ArticlePublisher preview available

Open abdomen in the trauma ICU patient: who? when? why? and what are the outcome results?

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

Purpose Temporary abdominal closure is a component of damage control surgery and may decrease mortality rates. The ultimate aim in managing an open abdomen is to achieve definitive fascial closure. The aim of this study is to assess the previously known predictors for failure to achieve definitive fascial closure and identify new predictors in order to achieve a better outcome. Methods An 11-year retrospective chart review included open abdomen cases at Inkosi Albert Luthuli Hospital Trauma ICU in KZN (Ethics Approval BCA207-09). The evaluated outcomes were definitive fascial closure, open abdomen and mortality. Variables included age, co-morbidities, albumin levels, renal failure, multiple blood transfusions, type of blood products given, entero-atmospheric fistulas, TAC, anastomosis, intra-abdominal abscess, type of nutrition, ACS, number of re-laparotomies, deep site infections (peritonitis), systemic infections (bloodstream), ventilator acquired pneumonia, head injury, and type of fluids given. Results This study reviewed 188 cases, 46.8% (88) arrived from elsewhere with an open abdomen while 53.2% (100) did not; 46.8% suffered blunt trauma, 45.2% suffered gunshots, while 8.0% were stabbed. Ninety deaths (47.9%) occurred during the index admission with 57 (30.3%) within the first 30 days. For both death within 30 days and death as final outcome, the majority were blunt abdominal trauma, 51.1 and 52.6%, respectively. Out of 188 patients, 27.1% had definitive fascial closure and 26.6% remained with an open abdomen. The relevant variables related to failure to achieve fascial closure were hypoalbuminemia (p = 0.002, p = 0.036), anastomotic leak (p < 0.05), VAP (p = 0.007), age (p = 0.002), intra-abdominal abscesses (p = 0.006), ACS (p = 0.005), multiple re-laparotomies (p = 0,028), deep surgical site infection (p < 0.05) and multi-organ failure (p = 0.003). Conclusion This study identified the predictors of failed fascial closure and mortality. While not directly modifiable, hypoalbuminaemia, anastomotic leak and sepsis, leading to multiple re-laparotomy, preclude early closure and portend high mortality.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
1 3
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (2022) 48:953–961
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01543-6
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Open abdomen inthetrauma ICU patient: who? when? why? andwhat
are theoutcome results?
KurtNirishanBoolaky1 · AliHassanTariq2 · TimothyCraigHardcastle3,4
Received: 1 August 2020 / Accepted: 31 October 2020 / Published online: 17 November 2020
© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020
Abstract
Purpose Temporary abdominal closure is a component of damage control surgery and may decrease mortality rates. The
ultimate aim in managing an open abdomen is to achieve definitive fascial closure. The aim of this study is to assess the
previously known predictors for failure to achieve definitive fascial closure and identify new predictors in order to achieve
a better outcome.
Methods An 11-year retrospective chart review included open abdomen cases at Inkosi Albert Luthuli Hospital Trauma
ICU in KZN (Ethics Approval BCA207-09). The evaluated outcomes were definitive fascial closure, open abdomen and
mortality. Variables included age, co-morbidities, albumin levels, renal failure, multiple blood transfusions, type of blood
products given, entero-atmospheric fistulas, TAC, anastomosis, intra-abdominal abscess, type of nutrition, ACS, number of
re-laparotomies, deep site infections (peritonitis), systemic infections (bloodstream), ventilator acquired pneumonia, head
injury, and type of fluids given.
Results This study reviewed 188 cases, 46.8% (88) arrived from elsewhere with an open abdomen while 53.2% (100) did
not; 46.8% suffered blunt trauma, 45.2% suffered gunshots, while 8.0% were stabbed. Ninety deaths (47.9%) occurred dur-
ing the index admission with 57 (30.3%) within the first 30days. For both death within 30days and death as final outcome,
the majority were blunt abdominal trauma, 51.1 and 52.6%, respectively. Out of 188 patients, 27.1% had definitive fascial
closure and 26.6% remained with an open abdomen. The relevant variables related to failure to achieve fascial closure were
hypoalbuminemia (p = 0.002, p = 0.036), anastomotic leak (p < 0.05), VAP (p = 0.007), age (p = 0.002), intra-abdominal
abscesses (p = 0.006), ACS (p = 0.005), multiple re-laparotomies (p = 0,028), deep surgical site infection (p < 0.05) and
multi-organ failure (p = 0.003).
