 weeks (39.1% vs. 17.2%, p = 0.04), and 12 week follow up or more (41% vs. 17.2%, p = 0.05), and in children with three or more symptoms at 12 weeks follow up compared to those that had recovered (64.3% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.002). For the other coagulation profiles, there were abnormal values detected for VWF, FVIII, RC and Fibrinogen but no significant differences between children with PCC compared to controls. Although the majority of children in our cohort showed coagulation profile within or close to normal ranges, we found that a higher proportion of children with PCC, and specifically those with a more severe spectrum characterized with three or more persisting symptoms, had abnormal D-dimer levels compared to other children that fully recovered from an acute SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Article
Full-text available
A systematic literature review was conducted up to 15th February 2022 to summarize long COVID evidence and to assess prevalence and clinical presentation in children and adolescents. Articles reporting long COVID prevalence and symptoms based on original data in the paediatric population were included. Case series quality was assessed through the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist. For observational studies, adherence to STROBE checklist was evaluated. Twenty-two articles were included: 19 observational studies (12 cohort/7 cross-sectional) and 3 case series. Nine studies provided a control group. We found a high variability in terms of prevalence (1.6–70%). The most frequently reported symptoms were fatigue (2–87%), headache (3.5–80%), arthro-myalgias (5.4–66%), chest tightness or pain (1.4–51%), and dyspnoea (2–57.1%). Five studies reported limitations in daily function due to long COVID. Alterations at brain imaging were described in one study, transient electrocardiographic abnormalities were described in a minority of children, while most authors did not evidence long-term pulmonary sequelae. Older age, female sex, and previous long-term pathological conditions were more frequently associated with persistent symptoms. Conclusion: Long COVID evidence in children is limited, heterogeneous, and based on low-quality studies. The lockdown consequences are difficult to distinguish from long COVID symptoms. High-quality studies are required: WHO definition of long COVID should be used, controlled clinical studies should be encouraged, and the impact of new variants on long COVID prevalence should be investigated to ensure an objective analysis of long COVID characteristics in children and a proper allocation of healthcare system resources. What is Known: • Children rarely develop a severe respiratory disease in the acute phase of COVID-19. • A limited number of patients develop a multisystem inflammatory condition that can lead to multiorgan failure and shock. What is New: • Persistent symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 infection are reported in children and limitations in daily function due to long COVID symptoms affect school attendance. • Functional complaints of post-acute COVID are difficult to be distinguished from those due to social restrictions.
Article
Full-text available
Paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with COVID-19 (PIMS-TS) is a novel condition that was first reported in April, 2020. We aimed to develop a national consensus management pathway for the UK to provide guidance for clinicians caring for children with PIMS-TS. A three-phase online Delphi process and virtual consensus meeting sought consensus over the investigation, management, and research priorities from multidisciplinary clinicians caring for children with PIMS-TS. We used 140 consensus statements to derive a consensus management pathway that describes the initial investigation of children with suspected PIMS-TS, including blood markers to help determine the severity of disease, an echocardiogram, and a viral and septic screen to exclude other infectious causes of illness. The importance of a multidisciplinary team in decision making for children with PIMS-TS is highlighted throughout the guidance, along with the recommended treatment options, including supportive care, intravenous immunoglobulin, methylprednisolone, and biological therapies. These include IL-1 antagonists (eg, anakinra), IL-6 receptor blockers (eg, tocilizumab), and anti-TNF agents (eg, infliximab) for children with Kawasaki disease-like phenotype and non-specific presentations. Use of a rapid online Delphi process has made it possible to generate a national consensus pathway in a timely and cost-efficient manner in the middle of a global pandemic. The consensus statements represent the views of UK clinicians and are applicable to children in the UK suspected of having PIMS-TS. Future evidence will inform updates to this guidance, which in the interim provides a solid framework to support clinicians caring for children with PIMS-TS. This process has directly informed new PIMS-TS specific treatment groups as part of the adaptive UK RECOVERY trial protocol, which is the first formal randomised controlled trial of therapies for PIMS-TS globally.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Few paediatric cases of COVID-19 have been reported and we know little about the epidemiology in children, though more is known about other coronaviruses. We aimed to understand the infection rate, clinical presentation, clinical outcomes and transmission dynamics for SARS-CoV-2, in order to inform clinical and public health measures. Methods: We undertook a rapid systematic review and narrative synthesis of all literature relating to SARS-CoV-2 in paediatric populations. The search terms also included SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. We searched three databases and the COVID-19 resource centres of eleven major journals and publishers. English abstracts of Chinese language papers were included. Data were extracted and narrative syntheses conducted. Results: 24 studies relating to COVID-19 were included in the review. Children appear to be less affected by COVID-19 than adults by observed rate of cases in large epidemiological studies. Limited data on attack rate indicate that children are just as susceptible to infection. Data on clinical outcomes are scarce but include several reports of asymptomatic infection and a milder course of disease in young children, though radiological abnormalities are noted. Severe cases are not reported in detail and there are little data relating to transmission. Conclusions: Children appear to have a low observed case rate of COVID-19 but may have similar rates to adults of infection with SARS-CoV-2. This discrepancy may be because children are asymptomatic or too mildly infected to draw medical attention, be tested and counted in observed cases of COVID-19.
Article
Full-text available
In December 2019, a cluster of patients with pneumonia of unknown cause was linked to a seafood wholesale market in Wuhan, China. A previously unknown betacoronavirus was discovered through the use of unbiased sequencing in samples from patients with pneumonia. Human airway epithelial cells were used to isolate a novel coronavirus, named 2019-nCoV, which formed another clade within the subgenus sarbecovirus, Orthocoronavirinae subfamily. Different from both MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV, 2019-nCoV is the seventh member of the family of coronaviruses that infect humans. Enhanced surveillance and further investigation are ongoing. (Funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China and the National Major Project for Control and Prevention of Infectious Disease in China.).
