ArticlePDF Available

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Mitigation Measures and Hospitals Preparedness

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is currently causing a world pandemic. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) reported its first case on the 2nd of March 2020. Due to its potential rapid dissemination within the public and a large probability of a countrywide outbreak, along with the country’s experience in battling another similar coronavirus the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV), the KSA was amongst the leading bodies in the world for its swift community action and hospital preparedness.
Content may be subject to copyright.
© 2020 Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 155
Review Article
IntRoductIon
In December 2019, a cluster of patients with pneumonia
was linked to a seafood wholesale market in Wuhan, China,
which led to the discovery of a new betacoronavirus,[1]
on January 7, 2020, named severe acute respiratory
syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2)[2] that causes
coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). With its novelty and
rapid national and international spread on January 30, 2020,
the World Health Organization International Health Regulation
emergency committee declared the disease a Public Health
Emergency of International Concern. It was declared as a
worldwide pandemic[3] on March 11, 2020. At the time of this
writing, it has infected 862,234 individuals in 180 countries
with 178,836 recoveries and 42,404 deaths with an overall
estimated case fatality rate of 4.9%.[4] The KSA currently has
1720 cases with 264 recoveries and 16 deaths. We review the
different mitigation measures and hospital preparedness for
COVID-19 within the KSA.
communIty contaInment and mItIgatIon measuRes
Different mathematical simulation models have demonstrated
that within a city with a population of almost 5 million people,
with the median cumulative number of SARS-CoV-2 infections
at 80 days after conrming 100 cases in the community with
an assumption that 7.5% of infections were asymptomatic, and
with a basic reproduction number (R0) of 2.5, there would be
an estimated 1207,000 cases,[5] but this would be reduced to
258,000 cases when different interventions at the community
level are implemented. Several community measures would
help delay the spread of the pandemic as was shown with
the total lockdown of Wuhan city.[6] Key strategies on the
community level include cancellation of planned events and
suspension of events with super-spreader potential;[7] use of
social-distancing measures to reduce direct and close contact
between people in the community; travel restrictions, including
reduced ights and public transport and route restrictions
without compromising essential services; voluntary home
quarantine of members of household contacts; changes to
funeral services to minimize crowd size and exposure to
body uids of the diseased;[8] and clear communication from
Coronavirus Disease‑2019 Pandemic in the Kingdom
of Saudi Arabia: Mitigation Measures and Hospital Preparedness
Mazin Barry1, Leen Ghonem2, Aynaa Alsharidi1, Awadh Alanazi1, Naif H. Alotaibi1, Fatimah S. Al‑Shahrani1, Fahad Al Majid1, Ahmed S. BaHammam3,4
1Department of Internal Medicine, Infectious Disease Unit, College of Medicine, King Saud University, 2Department of Pharmacy, King Saud University Medical City,
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 3Department of Medicine, University Sleep Disorders Center and Pulmonary Service, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 4The Strategic
Technologies Program of the National Plan for Sciences and Technology and Innovation in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia(08‑MED511‑02), Saudi Arabia
Coronavirus disease-2019 is currently causing a world pandemic. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) reported its rst case on March 2,
2020. Due to its potential rapid dissemination within the public and a large probability of a countrywide outbreak, along with the country’s
experience in battling another similar coronavirus (the Middle East respiratory syndrome–coronavirus), the KSA was among the leading bodies
in the world for its swift community action and hospital preparedness.
Keywords: Coronavirus disease-2019, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus
Address for correspondence: Dr.Mazin Barry,
Department of Internal Medicine, Head Infectious Disease Unit, College of
Medicine, King Saud University, P.O. Box2925, Riyadh 11461, Saudi Arabia.
E‑mail:mbarry@ksu.edu.sa
Access this article online
Quick Response Code:
Website:
www.jnsmonline.org
DOI:
10.4103/JNSM.JNSM_29_20
This is an open access journal, and arcles are distributed under the terms of the
Creave Commons Aribuon‑NonCommercial‑ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows
others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non‑commercially, as long as
appropriate credit is given and the new creaons are licensed under the idencal terms.
For reprints contact: reprints@medknow.com
How to cite this article: Barry M, Ghonem L, Alsharidi A, Alanazi A,
Alotaibi NH, Al-Shahrani FS, et al. Coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic
in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Mitigation measures and hospital
preparedness. J Nat Sci Med 2020;3:155-8.
Abstract
Submission: 01-04-2020 Acceptance: 02-04-2020
Published: 02-07-2020
[Downloaded free from http://www.jnsmonline.org on Thursday, July 2, 2020, IP: 10.232.74.22]
Barry, et al.: COVID-19 Pandemic in Saudi Arabia
Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine ¦ Volume 3 ¦ Issue 3 ¦ July-September 2020
156
national and international health authorities, to ensure veried
information and avoid fake news, rumors, and panic.[9] Mass
gatherings and events such as citywide festivals, religious
gatherings, cultural celebrations, scientic conferences, and
large political events should be restricted. Respiratory infections
such as inuenza and now like COVID-19 are commonly
transmitted at a high rate within such large gatherings.[10] On
February 27, 2020, all visits to Mecca and Medina to perform
Umrah and visit the holy mosques have been suspended,
irrespective of nationality, visa type, or residence status.
