ArticlePDF Available

STEROID

Taylor & Francis
Patient Preference and Adherence
Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Background: Because systemic corticosteroids are associated with severe adverse effects, a study on the prescribing pattern for rationalizing drug therapy is needed. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the prescription pattern of systemic steroidal drugs at the outpatient department of Menelik II Referral Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2019. Methods: A cross-sectional study design was used to assess the prescription pattern of systemic steroidal drugs in the outpatient department of Menelik II Referral Hospital. A total of 384 patient charts were included in the study. The sample was selected by using a non-probability quota sampling method. The data was collected from patient charts by using a checklist and analyzed by using SPSS version 20 computer software package. Finally, the data was presented with tables, graphs and charts. Results: A total of 384 patient medical charts were reviewed during the study period. From which, 61.2% were females and 22.4% were in the age group of 31-40 years. The majority, 63.5%, of systemic corticosteroid use was indicated for respiratory disorders and the most frequently prescribed drug was prednisolone (42.4%). It was also found that intermediate acting corticosteroids (prednisolone and methyl prednisolone) were mostly prescribed during the study period. Conclusion: In this study, most steroids were indicated for respiratory disorders and prednisolone was found to be the most widely prescribed medication among systemic steroids.
Content may be subject to copyright.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Assessment of Prescription Pattern of Systemic
Steroidal Drugs in the Outpatient Department of
Menelik II Referral Hospital, Addis Ababa,
Ethiopia, 2019
This article was published in the following Dove Press journal:
Patient Preference and Adherence
Yohannes Tsegyie Wondmkun
Akeberegn Gorems Ayele
Department of Pharmacology and
Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy,
College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa
University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Background: Because systemic corticosteroids are associated with severe adverse effects,
a study on the prescribing pattern for rationalizing drug therapy is needed.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the prescription pattern of systemic
steroidal drugs at the outpatient department of Menelik II Referral Hospital, Addis Ababa,
Ethiopia, 2019.
Methods: A cross-sectional study design was used to assess the prescription pattern of
systemic steroidal drugs in the outpatient department of Menelik II Referral Hospital. A total
of 384 patient charts were included in the study. The sample was selected by using a non-
probability quota sampling method. The data was collected from patient charts by using
a checklist and analyzed by using SPSS version 20 computer software package. Finally, the
data was presented with tables, graphs and charts.
Results: A total of 384 patient medical charts were reviewed during the study period. From
which, 61.2% were females and 22.4% were in the age group of 31–40 years. The majority,
63.5%, of systemic corticosteroid use was indicated for respiratory disorders and the most
frequently prescribed drug was prednisolone (42.4%). It was also found that intermediate
acting corticosteroids (prednisolone and methyl prednisolone) were mostly prescribed during
the study period.
Conclusion: In this study, most steroids were indicated for respiratory disorders and
prednisolone was found to be the most widely prescribed medication among systemic
steroids.
Keywords: prescribing pattern, systemic steroid, corticosteroid, prednisolone
Introduction
Steroids are among the most frequently prescribed drugs in the world because they are
extremely effective for the relief of symptoms of many inammatory and immune
disorders and other conditions.
1
Systemic steroids are synthetic forms of natural
steroids, cortisol, developed by adrenal glands, which have powerful anti-
inammatory effects. Oral or parenteral systemic corticosteroids (e.g. dexamethasone,
prednisolone, and methyl prednisolone) exhibit strong immunomodulatory, anti-
inammatory, and anticancer properties and are essential to the treatment of various
disorders, including autoimmune disorder, allergic reactions, chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease, asthma exacerbations, and in some selected malignancies
2,3.
Correspondence: Yohannes Tsegyie
Wondmkun
Department of Pharmacology and Clinical
Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of
Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University,
P.O. Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Email yonitse2015@gmail.com
submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Patient Preference and Adherence 2021:15 9–14 9
http://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S285064
DovePress © 2021 Wondmkun and Ayele. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.
com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By
accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
Patient Preference and Adherence Dovepress
open access to scientific and medical research
Open Access Full Text Article
Patient Preference and Adherence downloaded from https://www.dovepress.com/ by 196.189.185.248 on 06-Jan-2021
For personal use only.
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) 1 / 1
2021:15
Glucocorticoids (GCs) provide rapid relief within hours of
treatment. Systemic treatment is started with large doses that
are then tapered quickly and tapering is frequently part of
treatment protocols to decrease the risk of relapse.
