Content uploaded by Hao Ling
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Hao Ling on Nov 23, 2012
Content may be subject to copyright.
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, VOL. 4, NO. 4, JULY 2005 1869
Simulation of MIMO Channel Capacity With
Antenna Polarization Diversity
Liang Dong, Member, IEEE, Hosung Choo, Member, IEEE,
Robert W. Heath, Jr., Member, IEEE, and Hao Ling, Fellow, IEEE
Abstract—A simulation study of the channel capacity of a
multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) antenna system exploit-
ing multiple polarizations is carried out. We focus on a simple
yet realistic trimonopole antenna structure, taking into account
all the mutual coupling and casing effects using the computational
electromagnetics solver—numerical electromagnetics code. Simu-
lation results show that, with a special transmit geometry, using
the collocated trimonopole antennas at a size-constrained receiver
can offer channel capacity that approaches the capacity of an
uncorrelated MIMO Rayleigh channel. In addition, it is shown
that the capacity increase is mainly attributed to polarization
diversity instead of pattern diversity. Furthermore, we find that
the mutual coupling and casing effects in the trimonopole system
can actually provide a large capacity increase with less constraint
on the antenna configurations than the idealized tridipole system.
Index Terms—Channel capacity, fading correlation, multiple-
input multiple-output (MIMO) systems, multiple polarizations.
I. INTRODUCTION
A
PROMISING way of achieving high data rate in wireless
communications is to use multiple antennas at both the
transmitter and the receiver, forming a multiple-input multiple-
output (MIMO) system [1], [2]. Parallel subchannels can be
established between the transmitter and the receiver antennas if
the fading of the transmitter–receiver pairs is uncorrelated [3].
Correlated fading can pose a serious problem, typically at the
mobile handset where the spacing of antenna elements is highly
constrained. Polarization diversity and pattern diversity have
been exploited to decrease the signal correlation of local anten-
nas at mobile handsets [4]. The performance of a MIMO system
employing dual-polarized antennas has been investigated in [5]
and [6].
Recently, many researchers have examined the multiple
polarizations for a MIMO antenna system. Andrews et al. [7]
argued for a wireless MIMO link that provides six uncorrelated
signals with three electric dipoles and three magnetic dipoles
Manuscript received August 26, 2003; revised January 14, 2004; accepted
May 11, 2004. The editor coordinating the review of this paper and approving it
for publication is R. Valenzuela. This work was supported by the Texas Higher
Education Coordinating Board under the Texas Advanced Technology Program
and by the Office of Naval Research.
L. Dong is with the Department of Electrical and Computer En-
gineering, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008 USA
(e-mail: liang.dong@wmich.edu).
H. Choo is with the School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Hongik
University, Seoul, 121-791, Korea (e-mail: hschoo@hongik.ac.kr).
R. W. Heath, Jr. and H. Ling are with the Department of Electrical and
Computer Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA
(e-mail: rheath@ece.utexas.edu; ling@ece.utexas.edu).
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TWC.2005.850318
at the transceiver. They assumed an antenna model with ideal
polarizations and a rich scattering environment, and verified
their analysis experimentally using three orthogonal electric
dipoles. Svantesson [8] studied the effect of multipath angular
spread on the channel capacity of such a system, and showed
that the capacity increase is due to a combination of polarization
and pattern diversity. Stancil et al. [9] presented experimental
results verifying that collocated electric and magnetic dipoles
can be used to realize independent channels. Andersen and
Getu [10] proposed an antenna cube with an electric dipole on
each of the 12 edges. The diversity among the antennas is a
combination of space and polarization diversity.
In this paper, we present a simulation study to investigate
the capacity of a multipolarized MIMO channel. The capacity
increase is affected by various system parameters, such as
antenna configurations, propagation environments, and system
assumptions. For the mobile handset, we use a realistic antenna
structure consisting of three collocated monopole antennas
mounted on a small box (to simulate the handheld unit). The
numerical electromagnetics code (NEC) [11], a full-wave com-
putational electromagnetic solver, is used to simulate the an-
tenna radiation patterns and polarizations taking into account
all the mutual coupling and casing effects. The antenna pat-
tern from the NEC model is verified by measured data from
an experimental prototype. Based on the simulation results,
we examine the effect of different propagation environments,
pinpoint the channel capacity increase from polarization and
pattern diversity, and compare the performance to idealized
dipole-antenna systems.