Travelers are not permitted entry to the KSA with Umrah visas.
Religious gatherings, including daily congregational prayers
and Friday weekly congregational prayer in local mosques,
have been suspended, and the transmission of COVID-19 in
the country – to date – has been low.
The KSA also suspended operations in many government
agencies starting March 16, 2020. All schools and universities
are temporarily closed with remote teaching through virtual
learning platforms. Operation of many markets and malls
is suspended; gatherings in parks, beaches, and resorts are
prohibited. Restaurants are closed except for take-away
service. Pharmacies and grocery stores remain open to serve
customers through governmental assigned online delivery
applications and systems.
All international ights, both incoming and outgoing, were
suspended from March 15, 2020. All domestic ights, as
well as inter-urban bus, taxi, and train transportation, were
all suspended beginning on March 21, 2020. On March 26,
2020, travel between regions of the KSA became prohibited.
A nationwide 7 p.m.–6 a.m. curfew remains in effect for the
entire country; the cities of Riyadh, Mecca, and Medina are
under a 3 p.m.–6 a.m. curfew. The curfew remains in effect for
21 days beginning on March 23, 2020, with limited exceptions
for life and safety.[11] Such lockdowns would help alleviate
health-care system overload.
All international passenger trafc, whether by air, land, or sea,
has been suspended. All tourist travel is currently suspended.
Persons who have been in China, Hong Kong, Taiwan,
Macao, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Bahrain,
Lebanon, Syria, Egypt, Iraq, Italy, and South Korea in the
previous 14 days are not to be permitted to enter or transit
the country, irrespective of visa or residency status. Travel
to/from mainland China has been suspended. The causeway
between the KSA and Bahrain and land borders between
the KSA and the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, and Jordan
are restricted to commercial trafc only. All movement into
and out of the city of Qatif in the Eastern Province has been
suspended [Figure 1].[12] Temperature screening of all airline
passengers was also in effect, with travelers arriving from
outside the KSA, including Saudi citizens and residents, will be
placed in health isolation for 14 days following their arrival.[12]
All these decisive measures for the COVID-19 pandemic will
likely prove effective.
The ongoing evaluation of extensions or relaxations of these
measures should take into account testing, contact tracing, and
localized quarantine of suspected cases.[13] Transmission of
COVID-19 can be determined by models that simulate localized
clusters throughout the country and estimate their likely
coverage by testing, given the number of test kits available
nationally per day. Pooled testing methods in which multiple
samples (e.g., from a common household, or a local cluster of
up to 64 people — the limit of pool sample accuracy) are pooled
Figure 1: Conformed cases of coronavirus disease‑2019 in Saudi Arabia and mitigation measures(adapted from the Saudi Health Council)
[Downloaded free from http://www.jnsmonline.org on Thursday, July 2, 2020, IP: 10.232.74.22]
Barry, et al.: COVID-19 Pandemic in Saudi Arabia
Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine ¦ Volume 3 ¦ Issue 3 ¦ July-September 2020 157
to be tested spontaneously, and all individuals are quarantined if
the sample comes back positive; this could be useful to multiply
the effect of restricted testing capacity, which is likely to be vital
in determining whether such interventions could be successful
in efciently suppressing COVID-19 spread.[14]
HospItal pRepaRedness
The KSA has a unique position among the rest of the world
by dealing with a similar coronavirus infection: the Middle
East respiratory syndrome-coronavirus (MERS-CoV) that has
been epidemic in the country since 2013 with ongoing sporadic
cases.[15] Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) has been scaled
up across the country since then, and in response to COVID-19,
the Saudi Central Board for Accreditation of Healthcare
Institutions has updated its essential standard requirements
for MERS to include COVID-19.[16] Currently, the Ministry
of Health designated 25 hospitals for COVID-19-infected
patients,[12] amounting to 80,000 hospital beds and 8000
intensive care unit (ICU) beds; in addition, 2200 beds have
been allocated for isolation of suspected and quarantined
cases.[17]
At a hospital level, robust, transparent collaboration between
vital hospital departments is crucial in preparedness, with clear
leadership from hospital management, IPC, internal medicine
and infectious disease departments, pharmacy, critical care
and emergency departments, nursing staff, and microbiology
department. Such collaboration is a keynote essential in facing
pending pandemic diseases.[18]
In anticipation of the pandemic which can stress bed capacity,
medical equipment, and health-care personnel (HCP),
health-care facilities (HCFs) must be ready – to its best
capabilities – by developing strategies for large patient
volume and complex care, attempting to cohort patients
within certain areas, limiting the number of exposed staff,
and conserving medical supplies. This can be challenging,
especially with a limited number of airborne infection
isolation rooms and ICU beds in any given hospital.[19]
Therefore, staff should be divided into different teams that
would care exclusively for COVID-19 patients – when
possible – with backup medical teams in case of infected
staff; this should take into account the incubation period of
the disease of 14 days.[20]
Patients should be discharged, slowing the rate of usual
bed admissions, delaying elective procedures, and reducing
visitation hours, while ensuring ongoing care for most needed
patients (e.g., immunocompromised and posttransplant) with
advancements in technology and virtual telemedicine;[21]
this has been quickly implemented by many HCFs through
web-based and smartphone application services, including
home medication carrier delivery; this led to a great
reduction in overall patient volume within these facilities.
