Content uploaded by Mohammad Mahdi Pourbasir
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Mohammad Mahdi Pourbasir on Jun 26, 2020
Content may be subject to copyright.
14
1
1398
1398141251 -261
_
jte.sru.ac.ir ISSN: 2345 – 5462
1
2
3
2
1
ut.ac.ir@meigounpoory
2
3
14 1397
26 1397
20
9
Entrepreneurial university campus ecosystem (EUCE) design with interpretive
structural modelling: A new approach in higher education system
M. R. Meigounpoory1, A. Arabiun,2 M. M. Poorbasir3, A. Mobini Dehkordi2
1 Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding author) meigounpoory@ut.ac.ir
2 Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
3 PhD student, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
ARTICLE INFORMATION
Original Research Paper
Received: 04 june 2018
Accepted: 16 January 2019
Keywords:
Entrepreneurship Ecosystem
University Based Entrepreneurship
Ecosystem
Entrepreneurial University Campus
Ecosystem (EUCE)
Interpretive Structural Modelling
ABSTRACT
The study of the higher education policies for university entrepreneurship ecosystem creation has
become one of the major new and important topics in the field of higher education and university
entrepreneurship ecosystems. Hence, changing the approach from purely educational and research
planning to the establishment of the university campus entrepreneurship ecosystem has been
attended by the world's leading universities. The current study aims to design a model for creating
an Entrepreneurial University Campus Ecosystem (EUCE) with the configuration and leveling of
the factors. Hence using a qualitative approach, an in-depth and exploratory interview was
conducted with 20 experts from the research population. Then, using open and axial coding
method, 9 axial factors were identified. The axial factors affecting the creation of Entrepreneurial
University Campus Ecosystem (EUCE) have been classified using an Interpretive Structural
method. A questionnaire was designed and distributed among 28 academic and field experts. A
group of five experts on EUCE has studied the completed questionnaires and determined the
relations between subject to disagreement components. Then, Interpretive Structural Modelling
was built using Matlab software to develop an EUCE model.
252
141
1398
1
[1, 2]
[3, 4]
[5, 6]
[7, 8]
[9-
11]
[12, 13]
[10,12, 14]
[10,
15]
[1, 16]
[17]
[12]
Entrepreneurial university campus
ecosystem
1935"
"
[18]
"
" [12]
[19]
[4]
[20]
[21]
-
[3, 4]
[7, 22]
-
[4]
253
14
1
1398
-
[13]
1983[24.]
-
80
[25-27.]
[28]
[29.]
[30]
[31.]
[32]
""
[33 ,
34].
[9 ,35.]
[36, 13] .
121436.
[15.]
[37.]
[38.]
[10 ,15.]
[10, 39]
[33, 34]
1
.
1
254
141
1398
2.
1.
Fig 1. Research process.
20
[40]
12
8
20
(2)
[41]
3
20
3
Qualitative analysis Interpretive structural
modelling
1
Table 1. The university entrepreneurship ecosystem dimensions identified in the literature
Fu &
Hsia
Moriss
Nelson and
Monsen
Rideout
& Gray
Rice et
al
Graham
Graham
U.S
department of
commerce
Miler
& Acs
The dimensions of the
university
entrepreneurship
ecosystem
2014
2017
2014
2013
2010
2013
2014
2013
2017
*
*
*
*
*
Policies and rules
*
*
*
*
*
Programs and supports
of government
*
*
*
*
*
Capital
*
*
*
Culture
*
*
*
*
Soft supports,
Knowledge, Information
*
*
*
*
Infrastructure
*
*
*
Attractive living
conditions
*
*
Official institutions
*
*
*
*
The internationalization
of the university and the
diversity of human
resources in the
university and
ecosystem area
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Networks / Interactions /
Informal Relationships
*
*
*
*
*
Leadership
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
University requirements
and curricular and co
curricular
255
14
1
1398
3
20228
90
48
7960
[42]
4
.2
Table 2. The demographic features of the interviewees
3
Table 3. The reliability of the method
Row
Total
number
of codes
Number of
similarities
Number of
non-
similarities
Reliability
(percent)
1
82
30
22
73
2
74
29
16
78
3
72
31
10
86
Total
228
90
48
79
4.