Conclusion This study identified the predictors of failed fascial closure and mortality. While not directly modifiable,
hypoalbuminaemia, anastomotic leak and sepsis, leading to multiple re-laparotomy, preclude early closure and portend
high mortality.
Keywords Open abdomen· Definitive closure· Risk factors· Trauma ICU
Introduction
An open abdomen (OA) has been variably defined in litera-
ture but results in not approximating the abdominal rectus
sheath after considering assessment of physiology, identi-
fied injuries and need for abdominal re-exploration. This
decision is usually made either pre-operatively or intra-
operatively [1].
Damage control surgery (DCS) is the most common pro-
cedure resulting in the OA [2]. As per the WSES guidelines
for trauma, the predictors with level 2A evidence to leave an
open abdomen are persistent hypotension (SBP < 90mmHg),
acidosis (pH < 7.2), base deficit > 8, hypothermia (T < 34°C)
This work has not been published or presented elsewhere.
* Timothy Craig Hardcastle
hardcastle@ukzn.ac.za
1 Department ofSurgery, University ofKwaZulu-Natal,
Durban, SouthAfrica
2 General Surgery, Prince Mshiyeni Memorial Hospital,
Umlazi, SouthAfrica
3 Trauma Unit, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital,
Department ofSurgery, University ofKwaZulu-Natal,
Durban, SouthAfrica
4 IALCH Trauma Service, 800 Vusi Mzimela Rd, Mayville,
Durban4055, SouthAfrica
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... The mortality rate still reaches 35% in these cases [96]. Hypoalbuminemia (albumin < 3.5 g per 100 mL) is most commonly associated with fistula formation [32,97]. Patients with hypoalbuminemia have increased morbidity and mortality rates associated with fistula formation [98]. ...
... The management of patients with an OA and an EAF is very challenging [18,97]. These patients are usually critically ill and hypercatabolic and deteriorate rapidly if complications occur during their hospitalization in the intensive care unit. ...
... The resection of the involved enteric loop is actually the most definite way of treating an EAF [97,[115][116][117]. However, this therapeutic option is only feasible in clinically stable patients, in good nutritional conditions, and, above all, in conditions that are free of infections. ...
Article
Full-text available
Enteric fistulas are a common problem in gastrointestinal tract surgery and remain associated with significant mortality rates, due to complications such as sepsis, malnutrition, and electrolyte imbalance. The increasingly widespread use of open abdomen techniques for the initial treatment of abdominal sepsis and trauma has led to the observation of so-called entero-atmospheric fistulas. Because of their clinical complexity, the proper management of enteric fistula requires a multidisciplinary team. The main goal of the treatment is the closure of enteric fistula, but also mortality reduction and improvement of patients’ quality of life are fundamental. Successful management of patients with enteric fistula requires the establishment of controlled drainage, management of sepsis, prevention of fluid and electrolyte depletion, protection of the skin, and provision of adequate nutrition. Many of these fistulas will heal spontaneously within 4 to 6 weeks of conservative management. If closure is not accomplished after this time point, surgery is indicated. Despite advances in perioperative care and nutritional support, the mortality remains in the range of 15 to 30%. In more recent years, the use of negative pressure wound therapy for the resolution of enteric fistulas improved the outcomes, so patients can be successfully treated with a non-operative approach. In this review, our intent is to highlight the most important aspects of negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of patients with enterocutaneous or entero-atmospheric fistulas.
... Most of these studies do however have much less penetrating trauma (87% blunt, 13% penetrating), and the patients studied are older (median age 47) and mostly blunt trauma. 18 The Kaplan-Meier graphs clearly demonstrate how patients receiving a massive transfusion had a higher chance of mortality at 15-days than the group without. Coagulopathy and the severity of injuries also decreased survival time significantly. ...
... 21 It takes the three most severely injured compartments and adds up the squares of these. 18 This has been shown in the literature to have a direct correlation to increased mortality. In our retrospective review, the higher the ISS, the higher the chances of mortality. ...