4
Since
GCs potently inhibit inammation and are used in a number
of inammatory and autoimmune diseases, they are one of
the most commonly prescribed drug categories. Because
GCs affect almost every organ system, the therapeutic use
and removal of corticosteroids is affected by a variety of
severe adverse effects, some of which are life-threatening.
Therefore, the decision to apply systemic corticosteroid
therapy also requires careful consideration of relative risks
and benets for each patient, intra-articular GCs are useful if
only a few joints are involved and septic arthritis is
removed.
5
The under-use of steroids results in a sub-therapeutic
effect, while overdose of steroids, not considering the
exact amount of steroids, results in different adverse effects.
The pharmacists should also share responsibility for educat-
ing patients on the proper administration of systemic corti-
costeroids, the pace of administration, and so on. Patients
should also consider the disease and its progression, the
complications caused by insufcient treatment, and the use
and abuse of drugs and their consequences.
6
Drug use or drug use measurement trials are legitimate
and structured quality assurance systems. These studies
are designed to review medication usage and suggest
medication trends with existing recommendations or
guidelines for the treatment of a particular disease. Drug
use is measured at the community level by age, sex, and
social status. Daily audits of medications are required to
improve clinical efcacy, minimize adverse effects, ques-
tion prescribers and assess the application of medical care
requirements. Inappropriate prescriptions are known
worldwide as a main healthcare concern, particularly in
developing countries.
7,8
Since corticosteroids play
a crucial role in the treatment of many diseases, including
the skin, they are commonly prescribed by clinicians.
According to World Health Organization gures, 50% of
all drugs are wrongly prescribed, administered or sold, in
particular, by GCS. These drugs are extensively adminis-
tered due to their strong immunosuppressive and anti-
inammatory action. This activity has also contributed to
over-prescription of these medications and, as a result,
increased adverse drug reactions. Corticosteroids were
developed in the early 1950s; since then, these drugs
have been commonly used for different clinical condi-
tions, requiring important caution in the selection of
corticosteroid medications for use and their dosing
schedule.
9,10
Although drug prescription patterns are
widely studied in Ethiopia,
11,12
specic information is
lacking for GCs in this regard. It is therefore essential to
research the medication prescription pattern of systemic
corticosteroids. Therefore, this study was aimed to assess
prescription pattern of systemic steroid drugs at the out-
patient department of Menelik II Referral Hospital, Addis
Ababa, Ethiopia.
Methods
Study Area and Period
This study was conducted in Menelik II Referral Hospital,
Addis Ababa, the capital city of Ethiopia and the head-
quarter of the African Union. Addis Ababa has 13 public
hospitals, 32 private hospitals and 93 health centers. The
study was conducted from April to June 2019 GC.
Study Design and Population
A cross-sectional study design was used to assess prescrip-
tion patterns of systemic steroidal drugs at the outpatient
department of Menelik II Referral Hospital. All patient
medical charts with systemic steroidal drugs at the out-
patient department of Menelik II Referral Hospital were
included in the study.
Sample Size Determination and Sampling
Techniques
The sample size for the study was determined using single
population proportion formula by assuming 95% con-
dence level, 5% marginal error, and 50% proportion of
appropriate systemic steroidal prescription pattern.
zα=2
2P1pð Þ
d2¼1:96ð Þ20:5 ð10:5Þ
0:05ð Þ2¼384
Therefore, the sample size for the study was 384 patient
medical charts with systemic steroidal prescriptions. Non-
probability quota sampling method was used to select
patient medical charts. Patient medical charts with sys-
temic steroidal prescription were included in the study
until the required sample size is reached (384 patient
medical charts with systemic steroidal prescriptions).
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Medical charts which contain systemic steroidal drugs
were included in the study whereas, incomplete patient
submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
DovePress
Patient Preference and Adherence 2021:15
10
Wondmkun and Ayele Dovepress
Patient Preference and Adherence downloaded from https://www.dovepress.com/ by 196.189.185.248 on 06-Jan-2021
For personal use only.
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) 1 / 1
medical charts and those contain non-systemic steroidal
drugs were excluded from the study.
Study Variables
The dependent variable was systemic steroidal prescription
pattern while the independent variables were socio demo-
graphic characteristics (sex and age), indication, type of
drug dose, route of administration, frequency and duration.
Data Collection Procedure
Data was collected by using a data abstraction checklist
developed by the investigators. The data were collected by
reviewing patient medical charts that contain systemic
steroidal prescriptions.
Data Quality Management
To maintain the quality of the data only complete medical
charts were included in the study. The collected data were
checked for completeness and accuracy. After data entry,
data cleaning was performed.
