ArticlePDF Available

Initial Arterial pCO2 and Its Course in the First Hours of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Show No Association with Recovery of Consciousness in Humans: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Background: Cardiac arrest is a severe condition with high mortality rates, especially in the case of prolonged low-flow durations resulting in severe ischaemia and reperfusion injury. Changes in partial carbon dioxide concentration (pCO2) may aggravate this injury. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) shortens the low-flow duration and enables close regulation of pCO2. We examined whether pCO2 is associated with recovery of consciousness. Methods: We retrospectively analysed ECPR patients ≥ 16 years old treated between 2010 and 2019. We evaluated initial arterial pCO2 and the course of pCO2 ≤ 6 h after initiation of ECPR. The primary outcome was the rate of recovery of consciousness, defined as Glasgow coma scale motor score of six. Results: Out of 99 ECPR patients, 84 patients were eligible for this study. The mean age was 47 years, 63% were male, 93% had a witnessed arrest, 45% had an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and 38% had a recovery of consciousness. Neither initial pCO2 (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval 95% (CI) 0.78-1.08) nor maximum decrease of pCO2 (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.95-1.13) was associated with the recovery of consciousness. Conclusion: Initial arterial pCO2 and the course of pCO2 in the first six hours after initiation of ECPR were not associated with the recovery of consciousness.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Membranes2021,11,208.https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11030208www.mdpi.com/journal/membranes
Article
InitialArterialpCO
2
anditsCourseintheFirstHours
ofExtracorporealCardiopulmonaryResuscitationShowNo
AssociationwithRecoveryofConsciousnessinHumans:
ASingleCentreRetrospectiveStudy
LoesMandigers
1,
*,CorstiaanA.denUil
1,2
,JeroenJ.H.Bunge
1,2
,DiederikGommers
1

andDinisdosReisMiranda
1,
*
1
DepartmentofIntensiveCare,ErasmusMCUniversityMedicalCenter,
3015GDRotterdam,TheNetherlands;c.denuil@erasmusmc.nl(C.A.d.U.);j.bunge@erasmusmc.nl(J.J.H.B.);
d.gommers@erasmusmc.nl(D.G.)
2
DepartmentofCardiology,ErasmusMCUniversityMedicalCenter,3015GDRotterdam,TheNetherlands
*Correspondence:l.mandigers@erasmumc.nl(L.M.);d.dosreismiranda@erasmusmc.nl(D.d.R.M.);
Tel.:+310107035142(D.d.R.M.)
Abstract:Background:Cardiacarrestisasevereconditionwithhighmortalityrates,especiallyin
thecaseofprolongedlowflowdurationsresultinginsevereischaemiaandreperfusioninjury.
Changesinpartialcarbondioxideconcentration(pCO
2
)mayaggravatethisinjury.Extracorporeal
cardiopulmonaryresuscitation(ECPR)shortensthelowflowdurationandenablescloseregulation
ofpCO
2
.WeexaminedwhetherpCO
2
isassociatedwithrecoveryofconsciousness.Methods:We
retrospectivelyanalysedECPRpatients≥16yearsoldtreatedbetween2010and2019.Weevaluated
initialarterialpCO
2
andthecourseofpCO
2
≤6hafterinitiationofECPR.Theprimaryoutcomewas
therateofrecoveryofconsciousness,definedasGlasgowcomascalemotorscoreofsix.Results:
Outof99ECPRpatients,84patientswereeligibleforthisstudy.Themeanagewas47years,63%
weremale,93%hadawitnessedarrest,45%hadanoutofhospitalcardiacarrest,and38%hada
recoveryofconsciousness.NeitherinitialpCO
2
(OddsRatio(OR)0.93,95%confidenceinterval95%
(CI)0.78–1.08)normaximumdecreaseofpCO
2
(OR1.03,95%CI0.95–1.13)wasassociatedwiththe
recoveryofconsciousness.Conclusion:InitialarterialpCO
2
andthecourseofpCO
2
inthefirstsix
hoursafterinitiationofECPRwerenotassociatedwiththerecoveryofconsciousness.
Keywords:cardiacarrest;heartarrest;extracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitation;
extracorporealmembraneoxygenation;carbondioxide;outcome
1.Introduction
Survivalandfavourableneurologicalsurvivalaftercardiacarrestarehighly
influencedbylowflowdurationandtheassociatedseverityofischaemiaandreperfusion
injury[1].Thisischaemiaandreperfusioninjuryisinfluencedbythelevelandcourseof
partialoxygenpressure(pO
2
)andpartialcarbondioxidepressure(pCO
2
)duringandafter
cardiopulmonaryresuscitation(CPR)[2].DuringCPR,hypoxemiacausesneuron
ischaemiaandcelldeathwhereashypercapniacausescerebrovascularvasodilatation,
whichmayraiseintracranialpressure[2].Afterregainingcirculation,pO
2
andpCO
2
will
changeimmediately,whichcancontributetoreperfusioninjury.Especiallyinthecaseof
hyperoxemia,oxygenfreeradicalswillbeproducedcausingintracellularoxidation.If
hypocapniaoccurs,thiswillresultincerebrovascularvasoconstriction,causinga
decreasedCBF[2].Clinically,theimportanceofregulatingpO
2
duringandafter
Citation:Mandigers,L.;denUil,
C.A.;Bunge,J.J.H.;Gommers,D.;
dosReisMiranda,D..InitialArterial
pCO
2
andItsCourseintheFirst
HoursofExtracorporeal
CardiopulmonaryResuscitation
ShowNoAssociationwithRecovery
ofConsciousnessinHumans:
ASingleCentreRetrospective
Study.Membranes2021,11,208.
https://doi.org/10.3390/
membranes11030208
AcademicEditor:GennaroMartucci
Received:20February2021
Accepted:9March2021
Published:15March2021
Publisher’sNote:MDPIstays
neutralwithregardtojurisdictional
claimsinpublishedmapsand
institutionalaffiliations.
Copyright:©2021bytheauthors.
LicenseeMDPI,Basel,Switzerland.
Thisarticleisanopenaccessarticle
distributedunderthetermsand
conditionsoftheCreativeCommons
Attribution(CCBY)license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses
/by/4.0/).
Membranes2021,11,2082of10
conventionalCPRhasalreadybeenproven[3–5].However,researchinpCO2valuesis
morelimitedandtheresultsvaryalot[3,5–7].
Inanattempttolimitischaemiaandreperfusioninjury,extracorporeal
cardiopulmonaryresuscitation(ECPR)canbeusedtorestorecirculationtovitalorgans
assoonaspossible.TheuseofthisECPRenablesveryfastoxygenationand
decarboxylation.However,itisnotclearwhetherthesechangesinpO2andpCO2should
occurrapidly.InpatientstreatedwithECPR,hypoxemiaaswellashyperoxemiaare
associatedwithlowersurvivalrates[8,9].Thebestneurologicalsurvivaloutcomesare
seeninpatientswithnormoxia.[8].DespitethepossibleeffectsofpCO2inischaemiaand
reperfusion,limitedstudieshavebeenperformedonthecourseofpCO2duringandafter
ECPR.ArecentstudyshowedthatalargedecreaseofpCO2afterinitiationof
extracorporealmembraneoxygenation(ECMO)forrespiratoryfailureisassociatedwith
neurologicalcomplications[10].
WehypothesisethatinECPR,arapiddecreaseinpCO2couldsimulatetheoccurrence
ofhypocapnia,leadingtocerebralvasoconstriction,whichcouldhaveanegativeimpact
onneurologicaloutcomes.Therefore,theaimofthisstudywastoinvestigatethe
associationbetweenpCO2inthefirsthoursafterinitiationofECPRandtherecoveryof
consciousness.
2.MaterialsandMethods
WeperformedaretrospectivestudyattheErasmusUniversityMedicalCentrein
Rotterdam,theNetherlands.Thishospitalhasalocaldatabaseinwhichalladultpatients
treatedattheemergencydepartmentand/orpatientsof≥16yearsoldadmittedtothe
intensivecareunit(ICU)foradults,treatedwithECMOareregistered.Thestudywas
conductedinaccordancewiththeDeclarationofHelsinki,andtheMedicalEthics
CommitteeoftheErasmusUniversityMedicalCentrereviewedandapprovedthestudy
protocol(numberMEC20190681).Theneedforinformedconsentwaswaived.
2.1.Patients
AllpatientstreatedwithECMOwhoreceivedECPRintheperiod1January2010
until1January2020wereselected.AfterinitiationofECPR,atleastthreearterialblood
gasanalyseswithinthefirst6hhadtobeknown.Weexcludedallpatientswithreturnof
spontaneouscirculation(ROSC)beforeECPRinitiation.Inourhospital,weconsider
ECPRinbothoutofhospitalcardiacarrest(OHCA)andinhospitalcardiacarrest(IHCA)
patientswhenthefollowingcriteriaaremet:age≤70years,witnessedcardiacarrest(last
seen<5min),goodqualityofbasiclifesupport(BLS)oradvancedlifesupport(ALS)
leadingtoanendtidalcarbondioxide>1.33kPa,maximumnoflowtimeof5min,alow
flowdurationof<60minatthestartofECPRplacement,noknownterminalillnesses,and
noimpairmentofdailylivingactivities.
2.2.ECPRProcedure
ECPRplacementwasperformedbyaninterventionalcardiologist,cardiothoracic
surgeonorintensivist,dependingonthelocationwherethepatientresided.This
procedureismostlyperformedpercutaneouslyandultrasoundguided.Inthecasethisis
notsuccessful,orifitisperformedintheoperationroom,itisperformedsurgically.The
cannulasareplacedinthefemoralarteryandfemoralvein.Everypatientreceivesan
antegradecannulainordertoperfusethelegdistallyfromthecannulaplacement.
CannulationwasstartedataminimumCPRdurationof20min.Thedecisiontocontact
theECPRteamwasmadebytheattendingintensivist.ForOHCApatients,wefirststarted
withECPRproceduresinpatientswithmassivepulmonaryembolismasthecauseof
arrest.Startingfrom1February2019,everyOHCApatientcouldbeeligibleforECPR.
Membranes2021,11,2083of10
2.3.MeasuredVariables
Weextractedthefollowingvariables:patientcharacteristics(sex,age,andbodymass
index(BMI));clinicalcharacteristics(AcutePhysiologyandChronicHealthEvaluation
(APACHE)IVscore,witnessedthearrest,OHCA/IHCA,BLS,directlifesupport(i.e.,BLS
orALS);noflowduration,lowflowduration,mechanicalcompressiondevice,primary
cardiacrhythm,locationofarrest,causeofarrest,laboratoryresults,andcomplications);
andoutcomes(primaryoutcome:recoveryofconsciousnessandsecondaryoutcomes:
ECMOsurvival,ICUsurvival,hospitalsurvival,andcauseofdeath).Allknownpre
ECMOdatawerereportedaccordingtotheUtsteincriteria[11].
2.4.StatisticalAnalysis
ThedistributionofthevariableswastestedusingtheShapiro–Wilktest.Normally
distributedcontinuousvariableswerereportedasmeanandstandarddeviation(SD),and
categoricalvariablesasnumbersandpercentages(%).Nonnormallydistributed
continuousvariableswerereportedasmedianandinterquartileranges(IQR).Tostudy
statisticaldifferencesofcontinuousvariables,weusedtheunpairedTtestfornormally
distributedvariablesandtheMann–WhitneyUtestfornonnormallydistributed
variables.Forthecategoricalvariables,weusedtheChi2testortheFisher’sexacttest
dependingonthenumbersineachcell.
ToexaminethepossibleeffectofpCO2onourprimaryoutcome,weperformeda
binarylogisticregressionanalysis.WeincludedthefollowingpCO2values:initialpCO2
valueafterinitiationofEPCR(definedasthefirstarterialpCO2afterstartingECMOflow
orthelastpCO2withinfiveminutesbeforestartingECMOflow),courseofpCO2(defined
astheslopebetweenthefirstandlastpCO2measurementwithin6h),andtheinteraction
betweentheinitialpCO2andthecourseofpCO2.Next,weperformedabinarylogistic
regressionanalysisincludingtheinitialpCO2valueafterinitiationofEPCR,themaximum
decreaseofpCO2(definedasthemaximumpercentageofdecreaseperhourbetweentwo
measurementswithin6hafterinitiationofECPR),andtheinteractionbetweentheinitial
pCO2andthemaximumdecreaseofpCO2.Assensitivityanalyses,weperformedbinary
logisticregressionanalysisforsustainedregainofconsciousnessathospitaldischargeand
expectedaneurologicallyfavourableoutcomeatanytimeafterhospitaldischarge.This
expectedfavourableneurologicaloutcomewasdeterminedbyreviewingpatientcharts.
Apvalue<0.05wasdefinedasstatisticallysignificantandtheanalyseswereperformed
inRstudio,version3.6.0.
3.Results
InourECMOdatabase,99patientsunderwentECPR.Weexcludedpatientswithtwo
orlessarterialbloodgasmeasurementsafterinitiationofECPR(n=11),andweexcluded
patientswithROSCbeforeECPRinitiation(n=4).Atotalof84patientswereincludedin
thisstudy,ofwhich32(38%)hadarecoveryofconsciousnessattheICU.Patient
characteristics,clinicalcharacteristics,andoutcomesareshowninTable1.
Table1.Characteristicsofextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitation(ECPR)patientsfor
patientswhodidanddidnotexperiencearecoveryofconsciousness.
Total
Recoveryof
Consciousness
(N=32)
NoRecoveryof
Consciousness
(N=56)
pValue
Patientnumber
(%)8432(38.1)52(61.9)

