ArticlePDF Available

A Survey of Endophytic Fungi Associated with High-Risk Plants Imported for Ornamental Purposes

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

An extensive literature search was performed to review current knowledge about endophytic fungi isolated from plants included in the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) dossier. The selected genera of plants were Acacia, Albizia, Bauhinia, Berberis, Caesalpinia, Cassia, Cornus, Hamamelis, Jasminus, Ligustrum, Lonicera, Nerium, and Robinia. A total of 120 fungal genera have been found in plant tissues originating from several countries. Bauhinia and Cornus showed the highest diversity of endophytes, whereas Hamamelis, Jasminus, Lonicera, and Robinia exhibited the lowest. The most frequently detected fungi were Aspergillus, Colletotrichum, Fusarium, Penicillium, Phyllosticta, and Alternaria. Plants and plant products represent an inoculum source of several mutualistic or pathogenic fungi, including quarantine pathogens. Thus, the movement of living organisms across continents during international trade represents a serious threat to ecosystems and biosecurity measures should be taken at a global level.
Content may be subject to copyright.
agriculture
Review
A Survey of Endophytic Fungi Associated with
High-Risk Plants Imported for Ornamental Purposes
Laura Gioia 1, *, Giada d’Errico 1, * , Martina Sinno 1, Marta Ranesi 1, Sheridan Lois Woo 2,3,4
and Francesco Vinale 4,5
1Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy;
martina.sinno@unina.it (M.S.); marta.ranesi@unina.it (M.R.)
2Department of Pharmacy, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; woo@unina.it
3Task Force on Microbiome Studies, University of Naples Federico II, 80128 Naples, Italy
4National Research Council, Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection, 80055 Portici, Italy; frvinale@unina.it
5Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples Federico II,
80137 Naples, Italy
*Correspondence: laura.gioia@unina.it (L.G.); giada.derrico@unina.it (G.d.); Tel.: +39-2539344 (L.G. & G.d.)
Received: 31 October 2020; Accepted: 11 December 2020; Published: 17 December 2020


Abstract:
An extensive literature search was performed to review current knowledge about endophytic
fungi isolated from plants included in the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) dossier. The selected
genera of plants were Acacia,Albizia,Bauhinia,Berberis,Caesalpinia,Cassia,Cornus,Hamamelis,Jasminus,
Ligustrum,Lonicera,Nerium, and Robinia. A total of 120 fungal genera have been found in plant tissues
originating from several countries. Bauhinia and Cornus showed the highest diversity of endophytes,
whereas Hamamelis,Jasminus,Lonicera, and Robinia exhibited the lowest. The most frequently detected
fungi were Aspergillus,Colletotrichum,Fusarium,Penicillium,Phyllosticta, and Alternaria. Plants and
plant products represent an inoculum source of several mutualistic or pathogenic fungi, including
quarantine pathogens. Thus, the movement of living organisms across continents during international
trade represents a serious threat to ecosystems and biosecurity measures should be taken at a
global level.
Keywords:
endophytic fungi; crop protection; Acacia;Albizia;Bauhinia;Berberis;Caesalpinia;Cassia;
Cornus;Hamamelis;Jasminus;Ligustrum;Lonicera;Nerium;Robinia; EFSA; high-risk plants
1. Introduction
Endophytic fungi are ubiquitous to plants, and are mainly members of Ascomycota or their
mitosporic stage, but they also include some taxa of Basidiomycota, Zygomycota, and Oomycota.
Endophytes are organisms living within the tissues of plants [
1
] establishing stable relationships
with their host, ranging from non-pathogenic to beneficial [
2
,
3
]. The endophytic fungi communities
represent an enormous reserve of biodiversity and constitute a rich source of bioactive compounds
used in agriculture [
4
,
5
]. For these reasons, they have attracted the attention of the scientific
community worldwide. By definition, all or at least a significant part of the endophytic fungi
life cycle occurs within the plant tissues without causing symptoms to their host [
6
8
]. A wide
range of fungi, including pathogens and saprophytes, may be endophytes. Several pathogens live
asymptomatically within plant tissues during their latency or quiescent stage, while some saprobes
can also be facultative parasites [
1
,
8
,
9
]. Fungal endophytes are influenced by abiotic and biotic factors,
occupying dierent habitats and locations during their life cycle phases. Even if host plants do not
show any symptoms, they may represent a source of inoculum for other species [
10
13
]. Furthermore,
changes in environmental conditions or species hosts may modify the fungal behavior, thus producing
Agriculture 2020,10, 643; doi:10.3390/agriculture10120643 www.mdpi.com/journal/agriculture
Agriculture 2020,10, 643 2 of 31
disease symptoms [
8
,
11
,
14
]. Large quantities of plants and plant material that are globally traded
might contain asymptomatic infections of these fungi. It is generally accepted that the movement of
plants and plant products by global trade and human activities is the most common way to introduce
exotic pathogens and pests in non-endemic countries. Plant health is increasingly threatened by the
introduction of emerging pests and/or pathogens [
15
,
16
]. Noticeable examples are represented by the
invasion of alien plant pathogens into new areas [
17
19
]. Generally, biological invasions are the main
threat to biodiversity [
20
], causing a decrease in species richness and diversity [
20
,
21
] or aecting local
biological communities [22], as well as changing ecosystem processes [2325].
In this scenario, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Panel on Plant Health is responsible
for the risk assessment, evaluations of risk reduction options, as well as guidance documents [
26
] in the
domain of plant health for the European Union (EU) [
26
,
27
]. Commission Implementing Regulation
(EU) [
28
] prohibits the importation of 35 so-called ‘High-Risk Plants, plant products and other objects’
from all third (non-EU) countries as long as no full risk assessment has been carried out. The EFSA Panel
on Plant Health was requested to prepare and deliver risk assessments for these commodities [
27
,
28
],
to evaluate whether the plant material will remain prohibited or removed from the list, with or without
the application of additional measures [
27
,
29
]. The Commodity Risk Assessment has to be performed
on the basis of technical dossiers provided by National Plant Protection Organizations of third countries.
Information required for the preparation and submission of technical dossiers includes data on the
pests potentially associated with the plant species or genera and on phytosanitary mitigation measures
and inspections [30,31].
These plants have been identified as ‘High-Risk Plants’ by the EU since they ‘host commonly
hosted pests known to have a major impact on plant species which are of major economic, social or
environmental importance to the Union’ [
28
]. However, among these 35 plant genera, within the
meaning of Art. 42 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031, a list of only 13 taxa have been selected by the
EFSA as plants mostly traded for ornamental purposes. According to this list, we have reviewed the
following genera: Acacia Mill., Albizia Durazz., Bauhinia L., Berberis L., Caesalpinia L., Cassia L., Cornus L.,
Hamamelis L., Jasminus L., Ligustrum L., Lonicera L., Nerium L., and Robinia L. In this article, as much as
possible, we highlight the potential risks associated with the movement of plants or materials among
nations. Although other plant species may also have a significant impact, this review is limited to plants
included in EU regulation [
28
] that do not originate within Europe. Thus, given these perspectives
for future assessments, the present investigation oers an up-to-date snapshot of endophytic fungi
associated with the so-called ‘High-Risk Plants for ornamental purpose’. The aim is to facilitate the
information required for technical dossiers, needed by the EFSA to perform the Commodity Risk
Assessment of 13 plants mandated on an EU import list.
2. Endophytic Fungi Occurring in Selected Plants
Table 1summarizes the abundance of endophytic fungi reported in association with High-Risk
Plants for ornamental purposes. Herein, the number of endophytic species found in association with
the examined plant genera has been taxonomically grouped by fungal genus. There are important
dierences in terms of fungi recovered per specific plant genus (SP) as well as in the frequency of
a specific fungal genus (SF). These discrepancies could be explained by the dierent availability of
literature data on these specific plants.
Agriculture 2020,10, 643 3 of 31
Table 1.
Endophytic fungi isolated from Acacia (AC), Albizia (AL)., Bauhinia (BA), Berberis (BE),
Caesalpinia (CP), Cassia (CS), Cornus (CO), Hamamelis (HA), Jasminus (JA), Ligustrum (LI), Lonicera (LO),
Nerium (NE), Robinia (RO). Columns report the number of isolated fungal species. The total number
of records calculated per fungal genus is indicated as Tot. SF. The total number of records per plant
genera is indicated as Tot. SP. Fungal genera are sorted by alphabetic order.
Fungi Genera Plant Genera
AC AL BA BE CP CS CO HA
JA LI
LO NE RO
Tot
SF
Acremonium 1 3 4
Albifimbria 1 1
Alternaria 1 1 4 1 3 2 2 14
Anguillospora 1 1
Ascochyta 1 1
Ascotricha 2 2
Aspergillus 3 8 11 1 9 2 3 3 40
Aureobasidium 2 4 6
Bacillispora 1 1
Beauveria 1 1
Bipolaris 1 2 1 4
Botryosphaeria 1 2 3
Botrytis 1 1 2
Campylospora 1 1
Cercospora 1 1
Chaetomium 2 1 3 6
Chrysosporium 1 1
Cladosporium 4 1 5 1 3 14
Clonostachys 1 1 1 3
Cochliobolus 1 3 1 5
Colletotrichum 2 1 3 4 1 2 1 7 3 3 27
Coprinus 1 1
Cordyceps 1 1
Corynespora 1 1
Cryptodiaporthe 1 1
Cryptodiaporthe 1 1
Curvularia 1 5 2 2 10
Cylindrocarpon 1 1
Cyrptosporiopsis 1 1
Daldinia 1 1
Diaporthe 1 1 2 2 1 7
Didymella 2 2
Diplococcium 2 2
Diplodia 1 1 2
Discula 1 1
Dothiorella 6 2 8
Drechslera 1 1
Drepanopeziza 1 1
Elsinoe 1 1
Epicoccum 1 1 2
Eupenicillium 1 1
Eutiarosporella 1 1
Exserohilum 1 2
Fusarium 1 4 4 4 4 4 2 1 4 1 29
Fusidium 1 1
Geomyces 1 1
Geotrichum 1 1 1 3
Gibberella 2 2
Glomerella 1 1
Gloniopsis 1 1
Guignardia 1 1 1 3
Agriculture 2020,10, 643 4 of 31
Table 1. Cont.
Fungi Genera Plant Genera
AC AL BA BE CP CS CO HA
JA LI
LO NE RO
Tot
SF
Heliscus 1 1
Helminthosporium 1 1 2
Hypoxylon 1 1
Khuskia 1 1
Kiflimonium 1 1
Lasiodiplodia 6 1 1 1 2 1 12
Lasmenia 2 2
Lecanicillium 1 1
Leptosphaerulina 1 1
Libertella 1 1
Lophiostoma 1 1
Microsphaeropsis 1 1
Moesziomyces 1 1 2
Myrmecridium 2 2
Myrothecium 1 3
Nectria 2 2
Nemania 1 1
Neocosmospora 1 1 1 3
Neofabraea 1 1
Neofusicoccum 6 6
Neonectria 2 2
Nigrospora 4 1 1 1 1 8
Nodulisporium 2 2 4
Oblongocollomyces 1 1
Paecilomyces 2 2
Papulospora 1 1
Paraboeremia 1 1
Paraphaeosphaeria 1 1 2
Penicillium 2 3 7 3 2 8 1 4 30
Periconia 1 1
Peroneutypa 1 1
Pestalotia 1 1 2
Pestalotiopsis 2 4 1 7
Peyronellaea 1 1
Pezicula 1 1
Phaeobotryosphaeria 1 1
Phoma 2 3 1 1 7
Phomopsis 3 1 2 3 3 12
Phyllosticta 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9
Phytophthora 1 1
Pithomyces 1 1
Pleuroceras 1 1
Prathoda 1 1
Preussia 1 1
Psathyrella 1 1
Pseudopithomyces 1 1
Pseudothielavia 1 1
Puccinia 1 1
Pycnidiella 1 1
Rhizopus 1 1 2
Rosellinia 1 1
Sarocladium 1 1
Scedosporium 1 1
Sclerotinia 1 1
Scopulariopsis 1 1
Septoria 1 1
Agriculture 2020,10, 643 5 of 31
Table 1. Cont.
Fungi Genera Plant Genera
AC AL BA BE CP CS CO HA
JA LI
LO NE RO
Tot
SF
Simplicillium 1 1
Spegazzinia 2 2
Spencermartinsia 1 1
Sphaeria 1 1
Sporormiella 1 1
Stenella 1 1
Talaromyces 3 2 3 8
Thelioviopsis 1 1
Thelonectria 1 1
Torula 1 3
Trichoderma 1 1 2 6 1 2 1 14
Tubakia 2 2
Verticillium 1 1 2
Xylaria 1 2 1 1 2 1 8
Wickerhamomyces 1 1
Tot. SP 51 27 94 29 42 19 78 4 7 29 3 37 6
2.1. Acacia
The Acacia, commonly known as wattle, belongs to the family Mimosaceae. The genus comprises
more than 1350 species found throughout the world: almost 1000 are native of Australia, up to
140 species occur in Africa, 89 from Asia, and about 185 species are found in North and South America.
Some Australian wattles are naturalized beyond their native range and have become invasive in
many parts of Europe, South Africa, and Florida, especially in conservation areas [
32
]. Aboriginal
communities use some Acacia species as sources of food and medicine. Australian acacias are widely
used as wood products, ornamental plants, commercial cut flowers, and perfume crops [33].
Endophytic occurrence (Table 2) has been reported for 61 fungal isolates belonging to genera
Lasiodiplodia (7 isolates), Dothiorella (8 isolates), Neofusicoccum (9 isolates), Aspergillus (3 isolates),
Chaetomium (3 isolates), Botryosphaeria (1 isolate), Colletotrichum (2 isolates), Aureobasidium (2 isolates),
Spencermartinsia (2 isolates), Alternaria (1 isolate), Cochliobolus (1 isolate), Diplodia (2 isolates),
Eupenicillium (1 isolate), Fusarium (1 isolate), Moesziomyces (1 isolate), Paraphaeosphaeria (1 isolate),
Penicillium (2 isolates), Eutiarosporella (2 isolates)
,
Pestalotia (1 isolate), Peyronellaea (1 isolate),
Phaeobotryosphaeria (1 isolate), Phoma (2 isolates), Phyllosticta (1 isolate), Wickerhamomyces (1 isolate),
Preussia (1 isolate), Rhizopus (1 isolate), Oblongocollomyces (1 isolate), Trichoderma (1 isolate), and Xylaria
(1 isolate). Plant host tissues were collected in Egypt, China, India, Australia, South Africa, La R
é
union
(France), France, USA, and Hawaii.
Table 2. Endophytic fungi isolated from Acacia species.
Species Host Plant Plant Part Country Reference
Phyllosticta sp. A. amara leaf Masinagudi, India [34]
Xylaria sp. A. amara leaf Masinagudi, India [34]
Aspergillus niger A. arabica leaf Punjab, India [35]
Aspergillus sp. A. auriculaeformis root Guangdong, China [36]
Trichoderma sp. A. auriculaeformis root Guangdong, China [36]
Aureobasidium pullulans A. baileyana phyllode Melbourne, Australia [37]
Alternaria sp. A. decurrens leaf, stem Yunnan, China [38]
Penicillium sp. A. decurrens leaf, stem Yunnan, China [38]
Peyronellaea sp. A. decurrens leaf, stem Yunnan, China [38]
Agriculture 2020,10, 643 6 of 31
Table 2. Cont.
Species Host Plant Plant Part Country Reference
Phoma sp. A. decurrens leaf, stem Yunnan, China [38]
Rhizopus sp. A. decurrens leaf, stem Yunnan, China [38]
Aureobasidium pullulans A. floribunda phyllode Melbourne, Australia [37]
Chaetomium globosum A. floribunda phyllode Melbourne, Australia [37]
Dothiorella heterophyllae A. heterophylla branch La Réunion, France [39]
Dothiorella reunionis A. heterophylla branch La Réunion, France [39]
Lasiodiplodia iranensis A. heterophylla branch La Réunion, France [39]
Lasiodiplodia rubropurpurea A. heterophylla branch La Réunion, France [39]
Neofusicoccum parvum A. heterophylla branch La Réunion, France [39]
Cochliobolus geniculatus A. hindsii leaf Mexico [40]
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides A. hindsii leaf Mexico [40]
Colletotrichum truncatum A. hindsii leaf Mexico [40]
Eupenicillium javanicum A. hindsii leaf Mexico [40]
Fusarium oxysporum A. hindsii leaf Mexico [40]
Moesziomyces bullatus A. hindsii leaf Mexico [40]
Paraphaeosphaeria sp. A. hindsii leaf Mexico [40]
Phoma sp. A. hindsii leaf Mexico [40]
Wickerhamomyces anomalus A. hindsii leaf Mexico [40]
Botryosphaeria dothidea A. karroo branch South Africa [41]
Diplodia allocellula A. karroo branch South Africa [41,42]
Dothiorella brevicollis A. karroo branch South Africa [41,42]
Dothiorella dulcispinae A. karroo branch South Africa [42]
Dothiorella pretoriensis A. karroo branch South Africa [41,42]
Eutiarosporella urbis-rosarum A. karroo branch South Africa [41,42]
Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae A. karroo branch South Africa [41]
Lasiodiplodia theobromae A. karroo branch South Africa [41]
Lasiodiplodia gonubiensis A. karroo branch South Africa [41]
Neofusicoccum kwambonambiense A. karroo branch South Africa [41]
Neofusicoccum protearum A. karroo branch South Africa [41]
Neofusicoccum vitifusiforme A. karroo branch South Africa [41,42]
Neofusicoccum australe A. karroo branch South Africa [41]
Neofusicoccum parvum A. karroo branch South Africa [41]
Oblongocollomyces variabilis A. karroo branch South Africa [41]
Phaeobotryosphaeria variabilis A. karroo branch South Africa [42]
Spencermartinsia viticola A. karroo branch South Africa [41,42]
Dothiorella koae A. koa branch Hawaii, USA [39]
Lasiodiplodia theobromae A. koa branch Hawaii, USA [39]
Lasiodiplodia exigua A. koa branch Hawaii, USA [39]
Neofusicoccum occulatum A. koa branch Hawaii, USA [39]
Neofusicoccum parvum A. koa branch Hawaii, USA [39]
Aspergillus ochraceus A. nilotica stem Al-Sharqia, Egypt [43]
Penicillium sp. A. nilotica stem Al-Sharqia, Egypt [43]
Pestalotia sp. A. nilotica stem Al-Sharqia, Egypt [43]
Chaetomium globosum A. podalyriifolia phyllode Melbourne, Australia [37]
Chaetomium sp. A. podalyriifolia phyllode Melbourne, Australia [37]
Preussia sp. A. victoriae leaf Arizona, USA [44]
2.2. Albizia
The genus Albizia (Mimosaceae) comprises almost 150 species, mostly trees and shrubs native
to tropical and subtropical regions of Asia and Africa. They are common components of timber
plantations, cropping, and livestock production systems [
45
]. Albizia synthesizes numerous bioactive
compounds with pharmacological properties such as saponins, alkaloids, flavonoids, and phenolics [
45
].
