A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Landscape Ecology
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Landscape patterns of ocelot–vehicle collision sites
AnnMarie Blackburn .C. Jane Anderson .Amanda M. Veals .
Michael E. Tewes .David B. Wester .John H. Young Jr. .Randy W. DeYoung .
Humberto L. Perotto-Baldivieso
Received: 15 May 2020 / Accepted: 6 November 2020 / Published online: 17 November 2020
ÓSpringer Nature B.V. 2020
Abstract
Context Road networks can negatively impact wild-
life populations through habitat fragmentation,
decreased landscape connectivity, and wildlife-vehi-
cle collisions, thereby influencing the spatial ecology
and population dynamics of imperiled species. The
ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) is a federally endangered
wild felid in South Texas, with a high mortality rate
linked to vehicle collisions.
Objectives Using a multi-scale approach, we quan-
tified and examined landscape spatial structure at
ocelot roadkill locations, and between roadkill loca-
tions of male and female ocelots.
Methods We quantified the spatial distribution of
land cover types at 26 ocelot–vehicle collision sites in
South Texas that occurred from 1984–2017. We
compared landscape metrics of woody, herbaceous,
and bare ground cover types across multiple spatial
scales at roadkill locations to those from random road
locations, and between male and female ocelots.
Results Roadkill sites consisted of 13–20% more
woody cover than random locations. Woody patches at
roadkill sites were 7.1–11% larger (2.4 ha) closer to
roads and spaced 10–16 m closer together farther
away from roads compared to random locations.
Percent woody cover was the best indicator of
ocelot–vehicle collision sites; there were no differ-
ences in woody cover between male and female road
mortality locations.
Conclusion These findings suggest that ocelots are
likely struck by vehicles while crossing between
habitat patches. Roads that bisect areas of woody
cover have negative impacts on ocelots by increasing
habitat fragmentation and vulnerability to vehicle
collisions. Crossing structures should be placed in
areas with C30% woody cover and 3.5 ha woody
patches.
Keywords Landscape ecology Multi-scale spatial
analyses Ocelot Wildlife-vehicle collisions
Wildlife crossing structures
Introduction
Roads can negatively impact survival and movements
of wildlife, including reptiles and amphibians (Marsh
et al. 2005; Shephard et al. 2008), birds (Laurance
et al. 2005), and mammals (Oxley et al. 1974; Groot
Bruinderink and Hazebroek 1996). Negative impacts
A. Blackburn (&)C. J. Anderson
A. M. Veals M. E. Tewes D. B. Wester
R. W. DeYoung H. L. Perotto-Baldivieso
Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&M
University-Kingsville, 700 University Boulevard, MSC
218, Kingsville, TX 78363, USA
e-mail: annmarieblackburn8@gmail.com
J. H. Young Jr.
Environmental Affairs Division, Texas Department of
Transportation, 125 E. Street, Austin,
TX 78701, USA
123
Landscape Ecol (2021) 36:497–511
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01153-y(0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,-volV)
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.