ArticlePublisher preview available

Overview of Emissions at Montreal’s Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport and Impact of Local Weather on Related Pollutant Concentrations

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

This study used AEDT 2.d to estimate the pollutant emissions at Montreal’s Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport (YUL) for 2015 while quantifying the impact of the airport’s taxi time and atmospheric conditions on aircraft emissions. Using the more airport-specific parameters available and ICAO standard values otherwise, the yearly emissions of NOx, HC, CO, PM10, SOx, and CO2 at YUL were, respectively, 7.64 102, 1.18 102, 1.33 103, 1.35 101, 6.77 101, and 2.31 105 tonnes/year. The results show that reducing aircraft taxi time by 31 % reduced aircraft emissions by 6 % (NOx) and 27 % (CO). Atmospheric conditions impact aircraft emissions of NOx, CO and HC with a seasonal effect. Summer conditions reduced NOx emissions by 5 % and increased CO emissions by 2 %, while winter conditions reduced HC and CO emissions by approximately 15 % and increased NOx emissions by 1 %. To further investigate the impact of atmospheric conditions, dispersion calculations of NOx and CO emissions were carried out using identical air-traffic and weather data from the warmest and coldest weeks in 2015. The results demonstrate that pollutant concentrations were higher during the winter and that pollutants were also dispersed further during the winter than the summer according to the dominant wind direction. A 1-h NOx and CO concentrations greater than 10 μg/m3 were found up to 24 km and 30 km, respectively, away during the winter compared to 14 km and 20 km during the summer. Yet, local air quality standards were satisfied as pollutant concentrations found outside the airport enclosure were below those standards.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Overview of Emissions at Montreals Pierre Elliott
Trudeau International Airport and Impact of Local
Weather on Related Pollutant Concentrations
Thomas Henry-Lheureux &Patrice Seers &
Weeded Ghedhaïfi &François Garnier
Received: 23 November 2020 /Accepted: 18 March 2021
#The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021
Abstract This study used AEDT 2.d to estimate the
pollutant emissions at Montreals Pierre Elliott Trudeau
International Airport (YUL) for 2015 while quantifying
the impact of the airports taxi time and atmospheric
conditions on aircraft emissions. Using the more airport-
specific parameters available and ICAO standard values
otherwise, the yearly emissions of NOx, HC, CO, PM
10
,
SOx, and CO
2
at YUL were, respectively, 7.64 10
2
,1.18
10
2
,1.3310
3
,1.3510
1
,6.7710
1
, and 2.31 10
5
tonnes/
year. The results show that reducing aircraft taxi time by
31 % reduced aircraft emissions by 6 % (NOx) and 27 %
(CO). Atmospheric conditions impact aircraft emissions
of NOx, CO and HC with a seasonal effect. Summer
conditions reduced NOx emissions by 5 % and in-
creased CO emissions by 2 %, while winter conditions
reduced HC and CO emissions by approximately 15 %
and increased NOx emissions by 1 %. To further inves-
tigate the impact of atmospheric conditions, dispersion
calculations of NOx and CO emissions were carried out
using identical air-traffic and weather data from the
warmest and coldest weeks in 2015. The results dem-
onstrate that pollutant concentrationswere higher during
the winter and that pollutants were also dispersed further
during the winter than the summer according to the
dominant wind direction. A 1-h NOx and CO concen-
trations greater than 10 μg/m
3
were found up to 24 km
and 30 km, respectively, away during the winter com-
pared to 14 km and 20 km during the summer. Yet, local
air quality standards were satisfied as pollutant concen-
trations found outside the airport enclosure were below
those standards.
