Content uploaded by Fabian Sanchis-Gomar
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Fabian Sanchis-Gomar on Mar 16, 2020
Content may be subject to copyright.
Page 1 of 6
© AME Medical Journal. All rights reserved. AME Med J 2020 | http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/amj.2020.03.03
Introduction
Irrespective of the underlying cause, heart failure (HF)
generates an enormous clinical, societal and economic
burden. Although some population statistics suggested that
the epidemiologic burden of HF may have significantly
decreased between 2000 and 2010 (1), this trend could
not be confirmed in other continental or nationwide
surveys, which showed instead that both the incidence and
prevalence of HF may be increasing especially due to a
constantly growing proportion of population aged 70 years
or older (2-5). Accurate assessment of epidemiologic trends
is vital for optimizing healthcare resources allocation
in a world still plagued by an unprecedented economic
crisis (6). Therefore, in this brief report, we aimed to
provide an objective and concise analysis of the worldwide
epidemiological burden of HF, providing also an estimation
of possible future trends.
Methods
An electronic search was performed in the Global Health
Data Exchange (GHDx) registry, a large database of health-
related data maintained by the Institute for Health Metrics
and Evaluation (7), using the keyword “heart failure”
[International Classification of Diseases 10 (ICD-10)
Code I50] in the category “impairment” combined
with “all causes” in the category “cause”. According to
the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Collaborators,
HF clinically diagnosed, using structured criteria such
as those of Framingham or the European Society of
Cardiology (ESC) (8,9). Mild HF was then defined as
shortness of breath and fatigue with moderate physical
activity such as walking uphill or more than a quarter-
mile on level ground (disability weight, 0.041; 95%
confidence interval (CI), 0.026–0.062), moderate HF
as is shortness of breath and easy fatigue with minimal
Brief Report
Global epidemiology and future trends of heart failure
Giuseppe Lippi1, Fabian Sanchis-Gomar2
1Section of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; 2Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia and
INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
Correspondence to: Fabian Sanchis-Gomar, MD, PhD. Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibañez 15,
46010 Valencia, Spain. Email: fabian.sanchis@uv.es.
Abstract: Some population statistics suggested that the epidemiologic burden of heart failure (HF) may
have signicantly decreased between 2000 and 2010. However, this trend could not be conrmed in other
continental or nationwide surveys. We aimed to provide an objective and concise analysis of the worldwide
epidemiological burden of HF. An electronic search was performed in Global Health Data Exchange (GHDx)
registry, with the keyword “heart failure”. The current worldwide prevalence of HF is 64.34 million cases (8.52
per 1,000 inhabitants), accounting for 9.91 million years lost due to disability (YLDs) and 346.17 billion US
$ expenditure. YLDs value is marginally higher in men. HF poses the largest burden after 60 years of age
and both prevalence and YLDs have increased by 3.9% and 4.5% in very elderly people during the last 28
years. A linear, direct relationship can be found between socio-demographic index (SDI) and both prevalence
and YLDs of HF. HF is an emerging worldwide threat whose prevalence and health loss burden constantly
increase, especially in the elderly and in people leaving in low-to middle SDI regions. Urgent preventive
interventions shall be prioritized and healthcare resources redesigned around this evolving epidemiology.
Keywords: Heart failure (HF); heart disease; health; epidemiology; mortality
Received: 22 January 2020. Accepted: 27 February 2020.
doi: 10.21037/amj.2020.03.03
View this article at: http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/amj.2020.03.03
6
AME Medical Journal, 2020Page 2 of 6
© AME Medical Journal. All rights reserved. AME Med J 2020 | http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/amj.2020.03.03
physical activity such as walking a short distance (disability
weight, 0.072; 95% CI, 0.047–0.103), whilst severe HF
was defined as shortness of breath and fatigue even at
rest (disability weight, 0.179; 95% CI, 0.122–0.251) (10).
The years lost due to disability (YLDs) was considered
the indicator of disease or risk factor attributable to health
loss, reecting the burden of living with a certain disease or
disability. The database search was then combined with the
epidemiologic variables “year”, “sex”, “age” and “location”
(using “SDI Regions”, where SDI stands for socio-
demographic index).
