Content uploaded by Étienne Léveillé-Bourret
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Étienne Léveillé-Bourret on Mar 16, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.
This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has
not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process,
which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please
cite this article as doi: 10.1111/jse.12740.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
Étienne Léveillé-Bourret ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0069-0430
Cryptic diversity and significant cophylogenetic signal detected
by DNA barcoding the rust fungi (Pucciniaceae) of Cyperaceae-
Juncaceae
Étienne Léveillé-Bourret1*, Quinn Eggertson2, Sarah Hambleton2, Julian R.
Starr3
1Institut de Recherche en Biologie Végétale and Département de Sciences
Biologiques, Université de Montréal, 4101 Sherbrooke E, Montréal, Québec, H1X
2B2, Canada.
2Biodiversity and Bioresources, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling
Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0C6, Canada.
3Department of Biology, University of Ottawa, 30 Marie Curie, Ottawa, Ontario,
K1N 6N5, Canada.
*Corresponding author: etienne.leveille-bourret@umontreal.ca
© 2021 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the
Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
Abstract
Plants play important roles as habitat and food for a tremendous diversity of
specialist animals and fungi. The disappearance of any plant species can lead to
extinction cascades of its associated biota. In consequence, documenting the
diversity and specificity of plant-associated organisms is of high practical relevance in
biodiversity conservation. Here we present the first large-scale molecular
investigation into the diversity, host-specificity, and cophylogenetic congruence of an
especially rich plant-fungal association, the rust fungi (Pucciniaceae) of Cyperaceae
and Juncaceae. Using the largest rust fungi DNA barcoding dataset published to date
(252 sequences, 82 taxa), we reject the presence of a global ITS2-28S barcode gap,
but find a local gap in Cyperaceae-Juncaceae rusts, and suggest the existence of
many cryptic species in North America, with some broadly-circumscribed species
possibly corresponding to >10 cryptic species. We test previous hypotheses of
correlations between the phylogenies of rust fungi and their Cyperaceae-Juncaceae
hosts using a combination of global-fit and event-based cophylogenetic methods.
Significant cophylogenetic signal is detected between rusts and their hosts, but the
small number of cospeciations argues for preferential host jumps as the driving
process behind these correlations. In addition, temporal congruence between the
origin of major Carex clades and their rusts suggests that host diversification may
have promoted parasite diversification. Finally, we discuss the relevance of rust
infection patterns to the systematics of Cyperaceae, highlight some taxonomic
problems uncovered by the analyses, and call attention to the promise of DNA
barcoding for bridging knowledge gaps in poorly studied plant-associated
microorganisms.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
Brief abstract
Phylogenies of Cyperaceae, Juncaceae and their rusts (Pucciniaceae) are congruent
despite few cospeciation events, suggesting that preferential host jumps generated the
cophylogenetic signal. Host diversification may have promoted parasite
diversification given the temporal congruence between the origin of major Carex
clades and their rusts. This large DNA barcoding effort (252 sequences, 82 taxa) also
uncovered many potential cryptic species.
KEYWORDS: Coevolution, host-parasite, molecular phylogenetics,
phytopathology, Pucciniomycotina, rushes, sedges, Uredinales.
1 Introduction
An important motivation for targeting vascular plants in conservation efforts is the
crucial role they play as food and habitat for a tremendous diversity of specialist
animals and fungi (Caro, 2010). Specialized associations are common in
phytophagous arthropods and plant-associated fungi, and it is estimated that there
could be three to six arthropods and two to five specialist fungi for every species of
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
vascular plant (Ødegaard, 2000; Zhou & Hyde, 2001; Schmit & Mueller, 2007;
Blackwell, 2011; Blackwell & Vega, 2018). The extinction of any plant species can
thus trigger extinction cascades of its associated biota, and of species that depend in
turn on this biota (Koh, 2004; Brodie et al., 2014). Documenting diversity of plant-
associated organisms and their degree of host specificity is thus of high practical
relevance for conservation, especially considering that most plant-associated
arthropods and microfungi remain undescribed (Hawksworth and Rossman, 1997;
Larsen et al., 2017). In this study, we present the first large-scale molecular
investigation into the diversity, host-specificity, and cophylogenetic congruence of a
particularly rich plant-fungal association, the rust fungi of Cyperaceae (sedges) and
Juncaceae (rushes).
Cyperaceae (ca. 5500 species) and Juncaceae (ca. 440 species) are sister
families of mostly wind-pollinated, grass-like plants that are particularly abundant in
wetlands, temperate forest understories, and arctic-alpine habitats (Goetghebeur,
1998; Kirschner, 2002; Govaerts et al., 2007). As a consequence of their diversity
and ecological prominence, Cyperaceae and Juncaceae host highly diverse fungal
assemblages, being amongst the most heavily used families by two extremely
diverse lineages of plant parasites, the smut (Ustilaginales) and rust (Pucciniales)
fungi (Arthur, 1934; Cummins & Hiratsuka, 2003; Henderson, 2004; Savile, 1979;
Vánky, 2012). The high diversity and specificity of fungal parasites of Cyperaceae
and Juncaceae fostered early interest into using them as an aid for plant
classification, with the underlying expectation that parasite phylogeny would mirror
the phylogeny of their hosts, a principle known as “Fahrenholz’s rule” (Eichler, 1948;
Fahrenholz, 1913; Klassen, 1992). Rust and smut fungi provided some of the earliest
evidence supporting the close relationship between Cyperaceae and Juncaceae
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
(Piepenbring et al., 1999; Savile, 1990; Riess et al., 2019), and they formed the basis
for one of the first phylogenetic hypotheses for Carex L. (Savile & Calder, 1953), a
genus comprising more than a third of all Cyperaceae species and ranking amongst
the largest in the world (ca. 2000 species; Frodin, 2004; Global Carex Group, 2015).
Molecular studies have since confirmed that phylogenies of Carex and their smut
fungi are correlated (Escudero, 2015; Hendrichs et al., 2005). Likewise, the close
relationship between Carex and Trichophorum Pers., first proposed by Kukkonen &
Timonen (1979) based on the presence of Anthracoidea Bref. smuts on both genera,
was recently confirmed by molecular phylogenetic studies (Léveillé-Bourret et al.,
2014, 2018b).
In his seminal paper on the use of fungi as aids in plant classification, Savile
(1979) proposed that young lineages of rust fungi infect young plant genera, whereas
older rust lineages remain confined to their initial hosts, thereby providing a basis for
the phylogenetic classification of plants. This work influenced many classical studies
on higher-level plant classification (Takhtajan, 1980; Dahlgren, 1983; Thorne, 2000),
and it was cited as evidence for several infrafamilial classifications, including the
most recent complete treatments of Cyperaceae tribes and genera (Bruhl, 1995;
Goetghebeur, 1998). However, no study has yet re-examined Savile’s hypothesis of
a correlation between the phylogenies of Cyperaceae genera and their rust parasites.
Rust fungi (>8400 species; Pucciniales, Basidiomycota) take their name from their
usually bright-orange replicative spores (Aime et al., 2014). They are responsible for
several economically devastating crop diseases such as crown rust of oats, stem rust
of wheat, and white pine blister rust (Saari & Prescott, 1985; Geils et al., 2010; Liu &
Hambleton, 2012, 2013), but they are also ecologically important as mediators of
plant competition in natural environments (Barnes et al., 2005; Price et al., 1988;
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
Rice & Westoby, 1982), and as food for many fungal and arthropod hyper-parasites
(Lutz et al., 2004a, 2004b; Nischwitz et al., 2005; Nelsen, 2010; Henk et al., 2011;
Trakunyingcharoen et al., 2014).
Rusts are infamously known for possessing some of the most complex life cycles
found in nature, often involving as many as five morphologically and functionally
distinct spore stages (O basidiospores, I spermatia, II aeciospores, III urediniospores,
IV teliospores) on two distantly related plant species (Jackson, 1931; Ono, 2002).
These two plant species are called “telial” and “aecial” hosts, which refers to the main
specialised spore type produced on each host. The monocotyledonous species of
Cyperaceae and Juncaceae are telial hosts used for clonal population growth
through the spread of urediniospores (stage III), and for the production of teliospores
(IV), thick-walled spores used for overwintering. In the spring, these teliospores
germinate into basidia, producing basidiospores (O) that infect a new dicotyledonous
aecial host. Spermatia (I) and receptive hyphae are produced on the aecial host, and
their fusion eventually results in the production of aeciospores (II) that complete the
cycle by infecting another telial host. From such complex host-alternating
(heteroecious) life-cycles, a great variety of reduced life cycles involving fewer spore
types (microcyclic) or the infection of a single host (autoecious) have evolved
(Jackson, 1931; Petersen, 1974; Ono, 2002).
Cyperaceae and Juncaceae are common hosts for rusts in one of the two main
clades of the giant genus Puccinia Chevall. (ca. 3000 species), including species of
the nested polyphyletic genera Aecidium Pers. p.p. and Uromyces (Link) Unger
(Aime, 2006; Maier et al., 2007, 2003; van der Merwe et al., 2007). These rusts
alternate between Cyperaceae-Juncaceae and at least 15 families of dicotyledons,
such as Asteraceae, Grossulariceae or Urticaceae, but each rust species normally
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
infects a single or a few closely-related plant species for both their telial and aecial
hosts (Arthur, 1934; Savile, 1972). Host fidelity should be especially important in the
aecial hosts because the infection of different hosts would make outcrossing more
difficult. This hypothesis would explain why cophylogenetic signal is higher and host
jumps less frequent in aecial hosts than in telial hosts, at higher taxonomic levels
(Aime et al., 2018). However, no study has yet examined the pattern at lower
taxonomic levels. We here hypothesize that a similar pattern will be found in the rusts
of Cyperaceae-Juncaceae, with a higher cophylogenetic in aecial dicotyledon hosts
than in telial Cyperaceae-Juncaceae hosts.
Using one of the largest rust fungi DNA barcoding dataset produced to date and
recent developments in cophylogenetic analysis of host-parasite associations, we
aim to answer the following questions: (1) how many species of rust fungi are there
on Cyperaceae-Juncaceae hosts?; (2) is the phylogeny of rust fungi correlated with
the phylogeny of their Cyperaceae-Juncaceae hosts?; (3) if it is, what are the
processes responsible for such cophylogenetic congruence?; and (4) are host jumps
more rare in the aecial dicotyledonous hosts (sexual stage), than in the telial
Cyperaceae-Juncaceae hosts?
2 Material and Methods
2.1 Taxonomic sampling
A total of 254 rust-infected herbarium specimens from the Canadian National
Mycological Herbarium (DAOM) at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) in
Ottawa were selected for DNA extraction and sequencing. Included were
representatives of 53 rust taxa (species, subspecies or varieties) in the genera
Aecidium (1), Puccinia (43) and Uromyces (9) and two unidentified specimens. In
addition, 94 sequences previously generated for DAOM specimens using the same
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
methods were also included in the analyses, representing an additional 29 Puccinia
and four Uromyces taxa. The DAOM specimens successfully sequenced and
included in the analyses for these 86 species are listed in Data S1 with their
GenBank species names and accessions, collection metadata, and AAFC DNA
numbers.
Of the total 348 specimens included in the study (254 newly sampled + 94
previously-sequenced), 50 were collected before 1930, 260 from 1930 to 1990, 37
since 1990, and one had no date recorded. The majority of rusts sampled were
collected on host plants in Cyperaceae (165) and Juncaceae (21) or alternate hosts
in Asteraceae (96) and Grossularicaeae (21), but other represented families are
Araliaceae, Celastraceae, Elaeagnaceae, Iridaceae, Lamiaceae, Lythraceae,
Onagraceae, Orobanchaceae, Primulaceae, and Urticaeae. Specimens were
primarily from Canada (184), USA (71), and countries in the European Union (51),
with the rest from Africa (5), Asia (8), New Zealand or Australia (12), South America
(11), Bermuda (1), Mexico (4), and Dominican Republic (1). Fourty four rust
sequences representing 17 additional species were acquired from GenBank when
they had a Cyperaceae or Juncaceae as host, were related to Cyperaceae-
Juncaceae rusts as evidenced from BLAST searches and preliminary phylogenetic
analyses, or to serve as outgroups (Austropuccinia Beenken and Dasyspora Berk. &
M.A. Curtis, Puccinia spp. on Poaceae; Data S1).