Patient
characteristics

Membranes2021,11,2084of10
Ageinyears(SD)46.9(15.6)47.1(15.5)46.7(15.7)0.91
Sex;Male(%)53(63.1)19(59.4)34(65.4)0.75
BMI(IQR)26.3(24.6–29.8)26.5(25.2–30.1)25.8(24.5–29.4)0.40

Clinical
characteristics

APACHEIV
score(SD)
(MissingN=36)
112(31)110(36)113(27)0.74
Witnessedarrest
(%)78(92.9)31(96.9)47(90.4)0.40
OHCA(%)38(45.2)13(40.6)25(48.1)0.66
BLS(%)37(44.0)15(46.9)22(42.3)0.85
Directlife
support(%)79(94.0)30(93.8)49(94.2)1.00
Noflowin
minutes(IQR)0(0–0)0(0–0)0(0–0)0.25
Totallowflow
durationin
minutes(IQR)
(MissingN=3)
51.0(37.0–80.0)45.0(30.0–76.5)58.0(40.0–84.0)0.24
Mechanical
compression
device,e.g.,
LUCAS(%)
27(32.1)6(18.8)21(41.2)0.06
Primarycardiac
rhythm

Shockable(%)26(31.0)11(34.4)15(29.4)0.82
Ventricular
fibrillation(%)23(27.4)9(28.0)14(28.1)1.00
Ventricular
tachycardia(%)3(3.6)2(6.3)1(2.0)0.56
Nonshockable
(%)57(68.7)21(65.6)36(70.6)0.82
Pulseless
electricalactivity
(%)
47(56.0)20(62.5)27(54.0)0.60
Asystole(%)9(10.7)1(3.1)8(16.0)0.08
Locationofarrest
Home(%)23(27.4)8(25.0)15(28.8)0.90
Public(%)13(15.5)5(15.6)8(15.4)1.00
ICU(%)24(28.6)9(28.1)16(30.8)0.99
Ward(%)10(11.9)3(9.4)7(13.5)0.73
Emergency
department(%)4(4.8)1(3.1)3(5.8)1.00
Operationroom
(%)4(4.8)3(9.4)1(1.9)0.15
Catherisation
laboratory(%)3(3.6)3(9.4)0(0.0)0.14
Other(%)1(1.2)0(0.0)1(1.9)1.00
Membranes2021,11,2085of10
Causeofarrest
Acutecoronary
syndrome(%)25(29.8)12(37.5)13(25.0)0.33
Pulmonary
embolism(%)30(35.7)11(34.4)19(36.5)1.00
Tamponade(%)3(3.6)2(6.3)1(1.9)0.55
Hypothermia/dr
owning(%)5(6.0)1(3.1)4(7.8)0.64
Postcardiac
surgery(%)2(2.4)0(0.0)2(3.8)0.52
Myocarditis(%)3(3.6)2(6.3)1(1.9)0.55
Heartfailure(%)3(3.6)2(6.3)1(1.9)0.55
Hypoxemia(%)2(2.4)0(0.0)2(3.8)0.52
Sepsis(%)2(2.4)1(3.1)1(1.9)1.00
Other(%)7(8.3)0(0.0)7(12.5)0.04
Unknown(%)2(2.4)1(3.1)1(1.9)1.00
Complications
Bleeding(%)56(66.7)24(75)32(61.5)0.30
Limbischaemia
(%)5(6.0)2(6.3)3(5.8)1.00
Cerebrovascular
accident(%)6(7.1)4(12.5)2(3.8)
Cerebral
bleeding(%)5(6.0)3(9.4)2(3.8)0.36
Cerebral
infarction(%)1(1.2)1(3.1)0(0.0)0.38
Infection(%)28(33.3)16(50.0)12(25.0)0.04
Acutekidney
injury(%)43(51.2)21(65.6)23(44.2)0.09
CRRT(%)15(17.9)6(18.8)9(17.3)1.00
Tamponade(%)6(7.1)2(6.3)4(7.7)1.00
Abdominal
compartment
syndrome(%)
4(4.8)1(3.1)3(5.8)1.00

