A preview of this full-text is provided by American Psychological Association.
Content available from Psychology of Religion and Spirituality
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Religious and Spiritual Struggles and Their Links to Psychological Adjustment:
A Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies
Margaret F. Bockrath
1
, Kenneth I. Pargament
2
, Serena Wong
2
, Valencia A. Harriott
3
, Julie M. Pomerleau
4
,
Steffany J. Homolka
5
, Zyad B. Chaudhary
1
, and Julie J. Exline
6
1
Mercy Health Family Medicine Residency Program, Toledo, Ohio, United States
2
Department of Psychology, Bowling Green State University
3
Department of Psychiatry, Psychology Division, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
4
John D. Dingell VAMC, Detroit, Michigan, United States
5
Children’s Advocacy Center of Greater West Texas, San Angelo, Texas, United States
6
Department of Psychological Sciences, Case Western Reserve University
In light of a growing body of longitudinal research on religious and spiritual (r/s) struggles and adjustment, a
meta-analysis was conducted in order to synthesize literature on whether r/s struggles predict decrements in
psychological adjustment over time. Multiple databases were searched for journal articles and dissertations
reporting on studies that met inclusion criteria. For each study, necessary statistical information was
extracted to calculate or estimate the standardized regression coefficient predicting follow-up psychological
adjustment from baseline r/s struggles, controlling only for autoregressive effects. The search and screening
process yielded 32 studies meeting inclusion criteria for which the necessary statistics were able to be
extracted or obtained from study authors. Results indicated that r/s struggles significantly predicted
increases in negative psychological adjustment (32 studies), Z
r
=0.08, 95% CI [0.04, 0.10]. Results
for positive psychological adjustment were non-significant (12 studies), Z
r
=−0.04, 95% CI [−0.11, 0.03].
These findings are consistent with a primary r/s struggles model in which r/s struggles lead to worsening
psychological adjustment. This study underscores the importance of attending to spiritual struggles within
clinical practice. Future studies on this topic could add to our understanding by examining longer time
frames and testing secondary and complex models of the longitudinal relationship between r/s struggles and
psychological adjustment.
Keywords: religion, spirituality, psychological adjustment, meta-analysis, longitudinal studies
Introduction
Although many studies of religion and spirituality (r/s) have
linked a variety of r/s expressions to indicators of psychological
adjustment (e.g., Koenig, King, & Carson, 2012), some aspects of
r/s may be more problematic. In the last 25 years, a growing body of
research has focused on one such form of r/s: r/s struggles. Many
studies have demonstrated robust ties between higher levels of r/s
struggles and lower levels of psychological adjustment (e.g., Abu-
Raiya, Pargament, Krause, et al., 2015;Currier et al., 2017;Ellison
& Lee, 2010;McConnell et al., 2015;Ogden et al., 2011). The
majority of this research, however, has been cross-sectional in
design, leaving unanswered questions about whether r/s struggles
may contribute to poorer adjustment over time. In this paper, we
present the results of a meta-analysis that focuses specifically on
longitudinal studies of r/s struggles and considers the degree to
which r/s struggles measured at baseline are predictive of changes in
adjustment over time.
Defining and Measuring R/S Struggles
R/s struggles have been defined as tensions, conflicts, and nega-
tive emotions around sacred matters (Exline, 2013;Pargament,
2007;Pargament et al., 2005). More specifically, r/s struggles
may be supernatural, intrapsychic, or interpersonal in nature; that
is, they may center around conflicts with supernatural forces, such as
God and the demonic, tensions within oneself about moral issues,
doubts about religion, questions of ultimate meaning, and conflicts
with other people about r/s issues.
A number of measures have been used to assess r/s struggles.
Some of these scales focus on specific types and contexts of r/s
struggles (e.g., struggling with particular life stressors). For exam-
ple, the Religious Conflict Scale assesses doubts about one’s
religion (Funk, 1958). The Penn Inventory of Scrupulosity
(Abramowitz et al., 2002) measures fears about having committed
sins and being punished by God. The Inventory of Complicated
Spiritual Grief (Burke et al., 2014) measures r/s struggles with the
divine and other people in the context of bereavement. Other scales
assess a wider range of r/s struggles. Bryant and Astin (2008)
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
This article was published Online First March 29, 2021.
Margaret F. Bockrath https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1616-4347
Serena Wong https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7837-6468
Valencia A. Harriott https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9654-3031
We are grateful for funding support from the John Templeton Foundation,
grants #36094 and #59916.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Margaret
F. Bockrath, Mercy Health Family Medicine Residency Program, 2200
Jefferson Avenue, Toledo, OH 43604, United States. Email: mfeuill@
bgsu.edu
Psychology of Religion and Spirituality
© 2021 American Psychological Association 2022, Vol. 14, No. 3, 283–299
ISSN: 1941-1022 https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000400
283
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.