Data Analysis and Procedures
Data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 20
statistical software. Frequencies and percentages were
done to organize and summarize the data. Finally, the
result was presented with tables, graphs and charts.
Ethical Consideration
Ethical clearance was obtained from Addis Ababa
University, College of Health Sciences, School of
Pharmacy institutional review board with a reference num-
ber of ERB/SOP/251/02/2019 and an ofcial letter was
written to Menelik II Referral Hospital to secure permis-
sion. Condentiality and privacy of the data was ensured
during the collection period. The patient’s name and
address were not recorded on the data abstraction checklist
and the collected information was used for research only.
Moreover, the study was carried out in accordance with
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
13
Operational Denition
Adverse Drug Reaction
Unwanted or harmful reaction following administration of
drugs.
Prescription Pattern
Are prescribing, dispensing and distribution of medicine.
Systemic Steroid
Is one of a group of chemical substances found in our
body and made articially and used for the treatment of
various disease ailments.
Outpatient
A patient who is not hospitalized, but instead comes to
a physician ofce, clinic, for treatment.
Results
Socio-Demographic Characteristics
In this study, from 384 assessed patient medical charts with
steroids, the majority of them, 235 (61.2%), were female. The
age group of 31–40 and <20 years accounted for the highest
and the lowest number of patients respectively (Table 1).
Common Indication of Systemic
Corticosteroids
A total of 384 patient medical charts were analyzed in
Menelik II Referral Hospital in the outpatient department.
Out of this, respiratory disorders 244 (63.5%), meningitis 39
(10.2%) and rheumatoid arthritis 29 (7.6%) are the top three
disease conditions in which corticosteroids are prescribed
with the highest frequency (Table 2). On the other hand,
stroke, deep vein thrombosis, lung and esophageal cancer
represent conditions where corticosteroids are prescribed
with the lowest frequency 1 (0.26%) (not shown on the table).
Patterns of Systemic Corticosteroid Use
From the total of 384 patient medical charts analyzed,
prednisolone was the most frequently prescribed drug 163
(42.4%), followed by hydrocortisone 117 (30.5%),
Table 1 Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Patients
Receiving Systemic Corticosteroids, Menelik II Referral
Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2019
Variable Frequency Percent
Sex Male 149 38.8
Female 235 61.2
Age <20 yrs 47 12.2
21–30 yrs 54 14.1
31–40 yrs 86 22.4
41–50 yrs 77 20.1
51–60 yrs 58 15.1
>60 yrs 62 16.1
Patient Preference and Adherence 2021:15 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
DovePress
11
Dovepress Wondmkun and Ayele
Patient Preference and Adherence downloaded from https://www.dovepress.com/ by 196.189.185.248 on 06-Jan-2021
For personal use only.
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) 1 / 1
dexamethasone 92 (24.0%), beclometasone puff 10 (2.6%),
and methyl prednisolone 2 (5%) (Figure 1).
Route of Administration of Systemic
Steroidal Drugs
Most systemic GCs were administered intravenously (IV)
(51.3%) out of the total of 384 examined patient medical
charts at Menelik II Referral Hospital, while the least
number of GCs were given through intramuscular (IM)
route 5 (1.3%) (Figure 2).
Polypharmacy
The number of drugs per prescription varied from one
to three and greater than three. The majority of the
prescriptions contained two drugs per prescription
163 (42.4%), followed by >three drugs per prescription
94 (24.5%), three drugs per prescription 75 (19.5%), and
one drug per prescription 52 (13.5%) (Table 3).
Common Class of Steroid Use Based on
the Duration
Intermediate-acting corticosteroids (prednisolone, methyl
prednisolone) were mostly prescribed 165 (43.0%) fol-
lowed by short-acting (hydrocortisone, beclomethasone)
127 (33.1%) and long-acting corticosteroids (dexametha-
sone) 92 (24%) (Table 4).
Discussion
In the present study, patients treated with corticosteroids
were mostly between 31–40 years of age (22.4%), and
most of them were female (61.2%). As per the demo-
graphic data collected, this result was in line with the
study conducted in India in which out of the total, 58.3%
were female patients.
14
This data showed that mid-aged
group in both populations are almost equally prone to
diseases for which steroids are used. But it is inconsistent
with the study done at the District General Hospital in
Amravati region, India which showed that 94 (53%) indi-
viduals were male patients.