Table 4. Axial factors for entrepreneurial university campus
ecosystem
Axial factors
Entrepreneurial culture in EUCE
1
The infrastructure needed to create EUCE
2
Policies on university finance and university resource
management
3
The intensity and level of research and development in the
university ecosystem
4
Internal policies of the university
5
Regional governance factors affecting the creation of EUCE
6
Economic and business environment factors in the ecosystem of
the region
7
Effective institutions to create EUCE
8
Regional market factors influencing the creation of the regional
ecosystem
9
ISM
1974 [43]ISM
ISM9
SSIM
5 9
A,V,X,O
28
Demographic
features
Characteristics of
contributors
Percent
Experts’ feature
Experts of university
entrepreneurship and
entrepreneurship ecosystem
40
Policymakers of university
entrepreneurship and
entrepreneurship ecosystem
30
Authorities in science,
research, and technology
30
Gender
Woman
10
Man
90
Position
The knowledgeable university
professor in the field of
entrepreneurship
70
Knowledgeable policy makers
in the field of the
entrepreneurship ecosystem
30
Work experience
Less than 15 years
10%
15 to 20 years
40%
More than 20 years
50%
Education
Ph.D.
100
Number of
interviewees
20
256
141
1398
24
5
5
5 ISM
Table 5. Relationships obtained from the ISM questionnaire
Factors
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
Entrepreneurial culture in
EUCE
O
V
V
V
V
O
O
A
O
2
The infrastructure needed to
create EUCE
O
A
V
A
A
A
A
O
3
Policies on university
finance and university
resource management
O
X
X
A
A
A
A
4
The intensity and level of
research and development in
the university ecosystem
O
A
O
A
A
A
5
Internal policies of the
university
O
A
A
A
A
6
Regional governance factors
affecting the creation of
EUCE
O
V
X
V
7
Economic and business
environment factors in the
ecosystem of the region
O
A
X
8
Effective institutions to
create EUCE
O
A
9
Regional market factors
influencing the creation of
the regional ecosystem
O
A,V,X,O
6
Table 6. The access matrix
Factors
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
7
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
9
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
n
𝐴 + 𝐼 M = (A + I)^n
AIM
:1+1=1 1x1=1
7
Table 7. The final access matrix
Factors
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
4
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
5
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
9
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
ISM
3
257
14
1
1398
(9)
8
Table 8. Determine the levels of factors
Factor
s
Set of access
Set of
prerequisite
Set of
intersectio
n
Level
1
1,2,3,4,5
1,6,7,8,9
1
Secon
d
2
2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
,9
2,3,4,5
First
3
2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
,9
2,3,4,5
First
4
2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
,9
2,3,4,5
First
5
2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
,9
2,3,4,5
First
6
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
,9
6,7,8,9
6,7,8,9
Third
7
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
,9
6,7,8,9
6,7,8,9
Third
8
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
6,7,8,9
6,7,8,9
Third
9
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
6,7,8,9
6,7,8,9
Third
9
ISM
(2)
2
ISM
9
Table 9. Comparison of the results of effective factors on the creation
of EUCE with other researchers
Axial factors
Other researchers
Entrepreneurial
culture in EUCE
Durst & Poutanen (2013) and Isenberg (2010)
refers to the culture of entrepreneurship
ecosystem. Graham (2013) has pointed to this
factor for the establishment of a university
ecosystem.
The infrastructure
needed to create
EUCE
Miller and Acs (2017) and Gray (2013)
referred to the existence of infrastructure to
create entrepreneurial university and university
entrepreneurship ecosystem.
Policies on
university finance
and university
resource
management
Miller & Acs (2017), Rice (2010) and Moriss
(2017) refer to capital for the creation of an
entrepreneurial ecosystem. Gabe (2005) and
Etzkowitz (1983, 2004) point out the
importance of financial capital for the creation
of an entrepreneurial university.
The intensity and
level of research
and development
in the university
ecosystem
Previous studies have not mentioned this factor
in the field of university entrepreneurship
ecosystem.
Internal policies of
the university
Ropke (1998), Etzkowitz (1983), Clark (1998)
and Guerrero & Urbano (2012) mentioned
entrepreneurship and university
entrepreneurship, but not about the university
entrepreneurship ecosystem.
