Available via license: CC BY 4.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
International Business & Economics Studies
ISSN 2640-9852 (Print) ISSN 2640-9860 (Online)
Vol. 3, No. 1, 2021
www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ibes
29
Original Paper
The Diversification of Agriculture in Italy: Agritourism and
Organic Management
Fabio Maria Santucci1*
1 Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
* Fabio Maria Santucci, Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of
Perugia, Perugia, Italy
Received: December 24, 2020 Accepted: January 12, 2021 Online Published: January 14, 2021
doi:10.22158/ibes.v3n1p29 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.22158/ibes.v3n1p29
Abstract
During the last 70 years, since the end of WW II, Italian agriculture has increased its productivity but,
despite the national and European financial support to the primary sector, millions of farms have
closed their operations, millions of hectares have been abandoned, and millions of farmers have
emigrated to towns and abroad. Rural desertification has been aggravated by the closures of public
offices and private businesses. Against this grim scenario, this paper illustrates, with the most recent
available data, the evolution and growth of two sub-sectors, organic farming and agritourism. Both
sub-sectors were initially contrasted and the first farmers adopting these strategies have encountered
problems and obstacles, they were fined, and sometimes had to close their operations. In both cases,
the pioneers resisted, organized themselves, and—thanks also to the support of consumers and some
scientists, were able to lobby local, national, and European law makers for appropriate legislation. The
first part of the article contains the data about the evolution and distribution of agritourism and
organic farms, while the second part compares several aspects of the two sub-sectors.
Keywords
common agricultural policy, sustainable development, farm management, resilience
1. Introduction
Italian agriculture, when valued according to the traditional methods of national accounting, nowadays
represents only a minor share of the Added Value produced in the country, slightly above two percent,
and employs less than four percent of the total labour force (CREA, 2019). Its importance remains
however relevant, because the primary products coming from the fields, pastures and stables generate
complex value chains producing jobs and income, partially on-farm and mainly off-farm, but it is
www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ibes International Business & Economics Studies Vol. 3, No. 1, 2021
30
Published by SCHOLINK INC.
evident that new activities must be found to ensure the survival of the farming sector and of many rural
areas.
As a matter of fact, since the end of World War II, Italian agriculture has continued to lose both farms
and workforce. Total output and productivity have increased (Fanfani, 1988), but the farmers’ income
has deteriorated, and the “agricultural exodus” does not stop. In the first two decades of the 3rd
Millennium, the number of farms has declined by almost 31 percent (Table 1), while the total
workforce employed in the fields and in the stables has lost 250 thousand units, -22.3 percent.
Table 1. Evolution of Farms in Italy
Items 2000 2018 Δ% 2000-18
Total farms, n 1,049,890 726,261 -30.8
Farms with agritourism, n 9,314 23,615 153.5
- beds, n 110,000 262,659 138.8
Organic farms, n 51,120 69,317 35.6
- with some processing, n 1,330 10,363 679.2
- with some processing, % 2.6 15.0
Area under conversion and organic, ha 1,040,377 1,958,045 88.2
Sources: Movimprese, 2020; CREA, 2019, SINAB, 2020.
Since 1996 (The Cork Declaration, 1996), it was understood, at least in Europe, that farmers cannot
continue to practice agriculture within the present paradigm, producing poorly paid undifferentiated
commodities. Only the diversification of the on-farm activities can offer sustainable new opportunities
for the individual farmers, their families, and for the rural communities. This process is not easy and
will not be accepted by all stakeholders, but it is unavoidable. Statistics are clear. Despite the huge
transfer of financial resources, made possible by the national and European interventions, the
conventional forms of industrial agriculture are suffering.
Rural areas, especially on the marginal territories, have witnessed a continuous decrease of their
residents, accompanied by the closure of public services (schools, health posts, post offices) and of
private businesses (grocery shops, coffee bars, banks, gas stations, mechanics, etc.). The Catholic
Church too, in many parts of the country, has reduced its activities. The social desertification is evident
and certified by the population censuses.
Within this dramatic scenario, there have been two components of the agribusiness that have shown
vitality and positive results: agritourism and organic farming, frequently coexisting in the same farm.