II. MIMO C
HANNEL CAPACITY WITH ANTENNA
POLARIZATION DIVERSITY
We assume a MIMO downlink with n
T
transmit antennas
at the base transceiver station (BTS) and n
R
receive antennas
at the mobile station (MS), where the channel is known to the
receiver but not to the transmitter. When the transmitted signals
are independent with equal power at each antenna, the ergodic
channel capacity taken over the probability distribution of G is
given by [1]
C = E
log
2
det
I
n
R
+
P
n
T
N
GG
†
(1)
where G is an n
R
× n
T
transfer matrix of the flat-fading
channel, P is the total transmitted power, and N is the variance
1536-1276/$20.00 © 2005 IEEE
1870 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, VOL. 4, NO. 4, JULY 2005
Fig. 1. MS prototype with three quarter-wavelength monopoles (polarization diverse antennas). (a) NEC model. (b) Experimental model. (c) X–Z section of
antenna radiation patterns from NEC simulation and measurement.
of the independent Gaussian noise at each receive antenna.
Both the signal strength and the channel correlation can affect
the capacity [5]. Focusing on the effect of channel correlation
on the capacity, we normalize the channel in the sense that
E[G
F
]=(n
T
n
R
)
1/2
, where ·
F
denotes the Frobenius
norm. This normalization has been used in other work such as
[12]. A deeper study of normalization issues, along the lines of
[13], is a topic for future work.
The elements of G are correlated by an amount that depends
on the propagation environment as well as the polarization of
the antenna elements and the spacing between them. One model
for G that takes the fading correlation into account splits the
correlation into two independent components as receive corre-
lation and transmit correlation G = Ψ
1/2
r
G
w
Ψ
1/2
t
[14], [15].
Ψ
r
and Ψ
t
are respectively the covariance matrices of the re-
ceive and transmit antennas, and G
w
has uncorrelated complex
Gaussian entries. Suppose receive antennas i and j, with field
patterns A
i
and A
j
, respectively, are exposed to the incident
wave represented by electric field E. We assume that the phase
angles of E
θ
and E
φ
are independent and uniformly distributed
in [0, 2π), and they are independent for waves arriving from
different directions. Thus, the (i, j)th entry of Ψ
r
is [16]
Ψ
(i,j)
r
=
1
σ
i
σ
i
E
[A
i
(Ω) · E(Ω)]
A
∗
j
(Ω) · E
∗
(Ω)
dΩ
(2)
where σ
i
and σ
j
are the variances of signals received by an-
tennas i and j, respectively. Ω is the solid angle over (θ, φ). In
general, A
i
and A
j
contain both amplitude and phase. Suppose
antennas i and j are collocated with no spatial diversity, it
follows that the phases of A
i
and A
j
are the same with respect
to angle Ω. As in (2), the entries of Ψ
r
are the weighted
correlations between receive antennas, where the weights are
the angular spectrum of the incident field E. In order to achieve
large channel capacity, Ψ
r
needs to be close to an identity
matrix. The correlation coefficient Ψ
(i,j)
r
,fori = j, can be
diminished by reducing the similarity in antenna polarizations
and/or patterns over the angular space.
III. S
YSTEM ASSUMPTIONS AND HANDSET MODEL
In the simulation, we consider a MIMO system that employs
three transmit antennas at the BTS and three receive antennas
at the MS. The antennas at the BTS can be placed sufficiently
apart to provide decorrelation. Therefore, the channel matrix
G has the same statistics as Ψ
1/2
r
G
w
[17]. The orientations
of the BTS antennas are different, e.g., 90
◦
slanted to each
other, in order to provide multipolarized transmission. Based
on the results on dual-polarized systems [5], [6], it is unlikely
that the scatterers, especially in a suburban environment, would
depolarize signals significantly. However, incident waves with
different polarizations are important for the receiver to exploit
the antenna polarization diversity. With this special transmit
geometry coupled with the random orientation of the receive
handset, we may assume that the incident waves arriving at the
MS have equal average power in all polarizations.