15
Respiratory diseases 244 (63.5%) were the major and
cancer 4 (1.0%) was the least disorder for systemic corti-
costeroids to be indicated. This result is comparable with
Table 2 Common Indications of Systemic Corticosteroids at
Menelik II Referral Hospital in Outpatient Department, Addis
Ababa, Ethiopia, 2019
Indications Frequency Percent
Respiratory disorders 244 63.5
Extrapulmonary tuberculosis 19 4.9
Meningitis 39 10.2
Cancer 4 1.1
Kidney disorders 7 1.8
Pneumocystis pneumonia 14 3.6
Allergic dermatitis 5 1.3
Rheumatoid arthritis 29 7.6
Others 23 6.0
Total 384 100
Figure 1 Patterns of systemic corticosteroid use at the OPD of Menelik II Referral Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2019.
Figure 2 Route of administration of systemic steroidal drugs outpatient depart-
ment at Menelik II Referral Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2019.
Abbreviations: IM, intramuscular; IV, intravenous; PO, per oral route.
submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
DovePress
Patient Preference and Adherence 2021:15
12
Wondmkun and Ayele Dovepress
Patient Preference and Adherence downloaded from https://www.dovepress.com/ by 196.189.185.248 on 06-Jan-2021
For personal use only.
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) 1 / 1
a study done in India, where 61.82% of indications were
for respiratory tract disorders.
16
The nding of this study
also showed that prednisolone was the most commonly
prescribed corticosteroid 163 (42.4%) while beclometha-
sone was the least prescribed drug 10 (2.6%). This nding
is comparable with a study done in Denmark where pre-
dnisolone was the most frequently prescribed GC,
accounting for 50% of all prescriptions assessed in the
period.
17
Out of the 384 patient medical charts analyzed,
the highest number of systemic corticosteroids were admi-
nistered through the intravenous (IV) route, accounting for
197 (51.3%), and the least was intramuscular, 5 (1.3%).
This result is contrary to a study done in India where
systemic corticoids administered through inhalation
(44.5%) is higher than the IV route (24%).
18
The majority
of the prescriptions in this study contained two drugs per
prescription 163 (42.4%). But, in another study done in
India, the most common number of drugs per prescription
was three (42.2%).
19
This difference might be due to the
degree of disease progression which requires more drugs
in the latter study. Intermediate-acting corticosteroids (pre-
dnisolone, methyl prednisolone) were prescribed in most
of the cases 165 (43.0%). This nding was in line with
a study done in India, in which out of 119 GCs prescribed,
intermediate acting corticosteroids that comprised of pre-
dnisolone and methyl prednisolone were most commonly
prescribed (38.66%).
18
Limitation of the Study
This was a cross-section study and the cause and effect
were evaluated simultaneously. Therefore, the causal link
could not be established due to the lack of a temporal link.
As the sample size for this analysis was taken from one
hospital using a quota sampling procedure, the ndings
presented here should be interpreted with caution and
cannot be generalized to the entire population. The present
study was also focused on the examination of the records;
therefore, there were no inherent design limitations such as
incompleteness of the data.
Conclusion
From this study, it can be concluded that among sys-
temic steroids prednisolone was found to be the most
frequently prescribed drug followed by hydrocortisone.
Most of these corticosteroids were prescribed for
respiratory disorders.
Abbreviations
GC, glucocorticoids; IV, intravenous; IM, intramuscular;
PO, per oral; WHO, World Health Organization.
Data Sharing Statement
The datasets used during the current study are available
from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The authors sincerely thank Addis Ababa University,
College of Health Sciences, School of Pharmacy,
Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy for
approving this study. We also thank the staff of Menelik II
Referral Hospital for their cooperation and allowing us to
conduct this study.
Author Contributions
All authors contributed to data analysis, drafting or revis-
ing the article, have agreed on the journal to which the
article will be submitted, gave nal approval of the version
to be published, and agree to be accountable for all aspects
of the work.
Funding
This study was done with no nancial support for any of
the partial or complete work.
Table 3 Number of Drugs per Prescription at Menelik II Referral
Hospital in Outpatient Department, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2019
Number per Prescription Frequency Percentage
1 drug 52 13.5
2 drugs 163 42.4
3 drugs 75 19.5
>3 drugs 94 24.5
Total 384 100
Table 4 Common Class of Corticosteroid Use Based on
Duration at OPD of Menelik II Referral Hospital, Addis Ababa,
Ethiopia, 2019
Common Class of Steroid Frequency Percent
Short-acting 127 33
Intermediate-acting 165 43
Long-acting 92 92
Patient Preference and Adherence 2021:15 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
DovePress
13
Dovepress Wondmkun and Ayele
Patient Preference and Adherence downloaded from https://www.dovepress.com/ by 196.189.185.248 on 06-Jan-2021
For personal use only.