This paper will describe, in comparative terms, the recent evolution of these two sub-sectors and will
analyse the reasons explaining their vitality and relevance for Italy. The conclusions, however, are
meaningful for most Countries, where the conventional type of modern agriculture is showing all its
www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ibes International Business & Economics Studies Vol. 3, No. 1, 2021
31
Published by SCHOLINK INC.
contradictions.
2. Method
This paper is based on the most recent available data, which have been found in different public
databases (Movimprese, SINAB, CREA), in publications and in unpublished documents, most of which
are in Italian language. Qualitative information has been provided by experts of the organic value chain
and by experts of agritourism, who work within public bodies, local organizations, public research
centres, and universities.
3. Result
Agritourism in Italy has a long and multifaceted history (Oho & Ciani, 2012; Santucci, 2013). Various
types of accommodations are offered in Italy by almost 24,000 controlled producers, the 3.2 percent of
the total Italian farmers, a 151.3 percent increase when compared to year 2000 (Table 1). The number
of beds presently available in these farms has grown to 262,659 (+138.8%). Furthermore, there are
11,000 on-farm camping sites for visitors coming with their campers / roulottes or tents. Most
agritourism farms also have a restaurant, for a total of 462,000 seats (Fratto et al., 2019).
Table 2. Distribution of Farms in 2018, by Regions
Regions Total farms Agritourism Organic farms
n % n % n %
Piemonte 51,147 7.0 1,316 5.6 2,517 3.6
Valle d'Aosta 1,422 0.2 60 0.3 78 0.1
Lombardia 45,061 6.2 1,673 7.1 1,989 2.9
Liguria 9,358 1.3 656 2.8 323 0.5
Trentino-Alto Adige 27,893 3.8 3,648 15.4 2,912 4.2
Veneto 63,607 8.8 1,456 6.2 2,486 3.6
Friuli-Venezia Giulia
13,037 1.8 670 2.8 825 1.2
Emilia-Romagna 54,553 7.5 1,166 4.9 4,803 6.9
Toscana 38,377 5.3 4,620 19.6 4,527 6.5
Umbria 16,344 2.3 1,402 5.9 1,767 2.5
Marche 26,007 3.6 1,082 4.6 2,647 3.8
Lazio 42,564 5.9 1,278 5.4 4,241 6.1
Abruzzo 26,262 3.6 565 2.4 1,716 2.5
Molise 9,951 1.4 128 0.5 432 0.6
Campania 60,838 8.4 705 3.0 5,469 7.9
www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ibes International Business & Economics Studies Vol. 3, No. 1, 2021
32
Published by SCHOLINK INC.
Puglia 77,766 10.7 876 3.7 8,485 12.2
Basilicata 18,140 2.5 187 0.8 2,166 3.1
Calabria 31,186 4.3 589 2.5 10,712 15.5
Sicilia 79,087 10.9 737 3.1 9,763 14.1
Sardegna 33,661 4.6 801 3.4 1,869 2.7
Italia 726,261 100.0 23,615 100.0 69,317 100.0
Sources: Movimprese, 2020; CREA, 2019, SINAB, 2020.
The clients can also enjoy a variety of other services: swimming pools, horse riding, guided tours,
cooking classes, yoga courses, wine tasting, etc. There are no limits to phantasy. Wine tourism (Asero
& Patti, 2009) represents a special segment, where wine producers join their energies with others, also
with non-farmers operators, to attract visitors along “wine routes” promoted worldwide.
Agritourism is practiced in all 20 Italian regions (Table 2), with the highest numbers in Trentino-Alto
Adige and in Tuscany. Trentino-Alto Adige (in German Sud Tyrol) is located at the North-Eastern
border with Austria, on the Alps, has an historical tradition of on-farm hospitality and enjoys a “double
season”, with alpine sports during the winter and climbing, hiking, riding during the summer. Most of
its population is bilingual, so German speaking foreign tourists have been a constant.
The case of Toscana—Tuscany in English, is different: it offers some beautiful historical towns
(Florence, Siena, Pisa, Lucca, Pistoia, etc.) and hundreds of smaller attractive villages, seaside beaches
for summer tourism, mountains, and an incredible countryside, famous for its landscapes, wines, olive
oils, cheeses, and gourmet products. Cultural tourism and food tourism propose synergies and attract
visitors from all over the world. The vineyard area of Chianti has so many English tourists and
residents to have been renamed “Chiantishire”.
