Content uploaded by Agus A Hakim
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Agus A Hakim on Jan 13, 2023
Content may be subject to copyright.
390
Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Management
10(3): 390-401. http://dx.doi.org/10.29244/jpsl.10.3.390-401
E-ISSN: 2460-5824
http://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jpsl
Identifying blue swimming crab (Portunus pelagicus) stocks with truss network
analysis approach in Indonesian Fisheries Management Area 712
Nurhaya Afifaha, Zairion Zairionbc, Hawis H. Madduppad, Agus A. Hakimc, Yusli Wardiatnobce
a Master Program in Coastal and Marine Resources Management, Graduate School of IPB University, Kampus IPB Darmaga, Bogor
16680, Indonesia [+62 81295380728]
b Center for Coastal and Marine Resources Studies, IPB University, Kampus IPB Baranangsiang, Bogor 16143, Indonesia
c Department of Aquatic Resources Management, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences, IPB University, Kampus IPB Darmaga,
Bogor 16680, Indonesia
d Department of Marine Science and Technology, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences, IPB University, Kampus IPB Darmaga,
Bogor 16680, Indonesia
e Environmental Research Center, IPB University, Kampus IPB Darmaga, Bogor 16680, Indonesia
Article Info:
Received: 01 - 05 - 2020
Accepted: 15 - 06 - 2020
Keywords:
Discriminant analysis, fisheries
management, Java Sea,
morphometric, Portunidae
Corresponding Author:
Yusli Wardiatno
Department of Aquatic
Resources Management, Faculty
of Fisheries and Marine
Sciences, IPB University;
Tel. +62-251-8622932
Email:
yusli@apps.ipb.ac.id
Abstract. The exploitation rate of the blue swimming crab (BSC) in Indonesian
Fisheries Management Area (FMA) 712 is over-optimum level in 2016. Stocks
concern in sustainable management is needed as an effort to maintain its
availability. The objective of this study is to identify the stock unit of BSC
based on Truss Network Analysis (TNA) of morphometric characters in FMA
712. The BSC was collect in five different locations, i.e. East Lampung,
Lancang Island, Cirebon, Rembang, and Southern Madura. Measurements on
TNA were carried out at 14 landmark points with 29 characters in carapace
to analyze its morphometric characters. The cluster analysis showed that TNA
method revealed two stocks units of BSC in FMA 712. The first stock was the
BSC population of Southern Madura, and the other stock was the other four
populations. The longest Euclidean distance was found at Southern Madura
indicating similarity level with other populations was low. The discriminant
analysis demonstrated different results. There were three group populations,
in which every population in one group were able to represent the other
population, namely Lancang Island-Cirebon, East Lampung-Rembang, and
Southern Madura. Regarding this study, it is recommended to manage BSC in
Southern Madura separately.
How to cite (CSE Style 8th Edition):
Afifah N, Zairion Z, Maduppa HH, Hakim AA, Wardiatno Y. 2020. Identifying blue swimming crab (Portunus pelagicus) stocks with
truss network analysis approach in Indonesian Fisheries Management Area 712. JPSL 10(3): 390-401.
http://dx.doi.org/10.29244/jpsl.10.3.390-401.
INTRODUCTION
In general, order Decapoda has become a lot of research objects in Indonesia, including blue swimming
crab (Hamid et al., 2015; Hamid and Wardiatno, 2015; Zairion et al., 2015a, 2015b; Hamid et al., 2016a;
Kembaren et al., 2018; Zairion et al., 2020) because of its high economic value (Prabawa et al., 2014;
Jayawiguna et al., 2017). Distribution areas of these species are along northern Java and east Lampung. The
region is incorporated in the 712 State Fisheries Management Areas (FMA) of the Republic of Indonesia and
is an area that intensively provides the highest foreign exchange earnings for crab export fisheries. Based on
Statistics Indonesia (2018), Indonesian crab exports reached 29038 tons in 2015 and the total volume of
Indonesian crab exports was 15867 tons in 2017 (MMAF, 2018). It’s similar with other countries which
Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam dan Lingkungan 10(3): 390-401
391
demand for crab in international trade has increased (Wiyono and Ihsan, 2015). Along with efforts to increase
the yield of crab fisheries, it is necessary to have sustainable crab management in order to decline increased
fishing activity that has the potential to cause a decrease crab population (Wiyono and Ihsan, 2018).
