Content uploaded by Tatiana Revkova
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Tatiana Revkova on Jun 19, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.
ZOOTAXA
ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition)
ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition)
Accepted by O. Holovachov: 1 Nov. 2019; published: 7 May 2020 183
Zootaxa 4772 (1): 183–188
https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/
Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press Article
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4772.1.6
http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3D6BC94F-51EA-4B51-9091-DE0DA2647139
A new species of Microlaimus de Man 1880 (Nematoda: Microlaimidae) from the
Black Sea
TATIANA N. REVKOVA
A.O. Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas of RAS, 2, Nakhimov av., 299011, Sevastopol, Russia
E-mail: alinka8314@gmail.com
Abstract
Microlaimus sergeevae sp. n. is described and illustrated from the Crimea shelf of the Black Sea. It is characterized by the
1301–1728 μm long body; cuticle with distinct annuli; spicules 34–37 μm long, curved; gubernacular apophyses 20–25
μm long, surrounding distal end of spicules; criptocyrcular amphidial fovea 7–8 μm in diameter; cervical setae present;
four submedian rows of pores spreading along the whole body length, and eight precloacal supplements in males. The
new species morphologically resembles M. gerlachi Wieser 1954, M. paraborealis Allgen 1940a and M. kaurii Wieser
1954, but differs from them by the length of cephalic setae, size of the body, presence of cervical setae, shape of the
gubernacular apophyses, eight tubular precloacal supplements and submedian rows of pores spreading along the whole
body length. M. sergeevae sp. n. differs from M. gerlachi by having a smaller amphidial fovea, shorter spicules and
gubernacular apophyses. The new species differs from M. paraborealis by having larger value of c. It differs from M.
kaurii by having longer spicules and larger values of c and b.
Key words: nematode, taxonomy, Microlaimus, Black Sea
Introduction
Free-living nematodes of the family Microlaimidae Micoletzky, 1922 are widespread over the world’s ocean bot-
toms (Gallucci et al. 2009, Semprucci et al. 2013, Al-Sofyani and El-Sherbiny 2018, Bezerra et al. 2019, Chen
et al. 2019). The list of valid species of the genus Microlaimus de Man, 1880 includes over 80 species (Bezerra
et al. 2019) occurring from the shallow-waters to deep-sea habitats (Giere 2009, Liu et al. 2007, Hasemann and
Soltwedel 2011, Kozlovskiy et al. 2019), and only 5 of them are known for the Black Sea: these are Microlaimus
ponticus Sergeeva 1976, M. kaurii Wieser 1954, M. globiceps de Man 1880, M. paraglobiceps Revkova 2017 and
M. tenuispiculum de Man 1922 (Revkova 2017, Revkova 2017, Sergeeva 2003). During a study of the meiobenthos
community structure, a previously unknown species of the genus Microlaimus, was discovered in the Crimean shelf
(near Sevastopol, Bay Kruglaya). The aim of this study is to describe this new species from the Black Sea shallow-
waters.
Material and methods
The material was collected at a depth of 8.5 m by a tubular sampler (18.1 cm2) in three repetitions with the help of
a diver in Bay Kruglaya (Sevastopol region) during different seasons (from July 23, 2009 to July 8, 2010) (Zaika et
al. 2011). All samples were fixed in 75% alcohol, which is known to preserve the animal morphological structures
of fauna without distortion (Sergeeva et al. 2012). Sediment samples were carefully washed with water on sieves
with mesh sizes of 1000 and 63 μm. The fraction retained on both sieves was stained with rose Bengal solution
before being transferred to a Bogorov chamber and sorted in water under a binocular microscope. For taxonomical
analysis, nematodes were mounted onto permanent glycerin-gelatin slides (Tsalolikhin 1980). Figures and measure-
ments were made with a Nikon Eclipse E200 microscope. Type specimens are deposited in the collection of A.O.
Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas of RAS (Sevastopol, Russia).
REVKOVA
184 · Zootaxa 4772 (1) © 2020 Magnolia Press
Abbreviation: a – body length divided by maximum body diameter; b – body length divided by esophageal
length; c’ – tail length divided by cloacae body diameter; c – body length divided by tail length; V – distance of
vulva from anterior body end as a percentage (%) of body length.