Respiratory illness visual triage at all hospital entry points
for staff, visitors, and patients has also been immediately
implemented.[16]
HCFs must protect and support HCP on the front lines,
and they should receive training on proper donning and
dofng of personal protective equipment, t testing of N95
masks, use of powered air-purifying respirators, and basic
infection prevention practices such as hand hygiene and clear
understanding of the evolving case denition for COVID-19.[12]
Rates of equipment use, inventories of all stored items, and
a stable supply chain should be maintained. Extended use
or limited reuse of N95 respirators may be necessary. Viral
transport mediums, nasopharyngeal swabs, and COVID-19
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) kits should be in high supply
to keep up with the high demand.
Overtime and extended hour compensations for overstretched
staff should be determined and communicated early to all staff,
with a robust mental support program for workers as such
stressful conditions could exacerbate mental conditions and
or cause posttraumatic stress disorder.[22] Some HCFs have
developed hotlines for HCPs for direct, immediate access to
psychiatrists.
Exposure to COVID-19 with plans outlining the management of
HCP regarding work restrictions and quarantine requirements
must be developed; staff with upper respiratory tract infections,
even without a fever, should not come into work. Log-in and
log-out sheet of staff entering rooms of infected patients should
be recorded. HCFs must dene strategies to allocate health-care
resources with plans for contingency and crisis standards that
layout a legal and ethical framework, in addition to developing
a robust, transparent, and open communication policy.[23]
Another important aspect is the disease dynamic itself. Due
to COVID-19 presenting as any other respiratory infection,
lack of specic signs and symptoms including fever, with
a sensitivity of one single nasopharyngeal PCR early in
the disease of 70%,[24] nosocomial transmission will be
challenging. Testing for all respiratory viruses including
SARS-CoV-2, inuenza, parainuenza, respiratory syncytial
virus, human metapneumovirus, and other coronaviruses,
including MERS-CoV, would not only help in establishing a
diagnosis, but also help make the work environment safer for
clinicians and help detect occult COVID-19 infections that
would otherwise be missed.[25] Such infected patients without
putting into account the severity of their illness and by using
proper isolation precautions (single rooms, contact precautions,
droplet precautions, airborne precautions when appropriate, and
plus eye protection) for patients with respiratory syndromes
regardless of the initial viral test results, might protect staff if a
patient is subsequently diagnosed with COVID-19. Health-care
providers who used these precautions will be considered
minimally exposed and will be able to continue working.[26]
It would require one mildly symptomatic patient, a HCP, or
a visitor to ignite a hospitalwide catastrophe. A tight robust,
efficient preparedness system with vigilant observation,
modication, communication, and transparency is key in
preventing such possible scenarios.
[Downloaded free from http://www.jnsmonline.org on Thursday, July 2, 2020, IP: 10.232.74.22]
Barry, et al.: COVID-19 Pandemic in Saudi Arabia
Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine ¦ Volume 3 ¦ Issue 3 ¦ July-September 2020
158
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There is no conicts of interest.
RefeRences
1. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. A novel
coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J
Med 2020;382:727-33.
2. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of
patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet
2020;395:497-506.
3. WHO Director-General’s Opening Remarks at the Media Brieng on
COVID-19–11 March 2020. World Health Organization; 11 March,
2020.
4. Coronavirus COVID-19 Global Cases by the Center for Systems
Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University (JHU).
Available from: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html. [Last retrieved
on 2020 Apr 01].
5. Koo JR, Cook AR, Park M, Sun Y, Sun H, Lim JT, et al. Interventions to
mitigate early spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Singapore: A modelling study.
Lancet Infect Dis 2020. S1473-3099(20)30162-6. doi: 10.1016/S1473-
3099(20)30162-6. [Epub ahead of print].
6. Heymann DL, Shindo N. COVID-19: What is next for public health?
Lancet 2020. 395(10224):542-545. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30374-3.