Attempt to manage fisheries resources cannot be generalized in each region. According to FAO (1995),
one important thing that must be considered in management is the stock of its resources in order to maintain a
balance of utilization and conservation. Each population stocks usually characterized by the specific biological
attributes (Secor, 2014). The differences can be seen through phenotype, genetic (Aini et al., 2020), or both
simultaneously (Hollander and Butlin, 2010). A particular geographical area can be said to have different stock
units or have been declared geographically separated from each other if the character of growth, mortality,
meristic and morphometric characteristics, and genetic are different in a relatively long time (Hart and
Reynolds, 2002). The concept explains that important tool for identifying stocks and evaluating the population
structure can be done with morphometric characterization techniques (Rawat et al., 2017; Sajina et al., 2011;
Sen et al., 2011), in more detail, namely the truss network approach (Bhosale et al., 2018). The truss network
approach has emerged as a new tool for understanding population structure in many fish species with more
effective strategies for descriptions of shape, better data collection and diversified analytical tools
(Pazhayamadom et al., 2015). This characterization technique is more effective than manual distance
measurement for the management of fishery resources throughout the world because truss networks are able
to show increased ability to identify differences in the morphological shapes of the bodies of each species
(Mojekwu and Anumudu, 2015). Using truss network approach in determining the stock structure of aquatic
species has been started from the 20th century. This method is applied in several crustacea studies, including
shrimp (Paramasivam et al., 2017; Marini et al., 2017; Rebello et al., 2013), and in BSC (Bhosale et al., 2018).
Data and information about the crab stock structure in morphometric FMA 712 have not been much
studied. However, the exploitation rate of BSC in northern Java waters has exceeded the level of sustainability
or is in the overexploited stage due to the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fishery Decree No. 70/2016.
Therefore, it is expected that the results of a morphometric analysis can be an input for the management of
crab fisheries stocks as an effective, optimal, and sustainable crab resource management concept. The main
objective of this study was to identify BSC stocks based on morphometric characters with truss network
analysis in FMA 712.
METHOD
Location and Specimen Collection
Figure 1 Sampling location of the blue swimming crab (Portunus pelagicus) in Fisheries Management Area
712 as indicated by the open-black rectangles
Afifah N, Zairion Z, Maduppa HH, Hakim AA, Wardiatno Y
392
Portunus pelagicus samples were collected from five locations, namely East Lampung, Lancang Island,
Cirebon, Rembang, and Southern Madura to represent FMA 712 (Figure 1). Sampling of various sizes was
done randomly from the local fishermen. A total of 476 crab individuals were taken from all location and
analysed at the laboratory.
Digitizing Sample
Each individual carapace of a BSC sample was separated from the rest of the body and then cleaned and
dried using a tissue to analyze its morphometric characters using truss network analysis. Carapace samples
were placed on a flat platform with scaled vertical and horizontal grids for easy calibration of digital image
coordinates. The distance between vertical and horizontal grids covers an area of 1 cm2. The tagging was then
carried out on each individual according to a predetermined landmark. The digitization phase was conducted
in order to become an archive for repeated measurements. Measurements on TNA were carried out at 14
landmark points with 29 characters in carapace (Bhosale et al., 2018). These landmark points were presented
in Figure 2. Labeling was done on each grid paper as a marker of the sample order. The crab was then
photographed with a camera with the help of a modified tripod (Marini et al., 2017). Furthermore, all images
of digitized could be identified based on the tagging attached.
Figure 2 Landmark truss network analysis for the blue swimming crab (Portunus pelagicus)
Morphometric Truss Measurements
Morphometric character measurements with truss network analysis were performed using a combination
of two software, TPSUtil V1.38 and TPSDig2 V2.1 software series (Rohlf, 2006) and Paleontological Statistics
(PAST) which were used to extract morphometric data from each image (Hammer et al., 2001). All images
were first converted from JPEG (*. jpeg) to TPS format (*. tps) using TPSUtil. The TPSDig2 was used for
digitizing landmarks and provided an outline of the distance of landmarks on the image object for geometric
morphometric analysis of objects. The encrypted tps format image file description data was utilized as an input
source in PAST, which was useful for multivariate analysis and paleontological modeling (Bhosale et al.
2018). Then the crab morphometric points were measured with morphometric truss, which theoretically could
improve accuracy in differentiating morphometrics among samples. The variables extracted from sample
digital images by interconnecting 14 landmarks to form 29 distance variables, as presented in Table 1.
Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam dan Lingkungan 10(3): 390-401
393
Table 1 Landmarks, codes, and description used in the morphometric truss of the carapace for the present
blue swimming crab (Portunus pelagicus) study
Landmark
Code
Descriptions
1-8
UP1
The midpoint of the abdomen to middle teeth on the forehead
3-13
UP2
Between first anterolateral teeth
4-12
UP3
Between third anterolateral teeth
5-11
UP4
Between fifth anterolateral teeth
6-10
UP5
Between seventh anterolateral teeth
7-9
UP6
Between antennule
1-7
UP7
The midpoint of the abdomen to left antennule
2-13
D1
The left abdomen to first teeth of the right anterolateral
3-14
D2
The first teeth of the left anterolateral to the right abdomen
4-13
D3
The third teeth of the left anterolateral to the first teeth of the right anterolateral
3-12
D4
The first teeth of the left anterolateral to the third teeth of the right anterolateral
5-12
D5
The fifth teeth of the left anterolateral to the third teeth of the right anterolateral
4-11
D6
The third teeth of the left anterolateral to the fifth teeth of the right anterolateral
6-11
D7
The seventh teeth of left anterolateral to the fifth teeth of the right anterolateral
5-10
D8
The fifth teeth of the left anterolateral to the seventh teeth of the right anterolateral
7-10
D9
The left antennule to the seventh teeth of the right anterolateral
6-9
D10
The seventh teeth of the left anterolateral to the right antennule
2-3
L1
The left abdomen to the first teeth of the left anterolateral
13-14
L2
The first teeth of the right anterolateral to the right abdomen
3-4
L3
The first teeth of the left anterolateral to the third teeth of the left anterolateral
12-13
L4
The first teeth of the right anterolateral to the third teeth of the right anterolateral
4-5
L5
The third teeth of the left anterolateral to the fifth teeth of the left anterolateral
11-12
L6
The third teeth of the right anterolateral to the fifth teeth of the right anterolateral
5-6
L7
The fifth teeth of the left anterolateral to the seventh teeth of the left anterolateral
10-11
L8
The fifth teeth of the right anterolateral to the seventh teeth of the right anterolateral
6-7
L9
The seventh teeth of the left anterolateral to the left antennule
9-10
L10
The right antennule to the seventh teeth of the right anterolateral
1-6
1-10
L11
L12
The midpoint of the abdomen to the seventh teeth of the left anterolateral
The midpoint of the abdomen to the seventh teeth of the right anterolateral
Data Analysis
Morphometric truss measurement results were all transformed based on data normality characteristics.
Data were transformed by eliminating all things affecting size by using the allometric approach from the
modified formula of Hurlbut and Clay (1998) and Ihsen et al. (1981), namely:
Mtrans = log M−ß (log SL−log SLmean)
Where:
Mtrans : truss measurement transformation
ß : the within-group slope regressions of the log M vs log SL
M : truss measurement
SL : length of crab carapace
SLmean: average crab carapace length in each population
Afifah N, Zairion Z, Maduppa HH, Hakim AA, Wardiatno Y
394
Morphometric data with both methods were analyzed using SPSS software version 15. The transformed
truss measurements were subjected to Kruskal Wallis analysis, cluster analysis, and classification by cross-
validation of discriminant analysis. The Kruskal Wallis test was used to find out the distinguishing
characteristics of morphometric characters which differed significantly in the crab group in five locations
(Ostertagova et al., 2014). The grouping of similar members in one population in BSC could use cluster
analysis assuming that certain amounts of data had a level of morphometric similarity between populations.
This numerical analysis was used to classify organism based on its systematics (Smith et al., 2011). Cluster
analysis was performed using the average morphometric data of the BSC measured from each location. The
results obtained were dendrogram trees based on euclidean distances. This distance explained the level of
kinship between populations. The greater the value of the euclidean distance, the lower the kinship between
populations. Conversely, the smaller the value of the euclidean distance, the higher the kinship between
populations. Variations in BSC morphometrics in this study were analyzed using Discriminant Analysis (DA).
The discriminant analysis was performed to determine groupings and test the equality of group (Hidayani et
al., 2015). This analysis examines and describe simultaneously the differences between two or more mutually
exclusive groups. The results obtained were in the form of a sketch population distribution plot of the five
study sites.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A total dorsal carapace of 235 males and 240 females were used and combined as one in the analysis.
Detailed information on the collected BSC is summarized in Table 2.