Farms with agritourism facilities represent 13.1 percent of total in Trentino Alto-Adige and 12.0
percent in Tuscany, with another region, Umbria, the “Green Heart of Italy”, ranking third, with 8.6
percent of farmers accepting tourists in their farms (Table 3).
All Italian regions, on the mainland and on the many islands, have now much to offer and agritourism
farms can be found everywhere. Natural beauties, historical and cultural attractions are scattered
everywhere in Italy, all small towns and villages have an ancient church, a castle, several ancient
palaces, archaeological sites, so tourists come to the rural areas not only for enjoying the silence and
peacefulness of the countryside, but also to visit the attractions in the proximity.
Organic farming is practiced nowadays in Italy by almost 70,000 certified producers (Table 1), out of
which 10,363, the 15 percent, have some sorts of on-farm processing and add value to their raw output
(ISMEA-CIHEAM, 2019). It extends nowadays on almost two million hectares.
Organic agriculture was—and still is—often indicated as an Italian success story (Santucci & Pignataro,
2002; Defrancesco & Rossetto, 2007; Viganò, 2013; Gamboni & Moscatelli, 2015), because all
www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ibes International Business & Economics Studies Vol. 3, No. 1, 2021
33
Published by SCHOLINK INC.
socio-economic indicators (average size, age and education of farmers, turnover, marketing strategies,
income, employment) are much better than those of the whole Italian agriculture.
In the period 2000-2018, the number of organic producers has grown by 35.6 percent, now representing
9.5 percent of the total Italian farmers.
On-farm processing has increased enormously and ensures employment and income to family members
and employees. The sale of products does not take place only at the on-farm shop or at the local open
markets, but thanks to internet and on-line payments the organic products are sold to consumers in
distant towns and even abroad. Furthermore, the organic farmers are the first stakeholders of a complex
system of off-farm processing units, that then provide all sorts of products to hundreds of restaurants,
retailers, grocery stores and catering firms.
The highest number of organic farmers can be found in some Southern regions (Table 2). Three large
regions, namely Calabria, Sicilia, and Puglia combined, have almost 42% of all organic farms in Italy:
respectively 15.5, 14.1 and 12.2 percent of the total.
More interesting is the relevance of organic agriculture, the share of organic farms compared to all
farms: the Italian figure is 9.5 per cent (Table 3). Every ten Italian farmers, almost one is now a
certified organic producer. The region where organic agriculture has highest relevance is Calabria,
famous for its olive oil, citrus fruits, wines, and veggies, followed at distance by several other regions,
which show a 10-12 percent of organic producers on total operating farms.
Table 3. Relative Importance in 2018, by Regions
Regions Agritourism/total
Organic/total
% %
Piemonte 2.6 4.9
Valle d'Aosta 4.2 5.5
Lombardia 3.7 4.4
Liguria 7.0 3.5
Trentino-Alto Adige 13.1 10.4
Veneto 2.3 3.9
Friuli-Venezia Giulia
5.1 6.3
Emilia-Romagna 2.1 8.8
Toscana 12.0 11.8
Umbria 8.6 10.8
Marche 4.2 10.2
Lazio 3.0 10.0
Abruzzo 2.2 6.5
Molise 1.3 4.3
www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ibes International Business & Economics Studies Vol. 3, No. 1, 2021
34
Published by SCHOLINK INC.
Campania 1.2 9.0
Puglia 1.1 10.9
Basilicata 1.0 11.9
Calabria 1.9 34.3
Sicilia 0.9 12.3
Sardegna 2.4 5.6
Italia 3.3 9.5
Sources: Movimprese, 2020; CREA, 2019, SINAB, 2020.
Quite frequently, the organic option and the offer of hospitality coexist in the same farm, where organic
products and meals are offered to clients. Some other aspects of sustainability are thus considered, to
meet the requirements of the most environmentally conscious clients: energy is provided with solar
cells and wind generators, water is managed with saving devices and is recycled after use, tablecloths,
and bed linen are made with organic materials, etc. This development has been in good part market
driven, thanks to the increasing demand for organic food and for alternative, sustainable approaches to
tourism, but the public intervention should not be underestimated (Giaccio et al., 2018). Table 4 shows
the normative framework that establish rules and conditions for the recognition of organic and
agritourism farms.
