This memoir, as all memoirs from Zimbabwean liberation war heroes do, is a celebration of the history and life of the author - a personal and intimate account of their life from birth, contributions to the liberation war and independent Zimbabwe. As such, it does not preclude itself from criticism of inherent contradictions and accusations of peddling half-truths. We argue here that reading this narrative should be done cognizant of the fact that,
The theory of self-expression that has driven various strands of autobiographical theory assumes that self-identity emerges from a psychic interiority, located somewhere “inside” the narrating subject. There it lies in a state of coherent, unified, evidentiary, even expectant, awaiting transmission to a surface, a tongue, a pen, a keyboard (Smith, 1995, p. 17).
Bourdieu (2000, p.300) cited in Sabao and Javangwe (2018) explains this incongruity that typifies auto/biographical narratives by postulating that the notion self-narration evinces an “inclination toward making oneself the ideologist of one’s own life, through the selection of a few significant events with a view to elucidating an overall purpose” is in itself a controversial and an act of political performativity. And On the Shoulders of Struggle: Memoirs of a Political Insider (2020) is not immune to these vices, and must be read on its own account – of course dialogically as well.