A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Current Psychology
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Understanding the smartphone generation: is problematic
smartphone use associated with low body esteem among adolescent
girls and boys?
Gianluca Lo Coco
1
&Laura Salerno
1
&Cecilia Giordano
1
&Maria Di Blasi
1
&Rachel F. Rodgers
2
#Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020
Abstract
Contemporary adolescents increasingly engage with social media via their smartphones, and problematic smartphone use has
been identified as a growing concern. The aim of the current study was to examine the association between problematic
smartphone use and body esteem among adolescent boys and girls. A sample of 647 adolescents (mean age: 14.15 years;
56.7% females) completed measures of problematic smartphone use, emotional regulation, and body esteem. Findings from
hierarchical regression models revealed that problematic smartphone use was weakly associated with body esteem among both
adolescent girls and boys. Furthermore, difficulties with emotional regulation were moderately associated with problematic
smartphone use and, among girls, moderated the relationship between problematic smartphone use and the evaluation attributed
to others about one’s own body, such that problematic smartphone use was more tightly associated with appearance attributions
among girls with greater emotion regulation difficulties. This study provides initial support for the relationships between
problematic smartphone use and emotional regulation difficulties on the one hand, and body esteem on the other, among both
adolescent boys and girls.
Keywords Problematic smartphone use .Body esteem .Body image .Emotion regulation .Adolescents
Introduction
In Western countries the large majority ofthe populationowns
a smartphone with permanent Internet access, and nearly all
adolescents go online daily for browsing, communicating with
peers, and gaming (Panova and Carbonell 2018; Statista
2020). The large amount of available applications fosters the
intensive use of smartphones among adolescents, which in
turn promotes the need to always be online and constantly
interact with others (Fisher-Grote et al. 2019). Thus,
experiencing pressure to not miss out and stay up to date has
become normative for teenagers (Franchina et al. 2018). Girls
are reported to spend more time on their phones per day than
boys, particularly for time-consuming activities such as
texting and using social media sites (Roberts et al. 2014;
Servidio 2019), revealing that smartphone related attitudes
and behaviors are gendered.
It has been shown that daily smartphone use including
engaging with social media, playing video games, online
shopping, viewing TV shows via the Internet, and chatting
and messaging, can increase feelings of dependency among
smartphone users (Lopez-Fernandez et al. 2017). Research on
the addictive potential of smartphones is ever increasing, but
most of the extant literature is characterized by the lack of a
theoretical rationale and mostly based on clinical concepts
borrowed from the area of substance dependence (Billieux
et al. 2015). However, there is still inconsistent support for
the usefulness of considering smartphone use through an ad-
dictions lens and, thus, scholars have moved towards a prob-
lematic smartphone use (PSU) framework (Panova and
Carbonell 2018). PSU (Elhai et al. 2017) refers to an excessive
engagement with one’ssmartphone,whichisassociatedwith
adverse daily-life outcomes and symptoms, such as withdraw-
al, loss of control and tolerance, only in part resembling those
of substance use disorders (Billieux et al. 2015;Kussetal.
2018). Billieux et al. (2015) proposed a three-pathway model
*Gianluca Lo Coco
gianluca.lococo@unipa.it
1
Department of Psychology, Educational Science and Human
Movement, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Edificio 15,
90128 Palermo, Italy
2
Northeastern University, Northeastern University International
Village Suite 404, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115,
USA
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00847-5
Published online: 10 June 2020
Current Psychology (2022) 41:3173–3184
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.