Keywords Air quality modeling .Airport emissions
inventory .Environment .Air pollution
1Introduction
Formerly estimated to 3.6 % (International Air
Transport Association, 2017), worldwide average annu-
al growth in air passengers has recently been revised to
3.7 %. North America and Europe regions have the
lowest growing rates of 2.2 % whereas the Pacific Asia,
the Middle East, and Africa present the highest rates of
5.0 % for Asia and 4.4 % for theMiddle East and Africa
(International Air Transport Association, 2020). Such
ongoing growth comes with an unavoidable increase in
related gaseous and particulate emissions, not only by
aircraft, but all airport-related activities such as ground
support equipment (GSE) or ground access vehicles
(GAVs). These higher emission rates influence the
air quality in the planetary boundary layer
(International Civil Aviation Organization, 2011)
and climate conditions due to induced radiative
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-021-05087-2
T. Henry-Lheureux (*):P. Seers :F. Garnier
Department of Mechanical Engineering, École de Technologie
Supérieure, 1100 Rue Notre-Dame Ouest, Montréal, Québec H3C
1K3, Canada
e-mail: thomas.henry-lheureux.1@ens.etsmtl.ca
W. Ghedhaïfi
Fundamental and Applied Energetics Department, ONERA - The
French Aerospace Lab, 8 Chemin de la Hunière, 91120 Palaiseau,
France
/ Published online: 19 April 2021
Water Air Soil Pollut (2021) 232: 173
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... To compensate for the shortcomings inherent in flow representation, they usually integrate complex dispersion processes (Tominaga & Stathopoulos, 2013); e.g., atmospheric stratification, buoyancy, chemistry, deposition, and concentration fluctuations. Gaussian models were used in airport environments (Celikel et al., 2004;Henry-Lheureux et al., 2021;Mazaheri et al., 2011;Winther et al., 2015;Yang et al., 2018;Yim et al., 2013) to develop a comprehensive formal assessment of emission inventories (aircraft main engines, APUs, ground-support equipment (GSE), ground-access vehicles (GAVs), private vehicle, stationary sources, etc.), because they are designed to enable different sources of pollutants (Winther et al., 2015) (main engines, APUs, GSE, etc.). For example, a Gaussian model was used to study NO x and CO emissions from Montreal's international airport (YUL) (Henry-Lheureux et al., 2021). ...
... Gaussian models were used in airport environments (Celikel et al., 2004;Henry-Lheureux et al., 2021;Mazaheri et al., 2011;Winther et al., 2015;Yang et al., 2018;Yim et al., 2013) to develop a comprehensive formal assessment of emission inventories (aircraft main engines, APUs, ground-support equipment (GSE), ground-access vehicles (GAVs), private vehicle, stationary sources, etc.), because they are designed to enable different sources of pollutants (Winther et al., 2015) (main engines, APUs, GSE, etc.). For example, a Gaussian model was used to study NO x and CO emissions from Montreal's international airport (YUL) (Henry-Lheureux et al., 2021). The study investigated the impact of both air traffic and GAVs on the whole island of Montreal (56 × 40 km) discretized with a spatial resolution of 110 m. Results under different atmospheric conditions show that pollutants were dispersed further and their concentrations higher during the winter season than in the summer season. ...
... The instantaneous fields allowed for the monitoring of transient emissions during aircraft traffic, which helped to better understand differences observed at different regimes and in different LTO operation zones. Local air quality, however, has been reported on most often in the literature using averaged fields over a specified time interval to estimate chronical effects (Zimmer & Larsen, 1965) (see for example studies Henry-Lheureux et al., 2021;Koulidis et al., 2020;Popescu et al., 2011)). As such, hourly mean concentrations are presented in Fig. 11 under stable atmospheric conditions. ...
Article
Full-text available
Pollutant emissions from aircraft operations contribute to the degradation of air quality in and around airports. Meeting the ICAO’s environmental certification standards regarding both gaseous and particulate aircraft engine emissions is one of the main challenges for air-transportation development over the coming years. To increase the accuracy of airport air pollution monitoring and prediction, advanced decision-making tools need to be developed. In this context, the present study aimed at demonstrating the modeling capabilities of an innovative methodology that accounts for the microscale evolution of aircraft emissions, both spatially and temporally. For this purpose, 3D high-resolution CFD simulations were carried out in the CAEPport configuration (medium-size mock airport) as defined by the Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection (CAEP/8) for local air-quality assessment. The modeled domain extends up to 8 km around the airport. A spatial resolution down to 1 m was used around buildings to refine the prediction of pollutant-emission concentrations. The model accounts for ambient meteorological conditions along with the background chemical composition. NOx emissions from main engines and auxiliary power units (APUs) were individually tracked along LTO trajectories with a time resolution down to 1 s. The impact of atmospheric stability was investigated in three cases, i.e., stable, neutral, and unstable. The results show NO2 dominating in apron areas due to the low power setting of main engines along APU contribution during extended parking. Conversely, a domination of NO emissions was observed at the runway threshold due to the high power setting of the main engines. Stable atmospheric conditions promoted higher NO and NO2 concentrations as compared to both neutral and unstable cases. The use of APUs contributed to higher concentrations of both NO and NO2 emissions and especially of NO2 in terminal areas.