Taxonomy
Order Desmodorida De Coninck, 1965
Superfamily Microlaimoidea Micoletzky, 1922
Family Microlaimidae Micoletzky, 1922
Genus Microlaimus de Man, 1880
Diagnosis. (modified from Tchesunov, 2014) Cuticle annulated, in some species also showing punctations or lon-
gitudinal bars. Head slightly set off. Spicules usually short and arcuate, seldom long and slender; gubernaculum
present, often bent distally but without dorso-caudal apophyses. Papilloid precloacal supplements may be present.
Ovaries paired, outstretched.
Type species: M. globiceps de Man, 1880
Microlaimus sergeevae sp. n.
(Figs 1, 2; Table 1)
Material studied: six males and three females. Glycerin-gelatin slides. Holotype male on slide # FlN/BS -24. Para-
type: males # FlN/BS -25 to # FlN/BS -29 and females # FlN/BS -30 to # FlN/BS -32.
Type locality: Black Sea, Crimea, Sevastopol, Bay Kruglaya, 8.5 m, silty sand with detritus; water salinity
17.6 ‰. Geographical coordinates 44°36’11.7”N 33°26’33.4”E.
Etymology: The species name is in honor of Prof. Nelli G. Sergeeva.
Description: Male. Body long and slender. Cuticle with distinct annuli; begin immediately posterior to cephalic
setae (ring width 1 μm) to near tail tip; in the middle of the body 2 μm. Four submedian rows of round pores 1
μm in diameter, situated along whole body. Cervical setae (Fig. 2D), 3.7 μm long. Six inner labial papillae and six
outer labial papillae in two separate circles; four cephalic setae 7.5–9 μm long. Cryptocircular amphideal fovea
53.3–68.1 % of corresponding body diameter with interruption in the posterior part. Distance from cephalic end to
anterior border of amphidial fovea 12–14 μm. Buccal cavity weakly sclerotized with small dorsal and two subven-
tral teeth. Pharynx narrow, cylindrical and muscular along its entire length; having a well-developed terminal oval
bulb 19–24 μm in width. Nerve ring is located at a distance of 43.5–56.4 %. Secretory- excretory system present;
renette cell situated posterior to cardia, on the ventral side and excretory pore not observed. Cardia is not surrounded
by intestinal tissue. Sperm cells elongated, maximum size 8 × 22 μm.
Reproductive system diorchic, testes opposed and outstretched. Anterior testis situated to left of intestine, pos-
terior testis to right of intestine. Spicules curved, 1.1–1.4 of anal body diam. Gubernaculum surrounding distal end
of spicules, with dorsally directed apophyses. A row of 8 pre-cloacal supplements in the form of thin channels in the
center of each papilla is located in front of the anus. Tail conical (3.2–4.3 of anal body diam.), slightly swollen at
the end. Precloacal setae absent. On the tail there is a row of 8 subventral caudal setae (4 µm long), visible in a light
microscope.
Female. Similar to males in most respects. Reproductive system didelphic, with opposed and outstretched geni-
tal branches both situated ventrally relative to intestine. Anterior genital branch 210–255 μm long, posterior genital
branch 255–340 μm long. Vulva situated slightly posterior to mid-body 53.1–55.9 %. Vagina with thick walls is
perpendicular to the longitudinal body axis. Diameter of the large oocyte 13 × 41 μm in female1. Vulval glands are
present, two different types anterior and posterior to the vagina.
Microlaimus sergeevae sp. n. from the Black Sea Zootaxa 4772 (1) © 2020 Magnolia Press · 185
FIGURE 1. Microlaimus sergeevae sp. n. Male: A: entire male; B: head; C: anterior body region; D: posterior body region;
Female 1. E: head; F: entire female 1; G: anterior body region. Scale bar: A, F = 100 μm; C, D, G = 50 μm; B, E = 10 μm.
REVKOVA
186 · Zootaxa 4772 (1) © 2020 Magnolia Press
FIGURE 2. Microlaimus sergeevae sp. n. A: entire male; B: entire female 1; C: head region of male; D: amphid of male; E:
lateral row of pores; F: tail region of male; G: spicula and precloacal supplements. Scale bar: A, B = 100 μm; E, F = 50 μm; C,
D, G = 20 μm.