The MS has a compact array structure consisting of three
quarter-wavelength monopoles mounted on a conducting box
of dimensions 3 × 5 × 10 cm
3
(to simulate the handheld unit).
With a carrier frequency of 2 GHz, the length of each monopole
antenna is about 3.75 cm. The feed points of the monopoles are
collocated. Each antenna is symmetrically slanted with an angle
ω with respect to the zenith, thus creating polarization dissim-
ilarity. The NEC is used to simulate the antenna radiation pat-
terns and polarizations. We used the standard “active element”
approach to fully take into account the electromagnetic cou-
pling between the elements and casing effects. This approach
determines the gain pattern with one element excited and all
the other elements terminated in their source impedances [18].
Fig. 1(a) shows the wire mesh used in the NEC simulation.
Fig. 1(b) shows an experimental MS antenna prototype. The
antenna radiation patterns from simulation and measurement
DONG et al.: SIMULATION OF MIMO CHANNEL CAPACITY WITH ANTENNA POLARIZATION DIVERSITY 1871
Fig. 2. Channel capacity of a 3 × 3 MIMO system with antenna polarization
diversity in various environments. Average receiver SNR = 10 dB. (a) Capac-
ity of 3 × 3 Rayleigh channel. (b) Capacity of 3 × 1 Rayleigh channel.
are compared in Fig. 1(c). It shows the patterns in the X–Z plane
at ω =45
◦
, with the excitation at one antenna port and 50-Ω
terminations at the other two ports. The antenna pattern from
the NEC model agrees well with that from the measurement.
The NEC results are used throughout our simulations.
The propagation environments for the MS are simulated
in three scenarios: indoor, outdoor dense urban, and outdoor
suburban. For indoor, the angular spectrum of incident waves
is assumed to have a uniform elevation spectrum θ ∈ [0, 180
◦
)
and a uniform azimuth spectrum φ ∈ [0, 360
◦
). For outdoor
dense urban, the angular spectrum of incident waves is limited
to a uniform elevation spread of 30
◦
about the horizontal plane,
with a uniform azimuth spectrum. For outdoor suburban, the
incident waves are also assumed to have a uniform elevation
spread of 30
◦
about the horizontal plane, but with a Laplacian
azimuth spectrum of σ
φ
=5
◦
[19] and the main azimuth direc-
tion randomly selected in [0, 360
◦
).
IV. R
ESULTS
Fig. 2 illustrates the dependence of channel capacities on the
slanting angle ω of the MS monopoles in different propagation
environments. We assume perfect transmit power control, hence
a normalized channel. Suppose ρ =(P/n
T
N)=10dB, where
P , n
T
, and N are defined in (1). Note that the difference
of receive branches is considered in the transfer matrix G.
With a normalized G, ρ is the average SNR over all receive
antennas. We observe that in rich scattering environments such
as indoor or outdoor dense urban, the decorrelation of signals
at local antennas can be achieved with moderate slanting angle
(ω>20
◦
), and the channel capacity approaches the capacity of
an uncorrelated 3 × 3 Rayleigh channel. In the suburban envi-
ronment with small azimuth spread, the capacity performance
is degraded modestly.
In addition to the polarization difference among the receive
antennas, the angular patterns in the principal polarization are
also different. Since antenna pattern diversity and polarization
Fig. 3. Channel capacity of a 3 × 3 MIMO system with different diversity
schemes. Average receiver SNR = 10 dB. (a) Capacity of 3 × 3 Rayleigh
channel. (b) Capacity of 3 × 1 Rayleigh channel.
diversity are always coupled in practice, the simulation devel-
oped here offers a tool to examine which one is more essential
in contributing to the capacity gain. We carry out the simulation
by deviating from the NEC antenna radiation model to two
ideal models.