The species A. lebbeck has been extensively introduced in seasonally dry tropical regions of Africa, Asia,
the Caribbean, and South America, mainly as an ornamental plant, and has become naturalized in
many areas [46].
Agriculture 2020,10, 643 7 of 31
Table 3reports endophytes isolated from Albizia genera. These fungi belong to 14 dierent
genera, most of them found in leaves and twigs of A. lebbeck originating from Iraq, India, Indonesia,
and Egypt. Isolated fungi included dierent species of Aspergillus (9 isolates), which are dominant in
comparison to other genera, followed by Fusarium (4 isolates), Penicillium (3 isolates), and Paecilomyces
(2 isolates). One isolate for each of the following genera Neocosmospora, Bipolaris, Colletotrichum,
Diaporthe,Lasiodiplodia,Rosellinia,Acremonium,Trichoderma,Verticillium,Curvularia, and Nigrospora has
been detected.
Table 3. Endophytic fungi isolated from Albizia species.
Species Host Plant Plant Part Country Reference
Acremonium sp. A. lebbeck - Indonesia [47]
Aspergillus fumigatus A. lebbeck leaf and twig Baghdad, Iraq [48]
Aspergillus fumigatus A. lebbeck leaf Al-Sharqia, Egypt [43]
Aspergillus glaucus A. lebbeck leaf and twig Baghdad, Iraq [48]
Aspergillus niger A. lebbeck leaf and twig Baghdad, Iraq [48]
Aspergillus raperi A. lebbeck leaf and twig Baghdad, Iraq [48]
Aspergillus sclerotioniger A. lebbeck leaf and twig Baghdad, Iraq [48]
Aspergillus flavus A. lebbeck leaf and twig Baghdad, Iraq [48]
Aspergillus sp. A. lebbeck - Indonesia [47]
A. lebbeck leaf and twig Baghdad, Iraq [48]
Bipolaris australiensis A. lebbeck leaf and twig Baghdad, Iraq [48]
Colletotrichum sp. A. amara leaf Masinagudi, India [34]
Curvularia cymbopogonis A. lebbeck leaf and twig Baghdad, Iraq [48]
Diaporthe sp. A. amara leaf Masinagudi, India [34]
Fusarium verticilloides A. lebbeck leaf and twig Baghdad, Iraq [48]
Fusarium sp. A. amara leaf Masinagudi, India [34]
A. lebbeck - Indonesia [47]
Fusarium oxysporum A. julibrissin - - [49]
Lasiodiplodia sp. A. amara leaf Masinagudi, India [34]
Neocosmospora solani A. lebbeck leaf and twig Baghdad, Iraq [48]
Paecilomyces variotii A. lebbeck leaf and twig Baghdad, Iraq [48]
Paecilomyces sp. A. lebbeck leaf and twig Baghdad, Iraq [48]
Penicillium sp.
A. lebbeck - Indonesia [47]
A. lebbeck leaf Al-Sharqia, Egypt [43]
A. lebbeck leaf and twig Baghdad, Iraq [48]
Rosellinia sanctae-cruciana A. lebbeck leaf Jammu, India [50]
Trichoderma sp. A. lebbeck - Indonesia [47]
Verticillium sp. A. lebbeck - Indonesia [47]
2.3. Bauhinia
The genus Bauhinia, commonly known as the orchid tree, belongs to the family Fabaceae.
It comprises more than 500 species of shrubs, and small trees mostly native to tropical countries (Africa,
Asia, and South America). Many species are widely used as ornamental plants, forage, human food,
and in folk medicine [51,52].
A total of 107 fungal endophytes have been found in Bauhinia plant tissues (Table 4). The most
common fungi reported were: Aspergillus (13 isolates), Curvularia (8 isolates), Penicillium (7 isolates),
Nigrospora (7 isolates), Fusarium (5 isolates), Phoma (3 isolates), Cladosporium (4 isolates), Acremonium
(3 isolates), Colletotrichum (3 isolates), Phomopsis (3 isolates), Cochliobolus (3 isolates), and Exserohilum
(3 isolates). Furthermore, other genera were found less frequently: Myrothecium (2 isolates), Gibberella
(2 isolates), Lasiodiplodia (2 isolates), Khuskia (1 isolate), Nodulisporium (2 isolates), Pestalotiopsis (2 isolates),
Alternaria (2 isolates), Gibberella (2 isolates), Pithomyces (1 isolate), Diplococcium (2 isolates), Dothiorella
(2 isolates), Ascotricha (2 isolates), Talaromyces (2 isolates), Trichoderma (2 isolates), Spegazzinia (2 isolates),
Kiflimonium (1 isolate), Geotrichum (1 isolate), Corynespora (1 isolate), Diaporthe (1 isolate), Glomerella
(1 isolate), Pestalotia (1 isolate), Scedosporium (1 isolate), Botrytis (1 isolate), Sporormiella (1 isolate),
Phyllosticta (1 isolate), Lasmenia (2 isolates), Albifimbria (1 isolate), Myrmecridium (2 isolates), Sphaeria
Agriculture 2020,10, 643 8 of 31
(1 isolate), Paraboeremia (1 isolate), Pseudopithomyces (1 isolate), Chaetomium (1 isolate), and Torulomyces
(1 isolate). All host plants, namely B. fortificata,B. brevipes,B. racemosa,B. guianensis,B. monandra,
B. malabarica,B. phoenicea, and B. vahlii, were from Brazil and India.
Table 4. Endophytic fungi isolated with Bauhinia species.
Species Host Plant Plant Part Country Reference
Acremonium sp.
B. brevipes - Brazil [53]
B. forficata - Brazil [53]
B. brevipes leaf Pirapitinga, Brazil [54]
Albifimbriaverrucaria B. fortificata stem Recife, Brazil [55]
Alternaria alternata B. malabarica stem Chennai, India [56]
B. racemosa leaf Mudumalai, India [57]
Ascotricha sp. B. forficata - Brazil [53]
Ascotricha chartarum B. fortificata seed Recife, Brazil [55]
Aspergillus sp.
B. forficata - Brazil [53]
B. monandra leaf Recife, Brazil [58]
B. guianensis - Brazil [53,59,60]
Aspergillus flavus B. malabarica leaf, root Chennai, India [56]
Aspergillus niger
B. fortificata stem Recife, Brazil [55]
B. malabarica leaf, root, stem Chennai, India [56]
B. racemosa leaf Mudumalai, India [57]
Aspergillus ochraceus B. fortificata stem, seed Recife, Brazil [55]
Aspergillus tamarii B. malabarica leaf, stem Chennai, India [56]
Aspergillus terreus B. malabarica leaf, root Chennai, India [56]
Aspergillus versicolor B. vahlii leaf Chilkigarh, India [61]
Botrytis cinerea B. racemosa leaf Mudumalai, India [57]
Chaetomium globosum B. malabarica leaf Chennai, India [56]
Cladosporium sphaerospermum
B. fortificata leaf Recife, Brazil [55]
Cladosporium sp. B. forficata - Brazil [53]
Cladosporium cladosporioides B. racemosa leaf Mudumalai, India [57]
Cladosporium oxysporum B. fortificata sepal Recife, Brazil [55]
Cochliobolus sp. B. forficata - Brazil [53]
Cochliobolus australiensis B. fortificata leaf Recife, Brazil [55]
Cochliobolus lunatus B. fortificata leaf, stem Recife, Brazil [55]
Colletotrichum sp. B. forficata - Brazil [53]
Colletotrichum coccodes B. guianensis stem Belem, Brazil [62]
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides B. racemosa leaf Mudumalai, India [57]
Corynespora cassiicola B. racemosa leaf Mudumalai, India [63]
Curvularia sp. B. monandra leaf Recife, Brazil [58]
Curvularia brachyspora B. malabarica leaf Chennai, India [56]
Curvularia clavata B. guianensis stem Belem, Brazil [62]
B. phoenicea leaf
Kudremukh range, India
[64]
Curvularia lunata
B. malabarica leaf Chennai, India [56]
B. racemosa leaf Mudumalai, India [57]
B. phoenicea bark, leaf
Kudremukh range, India
[64]
Curvularia pallescens B. phoenicea leaf
Kudremukh range, India
[64]
Diaporthe sp. B. brevipes leaf Pirapitinga, Brazil [54]
Diplococcium sp. B. forficata - Brazil [53]
Diplococcium spicatum B. fortificata leaf Recife, Brazil [55]
Dothiorella sp. B. brevipes - Brazil [53]
leaf Pirapitinga, Brazil [54]
Exserohilum rostratum B. racemosa leaf, stem Sathyamangalam, India [65]
B. guianensis stem Belem, Brazil [62,66]
Fusarium culmorum B. malabarica leaf, stem Chennai, India [56]
Agriculture 2020,10, 643 9 of 31
Table 4. Cont.
Species Host Plant Plant Part Country Reference
Fusarium verticillioides B. malabarica root Chennai, India [56]
Fusarium oxysporum B. malabarica leaf, root, stem Chennai, India [56]
B. phoenicea leaf
Kudremukh range, India
[64]
Fusarium sp. B. forficata - Brazil [53]
Fusidium viride B. vahlii petiole Chilkigarh, India [61]
Geotrichum candidum B. vahlii leaf, petiole Chilkigarh, India [61]
Gibberella fujikuroi B. fortificata leaf, stem Recife, Brazil [55]
Gibberella sp. B. forficata - Brazil [53]
Glomerella sp. B. forficata - Brazil [53]
Kiflimonium curvulum B. fortificata sepal, stem Recife, Brazil [55]
Khuskia sp. B. forficata - Brazil [53]
Lasiodiplodia theobromae B. racemosa leaf Mudumalai, India [57,63]
Lasmenia sp. B. forficata - Brazil [53]
Lasmeniabalansae B. fortificata stem Recife, Brazil [55]
Myrmecridium sp. B. forficata - Brazil [53]
Myrmecridium schulzeri B. fortificata sepal Recife, Brazil [55]
Nigrospora oryzae
B. racemosa leaf Mudumalai, India [57]
B. phoenicea stem, leaf
Kudremukh range, India
[64]
B. fortificata sepal Recife, Brazil [55]
Nigrospora sacchari B. phoenicea leaf
Kudremukh range, India
[64]
Nigrospora sp. B. forficata - Brazil [53]
Nigrospora sphaerica B. vahlii stem Chilkigarh, India [61]
B. racemosa leaf, stem Sathyamangalam, India [65]
Nodulisporium sp. B. forficata - Brazil [53]
B. fortificata stem Recife, Brazil [55]
Paraboeremia putaminum B. fortificata sepal Recife, Brazil [55]
Penicillium commune B. fortificata sepal Recife, Brazil [55]
Penicillium corylophilum B. fortificata seed Recife, Brazil [55]
Penicillium glabrum B. fortificata stem, seed Recife, Brazil [55]
Penicillium implicatum B. fortificata stem Recife, Brazil [55]
Penicillium sp. B. forficata - Brazil [53]
B. monandra leaf Recife, Brazil [58]
Penicillium aurantiogriseum B. fortificata seed Recife, Brazil [55]
Pestalotia sp. B. forficata - Brazil [53]
Pestalotiopsis sp. B. brevipes leaf Pirapitinga, Brazil [54]
B. brevipes - Brazil [53]
Phoma sp.
B. forficata - Brazil [53]
B. brevipes - Brazil [53]
leaf Pirapitinga, Brazil [54]
Phomopsis sp. B. brevipes - Brazil [53]
B. forficata - Brazil [53]
Phomopsis diachenii B. fortificata leaf Recife, Brazil [55]
Phyllosticta capitalensis B. racemosa leaf Mudumalai, India [57]
Pithomyces sp. B. forficata - Brazil [53]
Pseudopithomycesatro-olivaceus
B. fortificata seed Recife, Brazil [55]
Scedosporium apiospermum B. guianensis stem Belem, Brazil [62]
Spegazzinia sp. B. forficata - Brazil [53]
Spegazzinia tessarthra B. fortificata leaf Recife, Brazil [55]
Sphaeria baccata B. fortificata sepal Recife, Brazil [55]
Sporormiella minima B. racemosa leaf Mudumalai, India [57]
Talaromyces sp. B. forficata - Brazil [53]
Talaromyces funiculosus B. fortificata leaf Recife, Brazil [55]
Torulomyces lagena B. racemosa leaf Mudumalai, India [57]
Trichoderma piluliferum B. fortificata stem Recife, Brazil [55]
Trichoderma sp. B. forficata - Brazil [53]
Agriculture 2020,10, 643 10 of 31
2.4. Berberis
The genus Berberis (Berberidaceae) comprises almost 500 species of deciduous or evergreen shrubs,
which occur in the temperate and subtropical regions of Europe, Asia, Africa, and America [
67
].
This genus has remarkable pharmacological properties [
68
]. Berberine and Berbamine are the main
compounds produced by these plants, together with alkaloids, tannins, phenolic compounds, sterols,
and triterpenes [69].
Numerous endophytic fungi belonging to 19 genera have been isolated from tissues of Berberis
from India, China, Kenya, and the USA (Table 5). Isolated fungi included dierent species of Fusarium
(4 isolates) and Colletotrichum (4 isolates), followed by Alternaria (4 isolates), Anguillospora (1 isolate),
Phomopsis (1 isolate), Campylospora (1 isolate), Cercospora (1 isolate), Clonostachys (1 isolate), Heliscus
(1 isolate), Diaporthe (2 isolates), Microsphaeropsis (1 isolate), Phyllosticta (1 isolate), Paraphalosphaera
(1 isolate), Prathoda (1 isolate), Bacillispora (1 isolate), Neocosmospora (1 isolate), Aspergillus (1 isolate),
Myrothecium (1 isolate), and Puccinia (1 isolate).
Table 5. Endophytic fungi isolated from Berberis species.
Species Host Plant Plant Part Country Reference
Alternaria alternata B. poiretii leaf, twig Beijing, China [70]
B. aristata leaf Sial Sui, District Rajouri, J&K, India [68]
Alternaria macrospora B. aristata leaf Sial Sui, District Rajouri, J&K, India [68]
Alternaria solani B. aristata leaf Sial Sui, District Rajouri, J&K, India [68]
Anguillospora crassa Berberis sp. root Western Himalaya [71]
Aspergillus flavus B. aristata leaf Sial Sui, District Rajouri, J&K, India [68]
Campylospora parvula Berberis sp. root Western Himalaya [71]
Cercospora citrullina B. aristata stem Sial Sui, District Rajouri, J&K, India [68]
Clonostachys rosea B. aristata root Sial Sui, District Rajouri, J&K, India [68]
Colletotrichum coccodes B. aristata root Sial Sui, District Rajouri, J&K, India [68]
Colletotrichum coeanum B. aristata leaf Sial Sui, District Rajouri, J&K, India [68]
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides B. aristata leaf Sial Sui, District Rajouri, J&K, India [68]
Colletotrichum kahawae B. aristata leaf Sial Sui, District Rajouri, J&K, India [68]
Bacillispora aquatica Berberis sp. root Western Himalaya [71]
Diaporthe sp. B. vulgaris leaf, stem Kenya [72]
Neocosmospora falciformis B. aristata root Sial Sui, District Rajouri, J&K, India [68]
Fusarium lateritium B. aristata stem Sial Sui, District Rajouri, J&K, India [68]
Fusarium nematophilum B. aristata root Sial Sui, District Rajouri, J&K, India [68]
Fusarium oxysporum B. aristata stem Sial Sui, District Rajouri, J&K, India [68]
Fusarium solani B. aristata root Sial Sui, District Rajouri, J&K, India [68]
Heliscus lugdunensis Berberis sp. root Western Himalaya [71]
Microsphaeropsis conielloides B. poiretii twig Beijing, China [70]
Myrothecium inundatum B. aristata leaf Sial Sui, District Rajouri, J&K, India [68]
Paraphaeosphaeria sp.
B. thunbergii
stem China [73]
Phomopsis sp. B. poiretii twig Beijing, China [70]
Diaporthe tersa B. aristata leaf Sial Sui, District Rajouri, J&K, India [68]
Phyllosticta capitalensis B. aristata leaf Sial Sui, District Rajouri, J&K, India [68]
Prathoda longissima Berberis sp. root Western Himalaya [71]
Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici B. vulgaris - Pacific Northwest USA [74]
2.5. Caesalpinia
The genus Caesalpinia (Fabaceae) includes approximately 200 species, mainly arboreal and shrubby
species, distributed in seasonally dry tropical forests, as well as in tropical and warm temperate
savannas, tropical wet forests, and tropical coastal habitats [
75
]. Several classes of compounds,
mainly flavonoids, diterpenes, and steroids, have been isolated from Caesalpinia species, which have
shown various medicinal properties [
75
]. The most common species cultivated as ornamental plants
are C. pulcherrima and C. echinata.
Agriculture 2020,10, 643 11 of 31
A total of 44 fungal endophytes were isolated from leaves, stems, and bark of plants collected
from India, Brazil, and Indonesia (Table 6). Fungal genera associated with dierent species of
Caesalpinia were: Aspergillus (10 isolates), followed by Trichoderma (6 isolates) and Fusarium (4 isolates).
Other isolated endophytes have been identified as Penicillum (3 isolates), Curvularia (2 isolates),
Nectria (2 isolates), Bipolaris (2 isolates), Xylaria (2 isolates), and one isolate for the genera Alternaria,
Chrysosporium,Cladosporium,Colletotrichum,Epicoccum,Geotrichum,Helminthosporium,Lasiodiplodia,
Talaromyces,Scopulariopsis, and Phyllosticta, respectively.
Table 6. Endophytic fungi isolated from Caesalpinia species.
Species Host Plant Plant Part Country Reference
Alternaria alternata C. pulcherrima leaf India [76]
Aspergillus flavus C. pulcherrima leaf India [76]
Aspergillus fumigatus C. pulcherrima leaf India [76]
Aspergillus niger C. pulcherrima leaf India [76]
Aspergillus flavus var. oryzae C. pulcherrima leaf India [76]
Aspergillus rugulosus C. pulcherrima leaf India [76]
Aspergillus terreus C. pulcherrima leaf India [76]
Aspergillus sp.