7. Qualls N, Levitt A, Kanade N, Wright-Jegede N, Dopson S,
Biggerstaff M, et al. Community mitigation guidelines to prevent
pandemic inuenza – United States, 2017. MMWR Recomm Rep
2017;66:1-34.
8. Markel H, Lipman HB, Navarro JA, Sloan A, Michalsen JR, Stern AM,
et al. Nonpharmaceutical interventions implemented by US cities during
the 1918-1919 inuenza pandemic. JAMA 2007;298:644-54.
9. Pandey A, Atkins KE, Medlock J, Wenzel N, Townsend JP, Childs JE,
et al. Strategies for containing Ebola in West Africa. Science
2014;346:991-5.
10. Ebrahim SH, Ahmed QA, Gozzer E, Schlagenhauf P, Memish ZA.
Covid-19 and community mitigation strategies in a pandemic. BMJ
2020;368:m1066.
11. U.S Embassy and Consulates in Saudi Arabia COVID-19 Information.
Available from: https://sa.usembassy.gov/u-s-citizen-services/
covid-19-information/. [Last retrieved on 2020 Mar 26].
12. Saudi Center for Disease prevention and Control. Novel Corona
Virus (2019-nCoV) Infection Guidelines V1.2. Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia: Saudi Center for Disease Prevention and Control Ministry of
Health; March, 2020.
13. Prem K, Liu Y, Russell TW, Kucharski AJ, Eggo RM, Davies N, et al.
The effect of control strategies to reduce social mixing on outcomes of
the COVID-19 epidemic in Wuhan, China: A modelling study. Lancet
Public Health 2020. pii: S2468-2667(20)30073-6.
14. Colbourn T. COVID-19: Extending or relaxing distancing control
measures. Lancet Public Health 2020. pii: S2468-2667(20)30072-4. doi:
10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30072-4. [Epub ahead of print].
15. Barry M, Al Amri M, Memish ZA. COVID-19 in the shadows of
MERS-CoV in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J Epidemiol Global
Health 2020;10:1-3.
16. Saudi Central Board for Accreditation of Healthcare
Institutions (CBAHI). National Hospital Standards, V 2; 5 February,
2020.
17. World Health Organization, Regional Ofce for the Eastern
Mediterranean. Available from: http://www.emro.who.int/media/news/
who-saudi-arabia-join-forces-to-ght-covid-19-nationally-regionally-a
nd-globally.html. [Last retrieved on 2020 Mar 31].
18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Coronavirus Disease
2019 (COVID-19) in the U.S. Available from: http://www.cdc.
gov/coronavirus/2019-nCoV/cases-in-us.html. [Last retrieved on
2020 Mar 26].
19. Swerdlow DL, Finelli L. Preparation for possible sustained transmission
of 2019 novel coronavirus: Lessons from previous epidemics. JAMA
2020;323:1129-30.
20. Lauer SA, Grantz KH, Bi Q, Jones FK, Zheng Q, Meredith HR, et al.
The incubation period of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from
publicly reported conrmed cases: Estimation and application. Ann
Intern Med 2020. doi: 10.7326/M20-0504. [Epub ahead of print].
21. Hollander JE, Carr BG. Virtually perfect? Telemedicine for Covid-19.
N Engl J Med 2020. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2003539. [Epub ahead of
print].
22. Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, Woodland L, Wessely S,
Greenberg N, et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to
reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. Lancet 2020;395:912-20.
23. Chopra V, Toner E, Waldhorn R, Washer L. How should U.S. hospitals
prepare for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)? Ann Intern Med
2020. doi: 10.7326/M20-0907. [Epub ahead of print].
24. Fang Y, Zhang H, Xie J, Lin M, Ying L, Pang P, et al. Sensitivity of chest
CT for COVID-19: Comparison to RT-PCR. Radiology 2020;19:200432.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200432. [Epub ahead of print].
25. Rolfes MA, Foppa IM, Garg S, Flannery B, Brammer L, Singleton JA,
et al. Annual estimates of the burden of seasonal inuenza in the United
States: A tool for strengthening inuenza surveillance and preparedness.
Inuenza Other Respir Viruses 2018;12:132-7.
26. Klompas M. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Protecting
hospitals from the invisible. Ann Intern Med 2020. doi: 10.7326/M20-
0751. [Epub ahead of print].
[Downloaded free from http://www.jnsmonline.org on Thursday, July 2, 2020, IP: 10.232.74.22]
... Saudi Arabia has been appraised for its mitigation measures (a combination of Chinese and German technologies) characterized by swift community action and hospital preparedness. These efforts have been made in the absence of experimental studies on treatment options, economic impact assessments, and epidemiological studies [13][14][15][16][17]. This endeavor could be aligned with the 2030 Vision, which aims to position the country as a business and tourism hub, aiming for well-developed herd immunity [18,24]. ...