Laboratory
results

InitialpCO2in
kPa(IQR)7.3(5.7–9.9)7.1(5.3–8.9)7.7(6.0–9.9)0.30
CourseofpCO2
in%/h(IQR)
5.22(8.69to
1.99)
4.09(8.38to
1.30)
6.28(8.69to
2.08)0.37
Maximum
decreasepCO2
in%/hour(IQR)
0.67(0.38–1.06)0.58(0.24–1.06)0.72(0.41–0.82)0.43
Maximum
differencepCO2
in%/hour(IQR)
0.52(0.87to
0.39)
0.30(0.88to
0.08)
0.59(0.86to
0.71)0.76
InitialpO2inkPa
(IQR)25.3(10.8–43.5)17.4(9.4–42.5)32.8(11.5–47.1)0.10
Membranes2021,11,2086of10
CourseofpO2
in%/hour(IQR)
6.29(11.65to
9.31)
4.26(12.85to
12.53)
7.15(11.30to
5.97)0.90
InitialpH(IQR)6.96(6.80–7.08)7.07(6.84–7.21)6.90(6.79–7.00)<0.01
CourseofpH
in%/hour(SD)0.68(0.53)0.68(0.48)0.69(0.57)0.98
Initiallactatein
mmol/L(SD)13.7(5.8)12.5(6.0)14.5(5.7)0.14
Courseoflactate
in%/h(IQR)
7.44(11.89to
1.33)
10.38(12.98to
5.06)
6.11(11.12to
5.48)<0.05

Outcomes
ECMOsurvival
(%)32(38.1)28(87.5)4(7.7)<0.01
ICUsurvival(%)25(29.8)24(75.0)1(1.9)<0.01
Hospitalsurvival
(%)24(28.6)23(71.9)1(1.9)

CauseofdeathN=59N=9N=50
Braindeath(%)5(8.5)0(0.0)5(10.0)1.00
Neurology(%)23(39.0)4(44.4)19(38.0)0.73
Cardiac(%)4(6.8)1(11.1)3(6.0)0.49
Haemorrhagic
shock(%)2(3.4)0(0.0)2(4.0)1.00
Multiorgan
disease(%)14(23.7)2(22.2)13(26.0)1.00
Persistingcardiac
arrest(%)2(3.4)0(0.0)2(4.0)1.00
Other(%)7(11.9)2(22.2)5(10.0)0.29
Variableswerereportedasmeanandstandarddeviation(SD),medianandinterquartileranges
(IQR),andnumbersandpercentages(%)whenappropriate.ECPR:extracorporeal
cardiopulmonaryresuscitation,BMI:bodymassindex,APACHE:AcutePhysiologyandChronic
HealthEvaluation,OHCA:outofhospitalcardiacarrest,BLS:basiclifesupport,ICU:intensive
careunit,CRRT:continuousrenalreplacementtherapy,ECMO:extracorporealmembrane
oxygenation,T0:initialtimepoint,Tmax:maximumtimevalueknownwithin6hafterinitiation,
pCO2:partialcarbondioxideconcentration,pO2:partialoxygenconcentration.Bleedingwas
definedaseverycaseofbleedingthatneededanintervention(e.g.,bloodtransfusionorsurgical
repair)andtamponadewasdefinedasbloodinthepericardiumthatneededintervention.
3.1.ClinicalCharacteristics
Themeanageofthepatientswas47years(SD16),andthemajorityofthepatients
weremale(n=53,63%).AlmosthalfofthepatientshadanOHCA(n=38,45%),andin78
patients(93%)thearrestwaswitnessed.Themedianlowflowdurationwas51min(IQR
37–80).Thisdurationdidnotsignificantlydifferbetweenpatientswhorecovered
consciousnessversuspatientswhodidnotrecoverconsciousness.Mostpatientshada
nonshockableprimarycardiacrhythm(n=57,69%).Wefoundnosignificantdifference
intheprimarycardiacrhythmforpatientswithandwithoutrecoveryofconsciousness.
Thecauseofarrestwasprimarilypulmonaryembolism(36%)followedbyacutecoronary
syndrome(30%).
3.2.LaboratoryResults
PatientswiththerecoveryofconsciousnesshadhighermedianpHvalues(7.07,IQR
6.84–7.21)thanpatientswithouttherecoveryofconsciousness(6.90,IQR6.79–7.00,p<
Membranes2021,11,2087of10
0.01).NodifferenceswereseenininitialpO2values(p=0.10)andinitiallactatevalues(p
=0.14)forpatientswiththerecoveryofconsciousnessandpatientswithouttherecovery
ofconsciousness.ThedecreaseinlactatevaluesfrominitiationofECPRuntilsixhours
afterinitiationofECPRwassignificantlyhigherinpatientswiththerecoveryof
consciousness(10.38%/h,IQR12.98–5.06)thaninpatientswithouttherecoveryof
consciousness(6.11%/hIQR11.12–5.48,p<0.05).Nosignificantdifferenceswerefoundin
changesofpHandpO2valuesfrominitiationofECPRuntilsixhoursafterinitiationof
ECPR.
3.3.Outcomes
Intotal,32patients(38%)couldbeweanedfromtheECMO:28(33%)ofthesepatients
recoveredconsciousness.Twentyfivepatients(30%)survivedICUadmission,and24
patients(29%)surviveduntilhospitaldischarge.Ofthose,onlyonepatient(2%)didnot
recoverconsciousness.ThispatientwastransferredtoanotherhospitalwithaGlasgow
comascalemotorscoreoffive.Inmostcases,thecauseofdeathwasneurologic(47%,of
which9%braindeathand39%otherneurologiccauses).
AsshowninTable2,theinitialpCO2orpCO2courseswerenotassociatedwiththe
recoveryofconsciousness.InSupplementaryMaterialFigureS1,weincludedthecourses
ofpCO2inthefirstsixhoursafterinitiationofECPRforeveryindividualpatient.Asa
sensitivityanalysis,weperformedthebinarylogisticregressionforpatientswhohada
sustainedrecoveryofconsciousnessathospitaldischarge.Theseresultsareshownin
SupplementaryMaterialTableS1.Additionally,wedeterminedanexpectedneurological
favourableoutcomebasedonpatientcharts(classifiedascerebralperformancecategory
(CPC)score1–2)atanytimefromhospitaldischarge,showninSupplementaryMaterial
TableS2.Wealsoperformedthebinarylogisticregressionbasedonthisoutcome.As
showninSupplementaryMaterialTableS3,thesesensitivityanalyses,nosignificant
differenceswerefound.
Table2.BinarylogisticregressionanalysisofECPRpatientsregardingpCO2measurementsand
therecoveryofconsciousness.
(a)(b)(c) (d)(e)
InitialpCO20.93(0.78–
1.09)
0.97(0.79–
1.20)
0.92(0.65–
1.30)
0.94(0.78–
1.12)
0.75(0.52–
1.05)
Courseof
pCO2infirst6
h
1.03(0.9–1.13)1.05(0.92–
1.26)

Interaction
initialand
coursepCO2

0.99(0.97–
1.02)

Maximum
decreaseof
pCO2infirst6
h

1.07(0.48–
2.30)
0.14(0.01–
2.07)
Interaction
initialand
maximum
decreasepCO2

1.29(0.93–
1.88)
N8383838080
Nagelkerke
R20.030.040.040.100.13
AIC113.82115.22117.06111.36111.02
Membranes2021,11,2088of10
Thevaluesaredisplayedasoddsratioswith95%confidenceintervals(CI).T0:initial
values,pCO2:partialcarbondioxideconcentration.
4.Discussion
Inthisstudy,wefoundthatinitialpCO2valuesandthecourseofpCO2afterinitiation
ofECPRarenotassociatedwiththerecoveryofconsciousness.Wealsofoundno
significantdifferenceforinitialpO2values,courseofpO2andpH,andinitiallactate
values.Inpatientswithrecoveryofconsciousness,wefoundasignificantlyhigherinitial
pHandasignificantlymorerapiddecreaseoflactatethaninpatientswithoutrecoveryof
consciousness.
Contrarytoourhypothesis,recoveryofconsciousnesswasnotassociatedwithaless
rapiddecreaseofpCO2inthefirsthoursafterinitiationofECPR.Basedonthesefindings,
arapiddecreaseofpCO2untilnormocapniamightnotnegativelyinfluencecerebral
perfusion.SomestudiesperformedinpatientstreatedwithconventionalCPRexamined
theeffectsofpCO2onsurvival.Wangetal.[5]evaluatedthepresenceofhypercapniaand
hypocapniainthefirst24hafterhospitalarrival.Theyfoundincreasedhospitalmortality
inthecaseofanyhypercapniaorforfinalhypocapnia[5].Helmerhorstetal.[3]found
onlyincreasedhospitalmortalityinthecaseofasinglemeasurementofhypocapniainthe
first24hinpatientsadmittedtotheICUintheNetherlands.Incontrasttothesetwo
studies,Vaahersaloetal.[7]foundapositiveassociationforthedurationofhypercapnia
withinthefirst24hongoodneurologicaloutcome.However,thesestudiesdidnot
evaluatetheeffectsofthecourseofpCO2ontheoutcome.Ebneretal.[6]didstudythis
courseofpCO2incardiacarrestpatientsnottreatedwithECPR.Similartoourresults,
theyhaveshownnosignificantassociationofmaximumamplitudeinpCO2withpoor
neurologicaloutcome.Additionally,theyalsofoundnosignificantdifferenceforanarea
underthecurveanalysisforthefirstfourpCO2measurementsaswellasallpCO2
measurementsandneurologicaloutcomes[6].InastudybyBemtgenetal.[12],pCO2
valuesweremeasuredseveraltimesinthefirst24hafterECPRinitiation.Theyfoundno
significantdifferenceinsurvivalforpatientswithhypercapnia,hypocapnia,and
normocapnia[12].
Inadditiontoourprimaryoutcome,wefoundthreeotherresultsintheunivariate
analyses.First,wefoundatrendforlowerinitialpO2valuesinpatientswithrecoveryof
consciousnessthaninpatientswithoutrecoveryofconsciousness.Thisisinlinewiththe
recentstudybyHalteretal.[9]TheyhaveshownthatECPRpatientswithhyperoxemia
hadahigheroddsratio(OR)formortalityatday28(OR1.89,95%confidenceinterval(CI)
1.74–2.07)[9].Thesefindingssuggestthattheoutcomemaybeimprovedbyusingan
oxygenblenderwithcarefultitrationofthepercentageofoxygenformembranegasflow.
Second,inthisstudy,patientswithrecoveryofconsciousnesshadaslightlyhigher
initialpHthanpatientswithoutrecoveryofconsciousness.Acomparableresultwas
foundbyBemtgenetal.[12],whohaveshownhighersurvivalratesinpatientswith
higherpHvaluesduringthefirst24hafterinitiationofECPR.However,whencompared
withthestudyofBartosetal.[13],itseemsthatpHvaluesbeforeECPRinitiationarenot
associatedwithsurvivalwithfavourableneurologicaloutcomes.Despitethepossible
positiveassociationofhigherpHandfavourableoutcomes,thedifferencesaresmall(the
differenceofmedianpHbetweenpatientswithandwithoutrecoveryofconsciousness
was0.17).Therefore,itisstillnotpossibletodetermineatwhichpHapatientwillorwill
notbeeligibleforECPR.
Last,wefoundahigherlactatedecreaseinthefirstsixhoursafterinitiationofECPR
inpatientswhohadrecoveryofconsciousnessthaninpatientswithoutrecoveryof
consciousness.Thissignificantdifferenceinlactateclearanceisinlinewiththeresults
foundbyMizutanietal.[14].Theyfoundaneurologicallyfavourablesurvivalrate
(cerebralperformancecategory1–2)of63.1%inpatientswithhighlactateclearanceanda
neurologicallyfavourablesurvivalrateof22.2%inpatientswithlowlactateclearance
afterECPR.
Membranes2021,11,2089of10
Thisstudyalsohadsomelimitations.First,thearterialbloodgassamplingwasnot
scheduled,sothemeasurementswereperformedbyindicationdecidedbythetreating
physicians.Therefore,thenumberofsamplesaswellasthetimebetweenthesampleswas
varyingalotandcouldhaveinfluencedtheoutcomeofthestudy.Inordertominimize
thisinfluence,wedividedthesamplesintotimeframes.Second,thenumberofincluded
patientswasquitesmall.Duetothissmallsample,wewerenotabletoperforma
multivariablelogisticregressionanalysis.Therewerenosignificantdifferencesbetween
thepatientcharacteristicsandcardiacarrestcharacteristicsofthepatientswithand
withoutrecoveryofconsciousness.However,someofthecardiacarrestcharacteristics
couldhaveinfluencedtheoutcome.Third,weincludedahighrateofpatientswithnon
cardiaccausesofarrest.InordertodetermineiftheinitialpCO2orlowflowdurationin
patientswithcardiacversusnoncardiaccausesofarrestinfluencedtheoutcome,we
studiedthesevariablesanddidnotfindastatisticallysignificantdifference.Fourth,inthis
studywefoundhighratesofBLSinOHCApatients,shortnoflowdurations,andlimited
lowflowdurations.IntheNetherlands,bystanderCPRrates,populationeducatedto
performbystanderCPR,anduseofanautomaticexternaldefibrillator(AED)ishighand
risingeveryyear.[15,16]InourECPRprogram,weselectpatientswithanassumedhigh
chanceoffavourableoutcomes(i.e.,patientswithwitnessedarrest,shortnoflowtimes,
highqualityofCPR,andlowflowdurationsof<60min).TheselectionofECPRpatients,
highCPReducation,andAEDuseprobablyexplainsthehighratesofdirectstartofBLS
andassociatedshortnoflowdurationsinthisstudy.Last,duetothehypothesis,itcould
bethatthephysicianshaveadjustedtheECPRsettingsinordertopreventarapiddecrease
inpCO2.Thiscouldresultinlowermaximumdecreases.Therefore,itwouldbeadvisable
torepeatthisstudyinanotherpatientsample.
WedidnotfindanassociationbetweenthecourseofpCO2inthefirsthoursafter
initiationofECPRandtherecoveryofconsciousness.Futurestudiesshouldfocuson
performinganalysesofarterialbloodgasvaluesafterinitiationofECPRinorderto
determinethemostoptimalECMOsettingsforneurologicalfavourableoutcomes.These
studiesshouldbeperformedinlargersamplesandwithbloodgasanalysesatsettime
points.
5.Conclusions
InitialarterialpCO2andthecourseofpCO2inthefirstsixhoursafterinitiationof
ECPRwerenotassociatedwiththerecoveryofconsciousness.
SupplementaryMaterials:Thefollowingareavailableonlineatwww.mdpi.com/2077
0375/11/3/208/s1,FigureS1:CourseofarterialpCO2inpatientswithandwithoutrecoveryof
consciousness,TableS1:BinarylogisticregressionanalysisofECPRpatientsregardingpCO2
measurementsandpersistingrecoveryofconsciousness(GCS6athospitaldischarge),TableS2:
CPCscoresandexpectedCPCscoresatanytimeafterhospitaldischarge,TableS3:Binarylogistic
regressionanalysisofECPRpatientsregardingpCO2measurementsandexpectedfavourable
neurologicaloutcome.
AuthorContributions:L.M.participatedinthestudydesign,analysedandinterpretedthepatient
data,anddraftedthemanuscript.C.A.d.U.participatedinthestudydesign,helpedinterpretthe
results,andwasamajorcontributorinwritingthemanuscript.J.J.H.B.wasacontributorin
writingthemanuscript.D.G.participatedinthestudydesignandwasacontributorinwritingthe
manuscript.D.d.R.M.majorlycontributedtotheconceptionofthestudy,participatedinthestudy
design,helpedinterprettheresults,andwasamajorcontributorinwritingthemanuscript.All
authorshavereadandagreedtothepublishedversionofthemanuscript.
Funding:Thisresearchreceivednoexternalfunding.
InstitutionalReviewBoardStatement:Thestudywasconductedinaccordancewiththe
DeclarationofHelsinki,andtheMedicalEthicsCommitteeoftheErasmusUniversityMedical
Centrereviewedandapprovedthestudyprotocol(numberMEC20190681),date23February2020.
Membranes2021,11,20810of10
InformedConsentStatement:PatientconsentwaswaivedbytheMedicalEthicsCommitteedueto
onlyincludingretrospectivechartinformation.
EthicsStatements:TheMedicalEthicsCommitteeofthisinstitutionreviewedandapprovedthe
studyprotocol(numberMEC20190681).Theneedforconsentwaswaived.
AvailabilityofDataandMaterials:Thedatasetsusedandanalysedduringthecurrentstudyare
availablefromthecorrespondingauthoronreasonablerequest.
ConflictsofInterest:Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictofinterest.
References
1. Rea,T.D.;Cook,A.J.;Hallstrom,A.CPRduringischemiaandreperfusion:Amodelforsurvivalbenefits.Resuscitation2008,77,
6–9.
2. Sekhon,M.S.;Ainslie,P.N.;Griesdale,D.E.Clinicalpathophysiologyofhypoxicischemicbraininjuryaftercardiacarrest:A
“twohit”model.Crit.Care2017,21,1–10.
3. Helmerhorst,H.J.;RoosBlom,M.J.;vanWesterloo,D.J.;AbuHanna,A.;deKeizer,N.F.;deJonge,E.Associationsofarterial
carbondioxideandarterialoxygenconcentrationswithhospitalmortalityafterresuscitationfromcardiacarrest.Crit.Care2015,
19,348.
4. Roberts,B.W.;Kilgannon,J.H.;Hunter,B.R.;Puskarich,M.A.;Pierce,L.;Donnino,M.;Leary,M.;Kline,J.A.;Jones,A.E.;Shapiro,
N.I.;etal.AssociationBetweenEarlyHyperoxiaExposureAfterResuscitationFromCardiacArrestandNeurologicalDisability:
ProspectiveMulticenterProtocolDirectedCohortStudy.Circulation2018,137,2114–2124.
5. Wang,H.E.;Prince,D.K.;Drennan,I.R.;Grunau,B.;Carlbom,D.J.;Johnson,N.;Hansen,M.;Elmer,J.;Christenson,J.;
Kudenchuk,P.;etal.Postresuscitationarterialoxygenandcarbondioxideandoutcomesafteroutofhospitalcardiacarrest.
Resuscitation2017,120,113–118.
6. Ebner,F.;Harmon,M.B.;Aneman,A.;Cronberg,T.;Friberg,H.;Hassager,C.;Juffermans,N.;Kjærgaard,J.;Kuiper,M.;
Mattsson,N.;etal.Carbondioxidedynamicsinrelationtoneurologicaloutcomeinresuscitatedoutofhospitalcardiacarrest
patients:AnexploratoryTargetTemperatureManagementTrialsubstudy.Crit.Care2018,22,196.
7. Vaahersalo,J.;Bendel,S.;Reinikainen,M.;Kurola,J.;Tiainen,M.;Raj,R.;Pettilä,V.;Varpula,T.;Skrifvars,M.B.;FINNRESUSCI
StudyGroup.Arterialbloodgastensionsafterresuscitationfromoutofhospitalcardiacarrest:Associationswithlongterm
neurologicoutcome.Crit.CareMed.2014,42,1463–1470.
8. Chang,W.T.;Wang,C.H.;Lai,C.H.;Yu,H.Y.;Chou,N.K.;Wang,C.H.;Huang,S.C.;Tsai,P.R.;Chou,F.J.;Tsai,M.S.;etal.
OptimalArterialBloodOxygenTensionintheEarlyPostresuscitationPhaseofExtracorporealCardiopulmonaryResuscitation:
A15YearRetrospectiveObservationalStudy.Crit.CareMed.2019,47,1549–1556.
9. Halter,M.;Jouffroy,R.;Saade,A.;Philippe,P.;Carli,P.;Vivien,B.Associationbetweenhyperoxemiaandmortalityinpatients
treatedbyeCPRafteroutofhospitalcardiacarrest.Am.J.Emerg.Med.2020,38,900–905.
10. Cavayas,Y.A.;Munshi,L.;DelSorbo,L.;Fan,E.TheEarlyChangeinPaCO2afterExtracorporealMembraneOxygenation
InitiationIsAssociatedwithNeurologicalComplications.Am.J.Respir.Crit.CareMed.2020,201,1525–1535.
11. Nolan,J.P.;Berg,R.A.;Andersen,L.W.;Bhanji,F.;Chan,P.S.;Donnino,M.W.;Lim,S.H.;Ma,M.H.M.;Nadkarni,V.M.;Starks,
M.A.;etal.CardiacArrestandCardiopulmonaryResuscitationOutcomeReports:UpdateoftheUtsteinResuscitationRegistry
TemplateforInHospitalCardiacArrest:AConsensusReportFromaTaskForceoftheInternationalLiaisonCommitteeon
Resuscitation(AmericanHeartAssociation,EuropeanResuscitationCouncil,AustralianandNewZealandCouncilon
Resuscitation,HeartandStrokeFoundationofCanada,InterAmericanHeartFoundation,ResuscitationCouncilofSouthern
Africa,ResuscitationCouncilofAsia).Circulation2019,140,e746–e757.
12. Bemtgen,X.;Schroth,F.;Wengenmayer,T.;Biever,P.M.;Duerschmied,D.;Benk,C.;Bode,C.;Staudacher,D.L.Howtotreat
combinedrespiratoryandmetabolicacidosisafterextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitation?Crit.Care2019,23,183.
13. Bartos,J.A.;Grunau,B.;Carlson,C.;Duval,S.;Ripeckyj,A.;Kalra,R.;Raveendran,G.;John,R.;Conterato,M.;Frascone,R.J.;et
al.ImprovedSurvivalWithExtracorporealCardiopulmonaryResuscitationDespiteProgressiveMetabolicDerangement
AssociatedWithProlongedResuscitation.Circulation2020,141,877–886.
14. Mizutani,T.;Umemoto,N.;Taniguchi,T.;Ishii,H.;Hiramatsu,Y.;Arata,K.;Takuya,H.;Inoue,S.;Sugiura,T.;Asai,T.;etal.
Thelactateclearancecalculatedusingserumlactatelevel6hafterisanimportantprognosticpredictorafterextracorporeal
cardiopulmonaryresuscitation:Asinglecenterretrospectiveobservationalstudy.J.IntensiveCare2018,6,33.
15. Blom,M.T.;Beesems,S.G.;Homma,P.C.M.;Zijlstra,J.A.;Hulleman,M.;VanHoeijen,D.A.;Bardai,A.;Tijssen,J.G.P.;Tan,H.L.;
Koster,R.W.ImprovedSurvivalAfterOutofHospitalCardiacArrestandUseofAutomatedExternalDefibrillators.Circulation
2014,130,1868–1875.
16. Hartstichting.Jaarverslag2019.WerkenaaneenHartgezondeSamenleving.Availableonline:
https://magazines.hartstichting.nl/jaarverslag2019/cover/?_ga=2.261012493.1236433838.16150616611639466317.1605858018
(accessedon5March2021).
... However, survival rates were highly variable, from 8% to 40%. [17][18][19][20][21] In our cohort, survival was achieved in 17% of patients and 9.4% were discharged with favourable neurological outcome. Variability in patient's selection criteria together with heterogeneity in the strength of the chain of survival, implementation of ECPR, centre experience, and post-resuscitation practice, including withdrawal of life-support therapy 22 , can explain differences in outcomes observed among studies and centres. ...
... While our findings confirm predictors of good outcome, 26 they also point out that favourable outcomes are possible beyond 60 minutes in carefully selected patients. Of course, reducing pre-hospital delays could allow to further improve outcomes since time from hospital arrival to ECMO flow was already minimized in our centre (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22) minutes) and time from cardiac arrest to hospital arrival constituted the longest time interval (60 [IQR 52-71] minutes). Signs of life, when present during CPR, are associated with survival and neurological outcome [27][28][29] and may exclude an already established brain damage, thus indicating an optimal ECPR candidate. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Growing evidence supports extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients, especially in experienced centres. We present characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of patients treated with ECPR in a high-volume cardiac arrest centre in the metropolitan area of Milan, Italy and determine prognostic factors. Methods Refractory OHCA patients treated with ECPR between 2013 and 2022 at IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute in Milan had survival and neurological outcome assessed at hospital discharge. Results Out of 307 consecutive OHCA patients treated with ECPR (95% witnessed, 66% shockable, low-flow 70 [IQR 58–81] minutes), 17% survived and 9.4% had favourable neurological outcome. Survival and favourable neurological outcome increased to 51% (OR = 8.7; 95% CI, 4.3–18) and 28% (OR = 6.3; 95% CI, 2.8–14) when initial rhythm was shockable and low-flow (time between CPR initiation and ROSC or ECMO flow) ≤60 minutes and decreased to 9.5% and 6.3% when low-flow exceeded 60 minutes (72% of patients). At multivariable analysis, shockable rhythm (aOR for survival = 2.39; 95% CI, 1.04–5.48), shorter low-flow (aOR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.94–0.97), intermittent ROSC (aOR = 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2–5.6), and signs of life (aOR = 3.7; 95% CI, 1.5–8.7) were associated with better outcomes. Survival reached 10% after treating 104 patients (p for trend <0.001). Conclusions Patients with initial shockable rhythm, intermittent ROSC, signs of life, and low-flow ≤60 minutes had higher success of ECPR for refractory OHCA. Favourable outcomes were possible beyond 60 minutes of low-flow, especially with concomitant favourable prognostic factors. Outcomes improved as the case-volume increased, supporting treatment in high-volume cardiac arrest centres.
... Bartos et al. reported that PaCO 2 increased as the flow time increased from 47 mmHg in 20 min to 70 mmHg in 90min [4], but the exact cut-off point for FO prediction has not been reported. Mandigers et al. reported that PaCO 2 was not associated with neurological outcomes in the mixed 45% OHCA and 55% IHCA cohort [26] (PCO 2 53 mmHg in FO patients vs. 57 mmHg). These values are lower than those observed in our cohort. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Current guidelines on extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) recommend careful patient selection, but precise criteria are lacking. Arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO 2 ) has prognostic value in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients but has been less studied in patients receiving ECPR. We studied the relationship between PaCO 2 during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and neurological outcomes of OHCA patients receiving ECPR and tested whether PaCO 2 could help ECPR selection. Methods This single-centre retrospective study enrolled 152 OHCA patients who received ECPR between January 2012 and December 2020. Favorable neurological outcome (FO) at discharge was the primary outcome. We used multivariable logistic regression to determine the independent variables for FO and generalised additive model (GAM) to determine the relationship between PaCO 2 and FO. Subgroup analyses were performed to test discriminative ability of PaCO 2 in subgroups of OHCA patients. Results Multivariable logistic regression showed that PaCO 2 was independently associated with FO after adjusting for other favorable resuscitation characteristics (Odds ratio [OR] 0.23, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.08–0.66, p -value = 0.006). GAM showed a near-linear reverse relationship between PaCO 2 and FO. PaCO 2 < 70 mmHg was the cutoff point for predicting FO. PaCO 2 also had prognostic value in patients with less favorable characteristics, including non-shockable rhythm (OR, 3.78) or low flow time > 60 min (OR, 4.66). Conclusion PaCO 2 before ECMO implementation had prognostic value for neurological outcomes in OHCA patients. Patients with PaCO 2 < 70 mmHg had higher possibility of FO, even in those with non-shockable rhythm or longer low-flow duration. PaCO 2 could serve as an ECPR selection criterion.