C. pyramidalis leaf Brazil [53]
C. echinata leaf Brazil [53]
C. echinata stem, bark Brazil [77]
Aspergillus nidulans C. pulcherrima leaf India [76]
Bipolaris oryzae C. pulcherrima leaf India [76]
Bipolaris sp. C. pulcherrima leaf India [76]
Chrysosporium sp. C. sappan stem Indonesia [78]
Cladosporium cladosporioides C. echinata leaf Brazil [79]
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides C. echinata leaf Brazil [79]
Curvularia lunata C. sappan stem Indonesia [78]
Curvularia pallescens C. echinata leaf Brazil [79]
Epicoccum sp. C. echinata Brazil [53]
Fusarium sp. C. echinata
leaf Brazil [53]
stem Brazil [77]
stem, bark Brazil [77]
C. pulcherrima leaf India [76]
Geotrichum candidum C. sappan stem Indonesia [78]
Helminthosporium sp. C. pulcherrima leaf India [76]
Lasiodiplodia theobromae C. echinata leaf Brazil [79]
Nectria sp. C. echinata - Brazil [53]
Nectria pseudotrichia C. echinata stem, bark Brazil [77]
stem [80]
Penicillium citrinum C. pulcherrima leaf India [76]
Penicillium chrysogenum C. pulcherrima leaf India [76]
Penicillium sp. C. sappan stem Indonesia [78]
Phyllosticta sorghina C. echinata stem, bark Brazil [77]
Scopulariopsis coprophila C. echinata leaf Brazil [79]
Talaromyces sp. C. echinata stem, bark Brazil [77]
leaf Brazil [53]
Trichoderma atroviride C. pyramidalis stem, bark Brazil [81]
Trichoderma harzianum C. pyramidalis stem, bark Brazil [81]
Trichoderma koningiopsis C. pyramidalis stem, bark Brazil [81]
Trichoderma longibrachiatum C. pyramidalis stem, bark Brazil [81]
Trichoderma virens C. pyramidalis stem, bark Brazil [81]
Trichoderma sp. C. sappan stem Indonesia [78]
Xylaria sp. C. echinata leaf Brazil [53]
Xylaria berteri C. echinata stem, bark Brazil [77]
Agriculture 2020,10, 643 12 of 31
2.6. Cassia
The genus Cassia (Fabaceae) comprises about 600 species native to tropical and subtropical regions
of Southeast Asia, Africa, Northern Australia, and Latin America [
82
,
83
]. In particular, C. fistula and
C. alata are distributed worldwide and used as ornamental and medicinal plants for their biological and
pharmacological properties [
82
84
]. Some investigations on phytochemicals of Cassia revealed that
it comprises compounds like anthraquinones, alkaloids, catechols, flavonoids, phenolic compounds,
saponins, steroids, tannins, and triterpenoids [8386].
Nineteen endophytic fungi have been isolated from dierent tissues of Cassia species from
Thailand, India, Malaysia, and Brazil (Table 7): Aspergillus (2 isolates), Nodulisporium (2 isolates),
Penicillium (2 isolates), Phomopsis (2 isolates), Daldinia (1 isolate), Coprinus (1 isolate), Guignardia
(1 isolate), Hypoxylon (1 isolate), Nemania (1 isolate), Nigrospora (1 isolate), Papulospora (1 isolate),
Periconia (1 isolate), Xylaria (1 isolate), Psathyrella (1 isolate), and Thielaoviopsis (1 isolate).
Table 7. Endophytic fungi isolated from Cassia species.
Species Host Plant Plant Part Country Reference
Aspergillus flavus C. siamea leaf Malaysia [87]
Aspergillus sp. C. fistula leaf, stem, fruit India [88]
Coprinus sp. C. fistula leaf Bangkok, Thailand [89]
Daldinia sp. C. fistula leaf Bangkok, Thailand [89]
Guignardia sp. C. occidentalis leaf Brazil [53]
Hypoxylon sp. C. fistula leaf Bangkok, Thailand [89]
Nemania sp. C. fistula leaf Bangkok, Thailand [89]
Nigrospora sp. C. fistula leaf Bangkok, Thailand [89]
Nodulisporium sp. C. fistula leaf Bangkok, Thailand [89]
- - [90]
Papulospora sp. C. fistula bark India [91]
Penicillium
sclerotiorum C. fistula - India [92]
Penicillium sp. C. fistula leaf Bangkok, Thailand [89]
Periconia sp. C. fistula bark India [91]
Phomopsis cassiae C. spectabilis - Brazil [52]
Phomopsis sp. C. fistula leaf Bangkok, Thailand [89]
Psathyrella sp. C. fistula leaf Bangkok, Thailand [89]
Thelioviopsis sp. C. fistula leaf India [91]
Xylaria sp. C. fistula leaf Bangkok, Thailand [89]
2.7. Cornus
The genus Cornus (Cornaceae) consists of over 50 species of woody plants, many of which are
cultivated as ornamental and medicinal trees [
93
]. The most widespread ornamental plants of the
genus are C. florida and C. stolonifera, called the flowering dogwood, native to northern and central
America [
93
]. The species C. ocinalis is widely distributed in China, Korea, and Japan, and used for
its several pharmacological activities. Among bioactive compounds, iridoids, tannins, and flavonoids
are the major components [94].
About 90 fungal endophytes have been isolated and identified from C. alba,C. alternifolia,
C. stolonifera, C. controversa, and C. ocinalis collected in Canada, USA, Japan, China, and Korea
(Table 8): Penicillium (8 isolates), Fusarium (4 isolates), Cladosporium (5 isolates), Colletotrichum
(5 isolates), Alternaria (6 isolates), Pestalotiopsis (5 isolates), Aureobasidium (4 isolates), Botryosphaeria
(3 isolates), Cryptodiaporthe (2 isolates), Phomopsis (3 isolates), Talaromyces (4 isolates), Aspergillus
(3 isolates), Discula (4 isolates), Diaporthe (3 isolates), Neonectria (2 isolates), Trichoderma (2 isolates),
Tubakia (2 isolates), and Didymella (3 isolates). Only one isolate of the following genera has been
reported: Ascochyta,Botrytis,Cyrptosporiopsis,Elsinoe,Epicoccum,Helminthosporium,Lecanicillium,
Leptosphaerulina,Lophiostoma,Drepanopeziza,Nigrospora, Sarocladium, Cordyceps,Phyllosticta,Phytophthora,
Agriculture 2020,10, 643 13 of 31
Phoma,Pleuroceras,Thelonectria,Sclerotinia,Neofabraea,Septoria,Simplicillium,Stenella,Verticillium,
and Xylaria.
Table 8. Endophytic fungi isolated from Cornus species.
Species Host Plant Plant Part Country Reference
Alternaria alternata Cornus spp. leaf Japan, USA [95]
Alternaria sp. C. stolonifera leaf Canada [96]
Alternaria tenuissima C. ocinalis twig, leaf China [97]
Cornus spp. leaf Japan [95]
Ascochyta medicaginicola C. ocinalis twig China [97]
Aspergillus flavus var. oryzae C. alba leaf - [98]
Aspergillus sp. Cornus spp. leaf Japan, USA [95]
Aureobasidium pullulans Cornus spp. leaf USA [95]
Aureobasidium sp. C. stolonifera leaf Canada [96]
Cornus spp. leaf Japan, USA [95]
Botryosphaeria dothidea C. ocinalis twig, leaf China [97]
Cornus spp. leaf Japan [95]
Botryosphaeria sp. Cornus spp. leaf Japan [95]
Botrytis sp. C. stolonifera leaf Canada [96]
Cladosporium cladosporioides C. stolonifera leaf Canada [96]
Cladosporium herbarum C. stolonifera leaf Canada [96]
Cladosporium sp. C. stolonifera leaf Canada [96]
Cornus spp. leaf Japan [95]
Cladosporium sphaerospermum
C. stolonifera leaf Canada [96]
Colletotrichum acutatum Cornus spp. leaf USA, Japan [95]
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides C. ocinalis twig, leaf China [97]
C. stolonifera leaf Canada [96]
Colletotrichum sp. Cornus spp. leaf Japan [95]
Cordycepsfarinose C. stolonifera leaf Canada [96]
Cryptodiaporthe corni C. alternifolia stem USA [99]
bark, phloem USA [100]
Cyrptosporiopsis sp. Cornus spp. leaf USA [95]
Diaporthe amygdali Cornus spp. leaf USA, Japan [95]
Diaporthe lagerstroemiae Cornus spp. leaf Japan [95]
Didymellapinodella C. ocinalis twig China [97]
Didymella glomerata Cornus spp. leaf USA, Japan [95]
Discula destructiva
Cornus spp. leaf USA [101]
leaf USA [95]
C. florida leaf Germany [102]
leaf Italy [103]
Drepanopeziza populi C. ocinalis twig China [97]
Elsinoe fawcettii Cornus spp. leaf USA [95]
Epicoccum nigrum C. stolonifera leaf Canada [96]
Fusarium lateritium C. controversa stem Korea [104]
Fusarium oxysporum C. ocinalis root China [97]
Fusarium sp. Cornus spp. leaf Japan [95]
C. stolonifera leaf Canada [96]
Helminthosporium velutinum C. ocinalis twig China [97]
Lecanicillium psalliotae C. stolonifera leaf Canada [96]
Leptosphaerulina australis C. ocinalis twig China [97]
Lophiostoma sp. Cornus spp. leaf USA [95]
Neofabraea sp. Cornus spp. leaf USA [95]
Neonectria sp. Cornus spp. leaf USA, Japan [95]
Nigrospora sphaerica C. florida stem
Tennessee, USA
[105]
Penicillium brevicompactum C. stolonifera leaf Canada [96]
Penicillium chrysogenum Cornus spp. leaf USA [95]
Penicillium citrinum C. stolonifera leaf Canada [96]
Penicillium miczynskii C. stolonifera leaf Canada [96]
Penicillium simplicissimum Cornus spp. leaf USA [95]
Penicillium sp. C. stolonifera leaf Canada [96]
Agriculture 2020,10, 643 14 of 31
Table 8. Cont.
Species Host Plant Plant Part Country Reference
Penicillium spinulosum Cornus spp. leaf Japan [95]
Penicillium thomii C. stolonifera leaf Canada [96]
Phytophthora palmivora C. florida leaf, shoot USA [106]
Pestalotiopsis mangiferae Cornus spp. leaf Japan [95]
Pestalotiopsis microspora Cornus spp. leaf USA, Japan [95]
Pestalotiopsis monochaeta Cornus spp. leaf Japan [95]
Pestalotiopsis sp. Cornus spp. leaf Japan [95]
Phoma moricola C. ocinalis twig China [97]
Phomopsis sp. C. stolonifera leaf Canada [96]
Cornus spp. leaf USA, Japan [95]
Phyllosticta fallopiae C. ocinalis leaf China [97]
Phytophthora nicotianae C. florida leaf, shoot USA [106]
Pleuroceras tenellum Cornus spp. leaf USA [95]
Sarocladiumkiliense C. stolonifera leaf Canada [96]
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum C. stolonifera leaf Canada [96]
Septoria sp. C. stolonifera leaf Canada [96]
Simplicillium lanosoniveum C. ocinalis fruit China [97]
Stenella sp. C. stolonifera leaf Canada [96]
Talaromyces assiutensis C. ocinalis root China [97]
Talaromycescecidicola Cornus spp. leaf USA, Japan [95]
Talaromyces trachyspermus C. ocinalis root China [97]
Thelonectriadiscophora Cornus spp. leaf Japan [95]
Trichoderma lixii Cornus spp. leaf USA, Japan [95]
Tubakia sp. Cornus spp. leaf USA, Japan [95]
Verticillium dahliae Cornus spp. leaf USA [95]
Xylaria sp. Cornus spp. leaf USA [95]
2.8. Hamamelis
Hamamelis (Hamamelidaceae), commonly known as witch hazel, comprises six species of
ornamental shrubs. This genus is distributed across North America and eastern Asia. Bark extracts
contain proanthocyanidins and polyphenolic fractions, with medicinal properties [107,108].
Fungal endophytes belonging to genera Colletotrichum,Nigrospora,Pezicula, and Phyllosticta have
been isolated from Hamamelis plant tissues in the USA, China, Netherlands, Canada, and Japan
(Table 9).
Table 9. Endophytic fungi isolated from Hamamelis species.
Species Host Plant Plant Part Country Reference
Colletotrichum acutatum H. virginiana leaf Dutchess Co., USA [109]
Hamamelis sp. leaf Litchfield, USA [109]
Nigrospora oryzae H. mollis leaf China [110]
Pezicula sporulosa H. mollis - Netherlands [111]
H. virginiana - Canada [112]
Phyllosticta hamamelidis H. japonica leaf Japan [113,114]
2.9. Jasminum
The genus Jasminum (Oleaceae) includes more than 200 species distributed in China, Africa,
Asia, Australia, South Pacific Islands, and Europe. Jasmines are widely cultivated for ornamental,
medical, and cosmetical uses. The species J. sambac, commonly known as Arabian Jasmine, is cultivated
throughout India and tropical regions. This genus has been reported for several uses due to the following
pharmaceutical activities: antimicrobial [
115
], antioxidant [
116
], antidiabetic [
117
], antiviral [
118
],
and antitumor [
119
]. Seven species of endophytic fungi of the genus Colletotrichum have been reported
from J. sambac in India and Vietnam (Table 10).
Agriculture 2020,10, 643 15 of 31
Table 10. Endophytic fungi isolated from Jasminum species.
Species Host Plant Plant Part Country Reference
Colletotrichum dematium J. sambac leaf India [120]
Colletotrichum truncatum J. sambac leaf Vietnam [121]
Colletotrichum jasminicola J. sambac leaf, shoot India [120]
Colletotrichum
jasminigenum J. sambac leaf Vietnam [121]
Colletotrichum
jasmini-sambac J. sambac leaf Vietnam [121]
Colletotrichum siamense J. sambac leaf Vietnam [121]
Colletotrichum sp. J. sambac leaf Vietnam [121]
2.10. Ligustrum
Ligustrum (Family Oleaceae) is a genus of about 50 species of shrubs and trees from warm areas of
Europe to Asia [
122
]. Several species of the genus have been cultivated in many areas of the world as
urban ornamental hedge and street trees. In particular, the most widespread species L. lucidum compete
with and inhibit the regeneration of native flora, becoming invasive in many areas with a subtropical
and temperate climate, such as North America, South America, Europe, Asia, Africa, and Oceania [
123
].
Due to its active constituents such as glycosides, flavonoids, phenylpropanoids, phenylethanoid,
and terpenoids, Ligustrum spp. have been widely used as a health remedy in European, Chinese,
and Japanese communities [124,125].
Collected data showed that 29 species of endophytes belonging to 20 genera have been found in
plant tissues of L. lucidum, L. compactum, L. quihoui,L. obsusifoilium, and L. vulgare (Table 11): Guignardia
(3 isolates), Alternaria (2 isolates), Colletotrichum (3 isolates), Fusarium (2 isolates), Xylaria (2 isolates),
Pestalotiopsis (1 isolate), Trichoderma (2 isolates), Lasiodiplodia (2 isolates), Phomopsis (3 isolates),
and one isolate of Diplodia, Geotrichum, Libertella,Neocosmospora,Cladosporium, Peroneutypa,Penicillium,
Phyllosticta,Pycnidiella, and Rhizopus, respectively.
Table 11. Endophytic fungi isolated from Ligustrum species.
Species Host Plant Plant Part Country Reference
Alternaria alternata L. lucidum leaf, petiole Buenos Aires, Argentina [126]
Alternaria cheiranthi L. lucidum leaf Buenos Aires, Argentina [126]
Cladosporium oxysporum L. lucidum leaf Buenos Aires, Argentina [126]
Colletotrichum crassipes L. lucidum leaf Buenos Aires, Argentina [126]
Colletotrichum sp. L. roxburghii leaf Bhavani, India [34]
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides L. lucidum leaf Buenos Aires, Argentina [126]
Diplodia mutila L. lucidum stem Buenos Aires, Argentina [127]
Fusarium oxysporum L. lucidum - Jiangsu, China [128]
Fusarium lateritium L. lucidum stem Buenos Aires, Argentina [127]
Geotrichum candidum L. lucidum leaf Buenos Aires, Argentina [126]
Guignardia mangiferae
L. compactum var. tschonski leaf Kyoto, Japan [129]
L. quihoui leaf Kyoto, Japan [129]
L. obsusifoilium leaf Kyoto, Japan [129]
Lasiodiplodia theobromae L. lucidum stem Buenos Aires, Argentina [127]
Lasiodiplodia sp. L. roxburghii leaf Bhavani, India [34]
Libertella sp. L. lucidum branches Argentina [130]
Neocosmospora solani L. lucidum - Jiangsu, China [128]
Peroneutypa scoparia L. lucidum branches Argentina [130]
Penicillum sp. L. lucidum leaf China [131]
Pestalotiopsis sp. L. roxburghii leaf India [132]
Bhavani, India [34]
Phomopsis ligustri-vulgaris L. lucidum leaf Buenos Aires, Argentina [126]
Phomopsis sp. L. vulgare leaf
Braunschweig, Germany
[133]
L. roxburghii leaf Bhavani, India [34]
Phyllosticta sp. L. roxburghii leaf Bhavani, India [34]
Agriculture 2020,10, 643 16 of 31
Table 11. Cont.
Species Host Plant Plant Part Country Reference
Pycnidiella resinae L. lucidum leaf Buenos Aires, Argentina [126]
Rhizopus microsporus L. lucidum stem Buenos Aires, Argentina [127]
Trichoderma harzianum L. lucidum leaf Buenos Aires, Argentina [126]
Trichoderma koningii L. lucidum stem Buenos Aires, Argentina [127]
Xylaria sp. L. roxburghii leaf Bhavani, India [34]
L. lucidum leaf Buenos Aires, Argentina [126]
2.11. Lonicera
Lonicera (Caprifoliaceae) is a genus that comprises more than 150 species of shrubs and twining
climbers, occurring in North America, South Europe, North Africa, Philippines, and Malaysia [
134
].
L. japonica and L. morrowii, which are native to Asia, are ornamental species distributed in many areas
of the world. In the USA, they are considered invasive plants [
135
]. Only 3 fungal species have
been found to grow as endophytes in Lonicera plant tissues (Table 12): Fusarium sp., Phyllosticta sp.,
and Guignarda mangiferae.
Table 12. Endophytic fungi isolated from Lonicera species.
Species Host Plant Plant Part Country Reference
Fusarium sp. L. japonica leaf
Henan, China
[136]
Guignardia mangiferae L. morrowii leaf Kyoto, Japan [129]
Phyllosticta sp. L. morrowii leaf Kyoto, Japan [129]
2.12. Nerium
N. oleander, commonly called oleander, is the only species currently classified in the genus
Nerium (Family Apocynaceae). This evergreen shrub is native or naturalized to a wide area, from the
Mediterranean region to the Arabian Peninsula and Asia [
137
]. Several biologically active compounds
have been reported in the bark (cardenolides, triterpenoidal saponins, oleanderol, rutin, dambonitol
in leaves, odorosides), roots (triterpene, steroidal cardenolide, volatile oil, stearic acid, oleic acid),
and flowers (gitoxigenin, uzarigenin, strospeside, odoroside H) [137140].
Collected data showed that 38 fungi were isolated from leaves, stems, flowers, and roots of plants
collected in India and China (Table 13). These isolates belong to the genera, Fusarium (4 isolates),
Penicillium (4 isolates), Cladosporium (3 isolates), Chaetomium (3 isolates), Colletotrichum (3 isolates),
Aspergillus (3 isolates), Curvularia (2 isolates), Alternaria (2 isolates), Cylindrocephalum (1 isolate),
Lasiodiplodia (1 isolate), Torula (1 isolate), Phyllosticta (1 isolate), Phoma (1), Rhizopus (1 isolate), Geomyces
(1 isolate), Pseudothielavia (1 isolate), Trichoderma (1 isolate), Xylaria (1 isolate), Bipolaris (1 isolate),
Cochliobolus (1 isolate), and Drechslera (1 isolate).