2.2 DNA extraction and sequencing
The amount of infected leaf tissue sampled per specimen depended on the sizes
of lesions and degree of infection. Infected leaf tissue was excised with scalpels, or
with 1 mm, 1.5 mm, 2 mm or 3 mm biopsy punches. Most often, two 2 mm biopsy
punches were used to excise infected regions of plant tissue. Samples were similarly
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
excised from uninfected areas, from the same leaf as the rust whenever possible, for
host-only extractions. Methods for genomic DNA extraction were as described in
Hambleton et al. (2019) using a Macherey-Nagel NucleoMag® 96 Trace kit
(Macherey Nagel GmbH & Co. KG, Düren, Germany) and a KingFisher Flex
magnetic particle processor (Thermo Fisher Scientific Oy, Yantaa, Finland). The
protocol was modified as follows: prior to extraction, samples were homogenized
using liquid nitrogen and sterile disposable micro-centrifuge tube pestles (PES-15-B-
SI Axygen, Corning, NY USA), before suspending the DNA in 70 µl of elution buffer.
Methods for PCR amplification and sequencing of the nuclear rDNA ITS2 and
partial 28S region (ITS2-28S) for the rusts, and a portion of the ribulose-1,5-
bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene for the hosts, were
as described in Demers et al. (2017), with some modifications. For the rusts, PCR
fragments were typically amplified and sequenced using primers Rust2inv (Aime,
2006) and ITS4Ru1 (Rioux et al., 2015), which target ITS2 plus ca. 300 bp of the 28S
gene, or Rust2inv and ITS4 (White et al., 1990), which only target the ITS2 region,
when the amplification of longer fragments failed. For select samples, the reverse
primers LR5 or LR6 were used to target longer 28S fragments (Vilgalys & Hester,
1990). A few putatively misidentified host species were also barcoded for a fragment
of the external transcribed spacer region of rDNA (ETS-1f; Starr et al., 2003) using
primers ETS-1f and 18S-R or for the whole internal transcribed spacer region (ITS;
Cheng et al., 2016) using primers ITS-p5 and ITS-p4. The same protocol for
amplification was used for these regions as above, except for the following
modifications: 40 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 48°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 2 min (ETS) or
40 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 40 s, and 72°C for 1 min (ITS). Voucher
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
information and GenBank accession numbers of rust fungi and associated host
sequences can be found in Data S1.
Many of the specimens sampled for DNA in this study were processed as part of
a large-scale DNA barcoding project focused on generating reference sequence data
for a broad diversity of obligate plant pathogenic fungi housed in the DAOM
collection. There are challenges inherent in obtaining high-quality genomic data for
herbarium specimens collected and initially dried under unknown conditions. DNA
integrity is not necessarily related to age of the specimen (Liu & Hambleton, 2013),
meaning that success or failure at DNA barcode amplification is mostly
unpredictable. This routine initial PCR fragment for the rusts (comprising ITS2 and ~
300 bp of the adjacent 28S amplified with primers Rust2inv / ITS4Ru1) was adopted
because it can be sequenced bidirectionally with only two sequence reactions (one
forward, one reverse). Its use facilitates a rapid processing of specimens for initial
analyses and provides enough 28S signal to place the sequence near potential
relatives when the ITS2 sequence has no close matches. In analyses, this region
effectively groups specimens in OTUs that can then guide additional sequencing
efforts (eg. longer 28S), and the evaluation of other taxonomic characters.
We have observed that ITS2 is more amenable to direct sequencing than ITS1
because it possesses fewer indels and polybase regions that require cloning
approaches to resolve. In targeting the ITS2 region, we recognize that important
infraspecific variation may sometimes be difficult to interpret as compared to data
derived from the more conserved 28S region (McTaggart & Aime, 2018). Longer 28S
sequences were obtained for a select number of specimens but often only ITS2 could
be amplified and sequenced for many samples. No effort was made to sequence
alternative genes because of the lack of universal primers that work well across the
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
diversity of rust fungi, especially for DNA from herbarium specimens and single copy
genes (Hambleton et al., 2019), and the labour-intensive effort required to design and
test specific primers for each new group being studied.
2.3 Rust and host identification
Rust identifications were based on the latest taxonomic treatments and floras
available (Savile, 1965, 1970a, 1972, 1979; Parmelee, 1967, 1969; Parmelee &
Savile, 1981; Klenke & Scholler, 2015). Preliminary phylogenetic analyses showed
that many of the species we sampled were split into two to many distinct lineages,
sometimes distantly related. In consequence, we circumscribed Operational
Taxonomic Units (OTUs) for downstream analyses using a combination of genetic,
host range and geographic criteria. OTUs were circumscribed as monophyletic
clades of ITS2-28S sequences that are consistently different from all other OTUs by
at least one substitution or indel, and occur on different telial or aecial host species,
or on a different continent from their closest relative(s). Using such a combination of
phylogenetic, sequence similarity, ecological and geographic criteria can increase the
chance that OTUs correspond to species, when compared to methods based on
sequence similarity alone (Lücking et al., 2020). All analyses used OTUs in place of
species. Samples were given a species name (New Determination/OTU in Data S1),
appended with a number for species split into two or more OTUs (e.g., “Puccinia
angustata 1”, “Puccinia angustata 2”). Host identifications were based on information
present on herbarium labels, verified using the morphology of leaf, stem and
sometimes inflorescence fragments found in rust herbarium packets, as well as by
BLAST or phylogenetic (parsimony) analysis of host rbcL, ETS or ITS barcodes.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
2.4 Evaluating the barcode gap and diversity of rust fungi
An ideal molecular marker for species identification and discovery would show
higher interspecific than intraspecific sequence divergence, i.e. a discrete DNA
barcode gap (Stielow et al., 2015). We assessed the utility of the ITS2-28S region for
species identification of Cyperaceae-Juncaceae rust fungi by testing for the presence
of global and local barcode gaps. Pairwise distances between every sample were
measured using the F84 substitution model in the ape v5.3 package, and an
alignment-free k-mer approach (with k=7) using the kmer v1.1.2 package in R v3.6.3
(Edgar, 2004; Wilkinson, 2018; Paradis & Schliep, 2019; R Core Team, 2020).
Distances were calculated on the central portion of the alignment which was covered
by 95% of the samples, essentially consisting of the whole ITS2 and 25bp of the
downstream 28S. There was a strong linear relationship (R²=0.86) between F84 and
k-mer distances, so we report only results obtained with k-mers, which are not
affected by alignment errors.
To detect a global barcode gap, the distribution of pairwise distances within OTUs
was plotted alongside the distribution of distances between OTUs, with the
expectation that a global gap would show as a break or minimal overlap between the
two distributions. Even in the absence of a global gap, each OTU can still form a
cluster that is distinct from all other clusters, or in other words a “local barcode gap”.
To detect a local barcode gap, we focused on OTUs represented by at least two
samples, and compared for each of these the minimum between-OTU distance to the
maximum within-OTU distance. A local barcode gap is supported for an OTU if its
minimum between-OTU distance is at least twice as large as the maximum within-
OTU distance. In other words, the length of the branches separating individuals of
two different OTUs should be at least twice as long as the length of the branches
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
separating individuals of the same OTU for a local barcode gap to be recognized.
This is a conservative criterion compared to previous studies (e.g., Robinson et al.,
2009; Steinke et al., 2009), which considered a local barcode gap to exist when the
between-OTU distance was greater than the within-OTU distance. More sampling
within OTUs is expected to increase the maximum distance between individuals of
the same OTU. To determine whether uneven sampling of OTUs could drive
differences in the width of the local barcode gap, we ran an ordinary least-squares
analysis with number of samples per OTU as predictor, and maximum within-OTU
distance as response.
To estimate the magnitude of undescribed diversity existing in Cyperaceae-
Juncaceae rust fungi, richness accumulation curves were calculated for 11
morphologically-defined North American species (or species aggregates) where
more than five samples were available. We focused only on samples from the United
States and Canada because other countries were too poorly represented in the
dataset. A rarefaction curve was fit by treating OTUs as “species” and samples as
“individuals” in the R package vegan v2.5-6 (Oksanen et al., 2019), and checked the
presence or absence of a plateau. The Chao1 and ACE estimators of OTU richness
(O’Hara, 2005; Chiu et al., 2014) were also calculated as approximations of the total
number of OTUs (putative undescribed cryptic species) existing in each of the
studied rust species aggregates in North America north of Mexico.
2.5 Host phylogenetic data
We assembled phylogenetic datasets of monocot and dicot hosts using sequence
data available on GenBank (Data S2). For monocots, four plastid regions (rbcL,
matK, ndhF, trnL-F) and two nuclear ribosomal regions (ITS, ETS-1f) were selected
due to their good coverage across Cyperaceae and Juncaceae genera. Monocot
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
hosts were selected based on the hosts on which rust OTUs were found, and
supplemented with host information from the literature when there was no ambiguity
about the rust species identity. In a few cases, sequence data was unavailable or
coverage was poor for a monocot host species, in which cases we selected a
representative species that is putatively closely-related based on morphology. For
these reasons, Rhynchospora capitellata was used as an examplar host for rusts on
Rhynchospora gigantea, R. rariflora, and R. glomerata; Cyperus papyrus was used
as substitute for Cyperus latifolius (both C4 Cyperus); Carex pellita for C. lasiocarpa
(both sect. Paludosae); and Carex lurida for C. frankii (both sect. Vesicariae). For
dicot hosts, sequences of two plastid barcodes (rbcL and matK) were compiled for
one examplar species of each host genus from GenBank. Voucher information and
GenBank accession numbers of host sequences used for these analyses can be
found in Data S2.
2.6 Phylogenetic analyses
Rust relationships were estimated by Bayesian analysis using MrBayes v3.2.7a
(Ronquist et al., 2012) on the Cipres Science Gateway (Miller et al., 2010). Two
GTR+G+I partitions were used: (1) 5.8S + 28S rDNA, (2) ITS2. We used a two-
exponential branch length prior with mean of 0.01 for internal and 0.1 for external
branches, following recommendations for minimizing over-estimation of posterior
probabilities (Yang & Rannala, 2005). To speed convergence, searches were started
on a tree derived from a previous short approximate-maximum likelihood analysis in
FastTree v2.1.11 (Price et al., 2010), with 50 random perturbations. Two independent
MC3 chains were run for 50 million generations sampling trees every 5000
generations, with 11 heated chains using a temperature parameter of 0.02.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
Branch support for rust fungi relationships were further assessed by maximum
parsimony and distance-based bootstrapping (Felsenstein, 1985). Maximum
parsimony bootstrap (PBS) searches were done in PAUP* 4.0a166 for Linux
(Swofford, 2003) using 1000 replicates, with each replicate consisting of three
random-addition sequences (RAS), retaining three trees per RAS, and using the
strict-consensus bootstrap (GRPFREQ=NO). In addition, 1000 distance-based
bootstrap (DBS) searches were done in PAUP* using a GTR+Gamma model with
empirical base frequencies and neighbor-joining (NJ) for tree estimation.
Because global-fit cophylogenetic methods work best with ultrametric trees, rust
relationships and divergence times were also jointly estimated in MrBayes v3.2.7a.
Settings were the same as above, except for the use of a birth-death (clock) branch
length prior with an exponential speciation prior of 10, flat beta(1,1) extinction prior,
and sampling probability of 5% assuming random sampling. For dating, we used an
uncorrelated gamma (IGR) clock (Lepage et al., 2007) with a lognormal clock rate of
0.0025 substitutions/site/My with a standard-deviation (SD) of 0.5 and an exponential
hyperparameter of 10. Following previously estimated divergence times of rust fungi
(Aime et al., 2018), we placed a truncated normal secondary prior on the divergence
between the Austropuccinia-Dasyspora outgroup and the Puccinia-Uromyces-
Aecidium ingroup with an average of 71 My, a SD of 8, and a minimum of 40 My.
Two independent MC3 chains were run for 120 million generations sampling trees
every 10,000 generations, with 11 heated chains using a temperature parameter of
0.02.
Monocot and dicot host relationships and divergence times were also jointly
estimated by Bayesian analysis using MrBayes v3.6.7a, to generate ultrametric trees
for cophylogenetic analysis. Fossil and secondary calibrations were placed on select
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
nodes for dating (Smith et al., 2010; Barreda et al., 2015; Magallón et al., 2015;
Jiménez-Mejías et al., 2016; Mandel et al., 2019). Detailed methods can be found in
the supplementary material (Doc. S1).