... While these increases showed different patterns, Al-Kamil's rise was considered the fastest, particularly during Q3 2020 (an increase from 31 to 261; 230 cases), Q2 2021, and Q3 2021 (362-840, an increase of 478 cases, and to 1,170 cases, an increase of 330 cases, respectively), and Q1 2022 (1,180-1,741; 561 cases). In contrast, cases in Rabigh recorded rapid increases only in Q1 2022 (16,408; 3,452 cases), registering a 13.9-point surge. All other localities, including Jeddah and Makkah, recorded nominal increases, except in Q1 2022, although Makkah and Al-Qunfudhah did not. ...
... There were many seriously affected locations in the Riyadh Administrative area, including Wadi Ad Dawasir (11-65), followed by Hawtat Bani Tamim (9-61), Ad Dilam (2-47), and Afif (2-36). While Al-Kharj (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14), the rest of Riyadh (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16), and Ad Duwadimi (1-24) had low levels of spread, Riyadh City had a spread close to the total (7-28). In the Makkah administrative area, infection was widespread in Al-Lith (5-186), Khulays , and Al-Kamil (1-77). ...
Article
The legality of abortions and the decreasing birthrate are topics that regularly emerge on the global public agenda, sparking intense social, legal, and political discussions. In 2019, Israel’s birthrate (the birthrate is defined as the number of births relative to the population) was 3.1 children per woman-the highest among OECD countries and surpassing that of many developing nations (excluding Africa). Several explanations account for this phenomenon, among them - the national ethos and geopolitical status of Israel, which necessitate demographic intensification. However, a historical perspective reveals that the Jewish society in Palestine during the British Mandate (1920- 1948) despite the national struggle that was at its peak, experienced low birthrates due to considerable number of abortions.
... On January 30, 2020, the Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the outbreak of coronavirus as a public health emergency and international concern [4] . The virus spreads through small droplets from coughing, sneezing, and talking [5] . Adults may also become infected by touching a contaminated surface and then touching their face (eye, nose, and mouth). ...
... The antivaccine sentiment gets more attention than the actual number of vaccine refusers and appears to have a disproportionate impact on public discourse. In turn, this persistent questioning of vaccine safety despite overwhelming scientific evidence has increased vaccine hesitancy, questions about the safety and efficacy of vaccines among some parents even if they comply with the vaccination recommendations [5] , Because vaccine hesitancy in the United States, the proportion of adults who get flu vaccines remains low [6] . On the other hand, to control the epidemic herd immunity is needed. ...
... On January 30, 2020, the Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the outbreak of coronavirus as a public health emergency and international concern [4] . The virus spreads through small droplets from coughing, sneezing, and talking [5] . Adults may also become infected by touching a contaminated surface and then touching their face (eye, nose, and mouth). ...
... The antivaccine sentiment gets more attention than the actual number of vaccine refusers and appears to have a disproportionate impact on public discourse. In turn, this persistent questioning of vaccine safety despite overwhelming scientific evidence has increased vaccine hesitancy, questions about the safety and efficacy of vaccines among some parents even if they comply with the vaccination recommendations [5] , Because vaccine hesitancy in the United States, the proportion of adults who get flu vaccines remains low [6] . On the other hand, to control the epidemic herd immunity is needed. ...
... The strategic response included the allocation of resources across a network of more than 25 hospitals, boasting a collective capacity of 8,800 beds. This infrastructure encompassed not only 8,000 intensive care unit (ICU) beds but also 2,200 isolation beds dedicated to suspected and quarantined cases, illustrating a comprehensive and systematic approach to patient care during the pandemic (3,4,5). 2 The magnitude of this concerted effort was paramount in successfully managing the expected influx of infected individuals. By proactively expanding healthcare resources and adhering to meticulous treatment guidelines, Saudi Arabia positioned itself to navigate the complexities of the pandemic and provide optimal care to those affected by COVID-19. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Introduction: COVID-19's emergence caused devastating consequences worldwide, with high morbidity and mortality rates. Critically ill patients face challenges like acute respiratory failure requiring intensive measures, including mechanical ventilation. Mortality rates in ARDS are influenced by various factors. This paper focuses on describing characteristics, management, and survival factors of mechanically ventilated ICU patients in Saudi Arabia. Methods: a retrospective, noninterventional approach, we reviewed charts and data of all COVID-19-infected patients who were admitted to the ICU, particularly those requiring ventilation support at Aseer Central Hospital (ACH) in the southern region of Saudi Arabia. Results: The study enrolled 594 COVID patients, mean age 60.5 ± 17.3 years, with 67% males. Approximately half had O negative blood group. Common chronic health issues: diabetes mellitus (35.5%). Positive culture findings in almost 340 (57.2%), with Klebsiella pneumoniae being the most isolated microorganism (45.5%). Significant correlations found with mortality: age, blood culture, Rh positive group (P<0.05). Conclusion: this study provides critical insights into the clinical and epidemiological aspects of COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU in a Saudi Arabian hospital. The research underscores the impact of age, comorbidities, laboratory markers, and treatment interventions on patient out-comes, emphasizing the significance of tailored management strategies in this context.
