A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Child's Nervous System
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
FOCUS SESSION
The selective dorsal rhizotomy technique for spasticity
in 2020: a review
Rick Abbott
1
Received: 18 June 2020 / Accepted: 22 June 2020
#Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020
Abstract
This review looks at the advances in the surgical technique, selective dorsal rhizotomy, used for the management of spasticity in
children.
Keywords Selective dorsal rhizotomy .Selective posterior rhizotomy .Cerebral palsy treatment .North America .Spasticity
In the mid-1980s, the selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) was
introduced to North America for the treatment of spasticity
and, in particular, the treatment of children with spastic cere-
bral palsy (CP). In the late 1980s, I was asked to write a review
of its history and its use [1]. At the time the favored technique
was based on Peacock’s[2,3]. It consisted of a L2 through L5
laminectomies wide enough to view the nerve roots as they
exited the dura, separation of the sensory from the motor nerve
root at each targeted level then electrical stimulation of the L2
through S1 sensory roots bilaterally. Interpretation of the re-
sponses was based on Fasano’s manuscript that described an
normal root response to an electrical stimulus train (1 stimu-
lus/s) as causing contraction of a single muscle or muscle
group that continued in a one-for-one pattern [4]. As the fre-
quency of stimuli in the train was increased, the observed
muscle contraction rapidly lessened in duration and ceased
when the train’s frequency of stimuli went above 20 Hz. He
also described a normal root’sresponseas“The responding
muscle groups are always the same, for each root being ex-
amined, whatever stimulation frequency is employed.”He
observed that the threshold for stimulation of normal nerve
roots was between 0.1 and 0.5 V. Fasano deemed a nerve root
as being abnormal when its response to stimulation varied
from the above description.
Peacock’s presentation of his technique and his reports on
his CP patients’outcome rapidly gained attention in North
America, both by its pediatric neurosurgeons and the public
at large. Much controversy was generated in the medical field
over the procedure and its efficacy. Surgeons employing the
technique were compelled to report their results in an increas-
ingly stringent manor. The result has been an evolution in the
methods used both surgically and for assessing the patients
undergoing SDR. This review will focus on this evolution and
how it has affected patient selection for treatment with SDRs,
the tools used for their assessment, the surgical technique, and
some of the complications that have been driving this
evolution.
Candidate selection
In his 1987 report on using SDR to treat “cerebral palsy spas-
ticity,”Peacock concluded that children with pure spasticity
that predominantly involves the legs benefited most from the
procedure and this became his ideal candidate [5]. The paper
also reported that “…athetoid and ataxic patients should not
undergo this form of surgery unless there is considerable
amount of coexisting spasticity.”Great attention was placed
on clearly defining spasticity as described by Lance (“…a
motor disorder characterized by a velocity-dependent increase
in tonic stretch reflexes (muscle tone) with exaggerated ten-
don jerks, resulting from hyperexcitability of the stretch re-
flex, as one component of the upper motor neuron syn-
drome.”)[6]. Peacock’s subsequent reports focused on the
results of using SDR to treat spastic diplegics. This, coupled
with the introduction of intrathecal baclofen, narrowed the
application of SDR to children in most centers by the late
1990s.
*Rick Abbott
rickabbott@me.com
1
Albert Einstein College ofMedicine, Montefiore Health System, 110
E. 210th St Bronx NY 10467 USA
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-020-04765-6
/ Published online: 9 July 2020
Child's Nervous System (2020) 36:1895–1905
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.