Article
Full-text available
BACKGROUND: Damage control surgery (DCS) is a widely used approach in trauma. An open abdomen carries complications, increased morbidity and mortality. This study aims to quantify the mortality rate, determine contributory factors and factors influencing the decision to perform DCS and assess morbidity in patients undergoing open abdomen METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on 205 patients in Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital Trauma Unit. The mortality rate was evaluated over a 24-hour, 7-day and 28-day period. Data were collected by a data collection sheet from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2018 RESULTS: Of the 205 patients, 193 were male and the median age was 34.34 years. Penetrating trauma was the most predominant mechanism of injury in 162 (79%), with gunshot injuries seen in the majority (130/162). The mortality rate was 55/205 (26.8%) for open abdomen patients, 19/55 (34.5%) within the first 24 hours, 22/55 (40%) in the 24-hours to 7-days period, and 14/55 (25.4%) in the 8-day to 28-day period. Statistically significant factors contributing to mortality were haemodynamic instability, hypothermia, coagulopathy, massive transfusion, vasopressors, and significant associated injuries. Morbidities were entero-atmospheric fistula (EAF) in 7.3% (Clavien-Dindo grade Ilia), surgical site infection in 45.3% (Clavien-Dindo grade I) and ventral hernia in 10.24% (Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb CONCLUSION: Most open abdomens were performed in males, with gunshot injuries being the most common mechanism. The majority of mortalities were within the 24-hours to 7-days period. The most common morbidity associated with an open abdomen was surgical site infection
... [1][2][3] OA is a cutting-edge treatment for severe abdominal combat trauma, infection, and abdominal hypertension. 4 Usually, temporary abdominal closure (TAC) is required to close the abdominal cavity after opening to avoid unrestricted opening of this cavity. 5 However, direct contact between the TAC material and the intestinal canal can lead to the occurrence of enteroatmospheric fistula (EAF), which severely limits the application of OA therapy. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction This study aimed to establish an animal model of open abdomen (OA) through temporary abdominal closure via different techniques. Methods Adult male Sprague–Dawley rats were randomly divided into three groups: group A (OA with polypropylene mesh alone); group B (OA with polypropylene mesh combined with a patch); and group C (OA with polypropylene mesh and a sutured patch). Vital signs, pathophysiological changes, and survival rates were closely monitored in the rats for 7 days after surgery. Abdominal X‐rays and histopathological examinations were performed to assess abdominal organ changes and wound healing. Results The results showed no significant difference in mortality rates among the three groups ( p > 0.05). However, rats in group B exhibited superior overall condition, cleaner wounds, and a higher rate of wound healing compared to the other groups ( p < 0.05). Abdominal X‐rays indicated that varying degrees of distal intestinal obstruction in all groups. Histopathological examinations revealed fibrous hyperplasia, inflammatory cell infiltration, neovascularization, and collagen deposition in all groups. Group B demonstrated enhanced granulation tissue generation, neovascularization, and collagen deposition compared to the other groups ( p < 0.05). Conclusions Polypropylene mesh combined with patches is the most suitable method for establishing an animal model of OA. This model successfully replicated the pathological and physiological changes in postoperative patients with OA, specifically the progress of abdominal skin wound healing. It provides a practical and reliable animal model for OA research.
... 12 Local studies have reported mortality rates of 29-60% associated with DCS in trauma patients. [13][14][15][16] There was a higher rate of HG complications (CD ≥ 3) and ICU LOS in patients who did not have a thromboelastogram. This is in keeping with the current trauma literature that demonstrates lower complication rates and decreased ICU stay in patients receiving a VEA to guide resuscitation. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) is a complex multifaceted process which contributes to higher mortality rates in severely injured trauma patients. Thromboelastography (TEG) is effective in detecting TIC which assists in instituting goal-directed therapy as part of damage control resuscitation. Methods: This retrospective study included all adult patients over a 36-month period with penetrating abdominal trauma who required a laparotomy, blood products and admission for critical care. Analysis included demographics, admission data, 24-hour interventions, TEG parameters and 30-day outcomes. Results: Eighty-four patients with a median age of 28 years were included. The majority (93%; 78/84) suffered from a gunshot injury, with 75% (63/84) receiving a damage control laparotomy. Forty-eight patients (57%) had a TEG. Injury severity score and total fluid and blood product administered in the first 24 hours were all significantly higher in patients who had a TEG (p < 0.05). TEG profiles were: 42% (20/48) normal, 42% (20/48) hypocoagulable, 12% (6/48) hypercoagulable and 4% (2/48) mixed parameters. Fibrinolysis profiles were: 48% (23/48) normal, 44% (21/48) fibrinolysis shutdown and 8% (4/48) hyperfibrinolysis. Mortality rate was 5% (4/84) at 24 hours and 26% (22/84) at 30 days, with no difference between the two groups. High-grade complication rates, days on a ventilator and intensive care unit length of stay were all significantly higher in patients who did not have a TEG. Conclusion: TIC is common in severely injured penetrating trauma patients. The usage of a thromboelastogram did not impact on 24-hour or 30-day mortality but did result in a decreased intensive care stay and a decreased high-grade complication rate.