Table 13. Endophytic fungi isolated from Nerium species.
Species Host Plant Plant Part Country Reference
Alternaria brassicicola N. oleander stem, flower India [141]
Alternaria sp. N. oleander leaf Southern India [142]
Aspergillus flavus N. oleander flower Chennai, India [143]
Aspergillus niger N. oleander flower Chennai, India [143]
Aspergillus sp. N. oleander stem, root China [144]
Bipolaris sp. N. oleander stem, flower India [141]
Chaetomium sp.
N. oleander stem, flower India [141]
N. oleander stem Hong Kong, China [145]
N. oleander leaf Southern India [142]
Cladosporium sp.
N. oleander stem Hong Kong, China [145]
N. oleander stem India [141]
N. oleander leaf Southern India [142]
Agriculture 2020,10, 643 17 of 31
Table 13. Cont.
Species Host Plant Plant Part Country Reference
Cochliobolus sp. N. oleander stem, flower India [141]
Colletotrichum sp.
N. oleander stem Hong Kong, China [145]
N. oleander flower Chennai, India [143]
N. oleander leaf Southern India [142]
Curvularia brachyspora N. oleander stem, flower India [141]
Curvularia sp. N. oleander stem, flower India [141]
Cylindrocephalum sp. N. oleander stem, flower India [141]
Drechslera sp. N. oleander stem India [141]
Fusarium oxysporum N. oleander flower Chennai, India [143]
Fusarium semitectum N. oleander stem, flower India [141]
Fusarium sp. N. oleander stem, flower India [141]
N. oleander leaf Southern India [142]
Geomyces sp. N. oleander stem China [144]
Lasiodiplodia theobromae N. oleander flower Chennai, India [143]
Nigrospora sp. N. oleander root China [144]
Penicillium sp.
N. oleander stem China [144]
N. oleander stem, flower India [141]
N. oleander root China [146]
N. oleander leaf Southern India [142]
Phoma sp. N. oleander stem Hong Kong, China [145]
Phyllosticta sp. N. oleander leaf Southern India [142]
Rhizopus stolonifera N. oleander flower Chennai, India [143]
Pseudothielavia terricola N. oleander stem India [141]
Torula sp. N. oleander stem Hong Kong, China [145]
Trichoderma sp. N. oleander stem, root China [144]
Xylaria sp. N. oleander leaf Southern India [142]
2.13. Robinia
Robinia is a genus of flowering plants of the family Fabaceae. R. pseudoacacia, called black locust,
grows naturally on a wide range of sites. It is considered to be one of the 40 most invasive woody
species all over the world [
147
] and it is included in the invasive alien species list of the EU [
148
,
149
].
It is used for many purposes, such as ornamental plant, for shelterbelts, land reclamation, fuelwood,
and pulp production [
147
]. Six species of endophytic fungi were isolated from R. pseudoacacia in
Germany, Slovakia, Hungary, and China (Table 14).
Table 14. Endophytic fungi isolated from Robinia species.
Species Host Plant Plant Part Country Reference
Beauveria bassiana R. pseudoacacia - Mly ˇnany, Slovakia [150]
Diaporthe oncostoma
R. pseudoacacia stem Hungary [151]
Monodictys fluctuata
R. pseudoacacia - Germany [152]
Fusarium sp. R. pseudoacacia - Huaxi district, China [153]
Gloniopsis sp. R. pseudoacacia - Huaxi district, China [153]
Clonostachys sp. R. pseudoacacia - Huaxi district, China [153]
3. An Overview of Fungal Diversity and Frequency
Investigations on the mycobiota of plants frequently reported new taxa or new species distribution,
and several fungi are still undiscovered or undetected. Numerous higher plants have developed
a variety of resistance mechanisms to prevent fungal infections. However, the presence of weakly
pathogenic fungi in healthy plant tissues highlights the evolutionary continuum between latent
pathogens and symptomless endophytes [
15
]. Generally, all plants have symbiotic interactions with
fungal endophytes which can influence host performance in terms of disease resistance [
154
156
],
stress tolerance [
157
], and biomass accumulation [
158
]. Fungal endophytes may also change according
Agriculture 2020,10, 643 18 of 31
to plant tissues colonized [
159
], phenological growth stages, host genotypes [
160
], and geographical
distribution areas [161].
In this review, a total of 428 endophytic species belonging to 122 fungal genera have been
found in association with 13 plant genera (Table 1). The greatest level of fungal diversity was
reported in in association with Bauhinia with 43 fungal genera and 94 fungal species, and Cornus
with 44 fungal genera and 78 fungal species. The degree of fungal recovery from Acacia (29 genera,
51 species), Albizia (14 genera, 27 species), Berberis (17 genera, 29 species), Caesalpinia (19 genera,
42 species), Cassia (15 genera, 19 species), Ligustrum (20 genera, 29 species), and Nerium (21 genera,
37 species) was nearly half in comparison to the abundance noted in the genera Bauhinia and Cornus.
Nonetheless, the lowest diversity showed for Hamamelis (4 species/genera), Jasminus (7 species, 1 genera),
Lonicera (3 species/genera), and Robinia (6 species/genera) was also due to the lack of published research
about fungal endophytes in these plant genera.
The literature evidenced that several fungal endophytes live in association with the investigated
plants. The most representative genera in terms of abundance of isolated species were Aspergillus
(40 spp.), Penicillium (30), Fusarium (29), Colletotrichum (27), Alternaria (14), and Cladosporium (14).
These genera include ubiquitous and generalist fungi as well as several plant pathogens and
saprobes [162164].
It is worth noting the relative homogeneity in distribution of fungi such as Colletotrichum,Fusarium,
and Alternaria among these plant genera. In fact, Colletotrichum was undetected only in Lonicera
and Robinia,Fusarium in Caesalpinia, and Hamamelis, Jasminus, and Alternaria in Cassia and Lonicera.
Although scarcely abundant, the fungal genus Phyllosticta was almost reported for all selected plants
except for Albizia,Jasminus,Robinia, and Hamamelis. Other endophytic fungi were detected more
occasionally. Future surveys may reveal the presence of additional fungal species also from less
investigated plants, such as Robinia,Jasminum, and Lonicera.
The presence of pathogenic or saprotrophic fungi has already been discussed by several
authors [
165
,
166
]. Table 1shows that several of the listed fungi were apparently restricted to a
single plant genus or at least exhibit some preference for a particular one. Some common and
ubiquitous pathogens have been recovered in more than one plant host. This is the case of F. oxysporum
(8 host plant species belonging to 7 dierent genera), A. alternata,A. niger,C. gloeosporioides (7 host
plant species), N. oryzae (4 host plant species), B. dothidea,C. globosum, C. acutatum (3 host plant species),
A. ochraceus,A. pullulans, and C. truncatum (3 host plant species).
4. The Most Common Plant Pathogens
The most frequent endophytes detected from the investigated plants are cosmopolitan and
ubiquitous pathogens that may cause severe yield losses. In detail, F. oxysporum is responsible for the
wilt of vascular tissues on numerous crops that may result in plant death, even if several strains have
proved to be non-pathogenic [
167
]. It has been isolated from 8 dierent plant species belonging to
7 genera, namely A. hindsii,A. julibrissin,B. malabarica,B. phoenicea,B. aristata, C. ocinalis,L. lucidum,
and N. oleander. The fungus A. alternata may infect over 380 host plant species causing leaf spots, rots,
and blights. It includes opportunistic forms in developing field crops as well as saprophytic strains
that may cause harvest and post-harvest spoilage of harvested products. One of the major concerns
represented by its infection is related to the production of mycotoxins that may be introduced in the
food chain [
168
]. In this review, A. alternata has been found in association with 3 genera, in 7 plant
species (B. malabarica,B. racemosa,B. poiretii,B. aristata,Cornus sp., L. lucidum, and C. pulcherrima).
The saprophytic pathogen A. niger is responsible for the spoilage of a wide range of fruit, vegetable,
and food products. It is also the causal agent of the black rot of onion bulbs, the kernel rot of maize,
and the black mold rot of cherry [
169
,
170
]. It has been found within plant tissues of A. arabica,
A. lebbeck,B. fortificata,B. malabarica,B. racemosa,C. pulcherrima, and N. oleander (7 plant species or
4 genera). Furthermore, three dierent species of Colletotrichum have been isolated from reviewed
plants. C. gloeosporioides has been isolated from 7 plant species (3 genera), namely A. hindsii,B. racemosa,
Agriculture 2020,10, 643 19 of 31
B. aristata,C. echinata,C. ocinalis,C. stolonifera, and L. lucidum, whereas C. acutatum has been found
in Cornus spp., Hamamelis sp., and H. virginiana (3 species; 2 genera). Both Colletotrichum species
may cause severe fruit rot mainly occurring in pre- and post-harvest [
171
]. Moreover, C. truncatum,
the causal agent of anthracnose disease aecting several leguminous crops [
171
], has been collected
from 2 plant genera, namely A. hindsii and J. sambac. Furthermore, C. lunata, was isolated from the
tissues of 4 plant species (2 genera), including B. malabarica, B. racemosa, B. phoenicea, and C. sappan,
is the causal agent of seed and seedling blight in several crops, such as rice, millet, sugarcane, and rice,
and of maize leaf spot [
172
]. Besides, B. dothidea reported in association with A. karroo,Cornus sp.,
and C. ocinalis may cause cankers, dieback, fruit rot, and blue stain in woody plants, including
Acacia, Eucalyptus, Vitis, and Pistachio [
12
]. Concerning the species F. lateritium, it has been extensively
investigated as the causal agent of chlorotic leaf distortion on sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) in the
USA [
173
]. This fungus has been isolated from three dierent plant species and genera (B. aristata,
C. controversa, and L. lucidum). Moreover, the common soil-borne fungus G. candidum, found in
association with B. vahlii, C. sappan, and L. lucidum, is the causal agent of sour-rot of tomatoes and
citrus fruits, and it is also one of the most economically important post-harvest diseases of citrus [
174
].
Also, C. cladosporioides, detected in B. racemosa, C. echinata, and C. stolonifera, is the causal agent of
blossom blight in strawberries [
175
]. Other pathogenic fungi associated with these selected plants are
less widespread and some of them are subjected to containment measures in some countries. This is
the case of N. parvum, N. oryzae, L. theobromae, and D. destructiva. In particular, N. parvum, isolated as an
endophyte in three Acacia species (A. heterophylla, A. karroo, and A. koa), is one of the most aggressive
causal agent of Botryosphaeria dieback on the grapevine and it is known as an aggressive polyphagous
pathogen attacking more than 100 plant hosts [
176
]. Also, N. oryzae, reported from H. mollis, B. phoenicea,
B. racemosa, and B. fortificata, may reduce plant growth and seed quality of rice plants as well as
Brassica spp., maize, and cotton [177]. Moreover, L. theobromae, found in association with six dierent
plant species (A. karroo, A. koa, B. racemosa, C. echinata, L. lucidum, and N. oleander), is the causal agent of
dieback, root rot, and blights for a wide range of plant hosts, mainly located in tropical and subtropical
regions [
178
]. Finally, D. desctructiva, recovered from three dierent species of Cornus, is the causal
agent of the dogwood anthracnose, a devastating disease that was firstly documented in the USA and
then introduced into Europe [179].
Generally, closely related organisms, including pathogenic fungi as well as those non-pathogenic,
may share similar ecological niches and may potentially interact among themselves. Their co-occurrence
could be due to phylogenetic evolution or some unclear biological benefits gained [
180
,
181
].
The eects of this interaction may lead to a definition of spaces for development and survival.
Nevertheless, it is widely known that non-indigenous species represent one of the greatest threats
to native
biodiversity [11,2325]
. In fact, a fungal invasion into a new ecosystem may change
the native endophytic community structure, leading to the extinction of host-specialized fungi [
182
].
This antagonistic phenomenon is regulated by the production of antifungal compounds, mycoparasitism,
or competition for space and resources [
180
], as well as a synergy of these interactions [
181
]. Biological
invasions may set in motion a long-lasting cascade of eects on the plant host and associated species in
unpredictable ways. Generally, the ecological importance of native species prior to the invasion may not
be quantified because of the lack of information on fungal communities, especially for non-pathogenic
fungal species. As a consequence of global trade and climatic or environmental changes, studies about
the impact of new organisms on the ecosystem represent innovative challenges worldwide. In view of
these considerations, even if fungal pathogens found in association with investigated plants are widely
distributed in the EU [
182
190
], the risk posed by the introduction of potentially noxious species may
be very high. Thus, our results suggest the importance of monitoring imported material to avoid the
introduction of such alien species.
Agriculture 2020,10, 643 20 of 31
5. Emerging and Potential Threats Due to Commercial Trade
Several species reported in this review are Quarantine Pests (QP) or Regulated as Non-Quarantine
Pests (RNQP), as defined by containment measures within the importing country [
191
]. Among the
fungal pathogens found in Cornus species, Elsinoe fawcettii is listed as a QP in the EU, Tunisia, and Israel.
This fungus is the causal agent of Citrus scab and it is one of the most important pathogens in
many areas of citrus production [
192
]. E. fawcettii is common in South America and its presence
has been detected in other areas such as Central and South Africa, India and South-Eastern Asia,
and Australia [192].
Furthermore, the following pathogens are RNQP in the EU: F. verticilloides (isolated from
B. malabarica and A. lebbeck), C. acutatum (isolated from Cornus spp., H. virginiana, and Hamamelis sp.),
S. sclerotiorum (isolated from C. stolonifera), and V. dahliae (isolated from Cornus sp.). Outside the EU,
the following species are listed as QP: L. theobromae and P. palmivora (in Morocco), A. nidulans,
A. macrospora, C. kahawae,C. citrullina,C. herbarum,C. pallescens,A. brassicicola,F. semitectum,
F. verticillioides,N. oryzae, and P. longissima (in Mexico), P. graminis (Canada and USA), Diaporthe tersa
(in Israel), C.acutatum (in Tunisia and Israel), and C. gloeosporioides and P. capitalensis (in Egypt) [192].
Organisms that move across continents may or may not become dangerous depending on several
factors, and unexpected consequences may occur [
193
,
194
]. The current knowledge about the fungal
community associated with ornamental plants and their interaction with the environment is fragmentary.
Fungi species generally well known as pathogens, are not necessarily pathogenic when isolated as
endophytes [
6
8
]. Genetic mutation can occur in virulent pathogens, transforming the original pathogen
into a nonpathogenic strain [
9
]. Likewise, even though some endophytes are mutualistic, this does not
imply that they will not have negative impacts if introduced in a new ecosystem [
6
,
9
]. Alien pathogens
can often encounter more susceptible host plants and dierent microbial and abiotic environments
without their own ‘natural enemies’. The so-called ‘risk pathway’ defined by international protocols
tend to assume that the pathogen will attack a plant host taxonomically similar to that of the susceptibile
plant species in its native countries. However, an invasive pathogen may spread to new target hosts,
when introduced in a new ecosystem, and novel pathogen combinations can occur [
11
]. The disease
outcomes of these combinations may be extremely complex and the invasive pathogen populations
can reach explosive distribution levels that are usually dicult to eradicate once established [
23
25
].
Beyond the damage which may occur on the host plant species and local microbial communities,
biological invasions may aect entire ecosystems and the connected ecosystem processes and services,
such as soil fertility, fire control, hydrology, and recreation and tourism amenities [
23
25
]. In response
to expanding global trade, several EU regulations [
27
29
] and international protocols [
195
,
196
] are
aimed at regulating over-dissemination and accidental introduction of plant diseases. However, despite
existing laws and eorts to prevent the introduction of potential pathogens at ports of entry, many
of them will evade detection and establish alien populations [
197
,
198
]. Many pathogenic fungi may
be undetected, transported in the form of inocula as endophytes, propagules, mycelium, or spores
of vegetative material. In addition, large import volumes often permit the inspection of only a small
proportion of the introduced plants. According to the precautionary principle, all imported plant
species should be considered as a potential threat (vectors of fungi), therefore the presence and
establishment may not depend on the number of arrivals. As a consequence, even a reduced amount
of infected plants, which can easily escape phytosanitary inspections, may cause the introduction
and the spread of diseases with devastating outcomes [
199
]. The development of tools, such as new
molecular diagnosistics [
200
] and volatile compounds detection devices [
201
], that allow the rapid
and on-site identification of potentially invasive species and the screening of large volumes of plants,
clearly appears to be essential [
202
]. Despite increasing trade, targeted investment in biosecurity may
be eective to reduce pathogen introduction and limit the establishment of alien microorganisms. Thus,
we highlight the importance of surveillance due to the potential risk of accidental introductions in the
absence of eective biosecurity measures.
Agriculture 2020,10, 643 21 of 31
6. Conclusions
Globalization has led to intensified movement of people, plants, and plant products, and an increase
in the unintentional introduction of non-native fungal species into new ecosystems. Many plant
pathogens are biological opportunistic invaders causing several billion dollars in losses to crops,
pastures, and forests annually, worldwide. Consideration needs to be given to building resilience in
the new environments, from the perspective of pathogen introductions. In particular, the monitoring of
plants and plant products, plus early identification-detection of pathogen risks are key steps towards
ensuring successful regulation to exclude potential disorders caused by pathogens. This review
demonstrated the broad fungal diversity recovered from a small group of ornamental plants that have
been relatively unexplored as fungal hosts. Even if the reviewed plant genera are not recognized
as sources of significant forest diseases, that have had an ecosystemic impact on a continental scale
in the past, we highlight the risk represented by plants as inoculum sources of potentially harmful
organisms. Overall, many other species not listed by the EU have represented or may cause important
impact in many ecosystemic, environmental, and ecological issues. Our literature search revealed that
fungal species may also be introduced through a few hundred plants and invade new ecosystems.
In this context, it is important to underline that the amount of imported plant material may not be
related to a specific risk, but needs to be considered and evaluated to estimate the negative impacts on
agriculture, forestry, and public health, associated with non-indigenous species in European ecosystems.
For example, little is known about the eects of invasive species on ecosystem services, although some
historic pest invasions (e.g., chestnut blight from North America to Europe) have destroyed host tree
species in their locations. The true challenge lies in preventing further damage to natural and managed
ecosystems. For this reason, preventative policies need to take into account the means through which
pathogens gain access to the EU. The accidental introduction of potentially harmful pathogens also links
to other issues of major policy concern (i.e., biotechnology, human health, climate change, etc.) that
should be addressed through improved international cooperation and a holistic approach. We should
expect that some strategies should be continued or further established to prevent or monitor future
introductions, especially at airports, seaports, and other ports of entry, to reduce risks to an acceptable
level and preserve natural and agricultural ecosystems.
Author Contributions:
Conceptualization, L.G., G.d., F.V. and S.L.W.; literature investigation L.G., G.d., M.S. and
M.R.; writing—original draft preparation, L.G. and G.d.; writing—review and editing, project administration, F.V.
and S.L.W.; funding acquisition, F.V. and S.L.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of
the manuscript.