For all Bayesian phylogenetic analyses, parameter convergence was assessed in
Tracer v1.7.1 (Rambaut et al., 2014), ten percent of runs was discarded as burnin,
and a maximum clade credibility chronogram (MCCT) was estimated using functions
of the paleotree R package (Bapst, 2012). Clade support was subjectively
characterized as poor (<0.90 pp), moderate (0.90–0.94 pp) and strong (0.95–1 pp).
2.7 Quantifying cophylogenetic signal
Cophylogenetic signal between rust fungi and their monocot and dicot hosts was
quantified on four datasets. Two “complete” datasets with all rust-monocot and rust-
dicot associations, including rust OTUs that are autoecious (with only one host type),
or where one of the alternate hosts was unknown, thus maximizing the amount of
available data. Two “reduced” datasets were also generated (rust-monocot and rust-
dicot) by pruning from phylogenies rust OTUs that are autoecious or with unknown
alternate host, thus keeping only OTUs that have known hosts for both monocots and
dicots. The “reduced” datasets are more appropriate when comparing cophylogenetic
signal between host types.
For each dataset, we ran two global-fit methods (PACo and Random TaPas), and
one event-based (Jane 4) method. Global-fit approaches work on distance matrices
(genetic or cophenetic) and are therefore robust to phylogenetic uncertainty. They
are most appropriate for the type of datasets presented here, where a single barcode
locus is used to estimate the parasite phylogeny, affording limited signal to resolve
backbone relationships. Event-based methods are less accurate when phylogenetic
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
uncertainty is high, but they have the advantage of directly estimating the number of
cospeciation and host shift events.
PACo is based on Procrustes superimposition of Principal coordinates derived
from cophenetic matrices of host and parasite trees (Balbuena et al., 2013). Perfect
cospeciation results in host and parasite trees that are exactly identical in topology
and branch lengths, whereas other scenarios increase the distance between host
and parasite cophenetic matrices. The significance of cophylogenetic signal is tested
by random permutations of the host-parasite associations, and comparing the
observed Procrustes distance to the distribution of distances obtained by
permutations. We ran PACo analyses on all datasets using 10,000 permutations to
test for significance. While PACo is fast and relatively powerful at quantifying
cophylogenetic signal, the statistics obtained are not comparable between host-
parasite systems.
Random TaPas is a recently developed method which provides an absolute
measure of cophylogenetic signal (G*) that can be compared across different host-
parasite systems. The G* statistic ranges from G*=0 for perfect cospeciation, to
G*=2/3 for random associations, and up to G*=1 for highly uneven signal where most
clades are incongruent or random, but a few clades highly congruent (Balbuena et
al., 2020). Significant cophylogenetic signal is detected when the confidence interval
of G* does not overlap with 2/3. Random TaPas was run by calculating PACo fits on
N=10,000 random partial tanglegrams of size n=10% of the total number of
associations, which are optimal settings for quantification of cophylogenetic signal
(Balbuena et al., 2020). We obtained a point-estimate of G* on the MCCT, and
calculated 95% credibility intervals by re-running Ramdom TaPas on 500 randomly
selected host and parasite trees from the MrBayes posterior samples.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
Finally, we used Jane4, an event-based approach that estimates the number of
cospeciations and host-switches (Conow et al., 2010). Jane4 was run with a
population size of 200 for 20 generations using the following default costs (in steps):
cospeciation=0, duplication=1, host switch=2, loss=1, and failure to diverge=1. The
significance of the cophylogenetic signal was estimated by re-running the algorithm
on 100 randomly permuted host-parasite associations with the same settings, and
comparing the resulting cost distribution to the observed cost.
3 Results
3.1 Barcoding results
ITS2 barcodes were obtained for 157 of the 254 specimens sampled for this study
(62% sequencing success), including one specimen (DAOM 181219) yielding ITS2
barcodes for two different rust species from separate DNA extractions of aecial and
uredinial pustules. These 158 sequences were combined with previously sequenced
and unpublished ITS2 barcodes for 94 additional DAOM specimens. Sequencing of
the rust failed for 84 newly sampled specimens with collection dates between 1883
and 2013, and sequences were too short or difficult to interpret for another 13. As
well as the ITS2 spacer, the 28S was also successfully sequenced for a short length
(97–346 bp) in 211 sequences (83%), and for a longer length (421–1174 bp) in 37
sequences (15%). Good amplicons were obtained for specimens that ranged in age
from <1 to 136 years (oldest specimen collected in 1880), with the majority of
sequences from specimens collected before 1962. Basic sequence statistics can be
found in Table 1. Rust sequences were obtained to represent all the diversity of
Cyperaceae hosts, including 12 genera representing 11 tribes, although sampling
was biased towards North America and Europe. Additional sequences were obtained
on related Juncaceae and Iridaceae rusts, and on alternate dicot (aecial) hosts,
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
including samples from Adoxaceae, Celastraceae, Elaeagnaceae, Grossulariaceae,
Lamiaceae, Orobanchaceae, Primulaceae, Urticaceae, and 37 genera and 9 tribes of
Asteraceae.
We obtained rbcL host plant barcodes for 130 of the 158 (82%) specimens
successfully sequenced for the rust in this study, and included previously generated
rbcL barcodes for 70 of the other 94 specimens. We also selectively generated ETS-
1f (21) or ITS (1) barcodes for 22 of those specimens, and ETS-1f (2) or ITS (3) for
five specimens for which rbcL sequencing failed. The rbcL host plant barcodes
revealed two host genus misidentifications; the 23 ETS-1f barcodes revealed three
host genus misidentifications and three host species misidentifications, and the four
ITS barcodes revealed a single host genus misidentification. Overall, host genus
misidentification rate was around 2.9% (6 misidentifications out of 205 specimens
with host barcodes). Host misidentification is difficult to assess at the species level,
because of the poor resolution of rbcL barcodes and limited number of more
informative ETS-1f and ITS barcodes.
3.2 Barcode gap analysis
Barcode gap analyses were done on the final rust alignment including a total of
296 sequences (252 sequences published here + 44 sequences from Genbank). The
distribution of within-OTU pairwise k-mer distances overlapped and was completely
included within the distribution of distances between OTUs, rejecting the presence of
a global barcode gap (Fig. 1). However, 56 out of the 72 OTUs (78%) represented by
more than one sample showed a local barcode gap, because the distance to the
nearest OTU was more than twice as large as the maximum within-OTU distance
(Fig. 1; supplementary Fig. S1), supporting the status of most OTUs as distinct
entities (differentiated populations or species). The maximum within-OTU distance,
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
which is used to identify the width of the local barcode gap, was only weakly and
non-significantly associated with the number of individuals sampled per OTU (least
squares p=0.067, R2=0.047). A t-test did not detect a significant difference (p=0.37)
in sampling depth between OTUs that showed a local barcode gap (averaging 3.3
samples per OTU) and those that did not (averaging 2.9 samples per OTU). Depth of
sampling within OTUs is therefore unlikely to have influenced the detection of the
local barcode gap.
3.3 Rarefaction and richness analysis
Eleven rust species or aggregates were represented by enough North American
samples to be used in rarefaction and richness analyses. Of those, Puccinia
mcclatchieana Dietel & Holw. was the only taxon where all samples formed a clade
with little molecular variation. All others showed sample paraphyly, polyphyly, or
sufficient molecular variation for multiple OTUs (possible cryptic species) to be
recognized. The chao1 and ACE statistics estimated between two and four OTUs for
most rust aggregates, including the Puccinia asteris Duby agg., P. eriophori Thüm.
agg., P. lagenophorae Cooke agg., Uromyces junci Tul. agg., and U. silphii (Syd. &
P. Syd.) Arthur agg.
A few aggregates stood out by their high number of observed and estimated
OTUs. The rarefaction curve for the P. angustata Peck agg. was nearly flat at 25
samples, thus chao1 and ACE estimated the same number of OTUs as observed: 6
OTUs in total (Fig. 2). The situation was similar for the P. urticata DC. agg. with 14
North American samples included and 5 OTUs observed and estimated. The
rarefaction curve was still growing fast for the P. obtecta Peck agg. with only five
sampled specimens and ca. 3 OTUs observed, so that chao1 and ACE estimated
respectively 4 and 6.7 OTUs. The rarefaction curve for the P. caricina DC. agg. was
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
also still growing fast at 28 included North American samples, so that 20 and 29.8
total OTUs were estimated, much more than the 13 observed OTUs. The rarefaction
curve for the highly paraphyletic Puccinia dioicae Magnus agg. also showed no sign
of leveling off at 12 samples, and chao1 and ACE were consequently high,
respectively estimating a total of 19.5 and 26.8 OTUs for this aggregate in North
America.
3.4 Phylogenetic results
Austropuccinia psidii and Dasyspora amazonica were sister to a strongly-
supported Puccinia + Uromyces + Aecidium clade (1.00 pp; 99% PBS; 93% DBS).
Within the latter, rusts of Poaceae [Puccinia coronata Corda, P. graminis Pers., P.
heterospora Berk. & M.A. Curtis, P. kuehnii (W. Krüger) E.J. Butler], P. malvacearum
Bertero ex Mont., and P. myrsiphylli (Thüm.) G. Winter formed a grade of lineages
(outgroups, not shown in Figs. 3–4) leading to a nested clade comprising all
Cyperaceae-Juncaceae rusts and related microcyclic species (Figs. 3–4). The rusts
on Cyperaceae-Juncaceae (ingroup) were monophyletic in all analyses, although
support was low (<0.50 pp; <50% PBS; 74% DBS; Figs. 3–4). However, a single
Carex rust, Puccinia microsora Körn., was placed with low support as part of the
early-diverged grade of Poaceae rusts that was included in the outgroup. Within the
clade of Cyperaceae-Juncaceae rusts, backbone relationships also received poor
support, but 143 OTUs were determined, including 43 identified at the species level,
and 100 corresponding best to 50 species in 27 species aggregates (Data S1).
Several moderately to strongly-supported clades emerged from a highly paraphyletic
group of microcyclic Asteraceae rusts, and samples identified as part of the Puccinia
dioicae agg. This aggregate accommodates nearly all rusts alternating between
Carex and Asteraceae. The 12 sampled specimens of the P. dioicae agg. formed 9
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
distinct lineages placed throughout the phylogeny. Rusts on Juncaceae (Juncus L.
and Luzula DC.) formed seven lineages scattered throughout the phylogeny and
often associated with specimens of the P. dioicae agg. The crown age of
Cyperaceae-Juncaceae rusts was estimated to be Late Eocene (ca. 35 Mya), and
most major rust clades appeared between 34 and 12 Mya, coincident with the crown
age of Carex (34–37 Mya) and the divergence of its major clades (23–18 Mya;
Martín-Bravo et al., 2019; Figs. 3–4).
Rusts of Scirpeae formed several distantly related clades throughout the
phylogeny. A strongly-supported P. angustata agg. (1.00 pp, 99% DBS, 98% PBS;
Fig. 3) comprised rusts with telia on Scirpus Tourn. ex L. or Eriophorum L.
(Scirpeae), and aecia on Mentha L. or Lycopus L. (Lamiaceae tribe Mentheae).
Within the P. angustata agg., five subclades received high support (>0.95 pp), with
one of these subclades comprising rusts of Eriophorum originally identified as “P.
eriophori”. Other samples of P. eriophori formed two distantly related clades. One
comprising accessions of Puccinia eriophori var. apargidii Savile, including the
holotype, formed a strongly-supported clade (1.00 pp, <50% DBS, 96% PBS; Fig. 3)
that was distantly related to other accessions of “P. eriophori 1” (1.00 pp, 83% DBS,
97% PBS; Fig. 4). Puccinia mcclatchieana, a species on Scirpus without known
aecial host, formed a strongly supported subclade (1.00 pp, 95% DBS, 95% PBS;
Fig. 3) within the P. urticata Clade, which mostly comprises rusts of Carex. Puccinia
mcclatchieana showed no important sequence variation, although two samples
originally identified as “P. mcclatchieana” on Scirpus from Oregon and California
(DAOM 70596 and DAOM 134101) were found to be distantly related to other P.
mcclatchieana accessions. They clustered instead with samples of P. urticata, and
were accordingly re-identified as “P. urticata agg. 2”.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
A moderately supported P. eriophori-alpini Allesch.–P. dulichii P. Syd. & Syd.
clade consisted of species that alternate between Solidago L. (Asteraceae tribe
Astereae) and members of the Scirpo-Caricoid Clade: Trichophorum, Carex, and
Dulichium Pers. (0.93 pp, 98% DBS, 70% PBS; Fig. 3). Samples from Solidago
confirmed this aecial host for P. dulichii and one P. dioicae agg. species, but no
samples were available to confirm the aecial host of P. eriophori-alpini, which is
known from a single record on Solidago in Europe (Jørstad, 1942).
