A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Nature Microbiology
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Articles
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-020-0684-2
1Renewable and Sustainable Energy Institute, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA. 2Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Colorado,
Boulder, CO, USA. 3Biofrontiers Institute, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA. 4Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO,
USA. 5Biological Science Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA. ✉e-mail: jeffrey.c.cameron@colorado.edu
Cyanobacteria are photosynthetic microorganisms that
thrive in many diverse and extreme habitats1. In response to
changes in light intensity and wavelength, temperature and
nutrient availabiliity2–6, multiple regulatory processes have evolved
to prevent the overexcitation of photosynthesis reaction centres and
the resulting production of reactive oxygen species that can damage
cellular components7–10. Cellular homeostasis is disrupted when the
available energy source (light) exceeds the cellular energy demand
(source–sink imbalance), initiating non-photochemical quenching,
alternative electron flow pathways and state transitions to balance
energy flow7,11–14. The phycobilisome—a pigment–protein complex
that funnels light energy to the photosynthetic reaction centres—
has a major role in regulating photosynthesis in cyanobacteria11,15–17.
It has remained challenging to dissect the molecular mechanisms
that regulate photosynthesis using traditional cultivation method-
ologies and ensemble-based techniques that lack the ability to track
phenotypes across individual lineages and are therefore unable to
discern subtle, albeit important, variations within a population18.
Single-cell-based technologies can overcome these limitations19–21.
However, light toxicity and increased cellular fluorescence are often
cited as major issues during live-cell imaging of cyanobacteria22.
We developed a robust imaging and computational platform
to enable quantitative analysis of cyanobacterial growth and
physiology over multiple generations under precisely controlled
environmental conditions.
While optimizing our growth and imaging system, we noticed
that mechanical interactions between cells and the growth substrate
seemed to inhibit cell growth. Mechanical forces experienced due
to cell–cell and cell–substrate interactions impact many processes
in organisms ranging from unicellular bacteria to complex multi-
cellular organisms23,24. In bacterial growth studies, frictional forces
between cells and their environment can be modified by varying
the stiffness of solid growth medium or through interactions with
the walls in microfluidics devices25,26. In heterotrophic organisms,
including Escherichia coli, an increase in frictional forces often
results in a decrease in growth rates and altered colony morpholo-
gies compared with cells grown in planktonic environments26,27.
Many cyanobacteria are motile and exhibit phototaxis in response
to certain wavelengths of light28–33 and it has been suggested that
mechanical interactions between cells can limit the growth of motile
cyanobacteria in planktonic environments34. However, much less
is known about the effect of mechanical perturbations during the
growth of non-motile cyanobacteria on solid surfaces.
We used time-lapse fluorescence microscopy, electron micros-
copy and mathematical modelling to investigate the growth and
physiology of cyanobacteria that are grown on solid substrates.
We reveal that mechanical confinement of growing cells through
cell–cell or cell–substrate interactions induces phycobilisome
detachment from the thylakoid membrane and attenuation of pho-
tosynthetic growth. Together, we show that light energy must be
converted into mechanical energy for cyanobacteria to overcome
frictional forces in their environment, in addition to being con-
verted into chemical energy for growth and cellular maintenance.
Mechanical forces therefore have a critical role in the regulation of
excessive photosynthetic light harvesting. Understanding the effects
of mechanical perturbations on cyanobacterial growth is critical for
successful long-term imaging and analysis of cyanobacterial physi-
ology at the single-cell resolution.
Results
Quantitative imaging and tracking of rapidly growing cyano-
bacteria. We utilized time-lapse fluorescence microscopy and
Mechanical regulation of photosynthesis in
cyanobacteria
Kristin A. Moore1, Sabina Altus2, Jian W. Tay 1,3, Janet B. Meehl1,3,4, Evan B. Johnson1,4,
David M. Bortz2 and Jeffrey C. Cameron 1,4,5 ✉
Photosynthetic organisms regulate their responses to many diverse stimuli in an effort to balance light harvesting with utiliz-
able light energy for carbon fixation and growth (source–sink regulation). This balance is critical to prevent the formation of
reactive oxygen species that can lead to cell death. However, investigating the molecular mechanisms that underlie the regu-
lation of photosynthesis in cyanobacteria using ensemble-based measurements remains a challenge due to population het-
erogeneity. Here, to address this problem, we used long-term quantitative time-lapse fluorescence microscopy, transmission
electron microscopy, mathematical modelling and genetic manipulation to visualize and analyse the growth and subcellular
dynamics of individual wild-type and mutant cyanobacterial cells over multiple generations. We reveal that mechanical confine-
ment of actively growing Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 cells leads to the physical disassociation of phycobilisomes and energetic
decoupling from the photosynthetic reaction centres. We suggest that the mechanical regulation of photosynthesis is a criti-
cal failsafe that prevents cell expansion when light and nutrients are plentiful, but when space is limiting. These results imply
that cyanobacteria must convert a fraction of the available light energy into mechanical energy to overcome frictional
forces in the environment, providing insight into the regulation of photosynthesis and how microorganisms navigate their
physical environment.
NATURE MICROBIOLOGY | VOL 5 | MAY 2020 | 757–767 | www.nature.com/naturemicrobiology 757
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved