ArticlePDF Available

Entrepreneurial university campus ecosystem

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The study of the higher education policies for university entrepreneurship ecosystem creation has become one of the major new and important topics in the field of higher education and university entrepreneurship ecosystems. Hence, changing the approach from purely educational and research planning to the establishment of the university campus entrepreneurship ecosystem has been attended by the world's leading universities. The current study aims to design a model for creating an Entrepreneurial University Campus Ecosystem (EUCE) with the configuration and leveling of the factors. Hence using a qualitative approach, an in-depth and exploratory interview was conducted with 20 experts from the research population. Then, using open and axial coding method, 9 axial factors were identified. The axial factors affecting the creation of Entrepreneurial University Campus Ecosystem (EUCE) have been classified using an Interpretive Structural method. A questionnaire was designed and distributed among 28 academic and field experts. A group of five experts on EUCE has studied the completed questionnaires and determined the relations between subject to disagreement components. Then, Interpretive Structural Modelling was built using Matlab software to develop an EUCE model.
Content may be subject to copyright.

14

1

1398
1398141251 -261
 _ 

jte.sru.ac.ir ISSN: 2345 5462


1

2

3

2
1
ut.ac.ir@meigounpoory
2

3



14 1397
26 1397












 
20
9


Entrepreneurial university campus ecosystem (EUCE) design with interpretive
structural modelling: A new approach in higher education system
M. R. Meigounpoory1, A. Arabiun,2 M. M. Poorbasir3, A. Mobini Dehkordi2
1 Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding author) meigounpoory@ut.ac.ir
2 Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
3 PhD student, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
ARTICLE INFORMATION
Original Research Paper
Received: 04 june 2018
Accepted: 16 January 2019
Keywords:
Entrepreneurship Ecosystem
University Based Entrepreneurship
Ecosystem
Entrepreneurial University Campus
Ecosystem (EUCE)
Interpretive Structural Modelling
ABSTRACT
The study of the higher education policies for university entrepreneurship ecosystem creation has
become one of the major new and important topics in the field of higher education and university
entrepreneurship ecosystems. Hence, changing the approach from purely educational and research
planning to the establishment of the university campus entrepreneurship ecosystem has been
attended by the world's leading universities. The current study aims to design a model for creating
an Entrepreneurial University Campus Ecosystem (EUCE) with the configuration and leveling of
the factors. Hence using a qualitative approach, an in-depth and exploratory interview was
conducted with 20 experts from the research population. Then, using open and axial coding
method, 9 axial factors were identified. The axial factors affecting the creation of Entrepreneurial
University Campus Ecosystem (EUCE) have been classified using an Interpretive Structural
method. A questionnaire was designed and distributed among 28 academic and field experts. A
group of five experts on EUCE has studied the completed questionnaires and determined the
relations between subject to disagreement components. Then, Interpretive Structural Modelling
was built using Matlab software to develop an EUCE model.
 252
141
1398
1
      


[1, 2]




[3, 4]

   
[5, 6]

 
  
[7, 8]
[9-
11] 
  [12, 13]  

  

[10,12, 14]    
   

 [10,
15]     

[1, 16]
 


[17]



[12]



Entrepreneurial university campus
ecosystem 
1935"
"
[18]

 " 



" [12] 

 
[19]

[4]
      
[20]

 [21]

-
 
     
[3, 4] 


[7, 22]

-



[4]
  
    