A moderately supported “Uromyces lineolatus Clade” (0.94 pp, <50% DBS and
PBS; Fig. 3) comprised all rusts of Fuireneae s.lat. with unicellular teliospores and
aecia on Apiaceae: Uromyces lineolatus (Desm.) Schröt. subsp. lineolatus, U.
lineolatus subsp. neoarcticus Savile, and U. americanus Speg. Within this clade, U.
lineolatus subsp. lineolatus, an Old World rust on Bolboschoenus (Asch.) Palla, was
separated by a long branch from a poorly-supported New World clade consisting of
U. lineolatus subsp. neoarcticus and U. americanus, a rust that uses Schoenoplectus
(Rchb.) Palla as a host.
Sister to the U. lineolatus Clade was a strongly-supported “Puccinia urticata
Clade” (1.00 pp, <50% DBS, 51% PBS; Fig. 3), comprising all rusts of Carex with 3+
pores on the urediniospores, and with aecia usually on Urtica L. (Urticaceae).
Samples identified as “P. urticata” formed five distinct lineages separated by long
branches. One sample of a segregate species recognized in Europe, P. urticae-
acutae Kleb., was not positioned with the other samples of this species. Nested
within the P. urticata clade were a few species with different host alternations: P.
iridis Wallr. alternating between Iris L. (Iridaceae) and Valeriana L. (Valerianaceae);
P. paludosa Plowr. between Carex and Pedicularis L. (Orobanchaceae); and P.
minutissima Arthur between Carex and Decodon J.F.Gmel. (Lythraceae).
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
A strongly-supported “Puccinia caricina Clade” included all samples of P. caricina
and segregate species (1.00 pp, 66% DBS, 70% PBS; Fig. 4). These heteroecious
rusts alternate between Carex and Ribes L., Lysimachia L. or Parnassia L. The
autoecious derivative species P. parkerae Dietel & Holw. and P. ribis-japonici Henn.
of Ribes were nested in this clade. Species with distinctive characters such as single-
pored urediniospores (P. uniporula Orton) or aecia on genera other than Ribes (P.
karelica Tranzschel, P. limosae Magnus, P. uliginosa Juel) were nested within a
highly paraphyletic “P. caricina agg.” that formed subclades without obvious structure
in host ranges, but usually restricted either to samples from North America or from
Europe.
A strongly supported “Puccinia obtecta Clade” (1.00 pp, 83% DBS, 97% PBS; Fig.
4) consisted of all heteroecious rusts of Schoenoplectus and Cyperus L. with telia in
locules or surrounded by fused paraphyses, and aecia on Asteraceae, as well as a
few autoecious rusts on related genera of Asteraceae. Within this clade, a strongly-
supported subclade contained intermixed samples of P. obtecta and P. osoyoosensis
Savile (1.00 pp, 66% DBS, 98% PBS; Fig. 4), two species infecting Schoenoplectus
and alternating either on Bidens L. or Xanthium L. (Asteraceae tribe Heliantheae)
that differ by several morphological characters. Sister to this subclade was a
strongly-supported subclade including P. canaliculata (Schwein.) Lagerh. 2 (0.95 pp,
83% DBS, 68% PBS; Fig. 4), a rust of Cyperus also thought to alternate on
Xanthium, and autoecious derivatives on Xanthium and various other Heliantheae,
including accessions identified as P. xanthii Schwein. and P. melampodii Dietel &
Holw. that were not monophyletic.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
3.5 Cophylogenetic signal
Significant cophylogenetic signal was detected by global-fit (PACo, Random
TaPas) and event-based (Jane4) methods for complete and reduced datasets, and
for dicot and monocot hosts (Table 2). Yet, the event-based approach, Jane4,
estimated comparatively few cospeciations and a large number of host-switches and
duplications, suggesting that the significant cophylogenetic signal is not driven by
strict cospeciation.
The Random TaPas G* coefficient was >2/3 for all datasets, indicating that the
cophylogenetic signal was split between highly congruent clades (blue colours in Fig.
5), and highly discordant clades (red colours in Fig. 5). In monocots, high
cophylogenetic signal was visible in the deeper nodes of the Carex phylogeny
(Cariceae), and in the Scirpus-Eriophorum clade (Scirpeae; Fig. 5A). Highly
discordant signal comes from genera of Fuireneae s.lat., Eleocharis R.Br.
(Eleocharideae) and Cyperus (Cypereae), as well as Juncaceae. In dicots, the clade
comprising Grossulariaceae, Lythraceae, Celastraceae, Elaeagnaceae and
Urticaceae (Rosids) showed particularly discordant cophylogenetic signal as they
were hosts to several unrelated rust lineages (Fig. 5B). No other dicot lineage
showed particularly strong cophylogenetic signal.
In the reduced datasets, Jane4 estimated slightly more cospeciations and fewer
host switches in dicots compared to monocots, suggesting higher cophylogenetic
signal between rusts and dicot hosts. However, the confidence interval of the G*
coefficients of monocots and dicots overlapped in the reduced datasets (Table 2),
and there is thus no significant difference in cophylogenetic signal between monocot
and dicot hosts.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
4 Discussion
4.1 Cophylogenetic signal without cospeciation in Cyperaceae-Juncaceae rusts
Using the largest barcoding dataset of rust fungi to date (Feau et al., 2011;
Beenken et al., 2017), we demonstrated the utility of ITS2-28S barcodes for species
identification and discovery in North American Cyperaceae-Juncaceae rust fungi.
Perhaps surprisingly, our analyses suggest large numbers of host jumps and a
relatively minor role for cospeciation, in spite of the significant cophylogenetic signal
detected by both global-fit and event-based methods. A strict cospeciation scenario
can confidently be rejected, but what then explains the significant correlation we
observed between host and parasite phylogenies?
An emerging consensus is that strict cospeciation is exceedingly rare in nature,
and that other processes are responsible for the cophylogenetic signal observed in
most host-parasite associations (Nylin et al., 2018). The most recent review of the
empirical literature on the subject found only seven convincing examples of systems
dominated by cospeciation out of 103 cophylogenetic studies (de Vienne et al.,
2013). All conclusive cases were between invertebrates and internal mutualistic
prokaryotes that are transmitted internally from parent to offspring, limiting the
possibility of dispersal to new hosts (Bright & Bulgheresi, 2010). In external,
horizontally-transmitted parasites such as smut and rust fungi (Refrégier et al., 2008),
host jumps were the dominant mode of evolution. This could be due to the fact that
chance encounters with new hosts are more likely in external parasites. Indeed, rust
spores are mostly wind dispersed, and are therefore frequently deposited on non-
host species (Savile, 1976), providing constant opportunities to colonize new
species. Jumps may be further favored when related plant species live in close
sympatry, as is often the case in Cyperaceae (Elliott et al., 2016). Jumps may also be
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
common due to the fact that it can rescue parasites from extinction in the
coevolutionary arms race with their hosts (Thines, 2019).
One way to explain the significant cophylogenetic signal we detected in
Cyperaceae-Juncaceae rusts, even in the absence of cospeciation, would be to
assume that host jumps occur most often between closely related hosts (Charleston
& Robertson, 2002). Such a model of “preferential host jumps” is supported by
inoculation experiments that showed fungal pathogens better able to infect novel host
plants when they are closely related to their normal hosts (Gilbert & Webb, 2007; de
Vienne et al., 2009). The same pattern was demonstrated in RNA viruses, with
probability of host jumps following a sigmoidal relationship with phylogenetic distance
between hosts, indicating that jumps to closely related hosts are easy, whereas
moderately and distantly related hosts become quickly unreachable (Cuthill &
Charleston, 2013). Preferential host jumps have now been documented in a large
variety of plant and animal systems, and appear to be the rule in most systems (de
Vienne et al., 2013). Preferential host jumps were also suggested to be the main
driver behind cophylogenetic congruence of Anthracoidea smuts and their Carex
hosts (Hendrichs et al., 2005; Escudero, 2015), a classic example of host-parasite
correlation in Cyperaceae (Savile, 1952; Savile & Calder, 1953; Kukkonen &
Timonen, 1979). The rust fungi of Cyperaceae and Juncaceae appear to be yet
another example of cophylogenetic signal driven by preferential host jumps.
4.2 Cophylogenetic signal does not differ significantly between aecial and telial hosts
A previous study found that correlations between rusts and host phylogenies are
stronger on aecial than on telial hosts (Aime et al., 2018), a pattern we call here
“differential host conservatism”. Differential host conservatism could be explained by
the fact that sexual reproduction occurs on dicot aecial hosts, therefore making
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
infection of novel aecial hosts more disadvantageous than infection of novel telial
hosts. Indeed, a novel aecial host reduces the rust’s outcrossing opportunities,
whereas a novel telial hosts does not affect any component of the rust reproductive
cycle.
We find indications of differential host conservatism in the complete datasets,
when cophylogenetic signal is compared in dicot (mostly aecial) and monocot (telial)
hosts. However, analyses on reduced datasets where both aecial and telial hosts are
known for all terminals finds no significant difference in cophylogenetic signal. Thus,
the differential host conservatism detected on the complete datasets is likely caused
by the different size of the datasets, with the complete monocot dataset containing a
larger number of terminals and hence higher chance of catching instances of
incongruent signal. In consequence, the lack of a significant difference in
cophylogenetic signal between telial and aecial hosts in Cyperaceae-Juncaceae
rusts contrasts with the much stronger differential host conservatism reported by
Aime et al. (2018) at higher taxonomic levels in rust fungi.
Our results would fit a pattern where differential host conservatism is stronger in
more ancient rust lineages, such as between rust families (Aime et al., 2018), but
weaker in recent lineages such as within rust genera (present results). Such a decay
of differential host conservatism rejects the explanation that aecial hosts are
conserved due to reduced mating opportunities on novel aecial hosts, because this
phenomenon should act relatively fast in creating differences in host jump
probabilities. Hence, if this was true, it should be equally detectable at all taxonomic
levels. Consequently, the decay we observed points to a role for slowly-acting
evolutionary forces that would only create differences at longer evolutionary
timescales. Such forces could include differential speed of the coevolutionary arms
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
race in aecial and telial hosts, or the effect of one of the many biological
characteristics that differ between spore stages, such as ploidy (Ono, 2002) or
virulence (Rice and Westoby, 1982). More studies are needed to determine the
extent of differential host conservatism and to identify the causal factors behind the
pattern.
4.3 Utility of rust fungi relationships in Cyperaceae-Juncaceae classification
The fact that cophylogenetic signal is driven by preferential host jumps in the
Cyperaceae-Juncaceae rusts does not exclude the possibility that rust relationships
might corroborate proposed host relationships. In some of his most influential
studies, Savile (1972, 1979) hypothesized a close affinity between several groups of
Cyperaceae genera that shared the same rust lineages. For instance, he proposed
that Carex, Trichophorum, Scirpus, Eriophorum and Dulichium were closely related
based on the occurrence of rusts classified within the “dioicae-hieracii lineage”
infecting all these genera (Savile, 1970a). Such a close relationship among these
temperate sedge genera had never been proposed before, but molecular
phylogenetic studies have since placed them all in a strongly-supported “Scirpo-
Caricoid Clade” (Léveillé-Bourret et al., 2014, 2015, 2018a; Semmouri et al., 2019;
Léveillé-Bourret & Starr, 2019). Nevertheless, molecular analysis of the rusts
invalidates Savile’s hypothesis because members of his “dioicae-hieracii lineage”,
such as the Puccinia dioicae agg., P. dulichii, P. eriophori and U. perigynius Halst.
are scattered throughout the rust phylogeny, as in previous analyses (van der Merwe
et al., 2007, 2008). It therefore seems probable that characters used to delimit
Savile’s “dioicae-hieracii lineage”, such as bizonate aeciospores, flattened
urediniospores with two super-equatorial pores, and telia without paraphyses, are
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
plesiomorphic or convergent in Cyperaceae-Juncaceae rusts (Puccinia–Uromyces
clade I sensu Maier et al., 2007).