The output of the electronic search was downloaded in
comma-separated values (CSV), imported into an Excel
file (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) and analyzed with
Analyse-it (Analyse-it Software Ltd, Leeds, UK) and
MedCalc statistical software (MedCalc Software, Ostend,
Belgium). Simple (Pearson’s correlation) regression analyses
were used for assessing potential associations (and their
relative 95% CI) among different epidemiologic measures,
whilst the risk was expressed as odds ratio (OR) and relative
95% CI. The study was performed in accordance with the
Declaration of Helsinki and under the terms of relevant
local legislation.
Results
According to the last searchable GDHx period (i.e., year
2017), the current worldwide prevalence of HF is estimated
at 64.34 million cases (8.52 per 1,000 inhabitants, 29%
of which mild, 19% moderate and 51% severe HF),
accounting for 9.91 million YLDS (11.61 per 1,000 YLDs).
Based on an American Heart Association (AHA) estimation
of 5380 US $ per HF case (11), the current worldwide
economic burden of HF can be estimated at 346.17 billion
US $. The most frequent causes of HF with known etiology
is ischemic heart disease (42.3% of all cases), followed by
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (37.0%), mitral valve
disease (4.3%), aortic valve disease (3.4%), rheumatic heart
disease (3.0%), myocarditis (2.6%) and endocarditis (1.4%).
The last 28-year trend (i.e., between the years 1990 to 2017)
is shown in Figure 1. A considerable increase has occurred
for both prevalence and YLDs of HF, both trends perfectly
Figure 1 Last 28-year trend and current scenario of worldwide epidemiology of HF.
Cases (×1000)
Time (years)
YLDs (Years Lived with Disability)
Prevalence
13.0
12.5
12.0
11.5
11.0
10.5
10.0
9.5
9.0
8.5
8.0
7.5
7.0
6.5
6.0
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
1016
2030
AME Medical Journal, 2020 Page 3 of 6
© AME Medical Journal. All rights reserved. AME Med J 2020 | http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/amj.2020.03.03
matching a third-degree polynomial equation (r=1.000 and
P<0.001 for both). Overall, prevalence and YLDs of HF
have increased by ~36% since the year 1900, and this trend
is not likely to reverse soon. According to estimations based
on the third-degree polynomial equations, prevalence and
YLDs will probably grow to 9.81 per 1,000 inhabitants
(+15.1%) and 12.82 per 1,000 YLDs (+10.4%) by the year
2030, accounting for ~398.44 billion US $ worldwide
expenditure.
Although the prevalence of HF appears significantly
higher in the female sex (9.16 vs. 7.69 per million
inhabitants; OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.18–1.20; P<0.001), the
value of YLDs is instead marginally but signicantly higher
in men than in women (11.74 vs. 11.50 per 1,000 YLDs;
OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01–1.03; P<0.001). Both prevalence
and YLDs have remained almost constant between genders
during the last 28 years. The current and last 28-year trend
of prevalence and YLDs of HF in different age groups are
shown in Figure 2A. Overall, HF poses the largest burden
after 60 years of age (81% and 87% of all HF cases and all
YLDs for HF, respectively). The risk of developing HF
is over 20-fold higher in people aged ≥60 years than in
younger subjects (OR: 21.9; 95% CI, 21.8–22.0; P<0.001).
Importantly, the prevalence and YLDs of HF have increased
by 3.9% and 4.5% in very elderly people (i.e., aged
≥80 years) during the last 28 years. The burden of HF in
the different SDI areas is finally shown in Figure 2B. A
linear, direct relationship can be found between SDI and
both prevalence (r=0.94, 95% CI, 0.31–1.00; P=0.019) or
YLDs (r=0.92; 95% CI, 0.20–0.99; P=0.027) of HF.
