A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Water Air and Soil Pollution
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Overview of Emissions at Montreal’s Pierre Elliott
Trudeau International Airport and Impact of Local
Weather on Related Pollutant Concentrations
Thomas Henry-Lheureux &Patrice Seers &
Weeded Ghedhaïfi &François Garnier
Received: 23 November 2020 /Accepted: 18 March 2021
#The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021
Abstract This study used AEDT 2.d to estimate the
pollutant emissions at Montreal’s Pierre Elliott Trudeau
International Airport (YUL) for 2015 while quantifying
the impact of the airport’s taxi time and atmospheric
conditions on aircraft emissions. Using the more airport-
specific parameters available and ICAO standard values
otherwise, the yearly emissions of NOx, HC, CO, PM
10
,
SOx, and CO
2
at YUL were, respectively, 7.64 10
2
,1.18
10
2
,1.3310
3
,1.3510
1
,6.7710
1
, and 2.31 10
5
tonnes/
year. The results show that reducing aircraft taxi time by
31 % reduced aircraft emissions by 6 % (NOx) and 27 %
(CO). Atmospheric conditions impact aircraft emissions
of NOx, CO and HC with a seasonal effect. Summer
conditions reduced NOx emissions by 5 % and in-
creased CO emissions by 2 %, while winter conditions
reduced HC and CO emissions by approximately 15 %
and increased NOx emissions by 1 %. To further inves-
tigate the impact of atmospheric conditions, dispersion
calculations of NOx and CO emissions were carried out
using identical air-traffic and weather data from the
warmest and coldest weeks in 2015. The results dem-
onstrate that pollutant concentrationswere higher during
the winter and that pollutants were also dispersed further
during the winter than the summer according to the
dominant wind direction. A 1-h NOx and CO concen-
trations greater than 10 μg/m
3
were found up to 24 km
and 30 km, respectively, away during the winter com-
pared to 14 km and 20 km during the summer. Yet, local
air quality standards were satisfied as pollutant concen-
trations found outside the airport enclosure were below
those standards.
Keywords Air quality modeling .Airport emissions
inventory .Environment .Air pollution
1Introduction
Formerly estimated to 3.6 % (International Air
Transport Association, 2017), worldwide average annu-
al growth in air passengers has recently been revised to
3.7 %. North America and Europe regions have the
lowest growing rates of 2.2 % whereas the Pacific Asia,
the Middle East, and Africa present the highest rates of
5.0 % for Asia and 4.4 % for theMiddle East and Africa
(International Air Transport Association, 2020). Such
ongoing growth comes with an unavoidable increase in
related gaseous and particulate emissions, not only by
aircraft, but all airport-related activities such as ground
support equipment (GSE) or ground access vehicles
(GAVs). These higher emission rates influence the
air quality in the planetary boundary layer
(International Civil Aviation Organization, 2011)
and climate conditions due to induced radiative
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-021-05087-2
T. Henry-Lheureux (*):P. Seers :F. Garnier
Department of Mechanical Engineering, École de Technologie
Supérieure, 1100 Rue Notre-Dame Ouest, Montréal, Québec H3C
1K3, Canada
e-mail: thomas.henry-lheureux.1@ens.etsmtl.ca
W. Ghedhaïfi
Fundamental and Applied Energetics Department, ONERA - The
French Aerospace Lab, 8 Chemin de la Hunière, 91120 Palaiseau,
France
/ Published online: 19 April 2021
Water Air Soil Pollut (2021) 232: 173
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.