The close relationship of Bulbostylis Kunth and Eleocharis, supported by all
phylogenetic analyses of Cyperaceae (e.g., Muasya et al., 2009; Hinchliff & Roalson,
2013; Semmouri et al., 2019), was also thought to be supported by rust fungi (Savile,
1979). However, the rusts of Bulbostylis and Eleocharis are here shown to form three
separate and seemingly distant clades. Likewise, the fact that all rusts infecting
Fuireneae s.lat. genera (Bolboschoenus, Schoenoplectus, Schoenoplectiella Lye,
Fuirena Rottb.) and Eleocharis possess urediniospores with 3+ equatorial pores and
loculate telia has been suggested to reflect correlated evolution of rusts and their
hosts (Savile, 1979; Goetghebeur, 1998). However, urediniospores with 3+ pores
and loculate telia are here shown to have evolved in four lineages from 2-pored, non-
loculate ancestors: (1) in the Uromyces lineolatus Clade; (2) in Puccinia liberta F.
Kern; (3) in P. canaliculata 1; (4) and in the P. obtecta Clade. Repeated evolution of
loculate telia might be better understood as another example of parallel adaptation in
rusts subject to similar ecological pressures (Savile, 1976, 1978), as most Fuireneae
s.lat. and Eleocharideae produce emergent, leafless culms in open marshes. Their
culms offer a substrate subject to intense sunlight and heat that may have favored
rust species able to protect their resting spores by enclosing them within locules.
Stronger cophylogenetic signal is observed at lower taxonomic levels. Notably,
subclades within the Puccinia angustata agg. are each restricted to different
subclades of Scirpus and Eriophorum species, suggesting greater host specificity
than previously recognized (Scirpeae; Léveillé-Bourret et al., 2014, 2015). Rusts on
genera of Fuireneae s.lat. (Bolboschoenus, Schoenoplectus), a Cyperaceae tribe
long suspected to be unnatural (Shiels et al., 2014; Glon et al., 2017; Semmouri et
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
al., 2019), formed two distantly related clades that diverged in the Mid-Miocene (ca.
13 Mya), despite sharing highly distinctive loculate telia. These two rust clades differ
in important morphological and ecological features (Savile, 1972; Klenke & Scholler,
2015), and their divergence supports the recognition of separate tribes for the genera
Bolboschoenus and Schoenoplectus (Bolboschoeneae and Schoenoplecteae; see
Starr et al., 2021 in this issue). A more detailed discussion of cophylogenetic patterns
and their taxonomic implications can be found in the supplementary material (Doc.
S2).
4.4 Challenges and prospects of ITS2-28S for the discovery and identification of rust
species
The ITS2-28S provides good resolution for the identification of rust fungi, and
enough variation to serve as a first step in the discovery of new species, as
demonstrated here and in previous studies (e.g., McTaggart & Aime, 2018). The
absence of a global barcode gap is in line with previous studies on this locus (Stielow
et al., 2015), but is compensated by the presence of a local gap in most species or
OTUs (Robinson et al., 2009; Steinke et al., 2009). Combined with host and
distribution information, we expect ITS2-28S to provide good resolution for rust
identification, even in the most species-rich lineages. The large number of indels in
ITS2, and the short length of the 28S sequence usually obtained with our primers
provided only limited phylogenetic signal, but its relative ease of amplification and
specificity enables the rapid and extensive study of hundreds of taxa, even when old
specimens (>100 years) must be used. This is an important feature for barcoding a
group of fungi that is very diverse, but also severely under-collected in recent years
(Liu & Hambleton, 2010). In the future, increasingly sensitive genome sequencing
techniques and an acceleration in the availability of a diversity of rust genomes will
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
lead to the recognition of optimal regions for molecular phylogenetic analyses and
facilitate the development of new robust PCR primers for the rusts.
Our barcoding approach highlights the need for more in-depth studies of the
taxonomy of Cyperaceae-Juncaceae rusts, by demonstrating that the broad species
limits still in use in North America are in many case unnatural (high levels of sample
paraphyly or polyphyly). We estimate that between 5 and 24 potential cryptic species
(OTUs) could exist within each of the four most common and abundant North
American species aggregates on Carex, Scirpus and Eriophorum, the Puccinia
angustata s.lat., P. caricina agg., P. dioicae agg. and P. urticata agg. This leads us to
believe that the total number of rust species on Cyperaceae-Juncaceae recognized
in North America will more than double when detailed taxonomic studies combining
molecular and ecological data are made. In fact, if every OTU delimited here
corresponds to one rust species and the richness estimates are reliable, a minimum
of 90 rust species of Cyperaceae and 10 of Juncaceae would be expected in North
America north of Mexico. This would be roughly one rust species for every ten
Cyperaceae-Juncaceae species (Ball et al., 2002), which is well below the ratio of
one rust species for every two to three Cyperaceae species reported from Germany
(Klenke & Scholler, 2015). Such numbers are unsurprising given that similarly large
numbers of cryptic species are being discovered in many other groups of fungal plant
parasites (Roy et al., 1998; Pažoutová et al., 2015; Riess et al., 2019; Shoukouhi et
al., 2019; Kemler et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2020). Moreover, taxonomists have long
recognized the likelihood of cryptic speciation in several of the rust complexes we
studied, but were unable to discern robust diagnostic features due to the limited
number of characters that can be studied with traditional morphological approaches
(Savile, 1972, 1973, 1984; Parmelee, 1989).
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
In Europe, narrowly circumscribed species have been in use for a long time in the
notoriously difficult heteroecious rusts of Carex, giving greater weight to host range
and ecology compared to the broader “morphological species” recognized in North
America (Banz & Zwetko, 2018). This was made possible by abundant cross-
inoculation studies and careful observations in the field, data sources that are more
limited in North America. Our molecular results suggest that the narrower species
limits used in Europe may be more appropriate, although future studies will need to
confirm that the OTUs delimited here correspond to species, rather than intraspecific
variants. DNA barcoding promises to play an important role in rust species
delimitation by replacing labour-intensive cross-inoculations and field observations
with easily-obtained molecular data when linking life stages on telial (monocot) and
aecial (dicot) hosts. Combined with other modern techniques such as multi-locus
approaches to species delimitation (Rintoul et al., 2012), and the re-examination of
morphological features using electron microscopy and morphometric analysis
(Zwetko & Blanz, 2012; Liu & Hambleton, 2013), the tools are now available to
document the diversity of undescribed microfungi that occur on Cyperaceae and
Juncaceae in North America. A detailed discussion of the taxonomic implications of
the phylogenetic results for a few important rust species aggregates and their
correlated microcyclic or autoecious relatives can be found in the supplementary
material (Doc. S2).
4.5 Diversity begets diversity in the rusts of Carex
The genus Carex (>2000 species) is larger than 92% of all flowering plant
families. With a distribution that spans all the continents except Antarctica, its species
can be found in habitats as varied as tropical rain forests, deserts, prairies and arctic
tundra (Starr et al., 2015; Global Carex Group, 2015; Martín-Bravo et al., 2019). This
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
broad diversity is probably the driving factor behind the importance of Carex as telial
host to such a phylogenetically and taxonomically diverse collection of rusts. Our
results provide evidence that Carex diversity has promoted the diversification of their
rust parasites because (1) the timing of origin of Carex and its major clades appears
to coincide roughly with the origin and diversification of the Cyperaceae-Juncaceae
rusts (Puccinia–Uromyces clade I sensu Maier et al., 2007), and (2) several major
rust lineages such as the P. urticata Clade and the P. caricina Clade are mostly
restricted to a single small aecial host genus (respectively Urtica and Ribes), and yet
they appear to comprise numerous cryptic rust species or races that have probably
evolved by specialization on one or a few Carex hosts. This is not entirely
unexpected as studies on other parasitic associations have shown that the
diversification of plant hosts drives the diversification of their insect associates (Janz
et al., 2006; Cruaud et al., 2012), and that taxonomically diverse host communities
increase parasite diversity (e.g., in amphibians, Johnson et al., 2016; birds,
Hechinger and Lafferty, 2005; and insect protective symbionts (Hafer & Vorburger,
2019). Simulations also suggest that rapidly diversifying host clades promote parasite
diversification in the presence of preferential host shifts (Engelstädter & Fortuna,
2019).
The high rate of ecological niche evolution observed in rapidly radiating lineages
of Carex (Pender, 2015; Spalink et al., 2016; Pender et al., 2021 in this issue) may
also have played a role in the diversification of their rust fungi, by facilitating the
evolution of new aecial host associations or by promoting ecological specialization.
As more phylogenetic data accumulates on rust fungi and as taxonomic studies
clarify species limits, diversity and host ranges, it should soon be possible to explicitly
test for correlations between rust and host diversification rates. We suspect that such
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
studies will find that the amazing diversity of rust fungi on Carex is more than mere
coincidence.
Acknowledgements
Development of molecular data for DAOM specimens was supported by funding
from the Genomics Research and Development Initiative (GRDI-QIS, Project ID
2679) of the Government of Canada (https://grdi.canada.ca/en). For assistance in
locating herbarium specimens and permitting DNA work, we thank Jennifer Wilkinson
and Scott Redhead (Canadian National Mycological Herbarium, Ottawa, Canada).
We also thank Sylvia Wilson and the Molecular Technologies Laboratory (MTL) at
the Ottawa Research & Development Centre, specifically Julie T. Chapados, Kasia
Dadej, Wayne McCormick and Lisa Koziol, for technical assistance. Finally, we thank
Julie Carey for preparing all the GenBank submissions. Part of this research was
conducted while the first author was a PhD student at the University of Ottawa
(UofO) with support from an Alexander-Graham-Bell NSERC Research Scholarship,
a FRQNT Doctoral Scholarship, and an UofO Excellence Scholarship. This work was
also supported by National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada
(NSERC) Discovery Grants to Julian R. Starr (RGPINs 342278-2013 and 2018-
04115). Two anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments on an early version of
this manuscript.
References
Aime MC. 2006. Toward resolving family-level relationships in rust fungi
(Uredinales). Mycoscience 47, 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10267-006-
0281-0
Aime MC, Bell CD, Wilson AW. 2018. Deconstructing the evolutionary complexity
between rust fungi (Pucciniales) and their plant hosts. Studies in Mycology 89,
143–152.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
Aime MC, Toome M, McLaughlin DJ. 2014. Pucciniomycotina. In: McLaughlin DJ,
Spatafora JW eds. The Mycota, volume 7A: systematics and evolution.
Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 271–294.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55318-9_10
Arthur JC. 1934. Manual of the rusts in United States and Canada. Purdue Research
Foundation, Lafayette, Indiana (United-States).
Balbuena JA, Míguez-Lozano R, Blasco-Costa I. 2013. PACo: a novel procrustes
application to cophylogenetic analysis. PLoS ONE 8, e61048.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061048
Balbuena JA, Pérez-Escobar ÓA, Llopis-Belenguer C, Blasco-Costa I. 2020. Random
Tanglegram Partitions (Random TaPas): an alexandrian approach to the
cophylogenetic gordian knot. Systematic Biology 69: 1212–1230.
Ball PW, Reznicek AA, Murray DF 2002. Cyperaceae Jussieu. In: Flora of North
America Editorial Committee eds. Flora of North America north of Mexico,
vol. 23. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Brooks RE, Clemants SE. 2000. Juncaceae A. L. Jussieu. In: Flora of North America
Editorial Committee eds. Flora of North America north of Mexico, vol. 22.
Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Banz P, Zwetko P. 2018. Remarks on species concepts in European Florae of rust
fungi. In: Banz P ed. Biodiversity and ecology of fungi, lichens, and mosses:
Kerner von Marilaun Workshop 2015 in Memory of Josef Poelt. Verlag der
Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien, pp. 289–310.