Table 2 Sex ratio of blue swimming crab collected from five sampling points of FMA 712
Sampling Site
Number of
Samples
Sex
Sex Ratio
Male
Female
(Male/Female)
East Lampung
99
59
40
1:0.680
Lancang Island
106
49
57
1:1.163
Cirebon
92
21
71
1:3.381
Rembang
73
24
49
1:2.042
Southern Madura
105
82
23
1:0.281
Total
475
235
240
Normality Test
The normality test was an important step for deciding the measures of central tendency and statistical
methods for data analysis (Mishra et al., 2019). Data normality was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (2-
tailed) test (Ghasemi and Zahediasl, 2012). These test results were the significance value of the SPSS output
results. The significance value (α>0.05) indicated data that are normally distributed. The test was carried out
on all morphometric data of male and female swimming crab at five locations. All male and female swimming
crab characters were found to be normally distributed with an Asympt-sig (2-tailed) value >0.05. Overall data
that were normally distributed could be considered to be representative of the population, and further tests
were carried out in the parametric test.
Comparison of Morphometric Characters
Comparison of crab morphometrics was estimated by using Kruskal Wallis test analysis (Table 3). The
results of the analysis of BSC morphometrics at five locations showed a significant difference (p<0.05) in
twenty-nine characters. This explains that the crab in East Lampung, Lancang Island, Cirebon, Rembang, and
Southern Madura can be distinguished from the overall character. Differences in environmental conditions are
thought to have a significant effect on differences in BSC morphometrics in FMA 712. The environmental
Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam dan Lingkungan 10(3): 390-401
395
condition influences the differences in morphometric characters and could affect the growth rate of a particular
body part (Zairion et al., 2020). Changes in morphological characters become a form of adjustment for each
organism to its environment (Pramithasari et al., 2017). Li et al. (2018) explains that differences in
environmental conditions affect the adaptation patterns of a species. The differences in the morphology of a
species are often occur due to environmental and geographical location differences (Hidayani et al., 2018).
One of the most common forms of adaptation seen is the changes in the morphology and morphometry of the
body. This statement is strengthened by Lai et al. (2010) saying that the adaptation form of an organism to
external factors (habitat and food) is by changing its morphological character. The female crab in pre-molt
phase that living in an environment with limit food availability had a lower growth than the crab with enough
food (Josileen, 2011).
Table 3 Comparison of crab morphometric characters in Fisheries Management Area 712, Indonesia using t-
test at p=0.05
Code
Landmark
p-value
UP1
1-8
6x10-23
UP2
3-13
1x10-23
UP3
4-12
4x10-17
UP4
5-11
3x10-13
UP5
6-10
3x10-12
UP6
7-9
4x10-27
UP7
1-7
1x10-22
D1
2-13
1x10-28
D2
3-14
8x10-20
D3
4-13
9x10-23
D4
3-12
5x10-19
D5
5-12
2x10-16
D6
4-11
2x10-15
D7
6-11
2x10-14
D8
5-10
2x10-12
D9
7-10
8x10-18
D10
6-9
2x10-12
L1
2-3
5x10-15
L2
13-14
2x10-5
L3
3-4
4x10-8
L4
12-13
1x10-42
L5
4-5
8x10-8
L6
11-12
6x10-9
L7
5-6
9x10-5
L8
10-11
4x10-6
L9
6-7
3x10-10
L10
9-10
3x10-22
L11
1-6
1x10-18
L12
1-10
1x10-19
Afifah N, Zairion Z, Maduppa HH, Hakim AA, Wardiatno Y
396
Portunus pelagicus Population Grouping
The grouping of crab populations can be seen from the level of similarity among populations based on
morphometric characters that are thought to use cluster analysis. The results of the crab cluster analysis are
presented in the form of the dendrogram (Figure 3). The dendrogram formed will show the similarity of BSC
from five locations in FMA 712. The BSC relationship among populations is explained in the results of cluster
analysis. The results of cluster analysis of five crab populations formed two groups, namely the crab population
group of Lancang Island-Cirebon-East Lampung-Rembang crab population group, and the Southern Madura
crab group. BSC located in Southern Madura formed their own group into the second group with low similarity
with BSC populations in four other locations. However, BSC located in the area of East Lampung, Rembang,
Lancang Islang, and Cirebon have the same similarity and form one group. This similarity in closely
geographical location was related to similar environments. However, East Lampung-Rembang crabs, which
are geographically separated populations, have morphological similarity. This result might be due to local
migration between connected locations (Hossain et al., 2010) or the similar ecological impacts (Mir et al.,
2013).
Figure 3 Cluster analysis of inter-population of blue swimming crab (Portunus pelagicus) in Fisheries
Management Area 712, Indonesia
Based on the Euclidean distance, the higher the level of population similarity of organisms within the
group will be higher. Things that cause grouping among populations include proximity of geographical
locations (Abinawanto et al., 2018) and similar environmental conditions among locations (Solomon et al.,
2015; Abinawanto et al., 2018; Zairion et al., 2020). The environmental conditions that might play important
role for blue swimming crab are temperature, light intensity, and photoperiod vary seasonally among locations
where the crab lives (Hamid et al., 2016b). Green et al. (2014) explain that crabs are shaped by environmental
variation through the distribution ecology, productivity or even their market traits such as colour and size. The
Euclidean distance among small populations is presented in Table 4.
