This chapter presents a statistical analysis of capital flight from less developed countries (LDCs). Unlike with the imports of LDCs, a significant part of the export sector is usually free from very large subsidies and taxes and the export duties on traditional exports are usually well-balanced by subsidies on nontraditional exports. Hence, no pronounced effect of trade tax and subsidy policies need be expected to affect the trade declarations in the direction of either net overinvoicing or net underinvoicing of exports. Altogether 7 LDCs show a percentage excess of imports over exports, on exports, of over 10% for total trade, with 6 more LDCs having a positive (but less than 10%) excess and 15 LDCs having a negative excess figure. Imports are c.i.f. and exports are f.o.b., and this discrepancy may be taken at an average figure of 10% on f.o.b. value; 7 LDCs with excess on top of 10% are clear overinvoicers whereas all the rest are not, while those having negative figures are probably clear underinvoicer. However, if imports are overinvoiced (underinvoiced), the importer must sell (buy) in the black market an amount of foreign exchange equal to the difference between the correct and the faked price on the invoice. Hence, two critical variables in his decision will clearly be the duty and the black market premium on foreign exchange. The asymmetry of conduit behavior for capital flight, in the exports and imports of LDCs is, on the other hand, a conclusion of great interest to policymakers in these countries.