... It is crucial to educate the public on the signs and symptoms of COVID-19, and the Ministry of Health in Saudi Arabia has launched awareness campaigns through social media, television, and websites to raise awareness among the population about the precautionary measures needed for COVID- 19 (22). The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has successfully dealt with two outbreaks, which has enabled the Saudi government to take prompt action against the spread of COVID-19 (23). ...
Article
Full-text available
Background and objectives COVID-19 has emerged as a public health emergency caused by the coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2). However, only a few studies have reported that anosmia is an early predictor of COVID-19. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the current level of knowledge regarding smell dysfunction in COVID-19 era in Saudi community. Materials and methods An online survey was conducted using Survey Monkeys in Saudi Arabia. The survey was distributed through Twitter and WhatsApp. The questionnaire included individuals’ demographic information, such as sex, age, residence, income, and qualifications, as well as their knowledge of the early symptoms of COVID-19. ANOVA and Mann–Whitney U-test were conducted to analyze the data. There were twelve items on knowledge dimensions which were assessed through five-point Likert scale. Results In total, 809 respondents completed the questionnaire. Among them, 658 (81.3%) had no knowledge of how sudden loss of or change in the sense of smell can be the only symptom of COVID-19. However, most participants, 738 (91.2%), knew that fever was a symptom of COVID-19. Similarly, 707 (87.4%) and 772 (95.5%) participants knew that cough and shortness of breath were the major symptoms of COVID-19, respectively. In addition, 395 (48.3%) participants had no information regarding taste changes as a symptom of COVID-19. Notably, participants who were female, married, or diagnosed with COVID-19 had significantly greater knowledge of smell-related issues due to COVID-19 than males, unmarried, and healthy/those without COVID-19. Conclusion This study revealed that the Saudi population has an fairly good level of knowledge regarding common COVID-19 symptoms as more than 90% of the participants understood symptoms of COVID-19, but less acceptable knowledge regarding smell and taste dysfunction as more than 80% had no knowledge of change in olfactory and taste function was due to COVID-19.
... The COVID-19 pandemic spread rapidly worldwide, including in Saudi Arabia, leading to a severe health emergency [1]. The clinical presentation and progression of COVID-19 in patients are highly variable [2], making it difficult for physicians to triage patients and determine their risk of poor outcomes. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: The International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infections Consortium (ISARIC) 4C mortality score has been used before as a valuable tool for predicting mortality in COVID-19 patients. We aimed to address the utility of the 4C score in a well-defined Saudi population with COVID-19 admitted to a large tertiary referral hospital in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted that included all adults COVID‑19 patients admitted to the Armed Forces Hospital Southern Region (AFHSR), between January 2021 and September 2022. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve depicted the diagnostic performance of the 4C Score for mortality prediction. Results: A total of 1,853 patients were enrolled. The ROC curve of the 4C score had an area under the curve of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.702-0.758), p<0.001. The sensitivity and specificity with scores >8 were 80% and 58%, respectively, the positive and negative predictive values were 28% and 93%, respectively. Three hundred and sixteen (17.1%), 638 (34.4%), 814 (43.9%), and 85 (4.6%) patients had low, intermediate, high, and very high values, respectively. There were significant differences between survivors and non-survivors with regard to all variables used in the calculation of the 4C score. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that all components of the 4C score, except gender and O2 saturation, were independent significant predictors of mortality. Conclusions: Our data support previous international and Saudi studies that the 4C mortality score is a reliable tool with good sensitivity and specificity in the mortality prediction of COVID-19 patients. All components of the 4C score, except gender and O2 saturation, were independent significant predictors of mortality. Within the 4C score, odds ratios increased proportionately with an increase in the score value. Future multi-center prospective studies are warranted.
... This first outbreak of the novel coronavirus was declared as a public health emergency of international concern by the World Health Organization on 30 January [2] and a global pandemic on 11 March 2020 [1]. The COVID-19 pandemic spread rapidly around the world, including Saudi Arabia, which led to a severe health emergency [3]. ...