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) 1 / 1
Disclosure
The authors declare that they have no nancial and/or non-
nancial competing interests.
References
1. Moura MDG, Lopes LC, Silva MT, Barberato-Filho S, Motta RHL, de
Cássia Bergamaschi C. Use of steroid and nonsteroidal
anti-inammatories in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: systematic
review protocol. Medicine. 2018;97:41.
2. Salek S, Boscoe AN, Evans C, et al. Development of Patient-Reported
Outcome Measures (Symptoms and Impacts) in Adults with Pyruvate
Kinase Deciency. Washington, DC: American Society of
Hematology; 2019.
3. Wan ES, Qiu W, Baccarelli A, et al. Systemic steroid exposure is
associated with differential methylation in chronic obstructive pulmon-
ary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(12):1248–1255.
doi:10.1164/rccm.201207-1280OC
4. Ericson-Neilsen W, Kaye AD. Steroids: pharmacology, complications,
and practice delivery issues. Ochsner J. 2014;14(2):203–207.
5. Luís M, Freitas J, Costa F, et al. An updated review of
glucocorticoid-related adverse events in patients with rheumatoid
arthritis. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2019;18(7):581–590. doi:10.1080/
14740338.2019.1615052
6. Ahmad DS, Wazaify MM, Albsoul-Younes A. the role of the clinical
pharmacist in the identication and management of corticophobia–an
Interventional Study. Trop J Pharm Res. 2014;13(3):445–453.
doi:10.4314/tjpr.v13i3.20
7. Bylappa BK, Patil RT, Pillai RT. Drug prescribing pattern of topical
corticosteroids in dermatology unit of a tertiary-care hospital.
Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2015;4(12):1702. doi:10.5455/
ijmsph.2015.17052015351
8. Enato EF, Sounyo AA, Madadi P. Assessment of disease proles and
drug prescribing patterns of health care facilities in Edo state, Nigeria.
J Public Health Africa. 2012;e25–e. doi:10.4081/jphia.2012.e25
9. Ankit P, Bharat G. Study of drug utilization pattern of glucocorticos-
teroid drugs with special emphasis on their immediate adverse effects
in a tertiary care teaching rural hospital. Int J Pharm Pract. 2010;3:4.
10. Rathi SK, D’Souza P. Rational and ethical use of topical corticoster-
oids based on safety and efcacy. Indian J Dermatol. 2012;57(4):251.
doi:10.4103/0019-5154.97655
11. Desta Z, Abula T, Gebre-Yohannes A, Worku A. Drug prescribing
patterns for outpatients in three hospitals in north-west Ethiopia.
Ethiop J Health Dev. 2002;16(2):183–189. doi:10.4314/ejhd.
v16i2.9809
12. Berha AB, Seyoum N. Evaluation of drug prescription pattern using
world health organization prescribing indicators in tikur anbessa
specialized hospital: a cross sectional study. J Drug Deliv Ther.
2018;8(1):74–80. doi:10.22270/jddt.v8i1.1652
13. Association WM. World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki.
Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.
Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(4):373.
14. Gupta R, Malhotra P. Prescribing pattern of corticosteroids among the
dermatology inpatients in a tertiary care teaching hospital of north
India-a retrospective, observational study. Natl J Physiol Pharm
Pharmacol. 2018;8(2):158–162. doi:10.5455/njppp.2018.8.05184240
52018
15. Mulchand S, Bhupesh G, Dhanshree P, Aparna K. Assessment of
drug utilization pattern of steroids in a district general hospital in
Amravati region. Res Results Pharmacol. 2019;5:2.
16. Issac A, Yogananda R, Shehin M. Assessment of prescription pattern
and monitoring adverse drug reaction of antibiotics in paediatric
inpatients. Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2016;3(3):1071–1075.
doi:10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20162393
17. Laugesen K, Jørgensen JOL, Sørensen HT, Petersen I. Systemic
glucocorticoid use in Denmark: a population-based prevalence
study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(5):e015237. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-
015237
18. Aryal A, Kunwar K, Shadvar S, et al. Study on steroid utilization
pattern in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Int J Pharm Pract.
2017;10(2):96–103. doi:10.5530/ijopp.10.2.19
19. Thakur PK, Majid A, Shramik M, Kumar S, Prospective A. Study on
drug utilization evaluation of corticosteroids among out-patients of
teaching hospital. Int J Pharm Pract Teach Pract. 2015;6(4):1–5.
