A preview of this full-text is provided by Wiley.
Content available from International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Thermal analysis of brushless DC motor using
multiobjective optimization
Kamal Chakkarapani
1
| Thyagarajan Thangavelu
2
| Kalpana Dharmalingam
2
1
Department of Electrical and Electronics
Engineering, Sri Venkateswara College of
Engineering, Chennai, India
2
Department of Instrumentation
Engineering, MIT Campus, Anna
University, Chennai, India
Correspondence
Kamal Chakkarapani, Department of
Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Sri
Venkateswara College of Engineering,
Chennai, India.
Email: kamalc@svce.ac.in
Peer Review
The peer review history for this article is
available at https://publons.com/publon/
10.1002/2050-7038.12546.
Summary
In this article, the design of brushless DC (BLDC) motor is performed using
multiobjective optimization algorithm (MOOA) by satisfying multiple
objectives. Initially, sensitivity analysis is carried out to find the most
influencing parameters that affect the performance of BLDC motor.
MOOAs such as Pareto envelope-based selection algorithm (PESA), Pareto
archived evolution strategy (PAES) and nondominated sorting genetic algo-
rithm-II (NSGA-II) is employed in the optimal design of the BLDC motor.
The proposed MOOA have three objectives namely: output torque maximi-
zation, volume minimization, and minimization of total losses. MOOAs are
analyzed using performance metrics and qualitative comparison is provided
to select the best algorithm. Later, finite element method (FEM) is used to
investigate the transient and thermalcharacterizationontheBLDCmotor
designed using NSGA-II. The thermal results thus obtained using NSGA-II
for the above motor under different operating conditions is also compared
with the existing single objective optimization algorithm. From the compar-
isons, it is observed that NSGA-II algorithm significantly outperforms the
existing single objective optimization algorithm. Finally, the usefulness of
the designed machine based on NSGA-II is compared with the results
obtained from simulation and hardware analysis.
KEYWORDS
BLDC motor, NSGA-II, optimization, performance metrics, thermal analysis
List of Symbols and Abbreviations: BLDC, Brushless DC; DSD, Definite Screening Design; FEA, Finite Element Analysis; FEM, Finite Element
Method; GD, Generational Distance; HV, Hyper Volume; IGD, Inverted Generational Distance; MOOA, Multi Objective Optimization Algorithm;
MOO, Multi Objective Optimization; NSGA-II, Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II; PAES, Pareto Archived Evolution Algorithm; PESA,
Pareto Envelope-based Selection Algorithm; SOOA, Single Objective Optimization Algorithm; SOO, Single Objective Optimization; A
g
, Air gap area at
the winding surface; B
g
, Magnetic flux density; B
sy
, Stator core maximum flux density; B
r
, Permanent Magnet Remanance; F
m
, Magneto-motive force
(MMF) of each magnet; J
cu
, Current density; k
l
, Magnetic field leakage; l
m
, Magnet thickness; l
s
, Stator/rotor axial length; l
w
, Winding thickness; l
g
,
Mechanical air gap; l
y
, Stator/ rotor core thickness; P
total
, Total power loss; P
w
, Windage losses; P
b
, Friction of bearing losses; P
cu
, Copper losses; P
h
,
Hysteresis losses; P
e
, Eddy current losses; P, Number of pole pairs; r
r
, Rotor radius; T
em
, Electromagnetic torque; T
ripple
, Ripple Torque; T
min
,
Minimum Torque; T
max
, Maximum Torque; T
avg
, Average Torque; V
t
, Total volume; ℜ, sum of the reluctances of the winding, air gap and magnet
regions for each pole; λ, Stator/rotor axial length; β, Pole-arc per pole pitch ratio; μ
0
, Free space permeability; μ
r1
, Magnet permeability; μ
r2
, Winding
permeability.
Received: 23 March 2020 Revised: 21 May 2020 Accepted: 18 June 2020
DOI: 10.1002/2050-7038.12546
Int Trans Electr Energ Syst. 2020;30:e12546. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/etep © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd 1of18
https://doi.org/10.1002/2050-7038.12546