Bapst DW. 2012. paleotree: an R package for paleontological and phylogenetic
analyses of evolution. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3: 803–807.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00223.x
Barnes CW, Kinkel LL, Groth JV. 2005. Spatial and temporal dynamics of Puccinia
andropogonis on Comandra umbellata and Andropogon gerardii in a native
prairie. Canadian Journal of Botany 83, 1159–1173.
https://doi.org/10.1139/b05-087
Barreda VD, Palazzesi L, Tellería MC, Olivero EB, Raine JI, Forest F. 2015. Early
evolution of the angiosperm clade Asteraceae in the Cretaceous of Antarctica.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 10989–10994.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1423653112
Beenken L, Lutz M, Scholler M. 2017. DNA barcoding and phylogenetic analyses of
the genus Coleosporium (Pucciniales) reveal that the North American
goldenrod rust C. solidaginis is a neomycete on introduced and native
Solidago species in Europe. Mycological Progress 16, 1073–1085.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-017-1357-2
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
Blackwell M. 2011. The Fungi: 1, 2, 3 … 5.1 million species? American Journal of
Botany 98, 426–438. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1000298
Blackwell M, Vega FE. 2018. Lives within lives: hidden fungal biodiversity and the
importance of conservation. Fungal Ecology 35, 127–134.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2018.05.011
Bright M, Bulgheresi S. 2010. A complex journey: transmission of microbial
symbionts. Nature Reviews Microbiology 8, 218–230.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2262
Brodie JF, Aslan CE, Rogers HS, Redford KH, Maron JL, Bronstein JL, Groves CR.
2014. Secondary extinctions of biodiversity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution
29, 664–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.09.012
Bruhl JJ, 1995. Sedge genera of the world: relationships and a new classification of
the Cyperaceae. Australian Systematic Botany 8, 125–305.
Caro T. 2010. Conservation by proxy: indicator, umbrella, keystone, flagship, and
other surrogate species, 2nd ed. Island Press.
Charleston MA, Robertson DL. 2002. Preferential host switching by primate
Lentiviruses can account for phylogenetic similarity with the primate
phylogeny. Systematic Biology 51, 528–535.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150290069940
Cheng T, Xu C, Lei L, Li C, Zhang Y, Zhou S. 2016. Barcoding the kingdom Plantae:
new PCR primers for ITS regions of plants with improved universality and
specificity. Molecular Ecology Resources 16, 138–149.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12438
Chiu CH, Wang YT, Walther BA, Chao A. 2014. An improved nonparametric lower
bound of species richness via a modified good-turing frequency formula.
Biometrics 70, 671–682. https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12200
Conow C, Fielder D, Ovadia Y, Libeskind-Hadas R. 2010. Jane: a new tool for the
cophylogeny reconstruction problem. Algorithms for Molecular Biology 5,
Article 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7188-5-16
Cruaud A, Rønsted N, Chantarasuwan B, Chou LS, Clement WL, Couloux A,
Cousins B, Genson G, Harrison RD, Hanson PE, Hossaert-Mckey M, Jabbour-
Zahab R, Jousselin E, Kerdelhué C, Kjellberg F, Lopez-Vaamonde C, Peebles
J, Peng YQ, Pereira RAS, Schramm T, Ubaidillah R, van Noort S, Weiblen
GD, Yang DR, Yodpinyanee A, Libeskind-Hadas R, Cook JM, Rasplus JY,
Savolainen V. 2012. An extreme case of plant–insect codiversification: figs
and fig-pollinating wasps. Systematic Biology 61, 1029–1047.
https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys068
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
Cummins GB, Hiratsuka Y. 2003. Illustrated genera of rust fungi, 3rd ed. American
Phytopathological Society (APS), St. Paul, Minnesota (United States).
Cuthill JH, Charleston MA. 2013. A simple model explains the dynamics of
preferential host switching among mammal RNA viruses. Evolution 67, 980–
990. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12064
Dahlgren R. 1983. General aspects of angiosperm evolution and macrosystematics.
Nordic Journal of Botany 3, 119–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-
1051.1983.tb01448.x
de Vienne DM, Hood ME, Giraud T. 2009. Phylogenetic determinants of potential
host shifts in fungal pathogens. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22, 2532–
2541. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01878.x
de Vienne DM, Refrégier G, López-Villavicencio M, Tellier A, Hood ME, Giraud T.
2013. Cospeciation vs host-shift speciation: methods for testing, evidence
from natural associations and relation to coevolution. New Phytologist 198,
347–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12150
Demers JE, Liu M, Hambleton S, Castlebury LA. 2017. Rust fungi on Panicum.
Mycologia 109, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2016.1262656
Edgar RC. 2004. Local homology recognition and distance measures in linear time
using compressed amino acid alphabets. Nucleic Acids Research 32, 380–385.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh180
Eichler W. 1948. XLI.--Some rules in ectoparasitism. The Annals and Magazine of
Natural History Series 12 1, 588–598.
Elliott TL, Waterway MJ, Davies TJ. 2016. Contrasting lineage-specific patterns
conceal community phylogenetic structure in larger clades. Journal of
Vegetation Science 27, 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12345
Engelstädter J, Fortuna NZ. 2019. The dynamics of preferential host switching: host
phylogeny as a key predictor of parasite distribution. Evolution 73: 1330–
1340. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13716
Escudero M. 2015. Phylogenetic congruence of parasitic smut fungi (Anthracoidea,
Anthracoideaceae) and their host plants (Carex, Cyperaceae): cospeciation or
host-shift speciation? American Journal of Botany 102, 1108–1114.
https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1500130
Fahrenholz H. 1913. Ectoparasiten und abstammungslehre. Zoologischer Anzeiger 41,
371–374.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
Feau N, Vialle A, Allaire M, Maier W, Hamelin RC. 2011. DNA barcoding in the rust
genus Chrysomyxa and its implications for the phylogeny of the genus.
Mycologia 103, 1250–1266. https://doi.org/10.3852/10-426
Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the
bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783–791. https://doi.org/10.2307/2408678
Fernald ML. 1905. The North American species of Eriophorum. Part II. Notes on the
preceeding synopsis. Rhodora 7, 129–136.
Frodin DG. 2004. History and concepts of big plant genera. Taxon 53, 753–776.
Geils BW, Hummer KE, Hunt RS. 2010. White pines, Ribes, and blister rust: a review
and synthesis. Forest Pathology 40, 147–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-
0329.2010.00654.x
Gilbert GS, Webb CO. 2007. Phylogenetic signal in plant pathogen-host range.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104, 4979–4983.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0607968104
Gilmour CN, Starr JR, Naczi RFC. 2013. Calliscirpus, a new genus for two narrow
endemics of the California Floristic Province, C. criniger and C. brachythrix
sp. nov. (Cyperaceae). Kew Bulletin 68, 84–105.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12225-012-9420-2
Global Carex Group, 2015. Making Carex monophyletic (Cyperaceae, tribe
Cariceae): a new broader circumscription. Botanical Journal of the Linnean
Society 179, 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12298
Glon HE, Shiels DR, Linton E, Starr JR, Shorkey AL, Fleming S, Lichtenwald SK,
Schick ER, Pozo D, Monfils AK. 2017. A five gene phylogenetic study of
Fuireneae (Cyperaceae) with a revision of Isolepis humillima. Systematic
Botany 42, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1600/036364417X694601
Goetghebeur P. 1998. Cyperaceae. In: Kubitzki K ed. Flowering Plants,
Monocotyledons: Alismatanae and Commelinanae (except Gramineae), The
Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. Springer, New York (United-States),
pp. 141–190.
Govaerts R, Simpson DA, Bruhl JJ, Egorova, T., Goetghebeur P, Wilson K. 2007.
World checklist of Cyperaceae. Kew Publishing, Kew (England).
Hafer N, Vorburger C. 2019. Diversity begets diversity: do parasites promote
variation in protective symbionts? Current Opinion in Insect Science 32, 8–14.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2018.08.008
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
Hambleton S, Liu M, Eggertson Q, Wilson S, Carey J, Anikster Y, Kolmer JA. 2019.
Crown rust fungi with short lifecycles – the Puccinia mesnieriana species
complex. Sydowia 71: 47–63.
Hawksworth DL, Rossman AY. 1997. Where are all the undescribed fungi?
Phytopathology 87, 888–891. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.1997.87.9.888
Hechinger RF, Lafferty KD. 2005. Host diversity begets parasite diversity: bird final
hosts and trematodes in snail intermediate hosts. Proceedings of the Royal
Society B: Biological Sciences 272, 1059–1066.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3070
Henderson DM. 2004. The rust fungi of the British Isles: a guide to identification by
their host plant. British Mycological Society, Kew (England).
Hendrichs M, Begerow D, Bauer R, Oberwinkler F. 2005. The genus Anthracoidea
(Basidiomycota, Ustilaginales): a molecular phylogenetic approach using LSU
rDNA sequences. Mycological Research 109, 31–40.
Henk DA, Farr DF, Aime MC, 2011. Mycodiplosis (Diptera) infestation of rust fungi
is frequent, wide spread and possibly host specific. Fungal Ecology 4, 284–
289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2011.03.006
Hinchliff CE, Roalson EH, 2013. Using supermatrices for phylogenetic inquiry: an
example using the sedges. Systematic Biology 62, 205–219.
https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys088
Hiratsuka N. 1933. Inoculation experiments with heteroecious species of the Japanese
rust fungi. The Botanical Magazine, Tokyo 47, 710–714.
Ito S. 1934. Cultures of Japanese Uredinales I. The Botanical Magazine, Tokyo 48,
531–539. https://doi.org/10.15281/jplantres1887.48.531
Jackson HS. 1931. Present evolutionary tendencies and the origin of the life cycles in
the Uredinales. Memoirs of the Torrey Botanical Club 18, 1–108.
Janz N, Nylin S, Wahlberg N. 2006. Diversity begets diversity: host expansions and
the diversification of plant-feeding insects. BMC Evolutionary Biolology 6, 4.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-6-4
Jiménez-Mejías P, Martinetto E, Momohara A, Popova S, Smith SY, Roalson EH.
2016. A commented synopsis of the pre-Pleistocene fossil record of Carex
(Cyperaceae). The Botanical Review 82, 258–345.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-016-9169-7
Johnson PTJ, Wood CL, Joseph MB, Preston DL, Haas SE, Springer YP. 2016.
Habitat heterogeneity drives the host-diversity-begets-parasite-diversity
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
relationship: evidence from experimental and field studies. Ecology Letters 19,
752–761. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12609
Jørstad I. 1942. The aecidial stage of Puccinia confinis Sydow. Nyt Magazin for
Naturvidenskaberne 83, 100–103.
Kemler M, Denchev TT, Denchev CM, Begerow D, Piątek M, Lutz M. 2020. Host
preference and sorus location correlate with parasite phylogeny in the smut
fungal genus Microbotryum (Basidiomycota, Microbotryales). Mycological
Progress 19, 481–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-020-01571-x
Kirschner J. 2002. Juncaceae 1: Rostkovia to Luzula, in: Orchard AE, Bleyerveen JE,
Wilson AJG, Kuchlmayer B eds. Species Plantarum: Flora of the World.
Australian Biological Ressources Study, Canberra, p. 122.
Klassen GJ. 1992. Coevolution: a history of the macroevolutionary approach to
studying host-parasite associations. Journal of Parasitology 78, 573–587.
Klenke F, Scholler M. 2015. Pflanzenparasitische Kleinpilze. Springer Berlin
Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46162-4
Koh LP. 2004. Species coextinctions and the biodiversity crisis. Science 305, 1632–
1634. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1101101
Koyama T. 1958. Taxonomic study of the genus Scirpus Linné. Journal of the Faculty
of Science, University of Tokyo, Section 3. Botany 7, 271–366.
Kukkonen I, Timonen T. 1979. Species of Ustilaginales, especially of the genus
Anthracoidea, as tools in plant taxonomy. Symbolae botanicae Upsalienses
22, 166–176.
Larsen BB, Miller EC, Rhodes MK, Wiens JJ. 2017. Inordinate fondness multiplied
and redistributed: the number of species on Earth and the new pie of life. The
Quaternary Review of Biology 92, 229–265. https://doi.org/10.1086/693564
Lepage T, Bryant D, Philippe H, Lartillot N. 2007. A general comparison of
molecular clock models. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24, 2669–2680.
https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm193
Léveillé-Bourret É, Donadío S, Gilmour CN, Starr JR, 2015. Rhodoscirpus
(Cyperaceae: Scirpeae), a new South American sedge genus supported by
molecular, morphological, anatomical and embryological data. Taxon 64, 931–
944. http://dx.doi.org/10.12705/645.4
Léveillé-Bourret É, Gilmour CN, Starr JR, Naczi RFC, Spalink D, Sytsma KJ. 2014.