Table 4 The Euclidean distance among population of blue swimming crab (Portunus pelagicus) in Fisheries
Management Area 712, Indonesia
Euclidean
Distance
East Lampung
Lancang Island
Cirebon
Rembang
Southern Madura
East Lampung
0
0.0365
0.0267
0.0232
0.073
Lancang Island
0.0365
0
0.0209
0.0311
0.0839
Cirebon
0.0267
0.0209
0
0.0276
0.0680
Rembang
0.0232
0.0311
0.0276
0
0.0817
Southern Madura
0.073
0.0839
0.0680
0.0817
0
Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam dan Lingkungan 10(3): 390-401
397
Morphometric Character Classification
Morphometric character classification at each location was assumed to use discriminant analysis.
Discriminant analysis showed that the grouping of characters formed was marked by differences in the location
of centroids. The crab morphometric character classification (Figure 4) shows that there are three centroid
centers in five locations of FMA 712. The crab morphometric character distribution at each location shows the
level of closeness to other locations. The crab character from Lancang Island has an adjacent centroid point,
and the characters are not completely separated from the crab character from Cirebon, which means it has the
same size between characters. The BSC in these two locations are significantly separated from the BSC in East
Lampung and Rembang, while the BSC in southern madura is not completely separated. The BSC population
in East Lampung is not completely separated from the BSC population in Rembang. Yet it is significantly
separated from the other three locations. This indicates the level of morphological similarity in the BSC
population at that location (Marini et al., 2017).
Figure 4 showed that Function 1 successfully discriminated the individuals into three separate groups.
Muchlisin (2013) saying that the presence of contact among populations indicate the closeness of population
groups. The point of intersecting population indicates that the population has a close kinship. Abinawanto et
al. (2018) state that the overlap among morphometric characters of the two populations shows the high
morphological similarity. The BSC in East Lampung, and Rembang were significantly separated and
significantly different from the BSC in 3 other locations. This shows that there are different habitat preferences
in an organism that can affect population structure. Zimmerman et al. (2011) and Hepp et al. (2012) explain
that adaptations frequently encompass changes in morphology, such as in the size and shape of the carapace
or cheliped or in individual condition. Zairion et al. (2020) explain that BSC was able to adapt in habitats with
variation environmental parameters. It’s indicated that BSC was able to live in a high variation of environment,
such as in dry season even in low proportion (Supadminingsih et al., 2019).
Figure 4 Canonical distribution analysis using morphometric characters of blue swimming crab (Portunus
pelagicus) collected from five sites in Fisheries Management Area 712, Indonesia
Percentage of BSC population from East Lampung waters, Lancang Island, Cirebon, Rembang, and
Southern Madura has been classified as 84.8%, 62.3%, 62%, 87.7%, and 75.2%, respectively (Table 5). More
than half of the population from East Lampung can describe the location of Rembang marked by a group point
of one location that is in another location group. According to Marini et al. (2017), a percentage value of >80%
indicates that the population of the BSC group at one location truly characterizes the blue swimming crab
group from another population group.
Afifah N, Zairion Z, Maduppa HH, Hakim AA, Wardiatno Y
398
Table 5 Results of blue swimming crab population grouping in Fisheries Management Area 712, Indonesia
from five locations due to discriminant analysis
Prediction Group
East
Lampung
Lancang Island
Cirebon
Rembang
Southern Madura
East Lampung
84.85
1.01
0
14.14
0
Lancang Island
0.94
62.26
22.64
0
14.15
Cirebon
2.17
20.65
61.96
5.43
9.78
Rembang
10.96
0
0
87.67
1.37
Southern Madura
0.95
11.43
7.62
4.76
75.24
CONCLUSION
Based on morphometric characters, population of blue swimming crab (BSC) Portunus pelagicus from
the southern Madura had a low level of similarity with the other four BSC populations. It is recommended to
consider the Southern Madura crab as a separate sub division in the management of crab fisheries in FMA 712.
It is also recommended to create the sub management area in FMA 712 that manages the BSC in Southern
Madura separately. The sub management area of FMA 712 could help stakeholders to establish best strategies
for sustainable use of the BSC.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This paper is part of our research work funded by the Directorate General of Research and Development
Reinforcement, Ministry of Technology Research and Higher Education for a research grant in accordance
with the Letter of Appointment for Research Program Implementation Number: 1728/IT3.11/PN/2018. The
first author would like to thank Alvia, Fauziyyah, Denanda, Bagus, and Dinda for their assistance in the field
and laboratory works.