... The nearest station, Gu'an Li Hu Primary School (GLHPS), was most affected by emissions from PKX, where the average concentrations of CO, NO X , and HC were 0.74, 0.72, and 0.08 μg/m 3 , respectively. This is likely because winter weather conditions are not conducive to the spread of pollutants (Henry-Lheureux et al., 2021). The Daxing International Airport area is dominated by northeastern winds in winter, whereas the GLHPS site is downwind of the airport, resulting in higher annual concentrations of pollutants than at several other monitoring sites. ...
Article
The Beijing Daxing International Airport is a newly opened airport, and a comprehensive emission inventory of air pollution sources has not yet been established. The lack of basic inventory data will cause difficulties in controlling the air quality (AQ) in and around the airport. Based on actual flight data, we established a comprehensive emission inventory (carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOX), hydrocarbons (HC), sulfur dioxide (SO2), particulate matter (PM), and carbon dioxide (CO2)) at Beijing Daxing International Airport. Furthermore, we evaluated the impact of airport emissions on the AQ of the surrounding areas using the ADMS-Airport model. The results showed that Beijing Daxing International Airport emitted 1.15 E+03, 1.76 E+03, 1.38 E+02, 1.16 E+02, 3.53 E+01, and 3.75 E+05 t of CO, NOX, HC, SO2, PM, and CO2, respectively, from July 1, 2020, to June 30, 2021. Engine exhaust emissions (landing and takeoff [LTO] cycles) dominated all airport pollutant emissions except for PM from the power plant. Among all aircraft types, B738 emitted the most CO2, as it accounted for almost half of all the flights. The AQ simulations showed that the air pollutant diffusion range was concentrated within 15 km of the airport and the surrounding areas. The contribution of airport emissions to NOX concentrations was most apparent under the most unfavorable meteorological conditions. Based on the average pollutant concentration during the study period, the Gu'an Li Hu Primary School station was the most affected. In particular, NOX concentrations at this station were approximately 50% higher in winter than in summer. Currently, the airport's contribution to pollution in the surrounding areas is insignificant. However, with the continuous increase in the number of flights at the airport, its impact on the AQ in the surrounding areas must be addressed in the future.
Article
Many studies have investigated air-traffic impact on airport air quality through main-engine emissions, however very few have characterized the APU-related impact. As field-monitoring remains limited, our study used CFD simulations to provide a high-fidelity representation of 19 APU dispersion plumes in a realistic airport configuration. Results of three dominant wind configurations show that the global dispersion plume (from all APUs) was transported by incident winds. Depending on wind direction, pollutant trapping within a large downwash region was observed downstream of the terminal-building. Local differences were observed depending on source locations; emissions within the downwash region were pushed against the terminal-facade which promoted emission spillover on terminal-roof, while plumes within the unperturbed boundary layer were transported by incident winds. Quantitatively, APU pollutant concentrations dropped overall by 3–4 orders of magnitude around the terminal-building, while diluted concentrations by 5–6 orders of magnitude were monitored at the airport exit. Given source concentrations with an appropriate experimental apparatus, this model can serve as an airport air quality decision-making tool to finely characterize individual source impacts. Such information can help assist airport operation management (taxi to gate/runway, gate assignment, safe corridors for ground-handling personnel) so as to reduce/prevent the impact of pollutant hot spots depending on wind configurations.