Patient Preference and Adherence Dovepress
Publish your work in this journal
Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer-reviewed,
open access journal that focusing on the growing importance of
patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic conti-
nuum. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance,
persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities
and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease
states are major areas of interest for the journal. This journal has
been accepted for indexing on PubMed Central. The manuscript
management system is completely online and includes a very quick
and fair peer-review system, which is all easy to use. Visit http://
www.dovepress.com/testimonials.php to read real quotes from pub-
lished authors.
Submit your manuscript here: https://www.dovepress.com/patient-preference-and-adherence-journal
submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
DovePress
Patient Preference and Adherence 2021:15
14
Wondmkun and Ayele Dovepress
Patient Preference and Adherence downloaded from https://www.dovepress.com/ by 196.189.185.248 on 06-Jan-2021
For personal use only.
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) 1 / 1
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction : Rational use of corticosteroids is very important in the long term for improving patient safety. The main objective of the study was to analyze the prescribing patterns of steroids in a district general hospital, Amravati. Materials and methods : A prospective observational study was carried out over a period of six months in a district general hospital. All patients receiving any category of steroid therapy were enrolled, and the prescribing tapering patterns of steroids were reviewed. The demographic data, disease data and data on the utilization of various steroids were analyzed, and the knowledge of the patients was assessed by using a Michigan questionnaire. Results and discussion : 179 patients were recruited for the study. Steroids were prescribed for various (29.6%) respiratory conditions, (10.1%) CVS diseases, (11.7%) CNS, (1.6%) in hepatic disorders, (1.1%) musculoskeletal disorders, (3.4%) skeletal disorders, (0.6%) renal impairments, (3.9%) GI disorders, (19.0%) skin diseases and (19.0%) other diseases. The utilization of steroid dexamethasone was the most commonly prescribed to 111 patients (63.8%) followed by hydrocortisone (57 patients, 32.8%) and prednisolone (6 patients, 3.4 %). Dexamethasone was most commonly associated with adverse effects (1.8% of such as headaches, abdominal pains, and rashes), followed by prednisolone (0.8% of such as facial swelling), clobetasol (0.4%) and fluticasone (0.4 %). Conclusions : Very little variation was found in the prescription pattern amongst the healthcare professionals. Most of the drugs were prescribed rationally; the significance of the study is to improve the patient safety in the long-term use of steroid therapy by observing the prescribing patterns as irrational use of steroids can increase the risk of adverse effects.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: Glucocorticoids represent a cornerstone in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Their effect as a disease-modifying treatment in rheumatoid arthritis is well established. Despite this, the risk of adverse events of glucocorticoids, especially in high doses and over a long time, is constantly highlighted. Data on the prevalence and impact of glucocorticoid-related adverse effects in rheumatoid arthritis is needed, therefore, to be regularly revisited. Areas covered: In this review, our primary aim was to provide an update of evidence from randomized controlled trials and observational cohort studies on the safety of glucocorticoid treatment in rheumatoid arthritis. Our secondary aim was to provide a critical overview of the concerns raised with both study designs - randomized clinical trials versus nonrandomized observational studies – regarding the assessment of the safety of glucocorticoids in rheumatoid arthritis. Expert opinion: In the meantime, adherence to recommendations and consensus on standardized methodologies for monitoring and reporting adverse events is essential to improve our knowledge and competence in the best management of glucocorticoids.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Rheumatoid arthritis affects 1% of the world's population and its current treatment options are costly. There are not enough studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of anti-inflammatory drugs medications used to reduce rheumatoid arthritis's symptoms. This study will evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of steroid and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Methods: Randomized clinical trials eligible for our systematic review will enroll adults with rheumatoid arthritis treated with anti-inflammatory drugs compared with a control group (placebo or active control) at any dose, duration, and route of administration and double blind studies. In order to include all forms of rheumatoid arthritis and anti-inflammatory drugs, we will search the following electronic databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE (via Ovid); ExcerptaMedica Database (via Ovid); Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (via Ovid); Web of Science; ClinicalTrial.gov; and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. We will not impose any language restrictions or publication status. Outcomes of interest include are pain, physical function, swelling, stiffness, grip force, radiological image of the joint, quality of life, adverse events, discontinuation due to adverse events, satisfaction with the treatment, and rescue medication for pain. A team of reviewers will independently screen search results, extract data from eligible trials, and assess risk of bias. We will use the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to rate overall certainty of the evidence by outcome. Dichotomous data will be summarized as risk ratios; continuous data will be given as standard average differences with 95% confidence intervals. Results: The evidence derived by this study will increase awareness of the effectiveness and safety of steroid and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Conclusion: The results could guide patients and healthcare practitioners and help facilitate evidence-based shared care decision making.