REFERENCES
Abinawanto, Hamidah H, Bowolaksono A, Eprilurahman R. 2018. Short communication: biometric of
freshwater crayfish (Cherax spp.) from Papua and West Papua, Indonesia. Biodiversitas. 19(2): 489-
495. doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d190216.
Aini NK, Mashar A, Madduppa HH, Wardiatno Y. 2020. Genetic diversity of horseshoe crabs
(Carcinoscorpius rotundicauda and Tachypleus gigas) in Demak, Madura and Balikpapan waters based
on Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA marker. Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental
Management. 10(1): 124-137. doi: 10.29244/jpsl.10.1.124-137.
Bhosale MM, Pawar RA, Bhendarkar MP, Sawant MS, Pawase AS. 2018. Truss based morphometric approach
for the analysis of body shape in portunid crabs (Charybdis feriatus, P. pelagicus and P. sanguinolentus)
along Ratnagiri coast, India. Journal Entomology Zoology Studies. 6(2): 2641-2648.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 1995. Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries. Rome (IT): FAO
Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries.
Ghasemi A, Zahediasl S. 2012. Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians. Int J
Endocrinol Metab. 10(2): 486-489. doi: 10.5812/ijem.3505.
Green BS, Gardner C, Hochmuth JD, Linnane A. 2014. Environmental effects on fished lobster and crabs. Rev
Fish Biol Fisheries. 24(2): 613-638. doi: 10.1007/s11160-014-9350-1.
Hamid A, Wardiatno Y. 2015. Population dynamics of the blue swimming crab (Portunus pelagicus Linnaeus,
1758) in Lasongko Bay, Central Buton, Indonesia. AACL Bioflux. 8(5): 729-739.
Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam dan Lingkungan 10(3): 390-401
399
Hamid A, Wardiatno Y, Lumban Batu DTF, Riani E. 2015. Fecundity and gonad maturity stages of ovigerous
female blue swimming crab (Portunus pelagicus) in Lasongko Bay, Southeast Sulawesi. Bawal. 7(1):
43-50.
Hamid A, Wardiatno Y, Djamar TFLB, Riani E. 2016a. Stock status and fisheries exploitation of blue
swimming crab Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus 1758) in Lasongko Bay, Central Buton, Indonesia. Asian
Fish Sci. 29(4): 206-219.
Hamid A, Batu DTFL, Riani E, Wardiatno Y. 2016b. Reproductive biology of blue swimming crab (Portunus
pelagicus Linnaeus, 1758) in Lasongko Bay, Southeast Sulawesi-Indonesia. AACL Bioflux. 9(5): 1053-
1066.
Hammer O, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. 2001. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education
and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica. 4(1): 1-9.
Hart PJB, Reynolds JD. 2002. Handbook of Fish Biology and Fisheries: Fish Biology. Oxford (UK): Blackwell
Publishing.
Hepp LU, Fornel R, Restello RM, Trevisan A, Santos S. 2012. Intraspecific morphological variation in a
freshwater crustacean Aegla Plana in Southern Brazil: effects of geographical issolation on carapace
shape. Journal of Crustacean Biology. 32(4): 511-518. doi: 10.1163/193724012X630660.
Hidayani AA, Fujaya Y, Asphama AI, Trijuno DD, Tenriulo A, Parenrengi A. 2015. The morphometric
character and mitochondrial 16S rRNA sequence of Portunus pelagicus. Aquacultura Indonesiana.
16(1): 1-9. doi: 10.21534/ai.v16i1.1.
Hidayani AA, Trijuno DD, Fujaya Y, Alimuddin, Umar MT. 2018. The morphology and morphometric
characteristics of the male swimming crab (Portunus pelagicus) from the East Sahul Self, Indonesia.
AACL Bioflux. 11(6): 1724-1736.
Hollander J, Butlin RK. 2010. The adaptive value of phenotypic plasticity in two ecotypes of a marine
gastropod. BMC Evol Biol. 10(1): 333-340. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-333.
Hossain MAR, Nahiduzzaman M, Saha D, Khanam MUH, Alam MS. 2010. Landmark-based morphometric
and meristic variations of the endangered carp, Kalibaus Labeo calbasu, from stocks of two isolated
rivers, the Jamuna and Halda, and a hatchery. Zool Stud. 49(4): 556-563.