1) Polarization-diverse only: We use the antenna polariza-
tions from the NEC model, but set the angular patterns to
be isotropic in radiation intensity. That is, we substitute
(A
i
(Ω)/|A
i
(Ω)|) and (A
j
(Ω)/|A
j
(Ω)|) for A
i
(Ω) and
A
j
(Ω) in (2), respectively.
2) Pattern-diverse only: We use the pattern differences in
radiation intensity, but no polarization diversity. That is,
we substitute |A
i
(Ω)| and |A
j
(Ω)| for A
i
(Ω) and A
j
(Ω)
in (2), respectively.
Fig. 3 compares the MIMO channel capacity of the trimono-
pole antennas with those from the polarization-diverse-only and
the pattern-diverse-only models. Indoor environment is simu-
lated to maximize the effects of different diversity factors. We
observe that the channel capacity of the polarization-diverse-
only model is very close to that of the actual trimonopole
system. The capacity of the pattern-diverse-only model, on
the other hand, is much lower. Thus, it is indeed polarization
diversity that accounts for most of the capacity increase in
antenna-diverse MIMO systems. This confirms the assumption
by Andrews et al. [7].
Finally, we compare the capacity of the trimonopole system
to that of the idealized tridipole model used in previous works.
Three electrically short dipoles are orthogonally collocated in
the ideal tridipole model, where the antenna radiation pattern
of a vertical dipole (ω =0)is A(Ω) = sin(θ)
ˆ
a
θ
. The mutual
coupling between local antennas and the casing effect are
not considered. In the outdoor dense urban environment, the
slanting angle of antennas that maximizes the channel capac-
ity can be calculated as ω
∗
≈ (1/2) cos
−1
[−(π + 15)/(7π +
9)] = 62.9
◦
. This agrees with the simulation result in Fig. 4.
In the outdoor suburban environment with Laplacian azimuth
spectrum, Ψ
r
cannot be exactly an identity matrix due to
1872 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, VOL. 4, NO. 4, JULY 2005
Fig. 4. Channel capacity of a 3 × 3 MIMO system with antenna polarization
diversity (ideal model). Average receiver SNR = 10 dB. (a) Capacity of 3 ×
3 Rayleigh channel. (b) Capacity of 3 × 1 Rayleigh channel.
the asymmetry of the weighted correlations. Therefore, the
channel capacity cannot reach the capacity of the uncorrelated
3 × 3 Rayleigh channel, as shown in Fig. 4. One observation
comparing Fig. 4 with Fig. 2 is that practical antennas with
mutual coupling and casing effects can provide large capacity
increase with less constraint on antenna configurations than the
idealized tridipole system.
V. C
ONCLUSION
We presented a simulation study of MIMO channel capacity
as a function of antenna configurations and propagation envi-
ronments. For a size-constrained receiver, antenna polarization
diversity provides local decorrelation, hence increased channel
capacity. We focused on a simple yet realistic trimonopole
antenna structure, and we took into account all the mutual
coupling and casing effects using full-wave electromagnetic
simulation. We arrived at the following conclusions.
1) The trimonopole antennas can provide a large channel
capacity that approaches the capacity of the uncorrelated
Rayleigh channel; the increase is especially pronounced
when the mobile is in a rich-scattering environment.
2) Although the decorrelation of received signals is due to a
combination of antenna polarization and pattern diversity,
the capacity gain is mainly attributed to the polarization
diversity.
3) The trimonopole antennas with mutual coupling and cas-
ing effects can provide large capacity increase with less
constraint on antenna configurations than the idealized
tridipole system.
Further research will be conducted on polarization-diverse
MIMO systems using improved propagation models and re-
laxing the channel normalization assumption. This will involve
more sophisticated models of the channel matrix.
R
EFERENCES
[1] G. J. Foschini and M. J. Gans, “On limits of wireless communications
in a fading environment when using multiple antennas,” Wireless Pers.
Commun., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 311–335, Mar. 1998.
[2] I. E. Telatar, “Capacity of multi-antenna Gaussian channels,” Eur. Trans.
Telecommun., vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 585–595, Nov./Dec. 1999.