Qualitative analysis Interpretive structural
modelling
1 
Table 1. The university entrepreneurship ecosystem dimensions identified in the literature
Fu &
Hsia
Moriss
Nelson and
Monsen
Rideout
& Gray
Rice et
al
Graham
Graham
U.S
department of
commerce
Miler
& Acs
The dimensions of the
university
entrepreneurship
ecosystem
2014
2017
2014
2013
2010
2013
2014
2013
2017
*
*
*
*
*
Policies and rules
*
*
*
*
*
Programs and supports
of government
*
*
*
*
*
Capital
*
*
*
Culture
*
*
*
*
Soft supports,
Knowledge, Information
*
*
*
*
Infrastructure
*
*
*
Attractive living
conditions
*
*
Official institutions
*
*
*
*
The internationalization
of the university and the
diversity of human
resources in the
university and
ecosystem area
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Networks / Interactions /
Informal Relationships
*
*
*
*
*
Leadership
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
University requirements
and curricular and co
curricular
Row
Total
number
of codes
Number of
similarities
Number of
non-
similarities
Reliability
(percent)
1
82
30
22
73
2
74
29
16
78
3
72
31
10
86
Total
228
90
48
79
Axial factors
Entrepreneurial culture in EUCE
1
The infrastructure needed to create EUCE
2
Policies on university finance and university resource
management
3
The intensity and level of research and development in the
university ecosystem
4
Internal policies of the university
5
Regional governance factors affecting the creation of EUCE
6
Economic and business environment factors in the ecosystem of
the region
7
Effective institutions to create EUCE
8
Regional market factors influencing the creation of the regional
ecosystem
9
Demographic
features
Characteristics of
contributors
Percent
Experts’ feature
Experts of university
entrepreneurship and
entrepreneurship ecosystem
40
Policymakers of university
entrepreneurship and
entrepreneurship ecosystem
30
Authorities in science,
research, and technology
30
Gender
Woman
10
Man
90
Position
The knowledgeable university
professor in the field of
entrepreneurship
70
Knowledgeable policy makers
in the field of the
entrepreneurship ecosystem
30
Work experience
Less than 15 years
10%
15 to 20 years
40%
More than 20 years
50%
Education
Ph.D.
100
Number of
interviewees
20
Factors
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
Entrepreneurial culture in
EUCE
O
V
V
V
V
O
O
A
O
2
The infrastructure needed to
create EUCE
O
A
V
A
A
A
A
O
3
Policies on university
finance and university
resource management
O
X
X
A
A
A
A
4
The intensity and level of
research and development in
the university ecosystem
O
A
O
A
A
A
5
Internal policies of the
university
O
A
A
A
A
6
Regional governance factors
affecting the creation of
EUCE
O
V
X
V
7
Economic and business
environment factors in the
ecosystem of the region
O
A
X
8
Effective institutions to
create EUCE
O
A
9
Regional market factors
influencing the creation of
the regional ecosystem
O
Factors
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
7
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
9
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
Factors
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
4
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
5
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
9
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Factor
s
Set of access
Set of
prerequisite
Set of
intersectio
n
Level
1
1,2,3,4,5
1,6,7,8,9
1
Secon
d
2
2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
,9
2,3,4,5
First
3
2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
,9
2,3,4,5
First
4
2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
,9
2,3,4,5
First
5
2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
,9
2,3,4,5
First
6
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
,9
6,7,8,9
6,7,8,9
Third
7
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
,9
6,7,8,9
6,7,8,9
Third
8
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
6,7,8,9
6,7,8,9
Third
9
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
6,7,8,9
6,7,8,9
Third
Axial factors
Other researchers
Entrepreneurial
culture in EUCE
Durst & Poutanen (2013) and Isenberg (2010)
refers to the culture of entrepreneurship
ecosystem. Graham (2013) has pointed to this
factor for the establishment of a university
ecosystem.
The infrastructure
needed to create
EUCE
Miller and Acs (2017) and Gray (2013)
referred to the existence of infrastructure to
create entrepreneurial university and university
entrepreneurship ecosystem.
Policies on
university finance
and university
resource
management
Miller & Acs (2017), Rice (2010) and Moriss
(2017) refer to capital for the creation of an
entrepreneurial ecosystem. Gabe (2005) and
Etzkowitz (1983, 2004) point out the
importance of financial capital for the creation
of an entrepreneurial university.
The intensity and
level of research
and development
in the university
ecosystem
Previous studies have not mentioned this factor
in the field of university entrepreneurship
ecosystem.
Internal policies of
the university
Ropke (1998), Etzkowitz (1983), Clark (1998)
and Guerrero & Urbano (2012) mentioned
entrepreneurship and university
entrepreneurship, but not about the university
entrepreneurship ecosystem.
Regional
governance
factors affecting
the creation of
EUCE
This factor in the field of university
entrepreneurship ecosystem has not been
mentioned. Miller & Acs (2017) has Only
mentioned it, not its sub-components
Effective
institutions to
create EUCE
Isenberg, 2010 has mentioned this factor in the
entrepreneurship ecosystem, but not in the
university entrepreneurship ecosystem. Moriss
(2017) has mentioned international importance
and diversity of human resources.
Regional market
factors influencing
the creation of the
regional
ecosystem
It has not been mentioned.
Economic and
business
environment
factors in the
ecosystem of the
region
It has not been mentioned.
First level
Third level