Hurlbut T, Clay D. 1998. Morphometric and meristic differences between shallow and deep-water populations
of white hake (Urophycis tenuis) in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 55: 2274-
2282. doi: 10.1139/cjfas-55-10-2274.
Ihsen PE, Booke HE, Casselman JM, Mc Glade JM, Payne NR, Utter FM. 1981. Stock identification materials
and methods. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 38: 1838-1855. doi: 10.1139/f81-230.
Jayawiguna MH, Mulyono M, Nugraha E, Prayitno H, Basith A. 2017. Biology aspect of blue swimming crab
(Portunus pelagicus) in Jakarta Bay Waters, Indonesia. Aust J Basic App Sci. 11(13): 63-67. doi:
10.15578/bawal.8.1.2016.13-20.
Josileen J. 2011. Morphometrics and length-weight relationship in the blue swimmer crab Portunus pelagicus
(Linnaeus, 1758) (Decapoda, Brachyura) from The Mandapam, Coast India. Crustaceana. 84(14): 1665-
1681. doi: 10.1163/156854011X607060.
Kembaren DD, Zairion, Kamal MM, Wardiatno Y. 2018. Abundance and spatial distribution of blue swimming
crab (Portunus pelagicus) larvae during east monsoon in the East Lampung waters, Indonesia.
Biodiversitas. 19(4): 1326-1333. doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d190420.
Lai JCY, Ng PKL, Davie PJF. 2010. A revision of the Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758) species complex
(Crustacea: Brachyura: Portunidae), with the recognition of four species. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology.
58(2): 199-237.
Li S, Cui B, Xie T, Bai J, Wang Q, Shi W. 2018. What drives the distribution of crab burrows in different
habitats of intertidal salt marshes, Yellow River Delta, China. Ecol Indic. 92: 99-106. doi:
10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.11.003.
Afifah N, Zairion Z, Maduppa HH, Hakim AA, Wardiatno Y
400
Marini M, Suman A, Farajallah A, Wardiatno Y. 2017. Identifying Penaeus merguiensis de Man, 1888 stocks
in Indonesian Fisheries Management Area 573: a truss network analysis approach. AACL Bioflux. 10(4):
922-935.
Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries (MMAF). 2018. Crab Export in 2014-2018. Jakarta (ID): Direktorat
Jenderal Penguatan Daya Saing Produk Kelautan dan Perikanan.
Mir JI, Sarkar UK, Dwivedi AK, Gusain OP, Jena JK. 2013. Stock structure analysis of Labeo rohita
(Hamilton, 1822) across the Ganga basin (India) using a truss network system. J Appl Ichthyol. 29: 1097-
1103. doi: 10.1111/jai.12141.
Mishra P, Pandey CM, Singh U, Gupta A, Sahu C, Keshri A. 2019. Descriptive statistics and normality test
for statistical data. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia. 22(1): 67-72. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_157_18.
Mojekwu TO, Anumudu CI. 2015. Advanced techniques for morphometric analysis in fish. J Aquac Res
Develop. 6(8): 1-6. doi: 10.4172/2155-9546.1000354.
Muchlisin ZA. 2013. Morphometric variations of Rasbora Group (Pisces: Cyprinidae) in Lake Laut Tawar,
Aceh Province, Indonesia, based on truss character analysis. Hayati J Biosci. 20(3): 138-143. doi:
10.4308/hjb.20.3.138.
Ostertagova E, Ostertag O, Kovac J. 2014. Methodology and application of the Kruskal Wallis test. Appl Mech
Mater. 611: 115-120. doi: 10.4135/9781412961288.n207.
Paramasivam P, Chakraborty RD, Ganesan K, Maheswarudu G. 2017. Stock structure analysis of ‘Aristeus
alcocki Ramadan, 1938 (Decapoda: Aristeidae)’ in the Indian coast with truss network morphometrics.
Can J Zool. 96(5): 411-424. doi: 10.1139/cjz-2016-0283.
Pazhayamadom DG, Chakraborty SK, Jaiswar AK, Sudheesan D, Sajina AM, Jahageerdar S. 2015. Stock
structure analysis of “Bombay duck” (Harpadon nehereus Hamilton, 1822) along the Indian coast using
truss network morphometrics. J Appl Ichthyolo. 31: 37-44. doi: 10.1111/jai.12629.
Prabawa A, Riani E, Wardiatno Y. 2014. The influence of heavy metals contamination to the population
structure and organs of the blue swimming crab (Portunus pelagicus, LINN). Journal of Natural
Resources and Environmental Management. 4(1): 17-23. doi: 10.29244/jpsl.4.1.17.