Funding:
This research was funded by the following projects: MIURPON (Grant number Linfa 03PE_00026_1;
Grant number Marea 03PE_00106); POR FESR CAMPANIA 2014/2020-O.S. 1.1 (Grant number Bioagro 559);
MISE CRESO (Grant number Protection n. F/050421/01-03/X32); PSR Veneto 16.1.1 (Grant number Divine n.
3589659); PSR Campania 2014/2020 Misura 16-Tipologia di intervento 16.1–Azione 2 ‘Sostegno ai Progetti Operativi
di Innovazione (POI)’—Progetto ‘DI.O.N.IS.O.’, C.U.P. B98H19005010009; European Union Horizon 2020 Research
and Innovation Program, ECOSTACK (Grant agreement no. 773554); PRIN 2017 (Grant number PROSPECT
2017JLN833).
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1.
Andrews, J.H.; Hirano, S.S. Microbial Ecology of Leaves; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; New York, NY,
USA, 1991; pp. 467–479.
2.
Ragozzino, A.; d’Errico, G. Interactions between nematodes and fungi: A concise review. Redia
2011
,94,
123–125.
3.
d’Errico, G.; Mormile, P.; Malinconico, M.; Bolletti Censi, S.; Lanzuise, S.; Crasto, A.; Woo, S.L.; Marra, R.;
Lorito, M.; Vinale, F. Trichoderma spp. and a carob (Ceratonia siliqua) galactomannan to control the root-knot
nematode Meloidogyne incognita on tomato plants. Can. J. Plant. Pathol. 2020, 1–8. [CrossRef]
Agriculture 2020,10, 643 22 of 31
4.
Vinale, F.; Nicoletti, R.; Lacatena, F.; Marra, R.; Sacco, A.; Lombardi, N.; d’Errico, G.; Digilio, M.C.; Lorito, M.;
Woo, S.L. Secondary metabolites from the endophytic fungus Talaromyces pinophilus.Nat. Prod. Res.
2017
,31,
1778–1785. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5.
d’Errico, G.; Aloj, V.; Flematti, G.R.; Sivasithamparam, K.; Worth, C.M.; Lombardi, N.; Ritini, A.; Marra, R.;
Lorito, M.; Vinale, F. Metabolites of a Drechslera sp. endophyte with potential as biocontrol and bioremediation
agent. Nat. Prod. Res. 2020, 1–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6.
Stone, J.K.; Bacon, C.W.; White, J.F. An overview of endophytic microbes: Endophytism defined.
Microb. Endophytes. 2000,3, 29–33.
7.
Wilson, D. Fungal endophytes which invade insect galls: Insect pathogens, benign saprophytes, or fungal
inquilines? Oecologia 1995,103, 255–260. [CrossRef]
8.
Petrini, O. Fungal endophytes of tree leaves. In Microbial Ecology of Leaves; Andrews, J.H., Hirano, S.S., Eds.;
Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1991; pp. 179–197.
9.
Osono, T. Role of phyllosphere fungi of forest trees in the development of decomposer fungal communities
and decomposition processes of leaf litter. Can. J. Microbiol. 2006,52, 701–716. [CrossRef]
10.
Redman, R.S.; Dunigan, D.D.; Rodriguez, R.J. Fungal symbiosis from mutualism to parasitism: Who controls
the outcome, host or invader? New Phytol. 2001,151, 705–716. [CrossRef]
11.
Dunn, A.M.; Hatcher, M.J. Parasites and biological invasions: Parallels, interactions, and control. Trends Parasit.
2015,31, 189–199. [CrossRef]
12.
Marsberg, A.; Kemler, M.; Jami, F.; Nagel, J.H.; Postma-Smidt, A.; Naidoo, S.; Wingfield, M.J.; Crous, P.W.;
Spatafora, J.W.; Hesse, C.N.; et al. Botryosphaeria dothidea: A latent pathogen of global importance to woody
plant health. Mol. Plant. Pathol. 2017,18, 477–488. [CrossRef]
13.
Slippers, B.; Smit, W.A.; Crous, P.W.; Coutinho, T.A.; Wingfield, B.D.; Wingfield, M.J. Taxonomy, phylogeny
and identification of Botryosphaeriaceae associated with pome and stone fruit trees in South Africa and
other regions of the world. Plant. Pathol. 2007,56, 128–139. [CrossRef]
14.
Facon, B.; Genton, B.J.; Shyko, J.; Jarne, P.; Estoup, A.; David, P. A general eco-evolutionary framework for
understanding bioinvasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2006,21, 130–135. [CrossRef]
15. Saul, W.C.; Jeschke, J.; Heger, T. The role of eco-evolutionary experience in invasion success. NeoBiota 2013,
17, 57. [CrossRef]
16.
Pautasso, M.; Schlegel, M.; Holdenrieder, O. Forest health in a changing world. Microb. Ecol.
2015
,69,
826–842. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17.
Grünwald, N.J. Genome sequences of Phytophthora enable translational plant disease management and
accelerate research. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2012,34, 13–19. [CrossRef]
18.
Cleary, M.; Nguyen, D.; Marˇciulynien
˙
e, D.; Berlin, A.; Vasaitis, R.; Stenlid, J. Friend or foe? Biological and
ecological traits of the European ash dieback pathogen Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in its native environment.
Sci. Rep. 2016,6, 21895. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
19.
Dickie, I.A.; Bolstridge, N.; Cooper, J.A.; Peltzer, D.A. Co-invasion by Pinus and its mycorrhizal fungi.
New Phytol. 2010,187, 475–484. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
20.
McNeely, J.A. An introduction of human dimensions of invasive alien species. In The Great Reshuing:
Human Dimensions of Invasive Alien Species; McNeely, J.A., Ed.; IUCN: Cambridge, UK, 2001; pp. 5–20.
21.
Hejda, M.; Pyšek, P.; Jaroš
í
k, V. Impact of invasive plants on the species richness, diversity and composition
of invaded communities. J. Ecol. 2009,97, 393–403. [CrossRef]
22.
Olden, J.D.; Rooney, T.P. On defining and quantifying biotic homogenization. Glob. Ecol. Biogeog.
2006
,15,
113–120. [CrossRef]
23.
Ehrenfeld, J.G. Ecosystem consequences of biological invasions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst.
2010
,41, 59–80.
[CrossRef]
24.
Vil
à
, M.; Espinar, J.L.; Hejda, M.; Hulme, P.E.; Jaroš
í
k, V.; Maron, J.L.; Pyšek, P. Ecological impacts of invasive
alien plants: A meta-analysis of their eects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol. Lett.
2011
,14,
702–708. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25.
Lazzaro, L.; Mazza, G.; d’Errico, G.; Fabiani, A.; Giuliani, C.; Inghilesi, A.F.; Lagomarsino, A.; Landi, S.;
Lastrucci, L.; Pastorelli, R.; et al. How ecosystems change following invasion by Robinia pseudoacacia: Insights
from soil chemical properties and soil microbial, nematode, microarthropod and plant communities. Sci. Total
Environ. 2018,622, 1509–1518. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Agriculture 2020,10, 643 23 of 31
26.
Jeger, M.; Schans, J.; Lövei, G.L.; van Lenteren, J.; Navajas, M.; Makowski, D.B.; Ceglarska, E. Risk assessment
in support of plant health. Efsa J. 2012,10, s1012. [CrossRef]
27. European Union. Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament of the Council of 26 October 2016
on protective measures against pests of plants, amending Regulations (EU) No 228/2013,(EU) No 652/2014
and (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives
69/464/EEC, 74/647/EEC, 93/85/EEC, 98/57/EC, 2000/29/EC, 2006/91/EC and 2007/33/EC. O. J. Eur. Union
2016,317, 4–104.
28.
European Union. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 of 18 December 2018 establishing
a provisional list of high risk plants, plant products or other objects, within the meaning of Article 42 of
Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 and a list of plants for which phytosanitary certificates are not required for
introduction into the Union, within the meaning of Article 73 of that Regulation. O. J. Eur. Union
2018
,323,
10–15.
29.
Directive, C. Council Directive 2000/29/EC of 8 May 2000 on protective measures against the introduction
into the Community of organisms harmful to plants or plant products and against their spread within the
Community (Annex II). O. J. Eur. Union. 2000,169, 60.
30.
European Food Safety Authority, (EFSA); Dehnen-Schmutz, K.; Jaques Miret, J.A.; Jeger, M.; Potting, R.;
Corini, A.; Simone, G.; Kozelska, S.; Munoz Guajardo, I.; Stancanelli, G.; et al. Information required for
dossiers to support demands for import of high risk plants, plant products and other objects as foreseen in
Article 42 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031. EFSA Support Publ 2018,15, 1492E. [CrossRef]
31.
European Food Safety Authority, (EFSA); Panel on Plant Health (PLH); Bragard, C.; Dehnen-Schmutz, K.;
Di Serio, F.; Gonthier, P.; Jacques, M.A.; Miret, J.A.J.; Justesen, A.F.; MacLeod., A.; et al. Guidance on
commodity risk assessment for the evaluation of high risk plants dossiers. Efsa J
2019
,17, e05668. [CrossRef]
32.
Lorenzo, P.; Gonz
á
lez, L.; Reigosa, M.J. The genus Acacia as invader: The characteristic case of Acacia dealbata
Link in Europe. Ann. For. Sci. 2010,67, 101. [CrossRef]
33.
Ratnayake, K.; Joyce, D. Native Australian acacias: Unrealised ornamental potential. Chron. Horticult.
2010
,
50, 19–22.
34.
Suryanarayanan, T.S.; Devarajan, P.T.; Girivasan, K.P.; Govindarajulu, M.B.; Kumaresan, V.; Murali, T.S.;
Venkatesan, G. The host range of multi-host endophytic fungi. Curr. Sci. 2018,115, 1963–1969. [CrossRef]
35.
Kaur, T.; Kaur, J.; Kaur, A.; Kaur, S. Larvicidal and growth inhibitory eects of endophytic Aspergillus niger
on a polyphagous pest, Spodoptera litura.Phytoparasitica 2016,44, 465–476. [CrossRef]
36.
Jiang, M.; Cao, L.; Zhang, R. Eects of Acacia (Acacia auriculaeformis A. Cunn) associated fungi on mustard
(Brassica juncea (L.) Coss. var. foliosa Bailey) growth in Cd- and Ni-contaminated soils. Lett. Appl. Microbiol.
2008,47, 561–565. [CrossRef]
37.
Tran, H.B.Q.; Mcrae, J.M.; Lynch, F.; Palombo, E.A. Identification and bioactive properties of endophytic
fungi isolated from phyllodes of Acacia species. In Current Research, Technology and Education Topics in Applied
Microbiology and Microbial Biotechnology; M
é
ndez-Vilas, A., Ed.; Formatex: Badajoz, Spain, 2010; Volume 1,
pp. 377–382.
38.
Li, H.Y.; Li, D.W.; He, C.M.; Zhou, Z.P.; Mei, T.; Xu, H.M. Diversity and heavy metal tolerance of endophytic
fungi from six dominant plant species in a Pb-Zn mine wasteland in China. Fungal Ecol.
2012
,5, 309–315.
[CrossRef]
39.
Jami, F.; Marincowitz, S.; Slippers, B.; Crous, P.W.; Le Roux, J.J.; Richardson, D.M.; Wingfield, M.J.
Botryosphaeriaceae associated with Acacia heterophylla (La R
é
union) and Acacia koa (Hawaii). Fungal Biol.
2019,123, 783–790. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
40.
Gonz
á
lez-Teuber, M.; Jim
é
nez-Alem
á
n, G.H.; Boland, W. Foliar endophytic fungi as potential protectors
from pathogens in myrmecophytic Acacia plants. Commun. Integr. Biol. 2014,7, 3–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
41.
Jami, F.; Slippers, B.; Wingfield, M.J.; Loots, M.T.; Gryzenhout, M. Temporal and spatial variation of
Botryosphaeriaceae associated with Acacia karroo in South Africa. Fungal Ecol. 2015,15, 51–62. [CrossRef]
42.
Jami, F.; Slippers, B.; Wingfield, M.J.; Gryzenhout, M. Greater Botryosphaeriaceae diversity in healthy than
associated diseased Acacia karroo tree tissues. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2013,42, 421–430. [CrossRef]
43.
El-Sayed, A.S.A.; Moustafa, A.H.; Hussein, H.A.; El-Sheikh, A.A.; El-Shafey, S.N.; Fathy, N.A.M.; Enan, G.A.
Potential insecticidal activity of Sarocladium strictum, an endophyte of Cynanchum acutum, against Spodoptera
littoralis, a polyphagous insect pest. Biocat. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020,24, 101524. [CrossRef]
Agriculture 2020,10, 643 24 of 31
44.
McCabe, E.S. Endophytic Symbionts of Acacia Victoriae: Diversity and Potential for Antibiotic Production.
Ph.D. Thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA, 2019.
45.
Kokila, K.; Priyadharshini, S.D.; Sujatha, V. Phytopharmacological properties of Albizia species: A review.
Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2013,5, 70–73.
46.
CABI. Available online: https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/4008#005AE80D-6260-41E0-A2DA-0B4BD78D53
83 (accessed on 20 October 2020).
47.
Wulandari, R.S.; Suryantini, R. Growth of Albizia in Vitro: Endophytic Fungi as Plant Growth Promote of
Albizia. Int. Sch. Sci. Res. Inn. 2018,12, 8.
48.
Ali, B.Z.; Alfayed, A.A. Endophytic Fungi from Leaves and Twigs of Albizia lebbeck and Their Antifungal
Activity. Ibn AL Haitham J. For. Pure Appl. Sci. 2017,27, 24–33.
49. Gill, D.L. Fusarium wilt infection of apparently healthy mimosa tree. Plant. Dis. Rep. 1967,35, 111–128.
50.
Sharma, N.; Kushwaha, M.; Arora, D.; Jain, S.; Singamaneni, V.; Sharma, S.; Shankar, R.; Bhushan, S.; Gupta, P.;
Jaglan, S. New cytochalasin from Rosellinia sanctae-cruciana, an endophytic fungus of Albizia lebbeck.J. Appl.
Microb. 2018,125, 111–120. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
51.
da Silva, K.L.; Biavatti, M.W.; Leite, S.N.; Yunes, R.A.; Delle Monache, F.; Cechinel Filho, V. Phytochemical
and pharmacognostic investigation of Bauhinia forficata Link (Leguminosae). Z. Naturforsch. C.
2000
,55,
478–480. [CrossRef]
52.
Silva, K.L.D.; Cechinel Filho, V. Plantas do g
ê
nero Bauhinia: Composiç
ã
o qu
í
mica e potencial farmacol
ó
gico.
Quím. Nova 2002,25, 449–454. [CrossRef]
53.
Bezerra, J.D.P.; da Silva, L.F.; de Souza-Motta, C.M. The Explosion of Brazilian Endophytic Fungal
Diversity: Taxonomy and Biotechnological Potentials. In Advancing Frontiers in Mycology & Mycotechnology;
Satyanarayana, T., Deshmukh, S., Deshpande, M., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2019. [CrossRef]
54.
Hilarino, M.P.A.; de Silveira, F.A.O.; Oki, Y.; Rodrigues, L.; Santos, J.C.; Corr
ê
a, A.; Fernandes, G.W.;
Rosa, C.A. Distribuiç
ã
o da comunidade de fungos endofiticos em folhas de Bauhinia brevipes (Fabaceae).
Acta Bot. Bras. 2011,25, 815–821. [CrossRef]
55.
Bezerra, J.D.; Nascimento, C.C.; Barbosa, R.D.N.; da Silva, D.C.; Svedese, V.M.; Silva-Nogueira, E.B.;
Gomes, B.S.; Paiva, L.M.; Souza-Motta, C.M. Endophytic fungi from medicinal plant Bauhinia forficata:
Diversity and biotechnological potential. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2015,46, 49–57. [CrossRef]
56.
Kannan, K.P.; Madhan Kumar, D.; Ramya, P.R.; Madhu Nika, S.; Meenatchi, G.; Sowmya, A.N.;
Bhuvaneswari, S. Diversity of endophytic fungi from salt tolerant plants. Int. J. ChemTech Res.
2014
,
6, 4084–4088.
57.
Murali, T.S.; Suryanarayanan, T.S.; Venkatesan, G. Fungal endophyte communities in two tropical forests of
southern India: Diversity and host aliation. Mycol. Progs. 2007,6, 191–199. [CrossRef]
58.
Araujo-Melo, R.; Souza, I.; Oliveira, C.; Ara
ú
jo, J.; Sena, K.; Coelho, L. Isolation and Identification of
Endophyte Microorganisms from Bauhinia monandra Leaves, Mainly Actinobacteria.Biotechnol. J. Int.
2017
,17,
1–12. [CrossRef]
59.
de Feitosa, A.O.; Dias, A.C.S.; da Ramos, G.C.; Bitencourt, H.R.; Siqueira, J.E.S.; Marinho, P.S.B.; Barison, A.;
Ocampos, F.M.M.; do Marinho, A.M.R. Letalidad de citocalasina B y otros compuestos aislados del hongo
Aspergillus spp. (Trichocomaceae) end
ó
fito de Bauhinia guianensis (Fabaceae). Rev. Argent. Microbiol.
2016
,48,
259–263. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
60.
Pinheiro, E.A.A.; Carvalho, J.M.; Dos Santos, D.C.P.; Feitosa, A.O.; Marinho, P.S.B.; Guilhon, G.M.S.P.;
Santos, L.S.; De Souza, A.L.D.; Marinho, A.M.R. Chemical constituents of Aspergillus sp EJC08 isolated as
endophyte from Bauhinia guianensis and their antimicrobial activity. An. Acad. Bras. Cien.
2013
,85, 1247–1252.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
61.
Bagchi, B. A relative study of endophytic fungi during winter and monsoon in Bauhinia vahlii from chilkigarh.
J. Glob. Biosci. 2019,8, 6257–6265.
62.
Pinheiro, E.A.A.; Pina, J.R.S.; Feitosa, A.O.; Carvalho, J.M.; Borges, F.C.; Marinho, P.S.B.; Marinho, A.M.R.
Bioprospecting of antimicrobial activity of extracts of endophytic fungi from Bauhinia guianensis.Rev. Argent.
Microbiol. 2017,49, 3–6. [CrossRef]
63.
Suryanarayanan, T.S.; Murali, T.S.; Venkatesan, G. Occurrence and distribution of fungal endophytes in
tropical forests across a rainfall gradient. Can. J. Bot. 2002,80, 818–826. [CrossRef]
64.
Ravijara, N.S. Fungal endophytes in five medicinal plant species from Kudremukh Range, Western Ghats of
India. J. Basic Microbiol. 2005,45, 230–235.
Agriculture 2020,10, 643 25 of 31
65.
Kandasamy, P.; Manogaran, S.; Dhakshinamoorthy, M.; Kannan, K.P. Evaluation of antioxidant and
antibacterial activities of endophytic fungi isolated from Bauhinia racemosa Lam. and Phyllanthus amarus
Schum. and Thonn. J. Chem. Pharm. 2015,7, 366–379.