... Vaccines, which are chemical substances that activate our immune system without disposing us of disease (15).Vaccines have been used since the 21st century and are considered an outstanding intervention in the field of healthcare prevention (16). However, its, acceptancy is varied with social class, educational level, and human (17).The present study was a community-based trial to assess the myths that hinder the acceptance of the covid vaccine in Pakistan. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Uncertainty about any kind of medication will be a potential threat. Hesitancy regarding vaccination is a danger to overall global public health. Since it’s the first-time global efforts were made to develop a vaccine against the pandemic of COVID-19. So, this is unknown its acceptance in the community. Getting information regarding the key determinants that influence and potential myths about the vaccine might help full to develop strategies that can help improve the vaccination programs globally. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine, its determinants, and myths about the vaccine among people in Pakistan. Methods: A descriptive web-based based study was done, using snowball sampling, bilingual, and a self-administered close-ended questionnaire was sent to participants through google forms on social media platforms and email. Results: A total of 463 participants from all over Pakistan showed the minimum level of secondary education. The occupational status of the participants showed that (45.1%) were currently employed. Vaccination and their perception can be influenced by educational/socioeconomic statuses, participants were also asked about factors they considered to be the most influential in terms of encouraging and discouraging. Fear of getting an infection was the most encouraging factor (39.1%) for people to get vaccinated, whereas adverse effects via social and digital media were the most demotivating factor (36.5%). Participants were asked the reasons for their reluctance; most were afraid of an allergic reaction to the vaccine. The various myths and misconceptions associated with the Covid vaccine showed by logistic regression analysis for factors that were potentially associated with the intake of covid vaccination. Conclusion: Addressing educational/sociodemographic factors relating to the COVID-19 vaccination might help encourage the uptake of the vaccination program globally which also tackles future pandemics.
Article
Full-text available
Background. Saudi Arabia, a large country in terms of population size and geographical area, is divided into administrative areas and governorates. It has metropolises, cities (large, medium sized, and small), towns, villages and rural neighborhoods, classifiable into well equipped, rapidly expanding, and others. The COVID-19 epidemics spread all over the country with differentials in infection rates, percentages, and affected persons, alongside daily increases. This analysis, focused on administrative areas, aimed to comprehend the spread and escalation of the epidemic, in addition to highlighting the distribution of the infected population with a special emphasis on geographical spread and seasonal variations. Materials and methods. This analysis of data compiled from COVID-19 daily reports published by the Saudi Arabian Ministry of Health considers into account administrative areas and localities (neighborhoods) to demonstrate the distribution of spread, increase in infection, and the proportion of population infected between March 21, 2020 and May 4, 2023. Results. A large majority of the infected cases were reported in three major administrative areas including Riyadh, Makkah, and the Eastern Region. Other regions had a smaller number of infected cases. However, some locations, especially medium-sized upcoming towns and neighborhoods experienced greater number of people seriously affected at a rapid pace, with seasonal differentials, in medium sized upcoming cities — the governorate headquarters and promising future cities, apart from the major cities. Conclusions. COVID-19 spread in the country followed a certain regional pattern. Beyond the populous administrative areas, upcoming cities in fast changing areas had a high impact. Thus, having a categorization of major, medium or low spread is necessary. Such detailing of COVID-19 infection would be useful not only to develop combating strategies but also to create epidemic and emergency preparedness.
Article
Full-text available
Background Saudi Arabia has 13 administrative areas, all of which have been seriously affected by the COVID-19 epidemic regardless of their features. Being the largest and a prominent Arab country, epidemic intensity and dynamics have importance, especially in the era of Vision 2030 where infrastructure development and growth to enhance quality of life has of prime focus. Aims This analysis aims to trace the differentials in COVID-19 infections, recoveries, and deaths across the country depending upon various demographic and developmental dimensions and interactions. Data and methods This analysis used Saudi Arabia Ministry of Health data from March 15th, 2020 to August 31st, 2022, by classifying administrative areas and locations to build a generalized linear model (3 × 3): three types of administrative areas (major, middle-sized, and others) and localities (major, medium-sized, and others). Apart from two-way ANOVA, an one-way ANOVA also carried out in addition to calculating mean values of infections, recoveries, and deaths. Results A total of 205 localities were affected with varying severity, which are based on local demographics. Both the administrative areas and localities had a significant number of cases of infections, recoveries, and mortality, which are influenced by relationships and interactions, leading to differential mean values and proportional distributions across various types of administrative areas and localities. Conclusion There is dynamism that major administrative areas have lesser threats from the epidemics whereas medium-sized ones have serious threats. Moreover, an interaction of administrative areas and localities explains the dynamics of epidemic spread under varying levels of infrastructure preparedness. Thus, this study presents lessons learned to inform policies, programs, and development plans, especially for regional, urban, and infrastructure areas, considering grassroots level issues and diversity.