... Open abdomen (OA) with temporary abdominal closure (TAC) is an essential component of lifesaving damage control surgery (DCS) in trauma, which is associated with high morbidity, mortality, and hospital costs [1][2][3][4]. Despite advances in trauma care, the selection of TAC is still dependent on the surgeon's experience. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: The choice of temporary abdominal closure (TAC) method affects the prognosis of trauma patients. Previous studies on TAC are challenging to extrapolate due to data heterogeneity. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and comparison of various TAC techniques. Methods: We accessed web-based databases for studies on the clinical outcomes of TAC techniques. Recognized techniques, including negative-pressure wound therapy with or without continuous fascial traction, skin tension, meshes, Bogota bags, and Wittman patches, were classified via a method of closure such as skin-only closure vs. patch closure vs. vacuum closure; and via dynamics of treatment like static therapy (ST) vs. dynamic therapy (DT). Study endpoints included in-hospital mortality, definitive fascial closure (DFC) rate, and incidence of intraabdominal complications. Results: Among 1,065 identified studies, 37 papers comprising 2,582 trauma patients met the inclusion criteria. The vacuum closure group showed the lowest mortality (13%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6%-19%) and a moderate DFC rate (74%; 95% CI, 67%-82%). The skin-only closure group showed the highest mortality (35%; 95% CI, 7%-63%) and the highest DFC rate (96%; 95% CI, 93%-99%). In the second group analysis, DT showed better outcomes than ST for all endpoints. Conclusion: Vacuum closure was favorable in terms of in-hospital mortality, ventral hernia, and peritoneal abscess. Skin-only closure might be an alternative TAC method in carefully selected groups. DT may provide the best results; however, further studies are needed.
... Our primary fascial closure rate is 69% in keeping with the reported literature (49-75%). [17][18][19][20] The results and consequent deductions should be made with caution given the small sample size of the review. Generalisability is also limited by the local scenario of extreme gang violence and some shortfalls encountered in the public sector with service delivery. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Damage control laparotomy (DCL) is associated with high mortality. The purpose of this study was to review the outcomes of DCL. Methods: All patients undergoing DCL for penetrating trauma from May 2015 to July 2017 were reviewed. Data retrieved were demographics, mechanism of injury, vitals, and biochemical parameters. Injury severity was described by the revised trauma score (RTS), penetrating abdominal trauma index (PATI), injury severity score (ISS) and trauma and injury severity score (TRISS). Indications for DCL, length of ICU stay, number of procedures and primary abdominal closure rates, complications and mortality were recorded. Results: Fifty-one patients underwent DCL and 47 patients sustained gunshot injuries. Indications for laparotomy were haemodynamic instability (n = 27) and peritonism in stable patients (n = 22). The medians for the different severity scores were RTS 7.36, ISS 20, and PATI 30. The organs most commonly injured, in decreasing frequency, were small bowel (33), large bowel (25), abdominal vasculature (22), liver (18), stomach (14), kidney (10), diaphragm (10), spleen (9) and pancreas (8). DCL procedures performed were abdominal packing (36), temporary bowel ligation (30), vascular (5) and ureteric (1) shunting. The median number of laparotomies performed per patient was three, with a primary fascial closure rate of 69%. The mortality rate was 29%. Conclusion: DCL in our centre is associated with a 29% mortality rate. Severe acidosis, massive blood transfusion in first 24 hours and median PATI score more than 47 are independent risk factors associated with increased mortality.