Table 4. Norms and regulations
Items Agritourism Organic
EU Regulations no since 1991
National laws since 1985 yes
Regional laws yes yes
Certification very partial yes
Sanitary controls yes yes
Wine Roads, Tutorial farms, Social farms
- National law yes
- Regional laws yes
The Italian national law shaping the framework for agritourism was issued in 1985, with all regional
governments producing their own adaptations, which are then updated and fine-tuned to meet new
problems and opportunities. Strange to say, in this case the European Union has remained absent,
without producing any own Regulation. The safety of the Italian agritourism operations is verified by
different public bodies: the Municipalities issuing permits and authorizations, the local Health
www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ibes International Business & Economics Studies Vol. 3, No. 1, 2021
35
Published by SCHOLINK INC.
Authorities, and the NAS, a specialised branch of the Carabinieri, a national police body, that looks
after hygiene and safety of foods. Third party certification is not yet common, but there is a hypothesis
for a nation–wide quality system, which should be agreed by all regional governments. In the meantime,
some regions have already issued their systems, to classify agritourism farms according with different
criteria. Tuscany, for example, considers several aspects of rurality, agricultural management, quality of
hospitality, human resources, etc., and classifies the agritourism farms into three different classes,
recognizable thanks to a logo showing from one to three ears.
Another type of voluntary certification is issued by ICEA, a large private certification body focusing on
organic management, that certifies the environmental qualities of the agritourism. This system
considers variables grouped within five areas: safeguard of environment and local resources, ecological
management, promotion of local culture, utilization of organic foods, and sustainable transport system.
The organic agritourism farms are thus classified into five classes, recognizable with a logo containing
from one to five suns.
The Italian experience is then enriched by the many successful farms and by the legislation about Wine
and Food Roads (Cinelli Colombini, 2015), Tutorial (or Didactic) farms—mainly for kids (Moruzzo et
al., 2020)—and by the Social farms (Ronchetti et al., 2011), these latter ones mainly devoted to the
social inclusion of people with handicaps, to the rehabilitation of drug addicts and the inclusion of
migrants.
In the case of organic farming, the history is different (Santucci, 2012). Until the 1980’s, the situation
was a bit chaotic. In absence of a national or European definition, some regional Governments had
begun to issue their own legislation, but the utilization itself of the word “organic” or “biological” was
contested and there were several interventions by the judiciary. In some cases, the first organic
producers were challenged in courts, were fined and some activities were even closed. Finally, the EU
first regulation about organic farming was produced in 1991 and has been continuously updated (Table
4). Thanks to this European initiative, the existence of organic producers, processors and traders has
been legalized. Presently, all Italian regions have their own laws, implementing the EU norms, and the
legal problems belong to the past.
The existence of legislation defining agritourism and organic farming has allowed the allocation of
important economic resources (Table 5), within the recent and present Common Agricultural Policy of
the European Union, and thanks to own resources of the Italian national and regional Governments.
Since 1994, the largest financial amount transferred to organic farmers, in Italy as well as all over the
European Union, falls in the category of “decoupled area subsidies”, an annual payment given to the
primary producers who apply the organic methods of cultivation and animal productions.
www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ibes International Business & Economics Studies Vol. 3, No. 1, 2021
36
Published by SCHOLINK INC.
Table 5. Economic Support
Typology Agritourism Organic
Decoupled annual subsidies no Yes, since 1994
Grants for investments yes yes
Grants for promotion yes yes
Grants for associations yes yes
Grants for research no yes
These subsidies are calculated per hectare (or acre) of land, and the amounts depend on the land use
(cereals, pastures, orchards, vineyards, etc.) or on the number of heads, without considering the
quantity of the output produced. The amounts are calculated by groups of experts, in collaboration with
representatives of the farmers, and are decided at regional level. This direct income support is given for
the period of conversion and then for the maintenance of the organic methods. Much has been written
about this type of subsidy, and about other types of support, all of which have pros and cons, supporters,
and opponents (Lampkin et al., 1999; Schwartz et al. 2010; Sanders et al., 2011, Abitabile & Viganò,
2012). Organic farmers applying for the direct income support are subject to certification by one of the
several private Certification Bodies recognized by the Italian Ministry of Agriculture and accredited to
exercise this task. The Certification Bodies send inspectors and analyse farming systems, soils, and
products to verify the respects of the organic methods.