Searching for the sister to sedges (Carex): resolving relationships in the
Cariceae-Dulichieae-Scirpeae clade (Cyperaceae). Botanical Journal of the
Linnean Society 176, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12193
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
Léveillé-Bourret É, Starr JR. 2019. Molecular and morphological data reveal three
new tribes within the Scirpo-Caricoid Clade (Cyperoideae, Cyperaceae).
Taxon 68, 218–245. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12055
Léveillé-Bourret É, Starr JR, Ford BA. 2018a. Why are there so many sedges?
Sumatroscirpeae, a missing piece in the evolutionary puzzle of the giant genus
Carex (Cyperaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics Evolution 119, 93–104.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2017.10.025
Léveillé-Bourret É, Starr JR, Ford BA, Lemmon, E.M., Lemmon, A.R., 2018b.
Resolving rapid radiations within angiosperm families using anchored
phylogenomics. Systematic Biology 67, 94–112.
https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syx050
Linnaeus C. 1753. Species plantarum, 1st ed. Printed by Lawrence Salvius,
Stockholm (Sweden).
Liu M, Hambleton S. 2013. Laying the foundation for a taxonomic review of Puccinia
coronata s.l. in a phylogenetic context. Mycological Progress 12, 63–89.
Liu M, Hambleton S. 2012. Puccinia chunjii, a close relative of the cereal stem rusts
revealed by molecular phylogeny and morphological study. Mycologia 104,
1056–1067. https://doi.org/10.3852/11-251
Liu M, Hambleton S. 2010. Taxonomic study of stripe rust, Puccinia striiformis sensu
lato, based on molecular and morphological evidence. Fungal Biology 114,
881–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2010.08.005
Liu M, Overy DP, Cayouette J, Shoukouhi P, Hicks C, Bisson K, Sproule A, Wyka
SA, Broders K, Popovic Z, Menzies JG. 2020. Four phylogenetic species of
ergot from Canada and their characteristics in morphology, alkaloid
production, and pathogenicity. Mycologia 1–15.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2020.1797372
Lücking R, Aime MC, Robbertse B, Miller AN, Ariyawansa HA, Aoki T, Cardinali
G, Crous PW, Druzhinina IS, Geiser DM, Hawksworth DL, Hyde KD, Irinyi
L, Jeewon R, Johnston PR, Kirk PM, Malosso E, May TW, Meyer W, Öpik
M, Robert V, Stadler M, Thines M, Vu D, Yurkov AM, Zhang N, Schoch CL.
2020. Unambiguous identification of fungi: where do we stand and how
accurate and precise is fungal DNA barcoding? IMA Fungus 11: 14.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43008-020-00033-z
Lutz M, Bauer R, Begerow D, Oberwinkler F. 2004a. Tuberculina —
Thanatophytum/Rhizoctonia crocorum — Helicobasidium: a unique
mycoparasitic-phytoparasitic life strategy. Mycological Research 108, 227–
238. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756204009359
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
Lutz M, Bauer R, Begerow D, Oberwinkler F, Triebel, D. 2004b. Tuberculina: rust
relatives attack rusts. Mycologia 96, 614–626.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15572536.2005.11832957
Magallón, S., Gómez-Acevedo, S., Sánchez-Reyes, L.L., Hernández-Hernández, T.,
2015. A metacalibrated time-tree documents the early rise of flowering plant
phylogenetic diversity. New Phytologist 207, 437–453.
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13264
Maier, W., Begerow D, Weiß M, Oberwinkler F. 2003. Phylogeny of the rust fungi:
an approach using nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Canadian
Journal of Botany 81, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1139/B02-113
Maier W, Wingfield BD, Mennicken M, Wingfield MJ. 2007. Polyphyly and two
emerging lineages in the rust genera Puccinia and Uromyces. Mycological
Research 111, 176–185.
Mandel JR, Dikow RB, Siniscalchi CM, Thapa R, Watson LE, Funk VA. 2019. A
fully resolved backbone phylogeny reveals numerous dispersals and explosive
diversifications throughout the history of Asteraceae. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences 116, 14083–14088.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1903871116
Martín‐Bravo S, Jiménez‐Mejías P, Villaverde T, Escudero M, Hahn M, Spalink D,
Roalson EH, Hipp AL, the Global Carex Group, Benítez‐Benítez C, P.
Bruederle L, Fitzek E, A. Ford B, A. Ford K, Garner M, Gebauer S, H.
Hoffmann M, Jin X, Larridon I, Léveillé‐Bourret É, Lu Y, Luceño M,
Maguilla E, Márquez‐Corro JI, Míguez M, Naczi R, A. Reznicek A, R. Starr J.
2019. A tale of worldwide success: behind the scenes of Carex (Cyperaceae)
biogeography and diversification. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 57:
695–718.
McTaggart AR, Aime MC. 2018. The species of Coleosporium (Pucciniales) on
Solidago in North America. Fungal Biology 122, 800–809.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2018.04.007
Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. 2010. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for
inference of large phylogenetic trees, in: Proceedings of the Gateway
Computing Environments Workshop (GCE). Presented at the Gateway
Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), New Orleans (United-States), pp.
1–8.
Muasya AM, Simpson DA, Verboom GA, Goetghebeur P, Naczi RFC, Chase MW,
Smets E. 2009. Phylogeny of Cyperaceae based on DNA sequence data:
current progress and future prospects. The Botanical Review 75, 2–21.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-008-9019-3
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
Nelsen DJ. 2010. A phylogenetic analysis of species diversity, specificity, and
distribution of Mycodiplosis on rust fungi (M.Sc.). Minnesota State
University.
Nischwitz C, Newcombe G, Anderson CL. 2005. Host specialization of the
mycoparasite Eudarluca caricis and its evolutionary relationship to
Ampelomyces. Mycological Research 109, 421–428.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756205002431
Nylin S, Agosta S, Bensch S, Boeger WA, Braga MP, Brooks DR, Forister ML,
Hambäck PA, Hoberg EP, Nyman T, Schäpers A, Stigall AL, Wheat CW,
Österling M, Janz N. 2018. Embracing colonizations: a new paradigm for
species association dynamics. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 33: 4–14.
Ødegaard F. 2000. How many species of arthropods? Erwin’s estimate revised.
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 71, 583–597.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2000.tb01279.x
O’Hara RB. 2005. Species richness estimators: how many species can dance on the
head of a pin? Journal of Animal Ecology 74, 375–386.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00940.x
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR,
O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens HH, Szoecs E, Wagner H.
2019. vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.5-6. 2019.
Ono Y. 2002. The diversity of nuclear cycle in microcyclic rust fungi (Uredinales)
and its ecological and evolutionary implications. Mycoscience 43, 421–439.
https://doi.org/10.1007/S102670200062
Palla E. 1896. Zur Systematic der Gattung Eriophorum. Botanische Zeitung 54, 141–
158.
Paradis E, Schliep K. 2019. ape 5.0: an environment for modern phylogenetics and
evolutionary analyses in R. Bioinformatics 35, 526–528.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty633
Parmelee JA. 1989. The rusts (Uredinales) of arctic Canada. Canadian Journal of
Botany 67, 3315–3365. https://doi.org/10.1139/b89-407
Parmelee JA. 1967. The autoecious species of Puccinia on Heliantheae in North
America. Canadian Journal of Botany 45, 2267–2327.
https://doi.org/10.1139/b67-248
Parmelee JA. 1969. The autoecious species of Puccinia on Heliantheae
[’Ambrosiaceae’] in North America. Canadian Journal of Botany 47, 1391–
1402. https://doi.org/10.1139/b69-199
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
Parmelee JA, Savile DBO. 1981. Autoecious species of Puccinia on Cichorieae in
North America. Canadian Journal of Botany 59, 1078–1101.
https://doi.org/10.1139/b81-147
Pažoutová S, Pešicová K, Chudíčková M, Šrůtka P, Kolařík M. 2015. Delimitation of
cryptic species inside Claviceps purpurea. Fungal Biology 119, 7–26.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2014.10.003
Pender JE. 2015. Climatic niche estimation, trait evolution and species richness in
North American Carex (Cyperaceae) (M.Sc.). University of Ottawa, Ottawa,
Ontario (Canada).
Pender JE, Starr JR. 2021. Trait evolution rates shape species richness on a
continental scale in sedges (Carex, Cyperaceae). Journal of Systematics and
Evolution manuscript number: JSE-2020-10-239
Petersen RH. 1974. The rust fungus life cycle. The Botanical Review 40, 453–513.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860021
Piepenbring M, Begerow D, Oberwinkler F, 1999. Molecular sequence data assess the
value of morphological characteristics for a phylogenetic classification of
Cintractia. Mycologia 91, 485–498.
Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. 2010. FastTree 2 – Approximately maximum-
likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 5, e9490.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009490
Price PW, Westoby M, Rice B. 1988. Parasite-mediated competition: some
predictions and tests. The American Naturalist 131, 544–555.
https://doi.org/10.1086/284805
R Core Team, 2020. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R
Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna (Austria).
Rambaut A, Shuchard MA, Xie D, Drummond AJ. 2014. Tracer version 1.6.
Refrégier G, Gac ML, Jabbour F, Widmer A, Shykoff JA, Yockteng R, Hood ME,
Giraud T. 2008. Cophylogeny of the anther smut fungi and their
caryophyllaceous hosts: prevalence of host shifts and importance of delimiting
parasite species for inferring cospeciation. BMC Evolutionary Biology 8: 100.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-100
Rice B, Westoby M. 1982. Heteroecious rusts as agents of interference competition.
Evolutionary Theory 6, 43–52.
Riess K, Schön ME, Ziegler R, Lutz M, Shivas RG, Piątek M, Garnica S. 2019. The
origin and diversification of the Entorrhizales: deep evolutionary roots but
recent speciation with a phylogenetic and phenotypic split between associates
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
of the Cyperaceae and Juncaceae. Organisms Diversity & Evolution 19: 13–
30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-018-0384-4
Rintoul TL, Eggertson QA, Lévesque CA. 2012. Multigene phylogenetic analyses to
delimit new species in fungal plant pathogens. In: Bolton MD, Thomma BPHJ
eds. Plant Fungal Pathogens. Springer, New York, pp. 549–569.
Rioux S, Mimee B, Gagnon AÈ, Hambleton S. 2015. First report of stripe rust
(Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici) on wheat in Quebec, Canada.
Phytoprotection 95, 7–9. https://doi.org/10.7202/1028400ar
Robinson E, Blagoev G, Hebert P, Adamowicz S. 2009. Prospects for using DNA
barcoding to identify spiders in species-rich genera. ZooKeys 16, 27–46.
https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.16.239
Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B,
Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient bayesian
phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space.
Systematic Biology 61, 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
Roy BA, Vogler DR, Bruns TD, Szaro TM. 1998. Cryptic species in the Puccinia
monoica complex. Mycologia 90, 846. https://doi.org/10.2307/3761326
Saari EE, Prescott JM. 1985. World distribution in relation to economic losses. In:
Roelfs AP, Buschnell WR eds. The cereal rusts: diseases, distribution,
epidemiology, and control. Elsevier, 259–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-
12-148402-6.50017-1
Savile DBO. 1990. Relationships of Poaceae, Cyperaceae, and Juncaceae reflected by
their fungal parasites. Canadian Journal of Botany 68, 731–734.
Savile DBO. 1984. Taxonomy of the cereal rust fungi, in: Bushnell, W.R., Roelfs,
A.P. (Eds.), The Cereal Rusts: Origins, Specificity, Structure, and Physiology.
Academic Press, Montreal (Canada), pp. 79–112.
Savile DBO. 1979. Fungi as aids in higher plant classification. The Botanical Review
45, 377–503.
Savile DBO. 1978. Paleoecology and convergent evolution in rust fungi (Uredinales).
Biosystems 10, 31–36.
Savile DBO. 1976. Evolution of the rust fungi (Uredinales) as reflected by their
ecological problems, in: Hecht MK, Steere WC, Wallace B eds. Evolutionary
Biology. Plenum Press, New York, NY (United States), pp. 137–207.
