ArticlePDF Available

Hamstring tightness causing low back pain among college going students - a cross-sectional study

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Introduction and aim: Posterior thigh muscles are also called the Hamstring group of muscles. Its major action is knee flexion and minor action in hip extensor. It is one of the two joint muscles that involve the hip joint and knee joint. When these muscles are shortened or become tight the movement in the hip and knee is affected or reduced. This shortened muscle causes a posterior pelvic tilt that leads to a flat back. Prolonged tightness causes low back pain. Tightness is mainly due to inadequate physical activity results in stiffness, osteoarthritis, and osteoporosis. The aim of this study is to find whether tight hamstring causes low back pain in college-going students. Materials and methods: The method used to measure the hamstring length in this study is the Active Knee Extension Test. The knee angle is measure using universal goniometry. The knee angle should be between 80-90 degrees. If the range is below 80 degrees, then that subject has a tight hamstring. Results: Mean hamstring tightness in males is calculated and found that the left is more affected than the right. The mean hamstring tightness in the female is calculated and found that the right side is more affected than the left side. Both males and females having tightness at the range of 30-40 degrees are more. Conclusion: This study shows that most of the colleges going students have knee range below 80 degrees. And investigation reveals that 2/4th of the total experienced low back pain in their life. This pain experience is present in all age group that comes under this study. Some students who involve in sports activities have tight hamstring. But some do not have because of stretching muscles before and after the sports activity. By this, it is concluded that prevalence is more among college-going, students.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Biomedicine: 2020; 40(4): 531-534 October December 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51248/.v40i4.335 Biomedicine- Vol. 40 No. 4: 2020
Research Article
Hamstring tightness causing low back pain among college going students - a cross-sectional
study
Kamalakannan, M.1, Hemamalini P.2, Divya T.2
1Assistant Professor, 2Physiotherapy Undergraduate, Saveetha College of Physiotherapy, SIMATS Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
(Received: December 2019 Revised: September 2020 Accepted: November 2020)
Corresponding author: Kamalakannan M. Email: kamal1712@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
Introduction and aim: Posterior thigh muscles are also called the Hamstring group of muscles. Its major action is
knee flexion and minor action in hip extensor. It is one of the two joint muscles that involve the hip joint and knee
joint. When these muscles are shortened or become tight the movement in the hip and knee is affected or reduced. This
shortened muscle causes a posterior pelvic tilt that leads to a flat back. Prolonged tightness causes low back pain.
Tightness is mainly due to inadequate physical activity results in stiffness, osteoarthritis, and osteoporosis. The aim of
this study is to find whether tight hamstring causes low back pain in college-going students.
Materials and methods: The method used to measure the hamstring length in this study is the Active Knee Extension
Test. The knee angle is measure using universal goniometry. The knee angle should be between 80-90 degrees. If the
range is below 80 degrees, then that subject has a tight hamstring.
Results: Mean hamstring tightness in males is calculated and found that the left is more affected than the right. The
mean hamstring tightness in the female is calculated and found that the right side is more affected than the left side.
Both males and females having tightness at the range of 30-40 degrees are more.
Conclusion: This study shows that most of the colleges going students have knee range below 80 degrees. And
investigation reveals that 2/4th of the total experienced low back pain in their life. This pain experience is present in all
age group that comes under this study. Some students who involve in sports activities have tight hamstring. But some
do not have because of stretching muscles before and after the sports activity. By this, it is concluded that prevalence is
more among college-going, students.
Keywords: Hamstring tightness; low back pain; goniometry, SLR
INTRODUCTION
osterior thigh muscles are called hamstring group
muscles. They are semitendinosus,
semimembranosus, and biceps femoris long and
short head. All together flex the knee but the short head
of biceps femoris alone extends the hip (1). Hamstring
muscles originate from the ischial tuberosity of the
pelvis and posterior femur and inserts on the proximal
lateral tibia. It is one of the two joint muscles.