... On the other hand, they only included witnessed CA, opposing the suggestion from Twohig et al. 4,75 Patient eligibility criteriawho is suitable for further resuscitation attempts and who is notis an ethical question. Some programmes name very few exclusion criteria; thus, giving even the very frail a chance, 19 whereas others have an extensive and narrow list that makes only a small fraction of an initially large OHCA population considered as ECPR candidates. 45 Presently, a patient might not meet the treatment criteria in one region, but an identical patient in a different region will, and will have the chance to survive. ...
Article
Full-text available
Aim of the review: To provide an overview of studies that have published data regarding region and population size, procedure location, team composition, inclusion and exclusion criteria, outcome parameters, and cost–benefit analyses on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Data sources: A structured systematic literature search of articles published prior to April 27, 2021, was performed in online databases (PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, the EU Clinical Trials Register, and Cochrane Library). Results: Sixty-three articles were included based on predefined eligibility criteria. The included articles were published between 2011 and 2021, with the highest number of articles in 2020 and 2021 (50%). Of the 58 articles that reported data on organisational topics, 47 reported transporting the patients to the hospital for cannulation, 10 reported initiating extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) on-scene, and one reported doing both. The most common inclusion criterion was a lower age limit of 18 years (in 86% of the articles). Other inclusion criteria were witnessed collapse (67%) and initial ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia (43%), asystole (3%), pulseless electrical activity (5%), pulmonary embolism (2%), and signs of life during CPR (5%). The most common exclusion criterion was a do-not-resuscitate order (38%). Of the 44 studies reporting outcomes, 77% reported survival to hospital discharge and 50%, a cerebral performance category score of 1-2. Other outcome parameters were sparsely reported. Conclusion: There is a variation in regional size, team composition, inclusion and exclusion criteria and reported outcomes. These discrepancies make it challenging to determine how to effectively use ECPR.
Preprint
Full-text available
Background Current guidelines on extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) recommend careful patient selection, but precise criteria are lacking. Arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) has prognostic value in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients but has been less studied in patients receiving ECPR. We studied the relationship between PaCO2 during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and neurological outcomes of OHCA patients receiving ECPR and tested whether PaCO2 could help ECPR selection. Methods This single-centre retrospective study enrolled 152 OHCA patients who received ECPR between January 2012 and December 2020. Favorable neurological outcome (FO) at discharge was the primary outcome. We used multivariable logistic regression to determine the independent variables for FO and generalised additive model (GAM) to determine the relationship between PaCO2 and FO. Subgroup analyses were performed to test discriminative ability of PaCO2 in subgroups of OHCA patients. Results Multivariable logistic regression showed that PaCO2 was independently associated with FO after adjusting for other favorable resuscitation characteristics (Odds ratio [OR] 0.23, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.08–0.66, p-value=0.006). GAM showed a near-linear reverse relationship between PaCO2 and FO. PaCO2 <70 mmHg was the cutoff point for predicting FO. PaCO2 also had prognostic value in patients with less favorable characteristics, including non-shockable rhythm (OR, 3.78) or low flow time >60 min (OR, 4.66). Conclusion PaCO2 before ECMO implementation had prognostic value for neurological outcomes in OHCA patients. Patients with PaCO2 <70 mmHg had higher possibility of FO, even in those with non-shockable rhythm or longer low-flow duration. PaCO2 could serve as an ECPR selection criterion.
Preprint
Full-text available
Background: The objective of this narrative review was to provide an overview of how programmes around the world are organised regarding the use of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out of hospital cardiac arrest. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, the EU Clinical Trials Register, and Cochrane Library. The main parameters assessed were article type, region- population-size, cost–benefit analyses, inclusion and exclusion criteria, procedure location, team composition and outcome parameters reported. Results: Sixty-three articles were eligible for inclusion. One randomised trial had been published and 4 were ongoing. Among the 58 articles that reported data on organisational topics, 47 transported the patient to the hospital for cannulation, 10 initiated extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation on-scene and one did both. The organisations cover different populations sizes that ranged between 30,788–19,303,000 inhabitants. The most common inclusion criterion was a lower age limit of 18 years (in 86% articles), followed by an upper age limit (in 83% articles), but this varied (50 and 80 years). Other criteria were witnessed collapse (67%) and initial shockable rhythm (43%), asystole (3%), pulseless electrical activity (5%), pulmonary embolism (2%), and signs of life during cardio- pulmonary resuscitation (5%). The most common exclusion criterion was a Do-Not-Resuscitate order (38%) followed by existence of major comorbidities (36%). The extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation teams varied between 2–8 members and had various professions involved. Of the 44 studies reporting outcomes, 77% reported survival to hospital discharge. Outcome as one- (in 14%), 3- (in 5%) and 6-month survival (in 7%), Cerebral-Performance-Category-score of 1–2 was reported by 50% of the studies. Conclusion: There is variation in regional size, team composition, inclusion and exclusion criteria and reported outcomes. These discrepancies make it difficult to determine how to use extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the most effective manner from the current publications. Despite an increasing amount of research published in the last few years, there remains a need for better coherence to inclusion/exclusion criteria and outcome reporting, the optimal team composition and location for the procedure.
Article
Full-text available