Article
There is increasing evidence that adult patients diagnosed with acute COVID‐19 suffer from Long COVID initially described in Italy. A recent large cohort of 1733 patients from Wuhan found persistent symptoms in 76% of patients 6 months after initial diagnosis. To date, data on Long Covid in children are scarce, with the exception of an earlier description of five children with Long Covid in Sweden.
Article
Importance Refinement of criteria for multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) may inform efforts to improve health outcomes. Objective To compare clinical characteristics and outcomes of children and adolescents with MIS-C vs those with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Setting, Design, and Participants Case series of 1116 patients aged younger than 21 years hospitalized between March 15 and October 31, 2020, at 66 US hospitals in 31 states. Final date of follow-up was January 5, 2021. Patients with MIS-C had fever, inflammation, multisystem involvement, and positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or antibody test results or recent exposure with no alternate diagnosis. Patients with COVID-19 had positive RT-PCR test results and severe organ system involvement. Exposure SARS-CoV-2. Main Outcomes and Measures Presenting symptoms, organ system complications, laboratory biomarkers, interventions, and clinical outcomes. Multivariable regression was used to compute adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) of factors associated with MIS-C vs COVID-19. Results Of 1116 patients (median age, 9.7 years; 45% female), 539 (48%) were diagnosed with MIS-C and 577 (52%) with COVID-19. Compared with patients with COVID-19, patients with MIS-C were more likely to be 6 to 12 years old (40.8% vs 19.4%; absolute risk difference [RD], 21.4% [95% CI, 16.1%-26.7%]; aRR, 1.51 [95% CI, 1.33-1.72] vs 0-5 years) and non-Hispanic Black (32.3% vs 21.5%; RD, 10.8% [95% CI, 5.6%-16.0%]; aRR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.17-1.76] vs White). Compared with patients with COVID-19, patients with MIS-C were more likely to have cardiorespiratory involvement (56.0% vs 8.8%; RD, 47.2% [95% CI, 42.4%-52.0%]; aRR, 2.99 [95% CI, 2.55-3.50] vs respiratory involvement), cardiovascular without respiratory involvement (10.6% vs 2.9%; RD, 7.7% [95% CI, 4.7%-10.6%]; aRR, 2.49 [95% CI, 2.05-3.02] vs respiratory involvement), and mucocutaneous without cardiorespiratory involvement (7.1% vs 2.3%; RD, 4.8% [95% CI, 2.3%-7.3%]; aRR, 2.29 [95% CI, 1.84-2.85] vs respiratory involvement). Patients with MIS-C had higher neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (median, 6.4 vs 2.7, P < .001), higher C-reactive protein level (median, 152 mg/L vs 33 mg/L; P < .001), and lower platelet count (<150 ×10³ cells/μL [212/523 {41%} vs 84/486 {17%}, P < .001]). A total of 398 patients (73.8%) with MIS-C and 253 (43.8%) with COVID-19 were admitted to the intensive care unit, and 10 (1.9%) with MIS-C and 8 (1.4%) with COVID-19 died during hospitalization. Among patients with MIS-C with reduced left ventricular systolic function (172/503, 34.2%) and coronary artery aneurysm (57/424, 13.4%), an estimated 91.0% (95% CI, 86.0%-94.7%) and 79.1% (95% CI, 67.1%-89.1%), respectively, normalized within 30 days. Conclusions and Relevance This case series of patients with MIS-C and with COVID-19 identified patterns of clinical presentation and organ system involvement. These patterns may help differentiate between MIS-C and COVID-19.
Article
The full text is available under the following link: https://www.aerzteblatt.de/int/archive/article/216878/Mental-health-and-quality-of-life-in-children-and-adolescents-during-the-COVID-19-pandemic-results-of-the-COPSY-study
Article
Importance Somatic symptoms are the core features of many medical diseases, and they are used to evaluate the severity and course of illness. The 8-item Somatic Symptom Scale (SSS-8) was recently developed as a brief, patient-reported outcome measure of somatic symptom burden, but its reliability, validity, and usefulness have not yet been tested.Objective To investigate the reliability, validity, and severity categories as well as the reference scores of the SSS-8.Design, Setting, and Participants A national, representative general-population survey was performed between June 15, 2012, and July 15, 2012, in Germany, including 2510 individuals older than 13 years.Main Outcomes and Measures The SSS-8 mean (SD), item-total correlations, Cronbach α, factor structure, associations with measures of construct validity (Patient Health Questionnaire–2 depression scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder–2 scale, visual analog scale for general health status, 12-month health care use), severity categories, and percentile rank reference scores.Results The SSS-8 had excellent item characteristics and good reliability (Cronbach α = 0.81). The factor structure reflects gastrointestinal, pain, fatigue, and cardiopulmonary aspects of the general somatic symptom burden. Somatic symptom burden as measured by the SSS-8 was significantly associated with depression (r = 0.57 [95% CI, 0.54 to 0.60]), anxiety (r = 0.55 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.58]), general health status (r = −0.24 [95% CI, −0.28 to −0.20]), and health care use (incidence rate ratio, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.10 to 1.14]). The SSS-8 severity categories were calculated in accordance with percentile ranks: no to minimal (0-3 points), low (4-7 points), medium (8-11 points), high (12-15 points), and very high (16-32 points) somatic symptom burden. For every SSS-8 severity category increase, there was a 53% (95% CI, 44% to 63%) increase in health care visits.Conclusions and Relevance The SSS-8 is a reliable and valid self-report measure of somatic symptom burden. Cutoff scores identify individuals with low, medium, high, and very high somatic symptom burden.