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Irrational use of antibiotics is a worldwide problem that contributes to dramatically increasing resistance and causes significant mortality, morbidity, and increased health care costs. In order to ensure the quality of health and medical care for patients and the community as a whole the proper use of medicines is an important element. Evaluation of drug use patterns with the WHO core drug use indicators is showing progressively more essential to promote rational drug use in developing countries. The main aim of this study was to assess the drug prescription pattern using WHO prescribing indicators at the Medical Outpatient Pharmacy in Tikur Ambessa Specialized Hospital (TASH). Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional survey was designed to the claim data .A sample of 2000 prescriptions was selected using systematic random sampling to determine the prescribing pattern from a total of 6,462 prescriptions written by medical interns, residents and senior physicians for a one -year period from February 2015 to January 2016. The raw data was cleaned, entered and analyzed using SPSS version 21.0 of the computer software. The results were summarized using texts and tables. Results: The average number of drugs per encounter was 2.84 +1.58 in the range of 1 to 9. The total number of the drugs which were prescribed by generic name was 97.9%. Of these, the total number of prescribed drugs which were included in the Ethiopian National Essential Medicine List was 99.3%. The present study highlighted the under use of antibiotics which accounts 6.6% (378), with majority being Crystalline Penicillin 27.1 % (94), followed by Amoxicillin 17.8%(62) and Ciprofloxacin 14.1% (49). A total of 8.4% (480) drugs were prescribed as injections. Conclusion: On the basis of the finding of this study, the drug prescription pattern did not meet the WHO core drug use indicators criteria.  It seems that there is a need for improvement of the prescribing patterns in the hospitals.  Therefore, the federal ministry of health and drug regulatory body's commitment will be required to bring about changes in drug use policies, organize health systems and legislative structures as required in order to foster rational drug use in the country. Keywords: Prescribing Indicators, Prescription, Rational Prescribing.  Â
Article
Full-text available
Background: Rational use of corticosteroids is very essential for improving patient safety on long term use. AIM: To study the prescribing pattern of steroids in teaching hospital. Method: A prospective observational study was conducted in the department of dermatology and general medicine in a tertiary care teaching hospital for the period of 6 months. All patients receiving any category of Steroid therapy were included and the prescribing and tapering pattern of steroids were reviewed. Result: Prescribing pattern was observed and analysed in 226 participants during the study period. Steroids were prescribed for various Respiratory illnesses (59.32 %) and Skin related conditions (33.18%). The steroid utilization was found to be more in elderly patients, particularly males. Inhaler administration was common in 44.5% of cases. Budesonide was the most commonly prescribed (43.45%) followed by Prednisolone (15.25%) and Hydrocortisone (14.91%). Budesonide + Hydrocortisone were the most common therapy given in combination (35.19%). In topical preparation, Ultra potent Steroid Clobetasol (45.93%) was commonly prescribed and in Systemic Preparation, Intermediate acting steroid Prednisolone (37.82%) was used. Most drugs were prescribed rationally although some factors like improper history, drug administration time and tapering were deviating away from rationality. Conclusion: Not much variation was found in the pattern of prescription amongst the healthcare professionals. Although most of the drugs were prescribed rationally, involvement of a Clinical pharmacist in patient care can help in more rational prescribing along with prevention and early detection of ADRs which can directly promote drug safety and better patient outcomes.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives Glucocorticoid (GC) use is widespread and associated with many adverse effects. Thus, it is important to ascertain GC utilisation patterns. In this study, we examined the annual prevalence of prescription users and amount of use of systemic GCs. Design Population-wide prevalence study. Setting The primary healthcare and hospital sectors in Denmark from 1999 to 2015. Results Approximately 3% of the Danish population redeemed at least one prescription for a systemic GC annually between 1999 and 2015, with annual prevalence remaining constant over the period. However, after adjusting for age and sex, we observed a decrease in annual prevalence from 1999 to 2015, with a prevalence ratio of 0.92 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.92). Annual prevalence was highest among the elderly (7.0%–8.2% among persons 65–79 years of age and 8.4%–10% among persons 80+ years of age). Prednisolone was the most frequently redeemed systemic GC, with annual prevalence increasing from 1.4% to 2.1% during the 1999–2015 period. The amount of systemic GCs provided to the hospital sector increased from 2.3 defined daily doses (DDD)/1000 inhabitants/day in 1999 to 3.5 DDD/1000 inhabitants/day in 2015, while the amount provided to the primary healthcare sector remained constant in the range of 10–11 DDD/1000 inhabitants/day. Conclusion We found a high prevalence of systemic GC use of 3% with a remarkably high prevalence in elderly of up to 10%, wherefore continued awareness of its effects is mandated.