... We found no difference in PFC with first re-laparotomy within 12 h compared to 24 h but found a dramatic decrease in the rate of achieving PFC with delay beyond 24 h that continued to worsen with more prolonged delay. Boolaky et al. [25] identified other risk factors for delay in PFC, including hypoalbuminemia, anastomotic leak, ventilator-associated pneumonia, age, intra-abdominal abscess or deep surgical site infection, abdominal compartment syndrome, or multiorgan failure. Although we did not have all the data required to verify Dr. Boolaky's results in our study, there is ample room for further investigation in these areas. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose Damage control laparotomy (DCL) is used for both traumatic and non-traumatic indications. Failure to achieve primary fascial closure (PFC) in a timely fashion has been associated with complications including sepsis, fistula, and mortality. We sought to identify factors associated with time to PFC in a multicenter retrospective cohort. Methods We reviewed retrospective data from 15 centers in the EAST SLEEP-TIME registry, including age, comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI]), small and large bowel resection, bowel discontinuity, vascular procedures, retained packs, number of re-laparotomies, net fluid balance after 24 h, trauma, and time to first takeback in 12-h increments to identify key factors associated with time to PFC. Results In total, 368 patients (71.2% trauma, of which 50.6% were penetrating, median ISS 25 [16, 34], with median Apache II score 15 [11, 22] in non-trauma) were in the cohort. Of these, 92.9% of patients achieved PFC at 60.8 ± 72.0 h after 1.6 ± 1.2 re-laparotomies. Each additional re-laparotomy reduced the odds of PFC by 91.5% (95%CI 88.2–93.9%, p < 0.001). Time to first re-laparotomy was highly significant (p < 0.001) in terms of odds of achieving PFC, with no difference between 12 and 24 h to first re-laparotomy (ref), and decreases in odds of PFC of 78.4% (65.8–86.4%, p < 0.001) for first re-laparotomy after 24.1–36 h, 90.8% (84.7–94.4%, p < 0.001) for 36.1–48 h, and 98.1% (96.4–99.0%, p < 0.001) for > 48 h. Trauma patients had increased likelihood of PFC in two separate analyses (p = 0.022 and 0.002). Conclusion Time to re-laparotomy ≤ 24 h and minimizing number of re-laparotomies are highly predictive of rapid achievement of PFC in patients after trauma- and non-trauma DCL. Level of evidence 2B.
Article
Full-text available
Background Damage control surgery has revolutionized trauma surgery. Use of damage control surgery allows for resuscitation and reversal of coagulopathy at the risk of loss of abdominal domain and intra-abdominal complications. Temporary abdominal closure is possible with multiple techniques, the choice of which may affect ability to achieve primary fascial closure and further complication. Methods A retrospective analysis of all trauma patients requiring damage control laparotomy upon admission to an ACS-verified level one trauma center from 2011 to 2016 was performed. Demographic and clinical data including ability and time to attain primary fascial closure, as well as complication rates, were recorded. The primary outcome measure was ability to achieve primary fascial closure during initial hospitalization. Results Two hundred and thirty-nine patients met criteria for inclusion. Primary skin closure (57.7%), ABThera™ VAC system (ABT) (15.1%), Bogota bag (BB) (25.1%), or a modified Barker’s vacuum-packing (BVP) (2.1%) were used in the initial laparotomy. Patients receiving skin-only closure had significantly higher rates of primary fascial closure and lower hospital mortality, but also significantly lower mean lactate, base deficit, and requirement for massive transfusion. Between ABT or BB, use of ABT was associated with increased rates of fascial closure. Multivariate regression revealed primary skin closure to be significantly associated with primary fascial closure while BB was associated with failure to achieve fascial closure. Conclusions Primary skin closure is a viable option in the initial management of the open abdomen, although these patients demonstrated less injury burden in our study. Use of vacuum-assisted dressings continues to be the preferred method for temporary abdominal closure in damage control surgery for trauma.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Open abdomen (OA) may be required in patients with abdominal trauma, sepsis or compartment syndrome. Vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction (VAWCM) is a widely used approach for temporary abdominal closure to close the abdominal wall. However, this method is associated with a high incidence of re-operations in short term and late sequelae such as incisional hernia. The current study aims to compare the results of surgical strategies of OA with versus without permanent mesh augmentation. Methods: Patients with OA treatment undergoing vacuum-assisted wound closure and an intraperitoneal onlay mesh (VAC-IPOM) implantation were compared to VAWCM with direct fascial closure which represents the current standard of care. Outcomes of patients from two tertiary referral centers that performed the different strategies for abdominal closure after OA treatment were compared in univariate and multivariate regression analysis. Results: A total of 139 patients were included in the study. Of these, 50 (36.0%) patients underwent VAC-IPOM and 89 (64.0%) patients VAWCM. VAC-IPOM was associated with reduced re-operations (adjusted incidence risk ratio 0.48 per 10-person days; CI 95% = 0.39-0.58, p < 0.001), reduced duration of stay on intensive care unit (ICU) [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.53; CI 95% = 0.36-0.79, p = 0.002] and reduced hospital stay (aHR 0.61; CI 95% = 0.040-0.94; p = 0.024). In-hospital mortality [22.5 vs 18.0%, risk difference - 4.5; confidence interval (CI) 95% = - 18.2 to 9.3; p = 0.665] and the incidence of intestinal fistula (18.0 vs 22.0%, risk difference 4.0; CI 95% = -10.0 to 18.0; p = 0.656) did not differ between the two groups. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, hernia-free survival was significantly increased after VAC-IPOM (p = 0.041). Conclusions: In patients undergoing OA treatment, intraperitoneal mesh augmentation is associated with a significantly decreased number of re-operations, duration of hospital and ICU stay and incidence of incisional hernias when compared to VAWCM.
Article
Full-text available
Damage control resuscitation may lead to postoperative intra-abdominal hypertension or abdominal compartmentsyndrome. These conditions may result in a vicious, self-perpetuating cycle leading to severe physiologic derangementsand multiorgan failure unless interrupted by abdominal (surgical or other) decompression. Further, in some clinicalsituations, the abdomen cannot be closed due to the visceral edema, the inability to control the compelling source ofinfection or the necessity to re-explore (as a“planned second-look”laparotomy) or complete previously initiateddamage control procedures or in cases of abdominal wall disruption. The open abdomen in trauma and non-traumapatients has been proposed to be effective in preventing or treating deranged physiology in patients with severe injuriesor critical illness when no other perceived options exist. Its use, however, remains controversial as it is resource consumingand represents a non-anatomic situation with the potential for severe adverse effects. Its use, therefore, should only beconsidered in patients who would most benefit from it. Abdominal fascia-to-fascia closure should be done as soon as thepatient can physiologically tolerate it. All precautions to minimize complications should be implemented.
Article
Full-text available
The term “open abdomen” refers to a surgically created defect in the abdominal wall that exposes abdominal viscera. Leaving an abdominal cavity temporarily open has been well described for several indications, including damage control surgery and abdominal compartment syndrome. Although beneficial in certain patients, the act of keeping an abdominal cavity open has physiologic repercussions that must be recognized and managed during postoperative care. This review article describes these issues and provides guidelines for the critical care physician managing a patient with an open abdomen.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose of Review This review focusing on the closure of the open abdomen which is one of the most complicated challenges of the modern critical care surgeon. Recent Findings Three phases of open abdomen can be defined. The first is from the primary damage control operation until all necessary intra-abdominal interventions were concluded. The second is from the end of the first period until closure of the wound. If by the end of the second phase the fascia could not be closed, the skin only coverage is mandated. The third phase is between the skin coverage to the definitive abdominal wall reconstruction. During the first two phases, the abdomen should be covered by a temporary closure technique that should minimize the open abdomen-related complications and facilitate delayed primary closure of the abdomen. Summary Modern temporary closure uses negative pressure therapy in combination with medial traction on the fascial edge. This approach gives the best chance for early delayed primary closure and minimal complication rate.
Article
Full-text available
Sepsis in the intensive care unit (ICU) presents a great challenge to any critical care clinician. Patients admitted to the ICU are especially vulnerable to sepsis due to the nature of the underlying pathology that warranted admission to the ICU and deranged physiological function coupled with invasive procedures. Nosocomial infections are common in patients admitted to the ICU, and with these infections come the burden of multidrug-resistant organisms. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is now a global emergency that warrants the attention of every health-care professional. AMR has escalated to epic proportions and solutions to this problem are now a matter of “life and death.” The ICU also represents the “breeding ground” of antibiotic-resistant organisms due to the high broad-spectrum antibiotic consumption. Many would argue that broad-spectrum antimicrobials are overprescribed in this patient population, but do all patients admitted to the ICU warrant such therapy? Is there evidence that narrower-spectrum antimicrobial agents can be employed in specific ICU populations coupled with surveillance strategies? The aims of this review are to focus on strategies with the aim of optimizing antimicrobial use within ICUs, and to highlight the importance of differentiating ICU populations with regard to the use of antimicrobial agents.