OBJECTIVES After cardiac arrest, a key factor determining survival outcomes is low-flow duration. Our aims were to determine the relation of survival and low-flow duration of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) and conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) and if these 2 therapies have different short-term survival curves in relation to low-flow duration. METHODS We searched Embase, Medline, Web of Science and Google Scholar from inception up to April 2021. A linear mixed-effect model was used to describe the course of survival over time, based on study-specific and time-specific aggregated survival data. RESULTS We included 42 observational studies reporting on 1689 ECPR and 375 751 CCPR procedures. Of the included studies, 25 included adults, 13 included children and 4 included both. In adults, survival curves decline rapidly over time (ECPR 37.2%, 29.8%, 23.8% and 19.1% versus CCPR-shockable 36.8%, 7.2%, 1.4% and 0.3% for 15, 30, 45 and 60 min low-flow, respectively). ECPR was associated with a statistically significant slower decline in survival than CCPR with initial shockable rhythms (CCPR-shockable). In children, survival curves decline rapidly over time (ECPR 43.6%, 41.7%, 39.8% and 38.0% versus CCPR-shockable 48.6%, 20.5%, 8.6% and 3.6% for 15, 30, 45 and 60 min low-flow, respectively). ECPR was associated with a statistically significant slower decline in survival than CCPR-shockable. CONCLUSIONS The short-term survival of ECPR and CCPR-shockable patients both decline rapidly over time, in adults as well as in children. This decline of short-term survival in relation to low-flow duration in ECPR was slower than in conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Trial registration Prospero: CRD42020212480, 2 October 2020.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Likelihood of neurologically favorable survival declines with prolonged resuscitation. However, the ability of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) to modulate this decline is unknown. We aimed to examine the effects of resuscitation duration on survival and metabolic profile in patients who undergo ECPR for refractory ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (VF/VT OHCA). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated survival in 160 consecutive adults with refractory VF/VT OHCA treated with the UMN-ECPR protocol (transport with ongoing CPR to the cardiac catheterization laboratory for ECPR) compared with 654 adults who had received standard CPR in the amiodarone arm of the ALPS trial. We evaluated the metabolic changes and rate of survival in relation to duration of CPR in UMN-ECPR patients. Results: Neurologically favorable survival was significantly higher in UMN-ECPR patients vs. ALPS patients (33% vs. 23%; p = 0.01) overall. The mean duration of CPR was also significantly longer for UMN-ECPR patients vs. ALPS patients (60 vs. 35 min; p < 0.001). Analysis of the effect of CPR duration on neurologically favorable survival demonstrated significantly higher neurologically favorable survival for UMN-ECPR patients compared to ALPS patients at each CPR duration interval less than 60 minutes; however, longer CPR duration was associated with progressive decline in neurologically favorable survival in both groups. All UMN-ECPR patients with 20-29 minutes of CPR (8/8) survived with neurologically favorable status compared to 24% (24/102) for ALPS patients with the same duration of CPR. There were no neurologically favorable survivors in the ALPS cohort with CPR {greater than or equal to}40 minutes, whereas neurologically favorable survival was 25% (9/36) for UMN-ECPR patients with 50-59 minutes of CPR and 19% with {greater than or equal to}60 minutes. Relative risk of mortality or poor neurologic function was significantly reduced in UMN-ECPR patients with CPR duration {greater than or equal to} 60 minutes, Significant metabolic changes included decline in pH, increased lactic acid and paCO2, and thickened left ventricular wall with prolonged professional CPR. Conclusions: ECPR was associated with improved neurologically favorable survival at all CPR durations less than 60 minutes despite severe progressive metabolic derangement. However, CPR duration remains a critical determinate of survival.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Dyscarbia is common in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients and its association to neurological outcome is undetermined. Methods: This is an exploratory post-hoc substudy of the Target Temperature Management (TTM) trial, including resuscitated OHCA patients, investigating the association between serial measurements of arterial partial carbon dioxide pressure (PaCO2) and neurological outcome at 6 months, defined by the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) scale, dichotomized to good outcome (CPC 1 and 2) and poor outcome (CPC 3-5). The effects of hypercapnia and hypocapnia, and the time-weighted mean PaCO2 and absolute PaCO2 difference were analyzed. Additionally, the association between mild hypercapnia (6.0-7.30 kPa) and neurological outcome, its interaction with target temperature (33 °C and 36 °C), and the association between PaCO2 and peak serum-Tau were evaluated. Results: Of the 939 patients in the TTM trial, 869 were eligible for analysis. Ninety-six percent of patients were exposed to hypocapnia or hypercapnia. None of the analyses indicated a statistical significant association between PaCO2 and neurological outcome (P = 0.13-0.96). Mild hypercapnia was not associated with neurological outcome (P = 0.78) and there was no statistically significant interaction with target temperature (Pinteraction = 0.95). There was no association between PaCO2 and peak serum-Tau levels 48 or 72 h after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Conclusions: Dyscarbia is common after ROSC. No statistically significant association between PaCO2 in the post-cardiac arrest phase and neurological outcome at 6 months after cardiac arrest was detected. There was no significant interaction between mild hypercapnia and temperature in relation to neurological outcome.
Article
Full-text available
Background Serum lactate level can predict clinical outcomes in some critical cases. In the clinical setting, we noted that patients undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) and with poor serum lactate improvement often do not recover from cardiopulmonary arrest. Therefore, we investigated the association between lactate clearance and in-hospital mortality in cardiac arrest patients undergoing ECPR. Methods Serum lactate levels were measured on admission and every hour after starting ECPR. Lactate clearance [(lactate at first measurement − lactate 6 h after)/lactate at first measurement × 100] was calculated 6 h after first serum lactate measurement. All patients who underwent ECPR were registered retrospectively using opt-out in our outpatient’s segment. Result In this retrospective study, 64 cases were evaluated, and they were classified into two groups according to lactate clearance: high-clearance group, > 65%; low-clearance group, ≤ 65%. Surviving discharge rate of high-clearance group (12 cases, 63%) is significantly higher than that of low-clearance group (11 cases, 24%) (p < 0.01). Considering other confounders, lactate clearance was an independent predictor for in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 7.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.71–29.5; p < 0.01). Both net reclassification improvement (0.64, p < 0.01) and integrated reclassification improvement (0.12, p < 0.01) show that adding lactate clearance on established risk factors improved the predictability of in-hospital mortality. Conclusion In our study, lactate clearance calculated through arterial blood gas analysis 6 h after ECPR was one of the most important predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients treated with ECPR after cardiac arrest.
Article
Rationale: Large decreases in PaCO2 that occur when initiating extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in patients with respiratory failure may cause cerebral vasoconstriction and compromise brain tissue perfusion. Objectives: To determine if the magnitude of PaCO2 correction upon ECMO initiation is associated with an increased incidence of neurological complications in patients with respiratory failure. Methods: We conducted a multicenter international retrospective cohort study using the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry, including adults with respiratory failure on any ECMO mode between 2012 and 2017. The relative change in PaCO2 in the first 24 hours was calculated as (24hPostECMOPaCO2 - PreECMOPaCO2)/PreECMOPaCO2. Our primary outcome was the occurrence of neurological complications, defined as seizures, ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, or brain death. Measurements and main results: We included 11,972 patients, 88% of whom were supported with venovenous-ECMO. The median relative change in PaCO2 was -31% (IQR -46 to -12%). Neurological complications were uncommon overall (6.9%) with a low incidence of seizures (1.1%), ischemic stroke (1.9%), intracranial hemorrhage (3.5%), and brain death (1.6%). Patients with a large relative decrease in PaCO2 > 50%) had an increased incidence of neurological complications compared to those with a smaller decrease (9.8% vs. 6.4%; p<0.001). A large relative decrease in PaCO2 was independently associated with neurological complications after controlling for previously described risk factors (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.3-2.3; p<0.001). Conclusions: In patients receiving ECMO for respiratory failure, a large relative decrease in PaCO2 in the first 24 hours after ECMO initiation is independently associated with an increased incidence of neurological complications.