66.
Pinheiro, E.A.A.; Borges, F.C.; Pina, J.R.S.; Ferreira, L.R.S.; Cordeiro, J.S.; Carvalho, J.M.; Feitosa, A.O.;
Campos, F.R.; Barison, A.; Souza, A.D.L.; et al. Annularins I and J: New metabolites isolated from endophytic
fungus Exserohilum rostratum.J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2016,27, 1432–1436. [CrossRef]
67.
Kim, Y.D.; Kim, S.H.; Landrum, L.R. Taxonomic and phytogeographic implications from ITS phylogeny in
Berberis (Berberidaceae). J. Plant Res. 2004,117, 175–182. [CrossRef]
68.
Sharma, S.; Gupta, S.; Dhar, M.K.; Kaul, S. Diversity and Bioactive Potential of Culturable Fungal Endophytes
of Medicinal Shrub Berberis aristata DC: A First Report. Mycobiology
2018
,46, 370–381. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
69.
Mokhber-Dezfuli, N.; Saeidnia, S.; Gohari, A.R.; Kurepaz-Mahmoodabadi, M. Phytochemistry and
pharmacology of Berberis species. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2014,8, 8. [PubMed]
70.
Sun, J.; Guo, L.; Zang, W.; Ping, W.; Chi, D. Diversity and ecological distribution of endophytic fungi
associated with medicinal plants. Sci. China Life Sci. 2008,51, 751–759. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
71.
Sati, S.C.; Belwal, M.; Pargaein, N. Diversity of water borne conidial fungi as root endophytes in temperate
forest plants of western Himalaya. Nat. Sci. 2008,6, 59–65.
72.
Erick, T.K.; Kiplimo, J.; Matasyoh, J. Two New Aliphatic Alkenol Geometric Isomers and a Phenolic Derivate
from Endophytic Fungus Diaporthe sp. Host to Syzygium cordatum (Myrtaceae). Sci. Lett. 2019,7, 108–118.
73.
Yang, R.; Chen, G.; Chen, R. Screening and identification of endophytic fungi with antifungal activities on
pathogenic fungi from Berberis thunbergii cv. atropurpurea. Acta Bot. Boreali Occident. Sin. 2013,33, 401–406.
74.
Wang, M.N.; Wan, A.M.; Chen, X.M. Barberry as alternate host is important for Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici
but not for Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici in the US Pacific Northwest. Plant. Dis. 2015,99, 1507–1516.
75.
Zanin, J.L.B.; De Carvalho, B.A.; Salles Martineli, P.; Dos Santos, M.H.; Lago, J.H.G.; Sartorelli, P.; Viegas, C.;
Soares, M.G. The genus Caesalpinia L. (Caesalpiniaceae): Phytochemical and pharmacological characteristics.
Molecules 2012,17, 7887–7902. [CrossRef]
76.
Uma Maheswari, N.; Saranya, P. Isolation and identification and phytochemical screening of endophytes
from medicinal plants. Int. J. Biol. Res. 2018,3, 16–24.
77.
Campos, F.F.; Sales Junior, P.A.; Romanha, A.J.; Ara
ú
jo, M.S.; Siqueira, E.P.; Resende, J.M.; Zani, C.L. Bioactive
endophytic fungi isolated from Caesalpinia echinata Lam.(Brazilwood) and identification of beauvericin as a
trypanocidal metabolite from Fusarium sp. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 2015,110, 65–74. [CrossRef]
78.
Hafsan, H.; Sukmawaty, S.; Masri, M.; Aziz, I.R.; Wulandari, S.L. Antioxidant Activities of Ethyl Acetic
Extract of Endophytic Fungi from Caesalpinia sappan L. and Eucheuma sp. Int. J. Pharm. Res. 2018,11, 1–6.
79.
de Lima, T.E.F.; Cavalcanti, M.D.S. Endophytes and phylloplane fungi of Caesalpinia echinata Lam. of estaç
ã
o
ecológica de Tapacurá, PE. Agrotrópica 2014,26, 43–50. [CrossRef]
80.
Cota, B.B.; Tunes, L.G.; Maia, D.N.B.; Ramos, J.P.; de Oliveira, D.M.; Kohlho, M.; Alves, T.M.A.;
Souza-Fagundes, E.M.; Campos, F.F.; Zani, C.L. Leishmanicidal compounds of Nectria pseudotrichia,
an endophytic fungus isolated from the plant Caesalpinia echinata (Brazilwood). Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz.
2018,113, 102–110. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
81.
De Souza, J.T.; Trocoli, R.O.; Monteiro, F.P. Plants from the Caatinga biome harbor endophytic Trichoderma
species active in the biocontrol of pineapple fusariosis. Biol. Control 2016,94, 25–32. [CrossRef]
82.
Ali, M.S.; Azhar, I.; Amtul, Z.; Ahmad, V.U.; Usmanghani, K. Antimicrobial screening of some Caesalpiniaceae.
Fitoterapia 1999,70, 299–304. [CrossRef]
83.
Singh, S.; Singh, S.K.; Yadav, A. A review on Cassia species: Pharmacological, traditional and medicinal
aspects in various countries. Am. J. Phytomedicine Clin. Ther. 2013,1, 291–312.
84.
Parsons, W.T.; Cuthbertson, E.G. Noxious Weeds of Australia, 2nd ed.; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial
Research Organisation (CSIRO): Canberra, Australia, 2001.
85.
Jang, D.S.; Lee, G.Y.; Kim, Y.S.; Lee, Y.M.; Kim, C.S.; Yoo, J.L.; Kim, J.S. Anthraquinones from the seeds of
Cassia tora with inhibitory activity on protein glycation and aldose reductase. Biol. Pharm. Bull.
2007
,30,
2207–2210. [CrossRef]
86.
Hatano, T.; Uebayashi, H.; Ito, H.; Shiota, S.; Tsuchiya, T.; Yoshida, T. Phenolic constituents of Cassia seeds
and antibacterial eect of some naphthalenes and anthraquinones on methicillin-resistent Staphylococcus
aureus.Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1999,47, 1121–1127. [CrossRef]
Agriculture 2020,10, 643 26 of 31
87.
Ibrahim, D.; Nurhaida, L.S.H. Anti-candidal activity of Aspergillus flavus IBRL-C8, an endophytic fungus
isolated from Cassia siamea Lamk leaf. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2018,8, 083–087.
88.
Pundir, R.K.; Yadav, D.; Jain, P. Production, optimization and partial purification of l-asparaginase from
endophytic fungus Aspergillus sp., isolated from Cassia fistula.Appl. Biol. Res 2020,22, 26–33. [CrossRef]
89.
Ruchikachorn, N. Endophytic Fungi of Cassia Fistula L. Ph.D. Thesis, Liverpool John Moores University,
Liverpool, UK, 2005.
90.
Nigg, J.; Strobel, G.; Knighton, W.B.; Hilmer, J.; Geary, B.; Riyaz-Ul-Hassan, S.; Harper, J.K.; Valenti, D.;
Wang, Y. Functionalized para-substituted benzenes as 1, 8-cineole production modulators in an endophytic
Nodulisporium species. Microbiology 2014,160, 1772–1782. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
91.
Tapwal, A.; Pandey, P.; Chandra, S. Antimicrobial activity and phytochemical screening of endophytic fungi
associated with Cassia fistula.Int. J. Chem. Biol. Sci. 2015,2, 15–21.
92.
Kuriakose, G.C.; Lakshmanan, D.M.; Arathi, B.P.; Kuriakose, G.C.; Kumar, R.S.; Anantha Krishna, A.;
Ananthaswamy, K.; Jayabhaskaran, C. Extract of Penicillium sclerotiorum an endophytic fungus isolated from
Cassia fistula L. induces cell cycle arrest leading to apoptosis through mitochondrial membrane depolarization
in human cervical cancer cells. Biomed. Pharm. 2018,105, 1062–1071. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
93.
Call, A.; Sun, Y.X.; Yu, Y.; Pearman, P.B.; Thomas, D.T.; Trigiano, R.N.; Carbone, I.; Xiang, Q.-Y. Genetic structure
and post-glacial expansion of Cornus florida L. (Cornaceae): Integrative evidence from phylogeography,
population demographic history, and species distribution modeling. J. Syst. Evol.
2016
,54, 136–151.
[CrossRef]
94.
Huang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Dong, L.; Gao, Q.; Yin, L.; Quan, H.; Chen, R.; Gu, X.; Lin, D. Ethnopharmacology,
phytochemistry, and pharmacology of Cornus ocinalis Sieb. et Zucc. J. Ethnopharmacol.
2018
,213, 280–301.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
95.
Miller, S.; Masuya, H.; Zhang, J.; Walsh, E.; Zhang, N. Real-Time PCR detection of dogwood anthracnose
fungus in historical herbarium specimens from Asia. PLoS ONE 2016,11, e0154030. [CrossRef]
96.
Osono, T. Endophytic and epiphytic phyllosphere fungi of red-osier dogwood (Cornus stolonifera) in British
Columbia. Mycoscience 2007,48, 47–52. [CrossRef]
97.
Zhao, X.; Hu, Z.; Hou, D.; Xu, H.; Song, P. Biodiversity and antifungal potential of endophytic fungi from the
medicinal plant Cornus ocinalis.Symbiosis 2020,81, 223–233. [CrossRef]
98.
Andr
é
s, M.F.; Diaz, C.E.; Gim
é
nez, C.; Cabrera, R.; Gonz
á
lez-Coloma, A. Endophytic fungi as novel sources of
biopesticides: The Macaronesian Laurel forest, a case study. Phytochem. Rev.
2017
,16, 1009–1022. [CrossRef]
99.
Redlin, S.C.; Rossman, A.Y. Cryptodiaporthe corni (Diaporthales), cause of Cryptodiaporthe canker of
pagoda dogwood. Mycologia 1991,83, 200–209. [CrossRef]
100.
Beier, G.L.; Hokanson, S.C.; Bates, S.T.; Blanchette, R.A. Aurantioporthe corni gen. et comb. nov., an endophyte
and pathogen of Cornus alternifolia.Mycologia 2015,107, 66–79. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
101.
Redlin, S.C. Discula destructiva sp. nov., cause of dogwood anthracnose. Mycologia
1991
,83, 633–642.
[CrossRef]
102.
Stinzing, A.; Lang, K.J. Dogwood anthracnose. First detection of Discula destructiva on Cornus florida in Germany.
Nachr. Des. Dtsch. Pflanzenschutzd. 2003,55, 1–5.
103.
Tantardini, A.; Calvi, M.; Cavagna, B.; Zhang, N.; Geiser, D. First report in Italy of dogwood anthracnose on
Cornus florida and C. nuttallii caused by Discula destructiva [Lombardy]. Inf. Fitopatol. 2004,54, 44–47.
104.
Yun, H.Y.; Lee, Y.W.; Kim, Y.H. Stem canker of giant dogwood (Cornus controversa) caused by Fusarium lateritium
in Korea. Plant. Dis. 2013,97, 1378. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
105.
Maheshwari, A.; Mmbaga, M.; Quick, Q. Nigrospora sphaerica products from the flowering dogwood exhibit
antitumorigenic eects via the translational regulator, pS6 ribosomal protein. Proc. Anticancer. Res.
2018
,2,
8–15. [CrossRef]
106.
Hagan, A.; Mullen, J. Controlling Powdery Mildew on Ornamentals, Alabama Coop. Ext. Sys. Circular ANR-407;
Auburn University: Auburn, AL, USA, 1995.
107.
Erdelmeier, C.A.J.; Cinatl, J.; Rabenau, H.; Doerr, H.W.; Biber, A.; Koch, E. Antiviral and antiphlogistic
activities of Hamamelis virginiana bark. Planta Med. 1996,62, 241–245. [CrossRef]
108.
Gloor, M.; Reichling, J.; Wasik, B.; Holzgang, H.E. Antiseptic eect of a topical dermatological formulation
that contains Hamamelis distillate and urea. J. Complement. Med. Res. 2002,9, 153–159. [CrossRef]
Agriculture 2020,10, 643 27 of 31
109.
Marcelino, J.A.P.; Gouli, S.; Parker, B.L.; Skinner, M.; Giordano, R. Entomopathogenic activity of a variety of
the fungus, Colletotrichum acutatum, recovered from the elongate hemlock scale, Fiorinia externa.J. Insect Sci.
2009,9, 1–11. [CrossRef]
110.
Wang, M.; Liu, F.; Crous, P.W.; Cai, L. Phylogenetic reassessment of Nigrospora: Ubiquitous endophytes,
plant and human pathogens. Persoonia 2017,39, 118. [CrossRef]
111.
Chen, C.; Verkley, G.J.M.; Sun, G.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Crous, P.W. Redefining common endophytes and plant
pathogens in Neofabraea,Pezicula, and related genera. Fungal Biol.
2016
,120, 1291–1322. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
112.
Abeln, E.C.A.; De Pagter, M.A.; Verkley, G.J.M. Phylogeny of Pezicula,Dermea and Neofabraea inferred from
partial sequences of the nuclear ribosomal RNA gene cluster. Mycologia 2000,92, 685–693. [CrossRef]
113.
Zhou, N.; Chen, Q.; Carroll, G.; Zhang, N.; Shivas, R.G.; Cai, L. Polyphasic characterization of four new plant
pathogenic Phyllosticta species from China, Japan, and the United States. Fungal Biol.
2015
,119, 433–446.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
114.
Wu, S.P.; Liu, Y.X.; Yuan, J.; Wang, Y.; Hyde, K.D.; Liu, Z.Y. Phyllosticta species from banana (Musa sp.) in
Chongqing and Guizhou Provinces, China. Phytotaxa 2014,188, 135–144. [CrossRef]
115.
Mahasneh, A.M.; Al-Hussaini, R. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of ethanol extract of dierent parts of
medicinal plants in Jordan. Jordan J. Pharm. Sci. 2011,108, 1–26.
116.
Abdoul-Latif, F.; Edou, P.; Mohamed, N.; Ali, A.; Djama, S.; Obame, L.C.; Bassol
é
, I.; Dicko, M. Antimicrobial
and antioxidant activities of essential oil and methanol extract of Jasminum sambac from Djibouti. Afr. J.
Plant Scie 2010,4, 038–043.
117.
Rambabu, B.; Patnaik, K.S.K. Anti diabetic and anti ulcer activity of ethanolic flower extract of Jasminum
sambac in rats. Asian J. Res. Chem. 2014,7, 580–585.
118.
Zhao, G.; Yin, Z.; Dong, J. Antiviral ecacy against hepatitis B virus replication of oleuropein isolated from
Jasminum ocinale L. var. grandiflorum. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2009,125, 265–268. [CrossRef]
119.
Rahman, M.A.; Hasan, M.S.; Hossain, M.A.; Biswas, N.N. Analgesic and cytotoxic activities of Jasminum
sambac (L.) Aiton. Pharmacologyonline 2011,1, 124–131.
120.
Agarwal, G.P.; Sahni, V.P. Fungi causing plant diseases at Jabalpur (MP) XI. Mycopathol. Mycol. Appl.
1965
,
27, 136–144. [CrossRef]
121.
Wikee, S.; Cai, L.; Pairin, N.; McKenzie, E.H.; Su, Y.Y.; Chukeatirote, E.; Thi, H.N.; Moslem, M.A.;
Abdelsalam, K.; Hyde, K.D. Colletotrichum species from Jasmine (Jasminum sambac). Fungal Divers.
2011
,46,
171–182. [CrossRef]
122.
Starr, F.; Starr, K.; Loope, L. Ligustrum spp.: Privet, Oleaceae. Maui: United States Geological
Survey-Biological Resources Division, Haleakala Field Station. 2003. Available online: http://www.
hear.org/pier/pdf/pohreports/ligustrum_spp.pdf (accessed on 15 October 2020).
123.
Fernandez, R.D.; Ceballos, S.J.; Arag
ó
n, R.; Malizia, A.; Montti, L.; Whitworth-Hulse, J.I.; Castro-Diez, P.;
Grau, H.R. A Global Review of Ligustrum Lucidum (Oleaceae) Invasion. Bot. Rev.
2020
,86, 93–118. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
124.
Che, C.T.; Wong, M.S. Ligustrum lucidum and its constituents: A mini-review on the anti-osteoporosis
potential. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2015,10. [CrossRef]
125.
Kim, Y.S.; Lee, S.J.; Hwang, J.W.; Kim, E.H.; Park, P.J.; Jeong, J.H. Anti-inflammatory eects of extracts from
Ligustrum ovalifolium H. leaves on RAW264. 7 macrophages. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr.
2012
,41, 1205–1210.
[CrossRef]
126.
Novas, M.V.; Carmar
á
n, C.C. Studies on diversity of foliar fungal endophytes of naturalised trees from
Argentina, with a description of Haplotrichum minutissimum sp. nov. Flora: Morphol. Distrib. Funct. Ecol.
Plants 2008,203, 610–616. [CrossRef]
127.
De errasti, A.; Carmar
á
n, C.C.; Novas, M.V. Diversity and significance of fungal endophytes from living
stems of naturalized trees from Argentina. Fungal Divers. 2010,41, 29–40. [CrossRef]
128.
Liu, C.; Liu, T.; Yuan, F.; Gu, Y. Isolating endophytic fungi from evergreen plants and determining their
antifungal activities. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2010,4, 2243–2248.
129.
Okane, I.; Lumyong, S.; Nakagiri, A.; Ito, T. Extensive host range of an endophytic fungus, Guignardia
endophyllicola (anamorph: Phyllosticta capitalensis). Mycoscience 2003,44, 353–363. [CrossRef]
130.
De Errasti, A.; Novas, M.V.; Carmar
á
n, C.C. Plant-fungal association in trees: Insights into changes in
ecological strategies of Peroneutypa scoparia (Diatrypaceae). Flora 2014,209, 704–710. [CrossRef]
Agriculture 2020,10, 643 28 of 31
131.
Xu, F.; Cao, H.; Cui, X.; Guo, H.; Han, C. Optimization of Fermentation Condition for Echinacoside Yield
Improvement with Penicillium sp. H1, an Endophytic Fungus Isolated from Ligustrum lucidum Ait Using
Response Surface Methodology. Molecules 2018,23, 2586. [CrossRef]
132.
Reddy, M.S.; Murali, T.S.; Suryanarayanan, T.S.; Govinda Rajulu, M.B.; Thirunavukkarasu, N. Pestalotiopsis
species occur as generalist endophytes in trees of Western Ghats forests of southern India. Fungal Ecol.
2016
,
24, 70–75. [CrossRef]
133.
Krohn, K.; Farooq, U.; Hussain, H.; Ahmed, I.; Rheinheimer, J.; Draeger, S.; Schulz, B.; van Ree, T. Phomosines
H–J, novel highly substituted biaryl ethers, isolated from the endophytic fungus Phomopsis sp. from
Ligustrum vulgare.Nat. Prod. Commun. 2011,6, 1907–1912. [PubMed]
134.
Schierenbeck, K.A. Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) as an invasive species; history, ecology,
and context. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2004,23, 391–400. [CrossRef]
135.