Regional
governance
factors affecting
the creation of
EUCE
This factor in the field of university
entrepreneurship ecosystem has not been
mentioned. Miller & Acs (2017) has Only
mentioned it, not its sub-components
Effective
institutions to
create EUCE
Isenberg, 2010 has mentioned this factor in the
entrepreneurship ecosystem, but not in the
university entrepreneurship ecosystem. Moriss
(2017) has mentioned international importance
and diversity of human resources.
Regional market
factors influencing
the creation of the
regional
ecosystem
It has not been mentioned.
Economic and
business
environment
factors in the
ecosystem of the
region
It has not been mentioned.
EUCE
258
141
1398
First level
Third level
2
Fig. 2. Modeling the euce based on the ism
Entrepreneurial culture in euce
Regional market
factors influencing
the creation of the
regional ecosystem
Economic and
business
environment factors
in the ecosystem of
the region
Effective
institutions to
create euce
Regional
governance factors
affecting the
creation of euce
Policies on
university finance
and university
resource
management
The intensity
and level of
research and
development in
the university
ecosystem
Internal policies
of the university
The infrastructure
needed to create
euce
Second level
259
14
1
1398
2
EUCE
ISM
-
EUCE
2
4
9
ISM
EUCE
4
-
260
141
1398
-
- Silicon Valley
[1] Morris, M. H., Kuratko, D. F., & Cornwall, J. R.
(2013). Entrepreneurship programs and the modern
university. Edward Elgar Publishing.
[2] Dickson, P. H., Solomon, G. T., & Weaver, K. M.
(2008). Entrepreneurial selection and success: does
education matter?. Journal of small business and
enterprise development, 15(2), 239-258.
[3] Shane, S. (2009). Why encouraging more people to
become entrepreneurs is bad public policy. Small business
economics, 33(2), 141-149.
[4] Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial
ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. Final
Report to OECD, Paris, 30(1), 77-102.
[5] Toledano, N., & Urbano, D. (2008). Promoting
entrepreneurial mindsets at universities: a case study in the
South of Spain. European Journal of International
Management, 2(4), 382-399.
[6] Lee, S. M., & Peterson, S. J. (2000). Culture,
entrepreneurial orientation, and global competitiveness.
Journal of world business, 35(4), 401-416.
[7] Theodotou, M., (2012). Cyprus Entrepreneurship
Ecosystem:A roadmap for economic growth., ISNB
Number: 978-9963-2863-0-0., (2012). Cyprus
Entrepreneurship Ecosystem:A roadmap for economic
growth., ISNB Number: 978-9963-2863-0-0
[8] Malecki, E. J. (2011). Connecting local entrepreneurial
ecosystems to global innovation networks: open
innovation, double networks and knowledge integration.
International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation
Management, 14(1), 36-59.
[9] Fetters, M., Greene, P. G., & Rice, M. P. (Eds.). (2010).
The development of university-based entrepreneurship
ecosystems: global practices. Edward Elgar Publishing.
[10] Miller, D. J., & Acs, Z. J. (2017). The campus as
entrepreneurial ecosystem: the University of Chicago.
Small Business Economics, 49(1), 75-95.
[11] Morris, M. H., Shirokova, G., & Tsukanova, T.
(2017). Student entrepreneurship and the university
ecosystem: a multi-country empirical exploration.
European Journal of International Management, 11(1),
65-85.
[12] Isenberg, D. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem
strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy:
Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Presentation
at the Institute of International and European Affairs.
[13] Isenberg, D. J. (2010). How to start an entrepreneurial
revolution. Harvard business review, 88(6), 40-50.
[14]WEF (World Economic Forum) (2014)
Entrepreneurial Ecosystems around the Globe and Early-
Stage Company Growth Dynamics, World Economic
Forum, Geneva, Switzerland.
[15] Rideout, E. C., & Gray, D. O. (2013). Does
entrepreneurship education really work? A review and
methodological critique of the empirical literature on the
effects of university‐based entrepreneurship education.
Journal of Small Business Management, 51(3), 329-351.
[16] Matlay, H. (2008). The impact of entrepreneurship
education on entrepreneurial outcomes. Journal of small
business and enterprise development, 15(2), 382-396.