Hamstring muscles act as strong flexors of the knee
and weak extensors of the hip (2). The hamstring is a
variable length. Some person cannot touch their fingers
while standing as their hamstring muscles are rather
short or tight. The sciatic nerve supplies the hamstring
group of muscles. The length of the hamstring cannot
be directly measured, this measurement is done in the
angular measurement of unilateral hip flexion with the
knee extended (3). A universal goniometer was used to
measure the angle of the knee for hamstring length
measurements while the hip was maintained at 90
degrees of flexion (4). It was impossible to conclude
whether individuals with LBP have impaired hamstring
flexibility and stiffness. Hamstring tightness causes
chronic low back pain. It may get worse if left
untreated (5, 6). On this basis, this study is to
investigate the relationship between hamstring
flexibility and low back pain. Hamstring muscle
extensibility and low back pain are closely related and
have a correlation with age and gender. Hamstring
tightness increases with age and affects between 40-49
and mostly males are affected hamstring measurement
using straight leg raise test is less accurate because of
the rotation of pelvis that occurs during the test (7, 8).
The Active knee extension test is the best method to
rule out the extensibility range of the hamstring muscle
with the hip stabilized at 90 degrees and with accurate
instrument placement. This method gives reliable
measurements about hamstring extensibility and length
with a 90/90 position in supine. The amount of
extension was measured using both an electro-
goniometer and a standard goniometer. From this
finding, it can be stated whether mechanical low back
pain is caused by hamstring tightness (9, 10).
The tight hamstring can cause a posterior tilt of the
pelvis which causes back pain. Low back pain and gait
abnormality are commonly linked with movement
P
531
Kamalakannan et al: Hamstring tightness causing……students - a cross-sectional study
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51248/.v40i4.335 Biomedicine- Vol. 40 No. 4: 2020
dysfunction at the lumbar spine, pelvis, and lower
limbs. If hamstrings are tight, then blood supply will be
squeezed out of them. Therefore, muscle is working
with less capacity to do work, which in turn causes low
back pain. Hamstring tightness leads to a high risk of
recurrent injury and reduces the performance and co-
ordination of athletes. So as to prevent such risk factors
for athletes and college-going students this study will
be an alarming sign. Because college students often
adopt a sitting posture for a long period of time. This
causes the hamstring to be in a contracted state for a
long time and goes for tightness. Tight hamstring
increases stress on low back and aggravates the pain
(11, 12). Previous history and early onset of low back
pain are associated with chronic low back pain in
adults, implying that prevention in adolescence may
have a positive impact in adulthood. Hence this study
was undertaken as there is a lack of literature on the
prevalence and severity of hamstring tightness hence
purpose of this study was to find hamstring tightness
among college-going students. This is just like the
screening process.
MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY
A cross-sectional study was conducted at Saveetha
College of Physiotherapy, Thandalam. Ethical
clearance was obtained from the institution. 250
college students were assessed in this study. Informed
consent was obtained, Inclusion criteria: The age group
of 18-21 years. Exclusion criteria: Subject with any
past hamstring injury within the last 2years, any recent
hamstring surgery.
The active knee extension (AKE) test is used to check
the range of motion at the knee joint and assess the
hamstring tightness. This study was done mainly on
college-going students. The procedure is first explained
to the subjects and assessed their hamstring length by
active knee extension test. For this test, the subjects
were assessed on a couch in the supine position with
both the lower extremities extended and in a fully
relaxed position. Both anterior superior iliac spines are
aligned straight. The lower extremity which is not
being measured is kept fixed on the couch. The
subjects were asked to flex the measuring hip to 90
degrees and extend the knee as much as they can. With
this position, the knee angle is measured using the
Universal Goniometer in marked joint axis as lateral
epicondyle of the femur, and with the fixed arm along
the long axis of the femur and the movable arm along
the long axis of the tibia. The Active knee extension
measurements were defined as the degree of knee
extension from the knee at 90 degrees in relation to the
hip at 90degree. On each side, measurements are done
twice or thrice, and the mean angle is taken which was
used for the analysis. There is an association of
hamstring tightness and range of Motion in Anterior
pelvic tilt, lumbar motion, and trunk.