Merriam, R.W. The abundance, distribution and edge associations of six non-indigenous, harmful plants
across North Carolina. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 2003,2003, 283–291. [CrossRef]
136.
Zhang, H.; Sun, X.; Xu, C. Antimicrobial activity of endophytic fungus Fusarium sp. isolated from medicinal
honeysuckle plant. Arch. Biol. Sci. 2016,68, 25–30. [CrossRef]
137.
Herrera, J. The reproductive biology of a riparian Mediterranean shrub, Nerium oleander L. (Apocynaceae).
Bot. J. Lin. Soc. 1991,106, 147–172. [CrossRef]
138.
Fu, L.; Zhang, S.; Li, N.; Wang, J.; Zhao, M.; Sakai, J.; Haseqawa, T.; Mitsu, T.; Kataoka, T.; Oka, S.; et al. Three
new triterpenes from Nerium oleander and biological activity of the isolated compounds. Nat. Prod.
2005
,68,
198–206. [CrossRef]
139.
El-Shazly, M.M.; El-Zayat, E.M.; Hermersdörfer, H. Insecticidal activity, mammalian cytotoxicity and
mutagenicity of an ethanolic extract from Nerium oleander (Apocynaceae). Ann. Appl. Biol.
2000
,136, 153–157.
[CrossRef]
140.
Zhao, M.; Zhang, S.; Fu, L.; Li, N.; Bai, J.; Sakai, J.; Kataoka, T.; Oka, S.; Kiuch, M.; Hirose, K.; et al.
Taraxasterane-and Ursane-Type Triterpenes from Nerium oleander and Their Biological Activities. J. Nat. Prod.
2006,69, 1164–1167. [CrossRef]
141.
Ramesha, A.; Sunitha, V.H.; Srinivas, C. Antimicrobial activity of secondary metabolites from endophytic
fungi isolated from Nerium oleander L. Int. J. Pharma Bio Sci. 2013,4, B683–B693.
142.
Shankar Naik, B.; Shashikala, J.; Krishnamurthy, Y.L. Diversity of fungal endophytes in shrubby medicinal
plants of Malnad region, Western Ghats, Southern India. Fungal Ecol. 2008,1, 89–93. [CrossRef]
143.
Kannan, K.; Madhankumar, D.; Prakash, N.U.; Muthezilan, R.; Jamuna, G.; Parthasarathy, N.;
Bhuvaneshwari, S. Fungal endophytes: A preliminary report from marketed flowers. Int. J. Appl. Biol.
2011
,
2, 14–18.
144.
Na, R.; Jiajia, L.; Dongliang, Y.; Yingzi, P.; Juan, H.; Xiong, L.; Nana, Z.; Jing, Z.; Yitian, L. Indentification
of vincamine indole alkaloids producing endophytic fungi isolated from Nerium indicum, Apocynaceae.
Microbiol. Res. 2016,192, 114–121. [CrossRef]
145.
Huang, W.Y.; Cai, Y.Z.; Hyde, K.D.; Corke, H.; Sun, M. Endophytic fungi from Nerium oleander L.
(Apocynaceae): Main constituents and antioxidant activity. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
2007
,23,
1253–1263. [CrossRef]
146.
Ma, Y.M.; Qiao, K.; Kong, Y.; Li, M.Y.; Guo, L.X.; Miao, Z.; Fan, C. A new isoquinolone alkaloid from an
endophytic fungus R22 of Nerium indicum.Nat. Prod. Res. 2017,31, 951–958. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
147.
V
í
tkov
á
, M.; Müllerov
á
, J.; S
á
dlo, J.; Pergl, J.; Pyšek, P. Black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) beloved and
despised: A story of an invasive tree in Central Europe. For. Ecol. Manag. 2017,384, 287–302. [CrossRef]
148.
European Commission. Commission Regulation No 1143/2014 of 22 October 2014 on the prevention and
management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species. O. J. Eur. Union 2014,57, 35–55.
149.
European Commission. Commission Implementing Regulation No 1141/2016 of 13 July 2016 adopting a
list of invasive alien species of Union concern pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European
Parliament and of the Council. O. J. Eur. Union 2016,59, 4–8.
150.
Ferus, P.; Barta, M.; Kon
ô
pkov
á
, J. Endophytic fungus Beauveria bassiana can enhance drought tolerance in
red oak seedlings. Trees Struct. Funct. 2019,33, 1179–1186. [CrossRef]
151.
Vajna, L. Diaporthe oncostoma causing stem canker of black locust in Hungary. Plant. Pathol.
2002
,51, 393.
[CrossRef]
Agriculture 2020,10, 643 29 of 31
152.
Krohn, K.; John, M.; Aust, H.J.; Draeger, S.; Schulz, B. Biologically active metabolites from fungi 131
Stemphytriol, a new perylene derivative from Monodictys fluctuata.Nat. Prod. Lett.
1999
,14, 31–34.
[CrossRef]
153.
Zheng, H.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Han, Y.F.; Chen, W.H.; Liang, Z.Q. Community composition and ecological functional
structural analysis of the endophytic fungi in Robinia Pseudoacacia. Mycosystema 2018,2, 13.
154.
Saikkonen, K.; Faeth, S.H.; Helander, M.; Sullivan, T.J. Fungal endophytes: A continuum of interactions with
host plants Annu.Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 1998,29, 319–343. [CrossRef]
155.
Stone, J.K.; Polishook, J.D.; White, J.F. Endophytic fungi. In Biodiversity of 25 Fungi. Inventory and Monitoring
Methods; Mueller, G.M., Bills, G.F., Foster, M.S., Eds.; Elsevier Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2004;
pp. 241–270.
156.
Busby, P.E.; Ridout, M.; Newcombe, G. Fungal endophytes: Modifiers of plant disease. Plant Mol. Biol.
2016
,
90, 645–655. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
157.
Rodriguez, R.J.; White, J.F., Jr.; Arnold, A.E.; Redman, A.R.A. Fungal endophytes: Diversity and functional
roles. New Phytol. 2009,182, 314–330. [CrossRef]
158.
Mucciarelli, M.; Scannerini, S.; Bertea, C.; Maei, M.
In vitro
and
in vivo
peppermint (Mentha piperita) growth
promotion by nonmycorrhizal fungal colonization. New Phytol. 2003,158, 579–591. [CrossRef]
159.
Wearn, J.A.; Sutton, B.C.; Morley, N.J.; Gange, A.C. Species and organ specificity of fungal endophytes in
herbaceous grassland plants. J. Ecol. 2012,100, 1085–1092. [CrossRef]
160.
Cheplick, G.P.; Cho, R. Interactive eects of fungal endophyte infection and host genotype on growth and
storage in Lolium perenne.New Phytol. 2003,158, 183–191. [CrossRef]
161.
Geisen, S.; Kostenko, O.; Cnossen, M.C.; ten Hooven, F.C.; Vreš, B.; van Der Putten, W.H. Seed and root
endophytic fungi in a range expanding and a related plant species. Front. Microbiol.
2017
,8, 1645. [CrossRef]
162.
Arnold, A.E. Understanding the diversity of foliar endophytic fungi: Progress, challenges, and frontiers.
Fungal Biol. Rev. 2007,21, 51–66. [CrossRef]
163.
Homan, M.T.; Arnold, A.E. Geographic locality and host identity shape fungal endophyte communities in
cupressaceous trees. Mycol. Res. 2008,112, 331–344. [CrossRef]
164.
Davis, E.C.; Franklin, J.B.; Shaw, A.J.; Vilgalys, R. Endophytic Xylaria (Xylariaceae) among liverworts and
angiosperms: Phylogenetics, distribution, and symbiosis. Am. J. Bot.
2003
,90, 1661–1667. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
165.
Kowalski, T.; Kehr, R. Fungal endophytes of living branch bases in several European tree species. In Endophytic
Fungi in Grasses an Woody Plants; Redlin, S.C., Carris, L.M., Eds.; American Phytopathological Society (APS):
St Paul, MN, USA, 1996; pp. 67–86.
166.
Pel
á
ez, F.; Collado, J.; Arenal, F.; Basilio, A.; Cabello, A.; Matas, M.D.; Garcia, J.B.; Del Val, A.G.; Gonz
á
lez, V.;
Gorrochategui, J.; et al. Endophytic fungi from plants living on gypsum soils as a source of secondary
metabolites with antimicrobial activity. Mycol. Res. 1998,102, 755–761. [CrossRef]
167.
Michielse, C.B.; Rep, M. Pathogen profile update: Fusarium oxysporum.Mol. Plant. Pathol.
2009
,10, 311.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
168.
Logrieco, A.; Moretti, A.; Solfrizzo, M. Alternaria toxins and plant diseases: An overview of origin, occurrence
and risks. World Mycotoxin J. 2009,2, 129–140. [CrossRef]
169.
Samson, A.R.; Hoekstra, E.S.; Frisvad, J.C.; Filtenborg, O. Introduction to Food and Airborne Fungi, 6th ed.;
The Dutch Centraalbureau Voor Schimmelcultures: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2000; pp. 64–97.
170.
Gautam, A.K.; Sharma, S.; Avasthi, S.; Bhadauria, R. Diversity, Pathogenicity and Toxicology of A. niger:
An important spoilage fungi. Res. J. Microbiol. 2011,6, 270–280. [CrossRef]
171.
Phoulivong, S.; Cai, L.; Chen, H.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Abdelsalam, K.; Chukeatirote, E.; Hyde, K.D.
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides is not a common pathogen on tropical fruits. Fungal Divers.
2010
,44, 33–43.
[CrossRef]
172.
Bisht, S.; Kumar, P.; Purohit, J. In Vitro Management of Curvularia Leaf Spot of Maize Using Botanicals,
Essential Oils and Bio-Control Agents. Bioscan 2013,8, 731–733.
173.
Vitale, S.; Santori, A.; Wajnberg, E.; Castagnone-Sereno, P.; Luongo, L.; Belisario, A. Morphological and
molecular analysis of Fusarium lateritium, the cause of gray necrosis of hazelnut fruit in Italy. Phytopathology
2011,101, 679–686. [CrossRef]
Agriculture 2020,10, 643 30 of 31
174.
Yaghmour, M.A.; Bostock, R.M.; Adaskaveg, J.E.; Michailides, T.J. Propiconazole sensitivity in populations of
Geotrichum candidum, the cause of sour rot of peach and nectarine, in California. Plant. Dis.
2012
,96, 752–758.
[CrossRef]
175.
Nam, M.H.; Park, M.S.; Kim, H.S.; Kim, T.I.; Kim, H.G. Cladosporium cladosporioides and C. tenuissimum cause
blossom blight in strawberry in Korea. Mycobiology 2015,43, 354–359. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
176.
Manca, D.; Bregant, C.; Maddau, L.; Pinna, C.; Montecchio, L.; Linaldeddu, B.T. First report of canker and
dieback caused by Neofusicoccum parvum and Diplodia olivarum on oleaster in Italy. Ital. J. Mycol.
2020
,49,
85–91. [CrossRef]
177.
Sharma, P.; Meena, P.D.; Chauhan, J.S. First Report of Nigrospora oryzae (Berk. & Broome) Petch Causing
Stem Blight on Brassica juncea in India. J. Phytopathol. 2013,161, 439–441. [CrossRef]
178.
Salvatore, M.M.; Andolfi, A.; Nicoletti, R. The Thin Line between Pathogenicity and Endophytism: The Case
of Lasiodiplodia theobromae.Agriculture 2020,10, 488. [CrossRef]
179.
Mantooth, K.; Hadziabdic, D.; Boggess, S.; Windham, M.; Miller, S.; Cai, G.; Spatafora, J.; Zhang, N.;
Staton, M.; Ownley, B.; et al. Confirmation of independent introductions of an exotic plant pathogen of
Cornus species, Discula destructiva, on the east and west coasts of North America. PLoS ONE
2017
,12, 1–26.
[CrossRef]
180.
Saunders, M.; Glenn, A.E.; Kohn, L.M. Exploring the evolutionary ecology of fungal endophytes in agricultural
systems: Using functional traits to reveal mechanisms in community processes. Evol. Appl.
2010
,3, 525–537.
[CrossRef]
181.
Maci
á
-Vicente, J.G.; Ferraro, V.; Burruano, S.; Lopez-Llorca, L.V. Fungal assemblages associated with roots of
halophytic and non-halophytic plant species vary dierentially along a salinity gradient. Microb. Ecol.
2012
,
64, 668–679. [CrossRef]
182.
McKinney, L.V.; Thomsen, I.M.; Kjær, E.D.; Bengtsson, S.B.K.; Nielsen, L.R. Rapid invasion by an aggressive
pathogenic fungus (Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus) replaces a native decomposer (Hymenoscyphus albidus):
A case of local cryptic extinction? Fungal Ecol. 2012,5, 663–669. [CrossRef]
183.
Ragazzi, A.; Moricca, S.; Capretti, P.; Dellavalle, I.; Turco, E. Dierences in composition of endophytic
mycobiota in twigs and leaves of healthy and declining Quercus species in Italy. For. Pathol.
2003
,33, 31–38.
[CrossRef]
184.
Moricca, S.; Ginetti, B.; Ragazzi, A. Species-and organ-specificity in endophytes colonizing healthy and
declining Mediterranean oaks. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2012,51, 587–598.
185.
Collado, J.; Platas, G.; Gonz
á
lez, I.; Pel
á
ez, F. Geographical and seasonal influences on the distribution of
fungal endophytes in Quercus ilex.New Phytol. 1999,144, 525–532. [CrossRef]
186.
Peršoh, D. Factors shaping community structure of endophytic fungi–evidence from the Pinus-Viscum-system.
Fungal Divers. 2013,60, 55–69. [CrossRef]
187.
Martins, F.; Pereira, J.A.; Bota, P.; Bento, A.; Baptista, P. Fungal endophyte communities in above-and
belowground olive tree organs and the eect of season and geographic location on their structures.
Fungal Ecol. 2016,20, 193–201. [CrossRef]
188.
Fisher, P.J.; Petrini, O.; Petrini, L.E.; Sutton, B.C. Fungal endophytes from the leaves and twigs of Quercus
ilex L. from England, Majorca and Switzerland. New Phytol 1994,127, 133–137. [CrossRef]
189.
Zamora, P.; Mart
í
nez-Ruiz, C.; Diez, J.J. Fungi in needles and twigs of pine plantations from northern Spain.
Fungal Divers. 2008,30, 171–184.
190.
Glynou, K.; Ali, T.; Buch, A.K.; Haghi Kia, S.; Ploch, S.; Xia, X.; Ali Çelik, A.; Thines, M.; Maci
á
-Vicente, J.G.
The local environment determines the assembly of root endophytic fungi at a continental scale.
Environ. Microbiol. 2016,18, 2418–2434. [CrossRef]
191. EPPO Global Database. Available online: https://gd.eppo.int (accessed on 10 October 2020).
192.
Tan, M.K.; Timmer, L.W.; Broadbent, P.; Priest, M.; Cain, P. Dierentiation by molecular analysis of Elsinoë spp.
causing scab diseases of citrus and its epidemiological implications. Phytopathology
1996
,86, 1039–1044.
[CrossRef]
193.
d’Errico, G.; Carletti, B.; Schröder, T.; Mota, M.; Vieira, P.; Roversi, P.F. An update on the occurrence of
nematodes belonging to the genus Bursaphelenchus in the Mediterranean area. Int. J. For. Res.
2015
,88,
509–520.
194.
d’Errico, G.; Crescenzi, A.; Landi, S. First report of the southern root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita on
the invasive weed Araujia sericifera in Italy. Plant. Dis. 2014,98, 1593. [CrossRef]
Agriculture 2020,10, 643 31 of 31
195. IPPC. International Plant. Protection Convention; IPPC & FAO: Rome, Italy, 1997.
196.
WTO. Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures; World Trade Organization: Geneva,
Switzerland, 1994.
197. Brasier, C.M. Preventing invasive pathogens: Deficiencies in the system. Plantsman 2005,4, 54–57.
198.
Brasier, C.M. The biosecurity threat to the UK and global environment from international trade in plants.
Plant Pathol. 2008,57, 792–808. [CrossRef]
199.
Sikes, B.A.; Buord, J.L.; Hulme, P.E.; Cooper, J.A.; Johnston, P.R.; Duncan, R.P. Import volumes and
biosecurity interventions shape the arrival rate of fungal pathogens. PLoS Biol.
2018
,16, e2006025. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
200.
Aglietti, C.; Luchi, N.; Pepori, A.L.; Bartolini, P.; Pecori, F.; Raio, A.; Capretti, P.; Santini, A. Real-time
loop-mediated isothermal amplification: An early-warning tool for quarantine plant pathogen detection.
AMB Express 2019,9, 50. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
201.
Botella, L.; Ba ˇcov
á
, A.; Dvor
á
k, M.; Kudl
á
ˇcek, T.; Pepori, A.L.; Santini, A.; Ghelardini, L.; Luchi, N.
Detection and quantification of the air inoculum of Caliciopsis pinea in a plantation of Pinus radiata in Italy.
iForest Biogeosciences For. 2019,12, 1–193. [CrossRef]
202.
Jactel, H.; Desprez-Loustau, M.L.; Battisti, A.; Brockerho, E.; Santini, A.; Stenlid, J.; Björkman, C.; Branco, M.;
Dehnen-Schmutz, K.; Douma, J.C.; et al. Pathologists and entomologists must join forces against forest pest
and pathogen invasions. NeoBiota 2020,58, 107. [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note:
MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional
aliations.
©
2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
... The population of Endophytic fungi is not static, and it has been reported that medicinal plants tend to have a higher incidence of these pharmaceuticals-producing organisms than their nonproducing counterparts (Gioia et al. 2020). Some of them have even been implicated as having the underlying blueprint for the medicinal activity of some of these plants. ...
... Some of them have even been implicated as having the underlying blueprint for the medicinal activity of some of these plants. They are, hence, essential to the existence of these organisms (Gioia et al. 2020). ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Fungal endophytes exhibit symbiotic relationships with their host plants but have recently emerged as sources for synthesizing important varieties of secondary metabolites (SMs). Many of these metabolites have shown significant importance as antibacterial, antifungal, antitumor, and anticancer drugs, leading to their exploration in medicine and pharmaceuticals. Main body of the abstract The endophytes' biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) are responsible for encoding enzymes that produce these SMs. The fungal endophytes' ability has been challenged due to their inability to trigger cryptic BGCs and their loss of ability to produce secondary metabolites over an extended period in an artificial culture medium. This review investigates the array of SMs produced by endophytic fungi. It identifies methods for awakening and exploiting silent BGCs to produce novel natural metabolites and explores recent advancements in metabolomics platforms used to profile SMs. Silent BGCs can be activated using various methods, including co-cultivation, one strain of many compounds, epigenetic modification, heterologous expression, and cluster-specific transcription factor methods. Short conclusion These methods reviewed effectively enhance the production of silent BGCs, leading to a significant increase in secondary metabolite production. Meanwhile, metabolomics profiling using liquid or gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry could provide several chances to discover bioactive compounds' complexity and chemical diversity. This review has, thus, given insight into the significance of methods used to reactivate BGCs from endophytes and the importance of varying techniques of their metabolomic profiling.