[3] D.-S. Shiu, G. J. Foschini, M. J. Gans, and J. M. Kahn, “Fading correlation
and its effect on the capacity of multielement antenna systems,” IEEE
Trans. Commun., vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 502–513, Mar. 2000.
[4] C. B. Dietrich, K. Dietze, J. R. Nealy, and W. L. Stutzman, “Spatial,
polarization, and pattern diversity for wireless handheld terminals,” IEEE
Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 1271–1281, Sep. 2001.
[5] P. Kyritsi, D. C. Cox, R. A. Valenzuela, and P. W. Wolniansky, “Effect
of antenna polarization on the capacity of a multiple element system in
an indoor environment,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 20, no. 6,
pp. 1227–1239, Aug. 2002.
[6] R. U. Nabar, H. Bölcskei, V. Erceg, D. Gesbert, and A. Paulraj,
“Performance of multiantenna signaling techniques in the presence of
polarization diversity” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 50, no. 10,
pp. 2553–2562, Oct. 2002.
[7] M. R. Andrews, P. P. Mitra, and R. deCarvalho, “Tripling the capacity
of wireless communications using electromagnetic polarization,” Nature,
vol. 409, no. 6818, pp. 316–318, Jan. 2001.
[8] T. Svantesson, “On capacity and correlation of multi-antenna systems
employing multiple polarizations,” in IEEE Int. Antennas Propagation
Symp. Digest, San Antonio, TX, Jun. 2002, pp. 202–205.
[9] D. D. Stancil, A. Berson, J. P. Van’t Hof, R. Negi, S. Sheth,
and P. Patel, “Doubling wireless channel capacity using co-polarised,
co-located electric and magnetic dipoles,” Electron. Lett., vol. 38, no. 14,
pp. 746–747, Jul. 2002.
[10] J. B. Andersen and B. N. Getu, “The MIMO cube—A compact MIMO
antenna,” in 5th Int. Symp. Wireless Personal Multimedia Communica-
tions, Honolulu, HI, Oct. 2002, pp. 112–114.
[11] G. J. Burke and A. J. Poggio, Numerical Electromagnetics Code
(NEC)—Method of Moments. Livermore, CA: Lawrence Livermore Nat.
Lab., 1981.
[12] H. Xu, M. J. Gans, N. Amitay, and R. A. Valenzuela, “Experimental verifi-
cation of MTMR system capacity in controlled propagation environment,”
Electron. Lett., vol. 37, no. 15, pp. 936–937, Jul. 2001.
[13] J. W. Wallace, M. A. Jensen, A. L. Swindlehurst, and B. D. Jeffs, “Exper-
imental characterization of the MIMO wireless channel: Data acquisition
and analysis,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 335–343,
Mar. 2003.
[14] D. Gesbert, H. Bölcskei, D. A. Gore, and A. Paulraj, “Outdoor MIMO
wireless channels: Model and performance prediction,” IEEE Trans. Com-
mun., vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 1926–1934, Dec. 2002.
[15] J. W. Wallace and M. A. Jensen, “Modeling the indoor MIMO wireless
channel,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 591–599,
May 2002.
[16] W. C. Jakes, Microwave Mobile Communications. New York: Wiley,
1974.
[17] D. Chizhik, F. Rashid-Farrokhi, J. Ling, and A. Lozano, “Effect of
antenna separation on the capacity of BLAST in correlated channels,”
IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 337–339, Nov. 2000.
[18] T. Su, K. Dandekar, and H. Ling, “Simulation of mutual coupling effect in
circular arrays for direction finding applications,” Microw. Opt. Technol.
Lett., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 331–336, Sep. 2000.
[19] K. I. Pedersen, P. E. Mogensen, and B. H. Fleury, “Spatial channel charac-
teristics in outdoor environments and their impact on BS antenna system
performance,” in Proc. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conf., Ottawa, ON,
Canada, May 1998, pp. 719–723.