Statistical analysis
The collected data were tabulated below. Statistical
analysis was done on a blinded, intention to treat basis
using SPSS software (version 18.0). P<0.05 was set for
all analyses and the significance level was set to α=
0.05.
Table 1: Hamstring tightness measurement
Range in
degrees
Male
Female
Right
Left
Right
20-30
23
18
29
30-40
57
66
52
40-50
26
33
21
50-60
29
23
12
Fig. 1: Hamstring tightness male
Fig. 2: Hamstring tightness - female
RESULTS
In this study, there were 250 college-going students,
aged between 18-21years were included. With the
above-collected data and calculated degree of
hamstring tightness, we obtained the mean value. Mean
hamstring tightness in males is calculated and found
that the left is more affected than the right. The mean
hamstring tightness in the female is calculated and
found that the right side is more affected than the left
side. Both male and female having tightness at the
range of 30-40 degree is more.
DISCUSSION
532
Kamalakannan et al: Hamstring tightness causing……students - a cross-sectional study
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51248/.v40i4.335 Biomedicine- Vol. 40 No. 4: 2020
This will be an alarming sign for the students to
prevent upcoming low back problems due to hamstring
tightness. This study includes all normal individuals
except those with low back pain and lumbar pain for
the past 2 years. Lack of mobility caused by tightness
or shortness of the ligaments and soft tissue causes
hamstring tightness (13, 14).
The tight hamstring is a frequent sign in Scheurmann
khyphosis after surgery and also gave preoperative
assessment for the lumbar pelvic range of motion.
There is a direct relationship between tight hamstring
and low back pain (15). A study measured the extent of
hamstring using electro goniometry and conventional
goniometry and resulted that the more the tightness the
higher the severity of low back pain. Tightness or
shortening of hamstring causes posterior tilt of the
pelvis which in turn increases the lumbar lordosis
results in severe lower back pain (16).
Hamstring tightness contributed by neural structures
causing severe pain in the posterior thigh, knee, leg,
and also in the cervical and thoracic region, which was
relieved by cervical extension and reduces the
discomfort. Passive knee angle was measured with a
standard force of 68.7N (7kg) applied proximal to the
lateral malleolus. Hamstring tightness in turn causes
patella femoral pain. Pain present in the front of the
knee and around the patella, this may be due to
vigorous use in athletics or training. Tight hamstring
Pull on the hip bone causing a slight rotation which
affects the curvature of the back leads to back pain and
lower back tightness and increases the incidence of a
hamstring strain. From the above discussion, it is clear
that hamstring tightness is caused because of the
overuse of muscle on college-going student’s age 18-
21 years (17). Tightness occurs in students who are not
involved in any physical activities. Their habit of
sitting with a flexed knee for the whole day cause the
hamstring muscles to shorten which causes the pelvic
bone to tilt posterior. The posterior tilt increases the
lumbar lordosis causing back muscle strain leads to
mechanical low back pain. Low back pain can be
regular hamstring stretch and physical activities and
often changing the Posture and walking. IA stokes
explain that hamstring muscle can restrict hip flexion
in standing. An individual with a short or tight
hamstring has an abnormal pelvic tilt in seating Posture
with greater flattening or reversal of the lumbar
lordosis. The range of hip flexion is measured using a
toe-touch test. This test is done in standing and sitting
hamstring tightness is a lack of ROM with the
continuous feeling of restriction in the posterior thigh
causing dysfunctional or restricted movement of the
Hip flexion (18, 19). Hamstring stiffness could be a
possible contributing factor to the low back pelvic
rhythm. Movement restrictions lead to compensatory
movement patterns of the lumbar spine and increase
stress on spinal soft tissues and increase the risk of low
back pain.
CONCLUSION
This study shows that most of the college-going
students have knee range below 80degree. And
investigation reveals that 2/4th of the total experienced
low back pain in their life. This pain experience is
present in all age group that comes under this study.