... Except for Aspergillus flavus, which was only obtained from Bruguiera gymnorrhiza and Sonneratia alba, most of the Aspergillus (three species) that were collected for this investigation were housed by Avicennia marina. Widespread and common in a variety of natural environments, including soil, air, water, and plants, species in this genus can tolerate harsh environmental conditions (Anita et al. 2009;Bennett et al. 2010;Gioia et al. 2020). It has been found that some interesting secondary metabolites are produced by species in this genus. ...
Article
Endophytic fungi exhibit a wide distribution across various plant tissues, including mangroves yet their exploration in many regions worldwide remains limited. Consequently, this study presents the first-ever report on the endophytic fungal diversity observed within the mangrove ecosystem of selected coastal areas in Tanzania. A culture-dependent technique was deployed to explore these fungi, followed by morphological and molecular characterization. Using the leaves, stems, and roots of five different mangroves: Avicennia marina, Brugniera gymnorrhiza, Lumnitzera racemosa, Ceriops tagal, and Sonneratia alba we examined how mangrove species and tissue types affected the diversity of endophytic fungi. A total of 34 fungal isolates were collected, and they represented three classes: Sordariomycetes, Dothideomycetes, and Eurotiomycetes. These classes included fifteen genera and seven orders, totaling twenty-five different species. Among the identified genera, Aspergillus emerged as the dominant genus, constituting 26.47% of the collected isolates, followed by Pestalotiopsis at 14.71%. Endophytic fungal diversity in the examined explants was analyzed using Shannon-Weiner (H’) and Simpson’s (1-D) diversity index. In comparison to other plant tissues, the stem showed a high degree of variety (H’ = 2.54). Conversely, compared to other mangrove species, Avicennia marina displayed a higher fungal diversity (H’ = 2.46). Notably, this study also reveals the presence of two species, namely Roussoella neopustulans and Spegazzinia bromeliacearum, that had not been previously documented as endophytic fungi within mangroves. The study underscores the diverse and promising potential of mangrove fungal endophytes, highlighting the need for further research and sustainable management in this area.
... However, a greater percentage of biologically active compounds isolated from bacteria vary, with the genus Streptomyces being the most examined for the production of specialized metabolites [13]. Similarly, a variety of endophytic fungi have been reported; common genera, among others, include Fusarium, Colletotrichum [27][28][29] and Phoma [29,30]. This review aims to provide dynamic information about specialized metabolites from organisms. ...
Article
Full-text available
Medicinal plants are rich sources of specialized metabolites that are of great importance to plants, animals, and humans. The usefulness of active biological compounds cuts across different fields, such as agriculture, forestry, food processing and packaging, biofuels, biocatalysts, and environmental remediation. In recent years, research has shifted toward the use of microbes, especially endophytes (bacteria, fungi, and viruses), and the combination of these organisms with other alternatives to optimize the production and regulation of these compounds. This review reinforces the production of specialized metabolites, especially by plants and microorganisms, and the effectiveness of microorganisms in increasing the production/concentration of these compounds in plants. The study also highlights the functions of these compounds in plants and their applications in various fields. New research areas that should be explored to produce and regulate these compounds, especially in plants and microbes, have been identified. Methods involving molecular studies are yet to be fully explored, and next-generation sequencing possesses an interesting and reliable approach.
... There has been growing interest in endophytic organisms isolated from plants, producing diverse secondary metabolites with different biological activities reported in recent literature [5,60]. Genus Albizia has been reported as a rich source of endophytic fungi [61] that have valuable bioactivities, including antimicrobial [62], cytotoxic [63] and antioxidant [64]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The rapid spread of bacterial infection caused by Staphylococcus aureus has become a problem to public health despite the presence of past trials devoted to controlling the infection. Thus, the current study aimed to explore the chemical composition of the extract of endophytic fungus Aspergillus fumigatus, isolated from Albizia lucidior leaves, and investigate the antimicrobial activity of isolated metabolites and their probable mode of actions. The chemical investigation of the fungal extract via UPLC/MS/MS led to the identification of at least forty-two metabolites, as well as the isolation and complete characterization of eight reported metabolites. The antibacterial activities of isolated metabolites were assessed against S. aureus using agar disc diffusion and microplate dilution methods. Compounds ergosterol, helvolic acid and monomethyl sulochrin-4-sulphate showed minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of 15.63, 1.95 and 3.90 �g/mL, respectively, compared to ciprofloxacin. We also report the inhibitory activity of the fungal extract on DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV, which led us to perform molecular docking using the three most active compounds isolated from the extract against both enzymes. These active compounds had the required structural features for S. aureus DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV inhibition, evidenced via molecular docking.
... It includes reviews concerning citrus [13], tomato [14], the Amaryllidaceae family [15], and medicinal plants, such as sages [16] and species in the Asteraceae family [17]. Another paper considers aspects pertaining to the trade of ornamentals, following concerns advanced by the European Food Safety Authority for the circulation of pathogens in asymptomatic plant materials [18]. This topic is also the thread of a review dedicated to one of such pathogens, Lasiodiplodia theobromae, which, besides concerns of its potential spread via the plant trade, has recently been spreading to temperate areas as a consequence of global warming [19]. ...
Article
Full-text available
After having been initially boosted by the general aim to exploit biodiversity in natural environments, research on endophytic microorganisms has recently started considering their occurrence in crop species. Many studies have shown that these microbial associates may improve plant fitness through various biological mechanisms of interaction, and have a major impact on plant growth and productive parameters. Besides the relevance of interesting case studies disclosing the effects/properties of single strains/species, a more comprehensive ecological approach should consider that endophytes more effectively play these functional roles in the form of interacting consortia. For this reason, it is important to organize, analyse, and implement the available information on the occurrence and functions of microbes that are part of the crop biocoenosis as a fundamental condition to define possible translational applications in view of enhancing crop performances.
Chapter
The study of endophytic fungi as a source of new bioactive molecules is an area that has grown very much within the chemistry of natural products, probably due to advances in the techniques of isolation, identification, and dereplication of fungal species and the exploration of new biomes and niches for the collection of host plants. Secondary metabolites produced by endophytes have been shown to be active against the most diverse types of biological targets, such as numerous tumor cell lines, parasites, and etiological agents causing neglected diseases (HIV, Chagas disease, Leishmaniasis, etc.). More recently, a significant number of metabolites of endophytic fungi have also been successfully studied against several important targets of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This chapter presents recent data on fungal metabolites that have distinguished biological activity and potential for further drug development.
Chapter
Plant parasitic nematodes represent limiting factors for the production of a wide range of crops. Possible alternatives to synthetic nematicides are based on the use of biological and biotechnological procedures, alone or in combination with other control strategies. Evidences of their beneficial effects are found in improved crop protection and agricultural productivity. For the optimal use of beneficial microorganisms, a depth knowledge of the nematode target is strongly needed. Genetic engineering technologies may be applied to improve their biocontrol activity by synergistically overexpressing quite a few characteristics. The most widely investigated approaches ranging from the traditional biocontrol up to molecular breeding are presented in this chapter.
Article
Objectives Endophytic fungi are widely known to reside in plant tissues causing no harm to host plants or even no noticeable change. They may colonize host plants for a part of their life cycle or may complete the entire life cycle since host provide a variety of novel metabolites. Despite being in a close relationship with medicinal host plants, the diversity and metabolic spectrum of endophytic fungi have not been researched well. Their diversity and ecological niche as plant symbionts make them attractive targets in the search for novel biochemicals. Methods We aimed to isolate, purify, and characterize the endophytic fungal population of medicinal host plants cultivated in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The goal was achieved through morphological identification and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions in rRNA analyses to determine phylogeny and diversity. Three aromatic and medicinal plants Jasminum sambac, Camellia sinensis, and Ocimum basilicum collected from the Riyadh region, Saudi Arabia were investigated. In total, 84 isolates were purified and they were grouped into 20 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) as per their sequences of ITS regions in rRNA. Results Twenty species of endophytic fungi were grouped in 12 genera i.e. Neopestalotiopsis, Trichoderma, Fusarium, Colletotrichum, Myrothecium, Chaetomium, Alternaria, Phoma, Curvularia, Cladosporium, Neodidymelliopsis, and Aspergillus and all isolates belonged to Ascomycota phylum. J. sambac was found dominant among other and had a relative frequency of 27%. C. sinensis was next with 18.7% relative frequency. The diversity was prominently recorded in leaf organs over stem and roots while roots exhibited the lowest diversity. Isolates also produced indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase enzyme, and siderophores with variable magnitudes that could be assigned to their wide range of metabolic variations from species to species. Conclusion Conclusively, J. sambac, C. sinensis, and O. basilicum are a good source of endophytic fungi with certain plant growth-promoting traits. Overall, Alternaria was found as the most predominant genus in terms of colonization rate. Further deternminations are required to screen the beneficial compounds released by these endophytic fungi.
Article
There are many species of Chinese traditional leguminosae family plants that are well known for their medicinal applications, such as Astragalus membranaceus, Catsia tora, Glycyrrhiza uralensis, Sophora flavescens and Albacia acacia. Their unique bioactive composition and internal phenological environment contribute to the formation of specific and unique endophytic fungal communities, which are important resources for new compounds used in a variety of pharmacological activities. Nonetheless, they have not been systematically studied. In the last decade, nearly 64 genera and thousands of species of endophytic fungi have been discovered from leguminosae plants, as well as 138 secondary metabolites (with 34 new compounds) including flavonoid, alkaloids, phenol, anthraquinone, macrolide, terpenoid, phytohormone and many more. They were shown to have diverse applications and benefits, such as antibacterial, antitumor, antioxidative, immunoregulatory and neuroprotective properties. Here, we provide a summarized overview with the aim of raising awareness of endophytic fungi from medicinal leguminosae plants and providing a comprehensive review of the discoveries of new natural products that may be of medicinal and pharmaceutical importance.
Article
Full-text available
Many fungi reported for endophytic occurrence are better known as plant pathogens on different crops, raising questions about their actual relationships with the hosts and other plants in the biocoenosis and about the factors underlying the lifestyle shift. This paper offers an overview of the endophytic occurrence of Lasiodiplodia theobromae (Dothideomycetes, Botryosphaeriaceae), a species known to be able to colonize many plants as both an endophyte and a pathogen. Prevalently spread in tropical and subtropical areas, there are concerns that it may propagate to the temperate region following global warming and the increasing trade of plant materials. The state of the art concerning the biochemical properties of endophytic strains of this species is also examined with reference to a range of biotechnological applications.
Article
Full-text available
Ligustrum lucidum is a highly invasive East Asian tree that successfully colonizes several subtropical and temperate areas around the world. Its invasion capacity results from a widespread human use mostly in urban and periurban settings, very abundant fruit and seed production, small bird-dispersed fruits, high germination rates, resprouting capacity, fast growth rates, low herbivory levels and tolerance to a wide range of light, temperature and soil. All these traits contribute to its ability to rapidly increase in abundance, alter biodiversity, landscape ecology and limit its management. This paper reviews the current knowledge on L. lucidum with particular focus on its uses, distribution, invasiveness, ecological and economic impacts and control measures. Most relevant aspect of the review highlight the negative ecological impacts of L. lucidum, its potential to continue expanding its range of distribution and the need of further studies on the eco-physiology of the species, economic impact and social perception of its invasion and early warning systems.
Article
Full-text available
Endophytic fungi are not only ubiquitous in plants, but also play an important role in the balancing of plant microecosystems. Numerous studies have shown that plant species and environment have a significant influence on the richness of endophytic fungi, and endophytic fungi often provide different forms of fitness benefits to their associated host plants. The present work aimed to isolate and identify endophytic fungi harboured in the tissues of the native medicinal plant Cornus officinalis and screen beneficial fungi to inhibit cornel pathogens. A total of 208 strains were recovered from 720 tissue segments. The overall colonisation and isolation rates of endophytic fungi were 33.89% and 28.89%, with triennial twigs (53.33%, 55%) and fruits (6.67%, 3.33%) having the highest and lowest rates, respectively. On the basis of morphological characteristics and internal transcribed spacer sequence analysis, 183 isolates were classified into 13 genera. Amongst them, Alternaria, Botryosphaeria and Talaromyces were dominant communities, and their relative abundances were 31.25%, 26.92% and 10.10%, respectively. A detailed calculation of the Shannon diversity (H′ = 1.65) and Margalef’s richness indices (Dmg = 2.30) revealed that the overall biodiversity of fungal endophytes in C. officinalis was relatively high, with the stems harbouring the highest diversity. The antagonism assay of 75 representative endophytes on the four main fungal pathogens of C. officinalis indicated that nine strains with antibiosis and eight strains with inhibition rate of more than 50% were obtained by the dual culture. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that investigated the distribution and antifungal activity of endophytic fungi from the medicinal plant C. officinalis.
Article
Full-text available
The world’s forests have never been more threatened by invasions of exotic pests and pathogens, whose causes and impacts are reinforced by global change. However, forest entomologists and pathologists have, for too long, worked independently, used different concepts and proposed specific management methods without recognising parallels and synergies between their respective fields. Instead, we advocate increased collaboration between these two scientific communities to improve the long-term health of forests. Our arguments are that the pathways of entry of exotic pests and pathogens are often the same and that insects and fungi often coexist in the same affected trees. Innovative methods for preventing invasions, early detection and identification of non-native species, modelling of their impact and spread and prevention of damage by increasing the resistance of ecosystems can be shared for the management of both pests and diseases. We, therefore, make recommendations to foster this convergence, proposing in particular the development of interdisciplinary research programmes, the development of generic tools or methods for pest and pathogen management and capacity building for the education and training of students, managers, decision-makers and citizens concerned with forest health.
Article
Full-text available
Oleaster (Olea europaea subsp. europaea var. sylvestris) is a sclerophyllous forest tree occurring in the Mediterranean region including Sardinia (Italy). Oleaster suffers from few major diseases but, since 2017, a new and unusual disease leading to the death of both young and old trees has been observed in several woodlands of high ecological value in northeastern Sardinia. Declining trees showed a variety of symptoms including leaf chlorosis, dieback and sunken canker on trunk and branches. The bleeding cankers exuded a white to orange sap, which gradually dried to a whitish gluey mass on the bark. Symptomatic wood samples yielded fungal isolates belonging to five fungal species: Diplodia olivarum, Dothiorella sarmentorum, Neofusicoccum parvum, Rosellinia corticium and unidentified Pestalotiopsis sp. In pathogenicity trials, Neofusicoccum parvum proved to be the most aggressive species. Our results provide the first evidence for a combined involvement of different Botryosphaeriaceae species in the aetiology of a new oleaster disease.
Article
Restrictions about the use of chemicals have limited the availability of control measures against plant-parasitic nematodes. The search for more sustainable approaches has focused the attention on biological control agents, such as Trichoderma species. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the use of biopolymers for a wide range of applications. These polysaccharide-based compounds may be 20 good carriers of microbial agents or act as barriers against pathogens or pests for their ability to form coating films. In this study, we evaluated the combination of a biopolymer obtained from the leguminous plant Ceratonia siliqua and T. harzianum M10, T. atroviride P1 or T. longibrachiatum MK1, as root protector or adjuvant agents, for the management of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita. Coating tomato roots with the carob galactomannan biopolymer followed by soil application of selected Trichoderma strains reduced the root galling index caused by M. incognita and soil nematode population in comparison to untreated control under greenhouse conditions. 25 Scanning electron microscopy revealed that coated tomato roots were embedded within a polymeric material. The sedimentation test showed that the addition of this biopolymer retarded the tendency of Trichoderma spores to settle in the bottom of aqueous suspension. In conclusion, beneficial fungi combined or formulated with a biopolymer could represent a promising strategy to increase their activity in plant protection and enhance their proliferation or distribution into rhizosphere.
Article
Endophytic fungi have several well-established beneficial effects on plant health and growth, and are a huge source of bioactive compounds. The endophyte Drechslera sp. strain 678, isolated from the roots of an Australian native grass Neurachne alopecuroidea, demonstrated efficacy against four plant pathogens (Pythium ultimum, Rhizoctonia solani, Botrytis cinerea, Alternaria alternata). In addition, strain 678 was capable of degrading a common additive used in gasoline, known as methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MtBE). Thus, the organic extracts obtained from the culture filtrate of strain 678 were studied. Metabolomic analysis revealed the presence of two major bioactive metabolites, monocerin and an alkynyl substituted epoxycyclohexenone derivative, which showed good antifungal activity. The Drechslera sp. strain 678 and its compounds show promise for applications in biocontrol and bioremediation activities in agriculture or as a remediation option for MtBE contamination in soil.
Article
Spodoptera littoralis has been recognized as the major destructive cause of various economic crops in Egypt. Chemical insecticides have been frequently used, however, the development of insecticidal resistance is the current challenge, thus searching for novel ecofriendly biocontrol agents is the prospective challenge. Fungal endophytes of plants have been recognized as a repertoire for bioactive metabolites. Thus, the objective of this study was to isolate a potential endophytic fungal isolates from different medicinal plants, with an efficient insecticidal activity against S. littoralis. Fifteen plant genera were selected, and their endogenous endophytic fungi were recovered, and their insecticidal activity were resolved. Forty-five isolates were recovered from these plants, Sarocladium strictum, endophyte of Cynancum acutum, and Aspergillus nidulans, endophyte of Lantana camara, displayed the highest insecticidal activity against 2nd larval instar of S. littoralis. The identity of S. strictum and A. nidulans has been confirmed based on their ITS sequence and deposited on genbank with accession # MK367604 and MK367603, and deposition # AUMC14096 and AUMC14095, respectively. The EtOAc and DCM extracts of S. strictum exhibited a strong effect on the total larval period, pupal period and development period of S. littoralis immature. The LC50 were 11.8, 15.3 mg/ml for S. strictum EtOAc and DCM extracts, while it was 22.6 and 34.4 mg/ml for A. nidulans DCM and EtOAc extract. A strong deformation was observed to the adults of S. littoralis by about 25.1% individuals descending from larvae treated with S. strictum EtOAc. The four major compounds from S. strictum EtOAc extract were resolved as Cis-13-octadecenoic acid, sebacic acid, pentamethoxy flavone and n-hexadecanoic acid.
Chapter
Brazil has the most immense biodiversity in the world, and therefore, it also harbors an incredible variety of fungal species. Over the past several decades, starting in the 1950s, Brazilian fungal diversity has been studied by several foreign groups as well as Brazilians not only because of its importance to taxonomy and ecology but also because of its potential as a source for biomolecules of economic interest. The study of endophytic fungi from Brazil has grown during the last 20–30 years, and its contribution to the estimation of global fungal diversity and its potential to produce several molecules have also contributed to the improvement of industrial procedures. Also, some studies investigating fungal endophytic diversity have contributed ecological information to programs for the protection of natural areas. In this chapter, selected publications about the taxonomy, ecology, and/or biotechnological potential of fungal endophytes from Brazil are summarized in order to show the importance of Brazilian endophyte mycodiversity.