Article
Introduction: Pyruvate kinase (PK) deficiency is a rare, congenital autosomal recessive hemolytic anemia managed with supportive treatments, including transfusion, splenectomy, and iron chelation. Disease-directed treatments, including a small molecule PK activator and gene therapy, are currently in development. No disease-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures have been validated for use in this patient population. The objective of this initiative was to develop PRO measures for assessing symptoms and impacts of PK deficiency and compare them to existing, non-disease-specific measures previously recommended for use in this disease area. Methods: A targeted literature review was conducted to inform the development of a preliminary hypothesized conceptual framework to identify signs, symptoms, and impacts commonly experienced by patients with PK deficiency and to inform the direction and content of interviews with such patients. Concept elicitation interviews were conducted with 21 adults with PK deficiency from the US, Netherlands, and Germany. Draft items were then tested in cognitive interviews with 20 adults with PK deficiency to further establish content validity and revised based on the results. A comparison was conducted between concepts included in the newly developed PK deficiency disease-specific measures and the domain structure and item concepts included in the EORTC QLQ-C30 and SF-36v2 to evaluate the extent of differences and conceptual overlap with instruments that had previously been recommended in this population. Specific attributes compared included face validity (i.e., conceptual coverage and inclusion of proximal symptoms and/or impacts) and measurement characteristics (i.e., item wording, recall, and response options). Results: Two measures, the PK Deficiency Diary (PKDD), a 7-item measure of the core signs and symptoms of PK deficiency, and PK Deficiency Impact Assessment (PKDIA), a 14-item measure of the impacts of PK deficiency on patients' HRQoL, were developed. A comparison of the newly drafted measures to the EORTC QLQ-C30 and SF-36v2 demonstrated minimal similarities in concepts, domains, item wording, and recall period. Of the 7 concepts in the PKDD, only 3 were common to the EORTC QLQ-C30, 4 were common to the SF36v2, and 2 were related but did not match exactly (i.e., "bone pain" and "pain"). Of the 12 distinct concepts in the PKDIA, only 5 were common to the EORTC QLQ-C30, 2 were common to the SF-36v2, and 3 were related but did not match exactly (i.e., difficulty starting things, difficulty finishing things, and difficulty performing moderate physical activity). Conclusions: This research demonstrates that the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and SF-36v2 lack the appropriate conceptual relevance and coverage of disease-specific signs, symptoms, and impacts most relevant and burdensome to patients with PK deficiency. The newly developed PKDD and PKDIA may be useful tools in clinical trials in patients with PK deficiency. Psychometric validation of these measures is currently underway. Disclosures Salek: Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy; Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Boscoe:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Evans:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Egan:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Wells:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Piantedosi:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Grace:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Storm:Agios: Employment.
Article
Background: Antibiotics constitute more than one third of prescriptions in paediatrics. Antibiotic prescribing pattern should be evaluated periodically in order to increase the rationality of use. The indiscriminate use of antibiotics results in increased occurrence of adverse drug reactions, suboptimal therapy, polypharmacy and antibiotic resistance. Hence, the present study is to assess the prescription pattern and the extent of adverse drug reactions due to antibiotic usage. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in Basaveshwara Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Chitradurga, Karnataka, India for a period of six months. This study included patients prescribed with antibiotics in paediatric ward. All data including patient’s demographic details, symptoms and treatment pattern were collected and documented in data collection form. Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) were reported by using an ADR reporting form. ADR were assessed using Naranjo’s scale. Results: Among the 160 patients 54% patients were males, 45% patients were under the age group 1-5 years. 50% of the diagnosis was acute gastroenteritis and bronchopneumonia. 80% of total antibiotics prescribed were cephalosporins which include 99% of ceftriaxone. A total of 14 ADRs were observed in the study. The occurrence of probable ADR was 6% and possible ADR was 3%. 79% of ADR caused gastro intestinal disturbances while 14% caused dermatological disorders and 7% caused other disorders. Conclusions: Although some ADR was present in the study, the antibiotic prescription in the patients who acutely needed was prescribed appropriately, where it proved to be beneficial.