Diagnosis. M. sergeevae sp. n. from the Black Sea is characterized by the 1301–1728 μm long body; cuticle
with distinct annuli; spicules 34–37 μm long, curved; gubernacular apophyses 20–25 μm long, surrounding distal
end of spicules; criptocyrcular amphidial fovea 7–8 μm in diameter; cervical setae present; four submedian rows of
pores spreading along the whole body length, and eight precloacal supplements in males.
Different diagnosis: M. sergeevae sp. n. mostly resembles M. gerlachi Wieser 1954, M. paraborealis Allgen
1940a and M. kaurii, Wieser 1954, but differs from them in the size of cephalic setae, shape of the gubernacular
apophyses, presence of cervical setae and four submedian rows of pores spreading along the whole body length.
Microlaimus sergeevae sp. n. from the Black Sea Zootaxa 4772 (1) © 2020 Magnolia Press · 187
M. sergeevae sp. n. differ from M. gerlachi by the size of the body 1301–1728 μm vs. 1630–2470 μm, shorter
spicules 34–37 μm (1.1–1.4 of anal body diam.) vs. 52 μm (1.1 of anal body diam.) and gubernacular apophyses
20–25 μm vs. 36 μm, smaller amphidial fovea 7–8 μm (53.3–68.1 % of corresponding body diameter) vs. 9–10 μm
(44–50 % of corresponding body diameter) and presence eight precloacal supplements. Meanwhile, Wieser (1954)
also mentioned some slight elevations of pre-cloacal supplements in the original description of M. gerlachi. The
new species differs from M. kaurii by having a larger body (1301–1728 μm vs. 700–960 μm), large values of c
(12.1–16.5 vs. 8.6–11.1) and b (10.9–13.1 vs. 6.5–8.3); larger spicules 34–37 μm (1.1–1.4 of anal body diam.) vs.
26–31 μm (1.3 of anal body diam.), and presence of eight precloacal supplements. The Black Sea specimens differ
from M. paraborealis by a large value of c (12.1–17.7 vs. 9–10.3).
TABLE 1. Morphometrics of Microlaimus sergeevae sp. n. (All measurements are given in μm unless otherwise
stated, except for the ratios a, b, c, cʹ)
Holotype
male
Paratype
males n=5
Paratype
female 1
Paratype
females n=2
Body length 1667 1381–1728 1404 1301–1480
a 41.7 34.1–53.1 25.5 29–38.3
b 13.1 10.9–12.3 12.2 10.2–12.8
c 13.4 13.2–16.5 13.3 12.1–14.5
c’ 4.1 3.2–4.3 4.3 3.7–5.4
V,% 55.9 53.1–53.4
Length of cephalic setae 9 7.5–9 7.5 7.5
Head diameter at level cephalic setae 10 10–11 10 9–11
Body width at amphid fovea level 13 11–15 12 11–17
Amphid fovea diameter 7 7–8 7 7
Amphid fovea from anterior end 14 12–14 11 11–15
Bulb diameter 23 19–24 21 17–24
Nerve ring from anterior end 70 60–75 71 60–75
Body diam. at nerve ring level 30 26–38 28 24–34
Body diam. at cardia level 32 25–36 32 23–38
Anal body diameter 30 24–32 25 20–27
Tail, length 125 98–114 106 102–108
Maximal body diameter 40 26–48 55 34–51
Gubernacular apophysis, length 20 20–25
Spicula, length (along the arch) 35 34–37
Distance from first precloacal supplement to anus 20 16–23
Distance between two precloacal supplements 10 7–13
Acknowledgements
The study was conducted within the framework of the Russian Academy of Sciences research assignment, State
registration No АААА-А18-118020890074-2 and partially funded by RFBR and Government of the Sevastopol
according to the research project № 18-44-920024. I am grateful to Prof. N.G. Sergeeva for her help during writ-
ing of the manuscript. Special thanks to colleague L.F. Lukyanova for her help in processing of bottom sediment
samples.