Though the burden of HF remains higher in high SDI
regions (31% of all HF cases and 28% of all YLDs for HF),
the 28-year trends reveal a −11.2% decreased prevalence in
these regions counterbalanced by a 10.3% increase in low-
to-middle SDI regions. The YLDs trend is very similar,
with a 10.5% decline in high SDI regions occurred during
the last 28 years, counterbalanced by a 10.0% increment in
low-to-middle SDI regions. The last 10-year trend of HF
prevalence seems virtually linear both in high SDI (r=0.999;
P<0.001) and low-to-middle SDI (r=1.000; P<0.001) regions
(Figure 3). By the year 2030, it can hence be estimated that
the prevalence of HF will increase over 50% in low-to-
middle SDI regions, whilst it will decline to ~27% in high
SDI countries, respectively.
Discussion
Although evidence has been provided that the
epidemiologic impact of HF may have decreased during
the past decades (1), more recently published continental
or nationwide studies showed an almost opposite trend
(2-5). The results of our analysis suggest that both
prevalence and health loss (i.e., YLDs) of HF have
constantly increased during the past 28 years on a
worldwide scale, following a path that is unlikely to reverse
in the next 10 years based on our estimations. The recent
AHA projections show that the prevalence of HF in the
US will probably increase from 2.42% in 2012 to 2.97%
in 2030 (11), exhibiting a relative increment of 22.7%
that would perfectly overlap the increment of worldwide
prevalence predicted by our estimation during the same
period of time (7.93 per 1,000 inhabitants in 2012 vs. 9.81
per 100 inhabitants in 2030, +23.7%) (Figure 1). Notably,
this increased population burden will then translate into
an enhanced worldwide expenditure for managing HF
patients, which will reach approximately 400 billion US $ in
2030, thus approximating the gross domestic product of an
entire country like Austria, Ireland or Israel. Although the
sex distribution of HF has not apparently changed during
the last 28 years, with prevalence constantly higher in the
female sex and YLDs slightly larger in men, the impact of
HF in different age ranges has instead signicantly varied,
with an ~4% increase in the very elderly population, as
possible reflection of worldwide population ageing. This
increment has been almost constant and has even sharpened
during the last 10 years (+ ~2%; Figure 2A), which would
hence lead us to estimate that both prevalence and
YLDs will consistently increase over 30% in people aged
≥80 years by the year 2030. Since the higher inpatient
costs for managing HF are those resulting from hospital
readmissions (12), which are up to 4-fold higher in the
elderly (13), it is hence very likely that the epidemic
proportion reached by HF in older individuals may
consistently amplify the usage of healthcare resource for
managing HF in the next 10 years.
The last 28-year trend and the current socioeconomic
distribution of HF around the world deserve special focus.
Although the burden of HF is still largely prevalent in
middle-to-high SDI regions, the recent trend shows that the
distribution may soon change (Figure 2B). More specically,
our analysis shows that the burden of HF has increased
by 3.1% in the last 10 years in low-to-middle SDI regions
(from 43.4% to 46.5% of all worldwide HF cases), which
would allow us to estimate that the burden of this condition
will overcome 50% by the year 2030, thus reversing the
current scenario where HF is more prevalent in middle-
AME Medical Journal, 2020Page 4 of 6
© AME Medical Journal. All rights reserved. AME Med J 2020 | http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/amj.2020.03.03
Figure 2 Global trends on HF during the last 28 years. (A) Last 28-year trend and current scenario of worldwide epidemiology of HF
in different age ranges; (B) last 28-year trend and current scenario of worldwide epidemiology of HF in different SDI regions. HF, heart
failure; SDI, socio-demographic index.
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
High SDI
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Time (years)
>90
85 to 89
80 to 84
75 to 79
70 to 74
65 to 69
60 to 64
55 to 59
50 to 54
<50
Time (years)
Percent of all heart failure cases
Percent of all heart failure cases
Middle-High SDI
Middle SDI
Middle-low SDI
LowSDI
A
B
AME Medical Journal, 2020 Page 5 of 6
© AME Medical Journal. All rights reserved. AME Med J 2020 | http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/amj.2020.03.03
Figure 3 Current and future trends of HF prevalence in middle-
to-low and high SDI regions. HF, heart failure; SDI, socio-
demographic index.
to-high SDI countries (Figure 3). This prediction will pose
additional challenges, whereby HF in low-income countries
is clinically different from Europe and North America and
its outcome is dramatically influenced by worse health-
care infrastructure availability, as well as by lower care
access and quality (14). This will require definition and
implementation of highly tailored healthcare measures
that may pose a theoretically unsustainable burden on local
healthcare systems in these countries (15).