Regional market
factors influencing
the creation of the
regional ecosystem
Economic and
environment factors
in the ecosystem of
the region
Regional
governance factors
creation of euce
Policies on
university finance
management
The intensity
development in
the university
ecosystem
Internal policies
of the university
The infrastructure
needed to create
Second level
How to cite this paper:
M. R. Meigounpoory, A. Arabiun, M. M. Poorbasir, A. Mobini Dehkordi,
(2019). Entrepreneurial university campus ecosystem (EUCE) design with
interpretive structural modelling: A new approach in higher education
system. Journal of Technology of Education, 14(1), 251-261.
DOI: 10.22061/jte.2019.3694.1921
URL: http://jte.sru.ac.ir/?_action=showPDF&article=980
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
The aim of this paper is to review research on innovation ecosystems to derive success factors supporting the implementation of them. The reviewed studies highlight different factors for the successful implementation of innovation ecosystems which can be assigned to the areas of resources, governance, strategy and leadership, organizational culture, human resources management, people, partners, technology and clustering. Based on the findings a number of future research directions are proposed which may stimulate more research in this new field of study.
Article
Full-text available
This paper employs Frederick Jackson Turner’s Frontier Thesis of American democracy to construct a framework for understanding the U.S. university campus as an entrepreneurial ecosystem. One question that immediately comes to mind when studying ecosystem performance is what the proper unit of analysis is: the country, the state, the city, the region, or something smaller, like an incubator or accelerator? This paper suggests that the open, innovative American frontier that closed at the end of the twentieth century has reemerged in the entrepreneurial economy on the U.S. campus. The contemporary campus entrepreneurial ecosystem offers the characteristics of Turner’s frontier: available assets, liberty, and diversity while creating opportunity, and fostering entrepreneurship and innovation. A case study of the University of Chicago explores governance of the campus as an entrepreneurial ecosystem and the output produced by that campus ecosystem.
Article
Full-text available
Using an embeddedness perspective, a model and hypotheses are developed concerning the impact of the university entrepreneurial context on student start-up activity. Results based on analysis of the GUESSS database from 25 countries demonstrate that students' involvement in entrepreneurship-related curricular programs and co-curricular activities at university is positively related, and financial support from university is negatively related, to start-up activities undertaken by students. Prior business experience moderates the relationships between student involvement in university initiatives and start-up activities. The negative relationship between financial support and start-up activities is positively moderated by business experience. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.
Technical Report
Full-text available
What are students’ entrepreneurial intentions and activities across the world? This question is of highest social and economic relevance. Students represent the entrepreneurs of tomorrow; their entrepreneurial plans and activities will shape tomorrow’s societies and the overall economic well-being. Hence, it is of highest interest for different stakeholders such as academics, practitioners, educators, policy-makers, and last but not least students how many students intend to pursue an entrepreneurial career and how those entrepreneurial intentions come into being. The GUESSS project (Global Universiy Entrepreneurial Spirit Students' Survey) addresses this question on a global level. For that purpose, the 6th data collection wave in the history of GUESSS was conducted in 34 countries at more than 700 universities between October 2013 and March 2014. This led to a dataset with more than 109’000 complete student responses. This report provides an in-depth analysis of this unique dataset, shedding a nuanced light on students’ entrepreneurial intentions and concrete activities. We focused in particular on crosscountry comparisons, whereby we also consider numerous other relevant aspects, such as gender and specific social and cultural determinants. Importantly, we also compare our results to those based on the GUESSS data collection in 2011 which allows us to recognize important trends and developments. Most importantly, we see that entrepreneurial intentions in most countries seem to be stagnating or have even declined compared to 2011.
Article
Full-text available
Regional policies for entrepreneurship are currently going through a transition from increasing the quantity of entrepreneurship to increasing the quality of entrepreneurship. The next step will be the transition from entrepreneurship policy towards policy for an entrepreneurial economy. The entrepreneurial ecosystem approach has been heralded as a new framework accommodating these transitions. This approach starts with the entrepreneurial actor, but emphasizes the context of productive entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship is not only the output of the system, entrepreneurs are important players themselves in creating the ecosystem and keeping it healthy. This research briefing reviews the entrepreneurial ecosystem literature and its shortcomings, and provides a novel synthesis. The entrepreneurial ecosystem approach speaks directly to practitioners, but its causal depth and evidence base is rather limited. This article provides a novel synthesis including a causal scheme of how the framework and systemic conditions of the ecosystem lead to particular entrepreneurial activities as output of the ecosystem and new value creation as outcome of the ecosystem. In addition it provides a framework for analysing the interactions between the elements within the ecosystem. This offers a much more rigorous and relevant starting point for subsequent studies into entrepreneurial ecosystems and the regional policy implications of these.
Book
After tracing the evolution of entrepreneurship within institutions of higher learning, the authors explore the key elements that constitute a comprehensive entrepreneurship program. Best practices at leading universities and differing kinds of academic environments are highlighted. They examine multiple aspects of program management and infrastructure, including curriculum and degree program development, where entrepreneurship is administratively housed, how it is organized, and approaches to staffing and resource acquisition. © Michael H. Morris, Donald F. Kuratko and Jeffrey R. Cornwall 2013. All rights reserved.
Chapter
This chapter focuses on the issues in current city planning and rebuilding. It describes the principles and aims that have shaped modern, orthodox city planning and rebuilding. The chapter shows how cities work in real life, because this is the only way to learn what principles of planning and what practices in rebuilding can promote social and economic vitality in cities, and what practices and principles will deaden these attributes. In trying to explain the underlying order of cities, the author uses a preponderance of examples from New York. The most important thread of influence starts, more or less, with Ebenezer Howard, an English court reporter for whom planning was an avocation. Howard's influence on American city planning converged on the city from two directions: from town and regional planners on the one hand, and from architects on the other.
Book
'A book of this magnitude, usefulness and complexity can hardly be framed within one direction of contribution to entrepreneurship education, it is many voices, responses and pathways of academic institutions clustered in an admirable collection of university-based entrepreneurship ecosystems.' © Michael L. Fetters, Patricia G. Greene, Mark P. Rice and John Sibley Butler 2010. All rights reserved.
Article
In spite of the fact that chain referral sampling has been widely used in qualitative sociological research, especially in the study of deviant behavior, the problems and techniques involved in its use have not been adequately explained. The procedures of chain referral sampling are not self-evident or obvious. This article attempts to rectify this methodological neglect. The article provides a description and analysis of some of the problems that were encountered and resolved in the course of using the method in a relatively large exploratory study of ex-opiate addicts.