Article
Full-text available
Airports are identified hotspots for air pollution, notably for fine particles (PM2.5) that are pivotal in aerosol-cloud interaction processes of climate change and human health. We herein studied the field observation and statistical analysis of 10-year data of PM2.5 and selected emitted co-pollutants (CO, NOx, and O3), in the vicinity of three major Canadian airports, with moderate to cold climates. The decadal data analysis indicated that in colder climate airports, pollutants like PM2.5 and CO accumulate disproportionally to their emissions in fall and winter, in comparison to airports in milder climates. Decadal daily averages and standard errors of PM2.5 concentrations were as follows: Vancouver, 5.31 ± 0.017; Toronto, 6.71 ± 0.199; and Montreal, 7.52 ± 0.023 μg/m³. The smallest and the coldest airport with the least flights/passengers had the highest PM2.5 concentration. QQQ-ICP-MS/MS and HR-S/TEM analysis of aerosols near Montreal Airport indicated a wide range of emerging contaminants (Cd, Mo, Co, As, Ni, Cr, and Pb) ranging from 0.90 to 622 μg/L, which were also observed in the atmosphere. During the lockdown, a pronounced decrease in the concentrations of PM2.5 and submicron particles, including nanoparticles, in residential areas close to airports was observed, conforming with the recommended workplace health thresholds (~ 2 × 10⁴ cm⁻³), while before the lockdown, condensable particles were up to ~ 1 × 10⁵ cm⁻³. Targeted reduction of PM2.5 emission is recommended for cold climate regions. Graphical abstract
Article
Full-text available
This study examined the impacts of aircraft emissions during the landing and takeoff cycle on PM2.5 concentrations during the months of June and July 2002 at the Hartsfield–Jackson Atlanta International Airport. Primary and secondary pollutants were modeled using the Advanced Modeling System for Transport, Emissions, Reactions, and Deposition of Atmospheric Matter (AMSTERDAM). AMSTERDAM is a modified version of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model that incorporates a plume-in-grid process to simulate emissions sources of interest at a finer scale than can be achieved using CMAQ's model grid. Three fundamental issues were investigated: the effects of aircraft on PM2.5 concentrations throughout northern Georgia, the differences resulting from use of AMSTERDAM's plume-in-grid process rather than a traditional CMAQ simulation, and the concentrations observed in aircraft plumes at subgrid scales. Comparison of model results with an air quality monitor located in the vicinity of the airport found that normalized mean bias ranges from −77.5% to 6.2% and normalized mean error ranges from 40.4% to 77.5%, varying by species. Aircraft influence average PM2.5 concentrations by up to 0.232 μg m−3 near the airport and by 0.001–0.007 μg m−3 throughout the Atlanta metro area. The plume-in-grid process increases concentrations of secondary PM pollutants by 0.005–0.020 μg m−3 (compared to the traditional grid-based treatment) but reduces the concentration of non-reactive primary PM pollutants by up to 0.010 μg m−3, with changes concentrated near the airport. Examination of subgrid-scale results indicates that median aircraft contribution to grid cells is higher than median puff concentration in the airport's grid cell and outside of a 20 km × 20 km square area centered on the airport, while in a 12 km × 12 km square ring centered on the airport, puffs have median concentrations over an order of magnitude higher than aircraft contribution to the grid cells. Maximum puff impacts are seen within the 12 km × 12 km ring, not in the airport's own grid cell, while maximum grid cell impacts occur within the airport's grid cell. Twenty-one (21)% of all aircraft-related puffs from the Atlanta airport have at least 0.1 μg m−3 PM2.5 concentrations. Near the airport, median daily puff concentrations vary between 0.017 and 0.134 μg m−3 (0.05 and 0.35 μg m−3 at ground level), while maximum daily puff concentrations vary between 6.1 and 42.1 μg m−3 (7.5 and 42.1 μg m−3 at ground level) during the 2-month period. In contrast, median daily aircraft contribution to grid concentrations varies between 0.015 and 0.091 μg m−3 (0.09 and 0.40 μg m−3 at ground level), while the maximum varies between 0.75 and 2.55 μg m−3 (0.75 and 2.0 μg m−3 at ground level). Future researchers may consider using a plume-in-grid process, such as the one used here, to understand the impacts of aircraft emissions at other airports, for proposed future airports, for airport expansion projects under various future scenarios, and for other national-scale studies specifically when the maximum impacts at fine scales are of interest.