Within the European Union’s policy for rural development, both sectors, agritourism and organic
farming, had the possibility to receive, after approved projects, grants for investments, which have been
used for modernizing buildings and to purchase field machinery and on-farm processing facilities.
Promotional activities have been financed to explore new markets, via participation in national and
international fairs, to organize events for buyers and importers, to print and distribute leaflets and other
information materials in several languages, and more recently to activate and update websites. Most of
the promotional activities have been financed to National and local associations, more rarely to the
individual farmer. Other grants have been given, through European projects, for the improvement of
human resources, thanks to projects co-financed by the European Social Fund. In the organic sector,
much applied research has been financed, mainly to improve quality and productivity of crops and
animals, with funds coming from the European Union (Horizon, 2020, for example, or the Rural
Development Plans) or from the Italian Ministry of Agriculture. Other grants have been allocated to
support the establishment and functioning of Associations, which favour the aggregation of the supply
and the qualitative improvement of the products, including material outputs and agritourism services.
As a matter of fact, in both sub-sectors, agritourism and organic production, the farmers have felt the
need to aggregate and work together (Table 6), first to exercise a pressure on the law makers, at local
and national level, to access the various types of grants seen before, and then to market together their
www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ibes International Business & Economics Studies Vol. 3, No. 1, 2021
37
Published by SCHOLINK INC.
produces.
Table 6. Social Capital, Dates of Foundation
Associations Agritourism Organic
Terra nostra (CD) 1973
Agritourist (CONFAGRI) 1975
Anagritour (national umbrella) 1980
Turismo Verde (CIA) 1981
Associazione biodinamica 1947
Suolo e Salute 1969
Commissione Nazionale Cos'è Biologico 1985
AIAB - Associazione Italiana Agricoltura Bio 1988
FEDERBIO 1992 - 2005
AssoBio 2006
Organic associations within traditional Farmers' Unions yes
The first national association for the promotion of agritourism was Terra Nostra (Our Land),
established in 1973 within the national Farmers’ Union Coldiretti (CD), that traditionally included a
large membership of mainly small and catholic family farmers. Two years later, Agritourist was
established by another national Union, CONFAGRI, whose associates are less numerous but have much
larger farms, managed with employed workers. Finally, in 1981 Turismo Verde (Green Tourism) was
founded, within the Confederation of Italian Agriculturalists (CIA), a numerically large union, whose
members are mainly small and politically oriented to the left. The main achievement of these
associations has been the national law in 1985 (and its periodical adaptations), that defines agritourism
an “agricultural activity”, with a special administrative and fiscal status, and the other national and
regional laws seen before (Table 4).
Even more important has been the social capital (Santucci, 2012) for the recognition and development
of organic agriculture, that has a longer history than agritourism, but was contrasted for several decades
by the scientific world and by the three conventional Unions mentioned before. The very first organic
producers were a sort of pioneers, outsiders, very alternative, often without links with the surrounding
conventional farmers. Many were of urban origins and several were foreigners. They had to establish
links among themselves, to survive, exchange information and sell their products. As a matter of fact,
the first grassroot association for the promotion of organic agriculture was established in Milano,
Northern Italy, just after the end of World War II, in 1947, by a tiny group of consumers, medical
doctors, agricultural technicians and a few producers, all followers of the teachings of Rudolph Steiner,
www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ibes International Business & Economics Studies Vol. 3, No. 1, 2021
38
Published by SCHOLINK INC.
the founder of Anthroposophy, whose followers had developed the Biodynamic Agriculture. A second
association “Soil and Health” was established in 1969, by a similarly small group of people, who
adopted norms and techniques from the organic French movement.