Pramithasari FA, Butet NA, Wardiatno Y. 2017. Variation in morphometric characters in four sand crab
(Albunea symmysta) populations collected from Sumatra and Java Island, Indonesia. Trop Life Sci Res.
28(1): 103-115. doi: 10.21315/tlsr2017.28.1.7.
Rawat S, Benakappa S, Kumar J, Naik K, Pandey G, Pema CW. 2017. Identification of fish stock based on
truss morphometric: a review. J Fish Life Sci. 2(1): 9-14.
Rebello VT, George MK, Paulton MP, Sathianandan TV. 2013. Morphometric structure of the jumbo tiger
prawn, Penaeus monodon Fabricius, 1798 from southeast and southwest coasts of India. J Mar Biol
Assoc India. 55(2): 11-15. doi: 10.6024/jmbai.2013.55.2.01784-02.
Rohlf FJ. 2006. Tps Dig2, version 2.1. State University of New York Stony Brook, NY [Internet]. [cited 2018
Dec 5]. Available from: http.//life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/.
Sajina AM, Chakraborty SK, Jaiswar AK, Pazhayamadam DG, Sudheesan D. 2011. Stock structure analysis
of Megalaspis cordyla (Linnaeus, 1758) along the Indian coast based on truss network analysis. Fish
Res. 108: 100-105. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2010.12.006.
Secor DH. 2014. The Unit Stock Concept: Bounded fish and fisheries. In: Stock Identification Methods. San
Diego (US): Academic Press.
Sen S, Jahageerdar S, Jaiswar AK, Chakraborty SK, Sajina AM, Dash GR. 2011. Stock structure analysis of
Decapterus russelli (Ruppell, 1830) from east and west coast of India using truss network analysis. Fish
Res. 112: 38-43. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2011.08.008.
Smith SL, Pollnac RB, Colburn LL, Olson J. 2011. Classification of coastal communities reporting commercial
fish landings in the U.S. northeast region: developing and testing a methodology. Mar Fish Rev. 73(2):
41-61.
Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam dan Lingkungan 10(3): 390-401
401
Statistics Indonesia (SI). 2018. Export of crabs and shellfish by major destination countries in 2002-2015.
Jakarta (ID): Sensus Pertanian BPS.
Solomon SG, Okomoda VT, Ogbenyikwu AI. 2015. Intraspecific morphological variation between cultured
and wild Clarias gariepinus (Burchell) (Clariidae, Siluriformes). Arch Pol Fish. 23: 53-61. doi:
10.1515/aopf-2015-0006.
Supadminingsih FN, Wahju RI, Riyanto M. 2019. Composition of blue swimming crab Portunus pelagicus
and horshoe crab Limulidae on the gillnet fishery in Mayangan Waters, Subang, West Java. AACL
Bioflux. 12(1): 14-24.
Wiyono ES, Ihsan. 2015. The dynamic of landing blue swimming crab (Portunus pelagicus) in Pangkajene
Kepulauan, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. AACL Bioflux. 8(2): 134-141.
Wiyono ES, Ihsan. 2018. Abundance, fishing season and management strategy for blue swimming crab
(Portunus pelagicus) in Pangkajene Kepulauan, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Trop Life Sci Res. 29(1): 1-
15. doi: 10.21315/tlsr2018.29.1.1.
Zairion, Wardiatno Y, Boer M, Fahrudin A. 2015a. Reproductive biology of the blue swimming crab Portunus
pelagicus (Brachyura: Portunidae) in east Lampung waters, Indonesia: fecundity and reproductive
potential. Trop Life Sci Res. 26(1): 67-85.
Zairion, Wardiatno Y, Fahrudin A. 2015b. Sexual maturity, reproductive pattern and spawning female
population of the blue swimming crab, Portunus pelagicus (Brachyura: Portunidae) in east Lampung
coastal waters, Indonesia. Indian J Sci Tech. 8(6): 596-607. doi: 10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i6/69368.
Zairion, Fauziyah, Riani E, Hakim AA, Mashar A, Madduppa H, Wardiatno Y. 2020. Morphometric character
variation of the blue swimming crab (Portunus pelagicus Linnaeus, 1758) population in western and
eastern part of Java Sea. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. doi: 10.1088/1755-
1315/420/1/012034.
Zimmerman G, Bosc P, Valade P, Cornette R, Ameziane N, Debat V. 2011. Geometric morphometrics of
carapace of Macrobrachium australe (Crustacea: Palaemonidae) from Reunion Island. Acta Zoologica
(Stockholm). 93: 492-500. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-6395.2011.00524.x.