References
Al-Sofyani, A. & El-Sherbiny, M. (2018) Meiobenthic assemblage of the grey mangrove (Avicennia marina) along the Saudi
REVKOVA
188 · Zootaxa 4772 (1) © 2020 Magnolia Press
Arabian coast of the Red Sea with emphasis on free-living nematodes. Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies, 47 (4),
359–375.
https://doi.org/10.1515/ohs-2018-0034
Bezerra, T.N., Decraemer, W., Eisendle-Flöckner, U., Hodda, M., Holovachov, O., Leduc, D., Miljutin, D., Mokievsky, V., Peña
Santiago, R., Sharma, J., Smol, N., Tchesunov, A., Venekey, V., Zhao, Z. & Vanreusel, A. (2019) Nemys: World Database
of Nematodes. Available from: http://nemys.ugent (accessed 2 September 2019)
Chen, Y., Guo, Y. & Liu, A. (2019) Community structures of free-living marine nematodes on sandy beach of Changjiangao
(Haitan Island, Fujian Province). Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39 (7), 2573–2582.
https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201801220173
Gallucci, F., Moens, T. & Fonseca, G. (2009) Small-scale spatial patterns of meiobenthos in the Arctic deep sea. Marine Biodi-
versity, 39, 9–25.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-009-0003-x
Giere, O. (2009) Meiobenthology. The microscopic motile fauna of aquatic sediments. 2nd Edition. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg,
527 pp.
Hasemann, C. & Soltwedel, T. (2011) Small-Scale Heterogeneity in Deep-Sea Nematode Communities around Biogenic Struc-
tures. PLoS One, 6 (12), e29152.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029152
Kozlovskiy, V.V., Chikina, M.V., Shabalin, N.V., Basin, A.B., Mokievskiy, V.O. & Kucheruk, N.V. (2019) Spatial Structure of
Macro- and Meiobenthic Communities in a Homogeneous Environment (on the Example of the Pechora Sea). Oceanology,
59 (3), 367–373.
https://doi.org/10.1134/S000143701903010X
Liu, X.S., Zhang, Z.N. & Huang, Y. (2007) Sublittoral meiofauna with particular reference to nematodes in the southern Yellow
Sea, China. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 71 (3–4), 616–628.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2006.09.013
Revkova, T.N. (2017) Two new species of free-living nematodes genera Microlaimus de Man, 1880 and Aponema Jensen, 1978
(Nematoda: Microlaimidae) from the Black Sea. Zootaxa, 4344 (2), 387–394.
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa. 4344.2.13
Revkova, T.N. (2017) First records of Microlaimus tenuispiculum de Man, 1922 (Nematoda: Microlaimidae) from the Black
Sea. Ecologica Montenegrina, 14, 74–79.
Semprucci, F., Colantoni, P., Baldelli, G., Sbrocca, C., Rocchi, M. & Balsamo, M. (2013) Meiofauna associated with coral sedi-
ments in the Maldivian subtidal habitats (Indian Ocean). Marine Biodiversity, 43, 189–198.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-013-0146-7
Sergeeva, N.G., Gooday, A.J., Mazlumyan, S.A., Kolesnikova, E.A., Lichtschlag, A., Kosheleva, T.N. & Anikeeva, O.V. (2012)
Meiobenthos of the oxic/anoxic interface in the Southwestern region of the Black Sea: abundance and taxonomic com-
position. In: Altenbach, A.V., Bernhard, J.M. & Seckbach, J. (Eds.), Anoxia: paleontological strategies and evidence for
eukaryotes Survival. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 369–401.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1896-8_20
Sergeeva, N.G. (2003) Meiobenthos of area with methane gas seeps. In: Eremeev, V.N. & Gaevskaya, A.V. (Eds.), Modern
condition of biological diversity in near-shore zone of the Crimea (the Black Sea sector). Ekosi-Gidrophizika, Sevastopol,
pp. 258–267.
Tchesunov, A.V. (2014) Order Desmodorida De Coninck, 1965. In: Schmidt-Rhaesa, A. (Ed.), Handbook of Zoology. Gastrotri-
cha, Cycloneuralia, Gnathifera. Vol. 2. Nematoda. De Gruyter, Hamburg, pp. 399–434.
Tsalolikhin, S. Ya. (1980) Free-Living Nematodes of Lake Baikal. Nauka, Novosibirsk, 119 pp.
Wieser, W. (1954) Free-living marine nematodes. II. Chromadoroidea. Acta Universitatis Lundensis, Neue Folge, 2), 50 (16),
1–148.
Zaika, V.E., Ivanova, Е.А. & Sergeeva, N.G. (2011) Seasonal changes of meiobenthos of the Sevastopol Bays with the analysis
of influence of bottom hypoxia. Marine Ecological Journal, Special Issue 2, 29–36.