Some students who involve in sports activity and use
their hip and knee more like football players and
athletes etc. have tight hamstring. But some do not
have because of stretching muscles before and after the
sports activity. By this, we conclude that prevalence is
more among college-going, students. This is mainly
due to lifestyle adaptation.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
There is no conflict of interest from other authors.
REFERENCES
1. Akinpelu, A. O., Bakare., and B. A., Influence of age on
hamstring tightness in apparently healthy Nigerians. Journal of
Nigeria Society of Physiotherapy, 2009; 15(2): 35-41.
2. Gajdosik, R. L., comparison of four clinical tests for accessing
hamstring muscle length. 1993; 18(5): 614-618.
3. Bellew, S., H. Ford., and Shere, E. The relationship between
hamstring flexibility and pelvic rotation around the hip during
forward bending. Plymouth Stud J Health Social Work, 2010;
2(2): 19-29.
4. Nikolaidis, P. T. Age-related differences of hamstring
flexibility in male soccer players. Baltic journal of health and
physical activity. 2012; 4(2): 110-115.
5. Aderone. O., Bakare, U. Influence of age on hamstring
tightness in apparently healthy Nigerians. 2005; 15(2): 35-42.
6. Bohannon, R. W. Cinematographic analysis of the passive
straight leg raising test for hamstring muscle length, Physical
therapy. 1982; 61(1): 1269-1274.
7. Gajdosik, R. L., Lusin, G. Hamstring Muscles tightness.
Reliability of an active knee extension test. Physical therapy.
1983; 63: 1083-1090.
8. Radwan, A., Bigney, K. A., Buonomo, H. N., Jarmak, M. W.,
Moats, S. M., Ross, J. K., et al. Evaluation of intra-subject
difference in hamstring flexibility in patients with low back
pain: An exploratory study. Journal of back and
musculoskeletal rehabilitation. 2015 Jan 1; 28(1): 61-66.
9. Falavigna, A., Teles, A. R., Mazzocchin, T., de Braga, G. L.,
Kleber, F. D., Barreto, F., et al. Increased prevalence of low
back pain among physiotherapy students compared to medical
students. European Spine Journal. 2011 Mar 1; 20(3): 500-
505.
10. Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA,
Lamonte MJ, Lee IM, et al. American College of Sports
Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for
developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory,
musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy
adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Medicine and
science in sports and exercise. 2011 Jul;43(7):1334.
11. Bhagyashree, K. Koli, Deepak, B., prevalence and severity of
hamstring tightness among college students: A cross-sectional
study. 2018;4(2):65-68.
533
Kamalakannan et al: Hamstring tightness causing……students - a cross-sectional study
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51248/.v40i4.335 Biomedicine- Vol. 40 No. 4: 2020
12. Kamalakannan, M. Efficacy of Proprioception Training for
Tibiofemoral Arthritis in relation with Pain and Functional
Disability. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology
2019 12(3): 995-998
13. Luca. D., Petera.M.D., Sylvia.,Davis., Effect of Hamstring and
psoas lengthening on pelvic tilt in patients with spastic
Diplegic cerebral palsy.1998; 18(6): 712-718.
14. Kate, E.K., Nicholas, L., The active knee extension test and
Slump test in subject with perceived hamstring tightness.
2005; 8(3): 89-97.
15. Kenny, G., Francis, F., Heiko, L., and Gregoire, P., Millet.
Passive knee Extension Test to Measure Hamstring Tightness:
Influence of Gravity correction. 2012; 21(3) .231-234.
16. Kamalakannan, M., J. Boaz, and M. Koushik Kannan.
"Influence of Ankle Mobilization and Active Stretching on
Low Back Pain in Pronated Foot Subjects." Research Journal
of Pharmacy and Technology 13, no. 3 (2020): 1142-1146.