Article
Full-text available
The use of open abdomen (OA) as a technique in the treatment of exsanguinating trauma patients was first described in the mid-19 th century. Since the 1980s, OA has become a relatively new and increasingly common strategy to manage massive trauma and abdominal catastrophes. OA has been proven to help reduce the mortality of trauma. Nevertheless, the OA method may be associated with terrible and devastating complications such as enteroatmospheric fistula (EAF). As a result, OA should not be overused, and attention should be given to critical care as well as special management. The temporary abdominal closure (TAC) technique after abbreviated laparotomy was used to improve wound healing and facilitate final fascial closure of OA. Negative pressure therapy (NPT) is the most commonly used TAC method.
Article
Background: The purpose of this study was to characterize associations among serum proteins, negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) fluid loss, and primary fascial closure (PFC) following emergent laparotomy and temporary abdominal closure (TAC). We hypothesized that high levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and NPWT output would be associated with hypoalbuminemia and failure to achieve PFC. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 233 patients managed with NPWT TAC. Serum proteins and resuscitation indices were assessed on admission, initial laparotomy, and then at 48h, 96h, 7d, and discharge. Correlations were assessed by Pearson's coefficient. Multivariable regression was performed to identify predictors of PFC with cutoff values for continuous variables determined by Youden's index. Results: Patients who failed to achieve PFC (n =55) had significantly higher CRP at admission (249 vs. 148 mg/L, p =0.003), initial laparotomy (237 vs. 154, p =0.002), and discharge (124 vs. 72, p =0.003), as well as significantly lower serum albumin at 7d (2.3 vs. 2.5 g/dL, p =0.028) and discharge (2.5 vs. 2.8, p =0.004). Prealbumin (mg/dL) was similar between groups at each time point. There was an inverse correlation between nadir serum albumin and total mL NPWT output (r =-0.33, p <0.001). Exogenous albumin administration (g/day) correlated with higher serum albumin levels at each time point: 48h: r =0.26 (p =0.002), 96h: r =0.29 (p =0.002), 7d: r =0.40 (p <0.001). Albumin <2.6 g/dL was an independent predictor of failure to achieve primary fascial closure (OR 2.59 (95% CI 1.02-6.61)) in a multivariate model including abdominal sepsis, body mass index >40 kg/m2, and CRP >250 mg/L. Conclusions: Early and persistent systemic inflammation and high NPWT output were associated with hypoalbuminemia, which was an independent predictor of failure to achieve primary fascial closure. The utility of exogenous albumin following TAC requires further study. Level of evidence: Prognostic study, level III.
Article
Introduction/background This study compares planned repeat laparotomy (PR) with on-demand repeat laparotomy (OD) in a developing world setting. Materials and methods This study was conducted over a 30-month study period (December 2012–May 2015) at Greys Hospital, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa. All trauma and general surgery adult patients requiring a single relaparotomy were included in this study. Prospectively gathered data entered into an established electronic registry were retrospectively analysed. Full ethical approval for the registry and this study was granted by the University of KwaZulu-Natal Biomedical Ethics Committee. Results A total of 162 patients were included, with an average age of 36 years (standard deviation 17) and 69 % male predominance. Appendicitis and stab abdomen were the most common underlying diagnoses. PR strategy was used in 46 % and an OD approach in 54 %. Patients selected for the PR strategy had higher admission pulse rates, higher Modified Early Warning System (MEWS) scores and significantly higher rates of diffuse intra-abdominal sepsis at initial laparotomy. However, findings at relaparotomy were similar in both groups. The PR group had a much shorter time between operations, but much higher need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission. There was no difference between the groups in terms of open abdomen at discharge, length of hospital stay, morbidity or mortality. Conclusion In our environment, a planned approach to relaparotomy shows no major outcome advantages over an on-demand approach. There is however increased need for ICU admission with the PR approach. This is in keeping with international literature. Of concern is the much longer time delay between index procedure and repeat operation in the OD group. Improved post-operative decision making may help address this.