Informal groups and movements continued to flourish all over Italy, and finally a national coordination
body, the National Committee “What is organic” was set up in 1985. Only three years later, the “Italian
Association for Organic (Biological) Agriculture” was established, to support the now fast expansion of
the organic sub-sector, that was finally legalized with a European Regulation in 1991. It is important to
underline that all these groups, associations, and movements for many years were totally self-financed
and had to contrast the opposition from the conventional Unions. Only after 1991, the conventional
Unions have “accepted” the existence of organic methods and have tried to recuperate the delay with
the establishment of organic sections within their organizations. Finally, it is worth mentioning the
existence of AssoBio, previously known as FEDERBIO, that groups together processing firms,
importers, traders, and retailers, all post-farmgate stakeholders, which nowadays play an important role
vis-à-vis the national Government and the European Union.
4. Discussion
Within the general scenario of the continuous decline in the number of conventional farmers and farms,
agritourism activities and organic management are the only options which have generated an inversion
of both trends. This has initially happened in the most difficult and marginal areas, where a relatively
younger generation of farmers, sometimes coming from an urban background, has revitalized
abandoned farms and villages, and used again abandoned pastures and fields (van der Ploeg, 2009;
Milone, 2009). Their presence has had a multiplying effect, with a positive fallout on all other
economic sectors. Table 7 proposes a synoptic view and a comparison of the positive impacts of these
two new processes and products of agriculture.
Local genetic resources have been greatly valorised by the organic farmers, who have retrieved
abandoned crops, ancient varieties, and local animal breeds, to enhance diversity and resilience (Smith
et al., 2011). The same is not necessary in agritourism farms, but this has been done by most operators.
Local traditional knowledge is very necessary for the agronomic aspects in organic farms and is also
used by those agritourism farmers with restaurants, who decide to offer local recipes to their clients. In
both cases, the diversification of activities grows, and consequently the technical and economic
resilience of the farms increases. More varieties of the same crop, more crops in the fields, more
on-farm processing, more marketing channels, diversified clientele. All these factors determine a higher
demand of work (Jansen, 2000). that can be properly paid thanks to the increased added value. More
family members, if they wish, can have an opportunity in the farm, with new knowledge and modern
skills required: on farm processing, marketing, cooking, foreign languages, communication skills for
visitors, internet, and social media. The role of women has improved and many farms, in both
sub-sectors, are managed by women.
www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ibes International Business & Economics Studies Vol. 3, No. 1, 2021
39
Published by SCHOLINK INC.
With higher frequency in agritourism activities, than in the organic ones, the quality-of-life increases
(Jansen, 2000), thanks to the investments and improvements made to the estate and the buildings.
Better roads, nicer surroundings, swimming pool, sauna, gym, air conditioning, fast internet connection,
etc. are necessary for the clients, and are also available to family members and staff.
Table 7. Comparative Assessment of the Valorisation
Aspects Agritourism Organic farming
Estate (buildings) xxxx xx
Local genetic resources xx xxxx
Local traditional knowledge xx xxxx
Diversification xxxx xx
Resilience xxxx xx
Added value xxxx xx (on-farm processing)
Employment xxxx xxx
Quality of life xxxx xx
Self-esteem xxxx xxx
Development of territory xxx xx
Export x xx
Import no xx
Another important aspect concerns the farmers’ psychological situation, since both job satisfaction and
self-esteem increase (Mzoughi, 2014). After decades during which the farmers were the “losers”, the
laggards in the path toward economic and social development, as certified by the numbers of the
agricultural and rural exodus, when the farmers were accused of poisoning the aquifers with their
chemicals, and foreign foods were invading the Italian diet, the organic foods are nowadays celebrated
as healthy and beneficial for the environment. Organic wines receive awards in international
competitions. Agritourism farms receive hundreds of thousands of tourists, from Italy and abroad, who
want to discover the beauties of countryside. Farmers are proud again of what they do, for the
environment and for the society at large.
When the numbers of organic farms and agritourism farms raise, there is also a beneficial impact on the
economic and demographic situation of the territory, first thanks to the activities linked in the value
chain (input and service suppliers, off-farm processors, and traders), and then with the other businesses
that can attract visitors and clients, in the nearby towns and villages of the area (Olivieri, 2014). Again,
this means added value, jobs, and income, in rural areas that seemed destined to social desertification.