Article
Full-text available
This paper presents an application of the EDMS dispersion modeling system to airport air quality calculations. The EDMS system is a combined emissions and dispersion model which can be used to produce an inventory of emissions generated at Budapest Ferihegy Airport, as well as to calculate pollutant concentrations on and around the airport. Calculated yearly average NOx and CO concentration distributions over the area of the airport are presented. Calculated hourly average NOx and CO concentration values are compared with observed air pollution concentrations and meteorological data, which were measured during three measurement campaigns held in the area of Budapest Ferihegy Airport.
Article
Beijing Capital International Airport (ZBAA) is the world's second busiest airport. In this study, the emissions of air pollutants from aircraft and other sources at ZBAA in 2015 were estimated using an improved method, which considered the mixing layer height calculated based on aircraft meteorological data relay (AMDAR), instead of using the height (915 m) recommended by ICAO. The yearly emissions of NOx, CO, VOCs, SO2, and PM2.5 at the airport were 8.76 × 10³, 4.43 × 10³, 5.43 × 10², 4.80 × 10², and 1.49 × 10² ton/year, respectively. The spatial–temporal distribution of aircraft emissions was systematically analyzed to understand the emission characteristics of aircraft. The results indicated that NOx was mainly emitted during the take-off and climb phases, accounting for 20.5% and 55.5% of the total emissions. CO and HC were mainly emitted during the taxi phase, accounting for 91.6% and 92.2% of the total emissions. Because the mixing layer height was high in summer, the emissions of aircraft were at the highest level throughout the year. Based on the detailed emissions inventory, four seasons simulation using WRF-CMAQ model was performed over the domain surrounding the airport. The results indicated that the contribution to PM2.5 was relatively high in winter; the average impact was about 1.15 μg/m³ within a radius of 1 km around the airport. Meanwhile, the near surroundings and southwest areas of the airport are the most sensitive to PM2.5.
Conference Paper
Recent investigations have indicated that aircraft engine exhaust emissions are sensitive to ambient conditions. This paper reports on combustor rig testing intended to evaluate variations due to ambient temperature and pressure with special emphasis on idle engine operating conditions. Empirically determined CO, CxHy, and NOx correction factors — the ratio of the pollutant emission index value obtained during standard day operation to that resulting during actual ambient conditions — are presented. The effects of engine idle cycle pressure ratio, primary zone fuel-air ratio, and fuel type were investigated. Ambient temperature variations were seen to cause substantial emission changes; correction factors in excess of 2.0 were determined in some cases. Ambient pressure variations were found to be less substantial. A previously published NOx emission model and a simplified hydrocarbon combustion analysis are shown to be in general agreement with the empirical results. Copyright © 1976 by ASME Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal
Conference Paper
Analysis of existing gaseous emissions data from gas turbines has shown that a substantial improvement in data correlation is possible. These correlations serve to increase confidence in the data, identify out-of-control points, and facilitate comparisons between engine models. Furthermore, the NOx correlation implies that a simplified primary zone mathematical model may be used to formulate trends or influence coefficients, which may be used to adjust experimental data to a common base for comparison to a specification. Finally, the presence of water vapor in the combustion air is seen to have a noticeable effect on NOx emissions. This effect should be accounted for in comparing experimental results. Copyright © 1972 by ASME Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal
Conference Paper
In recent years there has been increasing interest in quantifying the emissions from aircraft in order to generate inventories of emissions for climate models, technology and scenario studies, and inventories of emissions for airline fleets typically presented in environmental reports. The preferred method for calculating aircraft engine emissions of NOx, HC, and CO is the proprietary "P3T3" method. This method relies on proprietary airplane and engine performance models along with proprietary engine emissions characterizations. In response and in order to provide a transparent method for calculating aircraft engine emissions non proprietary fuel flow based methods 1,2,3 have been developed. This paper presents derivation, updates, and clarifications of the fuel flow method methodology known as "Fuel Flow Method 2". While not as rigorous as the P3T3 method used for emissions certification, fuel flow methods can give reasonable approximations of emissions on the order of ± 10 to 15% for NOx as compared to the P3T3 method. In depth studies of variation for HC and CO have not been undertaken, though a limited examination of the data indicates a much broader spread, with a range on the low end similar to NOx, while up to almost a factor of two on the high end, depending on engine and thrust rating.