Conclusions
The results of our analysis attest that HF is an emerging
worldwide threat whose prevalence and health loss burden
are constantly increasing, especially in the elderly and in
people leaving in low SDI regions. Urgent interventions
shall hence be prioritized and scaled up for targeting the
cause of HF and preventing its onset and worsening, as
well as for redesigning healthcare access, infrastructure and
therapies around this evolving epidemiology.
Acknowledgments
Fabian Sanchis-Gomar is supported by a postdoctoral
contract granted by “Subprograma Atracció de Talent -
Contractes Postdoctorals de la Universitat de València”.
Footnote
Conicts of Interest: The authors have no conicts of interest
to declare.
Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all
aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related
to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are
appropriately investigated and resolved.
References
1. Gerber Y, Weston SA, Redeld MM, et al. A
contemporary appraisal of the heart failure epidemic in
Olmsted County, Minnesota, 2000 to 2010. JAMA Intern
Med 2015;175:996-1004.
2. Guha K, McDonagh T. Heart failure epidemiology:
European perspective. Curr Cardiol Rev 2013;9:123-7.
3. Roth GA, Forouzanfar MH, Moran AE, et al.
Demographic and epidemiologic drivers of global
cardiovascular mortality. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1333-41.
4. Conrad N, Judge A, Tran J, et al. Temporal trends and
patterns in heart failure incidence: a population-based
study of 4 million individuals. Lancet 2018;391:572-80.
5. Cleland JGF, van Veldhuisen DJ, Ponikowski P. The
year in cardiology 2018: heart failure. Eur Heart J
2019;40:651-61.
6. Krech R, Kickbusch I, Franz C, et al. Banking for health:
the role of nancial sector actors in investing in global
health. BMJ Glob Health 2018;3:e000597.
7. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Global Health
Data Exchange. Available online: http://ghdx.healthdata.
org/gbd-results-tool. Accessed August 7 2019.
8. The Framingham Study. Criteria For Events. Available
online: http://www.framinghamheartstudy.org/share/
protocols/soe0_03s_protocol.pdf. Accessed August 12
2019.
9. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. 2016 ESC
Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and
chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis
and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the
European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the
special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA)
of the ESC. Eur Heart J 2016;37:2129-200.
10. Disease GBD, Injury I, Prevalence C. Global, regional,
and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with
disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries
55%
50%
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
Percent of all cases
High SDI
L ow-to-middle SDI
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
Time (years)
AME Medical Journal, 2020Page 6 of 6
© AME Medical Journal. All rights reserved. AME Med J 2020 | http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/amj.2020.03.03
and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for
the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet
2018;392:1789-858.
11. Benjamin EJ, Muntner P, Alonso A, et al. Heart
Disease and Stroke Statistics-2019 Update: A Report
From the American Heart Association. Circulation
2019;139:e56-e528.
12. Lesyuk W, Kriza C, Kolominsky-Rabas P. Cost-of-illness
studies in heart failure: a systematic review 2004-2016.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2018;18:74.
13. Akintoye E, Briasoulis A, Egbe A, et al. National Trends
in Admission and In-Hospital Mortality of Patients With
Heart Failure in the United States (2001-2014). J Am
Heart Assoc 2017. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006955.
14. Dokainish H, Teo K, Zhu J, et al. Global mortality
variations in patients with heart failure: results from
the International Congestive Heart Failure (INTER-
CHF) prospective cohort study. Lancet Glob Health
2017;5:e665-e72.
15. Maggioni AP. Uncovering difference: a glimpse at patients
with heart failure in low-income and middle-income
countries. Lancet Glob Health 2017;5:e634-e5.
doi: 10.21037/amj.2020.03.03
Cite this article as: Lippi G, Sanchis-Gomar F. Global
epidemiology and future trends of heart failure. AME Med J
2020.