Article
Utstein-style reporting templates provide a structured framework with which to compare systems of care for cardiac arrest. The 2004 Utstein reporting template encompassed both out-of-hospital and in-hospital cardiac arrest. A 2015 update of the Utstein template focused on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, which makes this update of the in-hospital template timely. Representatives of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation developed an updated in-hospital Utstein reporting template iteratively by meeting face-to-face, by teleconference, and by online surveys between 2013 and 2018. Data elements were grouped by hospital factors, patient variables, pre-event factors, cardiac arrest and postresuscitation processes, and outcomes. Elements were classified as core or supplemental by use of a modified Delphi process. Variables were described as core if they were considered essential. Core variables should enable reasonable comparisons between systems and are considered essential for quality improvement programs. Together with core variables, supplementary variables are considered useful for research.
Article
Utstein-style reporting templates provide a structured framework with which to compare systems of care for cardiac arrest. The 2004 Utstein reporting template encompassed both out-of-hospital and in-hospital cardiac arrest. A 2015 update of the Utstein template focused on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, which makes this update of the in-hospital template timely. Representatives of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation developed an updated in-hospital Utstein reporting template iteratively by meeting face-to-face, by teleconference, and by online surveys between 2013 and 2018. Data elements were grouped by hospital factors, patient variables, pre-event factors, cardiac arrest and postresuscitation processes, and outcomes. Elements were classified as core or supplemental by use of a modified Delphi process. Variables were described as core if they were considered essential. Core variables should enable reasonable comparisons between systems and are considered essential for quality improvement programs. Together with core variables, supplementary variables are considered useful for research.
Article
Objectives: Hyperoxia could lead to a worse outcome after cardiac arrest. Few studies have investigated the impact of oxygenation status on patient outcomes following extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We sought to delineate the association between oxygenation status and neurologic outcomes in patients receiving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Design: Retrospective analysis of a prospective extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation registry database. Setting: An academic tertiary care hospital. Patients: Patients receiving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation between 2000 and 2014. Interventions: None. Measurements and main results: A total of 291 patients were included, and 80.1% were male. Their mean age was 56.0 years. The arterial blood gas data employed in the primary analysis were recorded from the first sample over the first 24 hours in the ICUs after return of spontaneous circulation. The mean PaO2 after initiation of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was 178.0 mm Hg, and the mean PaO2/FIO2 ratio was 322.0. Only 88 patients (30.2%) demonstrated favorable neurologic status at hospital discharge. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that PaO2 between 77 and 220 mm Hg (odds ratio, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.01-5.22; p = 0.05) and PaO2/FIO2 ratio between 314 and 788 (odds ratio, 5.09; 95% CI, 2.13-12.14; p < 0.001) were both positively associated with favorable neurologic outcomes. Conclusions: Oxygenation status during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation affects neurologic outcomes in patients receiving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The PaO2 range of 77 to 220 mm Hg, which is slightly narrower than previously defined, seems optimal. The PaO2/FIO2 ratio was also associated with outcomes in our analysis, indicating that both PaO2 and the PaO2/FIO2 ratio should be closely monitored during the early postcardiac arrest phase for postextracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation patients.
Article
Objective: Assess whether elevated oxygen partial arterial pressure (PaO2) measured after the initiation of extra-corporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR), is associated with mortality in patients suffering from refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (rOHCA). Methods: Retrospective cohort study including rOHCA admitted to the ICU. Patients were divided into 3 groups, defined according to the PaO2 measured from arterial blood gas analysis 30 min after the initiation of eCPR. Hyperoxemia was defined as PaO2 ≥ 300 mmHg, hypoxemia as PaO2 ≤ 60 mmHg and normoxemia, as 60 < PaO2 < 300 mmHg. The main outcome was the mortality rate on day 28 after hospital admission. Results: Sixty-six consecutive rOHCA, 77% male, with a mean age of 51 ± 14 years, were admitted to the ICU. rOHCA were mainly due to acute coronary syndrome (67%), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (8%) and cardiotoxic overdose (8%). Mortality at day 28 reached 61%. In the overall population, the mean PaO2 was 227 ± 124 mmHg. An association between mortality and PaO2 was observed (OR = 1.01 [1.01-1.02]). The AUC for PaO2 after starting eCPR was 0.77 [0.65-0.89]. After adjustment for witnessed arrest, bystander's CPR, location, no-flow, low-flow, lactate and pH, age, and PaCO2, hyperoxemia had an ORa of 1.89 (CI95 [1.74-2.07]). Conclusion: We found an association between mortality and hyperoxemia in patients admitted to the ICU for rOHCA requiring eCPR. These data underline the potential toxicity of high dose of oxygen and suggest that controlled oxygen administration for these patients is crucial.
Article
Background: Studies examining the association between hyperoxia exposure after resuscitation from cardiac arrest and clinical outcomes have reported conflicting results. Our objective was to test the hypothesis that early postresuscitation hyperoxia is associated with poor neurological outcome. Methods: This was a multicenter prospective cohort study. We included adult patients with cardiac arrest who were mechanically ventilated and received targeted temperature management after return of spontaneous circulation. We excluded patients with cardiac arrest caused by trauma or sepsis. Per protocol, partial pressure of arterial oxygen (Pao2) was measured at 1 and 6 hours after return of spontaneous circulation. Hyperoxia was defined as a Pao2 >300 mm Hg during the initial 6 hours after return of spontaneous circulation. The primary outcome was poor neurological function at hospital discharge, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score >3. Multivariable generalized linear regression with a log link was used to test the association between Pao2 and poor neurological outcome. To assess whether there was an association between other supranormal Pao2 levels and poor neurological outcome, we used other Pao2 cut points to define hyperoxia (ie, 100, 150, 200, 250, 350, 400 mm Hg). Results: Of the 280 patients included, 105 (38%) had exposure to hyperoxia. Poor neurological function at hospital discharge occurred in 70% of patients in the entire cohort and in 77% versus 65% among patients with versus without exposure to hyperoxia respectively (absolute risk difference, 12%; 95% confidence interval, 1-23). Hyperoxia was independently associated with poor neurological function (relative risk, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.35). On multivariable analysis, a 1-hour-longer duration of hyperoxia exposure was associated with a 3% increase in risk of poor neurological outcome (relative risk, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.05). We found that the association with poor neurological outcome began at ≥300 mm Hg. Conclusions: Early hyperoxia exposure after resuscitation from cardiac arrest was independently associated with poor neurological function at hospital discharge.