17. I.A.Stokes., Joan, M., Influence of the hamstring muscles in
lumbar spine curvature in sitting.1980; Spine 5(6):525-528.
18. Brittany, L., Hansberger. Evaluating the Relationship between
clinical Assessment of Apparent Hamstring tightness: A
correlational Analysis. Int J Sports Phys Ther, Apr
2019;14(2):253-263.
19. Jandre, R., F. Macedo., Influence of Hamstring tightness in
pelvic, lumbar, and trunk range of motion in low back pain
and A-symptomatic volunteers during forwarding bending.
Asian spine. 2015; 9(4): 535-540.
534
... There are various component and property of the low back muscle being attested in the past which exercising. The most common component that has been associated with LBA is the strength and then the flexibility of the core muscles (3). ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction and Aim: Low back muscle endurance is becoming a major issue because of low back ache. Though many treatment protocols have been suggested and proved effective, endurance exercises have been under less researched area over its effectiveness in comparison to other treatment protocols. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of trunk extensor muscle endurance training with conventional spinal exercise for trunk extensor muscle in subjects with LBP. Materials and Methods: This is a quasi-experimental study involving 56 patients in the age group of 25-35 years who were allocated in the experimental group (endurance exercises) and control group (conventional spinal exercise) for 3 times per week, for 6 weeks for a duration of 30-45 minutes. Outcome measures used for the study were McGill Pain Questionnaire, RMDQ, 60 sec. spinal extension endurance tests. Results: There was no significant difference found within group analysis in all outcome measures. In between, the group analysis experimental group has shown statistically significant difference in all outcome measures at post-test with the p-value of 0.000. Conclusion: Endurance training has proved to be a much more effective method and provides faster recovery than conventional spinal extension exercise in treatment of patients with subacute low back pain.
... Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common global health enigmas and the major cause of infirmity affecting performance at work and general wellbeing¹.Low back pain is defined as pain, muscle tension or stiffness localized below the costal margin and above the inferior gluteal fold with or without leg pain. It is often classified as acute (less than 6 week), sub-acute (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12) week) and chronic (more than 12 week) ². ...
Article
Background and objectives: Low back pain is a highly disabling medical condition characterized by pain and discomfort localized to area between the costal margin and inferior gluteal folds, with or without leg pain. The present study aims to investigate the effectiveness of muscle energy technique on rectus femoris muscle to reduce pain and functional disability in patients with low back pain. Methods: 30 subjects those fulfilling the inclusion criteria were recruited for the study. Subjects were then allocated to two groups- Group A (Control group) and Group B (Experimental group). Subjects in group A received William’s Flexion exercises and subjects in group B received experimental treatment of muscle energy technique on rectus femoris and William’s flexion exercises. Pain and functional disability were measured using Numeric Pain Rating Scale and Oswestry Disability Index before and after the intervention period respectively. Results: the post test scores of NPRS and ODI of control and experimental group were analysed using two sample t test and paired t test. The data analysed showed statistically significant difference in the post test scores of NPRS and ODI of experimental group over control group at 5% significance level. Conclusion: The study concluded that muscle energy technique on rectus femoris is effective in reducing pain and functional disability in patients with low back pain.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Plantar fasciitis is a prevalent condition among athletes, especially runners, characterized by heel pain and potentially influenced by biomechanical factors such as hamstring tightness. However, the specific relationship between hamstring tightness and plantar fasciitis in athletes has not been extensively studied. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the association between hamstring tightness and plantar fasciitis among runners, to determine whether hamstring tightness contributes to the severity or incidence of plantar fasciitis. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study involving 30 athletes diagnosed with plantar fasciitis from sports clubs in Lahore. The study included both male (86.6%) and female (13.4%) runners aged 20 to 45 years. Hamstring tightness was assessed using the Active Knee Extension test. Data were analyzed using Pearson Chi-Square tests in SPSS version 25, with a significance threshold set at p<0.05. Results: The prevalence of hamstring tightness among the athletes was 30%. Statistical analysis revealed no significant association between hamstring tightness and plantar fasciitis (p=0.068), with a Pearson correlation coefficient (r) of -0.48, suggesting a moderate negative correlation. Conclusion: The study concluded that while hamstring tightness is common among runners with plantar fasciitis, it does not significantly influence the occurrence or severity of the condition. Further research is recommended to explore other biomechanical factors that may impact plantar fasciitis in athletic populations.