Obviously, whenever organic agriculture is practiced in the agritourism farm, the better of two worlds
merges and all possible synergies are activated. For example, there are in Italy biodynamic farmers,
www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ibes International Business & Economics Studies Vol. 3, No. 1, 2021
40
Published by SCHOLINK INC.
followers of doctrine of Steiner, who are certified by ICEA and attract, from all over the world,
followers of the anthroposophical movement, who wish to spend their holidays in a setting that ensures
the respect of their belief. Another fast-growing segment of clients is represented by the vegetarian and
vegan consumers, who look for organic agritourism facilities without animal products in their meals.
This imposes other choices to the farmers, and also creates new opportunities. Both sub-sectors
generate a positive flow of goods and external payments: organic Italian foods are exported all over the
world and can be found in foreign countries, foreign tourists visiting Italy buy organic products from
the farms they have visited and bring them back home. In the most recent years, Internet has generated
an increasing volume and value of organic foods sold all over the world through e-commerce. This
flow counterbalances the import of organic products from other European countries and from Third
countries.
This progress, as described in this paper, has not happened in one day. The first organic farmers and
consumers in Italy date back to the late 1940’s and the first agritourism farms begun their operations in
the 1970’s. In both cases, these farmers were pioneers, who often had problems with the surrounding
world and with the Institutions, because these activities were not yet regulated. Some consumers, feeble
market forces, have initiated both movements, then the farmers have organized themselves, and were
supported by some consumers and scientists, to push the policy makers for appropriate legislation.
Once the regulatory frameworks were in place, the combined forces of the consumers’ demand and of
the public funds have favoured the huge expansion of both subsectors. This successful story has been
possible thanks to the efforts of the private sector, the civil society, and the public Institutions (Santucci
& Antonelli, 2004; Di Iacovo & O’Connor, 2009). The role of organic farming in the Europe Union is
now well specified (European Commission, 2020). Further development is next to come, when the
financial resources of the EU 2021-2027 Planning period and of the EU Next Generation Fund will be
available.
References
Abitabile, C., & Viganò, L. (2012). (Eds.) Policies and supporting tools for organic agriculture in some
European countries (in Italian). Rome: MIPAAF.
Asero V., & Patti, S. (2009). From wine production to wine tourism experience: The case of Italy. AWE
Working Paper 42.
Cinelli Colombini, D. (2015). Wine tourism in Italy. International Journal of Wine Research, 7, 29-35.
https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWR.S82688
CREA. (2019). Italian agriculture counts (in Italian). Rome.
Defrancesco, E., & Rossetto, L. (2007). From niche to market: The growth of organic business in Italy.
In M. Canavari, & K. D. Olson (Eds.), Organic Food Consumers’ Choices and Farmers’
Opportunities. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-39582-1
Di Iacovo, F., & O’Connor., D. (2009). (Eds.), Supporting policies for social farming in Europe.
www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ibes International Business & Economics Studies Vol. 3, No. 1, 2021
41
Published by SCHOLINK INC.
Progressing multifunctionality in responsive rural areas. Firenze: ARSIA. Retrieved from
http://sofar.unipi.it/index_file/arsia_So.Far-EU_def.pdf
European Commission. (2020). From farm to fork—for a fair, healthy and environmentally friendly
food system. Communication COM (2020)381 Brussels, 20.5.2020.
Fanfani, R. (1998). Agriculture in Italy (in Italian). Bologna: Il Mulino.
Fratto, F., Galasso, A., Hausmann, C., Macrì, M., Morelli, F., & Selmi, U. (2019). Agritourism and
multifunctionality. Scenario and perspectives (in Italian). Roma: Rete Rurale Nazionale. Retrieved
from https://www.reterurale.it/flex/cm/pages/ServeBLOB.php/L/IT/IDPagina/20364
Gamboni, M., & Moscatelli, S. (2015). Organic agriculture in Italy: Challenges and perspectives.