DONG et al.: SIMULATION OF MIMO CHANNEL CAPACITY WITH ANTENNA POLARIZATION DIVERSITY 1873
Liang Dong (S’96–M’02) was born in Shanghai,
China, on February 15, 1974. He received the B.S.
degree in applied physics and computer engineer-
ing from Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai,
China, in 1996, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in
electrical and computer engineering from the Univer-
sity of Texas, Austin, in 1998 and 2002, respectively.
From 1996 to 2002, he was a Research Assistant
with the Department of Electrical and Computer En-
gineering, University of Texas at Austin. From 1998
to 1999, he was an Engineer at CWiLL Telecom-
munications Inc., Austin, TX, where he participated in the design and imple-
mentation of a smart antenna communications system. During the summer of
2000, he was a Consultant for Navini Networks Inc., Richardson, TX. From
2002 to 2004, he was a Research Associate with the Department of Electrical
Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN. He joined the faculty
of Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, in August 2004, where he is
currently an Assistant Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering. His
research interests include array signal processing for communications, channel
estimation and modeling, space–time coding, and wireless networking.
Dr. Dong is a member of Sigma Xi, Phi Kappa Phi, and Tau Beta Pi.
Hosung Choo (S’00–M’04) was born in Seoul, Ko-
rea, in 1972. He received the B.S. degree in radio
science and engineering from Hanyang University,
Seoul, Korea, in 1998, and the M.S. and Ph.D. de-
grees in electrical and computer engineering from
the University of Texas at Austin, in 2000 and 2003,
respectively.
From 1999 to 2003, he was a Research Assistant
with the Department of Electrical and Computer
Engineering, University of Texas at Austin. In Sep-
tember 2003, he joined the School of Electronic
and Electrical Engineering, Hongik University, Seoul, Korea, where he is
currently a Full-Time Instructor. His principal area of research is the use of the
genetic algorithm in developing microstrip and wire antennas and microwave
absorbers. His studies include broadband and multiband antennas for wireless
communications and miniaturized antennas for HF frequency bands.
Robert W. Heath, Jr. (S’96–M’01) received the
B.S. and M.S. degrees from the University of Vir-
ginia, Charlottesville, in 1996 and 1997, respectively,
and the Ph.D. degree from Stanford University, Stan-
ford, CA, in 2002, all in electrical engineering.
From 1998 to 1999, he was a Senior Member of
the Technical Staff at Iospan Wireless Inc., San Jose,
CA, where he played a key role in the design and
implementation of the physical and link layers of
the first commercial MIMO–OFDM communication
system. From 1999 to 2001, he served as a Senior
Consultant for Iospan Wireless Inc. In 2003, he founded MIMO Wireless
Inc. Since January 2002, he has been with the Department of Electrical and
Computer Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, where he serves as an
Assistant Professor as part of the Wireless Networking and Communications
Group. His research interests include interference management in wireless
networks, sequence design, and all aspects of MIMO communication including
antenna design, practical receiver architectures, limited feedback techniques,
and scheduling algorithms.
Dr. Heath serves as an Associate Editor for the IEEE T
RANSACTIONS
ON
COMMUNICATIONS and the IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR
TECHNOLOGY.
Hao Ling (S’83–M’86–SM’92–F’99) was born in
Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C., on September 26, 1959.
He received the B.S. degree in electrical engineer-
ing and physics from the Massachusetts Institute
of Technology, Cambridge, in 1982, and the M.S.
and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, in 1983
and 1986, respectively.
He joined the faculty of the University of Texas
at Austin, in September 1986, and is currently a
Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering
and holds the L. B. Meaders Professorship in Engineering. During 1982,
he was associated with the IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, York-
town Heights, NY, where he conducted low-temperature experiments with the
Josephson Department. He participated in the Summer Visiting Faculty Pro-
gram in 1987 at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. In 1990, he was
an Air Force Summer Fellow at Rome Air Development Center, Hanscom Air
Force Base. His principal area of research is in computational electromagnetics.
His recent research interests also include radar signal processing, automatic
target identification, antenna design, and physical layer modeling for wireless
communications.
Dr. Ling was a recipient of the National Science Foundation Presidential
Young Investigator Award in 1987, the NASA Certificate of Appreciation in
1991, as well as several teaching awards from the University of Texas at Austin.