A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
REVIEW ARTICLE
Catalytic tar conversion and the prospective use of iron-based
catalyst in the future development of biomass gasification: a review
Bakari Ramadhani
1,2,3
&Thomas Kivevele
1,2
&Joseph H. Kihedu
4
&Yusufu A. C. Jande
1,2
Received: 15 January 2020 / Revised: 4 June 2020 / Accepted: 10 June 2020
#Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020
Abstract
Biomass is a promising renewable energy source which is available globally, mostly in developing countries where access to
clean and affordable energy is a critical problem.Biomass gasification is an interesting technology that can convert biomasses to
a more versatile fuel known as syngas, the energy which can substitute conventional fossil fuels in the future. Syngas can
amenably be combusted to produce power and heat as well as a feedstock for synthesis of chemicals and other fuels. The biomass
gasification is facing severe operational challenges, one of the problems being tar formation and its removal techniques. Tar
condenses at reduced temperature, thus causing blockage in the downstream equipment such as compressors and engines. Many
studies have considered syngas cleaning by physical removal and thermal cracking unsuitable as they need downstream pro-
cessing of scrub liquor and utilizes a part of the produced gas in maintaining the thermal cracking temperature, respectively. The
utilization of catalysts has been an interesting focus; however, it has not yet been fruitful as many of the developed catalysts
deactivate rapidly, and they are expensive or toxic. The motives of the current study are to review tar formation characteristicsand
trends on catalytic conversion. In addition, the study elucidates the fascinating behaviour of metallic and oxides of the iron-based
catalyst under different syngas composition (oxidizing and reducing environments). The behaviours of the iron-based catalyst
indicate its fundamental role in developing a catalyst for tar cracking with respect to less toxic, inexpensive, abundant, and
regenerable alternatives.
Keywords Biomass gasification .Syngas .Tar removal .Catalyst .Iron-based catalyst .Biomass conversion
1 Introduction
The growing concerns over fossil fuel price, increased energy
demand due to rapid industrialisation and increased popula-
tion, and foreseen damage of climate change through global
warming is a contemporary threat to the quality of life of
populations, plants, and animals [1–6]. At present, the global
energy matrix is 80–85% dependent on fossil fuel as the pri-
mary energy source; however, depending on the country, the
dependency varies from 32.1 to 100% [7,8]. The combustion
of fossil fuelcontributes about 70% of total global GHG emis-
sions in the form of CO
2
[9].
To ensure sustainable development of the society, the only
possibility is to emphasize on clean and green energy through
searching for the ideal renewable energy resources [10,11].
Amongst the available resources, it ought to note thatbiomass
is considered a prominent form of energy which can deliver
steady energy as fossil fuels [12,13].
Biomass contributes about 10–14% of the global energy
requirement, while in rural and remote areas of developing
countries, its contributions are more than 90% [2,14,15].
Biomass gasification is one of the effective thermochemi-
cal conversion processes that convert the energy values of
biomass to permanent gases (H
2
, CO, and CH
4
)calledsyngas,
the hydrogen-rich gas with stable energy content like fossil
fuels [1,16]. The syngas from biomass is more useful than its
*Yusufu A. C. Jande
yusufu.jande@nm-aist.ac.tz
1
Department of Materials, Energy Sciences and Engineering, The
Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, P.
O. Box 447, Arusha, Tanzania
2
Water Infrastructure and Sustainable Energy Futures
(WISE-Futures), African Centreof Excellence, The Nelson Mandela
African Institution of Science and Technology, P. O. Box 9124,
Arusha, Tanzania
3
Department of Petroleum and Energy Engineering, The University of
Dodoma, P. O. Box 11090, Dodoma, Tanzania
4
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of
Dar es Salaam, P. O. Box 35131, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00814-x
/ Published online: 27 June 2020
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery (2022) 12:1369–1392
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.