Organic Agriculture, 5, 165-177. https://doi.org/101007/s13165-015-0098-2
Giaccio, V., Mastronardi, L., Marino, D., Giannelli, A., & Scardera, A. (2018). Do rural policies impact
on tourism development in Italy? A case study of agritourism. Sustainability, August.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082938
ISMEA-CIHEAM. (2019). Bio in Figures 2019 (in Italian). Retrieved from
http://www.sinab.it/sites/default/files/share/Bio%20in%20cifre%202019%20-%20Anticipazioni.p
df
Jansen, K. (2000). Labour livelihoods and quality of life in organic agriculture in Europe. Biological
agriculture and horticulture, 17, 247-278. Retrieved from
https://www.keesjansen.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Labour-in-Organic-Agriculture.pdf
Lampkin, N., Foster, C., Padel, S., & Midmore, P. (1999). The policy and regulatory environment for
organic farming in Europe. University of Hohenheim.
Milone, P. (2009). Agriculture in transition.Assen: Van Gorcum.
Moruzzo, R., Riccioli, F., Galasso, A., Troccoli, C., Espinosa Diaz, S., & Di Iacovo, F. (2020). Italian
Social Farming: The Network of Coldiretti and Campagna Amica. Sustainability, 12, 5036.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125036
Retrieved from
https://www.smartchain-platform.eu/sites/default/files/publication-files/Italian%20Social%20Farm
ing-the%20Network%20of%20Coldiretti%20and%20Campagna%20Amica.pdf
Movimpresa. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.infocamere.it/en/movimprese
Mzoughi, N. (2014). Do organic farmers feel happier than conventional ones? An exploratory analysis.
Ecological Economics, 103, 38-43.
Ohe, A., & Ciani, A. (2012). Assessing demand characteristics of agritourism in Italy. Tourism and
Hospitality Management, 18(2), 281-296.
Olivieri, F. M. (2014). Rural Tourism and Local Development: Typical Productions of Lazio.
Almatourism-Journal of Tourism, Culture and Territorial Development, 5(3), 36-59.
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2036-5195/4620
Ronchetti, F., Castellani, I., & Fossati, P. (2011). Tutorial Farms (in Italian). Rassegna di Diritto
www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/ibes International Business & Economics Studies Vol. 3, No. 1, 2021
42
Published by SCHOLINK INC.
Legislazione e Medicina Legale Veterinaria, X, 4.
Sanders J., Stolze, M., & Padel, S. (2011). (Eds.). Use and efficiency of public support measures
addressing organic farming. Braunschweig: Institute of Farm Economics.
Santucci, F. M. (2012). The history of organic since its origins (in Italian). In D. Caccioni, & L.
Colombo (Eds.), Manuale del Biologico (pp. 7-14), Bologna: MIPAAF-Edagricole.
Santucci, F. M. (2013). Agritourism for rural development in Italy-evolution, situation and perspectives.
British Journal of Economics, Management and Trade, 3(3), 186-200.
Santucci, F. M., & Antonelli, A. (2004). The role of public, non-governmental and private actors for the
development of organic farming: the Italian successful example, NEW MEDIT, 3(2), 42-49.
Santucci, F. M., & Pignataro, F. (2002). Organic farming in Italy. USDA - OECD Workshop on organic
agriculture. September 23-26, Washington DC. Retrieved from
https://orgprints.org/2159/1/Santucci_Pignataro_2002_Organic_farming_in_Italy.pdf
Schwarz, G., Nieberg, H., & Sanders, J. (2010). Organic farming support payments in the EU. Special
Issue 339, Braunschweig: Institute of Farm Economics.
SINAB. (2020). The organic olives-oil filière (in Italian), Roma.
Smith, J., Wolfe, M., Woodward, L., Pearce, B., & Lampkin, N. (2011). Organic farming and
biodiversity: A review of the literature. Organic Research Centre, Elm Farm. Retrieved from
http://www.organiccentrewales.org.uk/uploads/biodiversity_review_2011.pdf
The Cork Declaration. (1996). Retrieved from http://www.terport.hu/webfm_send/545
van der Ploeg, J. D. (2009). The new peasantries (in Italian). Roma: Donzelli Editore.
Viganò, L. (2013). The profile of the Italian organic farmers in the Census (in Italian). In C. Abitabile,
M. F. Marras, & L. Viganò (Eds.), BioReport 2013, L’agricoltura biologica in Italia, 9-17. Roma:
CREA. Retrieved from https://www.reterurale.it/Bioreport