Article
Full-text available
Background In December, 2019, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a novel coronavirus, emerged in Wuhan, China. Since then, the city of Wuhan has taken unprecedented measures in response to the outbreak, including extended school and workplace closures. We aimed to estimate the effects of physical distancing measures on the progression of the COVID-19 epidemic, hoping to provide some insights for the rest of the world. Methods To examine how changes in population mixing have affected outbreak progression in Wuhan, we used synthetic location-specific contact patterns in Wuhan and adapted these in the presence of school closures, extended workplace closures, and a reduction in mixing in the general community. Using these matrices and the latest estimates of the epidemiological parameters of the Wuhan outbreak, we simulated the ongoing trajectory of an outbreak in Wuhan using an age-structured susceptible-exposed-infected-removed (SEIR) model for several physical distancing measures. We fitted the latest estimates of epidemic parameters from a transmission model to data on local and internationally exported cases from Wuhan in an age-structured epidemic framework and investigated the age distribution of cases. We also simulated lifting of the control measures by allowing people to return to work in a phased-in way and looked at the effects of returning to work at different stages of the underlying outbreak (at the beginning of March or April). Findings Our projections show that physical distancing measures were most effective if the staggered return to work was at the beginning of April; this reduced the median number of infections by more than 92% (IQR 66–97) and 24% (13–90) in mid-2020 and end-2020, respectively. There are benefits to sustaining these measures until April in terms of delaying and reducing the height of the peak, median epidemic size at end-2020, and affording health-care systems more time to expand and respond. However, the modelled effects of physical distancing measures vary by the duration of infectiousness and the role school children have in the epidemic. Interpretation Restrictions on activities in Wuhan, if maintained until April, would probably help to delay the epidemic peak. Our projections suggest that premature and sudden lifting of interventions could lead to an earlier secondary peak, which could be flattened by relaxing the interventions gradually. However, there are limitations to our analysis, including large uncertainties around estimates of R0 and the duration of infectiousness. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, National Institute for Health Research, Wellcome Trust, and Health Data Research UK.
Article
Full-text available
Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) has plagued the Middle East since it was first reported in 2012. Recently, at the end of December 2019, a cluster of pneumonia cases were reported from Wuhan city, Hubei Province, China, linked to a wet seafood market with a new coronavirus identified as the etiologic agent currently named SARS-CoV-2. Most cases are in Mainland China with international spread to 25 countries. The novelty of the virus, the rapid national and international spread, and the lack of therapeutic and preventative strategies have led the WHO International Health Regulation emergency committee to declare the disease as Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) on January 30, 2020. As it relates to countries with the ongoing MERS-CoV community cases and hospital acquired infections, there will be a huge challenge for HCWs to deal with both coronaviruses, especially with the lack of standardized and approved point of care testing. This challenge will now be faced by the whole global health community dealing with COVID-19 since both coronaviruses have similar presentation. Those patients should now be tested for both MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 simultaneously, and with the continuing wide international spread of SARS-CoV-2, the travel history to China in the last 14 days will be of less significance
Article
https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/155427/3/DeepBluepermissions_agreement-CCBYandCCBY-NC_ORCID_Chopra.pdf
Article
Background: A novel human coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was identified in China in December 2019. There is limited support for many of its key epidemiologic features, including the incubation period for clinical disease (coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]), which has important implications for surveillance and control activities. Objective: To estimate the length of the incubation period of COVID-19 and describe its public health implications. Design: Pooled analysis of confirmed COVID-19 cases reported between 4 January 2020 and 24 February 2020. Setting: News reports and press releases from 50 provinces, regions, and countries outside Wuhan, Hubei province, China. Participants: Persons with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection outside Hubei province, China. Measurements: Patient demographic characteristics and dates and times of possible exposure, symptom onset, fever onset, and hospitalization. Results: There were 181 confirmed cases with identifiable exposure and symptom onset windows to estimate the incubation period of COVID-19. The median incubation period was estimated to be 5.1 days (95% CI, 4.5 to 5.8 days), and 97.5% of those who develop symptoms will do so within 11.5 days (CI, 8.2 to 15.6 days) of infection. These estimates imply that, under conservative assumptions, 101 out of every 10 000 cases (99th percentile, 482) will develop symptoms after 14 days of active monitoring or quarantine. Limitation: Publicly reported cases may overrepresent severe cases, the incubation period for which may differ from that of mild cases. Conclusion: This work provides additional evidence for a median incubation period for COVID-19 of approximately 5 days, similar to SARS. Our results support current proposals for the length of quarantine or active monitoring of persons potentially exposed to SARS-CoV-2, although longer monitoring periods might be justified in extreme cases. Primary funding source: U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, and Alexander von Humboldt Foundation.
Article
The December, 2019 coronavirus disease outbreak has seen many countries ask people who have potentially come into contact with the infection to isolate themselves at home or in a dedicated quarantine facility. Decisions on how to apply quarantine should be based on the best available evidence. We did a Review of the psychological impact of quarantine using three electronic databases. Of 3166 papers found, 24 are included in this Review. Most reviewed studies reported negative psychological effects including post-traumatic stress symptoms, confusion, and anger. Stressors included longer quarantine duration, infection fears, frustration, boredom, inadequate supplies, inadequate information, financial loss, and stigma. Some researchers have suggested long-lasting effects. In situations where quarantine is deemed necessary, officials should quarantine individuals for no longer than required, provide clear rationale for quarantine and information about protocols, and ensure sufficient supplies are provided. Appeals to altruism by reminding the public about the benefits of quarantine to wider society can be favourable.