Savile DBO. 1973. Aeciospore types in Puccinia and Uromyces attacking
Cyperaceae, Juncaceae and Poaceae. Reports of the Tottori Mycological
Institute 10, 225–241.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
Savile DBO. 1972. Some rusts of Scirpus and allied genera. Canadian Journal of
Botany 50, 2579–2596. https://doi.org/10.1139/b72-331
Savile DBO. 1970a. Some Eurasian Puccinia species attacking Cardueae. Canadian
Journal of Botany 48, 1553–1566.
Savile DBO. 1965. Puccinia karelica and species delimitation in the Uredinales.
Canadian Journal of Botany 43, 231–238. https://doi.org/10.1139/b65-027
Savile DBO. 1952. A study of the species of Cintractia on Carex, Kobresia, and
Scirpus in North America. Canadian Journal of Botany 30, 410–435.
Savile DBO, Calder JA. 1953. Phylogeny of Carex in the light of parasitism by the
smut fungi. Canadian Journal of Botany 31, 164–174.
Schmit JP, Mueller GM. 2007. An estimate of the lower limit of global fungal
diversity. Biodiversity and Conservation 16, 99–111.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9129-3
Semmouri I, Bauters K, Léveillé-Bourret É, Starr JR, Goetghebeur P, Larridon I.
2019. Phylogeny and systematics of Cyperaceae, the evolution and importance
of embryo morphology. The Botanical Review 85, 1–39.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-018-9202-0
Shiels DR, Hurlbut DL, Lichtenwald SK, Monfils AK. 2014. Monophyly and
phylogeny of Schoenoplectus and Schoenoplectiella (Cyperaceae): evidence
from chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. Systematic Botany 39, 132–144.
Shoukouhi P, Hicks C, Menzies JG, Popovic Z, Chen W, Seifert KA, Assabgui R, Liu
M. 2019. Phylogeny of Canadian ergot fungi and a detection assay by real-
time polymerase chain reaction. Mycologia 111, 493–505.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2019.1581018
Small E, Cayouette J. 2016. 50. Sedges – the key sustainable resource for Arctic
biodiversity. Biodiversity 17, 60–69.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2016.1164624
Smith SY, Collinson ME, Rudall PJ, Simpson DA. 2010. The Cretaceous and
Paleogene fossil record of Poales: review and current research. In: Seberg O,
Petersen G, Barfod AS, Davis JI eds. Diversity, Phylogeny, and Evolution in
the Monocotyledons: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on
the Comparative Biology of the Monocotyledons and the Fifth International
Symposium on Grass Systematics and Evolution. Aarhus University Press,
Denmark, pp. 333–356.
Spalink D, Drew BT, Pace MC, Zaborsky JG, Li P, Cameron KM, Givnish TJ,
Sytsma KJ. 2016. Evolution of geographical place and niche space: patterns of
diversification in the North American sedge (Cyperaceae) flora. Molecular
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
Phylogenetics Evolution 95: 183–195.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2015.09.028
Starr JR, Harris SA, Simpson DA. 2003. Potential of the 5′ and 3′ ends of the
intergenic spacer (IGS) of rDNA in the Cyperaceae: new sequences for lower‐
level phylogenies in sedges with an example from Uncinia Pers. International
Journal of Plant Sciences 164, 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1086/346168
Starr JR, Janzen FH, Ford BA. 2015. Three new, early diverging Carex (Cariceae,
Cyperaceae) lineages from East and Southeast Asia with important
evolutionary and biogeographic implications. Molecular Phylogenetics
Evolution 88, 105–120. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2015.04.001
Starr JR, Jiménez-Mejías P, Zuntini AR, Semmouri I, Muasya AM, Baker WJ,
Brewer GE, Epitawalage N, Fairlie I, Forest F, Léveillé-Bourret É, Pokorny L,
Larridon I. 2021. Targeted sequencing supports morphology and embryo
features in resolving the classification of Cyperaceae tribe Fuireneae s.l.
Journal of Systematics and Evolution Early View.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12721
Starr JR, Léveillé-Bourret É, Vũ Anh T, Nguyễn Thị KT, Ford BA. 2019. The
rediscovery of the rare Vietnamese endemic Eriophorum scabriculme
redefines generic limits in the Scirpo-Caricoid Clade (Cyperaceae). PeerJ 7,
e7538.
Steinke D, Zemlak TS, Hebert PDN. 2009. Barcoding Nemo: DNA-based
identifications for the ornamental fish trade. PLoS ONE 4, e6300.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006300
Stielow JB, Lévesque CA, Seifert KA, Meyer W, Irinyi L, Smits D, Renfurm R,
Verkley GJM, Groenewald M, Chaduli D, Lomascolo A, Welti S, Lesage-
Meessen L, Favel A, Al-Hatmi AMS, Damm U, Yilmaz N, Houbraken J,
Lombard L, Quaedvlieg W, Binder M, Vaas LAI, Vu D, Yurkov A, Begerow
D, Roehl O, Guerreiro M, Fonseca A, Samerpitak K, van Diepeningen AD,
Dolatabadi S, Moreno LF, Casaregola S, Mallet S, Jacques N, Roscini L, Egidi
E, Bizet C, Garcia-Hermoso D, Martín MP, Deng S, Groenewald JZ,
Boekhout T, de Beer ZW, Barnes I, Duong TA, Wingfield MJ, de Hoog GS,
Crous PW, Lewis CT, Hambleton S, Moussa TAA, Al-Zahrani HS,
Almaghrabi OA, Louis-Seize G, Assabgui R, McCormick W, Omer G, Dukik
K, Cardinali G, Eberhardt U, de Vries M, Robert V. 2015. One fungus, which
genes? Development and assessment of universal primers for potential
secondary fungal DNA barcodes. Persoonia - Molecular Phylogeny and
Evolution of Fungi 35: 242–263. https://doi.org/10.3767/003158515X689135
Takhtajan AL. 1980. Outline of the classification of flowering plants
(Magnoliophyta). The Botanical Review 46, 225–359.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
Thines M. 2019. An evolutionary framework for host shifts – jumping ships for
survival. New Phytologist 224, 605–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16092
Thorne RF. 2000. The classification and geography of the flowering plants:
Dicotyledons of the class Angiospermae: Subclasses Magnoliidae,
Ranunculidae, Caryophyllidae, Dilleniidae, Rosidae, Asteridae, and Lamiidae.
The Botanical Review 66, 441–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02869011
Trakunyingcharoen T, Lombard L, Groenewald JZ, Cheewangkoon R, Toanun C,
Crous PW. 2014. Mycoparasitic species of Sphaerellopsis, and allied
lichenicolous and other genera. IMA Fungus 5, 391–414.
https://doi.org/10.5598/imafungus.2014.05.02.05
van der Merwe M, Ericson L, Walker J, Thrall PH, Burdon JJ. 2007. Evolutionary
relationships among species of Puccinia and Uromyces (Pucciniaceae,
Uredinales) inferred from partial protein coding gene phylogenies.
Mycological Research 111, 163–175.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycres.2006.09.015
van der Merwe MM, Walker J, Ericson L, Burdon J. 2008. Coevolution with higher
taxonomic host groups within the Puccinia/Uromyces rust lineage obscured by
host jumps. Mycological Research 112, 1387–1408.
Vánky K. 2012. Smut fungi of the world. APS Press, United-States.
Vilgalys R, Hester M. 1990. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of
enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species.
Journal of Bacteriology 172, 4238–4246.
https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.172.8.4238-4246.1990
White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of
fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH,
Sninsky JJ, White TJ eds. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and
applications. Academic Press, New York, pp. 315–322.
Wilkinson SP. 2018. kmer: an R package for fast alignment-free clustering of
biological sequences. R package version 1.1.2.
Yang Z, Rannala B. 2005. Branch-length prior influences Bayesian posterior
probability of phylogeny. Systematic Biology 54, 455–470.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150590945313
Yano O, Ikeda H, Watson MF, Rajbhandari K, Jin XF, Hoshino T, Muasya AM, Ohba
H. 2012. Phylogenetic position of the Himalayan genus Erioscirpus
(Cyperaceae) inferred from DNA sequence data. Botanical Journal of the
Linnean Society 170, 1–11.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
Zhou D, Hyde KD. 2001. Host-specificity, host-exclusivity, and host-recurrence in
saprobic fungi. Mycological Research 105, 1449–1457.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756201004713
Zwetko P, Blanz P. 2012. Aeciospore types in rusts on Ranunculus and allied genera.
Stapfia 96, 105–121.
Figure 1. Barcode gap in the ITS2-28S dataset. Histogram of within-OTU (blue) and
between-OTU (orange, hatched) k-mer distances between samples, showing important
overlap and suggesting the absence of a global barcode gap. Inset shows violin and dot
plots of the ratio between minimum between-OTU and maximum within-OTU k-mer
distances (log scale). A local barcode gap is present in OTUs with a ratio above 2.
Figure 2. Rarefaction curves of the eleven North American rust species and
aggregates included in rarefaction and richness analyses. The four aggregates where
>10 individuals were sequenced are identified by name.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
Figure 3. Bayesian Maximum clade credibility chronogram of rust fungi (Aecidium,
Puccinia and Uromyces) parasites of Cyperaceae-Juncaceae, based on ITS2-
28S barcodes. Branch support indicated as Bayesian posterior probabilities/NJ
bootstrap/ML bootstrap. Support values <50% bootstrap or 0.50 posterior
probability indicated by a hyphen (-) or left blank. Wider branch lines indicate
≥0.95 Bayesian posterior probabilities. Bold names indicate rust species with at
least one life stage on Cyperaceae or Juncaceae (all other rusts with all stages
on dicots, except for Puccinia iridis on Iridaceae). Species that alternate between
Carex and Asteraceae, or autoecious on Asteraceae, are not highlighted with
colors. All other clades or lineages highlighted with colors, and with telial host(s)
labelled beside the clade preceded by “ex” (Latin “from”). Ages corresponding to
the origins of Carex and of its major clades (Martín-Bravo et al., 2019), and
Pleistocene glaciations (2.58 Mya) are indicated with blue and yellow shaded
boxes. Outgroup species are not shown.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
Figure 4. Continued from Figure 3.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
Figure 5. Tanglegrams showing associations between rust fungi and their monocot
(A) or dicot (B) hosts. Links colored in dark blue are highly congruent, those in
dark red are highly discordant, and those in light grey are purely random. The
amount of cophylogenetic signal is also expressed at branch nodes using the
same color codes. A pure cospeciation scenario would be visualized as
tanglegrams without any overlapping lines, and dark blue colors throughout.
These tanglegrams show uneven cophylogenetic signal (both dark blue and dark
red are present).
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
Table 1. Sequence statistics for the ITS2-28S dataset.
Dataset
Aligned
length
Terminals
missing
Gaps,
missing, &
ambiguous
characters
Variable
characters
Parsimony
informative
characters
Consistency
index (CI)
Retention
index (RI)
5.8S
159
10 (3.7%)
48%
22 (14%)
15 (9.4%)
0.585
0.877
ITS2
360
0
57%
257 (71%)
199 (55%)
0.234
0.761
28S
1244
9 (3.0%)
71%
321 (26%)
176 (14%)
0.529
0.671
Full
alignment
1763
0
72%
600 (34%)
390 (22%)
0.304
0.737
Table 2. Cophylogenetic signal and estimated coevolutionary events between rust
fungi and their monocot and dicot hosts. An asterisk (*) indicates a statistically
significant value at alpha=0.05.
Statistics
Complete datasets
Reduced datasets
Monocot hosts
Dicot hosts
Monocot hosts
Dicot hosts
PACo
p-value
<0.0001 *
<0.0001 *
<0.0001 *
<0.0001 *
Random TaPas
G* coefficient
0.706
[0.704–0.732] *
0.747
[0.733–0.760] *
0.735
[0.708–0.744] *
0.741
[0.709–0.763] *
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Accepted Article
Statistics
Complete datasets
Reduced datasets
Jane 4
p-value
<0.01 *
<0.01 *
<0.01 *
<0.01 *
cost
284
211
209
105
events
240
176
191
90
cospeciations
14 (5.8%)
14 (8.0%)
10 (5.2%)
6 (6.7%)
duplications
18 (7.5%)
42 (24%)
19 (10%)
30 (33%)
host switches
58 (24%)
52 (30%)
28 (15%)
21 (23%)
losses/sorting
127 (53%)
49 (28%)
113 (59%)
21 (23%)
failures to diverge
23 (9.6%)
16 (9.2%)
21 (11%)
12 (13%)