[17] Sieger, P., Fueglistaller, U., & Zellweger, T. (2014).
Student entrepreneurship across the globe: a look at
intentions and activities.
[18] Tansley, A. G. (1935). The use and abuse of
vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology, 16(3), 284-307.
[19] Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and
regional policy: a sympathetic critique. European
Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759-1769.
[20] Van de Ven, H. (1993). The development of an
infrastructure for entrepreneurship. Journal of Business
venturing, 8(3), 211-230.
[21] Mason, C. M., & Harrison, R. T. (2006). After the
exit: Acquisitions, entrepreneurial recycling and regional
economic development. Regional Studies, 40(1), 55-73
[22] Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Keystones and
dominators: Framing operating and technology strategy in
a business ecosystem. Harvard Business School, Boston,
24-25.
[23] Durst, S., & Poutanen, P. (2013, June). Success
factors of innovation ecosystems-Initial insights from a
literature review. In Proceedings of Co-Create 2013: The
Boundary-Crossing Conference on Co-Design in
Innovation (pp. 16-19). Espoo, Finland: Aalto University.
261
14
1
1398
[24] Etzkowitz, H. (1983). Entrepreneurial scientists and
entrepreneurial universities in American academic
science. Minerva, 21(2-3), 198-233.
[25] Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-
firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university.
Research policy, 32(1), 109-121.
[26] Mian, S. A. (2006, May). Can entrepreneurial
university model help Pakistan leapfrog into the
knowledge economy? Some reflections. In Proceedings of
First International Conference on Assessing Quality in
Higher Education, Lahore, December (pp. 11-13).
[27] Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2012). The development
of an entrepreneurial university. The journal of technology
transfer, 37(1), 43-74.
[28] Gibb, A. (2005). Towards the entrepreneurial
university: Entrepreneurship education as a lever for
change (Policy paper). National Council for Graduate
Entrepreneurship, Birmingham, 3.
[29] Röpke, J. (1998). The entrepreneurial university.
Innovation, academic knowledge creation and regional
development in a globalized economy, Department of
Economics, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany.
[30] Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial
universities: organizational pathways of transformation.
Issues in Higher Education. New York, NY 10010).
[31] Etzkowitz, H. (2004). The evolution of the
entrepreneurial university. International Journal of
Technology and Globalisation, 1(1), 64-77.
[32] Barnes, T., Pashby, I., & Gibbons, A. (2002).
Effective University–Industry Interaction:: A Multi-case
Evaluation of Collaborative R&D Projects. European
Management Journal, 20(3), 272-285.
[33] Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of American
cities.
[34] Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class and
how it’s transforming work, life, community and everyday
life (Paperback Ed.).
[35] Graham, R. (2014). Creating university-based
entrepreneurial ecosystems: evidence from emerging
world leaders. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
[36] Isenberg, D. (2014). What an entrepreneurship
ecosystem actually is. Harvard Business Review, 5, 1-7.
[37] Nelson, A. J., & Monsen, E. (2014). Teaching
technology commercialization: introduction to the special
section. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(5), 774-
779.
[38] Fu, E., Hsia, T. Universities and Entrepreneurial
Ecosystems: Elements of the Stanford-Silicon Valley
Success. From
http://www.kauffmanfellows.org/journal_posts/universiti
es-and-entrepreneurial-ecosystems-stanford-silicon-
valley-success/..
[39] Turner, F. J. (1893). The significance of the frontier
in American history.
[40] Biernacki, P., & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball
sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral
sampling. Sociological methods & research, 10(2), 141-
163.
[41] Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative
research: Procedures and techniques for developing
grounded theory.
[42] Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An Introduction to
qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
[43] Warfield, J. N. (1974). Developing interconnection
matrices in structural modeling.
How to cite this paper:
M. R. Meigounpoory, A. Arabiun, M. M. Poorbasir, A. Mobini Dehkordi,
(2019). Entrepreneurial university campus ecosystem (EUCE) design with
interpretive structural modelling: A new approach in higher education
system. Journal of Technology of Education, 14(1), 251-261.
DOI: 10.22061/jte.2019.3694.1921
URL: http://jte.sru.ac.ir/?_action=showPDF&article=980