Article
Purpose: The purpose of this research is to compare the effectiveness of different Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) stretching techniques for hamstring muscle tightness, and to find out the best PNF technique for improving hamstring flexibility. Methods: In this quasi-experimental designed study, 30 university students who were between 18-25 years-old, sitting >6 hours per day, and had a Active Knee Extension Test (AKET) >20º were recruited with convenience sampling and equally allocated into Group A, B and C, non-randomly. Hold-Relax (HR), Agonist Contraction (AC) and Contract-Relax-Antagonist-Contract (CRAC) stretching techniques were given respectively, 3 sessions/week, for three weeks. Results: Paired t-test showed significant effect of each technique compared between pre-test value and post-test value of AKET measurements of Hold-relax (HR), AC and CRAC groups (p
Article
Full-text available
Background: Hamstring tightness is a common condition typically assessed via the active knee extension (AKE), passive straight leg raise (PSLR), V-sit and reach (VSR), and finger-floor-distance (FFD). Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships between four common clinical tests of apparent hamstring tightness. A secondary purpose was to compare the differences in correlations between sub-groups based on positive test findings. Study design: Descriptive, correlational laboratory design. Methods: Recreationally active individuals (N = 81; 23.7 ± 5.9 years) performed the AKE, PSLR, VSR, and FFD in a randomized order, and subsequent correlational analyses were conducted. Results: Strong correlations were identified between the VSR and FFD (r = -.798, r2 = .637, p < .001); moderate correlations were demonstrated between the PSLR and FFD (r = -.565, r2 = .319, p < .001) and PSLR and VSR (r = .536, r2 = .287, p < .001). Low correlations were found between the PSLR and AKE (r = -.284, r2 = .081, p = 0.01), AKE and VSR (r = -.297, r2 = .088, p = .007), and AKE and FFD (r = .263, r2 = .069, p = .018). If one assessment was identified in a subject as dysfunctional, all relationships were affected, regardless of which assessment was dysfunctional. Conclusions: The AKE, one of the most common measures for apparent hamstring tightness, has low correlations with the other assessments. Based on the findings of this study, it is possible that not all assessments of AHT are measuring the same phenomena, with each involving different factors of perceived hamstring length. Level of evidence: Level 2b.
Article
Full-text available
Cross-sectional study. To verify the association of hamstring tightness and range of motion in anterior pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar motion (LM), and trunk flexion (TF) during forward bending. Increased hamstring stiffness could be a possible contributing factor to low back injuries. Clinical observations have suggested that hamstring tightness influences lumbar pelvic rhythm. Movement restrictions or postural asymmetry likely lead to compensatory movement patterns of the lumbar spine, and subsequently to increased stress on the spinal soft tissues and an increased risk of low back pain (LBP). Hamstring muscle tightness was measured using the self-monitored active knee extension (AKE) test. A bubble inclinometer was used to determine the range of motion of PT, LM, and TF during forward bending. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, comparisons between groups and a correlation between hamstring tightness (AKE) and anterior PT, TF, and regional LM with p≤0.05. The LBP group was composed of 36 participants, and the asymptomatic group consisted of 32 participants. The mean for PT in the control group was 66.7°, 64.5° for LM and 104.6° for TF. Respective values in the symptomatic group were 57.0°, 79.8°, and 82.2°. Participants with LBP showed restriction in the pelvis and TF range of motion, but had higher amplitudes in the lumbar spine during forward bending.
Article
Full-text available
Background Reduced hamstring extensibility is commonly assumed to be due to stiffness or decreased length of the hamstring muscle group. The first aim of this study was to collect data on the results of the active knee extension test in subjects with perceived reduction in hamstring extensibility. The second aim was to establish the prevalence and location of symptoms induced by the Slump test in those subjects with perceived hamstring tightness.