Article
The risk of air quality degradation is of considerable concern particularly for those airports that are located near urban areas. The ability to quantitatively predict the effects of air pollutants originated by airport operations is important for assessing air quality and the related impacts on human health. Current emission regulations have focused on local air quality in the proximity of airports. However, an integrated study should consider the effects of meteorological events, at both regional and local level, that can affect the dispersion and the deposition of exhausts. Rigorous scientific studies and extensive experimental data could contribute to the analysis of the impacts of airports expansion plans. This paper is focused on the analysis of the effects of meteorology on aircraft emission for the Marco Polo Airport in Venice. This is the most important international airport in the eastern part of the Po' Valley, one of the most polluted area in Europe. Air pollution is exacerbated by meteorology that is a combination of large and local scale effects that do not allow significant dispersion. Moreover, the airport is located near Venice, a city of noteworthy cultural and architectural relevance, and nearby the lagoon that hosts several areas of outstanding ecological importance at European level (Natura 2000 sites). Dispersion and deposit of the main aircraft exhausts (NOx, HC and CO) have been evaluated by using a Lagrangian particle model. Spatial and temporal aircraft exhaust dispersion has been analyzed for LTO cycle. Aircraft taxiing resulted to be the most impacting aircraft operation especially for the airport working area and its surroundings, however occasionally peaks may be observed even at high altitudes when cruise mode starts. Mixing height can affect concentrations more significantly than the concentrations in the exhausts themselves. An increase of HC and CO concentrations (15-50%) has been observed during specific meteorological events.
Article
The air quality impact of an airport due to both ground sources and air traffic emissions within the troposphere boundary layer is a relevant topic at a local scale, especially where the airport is surrounded by urbanized areas. The work analyses the emissions from the Amerigo Vespucci airport in Florence, Italy. The comparison between the present and the future layout of the airport, which is under project, is addressed, providing a possible tool to guide local air pollution prevention strategies within the framework of the strategic transport infrastructures development. The emission scenarios of the present and future airport layouts were estimated with EDMS 5.1.3, the software package issued by FAA (Federal Aviation Administration) which is an US-EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) preferred model for airport emissions evaluation. The total yearly emissions of NOX; CO; SOX; VOCs and PM10 have been assessed, divided into the main phases of the LTO (landing and takeoff) cycle, provided for each aircraft. The results show that the takeoff phase is mainly responsible for NOX; SOX and PM10 contributions. The AERMOD dispersion model was run over one year to evaluate the concentrations of those pollutants, modelled as chemically inert. The maximum concentrations occur close to the gate and the ground movement areas. However, the air quality standards ruled by Directive 50/2008/EU are never reached except for NOX, which shows an overall maximum of the annual average close to the standard for the vegetation health.
Article
In a hot summer climate, as in Kuwait and other Arabian Gulf countries, the performance of a gas turbine deteriorates drastically during the high-temperature hours (up to 60°C in Kuwait). Power demand is the highest at these times. This necessitates an increase in installed gas turbine capacities to balance this deterioration. Gas turbines users are becoming aware of this problem as they depend more on gas turbines to satisfy their power needs and process heat for desalination due to the recent technical and economical development of gas turbines. This paper is devoted to studying the impact of atmospheric conditions, such as ambient temperature, pressure, and relative humidity on gas turbine performance. The reason for considering air pressures different from standard atmospheric pressure at the compressor inlet is the variation of this pressure with altitude. The results of this study can be generalized to include the cases of flights at high altitudes. A fully interactive computer program based on the derived governing equations is developed. The effects of typical variations of atmospheric conditions on power output and efficiency are considered. These include ambient temperature (range from −20 to 60°C), altitude (range from zero to 2000 m above sea level), and relative humidity (range from zero to 100 percent). The thermal efficiency and specific net work of a gas turbine were calculated at different values of maximum turbine inlet temperature (TIT) and variable environmental conditions. The value of TIT is a design factor that depends on the material specifications and the fuel/air ratio. Typical operating values of TIT in modern gas turbines were chosen for this study: 1000, 1200, 1400, and 1600 K. Both partial and full loads were considered in the analysis. Finally the calculated results were compared with actual gas turbine data supplied by manufacturers.