Article
Full-text available
The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between age and hamstring flexibility of male soccer players and to provide reference data. Material/Methods: The study comprised 698 male subjects. The largest group consisted of male adolescents (n = 597; aged 10-22 years, yr), further subdivided into six two-year age groups; the other two groups being children (n = 21, younger than 10 yr) and adult players (n = 80; older than 22 yr). All of those who participated in our study were members of competitive soccer clubs. They were examined for anthropometric characteristics, body composition, and performed the sit-and-reach test (SAR). Results: An analysis of variance revealed significant differences between age groups with respect to SAR (F7,690 = 17.62, p<0.001, η2 = 0.15). Our findings indicated that the older the age group, the higher the SAR (e.g. 16.6±5.1 cm in the children’s group, 20.7±7.5 cm in the under-16 yr group and 24.7±6.9 cm in the adult group). This result came in agreement with the significant and moderate correlation coefficient between age and SAR (r = 0.33, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Although the cross-sectional design did not allow inferring causal relationship between age and hamstring flexibility, it is reasonable to suppose that there are small gains in flexibility with development. Compared with previous findings, soccer players had similar values to the general population.
Article
The purpose of this study was to examine intratester reliability of a test designed to measure tightness in the hamstring muscles. The test measures the angle of knee flexion with a pendulum goniometer after active knee extension with the hip stabilized at 90 degrees flexion. The angle of knee flexion represents hamstring tightness. After an instruction session for the subjects, the hamstring muscle tightness of both extremities of 15 men was measured during test and retest sessions. The reliability coefficients for test and retest measurements were .99 for the left extremity and .99 for the right extremity. High reliability resulted from strict body stabilization methods, a well-defined end point of motion, and accurate instrument placement. If conducted properly, the test should provide therapists with an objective and reliable tool for measuring hamstring muscle tightness.
Article
Purpose: To evaluate the extent of intra-subject difference in hamstring flexibility and its possible relationship to the severity of Low Back Pain (LBP). A secondary purpose was to evaluate the extent of intra-rater reliability using both electrogoniometer and conventional goniometer for measuring hamstring tightness. Importance: Potential correlations between muscle impairments and LBP may lead to more effective treatments and prevention strategies. Methods: Seventy two participants with mechanical LBP were recruited for this study. The sample included; 41 females, 31 males with a mean age of 33.69 ± (11.04) years, height of 170 ± (9) cm, and weight of 79.5 ± (1.6) kg. Hamstring length was detected indirectly using the Active Knee Extension method in the 90/90 position from supine. The amount of extension was measured using both electro-goniometer (EG)and a standard goniometer (SG). Results: Right lower extremities of these patients were significantly more flexible than left ones at α = 0.025 ( t_{72} = 3.14, p=0.002). Similarly, dominant lower extremities of these patients were significantly more flexible than the non dominant ones at α=0.025 ( t _{72} =2.56, p=0.013). Additionally, Oswestry scores of the patients were significantly and positively correlated with the amount of hamstring tightness of the right lower extremities (r=0.244, p=0.039), left lower extremities (r=0.225, p=0.048) and the average of both sides (r=0.24, p=0.039). However, the Oswestry scores were negatively, but insignificantly correlated to the absolute difference between right and left extremities at (r=-0.156, p=0.091). Finally, the extent of intrasubject reliability in measuring hamstring tightness using EG and SG was found to be high (ICC=0.93).CONCLUSION: There is a possible relation between mild mechanical LBP and hamstrings tightness. It was found that the more the tightness, the higher the severity of LBP that patient experienced. Also, these patients had one of their lower extremities significantly tighter than the other. Such tightness was successfully detected utilizing both EG and SG. These findings and their possible pathomechanical consequences should be considered while constructing effective rehabilitation protocols for patients with mechanical LBP.